BK Virus Nephropathy: Histological Evolution by Sequential Pathology

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Efficacy of mTOR Inhibitors and Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Treatment of Polyoma BK Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Biopsy-Proven Study

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the efficacy of a predetermined protocol that consisted of immunosuppressive drug reduction/withdrawal and intravenous immunoglobulin administration for the treatment of polyoma BK virus nephropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven polyoma BK virus nephropathy received a treatment regimen based on discontinuation of both calcineurin inhibitors and antiproliferative agents and switching to mTOR inhibitors accompanied by intravenous immunoglobulin administration.

RESULTS

Our study included 508 patients, with polyoma BK viremia detected in 80 patients. The mean age was 45.3 ± 9.5 years (range, 18-71 y), 64% were male, and mean follow-up was 37 ± 21 months (6-94 mo). All 16 patients who developed polyoma BK virus nephropathy and 9 patients who had highgrade polyoma BK viremia without nephropathy received intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. Compared with patients with viremia, patients with polyoma BK virus nephropathy had significantly higher rates of graft loss due to rejection (18.8% vs 1.6%; P = .024) and all-cause graft loss (31.2% vs 6.3%; P = .014). Histopathologically, viral inclusion bodies disappeared and SV40 became negative after treatment in all 13 patients who underwent protocol biopsies. Unfortunately, histopathologically complete recovery without chronic tubular and interstitial tissue damage was achieved in only 4 patients after treatment. In addition, 3 patients lost their grafts due to acute antibody-mediated or mixed-type rejection (18.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with polyoma BK virus nephropathy, clearance of viremia and SV40 should not be the sole outcomes to obtain. Aggressive reductions in maintenance immunosuppression and switching to double-drug therapy combined with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to high rates of graft loss/rejection and sequalae of chronic histological changes.

Viral specific T cell therapy in kidney transplant recipients - A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Viral infections such as adenovirus (ADV), BK virus (BKV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) after kidney transplantation negatively impact outcomes in transplant recipients despite advancements in screening and antiviral therapy. We describe our experience of using the virus-specific T cell therapy (VSTs) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) at our transplant center.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single center review of KTR with ADV, BKV and CMV infections between June 2021 and December 2022. These patients received third party VSTs as part of the management of infections. The immunosuppression, details of infection and outcome data were obtained from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

Two cases of ADV infection resolved after one infusion of VSTs. The response rate of BKV and CMV infection was not as robust with close to 50% reduction in median viral load after VSTs. Out of 23 patients, two patients developed chronic allograft nephropathy from membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and acute rejection.

CONCLUSION

Patients that are resistant to antivirals or who have worsening viremia despite conventional management may benefit from VSTs therapy to treat underlying viral infection. Additional studies are needed to ascertain efficacy and short- and long-term risks secondary to VSTs.

An observational cohort study of histological screening for BK polyomavirus nephropathy following viral replication in plasma

Systematic screening for BKPyV-DNAemia has been advocated to aid prevention and treatment of polyomavirus associated nephropathy (PyVAN), an important cause of kidney graft failure. The added value of performing a biopsy at time of BKPyV-DNAemia, to distinguish presumptive PyVAN (negative SV40 immunohistochemistry) and proven PyVAN (positive SV40) has not been established. Therefore, we studied an unselected cohort of 950 transplantations, performed between 2008-2017. BKPyV-DNAemia was detected in 250 (26.3%) transplant recipients, and positive SV40 in 91 cases (9.6%). Among 209 patients with a concurrent biopsy at time of first BKPyV-DNAemia, 60 (28.7%) biopsies were SV40 positive. Plasma viral load showed high diagnostic value for concurrent SV40 positivity (ROC-AUC 0.950, 95% confidence interval 0.916-0.978) and the semiquantitatively scored percentage of tubules with evidence of polyomavirus replication (pvl score) (0.979, 0.968-0.988). SV40 positivity was highly unlikely when plasma viral load is below 4 log10 copies/ml (negative predictive value 0.989, 0.979-0.994). In SV40 positive patients, higher plasma BKPyV-DNA load and higher pvl scores were associated with slower viral clearance from the blood (hazard ratio 0.712, 95% confidence interval 0.604-0.839, and 0.327, 0.161-0.668, respectively), whereas the dichotomy positivity/negativity of SV40 immunohistochemistry did not predict viral clearance. Although the pvl score offers some prognostic value for viral clearance on top of plasma viral load, the latter provided good guidance for when a biopsy was unnecessary to exclude PyVAN. Thus, the distinction between presumptive and proven PyVAN, based on SV40 immunohistochemistry, has limited clinical value. Hence, management of BKPyV-DNAemia and immunosuppression reduction should be weighed against the risk of occurrence of rejection, or exacerbation of rejection observed concomitantly.

BK polyomavirus: latency, reactivation, diseases and tumorigenesis

The identification of the first human polyomavirus BK (BKV) has been over half century, The previous epidemiological and phylogenetic studies suggest that BKV prevailed and co-evolved with humans, leading to high seroprevalence all over the world. In general, BKV stays latent and symptomless reactivation in healthy individuals. BKV has been mainly interlinked with BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in kidney-transplant recipients and hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCTRs). However, the mechanisms underlying BKV latency and reactivation are not fully understood and lack of extensive debate. As Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) was identified as a pathogenic agent of malignant cutaneous cancer Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) since 2008, linking BKV to tumorigenesis of urologic tumors raised concerns in the scientific community. In this review, we mainly focus on advances of mechanisms of BKV latency and reactivation, and BKV-associated diseases or tumorigenesis with systematical review of formerly published papers following the PRISMA guidelines. The potential tumorigenesis of BKV in two major types of cancers, head and neck cancer and urologic cancer, was systematically updated and discussed in depth. Besides, BKV may also play an infectious role contributing to HIV-associated salivary gland disease (HIVSGD) presentation. As more evidence indicates the key role of BKV in potential tumorigenesis, it is important to pay more attention on its etiology and pathogenicity in vitro and in vivo.

Characteristics, risk factors and outcome of BKV nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Following kidney transplantation, BK virus associated nephropathy (BKVN) occurs in 1 to 10% of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and represents a major cause of graft loss. We aim at identifying factors associated with biopsy proven BKVN among KTR.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study including all KTR with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of BKVN between 2005 and 2019. Clinical characteristics and outcome were described. For each case, one control KTR without BKV infection was identified and matched by age, transplant date, and donor status. Factors associated with BKVN diagnosis were identified using exact conditional logistic regression. Comparative survival was described using Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

Sixty-four cases of BKVN were identified among 1737 new kidney transplantation (3.7% prevalence). Clinical characteristics did not differ between groups, except for a higher c-PRA among cases. BKVN occurred in a median time of 11 (5-14.5) months after KT, and was associated with a significantly impaired graft function at diagnosis. Following BKVN, 61 (95%) of the patients had immunosuppression reduction, which led to BKV DNAemia resolution in 49% of cases. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with BKVN diagnosis were lymphopenia < 500/mm³ and a prednisone dose > 7.5 mg/day. Median duration of follow-up was 40 months for both groups. BKVN was associated with a significantly increased risk of graft rejection (P = 0.02) and return to dialysis (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

BKVN remains a severe complication in KTR and is associated with an increased risk for acute rejection and return to dialysis. Lymphopenia below 500/mm³ and corticosteroid maintenance therapy are significantly associated with biopsy-proven BKVN diagnosis.

Impact of antimetabolite discontinuation following cytomegalovirus or BK polyoma virus infection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK polyoma virus (BKV) infection following kidney transplantation have been associated with allograft dysfunction and allograft loss. Reduction in immunosuppression is a mainstay of management yet has been associated with increased risk of rejection. According to international consensus guidelines, one approach to management of these viral infections is to discontinue the antimetabolite. Little is known surrounding long-term outcomes in these patients, and it remains unclear if consideration should be given to resuming the antimetabolite as variable re-escalation strategies have been reported. The objective was to describe episodes of rejection and identify risk factors for rejection following antimetabolite withdrawal after CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective review evaluated adult kidney transplant recipients with a serum CMV or BKV DNA PCR ≥500 copies/ml who underwent antimetabolite discontinuation. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR).

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-nine patients were included. Overall, 14 patients (8.8%) experienced BPAR at a median of 1.6 years after antimetabolite discontinuation. Compared to CMV, discontinuation after BKV DNAemia was associated with a higher incidence of BPAR. Characteristics observed more frequently in patients with BPAR included younger age, female sex, higher initial viral load, and development of de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that antimetabolite discontinuation after CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients is a reasonable and safe approach. Further prospective studies investigating optimal immunosuppression management following CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients are warranted.

Proteomic analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles of kidney transplant recipients with BKV viruria and viremia: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

To better define the biological machinery associated with BK virus (BKV) infection, in kidney transplantation, we performed a proteomics analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs).

METHODS

Twenty-nine adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with normal allograft function affected by BKV infection (15 with only viremia, 14 with viruria and viremia) and 15 controls (CTR, KTRs without BKV infection) were enrolled and randomly divided in a training cohort (12 BKV and 6 CTR) used for the mass spectrometry analysis of the EVs (microvesicles and exosomes) protein content and a testing cohort (17 BKV and 9 CTR) used for the biological validation of the proteomic results by ELISA. Bioinformatics and functional analysis revealed that several biological processes were enriched in BKV (including immunity, complement activation, renal fibrosis) and were able to discriminate BKV vs. CTR. Kinase was the only gene ontology annotation term including proteins less abundant in BKV (with SLK being the most significantly down-regulated protein). Non-linear support vector machine (SVM) learning and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) identified 36 proteins (including DNASE2, F12, AGT, CTSH, C4A, C7, FABP4, and BPNT1) able to discriminate the two study groups. The proteomic profile of KTRs with BKV viruria alone vs. viremia and viruria was quite similar. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for SLK, BPNT1 and DNASE2, performed on testing cohort, validated proteomics results.

DISCUSSIONS

Our pilot study demonstrated, for the first time, that BKV infection, also in the viruric state, can have a negative impact on the allograft and it suggested that, whether possible, an early preventive therapeutic strategy should be undertaken also in KTRs with viruria only. Our results, then, revealed new mechanistic insights into BKV infection and they selected potential biomarkers that should be tested in future studies with larger patients' cohorts.

Levels of donor-derived cell-free DNA and chemokines in BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) carries a risk of irreversible allograft injury. While detection of BK viremia and biopsy assessment are the current diagnostic gold standard, the diagnostic value of biomarkers reflecting tissue injury (donor-derived cell-free DNA [dd-cfDNA]) or immune activation (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand [CXCL]9 and CXCL10) remains poorly defined.

METHODS

For this retrospective study, 19 cases of BKPyVAN were selected from the Vienna transplant cohort (biopsies performed between 2012 and 2019). Eight patients with T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), 17 with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and 10 patients without polyomavirus nephropathy or rejection served as controls. Fractions of dd-cfDNA were quantified using next-generation sequencing and CXCL9 and CXCL10 were detected using multiplex immunoassays.

RESULTS

BKPyVAN was associated with a slight increase in dd-cfDNA (median; interquartile range: .38% [.27%-1.2%] vs. .21% [.12%-.34%] in non-rejecting control patients; p = .005). Levels were far lower than in ABMR (1.2% [.82%-2.5%]; p = .004]), but not different from TCMR (.54% [.26%-3.56%]; p = .52). Within the BKPyVAN cohort, we found no relationship between dd-cfDNA levels and the extent of tubulo-interstitial infiltrates, BKPyVAN class and BK viremia/viruria, respectively. In some contrast to dd-cfDNA, concentrations of urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 exceeded those detected in ABMR, but similar increases were also found in TCMR.

CONCLUSION

BKPyVAN can induce moderate increases in dd-cfDNA and concomitant high urinary excretion of chemokines, but this pattern may be indistinguishable from that of TCMR. Our results argue against a significant value of these biomarkers to reliably distinguish BKPyVAN from rejection.

Glomerulonephritis with Crescents in Polyomavirus Nephropathy

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is a known complication of renal transplantation due to the reactivation of latent BK virus (BKV) infection. Viral replication is usually confined to tubules. However, in severe viremia and late stages of PVN, it can involve glomerular parietal epithelial cells. Glomerular involvement by BKV can cause crescent formation and may lead to graft failure. We describe a relatively rare case of PVN with glomerular involvement and crescent formation in a 52-year-old male who had undergone a transplant 16 months ago. Despite the stoppage of immunosuppression, graft failure occurred eventually. Interestingly, we observed the intense positivity for IgG and c4d in the Bowman capsule on immunofluorescence. Observation of such positivity along Bowman capsule in renal biopsies with a limited number of glomeruli should alert pathologists to do a vigilant search of BKV inclusion and perform immunohistochemistry for SV 40 large T antigen.

BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: A State-of-the-Art Review

BK virus maintains a latent infection that is ubiquitous in humans. It has a propensity for reactivation in the setting of a dysfunctional cellular immune response and is frequently encountered in kidney transplant recipients. Screening for the virus has been effective in preventing progression to nephropathy and graft loss. However, it can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In this in-depth state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the history of the virus, virology, epidemiology, cellular response, pathogenesis, methods of screening and diagnosis, evidence-based treatment strategies, and upcoming therapeutics, along with the issue of re-transplantation in patients.

Treatment of BK virus with a stepwise immunosuppression reduction and intravenous immunoglobulin in pediatric kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

BKV and BKVN are common in pediatric kidney transplant, but there is limited data on treatment approaches. Our objective was to study the prevalence of BKV and BKVN utilizing only plasma qPCR and report treatment outcomes with stepwise IR and IVIG.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all pediatric kidney transplants from 2013 to 2020. Excluded patients >21 years at transplant and immediate graft failure. Surveillance was conducted using only plasma BK qPCR at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months and annually. BKV defined as ≥250 copies/ml and resolution as <250 copies/ml. Presumed BKVN as >10 000 copies/ml despite IR; and BKVN if confirmed on histology.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included in the study; 20 (35.7%) had BKV. BKV was associated with longer duration of stent, 40 vs. 33.5 days (p = .004). Two patients (3.5%) had confirmed, and 2(3.5%) had presumed BKVN. The first-line treatment was IR in 100% of patients. BKVN confirmed and presumed received IVIG every month for six doses. Viral resolution was achieved in 70%, and no difference was noted in estimated glomerular filtration rate between BKV and non-BKV group (p = .438). There were no rejection episodes, and graft survival was 100% over median follow-up of 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma qPCR alone is adequate for screening and monitoring treatment of BKV and BKVN. A stepwise IR and IVIG resulted in BKV resolution in the majority of patients. Larger studies are required to study the role of IVIG in the treatment of BKVN.

Mechanisms and Models of Kidney Tubular Necrosis and Nephron Loss

Understanding nephron loss is a primary strategy for preventing CKD progression. Death of renal tubular cells may occur by apoptosis during developmental and regenerative processes. However, during AKI, the transition of AKI to CKD, sepsis-associated AKI, and kidney transplantation ferroptosis and necroptosis, two pathways associated with the loss of plasma membrane integrity, kill renal cells. This necrotic type of cell death is associated with an inflammatory response, which is referred to as necroinflammation. Importantly, the necroinflammatory response to cells that die by necroptosis may be fundamentally different from the tissue response to ferroptosis. Although mechanisms of ferroptosis and necroptosis have recently been investigated in detail, the cell death propagation during tubular necrosis, although described morphologically, remains incompletely understood. Here, we argue that a molecular switch downstream of tubular necrosis determines nephron regeneration versus nephron loss. Unraveling the details of this "switch" must include the inflammatory response to tubular necrosis and regenerative signals potentially controlled by inflammatory cells, including the stimulation of myofibroblasts as the origin of fibrosis. Understanding in detail the molecular switch and the inflammatory responses to tubular necrosis can inform the discussion of therapeutic options.

Consensus Definitions of BK Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients for Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection and BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) are important causes of allograft dysfunction and premature allograft loss in renal transplant recipients.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Controlled clinical trials to evaluate new agents for prevention and treatment are needed but are hampered by the lack of outcome measures that accurately assess the effect of the intervention, are clinically relevant, and are acceptable from a regulatory perspective.

METHODS

To facilitate consistent end points in clinical trials and to support clinical research and drug development, definitions of BKPyV infection and disease have been developed by the BK Disease Definitions Working Group of the Transplantation Associated Virus Infection Forum with the Forum for Collaborative Research, which consists of scientists, clinicians, regulators, and industry representatives.

CONCLUSIONS

These definitions refine established principles of "proven" BKPyV disease and introduce a "probable" disease category that could be used in clinical trials to prevent or treat BKPyVAN in renal transplant recipients.

Clinical Relevance of Absolute BK Polyoma Viral Load Kinetics in Patients With Biopsy Proven BK Polyomavirus Associated Nephropathy

Introduction: The absolute BK viral load is an important diagnostic surrogate for BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy (PyVAN) after renal transplant (KTX) and serial assessment of BK viremia is recommended. However, there is no data indicating which particular viral load change, i.e., absolute vs. relative viral load changes (copies/ml; percentage of the preceding viremia) is associated with worse renal graft outcomes.

Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study of 91 biopsy proven PyVAN, we analyzed the interplay of exposure time, absolute and relative viral load kinetics, baseline risk, and treatment strategies as risk factors for graft loss after 2 years using a multivariable Poisson-model.

Results: We compared two major treatment strategies: standardized immunosuppression (IS) reduction (n = 53) and leflunomide (n = 30). The median viral load at the index biopsy was 2.15E+04 copies/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 1.70E+03–1.77E+05) and median peak viremia was 3.6E+04 copies/ml (IQR 2.7E+03–3.3E+05). Treatment strategies and IS-levels were not related to graft loss. After correction for baseline viral load and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), absolute viral load decrease/unit remained an independent risk factor for graft loss [incidence rate ratios [IRR] = 0.77, (95% CI 0.61–0.96), p = 0.02].

Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the prognostic importance of absolute BK viremia kinetics as a dynamic parameter indicating short-term graft survival independently of other established risk factors.

Current Status, Prevention and Treatment of BK Virus Nephropathy

All renal transplant recipients should undergo a regular screening for BK viral (BKV) viremia. Gradual reduction of immunosuppression is recommended in patients with persistent plasma BKV viremia for 3 weeks after the first detection, reflecting the presence of probable or suspected BKV-associated nephropathy. Reduction of immunosuppression is also a primary intervention in biopsy proven nephropathy associated with BKV (BKVN). Thus, allograft biopsy is not required to treat patients with BKV viremia with stabilized graft function. There is a lack of proper randomised clinical trials recommending treatment in the form of switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporin-A, from mycophenolate to mTOR inhibitors or leflunomide, or the additive use of intravenous immunoglobulins, leflunomide or cidofovir. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for prophylaxis or therapy. There are on-going studies to evaluate the possibility of using a multi-epitope anti-BKV vaccine, administration of BKV-specific T cell immunotherapy, BKV-specific human monoclonal antibody and RNA antisense oligonucleotides. Retransplantation after allograft loss due to BKVN can be successful if BKV viremia is definitively removed, regardless of allograft nephrectomy.

Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management

Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.

Chaphamaparvovirus antigen and nucleic acids are not detected in kidney tissues from cats with chronic renal disease or immunocompromised cats

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in domestic cats, but the cause is still largely elusive. While some viruses have been associated with this disease, none have been definitively implicated as causative. Recently, Rodent chaphamaparvovirus 1 was recognized as the cause of murine inclusion body nephropathy, a disease reported for over 40 years in laboratory mice. A novel virus belonging to the same genus, Carnivore chaphamaparvovirus 2, was recently identified in the feces of cats with diarrhea. The goal of this study was to investigate the possible role of chaphamaparvoviruses including members of Rodent chaphamaparvovirus 1 and Carnivore chaphamaparvovirus 2 in the development of feline CKD. The presence of these viruses was retrospectively investigated in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded feline kidney samples using polymerase chain reaction, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. Cats were divided into 3 groups: normal (N = 24), CKD (N = 26), and immunocompromised (N = 25). None of the kidney tissues from any of the 75 cats revealed the presence of chaphamaparvovirus DNA, RNA, or antigen. We conclude that viruses belonging to the chaphamaparvovirus genus are unlikely to contribute to the occurrence of feline CKD.

Immunosuppression as a Risk Factor for De Novo Angiotensin II Type Receptor Antibodies Development after Kidney Transplantation

(1) Background: Angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) represent a topic of interest in kidney transplantation (KT). Data regarding the risk factors associated with de novo AT1R-Ab development are lacking. Our goal was to identify the incidence of de novo AT1R-Ab at 1 year after KT and to evaluate the risk factors associated with their formation. (2) Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 56 adult patients, transplanted between 2018 and 2019. Recipient, donor, transplant, treatment, and complications data were assessed. A threshold of >10 U/mL was used for AT1R-Ab detection. (3) Results: De novo AT1R-Ab were observed in 12 out of 56 KT recipients (21.4%). The median value AT1R-Ab in the study cohort was 8.5 U/mL (inter quartile range: 6.8–10.4) and 15.6 U/mL (10.8–19.8) in the positive group. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, induction immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin (OR = 7.20, 95% CI: 1.30–39.65, p = 0.02), maintenance immunosuppression with immediate-release tacrolimus (OR = 6.20, 95% CI: 1.16–41.51, p = 0.03), and mean tacrolimus trough level (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.14–4.85, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for de novo AT1R-Ab at 1 year after KT. (4) Conclusions: De novo AT1R-Ab development at 1 year after KT is significantly influenced by the type of induction and maintenance immunosuppression.

A 2-fold Approach to Polyoma Virus (BK) Nephropathy in Kidney Transplants: Distinguishing Direct Virus Effects From Cognate T Cell-mediated Inflammation

BACKGROUND

BK nephropathy (BKN) in kidney transplants diagnosed by histology is challenging because it involves damage from both virus activity and cognate T cell-mediated inflammation, directed against alloantigens (rejection) or viral antigens. The present study of indication biopsies from the Integrated Diagnostic System in the International Collaborative Microarray Study Extension study measured major capsid viral protein 2 (VP2) mRNA to assess virus activity and a T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) classifier to assess cognate T cell-mediated inflammation.

METHODS

Biopsies were assessed by local standard-of-care histology and by genome-wide microarrays and Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) algorithms to detect rejection and injury. In a subset of 102 biopsies (50 BKN and 52 BKN-negative biopsies with various abnormalities), we measured VP2 transcripts by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

BKN was diagnosed in 55 of 1679 biopsies; 30 had cognate T cell-mediated activity assessed by by MMDx and TCMR lesions, but only 3 of 30 were histologically diagnosed as TCMR. We developed a BKN probability classifier that predicted histologic BKN (area under the curve = 0.82). Virus activity (VP2 expression) was highly selective for BKN (area under the curve = 0.94) and correlated with acute injury, atrophy-fibrosis, macrophage activation, and the BKN classifier, but not with the TCMR classifier. BKN with molecular TCMR had more tubulitis and inflammation than BKN without molecular TCMR. In 5 BKN cases with second biopsies, VP2 mRNA decreased in second biopsies, whereas in 4 of 5 TCMR classifiers, scores increased. Genes and pathways associated with BKN and VP2 mRNA were similar, reflecting injury, inflammation, and macrophage activation but none was selective for BKN.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-benefit decisions in BKN may be assisted by quantitative assessment of the 2 major pathologic processes, virus activity and cognate T cell-mediated inflammation.

Assessment of the Banff Working Group classification of definitive BK polyomavirus nephropathy

Polyomavirus associated nephropathy (PyVAN) continues to be a burden in renal transplantation leading to allograft insufficiency or graft failure. A presumptive diagnosis of PyVAN is made based on the presence of BK polyomavirus in patients' plasma; however, kidney biopsy remains the gold standard to establish a definitive diagnosis. The Banff Working Group on PyVAN proposed a novel classification of definitive PyVAN based on polyomavirus replication/load level and the extent of interstitial fibrosis. The aim of our study was to test the newly defined classes of PyVAN using independent cohorts of 124 kidney transplant patients with PyVAN with respect to the initial presentation and outcome, and to compare our analysis to that previously reported. Detailed analysis of our cohort revealed that the proposed classification of PyVAN did not stratify or identify patients at increased risk of allograft failure. Specifically, while class 3 was associated with the worst prognosis, there was no significant difference between the outcomes in classes 1 and 2. We also found that the timing post-transplantation and inflammation in areas of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy might be additional factors contributing to an unfavorable allograft outcome in patients with PyVAN.

Intravenous immunoglobulins do not prove beneficial to reduce alloimmunity among kidney transplant recipients with BKV-associated nephropathy

Reduced immunosuppression during BKV-DNAemia has been associated with T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) may reduce alloimmunity. We studied 860 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) for the development of BKV-DNAuria and BKV-DNAemia (low-level <10 000 IE/ml, high-level >10 000 IE/ml). 52/131 KTRs with high-level BKV-DNAemia received IVIG. The HLA-related immunological risk was stratified by the Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE) algorithm. BKV-DNAuria only was observed in 86 KTRs (10.0%), low-level BKV-DNAemia in 180 KTRs (20.9%) and high-level BKV-DNAemia in 131 KTRs (15.2%). KTRs with low-level BKV-DNAemia showed significantly less TCMR compared to KTRs with high-level BKV-DNAemia (5.2% vs. 25.5%; P < 0.001) and no BKV-replication (13.2%; P = 0.014), lowest rates of de novo DSA (21.3%), ABMR (9.2%) and flattest glomerular filtration rate (GFR) slope (-0.8 ml/min). KTRs with low-level BKV-DNAemia showed significantly higher median (interquartile range) total PIRCHE if they developed TCMR [100.22 (72.6) vs. 69.52 (49.97); P = 0.020] or ABMR [128.86 (52.99) vs. 69.52 (49.96); P = 0.005]. Administration of IVIG did not shorten duration of BKV-DNAemia (P = 0.798) or reduce TCMR, de novo DSA and ABMR (P > 0.05). KTRs with low-level BKV-DNAemia showed best protection against alloimmunity, with a high number of PIRCHE co-determining the remaining risk. The administration of IVIG, however, was not beneficial in reducing alloimmunity.

BK Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: Balancing Rejection and Infection

BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) and allograft rejection are two closely-associated diseases on opposite ends of the immune scale in kidney transplant recipients. The principle of balancing the immune system remains the mainstay of therapeutic strategy. While patient outcomes can be improved through screening, risk factors identification, and rapid reduction of immunosuppressants, a lack of standard curative therapy is the primary concern during clinical practice. Additionally, difficulty in pathological differential diagnosis and clinicopathology’s dissociation pose problems for a definite diagnosis. This article discusses the delicate evaluation needed to optimize immunosuppression and reviews recent advances in molecular diagnosis and immunological therapy for BKVN patients. New biomarkers for BKVN diagnosis are under development. For example, measurement of virus-specific T cell level may play a role in steering immunosuppressants. The development of cellular therapy may provide prevention, even a cure, for BKVN, a complex post-transplant complication.

High Incidence and Early Onset of Urinary Tract Cancers in Patients with BK Polyomavirus Associated Nephropathy

Over-immunosuppressed kidney transplant recipients are susceptible to malignancies and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). This study aimed to verify the association between BKPyV infection and urinary tract cancers (UTC). A total of 244 kidney transplant recipients were enrolled at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from June 2000 to February 2020. Biopsy-proven BKPyVAN patients (n = 17) had worse kidney function (eGFR: 26 ± 13.7 vs. 47.8 ± 31.0 mL/min/1.73 m²). The 5-year allograft survival rates for patients with and without BKPyVAN were 67% and 93%, respectively (p = 0.0002), while the 10-year patient survival was not different between the two groups. BKPyVAN patients had a significantly higher incidence of UTC compared to the non-BKPyVAN group (29.4% vs. 6.6%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the UTC-free survival rate was significantly lower in BKPyVAN patients, and the onset of UTC was significantly shorter in BKPyVAN patients (53.4 vs. 108.9 months). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age (RR = 1.062) and BKVAN (RR = 6.459) were the most significant risk factors for the development of UTC. Our study demonstrates that BKPyVAN patients have greater allograft losses, higher incidence, a lower cancer-free survival rate, and an earlier onset with a higher relative risk of developing UTC compared to non-BKPyVAN patients.

Polyomavirus Associated Nephropathy: Frequency and Graft Survival Analysis in Northeast of Iran

Background & Objective:

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN), mainly caused by the BK virus, is one of the most important infectious complications of kidney transplantation. The leading histopathologic characteristics of PVAN is viral cytopathic effects, such as nucleomegaly with smudged or clumped chromatin and intranuclear ground-glass inclusion, mostly in tubular epithelial cells. Moreover, tubular necrosis, tubulitis, interstitial inflammation, atrophy, and fibrosis have been noted. Positive immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for SV-40 highlights the infected epithelial cells of renal tubules.

Methods:

A total of 85 core needle biopsies of transplanted kidneys were evaluated histologically and were stained for SV-40 using the IHC method. In addition, a follow-up of graft failure was performed.

Results:

Our findings revealed that the frequency of polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant patients in the Northeast of Iran is 4.7%. There was no significant correlation between PVAN and graft rejection. Although a higher rate of graft loss was observed in PVAN patients, in comparison with non-PVAN patients (25% vs. 14.8%), the difference was not statistically significant. Moreover, patients with immunohistochemically confirmed PVAN and those with histopathologic features of viral-like cytopathic effects had significantly lower graft survival in the follow-up period (42.5 vs. 196.8 months and 109.4 vs. 205.7 months, respectively).

Conclusion:

The frequency of polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant patients in the Northeast of Iran is 4.7%. There was no significant correlation between PVAN and graft rejection. Furthermore, we observed that polyomavirus infection accelerates the course of graft loss.

Kidney Allograft Fibrosis: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies

Interstitial fibrosis with tubule atrophy (IF/TA) is the response to virtually any sustained kidney injury and correlates inversely with kidney function and allograft survival. IF/TA is driven by various pathways that include hypoxia, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling, cellular rejection, inflammation and others. In this review we will focus on key pathways in the progress of renal fibrosis, diagnosis and therapy of allograft fibrosis. This review discusses the role and origin of myofibroblasts as matrix producing cells and therapeutic targets in renal fibrosis with a particular focus on renal allografts. We summarize current trends to use multi-omic approaches to identify new biomarkers for IF/TA detection and to predict allograft survival. Furthermore, we review current imaging strategies that might help to identify and follow-up IF/TA complementary or as alternative to invasive biopsies. We further discuss current clinical trials and therapeutic strategies to treat kidney fibrosis.Supplemental Visual Abstract; http://links.lww.com/TP/C141.

BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy after Renal Transplantation

Recent advances in immunosuppressive therapy have reduced the incidence of acute rejection and improved renal transplantation outcomes. Meanwhile, nephropathy caused by BK virus has become an important cause of acute or chronic graft dysfunction. The usual progression of infection begins with BK viruria and progresses to BK viremia, leading to BK virus associated nephropathy. To detect early signs of BK virus proliferation before the development of nephropathy, several screening tests are used including urinary cytology and urinary and plasma PCR. A definitive diagnosis of BK virus associated nephropathy can be achieved only histologically, typically by detecting tubulointerstitial inflammation associated with basophilic intranuclear inclusions in tubular and/or Bowman’s epithelial cells, in addition to immunostaining with anti-Simian virus 40 large T-antigen. Several pathological classifications have been proposed to categorize the severity of the disease to allow treatment strategies to be determined and treatment success to be predicted. Since no specific drugs that directly suppress the proliferation of BKV are available, the main therapeutic approach is the reduction of immunosuppressive drugs. The diagnosis of subsequent acute rejection, the definition of remission, the protocol of resuming immunosuppression, and long-term follow-up remain controversial.

The 2018 Banff Working Group classification of definitive polyomavirus nephropathy: A multicenter validation study in the modern era

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) remained inadequately classified until 2018 when the Banff Working Group published a new 3-tier morphologic classification scheme derived from in-depth statistical analysis of a large multinational patient cohort. Here we report a multicenter "modern-era" validation study that included 99 patients with definitive PVN transplanted post January 1, 2009 and followed the original 2018 study design. Results validate the PVN classification, that is, the 3 PVN disease classes predicted clinical presentation, allograft function, and outcome independent of therapeutic intervention. PVN class 1 compared to classes 2 and 3 was diagnosed earlier (16.9 weeks posttransplant [median], P = .004), and showed significantly better function at 24 months postindex biopsy (serum creatinine 1.75 mg/dl, geometric mean, vs class 2: P = .037, vs class 3: P = .013). Class 1 presented during long-term follow-up with a low graft failure rate: 5% class 1, vs 30% class 2, vs 50% class 3 (P = .009). Persistent PVN was associated with an increased risk for graft failure (and functional decline in class 2 at 24 months postdiagnosis; serum creatinine with persistence: 2.48 mg/dL vs 1.65 with clearance, geometric means, P = .018). In conclusion, we validate the 2018 Banff Working Group PVN classification that provides significant clinical information and enhances comparative data analysis.

Validation of a noninvasive prognostic signature for allograft failure following BK virus associated nephropathy

Identifying kidney transplant recipients at risk for graft failure following BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) may allow personalization of therapy. We have reported that a noninvasive composite signature of urinary cell level of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1(PAI-1) mRNA and serum creatinine level, measured at the time of BKVN diagnosis, is prognostic of graft failure. In this investigation, we determined whether the composite signature is prognostic of graft failure in an independent cohort of 25 patients with BKVN. Of the 25 patients, 8 developed graft failure and 17 did not. We measured urinary cell levels of PAI-1 mRNA, 18S rRNA, and BKV VP1 mRNA at the time of BKVN diagnosis and evaluated clinical parameters including Banff pathology scores, acute rejection, and graft function. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the noninvasive composite signature was 0.95 (P < .001) for prognosticating graft failure. The previously reported threshold of -0.858 predicted graft failure with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 94%. Our current study validates the use of composite signature and the threshold of -0.858 to identify those at risk for graft failure following BKVN diagnosis, and supports future studies utilizing the composite signature score to personalize treatment of BKVN.

An application of the 2018 Banff Classification for BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is still a lack of a recognized morphological classification of BK viral nephropathy (BKVN) which can better reflect the clinical manifestations and prognosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 53 patients with BKVN in our center from January 2011 to December 2018 and evaluated the new Banff 2018 classifications' predictive value for the graft prognosis.

RESULTS

The period between transplantation and BKVN diagnosis lasted for 10.3 months (IQR, 5.3-21.9 months). The main reason (92.5%) for puncture was the increase of blood serum creatinine. Of the 53 patients diagnosed with BKVN, 100% were positive for urinary BK virus-DNA, and the viral load was 1.4 × 10⁸  copies/mL (IQR, 3.7 × 10⁴ -1.3 × 10¹¹  copies/mL); 75.5% were positive for blood BK virus-DNA, and the viral load was 3.3 × 10⁴  copies/mL (IQR, 0-2.8 × 10⁷  copies/mL). There were five cases in class 1, 31 cases in class 2, and 17 cases in class 3; the viral load of urine BK was 3.3 × 10⁸ , 1.4 × 10⁸ , and 6.3 × 10⁷  copies/mL (P > .05); the viral load of blood BK was 3.3 × 10⁴ , 3.3 × 10⁴ , and 3.3 × 10⁴  copies/mL (P > .05); the 1-year graft survival rates were 100%, 90.3%, and 52.9%, respectively (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

BKVN mostly occurs within 1 year after transplantation. There is no correlation between BK virus load in hematuria and pathological damage at the time of diagnosis. The 2018 Banff Classification for BKVN can better indicate the prognosis of graft.

The Role of HLA and KIR Immunogenetics in BK Virus Infection after Kidney Transplantation

BK virus (BKV) is a polyomavirus with high seroprevalence in the general population with an unremarkable clinical presentation in healthy people, but a potential for causing serious complications in immunosuppressed transplanted patients. Reactivation or primary infection in kidney allograft recipients may lead to allograft dysfunction and subsequent loss. Currently, there is no widely accepted specific treatment for BKV infection and reduction of immunosuppressive therapy is the mainstay therapy. Given this and the sequential appearance of viruria-viremia-nephropathy, screening and early detection are of utmost importance. There are numerous risk factors associated with BKV infection including genetic factors, among them human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) alleles have been shown to be the strongest so far. Identification of patients at risk for BKV infection would be useful in prevention or early action to reduce morbidity and progression to frank nephropathy. Assessment of risk involving HLA ligands and KIR genotyping of recipients in the pre-transplant or early post-transplant period might be useful in clinical practice. This review summarizes current knowledge of the association between HLA, KIR and BKV infection and potential future directions of research, which might lead to optimal utilization of these genetic markers.

Intragraft gene expression in native kidney BK virus nephropathy versus T cell-mediated rejection: Prospects for molecular diagnosis and risk prediction

Novel tools are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy and risk prediction in BK virus nephropathy (BKVN). We assessed the utility of intragraft gene expression testing for these purposes. Eight hundred genes were measured in 110 archival samples, including a discovery cohort of native kidney BKVN (n = 5) vs pure T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR; n = 10). Five polyomavirus genes and seven immune-related genes (five associated with BKVN and two associated with TCMR) were significantly differentially expressed between these entities (FDR < 0.05). These three sets of genes were further evaluated in samples representing a spectrum of BK infection (n = 25), followed by a multicenter validation cohort of allograft BKVN (n = 60) vs TCMR (n = 10). Polyomavirus 5-gene set expression reliably distinguished BKVN from TCMR (validation cohort AUC = 0.992), but the immune gene sets demonstrated suboptimal diagnostic performance (AUC ≤ 0.720). Within the validation cohort, no significant differences in index biopsy gene expression were identified between BKVN patients demonstrating resolution (n = 35), persistent infection (n = 14) or de novo rejection (n = 11) 6 months following a standardized reduction in immunosuppression. These results suggest that, while intragraft polyomavirus gene expression may be useful as an ancillary diagnostic for BKVN, assessment for concurrent TCMR and prediction of clinical outcome may not be feasible with current molecular tools.

A pilot study of immunosuppression resumption following BK viremia resolution

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression reduction for BK viremia is associated with de novo humoral responses, which are a risk factor for rejection and graft loss. In this pilot project, we tested a protocol of immunosuppression resumption to standard dose after viral clearance for optimal protection against humoral immunity in patients undergoing treatment for BK viremia.

METHODS

Thirty-six consecutive kidney transplant recipients who developed BK viremia from 7/1/2014 to 11/18/2016 underwent immunosuppression reduction. After 4 weeks of absent viremia, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was increased by 500mg/day every 2 weeks up to standard dosage, followed by increase of tacrolimus trough levels to 5-7 ng/mL. If viremia recurred during the increase, immunosuppression was reduced in this same stepwise fashion, with stepwise increase again after 2 months of negative viremia.

RESULTS

Mean tacrolimus trough level (ng/mL) was 8.3 ± 2.7 at viremia onset, 5.3 ± 3.6 at resolution, and 5.6 ± 2.0 at study end date. Mean daily dose (mg) of MMF was 1574 ± 355 at onset, 910 ± 230 at resolution, and 1377 ± 451 at study end date. Only one patient developed low level viremia recurrence (peak 2875 copies/mL) during the period of immunosuppression resumption that ultimately resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our pilot project indicate that following BK viremia resolution, resumption of standard immunosuppression can be achieved safely without BK viremia recurrence. Larger trials with long-term follow up are required to determine whether such an approach improves long-term graft survival.

Comparison of Immunohistochemical Staining for Large T Antigen and Capsid Protein VP1 in BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy

AIM

Most transplant centres use SV40 large T antigen (TAg) staining for the diagnosis and assessment of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). This study was performed to evaluate the significance of capsid protein VP1 expression in BKPyVAN.

METHODS

We performed immunohistochemical staining using anti-SV40 TAg and anti-BKPyV VP1 antibodies in 16 index biopsies and 12 re-biopsies of BKPyVAN and compared the patterns of positivity and the percentage of positive tubules by counting whole specimens. We investigated the correlation between serum creatinine increase from baseline and the percentage of positive tubules for both markers in 16 index biopsies.

RESULTS

In VP1 staining, positive findings were observed not only in the nuclei of tubular epithelial cells but also in the cytoplasm, cells shedding into the lumen, intra-tubular casts, and in the interstitium. Two of 28 biopsies (7.1%) showed TAg-positive and VP1-negative results, in which TAg-positive cells were detected only in a single tubule. The median (interquartile range) percentage of positive tubules was 2.8% (0.7-9.8%) for TAg and 1.4% (0.5-3.9%) for VP1 staining (p = 0.2). In 16 index biopsies, serum creatinine increases significantly correlated with the percentage of VP1-positive tubules (r = 0.49, p = 0.02), while this correlation revealed borderline significance with TAg-positive tubules.

CONCLUSIONS

VP1 expression showed various patterns, but was detected in half as many tubules as TAg staining, which might lead to false negatives in the samples with minimal viral replication. However, increased VP1-positive tubules indicate advanced tubular damage and possible association with graft dysfunction.

Advances in BK Virus Complications in Organ Transplantation and Beyond

Reactivation of BK virus (BKV) remains a dreaded complication in immunosuppressed states. Conventionally, BKV is known as a cause for BKV-associated nephropathy and allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. However, emerging studies have shown its negative impact on native kidney function and patient survival in other transplants and its potential role in diseases such as cancer. Because BKV-associated nephropathy is driven by immunosuppression, reduction in the latter is a convenient standard of care. However, this strategy is risk prone due to the development of donor-specific antibodies affecting long-term allograft survival. Despite its pathogenic role, there is a distinct lack of effective anti-BKV therapeutics. This limitation combined with increased morbidity and health care cost of BKV-associated diseases add to the complexity of BKV management. While summarizing recent advances in the pathogenesis of BKV-associated nephropathy and its reactivation in other organ transplants, this review illustrates the limitations of current and emerging therapeutic options and provides a compelling argument for an effective targeted anti-BKV drug.

Increasing net immunosuppression after BK polyoma virus infection

BACKGROUND

Reducing immunosuppression can effectively treat BK viremia (BKV) and BK nephropathy, but has been associated with increased risks for acute rejection and development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). To date there have been no systematic evaluations of re-escalating immunosuppression in transplant patients with resolving BKV. Importantly, the safety of this approach and impact on graft survival is unclear.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective review of kidney transplant recipients between July 2011 and June 2013 who had immunosuppression reduction after developing BKV (plasma PCR ≥ 1000 copies/ml). Changes in immunosuppression and patient outcomes were tracked until occurrence of a complication event: biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), detection of de novo DSA, or recurrent BKV. Patients were grouped according to whether or not net immunosuppression was eventually increased.

RESULTS

Out of 88 patients with BKV, 44 (50%) had net immunosuppression increased while the other 44 did not. Duration of viremia, peak viremia, induction, and sensitization status were similar between the two groups. In a Kaplan-Meier analysis, increasing immunosuppression was associated with less BPAR (P = .001) and a trend toward less de novo DSA development (P = .06). Death-censored graft survival (P = .27) was not different between the two groups. In the net immunosuppression increase group, recurrent BKV occurred in 22.7% without any BKV-related graft losses.

CONCLUSION

These findings support potential benefits of increasing immunosuppression in patients with low-level or resolved BKV, but prospective trials are needed to better understand such an approach.

Detection of Proximal Tubule Involvement by BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Urinary Sediment Double-Immunostaining

Background

The extent and depth of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in renal allograft correlate with prognosis. This study was designed to evaluate the value of urinary sediment double-immunostaining for predicting BKPyV infection in proximal tubular epithelium.

Materials and methods

A total of 76 urine sediment cell blocks, as well as the corresponding transplanted kidney tissues with BK polyomavirus associated-nephropathy (BKPyVAN), were evaluated by automatic double-immunostaining with anti-58-kDa Golgi protein (58K, a proximal renal tubular marker) + anti-SV40-T and anti-homogentisate 1, 2-dioxygenase (HGD, a renal tubular marker) + anti-SV40-T.

Results

Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that 58K was expressed in proximal tubular epithelium but not in distal tubular epithelium or transitional epithelium. Of the 76 patients, 28 (36.8%) had urinary 58K(+)/SV40-T(+) cells and HGD(+)/SV40-T(+) cells, 41 (53.9%) had only HGD(+)/SV40-T(+) cells, one (1.3%) had only 58K(+)/SV40-T(+) cells, and six (7.9%) had only 58K(−)/HGD(−)/SV40-T(+) cells. The presence of urinary 58K(+)/SV40-T(+) cells was correlated with BKPyV infection in proximal tubular epithelium (P < 0.001, r = 0.806). The mean extent of SV40-T staining was significantly more extensive in patients with urinary 58K(+)/SV40-T(+) cells than those without urinary 58K(+)/SV40-T(+) cells (21.4 vs. 12.0%, P < 0.001). The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity of urinary 58K(+)/SV40-T(+) cells for predicting BKPyV infection in proximal tubular epithelium were 89.7% (95% CI: 71.5–97.3%), 91.5% (95% CI: 78.7–97.2%), 86.7% (95% CI: 68.4–95.6%), and 93.5% (95% CI: 81.1–98.3%), respectively.

Conclusion

Urinary sediment double-immunostaining with anti-58K and anti-SV40-T is valuable for predicting the extent and depth of BKPyV infection in renal allograft.

Association of Pretransplant BK Polyomavirus Antibody Status with BK Polyomavirus Infection After Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Pilot Study of 47 Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Prevention and early detection of BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is important for long-term kidney graft survival; hence, pretransplant screening methods are essential to identify recipients at high risk for BKV infection. This study investigated the association of pretransplant donor and recipient BKV antibody status with the occurrence of post-transplant BKV infection.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 47 adult living donor kidney transplant pairs from December 2014 to January 2016. Recipient and donor pretransplant BKV antibody titer was measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. Donor and recipient median HI titer of 1:20 was used as a cutoff to define seropositivity. Recipients were divided into 2 groups (BKV antibody donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) and non-D+/R-). Urinary cytology was used to screen for BKV infection. Plasma polymerase chain reaction testing for BKV DNA was used when decoy cells in urine were persistently detected.

RESULTS

Nine (19.2%) of 47 patients belonged to the D+/R- group. Decoy cells were observed in 32 recipients (68.1%) during follow-up. BK viremia occurred in 3 (6.4%) cases. The maximum decoy cell count was significantly higher in the D+/R- group than in the non-D+/R- group (P = .0002). Decoy-cell-free survival was significantly shorter in the D+/R- group (P = .0220). Multivariate analysis identified only BKV antibody serostatus as an independent risk factor for decoy cell appearance (P = .0491).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant donor and recipient BKV antibody status was associated with higher maximum decoy cell count and shorter decoy-cell-free survival after kidney transplantation.

A Multicenter Application of the 2018 Banff Classification for BK Polyomavirus-associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

With current immunosuppressive regimens, BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is still a matter of concern. Stratification of patients at risk for allograft loss is of uttermost importance to guide treatment choice and assess prognosis. In 2018, the Banff working group proposed a classification scheme for the prognosis of BKPyVAN, but external application on independent cohorts is yet to be performed. We investigated how the 2018 Banff classification would perform in a multicenter cohort comprising 50 cases of biopsy-proven BKPyVAN compared to previously published classification systems.

METHODS

We analyzed consecutive BKPyVAN cases from two Dutch university hospitals between 2002 and 2013, retrieved clinical data, and scored all biopsies according to the Banff 2018 classification, and as a comparison, 4 previously proposed BKPyVAN classification systems. We used estimated glomerular filtration rate trajectories and death-censored graft survival as primary endpoints.

RESULTS

The 2018 Banff classification did not associate with estimated glomerular filtration rate decline or graft failure and performed only slightly better than the 4 previously proposed classifiers. Anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), especially in combination with ongoing biopsy-proven BKPyVAN on follow-up, did correlate with graft function and survival. Patients who were DSA+/BKPyVAN+ on follow-up had more inflammation at the baseline biopsy, which by itself was not associated with graft outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither the 2018 Banff BKPyVAN classification nor previously published stratification systems could be applied to our multicenter patient cohort. Our data suggest that there might be a prognostic value for follow-up biopsies and DSA measurements to improve risk stratification after BKPyVAN, although prospective multicenter efforts with protocol measurements are needed to confirm this.

Outcomes of kidney retransplantation after graft loss as a result of BK virus nephropathy in the era of newer immunosuppressant agents

We conducted this study using the updated 2005-2016 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database to assess clinical outcomes of retransplant after allograft loss as a result of BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Three hundred forty-one patients had first graft failure as a result of BKVAN, whereas 13 260 had first graft failure as a result of other causes. At median follow-up time of 4.70 years after the second kidney transplant, death-censored graft survival at 5 years for the second renal allograft was 90.6% for the BK group and 83.9% for the non-BK group. In adjusted analysis, there was no difference in death-censored graft survival (P = .11), acute rejection (P = .49), and patient survival (P = .13) between the 2 groups. When we further compared death-censored graft survival among the specific causes for first graft failure, the BK group had better graft survival than patients who had prior allograft failure as a result of acute rejection (P < .001) or disease recurrence (P = .003), but survival was similar to those with chronic allograft nephropathy (P = .06) and other causes (P = .05). The better allograft survival in the BK group over acute rejection and disease recurrence remained after adjusting for potential confounders. History of allograft loss as a result of BKVAN should not be a contraindication to retransplant among candidates who are otherwise acceptable.

BK Virus RNA in Renal Allograft Biopsies

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKpyVAN) remains a cause of graft loss in kidney transplant recipients on immunosuppressive therapy. Its diagnosis relies on the identification of BK virus (BKV) in the renal allograft biopsy by positive immunohistochemical (IHC) stain for the viral SV40 large T antigen, although in situ hybridization (ISH) for viral DNA is used in some centers. We examined tissue detection of BKV RNA by RNAscope, a novel, automated ISH test, in 61 allograft biopsies from 56 patients with BKpyVAN. We found good correlation between the estimate of BKV tissue load by RNAscope ISH and SV40 IHC (R² = 0.65, p<0.0001). RNAscope ISH showed 88% sensitivity and 79% specificity and, as an alternative test, could confirm the presence of BKV tissue in presumed BKpyVAN and rule out BKV as the causative agent in JC virus nephropathy. We also used tissue BK viral load estimates by both RNAscope ISH and SV40 IHC to examine the relation between tissue and plasma BK levels and found significant correlation only between BK viremia and tissue BK measured by RNAscope ISH. Our findings suggest that the RNAscope ISH assay could be a reliable test for BKV detection in allograft biopsies.

Viral load and duration of BK polyomavirus viraemia determine renal graft fibrosis progression: histologic evaluation of late protocol biopsies

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) infection of the renal allograft causes destructive tissue injury with inflammation and subsequent fibrosis.

METHODS

Using a prospective cohort of patients after kidney transplantation performed between 2003 and 2012, we investigated the role of BKV viraemia in the development and progression of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). The primary outcome was moderate-to-severe IFTA assessed by protocol biopsy at 36 months.

RESULTS

A total of 207 consecutive recipients were enrolled. Of these, 57 (28%) developed BKV viraemia with 10 (5%) cases of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN). Transient (<3 months) BKV viraemia occurred in 70% of patients, and persistent (≥3 months) BKV viraemia in 30%. A high viral load (≥10 000 copies/mL) was detected in 18% and a low viral load (<10 000 copies/mL) in 61%, while the viral load could not be determined in 21%. Moderate-to-severe IFTA was significantly increased in high [71%; odds ratio (OR) = 12.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62-90.0; P = 0.015] or persistent BKV viraemia (67%; OR = 6.33; 95% CI 1.19-33.7; P = 0.031) with corresponding rise in 'interstitial fibrosis + tubular atrophy' scores. Only patients with transient low BKV viraemia showed similar incidence and progression of IFTA to the no-BKV group. Persistent low BKV viraemia was uncommon yet the progression of fibrosis was significant. Only recipients with PVAN experienced inferior graft survival at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that only transient low BKV viraemia does not negatively affect the progression of allograft fibrosis in contrast to excessive risk of severe fibrosis after high or persistent BKV viraemia.

Glomerular Parietal Epithelial Cells Infection Is Associated With Poor Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients With BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV infection of glomerular parietal epithelial cells (GPECs) on graft outcome in kidney transplant recipients with BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN).

METHODS

A total of 152 kidney transplant recipients with BKPyVAN were divided into 31 with (GPEC-positive group) and 121 without (GPEC-negative group) BKPyV-infected GPECs. Clinicopathological characteristics and allograft survival were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The GPEC-positive group had more patients with advanced-stage BKPyVAN than the GPEC-negative group (P < .001). At the last follow-up, the GPEC-positive group had a significantly higher serum creatinine level than the GPEC-negative group. The graft loss rate in the GPEC-positive group was higher than that in the GPEC-negative group (32.3% vs 12.4%; P = .008). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the graft survival rate in the GPEC-positive group was lower than that in the GPEC-negative group (log-rank test, P = .004). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that BKPyV infection of GPECs was an independent risk factor for graft survival (hazard ratio, 3.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-8.76; P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

GPEC infection in patients with BKPyVAN indicates more-severe pathological damage and a rapid decline in renal function. BKPyV infection of GPECs is an independent risk factor for allograft loss.

Pathogenicity of BK virus on the urinary system

Introduction

The polyomaviruses are omnipresent in nature. The major sites of BK virus appearance are the kidney tubular epithelial cells and urinary bladder surface transitional cells.

Material and methods

A literature search according to PRISMA guidelines within the Medline database was conducted in July 2019 for articles presenting data about BK virus in urologic aspect without setting time limits, using the terms ‘BK virus’ in conjunction with transplantation, nephropathy, stenosis, cancer, bladder, prostate, kidney.

Results

The BK virus usually stays latent, however, its replication may become active in various clinical situations of impaired immunocompetence such as solid organ transplantation, bone marrow transplantation, AIDS, pregnancy, multiple sclerosis, administration of chemotherapy or biologic therapy. BK virus is associated with two main complications after transplantation: polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in kidney transplant patients and polyomavirus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

Conclusions

The aim of this article was to present available data on urologic aspects of BK virus infection, its detection methods and available treatment.

The immunophenotyping of different stages of BK virus allograft nephropathy

Objectives: To investigate the immunohistochemical features of different stages of BK virus allograft nephropathy (BKVN) and further elucidate the underlying immunological mechanism involved in the evolution of BKVN. Methods: Fifty-two renal transplant recipients with biopsy proven BKVN were retrospectively selected. According to the third edition of the American Society of Transplantation Infection guidelines, 10 patients were categorized as having mild BKVN (stage A), 25 were moderate (stage B) and 17 were severe (stage C). The differential infiltrations of CD3+ (T lymphocytes), CD4+ (helper T lymphocytes), CD8+ (cytotoxic T lymphocytes), CD20+ (B lymphocytes), CD68+ (macrophages) and CD138+ (plasma cells) cells and the expression of interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) and human leukocyte antigen DR (HLA-DR) were compared among the three groups. Results: CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD20+, CD138+ and CD68+ cells infiltrations, IL-2R and HLA-DR expression were positive in the BKVN patients. Moreover, with increasing stages of BKVN, the numbers of positively stained inflammatory cells and the expression of IL-2R were significantly increased in the severe group compared to the mild group, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed with regard to HLA-DR expression. Eosinophil and neutrophil infiltration could also be observed in moderate to advanced BKVN. Conclusion: Renal allograft damage caused by BKVN involved T lymphocyte-, B lymphocyte- and mononuclear macrophage-mediated immune responses. Inflammatory cell infiltrations in the renal allograft were probably the driving force for BKVN progression. Additionally, eosinophils and neutrophils may be involved in the pathophysiological mechanism of BKVN.