Asthma Control Test correlates well with the treatment decisions made by asthma specialists

The relationship of gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma control

Purpose

To study whether ACT responses are confounded by gastro-esophageal status (GERD), and if this is in concordance with the variation in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1%) and Fractional Excretion of Nitric Oxide (FeNO).

Materials and Methods

This is a prospective cohort study (n = 307). Patients were surveyed for demographics data, and underwent ACT scoring, FEV1% and FeNO testing.

Results

Patients with GERD had mean ACT scores that were 4.1 (p < .001) lower than without-GERD group. Not-well-controlled asthmatics (FEV1% <80, high FeNO) with-GERD had mean ACT scores that were 2.9 (p < .001) for FEV1% <80 and 3.8 (p = .008) for high FeNO lower than without-GERD group respectively. Well-controlled asthmatics (FEV1% ≥80, low FeNO) with-GERD had mean ACT scores that were 5.2 (p < .001) for FEV1% ≥80 and 5.1 (p < .001) for low FeNO lower than without-GERD group respectively.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that symptoms of GERD can lead to an inaccurate perception of asthma control and ACT as compared to objective measures, such as FEV1% and FeNO. Hence, this can lead to mismanagement of asthma, especially when objective measures are not conducted along with ACT.

Prospective study of disease persistence and lung function trajectories of childhood asthma

BACKGROUND

A proportion of asthmatic children outgrow their disease by adulthood, but there are limited data on predictors for asthma persistence. This prospective study characterized the trajectory of spirometric indices and identified predictors for the persistence of childhood asthma.

METHODS

Chinese asthmatic children aged 6-15 years from pediatric allergy clinic underwent annual visits for ≥5 years and until their adulthood. Pre-bronchodilator spirometry and anti-asthma medications were recorded at baseline and then at least annually. Asthma resolution was defined when patients were free from asthma symptoms and use of anti-asthma drugs for ≥2 years. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors for asthma persistence. Generalized estimating equation was used to analyze longitudinal changes in lung function parameters in relation to asthma persistence.

RESULTS

181 asthmatic children aged [mean (SD)] 10.0 (2.7) years were followed for [mean (SD)] 12.5 (2.8) years. One third of them outgrew asthma during follow-up. Female was 3.36 times more likely to have persistent asthma. Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment ever and frequent asthma exacerbation (AE) predicted asthma persistence with respective odds ratios of 3.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-7.09) and 3.05 (95% CI 1.39-6.68). Persistent asthma was inversely associated with baseline forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV₁ %) with an odds ratio of 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-1.00). Throughout follow-up, patients with persistent asthma had generally lower forced expiratory indices than those with asthma resolution. Children with persistent asthma experienced poorer lung function growth.

CONCLUSIONS

Female, ICS ever, and frequent AE predicted persistent asthma. Patients with persistent asthma had lower forced expiratory indices and poorer lung function growth into adulthood.

Treatment Decisions in Children with Asthma in a Real-Life Clinical Setting: The Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort

BACKGROUND

Asthma treatment should be modified according to symptom control and future risk, but there are scarce data on what drives treatment adjustments in routine tertiary care.

OBJECTIVE

We studied factors that drive asthma treatment adjustment in pediatric outpatient clinics.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort, a clinical cohort of 0- to 16-year-old children seen by pediatric pulmonologists. We collected information on diagnosis, treatment, lung function, and FeNO from hospital records; and on symptoms, sociodemographic, and environmental factors from a parental questionnaire. We used reported symptoms to classify asthma control and categorized treatment according to the 2020 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. We used multivariable logistic regression to study factors associated with treatment adjustment (step-up or down vs no change).

RESULTS

We included 551 children diagnosed with asthma (mean age, 10 years; 37% female). At the clinical visit, most children were prescribed Global Initiative for Asthma step 3 (35%). Compared with previsit treatment, 252 children remained on the same step (47%), 227 were stepped up (42%), and 58 were stepped down (11%). Female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.47), poor asthma control (aOR = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.72-5.54), and lower FEV₁ Z-score (aOR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86 per one Z-score increase) were independently associated with treatment step-up, and low FeNO (aOR = 2.34; 95% CI, 1.23-4.45) was associated with treatment step-down, with marked heterogeneity between clinics.

CONCLUSIONS

In this tertiary care real-life study, we identified main drivers for asthma treatment adjustment. These findings may help improve both asthma management guidelines and clinical practice.

Comparative analysis of effectiveness of asthma control test-guided treatment versus usual care in patients with asthma from China

OBJECTIVE

The present study compared the effectiveness of asthma control test (ACT)-guided treatment vs. usual care (UC) in patients with asthma from China.

METHODS

This prospective, phase IV, multicenter, cluster-randomized, open-label 24-week study was conducted in China; patients were randomized to either ACT-guided treatment or UC group. The patients recorded peak expiratory flow, symptoms, and medication in a diary card every day and completed ACT at every clinic visit. For the UC group, patients completed ACT after the physician's treatment decision.

RESULTS

In total, 83.6% patients (n = 443/530; ACT: n = 209, UC: n = 234) completed the study. A significantly higher proportion of patients (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 7.87 (1.29, 48.11; p = 0.027) responded to the treatment and had ACT total score ≥20 or demonstrated an improvement of >3 points in ACT total score in ≥1 post-baseline assessment in the ACT-guided treatment vs. UC group. A higher proportion of patients had an ACT total score ≥20 and an improvement of >3 points in ACT total score at Week 24 in the ACT-guided treatment vs. the UC group (adjusted OR (95% CI):2.28 (1.07, 4.85; p = 0.036). A significant difference (p = 0.005) in change from baseline in ACT total score was observed in ACT-guided treatment vs. UC group at Week 24. The mean annual exacerbation rate was similar in both the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ACT-guided treatment was more effective in achieving ACT total score ≥20 or showing an improvement of >3 points in the ACT total score and well tolerated compared with UC treatment in the 24-week treatment period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trials.gov Identifier: NCT02868281, https://clinicaltrials.gov/; GlaxoSmithKline study ID: 201097, https://www.gsk-studyregister.com/.

[Correlation between bronchial dilation test and asthma control level in children with asthma]

OBJECTIVE

To study the correlation between the bronchial dilation test (BDT) and asthma control level in children with asthma.

METHODS

A total of 153 children with asthma, aged 5-14 years, who attended the outpatient service from March 2016 to March 2018 were enrolled. According to the presence or absence of atopic constitution, they were divided into an allergic group with 79 children and a non-allergic group with 74 children. The correlation between BDT and Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) scores was analyzed for both groups.

RESULTS

All basic pulmonary function parameters were positively correlated with C-ACT scores in the non-allergic group (P < 0.05). Except the forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow and maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity in percent predicted values, the other pulmonary function parameters were positively correlated with C-ACT scores in the allergic group (P < 0.05). The improvement rates of all BDT parameters (except maximal expiratory flow at 25% vital capacity in the allergic group and maximal expiratory flow at 50% vital capacity in the non-allergic group) were negatively correlated with C-ACT scores in the two groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The improvement rate of BDT is well correlated with C-ACT scores in children with asthma, suggesting that BDT can be used as an index for predicting asthma control level.

A randomized controlled trial study protocol for Xiao-Qing-Long decoction in the treatment of refractory asthma: Study protocol clinical trial (spirit compliant)

INTRODUCTION

People with refractory asthma (RA) often seek help from Chinese medicine due to dissatisfaction with conventional treatments. External cold and internal fluid syndrome is the most common type of asthma and the Chinese herbal medicine formula Xiao-Qing-Long (XQL) decoction is commonly prescribed for patients with asthma with this syndrome. However, there is no direct evidence to support the efficacy and safety of XQL decoction for RA treatment and its potential mechanism is still unclear.

METHODS

We propose a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized superiority trial. After a 2-week run-in period, 112 eligible participants will be recruited and randomly allocated to an experimental group or control group in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the experimental group will take XQL decoction, while patients in the control group will receive a matched placebo. Symbicort Turbuhaler and Montelukast sodium tablets will be provided as the basic treatment for the 2 groups. All participants will receive 4 weeks of treatment and 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome is the mean change in the asthma control test score from the baseline to 4 weeks posttreatment. The secondary outcomes include quality of life, lung function, curative effect of traditional Chinese medicine, and rescue medication used. This trial will also include analyses of the associations between intestinal microbiota and RA treatment. Any side effects of the treatment will be recorded.

DISCUSSION

The results of this trial will provide consolidated evidence of the effect of XQL decoction for RA and the potential mechanism by which XQL decoction acts, which will inform treatment options for patients with RA.

The impact of bariatric surgery on asthma control differs among obese individuals with reported prior or current asthma, with or without metabolic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Both obesity and the metabolic syndrome have been independently associated with increased asthma morbidity. However, it is unclear whether metabolic syndrome limits the beneficial effects of weight loss on asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether bariatric weight loss is associated with improved asthma control, and whether this association varies by metabolic syndrome status.

METHODS

We determined the changes in asthma control, defined by the Asthma Control Test (ACT), before and after bariatric surgery among participants with asthma in the multi-center Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study, stratifying our analysis by the presence or absence of metabolic syndrome.

RESULTS

Among 2,458 LABS participants, 555 participants had an asthma diagnosis and were included in our analysis. Of these, 78% (n = 433) met criteria for metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) at baseline. In patients without MetSyn, mean ACT increased from 20.4 at baseline to 22.1 by 12-24 months, ending at 21.3 at 60 months. In contrast, among those with MetSyn there was no significant improvement in ACT scores. The proportion of patients without MetSyn with adequate asthma control (ACT >19) increased from 58% at baseline to 78% and 82% at 12 and 60 months, respectively, whereas among those with MetSyn, it was 73.8% at baseline, 77.1% at 12 months, dropping to 47.1% at 60 months (p = 0.004 for interaction between metabolic syndrome and time). Having MetSyn also increased the likelihood of losing asthma control during follow-up (HR = 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.97, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic syndrome may negatively modify the effect of bariatric surgery-induced weight loss on asthma control.

Continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea does not improve asthma control

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Unrecognized obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) may lead to poor asthma control despite optimal therapy. We assessed asthma control, airway responsiveness, daytime sleepiness and health status at baseline and 3 months after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment among asthma patients with nocturnal symptoms and OSAS.

METHODS

Patients with nocturnal asthma symptoms despite receiving at least moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting bronchodilators underwent a home sleep study using 'Embletta' portable diagnostic system. Patients with significant OSAS (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥10/h) were randomized to receive either CPAP or conservative treatment for 3 months.

RESULTS

Among 145 patients recruited, 122 underwent sleep study with 41 (33.6%) having AHI ≥10/h. Patients with significant OSAS had higher BMI (27.4 (5.1) vs 25.1 (4.5) kg/m² , P = 0.016), bigger neck circumference (36.6 (3.1) vs 34.8 (3.6) cm, P = 0.006) and lower minimum SaO₂ (80.7 (6.6) vs 87.2 (3.9) %, P < 0.001). Using intention-to-treat analysis among 37 patients with AHI ≥10/h (CPAP group (n = 17) vs control group (n = 20)), there was no significant difference in Asthma Control Test score (CPAP 3.2 (2.7) vs control 2.4 (5.7), P = 0.568) but the CPAP group had a greater improvement in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (-3.0 (4.5) vs 0.5(3.8), P = 0.014), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (0.6 (0.8) vs 0.02 (0.7), P = 0.022) and vitality domain in the SF-36 questionnaire (14.7 (16.8) vs 0.3 (16.2), P = 0.012) after 3 months. Data are presented as mean (SD) unless otherwise stated.

CONCLUSION

A high prevalence of OSAS was found among patients with asthma and snoring. CPAP therapy for 3 months did not enhance asthma control but improved daytime sleepiness, quality of life and vitality.

Efficacy of Jia Wei Yang He formula as an adjunctive therapy for asthma: study protocol for a randomized, double blinded, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Over the past two or three decades, the prevalence of asthma has significantly increased worldwide; therefore, effective treatment without side effects is of utmost importance. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) plays a vital role in reducing symptoms and improving the quality of life in persistent-asthma patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Jia Wei Yang He (JWYH) formula in the treatment of asthma and to explore the relationship between the airway microbiome and TCM treatment in asthma patients.

METHODS/DESIGN

This multicenter, parallel-arm, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial will assess the efficacy of JWYH in asthma patients with usual care. Persistent-asthma patients without life-threatening disease will be enrolled on a random basis and are equally assigned to a high- or a low-dose JWYH plus usual care group, or a placebo plus usual care group. Patients are followed up for 4 months. Accordingly, 240 patients will yield sufficient statistical power to determine a difference between groups. Based on modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analyses, the three groups will be compared at 4 weeks after the beginning of treatment. The primary efficacy measurement is the mean change in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) score from baseline to 4 weeks post treatment. Secondary outcomes include forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), and asthma exacerbations. This trial also includes analyses of the associations between airway microbiome and asthma treatment.

DISCUSSION

In this study, a randomized clinical trial design is described. The results are based on several outcomes that estimate the efficacy of the JWYH formula and prospective links between the airway microbiome and asthma treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03299322 . Registered on 3 October 2017.

Predictive Properties of the Asthma Control Test and Its Component Questions for Severe Asthma Exacerbations

BACKGROUND

Current US guidelines recommend the Asthma Control Test (ACT) for assessing disease control and selecting treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to prospectively assess the ACT and its component questions for their utility in predicting the risk of severe asthma exacerbations.

METHODS

Individuals were participants in the Study of Asthma Phenotypes and Pharmacogenomic Interactions by Race-Ethnicity, and those included in the current analysis had the following characteristics: age 18 years or more, physician-diagnosed asthma, and longitudinal care received at a large health system in southeastern Michigan. Study participants underwent a baseline evaluation, which included answering the ACT. A severe asthma exacerbation was defined as one requiring oral steroids, an emergency department visit, or inpatient admission. Receiver-operator characteristic curves were used to measure and compare the predictive utility of the ACT and its component questions for severe asthma exacerbations.

RESULTS

Of 1180 participants, 354 (30.0%) experienced a severe asthma exacerbation within 6 months of their baseline evaluation. When compared with the individual questions that composed the ACT, the composite score was significantly better at predicting severe exacerbations with 1 exception; the composite ACT score and the question assessing rescue medication use were not significantly different (P = .580). Pharmacy-based records of metered-dose inhaler short-acting beta-agonist use and asthma severity were also not significantly different from the composite ACT score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that although the ACT is modestly predictive for exacerbations, the composite score may not be superior to assessing rescue medication use alone for predicting the risk of severe asthma exacerbations.

Development and validation of asthma questionnaire for assessing and achieving best control in preschool-age children

BACKGROUND

Several patient-/caregiver-completed questionnaires have been utilized for the assessment of asthma control. However, due to the diversity in medical/social circumstances, they may not be optimal for use in all countries. The Japanese pediatric asthma guideline (JPGL) aims at higher levels of control compared with other international guidelines, based on a strong social demand for best care. We developed a new control test to help meet that demand.

METHODS

A 34-item working questionnaire was developed based on input from pediatric asthma specialists and the caregivers of preschool children with asthma. The questionnaire was administered to caregivers of 565 patients aged <6 years who had physician-diagnosed asthma or β2-agonist-responsive recurrent wheeze. Then, 6 questions for assessing JPGL-defined control levels were selected from the 34 questions by stepwise logistic regression methods using randomly selected questionnaires completed by two-thirds of the caregivers. We named that set of questions the Best Asthma Control Test for Preschoolers (Best ACT-P). Validation of Best ACT-P was performed using the remaining completed questionnaires.

RESULTS

The 6 questions asked about the frequency/severity of cold-induced wheeze, nighttime awakening, exercise-induced symptoms, and disruption of family life due to asthma in the past 4 weeks and hospitalization in the past 12 months. The 6-item logistic model showed good statistical fit, and the scores for the physicians' ratings of the asthma control differed significantly in the hypothetical direction.

CONCLUSIONS

Best ACT-P is a valid caregiver-completed questionnaire of asthma control in preschoolers in whom total control needs to be achieved.

Asthma insights from Jordan: cross-sectional observational study

OBJECTIVE

The burden of uncontrolled asthma on patients in Jordan is largely unknown. This study assessed different aspects of asthma clinical features: the level of asthma control, its correlation with quality of life, and possible predictors of asthma control.

METHODS

Face-to-face interviews with asthmatic patients (≥16 years old) in north Jordan from 2013 to 2014 were conducted. Outcomes measures were assessed using the asthma control test (ACT), the mini asthma quality of life questionnaire (mini-AQLQ), and the Generic health-related quality of life (EQ-5D). The relationship between asthma control and quality of life was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Predictors of asthma control were determined using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 255 patients were recruited (mean age 45.16 years, 74.5% female). Approximately one-third of subjects (30.6%; n = 78) had controlled asthma (ACT ≥ 20). A strong correlation between asthma control and both mini-AQLQ and EQ-5D scores was identified (p < 0.001). Subjects who required to step-up treatment (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.63, p = 0.01) and with acute asthma exacerbation (OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.18-0.58, p < 0.001) were independently associated with poor asthma control.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the recruited patients have not achieved optimal asthma control and was associated with low quality of life. The study highlights that even in low-income countries, a simple assessment tool such as the ACT can be utilized to screen and categorize asthma control. This approach would facilitate a better treatment plan and eventually improve asthma control and quality of life in asthma patients.

Asthma control questionnaires in the management of asthma in children: A review

Several self-administered questionnaires have been developed to assess childhood asthma control in a simple and standardized way. This review discusses the most commonly used questionnaires and explores their usefulness in asthma management in children. We conclude that the use of asthma control questionnaires in daily practice and in research contributes to the standardized evaluation of children with asthma and helps to track asthma symptoms, but validation studies in a wider range of settings are needed.

Comparison of clinical management of young and elderly asthmatics by respiratory specialists and general practitioners

BACKGROUND

Asthmatic death in the elderly is a serious problem worldwide. Differences in clinical skill between respiratory specialists (RS) and general practitioners (GP) are important in asthma control. The aim of this study was to compare asthma management between RS and GP.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was carried out in Shimane, Japan, in February 2009 using a questionnaire about patient background, treatment, asthma control test (ACT) and adherence to treatment. We secured the cooperation of 48 clinics (39 private clinics and 9 general hospitals). Asthmatics were divided into the elderly and young groups, and also into the RS and GP groups.

RESULTS

Clinical data of 779 patients were available for analysis. Elderly patients constituted 464 (RS group: 192, GP group: 272), while those of the young group were 315 (RS group: 207, GP group: 108). RS prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) to their elderly and young patients more than GP. The total ACT score was higher in young RS group than in young GP group, but no such difference was noted in the elderly. Despite more asthma-related symptoms, the ACT showed that elderly GP asthmatics used fewer rescue inhalers than elderly RS. Self-assessment was higher in elderly GP than elderly RS asthmatics. Adherence to therapy was better in elderly patients than young patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly asthmatics treated by GPs underestimated the severity of their asthma and asthmatics seen by GPs were undertreated. The results stress the need to engage patients in educational activities, to adhere to guidelines, and to improve the coordination between GP and RS.

Insights, attitudes and perceptions about asthma and its treatment: findings from a multinational survey of patients from 8 Asia-Pacific countries and Hong Kong

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Asthma Insight and Management (AIM) survey was conducted in North America, Europe, the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America to characterize patients' insights, attitudes and perceptions about their asthma and its treatment. We report findings from the Asia-Pacific survey.

METHODS

Asthma patients (≥12 years) from Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand were surveyed. Patients answered 53 questions exploring general health, diagnosis/history, symptoms, exacerbations, patient burden, disease management, medications/treatments and patient's attitudes. The Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines were used to assess asthma control. The survey was conducted by random digit telephone dialling (Australia, China and Hong Kong) or by random face-to-face interviews (India, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand).

RESULTS

There were 80 761 households screened. Data from 3630 patients were collected. Wide disparity existed between objective measures of control and patient perception. Reported exacerbations during the previous year ranged from 19% (Hong Kong) to 67% (India). Reported unscheduled urgent/emergency visits to a doctor's office/hospital/clinic in the previous year ranged from 15% (Hong Kong) to 46% (Taiwan). Patients who reported having controlled asthma in the previous month ranged from 27% (South Korea) to 84% (Taiwan). Substantial functional and emotional limitations due to asthma were identified by 13% (South Korea) to 78% (India) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma has a profound impact on patients' well-being despite the availability of effective treatments and evidence-based management guidelines. Substantial differences across the surveyed countries exist, suggesting unmet, country-specific cultural and educational needs. A large proportion of asthma patients overestimate their level of control.

Analysis of the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic infection in Japanese asthmatic patients: using a questionnaire-based survey

BACKGROUND

Influenza infection is known to be an exacerbating factor in the control of asthma, therfore its prevention is critical in managing asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the influenza A H1N1 2009 pandemic virus (H1N1 pdm09) infection in adult asthmatic patients.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a questionnaire-based survey of asthmatic patients conducted from September to October 2010 in Niigata Prefecture. Patient background, H1N1 pdm09 infection, vaccination status, and asthma exacerbation due to influenza infection were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 2,555 cases were analyzed. The incidence of the infection was 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-7.6), and the rate of vaccination was 63.9% (95% CI: 62.1-65.8). The odds ratio (OR) for vaccination against the infection among adult patients and younger patients (≤ the median age) were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45-0.84) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.42-0.90), respectively. However, OR among the older patient (> median age) were 1.38 (95%CI: 0.66-2.89). The rate of infection-induced asthma exacerbation was 23.2% (95% CI: 18.6-29.6), and the OR for vaccination against the infection-induced asthma exacerbation was 1.42 (95% CI: 0.69-2.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of the vaccination against the H1N1 pdm09 virus was confirmed during the first pandemic season, but it was limited. Further investigation on H1N1 pdm09 virus infection in asthmatics will be required.

Bronchial asthma control after argon plasma coagulation turbinectomy in patients with chronic rhinitis

Bronchial asthma is frequently accompanied by chronic rhinitis. It has been observed that effective treatment of rhinitis may reduce asthma symptoms. The aim of the study was the evaluation of the control of bronchial asthma symptoms in patients with chronic rhinitis after argon plasma coagulation turbinectomy (APCt). The effect of APCt was assessed in 47 adults with drug-resistant chronic rhinitis and bronchial asthma 3-month post-procedure. Changes of asthma symptoms were scored using Asthma Control Test (ACT). Subjective improvement of nasal congestion 3 months after APCt was observed in 87% and of rhinorrhoea in 75% patients. Rhinomanometry showed 219 ± 19 cm³/s increase of flow and 0.75 ± 0.06 Pa/cm³/s reduction of resistance. The prevalence of patients with insufficient bronchial asthma control decreased from 79 to 4%. The decrease was associated with diminished frequency of eosinophils >20% in nasal cytology from 83% pre-procedure to 28% in the follow-up. The percentage of eosinophils >20% in cytology before APCt increased the chance for asthma control improvement by 22.8 times. Reduction in symptoms of drug-resistant rhinitis after APCt is followed by significant improvement of asthma control. The most beneficial therapeutic effects of APCt are noted in patients with a high rate of eosinophils in nasal cytology.

Statin use and asthma control in patients with severe asthma

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesised that severe asthmatics taking a statin drug, in addition to inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonist inhaler therapy, would have better asthma symptom control and improved lung function compared to their controls.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective, cross-sectional study of 165 patients with severe asthma seen from 2001-2008. Hierarchical linear and logistic regression models were used for modelling fitting.

SETTING

University of California, Davis Medical Center (Sacramento, California, USA). Academic, single-centre, severe asthma subspecialty clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

612 screened, 223 eligible and 165 adult patients were included in the final study (N=165; 31 statin users and 134 non-users).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was asthma control as measured by the Asthma Control Test (ACT). The secondary endpoints included lung function, symptoms and the need for corticosteroid burst and peripheral eosinophil count.

RESULTS

At baseline, statin users compared to non-users were older, had lower lung function (FEV1% predicted, FEV1, forced vital capacity and FEF25-75%) and had a higher prevalence of comorbid conditions. Statin use was associated with more aspirin and ipratropium inhaler use than in non-users. Patients in both groups were obese (body mass index ≥ 30). Statin users had better asthma symptom control compared to non-users (higher adjusted mean ACT score by 2.2±0.94 points, p<0.02). Median statin use was for 1 year. There were no statistically significant differences in lung function, corticosteroid or rescue bronchodilator use or peripheral eosinophilia between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our severe asthma referral population, statin users already taking inhaled controller therapy achieved better asthma control compared to non-users. The implications of this study is that patients with severe asthma could potentially benefit from added statin treatment. Because our study population was on average obese, the obese severe asthmatic may be a viable asthma subphenotype for further studies. Prospective randomised clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of statins in severe asthma are warranted.

The Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Questionnaire for assessing asthma control: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, the cornerstone of asthma management is the achievement and maintenance of optimal asthma control, but the diagnostic performances of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) have not been evaluated systematically.

OBJECTIVE

We explored the diagnostic performances of and statistically compared the ACT and ACQ.

METHODS

Studies that examined the accuracy of the ACT, ACQ, or both in the assessment of asthma control were found by searching PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Ovid, and Embase. Summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios for the different levels of asthma control were determined by using bivariate random-effects models and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies with 11,141 subjects assessed with the ACT and 12,483 assessed with the ACQ were identified. The ACT had good diagnostic accuracy for assessment of controlled and not well-controlled asthma, and the ACQ (ACQ-7 and ACQ-6) had good diagnostic accuracy for assessment of not well-controlled asthma at prespecified cutoff points. The ACT and ACQ had significant differences in the assessment of controlled and not well-controlled asthma after adjusting for potential factors (P = .001 and P = .015). For assessment of uncontrolled asthma, the ACT had poor accuracy, with a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.69, and the cutoff point for the ACQ has not been established.

CONCLUSION

The ACT is preferable to the ACQ in clinical practice, and the ACQ requires further cross-validation. Moreover, neither the ACT nor the ACQ is useful for the assessment of uncontrolled asthma.

The Asthma Control Test (ACT) as an alternative tool to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline criteria for assessing asthma control in Vietnamese outpatients

AIMS

To determine the reliability and validity of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) to detect Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)-defined uncontrolled or partly controlled asthma, and to determine the agreement between ACT and GINA in classifying asthma control among Vietnamese patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed in 323 of 360 invited outpatients with asthma in Ho Chi Minh City to compare the ACT and GINA classification for asthma control.

RESULTS

Internal consistency of the ACT (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.83. The kappa coefficient of 0.55, based on the ternary split, represents moderate agreement between the two rating systems with a correctly classified rate of 75%. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the ACT score predicting GINA control was 0.85. To detect GINA-defined 'not controlled asthma', the ACT had a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 93%, and a positive predictive value of 89%, with a cut-off point of 19. The validity of the ACT with regard to agreement with the GINA classification was consistent across both sexes, but less so in adolescents or younger adults. The ACT score was significantly correlated with the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (r=0.35, p<0.001) and percentage predicted peak expiratory flow (r=0.26, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Vietnamese ACT is useful for identifying outpatients with GINA-defined uncontrolled or partly controlled asthma.

Evaluation of the asthma control test: a reliable determinant of disease stability and a predictor of future exacerbations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the asthma control test (ACT) cut-off values for asthma control according to the Global Initiative for Asthma guideline in adults and the effectiveness of ACT scores in predicting exacerbations and serial changes in ACT scores over time in relation to treatment decisions.

METHODS

Subjects completed ACT together with same-day spirometry and fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement at baseline and at 3 months. Physicians, blinded to the ACT scores and FeNO values, assessed the patient's asthma control in the past month and adjusted the asthma medications according to management guidelines. Asthma exacerbations and urgent health-care utilization (HCU) at 6 months were recorded.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-nine (120 men) asthmatics completed the study. The ACT cut-off for uncontrolled and partly controlled asthma were ≤19 (sensitivity 0.74, specificity 0.67, % correctly classified 69.5) and ≤22, respectively (sensitivity 0.73, specificity 0.71, % correctly classified 72.1). Baseline ACT score had an odds ratio of 2.34 (95% confidence interval: 1.48-3.69) and 2.66 (1.70-4.18) for urgent HCU and exacerbations, respectively, at 6 months (P < 0.0001). However, baseline FeNO and spirometry values had no association with urgent HCU and exacerbations. The 3-month ACT score of ≤20 correlated best with step-up of asthma medications (sensitivity 0.65, specificity 0.81, % correctly classified 72.8). For serial changes of ACT scores over 3 months, the cut-off value was best at ≤3 for treatment decisions with low sensitivity (0.23) and % correctly classified (57.3%) values.

CONCLUSIONS

Single measurement of ACT is useful for assessing asthma control, prediction of exacerbation and changes in treatment decisions.

Asthma outcomes: composite scores of asthma control

BACKGROUND

Current asthma guidelines recommend assessing the level of a patient's asthma control. Consequently, there is increasing use of asthma control as an outcome measure in clinical research studies. Several composite assessment instruments have been developed to measure asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

National Institutes of Health institutes and federal agencies convened an expert group to propose the most appropriate standardized composite score of asthma control instruments to be used in future asthma studies.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed using both the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings and key terms to identify studies that attempted to develop and/or test composite score instruments for asthma control. We classified instruments as core (required in future studies), supplemental (used according to study aims and standardized), or emerging (requiring validation and standardization). This work was discussed at a National Institutes of Health-organized workshop convened in March 2010 and finalized in September 2011.

RESULTS

We identified 17 composite score instruments with published validation information; all had comparable content. Eight instruments demonstrated responsiveness over time; 3 demonstrated responsiveness to treatment. A minimal clinically important difference has been established for 3 instruments. The instruments have demographic limitations; some are proprietary, and their use could be limited by cost.

CONCLUSION

Two asthma composite score instruments are sufficiently validated for use in adult populations, but additional research is necessary to validate their use in nonwhite populations. Gaps also exist in validating instruments for pediatric populations.

Utilization and responsiveness of the asthma control test (ACT) at the initiation of therapy for patients with asthma: a randomized controlled trial

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the responsiveness of the asthma control test (ACT) to detect changes at the initiation of therapy and its utilization in the initiation of asthma treatment.

Methods

This study was designed as a randomized clinical trial conducted in a primary care setting. The subjects were asthma patients who had not received controller therapy for at least two months. The patients were randomized into two groups: The Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) group and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) group. Treatment in the SINA group was initiated at step1 when the ACT scores ≥ 20, step 2 when the score between16-19, and step 3 when the score < 16 began at step 3. The GINA group patients were started on step 2 when they had persistent asthma symptoms or step 3 when they had severely uncontrolled disease.

Results

Forty-five patients were analyzed in each group. The improvement in ACT score after treatment initiation was significantly higher when the SINA approach was used (2.9 in the SINA group compared to 1.7 in the GINA group (p = 0.04)). The improvement in FEV₁ was 5.8% in the SINA group compared to 3.4% in the GINA group (p = 0.46). The number of patients who achieved asthma control at the follow-up visit and required no treatment adjustment was 33 (73.3%) in the SINA group and 27 (60%) in the GINA group (p = 0.0125).

Conclusion

The ACT was responsive to change at the initiation of asthma treatment and was useful for the initiation of asthma treatment.

Trial Registration number

ISRCTN31998214

Asthma control test (ACT): comparison with clinical, functional, and biological markers of asthma control

BACKGROUND

Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a simple tool for assessing the level of asthma control in clinical practice, and it has been validated in comparison with a general clinical assessment of asthma control, including forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between ACT score and clinical and functional findings of asthma control and biomarkers of airway inflammation.

METHODS

A total of 68 asthmatic patients observed in our asthma clinic (33 regularly treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and 35 ICS-naïve) filled ACT questionnaire and underwent the following measurements: (a) FEV(1) before and after salbutamol; (b) exhaled nitric oxide; (c) bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine; (d) sputum eosinophil count; and (e) daytime and nighttime symptoms, rescue salbutamol, and twice-daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) recording on a 4-week diary card.

RESULTS

ACT score significantly correlated with symptom score, rescue medication use, and PEF variability, but not with FEV(1), FEV(1) reversibility, and markers of airway inflammation, which could not distinguish controlled from uncontrolled patients according to ACT, regardless of ICS treatment.

CONCLUSION

ACT score is a valid tool to simply assess the current level of asthma control in terms of symptoms, rescue medication use, and PEF variability. Pulmonary function and biomarkers of airway inflammation are not related to the clinical asthma control as assessed by ACT and may represent additional measurements potentially useful in asthma management.

Effect of spirometry and medical review on asthma control in patients in general practice: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Although guidelines for asthma emphasize the importance of spirometry for continuity and evaluation of care, it is underused in general practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of spirometry and medical review on asthma control in general practice over 12 months.

METHODS

Patients were recruited through 31 practices, which were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Group A had 3-monthly spirometry with medical review, Group B spirometry only before and after the trial, and Group C usual care. Asthma control data were analysed by intention to treat using non-parametric tests and logistic regression models fitted to allow for confounders, repeated measures and clustering by practice.

RESULTS

The trial was completed by 195 patients (Group A 69, Group B 78, Group C 48). Asthma control improved in all groups during the 12 months trial, most impressively in Group A (odds ratio per 3 months = 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.49, P = 0.004), but the difference between the groups' respective 3-monthly changes was not significant. At 6 months, asthma control in Group A had increased more from baseline than in Groups B + C (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Regular spirometry with medical review was associated with improved asthma control in general practice patients, while there was less improvement in either the spirometry only or usual care group. The mechanisms of this improvement may include appropriate adjustment of medication and improved compliance.

The use of the Asthma Control Test in general practice and its correlation with asthma control according to the GINA guidelines

BACKGROUND

The GINA guidelines have redefined the primary goal of asthma treatment as achieving optimum control.

OBJECTIVES

To document the level of asthma control in Switzerland, the correlations between the international guidelines by GINA and the ACT's rating of asthma control, current treatment in adolescent and adult Swiss asthma patients and factors associated with asthma control.

METHODS

General practitioners and specialists (pulmonologists, allergologists and paediatricians) were invited to participate in the cross-sectional survey. Asthma control was assessed in 1093 asthma patients using both the ACT and the GINA classification for asthma control.

RESULTS

According to the GINA guidelines controlled asthma was found in 290 (27%) patients, when measured with the ACT 124 (11.5%) patients showed sufficient asthma control. Of the test results 65% were in accordance with each other, whereas in 85% of the non-matching results the ACT underestimated control according to GINA classification. An ACT cut-off score of ≤17 best identified uncontrolled asthma according to GINA guidelines. A total of 956 (87.7%) patients received controller medication and 849 (77.9%) patients received reliever medication. The following parameters were consistently identified to be significantly associated with insufficient asthma control in both GINA and ACT measurements: presence of exacerbation, use of reliever medication, switch of therapy and smoking.

STUDY LIMITATION

For this study only the ACT version for adults was used.

CONCLUSION

Asthma control remains insufficient in the majority of patients, despite prescription of regular controller medication. This survey confirms the validated ACT to be useful and important in everyday practice as an objective measure for asthma control according to GINA guidelines in order to monitor control and adjust treatment.

Age-dependent deterioration of peak inspiratory flow with two kinds of dry powder corticosteroid inhalers (Diskus and Turbuhaler) and relationships with asthma control

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy has improved the quality of life (QOL) for many asthmatics and reduced mortality rates associated with asthma. However, some patients do not obtain therapeutic benefit despite satisfactory adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether asthmatic patients were using ICS devices appropriately, and to clarify relationships between these results and QOL.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We studied 100 adult asthmatics, divided into two groups: 50 patients consecutively registered as using Diskus (fluticasone; D-group) and 50 consecutively registered as using Turbuhaler (budesonide; T-group). We measured peak inspiratory flows (PIFs) using the In-Check Dial device. Subjects also completed the Asthma Control Test for evaluation of QOL.

RESULTS

In the D-group, no patients showed PIF below the optimal range (30-90 L/min), whereas 52% of patients had PIF≥91 L/min. In the T-group, 6% of patients showed PIF over the optimal range (60-90 L/min), and 44% had PIF≤59 L/min. When patients in the T-group were required to deliberately make a maximal inhalation, 14% still had PIF≤59 L/min. The proportion of patients with poor control was significantly greater in the T-group than in the D-group. According to univariate logistic regression analyses, low PIF tended to be associated with poor asthma control in the T-group. No significant correlation was found between PIF and age in the D-group, but PIF decreased significantly with age in the T-group.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate measures for patients in whom PIF has been judged as lower than optimal include adequate education for inhalation and/or changing to a different inhalation device. These measures should be kept in mind for elderly asthma patients in particular, where appropriate selection of a corticosteroid inhalation device in the early stages of therapy would also be important.

Changes in total IgE plasma concentration measured at the third month during anti-IgE treatment predict future exacerbation rates in difficult-to-treat atopic asthma: a pilot study

In severe, difficult-to-treat atopic asthma with sensitization to perennial allergens, monoclonal antibodies directed against immunoglobulin E (IgE) are recognized to be clinically effective. Omalizumab, a recombinant monoclonal antibody, selectively binds to the high-affinity C-epsilon 3 site of human IgE and inhibits the inflammatory cascade in response to antigenic stimuli. Currently, no indicator is available for predicting patients' responsiveness to long-term omalizumab treatment. This study aims to assess the relationship between early changes in plasma IgE concentration and major outcome variables over a 12-month course of omalizumab.

METHODS

Twenty-three nonsmoking, severe asthmatics (14 females; mean age 47.3 years ± 12.0 SD; mean BMI 25.8 kg/m(2) ± 9.6 SD) sensitized to perennial allergens and unresponsive to high doses of common therapies were evaluated during a 12-month period of omalizumab treatment. Variables included total IgE plasma concentrations, Forced Expiratory Volume 1 second (FEV(1)) symptom complaints (Asthma Control Test (ACT) score), number of emergency visits, hospitalizations, and exacerbations. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare changes observed after the 1-year omalizumab treatment versus baseline. Statistical modelization was used to determine possible relationships between changes in outcomes after 12 months and early changes in plasma IgE (after 3 months of treatment).

RESULTS

The number of emergency visits, hospitalizations, and exacerbations decreased (p < .004, p < .001, and p < .001, respectively) over the 12-months. In contrast, FEV(1) and ACT score substantially increased (both p < .001); the ACT score reaching maximum after only 3 months. The S model showed the best fit and proved the strict relationship between the increase in IgE after 3 months and the exacerbation rate over the 1-year survey (threshold value of ≥250 IU/ml, p < .001). The improvement in FEV(1) was independent of the increase in IgE.

CONCLUSIONS

When confirmed on a larger population, early changes in IgE may be used as a predictor of future responders to omalizumab in terms of exacerbation rate, thus minimizing the economic burden of anti-IgE therapy.

[Comparison of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) with lung function, levels of exhaled nitric oxide and control according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)]

INTRODUCTION

The current goal of asthma treatment is to achieve and maintain control. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the ACT (Asthma Control Test) questionnaire and the levels of control according to GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) to establish the cut-off points for the ACT and evaluate its relationship with lung function and fractionated exhaled nitric oxide level (FeNO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multi-centre prospective study including 441 patients followed up in an outpatient Chest Clinic. A clinical protocol was followed, and FeNO, spirometry and ACT performed. Disease was classified according to levels of control using GINA. The study analysed sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (ROC), and the ACT cut-off points. We studied the differences between the functional parameters and FeNO between levels of control.

RESULTS

For controlled asthma the cut-off obtained was ACT> or =21 (area under the curve 0.791) and for uncontrolled < or =18 (AUC 0.774). We found significant differences in FeNO levels and pulmonary function among ACT> or =21 and ACT< or =18, although only 26.3% of patients with ACT< or =18 had a FEV1 <80% and 40% higher FeNO (> or =35 ppb). We found a correlation between baseline FEV1 and ACT (r=0.19, P<0.01) and between ACT and FeNO (r=-0.16, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The cut-off points would be, for controlled asthma ACT> or =21, partly controlled asthma ACT=19-20 and uncontrolled asthma ACT< or =18. A more complete assessment would require including monitoring operating parameters and FeNO.

Factors attributable to the level of exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic children

Background

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease with variable symptoms especially in children. Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has proved to be a marker of inflammation in the airways and has become a substantial part of clinical management of asthmatic children due to its potential to predict possible exacerbation and adjust the dose of inhalant corticosteroids.

Objectives

We analyzed potential factors that contribute to the variability of nitric oxide in various clinical and laboratory conditions.

Materials and methods

Study population consisted of 222 asthmatic children and 27 healthy control subjects. All children underwent a panel of tests: fractioned exhaled nitric oxide, exhaled carbon monoxide, asthma control test scoring, blood sampling, skin prick tests, and basic spirometry.

Results

FeNO and other investigated parameters widely changed according to clinical or laboratory characteristics of the tested children. Asthmatics showed increased levels of FeNO, exhaled carbon monoxide, total serum IgE, and higher eosinophilia. Boys had higher FeNO levels than girls. We found a significant positive correlation between FeNO levels and the percentage of blood eosinophils, %predicted of forced vital capacity, total serum IgE levels, and increasing age.

Conclusions

Various phenotypes of children's asthma are characterized by specific pattern of the results of clinical and laboratory tests. FeNO correlates with total serum IgE, blood eosinophilia, age, and some spirometric parameters with different strength. Therefore, the coexistence of atopy, concomitant allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis, and some other parameters should be considered in critical evaluation of FeNO in the management of asthmatic children.