KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors

Effectiveness of a Mobile Health System on Compliance With 2-Year Living Kidney Donor Follow-Up in the United States

BACKGROUND

Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy requires 2 years of follow-up for living kidney donors (LKDs); however, many transplant hospitals struggle to meet this requirement. We developed and tested a mobile health (mHealth) system for LKD follow-up in a pilot randomized-controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS

LKDs were randomly assigned to either the intervention (mHealth + standard of care) or control arm (standard of care). We assessed OPTN policy-defined completeness and timeliness of 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups. Four hundred LKDs were enrolled in the study (June 2018 to February 2021).

RESULTS

At 6-month follow-up, a higher proportion of the intervention arm participants completed composite visits (97.5% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.01). Both arms had similar compliance rates at 1- and 2-year follow-up (92.0% vs. 89.5%, p = 0.49, and 66.5% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.83). Intervention arm participants completed 6-month follow-up 11 days earlier than their counterparts (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

mHealth technologies improved 6-month follow-up, but did not impact 1- and 2-year LKD follow-up in this single-center RCT. Other strategies, such as providing services beyond data collection, may be necessary to improve donor engagement and support LDK's long-term follow-up.

The Flow of Living Kidney Donor Candidates Through the Evaluation Process: A Single-Center Experience in Ontario, Canada

Introduction

Tracking the evaluation process of living kidney donor candidates facilitates benchmarking and can inform process redesign to improve experiences with the evaluation and enable more living donor kidney transplantation.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records for all living donor candidates who were actively undergoing evaluation at any time between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, at the London Health Sciences Centre in London, Ontario, Canada. We abstracted information on demographic factors, the evaluation process, reasons for a delayed evaluation, reasons for an evaluation termination (eg, donation, decline, withdrawal, loss to follow-up), frequency and timing of evaluation testing, and recipient dialysis status.

Results

Over time, the number of living donor kidney transplants increased from 22 in 2013 to 32 in 2016 (18% and 34% of which were pre-emptive, respectively). The median number of candidates coming forward doubled from 167 in 2013 (2 candidates per recipient) to 348 in 2016 (4 candidates per recipient). Median time from first contact until donation decreased from 12.8 months in 2013 to 7.1 months in 2016 (a 45% reduction). The time from computed tomography (CT) angiography until donation (n = 74) was a median of 75 (interquartile range [IQR] = 36, 180) days, the longest single step in the evaluation. Common reasons for delay included waiting for the referral of their intended recipient for transplant evaluation (11% of candidates) and a need for the donor candidate to lose weight (8% of candidates). Donors completed the main evaluation tests on a median of 5 different dates. Thirty-six recipients started dialysis after their living donor candidates' evaluation had been underway for at least 3 months.

Conclusion

Tracking the steps and reasons for an inefficient living kidney donor evaluation process can be used for quality improvement, and efficiency improvements are expected to translate into improved outcomes and experiences.

Strategies for Monitoring and Supporting Living Donors in Korea: An Expert Position Paper

BACKGROUND

The number of organ transplants in South Korea has increased, with a notable rise in living donor transplants. Ensuring their long-term health and well-being is critical to address potential complications and maintain the success of the transplant programs.

METHODS

A diverse advisory panel, including transplant experts and coordinators, was established to evaluate the follow-up care for living donors. The panel reviewed the results of a brief survey of donors regarding their donation experience, follow-up programs, guidelines, and policies from South Korea and other countries, aiming to identify best practices and recommend improvements.

RESULTS

The study found that follow-up care for living donors in South Korea is inconsistent and lacks standardization. Significant variability exists in follow-up practices across different institutions, and comprehensive data on donor health pre- and post-donation are scarce. The need for continuous, systematic follow-up, encompassing both medical and psychological support, is emphasized to ensure donor well-being.

CONCLUSION

Improving follow-up care for living donors is essential. Establishing a national registry and increasing donor advocacy teams are meaningful steps to enhance donor care, ensure long-term health, and maintain ethical standards in organ donation.

Renal parenchymal volume analysis: Clinical and research applications

Background and Objectives

In most patients, the renal parenchymal volumes in each kidney directly correlate with function and can be used as a proxy to determine split renal function (SRF). This simple principle forms the basis for parenchymal volume analysis (PVA) with semiautomated software, which can be leveraged to predict SRF and new-baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) following nephrectomy. PVA was originally used to evaluate renal transplantation donors and has replaced nuclear renal scans (NRS) in this domain. PVA has subsequently been explored for the management of patients with kidney cancer for whom difficult decisions about radical versus partial nephrectomy can be influenced by accurate prediction of NBGFR. Our objective is to present a comprehensive review of the applications of PVA in urology including their clinical and research implications.

Methods

Key articles utilizing renal PVA to improve clinical care and facilitate urologic research were reviewed with special emphasis on take-home points of clinical relevance and their contributions to progress in the field.

Results

There have been considerable advances in renal PVA over the past 15 years, which is now established as a reference standard for the prediction of functional outcomes after renal surgery. PVA provides improved accuracy when compared to NRS-based estimates or non-SRF-based algorithms. PVA can be performed in minutes using routine preoperative cross-sectional imaging and can be readily applied at the point of care. Additionally, PVA has important research applications, enabling the precise study of the determinants of functional recovery after partial nephrectomy, which can affect surgical approaches to this procedure.

Conclusions

Despite the wide availability of PVA, primarily for use in renal transplantation, it has not been widely implemented for other urologic purposes at most centres. Our hope is that this narrative review will increase PVA utilization in urology and facilitate further progress in the field.

Outcomes of Living Kidney Donors Following Donor Nephrectomy in Aotearoa New Zealand

Introduction

Living donor kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for people with kidney failure (KF). Because living donors do not derive health benefits from donation, contemporary relevant information on post donation outcomes need to inform decision-making. Studies of donor outcomes are largely restricted to donations in the USA and Europe. We studied donors over a 30-year period in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) to investigate short-term and long-term outcomes.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational cohort study of all living kidney donors in NZ (1988-2018). The primary outcome was the incidence of KF. Secondary outcomes were death, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and the incidence of complications within 90 days after nephrectomy. Donors were identified using multiple data sources: the NZ Blood Service, the Ministry of Health (MoH), hospital records, and the Australia and New Zealand Live Kidney Donor Registry. Outcomes were determined via data linkage with the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) registry and the MoH. Follow-up was until December 31, 2019.

Results

A total of 1339 people donated a kidney from 1988 to 2018. During 16,272 person-years of follow-up, 5 people developed KF, an incidence of 3 per 10,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.3-7.4). Patient survival was 99% (98.2%-99.5%) at 10 years; 30 people died during follow-up. The incidence of CVD was 11.6 (95% CI: 7.4-19.2) per 10,000 person-years; 292 donors (22%) experienced a complication following donor nephrectomy and 69 (5%) required intervention.

Conclusion

There is a low risk of KF and other complications among living kidney donors in NZ. These findings represent important contemporary data to support decision making.

Improving healthcare services for living kidney donors: an experience-based approach in the Netherlands

Living kidney donors voluntarily donate one of their kidneys to someone suffering from end-stage kidney disease. Transplantation is a life-saving opportunity for these patients and generally provides an increase in quality of life. A major goal of research and practice related to living kidney donation concerns the safety of the donor. In comparison, only limited research has been carried out on donor experiences of the donor journey in the full cycle of care. To gain further insight into this, we have performed an experience-based co-design (EBCD) study in a major transplant center in the Netherlands. EBCD is a research approach where professionals and patients share experiences with the purpose of improving the healthcare journey. We identified 11 areas for potential improvement: from intake, throughout surgery and hospitalization, to homecare and aftercare. Donors indicated the importance of person-specific information during the admission process, accurate communication with health professionals and attention to recovery after surgery. Nevertheless, no one regretted their donation, and the overall experience was positive. An important finding for professionals is that donors feel like 'normal' patients and want to be taken care of even though they are healthy. Just like other patients, they can be anxious before surgery and some may have concerns about recovery. Although this is a single-center study, the results should be relevant for all transplant centers that are interested in improving donor experiences. We concluded that the EBCD approach, when embedded in a local context, is a valuable tool for bringing patients' experiences to healthcare improvement.

Relationship between new-onset proteinuria and the volume of the non-donated kidney before and after donation in living kidney donors

INTRODUCTION

Some living kidney donors (LKDs) experience proteinuria after donation. Based on several studies, preoperative non-donated side kidney volume (pre-KV) and postoperative percentage change in preserved kidney hypertrophy (%PKH) are associated with proteinuria. This study explored the association of the combination of pre-KV and %PKH with new-onset proteinuria.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study included eligible LKDs who underwent donor nephrectomy between January 2008 and July 2022 (N = 195). Among those, LKDs in whom KV and either urinary protein or albumin were obtained both pre-donation and 1 year post-donation were finally included (N = 70). The LKDs were assigned to four groups according to the mean body surface area-adjusted pre-KV and %PKH, and their association with the occurrence of proteinuria or albuminuria was investigated.

RESULTS

Among the 70 LKDs, mean age was 59.8 ± 7.9 years, and 50 (71.4%) were females. The mean preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate, %PKH, and pre-KV was 78.0 ± 13.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, 20.3 ± 7.0%, and 161.4 ± 24.1 cm3/1.73 m2, respectively. During the 2.4 year follow-up period, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of proteinuria among the four groups (log-rank test, P = 0.111). However, after adjustment, the large pre-KV and small %PKH group had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) for proteinuria than the small pre-KV and large %PKH groups (adjusted HR 3.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-8.91, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Proteinuria is more likely to occur postoperatively in LKDs whose kidneys are already enlarged before donation and cannot appropriately hypertrophy.

The utility of split function testing in determining recovery of glomerular filtration rate after living kidney donation: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

A number of UK transplantation centres use isotope studies to estimate the relative contribution from each kidney in living kidney donor assessment. The evidence that the estimation of pre-donation split function of the non-donated kidney influences post-donation renal recovery is limited. The aim of this study was to analyse whether, in the context of other donor factors, the split function of the non-donated kidney predicts the percentage recovery of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at one-year post-donation.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective cohort analysis was undertaken on 291 living kidney donors in the Glasgow Renal and Transplant Unit between 1st January 2011 and 1st June 2022. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis was used to analyse the impact of donor factors on recovery of renal function at one year relative to baseline isotope GFR (iGFR) or to estimated GFR (eGFR by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI] formula). Sub-analyses of donor outcome (% recovery of iGFR and eGFR at one year) were undertaken using single-measures ANOVA and grouping of donors by pre-donation isotope uptake of the non-donated kidney.

RESULTS

Median recovery of pre-donation GFR at 1 year was 70.0% (IQR 64.8-75.5). On linear regression analysis there was no significant association found between split function of the non-donated kidney and the percentage recovery of iGFR, although a small significant association was found for eGFR. There was no significant difference between mean iGFR or eGFR recovery on sub-analysis of donor outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated no clinically important predictive relationship between percentage recovery of renal function at 1 year after living kidney donation and pre-donation split function within the range accepted for donation in our centre.

Attitudes Toward Use of an APOL1 Genetic Testing Chatbot in Living Kidney Donor Evaluation: A Focus Group Study

BACKGROUND

Living kidney donor (LKD) candidates of African ancestry are increasingly asked to undergo Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) genetic testing during the donor evaluation process to better understand their risk of kidney disease. LKD candidates' attitudes about using a clinical chatbot on APOL1 remain unknown. This study builds on prior work to culturally adapt the Gia (Genetic Information Assistant) chatbot on APOL1 by assessing donor, recipient, and community member attitudes about the Gia chatbot for enhancing the integration of APOL1 testing into the LKD clinical evaluation workflow.

METHODS

This study involved focus groups and a post-focus group survey in two US cities about the APOL1 Gia chatbot. Qualitative data were analyzed via thematic analysis, and descriptive statistics were used for demographic data.

RESULTS

We conducted 10 focus groups including 54 participants (25 LKDs, 23 community members, and 6 living donor kidney transplant recipients of African ancestry). Five themes emerged: (1) participants supported LKD candidates using the Gia chatbot before the nephrologist clinic visit, (2) participants were interested in undergoing APOL1 testing after using Gia, (3) APOL1 testing costs may influence LKD candidates' willingness to get tested, (4) patients of African ancestry may hold varying preferences for using chatbots in the healthcare setting, and (5) individual-level barriers may limit the use of Gia in the healthcare setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals of African ancestry were highly receptive to integrating the APOL1 chatbot into LKD candidate clinical evaluation, which bodes well for integrating chatbots into the APOL1 clinical genetic testing process.

Time trends in preemptive kidney transplantation in Europe: an ERA registry study

BACKGROUND

Preemptive kidney transplantation (PEKT) has better outcomes when compared with transplantation after dialysis. We aimed to examine trends in PEKT between 2000 and 2019 in Europe and to provide an overview of associated policies, barriers and initiatives.

METHODS

Adult patients from 12 European countries who received a preemptive kidney transplant were included. The representatives of the registries providing these data were questioned on the policies, barriers and initiatives around PEKT.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2019, 20 251 adults underwent PEKT [11 169 from living donors (LDs), 8937 from deceased donors (DDs)]. The proportion of first kidney transplantations that were preemptive more than doubled from 7% in 2000 to 18% in 2019, reflecting a similar relative increase for LD kidney recipients (from 21% to 43%) and DD kidney recipients (from 4% to 11%). Large international differences were found. The increase in PEKT was observed across all age, sex and primary renal disease groups. Countries had similar criteria for preemptive waitlisting. Barriers mentioned included donor shortage, late referral to the transplant center and long donoror recipient work-up. Suggested initiatives included raising awareness on the possibility of PEKT, earlier start and shorter work-up time for recipient and LD.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last two decades the proportion of patients receiving a first kidney transplant preemptively has more than doubled, reflecting a similar relative increase for living and DD kidney recipients.

The Development of a Predictive Model for Postoperative Renal Function in Living Kidney-Transplant Donors

Background/Objectives: The accurate prediction of postoperative renal function (post-RF) in living kidney donors is essential for optimizing donor safety and long-term health. After nephrectomy, renal function can be significantly altered, owing to the functional adaptation of the remaining kidney; however, the extent of this has not been investigated. This study aimed to examine how various donor factors affect functional adaptation after nephrectomy, and to develop a new predictive model. Methods: In total, 310 patients who underwent donor nephrectomy were included. Preoperative split renal function (pre-SRF) of the remaining kidney was measured. Post-RF was measured 1 month after surgery. The functional adaptation rate was calculated from the difference between pre-SRF and post-RF. Multiple regression analysis was performed to develop a predictive formula for post-RF, incorporating donor age and pre-SRF. Results: The median age of the donors was 60 years, and 38.7% were men. The median pre-SRF was 36.4 mL/min/1.73 m2. The median functional adaptation rate was 26.8%, with donor age, pre-SRF, and a history of hyperuricemia (HUA) being significant predictors of the functional adaptation rate. The equation for post-RF was established as 0.94 × pre-SRF - 0.12 × age + 18.87 mL/min/1.73 m2. The estimated post-RF showed a high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.76), with a mean bias of -0.01 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conclusions: Donor age, pre-SRF, and HUA are key predictors of renal functional adaptation after nephrectomy. The developed formula accurately estimates post-RF, supporting clinical decision-making and donor counseling for living kidney donations.

Renal function outcomes in living kidney donors in a transplant center in Colombia

Introduction

Living kidney donation is currently low in Colombia, and this is associated with the lack of knowledge of the risks and renal function outcomes of potential donors; there are no studies that evaluate these outcomes. The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of renal function, the incidence of metabolic diseases, arterial hypertension, as well as the finding of albuminuria and/or proteinuria in living kidney donors with a 2-year follow-up post donation.

Methods

Observational study in living kidney donor patients, in which renal function outcomes were evaluated between the predonation period and up to 24 months postdonation.

Results

Ninety-one patients were included, with a median predonation glomerular filtration rate of 98 ml/min/1.73 m2, interquartile range (90.5-109), and 24-month postdonation of 66.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 interquartile range (57.9-75). A total of 60.26% of the population was in stage 2 at the end of follow-up and no patient had a glomerular filtration rate less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or required renal support therapy.

Conclusion

A living donor evaluation process based on risk factor stratification and adequate assessment of renal function was found to generate safe renal function outcomes both in the perioperative period and in medium- and long-term follow-up.

Preoperative Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Potential in Morbidly Obese Voluntary Kidney Donors

BACKGROUND

This was a retrospective study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a strategy for weight loss in obese prospective voluntary kidney donors who were unable to achieve weight reduction through lifestyle changes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included living kidney donors who underwent LSG as a strategy for weight loss in obese prospective voluntary kidney donors between 2012 and 2022. Prospective donors who were initially rejected due to obesity underwent LSG after pretransplantation evaluation. Changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), and laboratory parameters (hemogram, kidney function tests, liver function tests, fasting and postprandial glycemia, HbA1c, and lipid profile measurements) were recorded before bariatric surgery and before nephrectomy.

RESULTS

Of the 16 candidates who underwent LSG, one did not proceed with donor nephrectomy due to the intended recipient's death. Among the remaining 15 subjects, the average interval between bariatric surgery and donor nephrectomy was 165.95 ± 48.86 days. There was a significant decrease in BMI following bariatric surgery (P < .0001); the mean BMI before bariatric surgery was 40.94 ± 4.53 kg/m², and before nephrectomy, it was 30.91 ± 3.87 kg/m2. The mean weight loss was 22.64 ± 5.75 kg.

CONCLUSION

This study supports LSG as an effective approach for obese individuals who are potential kidney donors to achieve weight loss, mitigate obesity-associated risks, and become successful kidney donors.

Pre-donation assessment of cystatin C to improve prediction of pre- and post-donation GFR in potential living kidney donors

BACKGROUND

Accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial in living kidney donation. While most estimated GFR (eGFR) equations are based on plasma creatinine, its levels are strongly influenced by muscle mass. Application of cystatin C (cysC)-based estimates before donation may improve both estimation of current GFR and prediction of post-donation GFR.

METHODS

We assessed the performance of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations based on creatinine (eGFRcreat-2009, eGFRcreat-2021), cysC (eGFRCysC-2012) or both (eGFRcombined-2012, eGFRcombined-2021) for estimating pre- and post-donation (mGFR) GFR in 486 living kidney donors. We subsequently focused on a subgroup of individuals with high/low muscle mass (25% highest/lowest 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion, sex stratified and height indexed).

RESULTS

Pre-donation eGFRcombined-2012 and eGFRcombined-2021 showed the strongest associations with pre- and post-donation mGFR. Pre-donation eGFRcombined-2021 was most accurate for estimating both pre-donation (bias 0.01 ± 11.9 ml/min/1.73 m2) and post-donation mGFR (bias 1.3 ± 8.5 ml/min/1.73 m2). In donors with high/low muscle mass, cysC-based equations (with or without creatinine) performed better compared with equations based on only creatinine.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined eGFR equations yielded a better estimate of pre- and post-donation mGFR compared with estimates based on creatinine or cysC only. The added value of cysC seems particularly pronounced in donors with high or low muscle mass.

Short and long-term effects of kidney donation on mineral and bone metabolism

BACKGROUND

Living kidney donors (LKD) experience an abrupt decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) resulting in abnormalities of mineral and bone metabolism (MBD), and this may have implications for skeletal health. We prospectively studied acute and long term MBD adaptation of LKD from two kidney transplant centers (São Paulo, Brazil and Miami, USA).

METHODS

Renal function and MBD parameters longitudinally after kidney donation (baseline - D0, day 1, 14, 180 and 360 post-operatively) were measured in 74 patients (40 y, 73% female, 54% Brazilian). A subset of 20 donors from Brazil were reassessed after 10 years of nephrectomy.

RESULTS

At baseline, Brazilian donors presented lower intact FGF23 (20.8 vs. 80.1 pg/mL, P < 0.01) and higher PTH (47.4 vs. 40.1, P = 0.04) than their US counterparts. GFR decreased to 63% of its baseline levels just after donation but improved 10% during the first year. PTH levels increased on D1, returning to baseline levels on D14, while FGF23 remained higher than baseline over the first year. LKD had a significant reduction of serum phosphate on D1, which returned to baseline levels on D180. A higher fractional excretion of phosphate (FEP) was noted since D14. After 10 years of donation, 20 LKD presented a sustained reduction in GFR (74.8 ± 14mL/min). There was a return to baseline in serum FGF23 [21.8 (18-30) pg/mL] and FEP, accompanied by an increase in serum calcium. PTH remained elevated (57.9 ± 18 pg/mL), whereas serum calcitriol and Klotho were lower than before the donation.

CONCLUSIONS

The abrupt decline in kidney mass is associated with an increase in PTH and FGF23 that is not explained by phosphate retention. In a long-term evaluation, LKD showed a sustained drop in GFR, with lower serum calcitriol and Klotho, and higher PTH. The effects of these changes should be investigated in further studies.

Pregnancy Outcomes in Living Kidney Donors: Protocol of a Population-Based Cohort Study in Three Canadian Provinces

Background

A substantial proportion of living kidney donors are women of childbearing age. Some prior studies report a higher risk of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia in living kidney donors compared with nondonors. Further research is needed to better quantify the risk of adverse maternal, fetal/infant, and neonatal outcomes attributable to living kidney donation.

Objective

To determine the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and eclampsia, and other maternal and fetal/infant outcomes in living kidney donors compared with a matched group of nondonors of similar baseline health.

Design and Setting

Protocol for a population-based, matched cohort study using Canadian administrative health care databases. The protocol will be run separately in 3 provinces, Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia, and results will be combined statistically using meta-analysis.

Participants

The cohort will include women aged 18 to 48 years who donated a kidney between July 1992 and March 2022 and had at least one postdonation singleton pregnancy of ≥20 weeks gestation between January 1993 and February 2023. We expect to include at least 150 living kidney donors with over 200 postdonation pregnancies from Ontario and a similar number of donors and pregnancies across Alberta and British Columbia combined. Nondonors will include women from the general population with at least one pregnancy of ≥20 weeks gestation between January 1993 and February 2023. Nondonors will be randomly assigned cohort entry dates based on the distribution of nephrectomy dates in donors. The sample of nondonors will be restricted to those aged 18 to 48 years on their cohort entry dates with delivery dates at least 6 months after their assigned entry dates. A concern with donor and nondonor comparisons is that donors are healthier than the general population. To reduce this concern, we will also apply 30+ exclusion criteria to further restrict the nondonor group so that they have similar health measures at cohort entry as the donors. Donor and nondonor pregnancies will then be matched (1:4) on 5 potential confounders: delivery date, maternal age at delivery date, time between cohort entry and delivery date, neighborhood income quintile, and parity at delivery date.

Measurements

The primary outcome will be a composite of maternal gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or eclampsia. Secondary maternal outcomes will include components of the primary outcome, early pre-eclampsia, severe maternal morbidity, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, and gestational diabetes. Fetal/infant/neonatal outcomes will include premature birth/low birth weight, small for gestational age, neonatal intensive care unit admission, stillbirth, and neonatal death.

Methods

The primary unit of analysis will be the pregnancy. We will compute the risk ratio of the primary composite outcome in donors versus nondonors using a log-binomial mixed regression model with random effects to account for the correlation within women with multiple pregnancies and within matched sets of donors and nondonors. We will perform the statistical analyses within each province and then combine aggregated results using meta-analytic techniques to produce overall estimates of the study outcomes.

Limitations

Due to regulations that prevent individual-level records from being sent to other provinces, we cannot pool individual-level data from all 3 provinces.

Conclusion

Compared to prior studies, this study will better estimate the donation-attributable risk of adverse maternal, fetal/infant, and neonatal outcomes. Transplant centers can use the results to counsel female living donor candidates of childbearing age and to inform recommended practices for the follow-up and care of living kidney donors who become pregnant.

Performance of the New CKD-EPI Creatinine-and Cystatin C-based Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation Equation in Living Kidney Donor Candidate

Background

Accurate preoperative evaluation of renal function in living kidney donor candidates (LKDCs) is crucial to prevent kidney failure after nephrectomy. We examined the performance of various estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations, including the new chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in LKDCs.

Methods

We analyzed 752 LKDCs who were assessed for measured GFR by inulin clearance as part of routine pretransplant examination from 2006 to 2020. CKD-EPI2012 from cystatin C (CKD-EPI12cys), CKD-EPI2021 from creatinine (CKD-EPI21cr), CKD-EPI21cr-cys, Japanese modified (JPN) eGFRcr, and JPN eGFRcys were compared in determining the suitability for LKDCs.

Results

CKD-EPI12cys had the lowest absolute and relative biases, with higher P30 and P10, followed by JPN eGFRcys, CKD-EPI21cr, and CKD-EPI21cr-cys. The root mean square error was least for CKD-EPI12cys, then JPN eGFRcys, CKD-EPI21cr-cys, CKD-EPI21cr, and JPN eGFRcr. CKD-EPI21cr, CKD-EPI12cys, and CKD-EPI21cr-cys estimated GFR higher, whereas JPN eGFRcr estimated GFR lower. At the threshold of 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, CKD-EPI21cr had the highest percentage of misclassification at 37.37%, whereas JPN eGFRcr had the lowest percentage of misclassification at 6.91%. Using the age-adapted approach, JPN eGFRcr had the lowest percentage of misclassification into overestimation at 7.31%. All eGFR had >5.0%, and CKD-EPI21cr had the highest percentage of misclassification at 21.94%. Conversely, CKD-EPI21cr-cys had the lowest percentage of misclassification into underestimation at 3.19%, both at the threshold of 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the age-adapted approach. JPN eGFRcr had the highest percentage at 33.38% and 40.69%, respectively.

Conclusions

In evaluating the renal function of Japanese LKDCs, the new CKD-EPI equation had a lower rate of underestimation but a relatively high rate of overestimation. New GFR estimation formulas are needed to be tailored to each ethnic group to enhance the accuracy and reliability of donor selection processes.

Partial Nephrectomy Due to Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Patient Who Was a Prior Kidney Donor: Pitfalls About Living Kidney Donation, Case Report, and Review of the Literature

Cancer development in the remnant kidney in living kidney donors represents a challenging process in terms of patient management. Total nephrectomy is the preferred method for tumors exceeding 7 cm in size. In the case presented here, partial nephrectomy was preferred because the patient was a prior living kidney donor. On the other hand, being an organ donor always creates concerns for long-term safety and survival. The guidelines on the evaluation and care of living kidney donors have generally focused on assessment of the risk for chronic kidney disease in donors and donor-to-recipient infection or cancer transmission. In this case report, we also evaluated whether being a donor is a facilitating factor for cancer development in the remnant kidney.

Renal outcome of living kidney donors aged more than 70 years

BACKGROUND

The number of marginal living kidney donors has increased. Medically complex donors who have hypertension, older age, or low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) have been more likely to be used.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of living kidney donors at a single center. We analyzed 309 living donors and divided them into three groups: group with older donors (aged ≥70 years) (n = 41), middle-aged (aged 46-69 years) (n = 239), and young donors (aged <46 years) (N = 29). Donor factors associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b or worse within 5 years post-donation were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 309 live donors, 86 (27.8%) developed CKD stage3b or worse within 5 years post-donation. The incidence of CKD stage3b or worse within 5 years post-donation was significantly higher in older donor (p < 0.01). Cox regression models revealed that older donor ages and lower eGFR were significantly related to the development of CKD stage3b or worse, independent of comorbidities such as obesity and hypertension [hazard ratio (95% CI); 4.59 (1.02-20.6), p = 047, 0.95 (0.94-0.96), p ≤ 0.01, respectively]. However, recovery of eGFR 4-5 years after donation was noted in the middle-aged and older donor groups, whereas the level of eGFR remained unchanged in the young group.

CONCLUSIONS

Older donors tend to develop CKD stage3b within 5 years post-donation but with the potential of recovery. Healthy older people (aged ≥70 years) could be candidates for living donors under careful monitoring of kidney function after donation.

Longitudinal Trajectories of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in a European Population of Living Kidney Donors

A living donor (LD) kidney transplant is the best treatment for kidney failure, but LDs safety is paramount. We sought to evaluate our LDs cohort's longitudinal changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We retrospectively studied 320 LDs submitted to nephrectomy between 1998 and 2020. The primary outcome was the eGFR change until 15 years (y) post-donation. Subgroup analysis considered distinct donor characteristics and kidney function reduction rate (%KFRR) post-donation [-(eGFR6 months(M)-eGFRpre-donation)/eGFRpre-donation*100]. Donors had a mean age of 47.3 ± 10.5 years, 71% female. Overall, LDs presented an average eGFR change 6 M onward of +0.35 mL/min/1.73 m2/year. The period with the highest increase was 6 M-2 Y, with a mean eGFR change of +0.85L/min/1.73 m2/year. Recovery plateaued at 10 years. Normal weight donors presented significantly better recovery of eGFR +0.59 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, compared to obese donors -0.18L/min/1.73 m2/year (p = 0.020). Noteworthy, these results only hold for the first 5 years. The subgroup with a lower KFRR (<26.2%) had a significantly higher decrease in eGFR overall of -0.21 mL/min/1.73 m2/year compared to the groups with higher KFRR (p < 0.001). These differences only hold for 6 M-2 Y. Moreover, an eGFR<50 mL/min/1.73 m2 was a rare event, with ≤5% prevalence in the 2-15 Y span, correlating with eGFR pre-donation. Our data show that eGFR recovery is significant and may last until 10 years post-donation. However, some subgroups presented more ominous kidney function trajectories.

Donor Perceptions and Preferences of Telemedicine and In-Person Visits for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation

Introduction

Living kidney donor evaluation is a lengthy and complex process requiring in-person visits. Access to transplant centers, travel costs, lost wages, and dependent care arrangements are barriers to willing donors initiating evaluation. Telemedicine can help streamline and epedite the evaluation process. We aimed to deeply understand donor experiences and preferences using hybrid telemedicine video/in-person visits to ease access to donor evaluation or counseling.

Methods

We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with donors or donor candidates who completed their evaluation through telemedicine/in-person, or in-person only visits at a tertiary transplant center between November 27, 2019 and March 1, 2021. Enrollment continued until data saturation was reached (interviews with 20 participants) when no new information emerged from additional interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Eight themes were identified as follows: (i) reducing financial and logistical burdens (minimizing travel time and travel-related expenses), (ii) enhancing flexibility with scheduling (less time off work and child or family caregiver arrangements), (iii) importance of a walkthrough and establishing shared understanding, (iv) supporting information with technology and visual aids, (v) key role of the coordinator, (vi) preferred visit by provider role (meeting donor surgeon in-person to create rapport and engaging primary care provider in donor evaluation/follow-up), (vii) comparing modality differences in human connection, and (viii) opportunity for family and support network engagement (allowing loved ones to be involved in telemedicine visits irrespective of geographic locations and pandemic restrictions).

Conclusion

Telemedicine/in-person hybrid model can make donor evaluation more accessible and convenient. Our findings help inform about determinants that influence the adoption of telemedicine to initiate donor evaluation to motivate willing donors. In addition, our results call for policy and legislation that support telemedicine services for living donor kidney transplantation across states.

Robotic versus open mini-incision living donor nephrectomy: Single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Robotic surgery is associated with less tissue manipulation and earlier recovery with minimal incision. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between robotic-assisted donor nephrectomy (RDN) and open mini-incision donor nephrectomy (ODN).

METHODS

From 2016 to 2019, 141 cases involving RDN were analysed. Patient outcomes were compared with those of 191 patients who underwent ODN from 2010 to 2015. Demographics, operation factors, perioperative outcomes, and complications were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The RDN group presented with less blood loss than the ODN group (p = 0.023). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RDN group than in the ODN group (p < 0.005). The overall rate of complications was low and there was no significant difference in complication rates between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The robotic approach has benefits over the traditional open approach, including shorter length of hospital stay and reduced intraoperative blood loss.

Integrating Machine Learning into Statistical Methods in Disease Risk Prediction Modeling: A Systematic Review

Background: Disease prediction models often use statistical methods or machine learning, both with their own corresponding application scenarios, raising the risk of errors when used alone. Integrating machine learning into statistical methods may yield robust prediction models. This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess current development of global disease prediction integration models. Methods: PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, WanFang, and SinoMed databases were searched to collect studies on prediction models integrating machine learning into statistical methods from database inception to 2023 May 1. Information including basic characteristics of studies, integrating approaches, application scenarios, modeling details, and model performance was extracted. Results: A total of 20 eligible studies in English and 1 in Chinese were included. Five studies concentrated on diagnostic models, while 16 studies concentrated on predicting disease occurrence or prognosis. Integrating strategies of classification models included majority voting, weighted voting, stacking, and model selection (when statistical methods and machine learning disagreed). Regression models adopted strategies including simple statistics, weighted statistics, and stacking. AUROC of integration models surpassed 0.75 and performed better than statistical methods and machine learning in most studies. Stacking was used for situations with >100 predictors and needed relatively larger amount of training data. Conclusion: Research on integrating machine learning into statistical methods in prediction models remains limited, but some studies have exhibited great potential that integration models outperform single models. This study provides insights for the selection of integration methods for different scenarios. Future research could emphasize on the improvement and validation of integrating strategies.

Hypertension and Kidney Function After Living Kidney Donation

Importance

Recent guidelines call for better evidence on health outcomes after living kidney donation.

Objective

To determine the risk of hypertension in normotensive adults who donated a kidney compared with nondonors of similar baseline health. Their rates of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline and risk of albuminuria were also compared.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Prospective cohort study of 924 standard-criteria living kidney donors enrolled before surgery and a concurrent sample of 396 nondonors. Recruitment occurred from 2004 to 2014 from 17 transplant centers (12 in Canada and 5 in Australia); follow-up occurred until November 2021. Donors and nondonors had the same annual schedule of follow-up assessments. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on a propensity score was used to balance donors and nondonors on baseline characteristics.

Exposure

Living kidney donation.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥90 mm Hg, or antihypertensive medication), annualized change in eGFR (starting 12 months after donation/simulated donation date in nondonors), and albuminuria (albumin to creatinine ratio ≥3 mg/mmol [≥30 mg/g]).

Results

Among the 924 donors, 66% were female; they had a mean age of 47 years and a mean eGFR of 100 mL/min/1.73 m2. Donors were more likely than nondonors to have a family history of kidney failure (464/922 [50%] vs 89/394 [23%], respectively). After statistical weighting, the sample of nondonors increased to 928 and baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. During a median follow-up of 7.3 years (IQR, 6.0-9.0), in weighted analysis, hypertension occurred in 161 of 924 donors (17%) and 158 of 928 nondonors (17%) (weighted hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.75-1.66]). The longitudinal change in mean blood pressure was similar in donors and nondonors. After the initial drop in donors' eGFR after nephrectomy (mean, 32 mL/min/1.73 m2), donors had a 1.4-mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI, 1.2-1.5) per year lesser decline in eGFR than nondonors. However, more donors than nondonors had an eGFR between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at least once in follow-up (438/924 [47%] vs 49/928 [5%]). Albuminuria occurred in 132 of 905 donors (15%) and 95 of 904 nondonors (11%) (weighted hazard ratio, 1.46 [95% CI, 0.97-2.21]); the weighted between-group difference in the albumin to creatinine ratio was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.88-1.19).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of living kidney donors and nondonors with the same follow-up schedule, the risks of hypertension and albuminuria were not significantly different. After the initial drop in eGFR from nephrectomy, donors had a slower mean rate of eGFR decline than nondonors but were more likely to have an eGFR between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at least once in follow-up.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00936078.

Open Renal Transplantation in Obese Patients: A Correlation Study between BMI and Early and Late Complications with Implementation of a Prognostic Risk Score

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a global epidemic that affects millions worldwide and can be a deterrent to surgical procedures in the population waiting for kidney transplantation. However, the literature on the topic is controversial. This study evaluates the impact of body mass index (BMI) on complications after renal transplantation, and identifies factors associated with major complications to develop a prognostic risk score.

METHODS

A correlation analysis between BMI and early and late complications was first performed, followed by a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The 302 included patients were divided into obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2) groups. Correlation analysis showed that delayed graft function (DGF) was the only obesity-associated complication (p = 0.044). Logistic regression analysis identified female sex, age ≥ 57 years, BMI ≥ 25 and ≥30 kg/m2, previous abdominal and/or urinary system surgery, and Charlson morbidity Score ≥ 3 as risk factors for significant complications. Based on the analyzed data, we developed a nomogram and a prognostic risk score.

RESULTS

The model's area (AUC) was 0.6457 (95% IC: 0.57; 0.72). The percentage of cases correctly identified by this model retrospectively applied to the entire cohort was 73.61%.

CONCLUSIONS

A high BMI seems to be associated with an increased risk of DGF, but it does not appear to be a risk factor for other complications. Using an easy-to-use model, identification, and stratification of individualized risk factors could help to identify the need for interventions and, thus, improve patient eligibility and transplant outcomes. This could also contribute to maintaining an approach with high ethical standards.

Development and validation of risk prediction model for post-donation renal function in living kidney donors

This study aimed to create and validate a predictive model for renal function following live kidney donation, using pre-donation factors. Accurately predicting remaining renal function post live kidney donation is currently insufficient, necessitating an effective assessment tool. A multicenter retrospective study of 2318 live kidney donors from two independent centers (May 2007-December 2019) was conducted. The primary endpoint was the reduction in eGFR to below 60 mL/min/m2 6 months post-donation. The primary endpoint was achieved in 14.4% of the training cohort and 25.8% of the validation cohort. Sex, age, BMI, hypertension, preoperative eGFR, and remnant kidney proportion (RKP) measured by computerized tomography (CT) volumetry were found significant in the univariable analysis. These variables informed a scoring system based on multivariable analysis: sex (male: 1, female: 0), age at operation (< 30: 0, 30-39: 1, 40-59: 2, ≥ 60: 3), preoperative eGFR (≥ 100: 0, 90-99: 2, 80-89: 4, < 80: 5), and RKP (≥ 52%: 0, < 52%: 1). The total score ranged from 0 to 10. The model showed good discrimination for the primary endpoint in both cohorts. The prediction model provides a useful tool for estimating post-donation renal dysfunction risk, factoring in the side of the donated kidney. It offers potential enhancement to pre-donation evaluations.

Assessing asymmetrical kidney function in living donors: a retrospective cohort study on CT metrics

BACKGROUND

Live donor kidney transplantation is the preferred kidney replacement therapy for eligible patients but requires thorough donor evaluation to minimise risks. Contemporary guidelines recommend split kidney function measurement in living donors only when there is a significant kidney size discrepancy, yet the evidence for this is poor, and practice varies nationally. This study evaluates the efficacy of CT-derived kidney metrics in detecting significant functional asymmetry.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 prospective living kidney donors at a regional transplant centre from June 2011 to October 2014, utilising CT to determine kidney and cortical volumes and lengths. Asymmetric kidney function (AKF), defined by > 10% function difference on DMSA scans, was correlated with CT measurements to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of current guidelines.

RESULTS

Among the prospective donors, the median age was 42 years, and 59.3% were female. The median split kidney function difference was 4%, with 25 individuals exhibiting > 10% AKF. Kidney length discrepancy proved to be a poor indicator of AKF (sensitivity: 28%, specificity: 84%). While negative predictive values for cortical and kidney volumes were high (96% and 93%, respectively), sensitivity was low, and specificity and positive predictive value did not meet satisfactory thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-derived metrics of kidney length, cortical, and total volume show limited sensitivity and specificity in identifying significant AKF. These findings provide evidence to support revised guideline development in the assessment of living kidney donors.

Follow-up After Donor Nephrectomy in Living Kidney Donors: How to Manage Living Kidney Donors Postoperatively

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study investigated the follow-up rate of living kidney donors and explored the factors related to continuous follow-up and remnant renal function, enabling the optimal management of living kidney donors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 180 living kidney donors who underwent donor nephrectomies at our institute. Clinical information was obtained from medical charts, and remnant renal function was defined as the estimated glomerular filtration rate 12 months after donor nephrectomy.

RESULTS

Overall, 6/180 donors (3.3%) were lost to follow-up within a year, and the follow-up rate gradually declined yearly. Independent risk factors for loss to follow-up included a follow-up period <60 months and graft survival of the recipient (p=0.002 and p=0.043, respectively). Recipient survival was correlated with loss to follow-up; however, this was not significant (p=0.051). Regarding remnant renal function, age ≥60 years, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate <74 ml/min/1.73 m2, and a Δsingle-kidney estimated glomerular filtration rate <9.3 ml/min/1.73m2 were independent risk factors for poorly preserved remnant renal function (p=0.036, p<0.0001, and p<0.0001, respectively). Using propensity score matching to adjust for preoperative factors, a Δsingle-kidney estimated glomerular filtration rate <9.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 was the only significant postoperative factor for poorly preserved remnant renal function (p=0.023).

CONCLUSION

An increased 5-year follow-up rate could lead to an increase in long-term follow-up, and recipient prognosis may be correlated with the living kidney donor follow-up status. Furthermore, Δsingle-kidney estimated glomerular filtration rate was identified as a factor for establishing the optimal precision follow-up management of living kidney donors.

Consequences of kidney donation by age in Japanese living kidney donors: a single-center study

BACKGROUND

Elderly living kidney donors (LKDs) are becoming increasingly important in countries with a high prevalence of living-donor kidney transplants and an aging society. This study explored the features of elderly LKDs, focusing on their subsequent outcomes.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study included eligible LKDs who donated their kidneys between April 2008 and July 2022. LKDs were categorized into an elderly (≥70 years at donation) or a non-elderly group (<70 years). We examined pre-operative characteristics and post-operative outcomes, such as kidney function, complications, development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 188 LKDs observed for a median of 5.7 years, 31 were in the elderly group (16.5%) and 157 (83.5%) were in the non-elderly group (mean age 72.5 ± 2.7 and 58.2 ± 7.3 years, respectively). No significant differences were observed in hospital stay length or peri-operative complications between groups. Both groups experienced a similar decline in post-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-approximately 37%. In the elderly group, four LKDs died, and one progressed to ESKD. In the non-elderly group, two LKDs died, and none progressed to ESKD. The cause of death was not strongly suspected to be associated with the donation.

CONCLUSIONS

eGFR was maintained even in elderly LKDs post-donation. Prioritizing LKDs' safety is paramount; however, donations from elderly people would be acceptable, considering their life expectancy. This can expand the pool of living kidney donors and address the growing demand for kidney transplants.

Robotic-Assisted Nephrectomy for Living Kidney Donation-Single Center Initial Experience (Case Series) and Review of the Literature

Background: Robotic-assisted nephrectomy for living kidney-donation (RANLD) has the potential of becoming the leading technique of harvesting kidney, if expertise is available. The aim of this work is to present our initial experience with robotic technique with additional hand-assistance. Materials and Methods: We initiated RANLD at our clinic using the DaVinci System in September 2022, since then harvesting six kidneys, four left and two right; in two cases, multiple arteries existed. The renal vessels were ligated using vascular staplers. All the operations included a hand-assist with the use of Gelport. The mean operation time was 119.2 min (SD 12 min). Results: There were no conversions or donors' post-operative complications. Time of discharge from the hospital was 4.5 days post-operatively. Total hospital length of stay was 7.8 days. All the harvested kidneys were transplanted, five of them with adequate function, three with initially delayed function, and one needed to be removed due to thrombotic complications. Post-operative was pain assessed on the VAS scale and overall pain was assessed according to the NRS scale. At the discharge day, donors' performance status was about 87.5% according to the Karnofsky scale. The donors resumed their normal life activity within 15.7 days and returned to work within 45.2 days. The serum mean creatinine level before the donation was 0.85 mg/dL (SD 0.1 mg/dL), and mean eGFR (MDRD) = 91.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 (SD 16.1 mL/min/1.73 m2). Conclusions: Further development of RANLD could lead to an increase in the number of living kidney donors, particularly in Poland where the number is currently lower than that of deceased donors. Prolonged operation time, longer warm ischemic time, and high equipment costs are significant drawbacks of RANLD.

Post-Donation Evaluation: Emotional Needs for Social Connection and Social Support among Living Kidney Donors-A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Evaluation of post-nephrectomy social health in living kidney donors is essential. This systematic review examines their emotional need for social relatedness post-donation.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO.

RESULTS

Among the screened records, 32 quantitative and 16 qualitative papers met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative research predominantly utilized questionnaires featuring generic items on social functioning. However, a minority delved into emotional and social dimensions, aligning with qualitative studies emphasizing the importance of social connection and perceived social support post-donation. Specifically, post-donation changes in connecting with others encompass a sense of belongingness, heightened autonomy, shifts in concern for the recipient's health, and continued care by shielding the recipient from personal health issues. Social acknowledgment and social support from both close and extended networks are reported as relevant for recovery after nephrectomy.

DISCUSSION

These findings underscore the necessity for targeted measures of emotional needs and social functioning to effectively assess post-donation adjustment. They also inform the identification of key health themes for kidney donor Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) questions.

Gentamicin concentration and acute kidney injury in term neonates treated for neonatal sepsis with gentamicin and ampicillin-cloxacillin combination

Gentamicin is widely used to treat neonatal infections caused by both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and the WHO recommends its use while monitoring serum creatinine and gentamicin concentrations to avoid drug-induced nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Yet in some resource-limited settings, the drug is used without monitoring. A population pharmacokinetics study involving term neonates with neonatal infection admitted to a neonatal unit. Participants were started on intravenous gentamicin 5 mg/kg once a day in combination with ampicilin-cloxacillin. Blood samples for serum gentamicin concentration were taken at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 23, and 24 hours after the initial dose, each participant contributing two samples to the 24 hour sampling schedule. An additional sample for trough concentration was taken from each participant just before the third gentamicin dose while serum creatinine concentration was measured before and after treatment. Twenty-four participants were enrolled into the study and included in the final analysis. Mean (SD) peak and trough serum gentamicin concentrations were 16.66 (0.64) µg/mL and 3.28 (0.70) µg/mL, respectively. Gentamicin clearance (CL) was 0.40 mL min-1 kg-1 and volume of distribution (VD) was 0.31 L kg-1. Mean (SD) serum creatinine level after treatment was 209.7 (70.4) µmol/L compared to 103.3 (23.6) µmol/L before treatment [mean difference (106.4 ± 67.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 78.1; 134.7 µmol/L; t (23) = 7.77; P < 0.001]. All participants fulfilled the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria for acute kidney injury after treatment. Treatment of neonatal infection with antimicrobial regimen containing gentamicin, without renal function and gentamicin concentration monitoring, carries a significant risk for drug-induced acute kidney injury.

Nurse-led clinical activity in kidney transplantation care in Spain: A cross-sectional observational study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the presence of specialist outpatient nursing activity in care for kidney transplant recipients in Spain and to determine the level of competence development of this activity according to the Advanced Practice Nurse model.

DESIGN

Descriptive, cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS

All outpatient nurses specialising in renal transplantation in the 39 transplant hospitals in Spain were included. To fulfil the study objectives, an ad hoc questionnaire and the 'Advanced Practice Nurse Role Definition Instrument (IDREPA)' were administered to assess the nurses' level of competence development.

RESULTS

Of the facilities included in the study, 25 (64.1%) had posttransplant nursing activity, 13 (33.3%) had pretransplant nursing activity and 11 (28.2%) had nursing activity involving kidney donor candidates. Twenty-seven specialist nurse's offices were identified. The results of the IDREPA reflect the presence of advanced practice in the domains of 'expert care planning' and 'comprehensive care'. Three (11.1%) nurses met all criteria for advanced nursing practice.

CONCLUSION

The results on specialised outpatient nursing activity at the 39 transplantation facilities in Spain indicate a low presence of this type of activity, with an even lower presence of advanced practice nurses.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Management teams should consider investing in the quality of care provided by advanced nurse practice to ensure that suitable treatment is provided and better clinical outcomes are obtained.

Impact of Age 70 years or Older on Donors for Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation

Introduction

Kidney transplantation (KT) involving elderly living kidney donors (LKDs) is becoming more frequent because of a profound organ shortage. The efficacy of KT involving grafts obtained from LKDs aged 70 years or older has been reported. However, the safety of donor nephrectomy in LKDs aged 70 years or older, including that associated with changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), has not been investigated. This study investigated the outcomes of LKDs aged 70 years or older after donor nephrectomy.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included 1226 LKDs who underwent donor nephrectomy between January 2008 and December 2020. LKDs were stratified into the following age groups: 30 to 49 years (244 LKDs), 50 to 69 years (803 LKDs), and 70 to 89 years (179 LKDs). Surgical outcomes, postoperative eGFR changes, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) rates, and mortality rates were compared among these groups.

Results

No significant difference in surgical outcomes was identified among the groups. LKDs aged 70 to 89 years experienced the lowest eGFR changes at all time points and the lowest eGFR improvement; however, ESRD was not identified in any group during the observation period. Mortality was the highest among LKDs aged 70 to 89 years compared to the other age groups.

Conclusion

Surgical outcomes, eGFR changes, and ESRD incidences can support the safety of donor nephrectomy in LKDs aged 70 years or older. Considering the advanced age, the high mortality rates in LKDs aged 70 years or older could be considered acceptable.

Myosteatosis is associated with poor survival after kidney transplantation: a large retrospective cohort validation

PURPOSE

We aim to establish diagnostic thresholds of sarcopenia and myosteatosis based on CT measurements, and to validate their prognostic value in a large cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Local healthy population with abdominal CT between 2010 and 2022, and patients underwent kidney transplantation between 2015 and 2019 at our center were retrospectively included. The skeletal muscle index and muscle attenuation of abdominal muscles were calculated based on CT image at the middle of the third lumbar vertebra. Primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and death censored allograft survival.

RESULTS

Age- and sex-specific thresholds for sarcopenia and myosteatosis were established based on 1598 healthy local population. The final patient cohort consisted of 992 kidney transplant recipients (median age 34 years, interquartile range 28-44 years; 694 males), including 33 (3.3%) with sarcopenia and 95 (9.5%) with myosteatosis. Multivariate analysis revealed myosteatosis (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.08, p = 0.022) was an independent baseline risk factor of mortality after adjusting for age, the history of cancer, and the history of cardiovascular event. Multivariate analysis found preemptive transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.36, p = 0.037) was an independent protective factor of allograft loss. No difference was found in the prognosis between kidney transplant recipients with and without sarcopenia.

CONCLUSION

Myosteatosis was an independent risk factor of mortality after kidney transplantation, but sarcopenia was not. Neither sarcopenia nor myosteatosis was associated with graft loss.

Development of a culturally targeted chatbot to inform living kidney donor candidates of African ancestry about APOL1 genetic testing: a mixed methods study

Clinical chatbots are increasingly used to help integrate genetic testing into clinical contexts, but no chatbot exists for Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) genetic testing of living kidney donor (LKD) candidates of African ancestry. Our study aimed to culturally adapt and assess perceptions of the Gia® chatbot to help integrate APOL1 testing into LKD evaluation. Ten focus groups and post-focus group surveys were conducted with 54 LKDs, community members, and kidney transplant recipients of African ancestry. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Key themes about making Gia culturally targeted included ensuring: (1) transparency by providing Black LKDs' testimonials, explaining patient privacy and confidentiality protections, and explaining how genetic testing can help LKD evaluation; (2) content is informative by educating Black LKDs about APOL1 testing instead of aiming to convince them to undergo testing, presenting statistics, and describing how genetic discrimination is legally prevented; and (3) content avoids stigma about living donation in the Black community. Most agreed Gia was neutral and unbiased (82%), trustworthy (82%), and words, phrases, and expressions were familiar to the intended audience (85%). Our culturally adapted APOL1 Gia chatbot was well regarded. Future research should assess how this chatbot could supplement provider discussion prior to genetic testing to scale APOL1 counseling and testing for LKD candidate clinical evaluation.

Pros and cons of live kidney donation in prediabetics: A critical review and way forward

There is shortage of organs, including kidneys, worldwide. Along with deceased kidney transplantation, there is a significant rise in live kidney donation. The prevalence of prediabetes (PD), including impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance, is on the rise across the globe. Transplant teams frequently come across prediabetic kidney donors for evaluation. Prediabetics are at risk of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular events, stroke, neuropathy, retinopathy, dementia, depression and nonalcoholic liver disease along with increased risk of all-cause mortality. Unfortunately, most of the studies done in prediabetic kidney donors are retrospective in nature and have a short follow up period. There is lack of prospective long-term studies to know about the real risk of complications after donation. Furthermore, there are variations in recommendations from various guidelines across the globe for donations in prediabetics, leading to more confusion among clinicians. This increases the responsibility of transplant teams to take appropriate decisions in the best interest of both donors and recipients. This review focuses on pathophysiological changes of PD in kidneys, potential complications of PD, other risk factors for development of type 2 diabetes, a review of guidelines for kidney donation, the potential role of diabetes risk score and calculator in kidney donors and the way forward for the evaluation and selection of prediabetic kidney donors.

Comprehensive Surgical Audit of Live-Related Donor Nephrectomy: Procedural Parameters, Demographics, Health Assessments, Complications, and Postoperative Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) rates are on the rise globally, including in India. However, the affordability of dialysis treatment remains a significant challenge for many, with costs varying across different regions. Although cost-effective, kidney transplantation faces challenges like a surgeon shortage, lack of infrastructure, and lack of logistic support. The study examines Indian laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes and their benefits for donor recovery. It covers kidney donor procedural details, demographics, preoperative health evaluations, complications, and one-month follow-up.

METHODS

Ethical approval was obtained, and the study involved 102 cases at the Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Science, Patna, Bihar, India, from 2019 to 2023. Detailed preoperative assessments, postoperative complications, and one-month follow-up analyses were conducted. Statistical analysis employed SPSS version 17 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

The results revealed an average surgery time of 152.3 min, blood loss of 205 ± 42 ml, and a hospital stay of 4.6 ± 2.2 days. The study found a female predominance (80.39%), with a mean donor age of 35.9 ± 5.2 years. Preoperative assessments showed robust patient health, with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) exceeding the expected threshold and normal urea levels, creatinine, electrolytes, liver enzymes, bilirubin, albumin, and total protein. Post-nephrectomy complications were reported, with females experiencing more difficulties than males.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the efficiency and safety of laparoscopic nephrectomy in the Indian context, providing valuable insights into donor demographics, preoperative health assessments, complications, and postoperative outcomes. The findings contribute to understanding laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes and associated risk factors despite certain limitations.

Risk Factors for Developing Low Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Albuminuria in Living Kidney Donors

Rationale & Objective

Chronic kidney disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the general population, but little is known about the incidence and risk factors associated with developing low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and moderate-severe albuminuria in living kidney donors following nephrectomy.

Study Design

Retrospective, population-based cohort study.

Setting & Participants

Kidney donors in Alberta, Canada.

Exposure

Donor nephrectomy between May 2001 and December 2017.

Outcome

Two eGFR measurements <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 2 measurements of moderate or severe albuminuria from 1-year postdonation onwards that were at least 90 days apart.

Analytical Approach

Associations between potential risk factors and the primary outcome were assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.

Results

Over a median follow-up period of 8.6 years (IQR, 4.7-12.6 years), 47 of 590 donors (8.0%) developed sustained low eGFR or moderate-severe albuminuria with an incidence rate of 9.2 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 6.6-11.8). The median time for development of this outcome beyond the first year after nephrectomy was 2.9 years (IQR, 1.4-8.0 years). Within the first 4 years of follow-up, a 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower predonation eGFR increased the hazard of developing postdonation low eGFR or moderate-severe albuminuria by 26% (adjusted HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.44). Furthermore, donors were at higher risk of developing low eGFR or albuminuria if they had evidence of predonation hypertension (adjusted HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.28-4.96) or postdonation diabetes (adjusted HR, 4.72; 95% CI, 1.54-14.50).

Limitations

We lacked data on certain donor characteristics that may affect long-term kidney function, such as race, smoking history, and transplant-related characteristics.

Conclusions

A proportion of kidney donors at an incidence rate of 9.2 per 1,000 person-years will develop low eGFR or albuminuria after donation. Donors with lower predonation eGFR, predonation hypertension, and postdonation diabetes are at increased risk of developing this outcome.

Improving value delivery in living donor kidney transplant through process improvement

INTRODUCTION

Living donor kidney evaluation has substantial time variations with significant intercenter variation. One-day donor evaluation has shown to be clinically efficient and improve transplant rates. However, patients' perception of 1-day evaluation is unknown. We hypothesized that 1 day LKD evaluation will improve patient satisfaction and improve living donation rates.

METHODS

All interested LD candidates from April 2018 to May 2020 were enrolled in the study. Non-directed donors, donors greater than 60 years old, and recipients with more than three donors underwent multi-day evaluation (control group) while the rest underwent 1-day evaluation (intervention group). An anonymous survey was filled by both groups to assess their perceptions on different areas including time, communication, experience, information provided, and their preferences on living donor evaluation.

RESULTS

Donor candidates in the 1-day evaluation group selected that the time from the questionnaire to clinic evaluation took "under 1 month" or "less than 3 months" (62.5% vs. 15.8%, p = .002), with "excellent" for both scheduling process (65% vs. 31.6%, p = .03) and communication (82.5% vs. 57.9%, p = .09) when compared to candidates in the multiple-days evaluation group. One-day candidates felt "very satisfied" with the overall experience (95% vs. 68.4%, p = .02) and felt "extremely well" with the information provided regarding the living donor process (87.5% vs. 47.4%, p = .003) when compared to multiple-day evaluation group. Regardless of the group, 53 (89.8%) patients preferred 1-day evaluation.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate 1-day living donor evaluation is efficient, patient preferred, and adds value through improved communication, and better overall patient satisfaction.

Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Non-Directed Versus Directed Kidney Donors: Implications for the Promotion of Non-Directed Donation

Living kidney donation has increased significantly, but little is known about the post-donation health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of non-directed donors (NDs) vs. directed donors (DDs). We thus examined the outcomes of 112 living kidney donors (82 NDs, 30 DDs). For the primary outcomes-namely, the mean physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores of the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) questionnaire-scores were significantly higher for the NDs vs. the DDs (PCS: +2.69, MCS: +4.43). For secondary outcomes, NDs had shorter hospital stays (3.4 vs. 4.4 days), returned to physical activity earlier (45 vs. 60 days), exercised more before and after donation, and continued physical activity post-donation. Regression analyses revealed that donor type and white blood cell count were predictive of the PCS-12 score, and donor type was predictive of the MCS-12 score. Non-directed donation was predictive of a shorter hospital stay (by 0.78 days, p < 0.001) and the odds of having PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores above 50 were almost 10 and 16 times higher for NDs, respectively (p < 0.05). These findings indicate the safety and potential benefits of promoting non-directed donation. However, careful selection processes must be maintained to prevent harm and exploitation.

Obesity in Renal Transplantation

Obesity has surged as a formidable global public health concern, with its prevalence nearly tripling over the past 40 years. Concurrently, the burden of kidney disease remains substantial, with obesity emerging as a significant risk factor. Transplantation is a life-saving intervention for patients with end-stage kidney disease living with obesity. However, it introduces a dual-edged sword, decreasing the risk of mortality related to dialysis while still leaving cardiovascular disease as one of the leading causes of death in transplant recipients. The relationship between obesity and transplantation is a multifaceted challenge demanding concerted efforts from health-care providers, researchers, and policymakers to navigate. While transplantation offers hope and improved quality of life for many, the weight of obesity cannot be underestimated. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the intricate interplay between obesity and transplantation, with a particular focus on kidney transplantation. Through this review article, we want to reiterate the critical role of weight management, lifestyle modifications, and medical interventions in optimizing transplantation outcomes for individuals with obesity. By comprehensively addressing these issues, we aim to contribute to the development of a holistic approach that minimizes the risks while maximizing the benefits of transplantation for this vulnerable population.

Collaborative leadership in transplantation: Blending clinical, business, and regulatory roles

Transplantation is a high-risk, high-cost treatment for end-stage diseases and is the most strictly regulated area of healthcare in the United States. Thus, achieving success for patients and the program requires skillful and collaborative leadership. Various factors, such as outcomes, volume, and financial health, may measure the success of a transplant program. Strong collaboration between clinical and administrative leaders is key to achieving and maintaining success in those three categories. Clinical leaders of adult programs, such as medical and surgical directors, bear the primary responsibility for a program's volume, outcomes, and patient safety, while administrative directors are focused on business intelligence and regulatory compliance. This paper aims to provide readers with insights into the critical role of collaborative leadership in running a successful program, with a focus on clinical, business, and regulatory perspectives.

How the websites of high-volume US centers address the risks of living kidney donation

BACKGROUND

The websites of US transplant centers may be a source of information about the renal risks of potential living kidney donors.

METHODS

To include only likely best practices, we surveyed websites of centers that performed at least 50 living donor kidney transplants per year. We tabulated how risks were conveyed regarding loss of eGFR at donation, the adequacy of long-term ESRD risk data, long-term donor mortality, minority donor ESRD risk, concerns about hyperfiltration injury versus the risk of end-stage kidney diseases, comparisons of ESRD risks in donors to population risks, the increased risks of younger donors, an effect of the donation itself to increase risk, quantifying risks over specific intervals, and a lengthening list of small post-donation medical risks and metabolic changes of uncertain significance.

RESULTS

While websites had no formal obligation to address donor risks, many offered abundant information. Some conveyed OPTN-mandated requirements for counseling individual donor candidates. While actual wording often varied, there was general agreement on many issues. We occasionally noted clear-cut differences among websites in risk characterization and other outliers.

CONCLUSIONS

The websites of the most active US centers offer insights into how transplant professionals view living kidney donor risk. Website content may merit further study.