Expert Opinion Special Feature: Patient Selection for Initial Clinical Trials of Pig Organ Transplantation

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Kidney Xenotransplantation

Porcine kidney xenotransplantation for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached the stage of clinical testing following major advances in donor pig genetic modifications and effective immunosuppressive strategies through decades of rigorous translational research. Reports of pig kidney xenograft survival beyond 1 year post-transplant in nonhuman primate (NHP) models justify optimism for its potential as an alternative to allotransplantation. In the United States, experimental transplantations of genetically engineered (GE) porcine kidneys into brain-dead subjects and a small number of ESRD patients have shown no evidence of hyperacute rejection and adequate pig kidney function for up to several months. Here we discuss pre-clinical/clinical results, infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations, and propose evidence-based recommendations. For initial clinical trials in kidney xenotransplantation, we make the following recommendations: (i) transplantation with organs from a triple knockout (TKO) donor pig, preferably with added human transgenes, (ii) an immunosuppressive regimen with induction therapy to deplete T (and possibly B) cells, and maintenance therapy based on a cluster of differentiation (CD)40/CD154 co-stimulation pathway blockade, (iii) the patient should be fully acceptable as a candidate for allotransplantation but should be unlikely ever to receive an allograft. Patients aged 60-69 years (extendable to 40-75 years, if one of the criteria mentioned below is present), of blood group B or O, and with diabetes are most at risk in this regard. Other patients who could be considered are (i) those who have lost two or more previous kidney allografts from recurrent disease in the graft, (ii) those with broad human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-reactivity but no evidence of anti-pig antibodies, including swine leukocyte antigen (SLA), and (iii) those with failing vascular access. Clinical pilot studies in carefully and highly selected patients with no alternative therapy will provide the foundation upon which to base subsequent formal expanded clinical trials.

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Kidney Xenotransplantation

Porcine kidney xenotransplantation for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached the stage of clinical testing following major advances in donor pig genetic modifications and effective immunosuppressive strategies through decades of rigorous translational research. Reports of pig kidney xenograft survival beyond 1 year posttranplant in nonhuman primate (NHP) models justify optimism for its potential as an alternative to allotransplantation. In the United States, experimental transplantations of genetically engineered (GE) porcine kidneys into brain-dead subjects and a small number of ESRD patients have shown no evidence of hyperacute rejection and adequate pig kidney function for up to several months. Here we discuss pre-clinical/clinical results, infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations, and propose evidence-based recommendations. For initial clinical trials in kidney xenotransplantation, we make the following recommendations: (i) transplantation with organs from a triple knockout (TKO) donor pig, preferably with added human transgenes, (ii) an immunosuppressive regimen with induction therapy to deplete T (and possibly B) cells, and maintenance therapy based on a cluster of differentiation (CD)40/CD154 co-stimulation pathway blockade, (iii) the patient should be fully acceptable as a candidate for allotransplantation but should be unlikely ever to receive an allograft. Patients aged 60-69 years (extendable to 40-75 years, if one of the criteria mentioned below is present), of blood group B or O, and with diabetes are most at risk in this regard. Other patients who could be considered are (i) those who have lost two or more previous kidney allografts from recurrent disease in the graft, (ii) those with broad human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-reactivity but no evidence of anti-pig antibodies, including swine leukocyte antigen (SLA), and (iii) those with failing vascular access. Clinical pilot studies in carefully and highly selected patients with no alternative therapy will provide the foundation upon which to base subsequent formal expanded clinical trials.

Who shall go first? A multicriteria approach to patient selection for first clinical trials of cardiac xenotransplantation

After achieving sustained graft functioning in animal studies, the next step in the progression of xenotransplantation towards clinical application is the initiation of the first clinical trials. This raises the question according to which criteria patients shall be selected for these trials. While the discussion regarding medical criteria has already commenced, ethical considerations must also be taken into account. This is essential, first, to establish a procedure that is ethically reasonable and justified. Second, it is a prerequisite for a publicly acceptable and comprehensible implementation. This paper outlines a multicriteria approach for the selection of patients in first-in-human clinical trials of cardiac xenotransplantation with four ethical criteria: medical need, capacity to benefit, patient choice and compliance (as an exclusion criterion). Consequently, these criteria identify a primary target group of patients who exhibit a high medical need for cardiac xenotransplantation, face a high risk of morbidity and mortality without an organ replcaement therapy, have a substantial chance of benefiting from xenotransplantation, thereby also enhancing the scientific value of the trial, and qualify for an allotransplant to have a real choice between participating in a first-in-human xenotransplantation trial and waiting for a human organ. A secondary group would include patients for whom only the first two criteria are met, that is, who have a high medical need and a good capacity to benefit from xenotransplantation but who have a restricted choice because they do not qualify for an allotransplant.

Patients' Information Needs for Informed Consent to Participate in First-in-Human Pig Kidney Xenotransplant Clinical Trials: A Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Transplant programs preparing to initiate first-in-human pig kidney xenotransplant clinical trials must be especially careful when obtaining participants' informed consent. Little is known about the kind of information patients want for making an informed decision about trial participation.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with waitlisted kidney transplant patients about information needs regarding participating in a first-in-human pig kidney xenotransplant trial, which guided development of a prototype consent form. Subsequent usability testing interviews sought patient feedback on the consent form. We analyzed qualitative data by thematic analysis and quantitative data by descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients participated in semi-structured interviews; 16 patients participated in usability testing interviews. Most interview participants were male (68%, 56%), White (54%, 56%), or Black (36%, 31%), respectively. Interview participants identified five types of information needs: (1) the potential for infection contraction and transmission; (2) risks, benefits, and impact of xenotransplant trials; (3) xenotransplant clinical trial and recipient experience; (4) clinical trial logistics; and (5) the pig and its kidney. Usability testing participants suggested adding details to the prototype. Participants' preparedness to make a decision about participating in a xenotransplant trial increased after reviewing the prototype (12.5% vs. 31.3%, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

We identified multiple unique types of information patients desired to make informed decisions about pig kidney xenotransplant trial participation. Transplant programs initiating xenotransplant trials should be prepared to address patients' information needs to optimize informed decision-making for trial participation. The prototype consent form may support a patient-centered approach to informed consent.

Transplant Patients' Perceptions About Participating in First-in-Human Pig Kidney Xenotransplant Clinical Trials: A Mixed Methods Study

First-in-human pig xenotransplant clinical trials may soon begin, which raises ethical concerns about patients' decision-making to participate in such trials. We assessed kidney transplant candidates' attitudes and hypothetical decision-making about participating in xenotransplant trials through semi-structured telephone interviews and an online survey. We analyzed qualitative data by thematic analysis and quantitative data by descriptive statistics. Twenty-eight patients participated in interviews; 142 patients participated in the survey. Most interview and survey respondents were male (68%, 56%), White (54%, 61%), or Black (36%, 22%). Although interview participants appreciated xenotransplantation research's potential to advance science, they expressed concerns about infection transmission and graft function. Few survey respondents were willing to participate in a pig kidney trial to test the safety of pig kidneys (12.6%) or pig kidney function (16.9%). Interview participants would be more likely to participate in a first-in-human pig kidney trial if receiving a human kidney was unlikely and their health status declined. Willingness would also depend on how long the pig kidney would function. Most interview participants were receptive to long-term monitoring, but not to family monitoring. Transplant programs planning xenotransplant trials should anticipate these types of concerns for optimizing human subject protections and conducting a robust informed consent process.

Ethical Implications of Social Science Research on Xenotransplantation

Social science research has generated extensive knowledge on xenotransplantation, encompassing the perspectives of actual and potential patients, other stakeholders, public opinion and debate, human-animal relationships, animal production and husbandry, bioeconomy, as well as biotechnology governance and regulation. We therefore convened social science researchers to discuss the latest developments in xenotransplantation research and practice in late 2023. Based on a brief workshop report, we aim to highlight the various ethical implications of this debate. After outlining the role of social science research in the ethical evaluation of xenotransplantation, we elaborate three critical points that may become pivotal in the future evolution of xenotransplantation: the framing of xenotransplantation in the clinical setting and in the public, the potential impact of religious beliefs on patients' transplant choices, and the consequences for the allotransplantation system if xenotransplantation becomes clinically established, including the allocation of allo- and xeno-organs.

Pediatric Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Recommendations for the Ethical Design of Clinical Trials

For children with complex congenital heart problems, cardiac allotransplantation is sometimes the best therapeutic option. However, availability of hearts for pediatric patients is limited, resulting in a long and growing waitlist, and a high mortality rate while waiting. Cardiac xenotransplantation has been proposed as one therapeutic alternative for neonates and infants, either in lieu of allotransplantation or as a bridge until an allograft becomes available. Scientific and clinical developments in xenotransplantation appear likely to permit cardiac xenotransplantation clinical trials in adults in the coming years. The ethical issues around xenotransplantation of the heart and other organs and tissues have recently been examined, but to date, only limited literature is available on the ethical issues that are attendant with pediatric heart xenotransplantation. Here, we summarize the ethical issues, focusing on (1) whether cardiac xenotransplantation should proceed in adults or children first, (2) pediatric recipient selection for initial xenotransplantation trials, (3) special problems regarding informed consent in this context, and (4) related psychosocial and public perception considerations. We conclude with specific recommendations regarding ethically informed design of pediatric heart xenotransplantation trials.

Xenotransplantation Clinical Trials and Equitable Patient Selection

Xenotransplant patient selection recommendations restrict clinical trial participation to seriously ill patients for whom alternative therapies are unavailable or who will likely die while waiting for an allotransplant. Despite a scholarly consensus that this is advisable, we propose to examine this restriction. We offer three lines of criticism: (1) The risk-benefit calculation may well be unfavorable for seriously ill patients and society; (2) the guidelines conflict with criteria for equitable patient selection; and (3) the selection of seriously ill patients may compromise informed consent. We conclude by highlighting how the current guidance reveals a tension between the societal values of justice and beneficence.

Current Status of Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Report of a Workshop of the German Heart Transplant Centers, Martinsried, March 3, 2023

This report comprises the contents of the presentations and following discussions of a workshop of the German Heart Transplant Centers in Martinsried, Germany on cardiac xenotransplantation. The production and current availability of genetically modified donor pigs, preservation techniques during organ harvesting, and immunosuppressive regimens in the recipient are described. Selection criteria for suitable patients and possible solutions to the problem of overgrowth of the xenotransplant are discussed. Obviously microbiological safety for the recipient and close contacts is essential, and ethical considerations to gain public acceptance for clinical applications are addressed. The first clinical trial will be regulated and supervised by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute as the National Competent Authority for Germany, and the German Heart Transplant Centers agreed to cooperatively select the first patients for cardiac xenotransplantation.