Pharmacology of Dormicum (midazolam) and Anexate (flumazenil)

Simultaneously Predicting the Pharmacokinetics of CES1-Metabolized Drugs and Their Metabolites Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model in Cirrhosis Subjects

Hepatic carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) metabolizes numerous prodrugs into active ingredients or direct-acting drugs into inactive metabolites. We aimed to develop a semi-physiologically based pharmacokinetic (semi-PBPK) model to simultaneously predict the pharmacokinetics of CES1 substrates and their active metabolites in liver cirrhosis (LC) patients. Six prodrugs (enalapril, benazepril, cilazapril, temocapril, perindopril and oseltamivir) and three direct-acting drugs (flumazenil, pethidine and remimazolam) were selected. Parameters such as organ blood flows, plasma-binding protein concentrations, functional liver volume, hepatic enzymatic activity, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and gastrointestinal transit rate were integrated into the simulation. The pharmacokinetic profiles of these drugs and their active metabolites were simulated for 1000 virtual individuals. The developed semi-PBPK model, after validation in healthy individuals, was extrapolated to LC patients. Most of the observations fell within the 5th and 95th percentiles of simulations from 1000 virtual patients. The estimated AUC and Cmax were within 0.5-2-fold of the observed values. The sensitivity analysis showed that the decreased plasma exposure of active metabolites due to the decreased CES1 was partly attenuated by the decreased GFR. Conclusion: The developed PBPK model successfully predicted the pharmacokinetics of CES1 substrates and their metabolites in healthy individuals and LC patients, facilitating tailored dosing of CES1 substrates in LC patients.

Quantification of CYP3A and Drug Transporters Activity in Healthy Young, Healthy Elderly and Chronic Kidney Disease Elderly Patients by a Microdose Cocktail Approach

Background: Ageing and chronic kidney disease (CKD) affect pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Since mechanisms are related and remain unclear, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and drug transporter activities were investigated in the elderly with or without CKD and compared to healthy adults using a microdose cocktail. Methods: Healthy young participants (n = 20), healthy elderly participants (n = 16) and elderly patients with CKD (n = 17) received, in study period 1, a single dose of microdose cocktail probe containing 30 µg midazolam, 750 µg dabigatran etexilate, 100 µg atorvastatin, 10 µg pitavastatin, and 50 µg rosuvastatin. After a 14-day wash-out period, healthy young participants continued to study period 2 with the microdose cocktail plus rifampicin. PK parameters including area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum plasma drug concentration (C_max), and half-life were estimated before making pairwise comparisons of geometric mean ratios (GMR) between groups. Results: AUC and C_max GMR (95% confidence interval; CI) of midazolam, a CYP3A probe substrate, were increased 2.30 (1.70-3.09) and 2.90 (2.16-3.88) fold in healthy elderly and elderly patients with CKD, respectively, together with a prolonged half-life. AUC and C_max GMR (95%CI) of atorvastatin, another CYP3A substrate, was increased 2.14 (1.52-3.02) fold in healthy elderly and 4.15 (2.98-5.79) fold in elderly patients with CKD, indicating decreased CYP3A activity related to ageing. Associated AUC changes in the probe drug whose activity could be modified by intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) activity, dabigatran etexilate, were observed in patients with CKD. However, whether the activity of pitavastatin and rosuvastatin is modified by organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B (OATP1B) and of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), respectively, in elderly participants with or without CKD was inconclusive. Conclusions: CYP3A activity is reduced in ageing. Intestinal P-gp function might be affected by CKD, but further confirmation appears warranted. Clinical Trial Registration:http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ (TCTR 20180312002 registered on March 07, 2018).

Audit of flumazenil use in special care and oral surgery sedation services

Background The National Patient Safety Agency (2008) has advised against routine reliance on flumazenil for reversal of sedation and encourages regular audit to help identify issues with excessive dosing of midazolam. This multi-centre audit of flumazenil use across both community-based special care and dental hospital oral surgery specialist services was conducted to compare practice against that reported from other UK sedation services.Methods A six-year retrospective audit was conducted using controlled drug records and patient case notes.Results Both services used flumazenil at very infrequent levels and far below the agreed standard. The dose of flumazenil and justification for its use was recorded in all records. There was variability in the nature of the justifications between the two services, which likely relates to the differing patient groups seen by the specialties. The majority of cases related to supporting the patient's escort for their journey home; however, this was not always pre-planned.Conclusions There was a low level of flumazenil use over an extended period of time, supporting the concept of a culture of safe sedation provision in both services. The audit highlighted variation in record-keeping and need for improved communication with patients about escort requirements.

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF MIDAZOLAM AND FLUMAZENIL IN THE BALL PYTHON (PYTHON REGIUS)

The study objective was to evaluate the sedative, muscle relaxant, and cardiorespiratory effects of midazolam and flumazenil in the ball python (Python regius). Ten healthy adult female ball pythons were used in a randomized and blinded crossover trial evaluating the effects of two dosages (1 and 2 mg/kg intramuscular [i.m.] in the cranial third of the body). In a subsequent open trial, nine ball pythons received 1 mg/kg i.m. of midazolam followed by 0.08 mg/kg i.m. of flumazenil 60 min later. Heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and the level of sedation and muscle relaxation (using a semiobjective scoring system) were evaluated. There were no significant differences between midazolam dosages for any of the parameters evaluated. Sedation scores were significantly increased compared with baseline from 15 min (1 mg/kg) and 10 min (2 mg/kg) postinjection up until 56 hr (1 mg/kg) and 72 hr (2 mg/kg) postinjection. Peak effect was reached 60 min postinjection, with 60% of snakes (6/10) being unable to right themselves. One snake developed paradoxical excitation with the 2 mg/kg dosage. Heart rates were significantly lower than baseline from 30 min to 128 hr postinjection with both midazolam dosages. Respiratory rates were significantly lower than baseline at four time points, with the highest dosage only: 15, 45, 60 min, and 8 hr postinjection. Flumazenil resulted in reversal of sedation and muscle relaxation in all snakes within 10 min of administration. However, resedation was evident in all snakes 3 hr after reversal. Midazolam administered at 1 and 2 mg/kg i.m. provides a moderate to profound, although prolonged, sedation and muscle relaxation in ball pythons. Flumazenil reverses the effects of midazolam in ball pythons, but its duration of action at the evaluated dosage is much shorter than midazolam, leading to resedation.

Comprehensive phytochemical analysis and sedative-hypnotic activity of two Acanthopanax species leaves

Acanthopanax senticosus leaves (SCL) and Acanthopanax sessiliflorus leaves (SFL), which are usually made into functional teas, possess similar pharmacological activities. With the aim of revealing their chemical compositions and evaluating their sedative-hypnotic effects, comprehensive metabolite profiling analysis based on ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q/TOF-MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography with evaporative light scattering detection (HPLC-ELSD) as well as bioassay studies in mice were performed for the first time. Firstly, a total of 75 compounds (including 69 shared components) were identified or briefly characterized. Results indicated that the leaves of the two species were both rich in phytochemicals and contained similar structural types. Secondly, 20 and 7 chemical markers were identified from SCL and SFL, respectively. Five oleanane-type triterpene saponins (ciwujianoside C1, C3, D2, E and saniculoside N) and two lupine-type triterpene saponins (1-deoxychiisanoside and 24-hydroxychiisanoside) may be used for rapid identification of SCL and SFL. Thirdly, the contents of rutin, hederacoside D, ciwujianoside B, -C3, -E and ursolic acid in SCL (0.308%, 0.024%, 0.042%, 0.131%, 0.038%, and 0.255%, respectively) were higher than in SFL (0.067%, 0.005%, 0.012%, 0.015%, 0.002%, and 0.087%, respectively). Fourthly, an in vivo bioassay verified that both SCL and SFL could inhibit autonomous activity, shorten sleep latency and prolong sleep duration in a dose-dependent manner. To a certain degree, SCL showed a higher and more stable effect. The hypnotic effect could be inhibited by flumazenil (FLU). The two leaves not only had an obvious antagonism action of p-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (pCPA) but also showed a synergistic hypnotic effect with 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP). The beneficial bioactivity may be mediated by 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Finally, network pharmacology analysis showed that the undifferentiated and differentiated compounds were the material basis for the similar and the different activities of two leaves. Some typical chemical markers (such as saniculoside N, hederacoside D, ciwujianoside C3, -E and ursolic acid, 24-hydroxychiisanoside and 1-deoxyisochiisanoside) were the potential active compounds and could be used as quality markers in the future. The present study furnished a basis for the further development and utilization of the leaves of these two Acanthopanax species.

Midazolam: an essential palliative care drug

Midazolam is a commonly used benzodiazepine in palliative care and is considered one of the four essential drugs needed for the promotion of quality care in dying patients. Acting on the benzodiazepine receptor, it promotes the action of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Gamma-aminobutyric acid action promotes sedative, anxiolytic, and anticonvulsant properties. Midazolam has a faster onset and shorter duration of action than other benzodiazepines such as diazepam and lorazepam lending itself to greater flexibility in dosing than other benzodiazepines. The kidneys excrete midazolam and its active metabolite. Metabolism occurs in the liver by the P450 system. This article examines the pharmacology, pharmacodynamics, and clinical uses of midazolam in palliative care.

Medical interventions for prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in adults with cirrhosis: a network meta‐analysis

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of medical interventions for prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in adults with cirrhosis.

Oral Low-Dose Midazolam as Premedication for Intraocular Surgery in Retrobulbar Anesthesia: Cardiovascular Effects and Relief of Perioperative Anxiety

The aim was to investigate the efficacy and practicability of oral low-dose premedication with 3.75 mg midazolam (1/2 tablet Dormicum 7.5 mg) for selective intraocular surgery with retrobulbar anesthesia. Forty-six ASA II-III patients were randomly assigned to either group I: midazolam (n = 24) or group II: placebo (n = 22). Sedation was objectively quantified with a scale derived from the Glasgow-Coma-Scale and a verbal self-rating scale. Trait-anxiety was studied with the State-Trait Inventory by Spielberger, perioperative situative anxiety with the Erlanger Anxiety Scale. Cardiovascular variables and oxygenation were automatically monitored. Midazolam produced significant and sufficient sedation and significant anxiolysis. Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure were moderately but significantly, reduced. The effect on diastolic pressure was more pronounced. There was no effect on heart-rate. Oxygenation at all times remained well above 90% SpO2. In conclusion low-dose oral midazolam proved to be a single and effective premedication before intraocular surgery under local anesthesia.

The Endocrine Stress Response after Oral Premedication with Low-Dose Midazolam for Intraocular Surgery in Retrobulbar Anaesthesia

Purpose

It was the purpose of this study to examine the endocrine stess response in patients undergoing elective intraocular surgery in retrobulbar anaesthesia (RBA), and the effect of an oral premedication with 3.75 mg midazolam on this reaction.

Methods

In a prospective double-blind study, 23 patients were randomly assigned to either group I (n=12), receiving 3.75 mg midazolam, or group II (n=11), receiving a matched placebo 60 min before RBA. Plasma concentrations of known mediators of the endocrinological stress response were analysed at five perioperative times: adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisole (CORT), somatotropic hormone (STH), epinephrine (EPI), norepinephrine (NOR), and dopamine (DOP).

Results

The observed endocrinological reaction was moderate. Perioperative anxiety and, above all, RBA were the main stressors. The endocrine stress response could best be seen within the fast-reacting sympathoadrenergic system. Midazolam significantly suppressed the epinephrine and the cortisole answer (p < 0.01). After RBA an ACTH plasma peak only was observed after placebo. Plasma-STH showed extreme variability. An STH-peak after midazolam is presumably due to a gonadotropic hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion directly stimulated by midazolam. Midazolam had no significant effect upon norepinephrine. A significant (p<0.01) increase for plasma-cortisole was seen 60 min after the operation when compared to preoperative values.

Conclusions

The results indicate that even at a low dose midazolam positively influences the endocrine stress response. The combination of this stress-reducing effect with the well-known hemodynamic stability, the distinct anxiolytic and sedative action, suggest low-dose midazolam as a favourable premedication for intraocular surgery.

Flumazenil versus placebo or no intervention for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic encephalopathy is a common complication of cirrhosis which results in poor brain functioning. The spectrum of changes associated with hepatic encephalopathy ranges from the clinically 'indiscernible' or minimal hepatic encephalopathy to the clinically 'obvious' or overt hepatic encephalopathy. Flumazenil is a synthetic benzodiazepine antagonist with high affinity for the central benzodiazepine recognition site. Flumazenil may benefit people with hepatic encephalopathy through an indirect negative allosteric modulatory effect on gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor function. The previous version of this review, which included 13 randomised clinical trials, found no effect of flumazenil on all-cause mortality, based on an analysis of 10 randomised clinical trials, but found a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy, based on an analysis of eight randomised clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of flumazenil versus placebo or no intervention for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and LILACS; meeting and conference proceedings; and bibliographies in May 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials regardless of publication status, blinding, or language in the analyses of benefits and harms, and observational studies in the assessment of harms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data independently. We undertook meta-analyses and presented results using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 values as a marker of heterogeneity. We assessed bias control using the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group domains; determined the quality of the evidence using GRADE; evaluated the risk of small-study effects in regression analyses; and conducted trial sequential, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 eligible randomised clinical trials with 867 participants, the majority of whom had an acute episode of overt hepatic encephalopathy. In addition, we identified one ongoing randomised clinical trial. We were unable to gather outcome data from two randomised clinical trials with 25 participants. Thus, our analyses include 842 participants from 12 randomised clinical trials comparing flumazenil versus placebo. We classified one randomised clinical trial at low risk of bias in the overall assessment and the remaining randomised clinical trials at high risk of bias. The duration of follow-up ranged from a few minutes to two weeks, but it was less than one day in the majority of the trials.In total, 32/433 (7.4%) participants allocated to flumazenil versus 38/409 (9.3%) participants allocated to placebo died (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.16; 11 randomised clinical trials; low quality evidence). The Trial Sequential Analysis and the one randomised clinical trial assessed as low risk of bias (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.53) found no beneficial or harmful effects of flumazenil on all-cause mortality. The methods used to evaluate hepatic encephalopathy included several different clinical scales, electrophysiological variables, and psychometric tests. Flumazenil was associated with a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy when including all randomised clinical trials (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.80; 824 participants; nine randomised clinical trials; low quality evidence), or just the trial at low risk of bias (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.84; 527 participants). The Trial Sequential Analysis supported a beneficial effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy. The randomised clinical trials included little information about causes of death and little information on non-fatal serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found low quality evidence suggesting a short-term beneficial effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis, but no evidence of an effect on all-cause mortality. Additional evidence from large, high quality randomised clinical trials is needed to evaluate the potential benefits and harms of flumazenil in people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

Flumazenil versus placebo or no intervention for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic encephalopathy is a common complication of cirrhosis which results in poor brain functioning. The spectrum of changes associated with hepatic encephalopathy ranges from the clinically 'indiscernible' or minimal hepatic encephalopathy to the clinically 'obvious' or overt hepatic encephalopathy. Flumazenil is a synthetic benzodiazepine antagonist with high affinity for the central benzodiazepine recognition site. Flumazenil may benefit people with hepatic encephalopathy through an indirect negative allosteric modulatory effect on gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor function. The previous version of this review, which included 13 randomised clinical trials, found no effect of flumazenil on all-cause mortality, based on an analysis of 10 randomised clinical trials, but found a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy, based on an analysis of eight randomised clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of flumazenil versus placebo or no intervention for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and LILACS; meeting and conference proceedings; and bibliographies in May 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials regardless of publication status, blinding, or language in the analyses of benefits and harms, and observational studies in the assessment of harms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data independently. We undertook meta-analyses and presented results using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 values as a marker of heterogeneity. We assessed bias control using the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group domains; determined the quality of the evidence using GRADE; evaluated the risk of small-study effects in regression analyses; and conducted trial sequential, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 eligible randomised clinical trials with 867 participants, the majority of whom had an acute episode of overt hepatic encephalopathy. In addition, we identified one ongoing randomised clinical trial. We were unable to gather outcome data from 2 randomised clinical trials with 25 participants. Thus, our analyses include 842 participants from 12 randomised clinical trials comparing flumazenil versus placebo. We classified one randomised clinical trial at low risk of bias in the overall assessment and the remaining randomised clinical trials at high risk of bias. The duration of follow-up ranged from a few minutes to two weeks, but it was less than one day in the majority of the trials.In total, 32/433 (7.4%) participants allocated to flumazenil versus 38/409 (9.3%) participants allocated to placebo died (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.16; 11 randomised clinical trials; low quality evidence). The Trial Sequential Analysis and the one randomised clinical trial assessed as low risk of bias (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.53) found no beneficial or harmful effects of flumazenil on all-cause mortality. The methods used to evaluate hepatic encephalopathy included several different clinical scales, electrophysiological variables, and psychometric tests. Flumazenil was associated with a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy when including all randomised clinical trials (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.80; 824 participants; 9 randomised clinical trials; low quality evidence), or just the trial at low risk of bias (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.84; 527 participants). The Trial Sequential Analysis supported a beneficial effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy. The randomised clinical trials included little information about causes of death and little information on non-fatal serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found low quality evidence suggesting a short-term beneficial effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis, but no evidence of an effect on all-cause mortality. Additional evidence from large, high quality randomised clinical trials is needed to evaluate the potential benefits and harms of flumazenil in people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

Polymorphism rs4263535 in GABRA1 intron 4 was related to deeper sedation by intravenous midazolam

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether polymorphisms in the gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor α1 subunit (GABRA1) gene influence sleep induction time, bispectral index score (BIS) during sleep induction and the total dose of midazolam required to reach a Ramsay Sedation Assessment Scale (RSAS) score of 4.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for elective orthopaedic surgery were enrolled. All patients received initial doses of 0.02 mg/kg intravenous midazolam. If the RSAS score did not reach 4, an additional 1-mg dose of midazolam was administered. Results were compared among groups of patients with five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in GABRA1: rs4263535, rs980791, rs6556562, rs998754 and rs2279020.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were evaluated. Polymorphism rs4263535 was associated with the lowest BIS during sedation induction. Multinomial logistic regression analysis demonstrated that polymorphism rs4263535 was significantly associated with the total dose of midazolam required for sedation induction.

CONCLUSIONS

Polymorphism rs4263535 in GABRA1 intron 4 was associated with deeper sedation by intravenous midazolam. Patients with the A/A rs4263535 genotype required a smaller dose of midazolam.

Delayed flumazenil injection after endoscopic sedation increases patient satisfaction compared with immediate flumazenil injection

Background/Aims

Flumazenil was administered after the completion of endoscopy under sedation to reduce recovery time and increase patient safety. We evaluated patient satisfaction after endoscopy under sedation according to the timing of a postprocedural flumazenil injection.

Methods

In total, 200 subjects undergoing concurrent colonoscopy and upper endoscopy while sedated with midazolam and meperidine were enrolled in our investigation. We randomly administered 0.3 mg of flumazenil either immediately or 15 minutes after the endoscopic procedure. A postprocedural questionnaire and next day telephone interview were conducted to assess patient satisfaction.

Results

Flumazenil injection timing did not affect the time spent in the recovery room when comparing the two groups of patients. However, the subjects in the 15 minutes injection group were more satisfied with undergoing endoscopy under sedation than the patients in the immediate injection group according to the postprocedural survey (p=0.019). However, no difference in overall satisfaction, memory, or willingness to undergo a future endoscopy was observed between the two groups when the telephone survey was conducted on the following day.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that a delayed flumazenil injection after endoscopic sedation increased patient satisfaction without prolonging recovery time, even though the benefit of the delayed flumazenil injection did not persist into the following day.

Enhancement of GABAergic activity: neuropharmacological effects of benzodiazepines and therapeutic use in anesthesiology

GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). The type A GABA receptor (GABA(A)R) system is the primary pharmacological target for many drugs used in clinical anesthesia. The α1, β2, and γ2 subunit-containing GABA(A)Rs located in the various parts of CNS are thought to be involved in versatile effects caused by inhaled anesthetics and classic benzodiazepines (BZD), both of which are widely used in clinical anesthesiology. During the past decade, the emergence of tonic inhibitory conductance in extrasynaptic GABA(A)Rs has coincided with evidence showing that these receptors are highly sensitive to the sedatives and hypnotics used in anesthesia. Anesthetic enhancement of tonic GABAergic inhibition seems to be preferentially increased in regions shown to be important in controlling memory, awareness, and sleep. This review focuses on the physiology of the GABA(A)Rs and the pharmacological properties of clinically used BZDs. Although classic BZDs are widely used in anesthesiological practice, there is a constant need for new drugs with more favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects and fewer side effects. New hypnotics are currently developed, and promising results for one of these, the GABA(A)R agonist remimazolam, have recently been published.

The effects of midazolam on the bispectral index after fetal expulsion in caesarean section under general anaesthesia with sevoflurane

The effects of midazolam used with low concentration inhaled anaesthetics on the bispectral index (BIS) was investigated after fetal expulsion during caesarean section. Forty-five patients undergoing caesarean section received either normal saline (control, n = 15), or an intravenous bolus of 0.03 mg/kg (n = 15) or 0.05 mg/kg (n = 15) midazolam. Changes in BIS and maternal haemodynamics were monitored before induction, on intubation, at uterine incision, on delivery, at 3, 5 and 10 min after fetal expulsion, at subcutaneous tissue closure, at skin closure, on eye opening and at extubation. BIS values in the group that received 0.05 mg/kg midazolam were significantly lower than in the other two groups at 3, 5 and 10 min after fetal expulsion, and at subcutaneous tissue closure and skin closure. Values of BIS < 60 could only be maintained with 0.05 mg/kg midazolam and there was no delay in maternal emergence or recovery.

The role of flumazenil in outpatient transesophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines used for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) sedation may be associated with postprocedural psychomotor effects that are undesirable.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize that flumazenil can reverse cognitive and motor effects from benzodiazepine, promoting earlier return to baseline function.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the cognitive and motor function of patients who did or did not receive flumazenil following TEE. Patients' gait, level of drowsiness, and recall of items learned before and after benzodiazepine administration were evaluated before TEE, as well as immediately and 30 min after the procedure.

RESULTS

Of 207 patients (123 men and 84 women), 93 (45%) were given flumazenil 0.2 or 0.4 mg intravenously, and 113 (55%) were not. The baseline characteristics of the patients who received flumazenil were not significantly different from those who did not receive flumazenil, with the exception of a higher mean dosage of midazolam administered to the flumazenil group. In addition, patients in the flumazenil group appeared more drowsy immediately following TEE. When adjusted for age and midazolam dosage, there were no differences, at any time, between the two groups in gait or recall of items learned prior to sedation. however, at 30 min following TEE, the flumazenil group was able to recall a larger number of new items learned immediately after the procedure (1.92/3 vs. 1.61/3, p = 0.02) than did patients in the group not receiving flumazenil. No adverse effects were encountered in any patient.

CONCLUSION

Flumazenil appears safe and effective in reversing anterograde amnesic effects of benzodiazepine following TEE, but has no effects on retrograde amnesia and does not promote earlier return of motor function to baseline. It is useful in clinical situations where high dosages of benzodiazepine have been used and/or excessive drowsiness is evident following TEE. Routine use of the drug, however, is not necessary.

Population pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and midazolam and their metabolites in intensive care patients on continuous venovenous hemofiltration

BACKGROUND

The objective is to study the population pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and midazolam in critically ill patients with acute renal failure who are treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH).

METHODS

Twenty critically ill patients with acute renal failure on CVVH therapy were administered either lorazepam (n = 10) or midazolam (n = 10) by continuous infusion. CVVH was performed with an ultrafiltrate flow of 2 L/h with filtrate substitution in the predilution or postdilution mode. Blood flow through the 1.9-m 2 cellulose triacetate membrane filter was 180 mL/min. For 48 hours, multiple blood and ultrafiltrate samples were obtained for determination of concentrations of the drug and its metabolites.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of lorazepam is described best by a 1-compartment model. No significant covariates were identified. Total-body clearance was 6.4 L/h, and volume of distribution was 376 L. Ultrafiltration clearance was 0.31 L/h, equivalent to approximately 5% of total clearance. Average degree of plasma protein binding was 82.9% for lorazepam, with a sieving coefficient of 0.16 +/- 0.03. For lorazepamglucuronide, degree of plasma protein binding was 39.5%, and sieving coefficient was 0.48 +/- 0.07. The pharmacokinetics of midazolam is described best by a 1-compartment model. No significant covariates were identified. Total-body clearance was 8.5 L/h, and volume of distribution was 157 L. Clearance by ultrafiltration was 0.055 L/h, equivalent to approximately 0.7% of total clearance. Average degree of plasma protein binding was 95.8%, with a sieving coefficient of 0.04 +/- 0.03. For the metabolite 1-hydroxymidazolamglucuronide, average degree of plasma protein binding was 43.4%, with a sieving coefficient of 0.45 +/- 0.06.

CONCLUSION

Neither lorazepam nor midazolam is removed efficiently by CVVH. CVVH contributes significantly to the removal of the glucuronide metabolites lorazepamglucuronide and 1-hydroxymidazolamglucuronide.

Clinically Important Drug Interactions with Intravenous Anaesthetics in Older Patients

There is a continuously growing population of older surgical patients who require an increasing number of anaesthetics and sedation. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes associated with increasing age are often not appreciated enough. Dose requirements for midazolam, a benzodiazepine commonly used for outpatient procedures, have been demonstrated in prospective studies to decrease with increasing age. On the other hand, rigorous prospective studies investigating the effect of age on the induction doses of other intravenous anaesthetics, such as thiopental sodium or propofol, are missing. In addition, many of those patients take multiple drugs for medical problems often not related to the procedure. Drug interactions with anaesthetics are likely to occur, but are not well documented. In this review we have summarised the documented and clinically relevant drug interactions with anaesthetics in the elderly population. We have identified a significant lack of scientific and outcome data and the need for more studies and education.

Comparative study of the metabolism of drug substrates by human cytochrome P450 3A4 expressed in bacterial, yeast and human lymphoblastoid cells

1. The aim was to compare the metabolic activity of human CYP3A4 expressed in bacteria (E. coli), yeast (S. cerevisiae) and human lymphoblastoid cells (hBl), with the native CYP3A4 activity observed in a panel of human livers. 2. Three CYP3A4 substrates were selected for study: dextromethorphan (DEM), midazolam (MDZ) and diazepam (DZ). The substrate metabolism in each of the four systems was characterized by deriving the kinetic parameters K(m) or S(50), V(max) and intrinsic clearance (CL(int)) or maximum clearance (CL(max)) from the kinetic profiles; the latter differing by 100-fold across the three substrates. 3. The K(m) or S(50) for the formation of metabolites 3-methoxymorphinan (MEM), 1'-hydroxymidazolam (1'-OH MDZ) and 3-hydroxydiazepam (3HDZ) compared well in all systems. For CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of DEM, MDZ and DZ, the V(max) for hBl microsomes were generally 2-9-fold higher than the respective yeast and human liver microsomes and E. coli membrane preparations, resulting in greater CL(int) or CL(max). In the case of 3HDZ formation, non-linear kinetics were observed for E. coli, hBl microsomes and human liver microsomes, whereas the kinetics observed for S. cerevisiae were linear. 4. The use of native human liver microsomes for drug metabolic studies will always be preferable. However, owing to the limited availability of human tissues, we find it is reasonable to use any of the recombinant systems described herein, since all three recombinant systems gave good predictions of the native human liver enzyme activities.

The effect of intravenous administration of variable-dose flumazenil after fixed-dose ketamine and midazolam in healthy cats

The effects of intravenous administration of variable-dose flumazenil (0, 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.1 mg/kg) after ketamine (3 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.0 and 0.5 mg/kg) were studied in 18 healthy unmedicated cats from time of administration until full recovery. End-points were chosen to determine whether flumazenil shortened the recovery period and/or modified behaviors previously identified and attributed to midazolam. Overall, flumazenil administration had little effect on recovery or behaviors. One minute after flumazenil administration, all cats were recumbent but a greater proportion of cats which received the highest dose assumed sternal recumbency with head up than any other group. Although not significant, those cats that received the highest flumazenil dose also had shorter mean times for each of the initial recovery stages (lateral recumbency with head up, sternal recumbency with head up and walking with ataxia) than any of the other treatment groups that received midazolam. For complete recovery, flumazenil did decrease the proportion of the cats that was sedated, but did not shorten the time to walking without ataxia. Based on this study, the administration of flumazenil in veterinary practice, at the doses studied, to shorten and/or improve the recovery from ketamine and midazolam in healthy cats cannot be recommended.

A dose-ranging study of midazolam for postoperative sedation of patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the dose range, efficacy, and safety of midazolam for induction of sedation of mechanically ventilated postoperative patients in the intensive care unit.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Thirteen intensive care units in Japan.

PATIENTS

We included 98 patients undergoing general surgery who were ASA physical status I-III. The following inclusion criteria were applied to the patients after surgery: under mechanical ventilation, sedation level 2 or 3 on the Ramsay Sedation Scale, and any pain level but 4 on the Pybus and Torda Pain Scale.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Of the 98 patients initially enrolled in the study, 95 patients received one of the study medications: placebo (n = 24), 0.015 mg/kg midazolam (n = 21), 0.03 mg/kg midazolam (n = 26), or 0.06 mg/kg midazolam (n = 24). Level of sedation was assessed by using the Ramsay Sedation Scale before and 10 mins after medication. The proportions of patients with sedation level 4 or deeper after medication were 4.3%, 14.3%, 52.0%, and 90.9% in the placebo and the midazolam 0.015 mg/kg, 0.03 mg/kg, and 0.06 mg/kg groups, respectively. Safety was assessed by routine monitoring of body functions and monitoring for adverse events. Although midazolam dose-dependently reduced mean systolic arterial pressure, the changes in this variable were small; only one or two patients in each treatment group had decreases in systolic arterial pressure of >20%. No clear dose dependency was found for changes in other body functions measured in the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients who achieved a satisfactory level of sedation increased with an increasing dose of midazolam. Intravenous bolus injection of midazolam also dose-dependently reduced mean systolic arterial pressure. This study indicated that, balancing sedative efficacy and safety, from 0.03 to 0.06 mg/kg of midazolam provides relatively safe sedation in postoperative patients.

[Sedation induced by midazolam in intensive care: pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic aspects]

OBJECTIVE

Review on midazolam in order to optimize drug utilisation and therapeutic monitoring.

DATA SOURCES

Research of English or French articles published until August 2001, using Medline database. The key words were: midazolam, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic, sedation, drug interaction.

STUDY SELECTION

Original articles, clinical cases and letters to the Editor were selected. Animal studies were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

The articles were analysed according to their interest in midazolam clinical practice.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Midazolam is a benzodiazepine widely used in intensive care unit, as a sedative, anxiety-relieving, and amnesic drug. Midazolam could be used in patients with cardiac, or respiratory failure, and in neurosurgery. A great interindividual variability on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response was observed. In intensive care patients, elimination half-life is known to be widely increased. Midazolam is metabolised by hepatic microsomes. The major metabolite is the 1-hydroxymidazolam, which is pharmacologically active. A prolonged sedation due to an accumulation of conjugated metabolite was observed in renal failure patients. Enzymatic inductors or inhibitors could influence pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of midazolam.

CONCLUSION

According to midazolam pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability, an individual dosage adjustment is essential for long-term sedation. Target controlled sedation could be a mean to limit the variability and to reach quickly the pharmacodynamic effect.

Intravenous midazolam significantly enhances the lethal effect of thiopental but not that of ketamine in mice

Intravenous (i.v.) drug combinations are used in clinical anaesthesia in order to combine the desired effects and minimize toxicity from large doses of single agents. This fundamental assumption has not been systematically evaluated. We examined its validity by testing the influence of midazolam on the lethal effect of i.v. thiopental and ketamine in mice. Dose-response curves were constructed for the lethal effect of i.v. thiopental and ketamine, and for the loss of righting reflex effect by midazolam, in sexually mature male ICR mice weighing 20-40 g. For each curve, six or seven groups of eight to 10 mice each were used. A quarter of the median effective dose (ED50) for loss of righting reflex by midazolam was combined with the two other drugs to deduce dose-response curves for the lethal effect of the combinations. The ED50 for loss of righting reflex by i.v. midazolam was 43.5 mg x kg(-1) (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.4-46.5). The median lethal dose (LD 50) of i.v. thiopental was 50.6 mg x kg(-1) (95% CI, 50.0-54.9) and that of ketamine 42.9 mg x kg(-1) (95% CI, 32.3-52). In the presence of 10 mg x kg(-1) midazolam, the LD50 of thiopental was reduced to 20 mg x kg(-1) (17.7-22.2), but that of ketamine remained 44.4 mg x kg(-1) (37.7-54.9). Midazolam increased the lethal effect of thiopental 2.5-fold, but did not affect that of ketamine. Interactions at the toxic level between commonly used anaesthetic agents may differ from those at the hypnotic or analgesic levels, which should prompt evaluation of such combinations before their introduction to routine clinical use.

High-dose flumazenil potentiates the hypnotic activity of propofol, but not that of thiopental, in ddY mice

BACKGROUND

Flumazenil is a specific benzodiazepine agonist, which is reported to have a partial benzodiazepine agonist-like effect at a high dose. This study investigated the effects of flumazenil and midazolam on the hypnotic dose of propofol and thiopental in ddY mice, using a behavioral model.

METHODS

Mice were given either propofol or thiopental intravenously to induce hypnosis, which was defined as a loss of the righting reflex. The mice were pre-treated with flumazenil (0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mg kg(-1)) or midazolam (0.1 or 0.2 mg kg(-1)), and given propofol or thiopental after a 30-s delay.

RESULTS

Pre-treatment with flumazenil (0.1 or 0.2 mg kg(-1)) significantly decreased the hypnotic dose of propofol compared to the control group (9.3+/-0.39 [8.5-10.0] or 9.0+/-0.28 [8.5-9.6] vs. 10.8+/-0.42 [9.9-11.6] mg kg(-1) (ED50+/-SEM and [95% confidence interval]) P<0.05), but not that of thiopental (9.1+/-0.30 [8.5-9.7] with 0.2 mg kg(-1) flumazenil vs. 9.3+/-0.42 [8.4-10.1] mg kg(-1) with saline). Midazolam reduced the hypnotic dose of both propofol and thiopental. Flumazenil antagonized the potentiating effect of midazolam (0.2 mg kg(-1)) on the hypnotic activity of propofol.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the hypnotic activity of propofol is potentiated by the partial agonist activity of flumazenil in ddY mice.

A rapid high-pressure liquid chromatographic procedure for determination of flumazenil in plasma

INTRODUCTION

Flumazenil antagonizes the effects of benzodiazepines at gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptors in the central nervous system. Flumazenil has been reported to provoke panic attacks in patients with panic disorder (PD) but not in healthy controls. A rapid high-pressure liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was developed for determination of flumazenil in plasma samples from PD patients receiving flumazenil and the results obtained with that assay are reported here.

METHODS

Samples from 37 PD subjects receiving 2 mg of flumazenil intravenously were analyzed. Extraction under basic conditions was followed by an HPLC assay with UV detection (250 nm). Lamotrigine was used as intermal standard and a standard curve was constructed for each assay run. Flumazenil concentrations were measured in all the subjects in samples collected at 2 and 4 min after the drug administration and in some subjects, measurements were also done in samples collected at 7.5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min.

RESULTS

The procedure was reproducible and linear (from 2.5 to 1000 ng/ml). At 2 and 4 min after flumazenil administration, the concentrations did not differ significantly between panicking and nonpanicking subjects, indicating that the pharmacokinetics of the drug is not the major determinant of the responses. There was a steep decline in the plasma concentration-time profile during the first 4 min, reflecting an extensive and rapid distribution after which the decline was slower.

DISCUSSION

The method described here is rapid, replicable, and convenient for the determination of flumazenil in plasma.

A small dose of midazolam decreases the time to achieve hypnosis without delaying emergence during short-term propofol anesthesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a small dose of midazolam (10 microg kg(-1)) on induction and emergence during short-term propofol anesthesia and to investigate the effects of subsequent administration of flumazenil.

DESIGN

Double-blinded, prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Operating room of a medical college hospital.

PATIENTS

30 male ASA physical status I and II patients (ages 51 to 75) scheduled for minor surgery under spinal anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: the placebo-propofol-placebo (PP) group, the midazolam-propofol-placebo (MP) group, or the midazolam-propofol-flumazenil (MF) group. After administering placebo or midazolam (10 microg kg(-1)), propofol 250 microg kg(-1) min(-1) was infused. Immediately after confirming that the patient was hypnotized, we terminated the propofol infusion and administered placebo or flumazenil (5 microg kg(-1)).

MEASUREMENTS

The dose and the times required to achieve hypnosis (the first endpoint) and to emerge from anesthesia (the second endpoint). The plasma concentration at each endpoint was determined.

MAIN RESULTS

Midazolam significantly decreased the dose and time needed to achieve hypnosis [PP vs. MP, 66 +/- 14 vs. 48 +/- 15 mg, 260 +/- 55 vs. 179 +/- 44 sec, respectively (mean +/- SD)]. Thus, the plasma concentration of propofol at hypnosis was significantly lower (PP vs. MP, 3.31 +/- 0.78 vs. 2.41 +/- 0.57 microg mL(-1)). The time to emerge from anesthesia was not prolonged by midazolam, and was further shortened by administration of flumazenil (PP, MP vs. MF, 237 +/- 77, 207 +/- 71 s vs. 126 +/- 56 sec, respectively). Flumazenil also reversed the reduction in propofol concentration induced by midazolam at emergence (PP, MP, and MF, 0.54 +/- 0.17, 0.37 +/- 0.15, and 0.59 +/- 0.22 microg mL(-1), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of 10 microg kg(-1)midazolam decreases the dose and time required to achieve hypnosis with propofol induction without delaying emergence from anesthesia. Additional administration of flumazenil further shortens the time to emerge from midazolam-propofol anesthesia.

Intranasal midazolam for prolonged convulsive seizures

In order to determine the efficiency of intranasal midazolam in prolonged convulsive episodes, we conducted a prospective study in children with various types of seizures. Nine patients (six boys, three girls; age range 6 months to 9 years) with prolonged convulsions lasting more than 10 min were treated with intranasal midazolam, 0.3 mg/kg. The success rate was 100% with only one case requiring a second dose. Estimated duration of seizures was 12-30 min (mean 18.6) while mean time elapsed until cessation of seizures was 139.6 s (range 60-480). No significant adverse effects were noted except for one patient who had seizures secondary to serious CNS infection and respiratory depression after intranasal midazolam.

Midazolam in treatment of various types of seizures in children

Midazolam is a recently developed water-soluble benzodiazepine that shares anxiolytic, muscle relaxant, hypnotic and anticonvulsant actions with other members of this class. There are limited studies that midazolam can be used successfully to treat seizures in adults and children. In this study, 0.2 mg/kg intramuscular (i.m.) midazolam was administered to 11 children (eight boys and three girls), aged 3 days to 4 years (mean age 1.8 +/- 1.4 years), with seizures of various types. In all but one child, seizures stopped in 15 s-5 min after injection. No side effects were observed. These results suggest that i.m. administration of midazolam may be useful in a variety of seizures during childhood, especially in case of intravenous (i.v.) line problem.

The effects of midazolam and flumazenil on psychomotor function

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of midazolam and its antagonism with flumazenil on psychomotor function as assessed by the perceptive accuracy test (PAT) and choice reaction time (CRT).

DESIGN

Double-blind, cross-over, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

11 healthy volunteers (6 females, 5 males, mean age 32 years).

INTERVENTIONS

Midazolam 0.1 mg/kg (Group MH), midazolam 0.035 mg/kg (Group ML), or placebo (Group PL) were injected intravenously (IV) in a cross-over design. Flumazenil 0.5 mg was injected after 60 minutes. Plasma concentrations of midazolam were measured at 3, 30, 60 and 75 minutes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Baseline values were first obtained on psychomotor tests including the PAT and CRT. These tests were then repeated 30 and 60 minutes after the IV injection of midazolam or placebo, and repeated 15 and 30 minutes following the injection of flumazenil. A dose-dependent effect of midazolam was seen on the PAT and CRT. Flumazenil completely reversed the psychomotor effects of midazolam in Group ML at 60 minutes but not in Group MH, and this action was clearly detected by the PAT. Psychomotor tests had returned to baseline values when the plasma concentration of midazolam was below 33 ng/ml. A marked inter-individual variation was seen on the PAT, CRT, and in the correlation between the plasma concentration and the results on the PAT.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a dose-dependent deterioration in psychomotor performance in subjects given midazolam. The PAT was sensitive in the detection of these residual effects, but a large inter-individual variation in the psychomotor effects of midazolam was evident that could be due to pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variability between individuals. Flumazenil in a dose of 0.5 mg IV completely reversed the effects of low-dose, but not high-dose, midazolam.

Flumazenil reversal of psychomotor impairment due to midazolam or diazepam for conscious sedation for upper endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Flumazenil is a competitive benzodiazepine antagonist that acts to reverse their sedative and hypnotic effects. It is indicated in the management of benzodiazepine overdose, but its role in the routine reversal of endoscopic conscious sedation has not been defined.

METHODS

Patients undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy who received sedation with either diazepam or midazolam alone were given flumazenil 0.2 mg incrementally immediately following the procedure until awake. They were then asked to repeat three psychomotor tests measuring cognitive and motor skills, with their baseline scores compared with postprocedure scores over a 3-hour period.

RESULTS

Full psychomotor function was restored to baseline values within 30 minutes after flumazenil in 79% of patients, with no differences in the reversal of psychomotor skill impairment observed between diazepam and midazolam sedation. There was no evidence of rebound sedation seen for up to 3 hours. No significant anterograde amnesia was evident in 78% of individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that flumazenil's effects on reversing psychomotor impairment are similar when midazolam or diazepam are used for conscious sedation. However, the potential usefulness of routine flumazenil reversal of conscious sedation will require further evaluation of specific psychomotor performance skills (such as driving a car) before we lift the admonition against leaving the endoscopic suite unattended, driving a vehicle, or operating complicated machinery for several hours.

Pharmacology of flumazenil

Flumazenil, an imidazobenzodiazepine, is the first benzodiazepine antagonist available for clinical use. It is a specific competitive antagonist at benzodiazepine receptors, which are associated with receptors for gamma-aminobutyric acid, the most important inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. Administered orally, it has a low bioavailability and the preferred route is intravenous. Its usual clinical role is to reverse the effects of benzodiazepine sedation; however, administered before, or with, other benzodiazepines, it modifies their effects, the extent of such modification depending on the dose, duration of effect and relative receptor affinity of the agonist. Flumazenil also reverses adverse physiological effects of benzodiazepines. Its indications include reversal of benzodiazepine-induced sedation, termination of benzodiazepine-induced anaesthesia, return of spontaneous respiration and consciousness in intensive care patients and the treatment of paradoxical reactions to benzodiazepines. Other potential indications include its use in hepatic encephalopathy, alcohol intoxication and coma; however, these claims still require substantiation. Following sedation reversed with flumazenil, minimal residual effects of the agonist can sometimes be detected using psychomotor tests and are due to the relatively short half-life of flumazenil, but are of no clinical consequence. There is concern that flumazenil could precipitate an acute withdrawal syndrome following long-term benzodiazepine administration; however, the available evidence suggests otherwise and that it could be useful in the treatment of benzodiazepine tolerance. The existence of flumazenil is important, with implications for future research and the development of minimally invasive therapy and day-case surgery. With increasing pressures on non-anaesthetically trained practitioners to perform sedation, flumazenil has important implications for safety.

Flumazenil and midazolam in anaesthesia

Flumazenil, the first benzodiazepine antagonist, is currently used widely as an emergency drug, and has also been utilized in planned procedures, to time arousal intra- or post-operatively. It is known that flumazenil, used at the end of a procedure, causes instant recovery by reversing the residual effects of, for example, midazolam. An agonist-antagonist concept, midazolam-flumazenil, where benzodiazepine sedation or anaesthesia is terminated at will, is, therefore, finding increasing application. In neuroanaesthesia, for example, it facilitates immediate recovery, cardiovascular stabilization and the use of midazolam as an alternative to thiopentone and inhalational agents, and in ear, nose and throat endoscopies, it permits more rapid turnover of patients and is a good choice for haemodynamic stability in patients with a high cardiovascular risk factor. There continues to be debate over the term used to describe the level of sedation remaining after the effects of the antagonist have worn off. 'Resedation' is often used incorrectly to describe what is in reality residual sedation. Given the correct use of midazolam or the exploitation of synergism using opioids, flumazenil will cause arousal, while maintaining the benefit of opioid analgesia. Such a technique may eliminate the need for formal recovery facilities in many ambulatory patients, thereby reducing dependence on trolleys, beds and nurses. This has major implications for health economics, particularly in relation to endoscopy clinics and when co-induction of anaesthesia is employed.

Anaesthesia for thyroplasty

The purpose of this report is to describe the anaesthetic considerations for layngoplastic procedures. Thyroplasty is a procedure which restores the voice in unilateral vocal cord paralysis. The procedure employs an external approach via a window cut at the appropriate level in the thyroid ala. A wedge of silastic is inserted against the inner perichondrium, thereby displacing the vocal cord medially and permitting voice production. Correct placement of the implant is assessed by asking the patient to phonate; patient cooperation is therefore necessary at certain times during the procedure. We describe our management of a patient undergoing thyroplasty. The use of a benzodiazepine agonist-antagonist combination provided both optimal operating conditions and patient comfort.

Interaction between flumazenil and the anesthetic effects of hexobarbital in the rat

Interaction between flumazenil, a substance regarded mainly as a benzodiazepine antagonist, and an intravenous anesthetic barbiturate, hexobarbital, was investigated by using an electroencephalography threshold test in male rats. Flumazenil 10 mg/kg given as pretreatment reduced the threshold dose of hexobarbital approximately 20% indicating a synergistic interaction. Similar effects were obtained with the agonists, diazepam 20 mg/kg and lorazepam 2 mg/kg. Dose-response curve for flumazenil (2.5-10 mg/kg) was determined with the same technique and hexobarbital concentrations were analysed in serum and several brain regions at the threshold by high pressure liquid chromatography. Flumazenil 10 mg/kg pretreated group showed a different pattern of distribution of hexobarbital into the tested brain regions indicating a pharmacokinetic interaction. Low concentrations of hexobarbital in the brainstem which were negatively correlated with the dose of flumazenil indicate a pharmacodynamic interaction which could be due to partial agonistic intrinsic activity of flumazenil, usually seen at much higher doses.

The erythromycin breath test predicts the clearance of midazolam

Midazolam, a commonly used sedative and amnestic medication, has recently been shown to be largely metabolized in the liver by a cytochrome P450, termed CYP3A4. There is at least a tenfold intersubject variability in the liver content and catalytic activity of CYP3A4, which may in part account for the known interpatient differences in the kinetics of midazolam. To test this hypothesis, we determined the intravenous midazolam kinetics of 20 medically stable, hospitalized patients, whose hepatic CYP3A4 activities were determined with use of the [14C-N-methyl]erythromycin breath test. During the kinetic study, we also performed psychometric testing designed to quantitate the level of sedation and amnesia. We found a significant positive correlation between the erythromycin breath test results and weight adjusted clearance (in milliliters per minute per kilogram) of both total midazolam (r = 0.52; p = 0.03) and unbound midazolam (r = 0.61; p < 0.01). The relatively low dose of midazolam used (0.0145 mg/kg) produced significant but transient sedation and memory impairment in some of the patients. We conclude that interpatient differences in liver CYP3A4 activity in part account for the variations in midazolam kinetics. Our observations account for reported drug interactions involving midazolam and suggest that patients with low CYP3A4 activity may be most susceptible to prolonged amnestic effects occasionally produced by this short-acting benzodiazepine.

An assessment of resedation following flumazenil-induced antagonism of intravenous midazolam: comparison of psychomotor and amnesic recovery with a non-sedated reference group

The specific benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil can enhance patient recovery following local anaesthetic day-case surgery performed under sedation. However, in view of its short elimination half-life, concerns have been expressed about the risk of resedation following its use. An open, randomised, parallel group study was designed to explore this question. Eighty-five patients were studied. Group A (n=43) patients underwent local anaesthetic cystoscopy with intravenous (i.v.) midazolam sedation. Following cystoscopy, and 30 min after the injection of midazolam, a bolus dose of flumazenil (0.5 mg i.v.) was given. Group B (n=42) patients underwent no operation and received no drugs but, in all other respects, were treated in an identical fashion to patients in group A. Tests of psychomotor function and memory were administered at baseline and again at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h (or equivalent times for group B patients) following the injection of flumazenil. The test results showed no evidence of resedation, but there was evidence of incomplete reversal, as shown by significant differences in critical flicker fusion and delayed word recall at the 0.5-h test point. Group B patients showed no evidence of practice effects but did demonstrate an impairment in test performance possibly related to motivational factors. In conclusion, this study provides no evidence of resedation when using flumazenil to reverse the acute effects of midazolam. Incomplete reversal of amnesia need not delay patient discharge but has important implications with respect to the timing and nature of information imparted to patients prior to their release from hospital.

The effect of three H2-receptor antagonists on the disposition of midazolam in the rat in-situ perfused liver model

The rat in-situ perfused liver model was used to investigate the effect of three H2-receptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetic disposition of the short-acting benzodiazepine, midazolam. Perfusion experiments, using standard techniques, were carried out on four groups (one control and three H2-receptor antagonist-treated groups) of male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-350 g). All animals received midazolam 1 mg; the three treated groups received cimetidine (8 mg), ranitidine (3 mg) or famotidine (0.4 mg). Perfusate and bile samples were collected and assayed for midazolam using gas chromatography. The perfusate data indicated that midazolam disposition was impaired at 10, 50 and 60 min of the experimental period following the addition of cimetidine, whereas ranitidine and famotidine produced an effect at 10 min only; midazolam levels in bile were not affected by the presence of an H2-receptor antagonist. It was concluded that the limited inhibitory effect of cimetidine may be attributed to its lack of specificity for CYP3A, the isoenzyme responsible for the metabolism of midazolam.

Effects of flumazenil on cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide-induced panic symptoms in healthy volunteers

The neuropeptide cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide (CCK-4) has potent anxiogenic action in human and animal subjects. On the basis of prior work which demonstrated that benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor agonists antagonized CCK-induced excitation of rat hippocampal neurons we studied whether BZD receptors mediated the anxiogenic effect of CCK-4. To examine this possibility we determined whether the BZD receptor antagonist flumazenil could antagonize the effects of CCK-4 (50 micrograms) in healthy volunteers. Thirty subjects (10 females; 20 males) were pretreated with flumazenil (2 mg in saline) or placebo (0.9% NaCl in water) 15 min prior to CCK-4 challenge in a randomized double-blind crossover design. Flumazenil had no impact on the behavioral and cardiovascular effects of CCK-4, suggesting that BZD receptors do not mediate the anxiogenic action of CCK-4. The influence of GABA and non-GABA-related mechanisms on response to CCK-4 remains to be considered.

Benzodiazepine receptor equilibrium constants for flumazenil and midazolam determined in humans with the single photon emission computer tomography tracer [123I]iomazenil

This study is based on the steady state method for the calculation of Kd values recently described by Lassen (J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 12 (1992), 709), in which a constant infusion of the examined nonradioactive ligand is used with a bolus injection of tracer. Eight volunteers were examined twice, once without receptor blockade and once with a constant degree of partial blockade of the benzodiazepine receptors by infusion of nonradioactive flumazenil (Lanexat) or midazolam (Dormicum). Single photon emission computer tomography and blood sampling were performed intermittently for 6 h after bolus injection of [123I]iomazenil. The tracer in plasma was determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography and also by a simple octanol extraction procedure. The free concentration of flumazenil and midazolam in plasma water averaged 52% and 3.5% of that in whole plasma. The Kd values for the entire cortical rim for flumazenil were 7.4, 10.0, 10.3 and 17.7 nmol/l plasma water and, for midazolam, 73, 76, 58 and 30 nmol/l plasma water. The variation exceeds random methodological error and is probably due to interindividual differences in receptor affinity. The Kd level of midazolam is considerably higher than expected from the results of in vitro studies.

Topics in clinical pharmacology: flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist

Flumazenil is a central antagonist of the sedative effects of benzodiazepines. It has been used to reverse benzodiazepine effects in conscious sedation, general anesthesia, and overdose with restoration of alertness and psychomotor function within minutes of administration. Seizures have followed the use of flumazenil. Overdose patients who have co-ingested cyclic antidepressants are especially at risk for this complication. Flumazenil is administered intravenously in small, incremental doses.