siRNA mediated knockdown of tissue factor expression in pigs for xenotransplantation

Evaluating the efficacy of protein quantification methods on membrane proteins

Protein quantification is an important tool for a wide range of biological applications. The most common broadscale methods include the Lowry, bicinchoninic acid (BCA), and Coomassie Bradford assays. Despite their wide applicability, the mechanisms of action imply that these methods may not be ideal for large transmembrane proteins due to the proteins' integration in the plasma membrane. Here, we investigate this problem by assessing the efficacy and applicability of these three common protein quantification methods on a candidate transmembrane protein - the Na,K-ATPase (NKA). We compared these methods to an ELISA, which we newly developed and describe here for the quantification of NKA. The use of a relative standard curve allows this ELISA to be easily adapted to other proteins and across the animal kingdom. Our results revealed that the three conventional methods significantly underestimate the concentration of NKA compared to the ELISA. Further, by applying the protein concentrations determined by the different methods to in vitro assays, we found that variation in the resulting data was consistently low when the assay reactions were prepared based on concentrations determined from the ELISA. Thus, when target protein concentrations vary across samples, the conventional quantification methods cannot produce reliable results in downstream applications. In contrast, the ELISA we describe here consistently provides robust results.

Cardiac xenotransplantation: from concept to clinic

For many patients with terminal/advanced cardiac failure, heart transplantation is the most effective, durable treatment option, and offers the best prospects for a high quality of life. The number of potentially life-saving donated human organs is far fewer than the population who could benefit from a new heart, resulting in increasing numbers of patients awaiting replacement of their failing heart, high waitlist mortality, and frequent reliance on interim mechanical support for many of those deemed among the best candidates but who are deteriorating as they wait. Currently, mechanical assist devices supporting left ventricular or biventricular heart function are the only alternative to heart transplant that is in clinical use. Unfortunately, the complication rate with mechanical assistance remains high despite advances in device design and patient selection and management, and the quality of life of the patients even with good outcomes is only moderately improved. Cardiac xenotransplantation from genetically multi-modified (GM) organ-source pigs is an emerging new option as demonstrated by the consistent long-term success of heterotopic (non-life-supporting) abdominal and life-supporting orthotopic porcine heart transplantation in baboons, and by a recent 'compassionate use' transplant of the heart from a GM pig with 10 modifications into a terminally ill patient who survived for 2 months. In this review, we discuss pig heart xenotransplantation as a concept, including pathobiological aspects related to immune rejection, coagulation dysregulation, and detrimental overgrowth of the heart, as well as GM strategies in pigs to prevent or minimize these problems. Additional topics discussed include relevant results of heterotopic and orthotopic heart transplantation experiments in the pig-to-baboon model, microbiological and virologic safety concepts, and efficacy requirements for initiating formal clinical trials. An adequate regulatory and ethical framework as well as stringent criteria for the selection of patients will be critical for the safe clinical development of cardiac xenotransplantation, which we expect will be clinically tested during the next few years.

The Influence of Interdisciplinary Work towards Advancing Knowledge on Human Liver Physiology

The knowledge accumulated throughout the years about liver regeneration has allowed a better understanding of normal liver physiology, by reconstructing the sequence of steps that this organ follows when it must rebuild itself after being injured. The scientific community has used several interdisciplinary approaches searching to improve liver regeneration and, therefore, human health. Here, we provide a brief history of the milestones that have advanced liver surgery, and review some of the new insights offered by the interdisciplinary work using animals, in vitro models, tissue engineering, or mathematical models to help advance the knowledge on liver regeneration. We also present several of the main approaches currently available aiming at providing liver support and overcoming organ shortage and we conclude with some of the challenges found in clinical practice and the ethical issues that have concomitantly emerged with the use of those approaches.

Xenotransplantate vom Schwein – ist das Ende des Organmangels in Sicht?

Unter „Xenotransplantation“ wird die Übertragung von funktionsfähigen Zellen, Geweben oder Organen zwischen verschiedenen Spezies verstanden, insbesondere von Schweinen auf den Menschen. In den meisten Industrieländern klafft eine große Lücke zwischen der Anzahl geeigneter Spenderorgane und der Anzahl benötigter Transplantate. Weltweit können nur etwa 10% des Organbedarfs durch Spenden gedeckt werden. Eine erfolgreiche Xenotransplantation könnte diesen Mangel mildern oder sogar weitgehend vermeiden. Das Schwein wird aus verschiedenen Erwägungen heraus als am besten geeignete Spenderspezies angesehen. Bei einer Übertragung porziner Organe auf Primaten treten verschiedene immunologisch bedingte Abstoßungsreaktionen auf, die das übertragene Organ innerhalb kurzer Zeit zerstören können, wie die HAR (hyperakute Abstoßung), die AVR (akute vaskuläre Abstoßung) und die spätere zelluläre Abstoßung. Diese Abstoßungsreaktionen müssen durch genetische Modifikationen im Schwein und eine geeignete immunsuppressive Behandlung des Empfängers kontrolliert werden. Dazu müssen Tiere mit mehrfachen genetischen Veränderungen produziert und im Hinblick auf ihre Eignung für eine erfolgreiche Xenotransplantation geprüft werden. Inzwischen können die HAR und auch die AVR durch Knockouts von antigenen Oberflächenepitopen (z. B. αGal [Galaktose-α1,3-Galaktose]) und transgene Expression humaner Gene mit antiinflammatorischer, antiapoptotischer oder antikoagulativer Wirkung zuverlässig kontrolliert werden. Nach orthotopen Transplantationen in nicht humane Primaten konnten inzwischen mit Schweineherzen Überlebensraten von bis zu 264 Tagen und mit porzinen Nieren von 435 Tagen erzielt werden. Eine Übertragung pathogener Erreger auf den Empfänger kann bei Einhaltung einschlägiger Hygienemaßnahmen ausgeschlossen werden. PERV (porzine endogene Retroviren) können durch RNA-(Ribonukleinsäure-)Interferenz oder Gen-Knockout ausgeschaltet werden. Sie stellen damit kein Übertragungsrisiko für den Empfänger mehr dar. Anfang 2022 wurde in Baltimore (USA) ein Schweineherz mit 10 genetischen Modifikationen auf einen Patienten mit schwerem Herzleiden übertragen, mit dem der Empfänger 2 Monate offenbar ohne größere Probleme lebte. Es wird erwartet, dass Xenotransplantate vom Schwein in absehbarer Zeit zur klinischen Anwendungsreife kommen werden. Dazu werden klinische Versuche zur systematischen Erfassung aller Auswirkungen solcher Transplantate auf den Patienten sowie geeignete rechtliche und finanzielle Rahmenbedingungen benötigt.

Human IL-17 and TNF-α Additively or Synergistically Regulate the Expression of Proinflammatory Genes, Coagulation-Related Genes, and Tight Junction Genes in Porcine Aortic Endothelial Cells

Immune rejection is the major limitation for porcine xenograft survival in primate recipients. Proinflammatory cytokines play important roles in immune rejection and have been found to mediate the pathological effects in various clinical and experimental transplantation trials. IL-17 and TNF-α play critical pathological roles in immune disorders, such as psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis. However, the pathological roles of human IL-17 (hIL-17) and human TNF-α (hTNF-α) in xenotransplantation remain unclear. Here we found that hIL-17 and hTNF-α additively or synergistically regulate the expression of 697 genes in porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAECs). Overall, 415 genes were found to be synergistically regulated, while 282 genes were found to be additively regulated. Among these, 315 genes were upregulated and 382 genes were downregulated in PAECs. Furthermore, we found that hIL-17 and hTNF-α additively or synergistically induced the expression of various proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (e.g., IL1α, IL6, and CXCL8) and decreased the expression of certain anti-inflammatory genes (e.g., IL10). Moreover, hIL-17 plus hTNF-α increased the expression of IL1R1 and IL6ST, receptors for IL1 and IL6, respectively, and decreased anti-inflammatory gene receptor expression (IL10R). hIL-17 and hTNF-α synergistically or additively induced CXCL8 and CCL2 expression and consequently promoted primary human neutrophil and human leukemia monocytic cell migration, respectively. In addition, hIL-17 and hTNF-α induced pro-coagulation gene (SERPINB2 and F3) expression and decreased anti-coagulation gene (TFPI, THBS1, and THBD) expression. Additionally, hIL-17 and hTNF-α synergistically decreased occludin expression and consequently promoted human antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Interestingly, hTNF-α increased swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) class I expression; however, hIL-17 decreased TNF-α-mediated SLA-I upregulation. We concluded that hIL-17 and hTNF-α likely promote the inflammatory response, coagulation cascade, and xenoantibody-mediated cell injury. Thus, blockade of hIL-17 and hTNF-α together might be beneficial for xenograft survival in recipients.

Current Barriers to Clinical Liver Xenotransplantation

Preclinical trials of pig-to-nonhuman primate liver xenotransplantation have recently achieved longer survival times. However, life-threatening thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysregulation continue to limit preclinical liver xenograft survival times to less than one month despite various genetic modifications in pigs and intensive pharmacological support. Transfusion of human coagulation factors and complex immunosuppressive regimens have resulted in substantial improvements in recipient survival. The fundamental biological mechanisms of thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysregulation remain incompletely understood. Current studies demonstrate that porcine von Willebrand Factor binds more tightly to human platelet GPIb receptors due to increased O-linked glycosylation, resulting in increased human platelet activation. Porcine liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and Kupffer cells phagocytose human platelets in an asialoglycoprotein receptor 1-dependent and CD40/CD154-dependent manner, respectively. Porcine Kupffer cells phagocytose human platelets via a species-incompatible SIRPα/CD47 axis. Key drivers of coagulation dysregulation include constitutive activation of the extrinsic clotting cascade due to failure of porcine tissue factor pathway inhibitor to repress recipient tissue factor. Additionally, porcine thrombomodulin fails to activate human protein C when bound by human thrombin, leading to a hypercoagulable state. Combined genetic modification of these key genes may mitigate liver xenotransplantation-induced thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysregulation, leading to greater recipient survival in pig-to-nonhuman primate liver xenotransplantation and, potentially, the first pig-to-human clinical trial.

Pathways to Clinical Cardiac Xenotransplantation

Heart transplantation is the only long-lasting lifesaving option for patients with terminal cardiac failure. The number of available human organs is however far below the actual need, resulting in substantial mortality of patients while waiting for a human heart. Mechanical assist devices are used to support cardiac function but are associated with a high risk of severe complications and poor quality of life for the patients. Consistent success in orthotopic transplantation of genetically modified pig hearts into baboons indicates that cardiac xenotransplantation may become a clinically applicable option for heart failure patients who cannot get a human heart transplant. In this overview, we project potential paths to clinical cardiac xenotransplantation, including the choice of genetically modified source pigs; associated requirements of microbiological, including virological, safety; optimized matching of source pig and recipient; and specific treatments of the donor heart after explantation and of the recipients. Moreover, selection of patients and the regulatory framework will be discussed.

Investigation of the influence of xenoreactive antibodies on activation of complement and coagulation in an ex vivo perfusion animal study using porcine kidneys

During pig-to-primate xenotransplantation or perfusion of porcine organs with human blood, a xenogeneic coagulopathy with consecutive development of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) can be observed. The aim of this study was to elucidate the influence of the reduction of xenoreactive natural antibodies on the coagulopathy using an ex vivo perfusion system. Thirteen perfusion experiments using landrace wild-type porcine kidneys were performed in three different experimental groups: autologous, xenogeneic, and immunoadsorption. During and after perfusion, blood and tissue samples were collected to assess markers of coagulation, complement, inflammation, and endothelial activation. Immunoadsorption prior to perfusion did not prolong perfusion time (174 min ±28) compared to xenogeneic (182 min ±22) experiments, whereas autologous perfusion was possible for maximum of 240 min in all experiments. Activation of coagulation was similar comparing perfusions after immunoadsorption (D-Dimer 24 186 μg/l ±5813; TAT 566 μg/l ±34) to xenogeneic (D-Dimer 22 175 μg/l ±7826, TAT 600 μg/l ±0) experiments. But antibody-mediated complement activation was reduced in the immunoadsorption group. TNF-alpha and markers of endothelial cell activation were lower in the immunoadsorption group compared to the xenogeneic experiments. In this ex vivo perfusion model, we observed that marked removal of xenogeneic antibodies can reduce complement activation via the classical pathway as well as endothelial cell activation and inflammation. Immunoadsorption cannot prevent the activation of the terminal complement cascade and coagulation.

Genetically Modified Pigs as Organ Donors for Xenotransplantation

The growing shortage of available organs is a major problem in transplantology. Thus, new and alternative sources of organs need to be found. One promising solution could be xenotransplantation, i.e., the use of animal cells, tissues and organs. The domestic pig is the optimum donor for such transplants. However, xenogeneic transplantation from pigs to humans involves high immune incompatibility and a complex rejection process. The rapid development of genetic engineering techniques enables genome modifications in pigs that reduce the cross-species immune barrier.

Developmental Competence and Epigenetic Profile of Porcine Embryos Produced by Two Different Cloning Methods

The "Dolly" based cloning (classical nuclear transfer, [CNT]) and the handmade cloning (HMC) are methods that are nowadays routinely used for somatic cloning of large domestic species. Both cloning protocols share several similarities, but differ with regard to the required in vitro culture, which in turn results in different time intervals until embryo transfer. It is not yet known whether the differences between cloned embryos from the two protocols are due to the cloning methods themselves or the in vitro culture, as some studies have shown detrimental effects of in vitro culture on conventionally produced embryos. The goal of this study was to unravel putative differences between two cloning methods, with regard to developmental competence, expression profile of a panel of developmentally important genes and epigenetic profile of porcine cloned embryos produced by either CNT or HMC, either with (D5 or D6) or without (D0) in vitro culture. Embryos cloned by these two methods had a similar morphological appearance on D0, but displayed different cleavage rates and different quality of blastocysts, with HMC embryos showing higher blastocyst rates (HMC vs. CNT: 35% vs. 10%, p < 0.05) and cell numbers per blastocyst (HMC vs. CNT: 31 vs. 23 on D5 and 42 vs. 18 on D6, p < 0.05) compared to CNT embryos. With regard to histone acetylation and gene expression, CNT and HMC derived cloned embryos were similar on D0, but differed on D6. In conclusion, both cloning methods and the in vitro culture may affect porcine embryo development and epigenetic profile. The two cloning methods essentially produce embryos of similar quality on D0 and after 5 days in vitro culture, but thereafter both histone acetylation and gene expression differ between the two types of cloned embryos.

Potential Antigens Involved in Delayed Xenograft Rejection in a Ggta1/Cmah Dko Pig-to-Monkey Model

When hyperacute rejection is avoided by deletion of Gal expression in the pig, delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) becomes a major immunologic barrier to successful xenotransplantation. This study was to investigate the potential antigens involved in DXR. We isolated primary renal microvascular endothelial cells (RMEC) and aortic endothelial cells (AEC) from a GGTA1/CMAH double-knockout (DKO) pig (and a GGTA1-KO pig) and immunized cynomolgus monkeys with both of these cells. After sensitization, monkey serum antibody binding and cytotoxicity to RMEC was significantly higher than to AEC(p < 0.05), suggesting that RMEC are more immunogenic than AEC. Transcriptome sequencing of GGTA1/CMAH DKO pigs indicated that the expression of 1,500 genes was higher in RMEC than in AEC, while expression of 896 genes was lower. Next, we selected 101 candidate genes expressed only in pig RMEC, but not in pig AEC or in monkey or human RMEC. When these genes were knocked out individually in GGTA1/CMAH DKO RMEC, 32 genes were associated with reduced antibody binding, indicating that these genes might be primary immunologic targets involved in DXR. These genes may be important candidates for deletion in producing pigs against which there is a reduced primate immune response in pig kidney xenograft.

Porcine endothelium induces DNA-histone complex formation in human whole blood: a harmful effect of histone on coagulation and endothelial activation

BACKGROUND

Neutrophils play a role in xenograft rejection. When neutrophils are stimulated, they eject the DNA-histone complex into the extracellular space, called neutrophil extracellular traps (NET). We investigated whether NET formation actively occurs in the xenograft and contributes to coagulation and endothelial activation.

METHODS

Human whole blood was incubated with porcine aortic endothelial cells (pEC) from wild-type or α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO) pigs. In the supernatant plasma from human blood, the level of the DNA-histone complex was measured by ELISA, and thrombin generation was measured using a calibrated automated thrombogram. Histone-induced tissue factor and adhesion molecule expression were measured by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

pEC from both wild-type and GTKO pigs significantly induced DNA-histone complex formation in human whole blood. The DNA-histone complex produced shortened the thrombin generation time and clotting time. Histone alone dose-dependently induced tissue factor and adhesion molecule expression in pEC. Aurintricarboxylic acid pretreatment partially inhibited pEC-induced DNA-histone complex formation.

CONCLUSIONS

DNA-histone complex actively generated upon xenotransplantation is a novel target to inhibit coagulation and endothelial activation. To prevent tissue factor and adhesion molecule expression, a strategy to block soluble histone may be required in xenotransplantation.

The production of multi-transgenic pigs: update and perspectives for xenotransplantation

The domestic pig shares many genetic, anatomical and physiological similarities to humans and is thus considered to be a suitable organ donor for xenotransplantation. However, prior to clinical application of porcine xenografts, three major hurdles have to be overcome: (1) various immunological rejection responses, (2) physiological incompatibilities between the porcine organ and the human recipient and (3) the risk of transmitting zoonotic pathogens from pig to humans. With the introduction of genetically engineered pigs expressing high levels of human complement regulatory proteins or lacking expression of α-Gal epitopes, the HAR can be consistently overcome. However, none of the transgenic porcine organs available to date was fully protected against the binding of anti-non-Gal xenoreactive natural antibodies. The present view is that long-term survival of xenografts after transplantation into primates requires additional modifications of the porcine genome and a specifically tailored immunosuppression regimen compliant with current clinical standards. This requires the production and characterization of multi-transgenic pigs to control HAR, AVR and DXR. The recent emergence of new sophisticated molecular tools such as Zinc-Finger nucleases, Transcription-activator like endonucleases, and the CRISPR/Cas9 system has significantly increased efficiency and precision of the production of genetically modified pigs for xenotransplantation. Several candidate genes, incl. hTM, hHO-1, hA20, CTLA4Ig, have been explored in their ability to improve long-term survival of porcine xenografts after transplantation into non-human primates. This review provides an update on the current status in the production of multi-transgenic pigs for xenotransplantation which could bring porcine xenografts closer to clinical application.

The pathobiology of pig-to-primate xenotransplantation: a historical review

The immunologic barriers to successful xenotransplantation are related to the presence of natural anti-pig antibodies in humans and non-human primates that bind to antigens expressed on the transplanted pig organ (the most important of which is galactose-α1,3-galactose [Gal]), and activate the complement cascade, which results in rapid destruction of the graft, a process known as hyperacute rejection. High levels of elicited anti-pig IgG may develop if the adaptive immune response is not prevented by adequate immunosuppressive therapy, resulting in activation and injury of the vascular endothelium. The transplantation of organs and cells from pigs that do not express the important Gal antigen (α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout [GTKO] pigs) and express one or more human complement-regulatory proteins (hCRP, e.g., CD46, CD55), when combined with an effective costimulation blockade-based immunosuppressive regimen, prevents early antibody-mediated and cellular rejection. However, low levels of anti-non-Gal antibody and innate immune cells and/or platelets may initiate the development of a thrombotic microangiopathy in the graft that may be associated with a consumptive coagulopathy in the recipient. This pathogenic process is accentuated by the dysregulation of the coagulation-anticoagulation systems between pigs and primates. The expression in GTKO/hCRP pigs of a human coagulation-regulatory protein, for example, thrombomodulin, is increasingly being associated with prolonged pig graft survival in non-human primates. Initial clinical trials of islet and corneal xenotransplantation are already underway, and trials of pig kidney or heart transplantation are anticipated within the next few years.

The role of genetically engineered pigs in xenotransplantation research

There is a critical shortage in the number of deceased human organs that become available for the purposes of clinical transplantation. This problem might be resolved by the transplantation of organs from pigs genetically engineered to protect them from the human immune response. The pathobiological barriers to successful pig organ transplantation in primates include activation of the innate and adaptive immune systems, coagulation dysregulation and inflammation. Genetic engineering of the pig as an organ source has increased the survival of the transplanted pig heart, kidney, islet and corneal graft in non-human primates (NHPs) from minutes to months or occasionally years. Genetic engineering may also contribute to any physiological barriers that might be identified, as well as to reducing the risks of transfer of a potentially infectious micro-organism with the organ. There are now an estimated 40 or more genetic alterations that have been carried out in pigs, with some pigs expressing five or six manipulations. With the new technology now available, it will become increasingly common for a pig to express even more genetic manipulations, and these could be tested in the pig-to-NHP models to assess their efficacy and benefit. It is therefore likely that clinical trials of pig kidney, heart and islet transplantation will become feasible in the near future.

Kidneys From α1,3-Galactosyltransferase Knockout/Human Heme Oxygenase-1/Human A20 Transgenic Pigs Are Protected From Rejection During Ex Vivo Perfusion With Human Blood

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Multiple modifications of the porcine genome are required to prevent rejection after pig-to-primate xenotransplantation. Here, we produced pigs with a knockout of the α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene (GGTA1-KO) combined with transgenic expression of the human anti-apoptotic/anti-inflammatory molecules heme oxygenase-1 and A20, and investigated their xenoprotective properties.

Progress towards overcoming coagulopathy and hemostatic dysfunction associated with xenotransplantation

Dysregulation of coagulation and disordered hemostasis are frequent complications in the pig-to-nonhuman primate preclinical xenotransplantation model. The most extreme manifestations are the systemic development of a life-threatening consumptive coagulopathy, characterized by thrombocytopenia and bleeding, which is balanced at the opposite extreme by local complications of graft loss due to thrombotic microangiopathy. The contributing mechanisms include inflammation, vascular injury, heightened innate, humoral and cellular immune responses, and molecular incompatibilities affecting the regulation of coagulation. There also appear to be organ-specific factors that have been linked to vascular heterogeneity. As examples, liver xenografts rapidly induce thrombocytopenia by sequestering human/primate platelets; renal xenografts cause a broader coagulopathy, linked in some cases to reactivation of porcine CMV, whereas cardiac xenografts often succumb to microvascular thrombosis without associated systemic coagulopathy but with local perturbations in fibrinolysis. Overcoming coagulation dysfunction will require a combination of genetic and pharmacological strategies. Deletion of the xenoantigen αGal, transgenic expression of human complement regulatory proteins, and refinement of immunosuppression to blunt the antibody response have all had some impact, without providing a complete solution. More recently, the addition of approaches specifically targeted at coagulation have produced promising results. As an example, heterotopic cardiac xenografts from donors expressing human thrombomodulin have survived for more than a year in immunosuppressed baboons, with no evidence of thrombotic microangiopathy or coagulopathy.