Characterization of anti-histone antibodies in patients with type 1 autoimmune hepatitis

Epigenetics in inflammatory liver diseases: A clinical perspective (Review)

Inflammatory liver diseases are, nowadays, multifactorial and wide-spread, thus having an important socio-economic impact. Although the therapeutic algorithms are well-known in hepatitis, regardless of etiology, strategies to identify inflammatory hepatic lesions in early stages and to develop new epigenetic therapies should be prioritized. The main entities of inflammatory liver disease are: alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, viral hepatitis and Wilson disease. The main epigenetic processes include: DNA methylation/demethylation, which imply changes in DNA tertiary structure; post-translational histone covalent changes (methylation/demethylation, acetylation/deacetylation, ubiquitination), that cause DNA-histone instability; synthesis of small, non-coding RNA molecules, called microRNAs, that modulate translational potential of transcripts (mRNAs) and post-translational modification of polypeptide chains. Consequently, the epigenetic interactions aforementioned, play an important modulatory role in disease progression and response to conventional therapies The present review focused on the main epigenetic changes in inflammatory liver conditions, considering a new perspective: Epigenetic therapy. This approach is more than welcomed, taking into consideration that conventional therapeutic strategies are almost exhausted.

A comprehensive autoantigen-ome of autoimmune liver diseases identified from dermatan sulfate affinity enrichment of liver tissue proteins

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune diseases result from aberrant immune attacks by the body itself. It is mysterious how autoantigens, a large cohort of seemingly unconnected molecules expressed in different parts of the body, can induce similar autoimmune responses. We have previously found that dermatan sulfate (DS) can form complexes with molecules of apoptotic cells and stimulate autoreactive CD5+ B cells to produce autoantibodies. Hence, autoantigenic molecules share a unique biochemical property in their affinity to DS. This study sought to further test this uniform principle of autoantigenicity.

RESULTS

Proteomes were extracted from freshly collected mouse livers. They were loaded onto columns packed with DS-Sepharose resins. Proteins were eluted with step gradients of increasing salt strength. Proteins that bound to DS with weak, moderate, or strong affinity were eluted with 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0 M NaCl, respectively. After desalting, trypsin digestion, and gel electrophoresis, proteins were sequenced by mass spectrometry. To validate whether these proteins have been previously identified as autoantigens, an extensive literature search was conducted using the protein name or its alternative names as keywords. Of the 41 proteins identified from the strong DS-affinity fraction, 33 (80%) were verified autoantigens. Of the 46 proteins with moderate DS-affinity, 27 (59%) were verified autoantigens. Of the 125 proteins with weak DS-affinity, 44 (35%) were known autoantigens. Strikingly, these autoantigens fell into the classical autoantibody categories of autoimmune liver diseases: ANA (anti-nuclear autoantibodies), SMA (anti-smooth muscle autoantibodies), AMA (anti-mitochondrial autoantibodies), and LKM (liver-kidney microsomal autoantigens).

CONCLUSIONS

This study of DS-affinity enrichment of liver proteins establishes a comprehensive autoantigen-ome for autoimmune liver diseases, yielding 104 verified and 108 potential autoantigens. The liver autoantigen-ome sheds light on the molecular origins of autoimmune liver diseases and further supports the notion of a unifying biochemical principle of autoantigenicity.

Antihistone Autoantibodies in Dobermans With Hepatitis

Background

Immune system involvement is suggested as an underlying cause for Doberman hepatitis (DH) based on female predisposition, lymphocyte infiltration, abnormal hepatocyte expression of major histocompatibility complex class II antigens, and homozygosity for dog leukocyte antigen DRB1*00601.

Objective

To measure serum antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and serum antihistone antibodies (AHA) in Dobermans with hepatitis. To determine whether increased serum ANA or serum AHA could be used to support the diagnosis of Doberman hepatitis (DH).

Animals

Privately owned 25 subclinically and 13 clinically affected DH Dobermans and 17 healthy control Dobermans.

Methods

Case–control study. Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) microscopy and line blot tests were employed for the ANA pilot studies and an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay for detection of IgG AHA.

Results

Indirect immunofluorescence revealed ANA‐positive cases, and line blot showed AHA reactivity. In ELISA, importantly increased concentrations of AHA were found in 92% (23/25) of dogs in the subclinical stage and 84.6% (11 of 13) of dogs in the clinical stage of DH compared with no control dogs (0/17) (P < 0.0005). The mean AHA absorbance values of the blood samples obtained from the 25 subclinical DH dogs (1.36 ± 0.60, mean ± SD) and the 13 clinically affected dogs (1.46 ± 0.49) were significantly higher than in 17 control dogs (0.51 ± 0.18; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

As the presence of AHA indicates autoimmune activity, our results favor an autoimmune background as one cause for DH. Antihistone antibody could represent a novel means for screening Dobermans with increased serum alanine transaminase concentrations and suspicion of DH.

Autoimmune hepatitis, one disease with many faces: Etiopathogenetic, clinico-laboratory and histological characteristics

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an unresolving progressive liver disease of unknown etiology characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, autoantibodies detection and interface hepatitis. Due to the absence of specific diagnostic markers and the large heterogeneity of its clinical, laboratory and histological features, AIH diagnosis may be potentially difficult. Therefore, in this in-depth review we summarize the substantial progress on etiopathogenesis, clinical, serological and histological phenotypes of AIH. AIH has a global distribution affecting any age, both sexes and all ethnic groups. Clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic to severe or rarely fulminant hepatitis. Hypergammaglobulinemia with selective elevation of IgG is found in most cases. Autoimmune attack is perpetuated, possibly via molecular mimicry, and favored by the impaired control of T-regulatory cells. Histology (interface hepatitis, emperipolesis and hepatic rosette formation) and autoantibodies detection although not pathognomonic, are still the hallmark for a timely diagnosis. AIH remains a major diagnostic challenge. AIH should be considered in every case in the absence of viral, metabolic, genetic and toxic etiology of chronic or acute hepatitis. Laboratory personnel, hepato-pathologists and clinicians need to become more familiar with disease expressions and the interpretation of liver histology and autoimmune serology to derive maximum benefit for the patient.

Anti-nucleosome autoantibodies as markers for autoimmune hepatitis and their correlation with disease activity

AIM

To assess the prevalence of autoantibodies against nucleosomes (anti-nucleosome Ab) in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), examine the correlation between anti-nucleosome Ab and disease activity, and evaluate the effectiveness of anti-nucleosome Ab in predicting relapse.

METHODS

We analyzed serum anti-nucleosome Ab levels in 38 patients with AIH by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and assessed their correlation with clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Anti-nucleosome Ab levels were significantly higher in AIH, but not in patients with chronic hepatitis B (n = 20) or chronic hepatitis C (n = 20), compared to healthy controls (n = 15). The positive prevalence of anti-nucleosome Ab was 71.1% in AIH. Anti-nucleosome Ab levels were significantly lower during remission compared to that during flares within the same patients with AIH. Total bilirubin levels were significantly higher in patients with anti-nucleosome Ab levels of 53.7 U/mL or more compared to those with less than 53.7 U/mL at disease onset. Analysis of the reduction in anti-nucleosome Ab by immunosuppressive therapy in 16 AIH patients revealed that age at disease onset was significantly lower and IgG levels and relapse rates were significantly higher in patients with a reduction rate of less than 35% compared to those with a reduction rate 35% or more. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group score and γ-globulin levels were also higher in patients with reduction rates of less than 35% (borderline significance).

CONCLUSION

Anti-nucleosome Ab in AIH patients may be useful markers not only for disease diagnosis, but also for activity assessment and relapse prediction.

Review article: autoimmune hepatitis -- current management and challenges

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a disease of unknown aetiology characterised by interface hepatitis, hypergammaglobulinaemia, circulating autoantibodies and a favourable response to immunosuppression.

AIM

To review recent advancements in understanding aetiopathogenesis, clinical, serological and histological features, diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies of AIH.

METHODS

Published studies on AIH extracted mainly from PubMed during the last 15 years.

RESULTS

Autoimmune hepatitis has a global distribution affecting any age, both sexes and all ethnic groups. Clinical manifestations are variable ranging from no symptoms to severe acute hepatitis and only seldom to fulminant hepatic failure. Autoimmune attack is perpetuated, possibly via molecular mimicry mechanisms, and favoured by the impaired control of regulatory T-cells. A typical laboratory finding is hypergammaglobulinaemia with selective elevation of IgG, although in 15-25% of patients - particularly children, elderly and acute cases - IgG levels are normal. Liver histology and autoantibodies, although not pathognomonic, still remain the hallmark for diagnosis. Immunosuppressive treatment is mandatory and life-saving; however, to meet strict response criteria, the conventional therapy with prednisolone with or without azathioprine is far from ideal.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune hepatitis remains a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The clinician, the hepato-pathologist and the laboratory personnel need to become more familiar with different expressions of the disease, interpretation of liver histology and autoimmune serology. According to the strict definition of treatment response issued by the 2010 AASLD guidelines, many patients are nonresponders to conventional treatment. Newer immunosuppressive agents targeting pathogenetic mechanisms can improve patient management, which needs to be tailored on a case-by-case basis.

Autoantibodies in liver disease: important clues for the diagnosis, disease activity and prognosis

It has been well established that numerous kinds of autoantibodies have been detected in liver disease. Some kinds of autoantibodies may be helpful in the diagnosis of autoimmune liver diseases including autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis. However, these autoantibodies are present even in sera of patients with viral hepatitis, drug-induced hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocelluar carcinoma as well as in sera of patients with autoimmune liver diseases. Other kinds of autoantibodies are recognized as predictive hallmarks for disease activity or prognosis in liver diseases. On the other hand, treatment with interferon initiates the production of several types of autoantibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Some of autoantibodies induced by interferon may postulate the treatment outcome in those patients. Recent studies also revealed the close correlation between oxidative stress and the production of autoantibodies in liver diseases. This article primarily reviews the recent advances of autoantibodies in the liver diseases and discusses the clinical significance of these autoantibodies.

Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a variable clinical phenotype, and the absence of conventional autoantibodies does not preclude its diagnosis or need for treatment. The goals of this review are to describe the frequency and nature of autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis, indicate its outcome after corticosteroid treatment, and increase awareness of the diagnosis in patients with unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis. The frequency of presumed autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis in patients with acute and acute severe presentations is ≤7%, and its frequency in patients with chronic presentations is 1-34%. Patients with acute presentations can have normal serum γ-globulin levels, centrilobular zone 3 necrosis, and low pre-treatment international diagnostic scores. Liver tissue examination is essential for the diagnosis, and hepatic steatosis can be a co-morbid feature. The comprehensive international scoring system can support but never override the clinical diagnosis pre-treatment, and non-standard serological markers should be sought if the clinical diagnosis is uncertain or the diagnostic score is low. A 3-month treatment trial with corticosteroids should be considered in all patients, regardless of the serological findings, and improvements have occurred in 67-87% of cases. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis may be associated with an autoantibody outside the conventional battery; it may have a signature autoantibody that is still undiscovered, or its characteristic autoantibodies may have been suppressed or have a delayed expression. The pathogenic mechanisms are presumed to be identical to those of classical disease. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis is an infrequent but treatable disease that must be considered in unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis.

Autoantibodies as prognostic markers in autoimmune liver disease

Certain autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease have prognostic implications that are under-utilized and under-developed. The goals of this review are to indicate progress in characterizing the autoantibodies with prognostic connotations and to indicate the feasibility and importance of discovering other markers. Prime source and review articles in English were selected by a Medline search through 2010. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen, actin, liver cytosol type 1, asialoglycoprotein receptor, chromatin, cyclic citrullinated peptide, and uridine glucuronosyltransferases have been associated with the occurrence, severity, and progression of autoimmune hepatitis, and antibodies to Sp100, gp210, and centromere have had similar implications in primary biliary cirrhosis. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen have shown the most promise in autoimmune hepatitis as they have been associated with severe histological changes, long durations of treatment, relapse after drug withdrawal, and high frequency of liver failure. Antibodies to the nuclear rim pore protein, gp210, have shown the most promise in primary biliary cirrhosis as they have been associated with severe interface hepatitis, lobular inflammation, and progression to liver failure. The major limitations of the autoantibodies have been their lack of standardized assays, low negative predictabilities, and fluctuating levels. Performance parameters will improve as critical pathogenic pathways, comprehensive testing batteries, and standardized assays through international exchange workshops are developed. Progress has been made in identifying the serological markers of prognosis in autoimmune liver disease, and they promise to reflect critical disease mechanisms and enhance patient management.

The role of autoantibodies as diagnostic markers of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoantibody testing is the first step towards the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, and it is essential in the evaluation of acute and chronic hepatitis of undetermined cause and allograft dysfunction following liver transplantation. A standard diagnostic repertoire has been promulgated, and other autoantibodies are emerging that may have prognostic value. Supplemental autoantibodies may prove useful in assessing patients who lack the standard markers or who are distinctive among those with conventional markers. Serologic testing will improve as assays are standardized by serum exchange workshops, core diagnostic batteries are codified and promulgated, and markers emerge that are tightly associated with pathogenic mechanisms, and closely reflect disease activity and outcome.

Autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease

Autoantibodies indicate an immune reactive state, but in liver disease they lack pathogenicity and disease specificity. Antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies constitute the standard serological repertoire that should be assessed in all liver diseases of undetermined cause. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, actin, liver cytosol type 1, nuclear antigens specific to primary biliary cirrhosis, and pore complex antigens constitute an investigational repertoire that promises to have prognostic and diagnostic value. These autoantibodies may emerge as predictors of treatment response and outcome. Antibodies to histones, doubled-stranded DNA, chromatin, and lactoferrin constitute a supplemental repertoire, and they support the immune nature of the liver disease. Final diagnoses and treatment strategies do not depend solely on serological markers. Autoantibodies are floating variables, and their behavior does not correlate closely with disease activity. There are no minimum levels of significant seropositivity, especially in children. Over-interpretation is the major pitfall in the clinical application of the serological results. New autoantibodies will emerge as the search for target antigens and key pathogenic pathways continues.

Serological and immunohistochemical studies on porcine-serum-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats

We previously reported that the strain difference in the development of porcine-serum (PS)-induced rat hepatic fibrosis was closely related to the difference in the mode of MHC class-II-related genes expression. This study was carried out to clarify the serological and immunohistochemical changes in this hepatic fibrosis model. Six-week-old male Brown Norway (BN) and Wistar rats were injected with 0.5 ml of sterile PS twice a week for up to 8 weeks. The serum levels of PS-specific IgG1, IgG2a, and IgM were elevated more prominently in BN rats than Wistar rats. In the liver, significant increases in the numbers of PS-, OX-6 (RT1.B)-, CD4-, CD8, ED1-, and ED2-positive cells occurred earlier in BN rats than Wistar rats. At 8 weeks, deposition of PS and immunoglobulins was observed in hepatic fibrous septa and renal glomerular mesangium, and IgG1- and IgG2a-positive cells were found in the white pulp of the spleen. The present results suggest that humoral immunity probably regulated by MHC class II molecules and inflammatory cells may be involved in PS-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats.

Primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune cholangiopathy

AMA are detected in the serum of 92% to 95% of patients with PBC using indirect immunofluorescent methods. AIC is the term used to describe the 5% to 8% of AMA-negative PBC patients who uniformly have ANA and SMA. Recent applications of more sensitive and specific tests to detect serum AMA have shown that most, if not all, patients with AIC actually do have AMA. Emerging evidence that AMA and mitochondrial autoantigens play important roles in the immunopathogenesis of NSDC also suggests that AIC and PBC are likely to be a single disease, exhibiting variation in the types of autoantibodies and in both the concentrations and immunoglobulin isotypes of AMA.

Autoantibodies in the diagnosis and management of liver disease

Autoantibodies are nonpathogenic manifestations of immune reactivity, and they may occur in acute and chronic liver diseases. Autoantibodies may be consequences rather than causes of the liver injury, and they should be regarded as diagnostic clues rather than etiologic markers. Conventional autoantibodies used in the categorization of autoimmune liver disease are antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and atypical perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Ancillary autoantibodies that enhance diagnostic specificity, have prognostic connotation, or direct treatment are antibodies to endomysium, tissue transglutaminase, histones, doubled-stranded DNA, and actin. Autoantibodies that have an emerging diagnostic and prognostic significance are antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, liver cytosol type 1, and nuclear pore complex antigens. Autoantibodies of uncertain clinical value that remain under investigation are antibodies to chromatin, lactoferrin, and Saccharomyces cervisiae. Continued recognition and characterization of autoantibodies should improve diagnostic precision, provide prognostic indices, and elucidate target autoantigens. These advances may in turn clarify pathogenic mechanisms, facilitate the development of animal models, and generate novel site-specific therapies.

Current concepts in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a global distribution and affects all ages. Genetic factors strongly influence susceptibility, clinical expression, and treatment response. The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis has been codified by an international panel. An acute or fulminant presentation is recognized but not a cholestatic form. Subclassifications by predominant autoantibody profile have been proposed, but they lack etiologic and prognostic differences. Autoantibodies continue to be characterized to improve diagnostic specificity, predict outcome, and identify pertinent antigenic targets. Cytosolic enzymes are prime candidates as autoantigens. DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0401 are the susceptibility alleles in Caucasoid Northern Europeans and North Americans, and they also affect clinical expression and treatment outcome. Other autoimmune promoters affecting cytokine production and immunocyte activation may act in synergy with the susceptibility alleles to affect disease behavior. Cell-mediated and antibody-dependent forms of cytotoxicity are probably interactive pathogenic mechanisms, and novel site-specific therapies are feasible because these mechanisms are defined. Potent new immunosuppressive agents are emerging from the transplantation arena, but prednisone alone or in combination with azathioprine remains the mainstay of treatment. Corticosteroid therapy is effective but not ideal.

Autoimmune liver disease. Current standards, future directions

The diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis continues to evolve as new diagnostic tests and new therapies are added to the armamentarium. Also encouraging are the advances in the understanding of the human immune system and its involvement in the origin and course of auto immune diseases in general and in the variants of autoimmune liver disease. Promising changes are expected in the next few years as new medications become available to the practicing hepatologist. New immune tests may allow therapies to be customized to patients, and antiviral therapies may also eventually be used in the management of this autoimmune liver diseases.

Frequency and significance of antibodies to chromatin in autoimmune hepatitis type I

AIMS AND METHODS

To assess the frequency and clinical significance of antibodies to chromatin (ACA) in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), 36 Japanese patients with AIH type I were studied for serum reactivity with chromatin by using an ELISA.

RESULTS

Antibodies to chromatin were detected in 19 of 36 patients with AIH type I. There was a significantly higher frequency of ACA in patients with AIH type I than in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis C and B (52.8 vs 13.2, 5.4 and 6.7%, respectively; P<0.01). None of the 19 healthy subjects had positive reactions. Sixteen of 19 patients with seropositive sera (44.4%) had reactivities with other nuclear antigens (recombinant nucleoproteins U1RNP-A, U1RNP-70; recombinant ribonucleoprotein complexes SSA/Ro 52K, SSA/Ro 60K; recombinant centromere Cenp-B; dsDNA and histones). Adsorption with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and histones could not remove the majority of antichromatin reactivity as 81.9% of the antibody reactivity still remained. In five sera samples from AIH type I patients positive for anti-dsDNA and antihistones, the antibody activities for dsDNA and histones were inhibited after the absorbtion of sera with chromatin. The patterns of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) detected by using indirect immunofluorescence were similar between patients with and without ACA. Patients with ACA had significantly high serum levels of gamma-globulin and immunoglobulin G. The ACA titers dropped significantly after corticosteroid treatment (P< 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Antibodies to chromatin are frequently present in patients with AIH type I and they are one of the dominant autoantibodies associated with ANA reactivity in AIH type I. Antibodies to chromatin cannot be used to characterize distinct clinical subgroups of AIH type I.

Autoimmune cholangiopathy

Currently available evidence is insufficient to classify PBC and AIC as separate diseases. The ultimate answer to the question of whether AIC, defined as AMA-negative PBC with ANA or SMA, is a disease distinct from AMA-positive PBC with or without ANA will require a detailed comparison of etiologic factors and pathogenetic mechanisms, once they are elucidated. It is intriguing to consider the suggestion of Heathcote that the term autoimmune cholangitis be adopted to describe PBC with or without detectable AMA. However, it is improbable that the venerable term PBC will be supplanted. Hepatologists will probably continue to use the terms AIC and AMA-negative PBC interchangeably, with little risk of being misunderstood.

Autoimmune liver disease

The incidence and prevalence of autoimmune hepatitis are greater than expected among white northern Europeans. Patients with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis have different HLA frequencies than patients with type 1 disease and HLA-DRB1*07 may be an important risk factor. Hepatitis C virus can trigger autoimmune hepatitis after needlestick inoculation. Elderly patients have milder disease than young patients and they are frequently untreated. Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis is indistinguishable from autoimmune hepatitis and it responds as well to corticosteroids. Variant syndromes are common and the degree of cholestasis influences the treatment response. Endomysial antibodies indicate celiac sprue in asymptomatic patients, and multiple endocrinopathies in individuals with type 2 disease may reflect molecular mimicries and cross-reacting autoantibodies. Phase I (cytochromes P-450) and phase II (uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases) drug-metabolizing enzymes are the autoantigens of syndromes characterized by liver/kidney microsomal autoantibodies. T-cell vaccination prevents the occurrence of experimental hepatitis in mice and it can also treat the disease. Liver transplantation can be complicated by recurrent disease, frequent allograft rejection, and de novo autoimmune hepatitis.

Efficient class II major histocompatibility complex presentation of endogenously synthesized hepatitis C virus core protein by Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell lines to CD4(+) T cells

The induction of an efficient CD4(+) T-cell response against hepatitis C virus (HCV) is critical for control of the chronicity of HCV infection. The ability of HCV structural protein endogenously expressed in an antigen-presenting cell (APC) to be presented by class II major histocompatibility complex molecules to CD4(+) T cells was investigated by in vitro culture analyses using HCV core-specific T-cell lines and autologous Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (B-LCLs) expressing structural HCV antigens. The T- and B-cell lines were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from HCV-infected patients. Expression and intracellular localization of core protein in transfected cells were determined by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence. By stimulation with autologous B-LCLs expressing viral antigens, strong T-cell proliferative responses were induced in two of three patients, while no substantial stimulatory effects were produced by B-LCLs expressing a control protein (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) or by B-LCLs alone. The results showed that transfected B cells presented mainly endogenously synthesized core peptides. Presentation of secreted antigens from adjacent antigen-expressing cells was not enough to stimulate a core-specific T-cell response. Only weak T-cell proliferative responses were generated by stimulation with B-LCLs that had been pulsed beforehand with at least a 10-fold-higher amount of transfected COS cells in the form of cell lysate, suggesting that presentation of antigens released from dead cells in the B-LCL cultures had a minimal role. Titrating numbers of APCs, we showed that as few as 10(4) transfected B-LCL APCs were sufficient to stimulate T cells. This presentation pathway was found to be leupeptin sensitive, and it can be blocked by antibody to HLA class II (DR). In addition, expression of a costimulatory signal by B7/BB1 on B cells was essential for T-cell activation.