1
|
Sutradhar R, Dalal DC. The roles of continuous and discontinuous proliferations on hepatitis B virus infection. Math Biosci 2025; 385:109448. [PMID: 40274258 DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2025.109448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2025] [Accepted: 04/11/2025] [Indexed: 04/26/2025]
Abstract
The proliferation of both uninfected and infected hepatocytes, as well as the recycling effects of rcDNA-containing capsids are two key mechanisms playing significant roles in the persistence and clearance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In this study, the temporal dynamics of this viral infection is investigated through two intercellular mathematical models considering proliferation of both types of hepatocytes (uninfected and infected) and recycling effects of capsids. Both models are formulated on the basis of a key finding in the existing literature: mitosis of an infected hepatocytes yields in two uninfected progenies. In the first model (defined by P-model), we examine the continuous proliferation (which occur continuously), while the second one (defined by M-model) deals with the discontinuous proliferation (happen when the concentration of liver cells decreases to less than 70% of its initial concentration). The proposed models are calibrated with the experimental data obtained from an adult chimpanzee. Results of this study suggest that when both hepatocytes proliferate with equal rate, proliferation helps the individual in a rapid recovery from the acute infection whereas in case of chronic infection, the severity of the infection increases. On the other hand, if the infected hepatocytes proliferate at a different rate that of uninfected hepatocytes, the proliferation of uninfected hepatocytes contributes to increase the infection, but the proliferation of infected hepatocytes acts to reduce the infection from the long-term perspective. The global sensitivity analysis also shows the same results. Furthermore, it is also observed that the differences between the outcomes of continuous and discontinuous proliferations are significant and noteworthy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupchand Sutradhar
- Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.
| | - D C Dalal
- Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li AY, Ahmad MU, Sofilos MC, Lee RM, Maithel SK, Lee TC, Chadalavada S, Shah SA, Acher AW, Abbott DE, Wong P, Kessler J, Melstrom LG, Kirks R, Rocha FG, Delitto DJ, Lee B, Visser BC, Poultsides GA. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency despite preoperative portal vein embolization: Not just about the volumetrics. Surgery 2025; 182:109345. [PMID: 40157125 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2025] [Accepted: 03/02/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Future liver remnant hypertrophy is the primary endpoint of portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy. However, even when adequate future liver remnant is achieved, postoperative hepatic insufficiency is not universally averted. We aimed to identify preoperative risk factors of postoperative hepatic insufficiency despite the use of portal vein embolization. METHODS Patients who underwent portal vein embolization followed by major hepatectomy at 6 academic medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency was defined as postoperative peak bilirubin >7 mg/dL. Preoperative variables associated with postoperative hepatic insufficiency were analyzed. RESULTS From 2008 to 2019, 164 patients underwent portal vein embolization followed by major hepatectomy. Twenty (12%) patients developed postoperative hepatic insufficiency. On univariate analysis, postoperative hepatic insufficiency was associated with older age, performance status, preoperative biliary drainage, smaller pre- and post-portal vein embolization future liver remnant volumes, diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer, and preoperative cholangitis. There was significant future liver remnant hypertrophy noted even in the setting of postoperative hepatic insufficiency (from 27% to 39%); however, degree of hypertrophy >5% (100% vs 93%, P = .6) and kinetic growth rate >2%/week (95% vs 82%, P = .3) did not differ between the postoperative hepatic insufficiency and non-postoperative hepatic insufficiency groups. On multivariate analysis, the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer and preoperative cholangitis (postoperative hepatic insufficiency incidence 34% and 62%, respectively), but not future liver remnant volumetrics, were independently associated with postoperative hepatic insufficiency. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency raised post-hepatectomy 90-day mortality from 3.5% to 45% and hospitalization from 7 days to 16 days (both P < .001). CONCLUSION Postoperative hepatic insufficiency still occurs in 12% of patients after major hepatectomy despite preoperative portal vein embolization. In addition to traditional volumetric information, surgeons should be aware of preoperative cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer as powerful predictors of this fatal complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Y Li
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - M Usman Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Marc C Sofilos
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Rachel M Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Tiffany C Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Seetharam Chadalavada
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Shimul A Shah
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Alexandra W Acher
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Paul Wong
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Jonathan Kessler
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Laleh G Melstrom
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Russell Kirks
- Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Flavio G Rocha
- Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Daniel J Delitto
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Brendan C Visser
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - George A Poultsides
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Korenblik R, James S, Smits J, Díaz-Nieto R, Davis R, Chan BK, Erdmann JI, Zijlstra IJA, Arntz PJ, Kollmar O, Hoffmann MH, Vass DG, Lindsay R, Serenari M, Cappelli A, Gobardhan PD, Imani F, Suarez YF, Muños FG, Grünhagen DJ, Moelker A, Pieterman KJ, Kleeff J, Wohlgemuth WA, Herrero E, Gelabert A, Breitenstein S, Seeger N, Detry O, Gerard L, Sandström PA, Björnsson B, Aldrighetti LA, De Cobelli F, Leclercq WK, van Baardewijk LJ, Croagh D, De Boo DW, Kingham TP, Ridouani F, Metrakos P, Valenti D, Kalil J, Fretland ÅA, Carling U, Martel G, Ryan S, Udupa V, Macdonald A, Tasse JC, Stavrou GA, Spuentrup E, Borobia FG, Criado E, Sparrelid E, Delle M, Navinés-López J, Moragues JS, Andorrà EC, Schnitzbauer A, Vogl TJ, Heil J, Primrose JN, Modi S, Fouraschen SM, Bokkers RP, de Boer MT, Borel Rinkes IH, Smits ML, Gruenberger T, Baclija I, Billingsley KG, Madoff DC, Serrablo A, Sarriá L, Wang X, Xudong Q, Winkens B, Olde Damink SW, Bemelmans MH, Dewulf MJ, Binkert CA, Schadde E, van der Leij C, van Dam RM. Safety and efficacy of combined portal and hepatic vein embolisation in patients with colorectal liver metastases (DRAGON1): a multicentre, single-arm clinical trial. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2025; 53:101284. [PMID: 40255933 PMCID: PMC12008670 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2025] [Accepted: 03/14/2025] [Indexed: 04/22/2025]
Abstract
Background Major liver resection is often required for complete clearance of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Patients with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) volume/function are at high risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and require FLR hypertrophy-inducing procedures to enable safe resection. The most recent variant of these procedures is combined portal and hepatic vein embolization (PVE/HVE). The DRAGON 1 trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of PVE/HVE, while assessing recruitment potential for the DRAGON 2 randomized trial. Methods DRAGON 1 is a prospective, single-arm, international, multicenter trial. Patients with upfront unresectable CRLM due to a small FLR were included. The primary outcome was the ability of centers to recruit three patients and perform PVE/HVE and liver resection without 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included recruitment capacity, PVE/HVE technical details, FLR volume changes, complications, and resection rates. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04272931. Findings In total, 102 patients were included from 43 centers. Twenty-four centers (24/43 = 56%) recruited three or more patients, and 20 centers (20/43 = 47%) achieved this without 90-day mortality. Of 96 patients undergoing PVE/HVE, no post-embolization mortality occurred, though major complications were reported in two patients. Resection was completed in 86 patients (86/96 = 90%), with seven patients (7/86 = 8%) dying within 90 days. PHLF grade B/C (International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria) occurred in 19 patients (19/86 = 22%). Interpretation DRAGON 1 demonstrates that PVE/HVE is safe, with no embolization-related mortality, low morbidity, and high resection rates in upfront unresectable CRLM. Funding The Dutch Cancer Society, National Institute for Health and Care Research UK, Maastricht UMC+, Abbott Laboratories and Guerbet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remon Korenblik
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sinéad James
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jens Smits
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rafael Díaz-Nieto
- Department of Liver Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS, Lower Ln, Fazakerley, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Rob Davis
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS, Lower Ln, Fazakerley, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Benjamin K.Y. Chan
- Department of Liver Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS, Lower Ln, Fazakerley, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Joris I. Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - IJsbrand A.J. Zijlstra
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J.W. Arntz
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Otto Kollmar
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Surgery, Kleinriehenstrasse 30, 4058, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin H. Hoffmann
- Department of Radiology, St. Claraspital, Kleinriehenstrasse 30, 4058, Basel, Switzerland
| | - David G. Vass
- Department of Surgery, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, 51 Lisburn Rd, Belfast, BT9 7AB, UK
| | - Richard Lindsay
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, 51 Lisburn Rd, Belfast, BT9 7AB, UK
| | - Matteo Serenari
- Hepato-biliary and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, 40138, Bologna, BO, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni, 33, 40126, Bologna, BO, Italy
| | - Alberto Cappelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Zamboni, 33, 40126, Bologna, BO, Italy
| | - Paul D. Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Farshad Imani
- Department of Radiology, Amphia Molengracht 21, 4818 CK, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Yiliam Fundora Suarez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Carrer de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fernando Gómez Muños
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Carrer de Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dirk J. Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kay J. Pieterman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jörg Kleeff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Walter A. Wohlgemuth
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Eric Herrero
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mútua Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arantxa Gelabert
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Parc Taulí 1, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefan Breitenstein
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Nico Seeger
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Detry
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, University of Liege, CHU Liege, Liege, Avenue de l'Hôpital 1, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| | - Laurent Gerard
- Department of Radiology, CHU Liege, Liege, Avenue de l'Hôpital 1, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| | - Per A. Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Universitetssjukhuset, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Universitetssjukhuset, 581 85, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Luca A. Aldrighetti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Wouter K.G. Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medisch Centrum, De Run 4600, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Daniel Croagh
- Department of Surgery, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Wellington Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Diederick W. De Boo
- Monash University, Melbourne, Wellington Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - T. Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Fourat Ridouani
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Peter Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - David Valenti
- Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Jennifer Kalil
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Åsmund A. Fretland
- Department of Surgery, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ulrik Carling
- Department of Radiology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guillaume Martel
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Stephen Ryan
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Venkatesha Udupa
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Andrew Macdonald
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Jordan C. Tasse
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, 1620 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Gregor A. Stavrou
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Elmar Spuentrup
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Francisco G. Borobia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Parc Taulí 1, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Criado
- Interventional Radiology Unit, UDIAT-Centre Diagnòstic, Hospital Universitario Parc Tauli Sabadell, Medicine Department Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Parc Taulí 1, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Nobels väg 6, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Delle
- Division of Radiology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Nobels väg 6, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jordi Navinés-López
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Ctra. de Canyet, s/n, 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Sampere Moragues
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Ctra. de Canyet, s/n, 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esteban Cugat Andorrà
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Ctra. de Canyet, s/n, 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andreas Schnitzbauer
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thomas J. Vogl
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jan Heil
- Department of Surgery, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 7, 89081, Ulm, Germany
| | - John N. Primrose
- University Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Sachin Modi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Suomi M.G. Fouraschen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Reinoud P.H. Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke T. de Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten L.J. Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Clinic Favoriten, Health Network Vienna, Kundratstraße 3, 1100, Wien, Austria
- Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Freudplatz 1, 1020, Wien, Austria
| | - Ivan Baclija
- Department of Radiology, Clinic Favoriten, Kundratstraße 3, 1100, Wien, Austria
| | - Kevin G. Billingsley
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - David C. Madoff
- Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Luis Sarriá
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qu Xudong
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Steven W.L. Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc H.A. Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Maxime J.L. Dewulf
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Christoph A. Binkert
- Clinic of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Erik Schadde
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1620 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- Chirurgie Zentrum, Hirslanden Klinik, St. Anna Luzern, St. Anna-Strasse 32, 6006, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Christiaan van der Leij
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald M. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tang T, Guo T, Zhu B, Tian Q, Wu Y, Liu Y. Interpretable machine learning model for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep 2025; 15:15469. [PMID: 40316613 PMCID: PMC12048636 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-97878-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2025] [Indexed: 05/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a severe complication following liver surgery. We aimed to develop a novel, interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict PHLF. We enrolled 312 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy, and 30% of the samples were utilized for internal validation. Variable selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression in conjunction with random forest and recursive feature elimination (RF-RFE) algorithms. Subsequently, 12 distinct ML algorithms were employed to identify the optimal prediction model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were utilized to assess the model's predictive accuracy. Additionally, an independent prospective validation was conducted with 62 patients. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis further explained the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model. The XGBoost model exhibited the highest accuracy with AUCs of 0.983 and 0.981 in the training and validation cohorts among 12 ML models. Calibration curves and DCA confirmed the model's accuracy and clinical applicability. Compared with traditional models, the XGBoost model had a higher AUC. The prospective cohort (AUC = 0.942) further confirmed the generalization ability of the XGBoost model. SHAP identified the top three critical variables: total bilirubin (TBIL), MELD score, and ICG-R15. Moreover, the SHAP summary plot was used to illustrate the positive or negative effects of the features as influenced by XGBoost. The XGBoost model provides a good preoperative prediction of PHLF in patients with resectable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianzhi Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University/Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Tianyu Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Zhu
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Qihui Tian
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University/Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Wu
- Medical Oncology Department of Thoracic Cancer (2), Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yefu Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No.44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haddad A, Khavandi MM, Lendoire M, Acidi B, Chiang YJ, Gupta S, Tam A, Odisio BC, Mahvash A, Abdelsalam ME, Lin E, Kuban J, Newhook TE, Tran Cao HS, Tzeng CWD, Huang SY, Vauthey JN, Habibollahi P. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Liver Venous Deprivation and Portal Vein Embolization Before Planned Hepatectomy in Patients with Extensive Colorectal Liver Metastases and High-Risk Factors for Inadequate Regeneration. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:1752-1761. [PMID: 39633174 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16558-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver venous deprivation (LVD) is known to induce better future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy than portal vein embolization (PVE). The role of LVD, compared with PVE, in inducing FLR hypertrophy and allowing safe hepatectomy for patients with extensive colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and high-risk factors for inadequate hypertrophy remains unclear. METHODS Patients undergoing LVD (n = 22) were matched to patients undergoing PVE (n = 279) in a 1:3 ratio based on propensity scores, prior to planned hepatectomy for CLM at a single center (1998-2023). The propensity scores accounted for high-risk factors for inadequate hypertrophy, namely pre-procedure standardized FLR (sFLR), body mass index, number of systemic therapy cycles, an extension of PVE to segment IV portal vein branches, prior resection, and chemotherapy-associated liver injury. RESULTS The matched cohort included 78 patients (LVD, n = 22; PVE, n = 56). Baseline characteristics were comparable. The number of tumors in the whole liver was similar but more LVD patients had five or more tumors in the left liver (32% vs. 11%; p = 0.024). Post-procedure sFLR was similar but LVD patients had a significantly higher degree of hypertrophy (16% vs. 11%; p = 0.017) and kinetic growth rate (3.9 vs. 2.4% per week; p = 0.006). More LVD patients underwent extended right hepatectomy (93% vs. 55%; p = 0.008). Only one patient had postoperative hepatic insufficiency after PVE, and no patients died within 90 days of hepatectomy. CONCLUSION In patients with extensive CLM and high-risk factors, LVD is associated with better FLR hypertrophy compared with PVE and allows for safely performing curative-intent extended major hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohammad Mahdi Khavandi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Belkacem Acidi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sanjay Gupta
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alda Tam
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Armeen Mahvash
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohamed E Abdelsalam
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan Lin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joshua Kuban
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven Y Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Padmanabhan C, Nussbaum DP, D'Angelica M. Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2025; 39:1-24. [PMID: 39510667 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
Approximately 50% of colorectal cancer patients develop liver metastases. Hepatic metastases represent the most common cause of colorectal cancer-related mortality. Metastasectomy, if possible, represents the most effective treatment strategy; 20% of patients will be cured and more than 50% survive at least 5 years. Nuances to treatment planning hinge on whether patients present with resectable disease upfront, whether the future liver remnant is adequate, and whether the primary tumor, if present, is colon versus rectal in origin. This article discusses considerations impacting our approach to patients with colorectal liver metastases and the role for various multimodal treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandrasekhar Padmanabhan
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-1272, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Daniel P Nussbaum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-1272, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Michael D'Angelica
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-898, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Haddad A, Lendoire M, Uppal A, Maki H, Folkert I, Wang Y, Ayabe RI, Newhook TE, Chun YS, Tzeng CWD, Vauthey JN, Tran Cao HS. CEA Rebound After Discontinuation of Pre-Hepatectomy Chemotherapy Predicts Worse Outcomes After Resection of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:1021-1032. [PMID: 39516416 PMCID: PMC11773633 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16370-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 10/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels may vary with administration and discontinuation of pre-hepatectomy chemotherapy in patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM). The prognostic significance of these changes, termed CEA dynamics, is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM (2001-2021) at a comprehensive cancer center were included. CEA dynamics were classified as CEA normal (CEA < 5 ng/mL before, during, and after chemotherapy), CEA decrease (elevated CEA levels that drop during and after chemotherapy), and CEA rebound (elevated CEA levels that drop during chemotherapy but rebound upon discontinuation). Recurrence-free (RFS), hepatic-specific disease-free (hDFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared across CEA dynamics groups. RESULTS Of 903 patients, 254 (28%) were CEA normal, 423 (47%) were CEA decrease, and 226 (25%) were CEA rebound. Median RFS was 15.9 months, median hDFS was not reached, and median OS was 11.9 years for CEA normal patients. By comparison, CEA decrease and CEA rebound patients had shorter median RFS (12.2 months, P = 0.002 and 7.4 months, P < 0.001, respectively), shorter median hDFS (29.1 months, P = 0.003 and 14.8 months, P < 0.001, respectively), and shorter median OS (7.1 years, P = 0.131, and 4.9 years, P < 0.001, respectively). On multivariable analysis, CEA rebound was an independent predictor of worse RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.93], hDFS (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.88), and OS (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.18-2.73). Among patients with CEA rebound, RAS-BRAF/TP53 comutation and multiple tumors predicted worse OS while APC mutation predicted improved OS. CONCLUSION CEA rebound between pre-hepatectomy chemotherapy discontinuation and CLM resection is associated with worse oncologic outcomes, particularly in patients with aggressive tumor biology, and may help frame patient and surgeon expectations ahead of CLM resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abhineet Uppal
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ian Folkert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yifan Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Reed I Ayabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim H, McRedmond L, McFarlin P, Ritchie D, Heblij P, Dunn J, Connor S. An anatomical analysis of liver volume and quality by ethnicity in a New Zealand population. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:2201-2205. [PMID: 39373113 DOI: 10.1111/ans.19255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Revised: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/22/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-hepatectomy liver failure is a major cause of mortality, where future liver remnant (FLR) is the key controllable factor. Recommended minimum FLR is influenced by quality of liver parenchyma. Historical research has often failed to include Māori and Pacific Island (PI) populations despite worse health outcomes. Liver analysis by ethnicity is one such example of this. The aims were to determine digital FLR for various anatomical hepatectomies, investigate any correlations between computed tomography (CT) hepatic textural analysis and body mass index (BMI); and assess the variance of these relationships for different ethnicities. METHOD One hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent abdominal CT scans at Burwood Hospital, Christchurch were retrospectively analysed. Māori and PI patients were selectively recruited to represent New Zealand's diversity. Liver volumetry, segmental ratio, and intra-hepatic fat deposits (IHFD) per ethnicity were examined. RESULTS Median age of the cohort was 66 (19-95) and 75 (50%) were males. 68%, 23% and 9% patients identified as being European, Māori/PI and Asian, respectively. No statistically significant difference in volume or segment/total volume ratio were noted across different ethnicities. Obese patients had higher IHFD compared with overweight and normal BMI groups. When stratified across ethnic groups, higher IHFD were observed in Asian compared with Māori/PI populations, despite lower BMI. CONCLUSION No significant variances in liver volumetry were found across different ethnic groups in New Zealand. However association between BMI and IHFD varied across different ethnic cohorts. Consequently, knowledge of liver volumetry is not enough; patient liver quality and ethnicity should considered for hepatic-surgery planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Kim
- General Surgery Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Liam McRedmond
- Radiology Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Paul McFarlin
- Radiology Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Darren Ritchie
- General Surgery Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Pieter Heblij
- Radiology Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Joel Dunn
- Radiology Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Saxon Connor
- General Surgery Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boubaddi M, Marichez A, Adam JP, Lapuyade B, Debordeaux F, Tlili G, Chiche L, Laurent C. Comprehensive Review of Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Assessment and Hypertrophy Techniques Before Major Hepatectomy: How to Assess and Manage the FLR. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:9205-9220. [PMID: 39230854 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16108-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The regenerative capacities of the liver and improvements in surgical techniques have expanded the possibilities of resectability. Liver resection is often the only curative treatment for primary and secondary malignancies, despite the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). This serious complication (with a 50% mortality rate) can be avoided by better assessment of liver volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR). OBJECTIVE The aim of this review was to understand and assess clinical, biological, and imaging predictors of PHLF risk, as well as the various hypertrophy techniques, to achieve an adequate FLR before hepatectomy. METHOD We reviewed the state of the art in liver regeneration and FLR hypertrophy techniques. RESULTS The use of new biological scores (such as the aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index + albumin-bilirubin [APRI+ALBI] score), concurrent utilization of 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy (HBS), or dynamic hepatocyte contrast-enhanced MRI (DHCE-MRI) for liver volumetry helps predict the risk of PHLF. Besides portal vein embolization, there are other FLR optimization techniques that have their indications in case of risk of failure (e.g., associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, liver venous deprivation) or in specific situations (transarterial radioembolization). CONCLUSION There is a need to standardize volumetry and function measurement techniques, as well as FLR hypertrophy techniques, to limit the risk of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Boubaddi
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France.
- Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, BRIC U1312, INSERM, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Arthur Marichez
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
- Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, BRIC U1312, INSERM, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Adam
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bruno Lapuyade
- Radiology Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Frederic Debordeaux
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Ghoufrane Tlili
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Laurence Chiche
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christophe Laurent
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
- Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, BRIC U1312, INSERM, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li Y, Wang L, Guo Y, Zhou J, Zhang N, He X, Wang Y, Zhu W, Wang M, Zhu H, Ding Z, Wu Y, Zhang T, Pan Q, Feng Y, Lin Z, Mao A, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhang B, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Wang L. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for liver resection: a multicenter cohort study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:26410. [PMID: 39488564 PMCID: PMC11531516 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76260-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The relative risk and benefits of Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate perioperative and survival outcomes for three primary malignant liver tumors related outcomes following LLR. Data from three Homogeneous-High-Volume-Expert-Centers were collected. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for the association between LLR, and major complications defined as Clavien-Dindo Classification grade ≥ II. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to explore the impact of LLR on primary malignant liver tumor survival. Overall, 5886 patients underwent liver resection, of which 1991 underwent LLR. After adjusting for covariables, LLR had significantly lower rate of CDC grade ≥ II (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.48-0.67, P < 0.001). Interaction analysis showed that LLR had significant association with sex, drinking status, history of abdominal surgery, and platelet count (all P < 0.05). The overall survival for each primary malignant liver tumor shown potential risk but without significantly different between LLR and OLR (all P > 0.05). LLR was associated with lower rate of major complications, especially in women, non-drinkers, those without a history of abdominal surgery, and those with normal platelet. For primary malignant liver tumors, the survival outcomes did not differ significantly between LLR and OLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yesheng Li
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China
| | - Longrong Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yibin Guo
- Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Jiamin Zhou
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xigan He
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yixiu Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Weiping Zhu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Miao Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Hongxu Zhu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhiwen Ding
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yibin Wu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Ti Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qi Pan
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yun Feng
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhenhai Lin
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Anrong Mao
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yongfa Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yilin Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Research Center of Digestive Diseases, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221002, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Yangqing Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China.
| | - Yiming Zhao
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Maino C, Romano F, Franco PN, Ciaccio A, Garancini M, Talei Franzesi C, Scotti MA, Gandola D, Fogliati A, Bernasconi DP, Del Castello L, Corso R, Ciulli C, Ippolito D. Functional liver imaging score (FLIS) can predict adverse events in HCC patients. Eur J Radiol 2024; 180:111695. [PMID: 39197273 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the performance of FLIS in predicting adverse outcomes, namely post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and death, in patients who underwent liver surgery for malignancies. METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent liver resection and 1.5 T gadoxetic acid MR were enrolled. PHLF and overall survival (OS) were collected. Two radiologists with 18 and 8 years of experience in abdominal imaging, blinded to clinical data, evaluated all images. Radiologists evaluated liver parenchymal enhancement (EnQS), biliary contrast excretion (ExQS), and signal intensity of the portal vein relative to the liver parenchyma (PVsQs). Reliability analysis was computed with Cohen's Kappa. Cox regression analysis was calculated to determine which factors are associated with PHLF and OS. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) was computed. RESULTS 150 patients were enrolled, 58 (38.7 %) in the HCC group and 92 (61.3 %) in the non-HCC group. The reliability analysis between the two readers was almost perfect (κ = 0.998). The multivariate Cox analysis showed that only post-surgical blood transfusions and major resection were associated with adverse events [HR=8.96 (7.98-9.88), p = 0.034, and HR=0.99 (0.781-1.121), p = 0.032, respectively] in the whole population. In the HCC group, the multivariable Cox analysis showed that blood transfusions, major resection and FLIS were associated with adverse outcomes [HR=13.133 (2.988-55.142), p = 0.009, HR=0.987 (0.244-1.987), p = 0.021, and HR=1.891 (1.772-3.471), p = 0.039]. The FLIS AUROC to predict adverse outcomes was 0.660 (95 %CIs = 0.484-0.836), with 87 % sensitivity and 33.3 % specificity (81.1-94.4 and 22.1-42.1). CONCLUSIONS FLIS can be considered a promising tool to preoperative depict patients at risk of PHLF and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Maino
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy.
| | - Fabrizio Romano
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Via Cadore 33, 20090 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Paolo Niccolò Franco
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Antonio Ciaccio
- Department of Gastroenterlogy, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Mattia Garancini
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Cammillo Talei Franzesi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Mauro Alessandro Scotti
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Davide Gandola
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fogliati
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Davide Paolo Bernasconi
- Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre-B4, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza, MB 20900, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Del Castello
- Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre-B4, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, Monza, MB 20900, Italy
| | - Rocco Corso
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Cristina Ciulli
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Davide Ippolito
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Via Cadore 33, 20090 Monza, MB, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Reese T, Gilg S, Böcker J, Wagner KC, Vali M, Engstrand J, Kern A, Sturesson C, Oldhafer KJ, Sparrelid E. Impact of the future liver remnant volume before major hepatectomy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108660. [PMID: 39243696 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Revised: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Following major liver resection, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is associated with a high mortality rate. As there is no therapy for PHLF available, avoidance remains the main goal. A sufficient future liver remnant (FLR) is one of the most important factors to reduce the risk for PHLF; however, it is not known which patients benefit of volumetric assessment prior to major surgery. METHODS A retrospective, bi-institutional cohort study was conducted including all patients who underwent major hepatectomy (extended right hepatectomy, right hepatectomy, extended left hepatectomy and left hepatectomy) between 2010 and 2023. RESULTS A total of 1511 major hepatectomies were included, with 29.4 % of patients undergoing FLR volume assessment preoperatively. Overall, PHLF B/C occurred in 9.8 % of cases. Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus, extended right hepatectomy, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), gallbladder cancer (GBC) and cirrhosis as significant risk factors for PHLF B/C. High-risk patients (with one or more risk factors) had a 15 % overall incidence of PHLF, increasing to 32 % with a FLR <30 %, and 13 % with an FLR of 30-40 %. Low-risk patients with a FLR <30 % had a PHLF rate of 21 %, which decreased to 8 % and 5 % for FLRs of 30-40 % and >40 %, respectively. For right hepatectomy, the PHLF rate was 23 % in low-risk and 38 % in high-risk patients with FLR <30 %. CONCLUSION Patients scheduled for right hepatectomy and extended right hepatectomy should undergo volumetric assessment of the FLR. Volumetry should always be considered before major hepatectomy in patients with risk factors such as diabetes, cirrhosis, GBC and pCCA. In high-risk patients, a FLR cut-off of 30 % may be insufficient to prevent PHLF, and additional liver function assessment should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Reese
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Stefan Gilg
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jörg Böcker
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany; Semmelweis University Budapest, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kim C Wagner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany; Semmelweis University Budapest, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marjan Vali
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jennie Engstrand
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Kern
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christian Sturesson
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karl J Oldhafer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany; Semmelweis University Budapest, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sakuhara Y. Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization: Basics Interventional Radiologists Need to Know. INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY (HIGASHIMATSUYAMA-SHI (JAPAN) 2024; 9:134-141. [PMID: 39559802 PMCID: PMC11570156 DOI: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2024]
Abstract
One of the major reasons for unresectability of the liver is that the remnant liver volume is insufficient to support postoperative liver function. Post-hepatectomy liver insufficiency is one of the most serious complications in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Preoperative portal vein embolization is performed with the aim of inducing hypertrophy of the future liver remnant and is thought to reduce the risk of liver insufficiency after hepatectomy. We, interventional radiologists, are required to safely complete the procedure to promote future liver remnant hypertrophy as possible and understand portal vein anatomy variations and hemodynamics, embolization techniques, and how to deal with possible complications. The basic information interventional radiologists need to know about preoperative portal vein embolization is discussed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Sakuhara
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, KKR Tonan Hospital, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Banchini F, Capelli P, Hasnaoui A, Palmieri G, Romboli A, Giuffrida M. 3-D reconstruction in liver surgery: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:1205-1215. [PMID: 38960762 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three-dimensional reconstruction of the liver offers several advantages to the surgeon before and during liver resection. This review discusses the factors behind the use of liver 3-D reconstruction. METHODS Systematic electronic search, according to PRISMA criteria, was performed. A literature search of scientific papers was performed until October 2023. Articles were chosen based on reference to 3-D liver reconstruction and their use in liver surgery. GRADE methodology and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS The research included 47 articles and 7724 patients were analyzed. Preoperative planning was performed with 3-D liver reconstruction in the 87.2% of the studies. Most of preoperative 3-D liver reconstructions were performed in the planning of complex or major hepatectomies. Complex hepatectomies were performed in 64.3% patients. The 55.3% of the studies reported an improved navigation and accuracy during liver resection. Four studies (8.6%) on living donor liver transplant (LDLT) concluded that 3-D liver reconstruction is useful for graft selection and vascular preservation. Nine papers (19.1%) reported an accurate measurement of future liver remnant. CONCLUSION Liver 3-D reconstruction helps surgeons in the planning of liver surgery, especially in liver graft and complex liver resections, increasing the accuracy of the surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Banchini
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, 29100 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Patrizio Capelli
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, 29100 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Anis Hasnaoui
- Department of General Surgery, Menzel Bourguiba Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Gerardo Palmieri
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, 29100 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Andrea Romboli
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, 29100 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Mario Giuffrida
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, 29100 Piacenza, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Son SY, Geevarghese R, Marinelli B, Zhao K, Covey A, Maxwell A, Wei AC, Jarnagin W, D’Angelica M, Yarmohammadi H. Conversion Therapy to Transplant or Surgical Resection in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Boosted Dose of Yttrium-90 Radiation Segmentectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3024. [PMID: 39272882 PMCID: PMC11394260 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2024] [Revised: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of boosted dose yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE) as a modality for conversion therapy to transplant or surgical resection in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS In this single-center retrospective study, all patients with a diagnosis of HCC who were treated with boosted dose TARE (>190 Gy) between January 2013 and December 2023 were reviewed. Treatment response and decrease in tumor size were assessed with the RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST criteria. Milan and University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), criteria were used to determine transplant eligibility, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) surgical resection recommendations were used to evaluate tumor resectability. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients with primary HCC who were treated with boosted dose TARE were retrospectively analyzed. The majority of the patients were Child-Pugh A (n = 35; 92.1%), BCLC C (n = 17; 44.7%), and ECOG performance status 0 (n = 25; 65.8%). The mean sum of the target lesions was 6.0 cm (standard deviation; SD = 4.0). The objective response rate (ORR) was 31.6% by RECIST and 84.2% by mRECIST. The disease control rate (DCR) was 94.7% by both RECIST and mRECIST. Among patients outside of Milan or UCSF, 13/25 (52.0%, Milan) and 9/19 (47.4%, UCSF) patients were successfully converted to within transplant criteria. Of patients who were initially unresectable, conversion was successful in 7/26 (26.9%) patients. CONCLUSIONS This study provides further real-world data demonstrating that boosted-dose TARE is an effective modality for conversion of patients with unresectable HCC to transplant or resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Y. Son
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; (S.Y.S.); (R.G.); (B.M.); (K.Z.); (A.C.)
| | - Ruben Geevarghese
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; (S.Y.S.); (R.G.); (B.M.); (K.Z.); (A.C.)
| | - Brett Marinelli
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; (S.Y.S.); (R.G.); (B.M.); (K.Z.); (A.C.)
| | - Ken Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; (S.Y.S.); (R.G.); (B.M.); (K.Z.); (A.C.)
| | - Anne Covey
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; (S.Y.S.); (R.G.); (B.M.); (K.Z.); (A.C.)
| | - Aaron Maxwell
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, One Prospect Steet, Providence, RI 02912, USA;
| | - Alice C. Wei
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.W.); (W.J.); (M.D.)
| | - William Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.W.); (W.J.); (M.D.)
| | - Michael D’Angelica
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; (A.C.W.); (W.J.); (M.D.)
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; (S.Y.S.); (R.G.); (B.M.); (K.Z.); (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ye TW, Fu TW, Du CF, Yue RC, Jiang QT, Zhong ZH, Zhao Q, Zhang CW, Liu J, Liu JW, Luo ZY, Fan XM, Hong DF, Cheng J, Xiao ZQ. Comparison of percutaneous microwave/radiofrequency ablation liver partition and portal vein embolization versus transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization for planned hepatectomy with insufficient future liver remnant. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:985. [PMID: 39123182 PMCID: PMC11312699 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12666-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In China, both percutaneous microwave/radiofrequency ablation liver partition plus portal vein embolization (PALPP) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus portal vein embolization (PVE) have been utilized in planned hepatectomy. However, there is a lack of comparative studies on the effectiveness of these two techniques for cases with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS Patients were categorized into either the PALPP group or the TACE + PVE group. Clinical data, including FLR growth rate, complications, secondary resection rate, and overall survival rate, were compared and analyzed for both groups retrospectively. RESULTS Between December 2014 and October 2021, a total of 29 patients underwent TACE + PVE (n = 12) and PALPP (n = 17). In the TACE + PVE group, 7 patients successfully underwent two-stage hepatectomy, while in the PALPP group, 13 patients underwent the procedure (two-stage resection rate: 58.3% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.42). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications of one-stage procedures (11.8% vs. 8.3%, P > 0.05) and second-stage resection complication (0% vs. 46.2%, P = 0.05) between the TACE + PVE and PALPP groups. However, the PALPP group demonstrated a shorter time to FLR volume growth for second-stage resection (18.5 days vs. 66 days, P = 0.001) and KGR (58.5 ml/week vs. 7.7 ml/week, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compared with TACE + PVE, PALPP results in a more significant increase in FLR volume and a higher rate of two-stage resection without increasing postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tai-Wei Ye
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China
| | - Tian-Wei Fu
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China
| | - Cheng-Fei Du
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China
| | - Ru-Chi Yue
- Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, 443000, China
| | - Qi-Tao Jiang
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Zhi-Hang Zhong
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Qin Zhao
- Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, 116000, China
| | - Cheng-Wu Zhang
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Jie Liu
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Jun-Wei Liu
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Zu-Yan Luo
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Fan
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - De-Fei Hong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine(DeFei Hong), No.3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian Cheng
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
| | - Zun-Qiang Xiao
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yilmaz E, Torsello GF, Hosseini ASA, Zygmunt AC, Lorf T, Keck J, Schild-Suhren S, Wellge B, Oberhuber R, Kollmar O, Ghadimi M, Bösch F. Role of liver augmentation prior to hepatic resection - a survey on standards, procedures, and indications in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:228. [PMID: 39066906 PMCID: PMC11283428 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03418-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE For primary and secondary liver tumors oncological resection remains a chance of cure. Augmentation of functional liver tissue may be necessary to preserve sufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Clinical decision-making on liver augmentation techniques and indications may differ internationally. Thus, this study aims to identify standards of liver augmentation in hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. METHODS Using a web-based survey, 48 hospitals in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria were invited to report their surgical indication, standard procedures, and results of liver augmentation. RESULTS Forty (83.3%) of the hospitals invited participated. Most of the hospitals were certified liver centers (55%), performing complex surgeries such as liver transplantation (57.5%) and ALPPS (80%). The standard liver augmentation technique in all countries was portal vein embolization (PVE; 56%), followed by ALPPS (32.1%) in Germany or PVE with hepatic vein embolization (33.3%) in Switzerland and Austria. Standard procedure for liver augmentation did not correlate with certification as liver center, performance of liver transplantation or ALPPS. Surgical indication for PVE varied depending on tumor entity. Most hospitals rated the importance of PVE before resection of cholangiocarcinoma or colorectal metastases as high, while PVE for hepatocellular carcinoma was rated as low. CONCLUSION The survey gives an overview of the clinical routine in HPB centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. PVE seems to dominate as standard technique to increase the FLR. However, there is a variety in the main indication for liver augmentation. Further studies are necessary evaluating the differing PVE techniques for liver augmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elif Yilmaz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Giovanni F Torsello
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ali Seif Amir Hosseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Anne-Christine Zygmunt
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Lorf
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jan Keck
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Stina Schild-Suhren
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Björn Wellge
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Rupert Oberhuber
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center for Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Otto Kollmar
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Florian Bösch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jo Y, Lee HW, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY. The Cross-Sectional Area Ratio of Right-to-Left Portal Vein Predicts the Effect of Preoperative Right Portal Vein Embolization. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1114. [PMID: 39064543 PMCID: PMC11279089 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2024] [Revised: 06/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Preoperative right portal vein embolization (RPVE) is often attempted before right hepatectomy for liver tumors to increase the future remnant liver volume (FRLV). Although many factors affecting FRLV have been discussed, few studies have focused on the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the right portal vein to that of the left portal vein (RPVA/LPVA). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of RPVA/LPVA on predicting FRLV increase after RPVE. Materials and Methods: The data of 65 patients who had undergone RPVE to increase FRLV between 2004 and 2021 were investigated retrospectively. Using computed tomography scans, we measured the total liver volume (TLV), FRLV, the proportion of FRLV relative to TLV (FRLV%), the increase in FRLV% (ΔFRLV%), and RPVA/LPVA twice, immediately before and 2-3 weeks after RPVE; we analyzed the correlations among those variables, and determined prognostic factors for sufficient ΔFRLV%. Results: Fifty-four patients underwent hepatectomy. Based on the cut-off value of RPVA/LPVA, the patients were divided into low (RPVA/LPVA ≤ 1.20, N = 30) and high groups (RPVA/LPVA > 1.20, N = 35). The ΔFRLV% was significantly greater in the high group than in the low group (9.52% and 15.34%, respectively, p < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, RPVA/LPVA (HR = 20.368, p < 0.001) was the most significant prognostic factor for sufficient ΔFRLV%. Conclusions: RPVE was more effective in patients with higher RPVA/LPVA, which is an easily accessible predictive factor for sufficient ΔFRLV%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeongsoo Jo
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul 07804, Republic of Korea;
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea; (H.-S.H.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.Y.C.)
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea; (H.-S.H.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.Y.C.)
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea; (H.-S.H.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.Y.C.)
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 13620, Republic of Korea; (H.-S.H.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.Y.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Maki H, Nishioka Y, Haddad A, Lendoire M, Tran Cao HS, Chun YS, Tzeng CWD, Vauthey JN, Newhook TE. Reproducibility and efficiency of liver volumetry using manual method and liver analysis software. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:911-918. [PMID: 38632032 PMCID: PMC11753197 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.03.1157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For liver volumetry, manual tracing on computed tomography (CT) images is time-consuming and operator dependent. To overcome these disadvantages, several three-dimensional simulation software programs have been developed; however, their efficacy has not fully been evaluated. METHODS Three physicians performed liver volumetry on preoperative CT images on 30 patients who underwent formal right hepatectomy, using manual tracing volumetry and two simulation software programs, SYNAPSE and syngo.via. The future liver remnant (FLR) was calculated using each method of volumetry. The primary endpoint was reproducibility and secondary outcomes were calculation time and learning curve. RESULTS The mean FLR was significantly lower for manual volumetry than for SYNAPSE or syngo.via; there was no significant difference in mean FLR between the two software-based methods. Reproducibility was lower for the manual method than for the software-based methods. Mean calculation time was shortest for SYNAPSE. For the two physicians unfamiliar with the software, no obvious learning curve was observed for using SYNAPSE, whereas learning curves were observed for using syngo.via. CONCLUSIONS Liver volumetry was more reproducible and faster with three-dimensional simulation software, especially SYNAPSE software, than with the conventional manual tracing method. Software can help even inexperienced physicians learn quickly how to perform liver volumetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yujiro Nishioka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yun S Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hall MD, Howell RM, Jackson A, Owens CA, Hernandez S, Castellino SM, Ronckers CM, Constine LS, Bradley JA. Liver Late Effects in Childhood Cancer Survivors Treated With Radiation Therapy: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:575-587. [PMID: 37480885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A pediatric normal tissue effects in the clinic (PENTEC) comprehensive review of patients with childhood cancer who received radiation therapy (RT) to the liver was performed to develop models that may inform RT dose constraints for the liver and improve risk forecasting of toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature search was performed to identify published data on hepatic toxicities in children. Treatment and outcome data were extracted and used to generate normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. Complications from both whole and partial liver irradiation were considered. For whole liver irradiation, total body irradiation and non-total body irradiation treatments were considered, but it was assumed that the entire liver received the prescribed dose. For partial liver irradiation, only Wilms tumor flank field RT could be analyzed. However, a prescribed dose assumption could not be applied, and there was a paucity of analyzable liver dosimetry data. To associate the dose-volume exposures with the partial volume complication data from flank irradiation, liver dose-volume metrics were reconstructed for Wilms tumor flank RT using age-specific computational phantoms as a function of field laterality and superior extent of the field. RESULTS The literature search identified 2103 investigations pertaining to hepatic sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) and liver failure in pediatric patients. All abstracts were screened, and 241 articles were reviewed in full by the study team. A model was developed to calculate the risk of developing SOS after whole liver RT. RT dose (P = .006) and receipt of nonalkylating chemotherapy (P = .01) were significant. Age <20 years at time of RT was borderline significant (P = .058). The model predicted a 2% risk of SOS with zero RT dose, 6.1% following 10 Gy, and 14.5% following 20 Gy to the whole liver (modeled as the linear-quadratic equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions [α/β = 3 Gy]). Patients with Wilms tumor treated with right flank RT had a higher observed rate of SOS than patients receiving left flank RT, but data were insufficient to generate an NTCP model for partial liver irradiation. From the phantom-based dose reconstructions, mean liver dose was estimated to be 2.16 ± 1.15 Gy and 6.54 ± 2.50 Gy for left and right flank RT, respectively, using T10-T11 as the superior field border and a prescription dose of 10.8 Gy (based on dose reconstruction). Data were sparse regarding rates of late liver injury after RT, which suggests low rates of severe toxicity after treatment for common pediatric malignancies. CONCLUSIONS This pediatric normal tissue effects in the clinic (PENTEC) review provides an NTCP model to estimate the risk of hepatic SOS as a function of RT dose following whole liver RT and quantifies the range of mean liver doses from typical Wilms tumor flank irradiation fields. Patients treated with right flank RT had higher rates of SOS than patients treated with left flank RT, but data were insufficient to develop a model for partial liver irradiation. Risk of SOS was estimated to be approximately ≤6% in pediatric patients receiving whole liver doses of <10 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Constance A Owens
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Soleil Hernandez
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon M Castellino
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Cecile M Ronckers
- Department of Pediatrics, UMC Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Medical University Brandenburg-Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lauscher JC, Dixon MEB, Jada G, Afshin M, Neumann K, Cheung H, Martel G, Hallet J, Coburn N, Law C, Milot L, Karanicolas PJ. Prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure by preoperative gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:782-788. [PMID: 38472015 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 15% of patients experience post-hepatectomy liver failure after major hepatectomy. Poor hepatocyte uptake of gadoxetate disodium, a magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent, may be a predictor of post-hepatectomy liver failure. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing major hepatectomy (≥3 segments) with a preoperative gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was conducted. The liver signal intensity (standardized to the spleen) and the functional liver remnant was calculated to determine if this can predict post-hepatectomy liver failure after major hepatectomy. RESULTS In 134 patients, low signal intensity of the remnant liver standardized by signal intensity of the spleen in post-contrast images was associated with post-hepatectomy liver failure in multiple logistic regression analysis (Odds Ratio 0.112; 95% CI 0.023-0.551). In a subgroup of 33 patients with lower quartile of functional liver remnant, area under the curve analysis demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of functional liver remnant to predict post-hepatectomy liver failure of 0.857 with a cut-off value for functional liver remnant of 1.4985 with 80.0% sensitivity and 89.3% specificity. CONCLUSION Functional liver remnant determined by gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is a predictor of post-hepatectomy liver failure which may help identify patients for resection, reducing morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes C Lauscher
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthew E B Dixon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center 1725 W Harrison St, Chicago, Illinois, 60612 USA
| | - George Jada
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Mariam Afshin
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Konrad Neumann
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin
| | - Helen Cheung
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | | | - Julie Hallet
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Natalie Coburn
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Calvin Law
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | | | - Paul J Karanicolas
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Forton C, Sandoval V, Schwantes IR, Patel RK, Kolbeck KJ, Dewey EN, Korngold EK, Mayo SC. Clinician overconfidence in visual estimation of the posthepatectomy liver remnant volume: A proximal source of liver failure after major hepatic resection? Surgery 2024; 175:1533-1538. [PMID: 38519407 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-hepatectomy liver failure is a source of morbidity and mortality after major hepatectomy and is related to the volume of the future liver remnant. The accuracy of a clinician's ability to visually estimate the future liver remnant without formal computed tomography liver volumetry is unknown. METHODS Twenty physicians in diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery reviewed 20 computed tomography scans of patients without underlying liver pathology who were not scheduled for liver resection. We evaluated clinician accuracy to estimate the future liver remnant for 3 hypothetical major hepatic resections: left hepatectomy, right hepatectomy, and right trisectionectomy. The percent-difference between the mean and actual computed tomography liver volumetry (mean percent difference) was tested along with specialty differences using mixed-effects regression analysis. RESULTS The actual future liver remnant (computed tomography liver volumetry) remaining after a hypothetical left hepatectomy ranged from 59% to 75% (physician estimated range: 50%-85%), 23% to 40% right hepatectomy (15%-50%), and 13% to 29% right trisectionectomy (8%-39%). For right hepatectomy, the mean future liver remnant was overestimated by 95% of clinicians with a mean percent difference of 22% (6%-45%; P < .001). For right trisectionectomy, 90% overestimated the future liver remnant by a mean percent difference of 25% (6%-50%; P < .001). Hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons overestimated the future liver remnant for proposed right hepatectomy and right trisectionectomy by a mean percent difference of 25% and 34%, respectively. Based on years of experience, providers with <10 years of experience had a greater mean percent difference than providers with 10+ years of experience for hypothetical major hepatic resections, but was only significantly higher for left hepatectomy (9% vs 6%, P = .002). CONCLUSION A clinician's ability to visually estimate the future liver remnant volume is inaccurate when compared to computed tomography liver volumetry. Clinicians tend to overestimate the future liver remnant volume, especially in patients with a small future liver remnant where the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure is greatest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camelia Forton
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Heath & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR. https://twitter.com/CamiForton
| | - Victor Sandoval
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, OR
| | - Issac R Schwantes
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, OR
| | - Ranish K Patel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, OR
| | - Kenneth J Kolbeck
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Dotter Institute, OHSU, Portland, OR; Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, OR
| | | | - Elena K Korngold
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Heath & Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR
| | - Skye C Mayo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, OR.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sundaravadanan S, Welsh FK, Sethi P, Noorani S, Cresswell BA, Connell JJ, Knapp SK, Núñez L, Brady JM, Banerjee R, Rees M. Novel multiparametric MRI detects improved future liver remnant quality post-dual vein embolization. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:764-771. [PMID: 38480098 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimisation of the future liver remnant (FLR) is crucial to outcomes of extended liver resections. This study aimed to assess the quality of the FLR before and after dual vein embolization (DVE) by quantitative multiparametric MRI. METHODS Of 100 patients with liver metastases recruited in a clinical trial (Precision1:NCT04597710), ten consecutive patients with insufficient FLR underwent quantitative multiparametric MRI pre- and post-DVE (right portal and hepatic vein). FLR volume, liver fibro-inflammation (corrected T1) scores and fat percentage (proton density fat fraction, PDFF) were determined. Patient metrics were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and statistical analysis done using R software. RESULTS All patients underwent uncomplicated DVE with improvement in liver remnant health, median 37 days after DVE: cT1 scores reduced from median (interquartile range) 790 ms (753-833 ms) to 741 ms (708-760 ms) p = 0.014 [healthy range <795 ms], as did PDFF from 11% (4-21%), to 3% (2-12%) p = 0.017 [healthy range <5.6%]. There was a significant increase in median (interquartile range) FLR volume from 33% (30-37%)% to 49% (44-52%), p = 0.002. CONCLUSION This non-invasive and reproducible MRI technique showed improvement in volume and quality of the FLR after DVE. This is a significant advance in our understanding of how to prevent liver failure in patients undergoing major liver surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senthil Sundaravadanan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
| | - Fenella Ks Welsh
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - Pulkit Sethi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - Shaheen Noorani
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | - Ben A Cresswell
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Luis Núñez
- Perspectum, Gemini One, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Myrddin Rees
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fulbert M, El Amrani M, Baillet C, Lecolle K, Ernst O, Louvet A, Pruvot FR, Huglo D, Truant S. Sarcopenia does not affect liver regeneration and postoperative course after a major hepatectomy. A prospective study on 125 patients using CT volumetry and HIDA scintigraphy. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2024; 48:102332. [PMID: 38574887 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES Sarcopenia is a morbi-mortality risk factor in digestive surgery, though its impact after major hepatectomy (MH) remains unknown. This prospective pilot study investigated whether volume and function of a regenerating liver is influenced by body composition. METHODS From 2011 to 2016, 125 consecutive patients had computed tomography and 99mTc-labelled-mebrofenin SPECT-scintigraphy before and after MH at day 7 and 1 month for measurements of liver volumes and functions. L3 vertebra muscle mass identified sarcopenia. Primary endpoint was the impact of sarcopenia on regeneration capacities (i.e. volume/function changes and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) rate). Secondary endpoint was 3-month morbi-mortality. RESULTS Sarcopenic patients (SP; N = 69) were significantly older than non-sarcopenic (NSP), with lower BMI and more malignancies, but with comparable liver function/volume at baseline. Postoperatively, SP showed higher rates of ISGLS_PHLF (24.6 % vs 10.9 %; p = 0.05) but with comparable rates of severe morbidity (23.2 % vs 16.4 %; p = 0.35), overall (8.7 % vs 3.6 %; p = 0.3) and PHLF-related mortality (8,7 % vs 1.8 %; p = 0.075). After matching on the extent of resection or using propensity score, regeneration and PHLF rates were similar. CONCLUSION This prospective study using first sequential SPECT-scintigraphy showed that sarcopenia by itself does not affect liver regeneration capacities and short-term postoperative course after MH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxence Fulbert
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Mehdi El Amrani
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille F-59000, France; CANTHER laboratory "Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies" UMR-S1277, Team "Mucins, Cancer and Drug Resistance", Lille F-59000, France
| | - Clio Baillet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Katia Lecolle
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Olivier Ernst
- Department of Digestive Radiology, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Alexandre Louvet
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille F-59000, France
| | - François-René Pruvot
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Damien Huglo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille F-59000, France
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, University Lille, Lille F-59000, France; CANTHER laboratory "Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies" UMR-S1277, Team "Mucins, Cancer and Drug Resistance", Lille F-59000, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Haddad A, Lendoire M, Maki H, Kang HC, Habibollahi P, Odisio BC, Huang SY, Vauthey JN. Liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions: history, rationale, and emerging tools. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:766-775. [PMID: 38519362 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative hepatic insufficiency (PHI) is the most feared complication after hepatectomy. Volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) is one objectively measurable indicator to identify patients at risk of PHI. In this review, we summarized the development and rationale for the use of liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions and highlighted emerging tools that could yield new advancements in liver volumetry. METHODS A review of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify literature related to liver volumetry. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional publications. RESULTS Liver volumetry based on radiologic imaging was developed in the 1980s to identify patients at risk of PHI and later used in the 1990s to evaluate grafts for living donor living transplantation. The field evolved in the 2000s by the introduction of standardized FLR based on the hepatic metabolic demands and in the 2010s by the introduction of the degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate as measures of the FLR regenerative and functional capacity. Several liver-regenerative interventions, most notably portal vein embolization, are used to increase resectability and reduce the risk of PHI. In parallel with the increase in automation and machine assistance to physicians, many semi- and fully automated tools are being developed to facilitate liver volumetry. CONCLUSION Liver volumetry is the most reliable tool to detect patients at risk of PHI. Advances in imaging analysis technologies, newly developed functional measures, and liver-regenerative interventions have been improving our ability to perform safe hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Hyunseon Christine Kang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Steven Y Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Boyev A, Tzeng CWD, Maki H, Arvide EM, Mrema DE, Jain AJ, Haddad A, Lendoire M, Malik N, Odisio BC, Chun YS, Tran Cao HS, Vauthey JN, Newhook TE. Local Therapy Improves Survival for Early Recurrence After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2547-2556. [PMID: 38148351 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14806-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early recurrence following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is associated with worse survival; yet, impact of further local therapy is unclear. We sought to evaluate whether local therapy benefits patients with early recurrence following hepatectomy for CLM. METHODS Clinicopathologic and survival outcomes of patients managed with hepatectomy for CLM (1/2001-12/2020) were queried from a prospectively maintained database. Timing of recurrence was stratified as early (recurrence-free survival [RFS] < 6 months), intermediate (RFS 6-12 months), and later (RFS > 12 months). Local therapy was defined as ablation, resection, or radiation. RESULTS Of 671 patients, 541 (81%) recurred with 189 (28%) early, 180 (27%) intermediate, and 172 (26%) later recurrences. Local therapy for recurrence resulted in improved survival, regardless of recurrence timing (early 78 vs. 32 months, intermediate 72 vs. 39 months, later 132 vs. 65 months, all p < 0.001). Following recurrence, treatment with local therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.24), liver and extrahepatic recurrence (HR = 1.81), RAS + TP53 co-mutation (HR = 1.52), and SMAD4 mutation (HR = 1.92) were independently associated with overall survival (all p ≤ 0.002). Among patients with recurrence treated by local therapy, patients older than 65 years (HR 1.79), liver and extrahepatic recurrence (HR 2.05), primary site or other recurrence (HR 1.90), RAS-TP53 co-mutation (HR 1.63), and SMAD4 mutation (HR 2.06) had shorter post-local therapy survival (all p ≤ 0.04). CONCLUSIONS While most patients recur after hepatectomy for CLM, local therapy may result in long-term survival despite early recurrence. Somatic mutational profiling may help to guide the multidisciplinary consideration of local therapy after recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Deborah E Mrema
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anish J Jain
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neha Malik
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Md Shah MN, Azman RR, Chan WY, Ng KH. Opportunistic Extraction of Quantitative CT Biomarkers: Turning the Incidental Into Prognostic Information. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024; 75:92-97. [PMID: 37075322 DOI: 10.1177/08465371231171700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The past two decades have seen a significant increase in the use of CT, with a corresponding rise in the mean population radiation dose. This rise in CT use has caused improved diagnostic certainty in conditions that were not previously routinely evaluated using CT, such as headaches, back pain, and chest pain. Unused data, unrelated to the primary diagnosis, embedded within these scans have the potential to provide organ-specific measurements that can be used to prognosticate or risk-profile patients for a wide variety of conditions. The recent increased availability of computing power, expertise and software for automated segmentation and measurements, assisted by artificial intelligence, provides a conducive environment for the deployment of these analyses into routine use. Data gathering from CT has the potential to add value to examinations and help offset the public perception of harm from radiation exposure. We review the potential for the collection of these data and propose the incorporation of this strategy into routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Nazri Md Shah
- Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Raja Rizal Azman
- Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Wai Yee Chan
- Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kwan Hoong Ng
- Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UCSI University, Springhill, Negri Sembilan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dixon MEB, Pappas SG. Utilization of Multiorgan Radiomics to Predict Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy After Portal Vein Embolization: Another Tool for the Toolbox? Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:705-708. [PMID: 38062291 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14659-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew E B Dixon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Sam G Pappas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yu J, Zhu P, Shi L, Gao N, Li Y, Shu C, Xu Y, Yu Y, He J, Guo D, Zhang X, Wang X, Shao S, Dong W, Wang Y, Zhang W, Zhang W, Chen WH, Chen X, Liu Z, Yang X, Zhang B. Bifidobacterium longum promotes postoperative liver function recovery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Host Microbe 2024; 32:131-144.e6. [PMID: 38091982 DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Timely liver function recovery (LFR) is crucial for postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Here, we established the significance of LFR on patient long-term survival through retrospective and prospective cohorts and identified a key gut microbe, Bifidobacterium longum, depleted in patients with delayed recovery. Fecal microbiota transfer from HCC patients with delayed recovery to mice similarly impacted recovery time post hepatectomy. However, oral gavage of B. longum improved liver function and repair in these mice. In a clinical trial of HCC patients, orally administering a probiotic bacteria cocktail containing B. longum reduced the rates of delayed recovery, shortened hospital stays, and improved overall 1-year survival. These benefits, attributed to diminished liver inflammation, reduced liver fibrosis, and hepatocyte proliferation, were associated with changes in key metabolic pathways, including 5-hydroxytryptamine, secondary bile acids, and short-chain fatty acids. Our findings propose that gut microbiota modulation can enhance LFR, thereby improving postoperative outcomes for HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Yu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Peng Zhu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Linlin Shi
- National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; Henan Key Laboratory of Microbiome and Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment, Henan Key Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China
| | - Na Gao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
| | - Yani Li
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Chang Shu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Ying Xu
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
| | - Ying Yu
- Henan Key Laboratory of Microbiome and Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment, Henan Key Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China
| | - Junqing He
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
| | - Dingming Guo
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
| | - Xiaoman Zhang
- Henan Key Laboratory of Microbiome and Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention & Treatment, Henan Key Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China
| | - Xiangfeng Wang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
| | - Sirui Shao
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
| | - Wei Dong
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Yuwei Wang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Wanguang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Wei-Hua Chen
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular-Imaging, Center for Artificial Biology, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; Institution of Medical Artificial Intelligence, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China.
| | - Xiaoping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Zhi Liu
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China.
| | - Xiangliang Yang
- National Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinorganic Chemistry and Materia Medica, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China.
| | - Bixiang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bonde A, Fung AW, Mayo SC, Li P, Walker BS, Jaganathan S, Mallak N, Korngold EK. Imaging of the hepatic arterial infusion pump: Primer for radiologists. Clin Imaging 2024; 105:110022. [PMID: 37992624 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.110022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) pumps are used to deliver liver-directed therapy by allowing the administration of selective chemotherapy to the liver via a catheter implanted most commonly into the gastroduodenal artery connected to a subcutaneous pump. This selective administration helps maximize the chemotherapeutic effect within the hepatic tumors while minimizing systemic toxicity. While HAI therapy has primarily been used to treat liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer, the indications have expanded to other malignancies, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Radiologists play an important role in pre-operative planning, assessment of treatment response, and evaluation for potential complications using various imaging studies, including computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and perfusion scintigraphy. This article describes the radiologist's role as part of a multi-disciplinary oncology team to help maximize the success of HAI therapy and also helps radiologists familiarize themselves with various aspects of HAI pumps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apurva Bonde
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, United States of America.
| | - Alice W Fung
- Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L340, Portland, OR 97239, United States of America
| | - Skye C Mayo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L340, Portland, OR 97239, United States of America
| | - Peter Li
- Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L340, Portland, OR 97239, United States of America
| | - Brett S Walker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L340, Portland, OR 97239, United States of America
| | - Sriram Jaganathan
- Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, AR 72205, United States of America
| | - Nadine Mallak
- Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L340, Portland, OR 97239, United States of America
| | - Elena K Korngold
- Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code: L340, Portland, OR 97239, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Huang R, Cai Y, He Y, Yu Z, Zhao L, Wang T, Shangguan X, Zhao Y, Chen Z, Chen Y, Zhang C. Predictive Model of Oxaliplatin-induced Liver Injury Based on Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2023; 11:1455-1464. [PMID: 38161498 PMCID: PMC10752815 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2023.00399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Identifying potential high-risk groups of oxaliplatin-induced liver injury (OILI) is valuable, but tools are lacking. So artificial neural network (ANN) and logistic regression (LR) models will be developed to predict the risk of OILI. METHODS The medical information of patients treated with oxaliplatin between May and November 2016 at 10 hospitals was collected prospectively. We used the updated Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method (RUCAM) to identify cases of OILI and summarized the patient and medication characteristics. Furthermore, the ANN and LR models for predicting the risk of OILI were developed and evaluated. RESULTS The incidence of OILI was 3.65%. The median RUCAM score with interquartile range was 6 (4, 9). The ANN model performed similarly to the LR model in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. In discrimination, the area under the curve of the ANN model was larger (0.920>0.833, p=0.019). In calibration, the ANN model was slightly improved. The important predictors of both models overlapped partially, including age, chemotherapy regimens and cycles, single and total dose of OXA, glucocorticoid drugs, and antihistamine drugs. CONCLUSIONS When the discriminative and calibration ability was given priority, the ANN model outperformed the LR model in predicting the risk of OILI. Other chemotherapy drugs in oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimens could have different degrees of impact on OILI. We suspected that OILI may be idiosyncratic, and chemotherapy dose factors may be weakly correlated. Decision making on prophylactic medications needs to be carefully considered, and the actual preventive effect needed to be supported by more evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Huang
- School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yuanxuan Cai
- School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yisheng He
- Ciechanover Institute of Precision and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Zaoqin Yu
- Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Li Zhao
- Hubei Center for Adverse Drug Reaction/Adverse Drug Event Monitoring, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Tao Wang
- National Center for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaofang Shangguan
- School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yuhang Zhao
- School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Zherui Chen
- School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yunzhou Chen
- Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Chengliang Zhang
- Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rushbrook SM, Kendall TJ, Zen Y, Albazaz R, Manoharan P, Pereira SP, Sturgess R, Davidson BR, Malik HZ, Manas D, Heaton N, Prasad KR, Bridgewater J, Valle JW, Goody R, Hawkins M, Prentice W, Morement H, Walmsley M, Khan SA. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gut 2023; 73:16-46. [PMID: 37770126 PMCID: PMC10715509 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
These guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology liver section. The guideline writing committee included a multidisciplinary team of experts from various specialties involved in the management of CCA, as well as patient/public representatives from AMMF (the Cholangiocarcinoma Charity) and PSC Support. Quality of evidence is presented using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) format. The recommendations arising are to be used as guidance rather than as a strict protocol-based reference, as the management of patients with CCA is often complex and always requires individual patient-centred considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon M Rushbrook
- Department of Hepatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Timothy James Kendall
- Division of Pathology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- University of Edinburgh MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Yoh Zen
- Department of Pathology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Raneem Albazaz
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Richard Sturgess
- Digestive Diseases Unit, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, London, UK
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| | - Derek Manas
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, King's College London, London, UK
| | - K Raj Prasad
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - John Bridgewater
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Juan W Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust/University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Goody
- Department of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Maria Hawkins
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Wendy Prentice
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Shahid A Khan
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology Section, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Huang LM, Zeng ZX, Wu JY, Li YN, Wang JX, Fu YK, Wu JY, Wei SM, Lv JH, Chen WZ, Huang RF, Cheng SQ, Yan ML. Surgical outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic bile duct tumor thrombus: a multicenter study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1291479. [PMID: 38111530 PMCID: PMC10726108 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1291479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The long-term prognosis after surgery of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and extrahepatic bile duct tumor thrombus (Ex-BDTT) remains unknown. We aimed to identify the surgical outcomes of patients with HCC and Ex-BDTT. Methods A total of 138 patients with Ex-BDTT who underwent hepatectomy with preservation of the extrahepatic bile duct from five large hospitals in China between January 2009 and December 2017 were included. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results With a median follow-up of 60 months (range, 1-127.8 months), the median OS and RFS of the patients were 28.6 and 8.9 months, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of HCC patients with Ex-BDTT were 71.7%, 41.2%, and 33.5%, respectively, and the corresponding RFS rates were 43.5%, 21.7%, and 20.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified that major hepatectomy, R0 resection, and major vascular invasion were independent prognostic factors for OS and RFS. In addition, preoperative serum total bilirubin ≥ 4.2 mg/dL was an independent prognostic factor for RFS. Conclusion Major hepatectomy with preservation of the extrahepatic bile duct can provide favorable long-term survival for HCC patients with Ex-BDTT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ming Huang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zhen-Xin Zeng
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jun-Yi Wu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yi-Nan Li
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jin-Xiu Wang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yang-Kai Fu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jia-Yi Wu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Shao-Ming Wei
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital South Branch, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jia-Hui Lv
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Wei-Zhao Chen
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Rong-Fa Huang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Shu-Qun Cheng
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mao-Lin Yan
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lendoire M, Maki H, Haddad A, Jain AJ, Vauthey JN. Liver Anatomy 2.0 Quiz: Test Your Knowledge. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:3045-3068. [PMID: 37803180 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05778-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
The liver is one the largest organs in the abdomen and the most frequent site of metastases for gastrointestinal tumors. Surgery on this complex and highly vascularized organ can be associated with high morbidity even in experienced hands. A thorough understanding of liver anatomy is key to approaching liver surgery with confidence and preventing complications. The aim of this quiz is to provide an active learning tool for a comprehensive understanding of liver anatomy and its integration into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Anish J Jain
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Horkaew P, Chansangrat J, Keeratibharat N, Le DC. Recent advances in computerized imaging and its vital roles in liver disease diagnosis, preoperative planning, and interventional liver surgery: A review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2382-2397. [PMID: 38111769 PMCID: PMC10725533 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i11.2382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The earliest and most accurate detection of the pathological manifestations of hepatic diseases ensures effective treatments and thus positive prognostic outcomes. In clinical settings, screening and determining the extent of a pathology are prominent factors in preparing remedial agents and administering appropriate therapeutic procedures. Moreover, in a patient undergoing liver resection, a realistic preoperative simulation of the subject-specific anatomy and physiology also plays a vital part in conducting initial assessments, making surgical decisions during the procedure, and anticipating postoperative results. Conventionally, various medical imaging modalities, e.g., computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, have been employed to assist in these tasks. In fact, several standardized procedures, such as lesion detection and liver segmentation, are also incorporated into prominent commercial software packages. Thus far, most integrated software as a medical device typically involves tedious interactions from the physician, such as manual delineation and empirical adjustments, as per a given patient. With the rapid progress in digital health approaches, especially medical image analysis, a wide range of computer algorithms have been proposed to facilitate those procedures. They include pattern recognition of a liver, its periphery, and lesion, as well as pre- and postoperative simulations. Prior to clinical adoption, however, software must conform to regulatory requirements set by the governing agency, for instance, valid clinical association and analytical and clinical validation. Therefore, this paper provides a detailed account and discussion of the state-of-the-art methods for liver image analyses, visualization, and simulation in the literature. Emphasis is placed upon their concepts, algorithmic classifications, merits, limitations, clinical considerations, and future research trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paramate Horkaew
- School of Computer Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
| | - Jirapa Chansangrat
- School of Radiology, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
| | - Nattawut Keeratibharat
- School of Surgery, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
| | - Doan Cong Le
- Faculty of Information Technology, An Giang University, Vietnam National University (Ho Chi Minh City), An Giang 90000, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Merath K, Tiwari A, Court C, Parikh A, Dillhoff M, Cloyd J, Ejaz A, Pawlik TM. Postoperative Liver Failure: Definitions, Risk factors, Prediction Models and Prevention Strategies. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2640-2649. [PMID: 37783906 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05834-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection is the treatment for a variety of benign and malignant conditions. Despite advances in preoperative selection, surgical technique, and perioperative management, post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following liver resection. METHODS A review of the literature was performed utilizing MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases in May of 2023. The MESH terms "liver failure," "liver insufficiency," and "hepatic failure" in combination with "liver surgery," "liver resection," and "hepatectomy" were searched in the title and/or abstract. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional eligible publications. RESULTS PHLF can have devastating physiological consequences. In general, risk factors can be categorized as patient-related, primary liver function-related, or perioperative factors. Currently, no effective treatment options are available and the management of PHLF is largely supportive. Therefore, identifying risk factors and preventative strategies for PHLF is paramount. Ensuring an adequate future liver remnant is important to mitigate risk of PHLF. Dynamic liver function tests provide more objective assessment of liver function based on the metabolic capacity of the liver and have the advantage of easy administration, low cost, and easy reproducibility. CONCLUSION Given the absence of randomized data specifically related to the management of PHLF, current strategies are based on the principles of management of acute liver failure from any cause. In addition, goal-directed therapy for organ dysfunction, as well as identification and treatment of reversible factors in the postoperative period are critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katiuscha Merath
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Ankur Tiwari
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Colin Court
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Alexander Parikh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, 395 W. 12Th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, 395 W. 12Th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, 395 W. 12Th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, 395 W. 12Th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fukuhara S, Kuroda S, Kobayashi T, Takei D, Namba Y, Oshita K, Matsubara K, Honmyo N, Nakano R, Sakai H, Tahara H, Ohira M, Kawaoka T, Tsuge M, Chosa K, Awai K, Ohdan H. Preoperative percutaneous or transvascular marking for curative resection of small liver tumours with potential for missing during hepatectomy: a study protocol for an open-label, single-arm phase II study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075891. [PMID: 37890974 PMCID: PMC10619086 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Small liver tumours are difficult to identify during hepatectomy, which prevents curative tumour excision. Preoperative marking is a standard practice for small, deep-seated tumours in other solid organs; however, its effectiveness for liver tumours has not been validated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative markings for curative resection of small liver tumours. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is an open-label, single-arm, single-centre, phase II study. Patients with liver tumours of ≤15 mm requiring hepatectomy will be enrolled and will undergo preoperative marking by placing a microcoil near the tumour using either the percutaneous or transvascular approach. The tumours, including the indwelling markers, will be excised. The primary endpoint will be the successful resection rate of liver tumours, defined as achieving a surgical margin of ≥5 mm and ≤15 mm. Secondary endpoints will include the results of preoperative marking and hepatectomy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for this trial was obtained from the Ethical Committee for Clinical Research of Hiroshima University, Japan. The results will be published at an academic conference or by submitting a paper to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER jRCTs062220088.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sotaro Fukuhara
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shintaro Kuroda
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Kobayashi
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Daisuke Takei
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yosuke Namba
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ko Oshita
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Keiso Matsubara
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Naruhiko Honmyo
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Nakano
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Sakai
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tahara
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masahiro Ohira
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Kawaoka
- Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masataka Tsuge
- Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Keigo Chosa
- Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kazuo Awai
- Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chouari T, Merali N, La Costa F, Santol J, Chapman S, Horton A, Aroori S, Connell J, Rockall TA, Mole D, Starlinger P, Welsh F, Rees M, Frampton AE. The Role of the Multiparametric MRI LiverMultiScan TM in the Quantitative Assessment of the Liver and Its Predicted Clinical Applications in Patients Undergoing Major Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4863. [PMID: 37835557 PMCID: PMC10571783 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for the histological assessment of the liver. With clear disadvantages and the rise in the incidences of liver disease, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and an explosion of surgical management options available, non-invasive serological and imaging markers of liver histopathology have never been more pertinent in order to assess liver health and stratify patients considered for surgical intervention. Liver MRI is a leading modality in the assessment of hepatic malignancy. Recent technological advancements in multiparametric MRI software such as the LiverMultiScanTM offers an attractive non-invasive assay of anatomy and histopathology in the pre-operative setting, especially in the context of CRLM. This narrative review examines the evidence for the LiverMultiScanTM in the assessment of hepatic fibrosis, steatosis/steatohepatitis, and potential applications for chemotherapy-associated hepatic changes. We postulate its future role and the hurdles it must surpass in order to be implemented in the pre-operative management of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis. Such a role likely extends to other hepatic malignancies planned for resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarak Chouari
- MATTU, The Leggett Building, Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford GU2 7WG, UK; (T.C.)
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
- Oncology Section, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7WG, UK
| | - Nabeel Merali
- MATTU, The Leggett Building, Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford GU2 7WG, UK; (T.C.)
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
- Oncology Section, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7WG, UK
| | - Francesca La Costa
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Jonas Santol
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Institute of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Center of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Shelley Chapman
- Department of Radiology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Alex Horton
- Department of Radiology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Somaiah Aroori
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Transplant Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK
| | | | - Timothy A. Rockall
- MATTU, The Leggett Building, Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford GU2 7WG, UK; (T.C.)
- Oncology Section, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7WG, UK
| | - Damian Mole
- Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH10 5HF, UK
- Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh EH105HF, UK
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
- Center of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Fenella Welsh
- Hepato-Biliary Unit, Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG24 9NA, UK
| | - Myrddin Rees
- Hepato-Biliary Unit, Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG24 9NA, UK
| | - Adam E. Frampton
- MATTU, The Leggett Building, Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford GU2 7WG, UK; (T.C.)
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK
- Oncology Section, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7WG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Peng Y, Tang H, Huang Y, Yuan X, Wang X, Ran Z, Deng W, Liu R, Lan X, Shen H, Zhang J. CT-derived extracellular volume and liver volumetry can predict posthepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma. Insights Imaging 2023; 14:145. [PMID: 37697217 PMCID: PMC10495294 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01496-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a severe complication of liver resection. We aimed to develop and validate a model based on extracellular volume (ECV) and liver volumetry derived from computed tomography (CT) for preoperative predicting PHLF in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS A total of 393 resectable HCC patients from two hospitals were enrolled and underwent multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT before surgery. A total of 281 patients from our hospital were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 181) and an internal validation cohort (n = 100), and 112 patients from another hospital formed the external validation cohort. CT-derived ECV was measured on nonenhanced and equilibrium phase images, and liver volumetry was measured on portal phase images. The model is composed of independent predictors of PHLF. The under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curve were used to reflect the predictive performance and calibration of the model. Comparison of AUCs used the DeLong test. RESULTS CT-derived ECV, measured future liver remnant (mFLR) ratio, and serum albumin were independent predictors for PHLF in resectable HCC patients. The AUC of the model was significantly higher than that of the ALBI score in the training cohort, internal validation cohort, and external validation cohort (all p < 0.001). The calibration curve of the model showed good consistency in the training cohort and the internal and external validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The novel model contributes to the preoperative prediction of PHLF in resectable HCC patients. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The novel model combined CT-derived extracellular volume, measured future liver remnant ratio, and serum albumin outperforms the albumin-bilirubin score for predicting posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. KEY POINTS • CT-derived ECV correlated well with the fibrosis stage of the background liver. • CT-derived ECV and mFLR ratio were independent predictors for PHLF in HCC. • The AUC of the model was higher than the CT-derived ECV and mFLR ratio. • The model showed a superior predictive performance than that of the ALBI score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangling Peng
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Tang
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuanying Huang
- Department of Hematology, Chongqing General Hospital, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoqian Yuan
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China
| | - Xing Wang
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China
| | - Zijuan Ran
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Deng
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China
| | - Renwei Liu
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaosong Lan
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China
| | - Hesong Shen
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China.
| | - Jiuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital & Chongqing Cancer Institute & Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Primavesi F, Maglione M, Cipriani F, Denecke T, Oberkofler CE, Starlinger P, Dasari BVM, Heil J, Sgarbura O, Søreide K, Diaz-Nieto R, Fondevila C, Frampton AE, Geisel D, Henninger B, Hessheimer AJ, Lesurtel M, Mole D, Öllinger R, Olthof P, Reiberger T, Schnitzbauer AA, Schwarz C, Sparrelid E, Stockmann M, Truant S, Aldrighetti L, Braunwarth E, D’Hondt M, DeOliveira ML, Erdmann J, Fuks D, Gruenberger T, Kaczirek K, Malik H, Öfner D, Rahbari NN, Göbel G, Siriwardena AK, Stättner S. E-AHPBA-ESSO-ESSR Innsbruck consensus guidelines for preoperative liver function assessment before hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1331-1347. [PMID: 37572099 PMCID: PMC10480040 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality after liver surgery. Standardized assessment of preoperative liver function is crucial to identify patients at risk. These European consensus guidelines provide guidance for preoperative patient assessment. METHODS A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus. The expert panel consisted of hepatobiliary surgeons, radiologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and hepatologists. The guideline process was supervised by a methodologist and reviewed by a patient representative. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Evidence assessment and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. RESULTS Based on 271 publications covering 4 key areas, 21 statements (at least 85 per cent agreement) were produced (median level of evidence 2- to 2+). Only a few systematic reviews (2++) and one RCT (1+) were identified. Preoperative liver function assessment should be considered before complex resections, and in patients with suspected or known underlying liver disease, or chemotherapy-associated or drug-induced liver injury. Clinical assessment and blood-based scores reflecting liver function or portal hypertension (for example albumin/bilirubin, platelet count) aid in identifying risk of PHLF. Volumetry of the future liver remnant represents the foundation for assessment, and can be combined with indocyanine green clearance or LiMAx® according to local expertise and availability. Functional MRI and liver scintigraphy are alternatives, combining FLR volume and function in one examination. CONCLUSION These guidelines reflect established methods to assess preoperative liver function and PHLF risk, and have uncovered evidence gaps of interest for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Primavesi
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Centre for Hepatobiliary Surgery, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Manuel Maglione
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian E Oberkofler
- Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Transplant Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Vivévis AG—Visceral, Tumour and Robotic Surgery, Clinic Hirslanden Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Centre of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary–pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jan Heil
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Liver Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Adam E Frampton
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
- Section of Oncology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Dominik Geisel
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benjamin Henninger
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Amelia J Hessheimer
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Damian Mole
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pim Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III and CD-Lab for Portal Hypertension and Liver Fibrosis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christoph Schwarz
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery and Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Stockmann
- Department of Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Paul Gerhardt Stift, Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, Lille University, Lille, France
- CANTHER Laboratory ‘Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies’ UMR-S1277, Team ‘Mucins, Cancer and Drug Resistance’, Lille, France
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Eva Braunwarth
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Michelle L DeOliveira
- Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Transplant Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Joris Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre Hopital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery, Clinic Favoriten, Hepatopancreatobiliary Centre, Health Network Vienna and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klaus Kaczirek
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hassan Malik
- Liver Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georg Göbel
- Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Centre for Hepatobiliary Surgery, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Obrecht M, Zurbruegg S, Accart N, Lambert C, Doelemeyer A, Ledermann B, Beckmann N. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound elastography in the context of preclinical pharmacological research: significance for the 3R principles. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1177421. [PMID: 37448960 PMCID: PMC10337591 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1177421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The 3Rs principles-reduction, refinement, replacement-are at the core of preclinical research within drug discovery, which still relies to a great extent on the availability of models of disease in animals. Minimizing their distress, reducing their number as well as searching for means to replace them in experimental studies are constant objectives in this area. Due to its non-invasive character in vivo imaging supports these efforts by enabling repeated longitudinal assessments in each animal which serves as its own control, thereby enabling to reduce considerably the animal utilization in the experiments. The repetitive monitoring of pathology progression and the effects of therapy becomes feasible by assessment of quantitative biomarkers. Moreover, imaging has translational prospects by facilitating the comparison of studies performed in small rodents and humans. Also, learnings from the clinic may be potentially back-translated to preclinical settings and therefore contribute to refining animal investigations. By concentrating on activities around the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound elastography to small rodent models of disease, we aim to illustrate how in vivo imaging contributes primarily to reduction and refinement in the context of pharmacological research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Obrecht
- Diseases of Aging and Regenerative Medicines, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Zurbruegg
- Neurosciences Department, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nathalie Accart
- Diseases of Aging and Regenerative Medicines, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Lambert
- Diseases of Aging and Regenerative Medicines, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Arno Doelemeyer
- Diseases of Aging and Regenerative Medicines, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Birgit Ledermann
- 3Rs Leader, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicolau Beckmann
- Diseases of Aging and Regenerative Medicines, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Du S, Wang Z, Lin D. A bibliometric and visualized analysis of preoperative future liver remnant augmentation techniques from 1997 to 2022. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1185885. [PMID: 37333827 PMCID: PMC10272555 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1185885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The size and function of the future liver remnant (FLR) is an essential consideration for both eligibility for treatment and postoperative prognosis when planning surgical hepatectomy. Over time, a variety of preoperative FLR augmentation techniques have been investigated, from the earliest portal vein embolization (PVE) to the more recent Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) procedures. Despite numerous publications on this topic, no bibliometric analysis has yet been conducted. Methods Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database was searched to identify studies related to preoperative FLR augmentation techniques published from 1997 to 2022. The analysis was performed using the CiteSpace [version 6.1.R6 (64-bit)] and VOSviewer [version 1.6.19]. Results A total of 973 academic studies were published by 4431 authors from 920 institutions in 51 countries/regions. The University of Zurich was the most published institution while Japan was the most productive country. Eduardo de Santibanes had the most published articles, and Masato Nagino was the most frequently co-cited author. The most frequently published journal was HPB, and the most cited journal was Ann Surg, with 8088 citations. The main aspects of preoperative FLR augmentation technique is to enhance surgical technology, expand clinical indications, prevent and treat postoperative complications, ensure long-term survival, and evaluate the growth rate of FLR. Recently, hot keywords in this field include ALPPS, LVD, and Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy. Conclusion This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of preoperative FLR augmentation techniques, offering valuable insights and ideas for scholars in this field.
Collapse
|
43
|
Xu LL, Zhou L, Liang X, Zheng LL, Xu HS, Chen C, Hu P, Li SY. Preoperative Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Totally Laparoscopic Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy for Liver Tumors: A Preliminary Study. Ultrasound Q 2023; 39:95-99. [PMID: 36580400 DOI: 10.1097/ruq.0000000000000631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The clinical data of 15 cases that planned to receive totally laparoscopic associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy were retrospectively collected. Before the stage 1 operation, the size and number of the tumors in future liver remnant (FLR) and the presence of cancer embolus in the portal vein were assessed using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). Before the stage 2 operation, CEUS was performed to assess the presence of traffic blood flow between the diseased liver and FLR after round-the-liver ligation. Before the stage 1 operation, 5 cases with tumors in FLR were found by CEUS and 6 cases were found by CECT ( P > 0.05). Similarly, CEUS found 5 cases with cancer thrombus in portal vein, and CECT found 7 cases ( P = 0.500). The consistency between the 2 modalities was good (κ = 0.857, P < 0.05, κ = 0.727, P < 0.05, respectively). Before the stage 2 operation, CEUS confirmed that there were 7 cases without traffic blood flow between the diseased liver and FLR, and 3 cases with residual traffic blood flow. The daily growth rate of FLR in the group without traffic blood flow (mean rank = 7.00) was higher than that in the group with traffic blood flow (2.00) significantly ( P < 0.05). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a promising application in the preoperative evaluation of totally laparoscopic associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Chao Chen
- Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peng Hu
- Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Piccus R, Joshi K, Hodson J, Bartlett D, Chatzizacharias N, Dasari B, Isaac J, Marudanayagam R, Mirza DF, Roberts JK, Sutcliffe RP. Significance of predicted future liver remnant volume on liver failure risk after major hepatectomy: a case matched comparative study. Front Surg 2023; 10:1174024. [PMID: 37266000 PMCID: PMC10229890 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1174024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Future liver remnant volume (FLRV), a risk factor for liver failure (PHLF) after major hepatectomy (MH), is not routinely measured. This study aimed to evaluate the association between FLRV and PHLF. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients undergoing MH (4 + segments) between 2011 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained single-centre database. Perioperative data were collected for patients with PHLF, who were matched (1:2) with non-PHLF controls. FLRV and FLRV% (i.e., % of total liver volume) were calculated retrospectively from preoperative CT scans using Synapse-3D software, and compared between the PHLF and matched control groups. RESULTS Of 711 patients undergoing MH, PHLF occurred in 27 (3.8%), of whom 24 had preoperative CT scans available. These patients were matched to 48 non-PHLF controls, 98% of whom were classified as being at high risk of PHLF on preoperative risk scoring. FLRV% was significantly lower in the PHLF group, compared to matched controls (median: 28.7 vs. 35.2%, p = 0.010), with FLRV% < 30% in 58% and 29% of patients, respectively. Assessment of the ability of FLRV% to differentiate between PHLF and matched controls returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.69, and an optimal cut-off value of FLRV% < 31.5%, which yielded 79% sensitivity and 67% specificity. CONCLUSIONS FLRV% is significantly predictive of PHLF after MH, with over half of patients with PHLF having FLRV% < 30%. In light of this, we propose that all patients should undergo risk stratification prior to MH, with the high risk patients additionally being assessed with CT volumetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Piccus
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - K. Joshi
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J. Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Health Informatics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - D. Bartlett
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - B. Dasari
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J. Isaac
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - R. Marudanayagam
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - D. F. Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J. K. Roberts
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - R. P. Sutcliffe
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kimura‐Seto K, Kojima Y, Komori S, Hisada Y, Otake Y, Yanai Y, Saito A, Akazawa N, Tanaka Y, Yokoi C, Yanase M, Akiyama J, Yamamoto N, Yamada K. Main causes of death in advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Med 2023; 12:10889-10898. [PMID: 36991582 PMCID: PMC10225207 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no previous reports on the main causes of death in biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the main causes of death and survival rates in patients with BTC. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 143 patients who were diagnosed with unresectable BTC between August 2010 and March 2020. We classified the main causes of death based on laboratory data, imaging studies, and medical records. The main causes of death evaluated included liver failure, cholangitis, cachexia, other causes associated with tumor progression, and complications. We also analyzed survival rates for each main cause of death. RESULTS After excluding patients who were lost to follow-up, living patients, and patients who had no records of laboratory data within 30 days before the date of death, 108 patients were analyzed. The main cause of death was cholangitis in 33 (30.6%), cachexia in 22 (20.4%), liver failure in 10 (9.3%), other causes associated with tumor progression in 18 (16.7%), and complications in 25 (23.2%) patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 334.0 days in the chemotherapy group and 75.0 days in the best supportive care (BSC) group. Survival analyzed according to the main cause of death was significantly different between the chemotherapy and BSC groups; OS for cachexia, cholangitis, liver failure, other causes associated with tumor progression, and complications, respectively, were 453.0, 499.0, 567.0, 205.0, and 327.5 days (p = 0.003) in the chemotherapy group and 219.0, 69.0, 34.0, 93.0, and 56.0 days (p = 0.001) in the BSC group. CONCLUSION The main causes of death in patients with advanced BTC are cholangitis, cachexia, liver failure, other causes associated with tumor progression, and complications. Other causes associated with tumor progression in the chemotherapy group, and liver failure in the BSC group as the main causes of death shortened the survival of BTC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kana Kimura‐Seto
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
- Course of Advanced and Specialized MedicineJuntendo University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine2‐1‐1 Hongo, Bunkyo‐kuTokyo113‐8421Japan
| | - Yasushi Kojima
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Shiori Komori
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Yuya Hisada
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Yuki Otake
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Yuka Yanai
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Akiko Saito
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Naoki Akazawa
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Yasuo Tanaka
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Chizu Yokoi
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Mikio Yanase
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Junichi Akiyama
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Natsuyo Yamamoto
- Department of GastroenterologyNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yamada
- Course of Advanced and Specialized MedicineJuntendo University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine2‐1‐1 Hongo, Bunkyo‐kuTokyo113‐8421Japan
- Department of SurgeryNational Center for Global Health and Medicine1‐21‐1 Toyama, Shinjuku‐kuTokyo162‐8655Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wen Y, Emontzpohl C, Xu L, Atkins CL, Jeong JM, Yang Y, Kim K, Wu C, Akira S, Ju C. Interleukin-33 facilitates liver regeneration through serotonin-involved gut-liver axis. Hepatology 2023; 77:1580-1592. [PMID: 36129070 PMCID: PMC10758291 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Insufficient liver regeneration causes post-hepatectomy liver failure and small-for-size syndrome. Identifying therapeutic targets to enhance hepatic regenerative capacity remains urgent. Recently, increased IL-33 was observed in patients undergoing liver resection and in mice after partial hepatectomy (PHx). The present study aims to investigate the role of IL-33 in liver regeneration after PHx and to elucidate its underlying mechanisms. APPROACH AND RESULTS We performed PHx in IL-33 -/- , suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) -/- , and wild-type control mice, and found deficiency of IL-33 or its receptor ST2 delayed liver regeneration. The insufficient liver regeneration could be normalized in IL-33 -/- but not ST2 -/- mice by recombinant murine IL-33 administration. Furthermore, we observed an increased level of serotonin in portal blood from wild-type mice, but not IL-33 -/- or ST2 -/- mice, after PHx. ST2 deficiency specifically in enterochromaffin cells recapitulated the phenotype of delayed liver regeneration observed in ST2 -/- mice. Moreover, the impeded liver regeneration in IL-33 -/- and ST2 -/- mice was restored to normal levels by the treatment with (±)-2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine, which is an agonist of the 5-hydroxytrytamine receptor (HTR)2A. Notably, in vitro experiments demonstrated that serotonin/HTR2A-induced hepatocyte proliferation is dependent on p70S6K activation. CONCLUSIONS Our study identified that IL-33 is pro-regenerative in a noninjurious model of liver resection. The underlying mechanism involved IL-33/ST2-induced increase of serotonin release from enterochromaffin cells to portal blood and subsequent HTR2A/p70S6K activation in hepatocytes by serotonin. The findings implicate the potential of targeting the IL-33/ST2/serotonin pathway to reduce the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure and small-for-size syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yankai Wen
- Department of Anesthesiology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christoph Emontzpohl
- Department of Anesthesiology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Long Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- School of Basic Medical Science, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | | | - Jong-Min Jeong
- Department of Anesthesiology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- School of Basic Medical Science, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Kangho Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chuan Wu
- Experimental Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shizuo Akira
- Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Cynthia Ju
- Department of Anesthesiology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Roozen EA, Lomme RMLM, Calon NUB, Ten Broek RPG, van Goor H. Efficacy of a novel polyoxazoline-based hemostatic patch in liver and spleen surgery. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:19. [PMID: 36918896 PMCID: PMC10012589 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00483-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A new hemostatic sealant based on a N-hydroxy-succinimide polyoxazoline (NHS-POx) polymer was evaluated to determine hemostatic efficacy and long-term wound healing and adverse effects in a large animal model of parenchymal organ surgical bleeds. METHODS Experiment 1 included 20 pigs that were treated with two NHS-POx patch prototypes [a gelatin fibrous carrier (GFC) with NHS-POx and an oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-NHS-POx:NU-POx (nucleophilically activated polyoxazoline)], a blank gelatin patch (GFC Blank), TachoSil® and Veriset™ to stop moderate liver and spleen punch bleedings. After various survival periods (1-6 weeks), pigs were re-operated to evaluate patch degradation and parenchymal healing. During the re-operation, experiment 2 was performed: partial liver and spleen resections with severe bleeding, and hemostatic efficacy was evaluated under normal and heparinized conditions of the two previous prototypes and one additional NHS-POx patch. In the third experiment an improved NHS-POx patch (GATT-Patch; GFC-NHS-POx and added 20% as nucleophilically activated polyoxazoline; NU-POx) was compared with TachoSil®, Veriset™ and GFC Blank on punch bleedings and partial liver and spleen resections for rapid (10s) hemostatic efficacy. RESULTS NHS-POx-based patches showed better (GFC-NHS-POx 83.1%, ORC-PLGA-NHS-POx: NU-POx 98.3%) hemostatic efficacy compared to TachoSil® (25.0%) and GFC Blank (43.3%), and comparable efficacy with Veriset™ (96.7%) on moderate standardized punch bleedings on liver and spleen. All patches demonstrated gradual degradation over 6 weeks with a reduced local inflammation rate and an improved wound healing. For severe bleedings under non-heparinized conditions, hemostasis was achieved in 100% for Veriset™, 40% for TachoSil and 80-100% for the three NHS-POx prototypes; similar differences between patches remained for heparinized conditions. In experiment 3, GATT-Patch, Veriset™, TachoSil and GFC Blank reached hemostasis after 10s in 100%, 42.8%, 7.1% and 14.3%, respectively, and at 3 min in 100%, 100%, 14.3% and 35.7%, respectively, on all liver and spleen punctures and resections. CONCLUSIONS NHS-POx-based patches, and particularly the GATT-Patch, are fast in achieving effective hemostatic sealing on standardized moderate and severe bleedings without apparent long-term adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin A Roozen
- Department of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,GATT Technologies BV, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Roger M L M Lomme
- Department of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Nicole U B Calon
- Department of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Richard P G Ten Broek
- Department of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Harry van Goor
- Department of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jenvrin A, Galletto-Pregliasco A, Audureau E, Pujals A, Favre L, Luciani A, Calderaro J, Sommacale D, Chatellier G, Tournigand C, Laurent A, Kempf E. Intentional R1 resection of liver metastases: A new treatment paradigm for patients with advanced colorectal cancer based on a propensity score-Matched case-control analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2023; 47:102097. [PMID: 36804451 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after an incomplete microscopic (R1) resection of liver metastases may not differ from those following a microscopically margin negative (R0) resection, when the latest is not feasible because of anatomic issues. We aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of CRC patients with an intentional R1 or with a R0 resection of liver metastases. METHODS All patients with advanced in CRC and liver metastases consecutively treated by liver resection between February 2005 and January 2019 at in the department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery of Henri Mondor University Hospital (Créteil, France) were included in this retrospective case-control study. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were compared between patients who underwent an intentional (pre-operative decision) R1 resection (iR1) to those who had a R0 resection of liver metastases. To account for confounding, comparison between the 2 groups was performed after adjustment using propensity score analysis. RESULTS Twenty-six CRC patients treated by iR1 resection of liver metastases were compared to 98 patients treated by R0 resection. Median OS reached 39 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 25-67] and 63 months [95% CI: 52-76] in the iR1 and R0 groups, respectively. After adjustment by inverse probability of treatment weighting, patients' OS and EFS did not differ significantly between the iR1 and R0 groups (hazard ratio (HR): 1.19 [0.54-2.62] and 1.67 [0.93-3.03]), respectively. CONCLUSION iR1 resection of liver metastases in advanced CRC patients is an acceptable therapeutic strategy, when R0 resection is not feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anaïs Jenvrin
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Créteil, France
| | | | - Etienne Audureau
- Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), INSERM Unite U 955 Equipe CEpiA, APHP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Public Health, Créteil, France
| | - Anaïs Pujals
- UPEC, INSERM Unité U 955 Equipe 9, APHP, Department of Pathology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Loëtitia Favre
- UPEC, INSERM Unité U 955 Equipe 9, APHP, Department of Pathology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- UPEC, INSERM Unite U 955 Equipe 18, APHP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Créteil, France
| | - Julien Calderaro
- UPEC, INSERM Unité U 955 Equipe 18, APHP, Department of Pathology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- UPEC, INSERM Unite U 955 Equipe 18, APHP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Créteil, France
| | - Gilles Chatellier
- Université Paris Cité, APHP, Department of Medical Information, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Créteil, France; UPEC, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010, APHP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Créteil, France
| | - Alexis Laurent
- UPEC, INSERM Unite U 955 Equipe 18, APHP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Créteil, France
| | - Emmanuelle Kempf
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Surgical Strategies for Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC). Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030774. [PMID: 36765731 PMCID: PMC9913263 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a tumor entity presenting features of hepatocellular and cholangiocellular epithelial differentiation. Due to the likeness between cHCC-CC, HCC and CC, accurate pretherapeutical diagnosis is challenging and advanced stages are prevalent. Radical oncological surgery is the only curative therapeutical option in patients with cHCC-CC. To reach this goal a profound understanding of this rare liver tumor is crucial. Factors such as clinicopathological characteristics, growth patterns and biological behavior are of central importance. To explore onco-surgical strategies and aspects for complete resection of cHCC-CC and to answer important key questions, an extensive review of the literature was conducted to answer the following questions: What are the best surgical options? Is there a significance for nonanatomical resections? Is there a prognostic value of concomitant lymphadenectomy? What about multimodal concepts in local advanced cHCC-CC? The role of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) including the role of robotic liver surgery for cHCC-CC will be discussed. While liver transplantation (LT) is standard for patients with unresectable HCC, the role of LT in cHCC-CC patients is still controversial. How can patients with high risk for early tumor recurrence be identified to avoid aggressive surgical treatment without clinical benefit? The comprehensive understanding of this challenging liver tumor will help to improve future treatment options for these patients.
Collapse
|
50
|
Liu GM, Zhang YM. Mini-ALPPS-based multidisciplinary treatment leading to long-term survival in a patient with a large HCC: A case report. Front Surg 2023; 9:920953. [PMID: 36760667 PMCID: PMC9902497 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.920953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The future liver remnant (FLR) induced by stage I associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) might be limited due to liver fibrosis/cirrhosis or incomplete liver parenchymal transection. Case presentation A 51-year-old male with hepatitis B liver fibrosis was diagnosed with a large HCC (13.5 cm × 12.5 cm × 13.8 cm). The FLR of the patient was insufficient to permit one-stage tumor resection. Therefore, the two-stage ALPPS surgery was planned. Stage I ALPPS was performed with incomplete liver parenchymal transection due to bleeding (which is why we called it Mini-ALPPS). On postoperative day (POD) 18, CT revealed that the FLR hypertrophy was poor. The FLR/standard liver volume (SLV) had only increased from 22.00% to 34.63%. Salvage transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed on POD 22 days to control possible tumor progression during the waiting period and to further facilitate FLR growth. About 16 days later, a CT reassessment of FLR revealed a 42.5% FLR/SLV. A right hepatectomy was then uneventfully performed. Although HCC recurred after 586 days, the patient survived for more than 1,920 days after stage II ALPPS. Discussion Damage control during a difficult conventional stage I ALPPS was important. TACE during the interstage and postoperative periods of this Mini-ALPPS was safe and beneficial. A multidisciplinary based on Mini-ALPPS treatment could provide patients long-term survival; however, Mini-ALPPS should not be selected as the primary solution for such patients today, as some other minimally invasive and effective strategies are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gao-Min Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Clinical Translational Research of Hakka Population, Meizhou, China,Correspondence: Gao-Min Liu Yao-Min Zhang
| | - Yao-Min Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Meizhou People’s Hospital, Meizhou, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Clinical Translational Research of Hakka Population, Meizhou, China,Correspondence: Gao-Min Liu Yao-Min Zhang
| |
Collapse
|