Clinical and immunological effects of oral immunotherapy with a standardized birch pollen extract

Long-term oral administration of transgenic rice containing cedar pollen T-cell epitopes potentially improves medication- and allergy-related quality-of-life scores

Background: We previously developed a transgenic rice that contains seven linked human predominant T-cell epitopes (7Crp) derived from Japanese cedar (JC) pollen allergens Cry j 1 and Cry j 2. Oral administration of 80 g of transgenic rice for 20 weeks suppressed allergen-specific T-cell proliferation in participants with JC pollinosis, but their clinical symptoms did not improve. Objective: We examined the clinical efficacy of low-dose (5 g and 20 g) intake of the transgenic rice administered for two successive seasons. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study, transgenic rice seeds (5 g or 20 g) were orally administered to the participants for 24 weeks in each of two successive JC pollen seasons. We analyzed T-cell proliferation and cytokine expression, and monitored symptom and medication scores during the pollen season. Quality of life (QOL) was evaluated by using the Japanese Allergic Rhinitis Quality of Life Standard Questionnaire (JRQLQ). Results: Specific T-cell proliferation after stimulation with 7Crp, Cry j 1, and Cry j 2 was significantly suppressed in the second JC pollen season. No significant differences were found among the three groups (5 g, 20 g, and placebo) with regard to clinical symptoms or medication scores in the first season. However, the medication scores and face scale for overall condition of JRQLQ improved in the 5-g transgenic rice group in the second season, although careful re-examination with a large sample size is necessary to confirm the results. Conclusion: Low-dose oral administration of transgenic rice that contains 7Crp significantly reduced allergen-specific T-cell responses and improved medication scores during the second season of administration. Thus, oral intake of the transgenic rice has the potential to induce immune tolerance to JC pollen allergens when administered for at least two successive seasons.

Next generation immunotherapy for tree pollen allergies

Tree pollen induced allergies are one of the major medical and public health burdens in the industrialized world. Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy (AIT) through subcutaneous injection or sublingual delivery is the only approved therapy with curative potential to pollen induced allergies. AIT often is associated with severe side effects and requires long-term treatment. Safer, more effective and convenient allergen specific immunotherapies remain an unmet need. In this review article, we discuss the current progress in applying protein and peptide-based approaches and DNA vaccines to the clinical challenges posed by tree pollen allergies through the lens of preclinical animal models and clinical trials, with an emphasis on the birch and Japanese red cedar pollen induced allergies.

Differences and similarities between sublingual immunotherapy of allergy and oral tolerance

Allergen immunotherapy is the only treatment altering the natural course of IgE-mediated allergies. Whereas the subcutaneous route for immunotherapy (SCIT) has been historically considered as a reference, we discuss herein the relative advantages of the sublingual and oral routes as alternatives to SCIT in order to elicit allergen-specific tolerance. The buccal and gut immune systems are similarly organized to favor immune tolerance to antigens/allergens, due to the presence of tolerogenic dendritic cells and macrophages promoting the differentiation of CD4⁺ regulatory T cells. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is now established as a valid treatment option, with clinical efficacy demonstrated in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (to either grass, tree, weed pollens or mite allergens) and encouraging results obtained in the management of mild/moderate allergic asthma. While still exploratory, oral immunotherapy (OIT) has shown promising results in the desensitization of patients with food allergies. We review at both biological and clinical levels the perspectives currently pursued for those two mucosal routes.

Safety and efficacy of short-term oral immunotherapy with Cry j 1-galactomannan conjugate for Japanese cedar pollinosis: a randomized controlled trial

Current allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) for pollinosis requires long-term treatment with potentially severe side effects. Therefore, development of an AIT that is safe and more convenient with a shorter regimen is needed. This prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized 55 participants with Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP) to active or placebo groups to test the safety and efficacy of short-term oral immunotherapy (OIT) with Cry j 1-galactomannan conjugate for JCP. Mean symptom-medication score as the primary outcome in the active group improved 27.8% relative to the placebo group during the entire pollen season. As the secondary outcomes, mean medication score in active group improved significantly, by 56.2%, compared with placebo during the entire pollen season. Mean total symptom score was similar between active and placebo groups during the entire pollen season. There were no severe treatment-emergent adverse events in the active and placebo groups. Therefore short-term OIT with Cry j 1-galactomannan conjugate is safe, and effective for reducing the amount of medication use for JCP.

Safety and efficacy of a new regimen of short-term oral immunotherapy with Cry j 1-galactomannan conjugate for Japanese cedar pollinosis: a prospective, randomized, open-label study

BACKGROUND

Short-term oral immunotherapy (OIT) using the Cry j1-galactomannan conjugate for Japanese cedar pollinosis may be effective and relatively safe. However, a treatment regimen has not been established. In the present study, we examined a new OIT regimen with a build-up phase and extended the maintenance phase of OIT to the peak period of the pollen season to enhance the therapeutic effect and safety of OIT.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, open-label trial was conducted over a period of 4 months. Participants were randomly divided into two groups. The OIT group comprised 23 subjects. The build-up phase was initiated 1 month before the expected pollen season. The maintenance phase was continued for 51 days during the peak pollen season. The control group comprised 24 subjects. The symptoms and medication score, levels of allergen-specific serum antibodies throughout the pollen season, and adverse effects with OIT were evaluated.

RESULTS

Participants receiving OIT showed significant improvements in total symptom scores, medication score, and total symptom-medication scores throughout the pollen season compared with the control group. The levels of allergen-specific serum IgG4 were significantly increased in the OIT group but not in the control group throughout the cedar pollen season. Importantly, no severe adverse effects were observed with OIT.

CONCLUSIONS

The new regimen of short-term OIT using the Cry j1-galactomannan conjugate for Japanese cedar pollinosis is effective, relatively safe and induces immune tolerance. Thus, OIT using allergen-galactomannan conjugates may provide a rapid, effective, and thus convenient immunotherapy for pollinosis instead of SLIT or SCIT.

Phase I/II study of oral immunotherapy with Cry j1-galactomannan conjugate for Japanese cedar pollinosis

OBJECTIVE

Among many immunotherapeutic approaches, oral immunotherapy (OIT) is thought to be an effective route for desensitization against a variety of allergens. However, there is little evidence that OIT is effective for airway allergic diseases such as pollen allergy. Thus, in the present study, we assessed the safety, efficacy and immune response of OIT using the Cry j1-galactomannan conjugate for Japanese cedar pollen allergy.

METHODS

An open trial was conducted over a period of 4 months. The OIT group comprised of 23 subjects. Treatment was initiated 1 month before the estimated pollen season and continued for 1 month. The control group (the pharmacological treatment group without OIT) comprised of 11 subjects. The symptoms and medication score, levels of allergen-specific serum antibodies, cellular components of lymphocytes and cytokine production from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were evaluated throughout the pollen season.

RESULTS

The participants receiving OIT treatment showed significant improvements in total symptom scores and symptom-medication scores during the pollen season compared with the control group. The levels of allergen-specific serum IgG4 and IL-10 production in PBMCs were significantly increased in the OIT group compared with that in the control group. Importantly, no severe adverse effects were observed in the participants receiving OIT treatment.

CONCLUSION

Short-term OIT using the Cry j1-galactomannan conjugate is effective, relatively safe and induces tolerant immune responses such as increased allergen-specific serum IgG4 and IL-10 production in PBMCs. These results suggest that OIT using allergen-galactomannan conjugates may provide a rapid, effective, and safe immunotherapy regimen for cedar pollen allergy.

Allergen immunotherapy: routes, safety, efficacy, and mode of action

Allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and allergic asthma have been steadily increasing in prevalence in recent years. These allergic diseases have a major impact on quality of life and are a major economic burden in the US. Although allergen avoidance and pharmacotherapy are currently the mainstays of therapy, they are not always successful in treating patients' symptoms effectively. If a patient fails allergen avoidance and medical therapy, immunotherapy may be indicated. Furthermore, immunotherapy is the only therapy that may change the course of the disease and induce long-term remission. Though subcutaneous administration has been the standard route for immunotherapy for many decades, there are several other routes of administration that have been and are currently being studied. The goal of utilizing alternative routes of immunotherapy is to improve safety without decreasing the efficacy of treatment. This paper will review the novel routes of immunotherapy, including sublingual, oral, local nasal, epicutaneous, and intralymphatic.

Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions

BACKGROUND

Placebo interventions are often claimed to substantially improve patient-reported and observer-reported outcomes in many clinical conditions, but most reports on effects of placebos are based on studies that have not randomised patients to placebo or no treatment. Two previous versions of this review from 2001 and 2004 found that placebo interventions in general did not have clinically important effects, but that there were possible beneficial effects on patient-reported outcomes, especially pain. Since then several relevant trials have been published.

OBJECTIVES

Our primary aims were to assess the effect of placebo interventions in general across all clinical conditions, and to investigate the effects of placebo interventions on specific clinical conditions. Our secondary aims were to assess whether the effect of placebo treatments differed for patient-reported and observer-reported outcomes, and to explore other reasons for variations in effect.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2008), EMBASE (1980 to March 2008), PsycINFO (1887 to March 2008) and Biological Abstracts (1986 to March 2008). We contacted experts on placebo research, and read references in the included trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised placebo trials with a no-treatment control group investigating any health problem.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. Trials with binary data were summarised using relative risk (a value of less than 1 indicates a beneficial effect of placebo), and trials with continuous outcomes were summarised using standardised mean difference (a negative value indicates a beneficial effect of placebo).

MAIN RESULTS

Outcome data were available in 202 out of 234 included trials, investigating 60 clinical conditions. We regarded the risk of bias as low in only 16 trials (8%), five of which had binary outcomes.In 44 studies with binary outcomes (6041 patients), there was moderate heterogeneity (P < 0.001; I(2) 45%) but no clear difference in effects between small and large trials (symmetrical funnel plot). The overall pooled effect of placebo was a relative risk of 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 0.99). The pooled relative risk for patient-reported outcomes was 0.93 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.00) and for observer-reported outcomes 0.93 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.02). We found no statistically significant effect of placebo interventions in four clinical conditions that had been investigated in three trials or more: pain, nausea, smoking, and depression, but confidence intervals were wide. The effect on pain varied considerably, even among trials with low risk of bias.In 158 trials with continuous outcomes (10,525 patients), there was moderate heterogeneity (P < 0.001; I(2) 42%), and considerable variation in effects between small and large trials (asymmetrical funnel plot). It is therefore a questionable procedure to pool all the trials, and we did so mainly as a basis for exploring causes for heterogeneity. We found an overall effect of placebo treatments, standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.23 (95% CI -0.28 to -0.17). The SMD for patient-reported outcomes was -0.26 (95% CI -0.32 to -0.19), and for observer-reported outcomes, SMD -0.13 (95% CI -0.24 to -0.02). We found an effect on pain, SMD -0.28 (95% CI -0.36 to -0.19)); nausea, SMD -0.25 (-0.46 to -0.04)), asthma (-0.35 (-0.70 to -0.01)), and phobia (SMD -0.63 (95% CI -1.17 to -0.08)). The effect on pain was very variable, also among trials with low risk of bias. Four similarly-designed acupuncture trials conducted by an overlapping group of authors reported large effects (SMD -0.68 (-0.85 to -0.50)) whereas three other pain trials reported low or no effect (SMD -0.13 (-0.28 to 0.03)). The pooled effect on nausea was small, but consistent. The effects on phobia and asthma were very uncertain due to high risk of bias. There was no statistically significant effect of placebo interventions in the seven other clinical conditions investigated in three trials or more: smoking, dementia, depression, obesity, hypertension, insomnia and anxiety, but confidence intervals were wide.Meta-regression analyses showed that larger effects of placebo interventions were associated with physical placebo interventions (e.g. sham acupuncture), patient-involved outcomes (patient-reported outcomes and observer-reported outcomes involving patient cooperation), small trials, and trials with the explicit purpose of studying placebo. Larger effects of placebo were also found in trials that did not inform patients about the possible placebo intervention.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not find that placebo interventions have important clinical effects in general. However, in certain settings placebo interventions can influence patient-reported outcomes, especially pain and nausea, though it is difficult to distinguish patient-reported effects of placebo from biased reporting. The effect on pain varied, even among trials with low risk of bias, from negligible to clinically important. Variations in the effect of placebo were partly explained by variations in how trials were conducted and how patients were informed.

Novel ways for immune intervention in immunotherapy: mucosal allergy vaccines

Allergen-specific immunotherapy is currently the only curative treatment for allergy. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) has been successfully used to treat patients who are allergic to insect venom, house dust mites, or tree or grass pollens. In the context of potentially severe, albeit infrequent, side effects associated with SCIT, mucosal routes of administration are being investigated to conduct allergenic desensitization. This article reviews recent developments in the field of nasal, oral, and sublingual immunotherapy as they relate to safety, clinical efficacy, and immune mechanisms of action. Implications for the design and development of improved allergy vaccines that could be used through such nonparenteral routes are discussed. Specifically, allergen presentation platforms and adjuvants facilitating the targeting of immune cells at mucosal surfaces to promote tolerance induction are reviewed.

Review of novel particulate antigen delivery systems with special focus on treatment of type I allergy

For the treatment of infectious diseases, cancer and allergy, the directed induction of an appropriate immune response is the ultimate goal. Therefore, with the development of pure, often very small proteins, peptides or DNA by molecular biology techniques, the research for suitable adjuvants or delivery systems became increasingly important. Particle formulations are made of a variety of materials, including lipids, proteins or amino acids, polysaccharides, polyacrylic substances or organic acids. Microparticles serve as vehicles and provide a depot for the entrapped or coupled antigen. The release occurs in a pulsatile or continuous manner, a feature, which is well controllable for many particulate systems. Particles attract antigen presenting cells to the administration site, thereby guaranteeing the efficient presentation of the antigen to the immune system. Importantly, particles also protect the entrapped substance. This is especially necessary after oral application to avoid gastric or tryptic breakdown. In this article, the design and construction of different antigen delivery systems and their immune effects, with special focus on the suitability for allergy treatment, are discussed.

Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions

BACKGROUND

Placebo interventions are often claimed to improve patient-reported and observer-reported outcomes, but this belief is not based on evidence from randomised trials that compare placebo with no treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of placebo interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to 2002), EMBASE (1980 to 2002), Biological Abstracts (1986 to 2002), and PsycLIT (1887 to 2002). We contacted experts on placebo research, and read references in the included trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised placebo trials with a no-treatment control group investigating any health problem.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Outcome data were available in 156 out of 182 included trials, investigating 46 clinical conditions. We found no statistically significant pooled effect of placebo in 38 studies with binary outcomes (4284 patients), relative risk 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.01). The pooled relative risk for patient-reported outcomes was 0.95 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.03) and for observer-reported outcomes 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.03). There was heterogeneity (P=0.01) but the funnel plot was symmetrical. There was no statistically significant effect of placebo interventions in the four clinical conditions investigated in three trials or more: pain, nausea, smoking, and depression, but confidence intervals were wide. We found an overall effect of placebo treatments in 118 trials with continuous outcomes (7453 patients), standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.24 (95% CI -0.31 to -0.17). The SMD for patient-reported outcomes was -0.30 (95% CI -0.38 to -0.21), whereas no statistically significant effect was found for observer-reported outcomes, SMD -0.10 (95% CI -0.20 to -0.01). There was heterogeneity (P<0.001) and large variability in funnel plot results even for big trials. There was an apparent effect of placebo interventions on pain (SMD -0.25 (95% CI -0.35 to-0.16)), and phobia (SMD -0.63 (95% CI -1.17 to -0.08)); but also a substantial risk of bias. There was no statistically significant effect of placebo interventions in eight other clinical conditions investigated in three trials or more: nausea, smoking, depression, overweight, asthma, hypertension, insomnia and anxiety, but confidence intervals were wide.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence that placebo interventions in general have clinically important effects. A possible small effect on continuous patient-reported outcomes, especially pain, could not be clearly distinguished from bias.

Clinical efficacy of sublingual and subcutaneous birch pollen allergen-specific immunotherapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy study

BACKGROUND

Both sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy (SLIT) and subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) have a documented clinical efficacy, but only few comparative studies have been performed.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of SLIT vs SCIT and secondary to compare SLIT and SCIT with placebo and to evaluate the relative clinical efficacy in relation to systemic side-effects.

METHODS

A 3-year randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy study including 71 adult birch pollen hay fever patients treated for two consecutive years after a baseline year. Allocation to treatment groups was based on disease severity in the baseline season, gender and age.

RESULTS

Clinical efficacy was estimated in 58 patients completing the first treatment year by subtracting baseline data and by calculating the ratio first treatment season vs baseline. SLIT diminished the median disease severity to one-half and SCIT to one-third of placebo treatment. No statistical significant difference between the two groups was observed. Both for symptoms and medication scores actively treated patients showed statistically significant and clinical relevant efficacy compared with placebo. SLIT treatment only resulted in local mild side-effects, while SCIT resulted in few serious systemic side-effects.

CONCLUSION

Based on the limited number of patients the clinical efficacy of SLIT was not statistically different from SCIT, and both treatments are clinically effective compared with placebo in the treatment of birch pollen rhinoconjunctivitis. The lack of significant difference between the two treatments does not indicate equivalent efficacy, but to detect minor differences necessitates investigation of larger groups. Due to the advantageous safety profile SLIT may be favored.

Seasonal intestinal inflammation in patients with birch pollen allergy

BACKGROUND

The pathophysiologic interactions of inflammatory reactions between the mucosa of the respiratory tract and that of the gastrointestinal tract in individuals with allergy are poorly studied, despite the fact that allergic symptoms in the airways and the gastrointestinal tract might arise in the same patient.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the inflammatory response histologically by enumerating eosinophils, IgE+ cells, and T cells in duodenal biopsy specimens in adult patients with IgE-mediated birch pollen allergy during the birch pollen season and off-season.

METHODS

Nine patients with birch pollen allergy verified by skin prick test and serum IgE antibodies were investigated toward the end of the birch pollen season and again 6 months later (off-season). Duodenal biopsy specimens were obtained and studied by immunostaining for the eosinophil major basic protein (MBP), IgE, and CD3+ T cells.

RESULTS

Oral allergy syndrome to birch-associated foods was present in all patients as indicated by questionnaire. Duodenal increases of MBP+ eosinophils and IgE-bearing cells were found in the patients during the birch pollen season as compared with off-season. No seasonal differences in the T-cell numbers in these patients were seen. Off-season, there was no significant difference between the patients and the control subjects regarding the intestinal frequencies of MBP+ eosinophils, mucosal IgE+ cells, and T cells.

CONCLUSION

Birch pollen exposure triggered a local inflammation with an increase in duodenal eosinophils and IgE-carrying mast cells in patients with allergy. Our study gives evidence for the interplay between immunologically active cells in the airways and the gut.

Genetic engineering of pollen allergens for hayfever immunotherapy

Type I allergy is an immunoglobulin E-mediated disease, representing a major health problem affecting more than 25% of the world's population. Grass, birch and ragweed pollen are a major source of environmental allergen. Specific immunotherapy is clinically proven to be an effective treatment for allergic conditions that involve the administration of crude extracts prepared from natural sources with potential life-threatening anaphylactic side effects. Recent developments in the molecular biology of pollen allergens have made it possible to design novel therapeutic approaches for improved and safer forms of specific immunotherapy. Hypoallergenic forms of major allergens with reduced immunoglobulin E epitopes have been produced using genetic engineering, whilst preserving other characteristics of the molecule that are able to induce a protective response. These modified forms are expected to make allergen-specific immunotherapy more widely used.

Placebo treatment versus no treatment

BACKGROUND

Placebo interventions are often believed to improve patient reported and observer reported outcomes, but this belief is not based on evidence from randomised trials that compare placebo with no treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of placebo interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, issue 3, 1998), MEDLINE (Jan 1966 to Dec 1998), EMBASE (Jan 1980 to Dec 1998), Biological Abstracts (Jan 1986 to Dec 1998), PsycLIT (Jan 1887 to Dec 1998). Experts on placebo research were contacted and references in the included trials were read.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo trials with a no-treatment control group investigating any health problem were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Outcome data were available in 114 out of 130 included trials, investigating 40 clinical conditions. Outcomes were binary in 32 trials (3795 patients) and continuous in 82 (4730 patients). We found no statistically significant pooled effect of placebo in studies with binary outcomes, relative risk 0.95 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.88 to 1.02). The pooled relative risk for subjective (patient reported) outcomes was 0.95 (0.86 to 1.05) and for objective (observer reported) outcomes 0.91 (0.80 to 1.04). There was statistically significant heterogeneity (P < 0.03), but no evidence of sample size bias (P = 0.56). We found an overall positive effect of placebo treatments in trials with continuous outcomes, standardised mean difference -0.28 (95 per cent confidence interval -0.38 to -0.19). The standardised mean difference for subjective outcomes was -0.36 (-0.47 to -0.25), whereas no statistically significant effect was found for objective outcomes, standardised mean difference -0.12 (-0.27 to 0.03). There was statistically significant heterogeneity (P < 0.001), and evidence of sample size bias (P = 0.05). There was no statistically significant effect of placebo interventions in eight out of nine clinical conditions investigated in three trials or more (nausea, relapse in prevention of smoking and depression, overweight, asthma, hypertension, insomnia and anxiety), but confidence intervals were wide. There was a modest apparent analgesic effect of placebo interventions, standardised mean difference -0.27 (-0.40 to -0.15), but also a substantial risk of bias.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence that placebo interventions in general have clinically important effects. A possible moderate effect on subjective continuous outcomes, especially pain, could not be clearly distinguished from bias.

A pre-seasonal birch/hazel sublingual immunotherapy can improve the outcome of grass pollen injective treatment in bisensitized individuals. A case-referent, two-year controlled study

BACKGROUND

The study tests the hypothesis of a reduction of priming due to tree allergy in patients sensitised to both birch/hazel and grass pollen undergoing an associated preseasonal Sublingual/Injective immunotherapy.

METHODS

36 out of 49 bisensitized candidates were pair-matched into 18 case-referent couples. During two years all patients were administered preseasonal grass-SIT and one patient in each couple received also birch/hazel-SLIT. Diary cards were fulfilled for three consecutive grass pollen seasons. Specific Nasal Provocation Test (NPT) for grass and aspecific bronchial challenge were done; sera were analyzed for specific IgE and IgG.

RESULTS

During the peak of the grass pollen season both groups showed a significant improvement in total symptom-score. Conjunctivitis and cough improved significantly more in patients with associated therapies. While antihistamine score decreased significantly in both groups, antiasthmatics did only in the SLIT-SIT group. The follow-up documented a significant increase in grass- and birch-specific IgG and a decrease in grass-specific IgE. Grass-NPT threshold was clearly higher in SLIT-SIT-group (p = 0.01) and only in this group PD20 methacholine improved significantly (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined birch/hazel-SLIT and grass-SIT are safe and improve clinical outcomes of SIT alone in young bisensitized patients. Priming reduction is supported by specific NPT and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

[Immunotherapy with an oral Alternaria extract in childhood asthma. Clinical safety and efficacy and effects on in vivo and in vitro parameters]

Studies of immunotherapy with oral Alternaria extracts are scarce. We decided to perform a clinical trial of the clinical safety and efficacy of this extract as well as of its effects on in vivo and in vitro parameters in 39 patients with Alternaria allergy, aged between 7 and 17 years, who are also sensitized extract was used. Allergic activity was determined through RAST inhibition and skin prick test. Quantification of the principal allerten (Alt a 1) was performed through the 2-site binding assay, with a mean content of 34.2 ng Alt a 1/micro g protein. The parameters analyzed were the symptom-medication score, skin prick using the end-point technique, specific bronchial challenge test, peak flow, total and specific IgE and IgG4. Nineteen patiens received active treatment with oral immunotherapy and another 19 received symptomatic treatment. The initial phase of immunotherapy lasted 3 months until the maximum dose was reached. This was maintained for 12 months; the mean accumulated dos was 280,000 PNU. Significant differences were found in reduction in the symptom-medication score in the treated group after 12 months of immunotherapy. No differences were found in the control group. Immunotherapy was well tolerated with 0.42 adverse reactions per 100 doses administered. All adverse reactions were mild-to-moderate. In the treated group, papule size was significantly reduced. Values for the specific bronchial challenge test, expressed through PD20, were significantly higher in the immunotherapy group. Peak flow showed no changes in either group. Values of IgG4 were significantly higher in the immunotherapy group. Total and specific IgE levels showed no significant changes in either group. In conclusion, oral immunotherapy with Alternaria extract is clinically effective in pediatric patients. In general, the therapy was well tolerated. It modified specific cutaneous and bronchial reactivity in our sample and increased levels of specific IgG4, wich are implicated in humoral response.

Respiratory allergy

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma are common respiratory allergic disorders which are increasing globally more in developed countries. Although much has been written about childhood asthma and guidelines published by various international and national fora, not much information is available on AR. This is most common in children, is a significant risk factor for developing asthma, is a common comorbidity with asthma and affects quality of life. This paper highlights the risk factors for developing respiratory allergy asthma and AR, linkages between them and the management issues, particularly in relation to the allergic or allergological aspects as they have important bearing on management of children suffering from respiratory allergy. Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is re-emerging as useful therapy which alone has the potential to modify the natural history of disease and prevent the 'allergic march'. Timely diagnosis, correct management including timely referrals can ensure good quality life for those suffering from respiratory allergies.

Appropriate and inappropriate use of immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this review is to discuss indications for appropriate and inappropriate use of allergen immunotherapy (IT), including discussion of contraindications, adverse events, and alternative protocols and methods.

DATA SOURCES

A review of the literature on indications, contraindications, adverse events, and alternative methods and protocols associated with allergen IT was conducted.

STUDY SELECTION

The opinion of the author was used to select and review relevant data.

RESULTS

Clinical trials have proven the benefit of allergen IT, for allergic rhinitis, asthma, and anaphylaxis because of stinging insects, such as Hymenoptera and fire ants. Allergen IT may improve quality of life and decrease medication requirement for allergic rhinitis and asthma, especially for younger patients, and probably will assist in the prevention of the progression of allergic disease from rhinitis to asthma. Subcutaneous allergen IT is well established as clinically effective through multiple, blinded, placebo-controlled studies. The data for alternate therapies and routes of therapy are extensively reviewed and critiqued.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergen IT is a highly valuable form of treatment of IgE-mediated diseases. Documentation of sensitivity to allergen sensitization associated with symptoms is critical before use of allergen IT. Symptoms should also be of sufficient duration and severity to warrant IT. Before allergen IT is used, there must be an available allergen extract that is suitable for treatment of the relative sensitivity. It is essential for patients receiving allergen IT to understand the treatment principle, the frequency of injections, the duration of treatment, the risk and signs of adverse events, the magnitude of the efficacy, and the essential nature of patient compliance. Subcutaneous allergen IT is the only current mode of therapy in the United States that has been shown to be effective.

Clinical efficacy of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a standardized five-grass-pollen extract in rhinitis

Sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) using high doses of standardized allergen extracts has been found to be effective in reducing allergic symptoms and medication needs. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in a large number of patients to determine whether medication needs can be reduced by SLIT. Some 136 patients with grass-pollen rhinitis with or without mild asthma were studied. Patients received either placebo or SLIT with a standardized grass-pollen extract administered daily with increasing doses up to 300 IR (index of reactivity) from January to the end of July 1994. During the grass-pollen season, patients were instructed to use medications as required and to visit their doctors in case of asthma. Symptom-medications scores were assessed during the pollen season, and serum-specific IgG4 was measured before and at the end of SLIT. In the SLIT group, drug consumption dropped significantly throughout the pollen season (P < 0.02). Moreover, at the peak of the pollen season, betamethasone consumption was significantly reduced in the SLIT group (P < 0.02). Only one patient in the SLIT group had an asthma attack compared to eight patients in the placebo group (P < 0.02). IgG4 levels increased significantly in the SLIT group (P < 0.001) but without correlation with symptoms. Side-effects were comparable in both groups. This study indicates that SLIT in grass-pollen rhinitis is well tolerated, improves overall clinical symptoms, and reduces drug consumption and the need for oral corticosteroids.

Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy with short ragweed extract

BACKGROUND

Oral immunotherapy, if proven safe and effective, could be an alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study investigated the clinic and immunologic effects of ragweed immunotherapy using a new microencapsulated, pH-sensitive, oral delivery system.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 23 patients with allergic rhinitis to short ragweed. Following a baseline nasal challenge with ragweed allergen, oral immunotherapy with encapsulated short ragweed extract or placebo was administered once daily, 6 days/week. Dosed began at 3 micrograms Amb a 1 per day and were increased by 3 micrograms every three days as tolerated, to a maximum daily maintenance dose of 24 micrograms. A nasal challenge was repeated 6 weeks, later, followed by the continuation of maintenance therapy through the natural ragweed season. Daily allergy symptoms and relief medication usage was recorded. A final nasal challenge was performed at the end of the natural season. Short ragweed-specific serum IgE, IgG, and IgG4 antibody levels were measured every 2 weeks during the study.

RESULTS

Maximum tolerated doses ranged from 6 to 24 micrograms Amb a 1 per day (74% reached 24 micrograms). Adverse events were not serious or different between the active and placebo groups. The active group showed increased in short ragweed-specific serum IgG and IgG4 antibody levels. Symptom scores during the natural season were numerically but not statistically lower in the active treatment group. This group also experienced a greater reduction from baseline in nasal reactivity as assessed by nasal challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

These pilot data suggest that the encapsulated, pH-sensitive oral immunotherapy delivery system was safe, induced a brisk serologic response, and attenuated the symptomatic response to both experimental and environmental ragweed exposure.

Local nasal immunotherapy for birch allergic rhinitis with extract in powder form

BACKGROUND

Traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy has been proved effective in birch pollenosis. It has, however, some drawbacks as systemic reactions, which are rare but important. Local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) represents a potential safer route of allergen administration.

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical efficacy and safety of local nasal immunotherapy by means of an extract in powder form as treatment of birch allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Thirty birch allergic patients have been selected on the basis of a positive history, skin test, radioallergosorbent test assay (RAST) and specific nasal challenge. Two 15 patient groups were randomly assigned to the active treatment or to the placebo one. Treatment lasted 22 weeks (14 for the build-up phase and eight for maintenance period) and symptoms were recorded during the treatment and the birch pollen season.

RESULTS

The clinical efficacy of LNIT is suggested by a significant reduction of medication score only in the treated group during the pollen season, although the symptom score was significantly lower in the treated group for 1 week only. Moreover, a significant increase of specific nasal threshold dose was observed after treatment only in the active treated group. Mild adverse reaction to LNIT, limited to the upper respiratory tract, were reported during the treatment in the active group, but they did not interfere with LNIT schedule. No asthmatic or systemic reaction were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that LNIT with allergen in powder form has proven clinically effective in the treatment of birch allergic rhinitis. Further studies are needed to establish whether this treatment can be considered a real alternative to the traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy in birch allergic rhinitis.

Chemical denaturation of ovalbumin abrogates the induction of oral tolerance of specific IgG antibody and DTH responses in mice

We have examined the effects of ingestion of chemically denatured ovalbumin (OVA) in mice. Both 8 M urea-denatured OVA (UD-OVA) and carboxymethylated UD-OVA (CM-OVA) were purified by gel filtration. Specific IgG antibody and systemic delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to OVA were not suppressed by CM-OVA fed prior to or after immunization with OVA in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). When CM-OVA was used instead of OVA, for immunization, serum IgG and DTH responses to CM-OVA were orally tolerized by OVA, but not by UD-OVA or CM-OVA. Studies of antigen uptake in mice using sandwich ELISA tests showed that OVA, but not CM-OVA, was absorbed after antigen ingestion. In vitro studies further demonstrated that CM-OVA was digested much more rapidly than OVA. Moreover, studies using bovine serum albumin (BSA) demonstrated that both IgG and DTH responses to BSA were orally tolerant to BSA, but not to denatured BSA. Finally, studies using human gamma-globulin (HGG), a well-known tolerogen, also found that the IgG antibody response to HGG was not orally tolerized by denatured HGG. These results suggest that complete denaturation of globular proteins may affect their processing and absorption in the gut and thus abrogates oral tolerance induction.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial by the sublingual route of immunotherapy with a standardized grass pollen extract

Fifty-eight patients with well-documented history of seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis caused by grass pollens were allocated randomly on a double-blind basis to receive either sublingual therapy with a solution of purified, standardized allergen preparation (Stallergènes) or a matched placebo for 17 weeks. The assessment of the effect of oral immunotherapy, done with drops of five-grass allergen extract, was on the clinical symptoms and on the medication score of the authorized rescue treatments. The actively treated patients had significantly (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01) fewer symptoms of rhinitis (sneezing and rhinorrhea) and of conjunctivitis (redness and tears) during the pollen season than the placebo group. Consumption of nasal solution of sodium cromoglycate and of betamethasone and dexchlorpheniramine was significantly less in the desensitized group (P < 0.01). Side-effects were negligible. This study concludes that perlingual immunotherapy with grass pollen extract in grass-pollen-sensitive seasonal hay fever and conjunctivitis patients is effective, easy to perform, inexpensive, and safe.

Hypereosinophilia, neurologic, and gastrointestinal symptoms after bee-pollen ingestion

A patient developed hypereosinophilia (13,440 cells per cubic millimeter) 6 weeks after beginning the ingestion of bee pollen. Symptoms included generalized malaise, headache, nausea, abdominal pain diarrhea, generalized pruritus, and decreased memory. Evaluation revealed no other known cause for the patient's hypereosinophilia, which resolved after bee-pollen ingestion was stopped. The product contained a mixture of entomophilous and anemophilous pollens to which the patient was skin test positive. An open challenge with the bee pollen later reproduced the presenting symptoms with a concomitant rise of the eosinophil count from 207 to 890 cells per cubic millimeter. The patient has since remained well avoiding bee pollen. This study strongly suggests that hypereosinophilia with attendant pathophysiologic disturbances may be an adverse reaction to bee-pollen ingestion in atopic individuals.

Efficacy of grass-maize pollen oral immunotherapy in patients with seasonal hay-fever: a double-blind study

Forty patients with a well-documented history of seasonal hay fever and a positive skin-prick test specific to grass pollen, including Bermuda grass and maize pollen (Zea maize), were allocated randomly on a double-blind basis to receive either an oral mixed grass-maize pollen extract or a matched placebo during the 1981/1982 grass pollen season. After 12 months the code was broken and patients on placebo were transferred to active therapy while patients on active therapy continued with maintenance therapy for another 12 months during the 1982/1983 grass pollen season. The assessment of the effect of the orally administered grass-maize pollen extract was on the clinical symptoms. During the first year the patients on active therapy had significantly fewer hay fever symptoms during the summer months compared with the placebo group. During the second study year, with all patients on active therapy, both groups had markedly milder symptoms compared with the placebo group. Side-effects were negligible. This study concludes that oral immunotherapy with grass-maize pollen extract in grass pollen-sensitive seasonal hay fever patients is safe and effective.

The common mucosal immune system and current strategies for induction of immune responses in external secretions

The selective induction of antibodies in external secretions is desirable for the prevention of various systemic as well as predominantly mucosa-restricted infections. An enormous surface area of mucosal membranes is protected primarily by antibodies that belong, in many species, to the IgA isotype. Such antibodies are produced locally by large numbers of IgA-containing plasma cells distributed in subepithelial spaces of mucosal membranes and in the stroma of secretory glands. In humans and in some animal species, plasma-derived IgA antibodies do not enter external secretions in significant quantities and systemically administered preformed IgA antibodies would be of little use for passive immunization. Systemic administration of microbial antigens may boost an effective S-IgA immune response only in a situation whereby an immunized individual had previously encountered the same antigen by the mucosal route. Local injection of antigen in the vicinity of secretory glands is usually accompanied by an undesirable concomitant systemic response and frequently requires the addition of adjuvants that are unacceptable for administration in humans. Immunization routes that involve ingestion or possibly inhalation of antigens lead to the induction of not only local but also generalized immune responses manifested by the parallel appearance of S-Iga antibodies to ingested or inhaled antigens in secretions of glands distant from the site of immunization. Based on extensive studies in animal models as well as in humans, convincing evidence is available that antigen-sensitized and IgA-committed precursors of plasma cells from GALT are disseminated to the gut, other mucosa-associated tissues, and exocrine glands. However, due to the limited absorption of desired antigens from the gut lumen of orally immunized individuals, repeated large doses of antigens are required for an effective S-IgA response. Novel antigen delivery systems for the stimulation of such responses are currently being examined in several laboratories. Live attenuated or genetically manipulated bacteria expressing other microbial antigens have also been used for selective colonization of gut-associated lymphoid tissues. Unique antigen packaging and the use of adjuvants suitable for oral administration hold promise for an efficient antigen delivery to critical tissues in the intestine and deserve extensive exploration. The oral immunization route appears to have many advantages over systemic immunization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Oral immunotherapy of children with rhinoconjunctivitis due to birch pollen allergy. A double blind study

Thirty children with rhinoconjunctivitis due to birch pollinosis were treated in a double blind manner for 10 months with enteric-coated capsules containing either a birch pollen preparation (n = 14) with doses up to 1.4 X 10(6) biologic units per day or placebo (n = 16). Compared with the placebo group the actively treated children had less symptoms during the birch pollen season after 3 months of therapy (P = 0.035). Skin prick reactions decreased significantly more in the active group than in the placebo group after 10 months (P = 0.01). Conjunctival sensitivity was lower in the active group than in the placebo group after 3 months of treatment (P = 0.01) but not after 10 months. Compared with the placebo group the treated children more often increased their levels of IgG (P = 0.007) and pre-seasonal IgE (P = 0.001) against birch. There was a seasonal increase of IgE antibody level against birch in the placebo but not in the treatment group (P less than 0.001). None of the treated children developed asthma, compared with five of the untreated children. No general reactions occurred and few side effects were seen during the treatment period. We conclude that in children with birch pollinosis oral immunotherapy with high doses of a biologically potent preparation in enteric-coated capsules is effective, easy to perform, economic and safe.

Intestinal permeability as assessed with polyethyleneglycols in birch pollen allergic children undergoing oral immunotherapy

Twenty-four children with rhinoconjunctivitis due to birch pollinosis were treated in a double-blind manner with enteric-coated capsules containing either a high dose of a birch pollen preparation (n = 11) or placebo (n = 13). The permeability of the small intestine was analysed at three different occasions with a mixture of differently sized polyethyleneglycols (PEG 400 and PEG 1000), before the start of oral immunotherapy (OIT), at the moment of maximum allergen dose, and after 3 months of therapy which was at the beginning of the pollen season. The actively treated children did not significantly change their permeability characteristics as determined from PEG recovery in the urine. By contrast, in the control group of patients the recovery of larger PEG molecules was decreased after 3 months of therapy, possibly due to the commencing pollen season. In addition, small bowel biopsies were taken at the time of maximum allergen dose from two children openly treated with OIT. Both specimens were normal.