Immunohistochemical predictive markers of response to conservative treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer: A systematic review

Potential of molecular classification to guide fertility-sparing management among young patients with endometrial cancer

The traditional histological classification system for endometrial carcinoma falls short in addressing the disease's molecular heterogeneity, prompting the need for alternative stratification methods. Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) has emerged as a clinically efficient tool to categorize endometrial cancers according to mismatch repair deficiency, POLE exonuclease domain mutations, and p53 expression. However, the application of this classification to fertility-sparing treatments remains unexplored, and current guidelines lack specificity in how it should be used. In this review, we summarize the available literature and establish the framework for future investigations focused on molecular profiling-based risk assessment of endometrial cancer, with the goal of utilizing precision medicine to optimally counsel patients seeking fertility-sparing treatment. While the available evidence is limited and of low quality, it does provide insights and frames future perspectives for managing fertility-sparing approaches on the basis of molecular subtypes. Evidence suggests that mismatch repair-deficient tumors are likely to recur despite progestin therapy, emphasizing the need for alternative treatments, with targeted therapies being a new landscape that still needs to be explored. Tumors with POLE mutations exhibit a favorable prognosis, but the safety of hysteroscopic resection alone requires further investigation. p53 abnormal tumors have an unfavorable prognosis, raising questions about their suitability for fertility-sparing treatment. Lastly, the no specific molecular profile (or p53 wild-type) tumors, while having a relatively good prognosis, are heterogeneous and require more precise biomarkers to effectively guide therapy for those with poorer prognoses. Addressing these research gaps will lead to more precise guidelines to ensure optimal selection for fertility-sparing treatment.

Correlation between steroid receptor expression and response to progestational therapy in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or cancer

Background

Conservative management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or endometrial cancer (EMCA) often relies on the treatment of synthetic progestins, which show varied success and response rates. We evaluate the correlation between steroid receptor expression and response to progestin therapy in patients with AEH and EMCA.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study collected data for patients with AEH or EMCA who had an endometrial sample after receiving conservative therapy utilizing either Megestrol acetate or Levonorgestrel Intrauterine device (IUD). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on pre- and post- treatment biopsy samples to assess androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) expression. IHC scores (1-12) were calculated based on staining intensity and percentage of positive cells.

Results and analysis

We identified 15 patients with AEH and EMCA between 2015 and 2023 with the majority of African American ethnicity (53 %). Fourteen patients (93 %) received Megestrol acetate, and 1 patient received Levonorgestrel IUD alone. Three patients ultimately underwent hysterectomy. Seven (46.6 %) endometrial samples had strong positivity for AR, PR and ER expression on pre-treatment biopsies, and only 3 (20 %) of them maintained strong positivity for the 3 receptors in the post-treatment. Patients who successfully responded to the treatment demonstrated a significantly greater decrease in IHC scores after the treatment compared to those who did not respond (p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Steroid receptor expression could be used as a possible biomarker for response to progestin therapy in patients undergoing conservative management for AEH and EMCA.

Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Concurrent Cancer: A Comprehensive Overview on a Challenging Clinical Condition

The present review regarding atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) focused on the main debated factors regarding this challenging clinical condition: (i) predictive variables of occult endometrial cancer (EC); (ii) the rate of EC underestimation according to different endometrial sampling methods; and (iii) the appropriateness of lymph node status assessment. When cancer is detected, approximately 90% of cases include low-risk EC, although intermediate/high-risk cases have been found in 10-13% of women with cancer. Older age, diabetes, high BMI, and increased endometrial thickness are the most recurrent factors in women with EC. However, the predictive power of these independent variables measured on internal validation sets showed disappointing results. Relative to endometrial sampling methods, hysteroscopic endometrial resection (Hys-res) provided the lowest EC underestimation, ranging between 6 and 11%. Further studies, including larger sample sizes of women undergoing Hys-res, are needed to confirm these findings. These data are urgently needed, especially for female candidates for conservative treatment. Finally, the evaluation of lymph node status measured on 660 of over 20,000 women showed a lymph node positivity of 2.3%. Although there has been an increase in the use of this procedure in AEH in recent years, the present data cannot recommend this option in AEH based on a cost/risk/benefit ratio.

Identification of Potentially Novel Molecular Targets of Endometrial Cancer Using a Non-Biased Proteomic Approach

The present study was aimed at identifying novel proteins in endometrial cancer (EC), employing proteomic analysis of tissues obtained after surgery. A differential MS-based proteomic analysis was conducted from whole tissues dissected from biopsies from post-menopausal women, histologically confirmed as endometrial cancer (two endometrioid and two serous; n = 4) or normal atrophic endometrium (n = 4), providing 888 differentially expressed proteins with 246 of these previously documented elsewhere as expressed in EC and 372 proteins not previously demonstrated to be expressed in EC but associated with other types of cancer. Additionally, 33 proteins not recorded previously in PubMed as being expressed in any forms of cancer were also identified, with only 26 of these proteins having a publication associated with their expression patterns or putative functions. The putative functions of the 26 proteins (GRN, APP, HEXA, CST3, CAD, QARS, SIAE, WARS, MYH8, CLTB, GOLIM4, SCARB2, BOD1L1, C14orf142, C9orf142, CCDC13, CNPY4, FAM169A, HN1L, PIGT, PLCL1, PMFBP1, SARS2, SCPEP1, SLC25A24 and ZC3H4) in other tissues point towards and provide a basis for further investigation of these previously unrecognised novel EC proteins. The developmental biology, disease, extracellular matrix, homeostatic, immune, metabolic (both RNA and protein), programmed cell death, signal transduction, molecular transport, transcriptional networks and as yet uncharacterised pathways indicate that these proteins are potentially involved in endometrial carcinogenesis and thus may be important in EC diagnosis, prognostication and treatment and thus are worthy of further investigation.

ER and COX2 expression in endometrial hyperplasia processes

Endometrial hyperplastic processes (EHPs) encompass various morphological changes, characterized by an increased ratio of endometrial glands to stroma. These changes manifest as endometrial hyperplasia (EH) and endometrial polyps. The objective of this study was to investigate the expressions of ER and Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) in EH and endometrial polyps, and determine their correlation with histological and anthropometric parameters. Tissue samples were obtained during hysteroresectoscopy and divided into 3 groups: non-atypical EH, glandular EP, and glandular-fibrous EP. We examined the immunoprofile of epithelial and stromal cells using rabbit polyclonal anti-COX2 antibodies and rabbit monoclonal anti-ER antibodies (clone SP1). Our results indicate that there is no association between the expressions of ER and COX2 and the type of EHP. Furthermore, the expression levels of ER and COX2 are not influenced by the patients anthropometric parameters. However, tissues with EHPs exhibited significantly higher COX2 expression compared to intact tissues. We also observed a direct correlation between ER and COX2 expression in the endometrial epithelium. The variability in ER and COX2 expressions observed in hyperplastic processes of the endometrium potentially suggests their synergistic involvement in the initiation and progression of EHPs, as well as their potential role in subsequent tumor transformation.

Effect of adenomyosis on prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to contrast the prognoses of patients with endometrial cancer who had adenomyosis against those that did not.

METHODS

All patients who had received surgical staging for hysterectomy-based endometrial cancer had their medical data retrospectively examined. The analysis covered 397 patients, who were split into two groups depending on the presence of adenomyosis. Comparisons were made between patients covering type of surgery, histopathology, endometrial cancer stage, lymphovascular space invasion, presence of biochemical or histochemical markers, adjuvant therapy, presence of adenomyosis in the myometrial wall, and outcomes in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

There is no statistically significant difference in the 5-year disease-free survival or overall survival rates between endometrial cancer patients with and without adenomyosis. This is based on comparisons of tumor stage, tumor diameter, histological type and grade of tumor, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and biochemical markers that affect the course of the disease. The median follow-up times were 61 months for the adenomyosis-positive group and 56 months for the group without adenomyosis.

CONCLUSION

Coexisting adenomyosis in endometrial cancer has no bearing on survival rates and is not a prognostic factor.

Conservative treatment of endometrial cancer in women of reproductive age (Review)

Endometrial cancer is the fifth most common female cancer worldwide and the third leading female cancer in the Western world. The marked surge in endometrial cancer incidence is alarming. The aim of the present review is to focus on endometrial cancer affecting young women of reproductive age. Surgery, namely abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy, with or without salpingo-oophorectomy, and sentinel lymph node detection has become the standard surgical strategy for early stage endometrioid endometrial cancer. However, premenopausal women might want to preserve their fertility, especially if they are nulliparous or have not reached their desired number of children at the time of diagnosis. Conservative, uterus-sparing treatment, based on progestin products, may be an advantageous option for patients meeting the necessary criteria. Potential candidates have to be committed to following a rigorous protocol of treatment, investigations and follow-up. The evidence in favor of this approach, although limited, is encouraging and patients who have achieved a histologically documented disease complete remission could attempt to conceive spontaneously or with the immediate use of assisted reproductive technology techniques. The risk of partial or negative response to progestin treatment or cancer recurrence is well documented, thus patients have to be aware of the possible need for interruption of conservative treatment and hysterectomy.

Human chorionic gonadotropin expression in endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma: could it be a new marker?

Objective

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a glycoprotein hormone expressed in a variety of tumors and is correlated with advanced stage disease and poor prognosis. This study aimed to determine hCG expression immunohistochemically in endometrial specimens obtained from patients with normal endometrium, endometrial hyperplasia, and endometrial carcinoma, and to determine if there is a correlation between invasiveness and hCG positivity.

Methods

The histologic materials and medical records for patients diagnosed with normal endometrium, endometrial hyperplasia with/without atypia, and endometrial carcinoma between September 2017 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Immunohistochemical staining for hCG was performed and analyzed semi-quantitatively.

Results

A total of 96 patients were included: normal endometrium (27.1%) (n=26); endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (25%) (n=24); atypical endometrial hyperplasia (22.9%) (n=22); endometrioid endometrial cancer (25%) (n=24). Median age of the patients was 48 (range 28–81) years. hCG was positive in 8.3% of patients with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, 18.2% in those with atypical endometrial hyperplasia, and 41.7% in those with endometrial cancer (p<0.001). None of the patients with normal endometrium had a positive hCG. The rate of endometrial cancer was 62.5% in the hCG-positive group and 17.5% in the hCG-negative group.

Conclusion

hCG is expressed to a significantly greater degree in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma and it may be potentially used as a marker for these lesions.

PTEN mutation predicts unfavorable fertility preserving treatment outcome in the young patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of molecular classification and PTEN, KRAS and PIK3CA gene mutation on the outcome of fertility-preserving treatment in the patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) and endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH).

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study. A total of 135 patients with EEC and EAH receiving fertility-preserving treatment and molecular classification were reviewed. The distribution of the four types of molecular classification was described. The impact of non-specific molecular profile (NSMP), mismatch repair-deficiency (MMRd), and PTEN, KRAS and PIK3CA gene mutation on the outcome of fertility-preserving treatment was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the patients analyzed, 86.7% (117/136) were classified as having NSMP; 14 (10.4%), MMRd; 1 (0.7%), POLEmut EAH; and 3 (2.2%), p53abn EEC. The patients having NSMP and MMRd achieved similar 16-, 32-, and 48-week complete response rates. The patients harboring tier I and tier II PTEN mutations (PTENmut-Clin) achieved lower cumulative 32-week CR rates than those with PTEN-others (without PTENmut-Clin) (22/47, 46.8% vs. 50/74, 67.6%; p=0.023; odds ratio=0.422; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.199-0.896). Insulin-resistance (hazard ratio [HR]=0.435; 95% CI=0.269-0.702; p=0.001) and PTENmut-Clin (HR=0.535; 95% CI=0.324-0.885; p=0.015) were independent negative predictors for lower 32-week CR rates.

CONCLUSION

PTENmut-Clin is an independent risk factor for unfavorable fertility-preserving treatment outcomes in the patients with EEC and EAH. The patients with MMRd receiving fertility-preserving treatment achieved outcomes similar to those of the patients with NSMP. The molecular profiles might guide fertility-preserving treatment in the prognosis and clinical decisions.

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma

Background: The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in EC in a multidisciplinary setting. While also addressing work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility sparing treatment. Objectives: To define recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Materials and Methods: ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of EC (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. Results: The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma in four sections: patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues. Conclusions: These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery, and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario. What is new? A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE, aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Hum Reprod Open 2023;2023:hoac057. [PMID: 36756380 PMCID: PMC9900425 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

STUDY QUESTION

How should fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma be performed?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Forty-eight recommendations were formulated on fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in endometrial carcinoma in a multidisciplinary setting. While addressing also work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility-sparing treatment.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgement was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations in four sections; patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

Of the 48 recommendations, none could be based on level I evidence and only 16 could be based on level II evidence, implicating that 66% of the recommendations are supported only by observational data, professional experience and consensus of the development group.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

All costs relating to the development process were covered from ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE funds. There was no external funding of the development process or manuscript production. G.S. has reported grants from MSD Italia S.r.l., advisory boards for Storz, Bayer, Astrazeneca, Metronic, TESARO Bio Italy S.r.l and Johnson & Johnson, and honoraria for lectures from Clovis Oncology Italy S.r.l. M.G. has reported advisory boards for Gedeon Richter and Merck. The other authors have reported no conflicts of interest.

DISCLAIMER

This document represents the views of ESHRE, ESGO and ESGE which are the result of consensus between the relevant stakeholders and where relevant based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. The recommendations should be used for informational and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care, or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type.

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma

The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma, consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive information on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in endometrial carcinoma in a multidisciplinary setting. While addressing also work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility-sparing treatment.A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment (patient selection, tumor clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, special issues) in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (11 experts from across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified by a systematic search, was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma

Background

The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in EC in a multidisciplinary setting. While also addressing work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility sparing treatment.

Objectives

To define recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of EC (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.

Results

The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma in four sections: patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues.

Conclusions

These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery, and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario. What is new? A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE, aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.

Serum HE4 predicts progestin treatment response in endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: A prognostic study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate serum human epididymis-4 (HE4) as a predictive biomarker of intrauterine progestin response in endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH).

DESIGN

Prospective prognostic factor study.

SETTING

Consecutive sample of women attending a tertiary gynaecological oncology centre in northwest England.

POPULATION

Women with AEH or early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer who were unfit for or declined primary surgical management.

METHODS

A total of 76 women, 32 with AEH and 44 with endometrial cancer, were treated with a levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for 12 months. Endometrial biopsies and imaging were performed to assess treatment response. Pretreatment serum HE4 was analysed by chemiluminescence immunoassay and diagnostic accuracy and logistic regression analyses were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Progestin response at 12 months defined by histology and imaging.

RESULTS

The median age and body mass index (BMI) of the final cohort were 52 years (interquartile range [IQR] 33-62 years) and 46 kg/m² (IQR 38-54 kg/m² ), respectively. Baseline serum HE4 was significantly higher in non-responders than responders (119.2 pmol/L, IQR 94.0-208.4 pmol/L versus 71.8 pmol/L, IQR 56.1-84.2 pmol/L, p < 0.001). Older age (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99, p = 0.02), baseline serum HE4 (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p = 0.001) and endometrial cancer histology (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.72-0.68, p = 0.009) were associated with a lower likelihood of progestin treatment response. Serum HE4 remained independently associated with progestin treatment failure when adjusted for age and histology (adjusted hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Serum HE4 shows promise as a predictive biomarker of progestin treatment response in endometrial cancer and AEH.

Use of clinicopathological factors to predict prognosis of fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia

The incidence of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) has been gradually increasing over the past decade. Fertility-sparing therapy with progestin is a treatment option for EEC or endometrial atypical hyperplasia (AH). The present study evaluated the role of numerous prognostic factors following fertility-sparing therapy for EEC or AH. Furthermore, the present study assessed the strength of various clinicopathological indicators for the prediction of treatment efficacy. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with EEC and AH who received fertility-sparing therapy between August 2013 and September 2021 at Peking University People's Hospital (Beijing, China). Endometrial specimens were obtained from each patient after 3 months of treatment and at the end of the fertility-sparing therapy, before treatment efficacy and prognosis were evaluated using the χ² test. Furthermore, the protein expression levels of EEC biomarkers, such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), paired box 2 (PAX2), PTEN and p53 were assessed using immunohistochemistry. The overall complete response (CR) rate of fertility-sparing treatment in the EEC group was 67.39% (31/46), whereas that in the AH group was 86.49% (32/37). The difference between the CR rates in the EEC and AH groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no association between prognosis after treatment and ER, PAX2, PTEN or Ki-67 expression in the initially untreated AH or EEC groups. However, tissues with >50% positive PR expression were demonstrated to have a higher CR rate compared with those with ≤50% positive PR expression in both the EEC and AH groups. Furthermore, the PAX2-positive group tended to demonstrate higher CR rates compared with the PAX2-negative group in the patients with EEC. In conclusion, these data suggested that fertility-sparing therapy is effective for patients with EEC and AH who wish to remain fertile after treatment. Specifically, in the AH group, a higher proportion of patients achieved a CR whilst also achieving this more rapidly. Furthermore, PR was demonstrated to be a useful marker for the evaluation of EEC and AH.

Brusatol sensitizes endometrial hyperplasia and cancer to progestin by suppressing NRF2-TET1-AKR1C1-mediated progestin metabolism

Progestin resistance is the main obstacle for the conservative therapy to maintain fertility in women with endometrial cancer. Brusatol was identified as an inhibitor of the NRF2 pathway; however, its impact on progestin resistance and the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we found that brusatol sensitized endometrial cancer to progestin by suppressing NRF2-TET1-AKR1C1-mediated progestin metabolism. Brusatol transcriptionally suppressed AKR1C1 via modifying the hydroxymethylation status in its promoter region through TET1 inhibition. Suppression of AKR1C1 by brusatol resulted in decreased progesterone catabolism and maintained potent progesterone to inhibit endometrial cancer growth. This inhibition pattern has also been found in the established xenograft mouse and organoid models. Aberrant overexpression of AKR1C1 was found in paired endometrial hyperplasia and cancer samples from the same individuals with progestin resistance, whereas attenuated or loss of AKR1C1 was observed in post-treatment samples with well progestin response as compared with paired pre-treatment tissues. Our findings suggest that AKR1C1 expression pattern may serve as an important biomarker of progestin resistance in endometrial cancer.

Accuracy of cytological examination of Tao brush endometrial sampling in diagnosing endometrial premalignancy and malignancy

Although Tao brush has become one of the most studied and used endometrial cytological samplers, concerns remain about the adequacy of the cytological sample compared with definitive histology. We aimed to assess accuracy of cytological examination from Tao brush sampling in diagnosing endometrial premalignancy and malignancy through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Seven electronic databases were searched from January 2000 to July 2021 for all studies which allowed assessment of accuracy of Tao brush in diagnosing endometrial premalignancy and malignancy. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) on summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Five studies with 774 patients were included. In diagnosing endometrial premalignancy and malignancy, cytological examination from Tao brush endometrial sampling showed pooled sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-0.98), specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94), LR+ of 12.73 (95% CI, 3.94-41.18), LR- of 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05-0.18), DOR of 184.84 (95% CI, 24.37-1401.79), AUC of 0.9757 (standard error: 0.013). In conclusion, cytological examination from Tao brush seems to have a high diagnostic accuracy and might be proposed as both screening and diagnostic tool. However, further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Endometrial Cancer in Reproductive Age: Fertility-Sparing Approach and Reproductive Outcomes

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries and approximately 7% of the women with endometrial cancer are below the age of 45. Management of endometrial cancer in young women who desire to maintain fertility presents a unique set of challenges since the standard surgical treatment based on hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy is often not compatible with the patient's goals. A fertility-preserving approach can be considered in selected patients with early stage and low-grade endometrial cancer. An increasing amount of data suggest that oncologic outcomes are not compromised if a conservative approach is utilized with close monitoring until childbearing is completed. If a fertility-preserving approach is not possible, assisted reproductive technologies can assist patients in achieving their fertility goals.

Endometrial Cancer Following Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Insertion in Young Women with Atypical Hyperplasia: Two Case Reports and Literature Review

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) insertion is the first-line treatment for atypical hyperplasia (AH) in young women who wish to retain their fertility. However, the procedure is not always effective, and may allow AH to progress to endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). Two young women with AH who wished to preserve their fertility developed EEC following 52-mg LNG-IUS in insertion at our institution. One was a 34-year-old woman diagnosed with endometrial cancer 2 years after LNG-IUS insertion. The second was a 30-year-old woman diagnosed 17 months after LNG-IUS insertion. Proactive molecular risk classification for endometrial cancer (ProMisE) classification revealed that the first and second patients had p53-abnormal (p53abn) EEC and mismatch repair deficient (MMR-d) EEC, respectively. MMR-d and p 53abn were frequently observed in both AH and EEC specimens. Studies suggest that MMR-d and p53abn are predictors of the occurrence adverse effects after fertility-preserving treatment for EEC. AH is a precursor of EEC. Therefore, p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) mutation may be used to identify women with AH who will not likely benefit from progestin therapy. Molecular assays in women with AH will likely be useful for identifying novel predictive biomarkers of progestin resistance and to improve the safety of conservative treatment. Combined assessment of progesterone receptor (PR) with these predictive molecular markers may improve the predictive ability.

Metabolomic analysis of endometrial cancer by high-resolution magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy

PURPOSE

To analyze endometrial metabolite profiles between patients with endometrial cancer and controls.

METHODS

Seventeen (17) women with endometrium cancer and 18 controls were enrolled in this study. ¹H HR-MAS (High Resolution-Magic Angle Spinning) NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) spectroscopy data obtained from endometrial tissue samples of patients with endometrial cancer and control group were analyzed with bioinformatics methods.

RESULTS

Principal component analysis (PCA) and the partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score plots obtained with the multivariate statistical analysis of pre-processed spectral data shows a separation between the samples from patients with endometrial cancer and controls. Analysis results suggest that the levels of lactate, glucose, o-phosphoethanolamine, choline, glycerophosphocholine, phosphocholine, leucine, isoleucine, valine, glutamate, glutamine, n-acetyltyrosine, methionine, taurine, alanine, aspartate and phenylalanine are increased in patients with endometrial cancer compared to the controls.

CONCLUSION

The metabolomics signature of patients with endometrial cancer is different from that of benign endometrial tissue.

Symptom-related Ki-67 expression in endometrial polyps

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare Ki-67 expression in endometrial polyps that present with different abnormal uterine bleeding patterns.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 120 women diagnosed with endometrial polyps were included in the study. In this prospective study, tissue samples taken by hysteroscopic polypectomy method between September 2019 and September 2020 at Bursa City Hospital were examined. The main study groups were determined as premenopausal and postmenopausal patients. The patients' complaints at first admission to the hospital, demographic, histopathological and immunohistochemical features were recorded.

RESULTS

Ki-67 glandular and stromal expressions were higher in the premenopausal patient group (p = 0.016 and p = 0.005 respectively). Median Ki-67 gland and stroma measurements; was higher in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) than in patients with intermenstrual bleeding (IMB), patients with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB), and patients who were asymptomatic [(p = 0.012, p = 0.011 and p = 0.009 respectively); (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.004 respectively)]. The median Ki-67 stroma measurement was found to be higher in the patient group whose complaint persisted after polypectomy (p = 0.034). In the estimation of response to treatment, the cut-off value for Ki-67 stromal expression was determined as ≤ 6%.

CONCLUSION

High Ki-67 expression in endometrial polyps is associated with HMB and may predict the continuation of abnormal uterine bleeding after polypectomy.

Volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram metrics as imaging biomarkers for pretreatment predicting response to fertility-sparing treatment in patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility of volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis for prediction of fertility-sparing treatment (FST) response in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

Pretreatment data of 54 EC patients with FST were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment response at each follow-up was pathologically evaluated. The associations of ADC histogram metrics (volume, minADC, maxADC, meanADC; 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th ADC percentiles; skewness; kurtosis) and baseline clinical characteristics with complete response (CR) at the second and third follow-ups, two-consecutive CR, and recurrence at the final follow-up were evaluated by uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used for diagnostic performance evaluation.

RESULTS

Compared with non-CR patients, CR patients had significantly higher minADC and 10th and 25th ADC percentiles at the second follow-up (P = 0.008, 0.039, and 0.034, respectively) and higher minADC, older age, lower HE4 level, and higher overweight rate at the third follow-up (P = 0.001, 0.040, 0.021, and 0.004, respectively). Patients with two-consecutive CR had a significantly higher minADC than those without (P = 0.018). There was no association between ADC metrics or clinical characteristics and recurrence (all P > 0.05). MinADC yielded the largest AUC in predicting CR (0.688 and 0.735 at the second and third follow-up, respectively) and the presence of two-consecutive CR (0.753). When combined with patient age and HE4 level, the prediction of CR could be further improved at the third follow-up, with an AUC of 0.786.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment minADC could be a potential imaging biomarker for predicting FST response. Clinical characteristics may have incremental value to minADC in predicting CR.

Investigation of Molecular Features Involved in Clinical Responses and Survival in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma Treated by Hormone Therapy

Hormone therapy (HT) is an effective treatment for metastatic endometrial carcinoma (mEC), with limited toxicity and low cost. We focused on molecular analysis of mECs treated by HT and, for the first time to date, we compared the genomic profiles of paired metastasis and primary ECs. The main objective was to identify predictive factors of the response to HT as well as specific altered signaling pathways driving mEC biology. From 1052 patients with EC treated by HT in two French cancer centers, 32 with endometrioid EC and 6 with high grade serous EC were included. We evaluated hormone receptors (HR) and mismatch repair proteins expression by immunohistochemistry and gene alterations by targeted next-generation sequencing and array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Several variables were tested in univariate and multivariate analyses to identify potential associations with (i) the clinical benefit of HT (CBHT) and (ii) a longer response (>18 months) (LRHT) and overall survival (OS). We compared the biological and genomic profiles of 11 primary/metastatic EC pairs. Thirty tumors (78.9%) were HR-positive and 6 (15.8%) showed microsatellite instability (MSI). The genomic profiles of 34 tumors showed an average altered genome of 3.26%, DNA repair homologous recombination deficiency in five tumors (14.7%), and 17 regions significantly targeted by amplification/deletion. Thirty-three tumors had 273 variants (158 genes, median of 7 mutations/sample), including 112 driver mutations. TP53, PTEN, PPP2R1A, ARID1A, FGFR2, and PIK3CA were the most frequently mutated. Based on the genomic status, nine oncogenic pathways were altered in more than 25% of primary EC. Clinically, 22 (57.9%) and 6 (15.8%) patients presented CBHT and LRHT, respectively. Neither oncogenic pathways alterations nor the variables tested were associated with CBHT and LRHT. Only patient’s age, mitotic index and the presence of at least one HR were associated with OS. Paired analysis of the primary/metastatic samples showed that among the 22 mutations acquired in the metastatic counterparts, the most frequently targeted genes were involved in pathways that might confer a selective advantage to cancer metastasis including hormone resistance. In conclusion, only patient’s age, mitotic index and the presence of at least one HR were associated with OS. The identification of gene mutations newly acquired in metastasis might help to better understand the formation of EC metastasis and select the best actionable candidates for HT-treated patients at the metastatic stage.

Survey on Reporting of Endometrial Biopsies From Women on Progestogen Therapy for Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia/Endometrioid Carcinoma

Histologic assessment of response to progestogen therapy is a cornerstone of nonsurgical management of atypical hyperplasia/low-grade endometrioid carcinoma. Pathologists are required to assess whether there is ongoing preneoplastic or neoplastic change in the biopsies (often multiple) taken during therapy. There have been few studies documenting the specific histologic changes induced by therapeutic progestogens and currently there are no guidelines on terminology used in this scenario. Given the need for uniformity in reporting and the lack of guidance in the current literature, we initiated an online survey (including questions, categories of reporting, and scanned slides for assessment) which was sent to all members of British Association of Gynaecological Pathologists (BAGP) and the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP) with the aim to assess the variability among pathologists in reporting these specimens and to come up with a consensus-based terminology for reporting of endometrial biopsies from women on progestogen therapy for endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid carcinoma. In total, 95 pathologists participated in this survey. This manuscript elaborates on the results of the survey with recommendations aimed at promoting uniform terminology in reporting these biopsies.

Assessing Post-Treatment Pathologic Tumor Response in Female Genital Tract Carcinomas: An Update

In the last decades, several new therapeutic strategies have been introduced in the field of gynecologic oncology. These include neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma, hormonal fertility-sparing strategies for endometrial cancer, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for surgically incurable peritoneal metastasis, and neoadjuvant treatments for locally advanced cervical carcinomas. All these recent advances lead to the development of novel scoring systems for the evaluation of pathological response related to specific treatments. In this regard, pathological evaluation of the morphological modifications related to these treatments and the definition of a tumor regression grading score have been introduced in clinical practice in order to achieve a more efficient prognostic stratification of patients affected by gynecological malignancies. The aim of the present paper is to provide a detailed review on the post-treatment pathological scoring systems in patients affected by gynecological malignancies.

Biomolecular and Genetic Prognostic Factors That Can Facilitate Fertility-Sparing Treatment (FST) Decision Making in Early Stage Endometrial Cancer (ES-EC): A Systematic Review

Endometrial cancer occurs in up to 29% of women before 40 years of age. Seventy percent of these patients are nulliparous at the time. Decision making regarding fertility preservation in early stage endometrial cancer (ES-EC) is, therefore, a big challenge since the decision between the risk of cancer progression and a chance to parenthood needs to be made. Sixty-two percent of women with complete remission of ES-EC after fertility-sparing treatment (FST) report to have a pregnancy wish which, if not for FST, they would not be able to fulfil. The aim of this review was to identify and summarise the currently established biomolecular and genetic prognostic factors that can facilitate decision making for FST in ES-EC. A comprehensive search strategy was carried out across four databases; Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed; they were searched between March 1946 and 22nd December 2022. Thirty-four studies were included in this study which was conducted in line with the PRISMA criteria checklist. The final 34 articles encompassed 9165 patients. The studies were assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). PTEN and POLE alterations we found to be good prognostic factors of ES-EC, favouring FST. MSI, CTNNB1, and K-RAS alterations were found to be fair prognostic factors of ES-EC, favouring FST but carrying a risk of recurrence. PIK3CA, HER2, ARID1A, P53, L1CAM, and FGFR2 were found to be poor prognostic factors of ES-EC and therefore do not favour FST. Clinical trials with bigger cohorts are needed to further validate the fair genetic prognostic factors. Using the aforementioned good and poor genetic prognostic factors, we can make more confident decisions on FST in ES-EC.

Uterine sparing management in patients with endometrial cancer: a narrative literature review

Endometrial cancer is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract. Approximately 25% of cases occur in premenopausal women, and up to 5% of cases occur in women who are younger than 40 years old. The survival rate in these cases is 99%; therefore, uterine-sparing management could be considered under strict criteria selection and the strong desire of the woman to preserve uterus and fertility. Diagnosis should be performed after a hysteroscopic biopsy instead of dilatation and curettage. The highest remission rate was achieved after combining a hysteroscopic resection with hormonal therapy compared to single hormonal treatment. The most common regiments are the following progestins: megestrol acetate (MA) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) taken orally with a daily dosage of 160 mg-320 mg for MA and 250 mg-600 mg for MP. Evaluations at three and six months could be performed by office endometrial biopsy and/or hysteroscopic directed biopsy especially in the presence of levonorgestrel intrauterine system, and in cases of remission, either a pregnancy attempt or maintenance therapy should be considered. After childbearing, hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended, whereas ovarian preservation could be considered depending on the patient's age and whether they fulfil the strict criteria selection.

Hysteroscopic Curettage Followed by Megestrol Acetate Plus Metformin as a Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Women with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia or Well-Differentiated Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma

Background:

In reproductive-aged women, the incidence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC) is rising globally. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of hysteroscopic curettage followed by megestrol acetate (MA) plus metformin as conservative treatment in AEH and early EEC.

Methods:

We retrospectively studied AEH and stage IA, grade 1 EEC patients treated with hysteroscopic curettage followed by MA (160 mg/d) plus metformin (1500 mg/d) from January 2010 to December 2020 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Treatment outcomes were assessed by complete response (CR) rate, recurrence rate, and pregnancy outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed via the logistic regression model.

Results:

The study included 79 patients, 31 (39.2%) with AEH and 48 (60.8%) with EEC. The medians of age (years) and follow-up time (months) were 30 and 39.5, respectively. Seventy-six patients (96.2%) finally achieved CR. The median time to CR was 3.6 (3.0-20.6) months. The CR rate after 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year was 55 (69.6%), 67 (84.8%), and 72 (91.1%), respectively. Recurrence occurred in 26 (34.2%) patients. Treatment duration ⩾9 months was associated with a lower recurrence rate after CR (P = .012). Fourteen (93.3%) of the 15 recurrent patients who received progestin re-treatment achieved CR again. Finally, 29 patients delivered live births.

Conclusions:

Hysteroscopy followed by MA plus metformin can achieve CR in short time and is overall safe. Consolidation treatment should be prolonged to decrease the recurrence rate, despite a shorter time to CR.

Conservative Surgery in Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common female cancer worldwide. The median age of diagnosis is 65 years. However, 4% of women diagnosed with EC are younger than 40 years old, and 70% of these women are nulliparous. These data highlight the importance of preserving fertility in these patients, at a time when the average age of the first pregnancy is significantly delayed and is now firmly established at over 30 years of age. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN guidelines state that the primary treatment of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, limited to the uterus, is a total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and surgical staging. Fertility-sparing treatment is not the standard of care, and patients eligible for this treatment always have to undergo strict counselling. Nowadays, a combined approach consisting of hysteroscopic resection, followed by oral or intrauterine-released progestins, has been reported to be an effective fertility-sparing option. Hysteroscopic resection followed by progestins achieved a complete response rate of 95.3% with a recurrence rate of 14.1%. The pregnancy rate in women undergoing fertility-sparing treatment is 47.8%, but rises to 93.3% when only considering women who tried to conceive during the study period. The aim of the present review is to provide a literature overview reflecting the current state of fertility-sparing options for the management of EC, specific criteria for considering such options, their limits, the implications for reproductive outcomes and the latest research trends in this direction.

The Advance and Correlation of KRAS Mutation With the Fertility-Preservation Treatment of Endometrial Cancer in the Background of Molecular Classification Application

The annually increasing incidence of endometrial cancer in younger women has created a growing demand for fertility preservation. However, the diverse therapeutic efficacy among patients under the same histological subtype and the same tumor grade suggests the potential interference of the innate molecular characteristics. The molecular classification has now been applied in clinical practice and might help to stratify the endometrial cancer patients and individualize the therapy, but the candidates for the fertility-spared treatment are most likely to be subdivided in the subgroup lacking the specific signature. KRAS mutation has been linked to the malignant transition of the endometrium, while its role in molecular classification and fertility preservation is vague. Here, we mainly review the advance of molecular classification and the role of KRAS in endometrial cancer, as well as their correlation with fertility-preservation treatment.

Dusp6 immunohistochemistry is associated with the response of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer to conservative treatment

OBJECTIVE

Dual-specificity phosphatase 6 (Dusp6) was proposed as a predictive marker of response of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial cancer (EEC) to conservative treatment. However, its predictive accuracy has never been calculated. We aimed to define it in conservatively treated AEH and EEC.

METHODS

All patients <45 years with AEH or EEC and conservatively treated with hysteroscopic resection + LNG-IUD insertion from 2007 to 2018 were retrospectively assessed. Dusp6 immunohistochemical expression was assessed and dichotomized as "strong" vs "weak". Relative risk (RR) for "no regression" and "recurrence" or AEH/EEC was calculated. Predictive accuracy was calculated as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) and area under the curve (AUC) on receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Thirty-six women were included. Weak Dusp6 immunohistochemical expression was significantly associated with increased risk of resistance to treatment, with a RR = 16 (P = 0.0074); predictive accuracy analysis showed sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 90%, PPV = 57.1%, NPV = 96.4%, AUC = 0.85. A weak Dusp6 expression was not significantly associated with the risk of recurrence after an initial regression (RR = 0.4; P = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

Weak Dusp6 expression appears as a significant predictor of resistance of AEH/EEC to fertility-sparing treatment, with moderate predictive accuracy. Weak Dusp6 expression is significantly associated with resistance of atypical endometrial hyperplasia or early endometrial cancer to fertility-sparing treatment, with moderate predictive accuracy.

Overview of human 20 alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (AKR1C1): Functions, regulation, and structural insights of inhibitors

Human aldo-keto reductase family 1C1 (AKR1C1) is an important enzyme involved in human hormone metabolism, which is mainly responsible for the metabolism of progesterone in the human body. AKR1C1 is highly expressed and has an important relationship with the occurrence and development of various diseases, especially some cancers related to hormone metabolism. Nowadays, many inhibitors against AKR1C1 have been discovered, including some synthetic compounds and natural products, which have certain inhibitory activity against AKR1C1 at the target level. Here we briefly reviewed the physiological and pathological functions of AKR1C1 and the relationship with the disease, and then summarized the development of AKR1C1 inhibitors, elucidated the interaction between inhibitors and AKR1C1 through molecular docking results and existing co-crystal structures. Finally, we discussed the design ideals of selective AKR1C1 inhibitors from the perspective of AKR1C1 structure, discussed the prospects of AKR1C1 in the treatment of human diseases in terms of biomarkers, pre-receptor regulation and single nucleotide polymorphisms, aiming to provide new ideas for drug research targeting AKR1C1.

The IVF-generated human embryonic microenvironment reverses progestin resistance in endometrial cancer cells by inducing cancer stem cell differentiation

Progestin resistance is a critical factor that prevents patients with endometrial cancer (EC) from receiving conservative therapy. However, the etiology remains elusive. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) may be a contributing factor to progestin resistance in EC. These cells share similar stemness properties with embryonic stem cells that have a multipotent but differential naïve phenotype. Embryonic stem cells are programed to self-renew, to differentiate and to show plasticity toward a normal cellular phenotype in their defined microenvironment. However, whether this microenvironment may promote CSC differentiation toward a better responsive phenotype and reverse progestin resistance has not yet been clarified. In the current study, we found that progestin resistance of endometrial CSCs can be improved or reversed by using in vitro fertilization (IVF)-generated embryonic sac-derived fluid containing the embryonic microenvironment. Furthermore, suppression or reversal of progestin resistance was mediated by placental alkaline phosphatase (ALPP), a factor secreted into the embryonic microenvironment by IVF-generated blastocysts. ALPP significantly reversed progestin resistance by facilitating endometrial CSC differentiation through downregulating the stemness genes NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2. We further showed that the downregulation of NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2 by ALPP was carried out by TET1/2-mediated epigenetic modulation of the promoter regions of these genes. Such changes at the molecular level initiated endometrial CSC differentiation and promoted a better responsive endometrial cancer phenotype. In fact, their response to progestin treatment was similar to that of well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma cells without CSCs. ALPP could be a novel target in the process to overcome progestin resistance, and such findings may provide a new approach for the conservative treatment of endometrial cancer.

Fertility Sparing Treatments in Endometrial Cancer Patients: The Potential Role of the New Molecular Classification

Endometrial cancer is the most frequent gynecological malignancy, and, although epidemiologically it mainly affects advanced age women, it can also affect young patients who want children and who have not yet completed their procreative project. Fertility sparing treatments are the subject of many studies and research in continuous evolution, and represent a light of hope for young cancer patients who find themselves having to face an oncological path before fulfilling their desire for motherhood. The advances in molecular biology and the more precise clinical and prognostic classification of endometrial cancer based on the 2013 The Cancer Genome Atlas classification allow for the selection of patients who can be submitted to fertility sparing treatments with increasing oncological safety. It would also be possible to predict the response to hormonal treatment by investigating the state of the genes of the mismatch repair.

Management of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer or Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia Patients After Primary Fertility-Sparing Therapy

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of fertility-sparing re-treatment on patients with recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) who wish to preserve their uterus after complete remission (CR) for primary conservative therapy.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study on recurrent EC or AEH patients who received fertility-sparing re-treatment after achieving CR. Data regarding clinicopathological factors, adverse events, treatment efficacy, tumor prognosis, and reproductive outcome were analyzed.

Results

Of the 98 recurrent patients with a median disease-free interval period of 19 (3–96) months, 18 patients decided to receive hysterectomy directly, and 80 patients received fertility-preserving re-treatment. Seventy-one (88.6%) cases achieved CR, 96.0% in AEH and 75.8% in EC patients, with the 6 (3–16) months’ median CR time. Seven (8.8%) patients failed to achieve CR and then underwent the hysterectomy: one partial response (PR), four stable disease (SD), and two progressive disease (PD). Forty-nine women attempted to get pregnant after CR, 13 (26.5%) became pregnant, seven (14.3%) successfully delivered, and six (12.2%) miscarried. During the follow-up period, 22 (31.0%) women had developed a second relapse with the median recurrence time of 12 (4–90) months, and 10 patients decided to receive the third round of fertility-sparing treatment. Seven (70.0%) patients, 33.3% in EC and 85.7% in AEH, achieved CR again. Hysterectomy was performed in two (20.0%) patients due to SD. After the third-round treatment, six women had the desire to conceive but no one became pregnant successfully.

Conclusion

For patients with recurrent EC and AEH after primary conservative treatment, fertility-preserving re-treatment can still achieve a promising response, and patients have possibilities of completing childbirth.

Risk factors of endometrial cancer in patients with endometrial hyperplasia: implication for clinical treatments

Background

Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is commonly-seen in the patients with endometrial cancer (EC), we aimed to evaluated the risk factors of EC in patients with EH, to provide evidence to the clinical prevention and treatment of EC.

Methods

This study was a retrospective study design. EH patients confirmed by pathological examinations and treated with hysterectomy in our hospital from June 1, 2018 to February 28, 2021 were included. The clinical characteristics of EC and no-EC patients were compared and analyzed. Logistics regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the risk factors of EC in patients with EH.

Results

A total of 228 EH patients were included, the incidence of EC in the EH patients was 31.58%. There were significant differences in the age, BMI, diabetes, hypertension and pathology of EH between EC and no EC groups (all P < 0.05), no significant differences in the hyperlipidemia, preoperative CA₁₂₅, number of deliveries, menopause and endometrial thickness between EC and no EC groups were found (all P > 0.05). Logistic regression analyses indicated that age > 50 y (OR 3.064, 95% CI 1.945–5.931), BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² (OR 2.705, 95% CI 1.121–3.889), diabetes (OR 3.049, 95% CI 1.781–5.114), hypertension (OR 2.725, 95% CI 1.108–3.431) and severe hyperplasia (OR 3.181, 95% CI 1.496–4.228) were the risk factors of EC in patients with EH (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The risk of EC in EH patients is high, especially for those patients with age > 50 y, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², diabetes, hypertension and severe hyperplasia, special attentions should be paid for occurrence of EC and early diagnosis and early treatment are needed for those patients.

Immunophenotype of Atypical Polypoid Adenomyoma of the Uterus: Diagnostic Value and Insight on Pathogenesis

Atypical polypoid adenomyoma (APA) is a rare uterine lesion constituted by atypical endometrioid glands, squamous morules, and myofibromatous stroma. We aimed to assess the immunophenotype of the 3 components of APA, with regard to its pathogenesis and its differential diagnosis. A systematic review was performed by searching electronic databases from their inception to January 2019 for immunohistochemical studies of APA. Thirteen studies with 145 APA cases were included. APA glands appeared analogous to atypical endometrial hyperplasia (endometrioid cytokeratins pattern, Ki67≤50%, common PTEN loss, and occasional mismatch repair deficiency); the prominent expression of hormone receptors and nuclear β-catenin suggest that APA may be a precursor of "copy number-low," CTNNB1-mutant endometrial cancers. Morules appeared as a peculiar type of hyperdifferentiation (low KI67, nuclear β-catenin+, CD10+, CDX2+, SATB2+, p63-, and p40-), analogous to morular metaplasia in other lesions and distinguishable immunohistochemically from both conventional squamous metaplasia and solid cancer growth. Stroma immunphenotype (low Ki67, α-smooth-muscle-actin+, h-caldesmon-, CD10-, or weak and patchy) suggested a derivation from a metaplasia of normal endometrial stroma. It was similar to that of nonatypical adenomyoma, and different from adenosarcoma (Ki67 increase and CD10+ in periglandular stroma) and myoinvasive endometrioid carcinoma (h-caldesmon+ in myometrium and periglandular fringe-like CD10 pattern).

Fertility-sparing approach for endometrial cancer: the role of office hysteroscopy

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries, with increasing incidence among younger, nulliparous patients. These epidemiological shifts are attributed to increasing rates of obesity, in combination with delayed childbearing. This highlights a need for fertility-sparing options for individuals who wish to delay standard surgical management with hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy, and assessment of pelvic/para-aortic lymph nodes. Careful consideration should be taken to select which patients are suitable candidates for fertility-sparing methods. Typically, these are patients found to have FIGO grade 1 tumors of the endometrioid subtype without myometrial invasion. Currently, conservative treatment options include the use of oral progestins and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices, with an emerging role for hysteroscopy for direct visualization of the uterine cavity, targeted tissue sampling, and tumor resection. This paper aims to highlight the role of office hysteroscopy for diagnosis, hysteroscopic tumor resection, and follow-up in suitable endometrial cancer patients who wish to preserve their uterus until childbearing is complete.

Hysteroscopic treatments for endometrial malignancies and premalignancies: state of the art

Endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy worldwide. One in four cases will be diagnosed before menopause. Endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) is a precursor of endometrial cancer and tends to occur at a young age. Those who have early stage, grade 1 EEC or EAH and wish to preserve their fertility can be managed with hormonal therapy. Hysteroscopic treatment in addition to progestin therapy has been used more commonly in the last decade. Herein, a review of available data on hysteroscopic treatment in EEC and EAH is presented.

Weight Loss Improves Pregnancy and Livebirth Outcomes in Young Women with Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Atypical Hyperplasia

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of body weight loss on reproductive outcomes in young women with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical hyperplasia (AH) who underwent fertility-sparing therapy.

Patients and Methods

Patients with well-differentiated EC (n=8, FIGO stage Ia) and AH (n=36) who achieved complete regression after fertility-sparing therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into a weight loss group (n=25) and a non-weight loss group (n=19). Subgroup analysis according to body mass index and relative weight loss were performed to investigate the effect of weight loss on pregnancy and live birth outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken to determine pregnancy-associated factors.

Results

Mean body weight and body mass index at pre-progestin treatment and at fertility treatment initiation were 70.63±12.03 and 67.08±8.18 kg, respectively, 27.06±4.44 and 25.73±3.15 kg/m², respectively. Twenty-five patients (56.82%) lost weight, the median absolute weight loss was 5.00 kg (1.00–34.50), and the median relative weight loss was 6.70% (1.00–36.00%) over a median of 12 months (5.00–97.00). A favorable pregnancy rate (65.91%) and live birth rate (50.00%) were achieved. The pregnancy and live birth rates were meaningfully higher in the weight loss group than in the non-weight loss group (88.00% vs 36.84%, P=0.000; 64.00% vs 31.58%, P=0.033); weight loss ≥5% significantly increased pregnancy and live birth rate in patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m². The risk ratio of weight loss ≥5% in multivariate logistic analysis for pregnancy was 10.448 (1.102, 99.056, P=0.041).

Conclusion

Weight loss could positively affect pregnancy rate and improve live birth rate in overweight and obese women with early-stage EC and AH during/after fertility-sparing therapy. Weight loss ≥5% increased pregnancy and livebirth rates significantly in overweight and obese women.

Novel diagnostic approaches to intrauterine neoplasm in fertile age: sonography and hysteroscopy

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in the world. It is mostly detected in postmenopausal women, but it can also occur in women of fertile age who need fertility-sparing therapy. An early diagnosis is the main objective for the correct management of these patients, making it possible to use a fertility-sparing treatment approach without exposing the patients to the risk of cancer progression. In this review, we discuss the role of sonography and hysteroscopy in the detection of intrauterine neoplasm in women of childbearing age.

Significance of serum and pathological biomarkers in fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia: a retrospective cohort study

Background

This study analyzed the changes of serum and pathological biomarkers during fertility-sparing therapy of endometrial cancer (EC) or endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH), to investigate their implications for early prediction of treatment efficacy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of EC or EAH patients who received fertility-sparing therapy between 2012 and 2016 was performed. Serum and endometrium sampling were obtained for each patient at three time points: at baseline, at 3–6 months' treatment and at the end of conservative treatment. Serum biomarkers including insulin resistance (HbA1c, HOMA-IR), sex hormones and thyroid hormones were measured. Meanwhile expression of endometrial pathological biomarkers including ER, PR, PRB and Ki-67 was also assessed by immunohistochemistry.

Results

For the 53 recruited patients, overall complete response, recurrence and pregnancy rates were 94%, 26% and 36.4%. During the treatment, the serum biomarkers of HOMA-IR remained stable, while pathological markers including PR, PRB and Ki67 diminished significantly. Patients who achieved remission faster had significant lower HOMA-IR level and higher PRB expression at baseline. We also found a more remarkable down-regulation of PRB related with faster remission. Further multivariate analysis confirmed that baseline HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5 negatively affected treatment time to remission (OR 0.206; p = 0.017). While marked reduction of PRB (≥ 30%) at 3–6 months' treatment correlated with faster remission (OR 5.788; p = 0.010).

Conclusion

For EC and EAH patients who received fertility-sparing therapy, baseline status of insulin resistance predicted poor response to progestin, while marked reduction of PRB following the initial 3–6 months' treatment predicted fast remission.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-021-01383-5.

Molecular Classification to Prognosticate Response in Medically Managed Endometrial Cancers and Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether molecular classification prognosticates treatment response in women with endometrial cancers and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) treated with levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS).

METHODS

Patients treated with LNG-IUS for endometrial cancer or EIN from 2013 to 2018 were evaluated. Using immunohistochemistry and single gene sequencing of POLE, patients were classified into four groups as per the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial cancer (ProMisE): POLE-mutated, mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), p53 wild type (p53wt), and p53-abnormal (p53abn). Groups were assessed relative to the primary outcome of progression or receipt of definitive treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight subjects with endometrioid endometrial cancer or EIN treated with LNG-IUS were included. Of these, 22 subjects (37.9%) had endometrial cancer and 36 subjects (62.1%) had EIN. Per the ProMisE algorithm, 44 patients (75.9%) were classified as p53wt, 6 (10.3%) as MMRd, 4 (6.9%) as p53abn, and 4 (6.9%) as POLE-mutated. Of the 58 patients, 11 (19.0%) progressed or opted for definitive therapy. Median time to progression or definitive therapy was 7.5 months, with p53abn tumors having the shortest time to progression or definitive therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular classification of endometrial cancer and EIN prior to management with LNG-IUS is feasible and may predict patients at risk of progression.

Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review Protocol

INTRODUCTION

Endometrial cancer is the fifth most common cancer in women and atypical endometrial hyperplasia is a precancerous lesion. Obesity is an important risk factor for endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma and endometrial hyperplasia. Progesterone is recommended as first-line treatment in endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia in women who wish to preserve fertility, but optimal treatment schedules have not been defined. Metformin or bariatric surgery may also be useful in these women. The effectiveness and safety of fertility-preserving treatments being used for women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and stage IA grade 1 endometrial cancer is unclear. Therefore, the systematic review aims to determine this point.

METHODS

We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, trial registers, conference proceedings, abstracts, cooperative trial groups and reference lists. We will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare fertility-preserving therapy including orally administered progesterone versus a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS), metformin, other pharmacological interventions or bariatric surgery, and any of these interventions with womb-removing surgery. Quasi-randomised trials, non-randomised trials and cohort studies will be included. Two review authors will independently assess study eligibility and risk of bias and extract data. The primary outcomes are complete pathologic response and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, progression-free survival, pregnancy rate, need for hysterectomy, adverse events, psychological symptoms and quality of life.

PLANNED OUTCOMES

This review aims to clarify the effectiveness and risks of fertility-preserving treatments, including complete pathologic response rate, live birth rates, need for surgical treatment, adverse events, psychological symptoms and quality of life. The broad scope of the review includes the use of progesterone, metformin to reverse insulin resistance, and bariatric surgery or operative hysteroscopy.

RESULTS

The results may help to determine the optimal fertility-sparing treatment in endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Prospero 2019 number CRD42019145991.

Efficacy of the LNG-IUS for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early stage endometrial cancer: Can biomarkers predict response?

Endometrial Cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecologic malignancy in the developed world, and is increasing in premenopausal women. The surgical standard of care for early-stage EC is not possible in women with concurrent comorbidities or women who desire a fertility sparing approach. The Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) is gaining traction as an alternative treatment for endometrial hyperplasia and early stage EC in inoperable women. Whilst early evidence appears promising, predictive biomarkers need to be established to determine non-responders, which make up one in three women. This timely review discusses the current literature around the identification of clinical, molecular and novel biomarkers that show potential to predict response to progesterone treatment, including the LNG-IUS.

Stanford parameters stratify the risk of recurrence in gynecologic smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential

Smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) is an ill-defined category of neoplasms, which represent a diagnostic challenge. We aimed to assess whether the Stanford parameters, that is, high mitotic index (≥10/10HPF), significant atypia (moderate-to-severe), and coagulative tumor cell necrosis (CTCN), even when focal or ambiguous, may be used to stratify the risk of recurrence in gynecological smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP). Electronic databases were searched from their inception to October 2019. All studies assessing the Stanford parameters in gynecological STUMP series were included. STUMPs were subdivided according to the presence of the three Stanford parameters: high mitotic index, significant atypia, and CTCN. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for recurrence-free survival; hazard ratio (HR) was calculated in each category. Fourteen studies with 219 STUMPs were included. In 15.5% of cases, none of the three Stanford parameters were present, with a recurrence risk of 5.9%; 2.7% of cases showed high mitotic index alone, with a recurrence risk of 0% (HR = not calculable); 43.8% of cases showed significant atypia alone, with a recurrence risk of 18.7% (HR = 3.3; p = 0.012); 26.5% of cases showed CTCN alone, with a recurrence risk of 17.2% (HR = 3.1; p = 0.029); and 11.4% of cases showed at least two Stanford parameters, with a recurrence risk of 32% (HR = 7.5; p = 0.003). Stanford parameters may stratify the risk of recurrence of STUMP. Significant atypia and CTCN, but not high mitotic index, may be stand-alone risk factors for recurrence in STUMP. The presence of at least two Stanford parameters, even if equivocal (e.g., uncertain or focal CTCN, focal significant atypia, mitotic index around 10/10HPF), might still be enough to support a diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma. Further studies are necessary in this field.

Mismatch repair-deficiency specifically predicts recurrence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial carcinoma after conservative treatment: A multi-center study

OBJECTIVE

Deficient expression of mismatch repair proteins (MMR) has been suggested to be a predictor of resistance of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial carcinoma (EEC) to conservative treatment.

AIMS

To assess the predictive value of MMR immunohistochemistry in patients conservatively treated for AEH and EEC, and to calculate its predictive accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with AEH or EEC conservatively treated with hysteroscopic resection plus progestins in two referral centers from January 2004 to July 2019 were retrospectively assessed. Immunohistochemistry for MMR was ad hoc performed. Study outcomes were: (i) the association of a deficient immunohistochemical expression of MMR with resistance and recurrence of AEH and EEC after conservative treatment, and (ii) the accuracy of MMR immunohistochemistry in predicting the outcome of conservative treatment. Relative risk (RR) for the associations, and sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) on receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive accuracy were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine women, (47 AEH and 22 EEC) were included; deficient MMR expression was observed in 8.7% of cases. Resistance to conservative treatment was more common in MMR-deficient than MMR-proficient cases (33.3% vs 15.9%; RR = 2.1), but with no statistical significance (p = 0.2508). On the other hand, recurrence was significantly more common in MMR-deficient than MMR-proficient cases (100% vs 26.4%; RR = 3.8; p < 0.0001). In predicting recurrence, a deficient immunohistochemical expression of MMR showed sensitivity = 22.2%, specificity = 100%, and AUC = 0.61.

CONCLUSION

Deficient MMR immunohistochemical expression does not imply resistance of AEH/EEC to conservative treatment. On the other hand, MMR-deficiency appears as a highly specific predictor of recurrence of AEH/EEC after initial regression.

The Perspectives of Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometrial Cancer

Simple Summary

Endometrial cancer is a common gynecological malignant disease. Its incidence in women of reproductive age in developed countries is increasing. The standard treatment is surgical in the form of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, which has a significant impact on the quality of women’s lives and precludes further fertility. Conservative management to preserve reproductive function and delay final surgery can today be considered in carefully selected women. We analyze the current approaches to select appropriate candidates and current medical regimens for fertility sparing management. We elaborate on the future perspectives of management. With better characterization of the disease and implementation of molecular biomarkers, more women should be able to benefit from conservative approaches to management of endometrial cancer.

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. The disease is diagnosed with increasing frequency in younger women, commonly also in their reproductive age. The standard treatment of endometrial cancer is surgical in the form of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and this precludes future fertility in younger women. The current challenge is to identify the group of women with endometrial cancer and low-risk features that would benefit from more conservative treatment options. More focus in management needs to be aimed towards the preservation of quality of life, without jeopardizing oncological outcomes. In this review, we analyze the current approaches to identification of women for conservative management and evaluate the success of different medical options for treatment and surgical techniques that are fertility sparing. We also elaborate on the future perspectives, focusing on the incorporation of molecular characterization of endometrial cancer to fertility preservation algorithms. Future studies should focus specifically on identifying reliable clinical and molecular predictive markers in this group of young women. With improved knowledge and better risk assessment, the precision medicine is the path towards improved understanding of the disease and possibly widening the group of women that could benefit from treatment methods preserving their fertility.

Live births and maintenance with levonorgestrel IUD improve disease-free survival after fertility-sparing treatment of atypical hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Our objectives were to (1) compare different regimens of hormonal therapy (HT) in young women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial cancer (EC), (2) assess reproductive and oncologic outcomes and (3) explore possible predictors of complete response (CR) and disease free survival (DFS).

METHODS

Reproductive age women with AEH and Grade 1-2 endometrioid EC with no or minimal myometrial invasion on MRI treated with different regimens of HT were prospectively analyzed. Treatment protocols included levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG IUD), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (aGnRH) or high-dose oral medroxyprogesteron acetate (MPA) separately and in combinations.

RESULTS

Total of 418 patients with AEH (n = 228) and EC (n = 190) aged 19-46 years received HT. Overall CR rate was 96% in AEH and 88% in EC patients (р < 0.001). None of the regimens used in AEH (LNG IUD + 2 D&C vs. LNG IUD + aGnRH vs. LNG IUD + 3 D&C) was found inferior to the others (CR of 98%, 95%, 100%, respectively, p > 0.05) except for MPA alone (CR 87%, р = 0.009). Out of four HT regimens used in EC LNG IUD + aGnRH+3 D&C was superior to all others (CR 96%, р = 0.026) where 2 D&Cs were performed or oral MPA was prescribed. The median follow-up for 339 patients was 33 months (range: 3-136), 68% of patients (n = 232) attempted conception, 38% (n = 89) of them used ART. The birth rate was 42% (n = 97). The rate of recurrence was 26% (50/196) in AEH group and 36% (51/143) in EC group (p = 0.05). Birth after treatment (HR = 0.24) or LNG IUD maintenance (HR = 0.18) were associated with superior DFS (p < 0.001 for both). ART use did not influence DFS.

CONCLUSION

Hormonal therapy of AEH and early EC with LNG IUD is superior to MPA-containing regimens, however still carries high risk of recurrence. Post-treatment pregnancy rates are satisfactory and can be further improved by broader ART use which was proven safe. Initial diagnosis of AEH, post-treatment child birth and LNG IUD maintenance were associated with decreased rates of recurrence.

Predictive Accuracy of Progesterone Receptor B in Young Women with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer Treated with Hysteroscopic Resection plus LNG-IUD Insertion

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The immunohistochemical expression of isoform B of the progesterone receptor (PRB) has shown promising results in predicting the response of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial cancer (EEC) to conservative treatment. We aimed to calculate the accuracy of PRB as a predictive marker of conservative treatment outcome in AEH or EEC.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six consecutive premenopausal women <45 years of age with AEH (n = 29) or EEC (n = 7) conservatively treated from January 2007 to June 2018 were retrospectively assessed.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients had been treated with hysteroscopic resection plus levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device insertion and followed for at least 1 year. The immunohistochemical expression of PRB was separately assessed in the glands and stroma of the lesion and dichotomized as "weak" or "normal."

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

The treatment outcomes considered were (1) treatment failure (i.e., a combined outcome including no regression or recurrence); (2) no regression; and (3) recurrence. The predictive accuracy of PRB immunohistochemistry was assessed by calculating sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A weak glandular PRB expression showed SE = 70%, SP = 77%, and AUC = 0.74 for treatment failure; SE = 66.7%, SP = 70%, and AUC = 0.68 for no regression; and SE = 75%, SP = 68.8%, and AUC = 0.72 for recurrence. A weak stromal PRB expression showed SE = 100%, SP = 53.8%, and AUC = 0.77 for treatment failure; SE = 100%, SP = 46.7%, and AUC = 0.73 for no regression; and SE = 100%, SP = 43.8%, and AUC = 0.72 for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

A weak stromal PRB expression is a highly sensitive predictive marker of both no response and recurrence of AEH and EEC conservatively treated.