Increased Frequency of BK Virus-Specific Polyfunctional CD8+ T Cells Predict Successful Control of BK Viremia After Kidney Transplantation

Posoleucel in Kidney Transplant Recipients with BK Viremia: Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial

Key Points

Background

Kidney transplant recipients with BK virus infection are at risk of developing BK virus–associated nephropathy, allograft rejection, and subsequent graft loss. There are no approved treatments for BK virus infection. Posoleucel is an off-the-shelf, allogeneic, multivirus-specific T-cell investigational therapy targeting BK virus, as well as five other opportunistic viruses: adenovirus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, human herpesvirus 6, and John Cunningham virus.

Methods

In this phase 2, double-blind study, kidney transplant recipients with BK viremia were randomized 1:1:1 to receive posoleucel weekly for 3 weeks and then every 14 days (bi-weekly dosing) or every 28 days (monthly dosing) or placebo for 12 weeks. Participants were followed for 12 weeks after completing treatment. The primary objective was safety; the secondary objective was plasma BK viral load reduction.

Results

Sixty-one participants were randomized and dosed. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. No deaths, graft-versus-host disease, or cytokine release syndrome occurred. The proportion of patients who had adverse events (AEs) judged by the investigators to be treatment-related was slightly lower in recipients of posoleucel: 20% (4 of 20 patients) and 18% (4 of 22) in those infused on a bi-weekly and monthly schedule, respectively, and 26% (5 of 19) in placebo recipients. None of the grade 3–4 AEs or serious AEs in any group were deemed treatment-related. No deaths, graft-versus-host disease, or cytokine release syndrome occurred. Three participants had allograft rejection, but none were deemed treatment-related by investigators. In posoleucel recipients, BK viremia reduction was associated with an increase in the circulating frequency of BK virus–specific T cells, and the presence and persistence of posoleucel was confirmed by T-cell receptor sequencing.

Conclusions

Posoleucel was generally safe, well tolerated, and associated with a larger reduction of BK viremia compared with placebo. Limitations of this study include the relatively short duration of follow-up and lack of power to detect significant differences in clinical outcomes.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:

Study of Posoleucel (Formerly Known as ALVR105; Viralym-M) in Kidney Transplant Patients With BK Viremia, NCT04605484.

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

The value and complexity of studying cellular immunity against BK Polyomavirus in kidney transplant recipients

BK Polyomavirus is of particular concern for kidney transplant recipients, due to their immunosuppression. This problem is exacerbated by the high effectiveness of antirejection therapies, which also compromise the organism's ability to fight viral infections. The long-term risk is loss of graft function through BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). The assessment of host immunity and its link to the control of viral infections is a major challenge. In terms of humoral immunity, researchers have highlighted the prognostic value of the pre-transplantation anti-BKPyV immunoglobulin G titer. However, humoral immunity alone does not guarantee viral clearance, and the correlation between the humoral response and the time course of the infection remains weak. In contrast, cellular immunity variables appear to be more closely associated with viral clearance, given that the cellular immune response to the kidney transplant is the main target of immunosuppressive treatments in recipients. However, the assessment of the cellular immune response to BK Polyomavirus is complex, and many details still need to be characterized. Here, we review the current state of knowledge about BKPyV cellular immunity, as well as the difficulties that may be encountered in studying it in kidney transplant recipient. This is an essential area of research for optimizing the management of transplant recipients and minimizing the risks associated with insidious BKPyV disease.

Pretransplant BKV-IgG serostatus and BKV-specific ELISPOT assays to predict BKV infection after kidney transplantation

Introduction

Polyomavirus (BKV) infection can lead to major complications and damage to the graft in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We investigated whether pretransplant BK serostatus and BK-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) predicts post-transplant BK infection.

Methods

A total of 93 donor-recipient pairs who underwent kidney transplantation (KT) and 44 healthy controls were examined. Assessment of donor and recipient BKV serostatus and BKV-CMI in recipients was performed prior to transplantation using BKV-IgG ELISA and BKV-specific IFN-g ELISPOT assays against five BK viral antigens (LT, St, VP1, VP2, and VP3). BK viremia was diagnosed when blood BKV-DNA of 104 copies/mL or more was detected during follow-up periods.

Results

Anti-BKV IgG antibody was detected in 74 (79.6%) of 93 KTRs and in 68 (73.1%) of 93 KT donors. A greater percentage of KTRs who received allograft from donors with high levels of anti-BKV IgG had posttransplant BK viremia (+) than KTRs from donors with low anti-BKV IgG (25.5% [12/47] vs. 4.3% [2/46], respectively; P = 0.007). Pretransplant total BKV-ELISPOT results were lower in BK viremia (+) patients than in patients without viremia (-) 20.5 [range 9.9-63.6] vs. 72.0 [43.2 - 110.8]; P = 0. 027). The sensitivity and specificity of the total BKV-ELISPOT assay (cut-off ≤ 53 spots/3×105 cells) for prediction of posttransplant BK viremia were 71.4 (95% CI: 41.9-91.6) and 54.4 (42.8-65.7), respectively. The combination of high donor BKV-IgG, low recipient BKV-IgG, and low total BKV-ELISPOT results improved specificity to 91.1%.

Discussion

Our study highlights the importance of pretransplant BKV-IgG serostatus and BKV-specific CMI in predicting posttransplant BKV infection in KTRs. The combination of high donor BKV-IgG, low recipient BKV-IgG, and low total BKV-ELISPOT results predicted BK viremia after KT. Pretransplant identification of patients at highrisk for BK viremia could enable timely interventions and improve clinical outcomes of KTRs.

BK virus genotypes and humoral response in kidney transplant recipients with BKV associated nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with BK virus associated nephropathy (BKVN), BKV genotypes' evolution and anti-BKV humoral response are not well established. We aim to analyze BKV replication and genetic evolution following transplantation, and characterize concomitant anti-BKV-VP1 humoral response.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 32 cases of biopsy-proven BKVN. Stored plasma and kidney biopsies were tested for BKV viral load, and VP1 sequencing performed on positive samples. BKV-VP1 genotype-specific neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) titers were determined at transplantation and BKVN.

RESULTS

At the time of BKVN diagnosis, BKV viral load was 8.2 log₁₀ IU/10⁶ cells and 5.4 log₁₀ IU/mL in kidney and plasma, respectively. VP1 sequencing identified the same BKV-subtype in both compartments in 31/32 cases. At the time of transplantation, 8/20 (40%) of biopsies tested positive for BKV detection, whereas concomitant BKV viremia was negative. VP1 sequencing identified a different subtype compared to BKVN in 5/6 of these samples. This was confirmed following transplantation: 8 patients had a BKV+ biopsy before BKV viremia, and VP1 sequencing identified a different subtype compared to BKVN in all of them. After the onset of BKV viremia and prior to BKVN diagnosis, the BKV subtype in BKV+ plasma and kidney biopsy was the same as the one isolated at BKVN. BKV-VP1 NAbs titers were significantly higher at the time of BKVN compared to transplantation (p = .0031), with similar titers across genotypes.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, our data suggest that among some KTR with BKVN, the BKV genotype from the donor may not be responsible for BKVN pathogenesis.

Characteristics, risk factors and outcome of BKV nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Following kidney transplantation, BK virus associated nephropathy (BKVN) occurs in 1 to 10% of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and represents a major cause of graft loss. We aim at identifying factors associated with biopsy proven BKVN among KTR.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study including all KTR with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of BKVN between 2005 and 2019. Clinical characteristics and outcome were described. For each case, one control KTR without BKV infection was identified and matched by age, transplant date, and donor status. Factors associated with BKVN diagnosis were identified using exact conditional logistic regression. Comparative survival was described using Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

Sixty-four cases of BKVN were identified among 1737 new kidney transplantation (3.7% prevalence). Clinical characteristics did not differ between groups, except for a higher c-PRA among cases. BKVN occurred in a median time of 11 (5-14.5) months after KT, and was associated with a significantly impaired graft function at diagnosis. Following BKVN, 61 (95%) of the patients had immunosuppression reduction, which led to BKV DNAemia resolution in 49% of cases. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with BKVN diagnosis were lymphopenia < 500/mm³ and a prednisone dose > 7.5 mg/day. Median duration of follow-up was 40 months for both groups. BKVN was associated with a significantly increased risk of graft rejection (P = 0.02) and return to dialysis (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

BKVN remains a severe complication in KTR and is associated with an increased risk for acute rejection and return to dialysis. Lymphopenia below 500/mm³ and corticosteroid maintenance therapy are significantly associated with biopsy-proven BKVN diagnosis.

Monitoring of blood immunosuppressant concentrations and lymphocyte activation for predicting viral infections following kidney transplantation: A pilot study

The current standard pharmacokinetic monitoring of immunosuppressive therapy does not consider inter- and intra-individual differences in the biological response to multidrug immunosuppressive therapy. The authors evaluated the blood levels of the immunosuppressive drugs IL-2 and IFN-γ in circulating lymphocytes as surrogate indicators of the development of viral infections after living kidney transplantation. This single-center prospective study included 20 kidney transplant recipients who underwent living-donor transplantation at the Mie University Hospital. All the study participants received tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, methylprednisolone, and basiliximab. The area under the concentration curves (AUCs) of blood tacrolimus and serum mycophenolic acid were measured 1 day prior to transplantation and on post-transplantation days (PTD) for up to 5 months. IL-2 and IFN-γ levels in circulating lymphocytes were measured simultaneously. One recipient experienced an acute graft rejection. Although the AUC of tacrolimus at PTD 7 was significantly higher in the virus-infected group than that in the non-infected group, the AUC of mycophenolic acid did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The expression levels of IFN-γ+ NK, IFN-γ+ CD4+ T, and CD8+ T cells in the infected group also tended to be higher than those in the noninfected group. During the study period, there was a clear difference in the expression of IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cells, which increased significantly during or after infection. Circulating IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cell counts may serve as promising biomarkers for predicting opportunistic viral infections early after kidney transplantation.

Preservation of Antiviral Immunologic Efficacy Without Alloimmunity After Switch to Belatacept in Calcineurin Inhibitor-Intolerant Patients

Introduction

Belatacept has shown potential for prevention of rejection after kidney transplantation, given its demonstration of reduced nephrotoxicity in combination with absence of significant incidence of rejection. However, concerns have been raised regarding increased risk of viral infection.

Methods

We set out to explore the impact of the switch to belatacept on alloimmune and antiviral immunity through the study of patients switched from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept within 3 months of kidney transplantation compared with a matched cohort of control patients on a CNI-based regimen.

Results

After the switch to belatacept, immune phenotyping demonstrated a decrease in naive and an increase in terminally differentiated effector memory (TMRA) T cells, with no significant difference compared with control patients. Donor-specific immune response, measured by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), did not change significantly either by single or double cytokine secretion, but it was associated with the appearance of donor-specific antibody (DSA) in the control but not the belatacept cohort (P = 0.039 for naive and P = 0.002 for TMRA subtypes). Increased incidence of de novo DSA development was observed in the control group (P = 0.035). Virus-specific immune response, as measured by ICS in response to cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), was similar in both groups and stable over time.

Conclusion

We found that belatacept use was associated with an absence of alloreactivity without impact on immune phenotype, while preserving the antiviral immune response, for patients switched from a CNI-based regimen. In parallel, the antiviral immune response against CMV and EBV was preserved after the belatacept switch (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01953120).

The effect of BK polyomavirus large T antigen on CD4 and CD8 T cells in kidney transplant recipients

Human BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) can affect the machinery of the host cell to induce optimal viral replication or transform them into tumor cells. Reactivation of BKPyV happens due to immunosuppression therapies following renal transplantation which might result in BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) and allograft loss. The first protein that expresses after entering into host cells and has an important role in pathogenicity is the Large T antigen (LT-Ag). In this review tries to study the molecular and cellular inter-regulatory counteractions especially between CD4 and CD8 T cells, and BKPyV LT-Ag may have role in nephropathy after renal transplantation.

Research progress of BK virus and systemic lupus erythematosus

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease in which patients are often infected by viruses due to deficient immunity or immunosuppressant use. BK virus (BKV)mainly affects the kidney and can also cause multiple organ involvement throughout the body, which is similar to SLE. BKV is mostly a latent infection in vivo. The incidence of virus reactivation is higher in SLE patients. Reactivation of BKV can induce the production of autoantibodies, thereby promoting the occurrence and development of SLE.Purpose: Aim of this article is to review the prevalence and pathegenesis of BKV infection in SLE patients.Method: The literature search was conducted using four different databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science.Results: BK virus is higher infection and reactivation in SLE patients. The "hapten carrier" mechanism may lead to the production of autoantibodies. Some immunosuppressive drugs, like leflumide and hydroxychloroquine, may show a protective effect.Conclusions: BKV infection plays a role in the occurrence and development of SLE, and its significance deserves further exploration.

The effect of BKV reactivation on cytokines behavior in kidney transplanted patients

BACKGROUND

BK virus associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is one of the common causes of graft loss among kidney transplanted recipients (KTRs). The current treatment for BKV nephropathy is decreasing the immunosuppressive regimen in KTRs. Interleukin-27 (IL-27) is a multifunctional cytokine that might be the front-runner of an important pathway in this regard. Therefore, in current study it is tried to evaluate the changes in the expression level of IL-27 and some related molecules, resulting from BKV reactivation in KTR patients.

METHODS

EDTA-treated blood samples were collected from all participants. Patients were divided into two groups, 31 kidney transplant recipients with active and 32 inactive BKV infection, after being monitored by Real time PCR (Taq-Man) in plasma. Total of 30 normal individuals were considered as healthy control group. Real time PCR (SYBR Green) technique is used to determine the expression level of studied genes.

RESULTS

The results of gene expression comparisons showed that the expression level of IL-27, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TNFR2 and IRF7 genes was significantly higher in inactive group in comparison to active group. The expression level of TLR4 was lower in both active and inactive groups in comparison to control group. ROC curve analysis showed that IL-27 and IRF7 are significantly different amongst other studied genes. Finally, the analyses revealed that the expression level of most of the studied genes (except for TNF-α and TLR4) have significant correlation with viral load.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed that IL-27, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TNFR2 and IRF7 expression level is higher in inactive group and TLR4 expression level is lower in patients' groups in comparison to control group. Also, ROC curve analysis showed IL-27 and IRF7 can significantly differentiate studied groups (BKV active vs. inactive). Therefore, these results might help elucidating the pattern in charge of BKV reactivation in kidney transplanted patients.

Cytomegalovirus specific polyfunctional T-cell responses expressing CD107a predict control of CMV infection after liver transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load after liver transplantation (LT) is controlled by cell mediated immune responses (CMI). Quantification of CMV-specific T-cells may identify patients who control CMV spontaneously and avoid expensive and potentially toxic antiviral therapies. Prospective post-LT clinical, virological and immunological monitoring was carried out up to 1-year post-LT in a cohort of adult recipients. The CMV-specific T-cell response was characterized using flow cytometry intracellular cytokine staining in 49 LT recipients-R (79.6% R+, 20.4% R-). CMV infection occurred in 24 patients (18 D+/R+ and 6 D+/R-). Only patients with undetectable polyfunctional CMV-specific CD4+ T-cells developed CMV infection. Predictive models showed that polyfunctional CMV-specific CD4+ T-cells pre-existing before LT are protective for CMV reactivation posttransplantation. Quantitation of CD4+ T-cell responses to CMV may be a useful marker for spontaneous control of viral replication to tailor antiviral prophylaxis after LT.

BK polyomavirus-pathogen, paradigm and puzzle

BK virus is a polyomavirus with seroprevalence rates of 80% in adults. Infection is usually acquired during childhood, and the virus is benign or pathologic depending on immune status. The virus reactivates in immunodeficiency states, mostly among transplant (either kidney or bone marrow) recipients. There are approximately 15 000 renal transplants every year in the USA, of which 5-10% develop BK polyomavirus nephropathy; 50-80% of patients who develop nephropathy go on to develop graft failure. BK virus is associated with BK polyomavirus nephropathy, ureteral stenosis, late-onset hemorrhagic cystitis, bladder cancer and other nonlytic large T-expressing carcinomas. The renal spectrum begins with viruria and can end with graft failure. The clinical spectrum and outcomes vary among transplant patients. New noninvasive diagnostic methods, such as urinary polyomavirus Haufen detected by electron microscopy, are currently under study. Treatment is primarily directed at decreasing immunosuppression but may be associated with graft rejection. Repeat transplantation is encouraged as long as viral clearance in plasma prior to transplant is accomplished. There remain no definitive data regarding the utility of transplant nephrectomy.

The Natural History of BK Polyomavirus and the Host Immune Response After Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is associated with symptomatic hemorrhagic cystitis after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Little is known about the host immune response, effectiveness of antiviral treatment, or impact of asymptomatic replication on long-term kidney function.

METHODS

In children and young adults undergoing allogeneic HCT, we quantified BKPyV viruria and viremia (pre-HCT and at Months 1-4, 8, 12, and 24 post-HCT) and tested associations of peak viremia ≥10 000 or viruria ≥109 copies/mL with estimated kidney function (glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) and overall survival at 2 years posttransplant. We examined the factors associated with viral clearance by Month 4, including BKPyV-specific T cells by enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot at Month 3 and cidofovir use.

RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 193 participants (median age 10 years) and found that 18% had viremia ≥10 000 copies/mL and 45% had viruria ≥109 copies/mL in the first 3 months post-HCT. Among the 147 participants without cystitis (asymptomatic), 58 (40%) had any viremia. In the entire cohort and asymptomatic subset, having viremia ≥10 000 copies/mL was associated with a lower creatinine/cystatin C eGFR at 2 years post-HCT. Viremia ≥10 000 copies/mL was associated with a higher risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.2). Clearing viremia was associated with detectable BKPyV-specific T cells and having viremia <10 000 copies/mL, but not cidofovir exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for BKPyV viremia after HCT identifies asymptomatic patients at risk for kidney disease and reduced survival. These data suggest potential changes to clinical practice, including prospective monitoring for BKPyV viremia to test virus-specific T cells to prevent or treat BKPyV replication.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay for BK polyomavirus immune response monitoring after kidney transplantation

BK virus (BKV) infection after kidney transplantation can cause BKV nephropathy (BKVAN) resulting in graft dysfunction and allograft loss. The treatment for BKVAN is reduction of the immunosuppressive load which increases the risk of kidney transplant rejection. There is no biomarker to monitor BKV activity besides BK viral load. The value of the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot (ELISPOT) assay as a tool to monitor the recipient's anti-BKV immune response after transplantation was investigated systematically. Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies of ELISPOT evaluating the immune response against BKV. BKV status was categorized as "active BKV infection" and as "resolving BKV infection". Random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of the ELISPOT assay, after stratifying patients into groups based on positive and negative ELISPOT results. One-hundred twenty-seven articles were identified of which nine were included. Patients with negative ELISPOT had an increased risk of having active BKV replication (odds ratio of 71.9 (95%-CI 31.0-167.1). Pooled sensitivity was 0.95 (95%-CI 0.89-0.98) and specificity was 0.88 (95%-CI 0.78-0.94). The standardized mean difference of the number of IFN-γ producing cells between patients with active BKV infection compared with patients who had resolving BKV infection was -2.09 (95%-CI -2.50, -1.68). The ELISPOT assay is a useful tool for BKV risk assessment and in combination with BKV load may support clinicians in guiding immunosuppressive therapy in patients with BKV replication.

BK Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: Balancing Rejection and Infection

BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) and allograft rejection are two closely-associated diseases on opposite ends of the immune scale in kidney transplant recipients. The principle of balancing the immune system remains the mainstay of therapeutic strategy. While patient outcomes can be improved through screening, risk factors identification, and rapid reduction of immunosuppressants, a lack of standard curative therapy is the primary concern during clinical practice. Additionally, difficulty in pathological differential diagnosis and clinicopathology’s dissociation pose problems for a definite diagnosis. This article discusses the delicate evaluation needed to optimize immunosuppression and reviews recent advances in molecular diagnosis and immunological therapy for BKVN patients. New biomarkers for BKVN diagnosis are under development. For example, measurement of virus-specific T cell level may play a role in steering immunosuppressants. The development of cellular therapy may provide prevention, even a cure, for BKVN, a complex post-transplant complication.

BK Polyomavirus-specific T Cells as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker for BK Polyomavirus Infections After Pediatric Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

After kidney transplantation, uncontrolled BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) replication causes kidney graft failure through BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN), but markers predicting outcome are missing. BKPyV-specific T cells may serve as a predictive marker to identify patients at risk of persistent DNAemia and BKPyVAN.

METHODS

Out of a total of 114 pediatric kidney recipients transplanted between 2008 and 2018, 36 children with posttransplant BKPyV-DNAemia were identified. In a prospective noninterventional study, BKPyV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells were measured in 32 of 36 viremic pediatric kidney recipients using intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. The course of the BKPyV replication was monitored with regard to duration of BKPyV-DNAemia and need of therapeutic intervention and diagnosis of proven BKPyVAN.

RESULTS

Levels of BKPyV-specific T cells negatively correlated with subsequent duration of BKPyV-DNAemia. Patients with BKPyV-specific CD4 T cells ≥0.5 cells/µL and/or BKPyV-specific CD8 T cells ≥0.1 cells/µL had transient, self-limiting DNAemia (PPV 1.0, NPV 0.86). BKPyV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells below these thresholds were found in children with persistent BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyVAN with need for therapeutic intervention. After reducing immunosuppressive therapy, levels of BKPyV-specific CD4 T cells increased while plasma BKPyV-DNAemia declined.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that BKPyV-specific T cell levels may help to distinguish patients with transient, self-limiting BKPyV-DNAemia from those with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyVAN, who would benefit from individualized therapeutic interventions such as reduced immunosuppression. Thereby the risk for rejection because of unnecessary reduction of immunosuppression in case of self-limiting BKPyV-DNAemia can be minimized.

Usefulness of BK virus-specific interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay for predicting the outcome of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate if BK virus (BKV)-specific T cell immunity measured by an interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay can predict the outcome of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

METHODS

We included 68 KTRs with different viremia status (no viremia [n = 17], BK viremia [n = 27], and cleared viremia [n = 24]) and 44 healthy controls (HCs). The BK viremia group was divided into controller (< 3 months) and noncontroller (> 3 months) according to sustained duration of BKV infection. We compared BKV-ELISPOT results against five BKV peptides (large tumor antigen [LT], St, VP1-3).

RESULTS

BKV-ELISPOT results were higher in three KTRs groups with different BKV infection status than the HCs group (p < 0.05). In KTR groups, they were higher in cleared viremia group than no viremia or BK viremia group. Within the BK viremia group, controller group had higher LT-ELISPOT results compared to noncontroller group (p = 0.032). Also, KTRs without BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) had higher LT, St, VP1, and VP2-ELISPOT results than those with BKVN (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BKV-ELISPOT assay may be effective in predicting clinical outcomes of BKV infection in terms of clearance of BK virus and development of BKVN.

BK polyomavirus-specific antibody and T-cell responses in kidney transplantation: update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) has emerged as a significant cause of premature graft failure after kidney transplantation. Without effective antiviral drugs, treatment is based on reducing immunosuppression to regain immune control over BKPyV replication. The paradigm of high-level viruria/decoy cells, BKPyV-DNAemia, and proven nephropathy permits early interventions. Here, we review recent findings about BKPyV-specific antibody and T-cell responses and their potential role in risk stratification, immune monitoring, and therapy.

RECENT FINDING

Kidney transplant recipients having low or undetectable BKPyV-specific IgG immunoglobulin G (IgG) are higher risk for developing BKPyV-DNAemia if the donor has high BKPyV-specific IgG. This observation has been extended to neutralizing antibodies. Immunosuppression, impaired activation, proliferation, and exhaustion of BKPyV-specific T cells may increase the risk of developing BKPyV-DNAemia and nephropathy. Clearance of BKPyV-DNAemia was correlated with high CD8 T cell responses to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-types presenting BKPyV-encoded immunodominant 9mers. For clinical translation, these data need to be assessed in appropriately designed clinical studies, as outlined in recent guidelines on BKPyV in kidney transplantation.

SUMMARY

Evaluation of BKPyV-specific immune responses in recipient and donor may help to stratify the risk of BKPyV-DNAemia, nephropathy, and graft loss. Future efforts need to evaluate clinical translation, vaccines, and immunotherapy to control BKPyV replication.

Immunosuppression, BK polyomavirus infections, and BK polyomavirus-specific T cells after pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

After kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy increases risk of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). Outcomes of BKPyV viremia are various and prognostic markers are missing. The impact of different immunosuppressive regimens on BKPyV infections is currently under discussion.

METHODS

We analyzed immunosuppressive therapy and BKPyV-specific cellular immunity to distinguish patients at risk of BKPyVAN from those with self-limiting viremia for purposes of risk-stratified BKPyV management. In a retrospective analysis, 46 pediatric kidney recipients with BKPyV viremia were analyzed with regard to duration of BKPyV viremia and immunosuppressive therapy; in addition, in 37/46 patients, BKPyV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells were measured.

RESULTS

Nine patients showed persistent BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN, and required therapeutic intervention, while 37 patients had asymptomatic, self-limiting viremia. At onset of viremia, 78% of patients with persistent viremia and BKPyVAN were treated with tacrolimus, whereas tacrolimus therapy was significantly less frequent in patients with self-limiting viremia (14%). The majority of patients with transient, self-limiting viremia received cyclosporine A (81%) and/or mTOR inhibitors (81%). Patients with persistent BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN showed lack of BKPyV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells (6/6), whereas the majority of patients with self-limiting viremia (27/31) had detectable BKPyV-specific CD4 and/or CD8 T cells ≥ 0.5 cells/μl (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that tacrolimus enhances risk of BKPyVAN with need of therapeutic intervention, whereas under cyclosporine A and mTOR inhibitors, the majority of pediatric kidney recipients showed self-limiting viremia. In patients at risk of BKPyV infections, combination of cyclosporine A and mTOR inhibitor may be advantageous.

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies and the risk of BK polyomavirus viremia and nephropathy

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) is the cause of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy resulting in premature graft loss. There are limited data regarding the role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and its prevention in developing BKV viremia and PVAN. In a prospective study, we analyzed 207 consecutive renal transplant recipients previously enrolled in 2 randomized trials evaluating different CMV prevention regimens with routine screening for BKV and CMV. Of these, 59 received valganciclovir and 100 valacyclovir prophylaxis; 48 patients were managed by preemptive therapy. At 3 years, the incidence of BKV viremia and PVAN was 28% and 5%, respectively. CMV DNAemia developed in 55% and CMV disease in 6%. Both BKV viremia (42% vs 23% vs 21%, P = .006) and PVAN (12% vs 2% vs 2%, P = .011) were increased in patients treated with valganciclovir prophylaxis compared to valacyclovir and preemptive therapy. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, valganciclovir prophylaxis was independent predictor of BKV viremia (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.38, P = .002) and PVAN (HR = 4.73, P = .026). In contrast, the risk of subsequent BKV viremia was lower in patients with antecedent CMV DNAemia (HR = 0.50, P = .018). These data suggest valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with increased risk of BKV viremia and PVAN. CMV DNAemia did not represent a risk for BKV.

BK polyoma virus nephropathy in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

Background:

The epidemiology of BK polyoma virus nephropathy in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients is poorly characterized. Kidney dysfunction after hematopoietic cell transplant is often attributed to treatment toxicities and kidney biopsies are rarely performed.

Methods:

We reviewed pathology-confirmed BK polyoma virus nephropathy cases in adult and pediatric patients who had undergone a hematopoietic cell transplant between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 at our institution. Plasma and urine BK polyoma virus was assessed by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay and were obtained at the clinician discretion. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. BK polyoma virus nephropathy was scored by the Banff Working Group Proposal.

Results:

Eight (7 adult and 1 pediatric) cases of BK polyoma virus nephropathy were identified among 685 hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, 14 of whom had undergone a kidney biopsy. Five patients (62.5%) had received a CD34+-selected peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplant; two had received a cord blood allograft and one an unmodified peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplant. Two patients developed acute graft-versus-host disease grade II. Early post–hematopoietic cell transplant BK polyoma viruria was documented with onset at a median of 54 days (range, 6–91) post–hematopoietic cell transplant and median urine BK polyoma viral load was 9.6 log10 copies/mL (range, 8.6–10.0). BK polyoma virus nephropathy was diagnosed at a median of 267 days after hematopoietic cell transplant (range, 133–637). At BK polyoma virus nephropathy diagnosis, all patients had decreased renal function with glomerular filtration rate (median 29 mL/min/1.73 m2; range, 9–98 ) and creatinine (median 2.4 mg/dL; range, 0.8–7.5) ; median plasma BK polyoma viral load was 6.3 log10 copies/mL (range, 5.5–7.1) and median CD4+ lymphocyte count was 82 cell/mcL (range, 21–172).

Conclusions:

We report eight biopsy-proven BK polyoma virus nephropathies in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients from a single center. BK polyoma virus nephropathy should be considered in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with worsening kidney function and high BK polyoma viremia.

An immunoinformatic approach to universal therapeutic vaccine design against BK virus

In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) long-term immunosuppression leads to BK virus (BKV) reactivation, with an increased incidence of BKV-associated pathologies and allograft rejection. The current approaches to limit BKV infection include a reduction in immunosuppression and use of anti-BKV drugs, which are clinically sub-optimal and lead to undesirable therapeutic outcomes. Here, we adopted an immune-based approach to augment the endogenous BKV specific T-cells. Using reverse vaccinology based in silico analyses, we designed a peptide-based multi-epitope vaccine for BKV (MVBKV). A major advantage of our approach is that the selected epitopes show an affinity towards all the 12 superfamilies of HLA class I alleles and 27 reference alleles of HLA class II. This suggests MVBKV's universal nature and its potential effectiveness in a wide-population base. To improve MVBKV's immunogenic properties, a synthetic Toll-like Receptor (TLR) 4 peptide ligand (RS09) was added to the final vaccine construct. The sequences of the individual epitopes were molecularly linked to form a 3D-stable synthetic protein. Overall, our immunoinformatic-based approach led to the design of a new MVBKV vaccine, which remains to be validated experimentally.

Non-immunological complications following kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the most effective way to decrease the high morbidity and mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease. However, KT does not completely reverse the damage done by years of decreased kidney function and dialysis. Furthermore, new offending agents (in particular, immunosuppression) added in the post-transplant period increase the risk of complications. Cardiovascular (CV) disease, the leading cause of death in KT recipients, warrants pre-transplant screening based on risk factors. Nevertheless, the screening methods currently used have many shortcomings and a perfect screening modality does not exist. Risk factor modification in the pre- and post-transplant periods is of paramount importance to decrease the rate of CV complications post-transplant, either by lifestyle modification (for example, diet, exercise, and smoking cessation) or by pharmacological means (for example, statins, anti-hyperglycemics, and so on). Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a major contributor to mortality in this patient population. Although tacrolimus is a major contributor to PTDM development, changes in immunosuppression are limited by the higher risk of rejection with other agents. Immunosuppression has also been implicated in higher risk of malignancy; therefore, proper cancer screening is needed. Cancer immunotherapy is drastically changing the way certain types of cancer are treated in the general population; however, its use post-transplant is limited by the risk of allograft rejection. As expected, higher risk of infections is also encountered in transplant recipients. When caring for KT recipients, special attention is needed in screening methods, preventive measures, and treatment of infection with BK virus and cytomegalovirus. Hepatitis C virus infection is common in transplant candidates and in the deceased donor pool; however, newly developed direct-acting antivirals have been proven safe and effective in the pre- and post-transplant periods. The most important and recent developments on complications following KT are reviewed in this article.

Increased T cell immunosenescence and accelerated maturation phenotypes in older kidney transplant recipients

Older kidney transplant recipients experience increased rates of infection and death, and less rejection, compared with younger patients. However, little is known about immune dysfunction in older compared with younger kidney transplant recipients and whether it is associated with infection. We evaluated T cell phenotypes including maturation, immune senescence, and exhaustion in a novel investigation into differences in older compared with younger patients receiving identical immune suppression regimens. We evaluated PBMC from 60 kidney transplant recipients (23 older and 37 matched younger patients) by multiparameter immune phenotyping. Older kidney transplant recipients demonstrated decreased frequency of naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and increased frequency of terminally differentiated, immune senescent, and NK T cells expressing KLRG1. There was a trend towards increased frequency of T cell immune senescence in patients experiencing infection in the first year after transplantation, which reached statistical significance in a multivariate analysis. This pilot study reveals immune dysfunction in older compared with younger transplant recipients, and suggests a likely mechanism for increased vulnerability to infection. The ability to assess T cell maturation and immune senescence in transplant recipients offers the potential for risk stratification and customization of immune suppression to prevent infection and rejection after transplantation.

Differences in Proinflammatory Cytokines and Monocyte Subtypes in Older as Compared With Younger Kidney Transplant Recipients

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

The number of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring kidney transplantation continues to grow. Evaluation of healthy older adults has revealed proinflammatory changes in the immune system, which are posited to contribute to age-associated illnesses via “inflamm-aging.” Immunologic dysfunction is also associated with impaired control of infections. Whether these immunologic changes are found in older kidney transplant recipients is not currently known, but may have important implications for risk for adverse clinical outcomes.

Methods

Three months after transplant, innate immune phenotype was evaluated by flow cytometry from 60 kidney transplant recipients (22 older [≥60 years] and 38 younger [<60 years old]). Multiplex cytokine testing was used to evaluate plasma cytokine levels. Younger patients were matched to older patients based on transplant type and induction immune suppression.

Results

Older kidney transplant recipients demonstrated decreased frequency of intermediate monocytes (CD14++CD16+) compared with younger patients (1.2% vs 3.3%, P = 0.007), and a trend toward increased frequency of proinflammatory classical monocytes (CD14++CD16−) (94.5% vs 92.1%) (P = 0.065). Increased levels of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) were seen in older patients.

Conclusions

In this pilot study of kidney transplant recipients, we identified differences in the innate immune system in older as compared with younger patients, including increased levels of IFN-γ. This suggests that age-associated nonspecific inflammation persists despite immune suppression. The ability to apply noninvasive testing to transplant recipients will provide tools for patient risk stratification and individualization of immune suppression regimens to improve outcomes after transplantation.

BK Polyomavirus: Clinical Aspects, Immune Regulation, and Emerging Therapies

BK polyomavirus (BKV) causes frequent infections during childhood and establishes persistent infections within renal tubular cells and the uroepithelium, with minimal clinical implications. However, reactivation of BKV in immunocompromised individuals following renal or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may cause serious complications, including BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), ureteric stenosis, or hemorrhagic cystitis. Implementation of more potent immunosuppression and increased posttransplant surveillance has resulted in a higher incidence of BKVAN. Antiviral immunity plays a crucial role in controlling BKV replication, and our increasing knowledge about host-virus interactions has led to the development of improved diagnostic tools and clinical management strategies. Currently, there are no effective antiviral agents for BKV infection, and the mainstay of managing reactivation is reduction of immunosuppression. Development of immune-based therapies to combat BKV may provide new and exciting opportunities for the successful treatment of BKV-associated complications.

T cell therapies for human polyomavirus diseases

Rapid restoration of virus-specific T immunity via adoptive transfer of ex vivo generated T cells has been proven as a powerful therapy for patients with advanced cancers and refractory viral infections such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). BK virus (BKV), John Cunningham virus (JCV), and Merkel cell carcinoma virus (MCV) are the members of the rapidly growing human polyomavirus (hPyV) family that commonly infects most healthy humans. These viruses have a clearly established potential for causing severe end-organ damage or malignant transformation, especially in individuals with weakened immunity who are unable to mount or regain endogenous T-cell responses as a result of underlying leukemia or iatrogenic immunosuppression in autoimmunity, bone marrow and solid organ transplant settings. Here we will discuss recent advances in using T-cell-based immunotherapies to save patients suffering from PyV-associated diseases including hemorrhagic cystitis, BKV virus-associated nephropathy, and JC-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). We will also review progress in the understanding of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) as a virally driven tumor that is amenable to immune intervention and can be targeted with adoptively transferred T cells specific for viral oncoproteins.

BK polyomavirus: a review of the virology, pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, and treatment

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a non-enveloped, circular dsDNA virus with a genome of approximately 5100 base pairs. It can be divided into four major genotypes, but the effects of different genotypes on clinical disease are uncertain. Primary BKPyV infection is generally acquired asymptomatically in childhood. It establishes low-level persistence in many tissues, particularly the genitourinary tract. Reactivation can lead to severe disease including BKPyV-associated nephropathy confirmed by renal biopsy, hemorrhagic cystitis and meningoencephalitis. Nucleic acid amplification testing of blood and urine is the main diagnostic and prognostic test for BKPyV infection. The treatment of BKPyV infection has concentrated on reduction in immunosuppressive therapy. Recent studies suggest that antiviral drugs have demonstrated only modest benefit, but adoptive T-cell therapies offer potential advances.

Pre-transplant immune factors may be associated with BK polyomavirus reactivation in kidney transplant recipients

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) reactivation in kidney transplant recipients can lead to allograft damage and loss. The elements of the adaptive immune system that are permissive of reactivation and responsible for viral control remain incompletely described. We performed a prospective study evaluating BKPyV-specific T-cell response, humoral response and overall T-cell phenotype beginning pre-transplant through one year post-transplant in 28 patients at two centers. We performed an exploratory analysis of risk factors for the development of viremia and viruria as well as compared the immune response to BKPyV in these groups and those who remained BK negative. 6 patients developed viruria and 3 developed viremia. BKPyV-specific CD8⁺ T-cells increased post-transplant in viremic and viruric but not BK negative patients. BKPyV-specific CD4⁺ T-cells increased in viremic, but not viruric or BK negative patients. Anti-BKPyV IgG antibodies increased in viruric and viremic patients but remained unchanged in BK negative patients. Viremic patients had a greater proportion of CD8⁺ effector cells pre-transplant and at 12 months post-transplant. Viremic patients had fewer CD4⁺ effector memory cells at 3 months post-transplant. Exploratory analysis demonstrated lower CD4 and higher total CD8 proportions, higher anti-BKPyV antibody titers and the cause of renal failure were associated BKPyV reactivation. In conclusion, low CD4, high CD8 and increased effector CD8 cells were found pre-transplant in patients who became viremic, a phenotype associated with immune senescence. This pre-transplant T-cell senescence phenotype could potentially be used to identify patients at increased risk of BKPyV reactivation.

Clinically Relevant Reactivation of Polyomavirus BK (BKPyV) in HLA-A02-Positive Renal Transplant Recipients Is Associated with Impaired Effector-Memory Differentiation of BKPyV-Specific CD8+ T Cells

Polyomavirus BK (BKPyV) frequently reactivates in immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and may lead to graft loss due to BKPyV-induced interstitial nephritis (BKVN). Little is known on the differentiation of CD8⁺ T cells targeting BKPyV in RTRs. Here we investigated whether BKPyV-specific CD8⁺ T cell differentiation differs in RTRs with varying degrees of BKPyV reactivation and/or BKVN.

Using combinatorial encoding with tetramers carrying BKPyV major capsid protein (VP1) and large T antigen protein (LTAG) epitopes, we investigated CD8⁺ T cell responses to BKPyV in longitudinally obtained PBMC samples from 46 HLA-A02-positive RTRs and 20 healthy adults. We were also able to isolate BKPyV-specific CD8⁺ T cells from five renal allografts, two of which were affected by BKVN.

Before transplantation, BKPyV-specific CD8⁺ T cells targeting VP1 and LTAG epitopes appeared predominantly as central-memory and CD27⁺/CD28⁺ effector-memory (T_EM), and naïve-like PD-1-expressing cells, respectively. After viral reactivation, BKPyV-specific CD8⁺ T cells assumed CD28⁻ T_EM and T_EMRA states in patients who were able to control BKPyV, whereas differentiation lagged behind in patients with severe viral reactivation or BKVN. Furthermore, VP1-specific CD69⁺/CD103⁺ tissue-resident memory (T_RM) cells accumulated in BKVN-affected allografts but lacked signs of effector differentiation. In contrast, granzyme B-expressing effector cells were detected in allografts not affected by BKVN.

In conclusion, effector-memory differentiation of BKPyV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in patients with high viral load or BKVN is impaired. Further characterization of the specific mechanisms behind this altered cellular differentiation is necessary to develop therapies that can prevent the emergence of BKVN.

In immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients (RTRs), BKPyV frequently reactivates from latency and may cause severe interstitial nephritis in the allograft (BKVN). Not only is there no effective treatment, it also not understood why BKVN arises in some RTRs but not in all. In the current study we investigated populations of CD8⁺ T cells targeting epitopes from structural and non-structural BKPyV proteins in RTRs over the course of transplantation. In contrast to RTRs who suffered from self-limiting reactivation of BKPyV, patients who developed severe viral reactivation and BKVN were found to have BKPyV-specific CD8⁺ T cells which did not, or less often differentiate into CD28⁻ effector-memory cells during viral reactivation. Moreover, virus-specific CD8⁺ T cell activation and differentiation was not only impaired in the circulation, but possibly also in BKVN-affected renal allografts. In contrast to the CD8⁺ T cells in kidneys from three patients who did not develop BKVN, T cells in two BKVN-affected kidneys did not display typical cytotoxic effector traits. These findings suggest that impaired BKPyV-specific CD8⁺ T cell maturation in response to viral reactivation, possibly owing to inter-individual differences in sensitivity to immunosuppressive medication or to certain viral quasispecies, underlies the emergence of severe viral reactivation and BKVN.