Systematic review and network meta-analysis: first- and second-line biologic therapies for moderate-severe Crohn's disease

Factors driving persistence to first-line advanced therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: a real-world study from a tertiary referral centre

Factors driving the persistence of advanced therapies-defined as the duration from therapy initiation to discontinuation-in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the persistence of biologics and oral small molecules in a real-word IBD cohort and to identify influencing factors. Data from IBD patients starting advanced therapy at a tertiary referral centre after 2010 were retrospectively collected, including persistence and discontinuation reasons. Differences in persistence probability among therapies were analysed, and factors influencing persistence versus discontinuation due to failure were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Among 274 included patients [median age 42.5 years; F/M 119/155; 146 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 128 with ulcerative colitis; median follow-up 38 months (IQR 14-75)], 141 (51.5%) remained persistent with first-line therapy, while 70 (26%) discontinued due to failure. No significant difference in persistence was observed among drugs (p = 0.11). Univariate analysis identified CD phenotype (p < 0.01), disease duration prior to therapy (p = 0.01), concomitant mesalamine or steroids (p < 0.01), and therapy optimisation (p < 0.01) as factors influencing persistence. Multivariate analysis confirmed CD phenotype as associated with higher persistence, while therapy optimisation was linked to increased discontinuation risk. CD was associated with better drug persistence, while therapy optimisation correlated with a higher discontinuation rate. Targeting deep healing and enhancing timely, precise optimisation strategies is essential for improving treatment outcomes.

The safety assessment of ustekinumab on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A real-world analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database

OBJECTIVE

To assess safety of ustekinumab (UST) on treatment of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by analyze UST related adverse drug events (ADEs).

METHODS

Data on ADEs associated with UST on psoriasis and PsA were collected from the fourth quarter of 2009 through the third quarter of 2024 in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FEARS) database. A variety of signal quantization techniques such as reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma poisson shrinker (MGPS) are used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 67,765 ADE reports with UST on psoriasis and PsA as the primary suspected agent covered 25 system organ classes (SOCs). The three most common ADEs are infections and infestations (n = 9698), general disorders and administration site conditions (n = 6336), and injury, poisoning, and procedural complications (n = 6091). Specifically, reproductive system diseases (n = 262) was identified as unique adverse reactions not mentioned in official drug labels. At the preferred term (PT) level, the most common ADEs were psoriasis exacerbation (n = 3486), lower respiratory tract infection (n = 1302) and latent tuberculosis (n = 121). Strong yet rare signals, including notalgia paraesthetica (n = 3, empirical bayesian geometric mean [EBGM] 154.7) and chronic actinic dermatitis (n = 3, EBGM 101.15), were also detected. Compared to patients with PsA, patients with psoriasis treated with UST exhibit significantly stronger associations with hepatobiliary disorders (n = 955, ROR 2.44, PRR 2.4, information component [IC] 1.26, EBGM 2.4) and neoplasms (n = 3150, ROR 2.61, PRR 2.49, IC 1.31, EBGM 2.49). Spontaneous reports consistently demonstrated higher signal strength for infections and skin disorders compared to healthcare professional (HCP) reports. In contrast, at the PT level, HCP reports tended to emphasize stronger signals for rare or specific conditions.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights a spectrum of UST-associated ADEs covering 25 SOCs in the treatment of patients with psoriasis and PsA, which emphasizes the need for vigilant clinical monitoring, particularly for infections, hepatobiliary disorders, and rare but high-signal events such as notalgia paraesthetica, chronic actinic dermatitis and pure testicular seminoma stage I. Clinicians should combine insights from both spontaneous and HCP reports and pay special attention to infections and reproductive system disorders.

Effectiveness of biologics for endoscopic healing in patients with isolated proximal small bowel Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic healing (EH) is a key therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD). Proximal small bowel (SB) lesions in patients with CD are associated with a significant risk of strictures and bowel resection. Assessing SB in patients with CD is necessary because of its significant therapeutic implications. The advent of biologic therapies, including infliximab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, has significantly altered CD treatment. However, data on the efficacy of biologics in achieving EH, specifically in the proximal SB of patients with CD, remain limited.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of biologics for EH in patients with jejunal and/or proximal ileal CD.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2023, we retrospectively included 110 consecutive patients with isolated proximal SB CD, identified through baseline balloon-assisted enteroscopy. These patients completed 1-year of treatment with infliximab, ustekinumab, or vedolizumab, and underwent a second balloon-assisted enteroscopy at 1 year. Complete EH was defined as a modified Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) of < 3, while EH of the jejunum and proximal ileum was defined as a segmental modified SES-CD of 0.

RESULTS

In total, 64 patients were treated with infliximab, 28 with ustekinumab, and 18 with vedolizumab. The complete EH rate at 1 year was 20.9% (23/110), with 29.6% (19/64) for infliximab, 10.7% (3/28) for ustekinumab, and 5.5% (1/18) for vedolizumab. The median modified SES-CD significantly decreased compared to baseline [5 (2-8) vs 8 (6-9), P < 0.001]. The jejunal and proximal ileal EH rates at 1 year were 30.8% (12/39) and 15.5% (16/103), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that stricturing or penetrating disease [odds ratio (OR) = 0.261, 95%CI: 0.087-0.778, P = 0.016], prior exposure to biologics (OR = 0.080, 95%CI: 0.010-0.674, P = 0.020), and moderate-to-severe endoscopic disease (OR = 0.277, 95%CI: 0.093-0.829, P = 0.022) were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving EH at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Only 20.9% of patients with isolated proximal SB CD achieved complete EH after 1 year of biologic therapy.

CT-based body composition parameters predict the loss of response to infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

Infliximab is a first-line biologic agent for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD), in which loss of response (LOR) remains a challenge in the treatment of patients with CD. The study aimed to explore the association between body composition parameters and LOR to infliximab in CD patients.

METHODS

118 patients with CD admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University and treated with infliximab from June 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The body composition of patients was analyzed by computed tomography (CT). The primary outcome measure was the one-year LOR. Patients were divided into the Remission group and the LOR group to analyze the association between body composition parameters and the LOR to infliximab.

RESULTS

The rate of sarcopenia in the LOR group was higher than in the Remission group (83.7% vs. 60.0%, P=0.008). Multivariate analysis showed that females had a lower risk of sarcopenia than males (OR=0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.81, P =0.017); BMI was significantly associated with sarcopenia (OR=0.68, 95% CI 0.56-0.83, P <0.001); L1 CD and L2 CD had a lower risk of sarcopenia than L3 CD (OR=0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.83, P =0.021; OR=0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.87, P=0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia was identified as a risk factor for developing LOR in infliximab-treated patients.

Durable remission after ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease is achievable in selected patients. Long-term results of a prospective multicentric cohort study of the GETAID Chirurgie

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Postoperative recurrence requiring medical treatment intensification or redo surgery is common after ileocolic resection (ICR) for Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to identify a subgroup of CD patients for whom ICR could achieve durable remission.

METHODS

This retrospective follow-up study analyzed 592 CD patients who underwent ICR (2013-2015) in a nationwide prospective cohort. Patients with >36 months follow-up were included. Primary outcome was durable remission, defined as the absence of endoscopic recurrence and/or medical treatment intensification. Uni- and multivariate analyses identified predictive factors for durable remission.

RESULTS

Among 268 included patients, 59% had B2 phenotype, 70% had a first ICR, and 66% had postoperative medical treatment. After a median follow-up of 85 (36-104) months, 52 patients (19%) experienced durable remission, of whom 24 (46%) didn't require medical treatment and 28 (54%) maintained the same postoperative treatment, including anti-tumor necrosis factor in 15/28 patients (54%). Surgery could stabilize the disease course in 112 patients (41.7%), including 22.4% endoscopic recurrence that didn't require CD treatment initiation or intensification. Durable remission rate was significantly increased in B1 phenotype vs B2/B3 (n = 7/18;39% vs n = 45/250;18%, P = .030) and in first ICR vs redo ICR (n = 43/184;23% vs n = 9/80;11%, P = .023). In multivariate analysis, B1 phenotype was the only independent predictive factor for durable remission (odds ratio = 3.59, IC 95%, 1.13-11.37, P = .030).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for CD achieved durable remission in 20%, rising to 40% in those with a B1 phenotype. These results support surgery as a viable alternative to medical treatment, offering treatment-free durable remission and preserving medical treatment options.

Durability of Adalimumab and Infliximab in Children With Crohn's Disease: A Nationwide Comparison From the epi-IIRN Cohort

BACKGROUND

In a nationwide cohort, we aimed to compare the durability of infliximab and adalimumab as first biologic treatment in children with Crohn's disease (CD), stratified as combotherapy or monotherapy.

METHODS

We used data from the epi-IIRN cohort that includes all patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in Israel. Durability was defined as consistent treatment without surgery or treatment escalation. All comparisons followed stringent propensity-score matching in Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Of the 3487 children diagnosed with CD since 2005, 2157 (62%) received biologics (1127 [52%] infliximab, 964 [45%] adalimumab and 52 [2%] vedolizumab as first biologic), representing a higher proportion than that among adults diagnosed during the same time period (5295 of 15 776 [34%]; P < .001). Time from diagnosis to initiation of biologic was shorter in pediatric-onset compared with adult-onset disease (median time during the last 3 years was 2.7 months [interquartile range 1.2-5.4] vs 5.2 months [2.6-8.9]; P < .001). The durability of adalimumab monotherapy after 1 and 5 years from initiation of treatment was better than infliximab monotherapy (79%/54% vs 67%/37%, respectively; n = 452 matched children; hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.3; P < .001), while in those treated with combotherapy, durability was similar (94%/66% with infliximab vs 90%/54% with adalimumab; n = 100; HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.9-3.3; P = .1). Durability was higher in children treated with infliximab combotherapy vs infliximab monotherapy (87%/45% vs 75%/39%; n = 440; HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P = .01). The durability of adalimumab monotherapy was similar to infliximab combotherapy (83%/53% vs 89%/56%, respectively; n = 238; HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.2; P = .4).

CONCLUSION

Our results support using adalimumab monotherapy as a first-line biologic in children with CD. When infliximab is used, combotherapy may be advantageous over monotherapy.

Effectiveness comparison between ustekinumab and infliximab for Crohn's disease complicated with intestinal stenosis: a multicenter real-world study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) and infliximab (IFX) in Crohn's disease (CD) patients with intestinal stenosis remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the efficacy of UST and IFX in the treatment of CD patients with intestinal stenosis.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective and multicenter cohort study.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included CD patients treated with IFX or UST at five centers. We assessed the clinical response rate at weeks 12 and 24, steroid-free clinical remission rate at weeks 24 and 52 for overall patients and those with stenosis, and objective examination (intestinal ultrasound and/or endoscopy) response rate at week 52 for stenosis patients.

RESULTS

A total of 211 CD patients (106 IFX and 105 UST) were included, with 119 (56 IFX and 63 UST) having intestinal stenosis. In the overall patient population, there were no significant differences in clinical response rate and steroid-free clinical remission rate at weeks 12, 24, and 52 between the IFX and UST groups. In patients with stenosis, the steroid-free clinical remission rate at week 52 was significantly lower in the IFX group compared to the UST group (51.79% IFX vs 69.84% UST, p = 0.044). The objective examination response rate did not significantly differ between the IFX and UST groups at week 52 (66.67% IFX vs 76.19% UST, p = 0.690). In the UST group, steroid-free clinical remission rate was higher in bio-naïve patients than bio-experienced patients at week 24 (75.00% bio-naïve vs 55.38% bio-experienced, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

UST may be considered a more advantageous treatment option for those CD patients with intestinal stenosis, as it has better steroid-free clinical remission rates compared to IFX.

Crohn's Patient Serum Proteomics Reveals Response Signature for Infliximab but not Vedolizumab

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that affects the gastrointestinal tract. Common biologic families used to treat Crohn's are tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α blockers (infliximab and adalimumab) and immune cell adhesion blockers (vedolizumab). Given their differing mechanisms of action, the ability to monitor response and predict treatment efficacy via easy-to-obtain blood draws remains an unmet need.

METHODS

To investigate these gaps in knowledge, we leveraged 2 prospective cohorts (LOVE-CD, TAILORIX) and profiled their serum using high-dimensional isobaric-labeled proteomics before treatment and 6 weeks after treatment initiation with either vedolizumab or infliximab.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients endoscopically responding to treatment was comparable among infliximab and vedolizumab cohorts; however, the impact of vedolizumab on patient sera was negligible. In contrast, infliximab treatment induced a robust response including increased blood-gas regulatory response proteins, and concomitant decreases in inflammation-related proteins. Further analysis comparing infliximab responders and nonresponders revealed a lingering innate immune enrichments in nonresponders and a unique protease regulation signature related to clotting cascades in responders. Lastly, using samples prior to infliximab treatment, we highlight serum protein biomarkers that potentially predict a positive response to infliximab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results will positively impact the determination of appropriate patient treatment and inform the selection of clinical trial outcome metrics.

Short term effectiveness of ustekinumab versus vedolizumab in Crohn's disease after failure of anti-TNF agents: An observational comparative study design with a Bayesian analysis

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) is a debilitating gastrointestinal disease with complex etiology. Although effective, recipients of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents may experience primary or secondary nonresponse, necessitating alternative treatments. This study is intended to compare the short-term effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in treating CD after failure of multiple lines of anti-TNF therapy using real-world data.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, including adults (≥18 years old) with CD who did not respond to anti-TNF therapy. Primary endpoints were clinical improvement per the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) scores and remission at 12 weeks on an ordinal outcome scale. Secondary endpoints included clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission; clinical response; corticosteroid-free days; and cumulative steroid dose. Proportional odds and logistic regression Bayesian models were used to analyze outcomes, and the probability of treatment effectiveness was calculated from the posterior distribution.

RESULTS

The study included 101 patients (ustekinumab, n = 71 and vedolizumab, n = 30) with a median age of 32 years (IQR: 26.0-38.0); 54.4% were male. At 12 weeks, the HBI endpoint showed an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-1.31), favoring ustekinumab, with a 75% probability of treatment effectiveness over vedolizumab. The clinical ordinal scale had an aOR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.26-1.35) with a 73% probability of effectiveness for ustekinumab. Ustekinumab was also associated with favorable outcomes in secondary endpoints, reaching up to a 90% probability of effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

In CD patients with anti-TNF failure, ustekinumab was more effective than vedolizumab in the short term. These real-world insights contribute to understanding CD management but require validation in larger prospective studies and randomized controlled trials.

Vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in Crohn's disease with prior anti-tumor necrosis factor failure: an updated meta-analysis

Ustekinumab and vedolizumab are key treatment options for Crohn's disease patients who fail anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. This updated meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these two drugs. We performed a systematic review in PubMed, Embase , and Cochrane databases searching for randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease with previous anti-TNF failure or intolerance. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission (SFR) at the pos-induction (12-16 weeks) and maintenance period (48-52 weeks). The odds ratio (OR) was used for binary outcomes with their respective 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. This meta-analysis included 11 studies and 2724 patients. There was a significant difference favoring ustekinumab in SFR at pos-induction (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.88; P  = 0.006; I2  = 27%) and maintenance periods (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.23-2.82; P  = 0.003; I2  = 80%), in clinical remission at pos-induction period (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.58-2.63; P  < 0.001; I2  = 3%), and in treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.60; P  < 0.001; I2  = 0%). In patients with Crohn's disease with prior anti-TNF failure, ustekinumab showed higher SFR during both the pos-induction and maintenance period and a lower rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events.

[Old and New Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factors]

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, is a chronic condition characterized by relapsing and remitting inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and immune factors. Treatment paradigms have evolved significantly over the past few decades, with the introduction of biologics, particularly anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor) agents, marking a significant advancement. Anti-TNF therapies, including infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab pegol, have efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission, promoting mucosal healing, and improving the quality of life in moderate to severe IBD patients. The early and appropriate use of these agents can mitigate disease progression and reduce the dependency on corticosteroids, enhancing long-term patient outcomes. Nevertheless, these therapies are expensive and are associated with potential adverse effects, including increased risk of infections and malignancies. This review discusses the mechanisms, clinical efficacy, safety profiles, and therapeutic positioning of anti-TNF agents in IBD management, integrating current Korean treatment guidelines.

HLA-DQA1*05 correlates with increased risk of anti-drug antibody development and reduced response to infliximab in Chinese patients with Crohn's disease

Background

The efficacy of anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease (CD), such as infliximab, is often compromised by the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). The genetic variation HLA-DQA1*05 has been linked to the immunogenicity of biologics, influencing ADA formation. This study investigates the correlation between HLA-DQA1*05 and ADA formation in CD patients treated with infliximab in a Chinese Han population and assesses clinical outcomes.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, 345 infliximab-exposed CD patients were genotyped for HLADQ A1*05A > G (rs2097432). We evaluated the risk of ADA development, loss of infliximab response, adverse events, and treatment discontinuation among variant and wild-type allele individuals.

Results

A higher percentage of patients with ADAs formation was observed in HLA-DQA1*05 G variant carriers compared with HLA-DQA1*05 wild-type carriers (58.5% vs 42.9%, P = 0.004). HLA-DQA1*05 carriage significantly increased the risk of ADAs development (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.65, 95% CI 1.18-2.30, P = 0.003) and was associated with a greater likelihood of infliximab response loss (adjusted HR = 2.55, 95% CI 1.78-3.68, P < 0.0001) and treatment discontinuation (adjusted HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.59-3.06, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, combined therapy with immunomodulators increased the risk of response loss in HLA-DQA1*05 variant carriers.

Conclusions

HLA-DQA1*05 significantly predicts ADAs formation and impacts treatment outcomes in infliximab-treated CD patients. Pre-treatment screening for this genetic factor could therefore be instrumental in personalizing anti-TNF therapy strategies for these patients.

Risankizumab versus Ustekinumab for Moderate-to-Severe Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of risankizumab as compared with ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease are unknown.

METHODS

In this phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial with blinded assessment of end points, patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who had had an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy or unacceptable side effects with such therapy were randomly assigned to receive risankizumab or ustekinumab at standard doses for 48 weeks. The two primary end points, which were tested sequentially, were clinical remission at week 24 (defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of <150 [range, 0 to 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity]), which was analyzed in the first 50% of patients to complete the week 24 visit, with a noninferiority margin of 10 percentage points; and endoscopic remission at week 48 (defined as a score of ≤4, a decrease of ≥2 points from baseline, and no subscore >1 in any individual variable on the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [range, 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease]), which was analyzed for superiority in 100% of the patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of risankizumab or ustekinumab.

RESULTS

In the full intention-to-treat population for the efficacy analysis, 230 of 255 patients (90.2%) who received risankizumab and 193 of 265 patients (72.8%) who received ustekinumab completed all the assigned treatments. Both primary end points were met; risankizumab was noninferior to ustekinumab with respect to clinical remission at week 24 (58.6% vs. 39.5%; adjusted difference, 18.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6 to 30.3) and superior to ustekinumab with respect to endoscopic remission at week 48 (31.8% vs. 16.2%; adjusted difference, 15.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.4 to 22.9; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this head-to-head clinical trial of risankizumab and ustekinumab involving patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who had had unacceptable side effects with anti-TNF therapy or an inadequate response to such therapy, risankizumab was noninferior to ustekinumab with respect to clinical remission at week 24 and superior with respect to endoscopic remission at week 48. (Funded by AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04524611.).

Network meta-analysis: Comparative onset of early effect of biologics and small molecules in moderately to severely active luminal Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Rapidity of effect of advanced therapies for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) can be an essential decision parameter; however, comparative evaluation is lacking. We aimed to compare early response for advanced CD therapies in a network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

We searched systematically MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL up to 19 February 2024, for randomised controlled trials. The co-primary outcomes were induction of clinical remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤150) and clinical response (≥100-point reduction in CDAI) within the first 6 weeks of treatment. We incorporated any assessment within this time point in a Bayesian random-effects NMA following PRISMA-NMA guidance (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022368509).

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies, comprising 7414 patients, were included. Infliximab combined with azathioprine or monotherapy ranked highest for induction of clinical remission within 6 weeks and was significantly superior to certolizumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, vedolizumab, and upadacitinib. However, superiority over risankizumab 600 mg and adalimumab 160/80 mg was non-significant. Accordingly, infliximab in combination with azathioprine and guselkumab 600 mg ranked highest in the corresponding analysis of clinical response with no statistical significance demonstrated. Among bio-exposed patients, none of whom received infliximab, upadacitinib, and risankizumab induced the highest clinical responses. On the other hand, vedolizumab, certolizumab, and ustekinumab ranked lowest across the analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

We found infliximab to be ranked highest and superior to all other agents but risankizumab and adalimumab, demonstrating the highest probability of early induction of remission. Upadacitinib and risankizumab induced the highest clinical responses in bio-exposed patients. However, infliximab was not investigated in this population.

Therapeutic sequencing in inflammatory bowel disease: Determining the optimal position of vedolizumab for long-term Crohn's disease control using real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

Several biologics are available for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease, but data to optimize their use are scarce. Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective anti-lymphocyte trafficking monoclonal antibody that was approved in 2014 for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Based on real-world evidence, a model was developed to examine the effect of VDZ's position in the treatment sequence on clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a model using real-world data to investigate how the positioning of VDZ in a sequence of biologic therapies for CD affects clinical effectiveness outcomes of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYS), patient-reported disease activity, and surgery rates.

METHODS

A semi-Markov sequential model was developed to identify the optimal position of VDZ in a treatment sequence that included corticosteroids (CS), two biologics, and best supportive care (BSC). Using real-world data, three sequences were compared: VDZ as first (position), second, and last biologic (with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) and the anti-interleukin-12 and -23 agent ustekinumab (UST) as alternative biologic treatments). Published real-world evidence informed model inputs. Vedolizumab sequences were compared and ranked based on QALYS, patient-reported outcomes from Crohn's disease activity index scores, or proportion of patients undergoing surgery by the 10-year time horizon for model simulation. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the impact of model input uncertainty.

RESULTS

Vedolizumab as the first biologic was the optimal position for this treatment according to all criteria, including yielding the highest QALYs (5.09) versus VDZ in second (4.97) and third (4.96) biologic sequence positions in sequences containing CS, anti-TNFα (aggregated data), UST, and BSC; 1780/2000 (89%) probabilistic simulations. In sequences containing ADA, VDZ, and UST biologics, ADA and VDZ in the first-line biologic position yielded QALYs of 5.09 versus 5.07, respectively. Adalimumab as the first biologic was best for clinical remission.

CONCLUSIONS

This simulation model using real-world evidence indicates that positioning VDZ or ADA as the first biologic is likely to lead to improved long-term patient outcomes when compared to administering these treatments later or starting with IFX monotherapy.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Subcutaneous Infliximab Maintenance Therapy Compared With Intravenous Infliximab Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Although the pharmacokinetic profile of subcutaneous (SC) infliximab (IFX) is superior to conventional intravenous (IV) IFX, long-term efficacy and safety of SC IFX in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have not been reported yet. This study aimed to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes of IBD patients treated with SC IFX compared with those of IBD patients treated with IV IFX during maintenance therapy.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study enrolled 61 IBD patients in clinical remission who received scheduled IFX maintenance therapy. Of them, 38 patients were switched to SC IFX, while 23 patients continued IV IFX with dose optimization. Enrolled patients were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome was durable remission defined as clinical remission (Crohn's disease, Harvey-Bradshaw index <5; ulcerative colitis, partial Mayo score <2) and biochemical remission (C-reactive protein <0.5 mg/dL) with IFX trough level ≥3 µg/mL throughout the follow-up period.

RESULTS

One-year clinical remission, 1-year biochemical remission, and mucosal healing did not differ between the IV and SC IFX groups (n = 20 of 23 vs 33 of 38; P = 1.000; n = 22 of 23 vs 34 of 38; P = .641; and n = 10 of 18 vs 17 of 25; P = .414, respectively). During follow-up, the number of patients with IFX trough level <3 μg/mL was significantly lower in the SC IFX group (n = 0 of 38, 0%) than in the IV IFX group (n = 10 of 23, 43%) (P < .001). The SC IFX group showed higher 1-year durable remission than the IV IFX group (n = 31 of 38, 82% vs n = 11 of 23, 48%; P = .013). The incidence of IFX-related adverse events did not differ significantly between both groups (26% vs 39%; P = .446).

CONCLUSION

The SC IFX switch induced a higher 1-year durable remission rate than continuing IV IFX in patients with IBD during scheduled maintenance therapy, showing similar safety.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab at different intervals of maintenance phase in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ustekinumab has two alternative drug maintenance intervals for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), every 8 weeks (Q8W) and every 12 weeks (Q12W). The current study aimed at evaluating the comparative efficacy and safety of the two maintenance intervals in patients with IBD. A systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was carried out. The relative risk (RR) was pooled for efficacy and safety outcomes between the two intervals at various follow-up time points, categorized as short term (less than 44 weeks), medium term (about 92 weeks), and long term (about 152 weeks). A total of 14 studies with 1448 patients were included. Q8W didn't result in a remarkably higher proportion of clinical remission compared to Q12W at short term (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.16), medium term (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.91-1.20), and long term (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.91-1.26). Similarly, no substantial differences exist at short term in clinical response (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.85-1.17), endoscopic remission (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.26-3.69), and histologic improvement (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.93-1.36) between the two intervals. For safety outcomes, the RR values for any adverse events in the short, medium, and long term were 1.10 (95% CI, 1.00-1.21), 1.14 (95% CI, 1.08-1.20), and 1.12 (95% CI, 1.07-1.17) for Q8W versus Q12W. Finally, we conclude that ustekinumab maintenance therapy administered every 8 and 12 weeks showed similar effectiveness in achieving efficacy outcomes in IBD patients, and most safety outcomes were significantly better for Q12W during the maintenance phase.

Biologics, Small Molecules and More in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Present and the Future

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of heterogeneous chronic inflammatory diseases of the gut presenting with intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations. Most cases fit in predominantly two types, namely, ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. The incidence of IBD has been increasing steadily in the past three decades. Focused research has resulted in many therapeutic options. Biologics (derived from humans or animals) and small molecules have emerged as the cornerstone in the management of IBD and have become widely available. Currently, monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab), integrins (vedolizumab and natalizumab), and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 antagonists (ustekinumab), along with small molecules (tofacitinib), are approved for use. This article summarizes various aspects of these drugs, like clinical pharmacology, indications for use in IBD, safety in pregnancy and lactation, and the adverse effects profile based on the studies leading to their approval. This review also focuses on the recent advances and future perspectives specific to biologics in IBD.

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab in biologic-naive patients with Crohn's disease: results from the EVOLVE study

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the real-world effectiveness and safety of α 4 β 7 -integrin inhibitor vedolizumab and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) inhibitor infliximab in biologic-naive patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

EVOLVE was a retrospective, multicenter, medical chart review of biologic-naive adults with inflammatory bowel disease receiving vedolizumab or anti-TNFα treatment as first-line biologics in Canada, Greece, and the USA. Twelve-month outcomes were analyzed in vedolizumab- or infliximab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe CD (and subgroups with complicated and noncomplicated CD) including cumulative rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing, and incidence rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to account for baseline differences between treatment groups.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed from 167 patients. In the IPW dataset (99 vedolizumab-treated and 63 infliximab-treated), adjusted 12-month clinical remission rates were 73.1% and 55.2%, respectively ( P  = 0.31). Overall, effectiveness rates were similar across treatment and complicated/noncomplicated disease subgroups. Adjusted 12-month incidence rates (first occurrence/1000 person-years) of SAEs for vedolizumab vs. infliximab: 43.6 vs. 200.9 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.36 (0.09-1.54)]; SIs: 10.8 vs. 96.0 [HR 0.08 (<0.01-2.64)]. AE incidence was significantly lower in vedolizumab- vs. infliximab-treated patients for complicated [131.6 vs. 732.2; HR 0.19 (0.05-0.65)] and noncomplicated [276.3 vs. 494.8; HR 0.59 (0.35-0.99)] disease subgroups.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data on first-line biologics show no differences in 12-month effectiveness outcomes for vedolizumab- vs. infliximab-treated biologic-naive patients with CD. Vedolizumab may have a more favorable safety profile vs. infliximab in patients with complicated and noncomplicated disease.

Are the New Biologics Effective in the Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease?

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing therapeutic armamentarium, at least half of the patients with Crohn's disease will require surgery during their lifetime. Current evidence for the prevention and treatment of postoperative Crohn's disease supports the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents with limited data about the use of the newer biologics, vedolizumab and ustekinumab.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of available data to determine the efficacy of the newer biologics in the management of postoperative Crohn's disease. We included noncomparative and comparative studies. The main outcomes of interest were clinical and endoscopic postoperative recurrence rates.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 1231 citations, with 32 eligible for review. Several studies showed that the postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence rates with the use of the newer biologics were comparable to previously published results with the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, while other studies failed to show their efficacy. It is important to note that the studies were heterogeneous and included a relatively small sample size, making it difficult to draw a definite conclusion about the efficacy of the newer biologics in the management of postoperative Crohn's disease.

CONCLUSION

The newer biologics do play a role in the management of postoperative Crohn's disease. After our review, we proposed an updated algorithm on the role of newer biologics in the approach to patients with postoperative Crohn's disease. Yet, until we have better-designed studies, their definite positioning remains to be determined.

Integrating Evidence to Guide Use of Biologics and Small Molecules for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Advances in science have led to the development of multiple biologics and small molecules for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). This growth in advanced medical therapies has been accompanied by an increase in methodological innovation to study and compare therapies. Guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to integrating therapies into routine practice, but they are often unable to provide timely recommendations as new therapies come to market, and they have limited incorporation of real-world evidence when making recommendations. This limits the scope and usability of guidelines, and a gap remains in defining how best to position and integrate advanced medical therapies for IBD. In this review, we provide a framework for clinicians and researchers to understand key differences in sources of evidence, how different methodologies are applied to study the comparative effectiveness of advanced medical therapies in IBD, and considerations for how these sources of evidence can be used to better integrate current guideline recommendations. Over time, we anticipate this framework will allow for a transition to living guidelines and/or practice recommendations.

Clinical use of biologics for Crohn's disease in adults: lessons learned from real-world studies

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic armamentarium for managing Crohn's disease (CD) has expanded significantly in recent decades. Several biologics with three different mechanisms of action [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-integrin α4β7, and anti-IL 12/23] are currently available to manage CD.

AREA COVERED

This narrative review aims to summarize the most significant efficacy and safety data on the use of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) for the treatment of CD obtained from studies conducted in the real world (RW), compared to the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

EXPERT OPINION

RW studies reported that biologic agents included in this analysis have higher remission rates and lower adverse event rates than findings from RCTs for treating patients with CD. All biological agents have proven effective and safe in RW studies, even when using biosimilars or switching to subcutaneous administration of the molecules for which they are available. Finally, anti-TNF-α agents, particularly IFX, have a higher rate of adverse events (AEs) than VDZ and UST. Therefore, patients at higher risk of AEs may benefit from other biologics than anti-TNF-α. However, further long-term RW studies are needed to confirm these findings.

CT enterography-based radiomics combined with body composition to predict infliximab treatment failure in Crohn's disease

PURPOSE

Accurately predicting the treatment response in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) receiving infliximab therapy is crucial for clinical decision-making. We aimed to construct a prediction model incorporating radiomics and body composition features derived from computed tomography (CT) enterography for identifying individuals at high risk for infliximab treatment failure.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 137 patients with CD between 2015 and 2021, who were divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort with a ratio of 7:3. Patients underwent CT enterography examinations within 1 month before infliximab initiation. Radiomic features of the intestinal segments involved were extracted, and body composition features were measured at the level of the L3 lumbar vertebra. A model that combined radiomics with body composition was constructed. The primary outcome was the occurrence of infliximab treatment failure within 1 year. The model performance was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, and decision curves.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (38.0%) showed infliximab treatment failure. Eight significant radiomic features were used to develop the radiomics model. The model incorporating radiomics model score, skeletal muscle index (SMI), and creeping fat showed good discrimination for predicting infliximab treatment failure, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81, 0.95) in the training cohort and 0.83 (95% CI 0.66, 1.00) in the validation cohort. The favorable clinical application was observed using decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed a comprehensive model incorporating radiomics and muscle volume, which could potentially be used to facilitate the individualized prediction of infliximab treatment response in patients with CD.

Long-term effectiveness and acceptability of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with intensified doses: The REMSWITCH-LT study

BACKGROUND

The long-term risk of relapse after switching from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) infliximab remains unknown in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AIMS

To assess the long-term effectiveness and acceptability of switching from IV to SC infliximab in patients with IBD treated with or without an intensified IV regimen.

METHODS

We extended the follow-up of the REMSWITCH study including patients with IBD in clinical remission who were switched from IV to SC infliximab (120 mg/2 weeks). Relapse was defined as clinical relapse or faecal calprotectin increase ≥150 μg/g compared to baseline.

RESULTS

After median follow-up of 18 [15-20] months, among 128 patients, rates of relapse were 13.8% (8/58), 18.4% (7/38), 35.3% (6/17) and 86.7% (13/15) at last follow-up (p < 0.001), in those receiving 5 mg/kg/8 weeks, 10 mg/kg/8 weeks, 10 mg/kg/6 weeks and 10 mg/kg/4 weeks at baseline, respectively. Among relapsing patients, dose escalation led to clinical remission in 82.1% (23/28). In multivariable analyses, factors associated with higher risk of relapse were IV infliximab 10 mg/kg/4 weeks (OR = 61.0 [6.1-607.0], p < 0.001) or 10 mg/kg/6 weeks (OR = 4.7 [1.1-20.2], p = 0.017), and decreased (OR = 5.6 [1.5-20.3], p = 0.004) or stable (OR = 5.0 [1.6-15.0], p = 0.009) serum levels of infliximab between baseline and first post-switch visit. Acceptability was improved at 6 months and did not decrease over time (6.9 ± 1.6 before the switch vs. 8.8 ± 1.3 at 6 months and 8.8 ± 1.3 at last follow-up; p < 0.001). No severe adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from IV to SC infliximab 120 mg every other week is safe and well accepted leading to low long-term risk of relapse. Tight monitoring and dose escalation should be recommended for patients receiving 10 mg/kg/6 weeks and 4 weeks, respectively.

Durability of the First Biologic in Patients with Crohn's Disease: A Nationwide Study from the epi-IIRN

BACKGROUND

In this nationwide study we aimed to compare the durability of the first initiated biologic in Crohn's disease [CD], stratified by monotherapy and combotherapy.

METHODS

We used data from the epi-IIRN cohort, which includes 98% of the Israeli inflammatory bowel disease population [2005-2020]. Durability was defined as consistent treatment without surgery or added medications [except for combination therapy with thiopurines or methotrexate]. All comparisons were based on stringent propensity-score matching and paired time-to-event analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 19 264 patients with CD were included, of whom 7452 [39%] received biologics with a median follow-up of 6.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.6-10.7). Time to biologics decreased gradually from 6.7 years [IQR 2.7-10.4] in 2005 to 0.2 years [0.07-0.23] in 2020. The durability of the first biologic after 1 and 3 years was higher with adalimumab monotherapy [88%/61%] than vedolizumab monotherapy [81%/59%; n = 394 matched patients, p = 0.04] and similar between infliximab monotherapy and vedolizumab monotherapy [65%/43%; n = 182 matched patients, p = 0.1]. Durability was higher in adalimumab monotherapy vs infliximab monotherapy [83%/62% vs 71%/48% at 1/3 years; p <0.001] and it was similar in adalimumab monotherapy vs infliximab combotherapy [87%/63% vs 80%/58%, respectively; p = 0.1]. Durability was higher in combotherapy compared with monotherapy for both infliximab [85%/64% vs 67%/43%, respectively; n = 496 matched pairs, p <0.001], and adalimumab [93%/76% vs 82%/62%, respectively; n = 540 matched pairs, p <0.001].

CONCLUSION

Durability of the first biologic in CD was highest for adalimumab monotherapy. Combotherapy further increased the durability of adalimumab and infliximab. Unless otherwise indicated, our data may support using anti-tumour necrosis factors [TNFs] as first-line biologics in CD, particularly adalimumab if monotherapy is advised.

Use of double-balloon endoscopy and an endoscopic scoring system to assess endoscopic remission in isolated small bowel Crohn's disease after treatment with infliximab

Background

It is unclear how clinical and endoscopic factors affect the attainment of endoscopic remission (ER) in patients with small bowel Crohn's disease (SB-CD) who are infliximab-naïve.

Objectives

We aimed to identify the effect of different factors on attaining ER using double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) evaluation.

Design

A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted from 1 January 2018 to 30 November 2022. Among 262 patients who were screened for isolated SB-CD by baseline DBE, 108 patients were assessed for effectiveness during maintenance infliximab therapy by a second DBE evaluation.

Methods

DBE findings before and after infliximab therapy were compared. ER was defined as a simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) below 3, and segmental ER as SES-CD activity of 0. Multivariate regression with calculations of odds ratios (OR) was used to determine the impact of different factors on attaining ER.

Results

In all, 41 patients (38.0%) achieved ER. An elevated C-reactive protein at week 6 was independently associated with a decreased probability of ER [OR: 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.75-0.98, p = 0.03]. Segmental ER of the terminal ileum, rather than the proximal ileum, was associated with a higher rate of ER (60.9% versus 38.2%, p = 0.01). High baseline SES-CD (⩾16) was unrelated to overall ER. For patients with disease in the terminal ileum, those with moderate/severe disease were less likely to attain segmental ER than those with mild disease [adjusted odds ratios (aOR): 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09-0.83, p = 0.02]. A large ulcer in the terminal ileum was associated with a lower rate of segmental ER (aOR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06-0.56, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

For infliximab-naïve patients with SB-CD, the overall severity of the endoscopic score was unrelated to attainment of ER. Patients were less likely to attain segmental ER if they had greater endoscopic inflammation or larger ulcers in the terminal ileum.

Infections in inflammatory bowel disease patients on immunomodulator and biologic therapy are not associated with high serum drug levels

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies now utilise higher doses of immunomodulatory and biologic therapies, predisposing patients to an increased risk of infections.

AIMS

We aimed to determine whether infections were associated with high anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drug levels in IBD and to quantify the risk and consequences of infections.

METHODS

Two retrospective studies were performed, a descriptive cohort study and a matched case-control study. For the matched case-control study, cases of infection occurring on anti-TNF agents were matched in a 1:2 ratio to controls of anti-TNF treated patients without infections.

RESULTS

In the descriptive study, 76 infections occurred in 60 patients, including 49 bacterial, 24 viral, four fungal and four parasitic. Of these, 61 (80.3%) were on biologics, 49 (64.5%) on immunomodulators and 11 (14.5%) on corticosteroids. Thirty-four (44.7%) were on combination therapy, 27 (35.5%) on biologic monotherapy and 15 (19.7%) on immunomodulator monotherapy. Median anti-TNF drug levels in infection cases were 3.9 μg/mL for infliximab and 6.0 μg/mL for adalimumab. In the case-control study, 32 cases of infection in 27 anti-TNF treated patients were matched with 64 anti-TNF treated controls without infections. Among infection cases, 59.5% were on combination therapy versus 40.6% on biologic monotherapy (P = 0.59). Median drug levels for cases and controls respectively were 3.9 μg/mL versus 5.5 μg/mL for infliximab (P = 0.72) and 6.0 μg/mL versus 9.9 μg/mL for adalimumab (P = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

Infections in patients with IBD were common, and the risk was highest with combination therapy. Infections were not associated with high serum anti-TNF levels.

How do network meta-analyses address intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence: a systematic survey

OBJECTIVES

To describe how systematic reviews with network meta-analyses (NMAs) that used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) NMA approach addressed intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence.

DESIGN

Systematic survey.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from September 2014 to October 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials with aggregate data NMAs that used the GRADE NMA approach for assessing certainty of evidence.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

We documented how reviewers described methods for addressing intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence, how often they rated down for intransitivity and their explanations for rating down.

RESULTS

Of the 268 eligible systematic reviews, 44.8% (120/268) mentioned intransitivity when describing methods for assessing the certainty of evidence. Of these, 28.3% (34/120) considered effect modifiers and from this subset, 67.6% (23/34) specified the effect modifiers; however, no systematic review noted how they chose the effect modifiers. 15.0% (18/120) mentioned looking for differences between the direct comparisons that inform the indirect estimate. No review specified a threshold for difference in effect modifiers between the direct comparisons that would lead to rating down for intransitivity. Reviewers noted rating down indirect evidence for intransitivity in 33.1% of systematic reviews, and noted intransitivity for network estimates in 23.0% of reviews. Authors provided an explanation for rating down for intransitivity in 59.6% (31/52) of the cases in which they rated down. Of the 31 in which they provided an explanation, 74.2% (23/31) noted they detected differences in effect modifiers and 67.7% (21/31) specified in what effect modifiers they detected differences.

CONCLUSIONS

A third of systematic reviews with NMAs using the GRADE approach rated down for intransitivity. Limitations in reporting of methods to address intransitivity proved considerable. Whether the problem is that reviewers neglected to address rating down for transitivity at all, or whether they did consider but not report, is not clear. At minimum systematic reviews with NMAs need to improve their reporting practices regarding intransitivity; it may well be that they need to improve their practice in transitivity assessment. How to best address intransitivity may remain unclear for many reviewers thus additional GRADE guidance providing practical instructions for addressing intransitivity may be desirable.

Obefazimod: A First-in-class Drug for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

Biologic agents and oral small molecules are the mainstays of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] management. However, an unmet clinical need remains for additional agents with novel mechanism of action which are effective, safe, and disease-modifying; this is due to the substantial proportion of patients who do not respond, lose response, or develop intolerance to currently marketed products. microRNAs [miRNAs] that play a role in the modulation of signal transduction pathways implicated in the development of IBD hold the potential to be used as therapeutic targets. Recently, a novel first-in-class compound, obefazimod, originally conceived as a human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection drug, has shown great promise in phase II induction trials for ulcerative colitis [UC] patients. Findings from the maintenance phases of trials showed that long-term obefazimod treatment provides continued improvement in clinical symptoms of disease, with a substantial proportion of patients in clinical remission, and an overall good safety profile. With a novel mechanism of action, obefazimod is an orally available small molecule with anti-inflammatory properties through the specific and selective upregulation of miR-124 expression. The aim of this paper is to critically review the available evidence related to pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and to discuss the potential clinical implications of this first-in-class oral small molecule.

Effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab as second biologic agent in achieving target outcomes in tumor necrosis factor antagonists experienced patients with inflammatory bowel disease (enroll-ex study)

Background: About a third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. In our study, we evaluated the effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in achieving clinical and endoscopic outcomes in anti-TNF-experienced patients with IBD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Electronic medical records of patients with moderate to severe IBD, who were previously received anti-TNF therapies, were reviewed and evaluated retrospectively in a gastroenterology center. Outcomes of patients treated with ustekinumab or vedolizumab after failing one anti-TNF agent were evaluated. The primary outcomes were the percentage of hospitalization, surgery, mucosal healing and steroid-free remission. Mucosal healing was defined as a Mayo endoscopic score of 0 or 1 in ulcerative colitis (UC) and an SES-CD score of less than 3 in Crohn's disease (CD). Outcomes were quantified using descriptive analysis. Results: A total of 207 (130 CD: 77 UC) patients with IBD who had previously received one anti-TNF agent were included in the study. Of the total cohort, 62 (30.0%) patients were receiving vedolizumab, and 145 (70.0%) patients were on ustekinumab. 101 (77.6%) patients with CD who failed one anti-TNF therapy were on ustekinumab. Of these patients, 26 (19.7%) patients were hospitalized, and 12 (11.9%) patients had IBD-related surgery. 16 (16.1%) patients had at least one corticosteroid course. 60 (59.0%) patients with CD on ustekinumab achieved mucosal healing. 29 (22.3%) patients with CD who failed one anti-TNF therapy were receiving vedolizumab. Of those, 7 (25%) patients were hospitalized, and 11 (37.9%) patients had IBD-related surgery. 15 (51.0%) patients achieved mucosal healing. 44 (57.1%) patients with UC who failed one anti-TNF therapy were on ustekinumab. Of these 6 (14.1%) patients were hospitalized, 3 (7.0%) patients had IBD-related surgery and 13 (30%) patients had at least 1 corticosteroid course. 25 (57.0%) patients achieved mucosal healing. 33 (42.8%) patients with UC who failed one anti-TNF therapy were receiving vedolizumab. Of those, 6 (18.6%) patients were hospitalized, and 16 (49.6%) patients had at least 1 corticosteroid course. 17 (53.2%) patients achieved mucosal healing. Conclusion: Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were both effective in achieving clinical outcomes in patients with IBD after failing an anti-TNF agent. However, patients receiving ustekinumab had numerically higher percentages of reaching target outcomes than patients receiving vedolizumab. A prospective head-to-head trial is warranted to confirm these findings.

Clinical guidelines. Crohn’s disease (К50), adults

.

Self-reported treatment effectiveness for Crohn's disease using a novel crowdsourcing web-based platform

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Internet and social media platforms have become an unprecedented source for sharing self-experience, potentially allowing the collection and integration of health data with patient experience. StuffThatWorks (STW) is an online open platform that applies machine learning and the power of crowdsourcing, where patients with chronic medical conditions can self-report and compare their individual outcomes using a structured online questionnaire. We aimed to conduct a cross-sectional, international, crowdsourcing, artificial-intelligence (AI) web-based study of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) self-reporting their outcomes.

METHODS

A proprietary STW Bayesian inference model was built to measure improvement in CD severity (on scale of 1-5) for each treatment and ranked treatments using effectiveness. The effectiveness of first-line biological treatments was analyzed by multiple comparisons and by calculating odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for each treatment pair.

RESULTS

We included 7593 self-reported CD patients for the analysis. Most of the participants were female (75.8%) and from English-speaking countries (95.7%). Overall, anti-TNF drugs were the most reported tried treatment (52.8%). Infliximab (IFX) was ranked as the most effective treatment by the STW effectiveness model followed by bowel surgery (second), adalimumab (ADA, third), ustekinumab (UST, 4rd), and vedolizumab (VDZ, fifth). In paired comparison analyses, IFX was most effective, ADA had similar effectiveness compared to UST and all three were more effective than VDZ.

CONCLUSION

We present the first online crowdsourcing AI platform-based study of self-reported treatment effectiveness in CD. Net-based crowdsourcing patient-reported outcome platforms can potentially help both clinicians and patients select the best treatment for their condition.

Recruitment and Residence of Intestinal T Cells - Lessons for Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Targeting leukocyte trafficking in the management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] has been a significant therapeutic advance over the past 15 years. However, as with other advanced therapies, phase III clinical trials report response to trafficking inhibitors in only a proportion of patients, with fewer achieving clinical remission or mucosal healing. Additionally, there have been significant side effects, most notably progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in association with the α4 inhibitor natalizumab. This article reviews the mechanisms underpinning T cell recruitment and residence, to provide a background from which the strength and limitations of agents that disrupt leukocyte trafficking can be further explored. The therapeutic impact of trafficking inhibitors is underpinned by the complexity and plasticity of the intestinal immune response. Pathways essential for gut homing in health may be bypassed in the inflamed gut, thus providing alternative routes of entry when conventional homing molecules are targeted. Furthermore, there is conservation of trafficking architecture between proinflammatory and regulatory T cells. The persistence of resident memory cells within the gut gives rise to local established pro-inflammatory populations, uninfluenced by inhibition of trafficking. Finally, trafficking inhibitors may give rise to effects beyond the intended response, such as the impact of vedolizumab on innate immunity, as well as on target side effects. With significant research efforts into predictive biomarkers already underway, it is ultimately hoped that a better understanding of trafficking and residence will help us predict which patients are most likely to respond to inhibition of leukocyte trafficking, and how best to combine therapies.

Effectiveness of Switching From Intravenous to Subcutaneous Infliximab in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: the REMSWITCH Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We assessed the effectiveness of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) treated with or without intensified intravenous regimen.

METHODS

In this multicenter observational study, IBD patients in clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤2 or Harvey-Bradshaw index ≤4) were switched to a unique dose of subcutaneous infliximab (120 mg every other week). Pharmacological and biological data were collected at baseline, visit 1 (4-8 weeks postswitch), visit 2 (8-16 weeks postswitch), and visit 3 (16-24 weeks postswitch). Relapse was defined as clinical relapse or fecal calprotectin increase ≥150 μg/g compared with baseline.

RESULTS

Among 184 eligible patients, 72.3% (n = 133 of 184) agreed to switch to subcutaneous infliximab. At visit 3, a relapse occurred in 10.2% (n = 6 of 59), 7.3% (n = 3 of 38), 16.7% (n = 3 of 18), and 66.7% (n = 10 of 15) (P < .001) of patients receiving 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 8 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 6 weeks, and 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks, respectively. Dose escalation to 240 mg every other week led to recapture clinical remission in 93.3% (n = 14 of 15). Infliximab serum levels increased after the switch (P < .0001) except for patients receiving 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks. In multivariable analysis, 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks regimen (odds ratio, 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-98.4; P = .017) and fecal calprotectin >250 μg/g at baseline (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-27.6; P = .042) had a higher risk of relapse as well as reduced (41.7%) or stable (36.8%) infliximab serum levels between baseline and visit 1 compared with increased serum levels (12.7%) (P = .020 and P = .019, respectively). Patients' acceptability (10-point scale) was improved by the switch (6.9 ± 1.6 vs 8.6 ± 1.4; P < .0001). No severe adverse event was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every other week is safe and well accepted, leading to a low risk of relapse in IBD patients except for those receiving 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks requiring 240 mg every other week.

Circular and Circulating DNA in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Pathogenesis to Potential Molecular Therapies

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) are chronic multifactorial disorders which affect the gastrointestinal tract with variable extent. Despite extensive research, their etiology and exact pathogenesis are still unknown. Cell-free DNAs (cfDNAs) are defined as any DNA fragments which are free from the origin cell and able to circulate into the bloodstream with or without microvescicles. CfDNAs are now being increasingly studied in different human diseases, like cancer or inflammatory diseases. However, to date it is unclear how IBD etiology is linked to cfDNAs in plasma. Extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) are non-plasmidic, nuclear, circular and closed DNA molecules found in all eukaryotes tested. CfDNAs appear to play an important role in autoimmune diseases, inflammatory processes, and cancer; recently, interest has also grown in IBD, and their role in the pathogenesis of IBD has been suggested. We now suggest that eccDNAs also play a role in IBD. In this review, we have comprehensively collected available knowledge in literature regarding cfDNA, eccDNA, and structures involving them such as neutrophil extracellular traps and exosomes, and their role in IBD. Finally, we focused on old and novel potential molecular therapies and drug delivery systems, such as nanoparticles, for IBD treatment.

Anti-TNF Biologicals Enhance the Anti-Inflammatory Properties of IgG N-Glycome in Crohn's Disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammation of the digestive tract that significantly impairs patients' quality of life and well-being. Anti-TNF biologicals revolutionised the treatment of CD, yet many patients do not adequately respond to such therapy. Previous studies have demonstrated a pro-inflammatory pattern in the composition of CD patients' immunoglobulin G (IgG) N-glycome compared to healthy individuals. Here, we utilised the high-throughput UHPLC method for N-glycan analysis to explore the longitudinal effect of the anti-TNF drugs infliximab and adalimumab on N-glycome composition of total serum IgG in 198 patients, as well as the predictive potential of IgG N-glycans at baseline to detect primary non-responders to anti-TNF therapy in 1315 patients. We discovered a significant decrease in IgG agalactosylation and an increase in monogalactosylation, digalactosylation and sialylation during the 14 weeks of anti-TNF treatment, regardless of therapy response, all of which suggested a diminished inflammatory environment in CD patients treated with anti-TNF therapy. Furthermore, we observed that IgG N-glycome might contain certain information regarding the anti-TNF therapy outcome before initiating the treatment. However, it is impossible to predict future primary non-responders to anti-TNF therapy based solely on IgG N-glycome composition at baseline.

Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Anti-TNF Agent as First-Line Biological Therapy in Luminal Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective Study From 2 Referral Centers

BACKGROUND

Real-life data on the efficacy of ustekinumab as first-line therapy for the treatment of luminal Crohn's disease (CD) compared with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents are lacking. We compared the clinical response rates at 3 months in 2 cohorts of biologic-naïve patients treated by ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents.

METHODS

Biologic-naïve patients starting either ustekinumab or an anti-TNF agent for luminal CD between 2016 and 2019 in 2 tertiary centers were retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was clinical response at 3 months, defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw Index <4 or a 3-point drop in the score without steroids, need for CD-related surgery, or treatment discontinuation owing to failure or intolerance. Patients treated with ustekinumab were matched to patients receiving anti-TNF agents by a propensity score algorithm.

RESULTS

We included 156 patients starting anti-TNF agents (95 adalimumab and 61 infliximab) and 50 ustekinumab. After matching, clinical response rates at 3 months were 64% and 86% in the ustekinumab and anti-TNF groups, respectively (P = .01). At 12 months, in multivariate analysis adjusted for disease duration, location, concomitant immunosuppressant and steroids, and symptoms, clinical remission was independently associated with the biological therapy received (odds ratio, 2.6 for anti-TNF agent vs ustekinumab; P = .02). With a median follow-up duration of 40 (interquartile range, 23-52) months, no difference was observed in terms of time to drug withdrawal (P = .29) or safety.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective real-world data suggest that an anti-TNF agent as a first-line biological therapy is associated with higher rates of response at 3 months than ustekinumab in patients with CD.

Infliximab vs adalimumab: Points to consider when selecting anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease

Biologic agents with various mechanisms against Crohn's disease (CD) have been released and are widely used in clinical practice. However, two anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL), are the only biologic agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration for pediatric CD currently. Therefore, in pediatric CD, the choice of biologic agents should be made more carefully to achieve the therapeutic goal. There are currently no head-to-head trials of biologic agents in pediatric or adult CD. There is a lack of accumulated data for pediatric CD, which requires the extrapolation of adult data for the positioning of biologics in pediatric CD. From a pharmacokinetic point of view, IFX is more advantageous than ADL when the inflammatory burden is high, and ADL is expected to be advantageous over IFX in sustaining remission in the maintenance phase. Additionally, we reviewed the safety profile, immunogenicity, preference, and compliance between IFX and ADL and provide practical insights into the choice of anti-TNF therapy in pediatric CD. Careful evaluation of clinical indications and disease behavior is essential when prescribing anti-TNF agents. In addition, factors such as the efficacy of induction and maintenance of remission, safety profile, immunogenicity, patient preference, and compliance play an important role in evaluating and selecting treatment options.

Trough Concentration Response in Infliximab and Adalimumab Treated Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Following Treatment Adjustment: A Pharmacokinetic Model

OBJECTIVES

In patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), data on trough concentration (TC) response to adjustments of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNFα) are scarce.

METHODS

We included pediatric patients with IBD who were treated with anti-TNFα agents and had sequential monitoring of TC pre- and post-adjustment. Patients with positive anti-drug-antibodies or with concomitant change in immunomodulatory treatment were excluded.

RESULTS

For the entire cohort (86 patients), median age at diagnosis was 13.2 (interquartile range, 10.7-14.9) years [females, 48%; Crohn disease (CD), 72%]. For infliximab, 58 patients had 201 interval changes and 26 had dose increase. Increase in TC following dose increase could not be predicted due to significant variability (P = 0.9). For every 10% decrease in interval, TC was increased by 1.6 µg/mL or by 57.2% (P = 0.014). Perianal disease was associated with attenuated response. For every 10% increase in interval, TC was decreased by 0.66 µg/mL or by 4.2%. The diagnosis of CD was associated with reduced response to interval increase. For adalimumab, 28 patients had 31 and 12 events of interval decrease or increase, respectively. Interval decrease resulted in increased median TC from 4.5 (3.5-5.3) µg/mL to 8.1 (6.5-10.5) µg/mL (X1.8) while interval increase resulted in TC change from 15.5 (12.8-18.6) µg/mL to 9.7 (6.5-14.6) µg/mL (:1.6) (P < 0.001 for both). Increase in delta TC was associated with younger age, and with absence of perianal disease (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Changes in TC following treatment adjustment can be almost linearly predicted for adalimumab while response to infliximab adjustment are more variable.

Iranian Consensus Guideline for Pharmacotherapy with Biologics and Small Molecules Drugs in Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Background: Pharmacotherapy with biologics and small molecules, as the more effective therapies for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is complex. Choosing the best methods for their utilization in order to induce and maintain remission are critical for practicing gastroenterologists. We aimed to develop an Iranian consensus on the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with biologics and small molecules. Methods: A Delphi consensus was undertaken by experts who performed a literature summary and voting process. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading and Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; and an additional risk of bias-protocol. Results: Following an extensive search of the literature, 219 studies were used to determine the quality of the evidence. After three rounds of voting, consensus (defined as≥80% agreement) was reached for 87 statements. Conclusion: We considered different aspects of pharmacotherapy in this consensus. This guideline, along with clinical judgment, can be used to optimize management of IBD patients.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab and Adalimumab As Induction or Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis has been conducted to compare ustekinumab and adalimumab as induction or maintenance therapy in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). The current meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two investigators independently searched online databases including PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Cochrane Library for relevant articles published up to April 2023. The initial search terms were "ustekinumab," "adalimumab," and "Crohn's disease". Three studies (with a total of 612 patients) were included in the present meta-analysis. We did not find any significant difference in clinical remission (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.68-2.52), clinical response (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.39-4.91), endoscopic remission (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.66-3.64), and steroid-free remission (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.67-1.42) between patients who received ustekinumab and patients who received adalimumab. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab and adalimumab in the treatment of moderate to severe CD. Our findings indicate that both drugs have similar effectiveness in achieving clinical remission, clinical response, radiological remission and steroid-free remission.

Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Effectiveness between Anti-TNF and Ustekinumab after Vedolizumab Failure as First-Line Therapy in Crohn’s Disease: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: The effectiveness of anti-TNF or ustekinumab (UST) as a second-line biologic after vedolizumab (VDZ) failure has not yet been described. Aims and Methods: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, We aim to investigate the effectiveness of anti-TNF and UST as second-line therapy in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) who failed VDZ as a first-line treatment. The primary outcome was clinical response at week 16–22. Secondary outcomes included the rates of clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission, CRP normalization, and adverse events. Results: Fifty-nine patients who failed on VDZ as a first-line treatment for CD were included; 52.8% patients received anti-TNF and 47.2% UST as a second-line therapy. In initial period (Week 16–22), the clinical response and remission rate was similar between both groups: 61.2% vs. 68%, p = 0.8 and 48.3% vs. 56%, p = 0.8 on anti-TNF and UST therapy, respectively. Furthermore, in the maintenance period the rate was similar: 75% vs. 82.3%, p = 0.8 and 62.5% vs. 70.5%, p = 0.8, respectively. Of the patients, 12 out of the 59 stopped the therapy, without a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.6). Conclusion: Second-line biological therapy after VDZ failure therapy was effective in >60% of the patients with CD. No differences in effectiveness were detected between the use of anti-TNF and UST as a second line.

Single-Cell Sequencing-Based Validation of T Cell-Associated Diagnostic Model Genes and Drug Response in Crohn's Disease

Crohn's disease is a highly heterogeneous autoimmune disease with a unique inflammatory phenotype of T cells at the lesion site. We aim to further explore the diagnosis of Crohn's disease and drug prediction of T cell marker gene expression. We obtained single-cell expression profile data from 22 CDs or normal samples and performed cell annotation and cellular communication analysis. Through the intersection of T cell marker genes, differential genes, and WGCNA results, we identified T cell-specific key genes and their immune landscapes and potential pathogenesis, and validated them across multiple datasets and patient tissue samples. We also explored the differentiation characteristics of genes by pseudo-temporal analysis and assessed their diagnostic performance and drug sensitivity by molecular docking. Finally, we extended this study to the prognosis of IBD-associated colon cancer. TNF-centered 5-gene diagnostic model not only has excellent diagnostic efficacy, but is also closely associated with KRAS, P53, and IL6/JAK/STAT3 pathways and physiological processes, such as EMT, coagulation, and apoptosis. In addition, this diagnostic model may have potential synergistic immunotherapeutic effects, with positive correlations with immune checkpoints such as CTLA4, CD86, PDCD1LG2, and CD40. Molecular docking demonstrated that BIRC3 and ANXA1 have strong binding properties to Azathioprine and Glucoocorticoid. Furthermore, the 5-gene model may suggest antagonism to IFX and prognosis for colon cancer associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Single-cell sequencing targeting T cell-related features in patients with Crohn's disease may aid in new diagnostic decisions, as well as the initial exploration of high-potential therapies.

Ustekinumab Versus Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha Agents as Second-Line Biologics in Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

There are little data on positioning biologics in Crohn's disease (CD).

AIMS

We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab vs tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) agents after first-line treatment with anti-TNF in CD.

METHODS

We used Swedish nationwide registers to identify patients with CD, exposed to anti-TNF who initiated second-line biologic treatment with ustekinumab or second-line anti-TNF therapy. Nearest neighbour 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the groups. The primary outcome was 3-year drug survival used as a proxy for effectiveness. Secondary outcomes included drug survival without hospital admission, CD-related surgery, antibiotics, hospitalization due to infection and exposure to corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Some 312 patients remained after PSM. Drug survival at 3 years was 35% (95% CI 26-44%) in ustekinumab compared to 36% (95% CI 28-44%) in anti-TNF-treated patients (p = 0.72). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in 3-year survival without hospital admission (72% vs 70%, p = 0.99), surgery (87% vs 92%, p = 0.17), hospital admission due to infection (92% vs 92%, p = 0.31) or prescription of antibiotics (49% vs 50%, p = 0.56). The proportion of patients continuing second-line biologic therapy did not differ by reason for ending first-line anti-TNF (lack of response vs intolerance) or by type of first-line anti-TNF (adalimumab vs infliximab).

CONCLUSION

Based on data from Swedish routine care, no clinically relevant differences in effectiveness or safety of second-line ustekinumab vs anti-TNF treatment were observed in patients with CD with prior exposure to anti-TNF.

Efficacy of biological therapies and small molecules in induction and maintenance of remission in luminal Crohn's disease: systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

There are numerous biological therapies and small molecules licensed for luminal Crohn's disease (CD), but these are often studied in placebo-controlled trials, meaning relative efficacy is uncertain. We examined this in a network meta-analysis.

DESIGN

We searched the literature to 1 July 2022, judging efficacy according to induction of clinical remission, clinical response and maintenance of clinical remission, and according to previous exposure or non-exposure to biologics. We used a random effects model and reported data as pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs, ranking drugs according to p-score.

RESULTS

We identified 25 induction of remission trials (8720 patients). Based on failure to achieve clinical remission, infliximab 5 mg/kg ranked first versus placebo (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.79, p-score 0.95), with risankizumab 600 mg second and upadacitinib 45 mg once daily third. However, risankizumab 600 mg ranked first for clinical remission in biologic-naïve (RR=0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.85, p-score 0.78) and in biologic-exposed patients (RR=0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.82, p-score 0.92). In 15 maintenance of remission trials (4016 patients), based on relapse of disease activity, upadacitinib 30 mg once daily ranked first (RR=0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.72, p-score 0.93) with adalimumab 40 mg weekly second, and infliximab 10 mg/kg 8-weekly third. Adalimumab 40 mg weekly ranked first in biologic-naïve patients (RR=0.59, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.73, p-score 0.86), and vedolizumab 108 mg 2-weekly first in biologic-exposed (RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86, p-score 0.82).

CONCLUSION

In a network meta-analysis, infliximab 5 mg/kg ranked first for induction of clinical remission in all patients with luminal CD, but risankizumab 600 mg was first in biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed patients. Upadacitinib 30 mg once daily ranked first for maintenance of remission.

Korean clinical practice guidelines on biologics for moderate to severe Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a relapsing and progressive condition characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss, and hematochezia that results in serious complications such as perforations, fistulas, and abscesses. Various medications, interventions, and surgical treatments have been used to treat CD. The Korean guidelines for CD management were distributed in 2012 and revised in 2017 by the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Research Group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. Substantial progress in mucosal immunologic research has elucidated the pathophysiology of IBD, leading to development of biological agents for treatment of CD. The first developed biologic agent, tumor necrosis factor-α agents, were shown to be efficacious in CD, heralding a new era in management of CD. Subsequently, vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin α4β7, and ustekinumab, a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the common p40 subunit of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, were both approved for clinical use and are efficacious and safe for both induction and maintenance of remission in moderate-to-severe CD patients. Moreover, a recent study showed the non-inferiority of CT-P13, an infliximab biosimilar, compared with infliximab in CD patients. The third Korean guidelines for CD management provide updated information regarding treatment of moderate-to-severe CD patients with biologic agents.