Standardizing terminology and definitions of medication adherence and persistence in research employing electronic databases

Changes in weight and glycemic control following obesity treatment with semaglutide or tirzepatide by discontinuation status

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to characterize changes in body weight and glycated hemoglobin (in those with prediabetes at baseline) through 12 months by obesity pharmacotherapy discontinuation status.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from a large health system in Ohio and Florida to identify adults with overweight or obesity without type 2 diabetes who initiated injectable semaglutide or tirzepatide between 2021 and 2023. Treatment discontinuation was defined by a >90-day gap between exhaustion of previous supply and next dispense or end of study follow-up (December 2024) and was classified into early discontinuation (i.e., within 3 months of index date) and late discontinuation (i.e., within 3-12 months).

RESULTS

We identified 7881 patients; 6109 received semaglutide, and 1772 received tirzepatide. A total of 80.8% had low maintenance dosages. Mean (SD) percentage weight reduction at 1 year was 8.7% (9.6%); and it was 3.6% (8.1%) with early discontinuation, 6.8% (9.1%) with late discontinuation, and 11.9% (9.2%) with non-discontinuation (p < 0.001). The mean (SD) absolute reduction in percent glycated hemoglobin at 1 year was 0.1 (0.4) with early discontinuation, 0.2 (0.4) with late discontinuation, and 0.4 (0.4) with non-discontinuation (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The average weight reduction in this cohort was lower than that observed in the main phase 3 trials, likely because of higher rates of discontinuation and lower maintenance dosages.

Methods and validity indicators for measuring adherence and persistence to aspirin in secondary cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review

Background

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA) is widely recommended for long-term secondary cardiovascular prevention (SCP), but its clinical effectiveness depends on patient adherence, which remains suboptimal. Understanding how adherence and persistence to ASA are measured is essential to improving outcomes. This systematic review aimed to identify the methods used to assess adherence and persistence to ASA in SCP and evaluate their validity indicators.

Methods

We systematically searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus for studies published up to October 30, 2023, reporting methods for measuring adherence or persistence to ASA in adults undergoing secondary cardiovascular prevention. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data on study characteristics, measurement methods, and validity indicators. The results were synthesized in tabular form according to method type (indirect or direct) and outcome assessed (adherence or persistence). Risk of bias was evaluated for studies that conducted validation analyses of the measurement methods.

Results

Forty studies were included, most conducted in the United States. Indirect methods predominated: self-report questionnaires (45%, n = 18) and pharmacy dispensing records (32.5%, n = 13) were the most common tools for assessing adherence. Direct methods, such as platelet function tests or biochemical assays, were less frequently used (25%, n = 10). For persistence, dispensing records were the most used method (70%, n = 7). No indirect method reported validation specifically for ASA adherence or persistence. Validity indicators were only partially available for some direct methods.

Conclusions

Adherence and persistence to ASA in SCP are primarily measured through indirect methods, with a lack of specific validation for ASA. There is a critical need to develop standardized, validated tools that integrate both direct and indirect measures and address gender-specific barriers to adherence.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023470993, PROSPERO identifier CRD42023470993.

Methods and validity indicators for measuring adherence to statins in secondary cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adherence to statin therapy is crucial for reducing the recurrence of cardiovascular events. Numerous methods exist to measure medication adherence, including those based on prescription data, patient self-report, medication counting, and direct methods. It is important to determine which of these methods are appropriate for use in clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to identify the methods used to measure adherence and persistence to statins in patients undergoing cardiovascular secondary prevention and to evaluate the validity indicators of these methods.

METHODS

This systematic review included studies reporting methods to measure adherence and/or persistence to statins in cardiovascular secondary prevention. Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to February 2025. Rayyan was used for the study selection and extraction data processes. Validity indicators of the adherence/persistence methods were collected; it was reported. Risk of bias of studies reporting the method validity was evaluated using the COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) tool.

RESULTS

A total of 77 studies were included. Regarding adherence measurement, the most frequently used method was prescription refill records (n = 55) and self-report methods (n = 20). Electronic monitoring methods (n = 2), self-perceived adherence by physician (n = 1), and pill counting (n = 1) were less frequently used methods. Direct methods, using HPLC-MS/MS, were used in combination with other indirect methods (n = 5). For measuring persistence, prescription refill records were the predominant method (n = 9), while self-report methods were used in three studies, and one study used a standardized questionnaire. Several of the indirect methods have validity indicators for measuring adherence in different study populations and to different medications. Only one study provides validity indicators for the MAT questionnaire specifically adapted for statins.

CONCLUSIONS

The methods for measuring adherence to statins in secondary cardiovascular prevention were predominantly indirect, relying on prescription and supply records and self-report methods. Pill counting, electronic monitoring, and direct measurement via LC-MS/MS were less commonly used. Persistence was primarily measured through prescription refill records. None of the indirect methods was validated; thus, their use for measuring adherence to statins is not recommended. There is a need for new validated tools, incorporating a gender perspective, to measure adherence to statins in this population.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023463981.

Treatment Persistence and Variations in Prescribing Oral, Injectable, and Inhaled Corticosteroids: A Population-Based Drug Utilisation Study

PURPOSE

To examine variation in oral, injectable, and inhaled corticosteroid (CS) prescribing in primary care, exploring treatment persistence and coverage.

METHODS

We examined patient-level electronic health records from English general practices in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database. We delineated a cohort of new users of oral, injectable, or inhaled CS with prescriptions issued between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021. Lorenz curves assessed potential prescribing skewness, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots estimated treatment persistence. The Proportion of Patients Covered (PPC) method estimated the proportion of patients still covered by treatment 1 year after initiation.

RESULTS

We observed 1 942 571 CS users across 1471 general practices, with 20% of oral and inhaled CS users accounting for almost 80% of total CS use. Older patients with comorbidities including respiratory diseases (13.5%), skin conditions (5.8%), or inflammatory bowel diseases (1.6%) were more likely to be prescribed higher doses. The KM plots showed that 20% of oral and 50% of inhaled CS users were persistent after one and 2 months, respectively. The PPC method indicated that 30% of oral and 60% of inhaled CS users were covered by treatment 6 months post-initiation. Some variation was observed when different grace periods were applied. Combined use of oral and inhaled CS was observed for 6.9% of patients.

CONCLUSION

A fifth of patients receiving CS accounted for over 80% of oral and inhaled CS prescribing in primary care. Identifying these patients is crucial for targeting future interventions to promote patient safety and cost-effective CS use.

Medication adherence and persistence in heart failure: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To study medication adherence and persistence among heart failure patients, assess the methods utilised for estimating medication adherence, and identify optimal adherence thresholds and their impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Observational studies assessing medication adherence or persistence among heart failure patients via electronic healthcare databases will be included. A narrative synthesis will describe medication adherence and persistence reported and methods used to measure it. A meta-analysis will be attempted to evaluate the impact of secondary medication adherence (multiple and by drug class) on clinical outcomes, including hospitalisation, emergency visits, and mortality. The I2 statistic will be employed to study heterogeneity and the GRADE framework to evaluate evidence certainty. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines and is registered with the Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews CRD42024509542.

DISCUSSION

This study aims to evaluate medication adherence and persistence in heart failure management through electronic health databases, intending to explore widely used measurement methods and their limitations, and to identify adherence thresholds associated with improved clinical outcomes. By examining these aspects, we anticipate proposing enhancements for future research and establishing desired adherence goals. This approach highlights the expected significance of our findings in advancing patient care and research methodologies.

Factors associated with medication adherence among young adults with hypertension

Background

Poor adherence to antihypertensive medication remains a significant barrier to blood pressure control in young patients. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with antihypertensive medication adherence among young adults with hypertension.

Methods

From the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we included 141,132 participants aged 20 to 39 years (80.4% male), without cardiovascular disease, who initiated antihypertensive medication between 2013 and 2018. Participants were categorized as exhibiting good adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥ 0.8) or poor adherence (PDC < 0.8) to antihypertensive medication during the first year of treatment. We investigated the associations of demographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors with good medication adherence based on logistic regression analysis.

Results

Only 43.3% (n = 61,107) of young adults with hypertension showed good adherence to antihypertensive medication. Male sex, older age, higher income, urban residence, non-smoking, and higher physical activity were associated with good medication adherence. Initial combination therapy, especially with single-pill combination (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.18), was associated with good adherence. Among patients under monotherapy, initial use of renin-angiotensin blockers (OR, 5.24; 95% CI, 4.47-6.15) or calcium-channel blockers (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 3.47-4.78) was associated with better adherence than initial diuretics.

Conclusions

Although antihypertensive medication adherence is generally poor among young adults, we identified potential demographic and clinical factors associated with good adherence to antihypertensive treatment. Initial use of a single-pill combination may promote adherence in young patients, and its long-term clinical outcomes warrant further investigation.

Medication adherence and persistence in heart failure: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To study medication adherence and persistence among heart failure patients, assess the methods utilized for estimating medication adherence, and identify optimal adherence thresholds and their impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Observational studies assessing medication adherence or persistence among heart failure patients via electronic healthcare databases will be included. A narrative synthesis will describe medication adherence and persistence reported and methods used to measure it. A meta-analysis will be attempted to evaluate the impact of secondary medication adherence (multiple and by drug class) on clinical outcomes, including hospitalization, emergency visits, and mortality. The I statistic will be employed to study heterogeneity and the GRADE framework to evaluate evidence certainty. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines and is registered with the Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42024509542.

DISCUSSION

This study aims to evaluate medication adherence and persistence in heart failure management through electronic health databases, intending to explore widely used measurement methods and their limitations, and to identify adherence thresholds associated with improved clinical outcomes. By examining these aspects, we anticipate proposing enhancements for future research and establishing desired adherence goals. This approach highlights the expected significance of our findings in advancing patient care and research methodologies.

Exacerbation burden in patients treated as intermittent or mild-persistent asthma using short-acting β2-agonist rescue

BACKGROUND

Most people in the United States with asthma use therapies for intermittent/mild-persistent disease; however, exacerbations and death occur in patients with infrequent symptoms or labeled as mild asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate relationships between short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) use, exacerbations, and maintenance adherence in intermittent/mild-persistent asthma.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using US Merative MarketScan administrative claims (January 2010 to December 2017) for patients aged 12 years or older treated as intermittent/mild-persistent asthma. Patients were indexed on a random SABA claim, with 12 months continuous enrollment pre- and post-index. Post-index SABA groups were defined as low (index fill only), medium (2-3 fills), and high (≥4 fills). Severe exacerbations were compared within the treatment, SABA fill, and adherence (medication possession ratio) groups through unadjusted comparison of proportions, χ2, and odds ratios (OR [95% CI]); P less than or equal to .05.

RESULTS

A total of 533,679 patients were included: 68.1% female; mean age (SD) 34.6 (18.3) years; 70.0% intermittent (SABA only) and 30.0% mild-persistent (8.6% low-dose inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]; 21.4% leukotriene modifier [LM]). The proportion of patients with high SABA fills differed among the treatments: SABA only (14.8%), low-dose ICS (37.0%), and LM (25.5%) (P < .001). The proportion experiencing 1 or more exacerbations was higher in SABA only (61.2%) vs low-dose ICS (40.4%) or LM (50.4%): OR (95% CI) 2.32 (2.28-2.37) and 1.55 (1.53-1.57), respectively (both P < .001). The medication possession ratio was less than 50% in 59.3% of patients with mild-persistent asthma; however, adherence was only related to exacerbations in the high SABA group.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated as intermittent/mild-persistent asthma rely on SABA and experience exacerbations. Shifting from SABA only to an anti-inflammatory rescue therapy could decrease morbidity.

Assessment of Potential Factors Influencing Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Drug Adherence: A Database Study

First-line treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is pharmacological but is associated with poor success rates in adults. The potential to discontinuously use stimulants may confound adherence assessment. Approximately 30-50% of adults with ADHD will experience depressive episodes, and associated treatment with antidepressants is generally recommended. It can therefore be expected that patients with a formal F90 diagnosis would show higher medication adherence than patients without a diagnosis and that the simultaneous use of antidepressants would increase adherence to ADHD medication. The primary aim was to explore the influence of factors of ADHD diagnosis and comorbid antidepressant use on stimulant adherence. A retrospective, longitudinal pharmacoepidemiological study was conducted on South African community pharmacy dispensing records for 2012-2016 for all patients aged between 18 and 40 years with any record of receiving a drug classified as "Central nervous system other" by the MIMS in 2015. Patients endorsed with an ADHD-linked diagnostic code (F90) were identified and contrasted with those receiving ADHD-indicated medication in the absence of a confirmatory diagnostic code. Two methods were applied to assess adherence to ADHD and/or depression treatment drugs: monthly medicine plotting and Proportion of Days Covered (PDC). Patients were classified as being more or less adherent based on monthly medicine plotting criteria. A study population of 89 patients was identified: 50 had F90 diagnostic codes and 39 were classified as "Non F90". Adherence as measured based on PDC was generally higher for antidepressant use than for methylphenidate for patients classified as being more adherent. A trend towards higher consumption of antidepressants was shown for the treatment-adherent group. Diagnostic code distinction revealed significantly higher adherence rates to methylphenidate for F90 code patients. Adherence rates to antidepressants appeared to be generally higher for non-F90 patients. Many factors may influence adherence to ADHD-indicated drugs; however, the impact of a confirmed diagnosis may be a strong determinant of motivation to be adherent to ADHD pharmacotherapy.

Improving Timely Medication Access for Endocrinology and Diabetes Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Introduction

Managing chronic conditions such as endocrinology and diabetes requires consistent access to medications. Traditional methods of medication refill often involve in-person visits to healthcare providers or pharmacies, posing challenges for patients. Online medication refill services offer a promising solution to improve accessibility and convenience.

Methods

This is a digital-based solution using online medication refill services to enhance the management of endocrinology and diabetes medication refills. It examines the process of online medication refill, including patient registration, refill request submission, verification, provider input, processing, and pickup or delivery.

Results

Online medication refill services empower patients to easily request refills from the comfort of their homes, streamlining the refill process, and reducing walk-in pressure in clinics. The online medication refill with the option for home delivery option eliminates the need for patients to visit the hospital, further enhancing the patient experience. Before implementing the online medication refill solution, 26 patients will come to the clinic as walk-ins to request medication refills. The average waiting time for each patient is 45 minutes. Each provider will be interrupted for an average of 10 minutes to accommodate the request. The overall processing time required for each walk-in patient to submit the medication request is 1 hour on average. After implementing the online medication refill intervention, zero patients come to the clinic as walk-ins and hence, no interruption to the daily regular clinics. The overall processing time required for submitting the online medication request is now 2 minutes. These interventions promote medication adherence and patient engagement by facilitating access to medications and offering educational resources.

Conclusion

Online medication refill services represent a valuable tool in the comprehensive management of endocrinology and diabetes. They offer accessibility, convenience, and patient empowerment, potentially improving health outcomes and enhancing the overall patient experience.

Sex Differences in Prescription, Initiation, and Discontinuation of Secondary Prevention Medications After Stroke

BACKGROUND

Women less frequently receive secondary prevention medications at discharge poststroke than men. It is unclear whether similar sex differences exist in the long term poststroke, after accounting for age and clinical characteristics. We aimed to evaluate sex differences in medication prescription, initiation, and discontinuation poststroke or transient ischemic attack.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using person-level linked data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (42 hospitals; Victoria and Queensland; 2012-2016). We included all adults with first-ever ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or transient ischemic attack who survived >60 days post-discharge. For each major class of secondary prevention medication (antihypertensive, antithrombotic, or lipid lowering), we evaluated sex differences in prescription at hospital discharge, initiation within 60 days, and discontinuation within 2 years post-discharge. Sex differences were assessed using multivariable models, adjusted for sociodemographics and comorbidities. Where effect modification by age was found (Pinteraction≤0.05), age-specific odds ratios were reported.

RESULTS

Among 8108 women (median age, 74.3 years) and 10 344 men (median age, 70.5 years) with first-ever stroke (≈8% intracerebral hemorrhage) or transient ischemic attack, women were less likely to be prescribed antihypertensive medications on discharge (odds ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74-0.91]). Women were less likely to initiate antihypertensive (odds ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.69-0.84]) and antithrombotic (odds ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82-0.96]) medications within 60 days than men. While there was no overall difference in discontinuation between men and women, interactions were observed with age (Pinteraction, all <0.002). Younger women (aged <45 years) and older women (aged >90 years) were more likely to discontinue secondary prevention medications than men of equivalent age.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex differences exist for prescription, initiation, and discontinuation of secondary prevention medications poststroke. With many sex differences being age specific, there is a critical need for targeted interventions to improve prevention medication use in these patient subgroups.

Discontinuation Categories Underlying Gaps in Dispensing for Six Medication Groups

PURPOSE

Accurately identifying medication discontinuations at scale is important for developing evidence about deprescribing. Gaps in dispensing often serve as proxies for discontinuation but are imprecise. We categorize reasons for gaps in dispensing to inform data-based methods to accurately identify medication discontinuations.

METHODS

Using pharmacy dispensing data, we purposively sampled from a population of adults age 65+ with 2+ chronic conditions who experienced a 90-day gap in dispensing-with and without subsequent fills-of oral diabetes drugs, statins, proton pump inhibitors, drugs with anticholinergic properties, anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs, or antihypertensives. We reviewed clinical documentation (e.g., visit notes, communications, medication orders) from last dispensing through the 90-day gap plus 120 days to classify dispensing gaps as true discontinuations (clinically intended) or non-discontinuations (no evidence of intent to discontinue), and then into subcategories. Medications with no documented explanation for the gap in dispensing and continued listing on the patient's medication list were classified as non-discontinuations.

RESULTS

Of N = 1906 records reviewed, there were 1068 (56%) true discontinuations and 838 (44%) non-discontinuations. Subcategories within true discontinuations included provider intent to discontinue, provider substitutions, intentional stops followed by restarts, and agreeing with a colleague's or patient's decision to discontinue. Non-discontinuations included documented low adherence, changes in dose, changes in pharmacy formulary, and changes in drug formulation. Proportions of drugs in categories and subcategories varied by medication group.

CONCLUSION

Using gaps in dispensing as proxy measures for medication discontinuation may introduce bias through misclassification, and varied reasons for discontinuation may complicate causal interpretations.

Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Primary Adherence of Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OAC) reduce the risk of stroke among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, adherence remains suboptimal. We focused on primary nonadherence to OAC and its associations with patient characteristics-specifically social determinants of health collected in electronic health records (EHR).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used EHR data linked to prescription fill data from a large, integrated Midwestern community healthcare system. Adult patients with an incident AF diagnosis from 2020 to 2021 and a first OAC prescription (index visit) were included. Primary nonadherence was defined as failure to fill an initial OAC prescription within 30 days. Outcomes included 1-year all-cause mortality, first stroke, and first bleed after first OAC prescription. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the likelihood of primary nonadherence, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models evaluated the association between primary nonadherence with outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 8679 patients, 46% were female, 82% were non-Hispanic white, and the mean age was 71.3 ± 12.1 years. Twenty-one percent were primary nonadherent. The odds of primary nonadherence were greater among patients who were non-Hispanic Black, older (≥ 75 years), male, lacking commercial insurance, not employed/retired, and referred to social work; similar results were observed for secondary nonadherence. Primary nonadherence was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.01).

CONCLUSION

These results reveal disparities in primary nonadherence among patients with a new AF diagnosis. There is a need to develop and test interventions for primary nonadherence that are implemented in disadvantaged patients, among whom nonadherence is highest.

Patient-Provider Race Concordance and Medication Adherence: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) have lower rates of traditional medication use and compliance in comparison to their white counterparts. Documented mistreatment and systematic oppression of BIPOC patients in the healthcare system have led to perpetual consequences for this population, including lower rates of medication adherence. This systematic review of the current literature aims to examine the impact of patient-provider race-concordant relationships on medication adherence in BIPOC patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive and systematic search of published literature was conducted using eight databases, yielding 412 results, each of which was screened by two independent authors. Nine articles met the specified inclusion criteria. After a full-text review, five articles were retained for qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS

Four studies found that patient-provider race concordance was associated with higher cardiovascular and dermatological medication adherence rates in BIPOC patients. One study observed higher rates of medication adherence in Black-Black racially concordant dyads; however, this finding was not significant.

DISCUSSION

While increased medication adherence rates were observed in patient-provider race concordant dyads, this systematic review did not account for any complex confounding factors that influence an individual's adherence to medication, such as cost, access, or polypharmacy. Increasing diversity in healthcare allows for greater opportunity for patients to be in race-concordant dyads with their providers, thereby enhancing the potential for improved medication adherence.

CONCLUSION

Patient-provider race concordance was associated with higher medication adherence rates for BIPOC patients.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42023459428.

Barriers to Medication Adherence in People Living With Epilepsy

Background and Objectives

Epilepsy affects approximately 1.2% of the US population, resulting in 3.4 million Americans with active epilepsy. Antiseizure medication (ASM) is considered the mainstay of treatment, effective for two-thirds of people with epilepsy (PWE), while at least one-third experience drug-resistant epilepsy. A significant percentage of PWE who are treated with ASMs report nonadherence to this type of medication, leading to potentially preventable seizures and the potential for being inappropriately classified as having drug-resistant epilepsy. Ongoing seizures are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs, among other consequences. Recognizing when PWE struggle with ASM adherence is essential for creating effective interventions and prevention strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Methods

As part of the Epilepsy Learning Healthcare System Registry, we collected data from 2020 through 2023 from 4,917 individuals seen at 8 epilepsy clinics in the United States. In this cross-sectional study, we used logistic regression analysis to examine the relationship between patient-reported seizure control (or provider-reported seizure control for some sites) and endorsed barriers to medication adherence. In addition, we explored potential associations with demographic variables such as sex, race, and ethnicity. The data analysis was conducted using R version 2023.06.1 + 524.

Results

Overall, 18.4% (893/4,848) reported adherence barriers and 37.7% (1,447/3,834) reported seizure control, defined as no seizures for the preceding 12 months or longer. The most prevalent barriers were forgetting to take ASMs (48.2%), experiencing ASM side effects (29.2%), and feeling as if the ASMs were not helping in controlling seizures (21.3%). The PWE who reported adherence barriers had 0.6 lower odds of having seizure control compared with those who did not report barriers (95% CI 0.4-0.7) and 0.6 lower odds of having seizure control after adjusting for race, ethnicity, and sex (95% CI 0.5-0.7).

Discussion

We observed significant barriers to medication adherence and inadequate seizure control among adult PWE across 8 centers in the United States. This study suggests that PWE might benefit from standardized screening for adherence barriers with behavioral strategies to address these barriers offered during clinical encounters to personalize care.

Background therapy in severe asthma on monoclonal antibody treatment in real life

BACKGROUND

Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recently recommends clinicians to reduce inhaled corticosteroid doses in patients with severe asthma who respond positively to monoclonal antibodies (MAbs).

OBJECTIVE

As we operated this reduction even before the document, we analysed our cohort of subjects on treatment with a MAbs for at least 24 months.

METHODS

Data stored in our electronic archive and at the 6-month follow-up (FU) were registered and patients' adherence to asthma therapy was derived by electronic pharmacy claim database.

RESULTS

Sixty-three subjects were enrolled. A complete asthma remission and reduction to GINA Step 3 was obtained in 41 % and 61 % of them, respectively. Non-adherent subjects to inhaled and oral asthma therapy were 45 % of them, with a higher percentage among those in complete remission (59 % vs 33 %).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, stepping down asthma therapy from 5 to 3 level in severe asthmatic patients on Mabs is without any negative consequences on asthma control, even in the case of non-adherence.

Insignificant difference in medication adherence to dyslipidemia drugs between visually impaired and non-disabled people in South Korea: A nationwide cohort study using claims records

Incidence of visual impairment (VI) and dyslipidemia is increasing with aging. Although good medication adherence (MA) is a crucial factor in achieving therapeutic goals for dyslipidemia, there is a paucity of studies measuring MA in the visually impaired with dyslipidemia. We investigated whether patients with VI had worse MA to dyslipidemia drugs than non-disabled people and determined the factors affecting MA among patients with VI. Data on dyslipidemia patients with VI were extracted in 2017 from the sample cohort database of the National Health Insurance Service. MA to dyslipidemia drugs was measured for two years based on the proportion of days covered (PDC). Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the effect of VI on good MA (PDC ≥0.8). The VI group (0.860) had a larger PDC than the non-disabled group (0.850). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for good MA among VI vs. non-disabled individuals was statistically insignificant (1.137, 95% confidence interval:0.958-1.350). Significant factors for poor MA in the VI group were younger age (aOR for 20-39 vs. ≥75 years old: 0.124), lower income (aOR for 9-10th decile (rich) vs. 1-4th decile (poor): 1.771), shorter duration of dyslipidemia (aOR for 1-4 vs. 15 years: 0.416), having lower-level providers sas their main providers (aOR for clinics vs. general/tertiary-care hospitals: 0.545), and having mental diseases (aOR: 0.679). Patients with VI did not have worse MA than non-disabled patients taking dyslipidemia medication.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed NA, McCoy RG, Aleppo G, Balapattabi K, Beverly EA, Briggs Early K, Bruemmer D, Ebekozien O, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Ekhlaspour L, Garg R, Khunti K, Lal R, Lingvay I, Matfin G, Pandya N, Pekas EJ, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Bannuru RR. 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Estimating optimal thresholds for adherence to RASA medications among older adults with hypertension

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Star Ratings program incentivizes health plans in Medicare to improve performance on a variety of quality measures such as adherence to renin-angiotensin system antagonists (RASAs). Adherence to RASA medications, defined as having a proportion of days covered (PDC) of at least 80%, has been improving for several years, suggesting that further investigation is needed to assess the appropriateness of the current 80% PDC threshold for medication adherence as an indicator of quality. The 80% PDC threshold has been found to be associated with improved health care resource utilization outcomes; however, little evidence exists to show that this threshold is optimal.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between adherence to RASA medications and health care resource utilization outcomes within a Medicare Advantage population and to identify the optimal PDC threshold that maximizes economic and utilization benefits.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used de-identified administrative claims data from the 2015 to 2018 in Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Inclusion in the study was based on measure specifications for the RASA adherence measure used in the Medicare Part D Star Ratings program. Adherence was assessed over a 1-year period, and health care utilization and medical costs were assessed in the subsequent year. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between adherence and economic outcomes after accounting for hypothesized confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 1,006,901 individuals were included in the study with an average PDC of 87.5% (SD = 17.8%). During the follow-up period, 12.1% of individuals experienced a hospitalization, 14.81% used an emergency department (ED), and 32.3% visited a non-ED outpatient facility. Each percentage point increase in PDC was significantly associated with decreased odds of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] = 0.997; 95% CI = 0.997-0.997) and ED visit (OR = 0.997; 95% CI = 0.996-0.997), being in the top decile of payer medical costs (OR = 0.998; 95% CI = 0.997-0.998), and increased odds of outpatient visits (adjusted OR = 1.001; 95% CI = 1.001-1.002). Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses found the optimal PDC thresholds to be 91.5%, 90.7%, 90.7%, and 90.4% for hospitalization (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.527), ED visit (AUC = 0.534), outpatient visit (AUC = 0.501), and medical costs (AUC = 0.532), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the importance of medication adherence for preventing undesirable outcomes, such as future hospitalizations, ED visits, and high medical costs, among individuals with hypertension enrolled in Medicare Advantage. The optimal threshold for PDC related to health care resource utilization outcomes was found to be greater than that used in the measure in CMS Star Ratings. Future research should examine the impact of changes in adherence thresholds for economic and clinical outcomes.

Concomitant Usage of H1-Antihistamines and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Cancer Patient Survival

PURPOSE

Recent research (Li et al. 2021) suggests an upregulated expression and activation of H1 receptors on macrophages in the tumor microenvironment, and concomitant H1-antihistamine use is associated with improved overall survival in patients with lung and skin cancers receiving immunotherapy. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the impacts of H1-antihistamine use in cancer patients during immunotherapy.

METHODS

All patients who had received at least one dose of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) from July 1, 2014 to October 31, 2019 were identified from Hong Kong's territory-wide database, with this date defined as the baseline. A 1-month landmark analysis was conducted with follow-for up to 6 months, including an exposure period of 1 month before and after the baseline date. Patients were grouped according to the types of primary cancer and the percentages of daily H1-antihistamine usage within the exposure period. The primary outcome was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1740 (65.1% male, mean age 61.9 years) were included in the landmark analysis, of which 529 (30.4%) and 307 (17.6%) had primary lung and liver malignancies. The multivariable Cox regression model estimated statistically significant improvement in overall survival of intermediate use in patients with primary lung malignancies (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.223, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.052-0.958, p = 0.044), but not with primary liver maligancies. Similar frequency-dependent effects were identified in Kaplan-Meier analysis.

CONCLUSION

The benefits of adjunctive use of H1-antihistamines may be generation- and tumor-dependent. Further clinical and mechanistic studies are required to confirm the findings.

Non-dispensed prescriptions - A nationwide descriptive study

Background

Medication non-adherence is associated with suboptimal health outcomes, higher mortality, and increased healthcare costs.

Objective

The aim of this study was to estimate the number and share of non-dispensed prescriptions at a national level and in specific patient and medicine subgroups.

Methods

The study was a nationwide retrospective register-based study. The data consisted of prescriptions prescribed in Finland in 2020 and dispensed between 2020 and 2022. A prescription was considered non-dispensed if it had not been dispensed within the two-year validity period. For each prescription, information on the patient's birth date, sex, and income as well as details of the prescribed medicine and physician's employment sector (public/private) were collected. Distributions and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were used in the analyses.

Results

Of the 26 million prescriptions, 13.3 % were never filled. Over 1.7 million people (43.3 % of all people with prescriptions issued in 2020) had at least one non-dispensed prescription. The share of non-dispensed prescriptions was lower in men than women (12.9 % vs. 13.5 %; OR:0.95; CI:0.95-0.95). Compared to the youngest age group, the share of non-dispensed prescriptions was lower in the older age groups. The lowest share of non-dispensed medicines was in antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents (7.8 %) and in cardiovascular system medicines (8.1 %), whereas the highest was in dermatologicals (20.2 %). The proportion of non-dispensed prescriptions varied between medicine groups, from 5 % for thyroid therapy to 38 % for other nervous system drugs. The most frequently non-dispensed medications were paracetamol, ibuprofen, and salbutamol.

Conclusion

The share and number of non-dispensed prescriptions varied across therapeutic areas, medicine groups, active pharmaceutical ingredients, and patient groups. Healthcare professionals should avoid unnecessary prescribing and improve medication adherence to ensure safer and more effective care.

Measurement of Completeness and Timeliness of Linked Electronic Health Record Pharmacy Data for Early Detection of Nonadherence to Breast Cancer Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study evaluated whether linked electronic health record (EHR) pharmacy data were adequately complete and timely to detect primary nonadherence to breast cancer adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Linked EHR pharmacy data were extracted from the EHR for patients with stage 0 to III breast cancer who had their first prescription order for AET between 2016 and 2021. Patients with the first dispense event within 90 days of the prescription were classified as having sufficient or insufficient data available for early detection of primary adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 1,446 eligible patients had a first AET prescription order between 2016 and 2021; these orders were routed to 871 unique pharmacies, of which 856 (98.2%) were contracted with the linked EHR pharmacy database and 15 (1.8%) were not contracted. Among the 1,428 patients with a first prescription sent to a contract pharmacy, 164 (13%) had incomplete linked EHR pharmacy data refresh events to assess primary adherence. Among the 1,244 patients with at least 1 refresh event after their first prescription, 82% occurred within 90 days and were sufficiently timely for early detection of primary adherence. Overall, 32% of patients would benefit from an intervention to verify or improve primary adherence to AET.

CONCLUSION

Although linked EHR pharmacy data have adequate completeness of contract pharmacy data, local configurations of data refresh events tailored to medication reconciliation workflows are incomplete (13%) and insufficiently timely (32%) to fully support clinical decision support (CDS) for early detection of primary medication nonadherence. Prospective CDS interventions using linked EHR pharmacy data are possible with enhancements to the frequency and timeliness of refresh events.

Tafamidis medication adherence and persistence in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy in Japan

AIMS

This study aimed to describe baseline characteristics and adherence among patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) treated with tafamidis (VYNDAQEL®) in Japan using the Japanese Medical Data Vision (MDV) database.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study was a non-interventional, retrospective cohort study of adult (≥18 years old) patients in the Japanese MDV claims database diagnosed with ATTR-CM and with at least two tafamidis prescriptions of dose strength 4 × 20 mg/day between 1 March 2019 and 31 August 2021. The date of the first prescription was defined as the index date, with follow-up time defined as the time between the first and last prescription plus the days' supply from the last refill. Baseline characteristics were assessed during a 12 month pre-index period. Adherence was measured using two metrics: (i) the modified medication possession ratio (mMPR), calculated by taking the sum of days supplied for all fills within the follow-up period, divided by the number of days of follow-up, and reported as a percentage, with patients classified as adherent with an mMPR of ≥80%, and (ii) the proportion of days covered (PDC), calculated by taking the total number of days' supply dispensed during the follow-up period divided by the number of days of follow-up, adjusting for any days' supply overlap. A total of 210 patients were identified; the mean (standard deviation) age of the cohort was 77 (5.9) years, and the majority (89%) were male. The most common baseline cardiovascular comorbidities were heart failure (85%), ischaemic heart disease (66%), hypertensive diseases (49%), and diabetes (35%); 75% of patients received heart failure medications in the 12 months prior to index, with the most common being beta-blockers (49%), diuretics (48%), angiotensin receptor blockers (30%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (22%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (8.1%). Over an average 14 month follow-up, mean mMPR was 96% with a median of 100% [inter-quartile range (IQR): 97-101%]; 93% of patients were adherent (defined as an mMPR ≥ 80%). In the same follow-up period, mean PDC was 93.6% with a median of 99% (IQR: 93-100%). Persistence was high with 78% of patients having a 0 day gap between prescription refills.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found high adherence rates to tafamidis in this real-world Japanese patient population. Adherence rates in this study were similar to those reported by the tafamidis clinical trial and a previously published US commercial claims adherence analysis. Further studies should be conducted to assess the impact of real-world adherence on real-world outcomes.

Prevalence and associated factors of non-adherence to antihyperlipidemic medication: a nationwide cross sectional survey in Pakistan

Hyperlipidemia significantly contributes to the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. However, about half of the patients do not adhere to their antihyperlipidemic medications, leading to healthcare costs and premature mortality. This study's objective was to determine the prevalence and associated factors of non-adherence to antihyperlipidemic medications. The study covered hypertensive patients (21,451) aged 21-75 years, presenting to the primary and secondary healthcare facilities across Pakistan (covering 21 divisions) from January 2022 to April 2023. The outcome intended was non-adherence to antihyperlipidemic medication, which was assessed by SEAMS and pill-counting methods (non-adherence < 80%). The study found overall non-adherence to antihyperlipidemic medication of 60.6% across Pakistan, with the highest non-adherence rates found in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (71.9%) and the lowest in Islamabad (47.7%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that female, no health card (Sehat Sahulat Program government insurance), < 5 years of illness, < 5 daily medications, and dose frequency of twice daily revealed a positively significant association with non-adherence. While monthly income 51,000-100,000, graduation level of education, Muhajir, and hyperlipidemia with one comorbid condition had a significant negative association with the non-adherence. Antihyperlipidemic non-adherence is a multifaceted, multifactorial, profound problem requiring a multipronged approach.

Evaluation of Medication Adherence Among Prevalent Users in Hypertension, Dyslipidemia, and Diabetes Using Health Insurance Claims: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Japan

PURPOSE

Hypertension (HT), dyslipidemia (DL), and diabetes mellitus (DM) are major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Despite the wide availability of medications to reduce this risk, poor adherence to medications remains an issue. The aim of this study is to evaluate medication adherence of prevalent users in these disease medications (HT, DL, DM) using claims data. Factors associated with non-adherence were also examined.

METHODS

Of 7538 participants of the Tsuruoka Metabolomics Cohort Study, 3693 (HT: 2702, DL: 2112, DM: 661) were identified as prevalent users of these disease medications. Information on lifestyle was collected through a questionnaire. Adherence was assessed by a proportion of days covered (PDC) and participants with PDC ≥0.8 were defined as adherent. Predictors of non-adherence were determined by performing multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Medication adherence differed by treatment status. Among those without comorbidities, those with HT-only showed the highest adherence (90.2%), followed by those with DM-only (81.2%) and those with DL-only (80.8%). Factors associated with non-adherence in each medication group were skipping breakfast and poor understanding of medications among those with HT medications, females, having comorbidities, having a history of heart disease, and drinking habit among those with DL medications, and good sleep quality and skipping breakfast among those with DM medications.

CONCLUSION

While participants showed high medication adherence, differences were observed across medication groups. The identified predictors of non-adherence could help target those in need of adherence support.

'Matters-of-concern' associated with discontinuation of long-acting injectable buprenorphine: Findings from a longitudinal qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Discontinuation of medications such as methadone and buprenorphine amongst patients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is an international phenomenon. Recent developments in OAT medication include depot-injections of buprenorphine. Circumstances underlying discontinuation of these new formulations of medication are not fully understood from a qualitative perspective.

METHODS

Data derive from a longitudinal qualitative study of patients' experience of long-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAIB), involving semi-structured telephone-interviews held at six-points in time. The relevant dataset for this article consists of 44 interview transcripts, generated from 8 participants who were each affected by discontinuation of LAIB prescriptions (during the first 12-months of treatment). Analyses sought to identify circumstances associated with LAIB discontinuation and data were further situated within a framework of 'evidence making intervention' and associated 'matters-of-concern'. Matters-of-concern relate to the ways in which an intervention is 'made' and constructed through engagement and practice, from the perspective of the recipient.

FINDINGS

In this study, participants experienced either 'discontinuation of LAIB prescriptions by treatment services' or patient-led 'opt-out' from treatment. Matters-of-concern underlying the former were associated with late attendance for scheduled appointments, non-prescribed substance use or receiving a custodial sentence. Matters-of-concern relating to patient-initiated discontinuation were associated with personal circumstances that affected treatment motivation, side-effects (of buprenorphine), a preference to resume heroin use, or because individual treatment goals had been achieved.

CONCLUSION

The assorted matters-of-concern that influence discontinuation of LAIB demonstrate that such OAT is complex and multi-faceted, is neither fixed nor stable, and does not generate universally shared outcome. Experiences of LAIB discontinuation are shaped by a wide range of social, temporal and treatment-related effects that include disconnected therapeutic alliance between patient and treatment providers. In order to maximise the benefits of LAIB it is necessary to develop meaningful therapeutic alliances (notwithstanding policy boundaries) to enable exploration of matters-of-concern during treatment.

Facilitators and Barriers of Incremental Innovation by Fixed Dose Combinations in Cardiovascular Diseases

Despite the availability of affordable pharmaceuticals treating cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), many of the risk factors remain poorly controlled. Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs), a form of incremental innovation, have already demonstrated improvements over combinations of single medicines in adherence and hard clinical endpoints. Nevertheless, there are many barriers related to the wider use of FDCs in CVDs. Our aim was to identify these barriers and explore system-level facilitators from a multi-stakeholder perspective. Identified barriers include (i) hurdles in evidence generation for manufacturers, (ii) limited acceptance of adherence as an endpoint by clinical guideline developers and policymakers, (iii) limited options for a price premium for incremental innovation for healthcare payers, (iv) limited availability of real-world evidence, and (v) methodological issues to measure improved adherence. Initiatives to standardize and link healthcare databases in European countries, movements towards improved patient centricity in healthcare, and extended value assessment provide opportunities to capture the benefits of FDCs. Still, there is an emerging need to facilitate the generalizability of sporadic clinical evidence across different FDCs and to improve adherence measures. Finally, healthcare payers need to be convinced to pay a fair premium price for the added value of FDCs to incentivize incremental innovation in CVD treatment.

Improving medication adherence in cardiovascular disease

Non-adherence to medication is a global health problem with far-reaching individual-level and population-level consequences but remains unappreciated and under-addressed in the clinical setting. With increasing comorbidity and polypharmacy as well as an ageing population, cardiovascular disease and medication non-adherence are likely to become increasingly prevalent. Multiple methods for detecting non-adherence exist but are imperfect, and, despite emerging technology, a gold standard remains elusive. Non-adherence to medication is dynamic and often has multiple causes, particularly in the context of cardiovascular disease, which tends to require lifelong medication to control symptoms and risk factors in order to prevent disease progression. In this Review, we identify the causes of medication non-adherence and summarize interventions that have been proven in randomized clinical trials to be effective in improving adherence. Practical solutions and areas for future research are also proposed.

Estimating the effect of realistic improvements of metformin adherence on COVID-19 mortality using targeted machine learning

Background

Type 2 diabetes elevates the risk of severe outcomes in COVID-19 patients, with multiple studies reporting higher case fatality rates. Metformin is a widely used medication for glycemic management. We hypothesize that improved adherence to metformin may lower COVID-19 post-infection mortality risk in this group. Utilizing data from the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), we investigate the relationship between metformin adherence and mortality following COVID-19 infection in patients with chronic metformin prescriptions.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of 61,180 IMSS beneficiaries who received a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or rapid test for SARS-CoV-2 and had at least two consecutive months of metformin prescriptions prior to the positive test. The hypothetical intervention is improved adherence to metformin, measured by proportion of days covered (PDC), with the comparison being the observed metformin adherence values. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality following COVID-19 infection. We defined the causal parameter using shift intervention, an example of modified treatment policies. We used the targeted learning framework for estimation of the target estimand.

Findings

Among COVID-19 positive patients with chronic metformin prescriptions, we found that a 5% and 10% absolute increase in metformin adherence is associated with a respective 0.26% (95% CI: -0.28%, 0.79%) and 1.26% (95% CI: 0.72%, 1.80%) absolute decrease in mortality risk.

Interpretation

Subject to the limitations of a real-world data study, our results indicate a causal association between improved metformin adherence and reduced COVID-19 post-infection mortality risk.

Medication Adherence-From Measurer to Measured

This essay by a researcher who developed a widely used medication adherence measure explores his experience with being labeled “nonadherent.”

Persistence and Adherence to PCSK9 Inhibitor Monoclonal Antibodies Versus Ezetimibe in Real-World Settings

INTRODUCTION

The cardiovascular disease risk reduction benefits of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9i mAb) and ezetimibe are dependent on remaining on treatment and being persistent and adherent. We estimated the percentage of patients on therapy, persistent and adherent at 182 and 365 days among US adults with health insurance who initiated a PCSK9i mAb (n = 16,588) or ezetimibe (n = 83,086) between July 2015 and December 2019.

METHODS

Using pharmacy fill claims, being on therapy was defined as having a day of medication supply in the last 60 of 182 and 365 days following treatment initiation, being persistent was defined as not having a gap of 60 days or more between the last day of supply from one prescription fill and the next fill, and being adherent was defined by having medication available to take on ≥ 80% of the 182 and 365 days following treatment initiation. We estimated multivariable-adjusted risk ratios for being persistent and adherent comparing patients initiating PCSK9i mAb versus ezetimibe using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

At 182 days following initiation, 80% and 68% were on therapy and 76% and 64% were persistent among patients who initiated a PCSK9i mAb and ezetimibe, respectively. Among patients who were on therapy and persistent at 182 days following initiation, 88% and 81% of those who initiated a PCSK9i mAb and ezetimibe, respectively, were on therapy at 365 days. Among those on therapy and persistent at 182 days following initiation, being persistent and being adherent at 365 days were each more common among PCSK9i mAb versus ezetimibe initiators (persistent: 82% versus 76%, multivariable-adjusted risk ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.08; adherent: 74% versus 71%, multivariable-adjusted risk ratio 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest approaches to increase persistence and adherence to PCSK9i mAb and ezetimibe should be implemented prior to or within 182 days following treatment initiation.

Hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease patients with and without heart failure: an Italian economic modelling study

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalemia (HK) is frequently present in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Risk factors for HK among CKD patients include comorbidities and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) treatment. Current standard of care (SoC) often necessitates RAASi down-titration or discontinuation, resulting in poorer cardiorenal outcomes, hospitalization and mortality. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of patiromer for HK in CKD patients with and without heart failure (HF) in an Italian setting.

METHODS

A lifetime Markov cohort model was developed based on OPAL-HK to assess the health economic impact of patiromer therapy in comparison to SoC after accounting for the effects of HK and RAASi use on clinical events. Outcomes included accumulated clinical events, number needed to treat (NNT) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Subgroup analysis was conducted in CKD patients with and without HF.

RESULTS

Patiromer was associated with an incremental discounted cost of €4,660 and 0.194 quality adjusted life years (QALYs), yielding an ICER of €24,004. Per 1000 patients, patiromer treatment prevented 275 moderate/severe HK events, 54 major adverse cardiovascular event, 246 RAASi discontinuation and 213 RAASi up-titration/restart. Subgroup analysis showed patiromer was more effective in preventing clinical events in CKD patients with HF compared to those without; QALY gains were greater in CKD patients without HF versus those with HF (0.267 versus 0.092, respectively). Scenario analysis and sensitivity analysis results support base-case conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Patiromer is associated with QALY gains in CKD patients with and without HF compared to SoC in Italy. Patiromer prevented HK events, enabled RAASi therapy maintenance and reduced cardiovascular event risk.

Validating methods used to identify non-adherence adverse drug events in Canadian administrative health data

AIMS

Medication non-adherence is a type of adverse drug event that can lead to untreated and exacerbated chronic illness, and that drives healthcare utilization. Research using medication claims data has attempted to identify instances of medication non-adherence using the proportion of days covered or by examining gaps between medication refills. We sought to validate these measures compared to a gold standard diagnosis of non-adherence made in hospital.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of adverse drug events diagnosed during three prospective cohorts in British Columbia between 2008 and 2015 (n = 976). We linked prospectively identified adverse drug events to medication claims data to examine the sensitivity and specificity of typical non-adherence measures.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the non-adherence measures ranged from 22.4% to 37.5%, with a proportion of days covered threshold of 95% performing the best; the non-persistence measures had sensitivities ranging from 10.4% to 58.3%. While a 7-day gap was most sensitive, it classified 61.2% of the sample as non-adherent, whereas only 19.6% were diagnosed as such in hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

The methods used to identify non-adherence in administrative databases are not accurate when compared to a gold standard diagnosis by healthcare providers. Research that has relied on administrative data to identify non-adherent patients both underestimates the magnitude of the problem and may label patients as non-adherent who were in fact adherent.

A Multi-Component Intervention to Improve Therapeutic Adherence in Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients Within the Primary Care Level: A Before-and-After Study

INTRODUCTION

Non-adherence to medication severely affects chronic disease control.

AIM

To assess whether a multi-component intervention implemented at the public primary care level in Argentina improves adherence to antihypertensive medication and helps to reduce blood pressure (BP) levels in uncontrolled hypertensive patients.

METHODS

A before-and-after study was conducted in five public primary care clinics located in the city of Almirante Brown, Argentina. One hundred and twenty-five uncontrolled hypertensive patients received a multi-component intervention based on the Chronic Care model and the 5As strategy (Ask, Advise, Agree, Assist, and Arrange). Medication possession ratio (MPR) and BP values were assessed before and after a 6-month period.

RESULTS

The follow-up rate was 96.8%. Main baseline characteristics were as follows, male: 44.8%, mean age: 57.1 years (± 8.1), exclusive public healthcare coverage: 83.5%, primary school level or less: 68.8%, and mean systolic/diastolic BP: 157.4 (± 13.6)/97.7 (± 8.2) mmHg. After implementing the intervention, a significant increase in the proportion of adequate adherence (MPR ≥ 80%) was observed, from 16.8% at baseline to 47.2% (p < 0.001). A significant reduction of 16.4 mmHg (CI 95%: 19.6, 13.1) was observed for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 12.0 mmHg (CI 95%: 14.2, 9.9) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (p < 0.001). At 6 months, 51.2% of the population achieved blood pressure control (SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

The study intervention was associated with an increased adherence rate, achieving a significant reduction in BP values and reaching BP control in more than half of the population.

The Real-World Effectiveness, Persistence, Adherence, and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitor Baricitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Long-Term Study

Background/Aim: Baricitinib (BAR) is the first oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved in Europe for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Real-world data are still needed to clarify its long-term benefits/risk profile. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, persistence, adherence, and safety of BAR in a real-world setting. Methods: An ambispective study was conducted between October 2017 and December 2021 in RA patients starting BAR. The effectiveness was evaluated, assessing changes from the baseline of the Disease Activity Score using 28-joint counts-C reactive protein (DAS28CRP), and the achievement of low disease activity/remission. Drug persistence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Adherence was estimated using the medication possession ratio (MPR) and the 5-item Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology. Safety was assessed determining global incidence proportion and adverse event adjusted incidence rates. Results: In total, 61/64 recruited patients were finally analyzed, 83.6% were female, 78.7% were seropositive, the mean age was 58.1 (15.4) years, and the disease duration was 13.9 (8.3) years. A total of 32.8% of patients were naïve to biologics and 16.4% received BAR as monotherapy. The median exposure to BAR was 12.4 (6.6-31.2) months (range 3.1-51.4). A significant change in DAS28CRP was observed after treatment (difference -1.2, p = 0.000). 70.5% and 60.7% of patients achieved low disease activity or remission, respectively, and 50.8% (31/61) remained on BAR throughout the follow-up, with a median persistence of 31.2 (9.3-53.1) months. The average MPR was 0.96 (0.08) and all patients exhibited "good adherence" according to the questionnaire. In total, 21.3% of patients discontinued baricitinib due to toxicity. Conclusions: In our real-world practice, BAR demonstrated effectiveness, large persistence, high adherence to treatment, and an acceptable safety profile.

Antihypertensive medication persistence and adherence among non-Hispanic Asian US patients with hypertension and fee-for-service Medicare health insurance

BACKGROUND

Less than 50% of non-Hispanic Asian adults taking antihypertensive medication have controlled blood pressure.

METHODS

We compared non-persistence and low adherence to antihypertensive medication between non-Hispanic Asian and other race/ethnicity groups among US adults ≥66 years who initiated antihypertensive medication between 2011 and 2018 using a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries (non-Hispanic Asian, n = 2,260; non-Hispanic White, n = 56,000; non-Hispanic Black, n = 5,792; Hispanic, n = 4,212; and Other, n = 1,423). Non-persistence was defined as not having antihypertensive medication available to take in the last 90 of 365 days following treatment initiation. Low adherence was defined as having antihypertensive medication available to take on <80% of the 365 days following initiation.

RESULTS

In 2011-2012, 2013-2014, 2015-2016 and 2017-2018, the proportion of non-Hispanic Asian Medicare beneficiaries with non-persistence was 29.1%, 25.6%, 25.4% and 26.7% (p-trend = 0.381), respectively, and the proportion with low adherence was 58.1%, 54.2%, 53.4% and 51.6%, respectively (p-trend = 0.020). In 2017-2018, compared with non-Hispanic Asian beneficiaries, non-persistence was less common among non-Hispanic White beneficiaries (risk ratio 0.74 [95%CI, 0.64-0.85]), non-Hispanic Black beneficiaries (0.80 [95%CI 0.68-0.94]) and those reporting Other race/ethnicity (0.68 [95%CI, 0.54-0.85]) but not among Hispanic beneficiaries (1.04 [95%CI, 0.88-1.23]). Compared to non-Hispanic Asian beneficiaries, non-Hispanic White beneficiaries and beneficiaries reporting Other race/ethnicity were less likely to have low adherence to antihypertensive medication (relative risk 0.78 [95%CI 0.72-0.84] and 0.84 [95%CI 0.74-0.95], respectively); there was no association for non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic beneficiaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-persistence and low adherence to antihypertensive medication were more common among older non-Hispanic Asian than non-Hispanic White adults.

Early- and later-stage persistence with antiobesity medications: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The study's objective was to examine the percentage of patients with an initial antiobesity medication (AOM) fill who were persistent with AOM at 3, 6, and 12 months and to characterize factors associated with persistence at 12 months.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from January 2015 to July 2023 in a large health system in Ohio and Florida and included adults with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 who had an initial AOM prescription filled between 2015 and 2022.

RESULTS

The authors identified 1911 patients with a median baseline BMI of 38 (IQR, 34-44). Over time, 44% were persistent with AOM at 3 months, 33% at 6 months, and 19% at 12 months. Across categories of AOM, the highest 1-year persistence was in patients receiving semaglutide (40%). Semaglutide (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.26, 95% CI: 3.04-6.05) was associated with higher odds of 1-year persistence, and naltrexone-bupropion (AOR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-1.00) was associated with lower odds, compared with phentermine-topiramate. Among patients who were persistent at 6 months, a 1% increase in weight loss at 6 months was associated with 6% increased odds of persistence at year 1 (AOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Later-stage persistence with AOM varies considerably based on the drug and the weight loss at 6 months.

Adherence, persistence and switching rates of apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a multicentre real-life analysis at 3 years

INTRODUCTION

Adherence to and persistence with long-term treatment with oral anticoagulants play a significant role in preventing adverse events and mortality in patients with cardiac conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adherence, persistence and switching rate at 3 years in real-life patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving treatment with first-line new oral anticoagulants.

METHODS

The study assessed all patients treated with drugs with the ATC codes B01AA, B01AE, B01AF and dispensed in pharmacies in the Lanciano-Vasto-Chieti and Pescara Local Health Units from 1 January 2011 to 30 September 2021. Adherence was calculated as the proportion of days covered; persistence was calculated as the difference in days between the start and end of treatment; and the switching rate was calculated as the difference in days between the start of treatment and the switch.

RESULTS

A total of 4270 patients were analysed. The absolute adherence figure at 3 years was 0.85. The lowest adherence levels were found in patients treated with dabigatran with an absolute value of 0.72, while the highest levels were found in patients treated with rivaroxaban with an absolute value at 3 years of 0.88. The persistence curves at 3 years of treatment with dabigatran showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.0001) compared with those of rivaroxaban and apixaban.

CONCLUSIONS

The data collected over a 3-year period showed that adherence and persistence levels and switch data were optimal and comparable in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving treatment with either rivaroxaban or apixaban. In contrast, patients treated with dabigatran had worrying adherence and persistence levels.

Comparative Effectiveness of Biologic Therapies in Preventing Penetrating Complications in Patients With Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Comparative effectiveness of biologics in preventing penetrating disease (PD) in Crohn's disease (CD) is not well established. We compared the risk of developing luminal and perianal PD (LPD and PPD) between biologics used as first-line therapies.

METHODS

Adults (>17 years) with CD who initiated their first biologic (anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF], ustekinumab [UST], or vedolizumab [VDZ]) were identified from Merative Commercial Database (2006 and 2020). We excluded preexisting PD using a minimum look-back period of 1 year. Cohorts were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting based on age, sex, comorbidities, prior CD surgery, and CD severity. Pairwise comparisons were performed by Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for immunomodulator exposure, and with biologic exposure treated as a time-dependent variable based on a medication possession ratio of 0.8.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 40,693 patients: 93% anti-TNF, 3% UST, and 4% VDZ. After inverse probability of treatment weighting all comparisons were well balanced. Anti-TNF was protective against LPD (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.78; P < .0001) and PPD (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.96; P = .0045) compared with VDZ and LPD (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.46; P < .0001) compared with UST. There were no significant differences in the risk of LPD and PPD between VDZ and UST. These results were similar after limiting the study period to after 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TNF therapy was associated with a lower risk of LPD and PPD compared with VDZ, and lower risk of LPD compared with UST. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and to determine potential reasons for these differences.

Systematic Review of Outcomes for Assessment of Medication Adherence Enhancing Interventions: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report

OBJECTIVES

The lack of universal guidance on outcome measures for evaluating medication adherence enhancing interventions (MAEIs) poses a challenge for assessing their effectiveness. This literature review aimed to provide a systematic overview of outcome measures currently used for the value assessment of MAEIs.

METHODS

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, and Academic Search Complete for randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials, prospective cohort studies, model-based economic evaluations, and value frameworks published in English between January 2010 and September 2020. Two independent reviewers screened all titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review. Due to the large number of relevant studies, data extraction was limited to articles published between January 2018 and September 2020. We collected data on the general characteristics of the study, the type of intervention, and the outcomes measured.

RESULTS

We screened 14 685 records and identified 308 articles for data extraction. Behavioral interventions were the most common (n = 143), followed by educational interventions (n = 110) and mixed-method interventions (n = 73). Outcomes were clustered into 7 categories with medication adherence (n = 286) being the most frequently measured, followed by clinical outcomes (n = 155), health-related quality of life (n = 57), resource use (n = 43), patient satisfaction (n = 31), economic outcomes (n = 18), and other outcomes (n = 76).

CONCLUSIONS

Various outcomes measures have been used to evaluate MAEIs, with only a small number of studies exploring economic and patient-reported outcomes. Future research is warranted to develop a consensus-based set of criteria for assessing MAEIs to facilitate the comparison of interventions and enable informed decision making.

Estimating Type 2 Diabetes Prevalence: A Model of Drug Consumption Data

Observational, cross-sectional prevalence studies are costly and time-consuming. The development of indirect methods estimating prevalence used to obtain faster, less-expensive, and more robust results would be an advantage for several healthcare applications. This study aimed to use the drug dispensing data from community pharmacies to estimate the prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the Portuguese population. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a database of dispensed medicines with an indication for Diabetes mellitus in 2018 and 2021, stratified by geographic region. The methodology was based on a sequential method of acquiring prevalence estimates obtained through exposure to medicines using the daily doses defined per thousand inhabitants per day and adjusted to the rate of adherence to therapy, prescription patterns, and concomitance of antidiabetic drugs. The estimated overall T2DM prevalence in 2018 was 13.9%, and it was 14.2% for 2021. The results show the increased consumption of antidiabetic drugs, with fixed-dose combination antidiabetics and new antidiabetics being particularly important in 2021. This work allowed for the development of a model to obtain the estimated prevalence of T2DM based on drug consumption, using a simple, fast, and robust method that is in line with the available evidence. However, with the recent expanding indications for new antidiabetics, the inclusion of further data in the model needs to be studied.

Patient satisfaction with the quality of care received is associated with adherence to antidepressant medications

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of evidence on the association between satisfaction with quality of care and adherence to antidepressants.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between patient satisfaction with healthcare and adherence to antidepressants.

METHODS

A cohort study design was used to identify antidepressant users from the 2010-2016Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data, a national longitudinal complex survey study design on the cost and healthcare utilization of the noninstitutionalized population in the United States. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems were used to measure participants' satisfaction with access and quality of care, patient-provider communication and shared decision-making (SDM). Patients were considered satisfied if they ranked the quality of care at ≥9 (range: 0[worst]- 10[best]). Antidepressant adherence was measured based on medication refill and complete discontinuation. MEPS sampling survey-weighted multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between satisfaction and adherence to antidepressants. We tested for the potential presence of reverse associations by restricting the analysis to new users of antidepressants. The roles of patient-provider communication and SDM on the satisfaction-adherence association were examined through structural equation models (SEM).

RESULTS

Among 4,990 (weighted counts = 8,661,953) antidepressant users, 36% were adherent while 39% discontinued antidepressants therapy. Half of antidepressant users were satisfied with the healthcare received. Satisfied patients were 26% (OR = 1.26, 95%CI: 1.08, 1.47) more likely to adhere and 17% (OR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.71, 0.96) less likely to discontinue, compared to unsatisfied antidepressant users. Patient satisfaction was also associated with higher odds (OR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.88) of adherence among a subgroup of new users of antidepressants. The SEM analysis revealed that satisfaction was a manifestation of patient-provider communication (β = 2.03, P-value<0.001) and SDM (β = 1.14, P-value<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction is a potential predictor of antidepressant adherence. If our findings are confirmed through intervention studies, improving patient-provider communication and SDM could likely drive both patient satisfaction and adherence to antidepressants.

Adherence to riluzole therapy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in three Italian regions-The CAESAR study

PURPOSE

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare neurodegenerative disease. Riluzole may increase survival and delay the need for mechanical ventilation. The CAESAR project ('Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and safety of drugs used in rare neuromuscular and neurodegenerative diseases', FV AIFA project 2012-2013-2014) involves evaluating prescribing patterns, and analysing effectiveness and comparative safety of drugs, in patients with neurodegenerative diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate adherence to riluzole in patients with ALS during the first year of use, identifying adherence clusters.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative data from Latium, Tuscany, and Umbria. We identified subjects with a new diagnosis of ALS between 2014 and 2019, with the first dispensation of riluzole within 180 days of diagnosis. We considered a two-year look-back period for the characterization of patients, and we followed them from the date of first dispensing of riluzole for 1 year. We calculated 12 monthly adherence measures, through a modified version of the Medication Possession Ratio, estimating drug coverage with Defined Daily Dose. Adherence trajectories were identified using a three-step method: (1) calculation of statistical measures; (2) principal component analysis; (3) cluster analysis. Patient characteristics at baseline and during follow-up were described and compared between adherence groups identified.

RESULTS

We included 264 ALS patients as new users of riluzole in Latium, 344 in Tuscany, and 63 in Umbria. We observed a higher frequency of males (56.2%) and a mean age of 67.4 (standard deviation, SD, 10.4) in the overall population. We identified two clusters in all regions: one more numerous, including adherent patients (60%, 74%, 88%, respectively), and another one including patients who discontinued therapy (40%, 26%, 12%, respectively). In Tuscany patients discontinuing riluzole more frequently died (28.6% vs. 15.4%, p-value <0.01). Additionally, low-adherers had a higher frequency of central nervous system disorders (69.0% vs. 52.5%, p-value 0.01), and a greater use of non-pharmacological treatments (p-values ≤0.01 for invasive ventilation and tracheostomy). We did not observe any differences in Lazio, whereas in Umbria we observed a higher use of drugs for dementia-related psychiatric problems among low-adherers (57.1% vs. 7.8%, respectively, p-value <0.01), although with small numbers.

CONCLUSION

Most ALS patients who start riluzole adhere to therapy during the first year. Patients who discontinue therapy early show greater fragility and mortality.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Bannuru RR, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Ekhlaspour L, Hilliard ME, Johnson EL, Khunti K, Lingvay I, Matfin G, McCoy RG, Perry ML, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Prahalad P, Pratley RE, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Gabbay RA. 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at https://professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Polypharmacy and medication fill nonadherence in a population-based sample of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, 2008-2017

PURPOSE

We examined the association between polypharmacy-an established risk factor for nonadherence in the elderly-and medication fill nonadherence in a large national sample of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (AYAs) in the USA.

METHODS

We pooled data (2008-2017) from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We defined polypharmacy as ≥ 3 unique medications prescribed, based on self-report and pharmacy data, and medication fill nonadherence as self-reported delay or inability to obtain a necessary medication. We estimated prevalence of medication fill nonadherence among AYAs (age 18-39 years with a cancer history). We used logistic regression to estimate the association between (1) polypharmacy and medication fill nonadherence in AYAs, and (2) total number of medications prescribed and medication fill nonadherence, controlling for sex, number of chronic conditions, disability, and survey year.

RESULTS

AYAs (n = 598) were predominantly female (76.2%), age 30-39 years (64.9%), and non-Hispanic White (72.1%). Nearly half were poor (19.0%) or near-poor/low income (21.6%). One in ten AYAs reported medication fill nonadherence (9.75%). Of these, more than 70% cited cost-related barriers as the reason. AYAs with polypharmacy had 2.49 times higher odds of medication fill nonadherence (95%CI 1.11-5.59), compared to those without polypharmacy. Odds of medication fill nonadherence increased by 16% with each additional medication prescribed (AOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy may be an important risk factor for medication fill nonadherence in AYAs in the USA.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Improving AYAs' medication adherence requires eliminating cost-related barriers, particularly for those with polypharmacy.

[Association Between Medication Compliance and Various Risky Behaviors in Patients With Schizophrenia]

Objective

To investigate the status of medication adherence and various types of risky behaviors of schizophrenia patients in a certain area of western China and to explore accordingly the correlation between the two.

Methods

A total of 292 667 patients with schizophrenia were enrolled in a follow-up survey between 2006 and 2018. In addition, based on the outcome-wide analysis strategy, a multivariate Cox proportional risk regression model was used to estimate and compare the impact of medication adherence on different types of risky behaviors in schizophrenia patients.

Results

In this 13-year prospective cohort, 65 175 patients (31.4%) showed good medication adherence, while 142 394 patients (68.6%) showed poor medication adherence. The incidence rates of various risky behaviors during the follow-up period were as follows, minor nuisances, 12.25%, violation of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Penalties for Administration of Public Security (APS law), 3.82%, violation of criminal law, 0.94%, suicide completed, 0.28%, self-harm, 1.42%, and attempted suicide, 0.82%. Schizophrenia patients who had poor medication adherence had higher risks of committing violence against others and self-inflicted injury compared to patients with good medication adherence did, with the associated effects being minor nuisances (hazard ratio [HR]=1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.35), violation of APS law (HR=1.47, 95% CI: 1.38-1.56), violation of criminal law (HR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.05-1.31), and self-harm (HR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.32-1.56), respectively, while the risk of suicide completed is lower in schizophrenia patients with poor medication adherence than that in patients with good medication adherence (HR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.47-0.66). There was no statistically significant association between attempted suicide and medication adherence.

Conclusion

There are variations in the direction and strength of the association between medication adherence and different types of risky behaviors and further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms of the association.

Patient-Level Exposure to Actionable Pharmacogenomic Medications in a Nationally Representative Insurance Claims Database

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of exposure to pharmacogenomic medications is well established but little is known about how long patients are exposed to these medications.

AIM

Our objective was to describe the amount of exposure to actionable pharmacogenomic medications using patient-level measures among a large nationally representative population using an insurance claims database.

METHODS

Our retrospective cohort study included adults (18+ years) from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics claims database with incident fills of 72 Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium level A, A/B, or B medications from January 2012 through September 2018. Patient-level outcomes included the proportion of days covered (PDC), number of fills, and average days supplied per fill over a 12-month period.

RESULTS

Over 1 million fills of pharmacogenetic medications were identified for 605,355 unique patients. The mean PDC for all medications was 0.21 (SD 0.3), suggesting patients were exposed 21% (77 days) of the year. Medications with the highest PDC (0.55-0.89) included ivacaftor, tamoxifen, clopidogrel, HIV medications, transplant medications, and statins; with the exception of statins, these medications were initiated by fewer patients. Pharmacogenomic medications were filled an average of 2.8 times (SD 3.0, range 1-81) during the year following the medication's initiation, and the average days supplied for each fill was 22.3 days (SD 22.4, range 1-180 days).

CONCLUSION

Patient characteristics associated with more medication exposure were male sex, older age, and comorbid chronic conditions. Prescription fill data provide patient-level exposure metrics that can further our understanding of pharmacogenomic medication utilization and help inform opportunities for pharmacogenomic testing.

Association of patient copayment and medication adherence in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of medication copayment and treatment adherence to hydroxychloroquine and immunosuppressants for SLE.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of health claims data using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Individuals with SLE continuously enrolled for 180 days from 1 July 2010 to 31 December 2019 were included. Adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered ≥80%. Copayment for a 30-day supply of medication was dichotomised as high (≥$10) or low (<$10). We examined the association between copayment and odds of adherence in multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models, including age, sex, race or ethnicity, comorbidities, educational attainment and household income.

RESULTS

We identified 12 510 individuals (age 54.2±15.5 years; 88.2% female sex), of whom 9510 (76%) were prescribed hydroxychloroquine and 1880 (15%) prescribed hydroxychloroquine and an additional immunosuppressant (azathioprine, methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil). Median (IQR) 30-day copayments were $8 (4-10) for hydroxychloroquine, $7 (2-10) for azathioprine, $8 (3-11) for methotrexate and $10 (5-20) for mycophenolate mofetil. High copayments were associated with OR of adherence of 0.61 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.68) for hydroxychloroquine, OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.66) for azathioprine and OR 0.69 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.96) for mycophenolate mofetil. For methotrexate, the association was not significant.

CONCLUSION

In a large, administrative health claims database, we identified that high copayments were associated with reduced adherence to commonly prescribed medications for SLE. Incorporating awareness of the burden of copayments and its consequences into healthcare is essential to promote optimal medication adherence.