Interaction of NSAIDs and Helicobacter pylori on gastrointestinal injury and prostaglandin production: a controlled double-blind trial

The global burden of peptic ulcer disease in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer disease is one of the most common diseases in gastroenterology clinics. However, reported data about the global burden of peptic ulcer disease are still scarce.

METHODS

This was a secondary data analysis on the prevalence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to peptic ulcer disease by sex, age group and socio-demographic index (SDI) at the global level in 21 regions and 204 countries and territories between 1990 and 2019 using the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019.

RESULTS

Globally, the prevalence cases of peptic ulcer disease increased from 6 434 103 (95% uncertainty interval 5 405 963 to 7 627 971) in 1990 to 8 090 476 (6 794 576 to 9 584 000) in 2019. However, the age-standardized prevalence rate decreased from 143.4 (120.5 to 170.2) per 100 000 population in 1990 to 99.4 (83.9 to 117.5) per 100 000 population in 2019. Moreover, the age-standardized mortality rate decreased by 59.4% (55.3 to 63.1) and the DALYs rate fell by 60.6% (56.8 to 63.9) from 1990 to 2019. Across SDI quintiles, low-middle and low SDI quintiles had the highest age-standardized prevalence, mortality and DALYs rates from 1990 to 2019.

CONCLUSION

The age-standardized prevalence, mortality and DALYs estimates of peptic ulcer disease decreased from 1990 to 2019 globally, but more efforts are needed for the prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer disease in low SDI and low-middle SDI groups of countries.

The efficacy and safety of irsogladine maleate in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or aspirin-induced peptic ulcer and gastritis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Irsogladine maleate, an enhancer of gastric mucosal protective factors, has demonstrated its efficacy for various gastric mucosal injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irsogladine for prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin-induced peptic ulcer and gastritis.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, exploratory clinical trial, 100 patients over 50 years of age who needed continuous NSAIDs or aspirin for more than 8 weeks were randomly assigned to either test group (irsogladine maleate 2 mg, twice daily, 39 patients for full analysis) or placebo group (37 patients for full analysis). Primary outcomes were incidence of peptic ulcer and ratio of modified Lanza score (MLS) 2 to 4. Secondary outcome was the number of acute erosions confirmed by endoscopy at 8 weeks. Adverse effects were also compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in gastric protective effects between test and placebo groups. However, two cases of peptic ulcer in the placebo group but none in the test group were observed. These two cases of peptic ulcer were Helicobacter pylori-negative. In addition, H. pylori-negative group showed significant changes in MLS score (p = 0.0247) and edema score (p = 0.0154) after the treatment compared to those before treatment in the test group. There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of irsogladine maleate was found in H. pylori-negative group, suggesting its potential as a protective agent against NSAIDs or aspirin-induced peptic ulcer and gastritis.

Implication of antithrombotic agents on potential bleeding from endoscopically determined peptic ulcers, incidentally detected as surrogate markers for nsaids-associated ulcers complication

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Little is known about the clinical significance of treatment for endoscopically determined peptic ulcers (EPU), incidentally detected as surrogate endpoints for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-associated ulcers complication, such as overt bleeding and perforation. Even uncomplicated-EPU without overt bleeding signs when antithrombotic agents (AT) were cotherapied may be of potential bleeding sites. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether microcytic anemia, implying potential bleeding, is associated with NSAIDs-associated EPU or cotherapies with AT.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-eight outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis under long-term NSAIDs therapies underwent upper endoscopy and were divided into the following four groups according to the pattern (presence: + or absence: -) of AT cotherapy/EPU, respectively: A, -/- (n = 165); B, -/+ (n = 44); C, +/- (n = 25); and D, +/+ (n = 4).

RESULTS

EPU were found in 48 of the 238 studied patients (20.2%). After significant interactions among four groups hadstatistically been identified, hemoglobin (Hb) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) as biomarkers for potential bleeding were compared between the groups.Hb and MCV were significantly lower in the D group than in the A,B, or C groups (Hb: P < 0.01, respectively; P < 0.05, MCV; P < 0.01 or P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NSAIDs-associated EPU and AT cotherapy indicated significantly more severe microcytic anemia pattern than those without EPU or AT cotherapy, despite no evidence of overt bleeding. Even uncomplicated-EPU without overt bleeding when ATs were cotherapied may be of potential bleeding sites.

Epidemiology and demographics of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: prevalence, incidence, and mortality

Despite major advances in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment, nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding still is a serious problem in clinical practice. Current evidence indicates that most peptic ulcer bleeding-linked deaths are not a direct sequela of the bleeding ulcer itself. Instead, mortality derives from multiorgan failure, cardiopulmonary conditions, or terminal malignancy, suggesting that improving further current treatments for the bleeding ulcer may have a limited impact on mortality unless supportive therapies are developed for the global management of these patients.

Long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs normalizes the kinetics of gastric epithelial cells in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection via attenuation of gastric mucosal inflammation

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is associated with chronic gastritis and gastric carcinogenesis. The effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which exert chemopreventive effects on several cancers, on H. pylori-induced gastritis remain unknown. We investigated the effects of NSAIDs on gastric inflammation and the kinetics of gastric epithelial cells in H. pylori-induced gastritis.

METHODS

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis who took NSAIDs for more than 1 month and complained of dyspeptic symptoms were recruited for this study. Patients not on any NSAIDs were included as non-NSAID user controls. All patients underwent diagnostic testing for H. pylori infection, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and gastric biopsies. Neutrophil infiltration into gastric mucosa, expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and apoptosis and proliferation of gastric epithelial cells were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. In an in vitro study, the effects of NSAIDs on production of interleukin (IL)-8 induced by H. pylori in a gastric epithelial cell line (AGS) were determined.

RESULTS

Numbers of neutrophils infiltrating the gastric mucosa, iNOS-expressing inflammatory cells and apoptotic cells, and proliferating cells in gastric epithelium were higher in H. pylori-positive groups than H. pylori-negative groups. Among H. pyloripositive groups, these parameters were lower in NSAID users than in non-NSAID users. NSAIDs inhibited the production of IL-8 induced by H. pylori in AGS cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that long-term use of NSAIDs normalizes the kinetics of gastric epithelial cells in patients with H. pylori infection by attenuating gastric mucosal inflammation, which may result in prevention of the gastric carcinogenesis associated with H. pylori infection.

Effect of Low-dose, Enteric Coated Aspirin on Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study was performed to determine whether low-dose aspirin and/or clopidogrel can induce gastrointestinal bleeding and gastroduodenal mucosal injury.

METHODS

A total of 387 patients who underwent coronary angiography at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were assigned to one of three antiplatelet treatment groups: (1) control, (2) 100-mg enteric coated aspirin, and (3) 100-mg enteric coated aspirin plus clopidogrel. The incidences of gastroduodenal mucosal injury and gastrointestinal bleeding were prospectively evaluated, and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding were analyzed.

RESULTS

for gastrointestinal bleeding were analyzed.

RESULTS

The rate of gastroduodenal mucosal injury was higher in the aspirin-plus-clopidogrel group than in the aspirin group (p=0.012), and higher in the aspirin group than in the control group (p=0.049). The rate of gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly higher in the aspirin-plus-clopidogrel group (9.4%) than in the control group (2.4%, p=0.048). The risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding were older age (>/=60 years) and the presence of at least two comorbid disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose enteric coated aspirin was found to be safe in patients with coronary artery disease, but the addition of clopidogrel increased the rate of gastrointestinal bleeding. Combined clopidogrel and aspirin should be used with caution in older patients having at least two comorbid conditions.

Determinants of the short-term gastric damage caused by NSAIDs in man

BACKGROUND

The short-term gastric damage seen with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in man may involve inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX-1) and COX-2 as well as the topical irritancy, which is dependant on the acidity (pKa) and/or lipophilicity (log P(7.4)).

AIM

To study the quantitative relationship between NSAID-induced short-term gastric damage, their physicochemical properties and contrasting roles of COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition.

METHODS

We identified studies that allowed a qualitative comparison of the gastric injury (Lanza scores) induced by NSAIDs with their pKa and log P(7.4). Damage was correlated with gastric COX inhibition and potency to inhibit COX-1 and 2 and their COX-2/COX-1 selectivity ratio.

RESULTS

The gastric damage correlates significantly with pKa (r = -0.69; P < 0.01), log P (r = -0.58, P < 0.05) and potency of the NSAIDs to inhibit COX-1 (r = -0.61, P < 0.02), but not with COX-2 inhibition or COX-2/COX-1 selectivity.

CONCLUSION

Against a background of COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition, the physicochemical properties of NSAID appear to play an important role in short-term gastric damage.

Helicobacter pylori extract induces nuclear factor-kappa B, activator protein-1, and cyclooxygenase-2 in esophageal epithelial cells

Helicobacter pylori infection is recognized as the major cause of gastritis and gastric cancer; however, its role in the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's adenocarcinoma is unclear. The expression of NF-kappaB, AP-1, and COX-2 may be important in inflammation and tumorigenesis in the esophagus. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of live H pylori or H pylori extract (HPE) on these factors in the esophageal epithelial cell lines SKGT-4 and OE33. NF-kappaB and AP-1 activity were assessed by gel shift assay and COX-2 by Western blotting. Coculture of SKGT-4 and OE33 with live H pylori and HPE induced NF-kappaB and AP-1 DNA-binding activity, and also decreased IkappaB-alpha levels. Treatment with the specific MEK1/2 MAPK inhibitor PD98059, but not the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580, inhibited NF-kappaB and AP-1 activity. The antioxidant vitamin C inhibited H pylori-induced NF-kappaB activation, but increased AP-1 expression. Moreover, HPE induced COX-2 expression and IL-8 production, and PD98059 inhibited COX-2 expression, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and IL-8 production. These data demonstrate that both live H pylori and HPE induce NF-kappaB and AP-1 expression in esophageal epithelial cells. The induction of such transcription factors may play a role in the specific immune response within Barrett's mucosa and may indirectly cause inflammation of the gastric cardia and the distal esophagus.

Of microbe and man: determinants ofHelicobacter pylori-related diseases

The human gastric pathogen Helicobacterpylori infects the human gastric mucus layer of approximately half of the world's population. Colonization with this bacterium results in superficial gastritis without clinical symptoms, but can progress into gastric or duodenal ulcers, gastric malignancies and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-lymphomas. Disease outcome is affected by a complex interplay between host, environmental and bacterial factors. Irrespective of disease outcome, the majority of H. pylori infected individuals remain colonized for life. Changing conditions in the human gastric mucosa may alter gene expression and/or result in the outgrowth of more fit H. pylori variants. As such, H. pylori is a highly flexible organism that is optimally adapted to its host. the heterogeneity in H. pylori populations make predictions on H. pylori-related pathogenesis difficult. In this review, we discuss host, environmental and bacterial factors that are important in disease progression. Moreover, H. pylori adaptive mechanisms, which allow its life-long survival and growth in the gastric mucosa are considered.

NSAID-induced peptic ulcers and Helicobacter pylori infection: implications for patient management

The conflicting data about the influence of Helicobacter pylori infection on the ulcer risk in patients receiving NSAIDs can be accounted for by the heterogeneity of study designs and the diversified host response to H. pylori. Factors that will affect the outcome include the choice of H. pylori diagnostic tests, previous ulcer complications, concurrent use of acid suppressants, NSAID-naive versus long-term users, low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) versus non-aspirin NSAIDs and whether the result was derived from a pre-specified endpoint or post hoc subgroup analysis. Current evidence suggests that H. pylori eradication reduces the ulcer risk for patients who are about to start receiving NSAIDs but not for those who are already on long-term NSAID therapy. Since treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) worsens H. pylori-associated corpus gastritis, H. pylori should be tested for, and eradicated if present, before starting long-term prophylaxis with PPIs. Patients with H. pylori infection and a history of ulcer complications who require NSAIDs should receive concomitant PPIs or misoprostol after curing the infection. Among patients receiving low-dose aspirin, who have H. pylori infection and previous ulcer complications, long-term treatment with a PPI further reduces the risk of complicated ulcers if H. pylori eradication fails or if patients use concomitant non-aspirin NSAIDs. Current data on the gastric safety of COX-2 selective NSAIDs in H. pylori-infected patients are conflicting. Limited data suggest that the gastroduodenal sparing effect of rofecoxib is negated by H. pylori infection in patients who have had prior upper gastrointestinal events. In light of potential cardiovascular risk with COX-2 selective NSAIDs, it is important to weigh the potential adverse effects against the benefits for an individual patient.

Effect of high-dose aspirin on Helicobacter pylori eradication

We conducted a pilot study aimed at comparing the efficacy of the standard OAC (omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin) regimen with a combination of the OAC regimen and aspirin (OACA). Follow-up endoscopic findings showed that the previous ulcers were completely healed in all subjects. The eradication rates (per protocol) were 80.3% (49/61) in the OAC group and 86.7% (52/60) in the OACA group. The eradication rate was not significantly different between the two groups. The most common adverse event was a bad taste, and the overall adverse events were similar in the two groups. The combination of the OAC regimen and aspirin was not significantly superior to the standard OAC regimen, but it was well tolerated in a group of patients with peptic ulcer disease. Its potential for clinical use to augment the efficacy of H. pylori eradication may warrant further investigation.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on anti-thrombotic dose aspirin-induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are two major causes of gastric injury but the effect of H. pylori eradication on the development of aspirin-induced gastric mucosal injury is unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastroduodenal mucosal injury induced by antithrombotic doses of aspirin.

METHODS

Patients who had been planned to start on medium-dose aspirin (300 mg) for any kind of indication were included in the study. All subjects underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for determination of H. pylori status and Lanza score. The H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive either aspirin + eradication (omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 500 mg q.i.d. for 2 weeks) or aspirin + placebo eradication. Endoscopic reassessment was done 4 months after the onset of aspirin or when symptoms developed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (placebo group n = 16, H. pylori-eradicated group n = 16) completed the study and Lanza scores of both groups were similar before treatment. Lanza scores significantly increased in the placebo group (0.69 +/- 0.87 vs 2.25 +/- 1.3, P < 0.0001) and did not change in the H. pylori-eradicated group after aspirin treatment (0.43 +/- 0.72 vs 0.75 +/- 0.93, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Helicobacter pylori eradication may prevent medium-dose aspirin-induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury.

Should we eradicate Helicobacter pylori in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users?

The interaction between Helicobacter pylori and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in ulcerogenesis has been visited by many studies. Apparently these studies yielded conflicting results. This is a result of a wide diversity of methodology, selection of patient groups and definitions of outcome used by different investigators. This review attempts to analyse separately studies dealing with new or chronic NSAID users, primary or secondary prophylaxis, complicated or uncomplicated ulcers in NSAID or aspirin users. Evidence suggests that eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection may reduce the risk of ulcer and ulcer complications in patients requiring NSAIDs and aspirin. Whether or not one should test-and-treat H. pylori before prescribing NSAIDs is a complicated issue. Factors such as the ulcer risk of patients, previous history of NSAID usage and the use of aspirin or NSAIDs would guide the strategy.

Impact de l’infection à Helicobacter pylori sur le risque de complications gastro-duodénales des traitements anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens

The interaction of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the development of gastro-duodenal ulcers and their complications is complex and controversial. From a clinical point of view, the question is whether or not H. pylori infection should be tested and eradicated in patients treated or about to be treated by NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin. Contradictory results have been reported in epidemiological studies. Recent data suggest that H. pylori-NSAID interaction may be different depending on the type of treatment, non aspirin NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin, the gastric or duodenal localization of ulcer and the strains of H. pylori. Controlled randomized studies suggest that eradication of H. pylori may be beneficial in NSAID-naïve patients but not in those already on long term NSAID therapy. Recommendations are proposed for different subgroups of patients. In NSAID users presenting with gastro-duodenal ulcer or complications, H. pylori screening and eradication are indicated. In patients treated or about to be treated by NSAIDs, the "test and treat" H. pylori strategy is recommended if there is a history of gastroduodenal ulcer or complications. Whether this strategy should be generalized preventively in patients without ulcer history is still controversial and deserves further studies.

N/A

N/A

Relationship between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and Helicobacter pylori infection in bleeding or uncomplicated peptic ulcers: A case-control study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use has been closely associated with an increased risk of bleeding peptic ulcers, while the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection has been reported to be lower in bleeding ulcers than in non-bleeding ones. However, whether an interaction exists between NSAID use and H. pylori infection has not clearly been elucidated yet. The aims of this study were to determine the frequency of NSAID use and H. pylori infection, to predict risk factors in bleeding peptic ulcers and to determine whether NSAID use and H. pylori infection interact with each other.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients with bleeding ulcer were included in the study. The control group consisted of 106 patients with non-bleeding ulcer. Data were analyzed by using the chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis with or without interaction term (H. pylori by NSAID).

RESULTS

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was significantly more common in patients with bleeding ulcers than in controls (79.2 vs 38.7%, unadjusted odds ratio (OR): 6.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.21-11.29). The frequency of the H. pylori infection was significantly lower in patients with bleeding ulcers than in controls (66.7 vs 89.6%, unadjusted OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.10-0.49). In the logistic regression analysis with the interaction term, male sex (adjusted OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.65-8.29), multiplicity of ulcers (adjusted OR: 4.10, 95% CI: 1.02-16.45) and NSAID use (adjusted OR: 33.87, 95% CI: 4.36-262.97) were independent risk factors for bleeding ulcers. There was a negative interaction between H. pylori and NSAID use (adjusted OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

The negative interaction between the two variables suggests that the presence of H. pylori is associated with a lower risk of bleeding in ulcer patients taking NSAIDs.

Peptic-ulcer disease

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori has greatly changed our approach to peptic ulcer disease. Bacterial, host, and environmental factors all have a role in peptic-ulcer disease. Although the prevalence of uncomplicated peptic ulcers is falling, hospital admissions for ulcer complications associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are rising. Evidence suggests that prescription of NSAIDs along with potent antiulcer agents and the use of highly selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors reduce gastroduodenal ulceration. Whether these therapeutic advances will translate into clinical benefits remains to be seen. The interaction between H pylori and NSAIDs is one of the most controversial issues in peptic ulcer disease. With the fall in rates of H pylori infection, the proportion of ulcers not related to this organism and NSAIDs has risen, which will affect the management of peptic ulcer.

Impact of Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on gastric ulcerogenesis in experimental animals and in humans

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are the most common pathogens in the gastroduodenal mucosa in animals and humans, but their relationship in ulcerogenesis has been little studied. According to some authors, H. pylori infection in humans does not act synergistically with NSAID on ulcer healing, therefore, there is no need to eradicate the germ. This notion is supported by the finding that the eradication of H. pylori does not affect NSAID-induced gastropathy treated with omeprazole and that H. pylori infection induces a strong cyclooxygenase-2 expression resulting in excessive biosynthesis of gastroprotective prostaglandins, which should in turn counteract NSAID-induced gastropathy and heal the existing ulcer. Other investigators claim that H. pylori infection acts synergistically with NSAID on ulcer development, therefore, H. pylori should be eradicated, particularly at the start of long-term NSAID therapy. Maastricht 2-2000 consensus also recommends eradication prior to NSAID treatment, but this eradication does not appear to accelerate ulcer healing or to prevent the recurrent ulcers in NSAID users. Our studies in almost 6,000 dyspeptic patients undergoing upper endoscopy and [(13)C]-urea breath test (UBT) revealed that about 70% of these patients are H. pylori (+) and about 30.6% of these develop gastroduodenal ulcers. Of these ulcers, over 70% were H. pylori (+) positive, 12% NSAID (+), 8% were both H. pylori (+) and NSAID (+), while 22% ulcers were H. pylori (-) and NSAID (-) or "idiopathic" ulcers. Basically, our results support Hawkey's concept and this also agrees with our findings in the rat model showing that: (1) there is no synergistic interaction between H. pylori infection and NSAID on gastric ulcer development, (2) H. pylori and NSAID are independent risk factors for peptic ulceration, and (3) NSAID therapy in H. pylori positive patients attenuates the ulcer development possibly due to direct inhibitory action of these drugs on H. pylori.

Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori-induced cyclo-oxygenase-2 aggravates NSAID-caused gastric damage in Mongolian gerbils

BACKGROUND

The effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric mucosal injury is controversial.

AIM

To examine the effect of the interaction between H. pylori and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on gastric mucosal injury.

METHODS

Mongolian gerbils infected with H. pylori were treated with indometacin at 8 mg/kg for 2 days or 7 days. Mucosal damage was assessed by macroscopic and histological examination, and myeloperoxidase activity was measured as an index of neutrophil infiltration. The expression levels of cyclo-oxygenase proteins were determined by Western blot analysis and cyclo-oxygenase activity.

RESULTS

A 2-day course of indometacin did not cause an increase in gastric damage in H. pylori-infected Mongolian gerbils compared to uninfected gerbils, while a 7-day course of indometacin caused additive gastric damage in H. pylori-infected animals. H. pylori infection induced cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression in the stomach. Treatment with indometacin for 2 days did not significantly affect cyclo-oxygenase activity in H. pylori-infected animals, while treatment for 7 days inhibited both cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2 activities. Pre-treatment with a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor aggravated mucosal injury in H. pylori-infected animals treated or not treated with indometacin for 2 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that cyclo-oxygenase-2 protein induced by H. pylori infection may be involved in the defence of the gastric mucosa against damage caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Therefore, inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase-2 activity may enhance non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-caused gastric damage in H. pylori-infected animals.

Review article: the effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced upper gastrointestinal tract injury

Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the two major causes of peptic ulcers. This article reviews the interaction of H. pylori and NSAIDs on the development of gastric mucosal histological changes, endoscopically confirmed ulcers, and ulcer complications, and assesses whether underlying H. pylori infection potentiates (or mitigates) the development of NSAID-induced ulcer disease. The weight of evidence does not suggest that H. pylori infection potentiates the risk of ulcer formation or ulcer complications in NSAID users. If such an effect occurs, it is likely to be relatively small. Some data even suggest that H. pylori may be protective against NSAID-induced gastric ulcers. Limited data raise the possibility that H. pylori infection, however, may potentiate the effect of low-dose aspirin with respect to ulcer bleeding. Both NSAIDs and H. pylori are independent risk factors for ulcer disease. Therefore, in an individual patient with an ulcer, one cannot be certain which factor is responsible for the ulcer, and both risks should be removed if possible.

Effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and non-selective NSAIDs on Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in Mongolian gerbils

BACKGROUND

It is still a point of controversy whether Helicobacter pylori-infected patients are more likely to develop mucosal damage while taking NSAIDs. Selective cyclooxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors may be associated with less severe gastric mucosal damage than conventional NSAIDs, but this association is undefined in H. pylori-induced gastritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of selective COX-2 and nonselective NSAIDs on H. pylori-induced gastritis.

METHODS

After intragastric administration of indomethacin, NS-398 or vehicle alone, once daily for 5 days in H. pylori-infected and uninfected Mongolian gerbils, we evaluated gastric mucosal damage, inflammatory cell infiltration and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentration. We investigated whether H. pylori infection induced the COX-2 expression.

RESULTS

In H. pylori-uninfected groups, the indomethacin-treated group showed the highest mucosal damage score and the lowest PGE2 concentration. There was no difference in mucosal damage scores and PGE2 concentration between NS-398 and vehicle-alone treated group. In H. pylori-infected groups, there was no difference in mucosal damage scores, irrespective of the type of drugs administered. The indomethacin-treated group showed the lowest PGE2 concentration, similar to that of the NS-398 and vehicle-alone treated groups, both without H. pylori infection. Gastric neutrophil and monocyte infiltration scores were higher in H. pylori-infected groups than in uninfected groups. However, there was no difference in these scores according to the type of drugs administered, within H. pylori-infected or uninfected groups. COX-2 protein expression was observed in H. pylori-infected Mongolian gerbils but not in uninfected ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Our animal study showed that H. pylori infection induced COX-2 expression and increased prostaglandin concentration. Administration of NSAIDs decreased the prostaglandin concentration, but did not increase mucosal damage in H. pylori-induced gastritis. Selective COX-2 inhibitors, instead of conventional NSAIDs, had no beneficial effect on preventing mucosal damage in H. pylori-induced gastritis.

Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic-ulcer disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The relation between H pylori infection and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the pathogenesis of peptic-ulcer disease is controversial. We undertook a meta-analysis to address this issue.

METHODS

By computer and manually we sought observational studies on the prevalence of peptic-ulcer disease in adult NSAID takers or the prevalence of H pylori infection and NSAID use in patients with peptic-ulcer bleeding. Summary odds ratios were calculated from the raw data. Tests for homogeneity were done.

FINDINGS

Of 463 citations identified, 25 studies met inclusion criteria. In 16 studies of 1625 NSAID takers, uncomplicated peptic-ulcer disease was significantly more common in patients positive than in those negative for H pylori (341/817 [41.7%] vs 209/808 [25.9%]; odds ratio 2.12 [95% CI 1.68-2.67]). In five controlled studies, peptic-ulcer disease was significantly more common in NSAID takers (138/385 [35.8%]) than in controls (23/276 [8.3%]), irrespective of H pylori infection. Compared with H pylori negative individuals not taking NSAIDs, the risk of ulcer in H pylori infected NSAID takers was 61.1 (9.98-373). H pylori infection increased the risk of peptic-ulcer disease in NSAID takers 3.53-fold in addition to the risk associated with NSAID use (odds ratio 19.4). Similarly, in the presence of risk of peptic-ulcer disease associated with H pylori infection (18.1), use of NSAIDs increased the risk of peptic-ulcer disease 3.55-fold. H pylori infection and NSAID use increased the risk of ulcer bleeding 1.79-fold and 4.85-fold, respectively. However, the risk of ulcer bleeding increased to 6.13 when both factors were present.

INTERPRETATION

Both H pylori infection and NSAID use independently and significantly increase the risk of peptic ulcer and ulcer bleeding. There is synergism for the development of peptic ulcer and ulcer bleeding between H pylori infection and NSAID use. Peptic-ulcer disease is rare in H pylori negative non-NSAID takers.

Helicobacter pylori, NSAIDs and gastrointestinal haemorrhage

Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause the majority of bleeding ulcers. Whether the presence of H. pylori infection would affect the risk of ulcers in patients taking NSAIDs is important for both theoretical and practical reasons. However, the results have been so conflicting that there is no consensus on the management of patients requiring NSAIDs who are infected with H. pylori. The controversy is largely due to the variable study design and marked heterogeneity of the study population. Studying the interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs without considering these factors often leads to erroneous conclusions. Current evidence suggests that H. pylori contributes to an increased ulcer risk for patients who are about to start NSAID treatment, whereas NSAIDs probably account for the majority of ulcer disease in patients who are already taking long-term NSAIDs. In the light of the reduced gastric toxicity of COX-2 inhibitors, the relative importance of H. pylori in the pathogenesis of ulcers is expected to increase. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that H. pylori contributes to ulcer bleeding associated with low-dose aspirin. Among H. pylori-positive patients with a history of ulcer bleeding who are taking low-dose aspirin, the eradication of H. pylori has been shown to be comparable to omeprazole in preventing recurrent bleeding.

Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The complex interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs implies that it is over simplistic to conclude that their relationship is independent, synergistic, or antagonistic without considering the influence of other factors. Factors such as previous exposure to NSAIDs, a history of ulcer complication, concurrent use of acid-suppressant therapy, and the difference between NSAIDs and low-dose aspirin all affect the outcome. Several recommendations can be made with regard to the indications of H. pylori eradication for patients requiring NSAIDs. First, patients taking NSAIDs who have ulcers or previous ulcer disease should be tested for the bacterium, and it should be eradicated if present because it is impossible to determine whether the ulcers are caused by H. pylori or NSAIDs or both. Antiulcer drugs should be prescribed to prevent ulcer recurrence for patients who continue to require NSAIDs. Although the efficacy of omeprazole is enhanced by H. pylori infection, it is not justified to leave a pathogen in the stomach in exchange for a modest therapeutic gain. Second, for patients who take low-dose aspirin, eradication of H. pylori substantially reduces the risk of ulcer bleeding. It is advisable that patients taking low-dose aspirin who are at risk of ulcer bleeding should be tested for H. pylori and treated for it if the infection is found. Third, for patients who are about to start NSAIDs, screen-and-treat H. pylori has the potential of reducing the ulcer risk at an affordable incremental cost. It might be argued that any interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs would become irrelevant in the era of COX-2-selective NSAIDs. Even among patients who are receiving a COX-2-selective NSAID, however, a large-scale study showed that the ulcer risk is significantly higher in H. pylori-positive patients than in uninfected patients. This finding suggests that the relative importance of H. pylori in ulcer development might increase with a reduced toxicity of COX-2-selective NSAIDs. With an increasing use of low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis, the problem of aspirin-related ulcer disease is expected to rise. Given the significant role of H. pylori in the latter condition, screen-and-treat H. pylori might be a useful strategy for the prevention of ulcer complications in high-risk patients receiving low-dose aspirin in the future.

Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of NSAIDs

Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can each result in gastroduodenal ulcers and ulcer complications. Recent studies have suggested that there is an interaction between the two causes such that elimination of H. pylori before NSAID treatment decreases the occurrence of ulcers. This led to the conclusion of the Maastricht 2000 meeting that H. pylori eradication should be considered before embarking on long-term NSAID therapy. One of the main sources of confusion is related to the fact that prospective endoscopic studies testing various drugs for prevention of NSAID ulcers among chronic NSAID users are probably not directly applicable to problems of clinical ulcers and of ulcer complications. It has become clear that, to be interpretable clinically, such studies must provide separate analyses based on H. pylori status, history of ulcer, or an ulcer complication. Overall, the data strongly support the notion that eradication therapy is beneficial for primary prophylaxis. In contrast, one would expect little benefit when NSAIDs caused the clinical ulcer (secondary prevention) and, at best, H. pylori eradication has a modest effect on the prevention of recurrent ulcer bleeding in NSAID users who have suffered ulcer complications. The data support the notion that H. pylori eradication therapy should be given to all H. pylori -infected patients with peptic ulcers irrespective of whether or not they have used NSAIDs. Proton pump inhibitors are superior to placebo for the prevention of ulcer recurrence but are inferior to full-dose misoprostol for the prevention of ulcers among those with NSAID ulcers and no H. pylori infection. Selective COX-2 inhibitors appear to reduce markedly, but not eliminate, ulcer complications among chronic NSAID users.

Prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal symptoms and complications due to NSAIDs

The mechanisms by which aspirin(ASA) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause gastrointestinal symptoms are poorly understood. They probably arise from several causes, including direct and indirect mucosal injury, exacerbation of underlying peptic ulcer disease or non-ulcer dyspepsia, exacerbation of Helicobacter pylori gastritis, and possibly motility disorders. No single form of therapy has been generally successful. Because, in most cases, symptoms abate fairly rapidly with continued treatment, there is little evidence that benefit associated with any symptom-directed drug therapy is superior to placebo beyond 4 weeks. Exceptions may be the subsets of patients with pre-existing ulcer disease or heartburn, exacerbated by the NSAID therapy, who usually benefit from acid-suppressive drug treatment. Different NSAIDs vary in the frequency with which their use leads to gastrointestinal(GI) complications such as haemorrhage, perforation, obstruction, or the symptomatic ulcers from which about 40% of the complications arise. Most gastroduodenal ulcers heal over time, albeit more slowly, with conventional doses of any of the available anti-ulcer drugs. Maintenance therapy may be needed in many patients who continue NSAID therapy. Anti-ulcer drugs have not, thus far, been shown to be more effective than placebo in preventing ulcer complications or their recurrence. The use of COX-2-selective inhibitors appears, in outcome studies, to reduce gastrointestinal bleeding, including bleeding from ulcers, but it is not established that the ulcers protected were caused by NSAIDs, as distinct from ulcers exacerbating or recurring from antecedent peptic ulcer disease. To-date, perforation or obstruction have not been shown to be affected by selective COX-2 inhibitor drugs. If the major problem giving rise to severe NSAID complications is pre-existing peptic ulcer disease, it may yet emerge that the most effective approach will be the use of proton pump inhibitor drugs, for the duration of NSAID therapy, in a small subset of high-risk patients. Most other low-risk patients may not need any special care. Co-morbid conditions have a major impact on outcome of NSAID therapy. Morbidity or even death attributable solely to NSAIDs is probably small in normal patients, and requires little in the way of prophylaxis.

COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors

By inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause mucosal damage, ulceration and ulcer complication throughout the gastrointestinal tract. The recognition that there are two cyclo-oxygenase enzymes, one predominating at sites of inflammation (COX-2) and one constitutively expressed in the gastrointestinal tract (COX-1), has led to the important therapeutic development of COX-2 inhibitors. COX-2 is phylogenetically more primitive that COX-1 and, while very similar, has critical differences, particularly the existence of a small pocket half way down the active enzyme site. A number of drugs achieve selectivity by binding to this pocket, including presumptively rofecoxib and celecoxib. Others, such as meloxicam, may inhibit COX-2 by different mechanisms. Truly selective COX-2 inhibitors have been shown to have no effect on gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis, to cause no acute injury, and no chronic ulceration compared to placebo. Rofecoxib has, in a prospective systematic evaluation involving 8076 patients, been shown to reduce clinically significant ulcers, ulcer complications and gastrointestinal bleeding significantly compared to naproxen. Outcomes data for celecoxib have also been published although differences from the combined comparator agents (diclofenac and ibuprofen) did not reach statistical significance. Use of aspirin in the class study has shown that the benefits of COX-2 inhibitors may be reduced by aspirin use. The VIGOR study has raised the possibility that some NSAIDs, particularly naproxen, may protect against vascular disease compared to COX-2 inhibitors (or placebo).

Role of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastroduodenal injury and gastric prostaglandin synthesis during long term/low dose aspirin therapy: a prospective placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

Whether gastric infection with Helicobacter pylori increases the risk of gastric mucosal injury during long term/low dose aspirin therapy is unknown. We examined whether H. pylori infection enhances upper GI mucosal damage, assessed endoscopically, in volunteers given low dose aspirin. We studied 61 healthy men and women, 29 with and 32 without active H. pylori infection.

METHODS

We treated volunteers for 45 days with a placebo or aspirin (either 81 mg every day or 325 mg every 3 days). Gastroduodenal mucosal damage was then assessed by endoscopy, as was gastric histology and ex vivo gastric mucosal prostaglandin E2 and F2alpha synthesis rates.

RESULTS

Erosive disease from low dose aspirin (erosions and/or ulcers) occurred in 50% of H. pylori-infected volunteers and in 16% of their noninfected counterparts (p = 0.02). Aspirin caused a significantly higher average mucosal injury score in the gastric antrum in H. pylori-infected participants than in noninfected subjects (p = 0.03), and two H. pylori-infected subjects developed antral gastric ulcers. Subjects with H. pylori gastritis treated with the placebo had nearly 50% higher gastric mucosal prostaglandin (E2 plus F2alpha) synthesis rates than their noninfected counterparts (108 +/- 6 ng/g/min versus 75 +/- 6 ng/g/min, p < 0.001). Aspirin reduced mucosal prostaglandin synthesis to similar levels in infected and noninfected participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Long term/low dose aspirin therapy led to more gastric mucosal damage when H. pylori gastritis was present than when it was absent, despite similar degrees of gastric mucosal prostaglandin depletion.

The effect of helicobacter pylori eradication on NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity

OBJECTIVE

To review the data to determine whether Helicobacter pylori eradication alters nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.

DATA SOURCE

Literature accessed through MEDLINE from 1966 to May2000 and abstracts of recently presented data at scientific meetings.

DATA SYNTHESIS

NSAID use and H. pylon infection are independent risk factors for the development of gastrointestinal ulcers. An evaluation of the relationship between these two risk factors and the impact of H. pylori eradication on NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity was conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori colonization and NSAID use are independent risk factors for the development of gastrointestinal ulcers. The data regarding the interaction between these two risk factors in the development of gastrointestinal ulcers are conflicting. Eradication of H. pylori does not appear to decrease the risk of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity in the majority of patients. As there is little evidence to support a clear benefit of eradicating H. pylori in patients requiring NSAID therapy, routine screening for and eradication of H. pylori in these patients is not recommended.

The ever-emerging anti-inflammatories. Have there been any real advances?

Gastrointestinal (GI) Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) from the NSAIDs are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in arthritic patients taking these drugs. The recent much heralded development of COX-2 selective drugs (celecoxib, rofecoxib), the objective of which has been to spare inhibition of the production of COX-1 derived mucosal protective prostaglandins, may have represented an advance in reducing the risk of serious ADRs--ulcers and bleeding--but does not appear to have reduced the incidence of symptomatic side-effects (nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain/heartburn, abdominal discomfort) which are a major reason for withdrawal from NSAID therapy, especially in the long term. The rationale of COX-2 selectivity from these newer drugs is controversial since there may be pharmacokinetic differences from established carboxylate-NSAIDs that accounts for their apparent lower ulcerogenicity. Moreover, concerns have been recently expressed that as COX-2 is important in ulcer healing, control of prostacyclin production and renal function that they may have adverse reactions from these effects. Indeed, recent reports of enhanced risk of congestive heart failure with rofecoxib are of importance and may relate to impaired prostacyclin production. Moreover, there are other therapeutic strategies that have yielded equally low ulcerogenic NSAIDs (e.g. the prodrug, nabumetone; the established COX-2 inhibitory drug, nimesulide) and even the well-established NSAIDs ibuprofen and diclofenac have relatively low upper GI ulcerogenicity and have been used as benchmark standards in comparative trials of the newer "Oxib" drugs (celecoxib, rofecoxib). Much research interest has centred on the nitric oxide-donating NSAIDs (NO-NSAIDs). The rationale for donating NSAIDs being to counteract the vasoconstriction effects of NSAIDs but this has yet to be fully evaluated. It is not certain that this "antidote" approach will be acceptable as there may also be systemic effects of the nitrobutoxyl--or other NO-donors that may have toxicological consequences. Another strategy is the development of mixed COX-5 lipoxygenase (LOX) inhibitors--the progenitors of which were benoxaprofen and BW-755C. The rationale of reducing the potential for lipoxygenase mediated actions in the stomach (e.g. vasoconstriction, leucocyte accumulation). Clearly, the need to develop newer NSAIDs with lower risks of ulcers and bleeding as well as symptomatic ADRs is still representing a major challenge.

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs controversy

The relationship between NSAIDs and H. pylori as risk factors for the development of peptic ulcer is complex and controversial. In the case of duodenal ulcers in NSAID users, there now is enough information to suggest that eradication of H. pylori usually is worthwhile. In the stomach, however, there is some evidence that ulcers heal faster and are no more likely to reappear if the infection is left alone, provided that patients continue to take an NSAID. Why this situation should be so is unclear. Possibilities include greater efficacy of antisecretory agents, a smaller inhibition of prostaglandin production, and a blunted apoptotic response in patients who are infected with H. pylori and take NSAIDs.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug toxicity in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) toxicity in the upper gastrointestinal tract is the most common serious drug-induced toxicity reported to drug regulatory authorities. In the last two decades, the rediscovery of H. pylori, development of potent ulcer-healing drugs and specific Cox-II inhibitors have opened new horizons in the management of NSAID toxicity. A Working Party composed of gastroenterologists and rheumatologists in the Asia-Pacific region met in Cairns, Australia, in 1999 to review the literature and develop appropriate guidelines. Recommendations were made based on the latest existing evidence. The importance of clinical events as study endpoints was emphasized. While differences exist between NSAIDs and aspirin, most studies have shown that advanced age, history of peptic ulcer disease, serious concomitant illnesses and coprescription of NSAID/aspirin with anticoagulants and steroids are high risk factors. These patients should be considered for prophylactic anti-ulcer therapy. Helicobacter pylori infection may aggravate the toxicity of NSAIDs and, in selected cases, should be treated before NSAID/aspirin is prescribed. Proton pump inhibitors and misoprostol are the most promising agents in preventing gastric and duodenal ulcers. When NSAID/aspirin needs to be continued in patients who develop an NSAID-related ulcer, proton pump inhibitors offer the best healing effect. With the discovery of cyclo-oxygenase isoforms (Cox-I and Cox-II), preferential and specific Cox-II inhibitors have been developed. While early clinical data have suggested promising antiinflammatory effects and improved safety profile in the gastrointestinal tract, several key issues on long-term safety remain unresolved. The use of potent anti-ulcer therapy, treatment of H. pylori infection and the development of Cox-II inhibitor will change the scenario of NSAID/aspirin-related gastrointestinal toxicity in the next millennium.

The effects of omeprazole on healing and appearance of small gastric and duodenal lesions during dosing with diclofenac in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with gastrointestinal mucosal damage. Omeprazole prevents the formation, and accelerates the healing, of NSAID-induced ulcers.

AIM

To test whether omeprazole accelerates healing of standardized gastroduodenal lesions in the presence of diclofenac.

METHODS

In a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers received consecutive, 2-week courses of omeprazole (40 mg o.d.) and placebo, in random order, with an intervening, 4-week washout period; diclofenac (50 mg t.d.s.), was given for the second week of each course. Five endoscopies were performed, one at the outset and the others before and after each course of diclofenac. Biopsies were taken from the endoscopically normal mucosa of the corpus, antrum and duodenum and also from any new mucosal lesion that developed after diclofenac. The sites of biopsies taken before each course of diclofenac were evaluated endoscopically after each course to assess the extent of healing according to a predetermined healing score scale.

RESULTS

The healing scores observed after administration of placebo/diclofenac (median=0; range 0-6) and after omeprazole/diclofenac (median=0; range 0-6; P=0.17) did not differ. Small gastroduodenal lesions developed de novo in six subjects during placebo/diclofenac and in seven during omeprazole/diclofenac. Focal chemical gastropathy was observed only in close proximity to macroscopic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy subjects, omeprazole does not accelerate the healing of pre-existing mucosal lesions or prevent the development of small diclofenac-induced mucosal lesions.

How does Helicobacter pylori infection interact with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?

There have been conflicting clinical data on whether Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) contributes to the pathogenesis of ulcers induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The discrepant findings reflect the complex interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs, which has generated divergent results under different clinical conditions. This chapter reviews the pathogenetic mechanisms in ulcer formation that are common to H. pylori and NSAIDs, and explains how a better understanding of these factors might resolve some of the controversies. Existing evidence indicates that the interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs is not an 'all-or-none' relationship. Factors such as previous exposure to NSAIDs, a past history of ulcer complication, gastric acid output, neutrophil infiltration, concurrent acid suppressive therapy and the type of NSAID used (aspirin versus non-aspirin NSAIDs) would influence the role of H. pylori as a risk factor in NSAID users. Recommendations on H. pylori eradication for different subgroups of NSAID users are proposed.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori and bleeding gastric ulcer

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAID usage are considered to be independent risk factors for gastric ulcer (GU). Whether they interact to influence the risk of bleeding in GU is unclear.

AIM

To determine the prevalence of H. pylori infection and NSAID ingestion in a group of patients with GU and determine their roles in bleeding and non-bleeding GU.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From January 1993 to June 1996, a total of 217 GU patients (150 male, 67 female, median age 61 years, range 26-94) were eligible for the study. Eighty-five per cent were H. pylori-positive and 15% were H. pylori-negative. NSAID usage within 4 weeks prior to endoscopy was present in 30%, more in the H. pylori-negative than H. pylori-positive patients (59% vs. 25% P = 0.0002). Aspirin was most commonly used (43%). One hundred patients bled from GU (69 male, 31 female, mean age 67 years, range 26-94) and 117 did not (81 male, 36 female, mean age 57 years, range 28-86). Univariate logistic regression showed that advanced age (>/= 65 years) and NSAID usage carried an increased risk of bleeding GU (odds ratio 3.4 and 6.8, respectively) while H. pylori infection alone was not associated with additional risk (OR = 0.8). However, when three variables were considered jointly in a multiple logistic regression, the OR associated with H. pylori infection increased to 2.4, suggesting that in the presence of NSAIDs and advanced age, H. pylori also increases the risk of bleeding GU, indicating an interaction between the variables.

CONCLUSION

NSAID usage and advanced age are risk factors for bleeding GU, whereas H. pylori infection by itself is not. In the presence of NSAIDs and advanced age, an increased risk of bleeding GU with H. pylori is observed, indicating the possibility of an interaction between these factors.

Peptic ulcer bleeding: interaction between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori infection, and the ABO blood group system

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is found in almost all patients with an uncomplicated ulcer. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use is the main risk factor for bleeding peptic ulcer. In the older literature ABO blood groups were mentioned as a risk factor. There is continuing uncertainty about the interaction between these risk factors and the development of peptic ulcer bleeding. We therefore determined the separate and combined effect of NSAIDs, H. pylori infection, and the ABO blood group system in patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer.

METHODS

The prevalence of NSAID use, H. pylori infection, and blood group O was determined in 227 patients who were admitted with a bleeding gastric or duodenal ulcer between 1990 and 1997. These results were compared with the expected frequency of these risk factors in the Dutch population.

RESULTS

NSAID use was reported in 48.2% of the patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer. The H. pylori prevalence was 62.0%, whereas blood group O was present in 49.3% of the patients. NSAID use was the strongest risk factor for hemorrhage caused by a peptic ulcer (relative risk, 8.4), whereas the relative risk associated with H. pylori infection and blood group O was 1.5 and 1.2, respectively. With univariate analysis NSAID use and H. pylori infection seemed to be separate risk factors and did not really potentiate each other's effect. Moreover, blood group O did not potentiate the strong effect of NSAIDs.

CONCLUSION

H. pylori infection may add only a little to the important risk of NSAID use in the development of bleeding peptic ulcers.

Helicobacter pylori infection is a protective factor for bleeding gastric ulcers but not for bleeding duodenal ulcers in NSAID users

BACKGROUND

The effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on NSAID-induced gastroduodenal damage is unclear.

AIM

To determine the role of H. pylori and NSAID use in complicated peptic ulcers.

METHODS

A total of 185 consecutive patients with bleeding peptic ulcers and 185 hospitalized matched controls were studied prospectively. Additionally, 75 consecutive uncomplicated peptic ulcers and 75 community controls were also studied. Active H. pylori infection was determined by urea breath test and/or both urease test and histology. Serum CagA and VacA status were determined at random in 135 infected patients and 82 controls. NSAID use was determined by structured data collection.

RESULTS

H. pylori (odds ratio [OR]=5. 98; 2.9-12.3) and NSAID use (OR=5.74; 3.4-9.7) were independent risk factors for duodenal ulcer bleeding, whereas NSAID use was the main risk factor for bleeding gastric ulcers (OR=12.4; 5.5-27.9). Interaction of both factors was associated with reduced risk for bleeding gastric ulcers (OR=0.19; 0.04-0.88) but not for bleeding duodenal ulcers, which showed a similar risk to any one factor alone. This was observed for all types of NSAID use, including low-dose aspirin, and infection by CagA positive strains. H. pylori was the only factor involved in common uncomplicated duodenal ulcers.

CONCLUSION

Interaction of both H. pylori infection and NSAID use decreases the risk of bleeding due to gastric ulcers, but not that due to duodenal ulcers.

Review article: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastrointestinal complications--guidelines for prevention and treatment

Chronic ingestion of NSAIDs increases the risk for gastrointestinal complications, which range from dyspepsia to gastrointestinal bleeding, obstruction, and perforation. Among patients using NSAIDs, 0.1 to 2.0% per year suffer serious gastrointestinal complications. Patients who require analgesic therapy should be carefully assessed for the lowest possible dosage and shortest duration of NSAID use and for the potential of treatment with a non-NSAID pain reliever. These patients should also be assessed for factors that increase their risk of gastrointestinal complications, including increased age, concomitant anticoagulant or corticosteroid use, and past history of NSAID-associated gastrointestinal complications. The exact association between Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAID-related ulcer disease is unclear, and the routine testing and treatment of all NSAID using patients for H. pylori infection is not recommended at this time. NSAID-using patients who suffer from dyspepsia should have NSAIDs discontinued, the dosage changed, or be changed to a different class of NSAID. If NSAIDs cannot be discontinued, then an antisecretory agent should be initiated. Misoprostol prevents NSAID-associated gastrointestinal complications. Proton pump inhibitors are the most effective at healing NSAID-associated ulcers among patients who cannot discontinue NSAID therapy.

Effects of very low dose daily, long-term aspirin therapy on gastric, duodenal, and rectal prostaglandin levels and on mucosal injury in healthy humans

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The safety of low-dose daily aspirin therapy in the gastrointestinal tract is uncertain. Our objectives were to evaluate the long-term effects of very low daily aspirin doses in the gastrointestinal tract and effects on platelet-derived serum thromboxane levels in volunteers.

METHODS

Subjects were randomized to receive 10 mg (n = 8), 81 mg (n = 11), or 325 mg (n = 10) aspirin daily for 3 months. Before administration of aspirin, all subjects underwent gastroduodenoscopy, and most underwent proctoscopy for assessment of mucosal injury and prostaglandin content. After 1.5 and 3 months, subjects again underwent gastroduodenoscopy and, at 3 months, another proctoscopy.

RESULTS

Each aspirin dose (even 10 mg) significantly reduced gastric mucosal prostaglandin levels, to approximately 40% of the baseline value. All three doses also induced significant gastric injury, and 325 mg caused duodenal injury. Three subjects developed gastric ulcers, 1 while taking 10 mg/day of aspirin. Furthermore, aspirin at 81 mg/day and 325 mg/day (but not 10 mg/day) significantly reduced duodenal mucosal prostaglandin levels to approximately 40% of the baseline value. Only 325 mg of aspirin per day significantly reduced rectal mucosal prostaglandin levels to approximately 60% of the baseline value. Serum thromboxane levels were inhibited 62%, 90%, and 98% with 10, 81, and 325 mg of aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings explain aspirin's predominant gastric toxicity and question the safety of even 10 mg of aspirin daily.

Personal review: Helicobacter pylori, NSAIDs and cognitive dissonance

Helicobacter pylori and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) each cause peptic ulcers but by different mechanisms. As a result, the effect of both of these risk factors together is not a synergistic enhancement of injury, ulceration or rates of complications. Indeed, there are circumstances under which patients infected with H. pylori are less prone to NSAID-induced ulcers than those who are not infected or who have undergone eradication treatment. This may be because of opposite effects on gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis or for other reasons. Reluctance to accept that there may be specific circumstances where H. pylori is beneficial may arise because of the psychological process of cognitive dissonance.

Neutrophils, Helicobacter pylori, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ulcers

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Gastric injury by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is minimal in neutropenic animals. This study examined peptic ulcer development in the presence or absence of gastric neutrophils in patients requiring long-term use of NSAIDs.

METHODS

Gastric histology, neutrophils, and Helicobacter pylori were assessed in 120 patients randomized to receive placebo or 20 or 40 mg famotidine twice daily as prophylaxis against NSAID-related ulcers and who underwent endoscopy at 0, 4, 12, and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

In 43 patients without gastric neutrophils, ulcers developed in 1 of 14 (7.7%) taking placebo, 2 of 16 (12.5%) taking 20 mg famotidine, and none of 13 taking 40 mg famotidine. However, in 77 patients with neutrophils, ulcers developed in 13 of 28 (47. 4%) taking placebo (P < 0.001), 3 of 26 (12.6%) taking 20 mg famotidine, and 3 of 23 (13%) taking 40 mg famotidine. Eight of 46 patients (17%) without H. pylori had neutrophils compared with 69 of 74 (93%) with both H. pylori and neutrophils (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric neutrophils increase the incidence of ulceration in long-term NSAID users. Because neutrophils exist with H. pylori, eradicating this infection might prevent NSAID-related peptic ulcers.

The relation between Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Both infection with Helicobacter pylori and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can result in gastritis and ulcers. H. pylori has been identified as a major etiologic factor in the development of peptic ulcer disease; however, its relationship to NSAID-associated toxicity is less well characterized. Several studies have suggested that NSAID use does not increase susceptibility to H. pylori, and the converse has also been suggested, namely, that H. pylori does not exacerbate NSAID-associated injury. H. pylori itself may stimulate production of gastric prostaglandins, which may have a role in ulcer healing. More carefully controlled studies may be better able to elucidate the individual and synergistic mechanisms involved in ulceration induced by H. pylori and NSAIDs. Recent studies have suggested that elimination of H. pylori before NSAID treatment decreases ulcer occurrence. Therefore, at this time, eradication of H. pylori should be considered only in certain high-risk patients, i.e., those with a history of gastroduodenal ulcers.

Does Helicobacter pylori status affect nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastroduodenal pathology?

There are two lines of thought regarding the interrelationship between the damaging effects of Helicobacter pylori and those of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the gastroduodenal mucosa. First, both pathogenic factors exert a damaging effect on the mucosa, and therefore an additive, or even synergistic, effect occurs, leading to aggravation of mucosal damage. Second, mutual antagonism exists, leading to one of the pathogenic factors actually deriving some protection from the damaging potential of the other. Microscopically, H. pylori- and NSAID-associated gastritis are recognized as two separate entities. Furthermore, pathologically, the mechanisms of mucosal damage of the two factors have important differences; for example, H. pylori increases the synthesis of prostaglandins, whereas NSAIDs inhibit prostaglandin synthesis. The role of H. pylori infection in patients with NSAID-associated peptic ulcers has been addressed recently in two large, randomized, multicenter trials. From these studies, it appears that antisecretory drugs are more effective in H. pylori-positive peptic ulcer patients taking NSAIDs than in H. pylori-negative patients taking these drugs. The studies, however, do not provide any evidence that H. pylori infection reduces the pathogenic effects of NSAIDs. Other studies, however, have shown protection against NSAID-associated gastroduodenal damage in H. pylori-negative patients. Thus, there are no firm conclusions on the role of H. pylori infection in patients with NSAID-associated peptic ulcers. Based on the available data, however, practical considerations and guidelines are listed.

Infection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric adaptation to continued administration of aspirin in humans

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Involvement of Helicobacter pylori in aspirin-induced gastropathy and adaptation to aspirin remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare gastric damage and adaptation after repeated exposures to acetylsalicylic acid in the same subjects before and after eradication of H. pylori.

METHODS

Before and after H. pylori eradication, 8 volunteers were given aspirin, 2 g/day during 14 days. Mucosal damage was evaluated by endoscopy and histological analysis of biopsy samples. Gastric microbleeding, DNA synthesis, prostaglandin E2 generation, and luminal contents of transforming growth factor alpha and its immunohistochemical expression were determined on days 0, 3, 7, and 14 of aspirin course.

RESULTS

In all subjects, aspirin-induced gastric damage that reached maximum on day 3. In H. pylori-positive subjects, this damage was maintained at a similar level up to day 14. After H. pylori eradication, the damage was significantly lessened both in endoscopy and histology at day 14 and accompanied by increased mucosal expression and luminal release of transforming growth factor alpha. Prostaglandin E2 generation was significantly greater in H. pylori-positive subjects than after H. pylori eradication, but aspirin treatment resulted in >90% reduction of this generation independent of H. pylori status.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric adaptation to aspirin is impaired in H. pylori-positive subjects, but eradication of this bacterium restores this process.

Relationship between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, Helicobacter pylori, and gastroduodenal mucosal injury

With the realization that Helicobacter pylori is the main etiologic factor for peptic ulcer disease, recent studies have explored a potential relationship between H. pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related gastroduodenal mucosal injury. Using serology and/or histology to detect H. pylori, case-control studies have shown no meaningful differences in H. pylori prevalence in both arthritis and nonarthritis NSAID users and controls. Placebo-controlled short-term trials of NSAIDs have also shown no change in the frequency of detection of H. pylori by gastric mucosal biopsy specimens after 7-30 days of NSAID ingestion. A number of studies have shown that the histological gastritis identified in NSAID users is caused by H. pylori infection, whereas the reactive (chemical) gastritis can be caused by NSAID use. Although the overall relationship between H. pylori gastritis and dyspepsia remains controversial, there is no evidence from well-controlled studies using either serology or histology that this gastritis predisposes to NSAID-related dyspepsia. The effect of H. pylori on NSAID-related gastroduodenal mucosal injury may be best established by evaluating the ulcer recurrence rate after H. pylori eradication and rechallenge with NSAIDs. To date, only one such study has examined this question, and in this small study, the ulcer recurrence rate at 6 months was not reduced by H. pylori eradication.

Randomised trial of eradication of Helicobacter pylori before non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy to prevent peptic ulcers

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is common in patients with peptic ulcers caused by the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). But the pathogenic role of H pylori in this disease is controversial. We studied the efficacy of eradication of H pylori in the prevention of NSAID-induced peptic ulcers.

METHODS

We recruited patients with musculoskeletal pain who required NSAID treatment. None of the patients had previous exposure to NSAID therapy. Patients who had H pylori infection but no pre-existing ulcers on endoscopy were randomly allocated naproxen alone (750 mg daily) for 8 weeks or a 1-week course of triple therapy (bismuth subcitrate 120 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 400 mg, each given orally four times daily) before administration of naproxen (750 mg daily). Endoscopy was repeated after 8 weeks of naproxen treatment or when naproxen treatment was stopped early because of bleeding or intractable dyspepsia. All endoscopic examinations were done by one endoscopist who was unaware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the cumulative rate of gastric and duodenal ulcers.

FINDINGS

202 patients underwent endoscopic screening for enrolment in the trial, and 100 eligible patients were randomly assigned treatment. 92 patients completed the trial (47 in the naproxen group, 45 in the triple-therapy group). At 8 weeks, H pylori had been eradicated from no patients in the naproxen group and 40 (89%) in the triple-therapy group (p < 0.001). 12 (26%) naproxen-group patients developed ulcers: five had ulcer pain and one developed ulcer bleeding. Only three (7%) patients on triple therapy had ulcers, and two of these patients had failure of H pylori eradication (p = 0.01). Thus, 12 (26%) patients with persistent H pylori infection but only one (3%) with successful H pylori eradication developed ulcers with naproxen (p = 0.002).

INTERPRETATION

Eradication of H pylori before NSAID therapy reduces the occurrence of NSAID-induced peptic ulcers.