Review article: immunosuppressive therapy for inflammatory bowel disease

Review and clinical perspectives for the use of infliximab in ulcerative colitis

Infliximab is a chimeric, monoclonal anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha antibody. It has been previously demonstrated to be an effective treatment for patients with Crohn's disease who do not achieve the desired response with conventional treatments. Although the etiology of ulcerative colitis (UC) differs from that of Crohn's disease, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that infliximab is also beneficial for the treatment of moderate to severe UC in patients who are either intolerant of or refractory to immunosuppressant agents or steroids, or those who are steroid-dependent. A review of the literature is followed by practical recommendations regarding infliximab that address the needs of clinicians and UC patients. Where there is a lack of evidence-based information, the expert panel provides its combined opinion derived from the members' clinical experiences.

Management of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

The conventional medical treatment of IBD consists of aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurin, methotrexate, cyclosporin) and antibiotics. The only drugs able to modify the disease course are azathioprine, its metabolite 6-mercaptopurin and methotrexate. However, these drugs have a slow onset of action and are associated with important side-effects in some patients, necessitating the discontinuation of the drug. Moreover, up to 60% of patients do not respond to these drugs long-term. Fortunately, the management of IBD has entered a new era in the beginning of the 1990s with the development of new biological therapies, selectively blocking the inflammatory cascade. The novel molecules have arisen from the increasing knowledge about the disease pathogenesis and their production has been precipitated by the techniques of molecular biology. Infliximab, the first available biological for Crohn's disease has certainly revolutionised standard treatment. Because of its profound clinical, endoscopic and histological effects, the standard step up approach in the treatment of IBD has been challenged. A large array of new rationally designed biologicals, with a better safety profile and equally selectively acting is underway, and is likely to change our current practise even more dramatically in the next decade.

Cytolytic capabilities of lamina propria and intraepithelial lymphocytes in normal and chronically inflamed human intestine

Cell-mediated lymphocyte cytotoxicity in ileum and colon of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD) and controls was investigated. Frequencies of cells expressing perforin and Fas-ligand (FasL) were determined by immunomorphometry. mRNA expression of perforin, granzyme B and FasL in T cells and subsets was assayed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Cytotoxicity of intraepithelial and lamina propria lymphocytes was analysed without ex vivo activation in three functional assays: (1) anti-CD3-dependent T-cell receptor (TCR)-/CD3-mediated redirected cytotoxicity, (2) Fas-/FasL-mediated TCR-/CD3-independent cytotoxicity and (3) natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity. Inflammation in ileum of CD patients caused increased frequency of perforin-expressing cells and enhanced perforin-dependent TCR-/CD3-mediated cytotoxicity. In contrast, lymphocytes in the inflamed colon of UC or Crohn's colitis patients did not display this cytotoxicity nor did lymphocytes of normal colon. Normal colon lymphocytes showed spontaneous Fas-/FasL-mediated cytotoxicity. This activity was retained but not enhanced in inflamed UC colon. In contrast, a significant increase of FasL-expressing cells was seen in situ. Inflammation did not induce NK cell activity in colonic lymphocytes. Intestinal lymphocytes comprise effectors active in two different cytolytic processes. 'Classical' cytotoxic T lymphocytes in small intestine and lymphocytes executing TCR-/CD3-independent FasL-/Fas-mediated killing of unknown biological role present throughout the intestinal mucosa. Ongoing normal cytolytic processes seem to be enhanced by chronic inflammation.

Over-expression of interleukin 10 in mucosal T cells of patients with active ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC), a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, exhibits pronounced increase of T lymphocytes in the inflamed mucosa. To understand the role of intestinal T lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of UC their cytokine production in the mucosa was analysed. Intestinal T lymphocytes of UC, Crohn's disease and control patients were analysed for cytokine mRNA levels by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) directly after isolation without in vitro stimulation. Frequencies of cytokine positive cells were determined in UC and control colon by immunomorphometry. T lymphocytes in normal colon expressed interleukin (IL)-2, interferon (IFN)-gamma, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1, but not IL-4, IL-5 or IL-10. In UC, a highly significant increase in IL-10 mRNA levels in T lymphocytes and an increased frequency of IL-10 positive cells was seen in colon. IL-10 mRNA levels were also elevated in T lymphocytes of the non-inflamed ileum and correlated with disease activity at both locations. CD4+ T lymphocytes were the major source of IL-10 mRNA. IL-2, IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha mRNA levels were decreased in colonic T lymphocytes, and virtually no IL-2, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha or TGF-beta positive cells were detected in basal lymphoid aggregates. However, scattered IL-10 positive cells were found here. Lamina propria outside the aggregates contained IL-10-, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha and TGF-beta but not IL-2 positive cells. T cells of UC patients did not express IL-4 or IL-5. Taken, together the data suggest a generalized activation of IL-10 producing CD4+ T cells along the intestine of UC patients. The local environment seems to determine the biological consequences of elevated IL-10.

Medical therapy for ulcerative colitis

Although newer therapeutic agents are being developed for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, aminosalicylates and corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment for UC (Tables 2-5). Patients who do not respond to these agents or become steroid dependent require immunomodulatory therapy or curative surgery. Cyclosporine represents the greatest treatment advance for UC in 10 years. The role of nicotine, heparin, antibiotics, probiotics, and SCFA in the treatment of UC is less clear, but these agents may offer an alternative therapeutic approach for patients intolerant or nonresponsive to standard therapy.

Lack of efficacy of ridogrel, a thromboxane synthase inhibitor, in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-centre clinical trial in active Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Thromboxanes are produced in excess and platelets are activated in active Crohn's disease. Preliminary reports have suggested that ridogrel, a dual thromboxane synthase inhibitor and receptor antagonist, may have therapeutic benefit in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

AIMS

To investigate the efficacy of ridogrel in patients with active Crohn's disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an international, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 5 mg/day oral ridogrel for 12 weeks in 85 patients with moderately active Crohn's disease. Sixty patients were randomized to receive ridogrel, and 25 to placebo. The Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) was used to assess disease activity: remission was defined as a CDAI < 150. Changes in clinical condition, as assessed by the Harvey-Bradshaw index, global evaluation by the investigator and the patient, and blood measures of inflammation, were used as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The patients' mean (s.d.) CDAI at recruitment was 277 (68) in the ridogrel treated group and 265 (70) in the placebo group. At their final assessment, 20 out of 60 (35%) patients who had been given ridogrel in an intention-to-treat analysis and seven out of 25 (28%) patients given placebo were in remission (no significant difference). No significant differences in Harvey- Bradshaw index or global evaluation were noted between patients given ridogrel and those given placebo. Adverse events were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

A 5-mg dose of oral ridogrel was not more effective than placebo in inducing remission in patients with moderately active Crohn's disease. If thromboxane synthesis and platelet function are to be targeted for the treatment of Crohn's disease, more potent agents require development and assessment.

Medical therapy of active Crohn's disease

Active Crohn's disease constitutes a major problem in gastroenterology. Symptoms vary with site, extent and local complications of the disease as well as with the absence or presence of extraintestinal manifestations. Due to the troublesome consequences of the disease new treatments have continuously been tried. However, the results have varied and no definite breakthrough has occurred in the medical treatment of active Crohn's disease during the last years. The new salicylates have shown some effect using higher doses, but have not fulfilled the expectations once connected with their development. The new steroids have compared well to, but not exceeded, the older corticosteroid preparations in terms of therapeutic efficacy but they have a better side-effect profile. The role of the purine analogs azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine has been further evaluated. The onset of their effect is slow, an intravenous loading dose might shorten this time span, and they are steroid sparing. The controlled data on methotrexate are limited and the long-term effects not well studied and there is concern about toxicity. Even the use of cyclosporine in active Crohn's disease is controversial and connected with serious adverse events. Studies on the new immune modulating therapies such as anti-TNF-alpha antibodies, anti-CD4 antibodies, interleukin-10 and interferon have been encouraging but large scale studies are still awaited before the effect and the spectra of side-effects can be fully evaluated. The aim of this chapter is to summarize the present knowledge of medical treatment of active Crohn's disease and to point towards the directions of new therapeutic options.

Safety of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents in ulcerative colitis

For many years, corticosteroids have been the mainstay for treating acute ulcerative colitis. In patients with refractory disease, immunosuppressive therapy may be indicated, including azathioprine or its metabolite 6-mercaptopurine, cyclosporin and possibly methotrexate. Their benefits in ulcerative colitis must be weighed up against their possible adverse effects, the availability of surgical cure for this condition, and the long-term risk of carcinoma complicating colitis that applies in patients with chronic extensive disease. Information about the safety of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents has accumulated as a result of their extensive use in inflammatory bowel disease, organ transplantation and various other disorders.

Ulcerative colitis in children

Chronic nonspecific ulcerative colitis remains a disease of unknown etiology, although much new information continues to be gleaned from basic research and clinical trials. In most instances, ulcerative colitis responds to medical therapy. Selecting appropriate drug therapy for a specific child depends on the extent and severity of the colitis. This article summarizes the clinical information, diagnostic studies, and approaches to management that should be considered when evaluating a child for ulcerative colitis.

Review article: refractory distal colitis -- explanations and options

Distal colitis refractory to standard therapy is a complex and challenging problem. Physiological differences between the right and left colon may be exploited for maximum therapeutic benefit. Over-reliance on oral therapy should be seen as one of the reasons for treatment failure and delivery systems should target therapy to the distribution of the disease in doses proven to be therapeutically beneficial. The clinician should also be cognizant of potential adverse effects of standard therapies, particularly colitis due to mesalazine, which may mimic worsening disease. Numerous endogenous and exogenous factors that may exacerbate the underlying inflammatory bowel disease are discussed. This review explores the potential mechanisms why distal colitis may be refractory to therapy and addresses newer therapies that, while still in the investigatory stages, offer hope for a widening armamentarium of therapeutic modalities.