Dental Considerations in Children with Inherited Bleeding Disorders and Inhibitors: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of various hematological treatment protocols and local hemostatic measures in preventing oral bleeding and other complications during and after dental treatments in children with inherited bleeding disorders and inhibitors. Methods: This study was registered in the PROSPERO database. The comprehensive search strategy for this systematic review was conducted across five databases, namely, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. The search was aimed at identifying relevant literature published from January 2000 up to February 2024. Eligible studies included those with various designs, such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies. Data extraction was carried out systematically, and relevant information on study characteristics, interventions, treatment protocols, local measures, complications, and outcomes was collected. Results: The systematic review included a total of five studies, encompassing participants ranging from ages of 2 to 18 years. These studies varied in their scope, with some focusing on hemophilia A with inhibitors while others addressed broader inherited bleeding disorders. The interventions examined included various prophylactic and treatment measures such as Emicizumab, recombinant factor VIIa, and local hemostatic measures. The study outcomes primarily assessed the efficacy of these interventions in preventing postoperative bleeding and improving quality of life. Emicizumab has significantly shifted the treatment paradigm for children with inherited bleeding disorders and inhibitors. This prophylactic treatment has been associated with a marked reduction in the frequency of bleeding episodes, fewer hospital admissions for bleeding management, and enhanced participation in daily activities. Conclusions: This review highlights gaps in the management of dental care in children with inherited bleeding disorders and inhibitors. It underscores the need for standardized protocols that integrate new prophylactic treatments such as Emicizumab. Our findings suggest that adopting updated protocols can significantly reduce bleeding complications during dental procedures.

[Treatment of haemophilia in Austria]

This guideline is intended to provide practical guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of haemophilia in Austria. Few randomized controlled interventional trials are available addressing the treatment of haemophilia, therefore recommendations are usually based on low level of evidence and represent expert consensus.This guideline is based on the WFH guideline, published in 2020, and adapted according to the national circumstances and experience.It includes recommendations and suggestions for diagnosis and follow-up visits and pharmacological therapies for treatment and prophylaxis. Further topics comprise special aspects in children and adults with severe haemophilia, outcome measurement, and management of trauma, special bleedings and interventions, including dental procedures, inhibitors, management of haemophilia carriers, and psychosocial aspects.

Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in children: early steps in life's journey for people with severe hemophilia A

People with severe hemophilia A usually experience their first bleed early in life. In children with severe hemophilia A, primary prophylaxis is recommended to prevent recurrent and potentially life-threatening bleeds that significantly impact day-to-day life. Factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis is well-established in children and has been shown to reduce the development of hemophilic arthropathy. However, a major challenge of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (FVIII inhibitors). Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) is a human cell line-derived recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) whose immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety have been studied in 167 children with severe hemophilia A across two prospective clinical trials and their long-term extensions. In 105 previously untreated children, the inhibitor rate of 16.2% for high-titer inhibitors (26.7% for all inhibitors) was lower than published rates for hamster cell line-derived rFVIII products. There was no inhibitor development in previously untreated children with non-null F8 mutations and in previously treated children. In a case series of 10 inhibitor patients, 8 (80%) underwent successful immune tolerance induction with simoctocog alfa with a median time to undetectable inhibitor of 3.5 months. In an analysis of 96 children who enrolled in the extension studies and received long-term simoctocog alfa prophylaxis for up to 5 years, median spontaneous, joint, and total annualized bleeding rates were 0.3, 0.4, and 1.8, respectively. No thromboembolisms were reported in any of the 167 children, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Optimal care of children should consider several factors, including minimization of inhibitor development risk, maintaining tolerance to FVIII, highly effective bleed prevention and treatment, safety, and impact on long-term outcomes such as bone and joint health. In this context we review the pediatric clinical data and ongoing studies with simoctocog alfa.

Haemophilia in the era of novel therapies: Where do inhibitors feature in the new landscape?

INTRODUCTION

The advent of therapeutic recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) protein infusions revolutionized the care of persons with haemophilia in the 1990s. It kicked off an era with the increasing use of prophylactic factor infusions for patients and transformed conversations around the ideal trough activity levels as well as the ultimate goals in tailored, individualized care. Our knowledge surrounding the immunologic basis of inhibitor development and treatment derives from a time when patients were receiving frequent factor infusions and focused on immune tolerance induction following inhibitor development.

DISCUSSION

More recently, care was revolutionized again in haemophilia A with the approval of emicizumab, a bispecific antibody mimicking activated FVIII function, to prevent bleeding. The use of emicizumab prophylaxis has resulted in a significantly slower accumulation of factor exposure days and continued effective prophylaxis in the case of inhibitor development. While emicizumab is effective at reducing the frequency of bleeding events in patients with haemophilia A, management of breakthrough bleeds, trauma, and surgeries still requires additional treatment. Ensuring that FVIII is a therapeutic option, particularly for life-threatening bleeding events and major surgeries is critical to optimizing the care of persons with haemophilia A. Other novel non-factor concentrate therapies, including rebalancing agents, will dramatically change the landscape for persons with haemophilia B with inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

This review discusses the changing landscape regarding the timing of inhibitor development and management strategies after inhibitor development, stressing the importance of education across the community to continue to vigilantly monitor for inhibitors and be prepared to treat persons with inhibitors.

Non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

Management of congenital hemophilia A and B is by prophylactic or on-demand replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates. The effects of newer non-clotting factor therapies such as emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab, and fitusiran compared with existing standards of care are yet to be systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (clinical, economic, patient-reported, and adverse outcomes) of non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with congenital hemophilia A or B compared with prophylaxis with clotting factor therapies, bypassing agents, placebo, or no prophylaxis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. The date of the last search was 16 August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating people with congenital hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, who were treated with non-clotting factor therapies to prevent bleeds.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data for the primary outcomes (bleeding rates, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse events) and secondary outcomes (joint health, pain scores, and economic outcomes). We assessed the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) of effect estimates, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs (including 397 males aged 12 to 75 years) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors Four trials (189 participants) compared emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab with on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors. Prophylaxis using emicizumab likely reduced annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for all bleeds (MD -22.80, 95% CI -37.39 to -8.21), treated bleeds (MD -20.40, 95% CI -35.19 to -5.61), and annualized spontaneous bleeds (MD -15.50, 95% CI -24.06 to -6.94), but did not significantly reduce annualized joint and target joint bleeding rates (AjBR and AtjBR) (1 trial; 53 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Fitusiran also likely reduced ABR for all bleeds (MD -28.80, 95% CI -40.07 to -17.53), treated bleeds (MD -16.80, 95% CI -25.80 to -7.80), joint bleeds (MD -12.50, 95% CI -19.91 to -5.09), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -14.80, 95% CI -24.90 to -4.71; 1 trial; 57 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence was available on the effect of bleed prophylaxis using fitusiran versus on-demand therapy on AtjBR. Concizumab may reduce ABR for all bleeds (MD -12.31, 95% CI -19.17 to -5.45), treated bleeds (MD -10.10, 95% CI -17.74 to -2.46), joint bleeds (MD -9.55, 95% CI -13.55 to -5.55), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -11.96, 95% CI -19.89 to -4.03; 2 trials; 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but not target joint bleeds (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.26). Emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an 11.31-fold increase, fitusiran in a 12.5-fold increase, and concizumab in a 1.59-fold increase in the proportion of participants with no bleeds. HRQoL measured using the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) physical and total health scores was improved with emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab prophylaxis (low-certainty evidence). Non-serious adverse events were higher with non-clotting factor therapies versus on-demand therapy, with injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. Transient antidrug antibodies were reported for fitusiran and concizumab. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors Two trials (208 participants) compared emicizumab and fitusiran with on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors. One trial assessed two doses of emicizumab (1.5 mg/kg weekly and 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly). Fitusiran 80 mg monthly, emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week, and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly all likely resulted in a large reduction in ABR for all bleeds, all treated bleeds, and joint bleeds. AtjBR was not reduced with either of the emicizumab dosing regimens. The effect of fitusiran prophylaxis on target joint bleeds was not assessed. Spontaneous bleeds were likely reduced with fitusiran (MD -20.21, 95% CI -32.12 to -8.30) and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (MD -15.30, 95% CI -30.46 to -0.14), but not with emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (MD -14.60, 95% CI -29.78 to 0.58). The percentage of participants with zero bleeds was higher following emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (50% versus 0%), emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (40% versus 0%), and fitusiran prophylaxis (40% versus 5%) compared with on-demand therapy. Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week did not improve Haem-A-QoL physical and total health scores, EQ-5D-5L VAS, or utility index scores (low-certainty evidence) when compared with on-demand therapy at 25 weeks. Emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly may improve HRQoL measured by the Haem-A-QoL physical health score (MD -15.97, 95% CI -29.14 to -2.80) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MD 9.15, 95% CI 2.05 to 16.25; 1 trial; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Fitusiran may result in improved HRQoL shown as a reduction in Haem-A-QoL total score (MD -7.06, 95% CI -11.50 to -2.62) and physical health score (MD -19.75, 95% CI -25.76 to -11.94; 1 trial; 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of serious adverse events in participants without inhibitors also likely did not differ following prophylaxis with either emicizumab or fitusiran versus on-demand therapy (moderate-certainty evidence). Transient antidrug antibodies were reported in 4% (3/80) participants to fitusiran, with no observed effect on antithrombin lowering. A comparison of the different dosing regimens of emicizumab identified no differences in bleeding, safety, or patient-reported outcomes. No case of treatment-related cancer or mortality was reported in any study group. None of the included studies assessed our secondary outcomes of joint health, clinical joint function, and economic outcomes. None of the included studies evaluated marstacimab.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs shows that prophylaxis using non-clotting factor therapies compared with on-demand treatment may reduce bleeding events, increase the percentage of individuals with zero bleeds, increase the incidence of non-serious adverse events, and improve HRQoL. Comparative assessments with other prophylaxis regimens, assessment of long-term joint outcomes, and assessment of economic outcomes will improve evidence-based decision-making for the use of these therapies in bleed prevention.

Longitudinal dynamic changes in factor VIII inhibitor titers in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis

Emicizumab prophylaxis dramatically reduces bleeding events in patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. However, long-term dynamic changes in FVIII inhibitor titers during emicizumab prophylaxis remain to be investigated. We conducted a retrospective follow-up study of FVIII inhibitor titers after initiation of emicizumab prophylaxis in 25 PwHA carrying current or historical FVIII inhibitors. Nineteen PwHA had FVIII inhibitors at initiation of emicizumab prophylaxis (age: median 22 [range 4-60] years and inhibitor titer: 30 [1.0-1450] BU/mL). In 17 of the 19 patients, the inhibitor titers markedly decreased to a median of 1.2 (< 0.6-58) BU/mL at a median follow-up of 71 (38-111) months. In two patients, titers were slightly elevated after initiation of emicizumab but decreased in the long term. The remaining six patients had negative inhibitor status (< 0.6 BU/mL) when switched to emicizumab from FVIII prophylaxis. Five patients maintained negative titers. One patient had inhibitor recurrence, with a peak titer of 1.6 BU/mL that decreased to 0.9 BU/mL. In most cases, FVIII inhibitor titers can be expected to decrease spontaneously during emicizumab prophylaxis, but regular follow-up is necessary to manage breakthrough bleeds.

Paradigm shifts in haemophilia A therapy with emicizumab prophylaxis in Asia

Over the past decade, the development of emicizumab, the first-in-class factor VIII (FVIII), a mimetic monoclonal antibody bispecific to activated factor IX and factor X, has ushered in a significant revolution in non-factor replacement therapy for patients with congenital FVIII deficiency or haemophilia A (HA).

Real-world data on the use of emicizumab in patients with haemophilia A with and without inhibitors in Singapore

Introduction

Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody that mimics the function of factor VIII by binding to factor IXa and factor X to achieve haemostasis in haemophilia A. The long half-life and subcutaneous mode of administration makes emicizumab a compelling treatment option for bleeding prophylaxis. There is still limited real-world data on its use and management considerations, especially during surgical procedures. The objective of the study is to describe the real-world experience of emicizumab in a cohort of adult and paediatric haemophilia A patients in Singapore, including its use in the periprocedural setting.

Method

This was an observational study conducted at the 2 main haemophilia treatment centres in Singapore. All haemophilia A patients who commenced treatment with emicizumab before 1 July 2022 were recruited.

Results

A total of 18 patients with haemophilia A were included in this study. Ten (55.6%) patients had active inhibitors. The median annual bleeding rate for all patients before emicizumab use was 4.5 events (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8-8.3) compared with 0 events (IQR 0-0) after emicizumab was commenced (P=0). There were no adverse events of venous or arterial thrombosis, thrombotic microangiopathy, or death. A total of 6 procedures in 5 patients were performed during the study period with no major bleeding complications.

Conclusion

Emicizumab effectively protects against bleeding in haemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors, including in children less than 12 years old. More studies are required to address clinical nuances, such as periprocedural management and the role of immune tolerance in patients with inhibitors on emicizumab.

A review of the rationale for gene therapy for hemophilia A with inhibitors: one-shot tolerance and treatment?

The therapeutic landscape for people living with hemophilia A (PwHA) has changed dramatically in recent years, but many clinical challenges remain, including the development of inhibitory antibodies directed against factor VIII (FVIII) that occur in approximately 30% of people with severe hemophilia A. Emicizumab, an FVIII mimetic bispecific monoclonal antibody, provides safe and effective bleeding prophylaxis for many PwHA, but clinicians still explore therapeutic strategies that result in immunologic tolerance to FVIII to enable effective treatment with FVIII for problematic bleeding events. This immune tolerance induction (ITI) to FVIII is typically accomplished through repeated long-term exposure to FVIII using a variety of protocols. Meanwhile, gene therapy has recently emerged as a novel ITI option that provides an intrinsic, consistent source of FVIII. As gene therapy and other therapies now expand therapeutic options for PwHA, we review the persistent unmet medical needs with respect to FVIII inhibitors and effective ITI in PwHA, the immunology of FVIII tolerization, the latest research on tolerization strategies, and the role of liver-directed gene therapy to mediate FVIII ITI.

Between Scylla and Charybdis: thrombosis in children with hemophilia

Thromboembolism is an infrequent complication in children with hemophilia that has been traditionally associated with the presence of a central venous access device. Novel rebalancing agents have shown promising results as prophylactic therapies to minimize the risk of bleeding but both thromboembolism and thrombotic microangiopathy have been reported as complications. The management of thrombosis in children with hemophilia is particularly challenging given the inherent risk of bleeding. In this paper, we present clinical vignettes to review the literature, highlight challenges, and describe our approach to managing thromboembolism in children with hemophilia.

Factor VIII inhibitors in hemophilia A treated with emicizumab: longitudinal follow-up of outcomes

Background

Using emicizumab in lieu of immune tolerance induction (ITI) for patients with hemophilia A (HA) and factor (F)VIII inhibitors has been well described. However, decisions regarding ITI initiation, regimen, and preservation of tolerance remain to be elucidated.

Objectives

To study the course of FVIII inhibitors in patients with HA and a history of FVIII inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis.

Methods

Patients with HA, with and without FVIII inhibitors, initiating emicizumab prophylaxis were prospectively followed up in our center. All patients with current or previous inhibitors were included in this analysis. Plasma samples for FVIII inhibitor assays were obtained every 3 to 6 months or following FVIII exposure. Patients documented annual bleeding rate and any FVIII exposure days (EDs).

Results

Of 162 emicizumab-treated participants, 51 met the inclusion criteria. A decrease in annual bleeding rate was observed in all 51 participants followed up for a median of 3.3 years, with 31 breakthrough bleeding episodes reported in 22 of 51 participants. FVIII inhibitor level transiently increased following FVIII exposures in 5 of 15 failed ITI participants. Eight of 21 participants who did not undergo ITI were exposed to FVIII (1-2 EDs)), and 1 of these 8 participants demonstrated increased FVIII inhibitor levels after head trauma (following 1 ED). Among participants who underwent successful ITI, 8 of 15 patients were exposed to FVIII over a total of 13 EDs (1-2 ED(s) each) for traumatic breakthrough bleeds. In all these participants, inhibitor levels remained zero, indicating successful tolerance maintenance.

Conclusion

Our longitudinal follow-up of emicizumab-treated patients with HA and FVIII inhibitors shows that occasional exposure to FVIII may induce a transient anamnestic response. Nonetheless, no FVIII inhibitor recurrence was noted following FVIII exposures in patients who underwent successful ITI.

Economic Evaluation of Immune Tolerance Induction in Children With Severe Hemophilia A and High-Responding Inhibitors: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis With Emicizumab

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with emicizumab in PsHAhri on ITI in Brazil.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness modeling analysis was used to estimate the costs per PsHAhri on ITI and the number of prevented bleedings from undertaking one intervention (prophylaxis with BpA) over another (prophylaxis with emicizumab), based on the Brazilian Ministry of Health perspective. Costs of ITI with recombinant FVIII, prophylaxis with BpA or emicizumab, and treated bleeding episodes with BpA costs were evaluated for PsHAhri who had ITI success or failure. This study was conducted with the perspective of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (payer).

RESULTS

During ITI, prophylaxis with BpA cost US $924 666/PsHAhri/ITI, whereas prophylaxis with emicizumab cost US $488 785/PsHAhri/ITI. During ITI, there was an average of 9.32 bleeding episodes/PsHAhri/ITI when BpA were used as prophylaxis and 0.67 bleeding/PsHAhri/ITI when emicizumab was used. By univariate deterministic sensitivity analysis, emicizumab remained dominant whichever variable was modified.

CONCLUSION

In this study, prophylaxis with emicizumab during ITI is a dominant option compared with prophylaxis with BpA during ITI.

Emicizumab prophylaxis in haemophilia A with inhibitors: Three years follow-up from the UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO)

INTRODUCTION

The UK National Haemophilia Database (NHD) collects data from all UK persons with haemophilia A with inhibitors (PwHA-I). It is well-placed to investigate patient selection, clinical outcomes, drug safety and other issues not addressed in clinical trials of emicizumab.

AIMS

To determine safety, bleeding outcomes and early effects on joint health of emicizumab prophylaxis in a large, unselected cohort using national registry and patient reported Haemtrack (HT) data between 01 January 2018 and 30 September 2021.

METHODS

Prospectively collected bleeding outcomes were analysed in people with ≥6 months emicizumab HT data and compared with previous treatment if available. Change in paired Haemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS) were analysed in a subgroup. Adverse events (AEs) reports were collected and adjudicated centrally.

RESULTS

This analysis includes 117 PwHA-I. Mean annualised bleeding rate (ABR) was .32 (95% CI, .18; .39) over a median 42 months treatment with emicizumab. Within-person comparison (n = 74) demonstrated an 89% reduction in ABR after switching to emicizumab and an increase in zero treated bleed rate from 45 to 88% (p < .01). In a subgroup of 37 people, total HJHS improved in 36%, remained stable in 46% and deteriorated in 18%, with a median (IQR) within-person change of -2.0 (-9, 1.5) (p = .04). Three arterial thrombotic events were reported, two possibly drug related. Other AEs were generally non-severe and usually limited to early treatment, included cutaneous reactions (3.6%), headaches (1.4%), nausea (2.8%) and arthralgia (1.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Emicizumab prophylaxis is associated with sustained low bleeding rates and was generally well-tolerated in people with haemophilia A and inhibitors.

Management of children with hemophilia A on emicizumab who need surgery

The introduction of emicizumab into the treatment regime of persons with hemophilia A has dramatically reduced frequency of bleeding in patients with and without inhibitors. However, in children with Hemophilia A (CwHA) who require surgical or other invasive procedures, additional treatment with factor replacement or other hemostatic agents may still be needed to prevent intraoperative or postoperative bleeding. This review will look at the reported outcomes in CwHA on emicizumab who have had surgery and propose recommendations for the best perioperative management of major and minor procedures.

Considerations for shared decision management in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A or B

Recent advances in therapeutics are now providing a wide range of options for adults and children living with hemophilia. Although therapeutic choices are also increasing for the youngest individuals with severe disease, challenges remain about early management decisions, as supporting data are currently limited. Parents and healthcare professionals are tasked with helping children achieve an inclusive quality of life and maintain good joint health into adulthood. Primary prophylaxis is the gold standard to optimize outcomes and is recommended to start before 2 years of age. A range of topics need to be discussed with parents to aid their understanding of the decisions they can make and how these will affect the management of their child/children. For those with a family history of hemophilia, prenatal considerations include the possibility of genetic counseling, prenatal investigations, and planning for delivery, together with monitoring of the mother and neonate, as well as diagnosis of the newborn and treatment of any birth-associated bleeding. Subsequent considerations, which are also applicable to families where infant bleeding has resulted in a new diagnosis of sporadic hemophilia, involve explaining bleed recognition and treatment options, practical aspects of initiating/continuing prophylaxis, dealing with bleeds, and ongoing aspects of treatment, including possible inhibitor development. Over time, optimizing treatment efficacy, in which individualizing therapy around activities can play a role, and long-term considerations, including retaining joint health and tolerance maintenance, become increasingly important. The evolving treatment landscape is creating a need for continually updated guidance. Multidisciplinary teams and peers from patient organizations can help provide relevant information. Easily accessible, multidisciplinary comprehensive care remains a foundation to care. Equipping parents early with the knowledge to facilitate truly informed decision-making will help achieve the best possible longer-term health equity and quality of life for the child and family living with hemophilia.

Plain language summary

Points to be taken into account to help families make decisions to best care for children born with hemophilia Medical advances are providing a range of treatment options for adults and children with hemophilia. There is, however, relatively limited information about managing newborns with the condition. Doctors and nurses can help parents to understand the choices for infants born with hemophilia. We describe the various points doctors and nurses should ideally discuss with families to enable informed decision-making. We focus on infants who require early treatment to prevent spontaneous or traumatic bleeding (prophylaxis), which is recommended to start before 2 years of age. Families with a history of hemophilia may benefit from discussions before pregnancy, including how an affected child would be treated to protect against bleeds. When mothers are pregnant, doctors can explain investigations that can provide information about their unborn child, plan for the birth, and monitor mother and baby to minimize bleed risks at delivery. Testing will confirm whether the baby is affected by hemophilia. Not all infants with hemophilia will be born to families with a history of the condition. Identification of hemophilia for the first time in a family (which is 'sporadic hemophilia') occurs in previously undiagnosed infants who have bleeds requiring medical advice and possibly hospital treatment. Before any mothers and babies with hemophilia are discharged from hospital, doctors and nurses will explain to parents how to recognize bleeding and available treatment options can be discussed. Over time, ongoing discussions will help parents to make informed treatment decisions:• When and how to start, then continue, prophylaxis.• How to deal with bleeds (reinforcing previous discussions about bleed recognition and treatment) and other ongoing aspects of treatment. ○ For instance, children may develop neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) to treatment they are receiving, requiring a change to the planned approach.• Ensuring treatment remains effective as their child grows, considering the varied needs and activities of their child.

Current and future therapies for haemophilia-Beyond factor replacement therapies

Some non-factor products that work by facilitating the coagulation pathway (emicizumab) and blocking the anticoagulant pathway (fitusiran, concizumab and marstacimab) for patients with haemophilia (H) have been developed, and clinical trials using these products are currently ongoing. Prophylaxis using non-factor products by subcutaneous administration provides marked reductions of bleeding episodes in patients with HA or HB, regardless of the presence of inhibitor. Emicizumab has already been approved globally. Emicizumab alters the phenotype of patients with HA from severe to mild by maintaining trough levels of equivalent factor VIII activity (15-20 iu/dl). Phase 3 clinical trials and long-term observations assessing emicizumab revealed tolerable safety and efficacy. However, thrombotic events have occurred in patients receiving these non-factor products. Furthermore, monitoring of the haemostatic function of these products with concomitant therapy is also required in clinical practice. These products have promising haemostatic efficiency, but wider clinical experience is needed to provide optimal therapeutic strategies in the future.

Early stage clinical trials for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a severe bleeding disorder affecting about 1 in 5,000 males. The gold standard for prophylaxis and treatment of acute bleeding has been factor (F) VIII concentrate. A multitude of treatment modalities are now available and under clinical investigation.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses ongoing/recently completed early-phase clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in patients with hemophilia A through April 2022. These new pipeline therapies are focused on addressing the safety and efficacy of new factor-related products, non-factor related products, and gene therapy options for hemophilia.

EXPERT OPINION

Current standard of care effectively prevents and treats acute bleeding and has significantly improved the quality of life in hemophilia. The biggest challenges in the improvement of care are treatment-related burden and the burden of cost in developing countries. New drugs under development are likely to enter practice by the end of this decade and address many of the unmet needs particularly of those with severe disease. Data is limited in unique populations (e.g. congenital/inherited FVIII inhibitors, non-severe hemophilia A, women/girls with hemophilia and children) which are important areas for future research; additional clinical trials and long-term outcome data are necessary prior to incorporating these new therapies in our treatment arsenal.

Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) with a pdFVIII/VWF Concentrate (octanate) in 100 Patients in the Observational ITI (ObsITI) Study

Background  Immune tolerance induction (ITI) with repeated factor VIII (FVIII) administration is the only strategy proven to eradicate inhibitors. The observational ITI study is evaluating ITI with a range of FVIII products.

Methods  This subgroup analysis reports prospective interim data for patients treated with a plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII/VWF, octanate). Complete success (CS) of ITI required achievement of three criteria: inhibitor titer < 0.6 BU/mL; FVIII recovery ≥ 66%; FVIII half-life ≥6 hours. Partial success (PS) required achievement of two criteria and partial response (PR) one. ITI success was defined as CS or PS. Data were analyzed for patients who achieved CS, had 36 months' observation, or failed ITI.

Results  One-hundred prospectively enrolled patients were included in the analysis; 91 had poor prognosis factors for ITI success. The mean (standard deviation) daily ITI dose was 116.4 (61.1) IU FVIII/kg in 14 low responders (< 5 BU/mL) and 173.7 (112.0) IU FVIII/kg in 86 high responders (≥ 5 BU/mL). Inhibitor titers < 0.6 BU/mL were achieved in 71% of patients in a median of 4.01 months, accompanied by a 93% reduction in bleeding rate. ITI success was achieved by 70% of patients and 56 of 72 (78%) primary (first-line) ITI patients. PR was achieved by 5 patients; ITI failed in 25 patients. PS and CS were achieved in a median of 5.55 and 11.25 months, respectively.

Conclusions  ITI with pdFVIII/VWF led to rapid eradication of FVIII inhibitors, normalization of FVIII pharmacokinetics in the majority of patients, and a significant reduction in bleeding rates.

Emicizumab state-of-the-art update

Introduction

Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody developed to address the unmet needs of clotting factor replacement therapy and has become the benchmark for optimal prophylaxis in managing patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors. We describe the emicizumab rollout and pharmacokinetic strategies and their use in paediatric patients.

Methods

The evolving real‐world experience in using emicizumab has confirmed its safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile in paediatric, adolescent and adult patients receiving emicizumab at various prophylactic dosing regimens. The emicizumab current global rollout includes over 100 countries with 29 low to middle‐income countries accessing emicizumab through the World Federation of Haemophilia (WFH) Humanitarian Aid Program. The diversity of emicizumab dosing and pharmacokinetic tools such as the Calibra® and the WAPPS‐Hemo platforms make it possible to achieve prophylaxis goals in line with the WFH Haemophilia treatment guidelines recommendations, with minimal drug wastage. The emerging experience from long term clinical trials and long‐term real‐world follow‐up confirm the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile of emicizumab in paediatric haemophilia A patients. A few questions, including inhibitor recurrence, concurrent use of emicizumab with various replacement therapies and inhibitor eradication, are being addressed through multiple ongoing clinical studies.

Conclusion

The current global rollout of emicizumab is remarkable, and versatile dosing regimens and evolving pharmacokinetic tools such as the Calibra® and WAPPS‐Hemo platforms make it a treatment choice available also for pharmacokinetic guided personalised treatment. Data from paediatric studies are consistent with those seen in adolescent and adult Haemophilia A.

Emicizumab for All Pediatric Patients with Severe Hemophilia A

Emicizumab is the first approved nonreplacement therapy for bleeding prophylaxis in hemophilia A (HA) patients. In 2018, it was licensed for HA patients with inhibitors, subsequently followed by an "European Medicines Agency (EMA)" approval for patients with severe HA in the absence of inhibitors in 2019. This is immediately raising the question whether emicizumab is suitable as a first-line treatment for all pediatric patients with severe HA. In this review, we want to discuss what we have, what we know, and what we would like to know. Severe HA is characterized by severe spontaneous and traumatic bleedings, particularly into muscles and joints leading to chronic joint damage. Standard of care is the regular, prophylactic replacement of factor VIII to prevent bleedings. Due to approval of emicizumab-the first nonreplacement therapy for bleeding prophylaxis-in HA patients with inhibitors, and severe HA patients without inhibitors, it is of pivotal interest whether emicizumab could be the first-line treatment in all pediatric patients with severe HA. Clinical trials and real-world observational studies could demonstrate a good efficacy and safety for bleeding prevention during emicizumab treatment in HA patients with and without inhibitors. This clearly indicates that emicizumab could improve HA treatment. However, some crucial and critical questions are remaining with regard to the use of emicizumab. Some of this missing information is already under investigation in the context of clinical trials. Until getting finalized data to shed insights into the points that are currently being discussed, there is a variety of expert and expert group recommendations, which are tackling questions concerning the treatment of HA patients. This review will address major information that is already available, but will also focus on important points that remain to be elucidated in the context of HA treatment.

AKATSUKI study: a prospective, multicentre, phase IV study evaluating the safety of emicizumab under and immediately after immune tolerance induction therapy in persons with congenital haemophilia A with factor VIII inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

For persons with haemophilia A with factor (F) VIII inhibitors (PwHAwI), immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy is indicated for inhibitor eradication; however, since PwHAwI on ITI were excluded from the emicizumab clinical development programme, there are limited safety data for emicizumab treatment under/immediately after ITI in PwHAwI. Accordingly, there is a need to collect safety and efficacy data on this concomitant treatment strategy. The AKATSUKI study aims to evaluate the safety of emicizumab under/immediately after ITI in PwHAwI; here we report details of the study protocol.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

AKATSUKI is an open-label, non-randomised, interventional, multicentre study. Twenty participants with congenital HA with FVIII inhibitors will be enrolled from 17 sites across Japan. Emicizumab will be administered subcutaneously, with an initial loading dose of 3 mg/kg once per week (QW) for the first 4 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/kg QW, 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks or 6 mg/kg once every 4 weeks. For ITI therapy, 50 IU/kg FVIII will be administered three times per week. For extended half-life FVIII, a dosing frequency of twice per week will be permitted. The primary endpoint is a comprehensive safety evaluation of adverse events (mainly thromboembolic events) and abnormal laboratory values over time. Secondary endpoints are the number of bleeds requiring coagulation factor treatment, the number of participants achieving a partially successful ITI response, FVIII inhibitor titres under/immediately after ITI, quality of life and time to achieve a negative FVIII inhibitor result (<0.6 BU/mL) and partial success in PwHAwI starting ITI after study enrolment.

CONCLUSIONS

AKATSUKI will evaluate the safety of emicizumab administered under/immediately after ITI, providing reference data to inform treatment strategies in PwHAwI.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed international journal and presented at national and/or international medical scientific conferences; the major findings of this study will be published on the jRCT registry website (https://jrct.niph.go.jp).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCTs041200037.

Immune tolerance induction in the era of emicizumab - still the first choice for patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors?

INTRODUCTION

The development of inhibitory antibodies is a severe complication of clotting factor replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A (HA). Current World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) guidelines for haemophilia care indicate that eradication of inhibitors is best achieved through immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy.

AIM

The European Collaborative Haemophilia Network conducted a survey to determine whether ITI is still used in the routine management of patients with HA, and whether the availability of emicizumab prophylaxis has influenced treatment decisions.

METHODS

The survey was conducted in late 2020/early 2021 in 18 centres representing 17 countries in the Europe/Middle East region treating a total of 4955 patients, and included sections specific to patient and centre demographics, treatment protocols (both ITI and prophylactic), inhibitor development and initiation of ITI, treatment success, and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

While our results indicate that ITI can still be considered a mainstay of treatment for patients with HA with inhibitors, less than daily dosing of ITI in combination with emicizumab prophylaxis is becoming commonplace across the spectrum of disease severity, with initiation being guided by bleeding patterns. The most frequently cited reasons for not initiating emicizumab prophylaxis were availability or reimbursement issues.

CONCLUSION

ITI remains a mainstay for haemophilia treatment of patients with HA with inhibitors, but emicizumab has become a preferred first-line approach to protect against bleeds and represents an alternative to burdensome ITI in certain patient groups.

Predictors of inhibitor eradication by primary immune tolerance induction in severe haemophilia A with high responding inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only proven strategy to eradicate factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A (HA).

AIM

To identify patients and treatment options with the highest chance of inhibitor eradication by primary ITI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the frame of the Italian ITI Registry, carried out from 1995 to 2015 (last follow-up 2018), 137 primary ITI courses in severe HA patients (90/137 with poor prognosis) were analysed for predictors of outcome (complete/partial response or failure). Sixty-six of them (48%) were prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

ITI was successful in 91/137 patients (66.4%) and 70 (51.1%) achieved complete response within 11 months (median). Historical peak titres ≤200 BU/ml (P = .033), inhibitor titres ≤5 BU/ml at ITI start (P = .001), peak titres ≤100 BU/ml during ITI (P < .001) and missense mutations and small insertions/deletions of FVIII gene (P = .027) predicted complete inhibitor eradication. A score that considers the cumulative number of these variables predicted complete response with positive predictive values up to .81 at ITI start and .91 during ITI, respectively. Patients who had no bleeding (OR, 3.45, 95% CI: 1.4-8.6) nor other adverse events (OR 2.6, 95%CI: 1.3-5.3) during ITI had higher chances of complete response. During the 120-month follow-up (median), 2/70 patients who had achieved complete response relapsed (2.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

This Registry, with a centralized review of outcomes, homogeneous data collection (half of which prospective) and long-term follow-up, provides insights for optimizing ITI, with a rationale for further studies in the currently evolving scenario of inhibitor management in HA patients.

Real-world experience on the tolerability and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A with and without FVIII inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody that bridges activated factor (F) IX and FX, and maintains haemostasis in patients with haemophilia A (PwHA). As a novel agent, many questions remain unanswered about the loss of emicizumab efficacy due to anti-drug antibody (ADA) development, the incidence of inhibitor recurrence in previously tolerized patients, and the risk of de novo inhibitor development.

AIM

To present real-world experience regarding tolerability, side effects, and outcomes of adverse events of emicizumab prophylaxis in paediatric PwHA.

METHODS

Data on tolerability, compliance, adverse events, and laboratory results of paediatric patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis, treated at the Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre, at Birmingham Children's Hospital between March 2018 and June 2021, were collected.

RESULTS

Our results showed that out of 52 patients, four experienced minor adverse events, two developed headaches, one developed abdominal pain and nausea, and one developed injection site reactions. Moreover, four patients experienced major adverse events, including severe headaches, major bleeding events, development of ADAs, and recurrence of inhibitors. Emicizumab prophylaxis was discontinued in three patients (5.7% of the cohort) due to adverse events. In addition, emicizumab was discontinued in one patient because of poor compliance. No adverse events were reported in previously untreated/minimally treated patients, represented by four patients in our cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The real-world experience of emicizumab prophylaxis in our cohort showed that emicizumab was safe and well tolerated in paediatric PwHA with and without inhibitors. Long-term assessment is crucial to monitor major adverse events, recurrence of inhibitors, and development of ADAs.

Design of an international investigator-initiated study on MOdern Treatment of Inhibitor-positiVe pATiEnts with haemophilia A (MOTIVATE)

Background:

Inhibitor development is the most serious treatment-related complication of replacement coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) therapy for patients with haemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI), which involves intensive and prolonged treatment with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII, is the only clinically proven strategy for eradication of inhibitors. The bispecific antibody emicizumab is approved for use in patients with and without inhibitors to prevent bleeding but does not eliminate inhibitors. MOTIVATE (www.motivate-study.com) aims to capture different approaches to the treatment and management of patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, document current ITI approaches from real-world clinical experience, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of ITI, emicizumab prophylaxis and ITI with emicizumab prophylaxis.

Methods:

The investigator-initiated MOTIVATE study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04023019; EudraCT 2019-003427-38] will investigate in real-life clinical practice the management of patients with haemophilia A of any severity who have developed inhibitors to FVIII. All treatment is at the investigator’s discretion. The following treatment approaches will be evaluated: Group 1 – ITI with Nuwiq^®, octanate^® or wilate^® and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat bleeding episodes (BEs) or during surgery or for prophylaxis; Group 2 – ITI with Nuwiq^®, octanate^® or wilate^® and emicizumab prophylaxis and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat BEs or during surgery; Group 3 – routine prophylaxis with emicizumab, aPCC or rFVIIa without ITI and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat BEs or during surgery. Patients will not be randomised to a treatment group and may change groups during the study.

Conclusions:

It is planned to enrol 120 patients who will be followed for up to 5 years. Optional sub-studies will explore factors that may influence ITI results as well as the impact of different treatment approaches on important aspects of patient health, including joint and bone health and the risk of thrombotic events.

An update of the current pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

For several decades, we have seen unprecedented advances in novel therapy development for hemophilia A. These advances address the unmet need of replacement therapy, and they include the development of recombinant products with improved pharmacokinetics, subcutaneously administered products, and those with better efficacy and safety profiles in hemophilia A management.

AREAS COVERED

In this update of hemophilia A treatment, the author summarizes data from completed standard half-life FVIII products, extended half-life FVIII products and FVIII mimetic studies. All products have an acceptable safety profile. The standard half-life products, EHL-FVIII products and emicizumab are efficacious in the prevention and treatment of bleeds and for EHL-FVIII in the perisurgical setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Advances in pharmacotherapy for hemophilia A have been characterized by changing care goals from supportive care to eliminating infections, preventing inhibitors, and more recently achieving zero bleeds in many patients. While gene therapy has the potential for functional cure in hemophilia A, it has many limitations which need to be addressed. Therefore, pharmacotherapy is likely to remain the mainstay in the management of hemophilia A and promises to get better with currently available therapies. Evolving factor and non-factor replacement therapies may also improve current unmet needs in hemophilia A management.

Concomitant use of bypassing agents with emicizumab for people with haemophilia A and inhibitors undergoing surgery

INTRODUCTION

Surgery in people with haemophilia and factor VIII inhibitors is typically managed with perioperative administration of haemostatic agents to prevent or control the occurrence of bleeding events. Practical experience of surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving treatment with emicizumab is growing; however, the novelty of the situation means that standardised guidelines are lacking with regard to the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents, including dose and laboratory monitoring.

AIM

To review approaches to haemostatic management during major and minor invasive procedures in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, and to provide recommendations for controlling bleeding events.

METHODS

A search was conducted, limited to the past 4 years (January 2016-April 2020), pertaining to published evidence of surgery for patients receiving emicizumab. Publications identified from the search were manually reviewed to determine studies and case reports relevant for inclusion.

RESULTS

Identified literature and practical experience of the authors were used to build a consensus of practical recommendations for the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents during the perioperative period for elective surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence base indicates that surgery can be successfully performed in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab and that bypassing agents can be used concomitantly. Data from prospective studies are required to further support recommendations for haemostatic management of surgery in patients receiving emicizumab.

Management of children with hemophilia A: How emicizumab has changed the landscape

The key to having a good quality of life for an adult with hemophilia rests largely on how he or she was managed as children. With effective prophylaxis, young men can begin their adult life with excellent joint function and few, if any, other sequelae from their disease. Unfortunately, this outcome is not always (nor often) attained because of the limitations of the mainstay of treatment, which is factor replacement therapy. In resource-rich countries with an adequate supply of factor concentrates, the treatment burden and formation of inhibitors limit the potential for an ideal outcome, whereas in much of the world, factor concentrates are too expensive to even be an option. The novel agent, emicizumab, which has become available in numerous countries around the world, is reshaping how one approaches the treatment of children with hemophilia A. This Forum Article, based on a State-of-the-Art lecture given at the 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Virtual Meeting, presents an approach including clinically applicable algorithms for treating children with hemophilia A in the new era with emicizumab.

Haemophilia

Haemophilia A and B are rare congenital, recessive X-linked disorders caused by lack or deficiency of clotting factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX), respectively. The severity of the disease depends on the reduction of levels of FVIII or FIX, which are determined by the type of the causative mutation in the genes encoding the factors (F8 and F9, respectively). The hallmark clinical characteristic, especially in untreated severe forms, is bleeding (spontaneous or after trauma) into major joints such as ankles, knees and elbows, which can result in the development of arthropathy. Intracranial bleeds and bleeds into internal organs may be life-threatening. The median life expectancy was ~30 years until the 1960s, but improved understanding of the disorder and development of efficacious therapy based on prophylactic replacement of the missing factor has caused a paradigm shift, and today individuals with haemophilia can look forward to a virtually normal life expectancy and quality of life. Nevertheless, the potential development of inhibitory antibodies to infused factor is still a major hurdle to overcome in a substantial proportion of patients. Finally, gene therapy for both types of haemophilia has progressed remarkably and could soon become a reality.

Bispecific antibodies for the treatment of hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody exerting cofactor function of FVIIIa irrespective of the presence of FVIII inhibitors. Long-term data of phase 1/2 and phase 3 studies have been accumulated. Various questions such as indicated patients, ITI, application to PUPs, hemostatic treatment including surgeries, and emicizumab-related morbidity remain to be solved.

AREAS COVERED

The review describes the mode of action, data from pre-/post-marketing and ongoing clinical studies according to PubMed search and our own works.

EXPERT OPINION

For patients with a persistent inhibitor, emicizumab is a definite therapeutic option, although the possibility of BPAs-associated thromboembolic/TMA events raises concerns. The use of ITI together with emicizumab prophylaxis is being examined in clinical trials. For non-inhibitor, especially pediatric patients, emicizumab prophylaxis can be an option. Outcome assessment 'beyond ABR' such as joint health, physical/mental activity, QOL is required. Furthermore, continuous data collection for emicizumab-related adverse events and morbidity would be recommended.

Practical considerations for nonfactor-replacement therapies in the treatment of haemophilia with inhibitors

New therapeutic agents for haemophilia with inhibitors that are in development or already licensed are expected to provide transformative treatment options. Many of these new therapies are not based on simply replacing the missing factor; new strategies include bispecific antibody technology that mimics factor VIII coagulation function (emicizumab), and inhibition of anticoagulant proteins such as tissue factor pathway inhibitor (eg PF-06741086) and antithrombin (eg fitusiran). These agents are administered subcutaneously and should significantly reduce treatment burden and increase the ability to deliver prophylaxis for patients. Limited real-world data and validated practical guidance on these recently licensed/upcoming treatments resulted in the authors convening to discuss recommendations on their use. Emicizumab is currently the only licenced nonfactor therapy; thus, our recommendations focus on this product. Target candidates for emicizumab prophylaxis are difficult-to-treat patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors and/or venous access issues, frequent bleeds and target joints. In case of breakthrough bleeding while receiving emicizumab, patients still require treatment with bypassing agents; the adjunct treatment of choice is recombinant activated factor VII. This treatment is also recommended to prevent bleeds in patients with inhibitors undergoing surgery. Our recommendations on suitable laboratory assays and monitoring new products, as well as the benefit of patient-reported outcomes (such as pain and physical activity levels), are included. We also briefly discuss future treatment options for patients with haemophilia B and inhibitors. Although these nonfactor treatments offer great promise, further data and real-world evidence are needed.

Predicted coagulation potential using an in vitro simulated model of emicizumab prophylaxis and immune tolerance induction therapy in hemophilia A patients with inhibitor

Emicizumab reduces bleeding in hemophilia A patients with inhibitor (HA-inh). A combination of immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI) and emicizumab prophylaxis may provide additional benefits, but coagulation potential during this treatment remains unknown. We assessed coagulation potentials in simulated ITI models in vitro using modified-clot waveform analysis. Factor (F)VIII-deficient plasma preincubated with anti-A2 and anti-C2 monoclonal antibodies was reacted with emicizumab (50 µg/mL) (emicizumab-HA-plasma), then spiking bypassing agents (BPAs): activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC 1.3 IU/mL; 50 IU/kg), recombinant factor (rF)VIIa (2.2 µg/mL; 90 µg/kg), and FVIIa/FX (1.5 µg/mL; 60 µg/kg), and/or FVIII (100, 200 IU/dL). Coagulation potentials in emicizumab-HA-plasma (10 BU/mL) remained within the normal range when BPA and FVIII were both present. In emicizumab-HA-plasma (1 BU/mL) with BPA and FVIII (200 IU/dL), they were near or beyond the normal range, but those with a half concentration of rFVIIa based on the half-life in blood were within the normal range. In samples without inhibitor, coagulation potentials with combined BPA and FVIII were far beyond the normal range but with FVIII (100 IU/dL) and rFVIIa at half concentration they remained within the normal range. These results may provide information on the feasibility of concurrent ITI under emicizumab prophylaxis.

Patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors in China: a national real-world analysis and follow-up

The development of alloantibodies (inhibitors) against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is the most serious complication of FVIII replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia A (HA). We carried out a nationwide study focussing on patients with HA with inhibitors in China to evaluate the condition and management of this population. The study retrospectively analysed patient characteristics, clinical history, manifestation, treatment strategy as well as individual haemophilia care of 493 patients with inhibitors (466 with severe HA and 27 with non-severe HA) registered all over China. The median (interquartile range) age at diagnosis of FVIII inhibitors was 13 (5-28) years in patients with severe HA and 24 (10·5-39·5) years in patients with non-severe HA. Most patients (85%) had high-titre inhibitors. Prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated coagulation factor VII were used respectively in 76·2% and 29·2% of patients for acute bleeding. Only 22·3% of patients underwent immune tolerance induction (ITI) treatment, of whom 64·9% achieved negative inhibitor titre. In patients who did not undergo ITI, the inhibitors turned negative in 17·7%, and patients with low peak inhibitor titre were more likely to acquire negative titre spontaneously (odds ratio 11·524, 95% confidence interval 5·222-25·432; P = 0·000). We recorded that 3·2% of the patients died from haemophilia-related life-threatening bleeding.

Redefining prophylaxis in the modern era

Prophylaxis is the globally accepted standard of care for persons with haemophilia and presents many advantages over episodic treatment. The prophylaxis benefits include bleed reduction, reduction in musculoskeletal complications and improvement in the quality of life. The currently evolving novel therapies for the management of haemophilia has ushered a new era characterized by improved prophylaxis targets and outcomes. These redefined targets and outcomes have necessitated the need to also redefine prophylaxis. In this state-of-the-art review, we redefine prophylaxis in the modern era by revisiting its definition, presenting data to support higher trough levels to achieve with prophylaxis and introducing steady-state haemostasis as a possible new target for prophylaxis.

Key questions in the new hemophilia era: update on concomitant use of FVIII and emicizumab in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors

Introduction: Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the primary therapeutic strategy and only proven method to eradicate inhibitors to coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophilia A. Emicizumab, a humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody that mimics the function of activated FVIII, has expanded options to treat hemophilia A. The availability of emicizumab necessitates a revisit of recommendations for managing patients with inhibitors.Areas covered: Current evidence is reviewed about the concomitant use of emicizumab and FVIII concentrates during and after ITI. Areas where data are lacking are highlighted and ongoing studies designed to address these issues are described.Expert opinion: Inhibitor eradication remains a desirable goal. All patients with inhibitors should be offered at least one attempt at ITI. Emicizumab monotherapy is an option for inhibitor patients who are not candidates for ITI. Evidence is emerging about the use of emicizumab during ITI to prevent bleeds. Studies are currently addressing the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of concomitant emicizumab and FVIII in ITI. As evidence regarding the risk of inhibitor recurrence and need for continued FVIII to maintain immune tolerance post-ITI is limited, the role of emicizumab alone or in combination with FVIII after ITI is the subject of an upcoming study.

The design of a Bayesian platform trial to prevent and eradicate inhibitors in patients with hemophilia

Among individuals with the rare congenital bleeding disorder hemophilia A, the major challenge is inhibitor formation, which is associated with significant morbidity and cost. Yet, as the optimal approach to prevent and eradicate inhibitors is not known, we are at equipoise. Because classic trial design is not practical in a rare disease setting, we designed 2 48-week randomized trials comparing ELOCTATE and emicizumab to prevent and eradicate inhibitors. To achieve statistical efficiency, we incorporated historic data (Bayesian priors) on inhibitor formation to allow preferential randomization to emicizumab, piecewise exponential survival models to determine mean and 95% confidence interval for inhibitor formation in each arm, and simulations to determine the best model design to optimize power. To achieve administrative efficiency, the trials will be performed with the same sites, staff, visit frequency, blood sampling, laboratories, and laboratory assays, with streamlined enrollment so patients developing inhibitors in the first trial may be enrolled on the second trial. The primary end point is the probability of inhibitor formation or inhibitor eradication, respectively. The design indicates early stopping rules for overwhelming evidence of superiority of the emicizumab arms. Simulations indicate that, with 66 subjects, the Prevention Trial will have 84% power to detect noninferiority of emicizumab to ELOCTATE with a margin of 10% if emicizumab is truly 10% superior to ELOCTATE; with 90 subjects, the Eradication Trial will have 80% power to detect 15% superiority of ELOCTATE immune tolerance induction with vs without emicizumab. Thus, a platform design provides statistical and administrative efficiency to conduct INHIBIT trials.

The Art of Detecting Antibodies against Factor VIII

Antibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) can be detected based on their ability to neutralize the procoagulant activity of FVIII (neutralizing antibodies, inhibitors), or based on their specific binding capacity to FVIII protein. This article reviews the available assays and their clinical interpretation in patients with congenital and acquired hemophilia.

Optimizing the management of patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors in the era of emicizumab: Recommendations from a German expert panel

Standard treatment of haemophilia A is based on replacing the missing coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) to treat and prevent bleeding episodes. The most challenging complication of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) that can render treatment ineffective. Eradication of the inhibitor through immune tolerance induction (ITI) remains the most effective strategy for managing these patients. Bypassing agents can be used to help restore haemostasis in inhibitor patients. Several novel agents have recently been developed, such as the FVIII mimetic agent emicizumab, which has been effective in reducing the annualized bleeding rate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. When coadministered with repetitive high doses of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (ie >100 U/kg/d for ≥24 hours), emicizumab was associated with thrombotic microangiopathy and thrombosis events. As a consequence the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centres Doctors' Organisation (UKHCDO) issued the first guidance on the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients receiving emicizumab. To build on and extend this work, a panel of German haemophilia specialists met to discuss the UK guidance, review current evidence and provide additional guidance for German healthcare professionals on how to optimize the management of patients with haemophilia A receiving emicizumab. Recommendations are provided on the use of bypassing and other agents to manage breakthrough bleeding, ITI in the emicizumab era, haemostatic support during surgery and issues relating to laboratory monitoring.

Emerging benefits of Fc fusion technology in the context of recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy

Although the primary reason for recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) development was to reduce treatment burden associated with routine prophylaxis, new evidence suggests additional benefits of Fc fusion technology in the treatment of people with haemophilia A. Preclinical research has been utilized to characterize the potential immunomodulatory properties of rFVIIIFc, including an ability to reduce inflammation and induce tolerance to factor VIII. This has since been expanded into clinical research in immune tolerance induction (ITI) with rFVIIIFc, results of which suggest the potential for rapid tolerization in first‐time ITI patients and therapeutic benefit in patients undergoing rescue ITI. The potential for improved joint health through the anti‐inflammatory properties of rFVIIIFc has also been suggested. In addition, a new avenue of research into the role of rFVIIIFc in promoting bone health in patients with haemophilia A, potentially through reduced osteoclast formation, has yielded encouraging results that support further study. This review summarizes the existing preclinical and clinical studies of immunomodulation and tolerization with rFVIIIFc, as well as studies in joint and bone health, to elucidate the potential benefits of rFVIIIFc in haemophilia A beyond the extension of factor VIII half‐life.

Model of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Emicizumab Prophylaxis Treatment for Persons with Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A (HA) can result in bleeding events because of low or absent clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Prophylactic treatment for severe HA includes replacement FVIII infusions and emicizumab, a bispecific factor IXa- and factor X-directed antibody.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an economic model to predict the short- and long-term clinical and economic outcomes of prophylaxis with emicizumab versus short-acting recombinant FVIII among persons with HA in the United States.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to compare clinical outcomes and costs of emicizumab versus FVIII prophylaxis among persons with severe HA from U.S. payer and societal perspectives. Patients started prophylaxis at age 1 year in the base case. Mutually exclusive health states considered were "no arthropathy," "arthropathy," "surgery," and "death." Serious adverse events, breakthrough bleeds, and inhibitor development were simulated throughout the modeled time horizon. In addition to the prophylaxis drug costs, patients could incur other direct costs related to breakthrough bleeds treatment, serious adverse events, development of inhibitors, arthropathy, and orthopedic surgery. Indirect costs associated with productivity loss (i.e., missed work or disabilities) were applied for adults. Model inputs were obtained from the HAVEN 3 trial, published literature, and expert opinion. The model used a lifetime horizon, and results for 1 year and 5 years were also reported. Deterministic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to assess robustness of the model.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, the cumulative number of all treated bleeds and joint bleeds avoided on emicizumab versus FVIII prophylaxis were 278.2 and 151.7, respectively. Correspondingly, arthropathy (mean age at onset: 12.9 vs. 5.4 years) and FVIII inhibitor development (mean age at development: 13.9 vs. 1.1 years) were delayed. Total direct and indirect costs were lower for emicizumab versus FVIII prophylaxis for all modeled time horizons ($97,159 vs. $331,610 at 1 year; $603,146 vs. $1,459,496 at 5 years; and $15,238,072 vs. $22,820,281 over a lifetime horizon). The sensitivity analyses indicated that clinical outcomes were sensitive to efficacy inputs, while economic outcomes were driven by the discount rate, dosing schedules, and treatments after inhibitor development. Results for moderate to severe patients were consistent with findings in the severe HA population.

CONCLUSIONS

The model suggests that emicizumab prophylaxis confers additional clinical benefits, resulting in a lower number of bleeding events and delayed onset of arthropathy and inhibitor development across all time assessment horizons. Compared with short-acting recombinant FVIII, emicizumab prophylaxis leads to superior patient outcomes and cost savings from U.S. payer and societal perspectives.

DISCLOSURES

Funding for this study was provided by Genentech. Raimundo and Patel are employees of Genentech and own stock or stock options. Zhou, Han, Ji, Fang, Zhong, and Betts are employees of Analysis Group, which received consultancy fees from Genentech for conducting this study. Mahajerin received consultancy fees from Genentech for work on this study. Portions of this research were presented as a poster at the 2018 American Society of Hematology Conference; December 1-4, 2018; San Diego, CA.

Non-additive effect on thrombin generation when a plasma-derived factor VIII/von Willebrand factor (FVIII/VWF) is combined with emicizumab in vitro

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab is an alternative non-factor approach for treating patients with hemophilia A. However, there is a potential risk of thrombotic events when emicizumab is concomitantly administered with pro-hemostatic therapies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the hemostatic effect in vitro when a plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate containing von Willebrand factor (pdFVIII/VWF) was added to hemophilia A plasma (HAp) in combination with emicizumab.

METHODS

HAp and HAp with FVIII inhibitors (HAp-i) samples with different concentrations of emicizumab (50 and 100 μg/mL) were combined with activated prothrombin complex concentrate at 0.5 to 1 U/mL, recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) at 0.5 to 7 μg/mL, and pdFVIII/VWF at 0.1 to 4.5 IU/mL. Thrombin generation (TG; thrombin peak and endogenous thrombin potential) was determined using a Calibrated Automated Thrombogram assay.

RESULTS

When activated prothrombin complex concentrate was added to HAp and HAp-i with emicizumab, TG dramatically increased (multiplier effect > 4.5×). Addition of rFVIIa to HAp or HAp-i with emicizumab moderately increased TG in a concentration-related manner compared with rFVIIa alone. Addition of pdFVIII/VWF to HAp or HAp-i with emicizumab induced a TG response equivalent to those samples without emicizumab. In an in vitro model of immune tolerance induction with bleeds (HAp-i 15 Bethesda units), combination of pdFVIII/VWF, emicizumab, and rFVIIa did not trigger a multiplying effect on TG.

CONCLUSIONS

pdFVIII/VWF showed a non-additive effect on TG when combined in vitro with emicizumab. This finding suggests that emicizumab has limited ability to promote factor X activation in the presence of pdFVIII/VWF, thus reducing the risk of thrombotic events.

Bridging the Missing Link with Emicizumab: A Bispecific Antibody for Treatment of Hemophilia A

Hemophilia A, characterized by absent or ineffective coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), is a serious bleeding disorder that entails severe and potentially life-threatening bleeding events. Current standard therapy still involves replacement of FVIII, but is often complicated by the occurrence of neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors). Management of patients with inhibitors is challenging and necessitates immune tolerance induction for inhibitor eradication and the use of bypassing agents (activated prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant activated factor VII), which are expensive and not always effective. Emicizumab is the first humanized bispecific monoclonal therapeutic antibody designed to replace the hemostatic function of activated FVIII by bridging activated factor IX and factor X (FX) to activate FX and allow the coagulation cascade to continue. In the majority of hemophilic patients with and without inhibitors, emicizumab reduced the annualized bleeding rate to almost zero in several clinical trials and demonstrated a good safety profile. However, the concurrent use of emicizumab and activated prothrombin complex concentrate imposes a high risk of thrombotic microangiopathy and thromboembolic events on patients and should be avoided. Yet, the management of breakthrough bleeds and surgery remains challenging with only limited evidence-based recommendations being available. This review summarizes published clinical trials and preliminary reports of emicizumab and discusses the clinical implications of emicizumab in treatment of hemophilia A.

Inhibitors-Recent insights

The development of inhibitory antibodies to therapeutic factor VIII (FVIII) in haemophilia A (HA) patients is the major complication in treatment/prevention of haemorrhages. The reasons some HA patients develop inhibitors while others do not remain unclear. This review briefly summarizes our understanding of anti-FVIII immune responses, the roles of T cells, both effector and regulatory, and generally discusses the interplay between FVIII and the immune system, both in factor replacement therapy and gene therapy, with some comparisons to factor IX and haemophilia B therapies. Notably, we propose that the prevailing observed active tolerance to FVIII in both HA and non-HA individuals rests to greater or lesser extents on peripherally induced immune tolerance. We also propose that the immune systems of inhibitor-negative HA patients do not merely ignore therapeutic FVIII, but rather have immunologically assessed and actively tolerized the patients to exogenous FVIII. Induction of such peripheral immune tolerance may further be triggered in HA patients who failed to tolerize upon initial FVIII exposure by 'appropriate' stimulation of their immune system, eg by immune tolerance induction therapy via intensive FVIII therapy, by oral administration of FVIII, by cellular therapies or by gene therapy directed to immuno-tolerogenic sites such as the liver.