Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2019 version)

Real-world biologic treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization in psoriasis patients using an insurance claims database in Japan

BACKGROUND

With advent of newer treatments for psoriasis, real-world use of biologics in Japan is evolving.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized data from patients with ≥1 psoriasis-related biologic claims record between January 2016 and December 2020 in Japan to evaluate treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and associated costs. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of 1,614 eligible patients, 72.5% were male, 29.2% had comorbid hypertension and 26.6% had comorbid cardiovascular disease. Interleukin (IL)-17 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors were commonly prescribed across lines of treatment, while IL-23 inhibitors were most considered for switches (92% of switches were from IL-12/23/IL-17/TNFα inhibitors). The overall mean adherence rate for all classes was 80.1%, but adherence varied across biologics. Infliximab and IL-23 inhibitor users exhibited optimal medical possession ratios, reflecting the best adherence rates. Overall HCRU (visits/patient-year) was 9.05 for outpatient visits, 0.09 for inpatient hospitalization, and 0.5 for psoriasis-related phototherapy. HCRU associated with hospitalization was slightly higher for bio-experienced patients and so was the overall costs per patient-year relative to bio-naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

Variable adherence rates observed suggest the need for improvement in treatment management with different biologics. Bio-experienced patients burdened by disease progression and treatment switches may result in increased HCRU.

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque, erythrodermic, or generalized pustular psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from an open-label, phase 3 trial

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved in Japan for adult patients with plaque (PP), generalized pustular (GPP), and erythrodermic (EP) psoriasis who have had an inadequate response to conventional systemic therapies. This approval is based on results from the global phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials in which deucravacitinib was associated with significantly improved efficacy outcomes compared with placebo in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and results described here from POETYK PSO-4, an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial (NCT03924427), which evaluated the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily in adult Japanese patients with PP, GPP, or EP. The coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving a ≥75% reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (sPGA 0/1) with at least a two-point improvement from baseline at week 16. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. Efficacy responses, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded for up to 52 weeks. Seventy-four patients were treated (PP, n = 63; GPP, n = 3; EP, n = 8). At week 16, 76.2%, 66.7%, and 37.5% of patients with PP, GPP, and EP, respectively, had achieved PASI 75, and 82.5%, 0.0%, and 50.0% had achieved sPGA 0/1. Responses were overall maintained through week 52. AEs occurred in 74.6% of patients with PP, 100% of patients with GPP, and 87.5% of patients with EP. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis and acne. Rates of SAEs and discontinuations were low. There were no deaths. Deucravacitinib was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with moderate to severe PP and in a limited number of patients with GPP or EP.

Treatment patterns and drug survival for generalized pustular psoriasis: A patient journey study using a Japanese claims database

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a potentially life-threatening skin disease. Although several medications are approved for treating GPP in Japan, there are limited data on real-world treatment patterns or drug survival (the number of prescribed days of treatment). This retrospective cohort study describes drug survival and treatment patterns of patients with newly diagnosed GPP (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision code L40.1), and ≥1 year of follow-up, using de-identified claims data (Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd.) from January 2016 to August 2021. Most (97.0%) of the 434 Japanese patients received first-line therapy of etretinate (26.4%), topical medications (14.7%), or cyclosporin (14.3%); 80.0% and 60.1% of patients received a second and third line of therapy (LOT), respectively. Use of etretinate (12.6%) and cyclosporin (5.9%) decreased in second-line therapies, whereas use of biologics (interleukin [IL]-17, 14.3%; IL-23 inhibitors, 7.6%) and topical medications (22.1%) increased or remained consistent. Approximately 50% of biologics were prescribed in combination with systemic medications or systemic corticosteroids. Median (range) time to next therapy (TTNT) was 2.8 (0.03-48.07) months for first-line therapy and 3.3 (0.03-52.97) months for all other LOTs. TTNT was longer for combination therapies (up to 16.5 months) compared with monotherapies (up to 7.5 months). Biologics exhibited longer drug survival with fewer treatment episodes compared with non-biologic systemic medications. Among frequently used therapies, the median (95% confidence interval) drug survival was 8.8 (5.8-11.8) months for etretinate, 4.3 (2.2-6.9) months for systemic corticosteroids, and 19.6 (16.1-26.7) months for secukinumab. Treatment patterns varied considerably, highlighting the need for treatment algorithms and effective, well-tolerated medications to support patients to help them remain on long-term therapy.

Treatment patterns of systemic drug use in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis: A retrospective chart review

Plaque psoriasis (PsO) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease with skin lesions accompanied by an inflammation-related comorbidity risk. The development of various oral drugs and biologics for PsO has provided increasing systemic treatment options for patients with PsO, and the guidance regarding the use of biologics and PsO treatment schemes are widespread in Japan. However, no comprehensive guidelines regarding systemic drug use are available, and the current treatment patterns of systemic drugs for PsO in Japan remain unclear. We conducted a retrospective chart review to clarify the current treatment patterns of systemic drugs for PsO. We enrolled 114 patients who started systemic drugs for PsO between January 2017 and December 2020 at four institutes, with a mean follow-up of 37.2 months. The mean disease duration was 7.8 (standard deviation 9.5) years at the systemic drug initiation. Of all the patients, 78.1% started with oral drugs (phosphodiesterase [PDE] 4 inhibitors 56.1%. calcineurin inhibitors 14.0%. vitamin A derivatives 7.9%), whereas 21.9% started with biologics (interleukin [IL]-17 inhibitors 9.6%. tumor necrosis factor inhibitors 7.0%. IL-23 inhibitors 3.5%. IL-12/23 inhibitors 1.8%). Oral drugs had shorter drug persistence than biologics: the 12-month persistence of the oral drugs vitamin A derivative, calcineurin inhibitor, and PDE4 inhibitor, was 35.5%, 25.8%, and 60.1%, respectively, compared with that of the biologics IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors, which was 85.6% and 84.7%, respectively. During the study period, the incidence of treatment changes was 59.1/100 patient-years. Lack of efficacy was the most common reason for treatment changes from monotherapy (34.1%). This retrospective medical chart review allowed us to understand the real-world, long-term treatment patterns of systemic drugs for PsO and the relationships between the reasons for treatment changes and subsequent treatment selection, indicating that there is still room for improvement in the appropriate use of systemic drugs for PsO in Japan.

Spesolimab for the Treatment of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare but severe skin inflammatory disorder characterized by the eruption of widespread sterile neutrophilic pustules, often accompanied by systemic inflammation. Given its life-threatening potential, GPP requires prompt accurate diagnosis and effective treatment, but its rarity and relapsing-remitting nature pose challenges in performing large-scale randomized controlled clinical trials. Established international guidelines are currently lacking and management guidance often follows that for plaque psoriasis. However, while it can co-exist with plaque psoriasis and has traditionally been classified as a most severe form of psoriasis, GPP is now recognized as a distinct entity, with its own clinicopathological, autoinflammatory, immunologic and genetic features. Research conducted over the past decade revealed that an imbalance of interleukin (IL)-36 signaling favoring the proinflammatory activity is the central driver of the pathogenesis of GPP, thereby laying the groundwork for the development of targeted therapies for the disease. This article reviews the evidence thus far on spesolimab, a selective humanized antibody against the IL-36 receptor that was recently licensed in Europe and the United States for the treatment of GPP flares in adults. In phase II, randomized controlled clinical trials, spesolimab led to rapid and effective skin clearance in patients experiencing a GPP flare and demonstrated superiority to placebo in preventing flares for up to 48 weeks with maintenance treatment, with reassuring safety and tolerability profiles. Spesolimab is considered to be a first-in-class medication establishing itself as the standard of care for the treatment of GPP flares, thus changing the paradigm of the management of GPP to a new era of scientifically- and evidence-based targeted therapy for this distinctive disease.

A Propensity Score-Matched Study on the Changes of TB Status and TB-IGRA Values in Patients with Psoriasis with Latent TB Receiving Secukinumab

INTRODUCTION

The utilization of biologics in patients with psoriasis with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) has garnered significant attention. Although the tuberculosis (TB) safety profile of second-generation biologics, including secukinumab, has been partially confirmed in both clinical trials and real-world studies, the necessity for prophylactic therapy in patients with LTBI prior to administering this class of biologics remains a topic of controversy.

METHODS

This study enrolled 62 patients with psoriasis with LTBI who underwent secukinumab with routine TB reexamination. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received antituberculosis therapy (ATB; n = 48) or not (NTB; n = 16). We performed a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis between ATB and NTB subgroups and retrospectively reviewed their interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) and radiographic results.

RESULTS

No active TB case was reported on the basis of medical records and chest radiographs in either two group. Before PSM, the mean reexamining IGRA value was significantly elevated in patients who received prophylactic therapy (P = 0.00), but no significant increase was observed in patients who were not. After PSM, there was no significant IGRA value enhancement whether or not patients received prophylactic treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our data provide additional information on the safety profile of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis with LTBI. Furthermore, our presentation of the reexamined IGRA results revealed no significant elevation in the ATB or NTB group. As such, we believe further exploration is necessary to determine whether anti-TB medication is required prior to administering secukinumab.

Efficacy and safety of biological agents to treat patients with palmoplantar pustulosis: A systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP), a chronic, recurrent pustular dermatosis associated with erythema, scales, and sterile pustules on the palms and soles, is commonly encountered in dermatology clinics. Whether PPP is a variant of psoriasis or a distinct condition is still debated. Although biological agents have been successfully used to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis, existing literature on PPP is limited to case reports or small case series. The lack of well-documented clinical studies makes it difficult to select the ideal treatment for this condition. This review aims to discuss the efficacy and safety of biological agents in PPP treatment based on randomized controlled trials with the hope of inspiring dermatologist clinicians to propose new therapeutic approaches.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to obtain high-level evidence to assess the efficacy and safety of biological agents in the treatment of patients with PPP.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to May 18, 2023, for high-quality randomized controlled trials that reported at least one adverse event after PPP treatment with biological agents in patients > 18 years of age. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Nine trials involving 799 participants were included in the analysis. We used ppPASI 75 as the primary efficacy measure. Anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17A agents afforded 4.14-fold and 1.95-fold better outcomes than placebo treatment at weeks 16 and 12, respectively (P-value = 0.009, RR = 4.14, 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.43-11.98]; P-value = 0.02, RR = 1.95, 95% CI [1.11-3.42]). Moreover, anti-IL-23 agents at a dose of 100 mg were more effective than at 200 mg, indicating that 100 mg may be the best dose for anti-IL-23 agents. Next, we investigated the safety of biological agents for PPP treatment. The incidence of total adverse events (AEs) was 1.25 times higher for biological agents than for controls, indicating a good safety profile (RR = 1.25, P-value ＜ 0.00001, 95% CI [1.13, 1.37]). Additionally, we divided the common AEs into 16 categories and found that anti-IL-23 agents were more likely to induce infections. In conclusion, we evaluated safety and efficacy in a comprehensive comparison and found that anti-IL-23 agents conferred good clinical efficacy with a low incidence of AEs and could be recommended with caution.

LIMITATIONS

Only a few relevant, high-quality, randomized controlled trials were included in the study.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that biological agents can be used to treat patients with PPP with good efficacy; however, AEs cannot be ignored. Multi-center, high-quality clinical studies with large sample sizes are needed to further evaluate the effects and safety of biological agents in PPP treatment.

Efficacy and safety of the selective TYK2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, global phase 3 trial

Deucravacitinib is an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor that demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo and apremilast in a global phase 3 trial (POETYK PSO-1; NCT03624127) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (N = 666). This report describes efficacy and safety in Japanese patients from this study (N = 66) who were randomly assigned to treatment with deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily (n = 32), placebo (n = 17), or apremilast 30 mg twice daily (n = 17). Patients randomized to placebo crossed over to deucravacitinib at Week 16. Patients randomized to apremilast who did not achieve ≥50% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) score at Week 24 switched to deucravacitinib. The proportion of Japanese patients achieving ≥75% reduction from baseline in PASI (PASI 75) score was numerically higher with deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast at Week 16 (78.1% vs. 11.8% and 23.5%, respectively) and versus apremilast at Week 24 (78.1% vs. 29.4%). A numerically higher proportion of patients achieved a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) with at least a two-point improvement from baseline (sPGA 0/1) with deucravacitinib versus placebo or apremilast at Week 16 (75.0% vs. 11.8% and 35.3%) and versus apremilast at Week 24 (75.0% vs. 29.4%). Findings for other clinical and patient-reported outcomes also favored deucravacitinib. Response rates were maintained through 52 weeks in the deucravacitinib group. Incidence rates for adverse events per 100 person-years (PY) in the Japanese patients were comparable across treatment groups through Week 52 (deucravacitinib, 336.8/100 PY; placebo, 321.0/100 PY; apremilast, 358.6/100 PY). The most frequently reported adverse event with deucravacitinib was nasopharyngitis. The efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib in Japanese patients was consistent with those in the global population in POETYK PSO-1.

Effectiveness of Long-Term Treatment with Brodalumab on Anxiety or Depressive Symptoms in Japanese Patients with Psoriasis: The ProLOGUE Study

INTRODUCTION

Evidence on treatment effectiveness in patients with psoriasis having anxiety or depressive symptoms helps shared decision-making. This single-arm, open-label, prospective study-ProLOGUE-was conducted to assess the effectiveness of brodalumab on self-assessed anxiety and depressive symptoms in Japanese patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with plaque psoriasis without peripheral arthritis symptoms who had responded inadequately to current therapies were enrolled at 15 Japanese facilities and received brodalumab 210 mg subcutaneously.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients were enrolled (male, 82%; median age, 54 years). The proportion of patients without anxiety symptoms changed significantly from baseline (72.6%) to weeks 12 (88.9%, p = 0.008) and 48 (87.7%, p = 0.02); the proportion of patients without depressive symptoms did not change significantly. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score (median [quartile(Q)1-Q3], 1.0 [0.0-5.0] at baseline; 0.0 [0.0-2.0] at week 12, p = 0.008; and 0.0 [0.0-1.0] at week 48, p = 0.007) and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 score (median [Q1-Q3], 2.0 [0.0-4.0] at baseline; 1.0 [0.0-4.0] at week 12, p = 0.03; and 0.0 [0.0-2.0] at week 48, p = 0.004) significantly decreased after treatment. The median Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores after treatment were < 1, irrespective of the presence of baseline anxiety or depressive symptoms. At week 12, the health-related quality of life was more impaired in patients with versus without baseline depressive symptoms, which largely resolved at week 48.

CONCLUSIONS

Brodalumab treatment resulted in the reduction of the levels of self-assessed anxiety and depressive symptoms in Japanese patients with psoriasis. Unlike anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms did not resolve completely with brodalumab treatment. Patients with psoriasis having depressive symptoms may require long-term treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry identifier: UMIN000027783, Japan Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: jRCTs031180037.

A discrete choice experiment on oral and injection treatment preferences among moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients in Japan

Long-term psoriasis (PsO) management remains challenging. With growing variation in treatment efficacy, cost, and modes of administration, patient preferences for different treatment characteristics are not well understood. A discrete choice experiment (DCE), informed by qualitative patient interviews, was conducted to assess patient preferences for different attributes of PsO treatments; 222 adult patients with moderate-to-severe PsO receiving systemic therapy participated in the DCE web survey. Better long-term efficacy and lower cost were preferred (preference weights p < 0.05). Long-term efficacy had the highest relative importance (RI) and mode of administration was as important as the outcome attributes (efficacy and safety). Patients also preferred oral to injectable administration. In subgroup analyses by disease severity, residence, psoriatic arthritis as a comorbidity, and gender, the trends for each subgroup were the same as the overall population although the extent of RI for administration mode varied. Mode of administration was more important for patients with moderate versus severe disease, or rural versus urban residence. This DCE utilized attributes related to both oral and injectable treatment as well as a broad study population of systemic treatment users. Preferences were further stratified by patient characteristics to explore trends in different subgroups. Understanding the RI of treatment attributes and the attribute trade-offs acceptable to patients helps inform moderate-to-severe PsO systemic treatments decisions.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in Japanese patients with generalized pustular psoriasis or erythrodermic psoriasis: Primary analysis and 180-week follow-up results from the phase 3, multicenter IMMspire study

Risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobin G1 monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits interleukin 23 by binding to its p19 subunit, is approved in Japan to treat numerous indications, including generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and erythrodermic psoriasis (EP). Both GPP and EP are severe forms of psoriasis that have limited treatment options. In IMMspire (A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Dose Regimens of Risankizumab Administered Subcutaneously in Japanese Subjects With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis or Erythrodermic Psoriasis) (NCT03022045), a phase 3, randomized, multicenter study in Japan, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab for Japanese adults with GPP or EP. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive open-label risankizumab 75 mg or 150 mg at weeks 0 and 4 and every 12 weeks thereafter through week 160. The primary efficacy end point was GPP or EP clinical response at week 16. Other efficacy end points included GPP or EP clinical response, ≥90% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1 (DLQI 0/1) through 180 weeks (last follow-up visit). Safety was assessed throughout. A total of 17 patients (eight with GPP and nine with EP) were enrolled. All patients achieved the primary end point of GPP or EP clinical response at week 16. Among patients continuing risankizumab treatment, achievement of GPP or EP clinical response, PASI 90 and DLQI 0/1 were generally sustained throughout the treatment. The safety profile remained consistent with the safety profiles noted in previous risankizumab studies. Risankizumab demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy at week 16, with durable efficacy and a favorable long-term safety profile in Japanese patients with GPP or EP.

English version of Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2022 version)

This is the English version of Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2022 version). As the first biologics for psoriasis in Japan, infliximab and adalimumab, anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies, became available in the field of dermatology in 2010, followed by ustekinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23p40 antibody, which was launched in Japan in 2011. Moreover, after 2015, three IL-17 inhibitors, the IL-17A antibody preparations secukinumab and ixekizumab, and an anti-IL-17 receptor antibody preparation brodalumab were marketed. Furthermore, after 2018, the anti-IL23p19 antibody preparations guselkumab and risankizumab, the TNF inhibitor certolizumab pegol, the IL-23 inhibitor tildrakizumab, and the anti-IL-17A/F antibody bimekizumab were marketed. It is important for physicians to select appropriate biologic therapy for each psoriatic patient after due consideration of disease factors, treatment factors, and patient background factors, sharing such information with patients. The followings can be listed as points to be considered for the selection of biologics: drug effects (e.g., strength of effectiveness, time to onset of effectiveness, effectiveness against arthritis, primary failure, secondary failure), safety (e.g., infections, administration-related reactions, and relationships with other comorbidities), convenience for patients (e.g., hospital visit intervals, self-injection, maintenance therapy at clinics, feasibility of drug discontinuation/re-administration), and payment (medical costs) borne by patients. This guidance has been prepared with the aim of allowing dermatologists experienced in the treatment of psoriasis to use biologics appropriately according to the circumstances of individual patients after consideration of the above-mentioned factors.

Bimekizumab Efficacy and Safety in Japanese Patients with Plaque Psoriasis in BE VIVID: A Phase 3, Ustekinumab and Placebo-Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

Bimekizumab treatment resulted in improved clinical outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in BE VIVID, a 52-week, phase 3, randomized, ustekinumab and placebo-controlled study. We present data from the BE VIVID Japan patient subpopulation.

METHODS

Globally, patients were randomized to receive bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), ustekinumab (45/90 mg weight-based at baseline and week 4, then every 12 weeks), or placebo (Q4W through week 16, then bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W). Efficacy endpoints included week 16 Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1, and other outcomes [PASI 100, PASI 75, IGA 0, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1, absolute PASI, scalp IGA, Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure (P-SIM) responses]. Safety analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

There were 108 Japanese randomized patients (bimekizumab: 62; ustekinumab: 29; placebo: 17). At week 16, bimekizumab-treated patients had a higher clinical response versus ustekinumab and placebo (PASI 90: 85.5% versus 51.7% and 5.9%; IGA 0/1: 82.3% versus 48.3% and 0.0%). Over 52 weeks, improved clinical response was maintained with bimekizumab, including patients switching from placebo at week 16. Overall, the safety profile in Japanese patients was consistent with that observed in the global population.

CONCLUSION

Bimekizumab resulted in improved clinical response versus ustekinumab and placebo, and was well-tolerated in Japanese patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03370133.

Change in Antinuclear Antibody Titers during Biologic Treatment for Psoriasis

BACKGROUND

We previously evaluated blood screening data, including antinuclear antibodies (ANA), before initiating biologic treatment for patients with psoriasis in a real-world setting. However, we did not analyze change in ANA titers after the start of biologics. No previous study has comprehensively investigated change in ANA titers over time in individual patients or the effectiveness of certolizumab pegol or tildrakizumab.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated change in ANA titers in individual patients during treatment with biologics, including certolizumab pegol and tildrakizumab.

METHODS

111 patients were included in this study. Change in ANA was regarded as significant when the ANA titer was ×80 or more in patients with a previously undetectable ANA titer or when it increased by fourfold or more in those with a detectable ANA titer before treatment.

RESULTS

The ratios of patients with a significant change in ANA titer who were treated with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, interleukin (IL) -17 inhibitor, or IL-23 inhibitor were 34.9% (15/43), 0.0% (0/32), and 0.0% (0/36), respectively. There were 4 patterns of significant change in ANA titer: (i) an increase (n=8), (ii) a decrease after an increase (n=4), (iii) a decrease after an increase with a drug change (n=2), and (iv) an increase after a decrease after an increase (n=1). No symptom suggesting lupus syndrome was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

ANA titers must be carefully monitored throughout treatment with biologics, especially TNF inhibitors, and the possibility of lupus-like syndrome should be excluded.

Trends in prescriptions of oral medications for psoriasis: A single-center retrospective study

The systemic treatment of psoriasis has changed markedly with the introduction of many novel drugs. However, clinicians have had limited opportunities to evaluate these new therapies. One of the new drugs, apremilast (a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor), was approved in 2017 in Japan. We previously reported oral treatment for psoriasis before the introduction of apremilast. In this study, we investigated the impact of apremilast on oral medication for psoriasis by comparing data obtained before and after apremilast became available. This retrospective study enrolled patients who visited the Department of Dermatology, Fukuoka University Hospital, who were diagnosed with psoriasis and treated with anti-psoriatic oral medications. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, who first visited our clinic between January 2010 and March 2016; and Group 2, who first visited our clinic between April 2016 and March 2022. The information collected included patient demographics, drug use (apremilast, cyclosporine, methotrexate, and etretinate), and treatment duration. In Group 1 (n = 149 patients), cyclosporine, methotrexate, and etretinate were prescribed to 59.1%, 16.6%, and 24.3% of the patients, respectively. In Group 2 (n = 129 patients), apremilast was prescribed to 52.5% of patients, while the number of prescriptions for cyclosporine and etretinate had decreased to 17.1% and 8.3%, respectively. The number of methotrexate prescriptions did not change significantly. Apremilast, methotrexate, and etretinate had longer continuation rates than cyclosporine in Group 2. In conclusion, apremilast replaced cyclosporine and etretinate mainly because of its better safety profile, whereas methotrexate remained in constant demand in both eras. New oral treatments for psoriasis, such as tyrosine kinase-2 inhibitors, are now in the pipeline, and our data will serve as a control for oral anti-psoriatic medicine before the coming era.

Active Tuberculosis in a Patient Receiving Adalimumab for Psoriatic Arthritis and Chemoprophylaxis for Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, including adalimumab, are widely used to treat refractory psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Although isoniazid chemoprophylaxis is generally effective in preventing reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), prophylactic measures do not fully protect against development of active tuberculosis. We report a rare case of active tuberculosis despite chemoprophylaxis for LTBI in a patient receiving adalimumab for PsA. A 60-year-old Japanese woman who had received a diagnosis of psoriasis at age 35 years presented with arthralgia of the right hand, which she first noticed 2 months previously. Physical examination showed scattered erythematous papules and plaques with scales on her trunk, extremities, and scalp. Her right metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints were swollen and painful, and her right wrist and elbow were painful. PsA was diagnosed and adalimumab was initiated. Because an interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) showed a borderline result at screening, isoniazid was administered as chemoprophylaxis for LTBI. At 22 months after initiation of adalimumab, IGRA was positive and chest CT disclosed centrilobular nodules in both lungs and swelling of multiple lymph nodes. Culture of sputum at 24 months demonstrated Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Active tuberculosis was diagnosed, and treatment with a combination of isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol hydrochloride, and pyrazinamide was started. To ensure timely diagnosis and treatment of active tuberculosis, a tuberculosis expert should be consulted at an early stage, with regular screening and monitoring.

Early intervention in psoriasis: Where do we go from here?

Patients with psoriasis often have comorbidities and are at increased risk of developing several complications compared with the general population. Knowledge on the role of immune mediators and systemic inflammation in psoriasis has led to the hypothesis that early intervention with systemic therapy has the potential to modify the course of the disease and reduce the risk of long-term adverse outcomes. In this article, we address some potential issues that need to be considered before early intervention can be implemented routinely. The first is determining what constitutes "early" intervention for psoriasis. A second point is whether the intervention should be considered for patients with early disease or for selected subsets based on risk stratification. A third important consideration is defining success for early intervention. Finally, adoption of early and effective intervention should be based on high-level evidence. Ideally, randomized trials would be the best strategy to compare early vs. late systemic treatment in patients with psoriasis, probably using the frequency of long-term outcomes as primary endpoint, with cutaneous and pharmacoeconomic outcomes assessed secondarily.

Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with systemic therapy in Japan: A retrospective claims database study

The real-world treatment landscape for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving systemic therapies in Japan is not well understood. This study describes the demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and psoriasis-associated costs in these patients. This retrospective observational study used data from the Japan Medical Data Center database between January 2016 and December 2020. Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of psoriasis, ≥1 claim for a systemic treatment of interest, medical history for ≥6 months, and follow-up data for ≥12 months. Systemic therapies comprised biologics (tumor necrosis factor and interleukin inhibitors) and oral treatments (a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, immunosuppressants, and vitamin A). Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were evaluated. The study identified 1770 patients satisfying all inclusion criteria. The mean age was 49.0 years, with 68% of patients aged 20-54 years. Overall, 90.6% and 9.4% of patients received oral medications and biologics as index treatment, respectively. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were assessed for treatments received by ≥20 patients (n = 1730). During the 12-month follow-up period, 1102/1730 patients (63.7%) discontinued index treatment, of whom 9.9% switched to alternative systemic treatments. The persistence rate was ≥70% for most biologics and <50% for oral systemic treatments. All 1730 patients had ≥1 all-cause outpatient visit (2.0 visits per person per month) and hospitalization frequency was ≤0.01 per person per month. Persistent patients incurred inflation-adjusted costs of Japanese Yen (JPY) 88 667 per person per month. Treatment switching was associated with an increase in total cost: JPY 128 039 per person per month after switching versus JPY 117 504 before switching. This study of Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis demonstrated low persistence, high discontinuation, and low rates of treatment switching with systemic therapies. Switching was associated with increased total cost. These results indicate unmet needs for new treatments.

Monitoring Appropriate Monoclonal Antibodies Prescribing via Administrative Data: An Application to Psoriasis

The Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and the Italian Regional Health Systems have implemented measures together with data collection and analysis to improve medicines' appropriate prescription. Administrative databases represent rich Real-World Evidence (RWE) sources that may be leveraged for research purposes. Thus, such heritage may allow for appropriate prescription studies to be carried out on complex pharmaceutical molecules, as the appropriateness of prescriptions is essential both for patients' treatment and to ensure healthcare systems' sustainability. This study analyzed the appropriate monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) prescribed in psoriasis treatment across Tuscany, Italy. Data were extracted from several large administrative databases collected by the Tuscan Regional Healthcare System through record linkages. The analysis showed that over 30% of the 2020 cohort of psoriatic patients could be regarded as potentially inappropriate treated, signaling that mAbs are often prescribed as first-line treatment contrary to guidelines. Variation was observed in the appropriate prescription of mAbs, across different types of mAbs and areas. The study revealed potential inappropriate prescription, and its geographic variation should raise awareness among managers about the appropriate use of resources. Despite limitations, this could represent a pilot for future studies to evaluate the appropriate prescription of mAbs in other clinic conditions and across time.

Efficacy and safety of treatment of moderate and severe psoriasis with the interleukin 23 inhibitor risankizumab

A review of the literature on the use of the genetically engineered biological drug Skyrizi (INN: risankizumab) for the treatment of psoriasis in patients is presented. The problem of high dissatisfaction of patients with the available means (methods) of therapy for this dermatosis is discussed. Inhibition of regulatory IL-23 seems to be a very promising direction of therapy, which makes it possible to block the immunopathogenesis of the disease. The IL-23 inhibitor risankizumab is a highly effective GEBA for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in patients. The use of this drug is accompanied by a very rapid and stable therapeutic response in the form of clear or almost clear skin. Long-term use of risankizumab demonstrates the maintenance of a stable therapeutic response without a tendency to decrease. Risankizumab has a favorable safety profile with a low risk of infections and malignancies. At the same time, such adverse events as the development of tuberculosis or inflammatory bowel disease are not typical for therapy with these GIBDs.

Association between psoriasis and short-term outcomes of acute myocardial infarction: A matched-pair cohort study using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Limitations

Conclusion

Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in the Treatment of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Psoriasis in Japan: Results from PROMINENT, A Phase 3b, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study

Introduction

Patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis often experience reduced quality of life and increased disease burden due to itch or involvement of psoriasis in special areas such as the scalp and nails. Systemic therapy may be used concurrently with topical therapy in patients with active disease not controlled by topical therapy alone. The objective of PROMINENT was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast in combination with topical therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis in Japan.

Methods

PROMINENT, a phase 3b, open-label, single-arm study in Japan, enrolled adults ≥ 20 years of age with plaque psoriasis [static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) 2 (mild) or 3 (moderate)] not adequately controlled by topical therapy. Patients received apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 16 weeks in addition to their existing topical therapy, with the option of topical therapy reduction at the discretion of their physician while continuing apremilast treatment from weeks 16 to 32.

Results

Of the 152 patients enrolled in the study, 136 completed week 32. The primary endpoint of sPGA response [score 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear)] was achieved by 43.7% of patients at week 16, and 40.8% maintained response at week 32. Clinically meaningful improvements in skin, scalp, and nails were observed in > 40% of patients at weeks 16 and 32. Similarly, improvements in pruritus, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction were observed at week 16 and maintained at week 32. Common treatment-emergent adverse events through week 32 included gastrointestinal events, nasopharyngitis, and headache.

Conclusions

Apremilast in combination with topical therapy resulted in clinically meaningful and sustained efficacy in physician- and patient-reported outcomes at weeks 16 and 32 in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis. Tolerability was consistent with available prior safety data for apremilast.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03930186.

Patient perceptions of psoriatic disease in Japan: Results from the Japanese subgroup of the Understanding Psoriatic Disease Leveraging Insights for Treatment (UPLIFT) survey

The population‐based Understanding Psoriatic Disease Leveraging Insights for Treatment (UPLIFT) survey was designed to better understand patient and dermatologist perceptions of the disease burden of psoriasis (PsO) and their treatment expectations. UPLIFT was a cross‐sectional, quantitative, online survey conducted in Europe, North America, and Japan between 2 March and 3 June 2020. In Japan, 391 patients reporting a diagnosis of PsO and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were surveyed (75% had PsO alone, 23% had PsO and PsA, and 2% had PsA alone). Self‐reported body surface area (BSA) data were available for 309 Japanese patients, with the majority (80%) reporting PsO‐involved BSA ≤3 palms. Current symptoms of PsO were rated as moderate or severe by 43% of Japanese patients with BSA ≤3 palms, and severe by 44% of patients with BSA 4–10 palms. PsO frequently occurred in ≥1 special areas, most commonly the scalp in 76% of Japanese patients with BSA ≤3 palms, and ≥90% of those with BSA ≥4 palms. Furthermore, musculoskeletal symptoms in 42% of patients with PsO alone were suggestive of PsA. Whereas Japanese patients with BSA ≤3 palms mainly reported receiving topical therapy alone (34%) or no treatment (32%), 64% patients with BSA 4–10 palms reported receiving systemic therapy. Overall, 21% of Japanese patients with self‐perceived mild symptoms of PsO and 48% of patients with special area involvement experienced at least a moderate impact of disease on quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index score >5). Moreover, patients and dermatologists differed in their perceptions of determinants of PsO severity and treatment, and office visit discussions. In general, these findings from the Japanese subgroup of the UPLIFT survey demonstrated that a high proportion of patients perceived their symptoms to be moderate or severe irrespective of the level of skin involvement, suggesting a persistent unmet treatment need.

The Tuberculosis Positive Conversion Rate Among Psoriasis Patients Treated with Adalimumab and Secukinumab: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in China

Introduction

The tuberculosis (TB) positive conversion rate among psoriasis patients who received biologics has been reported worldwide, particularly in regions with low TB risk. Nonetheless, the TB-related safety of biologics such as adalimumab and secukinumab remains elusive in areas with high TB risk. According to the World Tuberculosis Report 2021, China is the country with the second highest TB burden, but data on TB conversion are also limited. Thus, we performed a retrospective, single-center study to profile the TB infection status conversion ratio among psoriasis patients treated with adalimumab and secukinumab in China.

Methods

Patients were enrolled between April 2019 and February 2021 from West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Baseline and relevant clinical information were summarized, and proper statistical analysis was used under different conditions.

Results

Five (5.43%) patients suffered TB conversion in the adalimumab group, two of whom developed active TB within the first 6 months. In the secukinumab group, four (5.26%) patients had TB positive conversion with no reports of active TB.

Conclusion

Our data show a relatively high rate of TB conversion among these psoriasis patients after mean treatment duration of 17.13 months. We recommend that, in patients who receive adalimumab, TB be reevaluated after the first 3 months and then monitored semiannually for the next 2 years. For patients treated with secukinumab, annual examination is sufficient.

Diagnosis and Intervention in Early Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that affects approximately 20–30% of patients with psoriasis. PsA causes deformities and joint damage, impairing quality of life and causing long-term functional disability. Several recent studies demonstrated that early diagnosis and intervention for PsA prevents permanent invalidity. However, the clinical features of PsA vary and are shared with other differential diseases, such as reactive arthritis, osteoarthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. The common and overlapping features among these diseases complicate the accurate early diagnosis and intervention of PsA. Therefore, this review focuses on the current knowledge of the diagnosis of early PsA and discusses the meaning of early intervention for early PsA.

Real-world blood examination screening data before initiation of biologics for psoriasis patients

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease characterized by hyperproliferation of epidermal keratinocytes. Biologics have been available for the treatment of patients with refractory psoriasis since 2010 in Japan, and as of December 2021, 10 biologics were available. The Biologics Review Committee of the Japanese Dermatological Association for Psoriasis recommends blood examination tests for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), Krebs von den Lugen (KL)-6, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibodies (HBsAb), hepatitis B core antibodies (HBcAb), hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies, HIV antibodies, human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV)-1 antibodies, β-D-glucan, and the T-cell spot (T-SPOT) test before initiation of biologics at screening. In this study, we evaluated the use of biologics for 127 psoriasis patients and the blood examination screening data before initiation of biologics in the real-world setting. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors and IL-23 inhibitors were initiated for 54 (42.5%), 36 (28.3%), and 37 (29.1%) patients, respectively. The numbers of patients positive for ANA, HBsAg, HBsAb, HBcAb, HCV antibody, HIV antibody, HTLV-1 antibody, and T-SPOT were 27 (21.3%), 0 (0%), 22 (17.3%), 20 (15.7%), three (2.4%), zero (0%), one (0.8%), and 4 (3.1%), respectively. The numbers of patients whose KL-6 and β-D-glucan levels were higher than the reference values were seven (5.5%) and seven (5.5%), respectively. In the real-world setting, it is sometimes unavoidable to use biologics for those patients with abnormal data although careful monitoring is necessary.

Apremilast Prolongs the Time to First Biologic Therapy in Japanese Patients with Psoriasis

Introduction

Biologic agents are used in patients with severe psoriasis who have not adequately responded to existing conventional systemic therapies. However, only a limited number of medical institutions in Japan are approved to use them, and their relatively high cost represents a substantial burden to patients. Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved in Japan for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris in adult patients with an inadequate response to topical therapies and psoriatic arthritis in adult patients with active disease. To date, a large-scale real-world study of treatment patterns and costs associated with apremilast in Japan has not been conducted. The objective of this study was to assess whether apremilast can prolong time to first biologic therapy use and decrease total medical cost.

Methods

Using the Medical Data Vision hospital-based claims database, 506 psoriasis patients were propensity score matched and analyzed (apremilast: n = 253; non-apremilast: n = 253).

Results

The incidence rate of first biologic therapy use per 1000 patient-years was significantly lower in the apremilast group than in the non-apremilast group (30.3 vs. 107.6; P < 0.001), and the total medical costs per month were significantly lower in the apremilast group than in the non-apremilast group (76,594 yen/month vs. 102,411 yen/month, P < 0.001). In a sensitivity analysis of a propensity-score-matched subset of eligible patients prescribed biologics during the follow-up period (apremilast: n = 14; non-apremilast: n = 14), the incidence of first biologic therapy use was 2,797.6 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI: 1,656.9, 4,723.6) in the non-apremilast group and 856.1 per 1000 patient-years (95% CI: 507.0, 1,445.5) in the apremilast group.

Conclusion

These results suggest that apremilast prolongs the time to first biologic therapy use in patients with psoriasis, thereby reducing the total medical cost and decreasing the economic burden on patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00659-w.

Evaluation of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Thresholds as Proxies for Systemic Inflammation on an Individual Patient Level

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic and systemic inflammatory disease with a loss of up to 5 life years, which is thought to be reduced by biologic treatment. Disease severity and eligibility for systemic treatment are often based on the cutaneous psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) with a cut-off of 10 in several European countries. However, it is unclear how well this cut-off reflects systemic inflammation and, consequently, the risk for the development of comorbidity.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To assess whether specific PASI thresholds, in particular PASI 10, predict elevated biomarkers of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular risk on an individual patient level. (2) To assess the association of PASI and psoriatic arthritis with biomarkers of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional study of 72 psoriasis patients without systemic treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, 68, 42, and 50% of patients had cardiovascular risk level neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein, and elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) values, respectively. The respective positive predictive values of PASI 10 were 70, 45, and 70. The performance of the optimal PASI cut-offs according to the Youden index was similarly weak. Subgrouping of patients with a PASI below 10 did not result in a considerably improved reflection of systemic inflammation. PLR was significantly higher in patients with moderate-to-severe compared to mild psoriasis and significantly correlated with PASI in patients with a PASI above 2 (rs = 0.266, n = 64). NLR was significantly higher in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

CONCLUSION

Specific PASI thresholds were not well suited to predict elevated biomarkers of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular risk on an individual patient level. Therefore, PASI, and possibly other purely cutaneous measures, may not be ideal as stand-alone parameters to define disease severity and eligibility for systemic treatment. Our results are relevant for the ongoing discussion on the definition of psoriasis severity and eligibility for systemic treatment. Further research addressing the added value of a set of biomarkers of systemic inflammation in the assessment of psoriasis severity would be desirable.

Certolizumab Pegol in Japanese Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Effect of Demographics and Baseline Disease Characteristics on Efficacy

Introduction

We present certolizumab pegol (CZP) efficacy data across patient demographic and baseline disease characteristic subgroups from a phase 2/3 trial investigating CZP treatment in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PSO; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03051217).

Methods

Patients were randomised 1:2:2 to placebo once every 2 weeks (Q2W), CZP 400 mg Q2W and CZP 200 mg Q2W (400 mg weeks 0, 2 and 4) for 16 weeks. Patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in their baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) score at week 16 continued therapy to week 52. PASI 75/90 (75% and 90% reduction, respectively) and Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) 0/1 responder rates at weeks 16 and 52 were reported for patient demographic and baseline disease characteristic subgroups, including body mass index (BMI), PASI, disease duration and prior biologic use. Non-responder imputation was used.

Results

Of the randomised patients, 2/26 patients in the placebo group, 47/53 patients in the CZP 400 mg Q2W group and and 39/48 patients in the CZP 200 mg Q2W group completed week 52. In the subgroups evaluated, week 16 efficacy was generally maintained through week 52. At week 52, PASI 75 was achieved by 84.2, 85.7 and 80.0% of patients receiving CZP 400 mg Q2W in the low (15.0–23.7 kg/m²)/intermediate (> 23.7–27.4 kg/m²)/high (> 27.4–47.0 kg/m²) BMI subgroups, respectively, and by 77.8, 70.6 and 69.2%, respectively of patients treated with CZP 200 mg Q2W. PASI 75 at week 52 was achieved by 92.9, 75.0 and 84.2% of patients receiving CZP 400 mg Q2W in the low (12.0–18.0)/intermediate (> 18.0–27.0)/high (> 27.0–67.2) baseline PASI subgroups, respectively, and by 85.0, 58.3 and 68.8% of patients receiving CZP 200 mg Q2W, respectively. Similar responses were observed across other subgroups evaluated for both CZP doses in PASI 75/90 and PGA 0/1.

Conclusion

Clinically meaningful improvements in signs and symptoms of PSO were maintained through week 52 for CZP dosed at 400 mg Q2W or 200 mg Q2W, across patient subgroups. In general, a numerically greater response was observed for patients receiving CZP 400 mg Q2W versus those receiving CZP 200 mg Q2W across patient subgroups.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03051217.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00645-2.

Pustular Psoriasis: A Narrative Review of Recent Developments in Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Options

Pustular psoriasis is an unusual form of psoriasis that frequently presents clinical challenges for dermatologists. The condition presents with pustules on an erythematous background and has two distinct subtypes: localized disease on the palms and soles, called palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP), and generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). The involvement of the fingers, toes, and nails is defined as a separate localized variant, acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau, and is now thought to be a subset of PPP. The rarity of pustular psoriasis frequently makes the correct diagnosis problematic. In addition, treatment is limited by a relative lack of evidence-based therapeutic options. Current management is often based on existing therapies for standard plaque psoriasis. However, there remains a need for treatments with high, sustained efficacy and a rapid onset of action in pustular psoriasis. Recent advances in understanding of the pathogenesis of pustular psoriasis have provided insights into potential therapies. Treatment of pustular psoriasis is generally determined by the extent and severity of disease, and recent years have seen an increasing use of newer agents, including biologic therapies. Current classes of biologic therapies with US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in the USA (and elsewhere) include tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, infliximab), interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (brodalumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab), an IL-12/23 inhibitor (ustekinumab), and IL-23 inhibitors (guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab). Recently, specific inhibitors of the IL-36 pathway have been evaluated in GPP and PPP, including spesolimab, an IL-36 receptor inhibitor which has shown promising results in GPP. The emerging drugs for pustular psoriasis offer the possibility of rapid and effective treatment with lower toxicities than existing therapies. Further research into agents acting on the IL-36 pathway and other targeted therapies has the potential to transform the future treatment of patients with pustular psoriasis. This article reviews the clinical features of PPP and GPP, and current understanding of the genetics and immunopathology of these conditions; it also provides an update on emerging treatments.

Pustular psoriasis is a skin condition where people develop small pus-filled blisters on their skin. Pustular psoriasis may affect certain areas of the body, such as the palms and/or the soles. This is called palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP for short). Another type of pustular psoriasis can affect most of the body called generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP for short). Not many people have PPP or GPP. Around 5–12 in every 10,000 people worldwide develop PPP. GPP is even rarer, affecting only 2–7 out of every 1 million people. In addition to being relatively uncommon, these conditions are challenging to treat. This article aims to help doctors who treat skin conditions (dermatologists) to identify and treat people with pustular psoriasis. Currently there is no standard treatment for GPP and PPP in the USA or Europe, but several medicines are approved for treatment of GPP in Japan. Doctors often use treatments that have been shown to work in plaque psoriasis, which is the most common type of psoriasis, to treat people with GPP and PPP. Traditional treatments for PPP and GPP are often not effective. Researchers are working on developing new effective treatments for pustular psoriasis that may work more rapidly and have fewer side effects. These are expected to be available in the next few years.

Generalized pustular psoriasis: current management status and unmet medical needs in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent flares of pustulation accompanied by systemic symptoms that can be life-threatening. The clinical and humanistic burden of GPP in Japan is high, and it is a designated intractable disease. We reviewed clinical evidence and guidelines for GPP treatment in Japan to identify unmet needs and assess data supporting the development and use of new targeted therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Using specific search terms in PubMed and Embase, with additional back-referencing, we retrieved literature related to GPP in Japan focusing on clinical and pathogenic characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Although there are approved systemic therapies for GPP in Japan, all present uncertainties in terms of safety and efficacy. Clinical evidence supporting their use comes mostly from studies in patients with mild or moderate disease, and their effectiveness in treating acute phase GPP is unknown. The interleukin-36 pathway appears to be central to GPP pathogenesis. New therapies targeting this pathway show promise in patients presenting with acute phase GPP. The rarity and intermittent course of GPP make it challenging to recruit sufficient patients for trials and robustly investigate the efficacy and safety of these agents to treat GPP.

Psoriasis epidemiology screening tool (PEST) is useful for the detection of psoriatic arthritis in the Japanese population

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that involves various systemic organs and tissues and is characterized by scaly erythematous skin. Among the different types of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is frequently reported, and occasionally develops into severe arthritis leading to joint dysfunction. There are various tools, especially questionnaires, to identify the presence of PsA in European and American populations; however, little is known about the utility of these tools in the Asian population. In this study, we investigated the utility of a representative tool, the psoriasis epidemiology screening tool (PEST) questionnaire, to identify PsA among Japanese patients with psoriasis. A total of 143 patients with psoriasis were enrolled in this study. Among them, 29 patients were diagnosed with PsA. The frequency of PsA was significantly increased in patients with PEST scores > 3, with a sensitivity of 93.1% and a specificity of 78.9%. Among the questions in the PEST questionnaire, "Have you ever had a swollen joint?" showed the highest frequency to answer "Yes" among patients with PsA. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that high PEST scores (> 3) was an independent variable in PsA patients. Taken together, our study suggests that the PEST questionnaire is a useful tool to identify PsA among Japanese patients with psoriasis.

Pediatric Psoriasis: From New Insights into Pathogenesis to Updates on Treatment

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory systemic disease primarily affecting the skin, but which often involves considerable comorbidities as well. One-third of psoriasis cases start during childhood. In pediatric psoriasis, an association with several medical comorbidities is also indicated. Furthermore, because of its chronic nature and frequent relapses, psoriatic patients tend to require long-term treatment and experience negative impacts on their quality of life. Considering the different clinical characteristics of pediatric psoriasis, it has recently been presented that the pathogenesis of pediatric psoriasis is distinct from adult psoriasis. Treatment for pediatric psoriasis usually involves the same methods as for adults. However, most treatments in pediatric psoriasis are used off-label and research in this regard is still lacking. Targeted therapies involving newly developed biologics are also increasingly being applied to psoriasis in children. This review summarizes the clinical characteristics of pediatric psoriasis and focuses mainly on the updated concepts of pathogenesis and treatments in pediatric psoriasis. This was undertaken to widen the understanding of these relevant aspects and to provide better management of pediatric psoriasis by clinicians.

Monitoring frequency of interferon gamma release assay for tuberculosis surveillance following infliximab therapy in patients with Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the pattern of positive conversion of interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) during infliximab therapy in China, which has a high burden of tuberculosis.

METHODS

Eligible patients with CD who received serial IGRA screening during infliximab therapy from January 2015 to March 2020 were retrospectively included. The positive conversion rate of IGRA and the risk of subsequent tuberculosis of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients with CD were included, and the median time from the initiation of IFX treatment to positive conversion or the last follow-up test of IGRA was 43.6 weeks. At baseline 3.9% of the patients were positive for IGRA and received prophylactic anti-tuberculosis treatment. In the other 123 patients with negative IGRA at baseline, 6.5% had IGRA positive conversion during infliximab treatment, and one (12.5%) who was exposed to Mycobacterium tuberculosis was diagnosed as having active tuberculosis. The conversion rate at 40 weeks, 2 years and 3 years after treatment were 10.0% (6/60), 2.2% (1/46) and 5.9% (1/17), respectively. Age, sex, history of smoking and alcohol consumption, disease severity (Crohn's disease activity index score) and immunosuppressive therapy were not significantly associated with latent tuberculosis test conversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive conversion of IGRA occurs early during treatment with infliximab for CD and the monitoring frequency of IGRA should be appropriately increased at the early stage of treatment. Physicians should pay attention to patient's history of tuberculosis exposure and carry out surveillance in a timely fashion.

Risankizumab: A Review in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Risankizumab (Skyrizi^®; risankizumab-rzaa) is a humanized immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that specifically targets the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23, thereby inhibiting IL-23-dependent cell signaling. Subcutaneous risankizumab is approved for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy (in the EU), those who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy (in the USA) and those who have an inadequate response to conventional therapies (in Japan). In pivotal phase III trials (UltIMMa-1, UltIMMa-2, IMMvent and IMMhance), risankizumab was more effective than placebo, ustekinumab and adalimumab with regard to the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 90) and a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 at week 16, with these benefits maintained over the longer term. In supportive head-to-head trials, risankizumab was also superior to secukinumab and fumaric acid esters in terms of PASI 90 response rate. In an ongoing open-label extension study (LIMMitless), risankizumab was associated with durable and improved efficacy after switching from ustekinumab or adalimumab, as well as durable maintenance of efficacy through > 2.5 years of continuous exposure. Treatment with risankizumab improved health-related quality of life and was generally well tolerated, both in the short- and longer-term. In conclusion, risankizumab represents a useful new treatment option for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Treatments and outcomes of generalized pustular psoriasis: A cohort of 1516 patients in a nationwide inpatient database in Japan

BACKGROUND

Because generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is rare, there are few studies reporting treatments and outcomes for large numbers of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To report treatments and outcomes in a large cohort of patients hospitalized with GPP.

METHODS

Using a Japanese national inpatient database, we identified 1516 patients with GPP who required hospitalization between July 2010 and March 2019. We categorized patients into 3 medication groups: biologics (294 patients), oral agents without biologics (948 patients), and systemic corticosteroids only (274 patients). We investigated their characteristics, treatments, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean age was 66 years (interquartile range: 52-77 years). Fifty patients (3.3%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, 125 (8.2%) required blood pressure support, and 63 (4.2%) died. Patients who received biologics were younger and had fewer comorbidities. In-hospital mortality was lower in the biologics group (1.0% [biologics group] vs 3.7% [oral-agents group] vs 9.1% [corticosteroids-only group]; P < .001) as was morbidity (5.4% vs 8.2% vs 12%, respectively; P = .02). Among those who received biologics, IL-17 inhibitor use increased over time, with in-hospital mortality and morbidity comparable to those of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study design. Some patients received multiple medications.

CONCLUSION

Biologic treatments showed favorable outcomes compared with other treatments.

Treatment practices and costs among patients with psoriatic arthritis: A Japanese hospital claims database analysis

OBJECTIVE

Assess patient characteristics, real-world treatment patterns, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Japan.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with PsA from April 2009 through July 2017 were identified from the Medical Data Vision database. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and HCRU were evaluated for these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 639 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis for patients with a PsA diagnosis. Over 12 months following diagnosis, patients received oral NSAIDs (61.7%), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (55.1%), corticosteroids (35.1%), topical NSAIDs (34.0%), adalimumab (14.7%), infliximab (9.7%), secukinumab (5.0%), ustekinumab (4.5%), ixekizumab (1.6%), and golimumab (1.6%). A total of 227 (35.5%) patients initiated biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) over the median 25.2 months of study follow-up. Compared with the overall group of patients diagnosed with PsA, patients who initiated bDMARDs had higher median total per-patient health care costs ($27,772 vs. $11,316), lower median per-patient hospitalization costs ($31,164 vs. $39,359), and fewer median hospital days per admission (8.0 vs. 12.0 days).

CONCLUSION

This study presents knowledge of the current state of patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs among patients with PsA in Japan. Considering the relatively recent guideline recommendations, the preliminary treatment patterns suggest physicians may be following treatment guidelines.

Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a 64-week phase 3 study (reSURFACE 1)

Tildrakizumab is a high‐affinity, humanized immunoglobulin G1κ, anti‐interleukin‐23p19 monoclonal antibody recently approved in Japan for treatment of plaque psoriasis. We report results from Japanese patients treated with tildrakizumab in the multinational, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled reSURFACE 1 study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01722331). Adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized (2:2:1) to receive subcutaneous tildrakizumab 100 or 200 mg or placebo every 12 weeks. Placebo recipients were rerandomized to tildrakizumab 100 or 200 mg at week 12. The global study coprimary endpoints were the proportions of patients achieving 75% improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) response (0/1 with ≥2 grade reduction from baseline) at week 12. Analyses included 158 Japanese patients randomized to tildrakizumab 100 (n = 64) or 200 mg (n = 62) or placebo (n = 32). Japanese patients had higher mean baseline body surface area involvement and PASI versus all reSURFACE 1 patients. At week 12, significantly more Japanese patients receiving tildrakizumab 100 and 200 mg versus placebo achieved PASI 75 (54.7% and 54.8% vs 6.3%, respectively, both nominal p < 0.001) and PGA 0/1 response (54.7% and 56.5% vs 9.4%, respectively, both nominal P < 0.001). Response rates increased over time with maximal efficacy after 22‐28 weeks; >80% of patients achieving PASI 75 or PASI 90 at week 28 and continuing tildrakizumab treatment at the same dose maintained response at week 64. From baseline to week 28, absolute PASI decreased from >12 in all patients to ≤2 in >40% and ≤3 in >50% of patients receiving tildrakizumab. Tildrakizumab was generally well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. Tildrakizumab treatment was associated with durable efficacy in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis despite greater baseline disease severity versus the global reSURFACE 1 population.

Long-term efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a 5-year extension of a phase 3 study (reSURFACE 1)

The three part, double‐blind, randomized, controlled reSURFACE 1 trial and extension study (NCT01722331) evaluated efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Patients with ≥50% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) following treatment with tildrakizumab 100 mg (TIL100) or 200 mg (TIL200) could enter the optional long‐term extension study and continue treatment at the same dose for an additional 192 weeks. This subgroup analysis assessed the long‐term efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab treatment for Japanese patients enrolled in reSURFACE 1 for up to 5 years of treatment. The primary efficacy outcomes were the proportions of patients who maintained PASI 75 and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) clear or minimal with ≥2‐grade reduction from baseline (PGA 0/1) from base study week 64 to extension week 192. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients who maintained PASI 90/100 from base study week 64 to extension week 192. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study and for up to 20 weeks after the last study visit. Of the 120 Japanese patients who entered the reSURFACE 1 extension study, 43 (79.6%) patients receiving tildrakizumab 100 mg and 58 (87.9%) patients receiving tildrakizumab 200 mg completed the extension study. Of all Japanese patients with PASI 75/90/100 and PGA 0/1 at week 64, 85%/88% receiving TIL100/TIL200 maintained PASI 75, 70%/96% maintained PASI 90, 63%/67% maintained PASI 100, and 68%/72% maintained PGA 0/1 at extension week 192. AEs led to discontinuation in 1.7 patients per 100 patient‐years (P100PY) receiving tildrakizumab 100 mg and 0.8 P100PY receiving tildrakizumab 200 mg. Incidences of severe infections, malignancies, confirmed major adverse cardiac events, and hypersensitivity reactions were low in both treatment groups. Through 5 years of treatment, tildrakizumab maintained efficacy and was well tolerated with low rates of AEs of special interest.

Long-term safety of combination treatment with methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists versus TNF-α antagonists alone in psoriatic patients

Methotrexate, a folic acid analog, is the conventional systemic anti-psoriatic agent most commonly chosen for combination with biologics in the treatment of psoriasis. Real-world long-term safety data of this combination versus biologic treatment alone in dermatological practice are sparse. Here, we present results of a comparative retrospective study of laboratory dynamics and adverse events in psoriatic patients receiving a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist (adalimumab or etanercept) with and without concomitant methotrexate (176 treatment courses, mean duration of 629 days). Co-treatment with methotrexate significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with a decrease of leukocyte, neutrophil and erythrocyte counts and an increase of glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT) (Pearson correlation, n > 148). The relative risk for a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1-2 laboratory adverse event was significantly elevated to 1.11 for anemia and 1.16 for a GPT increase if the patients received concomitant methotrexate at the time the laboratory test was performed. Combination treatment was given for equal or more than 30% of the time (MTX_≥30% ) during 12% of the treatment courses. During these treatment courses, dynamics of leukocyte (-8.1%), neutrophil (-8.1%), erythrocyte (-3.2%) counts and GPT (+16.9%) from baseline to average under treatment were significantly more pronounced. CTCAE grade 3-4 laboratory adverse events occurred in 9.5% and 5.2% of treatment courses with and without MTX_≥30% , respectively (p = 0.70), and affected transaminases in 90% of the cases. Methotrexate was discontinued due to CTCAE grade 3-4 laboratory adverse events in 4.25% of the treatment courses with MTX of 30% or more. Elevated baseline γ-glutamyl transferase levels significantly predicted the occurrence of CTCAE grade 3-4 laboratory adverse events and should trigger investigations for pre-existing liver disease or alcohol abuse. In conclusion, our comparative data supplement previous short-term studies and support a tolerable long-term safety profile of the combination treatment. However, given the additional toxicities and low evidence for benefits, alternative options such as biologic monotherapy or switching to a different biologic should be considered in a dermatological setting.

Utility of the Dermatology Life Quality Index at initiation or switching of biologics in real-life Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis: Results from the ProLOGUE study

BACKGROUND

Plaque psoriasis significantly affects patients' health-related quality of life. To aid treatment decisions, not only objective assessment by physicians but also subjective assessment by patients is important.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the significance of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) evaluation at the time of biologics introduction in clinical practice in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter study. At baseline, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and DLQI scores were measured and stratified based on DLQI scores ≥6/≤5 and PASI scores ≤10/>10. Other patient-reported outcomes assessed included EQ-5D-5L, itch numerical rating scale (NRS), skin pain NRS, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), Sleep Problem Index-II (SPI-II), and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9).

RESULTS

Of the 73 enrolled patients, 23 had PASI scores ≤10. Those with PASI/DLQI scores >10/≥6 had a significantly higher median PASI score than those with PASI/DLQI scores >10/≤5 (p = 0.0125). Regardless of PASI scores (>10/≤10), median itch NRS and GAD-7 scores were significantly higher in patients with DLQI scores ≥6 than in those with DLQI scores ≤5 (itch NRS, p = 0.0361 and p = 0.0086, respectively; GAD-7, p = 0.0167 and p = 0.0273, respectively). Patients with PASI/DLQI scores ≤10/≥6 had significantly higher skin pain NRS (p = 0.0292) and PHQ-8 (p = 0.0255) scores and significantly lower median SPI-II scores (p = 0.0137) and TSQM-9 Effectiveness domain scores (p = 0.0178) than those with PASI/DLQI scores ≤10/≤5.

CONCLUSION

DLQI may be useful for assessing patients' concerns that cannot be identified by PASI alone while initiating biologics or switching from other biologics in clinical practice.

Characteristics of anti-IL-17/23 biologics-induced interstitial pneumonia in patients with psoriasis

Objectives

Anti-IL-17/23 biologics are increasingly used to treat psoriasis. We aimed to elucidate characteristics of drug-induced interstitial pneumonia (DIIP) caused by anti-IL-17/23 biologics.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of psoriasis patients treated with anti-IL-17/23 biologics. Chest CT was performed to evaluate DIIP. Serum KL-6 levels were measured before treatment (baseline) and during treatment.

Results

A total of 603 psoriasis patients were treated with anti-IL-17/23 biologics with mean follow-up of 21.1 months. Six patients developed DIIP at mean 14 months after initiation of the therapy. Older age, higher baseline KL-6 value and more frequent pre-existing IPs were associated with development of DIIP by univariate analysis. At the onset of DIIP, elevated serum KL-6 levels with concomitantly increased ground glass opacity (GGO) in Chest CT were demonstrated. DIIP was improved by only cessation of causative agents in five patients but steroid therapy was needed in one patient.

Conclusions

DIIP is a plausible complication of anti-IL-17/23 biologics. Age, baseline KL-6 level and underlying IP could be the risk factors for DIIP development. Serum KL-6 levels and chest CT are useful for not only predicting but also detecting DIIP caused by anti-IL-17/23 biologics.

Safety and effectiveness of secukinumab in psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis: Real-world evidence in Japan

Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes interleukin‐17A, has been available for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis since February 2015 in Japan. Because there was a time gap after the previous approval of biologics for psoriatic disease indication, it was suggested that patients to be treated with secukinumab at its launch might have refractory disease symptoms. In order to assess the safety and effectiveness of secukinumab in those patients, a 52‐week, open‐label, multicenter, observational cohort study was conducted. In total, 306 and 250 patients were included in the safety and effectiveness analysis sets, respectively. Over half of patients had previously received biologics (56.9%). Adverse events, serious adverse events and adverse reactions were reported in 41.2%, 7.2% and 24.2% of patients, respectively. The most commonly reported adverse reactions were oral candidiasis (2.9%), consistent with those reported in clinical studies. In addition, none of the patient characteristics assessed for the effect on safety of secukinumab increased the occurrence of adverse reactions. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (mean ± standard deviation) improved from baseline (14.7 ± 12.3) to week 12 (1.78 ± 3.3), which was maintained up to week 24 (1.59 ± 3.0). The proportion of patients with a Dermatology Life Quality Index score of 0/1 improved from baseline (2.2%) to week 12 (64.7%) and sustained up to week 24 (71.4%). In addition to the skin symptoms, improvement was observed in all psoriatic arthritis disease‐related assessments. The current study reaffirmed the safety and effectiveness of secukinumab with broader patients than those in the clinical studies.

Effectiveness of oral vitamin D supplementation in lessening disease severity among patients with psoriasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Many treatment modalities have been used to manage psoriasis; however, there is, to our knowledge, no pooled estimate for the effectiveness of oral vitamin D supplements in patients with psoriasis. Hence, the aim of the present study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy of oral vitamin D supplementation in lessening disease severity of patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed on the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central and the gray literature for retrieving randomized controlled trials comparing oral vitamin D supplementation with placebo. The primary outcome was the change of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. We used the random effects model for synthesizing the evidence.

RESULTS

Of the total 5018 search results, 4 studies were included in the qualitative and 3 studies in quantitative analysis. Vitamin D supplementation was effective in ameliorating the PASI score after 6 mo of intervention (mean difference [MD] = -0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.72 to -0.11). However, after the Hartung-Knapp adjustment, the results became non-significant (MD = -0.92, 95% CI = -2.21 to 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

A favorable effect of oral vitamin D supplementation in patients with psoriasis could not be verified. More randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to produce robust results.