1
|
Liu Y, Song Y, Li J, Rui C, Qin C, Xu T. Comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy after radical surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2025:S1078-1439(25)00125-5. [PMID: 40414745 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2025] [Accepted: 03/24/2025] [Indexed: 05/27/2025]
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and adjuvant immunotherapy (AI) on the prognosis of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using studies identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to September 2024. We performed pair-wise and network meta-analyses to evaluate survival outcomes, focusing on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival. A total of 43 studies involving 13,132 patients were included. Pair-wise meta-analysis showed that AC significantly improved OS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86, P = 0.0001), CSS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.90, P < 0.00001), and DFS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.75, P < 0.00001). A pooled analysis of three RCTs with 384 UTUC patients showed that AI did not significantly improve DFS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87-1.64, P = 0.28) or OS (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.81-2.03). Network meta-analysis suggested that combining AC with AI could offer better DFS than AC alone, with AC outperforming AI. Ranking analysis indicated that MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) was the most effective for OS and CSS improvement, followed by GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin). AC improves the prognosis of UTUC patients, whereas the results with AI are less promising. AC shows better outcomes than AI after RNU. Preliminary evidence suggests that combining AC with AI may enhance DFS, but further research is needed to confirm its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuxuan Song
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jincong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Rui
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Caipeng Qin
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pinar U, Calleris G, Grobet-Jeandin E, Grande P, Benamran D, Thibault C, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2023; 41:3205-3230. [PMID: 36905443 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04330-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize evidence regarding the use of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A comprehensive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed to identify any original or review article on the role of perioperative chemotherapy for UTUC patients treated with RNU. RESULTS With regards to NAC, retrospective studies consistently suggested that it may be associated with better pathological downstaging (pDS) ranging from 10.8 to 80% and complete response (pCR) ranging from 4.3 to 15%, while decreasing the risk of recurrence and death as compared to RNU alone. Even higher pDS ranging from 58 to 75% and pCR ranging from 14 to 38% were observed in single-arm phase II trials. With regards to AC, retrospective studies provided conflicting results although the largest report from the National Cancer Database suggested an overall survival benefit in pT3-T4 and/or pN + patients. In addition, a phase III randomized controlled trial showed that the use of AC was associated with a disease-free survival benefit (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = [0.30-0.68]; p = 0.0001) in pT2-T4 and/or pN + patients with acceptable toxicity profile. This benefit was consistent in all subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes associated with RNU. Given the impact of RNU on renal function, the rational is stronger for the use of NAC which impacts final pathology and potentially prolongs survival. However, the level of evidence is stronger for the use of AC that has been proven to decrease the risk of recurrence after RNU with a potential survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Pinar
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Grande
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Benamran
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guan H, Wang G, Wang W, Zhou Y, Liu Z, Hou X, Yan J, Sun S, Hu K, Zhao J. Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent kidney-sparing surgery (KSS): a single-center study. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:120. [PMID: 37464353 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02303-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent kidney-sparing surgery (KSS). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 31 patients with primary UTUC who underwent kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) and who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy at our center between October 1998 and May 2017. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 23.0. The primary endpoints of this study included overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS); the secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS The median follow-up was 58.4 months (range, 12.7-185.3 months), and the median local recurrence time was 59.0 months (range, 7.0-185 months). All of the patients completed radiotherapy on schedule, and no grade 3-4 late-stage reaction was observed. The estimated 5-year and 10-year OS, DFS and LRFS rates of the patients were 64.0%, 61.1%, 69.6% and 48.0%, 40.9%, 64.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age (χ2 = 4.224, P = 0.040), R0 resection (χ2 = 3.949, P = 0.047), and early stage (I + II) (χ2 = 6.515, P = 0.011) were associated with good OS; DFS benefit in early stage patients (χ2 = 6.151, P = 0.013) and age<70 years old (χ2 = 5.091, P = 0.024). Patients with distal ureteral segments had better LRFS than patients with proximal ureteral cancer (χ2 = 5.248, P = 0.022). However, multivariate analysis showed that age was the only factor of OS (χ2 = 4.099, P = 0.043). CONCLUSION Adjuvant radiotherapy is safe and tolerated, and LRFS was superior in middle and distal ureteral cancer than in proximal ureteral cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Guangyu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Weiping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuncan Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhikai Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaorong Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Junfang Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuai Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Jing Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Inamoto T, Matsuyama H, Komura K, Ibuki N, Fujimoto K, Shiina H, Sakano S, Nagao K, Mastumoto H, Miyake M, Tatsumi Y, Yasumoto H, Azuma H. Tumor Location Based Segmentation in Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Impacts on the Urothelial Recurrence-Free Survival: A Multi-Institutional Database Study. Curr Urol 2020; 14:183-190. [PMID: 33488336 DOI: 10.1159/000499240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives The predictive impact of primary tumor location for patients with upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in the presence of concomitant urothelial bladder cancer, along with urothelial recurrence after the curative treatment is still contentious. We evaluated the association between precise tumor location and concomitant presence of urothelial bladder cancer and urothelial recurrence-free survival in patients with UTUC treated by radical nephroureterectomy with a bladder cuff. Methods A total of 1,349 patients with localized UTUC (Ta-4N0M0) from a retrospective multi-institutional cohort were studied. We queried four UTUC databases. This retrospective clinical series was of patients with localized UTUC managed by nephroureter-ectomy with a bladder cuff, for whom data were from the Nishinihon Uro-Oncology Collaborative Group registries. Patients with a history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded from the study. Associations between the location of the tumor and subsequent outcome following nephroureterectomy were assessed using COX multivariate analysis. The location of the tumor was verified by pathological samples. Urothelial recurrence was defined as tumor relapse in any local urothelium, and coded apart from distant metastasis. The median follow-up was 34 months. Results A total of 887 patients had an evaluation of the tumor location in which 475 patients had pelvic tumors (53.6%), 96 had ureteral tumors in the U1 segment (10.8%), 87 in the U2 segment (9.8%), and 176 in the U3 segment (19.8%). There were 52 patients who had multifocal tumors (5.9%) as follows: 8 (0.9%) in the pelvis and ureter, 11 (1.2%) in U1 + U2, 1 (0.1%) in U1 + U3, 27 (3.0 %) in U2 + U3, and 6 (0.7%) in U1 + U2 + U3. In all, 145 (16.3%) had concomitant bladder tumors. Logistic regression analysis of gender, age, hydronephrosis, cytology, performance status, grade, lymphovascular invasion, pT, pN, and tumor focality showed that tumor location was associated with the presence of concomitant bladder cancer (p = 0.004, HR = 1.265). When the tumor location was stratified into 8 segments, including multifocal tumors, only the U3 segment remained as a predictor for the presence of concomitant bladder cancer (p = 0.002, HR = 2.872). Kaplan-Meier analysis for unifocal disease showed that lower ureter tumors (a combination of U2 and U3) had a worse prognosis for urothelial recurrence than pelvic tumors or upper ureteral tumors (U1) (p < 0.001 for lower ureteral tumors versus pelvic tumors, p = 0.322 for upper ureteral tumor versus pelvic tumor by log rank). Multivariate analysis showed that lower ureter remained as a prognostic factor for urothelial recurrence after adjusting for gender, age, hydronephrosis, urine cytology, lymphovascular invasion, pT, and pN (p < 0.001, HR = 1.469), and a similar tendency was found when the analysis was run for patients without concomitant bladder tumors (p = 0.003, HR = 1.446). Patients with lower ureteral tumors had a higher prevalence of deaths (HR = 2.227) compared to patients with upper ureter tumors. Conclusions This multi-institutional study showed that the primary tumor locations were independently associated with the presence of concomitant bladder tumors and subsequent urothelial recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teruo Inamoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Kazumasa Komura
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | - Naokazu Ibuki
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | | | - Hiroaki Shiina
- Department of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Shigeru Sakano
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Kazuhiro Nagao
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Hiroaki Mastumoto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara
| | | | - Hiroaki Yasumoto
- Department of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Haruhito Azuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Motlagh RS, Rink M, D'Andrea D, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Turk J Urol 2020; 47:S33-S44. [PMID: 33052841 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease, posing many challenges for the treating physician due to the lack of strong evidence-based recommendations. However, novel molecular discoveries and a better understanding of the clinical behavior of the disease lead to a continuous evolution of therapeutic landscape in UTUC. The aim of the review is to provide a comprehensive update of the current diagnostic modalities and treatment strategies in UTUC with a special focus on recent developments and challenges. A comprehensive literature search including relevant articles up to August 2020 was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed database. Despite several technological improvements, accurate staging and outcome prediction remain major challenges and hamper appropriate risk stratification. Kidney-sparing surgery can be offered in low risk UTUC; however, physician and patient must be aware of the high rate of recurrence and risk of progression due to tumor biology and understaging. The value and efficacy of intracavitary therapy in patients with UTUC remains unclear due to the lack of high-quality data. In high-risk diseases, radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template lymph node dissection is the standard of care. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy is today accepted as a novel standard for advanced cancers. In metastatic or unresectable disease, the therapeutic landscape is rapidly changing due to several novel agents, such as checkpoint inhibitors. While several diagnostic and treatment challenges remain, progress in endoscopic technology and molecular knowledge have ushered a new age in personalized management of UTUC. Novel accurate molecular and imaging biomarkers are, however, still needed to guide decision making as tissue acquisition remains suboptimal. Next generation sequencing and novel agents are promising to rapidly improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leow JJ, Chong YL, Chang SL, Valderrama BP, Powles T, Bellmunt J. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy. Eur Urol 2020; 79:635-654. [PMID: 32798146 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT To improve the prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), clinicians have used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) before or after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Despite some new data, the evidence remains mixed on their efficacy. OBJECTIVE To update the current evidence on the role of NAC and AC for UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched for all studies investigating NAC or AC for UTUC in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to February 2020. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For NAC, the pooled pathologic complete response rate (≤ypT0N0M0) was 11% (n = 811) and pathologic partial response rate (≤ypT1N0M0) was 43% (n = 869), both across 14 studies. Across six studies, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.59, p < 0.001) for overall survival (OS) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.24-0.61, p < 0.001) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in favor of NAC. The evidence for NAC is at best level 2. As for AC, there was a benefit in OS (pooled HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.92, p = 0.004 across 14 studies and 7983 patients), CSS (pooled HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001 across 18 studies and 5659 patients), and disease-free survival (DFS; pooled HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38-0.70 across four studies and 602 patients). While most studies were retrospective (level 2 evidence), there were two prospective randomized trials providing level 1 evidence. There are currently four phase 2 trials on neoadjuvant immunotherapy and three phase 2 trials on adjuvant immunotherapy for UTUC. CONCLUSIONS NAC for UTUC confers a favorable pathologic response and tumor downstaging rate, and an OS and CSS benefit compared with RNU alone. AC confers an OS, CSS, and DFS benefit compared with RNU alone. Currently, the evidence for AC appears stronger (with positive level 1 evidence) than that for NAC (at best level 2 evidence). Limited data are available for chemoimmunotherapy approaches, but preliminary data support an active research investment. PATIENT SUMMARY After a comprehensive search of the latest studies examining the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cancer, the pooled evidence shows that perioperative chemotherapy was beneficial for prolonging survival; however, the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy was stronger than that for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yew Lam Chong
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trusts, London, UK
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and PSMAR-IMIM Research Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Quhal F, Mori K, Sari Motlagh R, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Rouprêt M, Necchi A, Moschini M, Shariat SF. Efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized and locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25:1037-1054. [PMID: 32206939 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01650-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the available literature regarding the oncologic effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with clinically non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and locally advanced UTUC. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases in November 2019, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included studies that compared patients with non-metastatic UTUC who received either neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with patients who underwent surgery alone. Subgroup meta-analyses were also performed for studies that investigated only locally advanced UTUC. Overall, 36 studies were included in the review of which 22 studies and 15,378 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was associated with higher rates of pathological downstaging (pDS) (RR 6.48, 95% CI 2.05-20.44, p = 0.001) and pathological complete response (RR 18.46, 95% CI 3.34-99.24, p = 0.001); and this was also proven in a subgroup analysis of studies that evaluated pDS in locally advanced UTUC (RR 3.18, 95% CI 2.0-5.07, p < 0.001). The association of NAC with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was also statistically significant in all patients and in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was associated with improved metastasis-free survival (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.76, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.77, p < 0.001), which continued to be true for the patients with locally advanced UTUC. The association of AC with OS was only significant in patients with locally advanced UTUC. Perioperative chemotherapy might provide better survival outcomes in patients with clinically non-metastatic UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to have promising results, although high level of evidence is still lacking. Despite the low level, the body of evidence suggests a need for multimodal therapy of invasive UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Urology Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim DK, Kim JW, Jung HD, Ahn HK, Lee JY, Cho KS. Effects of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Locally Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:e1193-e1202. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
9
|
Data Set for the Reporting of Carcinoma of the Renal Pelvis and Ureter—Nephroureterectomy and Ureterectomy Specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 2019; 43:e1-e12. [DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
10
|
Pelcovits A, Mueller-Leonhard C, Mega A, Amin A, Kim SP, Golijanin D, Gershman B. Outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with isolated lymph node involvement following surgical resection: implications for multi-modal management. World J Urol 2019; 38:1243-1252. [PMID: 31388818 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02897-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data on the oncologic outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with isolated lymph node (LN) involvement (pN+ M0) following surgical resection. We examined pN+ M0 UTUC in a large, nationwide oncology dataset to characterize its natural history, describe trends in utilization of perioperative chemotherapy, and identify clinicopathologic features associated with survival. METHODS We identified 794 patients aged 18-89 years who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with lymph node dissection for pN+ M0 UTUC from 2006 to 2013 in the National Cancer Database. The associations of clinicopathologic features with overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox regression models, and a simplified risk score was created. RESULTS Median follow-up among survivors was 39.5 months, during which time 555 (70%) patients died. Over the study period, neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization increased from 6.7 to 14.2% (p = 0.002), while adjuvant chemotherapy utilization remained stable (42.7 to 44.3%; p = 0.86). One-, 5-, and 8-year OS rates were 63.7%, 24.2%, and 18.7%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, older age, larger tumor size, higher pT stage, positive surgical margins, number of positive LNs, and non-receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with worse OS. A simplified risk score consisting of age, tumor size, pT stage, number of positive LNs, and margin status was created with predicted 5-year OS ranging from 12 to 44%. CONCLUSIONS In this large, contemporary cohort, pN+ M0 UTUC was associated with a 5-year OS of only 24%. Clinicopathologic predictors of survival after surgical resection may improve risk-stratification, counseling, and selection of patients for multimodal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aryeh Pelcovits
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.,Department of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Anthony Mega
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.,Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Ali Amin
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Simon P Kim
- Division of Urology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Dragan Golijanin
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.,Division of Urology, Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.,Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Boris Gershman
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jazayeri SB, Liu JS, Weissman B, Lester J, Samadi DB, Feuerstein MA. Comparison of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract versus Lower Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Urol 2019; 12:177-187. [PMID: 31602183 DOI: 10.1159/000499308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Principles of management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are mostly derived from knowledge of lower tract urothelial carcinoma (LTUC), however recent research indicates that these may be disparate diseases. In this review, we sought to compare the responsiveness of these tumors to similar treatment, platinum-based chemotherapy used in the adjuvant setting. Materials and Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched using a systematic search strategy. Disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with LTUC and UTUC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were compared. Review Manager V 5.3 was used for meta-analyses. Results Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved DFS (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.31-0.54), CSS (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.17-0.50) and OS (HR 0.51, 95%CI 0.38-0.70) rates in LTUC. The effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in UTUC was less pronounced with respect to DFS (HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.1-0.93) and CSS (HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.56-0.90) rates, and there was no effect on OS (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.69-1.10). Differences in CSS and OS were significant (p < 0.0001) in favor of adjuvant chemotherapy for LTUC versus UTUC. Conclusion Despite similar histology, we found significant differences in responsiveness to adjuvant chemotherapy between LTUC and UTUC. This may add to the already growing knowledge that these are disparate diseases. Newer systemic treatments for urothelial carcinoma may prove more effective than platinum-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed B Jazayeri
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jennifer S Liu
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Brittany Weissman
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Janice Lester
- Health Science Library, Northwell Health, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - David B Samadi
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Michael A Feuerstein
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim M, Kim JK, Lee J, Kim YS, Lee JL, Kwak C, Jeong CW, Byun SS, Lee SC, Ohyama C, Arai Y, Ahn H. Adjuvant Treatments for Advanced Stage, Non-metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:819-827. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
13
|
Murakami Y, Matsumoto K, Ikeda M, Hirayama T, Utsunomiya T, Koguchi D, Matsuda D, Okuno N, Taoka Y, Irie A, Iwamura M. Impact of histologic variants on the oncological outcomes of patients with upper urinary tract cancers treated with radical surgery: a multi-institutional retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 2019; 24:1412-1418. [PMID: 31197556 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01486-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No definitive evidence exists regarding the clinical significance of histologic variants (HV) in upper urinary tract cancer. We investigated the impact of HV on prognosis in patients with upper urinary tract cancer following radical surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 451 patients with upper urinary tract cancer who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at six affiliated hospitals from 1990 to 2015. Patients with distant metastatic disease prior to surgery and those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded, leaving 441 eligible patients. Patients were classified into two groups: pure urothelial carcinoma (UC) and HV. The clinicopathological variables of each group were examined using Kaplan-Meier plots and proportional Cox hazard ratios (HR) to compare the oncological outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS HV included 37 patients (8%). Compared with the pure UC patients, HV patients had significantly worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; RFS p = 0.0002, CSS p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis for RFS revealed HV were independent predictors (HR 1.92; p = 0.026), but the association did not remain significant for CSS. There was no significant difference in CSS between the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) group and the non-AC group for all HV patients, except in patients with ≥ pT3 tumor or positive lymph node status where the AC group had significantly favorable CSS. CONCLUSIONS HV in upper urinary tract cancer are independent predictors for RFS, but not for CSS. AC improved CSS for HV patients with ≥ pT3 tumor or positive lymph node status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasukiyo Murakami
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
| | - Masaomi Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642, Japan
| | - Takahiro Hirayama
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Takuji Utsunomiya
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, 2-8-18 Hashimoto, Midori-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-5188, Japan
| | - Dai Koguchi
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, 6-100 Arai, Kitamoto, Saitama, 364-8501, Japan
| | - Daisuke Matsuda
- Department of Urology, Higashiyamato Hospital, 1-13-12, Minami-machi, Higashiyamato, Tokyo, 207-0014, Japan
| | - Norihiko Okuno
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara Hospital, 18-1 Sakuradai, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0314, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Taoka
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, 6-100 Arai, Kitamoto, Saitama, 364-8501, Japan
| | - Akira Irie
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Song W, Jeong JY, Jeon HG, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Choi HY, Lee HM, Sung HH. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for patients with pT3NanyM0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2019; 66:12-17. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
15
|
Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 135:59-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
16
|
Goldberg H, Klaassen Z, Chandrasekar T, Sayyid R, Kulkarni GS, Hamilton RJ, Fleshner NE. Does perioperative chemotherapy improve survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma? A population based analysis. Oncotarget 2018; 9:18797-18810. [PMID: 29721162 PMCID: PMC5922356 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the utilization and outcomes of perioperative chemotherapy in non-metastatic UTUC patients over the past decade using a large national database. Methods All patients aged 18 and older diagnosed with non-metastatic UTUC between 2004 and 2013 were identified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Relevant clinical data was collected and predictors of cancer specific mortality (CSM) and other cause mortality (OCM) were analyzed. Results The total cohort included 8,762 patients. Of these, 1,402 (16%) patients received chemotherapy, including only 35% of high-risk patients (>pT2 or N1). Treated patients had higher CSM (21.3% vs. 13.1%, p<0.001). Predictors of chemotherapy utilization included residence in Midwest states, tumor located in the ureter, higher stage and grade. Predictors of CSM included older age, residence in southern states, receipt of chemotherapy (HR = 1.151, 95% CI: 1.003-1.32, p=0.044), higher stage and grade. OCM was predicted by male gender, older age, ureteral tumor, and higher stage. A subset analysis of patients younger than 65 showed similar predictors, while an analysis of high risk patients demonstrated that chemotherapy receipt did not predict CSM or OCM. Conclusions In this large contemporary non-metastatic UTUC cohort, chemotherapy utilization was found to be quite infrequent, but increasing steadily. Perioperative chemotherapy had no effect on CSM in high-risk patients, while correlated to higher CSM in the younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanan Goldberg
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rashid Sayyid
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil E Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fujita K, Taneishi K, Inamoto T, Ishizuya Y, Takada S, Tsujihata M, Tanigawa G, Minato N, Nakazawa S, Takada T, Iwanishi T, Uemura M, Okuno Y, Azuma H, Norio N. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. BMC Urol 2017; 17:110. [PMID: 29195499 PMCID: PMC5710092 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-017-0305-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purposes of this study were to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improved the prognosis of patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC)and to identify the patients who benefited from AC. METHODS Among a multi-center database of 1014 patients who underwent RNU for UTUC, 344 patients with ≥ pT3 or the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were included. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) estimates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and groups were compared by the log-rank test. Each patient's probability of receiving AC depending on the covariates in each group was estimated by logistic regression models. Propensity score matching was used to adjust the confounding factors for selecting patients for AC, and log-rank tests were applied to these propensity score-matched cohorts. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to identify the variables with significant interaction with AC. Variables included age, pT category, LVI, tumor grade, ECOG performance status and low sodium or hemoglobin score, which we reported to be a prognostic factor of UTUC. RESULTS Of the 344 patients, 241 (70%) had received RNU only and 103 (30%) had received RNU+AC. The median follow-up period was 32 (range 1-184) months. Overall, AC did not improve CSS (P = 0.12). After propensity score matching, the 5-year CSS was 69.0% in patients with RNU+AC versus 58.9% in patients with RNU alone (P = 0.030). Subgroup analyses of survival were performed to identify the patients who benefitted from AC. Subgroups of patients with low preoperative serum sodium (≤ 140 mEq/ml) or hemoglobin levels below the normal limit benefitted from AC (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.61, P = 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with normal sodium and normal hemoglobin levels, 5-year CSS was 77.7% in patients with RNU+AC versus 80.2% in patients with RNU alone (P = 0.84). In contrast, in the subgroup of patients with low sodium or low hemoglobin levels, 5-year CSS was 71.0% in patients with RNU+AC versus 38.5% in patients with RNU alone (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS High-risk UTUC patients, especially subgroups of patients with lower sodium and hemoglobin levels, could benefit from AC after RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazutoshi Fujita
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Kei Taneishi
- Department of Clinical System Onco-Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Teruo Inamoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yu Ishizuya
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shingo Takada
- Department of Urology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Go Tanigawa
- Department of Urology, Sumitomo Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Noriko Minato
- Department of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shigeaki Nakazawa
- Department of Urology, Nishinomiya Prefectural Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Takada
- Department of Urology, Minoh Municipal Hospital, Minoh, Japan
| | - Toshichika Iwanishi
- Department of Urology, Higashi Osaka General Medical Center, Higashi-, Osaka, Japan
| | - Motohide Uemura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yasushi Okuno
- Department of Clinical System Onco-Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Haruhito Azuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nonomura Norio
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Qin C, Liang EL, Du ZY, Qiu XY, Tang G, Chen FR, Zhang B, Tian DW, Hu HL, Wu CL. Prognostic significance of urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation in upper urinary tract after radical nephroureterectomy without metastatic diseases: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e6945. [PMID: 28538387 PMCID: PMC5457867 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000006945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation (UCDD) on the prognosis of patients for primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with pN0/x status treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and to evaluate the prognostic value of UCDD in different tumor locations (renal pelvis and ureter).Data from a total of 346 patients with UTUC who received RNU between January 2012 and March 2016 in the institution were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors age, sex, complaint, height, weight, blood pressure, tumor grade, stage, smoking status, history of adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor location, history of bladder cancer, tumor necrosis, degree of hydronephrosis, tumor size, tumor focality, and preoperative anemia were compared between patients with pure UTUC and patients with UCDD. The endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and intraluminal recurrence-free survival (IRFS).Overall, divergent differentiation was present in 50 patients (14.5%). UCDD was related to different tumor location (P = .01), smoking (P = .04), higher body mass index (P = .02), and advanced tumor grade (P = .01). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, UCDD was found to be significantly correlated with worse IRFS, CSS, and OS (all P < .01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that UCDD was an independent predictor of IRFS (P < .01), CSS (P = .01), and OS (P = .01). However, 40 patients died for various reasons and the 5-year OS rates were 91.9% in UCDD- group and 68.0% in UCDD+ group, respectively. In patients with ureteral tumors, UCDD was the significant predictor for IRFS, CSS, and OS. However, the prognostic value of UCDD was not observed in pyelocaliceal tumors.The presence of divergent differentiation is associated with inferior survival. UCDD may identify patients at high risks for poor prognosis especially in patients with ureteral tumors. As a result, more attention and follow-up should be given to patients with ureteric urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan Qin
- Department of Urology
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - En-Li Liang
- Department of Urology
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Zhi-Yong Du
- Department of Urology
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Xiao-Yu Qiu
- College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Gang Tang
- Department of Urology
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Fei-Ran Chen
- Department of Urology
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Bo Zhang
- Department of Urology
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Da-Wei Tian
- Department of Urology
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Hai-Long Hu
- Department of Urology
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| | - Chang-Li Wu
- Department of Urology
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Seisen T, Krasnow RE, Bellmunt J, Rouprêt M, Leow JJ, Lipsitz SR, Vetterlein MW, Preston MA, Hanna N, Kibel AS, Sun M, Choueiri TK, Trinh QD, Chang SL. Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Positive Regional Lymph Node Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:852-860. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.69.4141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is limited evidence to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Against this backdrop, we hypothesized that such treatment is associated with overall survival (OS) benefit in patients with locally advanced and/or positive regional lymph node disease. Patients and Methods Within the National Cancer Database (2004 to 2012), we identified 3,253 individuals who received AC or observation after RNU for pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UTUC. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) –adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare OS of patients in the two treatment groups. In addition, we performed exploratory analyses of treatment effect according to age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, pathologic stage (pT3/T4N0, pT3/T4Nx and pTanyN+), and surgical margin status. Results Overall, 762 (23.42%) and 2,491 (76.58%) patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UTUC received AC and observation, respectively, after RNU. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that median OS was significantly longer for AC versus observation (47.41 [interquartile range,19.88 to 112.39] v 35.78 [interquartile range, 14.09 to 99.22] months; P < .001). The 5-year IPTW-adjusted rates of OS for AC versus observation were 43.90% and 35.85%, respectively. In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, AC was associated with a significant OS benefit (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.88]; P < .001). This benefit was consistent across all subgroups examined (all P < .05), and no significant heterogeneity of treatment effect was observed (all Pinteraction > .05). Conclusion We report an OS benefit in patients who received AC versus observation after RNU for pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UTUC. Although our results are limited by the usual biases related to the observational study design, we believe that the present findings should be considered when advising post-RNU management of advanced UTUC, pending level I evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Seisen
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Ross E. Krasnow
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Jeffrey J. Leow
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Stuart R. Lipsitz
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Malte W. Vetterlein
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Mark A. Preston
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Nawar Hanna
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Adam S. Kibel
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Maxine Sun
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Toni K. Choueiri
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Steven L. Chang
- Thomas Seisen, Ross E. Krasnow, Jeffrey J. Leow, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Malte W. Vetterlein, Mark A. Preston, Nawar Hanna, Adam S. Kibel, Maxine Sun, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Steven L. Chang, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Joaquim Bellmunt and Toni K. Choueiri, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Morgan Rouprêt, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Perioperative chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review. World J Urol 2017; 35:1401-1407. [PMID: 28074261 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1995-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A comprehensive review of the current literature was performed searching for all studies investigating NAC and AC in UTUC in MEDLINE and https://clinicaltrials.gov , prior to April 2016. The following keywords were used: "ureteral neoplasms," "urothelium," "ureter," "upper tract urothelial," "chemotherapy," "adjuvant," "neoadjuvant" and relevant variants. RESULTS No randomized trials investigated the role of AC or NAC for UTUC. There was one prospective study with n = 36 patients investigating AC with carboplatin-paclitaxel. We included 14 retrospective studies (four in the NAC and ten in the AC setting), with a total of 694 patients receiving cisplatin-based or non-cisplatin-based AC after RNU and 1437 patients undergoing RNU alone. We found that the current literature, mainly based on retrospective studies, suggests significant overall and cancer-specific survival benefits for AC in UTUC. NAC appears promising, with favorable pathologic response rates up to 14%. CONCLUSIONS Evidence is scarce for both NAC and AC use in UTUC. This comprehensive review suggests promising response rates for NAC and a survival benefit for patients treated with AC. Prospective randomized trials are needed to establish the role of AC and NAC in UTUC.
Collapse
|
21
|
Soria F, Moschini M, Haitel A, Wirth GJ, Karam JA, Wood CG, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Raman JD, Kammerer-Jacquet SF, Mathieu R, Bensalah K, Lotan Y, Özsoy M, Remzi M, Gust KM, Shariat SF. HER2 overexpression is associated with worse outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). World J Urol 2016; 35:251-259. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1871-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
|
22
|
Mathieu R, Bensalah K, Lucca I, Mbeutcha A, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF. Upper urinary tract disease: what we know today and unmet needs. Transl Androl Urol 2016; 4:261-72. [PMID: 26816829 PMCID: PMC4708228 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.05.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and poorly investigated disease. Intense collaborative efforts have increased our knowledge and improved the management of the disease. The objective of this review was to discuss recent advances and unmet needs in UTUC. Methods A non-systematic Medline/PubMed literature search was performed on UTUC using the terms “upper tract urothelial carcinoma” with different combinations of keywords. Original articles, reviews and editorials in English language were selected based on their clinical relevance. Results UTUC is a disease with specific epidemiologic and risk factors different to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Similarly to UCB, smoking increases the risk of UTUC and worsens its prognosis, whereas aristolochic acid (AA) exposure and mismatch repair genes abnormality are UTUC specific risk factors. A growing understanding of biological pathways involved in the tumorigenesis of UTUC has led to the identification of promising prognostic/predictive biomarkers. Risk stratification of UTUC is difficult due to limitations in staging and grading. Modern imaging and endoscopy have improved clinical decision-making, and allowed kidney-sparing management and surveillance in favorable-risk tumors. In high-risk tumors, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the standard. Complete removal of the intramural ureter is necessary with inferiority of endoscopic management. Post-RNU intravesical instillation has been shown to decrease bladder cancer recurrence rates. While the role of neoadjuvant cisplatin based combination chemotherapy and lymphadenectomy are not clearly established, the body of evidence suggests a survival benefit to these. There is currently no evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in UTUC. Conclusions Despite growing interest and understanding of UTUC, its management remains challenging, requiring further high quality multicenter collaborations. Accurate risk estimation is necessary to avoid unnecessary RNUs while advances in technology are still required for optimal kidney-sparing approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Mathieu
- 1 Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France ; 2 Department of Urology, General Hospital, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; 3 Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland ; 4 Academic Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris 6, Paris, France ; 5 Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA ; 6 Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Karim Bensalah
- 1 Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France ; 2 Department of Urology, General Hospital, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; 3 Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland ; 4 Academic Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris 6, Paris, France ; 5 Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA ; 6 Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Ilaria Lucca
- 1 Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France ; 2 Department of Urology, General Hospital, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; 3 Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland ; 4 Academic Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris 6, Paris, France ; 5 Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA ; 6 Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Aurélie Mbeutcha
- 1 Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France ; 2 Department of Urology, General Hospital, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; 3 Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland ; 4 Academic Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris 6, Paris, France ; 5 Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA ; 6 Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- 1 Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France ; 2 Department of Urology, General Hospital, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; 3 Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland ; 4 Academic Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris 6, Paris, France ; 5 Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA ; 6 Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- 1 Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France ; 2 Department of Urology, General Hospital, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria ; 3 Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland ; 4 Academic Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris 6, Paris, France ; 5 Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA ; 6 Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Prognostic role of ERCC1 protein expression in upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy with curative intent. World J Urol 2015; 34:1155-61. [PMID: 26658888 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1737-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) has been associated with outcomes of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, but was not yet studied in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic role of ERCC1 expression in a large international cohort of UTUC patients. METHODS Immunohistochemical ERCC1 expression was evaluated in 716 UTUC patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with curative intent. ERCC1 was considered positive when the H-score was >1.0. Associations with overall survival and cancer-specific survival were assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox models. RESULTS ERCC1 was expressed in 303 tumors (42.3 %) and linked with the presence of tumor necrosis (16.2 vs. 10.4 %, p = 0.023), but not with any other clinical or pathological variable. ERCC1 status did not predict cancer-specific survival and overall survival on both univariable (p = 0.70 and 0.32, respectively) and multivariable analyses (p = 0.48 and 0.33, respectively). CONCLUSIONS ERCC1 is expressed in a significant proportion of UTUC and is linked with tumor necrosis, but its expression appears not to be associated with prognosis following radical nephroureterectomy.
Collapse
|
24
|
Mathieu R, Klatte T, Margulis V, Karam JA, Rouprêt M, Seitz C, Karakiewicz PI, Fajkovic H, Wood CG, Weizer AZ, Raman JD, Remzi M, Rioux-Leclercq N, Haitel A, Bensalah K, Lotan Y, Rink M, Kluth LA, Scherr DS, Robinson BD, Shariat SF. Survivin is not an independent prognostic factor for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Urol Oncol 2015; 33:495.e15-22. [PMID: 26228160 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2015] [Revised: 06/19/2015] [Accepted: 06/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Several small single-center studies have reported conflicting results on the prognostic value of survivin expression in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) following radical nephroureterectomy. We attempted to validate the prognostic utility of survivin using a large multi-institutional cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS Survivin expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in tumor tissue from 732 patients with unilateral, sporadic UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy between 1990 and 2008 at 7 centers. Survivin expression was considered altered when at least 10% of the tumor cells stained positive. Associations of altered survivin expression with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS Altered survivin expression was observed in 288 (39.3%) tumors and was associated with more advanced pathological tumor stages (P<0.001), lymph node metastases (P<0.001), lymphovascular invasion (P<0.001), tumor necrosis (P = 0.027), and tumor architecture (P<0.001). Median follow-up was 35 (16-64) months. There were 191 (25.4%) patients who experienced disease recurrence, and 165 patients (21.9%) died of the disease. In the univariable analysis, altered survivin expression was significantly associated with worse RFS and CSS (each P<0.001); however, altered survivin expression did not achieve independent predictive status on multivariable models (P = 0.24 and P = 0.53). Similarly, survivin was not independently associated with outcomes in subgroup analyses, including patients with high-grade tumors. CONCLUSIONS In UTUC, altered survivin expression is associated with worse clinicopathological features and worse RFS and CSS. However, it does not appear to be independently associated with cancer outcomes when considering standard prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Academic Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris 6, Paris, France
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Alon Z Weizer
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Mesut Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Douglas S Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Brian D Robinson
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fujita K, Inamoto T, Yamamoto Y, Tanigawa G, Nakayama M, Mori N, Tsujihata M, Azuma H, Nonomura N, Uemura M. Role of adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma and the prognostic significance of C-reactive protein: A multi-institutional, retrospective study. Int J Urol 2015; 22:1006-12. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.12868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 06/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kazutoshi Fujita
- Department of Urology; Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine; Suita Osaka Japan
| | - Teruo Inamoto
- Department of Urology; Osaka Medical College; Takatsuki Osaka Japan
| | | | - Go Tanigawa
- Department of Urology; Osaka General Medical Center; Osaka Japan
| | - Masashi Nakayama
- Department of Urology; Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases; Osaka Japan
| | - Naoki Mori
- Department of Urology; Sumitomo Hospital; Osaka Japan
| | - Masao Tsujihata
- Department of Urology; Osaka Rosai Hospital; Sakai Osaka Japan
| | - Haruhito Azuma
- Department of Urology; Osaka Medical College; Takatsuki Osaka Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology; Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine; Suita Osaka Japan
| | - Motohide Uemura
- Department of Urology; Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine; Suita Osaka Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Matin SF, Sfakianos JP, Espiritu PN, Coleman JA, Spiess PE. Patterns of Lymphatic Metastases in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma and Proposed Dissection Templates. J Urol 2015; 194:1567-74. [PMID: 26094807 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Information on patterns of lymph node metastases for upper tract urothelial carcinoma is sparse. We investigated patterns of lymph node metastases in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective multi-institutional study of 73 patients with N+M0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent template lymphadenectomy during nephroureterectomy. Anatomical locations of tumor, and number of lymph nodes removed and positive lymph nodes were analyzed and descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS On the right side the 20 renal pelvis tumors had lymph node metastases to the hilum in 22.1% of cases, and to paracaval, retrocaval and interaortocaval regions in 44.1%, 10.3% and 20.6%, respectively. The 10 proximal ureter tumors had lymph node metastases to the hilum in 46.2% of cases, and to paracaval and retrocaval regions in 46.2% and 7.7%, respectively. The 2 distal ureter tumors had lymph node metastases equally to the paracaval and pelvic regions. On the left side the 24 renal pelvis tumors had lymph node metastases to the hilum region in 50.0% of cases and to the para-aortic region in 30.0%. The 8 proximal ureter tumors had lymph node metastases to the hilum region in 36.4% of cases and the para-aortic region in 63.6%. The 5 mid ureter tumors had lymph node metastases to the para-aortic, common iliac and internal iliac regions in 40%, 40% and 20% of cases, respectively. The 4 distal ureter tumors had lymph node metastases to the para-aortic, common iliac, external iliac and internal iliac regions in 33.3%, 33.3%, 16.7% and 16.7% of cases, respectively. Interaortocaval involvement from both sides as well as out of field lymph node metastases appeared to occur secondarily. Consolidated templates were constructed based on the available data. CONCLUSIONS Upper tract urothelial carcinoma has characteristic patterns of lymph node metastases depending on the side and anatomical location of the primary tumor, including right-to-left migration and involvement of interaortocaval nodes in the setting of proximal disease. Standardized dissection templates should be prospectively evaluated in multicenter trials to assess morbidity and potential clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Surgery, Urology Division, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Patrick N Espiritu
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Department of Surgery, Urology Division, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Surgery, Urology Division, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee KS, Kim KH, Yoon YE, Choi KH, Yang SC, Han WK. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and lymphovascular invasion after radical nephroureterectomy. Korean J Urol 2015; 56:41-7. [PMID: 25598935 PMCID: PMC4294854 DOI: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records and clinicopatholgic outcomes of patients (n=552) treated with RNU between 1986 and 2013. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those for whom LVI status was not recorded were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups according to LVI (n=86) or no LVI (n=256). Results The study included 344 patients (240 men and 104 women) with a median of 53.9 months of follow-up (range, 1-297 months) after RNU. Tumors were organ confined (T2/N0) in 211 (61.3%) and tumor grade high in 291 (84.6%). AC was administered in 64 patients (18.6%). A total of 280 patients (81.4%) were treated with surgery alone. Patients with LVI tended to be older (p=0.049), have a higher pT stage (pT3/T4, p<0.001), be pN+ (p<0.001), have a high tumor grade (p<0.001), and experience recurrence (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, LVI was an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival and overall survival (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that in the subgroup of patients with LVI, AC was a significant prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; p=0.027 and hazard ratio, 0.50; p=0.025, respectively). Conclusions AC does not seem to reduce mortality in patients with advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma after RNU. In the subgroup of patients with LVI, AC had a positive impact on cancer-specific survival and overall survival. LVI would be helpful for selecting patients who are appropriate for AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwang Suk Lee
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang Hyun Kim
- Department of Urology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Eun Yoon
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwa Choi
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Choul Yang
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woong Kyu Han
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|