Validation of rapid suicidality screening in epilepsy using the NDDIE

Comparison of neurological and psychiatric profiles of people with epilepsy based on the presence and timing of potentially psychologically traumatic experiences

Objective: While psychological trauma in people with epilepsy (PWE) is a major issue, there is limited research on the interactions between such trauma and epilepsy. Therefore, our primary aim is to describe types and timing of potentially psychologically traumatic experiences (PPTE) in relation to epilepsy onset. Our secondary objective is to evaluate the impact of the timing of the PPTE on patients' psychiatric and neurological profiles.Methods: We conducted an observational study involving 182 PWE, excluding patients with comorbid functional/dissociative seizures. All participants underwent a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation, including biographical, neurological, psychiatric, and traumatic data collection through a semi-structured clinical interview and standardized scales. We compared the neurological and psychiatric characteristics of three groups of patients: those without PPTE, those with PPTE occurring before the onset of epilepsy, and those with PPTE occurring after the onset of their epilepsy.Results: Sixty-one patients (33.5%) reported having experienced PPTE before the onset of epilepsy, 65 patients (35.7%) reported having experienced PPTE after the onset of their epilepsy, and 56 patients (30.8%) had no history of PPTE neither before nor after the onset of epilepsy. The 'before' group had a significantly higher prevalence of epilepsy localized in the temporal lobe (p = .043). The 'after' group showed significantly more general psychiatric symptoms (p = .026), as well as more postictal mood and anxiety symptoms (p = .014). Additionally, the 'before' group reported a higher number of past traumatic experiences, with childhood traumatic experiences being more prevalent. According to our multinomial logistic regression model, higher temporal localization (p = .028) and fewer febrile seizures (p = .030) were significant predictors for the 'before' group.Significance: This study highlights the potential impact of the timing of PPTE on patients' psychiatric and neurological profiles. It underscores the importance of systematically assessing psychiatric and posttraumatic comorbidities in PWE. The role of trauma in temporal epilepsy requires further investigation.

Validation of Item 4 of the Neurological disorders depression Inventory for epilepsy as a rapid screening tool for suicidality in Russian persons with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Suicide rates among persons with epilepsy (PWE) are high and a reliable and valid tool to screen for suicidality in this population is needed. The aim of this study is to validate the Russian version of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) Item 4 as a screening tool for suicidality in PWE.

METHODS

A consecutive sample of the Russian PWE has completed the NDDI-E. The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used as the gold standard for assessing suicide risk. Statistical methods used were Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney test and Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Item 4 characteristics for suicide screening were evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, and the maximum value of Youden's index (J) was used to select the optimal cut-off point.

RESULTS

A total of 372 PWE were enrolled (mean age 42.9 years, 64.8 % female), of whom 42 (11.3 %) were at risk for suicide. The area under the curve (AUC) for Item 4 in identifying suicide risk was 0.86 and the optimal cut-off for Item 4 was > 1 (J = 0.661). At this cut-off, Item 4 had a sensitivity of 80.9 %, a specificity of 85.1 %, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 41.0 % and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.2 %.

CONCLUSION

Item 4 of the Russian version of the NDDI-E (with a cut-off of > 1) is a reliable and valid tool for screening suicidality in PWE. It has good psychometric properties, is not time-consuming, and could therefore be recommended for routine use in settings providing medical care to Russian-speaking PWE.

Major depression, anxiety disorder and suicidality in epilepsy: What should neurologists do?

Four to five patients with epilepsy (PWE) can suffer from Major Depressive episodes (MDE). Comorbid anxiety disorders (AD) frequently occur together with MDE. Failure to treat MDE can negatively affect several aspects of their life as well as the management of the epilepsy. Often, suicidal ideation is among its symptoms, which need to be addressed without delay to prevent suicidal attempts or a completed suicide. Unfortunately, access to health care professionals is very limited and, in many communities, non-existent. Accordingly, it falls upon the treating neurologist to begin a pharmacologic trial with psychotropic drugs. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide neurologists with very useful strategies on how to screen and identify MDEs with and without AD in the outpatient clinic and how to select the appropiate psychotropic drugs. Using an illustrative case, we discuss its differential diagnosis, particularly the recognition of iatrogenic episodes, and demonstrate the selection and mode of use of commonly used antidepressant in PWE. Finally, we provide a guide on how the neurologist can assess the suicidal risk of a patient that endorses suicidal ideation and the steps that need to be taken to minimize the risk of suicidal behavior.

Providing integrated mental health care as a neurologist

Mental health comorbidities are highly prevalent and problematic in epilepsy, making it important for neurologists to be equipped to manage their patients' mental health concerns. This article explores the paradigm shift toward integrated mental health care approaches, aiming to educate early-career neurologists on their role within epilepsy care. We focus on depression and anxiety, how they present in epilepsy, and the role of integrated mental health care in managing these comorbidities. Key areas include the neurologist's role in identifying mental health issues through patient discussions and screening tools, and the basics of neurologist-led management. This covers the selection and adjustment of antiseizure medications and the use of psychopharmacology. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of providing psychoeducation and promoting healthy lifestyle choices that support mental well-being. Finally, we discuss the neurologist's role in facilitating referrals to mental health specialists, including information about the role of psychological interventions and psychiatry. This article aims to provide foundational knowledge to encourage early-career neurologists to actively engage in integrated mental health care approaches with their patients. This care can be flexible in how it incorporates different modalities and is tailored to local resources. It does not have to be extensive but should be meaningful enough to identify mental health concerns and facilitate patient access to appropriate resources and care.

Screening for depression, anxiety, and suicidality in outpatients of a tertiary epilepsy center: How frequent are increased scores and what is recommended?

OBJECTIVE

Psychiatric comorbidities are frequent in people with epilepsy (PWE) or psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), and the use of validated screening instruments to identify respective symptoms is recommended. Our aim was to investigate the recommendations resulting from routine screening for depression, anxiety and suicidality with the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) in the outpatient clinic of a tertiary epilepsy center.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed NDDI-E and GAD-7 scores (German versions) of 264 outpatients at a tertiary epilepsy center and extracted recommendations regarding psychopathology from the outpatient letters.

RESULTS

The screening revealed a likely major depression (NDDI-E ≥17) in 15.2% of PWE (without PNES, 30/197) and an NDDI-E score ≥17 in 51.2% of patients with PNES ± epilepsy (21/41), moderate to severe symptoms of generalized anxiety (GAD-7 ≥10) in 20.3% of PWE (40/197) and 56.1% of patients with PNES (23/41), and a high risk of suicidality (NDDI-E item 4 ≥3) in 8.1% of PWE (16/197) and in 24.4% of patients with PNES (10/41). The most frequently given recommendations regarding depression or anxiety were a psychiatric/psychotherapeutic treatment for PWE and an admission to the psychotherapy ward of the epilepsy center for patients with PNES. No evidence for active suicidal tendencies was found in any of the patients with a positive screening for suicidality.

CONCLUSION

Routine screening with NDDI-E and GAD-7 for depression, anxiety and suicidality is efficient and feasible and leads to individual recommendations for further assessment and treatment.

Epilepsy Comorbidities

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the comorbidities of epilepsy and identifies tools to incorporate comorbidity awareness into clinical practice.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The comorbidities of epilepsy are broadly defined, including conditions that may cause but also be a consequence of epilepsy. These can be divided into somatic and psychiatric conditions. Many conditions occur twice as frequently in people with epilepsy compared with the general population. The comorbidities of epilepsy are a major determinant of quality of life and mortality in people with epilepsy. This article provides a concerted focus on the relationship between epilepsy and cognition, mental health disorders, and cardiovascular disease.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

There are practical means of adopting a comorbidity-aware approach to clinical care without overburdening already busy clinical practices. Screening instruments can be used to identify people with comorbid anxiety or depression. Fundamental safety precautions are relevant to all people with epilepsy. Appropriate consideration of the comorbidities of epilepsy, particularly when choosing an antiseizure medication, leads to improved patient care.

Double Stigma: Reluctance to be referred to a psychiatrist among people with epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidities

INTRODUCTION

Psychiatric comorbidities such as depression and anxiety disorders are highly prevalent among people with epilepsy (PWE). These two co-occurring chronic illnesses could lead to double stigma and negatively impact every aspect of psychiatric and epilepsy care for PWE, especially in help-seeking behavior. We aimed to identify the socio-demographic and clinical factors contributing to reluctance to be referred to a psychiatrist among PWE.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Psychological screening was done using the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) and General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire. Patients screened positive were offered psychiatric referrals and given an early psychiatric clinic appointment if they agreed to the referral. The reasons for those who refused the referral were noted.

RESULTS

Out of 585 patients, 91 (15.5 %) were screened positive for depression and/or anxiety. Eighteen patients were excluded from the study due to pre-existing psychiatric disorders. Of the remaining 73 patients, 23 (31.5 %) agreed to be referred to a psychiatrist. Only 17 (23.3 %) attended the psychiatrist appointment. A total of 11 (15.1 %) and one (1.4 %) patients were subsequently diagnosed with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder, respectively. Another 50 (68.5 %) patients were not referred to a psychiatrist, predominantly (n = 43, 58.9 %) due to reluctance to be referred to a psychiatrist. The reasons included avoidance of referral likely related to stigma (n = 22, 51.2 %), self-reliance, family and caregivers' disapproval of referral, and logistic difficulty. The mean scores in NDDI-E and GAD-7 in the referred group were higher than the not-referred group but not statistically significant (NDDI-E: 17.8 ± 3.6 vs. 16.5 ± 2.5, p = 0.072; GAD-7: 12.4 ± 5.70 vs. 9.8 ± 5.4, p = 0.061).

CONCLUSION

A significant number of PWE were reluctant to receive psychiatric referrals predominantly due to self-avoidance or family and caregiver disapproval of referral likely related to stigma. An integrated epilepsy care management model is recommended.

Distinct comorbidity phenotypes among post-9/11 Veterans with epilepsy are linked to diverging outcomes and mortality risks

OBJECTIVE

To investigate phenotypes of comorbidity before and after an epilepsy diagnosis in a national cohort of post-9/11 Service Members and Veterans and explore phenotypic associations with mortality.

METHODS

Among a longitudinal cohort of Service Members and Veterans receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) from 2002 to 2018, annual diagnoses for 26 conditions associated with epilepsy were collected over 5 years, ranging from 2 years prior to 2 years after the year of first epilepsy diagnosis. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify probabilistic comorbidity phenotypes with distinct health trajectories. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of each phenotype. Fine and Gray cause-specific survival models were used to measure mortality outcomes for each phenotype up to 2021.

RESULTS

Six distinct phenotypes were identified: (1) relatively healthy, (2) post-traumatic stress disorder, (3) anxiety and depression, (4) chronic disease, (5) bipolar/substance use disorder, and (6) polytrauma. Accidents were the most common cause of death overall, followed by suicide/mental health and cancer, respectively. Each phenotype exhibited unique associations with mortality and cause of death, highlighting the differential impact of comorbidity patterns on patient outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE

By delineating clinically meaningful epilepsy comorbidity phenotypes, this study offers a framework for clinicians to tailor interventions. Moreover, these data support systems of care that facilitate treatment of epilepsy and comorbidities within an interdisciplinary health team that allows continuity of care. Targeting treatment toward patients with epilepsy who present with specific heightened risks could help mitigate adverse outcomes and enhance overall patient care.

Screening for depression in patients with epilepsy: same questions but different meaning to different patients

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy (NDDI-E), a 6-item epilepsy-specific PROM, is used to screen for major depressive disorder symptoms for patients with epilepsy (PWE). The validity and interpretation of PROMs can be affected by differential item functioning (DIF), which occurs when subgroups of patients with the same underlying health status respond to and interpret questions about their health status differently. This study aims to determine whether NDDI-E items exhibit DIF and to identify subgroups of PWE that exhibit DIF in NDDI-E items.

METHODS

Data were from the Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program database, a clinical registry of adult PWE in Calgary, Canada. A tree-based partial credit model based on recursive partitioning (PCTree) was used to identify subgroups that exhibit DIF on NDDI-E items using patients' characteristics as covariates. Differences in the identified subgroups were characterized using multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 1,576 patients in this cohort, 806 (51.1%) were female, and the median age was 38.0 years. PCTree identified four patient subgroups defined by employment status, age, and sex. Subgroup 1 were unemployed patients ≤ 26 years old, subgroup 2 were unemployed patients > 26 years, subgroup 3 were employed females, while subgroup 4 were employed male patients. The subgroups exhibited significant differences on education level, comorbidity index scores, marital status, type of epilepsy, and driving status.

CONCLUSION

PWE differed in their interpretation and responses to questions about their depression symptoms, and these differences were a function of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Systematic literature review of the humanistic and economic burden of focal epilepsy and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in adults

This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed the humanistic and economic burden of focal epilepsy and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in adults to evaluate these domains in both populations and identify evidence gaps to inform future research. A search was conducted on December 7, 2022, using MEDLINE and Embase to identify studies published from 2012 onwards reporting humanistic burden (patient-reported or caregiver-reported outcomes or utilities, qualitative evaluations), economic burden (productivity loss, caregiver and societal costs of epilepsy), and sleep-related outcomes. Of the 2830 citations identified, 136 were included. Most studies were in the focal epilepsy population; very few studies reported outcomes in the PGTCS population. The presence of epilepsy-specific instruments varied based on the domain evaluated. Epilepsy exerted considerable humanistic and economic burden. Indicators of poor disease control (e.g., high seizure frequency, resistance to anti-seizure medications, polypharmacy) increased epilepsy burden. Seizure frequency and type, disease severity, and polypharmacy also affected work productivity. Adults with epilepsy, particularly focal epilepsy, reported higher indirect costs, more sick days accrued, and early entry into retirement. Caregivers similarly reported high productivity loss and absenteeism related to caregiving duties. The results of this SLR highlight the high humanistic and economic burden of focal epilepsy and PGTCS, although limited data were available for the PGTCS population. The results include patient-reported outcome data specific to focal epilepsy and PGTCS, expanding the limited humanistic burden evidence identified in previous reviews, and show the effect of poor disease control on individuals' lives and as a driver of indirect costs. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Our systematic literature review identified studies that evaluated the impact of focal epilepsy and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures on patients and their caregivers. We found that focal epilepsy negatively impacted patients' mental health and sleep and was associated with higher indirect costs and lower work productivity in people with more severe disease. The impact of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures on patients was rarely reported, and future research is needed.

Health utilities of patients with epilepsy in a Canadian population

OBJECTIVE

Health state utilities are required to obtain quality adjusted life years, a common metric that informs clinical decision-making at individual, group, and health policy levels. Health state utilities are different from health-related quality of life, and their distribution across patients with epilepsy, as well as the factors that impact them, have not been studied in depth. We aimed to describe the distribution of health state utilities in people with epilepsy and the impact of different combinations of clinical and demographic factors on health state evaluation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients' data prospectively collected in the Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program registry. Patient-reported health state utilities were measured using the 5-level EuroQol 5-Dimension scale (EQ-5D-5L) completed at their initial assessment. EQ-5D-5L index scores were derived via the time trade-off approach based on Canadian norms, and their distribution across different health states and patient characteristics was obtained. The Tobit regression model was used to evaluate the determinants of EQ-5D-5L index scores.

RESULTS

Of 1446 patients included in this analysis, 724 (50.5%) were female. The median (interquartile range) Canada-normed EQ-5D-5L index score was .87 (.71-.91). Patients with significantly lower health utilities were more likely to be female (p = .008), to be older (p = .034), to be unmarried (p = .013), to have failed to achieve 1-year seizure freedom (p < .001), to have no postsecondary education (p = .028), to be depressed (p < .001), to have antiseizure medication side effects (p = .001), to be unemployed (p < .001), and to be unable to drive (p < .001). A look-up table of health utilities based on combinations of clinical-demographic characteristics was produced.

SIGNIFICANCE

Health utility estimates for combinations of different health states in people with epilepsy attending specialty clinics are now available. These can help guide clinical decision-making in routine clinical practice, economic evaluations of treatment interventions, and health care policies.

Mental health and quality of life of individuals with epilepsy during the war in Ukraine

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the repercussions of the war in Ukraine on people with epilepsy (PWE), focusing on access to health care, seizure control, quality of life (QoL), psychological distress, anxiety, and depression; and to identify the key factors influencing these measures.

METHODS

Consecutive PWE, ≥18 years of age, presenting to one of seven health centers across Ukraine were invited to complete a self-administered survey in 2023. The survey gathered information on clinical and demographic aspects, geographic displacement, and access to care and medications. It also contained five valid questionnaires exploring psychological distress (Kessler-10), QoL with the EuroQOL-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), depression with the Neurological Disorders in Epilepsy scale (NDDIE), anxiety with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scalae-Anxiety (HADS-A), and epilepsy severity with the Global Assessment of the Severity of Epilepsy scale (GASE). Multivariate linear regression models assessed the relationship between measures of mental health and QoL and their potential predictors. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of NAMS of Ukraine, Ukraine.

RESULTS

Among 305 participants (mean age 38 years), 40% were female and 44% had to change residence because of the war. Seizures worsened during the war in 52% of those with active epilepsy and 42% of those with well-controlled epilepsy. Difficulties accessing health care and anti-seizure medications occurred in 25% and 34% of PWE, respectively, and was worse among those who were displaced. According to the mental health instruments, 46% suffered psychological distress, 62% experienced anxiety, 50% were depressed, and 59% rated their epilepsy as somewhat severe or worse. Statistically significant predictors of psychological distress, anxiety, and depression included female gender, more severe epilepsy, increased seizures during the war, and requiring mental health support.

SIGNIFICANCE

The war significantly disrupted access to health care and availability of medication in PWE, who suffer from significant anxiety, depression, and psychological distress. We identify high-risk factors that can guide resource allocation for prevention and treatment.

Risk of suicide and suicide-related events in subjects treated with antiseizure medications

INTRODUCTION

In the United States, it is reported that 1.4% of the general population commits suicide. It has been postulated that antiseizure medications (ASMs) can lead to the development of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior; however, this risk is still very low and has yet to be precisely established.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review evaluates the risk of suicide-related events (SREs) in subjects taking ASMs for various neurological disorders. Screening tools for suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior are also discussed. References for this article were found using PubMed/MEDLINE.

EXPERT OPINION

Although some ASMs can be associated with SREs, this is not yet clearly established. The mechanisms involved in suicide risk in subjects taking ASMs are multifactorial. The bidirectional relationship between depression and epilepsy, as well as other associations, should be kept in mind when interpreting any impact of ASMs in PWE. Screening for SREs, close monitoring of subjects taking ASMs are the most appropriate strategies to minimize suicide risk. More efforts should be made to achieve accurate risk stratification through prognostic models that could be applied to subjects taking ASMs. Studies exploring the association between ASMs and suicide should consider ASMs individually and control for prior SREs.

Quality of life during usual epilepsy care for anxiety or depression symptoms: Secondary patient-reported outcomes in a randomized trial of remote assessment methods

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anxiety and depression are highly prevalent and impactful in epilepsy. American Academy of Neurology quality measures emphasize anxiety and depression screening and quality of life (QOL) measurement, yet usual epilepsy care QOL and anxiety/depression outcomes are poorly characterized. The main objective was to assess 6-month QOL, anxiety and depression during routine care among adults with epilepsy and baseline anxiety or depression symptoms; these were prespecified secondary outcomes within a pragmatic randomized trial of remote assessment methods.

METHODS

Adults with anxiety or depression symptoms and no suicidal ideation were recruited from a tertiary epilepsy clinic via an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded process. Participants were randomized 1:1 to 6 month outcome collection via patient portal EHR questionnaires vs. telephone interview. This report focuses on an a priori secondary outcomes of the overall trial, focused on patient-reported health outcomes in the full sample. Quality of life, (primary health outcome), anxiety, and depression measures were collected at 3 and 6 months (Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10, QOLIE-10, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy). Change values and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated. In post-hoc exploratory analyses, patient-reported anxiety/depression management plans at baseline clinic visit and healthcare utilization were compared with EHR-documentation, and agreement was calculated using the kappa statistic.

RESULTS

Overall, 30 participants (15 per group) were recruited and analyzed, of mean age 42.5 years, with 60 % women. Mean 6-month change in QOLIE-10 overall was 2.0(95 % CI -6.8, 10.9), and there were no significant differences in outcomes between the EHR and telephone groups. Mean anxiety and depression scores were stable across follow-up (all 95 % CI included zero). Outcomes were similar regardless of whether an anxiety or depression action plan was documented. During the baseline interview, most participants with clinic visit EHR documentation indicating action to address anxiety and/or depression reported not being offered a treatment(7 of 12 with action plan, 58 %), and there was poor agreement between patient report and EHR documentation (kappa=0.22). Healthcare utilization was high: 40 % had at least one hospitalization or emergency/urgent care visit reported and/or identified via EHR, but a third (4/12) failed to self-report an EHR-identified hospitalization/urgent visit.

DISCUSSION

Over 6 months of usual care among adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms, there was no significant average improvement in quality of life or anxiety/depression, suggesting a need for interventions to enhance routine neurology care and achieve quality of life improvement for this group.

What is the role of screening instruments in the management of psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy? Tools and practical tips for the most common comorbidities: Depression and anxiety

Depression and anxiety are the most common psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy and are known to increase healthcare utilization, the risk of refractory epilepsy, and anti-seizure medication intolerability. Despite this, depression and anxiety continue to be underrecognized and undertreated in people with epilepsy (PWE). Several barriers to the identification of depression and anxiety in PWE exist, including reliance on unstructured interviews rather than standardized, validated instruments. Moreover, there is a dearth of behavioral health providers to manage these comorbidities once identified. The use of validated screening instruments in epilepsy clinics can assist with both the identification of psychiatric symptoms and monitoring of treatment response by the epilepsy clinician for PWE with comorbid depression and/or anxiety. While screening instruments can identify psychiatric symptoms occurring within a specified time, they are not definitively diagnostic. Screeners can be time efficient tools to identify patients requiring further evaluation for diagnostic confirmation. This article reviews recent literature on the utility of depression and anxiety screening instruments in epilepsy care, including commonly used screening instruments, and provides solutions for potential barriers to clinical implementation. Validated depression and anxiety screening instruments can increase identification of depression and anxiety and guide epilepsy clinician management of these comorbidities which has the potential to positively impact patient care.

Effect of drug treatment changes and seizure outcomes on depression and suicidality in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate changes in depressive and suicidality status and their relationship with seizure outcomes after the addition or substitution of another antiseizure medication (ASM) in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

METHODS

Seven hundred seventy consecutively enrolled patients were assessed and followed prospectively for seizure outcome and depressive status over a 6-month period after starting treatment with a newly introduced ASM. The Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDIE) was used to screen for depression and suicidality. Correlations of NDDIE results with clinical and treatment-related variables were assessed by using a stepwise logistic regression model.

RESULTS

At baseline, 50% of patients had a positive screening test result for depression and 13% had a positive screening test result for suicidal ideation. A psychiatric comorbidity at baseline was associated with a 2.3 times increased risk of an initially negative NDDIE screening result becoming positive at re-assessment after 6 months. In addition, the number of ASMs taken at baseline correlated with an increased risk of a change in depression screening test results from negative to positive during follow-up, whereas no association was identified with sociodemographic and epilepsy-related variables, including seizure outcomes. Approximately 6% of patients who were initially negative at screening for suicidal ideation became positive at the 6-month re-assessment. The risk of switch from a negative to a positive screening test result for suicidal ideation was increased more than two-fold in individuals who screened positive for depression at baseline, and was unrelated to the type of ASM introduced, sociodemographic variables, or seizure outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE

Almost 1 in 5 adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who screen negative for depression become positive when re-assessed 6 months after a treatment change. At re-assessment 6 months later, 6.1% who screen initially negative for passive suicidal ideation become positive. These changes in screening status are independent of type of ASM introduced or seizure outcomes but correlate with psychiatric status at baseline.

A pilot predictive model based on COVID-19 data to assess suicidal ideation indirectly

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on the mental health of the population. Many studies reported high levels of psychological distress and rising rates of suicidal ideation (SI). Data on a range of psychometric scales from 1790 respondents were collected in Slovenia through an online survey between July 2020 and January 2021. As a worrying percentage (9.7%) of respondents reported having SI within the last month, the goal of this study was to estimate the presence of SI, as indicated by the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS). The estimation was based on the change of habits, demographic features, strategies for coping with stress, and satisfaction with three most important aspects of life (relationships, finances, and housing). This could both help recognize the telltale factors indicative of SI and potentially identify people at risk. The factors were specifically selected to be discreet about suicide, likely sacrificing some accuracy in return. We tried four machine learning algorithms: binary logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and support vector machines. Logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models achieved comparable performance with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 on previously unseen data. We found an association between various subscales of Brief-COPE and SI; Self-Blame was especially indicative of the presence of SI, followed by increase in Substance Use, low Positive Reframing, Behavioral Disengagement, dissatisfaction with relationships and lower age. The results showed that the presence of SI can be estimated with reasonable specificity and sensitivity based on the proposed indicators. This suggests that the indicators we examined have a potential to be developed into a quick screening tool that would assess suicidality indirectly, without unnecessary exposure to direct questions on suicidality. As with any screening tool, subjects identified as being at risk, should be further clinically examined.

Telemedicine for Individuals with epilepsy: Recommendations from International League Against Epilepsy Telemedicine Task Force

Worldwide, People with Epilepsy (PWE) are confronted with several barriers to face-to-face consultations. These obstacles hamper appropriate clinical follow-up and also increase the treatment gap for Epilepsy. Telemedicine holds the potential to enhance management as follow-up visits for PWE are focused on more on clinical history and counselling rather than physical examination. Besides consultation, telemedicine can also be used for remote EEG diagnostics and tele-neuropsychology assessments. In this article, the Telemedicine Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) outlines recommendations regarding optimal practice in utilizing in the management of individuals with epilepsy. We formulated recommendations for minimum technical requirements, preparing for the first tele-consultation and the specificities for follow-up consultations. Special considerations are necessary for specific populations, including paediatric patients, patients who are not conversant with tele-medicine and those with intellectual disability. Telemedicine for individuals with epilepsy should be vigorously promoted with the aim of improving the quality of care and ultimately reduce the wide clinician access related treatment gap across several regions of the globe.

Suicidality and epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

We aimed to evaluate the association between epilepsy and suicidality, including suicidal ideation, attempts and completed suicide.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Online Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov from 1946 to June 21, 2021 and assessed the quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We calculated the pooled OR and the crude rate for suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and completed suicide in patients with epilepsy (PWE).

Results

We screened 2,786 studies and included 88 articles with 1,178,401 PWE and 6,900,657 participants as controls. Search terms included epilepsy and suicide. The pooled rates of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and completed suicide in PWE were 19.73% (95% CI: 17.00-22.62%), 5.96% (95% CI: 4.82-7.20%), and 0.24% (95% CI: 0.11-0.42%), respectively. Compared to the control group, PWE were at a significantly higher risk of total suicidality (pooled OR, 2.60; 95%: 2.13-3.18), including suicidal ideation (pooled OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.21-3.30), suicide attempts (pooled OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 2.08-3.61) and completed suicide (pooled OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.45-3.83). Subgroup analyses showed significant differences in the subgroups of the measurement of suicidality.

Conclusion

The rate of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and completed suicide in PWE were about 19.73, 5.96, and 0.24%. And there was an increased risk of suicidality in PWE especially temporal lobe epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy. Clinicians need to be aware of this risk in PWE with early identification and prevention at the time of diagnosis.Protocol Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021278220.

Psychiatric comorbidities among people with epilepsy: A population-based assessment in disadvantaged communities

Psychiatric disorders are frequent among people with epilepsy but often under-recognized. The diagnosis and treatment of these disorders in low- and low-middle-income countries (LMICs) are challenging.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey included people recruited during a community epilepsy screening program involving 59,509 individuals from poor communities in Ludhiana in Northwest India. Adults (age ≥18 years) with confirmed epilepsy on antiseizure medications were screened for depression and anxiety using the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) twice over two years of follow-up. They were later interviewed for symptoms using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, which was then confirmed by assessments by an experienced psychiatrist.

RESULTS

Of the 240 people with confirmed epilepsy, 167 (70%) were adults, of whom, 116 (70%) eventually participated in the study. The NDDI-E with a cut-off of 15 identified depression in 14 (12%) of 116 people after one year of follow-up and 17 (15%) at two years. The GAD-7 using a cut-off of 6 identified 22 (19%) at one year and 32 (28%) with anxiety at two years. The area under the curves for NDDI-E was estimated as 0.62 (_95%CI, 0.51-0.73; SE: 0.06; p = 0.04) and for GAD-7 as 0.62 (_95%CI, 0.46-0.78; SE: 0.08; p = 0.12). Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale identified 63 (54%) people with psychiatric symptoms, for whom, a psychiatric diagnosis was confirmed in 60 (52%). A psychiatric diagnosis was associated with education below high school [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.59, _95%CI, 1.12-5.1; p = 0.03], later age of seizure onset (OR, 1.05, _95%CI: 1.0-1.10; p = 0.04), seizure frequency of at least one/year at enrolment (OR, 2.36, _95%CI: 1.0-5.58; p = 0.05) and the use of clobazam (OR, 5.09, _95%CI, 1.40-18.42; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Depression and anxiety are common in people with epilepsy. Our findings underscore the low yields of screening instruments, NDDI-E and GAD-7, and comparatively better professionally-administered diagnostic assessments in resource-limited settings in LMICs. Moreover, previously established cut-offs do not apply to the community studied.

Patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal versus telephone: a pragmatic randomized pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy

Objective

To close gaps between research and clinical practice, tools are needed for efficient pragmatic trial recruitment and patient-reported outcome collection. The objective was to assess feasibility and process measures for patient-reported outcome collection in a randomized trial comparing electronic health record (EHR) patient portal questionnaires to telephone interview among adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms.

Materials and Methods

Recruitment for the randomized trial began at an epilepsy clinic visit, with EHR-embedded validated anxiety and depression instruments, followed by automated EHR-based research screening consent and eligibility assessment. Fully eligible individuals later completed telephone consent, enrollment, and randomization. Participants were randomized 1:1 to EHR portal versus telephone outcome assessment, and patient-reported and process outcomes were collected at 3 and 6 months, with primary outcome 6-month retention in EHR arm (feasibility target: ≥11 participants retained).

Results

Participants (N = 30) were 60% women, 77% White/non-Hispanic, with mean age 42.5 years. Among 15 individuals randomized to EHR portal, 10 (67%, CI 41.7%-84.8%) met the 6-month retention endpoint, versus 100% (CI 79.6%-100%) in the telephone group (P = 0.04). EHR outcome collection at 6 months required 11.8 min less research staff time per participant than telephone (5.9, CI 3.3-7.7 vs 17.7, CI 14.1-20.2). Subsequent telephone contact after unsuccessful EHR attempts enabled near complete data collection and still saved staff time.

Discussion

In this randomized study, EHR portal outcome assessment did not meet the retention feasibility target, but EHR method saved research staff time compared to telephone.

Conclusion

While EHR portal outcome assessment was not feasible, hybrid EHR/telephone method was feasible and saved staff time.

Psychometric properties of the Lithuanian version of the NDDI-E in persons with epilepsy and suicidal ideation

BACKGROUND

Suicidality and depression are associated with worse epilepsy outcomes, but their screening in routine clinical practice remains insufficient and may improve with the validation of brief and accessible psychometric tools. We explored the psychometric properties of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) in the Lithuanian population, which has one of the highest suicide rates globally.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional anonymous survey among adult outpatients visiting a tertiary epilepsy clinic in Vilnius, Lithuania. People with epilepsy (PWE) provided demographic and clinical information and completed the Geriatric depression scale (GDS), the Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), the Beck depression inventory (BDI), the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) and the Generalized anxiety scale-7 (GAD-7). Suicidal ideation was defined as a non-zero score on the suicide item of the BDI and clinically relevant levels of depression - as a total BDI score of >16. Psychometric properties of the NDDI-E were evaluated by measuring its internal consistency, dimensionality, correlation with other depression scales, and by conducting receiver operating characteristic analysis for the detection of suicidal ideation and symptoms of depression.

RESULTS

The study sample consisted of 246 PWE (average age 39.9 ± 16.3 years, 101 [41.1%] male), of them 31 (12.6%) and 41 (19.5% of those who completed the BDI) were identified with suicidal ideation or significant symptoms of depression, respectively. On average, PWE scored 10.4 ± 4.2 points on the NDDI-E. The instrument had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.863, n = 235), item-item and item-total correlation (>0.30). In factor analysis, its items comprised a single factor distinct from the GAD-7. The NDDI-E strongly correlated with other depression scales (r = 0.657 [GDS, n = 201], r = 0.657 [BDI, n = 201], r = 0.623 [HADS-D, n = 231], p < 0.001 for all). The NDDI-E had good diagnostic properties in discerning suicidal ideation (AUC = 0.858, 95%CI = 0.791-0.925). The isolated suicide item of the NDDI-E had acceptable properties in detecting suicidal ideation (AUC = 0.821, 95%CI = 0.724-0.918) as well.

CONCLUSION

The Lithuanian NDDI-E was shown to have good psychometric properties comparable to other versions of this scale. The NDDI-E is endorsed as a short and accessible instrument for estimating suicidal ideation among Lithuanian PWE.

I would be better off dead: investigating suicidal ideation in people with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

It is known that the risk of suicidal behavior in adult people with epilepsy (PWEs) is high. However, the associated clinical and psychosocial factors are still being discussed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of suicide in PWEs and relate it to resilience and quality of life (QoL) as well as with clinical variables.

METHODS

The item "I'd be better off dead" of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) was related to the resilience scale, clinical aspects, the presence of depression, and the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) scores of PWEs, with a p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 271 PWEs were assessed, 50.6% were female, with a mean age of 46.6 (± 15.8) years, and a mean age at 1st seizure of 24.1 (± 18.5) years. Risk for suicide occurred in 50 (19.3%) cases. In multiple logistic regression, the factors that explain the risk of suicide were female sex, depression, and lower scores on the QOLIE-31 and on the resilience scale. In the classification and regression trees, the order of importance of the variables was depression > resilience > age > QoL > age at 1st seizure.

CONCLUSION

The risk of suicide was high, and it was associated with demographic aspects, clinical variables, QoL, and resilience. A higher risk of suicide was associated with lower resilience regardless of the presence or absence of depression. In the presence of depression, a higher risk of suicide was associated with the early onset of epilepsy. In the absence of depression, the risk of suicide was associated with low QoL in young adults.

Suicide and Epilepsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Epilepsy has a bidirectional association with suicidality, and epilepsy patients are at much higher risk for suicide than the general population. This article reviews the recent literature on suicide risk factors, assessments, and management as they pertain specifically to suicidality in people with epilepsy, a population that requires unique considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Risk factors for suicidality include younger age (independent of comorbid psychiatric disorders), poor social support, psychiatric comorbidity (depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and alcohol use), and epilepsy-related factors (more frequent seizures, temporal lobe epilepsy, and drug-resistant epilepsy). Most clinicians agree with the need for addressing suicidality; however, there is inconsistency in the approach to caring for these patients. An example neurology clinic-based approach is outlined. Although PWE are at risk for suicide and risk factors have been characterized, care gaps remain. Screening strategies may help close these gaps.

Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Comorbidities in Epilepsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses psychiatric and cognitive comorbidities of epilepsy over the lifespan and illustrates opportunities to improve the quality of care of children and adults with epilepsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

One in 3 people with epilepsy have a lifetime history of psychiatric disorders, and they represent an important prognostic marker of epilepsy. Contributors are diverse and display a complex relationship. Cognitive comorbidities are also common among those living with epilepsy and are increasingly recognized as a reflection of changes to underlying brain networks. Among the cognitive comorbidities, intellectual disability and dementia are common and can complicate the diagnostic process when cognitive and/or behavioral features resemble seizures.

SUMMARY

Comorbidities require consideration from the first point of contact with a patient because they can determine the presentation of symptoms, responsiveness to treatment, and the patient's day-to-day functioning and quality of life. In epilepsy, psychiatric and cognitive comorbidities may prove a greater source of disability for the patient and family than the seizures themselves, and in the case of essential comorbidities, they are regarded as core to the disorder in terms of etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Positive anxiety or depression screen despite ongoing antidepressant prescription in people with epilepsy: A large cross-sectional analysis

Purpose

While antidepressants are recommended to manage anxiety or depression in epilepsy, limited effectiveness data exist in real-world epilepsy samples, and prior work indicated frequent positive screens despite antidepressant prescription. In response, this study evaluates factors associated with positive anxiety or depression screen during ongoing antidepressant prescription.

Methods

Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were collected among consecutive adult epilepsy clinic patients completing validated anxiety and depression instruments. The sample was divided by presence vs absence of existing antidepressant prescription at time of screening. Among those on an antidepressant, multivariable logistic regression was performed on pre-selected characteristics to evaluate for association with positive anxiety and/or depression screen. Pre-selected characteristics included: antidepressant dose, antidepressant prescriber specialty, antiseizure medications (number, potential psychotropic effects), seizure frequency, employment, visit no-shows, and medical insurance.

Results

Of 563 people with epilepsy, 152 had evidence of antidepressant prescription at time of screening and 73/152(48%) had positive anxiety and/or depression screen. Multivariable modeling demonstrated low antidepressant dose and no-show visit(s) were associated with positive screens (adjusted OR 2.29, CI 1.00-5.48 and 3.11, 1.26-8.22 respectively).

Conclusion

Low antidepressant dose and factors potentially associated with adherence (visit no-shows) may contribute to persistent anxiety and/or depression among epilepsy patients on an antidepressant.

Point prevalence of depression in persons with active epilepsy and impact of methodological moderators: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the pooled prevalence of depression in persons with epilepsy and assess the methodological moderators affecting the prevalence estimates.

METHODS

Five electronic databases PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, WHO Global Index Medicus, and Clinicaltrial.gov were searched for studies reporting prevalence of depression in PWE ≥ 18 years of age in any setting.

RESULTS

Out of 13,873 studies, after deduplication and screening, 56 studies with 10,527 PWE met the eligibility criteria. The overall pooled prevalence of depression in PWE was 32% (95%confidence interval [CI] 28-35%) and significant heterogeneity (Chi-square = 1171.53, p = 0.00; τ² = 0.02; I² = 94.36%). Prevalence has doubled in the recent years (16% in 2000-2005 vs. 35% in 2016-2020), was higher in Asia than in Europe (coefficient 0.899, 95%CI: 0.809-0.999; p = 0.049). Among assessment methods, prevalence was highest in HAM-D scale (54%, 95%CI: 27-82%) and lowest in MINI (22%, 95%CI: 19-26%). Sensitivity analysis also corroborated findings when MINI was excluded (35%, 95%CI: 31-38%).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of PWE have depression. Though there is substantial heterogeneity due to various methodological moderators, it is unlikely to affect the routine screening of PWE for depression. Use of a screening tool should be based on ease of administration, and cutoff selection should ensure identification of minimal depression as well.

Depression and suicidality among Hispanics with epilepsy: Findings from the Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network integrated database

OBJECTIVE

Although psychiatric disorders are more common among people with epilepsy,² depression and suicidal ideation among Hispanics with epilepsy remain understudied. We examined the prevalence and correlates of depression and suicidal ideation among Hispanic adults with epilepsy who participated in self-management studies in the Managing Epilepsy Well³ Network.

METHODS

This cross-sectional analysis of pooled data from ten studies used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9⁴ or Neurological Disease Depression Inventory-Epilepsy⁵ to examine the prevalence of elevated depressive symptoms (PHQ ≥ 10, NDDI-E ≥ 15) and suicidal ideation (PHQ-9 item 9 ≥ 1, NDDI-E item 4 ≥ 2). Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models examined associations between ethnicity, elevated depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among PWE. Secondary analyses examined correlates of elevated depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation among Hispanic PWE.

RESULTS

Of 559 participants, 49.6% (n = 277) were Hispanic. Elevated depressive symptoms were endorsed by 38.1% (n = 213) of all participants (32.5% of Hispanics); suicidal ideation was endorsed by 18.4% (n = 103) of all participants (16.3% of Hispanics). After adjustment for sociodemographic and health attributes, Hispanic PWE had a 44% lower prevalence of elevated depressive symptoms (OR = 0.56, CI 0.37-0.84, p = 0.0056) compared to non-Hispanics but similar rates of suicidal ideation (OR = 0.84, CI 0.45-1.58, p = 0.59). Acculturation measures were available for 256 (92.4%) of Hispanic PWE: language preference was Spanish for 62.9%, 46.1% were foreign-born. Spanish-speaking Hispanics were less likely than English-speaking Hispanics to report elevated depressive symptoms (OR = 0.43, CI 0.19-0.97, p = 0.041); however, Hispanics who reported fair or poor health status had a four-fold higher depression prevalence compared to those who reported excellent or very good health status [reference group] (OR = 4.44, CI 1.50-13.18, p = 0.0071). Of the Hispanics who provided prior 30-day seizure data, ≥1 monthly seizure was independently associated with higher depression prevalence (OR = 3.11, CI 1.29-7.45, p = 0.01). Being foreign-born was not associated with elevated depressive symptoms or suicidal ideation prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, geographically diverse sample of PWE, elevated depressive symptoms were significantly lower in Hispanics compared to non-Hispanics. Spanish language preference was associated with a lower prevalence of elevated depressive symptoms among Hispanic PWE. Future studies should include acculturation data to better screen for depression and suicidal ideation risk and optimize interventions for Hispanic PWE.

The use of patient-reported measures in epilepsy care: the Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program experience

The regular use of patient-reported measures (PRMs) has been associated with greater patient satisfaction and outcomes. In this article, we will review the Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program's successful experience with PRMs in both clinical and research settings, as well as our current challenges and future directions. Our experience will illustrate that is feasible and convenient to implement PRMs, and especially electronic PRMs (ePRMs), into epilepsy clinics. These PRMs have direct clinical and research applications. They inform clinical decision making through readily interpretable scales to which clinicians can expeditiously respond. Equally, they are increasingly forming an integral and central component of intervention and outcomes-based research. However, implementation studies are necessary to address knowledge gaps and facilitate adoption and dissemination of this approach. A natural symbiosis of the clinical and research realms is precision medicine. The foundations of precision-based interventions are now being set whereby we can maximize the quality of life and psychosocial functioning on an individual level. As illustrated in this article, this exciting prospect crucially depends on the routine use of ePRMs in the everyday care of people with epilepsy. Increasing ePRMs uptake will clearly be a catalyst propelling precision epilepsy from aspiration to clinical reality.

Understanding long-term changes in patient identity 15-20 years after surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Following epilepsy surgery, patients can experience complex psychosocial changes. We recently described a longer term adjustment and reframing ("meaning-making") process 15-20 years following surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy, which could involve an ongoing sense of being a "different" person for some patients. Here, we quantitatively examine identity at long-term follow-up and how this relates to meaning-making and postoperative seizure outcome.

METHODS

Eighty-seven participants were included: 39 who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) 15-20 years ago (59% female; median age = 49.2 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 10; median follow-up = 18.4 years, IQR = 4.4) and 48 surgically naïve focal epilepsy patients (56% female; median age = 34.5 years, IQR = 19). We captured approach to meaning-making by coding for key narrative features identified in our previous qualitative work. Nonparametric tests and correspondence analysis were then used to explore relationships between a quantitative measure of identity and meaning-making, as well as seizure outcome, mood, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

RESULTS

Patients 15-20 years post-ATL demonstrated a shift toward increasing identity commitment and exploration compared to the surgically naïve cohort, with this shift significantly linked to seizure outcome. Examining the relationship between identity and meaning-making also revealed three groups: (1) those who embraced self-change (29%), (2) those who continued to struggle with this process (60.5%), and (3) those who showed minimal engagement (10.5%). Those who "embraced change" were significantly younger at regular seizure onset and demonstrated a trend toward higher HRQOL.

SIGNIFICANCE

Findings suggest that ATL patients show a more developed identity profile compared to surgically naïve controls; however, the majority still struggled with postoperative identity change at long-term follow-up. Approximately one third of patients demonstrated positive psychological growth following surgery, reflected in the ability to embrace change. Findings highlight the importance of understanding the impact of surgery on patient identity to maximize the psychosocial benefits.

Factors associated with suicidal ideation in an epilepsy center in Northern New England

Suicidal ideation (SI), defined as thoughts and feelings of ending one's life, is a known risk factor for completed suicide. Although studies show that rates of SI are elevated in persons with epilepsy (PWE) compared to the general population, it is presently unclear how disease, social, and psychological factors contribute to its frequency and severity. With an overarching goal to develop a screening tool for suicide prevention, the objective of this study was to understand the rate, severity, and factors associated with SI in a large cohort of PWE. A generalized linear mixed model was used to test the relationship between changes in SI and disease, social, and psychological variables in 2450 PWE over a period of four years. The prevalence of SI was 23.6%. Associated disease factors included increased seizure frequency, severity, and recency. SI was impacted by employment status, but not by driving. Depression scores and aggression were highly associated with frequency and severity of SI. These findings highlight that disease, social, and psychological factors impact levels of SI in PWE and that screening for suicide prevention in PWE should include measures of such factors.

Young adults with epilepsy: Relationships between psychosocial variables and anxiety, depression, and suicidality

BACKGROUND

People with epilepsy (PWE) are at an increased risk of anxiety, depression, and suicidality. Young adulthood is a critical developmental period which can be complicated by the unique challenges of having epilepsy. The risk factors of mental health difficulties in young adults with epilepsy (YAWE) have not been investigated.

AIMS

To examine the relationships between psychosocial variables (coping strategies and sources of social support) and mental health outcomes in YAWE, and determine whether these psychosocial variables independently predict mental health outcomes after controlling for sociodemographic and epilepsy-related factors.

METHOD

An online survey was completed by 144 YAWE (18-25-year-olds), which measured sociodemographic and epilepsy-related factors, coping strategies, sources of social support, and current mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression, and suicidality).

RESULTS

Avoidant-focused coping was positively correlated, and problem-focused coping and meaning-focused coping were negatively correlated, with symptoms of anxiety, depression, and suicidality. Social support from family, friends, and a special person all negatively correlated with mental health outcomes. Using multiple regression analyses, greater use of avoidant-focused coping strategies independently predicted higher symptoms of anxiety, depression, and suicidality. Greater support from friends independently predicted significantly lower anxiety and depression, whereas greater support from family independently predicted significantly lower suicidality.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These findings have implications for clinical practice in YAWE and suggest that screening for mental health symptoms and psychosocial variables to identify those at risk would be beneficial. Access to tailored psychological support is also needed.

Managing depression and anxiety in people with epilepsy: A survey of epilepsy health professionals by the ILAE Psychology Task Force

Objectives

The Psychology Task Force of the Medical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has been charged with taking steps to improve global mental health care for people with epilepsy. This study aimed to inform the direction and priorities of the Task Force by examining epilepsy healthcare providers' current practical experiences, barriers, and unmet needs around addressing depression and anxiety in their patients.

Methods

A voluntary 27-item online survey was distributed via ILAE chapters and networks. It assessed practices in the areas of screening, referral, management, and psychological care for depression and anxiety. A total of 445 participants, from 67 countries (68% high income), commenced the survey, with 87% completing all components. Most respondents (80%) were either neurologists or epileptologists.

Results

Less than half of respondents felt adequately resourced to manage depression and anxiety. There was a lack of consensus about which health professionals were responsible for screening and management of these comorbidities. About a third only assessed for depression and anxiety following spontaneous report and lack of time was a common barrier (>50%). Routine referrals to psychiatrists (>55%) and psychologists (>41%) were common, but approximately one third relied on watchful waiting. A lack of both trained mental health specialists (>55%) and standardized procedures (>38%) was common barriers to referral practices. The majority (>75%) of respondents' patients identified with depression or anxiety had previously accessed psychotropic medications or psychological treatments. However, multiple barriers to psychological treatments were endorsed, including accessibility difficulties (52%).

Significance

The findings suggest that while the importance of managing depression and anxiety in patients with epilepsy is being recognized, there are ongoing barriers to effective mental health care. Key future directions include the need for updated protocols in this area and the integration of mental health professionals within epilepsy settings.

Neurologist prescribing versus psychiatry referral: Examining patient preferences for anxiety and depression management in a symptomatic epilepsy clinic sample

OBJECTIVE

Anxiety and depression symptoms in epilepsy are common, impactful and under-recognized and undertreated. While prior survey data suggests equipoise among epileptologists for managing anxiety and/or depression via prescribing in the epilepsy clinic versus psychiatry referral, patient preferences are unknown and should potentially influence practice habits among epileptologists. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to determine patient preference for anxiety and/or depression prescribing by neurologists versus psychiatry referral among an adult epilepsy clinic sample of symptomatic patients.

METHODS

Management preferences for anxiety and/or depression were surveyed in an adult tertiary care epilepsy clinic. Individuals who screened positive for anxiety and/or depression symptoms on validated instruments during a routine care-embedded learning health system study were recruited. Demographics, social variables, psychiatric treatment history, and treatment priorities and preferences were surveyed. Preference was defined as a slightly greater than 2:1 ratio in favor neurology prescribing or psychiatry referral. The study was powered to assess this primary objective using a two-sample binomial test. Multinomial logistic regression examined an a priori multivariable model of treatment preference (secondary objective).

RESULTS

The study sample included N = 63 symptomatic adults, with 64% women and mean age 42.2 years. Most reported past or current treatment for anxiety and/or depression, and treatment for these symptoms was a high or moderate priority among 65.1% of the sample. Neurologist prescribing was preferred in 83.0% (nearly 5:1) over psychiatry referral among those who chose neurology or psychiatry (as opposed to neither of the two; p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.702-0.919). Overall, 69.8% of the total study sample preferred neurology prescribing. Multivariable modeling indicated preference for neither management option (compared with neurologist prescribing) was associated with low overall treatment prioritization and having never received neurologist medication management. None of the factors examined in the a priori multivariable model were associated with selecting psychiatry referral (compared to neurologist prescribing).

CONCLUSION

In this sample, most patients indicated a preference for neurologists to prescribe for anxiety or depression symptoms in the epilepsy clinic. Care models involving neurologist prescribing for anxiety and depression symptoms merit further investigation and potential adoption in clinical practice.

Would people living with epilepsy benefit from palliative care?

Palliative care (PC) is an approach to the care of persons living with serious illness and their families that focuses on improving quality of life and reducing suffering by addressing complex medical symptoms, psychosocial needs, spiritual well-being, and advance care planning. While PC has traditionally been associated with hospice care for persons with cancer, there is now recognition that PC is relevant to many noncancer diagnoses, including neurologic illness, and at multiple points along the illness journey, not just end of life. Despite the recent growth of the field of neuropalliative care there has been scant attention paid to the relevance of PC principles in epilepsy or the potential for PC approaches to improve outcomes for persons living with epilepsy and their families. We believe this has been a significant oversight and that PC may provide a useful framework for addressing the many sources of suffering facing persons living with epilepsy, for engaging patients and families in challenging conversations, and to focus efforts to improve models of care for this population. In this manuscript we review areas of significant unmet needs where a PC approach may improve patient and family-centered outcomes, including complex symptom management, goals of care, advance care planning, psychosocial support for patient and family and spiritual well-being. When relevant we highlight areas where epilepsy patients may have unique PC needs compared to other patient populations and conclude with suggestions for future research, clinical, and educational efforts.

Validation of the Russian version of neurological disorders depression inventory for epilepsy (NDDI-E)

OBJECTIVE

To translate and validate the English version of the Neurologic Depression Disorders Inventory in Epilepsy (NDDI-E) into the Russian language as an instrument for rapid detection of major depressive episodes (MDE) for patients with epilepsy (PWE) from Russian Federation.

METHODS

One hundred and 75 consecutive PWE were included in the study. All patients were assessed with Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI 6.0.0), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Russian version of NDDI-E. Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare PWE with and without MDE. We analyzed internal structural validity, external validity, and receiver operator characteristics.

RESULTS

None of the participants had any difficulties in understanding the questions of NDDI-E. The internal consistency of the inventory was satisfactory (Cronbach's ά = 0.856). Correlation between the NDDI-E and the HADS scores was moderate (r = 0.64, P < 0.001), indicating acceptable external validity. NDDI showed good capacity to detect MDE, with area under the curve of 0.919 (95% CI = 0.868-0.955; standard error: 0.019; P < 0.001). An optimal cut-off point with the highest Yuden's index (J = 0.699) was  > 12. At this point NDDI-E showed sensitivity of 88.16% (95% CI = 78.7%-94.4%), specificity of 81.82% (95% CI = 72.8%-88.9%), positive predictive value of 59.3% (95% CI = 48.8%-69.0%), negative predictive value of 95.8% (95% CI = 92.5%-97.7%).

CONCLUSION

Russian version of NDDI-E is an affordable and fast screening tool with a good combination of sensitivity and specificity.

Comparison of the performance of suicide ideation scales in adult patients with epilepsy in China

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to evaluate and compare the performance of the Chinese version of the Suicide Ideation Scale-Current (SSI-C) and the Suicide Ideation Scale-Worst (SSI-W) as suicide ideation screening tools in patients with epilepsy (PWE).

METHODS

A consecutive sample of Chinese adult PWE recruited from a tertiary hospital completed the SSI-C and SSI-W and the suicidality module of the Chinese version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus 5.0.0.

RESULTS

A total of 260 consecutive PWE were recruited. The area under the curve (AUC) for the SSI-C was 0.831, and the optimal cutoff score was >1 (sensitivity 73%, specificity 91%); for the SSI-W, the AUC was 0.958, and the optimal cutoff score was >2 (sensitivity 94.6%, specificity 87.4%). The AUC for the SSI-W was larger than that for the SSI-C, and the two-factor structure was considered significant.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that the SSI-C and SSI-W had good validity as suicidal ideation screening tools in PWE in southern China and can be recommended for clinical suicidal ideation screening. The SSI-W is a better suicidal ideation screening tool than the SSI-C according to the results of our study.

Psychiatric Comorbidities in People With Epilepsy

Purpose of Review

To review the latest evidence concerning the epidemiology, clinical implications, and management of psychiatric disorders in epilepsy.

Recent Findings

People with epilepsy have a 2-5 times increased risk of developing any psychiatric disorder, and 1 in 3 patients with epilepsy have a lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. Psychiatric comorbidities represent a poor prognostic marker as they have been associated with a poor response to treatment (drugs and surgery), increased morbidity, and mortality. Validated screening instruments are available for mood and anxiety disorders in adults as well as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children with epilepsy.

Summary

All patients with epilepsy should be routinely screened for psychiatric disorder at the onset and at least once a year. Patients with epilepsy and their relatives should be informed of the risk of mental health problems and the implications.

Who is willing to participate in research? A screening model for an anxiety and depression trial in the epilepsy clinic

OBJECTIVE

Anxiety and depression in epilepsy are prevalent, associated with poor outcomes, underrecognized, undertreated, and thus a key area of need for treatment research. The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with research participation among epilepsy clinic patients who screened positive for anxiety or depression. This was accomplished by characterizing clinical and psychiatric factors among patients seen in an epilepsy clinic and evaluating which factors were associated with consent for potential research participation, via a combined clinical and research screening model.

METHODS

In a pragmatic trial of anxiety and depression treatment in epilepsy, individuals with a positive screen for anxiety and/or depression at a routine epilepsy clinic visit were invited to opt-in (via brief electronic consent) to further eligibility assessment for a randomized treatment study. Information on psychiatric symptoms and treatment characteristics were collected for dual clinical care and research screening purposes. Cross-sectional association of demographic, clinical, and psychiatric factors with opting-in to research was analyzed by multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among N = 199 unique adults with a first positive screen for anxiety and/or depression among 786 total screening events, 154 (77.4%) opted-in to further potential research assessment. Higher depression scores and current treatment with an antidepressant were independently associated with opting-in to research (depression odds ratio (OR) = 1.13 per 1-point increase in Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy (NDDI-E) score, p = 0.028, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.26; antidepressant OR = 2.37, p = 0.041, CI: 1.04-5.41). Nearly half of the 199 individuals (43.7%) with anxiety and/or depression symptoms were already being treated with an antidepressant, and 46.7% were receiving neither antidepressant therapy nor mental health specialty care. One-quarter (24.1%) reported a past psychiatric hospitalization, yet only half of these individuals were receiving mental health specialty care.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results demonstrate a high willingness to participate in research using a brief electronic consent approach at a routine clinic visit. Adults with persistent anxiety or depression symptoms despite antidepressant therapy and those with higher depression scores were more willing to consider a randomized treatment study. This has implications for future study design, as individuals already on treatment or those with more severe symptoms are often excluded from traditional research designs. We also found a high burden of psychiatric disease and high prevalence of persistent symptoms despite ongoing antidepressant treatment.

Screening for depression in youth with epilepsy: Psychometric analysis of NDDI-E-Y and NDDI-E in a French population

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy (NDDI-E) for Youth (NDDI-E-Y) for screening for major depressive disorder (MDD) in French youth with epilepsy (YWE), in order to (1) validate this tool in a separate population; (2) determine whether the 12-item NDDI-E-Y affords advantages over the 6-item adult NDDI-E; (3) measure psychometric performance of each item.

METHODS

Youth with epilepsy aged 11-17 years completed a 15-item questionnaire to calculate total scores for NDDI-E-Y (12 items) and NDDI-E (6 items). Gold standard for MDD was Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses for total NDDI-E-Y and NDDI-E scores were compared. Psychometric properties of each item were analyzed for: floor/ceiling effect, item-internal consistency, and ROC curve.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven YWE were included; 21.6% had MDD (CDI > 15). Correlation was very high between total NDDI-E-Y and NDDI-E scores, and high between NDDI-E-Y and CDI. Cutoff point for the NDDI-E-Y maximizing both sensitivity and specificity was 23 (original study cutoff 32). The ROC analysis of the NDDI-E-Y showed an area under the curve (AUC) 0.967 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.909-0.992); (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 100% [83.9; 100], 82.9% [72.5; 90.6], 61.8 [43.6; 77.8], and 100% [94.3; 100], respectively. The NDDI-E-Y was not superior to NDDI-E according to pairwise comparison of ROC (p = 0.07). Psychometric analysis revealed marked differences between items. After eliminating items with poorer performance, a 6-item version of the NDDI-E-Y showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100% [85.5; 100], 85.5% [75.6; 92.5], 65.6 [46.8; 81.4], and 100% [94.5; 100], respectively. This was significantly better than the adult NDDI-E (p = 0.03) though not NDDI-E-Y (p = 0.07).

SIGNIFICANCE

Significant difference in cutoff indicates that the NDDI-E-Y cannot yet be recommended for widespread screening of MDD in YWE. Discrepancies in psychometric performance between items suggest that further work is needed to examine both validation of the original 12-item NDDI-E-Y and comparison with a shorter version.

Should adult neurologists play a role in the management of the most common psychiatric comorbidities? Practical considerations

Despite the high prevalence and negative impact of psychiatric comorbidities on the life of adults with epilepsy, significant unmet mental health care need exists because of a variety of factors, including poor access to mental health care providers. A potential solution to address access barriers is neurologist-driven diagnosis and management of common psychiatric conditions in epilepsy, of which mood and anxiety disorders are the most common. In this manuscript, patient selection criteria and practical treatment strategies are outlined for common mood and anxiety disorders that can be safely managed by neurologists. This article is part of the Special Issue "Obstacles of Treatment of Psychiatric Comorbidities in Epilepsy".

Validation of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDIE) as a rapid suicidality screening tool in Chinese people with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to validate the Chinese version of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDIE) as a suicidality screening tool in Chinese people with epilepsy (PWE).

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of PWE was recruited from West China Hospital and 363 Hospital. Each patient received a psychiatric evaluation with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and the Chinese version of the NDDIE (C-NDDIE). Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted. The best possible cutoff was identified with the highest Youden index. Specificity, sensitivity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Among a total of 355 participants, 41 (11.5%) had a moderate to high suicide risk according to the Suicidality Module (SM) of the MINI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that item 4 ("I'd be better off dead") of the NDDIE had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.930 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.884-0.977), a sensitivity of 80.5%, a specificity of 94.9%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 68.0%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.7%, and the largest Youden index of 0.754 for a cutoff score of >2.

CONCLUSION

Item 4 of the NDDIE is a valuable tool for screening suicidality in Chinese PWE.

Developments in depression in epilepsy: screening, diagnosis, and treatment

INTRODUCTION

Depression is one of the most frequent comorbidities in epilepsy affecting between 17% and 22% of patients, but it is still underdiagnosed and undertreated. Areas covered: This paper discusses recent advances about screening, diagnosis, and treatment of depression in epilepsy taking into account the heterogeneity of clinical scenarios where depression can occur. Expert opinion: A number of screening instruments are now validated for adults with epilepsy, and their psychometric properties are discussed but the NDDI-E is the most practical and cost-effective. Challenges in diagnosing depression in epilepsy are discussed including reasons for the atypical features of mood disorders in epilepsy. Psychological treatments and/or SSRIs are indicated, but the level of evidence is still low. Even if there is no reason to hypothesise that internationally accepted guidelines of treatment of depression outside epilepsy may not be valid, rigorous studies are needed in order to have proper outcome measures. Epilepsy centers should have well-defined care pathways for depression in order to provide access to mental health support when needed.

Promoting faster pathways to surgery: a clinical audit of patients with refractory epilepsy

Background

Individuals with epilepsy who cannot be adequately controlled with anti-epileptic drugs, refractory epilepsy, may be suitable for surgical treatment following detailed assessment. This is a complex process and there are concerns over delays in referring refractory epilepsy patients for surgery and subsequent treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the different patient pathways, referral and surgical timeframes, and surgical and medical treatment options for refractory epilepsy patients referred to two Tertiary Epilepsy Clinics in New South Wales, Australia.

Methods

Clinical records were reviewed for 50 patients attending the two clinics, in two large teaching hospitals (25 in Clinic 1; 25 in Clinic 2. A purpose-designed audit tool collected detailed aspects of outpatient consultations and treatment. Patients with refractory epilepsy with their first appointment in 2014 were reviewed for up to six visits until the end of 2016. Data collection included: patient demographics, type of epilepsy, drug management, and assessment for surgery. Outcomes included: decisions regarding surgical and/or medical management, and seizure status following surgery. Patient-reported outcome measures to assess anxiety and depression were collected in Clinic 1 only.

Results

Patient mean age was 38.3 years (SD 13.4), the mean years since diagnosis was 17.3 years (SD 9.8), and 88.0% of patients had a main diagnosis of focal epilepsy. Patients were taking an average of 2.3 (SD 0.9) anti-epileptic drugs at the first clinic visit. A total of 17 (34.0%) patients were referred to the surgical team and 11 (22.0%) underwent a neuro-surgical procedure. The average waiting time between visit 1 to surgical referral was 38.8 weeks (SD 25.1), and between visit 1 and the first post-operative visit was 55.8 weeks (SD 25.0).

Conclusion

The findings confirm international data showing significant waiting times between diagnosis of epilepsy and referral to specialist clinics for surgical assessment and highlight different approaches in each clinic in terms of visit numbers and recorded activities. A standardised pathway and data collection, including patient-reported outcome measures, would provide better evidence for whether promoting earlier referral and assessment for surgery improves the lives of this disease group.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12883-019-1255-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Integrating the systematic assessment of psychological states in the epilepsy monitoring unit: Concept and compliance

BACKGROUND

Admission to the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) for long-term video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (VEEG) constitutes the gold standard for seizure diagnosis and presurgical evaluation. This study applied the concept of a high-frequency systematic monitoring of psychological states and tested patients' compliance in order to evaluate if its integration in the EMU is feasible and if patients benefit from the graphically underpinned discussion of their EMU stay-related cognitions and emotions.

METHODS

The process-monitoring is technically realized by an internet-based device for data collection and data analysis, the Synergetic Navigation System (SNS). A convenient sample was enrolled: All eligible patients who were admitted to the EMU of the Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Salzburg, Austria, between November 6th 2017 and January 26th 2018 were approached and recruited upon consent. After a short resource-oriented interview, each enrolled patient was provided with a tablet. The daily questionnaire included eight standardized and up to three personalized items. Self-assessments were collected every 5 h prior to meal times (6:30 am, 11:30 am, and 4:30 pm) and at 9:30 pm. The detailed visualizations of the patients' replies were discussed with the participants during a feedback session at the end of the EMU stay.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (12 women/9 men, median age 29 years [range 18-74 years]) were consecutively recruited (72% of all eligible patients). Compliance rates were high (median: 82%, range 60%-100%) among the respondents. Mood correlated strongly with hopefulness (r = 0.71) and moderately with energy (r = 0.63) in all patients. When correlating the intraindividual medians of the process questionnaire time series with the pretest total scores, energy correlated moderately and negatively with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) (r = -0.45), while self-efficacy correlated moderately and negatively with the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) total scores in all patients (r = -0.5). Nine patients (43%) reported that they learned something meaningful about themselves after the feedback discussion of their individual time series.

CONCLUSION

The results support the feasibility of high-frequency monitoring of psychological states and processes in routine EMU settings. Repeated daily collections four times per day of psychological surveys allow for the assessment of highly resolved, equidistant time series data, which gives insight into psychological states and processes during EMU admission.

Major depressive disorder in epilepsy clinics: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although depression is a frequent psychiatric comorbidity in people with epilepsy (PWE), its prevalence has been underestimated. Comorbid depression has negative impacts on treatment outcomes and quality of life (QOL). It also causes various problems in PWE, such as fatigue, irritability, and suicidality. This meta-analysis was performed to estimate the frequency of major depression disorder (MDD) in clinics managing PWE.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS to identify studies. Hospital-based studies and original research presenting information regarding prevalence of MDD, determined using a gold standard diagnostic tool in adult PWE, were considered for inclusion. The prevalence of depression was examined by meta-analysis. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed based on the continent where the selected studies were conducted, the strictness of selection criteria, and gender. Strict selection criteria were defined as any mention of the use of exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 6607 studies were identified by searching the five databases outlined above. After screening and rescreening, 35 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of PWE was 5434. In the test for heterogeneity of the studies, I² was 68.014, and the Cochran Q value was 106.296 (p < 0.01). As a pooled estimate, the point prevalence of MDD in PWE was 21.9% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 20.8-23.0 in a fixed effects model. In subgroup analyses, continent partly explained the heterogeneity among the selected studies, but the strictness of selection criteria did not. The prevalence of MDD was higher in females than in males (26.4% vs. 16.7%, respectively) with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.805 (95% CI: 1.443-2.258; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The point prevalence of MDD is estimated at 21.9% among PWE in epilepsy clinics and is higher in females than in males. Based on this relatively high prevalence in PWE, measures are required to identify and resolve MDD. In addition, the female predominance of MDD among PWE indicates a need to pay greater attention to females. Such efforts may reduce the impact of depression in PWE and improve their QOL.