Comparison of multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization in urine with other noninvasive tests for detecting bladder cancer

Advances in Liquid Biopsy for Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer (BCa) is the most common malignancy of the urinary system. It has a high recurrence rate and requires longterm follow-up. Significant advances in BCa research have been made in recent years; however, the initial diagnosis and follow-up of BCa relies on cystoscopy, which is an invasive and expensive procedure. Over the past decade, liquid biopsies (e.g., blood and urine) have proven to be highly efficient methods for the discovery of BCa biomarkers. This noninvasive sampling method is used to analyze unique tumor components released into body fluids and enables serial sampling and longitudinal monitoring of tumor progression. Several liquid biopsy biomarkers have been studied extensively and have shown promising results in the clinical applications of BCa, including early detection, microscopic residual disease detection, recurrence prediction, and treatment response. Therefore, this review aims to provide an update on various new liquid biopsy markers and the advantages and current limitations of liquid biopsy in the diagnosis of BCa.

Implications of TERT promoter mutations and telomerase activity in solid tumors with a focus on genitourinary cancers

INTRODUCTION

The reactivation of telomerase represents a key moment in the carcinogenesis process. Mutations in the central promoter region of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene cause telomerase reactivation in approximately 90% of solid tumors. In some of these, its prognostic and predictive role in response to treatments has already been demonstrated, in others (such as tumors of the genitourinary tract like urothelial carcinoma) data are controversial and the research is still ongoing. In the future, TERT promoter mutations and telomerase activity could have diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic applications in many types of cancer.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a review the literature with the aim of describing the current evidence on the prognostic and predictive role of TERT promoter mutations. In some tumor types, TERT promoter mutations have been associated with a worse prognosis and could have a potential value as biomarkers to guide therapeutic decisions. Mutations in TERT promoter seems to make the tumor particularly immunogenic and more responsive to immunotherapy, although data is controversial.

EXPERT OPINION

We described the role of TERT promoter mutations in solid tumors with a particular focus in genitourinary cancers, considering their frequency in this tract.

Advances in urinary biomarker discovery in urological research

A disease-specific biomarker (or biomarkers) is a characteristic reflecting a pathological condition in human body, which can be used as a diagnostic or prognostic tool for the clinical management. A urine-based biomarker(s) may provide a clinical value as attractive tools for clinicians to utilize in the clinical setting in particular to bladder diseases including bladder cancer and other bladder benign dysfunctions. Urine can be easily obtained by patients with no preparation or painful procedures required from patients' side. Currently advanced omics technologies and computational power identified potential omics-based novel biomarkers. An unbiased profiling based on transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenetics, metabolomics approaches et al. found that expression at RNA, protein, and metabolite levels are linked with specific bladder diseases and outcomes. In this review, we will discuss about the urine-based biomarkers reported by many investigators including us and how these biomarkers can be applied as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in clinical trials and patient care to promote bladder health. Furthermore, we will discuss how these promising biomarkers can be developed into a smart medical device and what we should be cautious about toward being used in real clinical setting.

Epidemiology, aetiology and screening of bladder cancer

Bladder cancer (BC) is a common, significant and expensive health condition. Understanding the risk factors for this disease is paramount to improving disease prevention and increasing public awareness. Historically BC has been a disease of industrialized regions and the most responsible carcinogens are tobacco smoke and occupational chemical exposure. BC incidence and mortality differ dramatically by region and reflect differences in risk factor exposure, healthcare behaviour, and population demographics. Screening studies have suggested a survival benefit amongst screened non-symptomatic populations with known risk factors, but this has not become standard practice.

Comparison of the diagnostic performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22), and their combination model in bladder carcinoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Emerging studies reported that combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) could increase the sensitivity and specificity of bladder carcinoma (BC) management. Nevertheless, the reports remain inconsistent. This meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FISH, NMP22, and their combination model in BC.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database dated up to October 2018. Suitable studies were identified and raw data were extracted. Meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the global sensitivities, specificities, likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves for FISH, NMP22, and their combination model, separately. All the meta-analysis estimates were derived using STATA (version 12.0) and MetaDisc (version 1.4) software packages.

Results

Seven eligible studies were included for analysis. The global sensitivities with 95% CI for FISH, NMP22, and their combination model were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75–0.83), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71–0.81), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75–0.88); specificities were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76–0.91), 0.70 (95% CI: 0.55–0.81), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.70–0.97); DORs were 22.215 (95% CI: 10.695–46.144), 7.365 (95% CI: 3.986–13.610), and 41.940 (95% CI: 13.546–129.853); and the areas under the SROC curves were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82–0.88), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76–0.83), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92).

Conclusion

Our systematic review implied that the diagnostic performance of combination model of FISH plus NMP22 may outperform FISH or NMP22 alone in BC detection.

The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization to predict patient response to intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy for bladder cancer: A diagnostic meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to systematically review the relevant studies to assess the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test for predicting patient response to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 5, 2018, and used Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnosis Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) to assess the quality. We pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) of baseline and post-BCG FISH test for predicting tumor recurrence. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and a Fagan nomogram were applied to assess predictive accuracy of post-BCG FISH test.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies with 442 participants for post-BCG test and 404 participants for baseline BCG test were included. The pooled analysis for post-BCG FISH test revealed the sensitivity of 0.54 (95% CI 0.38-0.69), specificity of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.72-0.91), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81) for predicting tumor recurrence. Patients with positive post-BCG FISH test were more likely to recur during follow-up (HR 3.95, 95% CI 2.72-5.72). The Fagan nomogram revealed the "post-test" probability of tumor recurrence increased by 29% for patients with positive post-BCG FISH test. The baseline FISH test had a pooled sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CI 0.55-0.81), specificity of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.26-0.58), and AUC of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.56-0.64) for predicting recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The post-BCG FISH test can predict BCG failure with high specificity and patients with positive post-BCG FISH test were more likely to recur. However, the relatively low sensitivity of post-BCG FISH test and unsatisfactory performance of baseline FISH test may limit their mono-use.

The Prevalence and Impact of Urinary Marker Testing in Patients with Bladder Cancer

PURPOSE

Novel urinary tumor markers for bladder cancer may permit early detection and improved oncologic outcomes but data on use is limited. We sought to identify trends in the application of urinary markers and long-term outcomes of urinary tumor marker use in patients with bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results)-Medicare database from 2001 to 2011 were used to identify a cohort of 64,450 patients with bladder cancer who underwent urinary marker testing with UroVysion® fluorescence in situ hybridization, or the NMP22® or BTA Stat® test. We assessed the prevalence of urinary marker testing and urine cytology. Characteristics of patients who did and did not undergo urinary marker testing were analyzed by the chi-square test. Urinary marker testing predictors were analyzed with a multivariable logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazards were used to determine unadjusted cancer specific and overall mortality risks.

RESULTS

The rate of urinary marker testing increased from 17.8% to a peak of 28.2% during the study years (p <0.0001). Predictors of marker use included female gender, younger age and lower Charlson score. Overall and cancer specific survival improved on Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses with urinary marker testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased urinary marker testing was documented over all stages and grades of bladder cancer, and in certain patient and provider variables. This increase may have contributed to improved overall and cancer specific survival. Additional investigation is necessary to further characterize this benefit.

Automated quantification of FISH signals in urinary cells enables the assessment of chromosomal aberration patterns characteristic for bladder cancer

Targeting the centromeres of chromosomes 3, 7, 17 (CEP3, 7, 17) and the 9p21-locus (LSI9p21) for diagnosing bladder cancer (BC) is time- and cost-intensive and requires a manual investigation of the sample by a well-trained investigator thus overall limiting its use in clinical diagnostics and large-scaled epidemiological studies. Here we introduce a new computer-assisted FISH spot analysis tool enabling an automated, objective and quantitative assessment of FISH patterns in the urinary sediment. Utilizing a controllable microscope workstation, the microscope software Scan^R was programmed to allow automatic batch-scanning of up to 32 samples and identifying quadruple FISH signals in DAPI-scanned nuclei of urinary sediments. The assay allowed a time- and cost-efficient, automated and objective assessment of CEP3, 7 and 17 FISH signals and facilitated the quantification of nuclei harboring specific FISH patterns in all cells of the urinary sediment. To explore the diagnostic capability of the developed tool, we analyzed the abundance of 51 different FISH patterns in a pilot set of urine specimens from 14 patients with BC and 21 population controls (PC). Herein, the results of the fully automated approach yielded a high degree of conformity when compared to those obtained by an expert-guided re-evaluation of archived scans. The best cancer-identifying pattern was characterized by a concurrent gain of CEP3, 7 and 17. Overall, our automated analysis refines current FISH protocols and encourages its use to establish reliable diagnostic cutoffs in future large-scale studies with well-characterized specimens-collectives.

NMP22® BladderChek® Test: point-of-care technology with life- and money-saving potential

A new, relatively obscure tumor marker assay, the NMP22 BladderChek Test (Matritech, Inc.), represents a paradigm shift in the diagnosis and management of urinary bladder cancer (transitional cell carcinoma). Specifically, BladderChek should be employed every time a cystoscopy is performed, with corresponding changes in the diagnostic protocol and the guidelines of the American Urological Association for the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer. Currently, cystoscopy is the reference standard and NMP22 BladderChek Test in combination with cystoscopy improves the performance of cystoscopy. At every stage of disease, BladderChek provides a higher sensitivity for the detection of bladder cancer than cytology, which now represents the adjunctive standard of care. Moreover, BladderChek is four-times more sensitive than cytology and is available at half the cost. Early detection of bladder cancer improves prognosis, quality of life and survival. BladderChek may be analogous to the prostate-specific antigen test and eventually expand beyond the urologic setting into the primary care setting for the testing of high-risk patients characterized by smoking history, occupational exposures or age.

TERT promoter mutations occur early in urothelial neoplasia and are biomarkers of early disease and disease recurrence in urine

Activating mutations occur in the promoter of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene in 66% of muscle-invasive urothelial carcinomas. To explore their role in bladder cancer development and to assess their utility as urine markers for early detection, we sequenced the TERT promoter in 76 well-characterized papillary and flat noninvasive urothelial carcinomas, including 28 pTa low-grade transitional cell carcinomas (TCC), 31 pTa high-grade TCCs, and 17 pTis carcinoma in situ lesions. We also evaluated the sequence of the TERT promoter in a separate series of 14 early bladder neoplasms and matched follow-up urine samples to determine whether urine TERT status was an indicator of disease recurrence. A high rate of TERT promoter mutation was observed in both papillary and flat lesions, as well as in low- and high-grade noninvasive urothelial neoplasms (mean: 74%). In addition, among patients whose tumors harbored TERT promoter mutations, the same mutations were present in follow-up urines in seven of eight patients that recurred but in none of the six patients that did not recur (P < 0.001). TERT promoter mutations occur in both papillary and flat lesions, are the most frequent genetic alterations identified to date in noninvasive precursor lesions of the bladder, are detectable in urine, and seem to be strongly associated with bladder cancer recurrence. These provocative results suggest that TERT promoter mutations may offer a useful urinary biomarker for both early detection and monitoring of bladder neoplasia.

Urinary markers in the everyday diagnosis of bladder cancer

Bladder cancer (BC) represents the fourth most common neoplasia in men and the ninth most common cancer in women, with a significant morbidity and mortality. Cystoscopy and voided urine cytology (involving the examination of cells in voided urine to detect the presence of cancerous cells) are currently the routine initial investigations in patients with hematuria or other symptoms suggestive of BC. Around 75-85% of the patients are diagnosed as having non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Despite the treatment, these patients have a probability of recurrence at 5 years ranging from 50 to 70% and of progression to muscle invasive disease of 10-15%. Patients with NMIBC must undergo life-long surveillance, consisting of serial cystoscopies, possibly urine cytology and ultrasonography. Cystoscopy is unsuitable for screening because of its invasiveness and costs; serial cystoscopies may cause discomfort and distress to patients. Furthermore, cystoscopy may be inconclusive, falsely positive or negative. Although urine cytology has a reasonable sensitivity for the detection of high-grade BC, it lacks sensitivity to detect low-grade tumors (sensitivity ranging from 4 to 31%). The overall sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology range from 7 to 100 and from 30 to 70%, respectively. There is a need for new urine biomarkers that may help in BC diagnosis and surveillance. A lot of urinary biomarkers with high sensitivity and/or specificity have been investigated. Although none of these markers have proven to be powerful enough to replace standard cystoscopy, some of them may represent accurate predictors of BC. A review of recent studies is presented.

Bladder cancer detection and monitoring: assessment of urine- and blood-based marker tests

Bladder cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, but the treatment and management of this disease can be very successful if the disease is detected early. The development of molecular assays that could diagnose bladder cancer accurately, and at an early stage, would be a significant advance. Ideally, such molecular assays would be applicable to non-invasively obtained body fluids, and be designed not only for diagnosis but also for monitoring disease recurrence and response to treatment. In this article, we assess the performance of current diagnostic assays for bladder cancer and discuss some of the emerging biomarkers that could be developed to augment current bladder cancer detection strategies.

Clinical utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for prediction of residual tumor after transurethral resection of bladder urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of a multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay for predicting the residual tumor load after transurethral resection (TUR) of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC).

METHODS

Voided urine specimens were collected from 125 consecutive patients with suspected UC who had been admitted for TUR. Of the 125 patients, 89 with UC diagnosed underwent a second procedure (repeated TUR or cystectomy) 4-6 weeks after the initial TUR and were included in the present study. Using the pathologic findings from the second procedure, the patients were divided into those with (n = 38) and those without (n = 51) residual tumor. Urine samples were taken both before and after the initial TUR. The multiprobe FISH assay was performed to detect aneuploidy of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 and the loss of the 9p21 locus.

RESULTS

Before the first TUR, no significant difference was found in the FISH-positive percentage between those with and without residual tumor. After the first TUR, the FISH-positive percentage in those with residual tumor was significantly greater than in those without residual tumor (42.2% vs 17.6%, P = .003). Moreover, before and after the initial TUR, the percentage of conversion from FISH positive to FISH negative in those with residual tumor was significantly lower than in those without residual tumor (28.9% vs 58.9%, P < .001). No patients were observed with a FISH result of conversion from negative to positive in those with and without residual tumor after the initial TUR.

CONCLUSIONS

FISH appears to be useful for the prediction of the presence of the residual tumor load after TUR of bladder UC.

UroVysion, urine cytology, and the College of American Pathologists: where should we go from here?

Abstract UroVysion (Abbott Molecular Inc, Des Plaines, Illinois) is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved test for the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma. Although widely used, there are a variety of different ways to evaluate and interpret the test, and questions remain about the test's cost effectiveness and reproducibility in actual clinical practice. I suggest that the College of American Pathologists has a unique opportunity to create educational programs focusing on borderline or difficult urine cytology and UroVysion samples to provide data upon which to make evidence-based decisions concerning the best use of these tests.

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for use of tumor markers in liver, bladder, cervical, and gastric cancers

BACKGROUND

Updated National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for the use of tumor markers in the clinic have been developed.

METHODS

Published reports relevant to use of tumor markers for 4 cancer sites--liver, bladder, cervical, and gastric--were critically reviewed.

RESULTS

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) may be used in conjunction with abdominal ultrasound for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis associated with hepatitis B or C virus infection. AFP concentrations >200 microg/L in cirrhotic patients with typical hypervascular lesions >2 cm in size are consistent with HCC. After a diagnosis of HCC, posttreatment monitoring with AFP is recommended as an adjunct to imaging, especially in the absence of measurable disease. Although several urine markers have been proposed for bladder cancer, none at present can replace routine cystoscopy and cytology in the management of patients with this malignancy. Some may, however, be used as complementary adjuncts to direct more effective use of clinical procedures. Although carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 19-9 have been proposed for use gastric cancer and squamous cell carcinoma antigen for use in cervical cancer, none of these markers can currently be recommended for routine clinical use.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of these recommendations should encourage optimal use of tumor markers for patients with liver, bladder, cervical, or gastric cancers.

Clinical states model for biomarkers in bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is a significant healthcare problem in the USA, with a high recurrence rate, the need for expensive continuous surveillance and limited treatment options for patients with advanced disease. Research has contributed to an understanding of the molecular pathways involved in the development and progression of bladder cancer, and that understanding has led to the discovery of potentially diagnostic, predictive and prognostic biomarkers. In this review, a clinical states model of bladder cancer is introduced and integrated into a paradigm for biomarker development. Biomarkers are systematically incorporated with predefined end points to aid in clinical management.

The utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of bladder urothelial carcinoma in routine clinical practice

To evaluate the ability of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in detecting bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC), FISH and cytology were compared for the evaluation of 308 consecutive urine samples from patients suspected of having BUC. All patients underwent cystoscopy for identification of bladder lesions. The FISH results were compared with the cytology assessment. In all, 122 patients had confirmed BUC. Among them, 68 (55.7%) were FISH-positive, while only 33 (27%) were positive on cytology. According to disease stage (superficial vs. invasive) and grade (low vs. high), the sensitivities of FISH were also significantly higher than those of cytology in all categories. Moreover, in 36 patients who had no visible tumor with flat, erythematous mucosa (suspicious lesion), FISH was more sensitive than cytology for the detection of BUC (83.3% vs. 33.3%, P=0.002). The FISH was negative in 168 (90.3%) of 186 patients with no histological evidence of BUC or negative cystoscopy findings. The sensitivity of FISH for detecting BUC was superior to that of cytology, regardless of tumor stage and grade. FISH is a significant additional and complementary method for detection of BUC in patients who have suspicious lesions on cystoscopy.

Reflex UroVysion testing in suspicious urine cytology cases

BACKGROUND

UroVysion is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe set for use in the detection of recurrent urothelial carcinoma and in patients with hematuria. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the usefulness of UroVysion as a reflex test in patients with a suspicious urine cytology diagnosis. The rationale was that a more aggressive workup might be indicated in patients with a suspicious cytology diagnosis and positive UroVysion test.

METHODS

The study population included 161 urine specimens diagnosed as suspicious over a period of 12 months. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (NPV) were calculated based on the histologic and cystoscopic correlation.

RESULTS

The results using the reporting criteria suggested by the manufacturer demonstrated a sensitivity of 68.3%, a specificity of 39.7%, a PPV of 56.8%, and a NPV of 51.9%. The results using the presence of any cytogenetic abnormality as a positive FISH test demonstrated a sensitivity of 82.9%, a specificity of 21.7%, a PPV of 54.8%, and an NPV of 51.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

A negative UroVysion test did not rule out the presence of low-grade or high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine specimens diagnosed as suspicious. The use of less strict criteria dramatically increased the sensitivity of UroVysion FISH; however, there was a marked decrease in specificity noted. The results in this current study appear to indicate that a more aggressive workup of patients with a suspicious cytology, positive UroVysion result, and negative cystoscopic evaluation is not currently justified.

[Usefulness of NMP22 BladderChek for the diagnosis and monitoring of bladder cancer]

BACKGROUND

As bladder cancer is a superficial tumor with frequent recurrences, early detection and confirmation of recurrence are important. We evaluated the usefulness of NMP22 BladderChek (NMP22BC) for the diagnosis and monitoring of bladder cancer.

METHODS

From July to December 2004, we enrolled in the study 670 patients who visited the urology clinic in Ewha Womans University, Dongdaemun Hospital with hematuria or dysuria and were tested with NMP22BC. We also performed the NMP22BC and BTA stat tests simultaneously in 21 patients and interference test in 10 patients.

RESULTS

NMP22BC tests were negative in 97% of the patients who had been cured of bladder cancer and were positive in 95% of the patients with recurred bladder cancer. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and efficiency were 95.0%, 91.5%, 25.7%, 99.8%, and 91.6%, respectively, with 8.5% false positive and 5% false negative rates. Fifty-five patients showed false positive in the NMP22BC test, the main cause of which was the presence of WBCs in urine. There was a good agreement between the NMP22BC and BTA stat tests (kappa agreement value, 0.5; P=0.008). According to the interference test, two patients with more than 3+ in leukocyte esterase results showed false positive in the NMP22BC test.

CONCLUSIONS

NMP22BC test was simple to perform, rapid to produce the results, and useful in diagnosing a bladder cancer recurrence; the test shows a high efficiency with a high sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and low false negative rate.

Bladder cancer detection using FISH (UroVysion assay)

UroVysion is a fluorescence in situ hybridization assay that was developed for the detection of bladder cancer in urine specimens. It consists of fluorescently labeled DNA probes to the pericentromeric regions of chromosomes 3 (red), 7 (green), and 17 (aqua) and to the 9p21 band (gold) location of the P16 tumor suppressor gene. The UroVysion assay works by detecting urinary cells that have chromosomal abnormalities consistent with a diagnosis of bladder cancer. Studies have shown that UroVysion is more sensitive than urine cytology for the detection of all stages and grades of bladder cancer. UroVysion is Food and Drug Administration-approved for the detection of recurrent bladder cancer in voided urine specimens from patients with a history of bladder cancer and for the detection of bladder cancer in voided urine specimens from patients with gross or microscopic hematuria, but no previous history of bladder cancer. Recent studies also suggest that UroVysion may be useful for assessing superficial bladder cancer patients' response to bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy and in detecting upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Epigenetic markers as promising prognosticators for bladder cancer

Transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder have diverse biological and functional characteristics. Surveillance strategies for bladder cancer recurrence have historically relied on the diagnostic combination of cystoscopy and urinary cytology. However, the accuracy of both tests depends on subjective and operator-dependent interpretations of the visible findings. In contrast, promoter hypermethylation of CpG islands is strongly associated with tumor development and prognosis of bladder cancer. Detection of DNA methylation in voided urine may be feasible and more sensitive than conventional urine cytology. Ultimately, all types of urological cancers may be screened in urine using a candidate panel of hypermethylated genes. The epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes is interest from a clinical point of view because it is possible to reverse epigenetic changes and restore gene function to a cell. Methylation markers might therefore be more useful than conventional molecular markers for the treatment and prevention of bladder cancer.

Urine cytology and urine-based markers for bladder urothelial carcinoma detection and monitoring: developments and future prospects

Bladder cancer is currently diagnosed using cystoscopy and cytology in patients with suspicious signs and symptoms. These tests are also used to monitor patients with a history of bladder cancer. The recurrence rate for bladder cancer is high, thus necessitating long-term follow-up. Urine cytology has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma, but lacks the sensitivity to detect low-grade tumors. Recently, multiple noninvasive urine-based bladder cancer tests have been developed. Many markers (BTA stat®, BTA TRAK®, ImmunoCyt™, NMP22® and UroVysion™) have already been approved by the US FDA for bladder cancer surveillance, while other markers are still undergoing development, preclinical and clinical investigation. An ideal bladder cancer test would be noninvasive, highly sensitive and specific, inexpensive, easy to perform and yield highly reproducible results. Many of the tests reviewed herein meet some, but not all, of these criteria.

Molecular biomarkers in urothelial bladder cancer

Bladder cancers are a mixture of heterogeneous cell populations, and numerous factors are likely to be involved in dictating their recurrence, progression, and the patient's survival. For any candidate prognostic marker to have considerable clinical relevance, it must add some predictive capacity beyond that offered by the conventional clinical and pathological parameters. None of the biomarkers reported to date have shown sufficient sensitivity and specificity for detecting the whole spectrum of bladder cancer diseases in routine clinical practice. The limitations of established prognostic markers requires us to identify better molecular parameters that could be of interest in predicting the prognosis of bladder cancer patients, in particular, the high-risk patient groups that are at risk of progression and recurrence. Recent progress in epigenetic modification and gene silencing opened a new avenue for the identification of epigenetic markers, which appears to be more useful for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Although epigenetic markers also have limitations, the combined epigenetic marker approach may increase sensitivity and reliability. The epigenetic silencing of tumor-suppressor genes is interesting from a clinical standpoint because of the possibility of reversing epigenetic changes and restoring gene function in a cell. In addition, microarray technology provides us with additional tools for the analysis of global gene-expression analysis of tumor samples. Future microarray analyses are likely to reveal particular gene-expression signatures that predict the likelihood of bladder cancer progression and recurrence, as well as a patient's survival and responsiveness to different anticancer therapies, with great specificity and sensitivity.

UroVysion FISH test for detecting urothelial cancers: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and comparison with urinary cytology testing

OBJECTIVES

Since the introduction of the UroVysion test for detecting urothelial cancers in urine, its reported performance has varied. This article systematically analyzed reported results.

METHODS

Articles in English conforming to the Oxford EBM criteria were included, with the evaluation focused on cancers that were histologically confirmed at the time of testing rather than on any cancers that might develop later. Where applicable, samples with no cells were reclassified as negative so as to further improve the actual estimation of test performance. Where available, cytology data were also analyzed. Meta-DiSc software was used for the statistical analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 14 studies involving 2477 FISH tests. The overall prevalence of urothelial cancers was 35%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of all studies were 72% (69%-75%) and 83% (82%-85%), respectively. Cytology data were available from 12 studies, with the overall sensitivity and specificity being 42% (38%-45%) and 96% (95%-97%). Excluding Ta tumors, the sensitivity was 86% (82%-89%) for UroVysion and 61% (56%-66%) for cytology. The overall performance was higher for UroVysion than for cytology: diagnostic odds ratio, 16.8 and 14.1; AUC, 0.867 (SE 0.021) and 0.626 (SE 0.091). These differences in overall test performance measures almost disappeared when superficial cancer cases were excluded from the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The published trials suggest that for a general mix of cases, cytology results are highly specific. However, a negative cytology result does not meaningfully change the post-test probability of the presence of urothelial cancer. UroVysion FISH test results should not be considered to provide conclusive evidence for the presence or absence of urothelial cancer, but both positive and negative results do moderately influence the post-test probability of disease.

[DNA methylation on urinalysis and as a prognostic marker in urothelial cancer of the bladder]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Detection of promoter hypermethylation has been proposed as a promising tool for cancer diagnosis and as a prognostic marker in various cancers. We studied the versatility of DNA methylation for noninvasive diagnosis and as a prognostic marker for non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma.

METHODS

Tumor specimens were microdissected and DNA was extracted from 105 paraffin-embedded paraffin specimens from patients undergoing transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. Urine specimens were collected from patients undergoing cystectomy for bladder cancer and from healthy volunteers. Methylation status was assessed with the real-time quantitative methylation-sensitive PCR (MethyLight). We checked a panel of 20 cancer-associated genes (p14ARF, p16 CDKN2A, STAT-1, SOCS-1, DR-3, DR-6, PIG-7, BCL-2, H-TERT, BAX, EDNRB, DAPK, RASSF-1A, FADD, TMS-1, E-CADHERIN, ICAM-1, TIMP-3, MLH-1, COX-2) for DNA methylation.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were available in 95 of 105 patients (91.4%). A tumor recurrence was observed in 26 patients (27.3%). We could identify six genes (SOCS-1, STAT-1, BCL-2, DAPK, TIMP-3, E-cadherin), where methylation was associated with tumor recurrence. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, TIMP-3 showed a significant association with recurrence-free survival. Methylation of TIMP-3 predicted prolonged disease-free interval. Regarding urinalysis we could identify a pattern of methylation markers including DAPK, BCL-2, and H-TERT that yielded a sensitivity of 81.1% with a specificity of 100% in a cancer-free control population

CONCLUSIONS

We present data on the clinical usefulness of methylation analysis in bladder carcinoma. Our data confirm that methylation analysis is a promising tool for bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

Bladder cancer biomarkers: current developments and future implementation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bladder cancer biomarker development has advanced significantly over the last decade, but has not yet been able to make a significant impact in the diagnosis and management of the disease. Many available markers are suitable, but do not meet the expectations of physicians and patients. Patients do not want to compromise accuracy in diagnosing bladder cancer for less-invasive tests. The review highlights the latest developments in bladder cancer biomarkers, including markers developed over the last year, and comments on the high standards placed on these markers which have delayed their widespread implementation into the urologic field.

RECENT FINDINGS

New markers described in the last year include soluble Fas, urothelial carcinoma-associated 1 and human chorionic gonadotropin beta type II genes. The latter two markers represent the contribution of genomic technology to this field. Also described are updates to known markers, including long-term follow-up of hematuria screening, recent studies in DNA methylation for bladder cancer diagnosis and patient perspectives on bladder tumor markers.

SUMMARY

Biomarkers for bladder cancer have been intensively scrutinized over the last decade, but despite new findings and good performance characteristics, they are currently not accepted in clinical practice.

Detection of urinary bladder cancer with flow cytometry and hexaminolevulinate in urine samples

OBJECTIVES

Urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma is diagnosed by a combination of cystoscopy and biopsy, with cytology as a valuable additional technique. The accuracy of cytological diagnosis depends on the experience of the cytologist and can inevitably vary from one cytologist to another. There is a need for an easy, reliable and objective diagnostic method. In the present study a new method was designed for the detection of bladder cancer cells in urine.

METHODS

Flow cytometry was utilized to detect protoporphyrin IX in an artificial model consisting of normal urinary bladder transitional epithelial cells (NBECs) from healthy volunteers' urine and an established human urinary bladder carcinoma cell line, TCCSUP, after incubation with hexaminolevulinate (HAL). In addition, urine samples from 19 patients with histopathologically confirmed superficial bladder cancer were examined.

RESULTS

Incubation of NBECs or TCCSUP cells with HAL for 1 hour resulted in production of protoporphyrin IX only in the TCCSUP cells. Incubation of a mixture of NBECs and TCCSUP cells with HAL gave rise to a separated subpopulation of cells with protoporphyrin IX fluorescence. After cell sorting by flow cytometry the protoporphyrin IX-containing subpopulation of cells was confirmed as TCCSUP cells on cytological examination. It was possible to detect 5% TCCSUP cells in the mixture of NBECs/TCCSUP cells. To test the feasibility of the method in clinica diagnosis, urine samples from patients with bladder cancer were also measured with comparable, although preliminary and limited, results to those of cytological examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary results show that the technique may be feasible for the detection of bladder cancer cells in urine with possible advantages of simplicity, reliability and objectivity.

Clinical utility of fluorescent in situ hybridization for the surveillance of bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of a multiprobe fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay for determining the response of patients with high-risk superficial bladder tumour (HRSBT) to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy.

METHODS

Bladder washing specimens from 65 HRSBT patients collected before and after BCG therapy were analyzed by FISH. Labelled probes for chromosomes 3, 7, 9, and 17 were used to assess chromosomal abnormalities indicative of malignancy.

RESULTS

Fifty-five of 65 (85%) patients had a positive pre-BCG FISH result; 29 (45%) patients had a positive and 36 (55%) had a negative post-BCG FISH result. Patients with a positive post-BCG FISH status had a 2.7 times higher risk for tumour recurrence than patients with a negative post-BCG FISH status (p = 0.017; 95% CI: 1.18-6.15). In addition, patients who maintained a positive FISH status before and after BCG therapy had a risk for tumour recurrence 2.96 times higher than patients whose FISH result changed from positive to negative after BCG (p = 0.02; 95% CI: 1.17-7.54). On the other hand, there was no significant difference between the risk for tumour progression in patients with a positive versus a negative post-BCG FISH result (p = 0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

The high percentage of positive pre-BCG FISH results suggests the need for adjuvant therapy in patients with HRSBT after the initial transurethral resection. In addition, patients with a positive post-BCG FISH result were more likely to relapse after therapy. Thus, FISH appears to be useful for the surveillance of patients with HRSBT following BCG therapy.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization: a multitarget approach in diagnosis and management of urothelial cancer

Noninvasive tests for detecting genetic or molecular alterations in urine indicative of urothelial cancer are increasingly becoming the focus of urological cancer research. Since its approval by the US FDA in 2001, the fluorescence in situ hybridization test (Vysis UroVysion) has been widely evaluated. In general, published data demonstrate better sensitivity and equal or better specificity compared with routine cytology, which is still considered the 'gold standard' in diagnosing and monitoring bladder tumors. However, the fluorescence in situ hybridization test seems to provide not only a useful tool in bladder cancer detection, but also in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract tumors, surveillance and determining therapy effectiveness. This multitarget assay that detects four different chromosomal aberrations in tumor cells is a kind of objective molecular cytology and has proven advantages over routinely used cytology.

UroVysion compared with cytology and quantitative cytology in the surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

OBJECTIVES

The multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization probe set Vysis UroVysion, consisting of probes for chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 and for the 9p21 band, was studied to evaluate its value in the follow-up of patients with bladder cancer. The results were compared with conventional cytology and quantitative cytology (Quanticyt). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether UroVysion is a better adjunct to urethrocystoscopy than cytology and quantitative cytology.

METHODS

UroVysion, cytology, and quantitative cytology were performed on 113 voided urinary samples of 105 patients under surveillance for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Before urethrocystoscopy or transurethral resection of the bladder, a voided urinary sample was obtained. Results of all tests were compared to evaluate the value of UroVysion.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients had biopsy-proven urothelial cell carcinoma. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 39.1% and 89.7% for UroVysion, 40.6% and 89.7% for cytology, and 42.1% and 67.9% for quantitative cytology. When the UroVysion test and cytology were combined, sensitivity increased to 53.1%, but specificity decreased to 79.5%. Detection of Ta tumours was equal for cytology and UroVysion (26.7%), detection of T1 and T2-T4 samples by UroVysion was 60% and 50%, respectively. Detection of grade 1, 2, and 3 tumours by UroVysion was 21.4%, 36.8%, and 66.7%, respectively. In four cases the UroVysion test was positive, but no abnormalities were seen at cystoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the use of UroVysion provides no improvement over cytology or quantitative cytology in the diagnosis of recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder tumours.

Molecular markers in bladder cancer: A critical appraisal

The diagnosis of both primary and recurrent bladder tumors currently relies upon the urine cytology and cystoscopy. Neither of these diagnostic tools is completely accurate. Prognostication of bladder cancer is largely based on pathologic tumor grade and stage. Over the past 2 decades, there is accumulating evidence that like many other cancers, bladder cancer, too, has a distinct molecular signature that separates it from other cancers and normal bladder tissue. Bladder tumors of different grades and stages even possess unique, and specific genotypic and phenotypic characteristics. Although recognition of several of these molecular alterations is possible by analyzing tumor tissue, urine, and serum samples, few if any of these "molecular markers" for bladder cancer are widely used in clinical practice. These markers include some that can be applied during the diagnostic work-up of symptoms (e.g., hematuria), those under surveillance for recurrence of superficial disease and forecasting long-term prognosis, or response to chemotherapy. In this review of molecular markers for bladder cancer, effectiveness of markers in each of these categories that are identifiable in the urine of patients with bladder cancer was examined. Many of the diagnostic markers appear to hold an advantage over urine cytology in terms of sensitivity, especially for the detection of low-grade superficial tumors. However, most markers tend to be less specific than cytology, yielding more false-positives. This result is more commonly observed in patients with concurrent bladder inflammation or other benign bladder conditions. Although there are several candidate markers for assessing prognosis or response to chemotherapy, studies of large patient populations are lacking. Further studies involving larger numbers of patients are required to determine their accuracy and widespread applicability in guiding treatment of bladder cancer.

Bladder cancer diagnosis and recurrence prognosis: Comparison of markers with emphasis on survivin

Expression of the anti-apoptotic protein survivin is hardly detectable or even absent in many differentiated adult tissues, but is upregulated in almost any type of cancer. Furthermore, high survivin mRNA or protein expression generally correlates with an adverse disease course. Both these important features of survivin expression have been investigated for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in many human cancers, including bladder cancer. In this review, the role of survivin in the detection of bladder tumors and the prediction of tumor recurrence in patients with superficial bladder cancer will be discussed and compared to that of other markers/tests. The most promising marker(s) will be outlined. Also, important requirements for a successful implementation of such markers in a hospital setting are discussed. Finally, future directions for the discovery of new diagnostic or prognostic candidate markers will be mentioned.

DNA–based molecular cytology for bladder cancer surveillance

Surveillance strategies for urothelial cancer (UC) recurrence have historically relied on the diagnostic combination of cystoscopy and conventional urinary cytology. In this review, results of studies evaluating the role of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay in bladder cancer surveillance are critically examined. The published research on FISH compared with conventional cytology and cystoscopy for bladder cancer was identified using a Medline search and was critically analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity data were tabulated and compared. FISH outperformed conventional cytology across all stages and grades in all published reports, and it detected malignancy before the development of lesions visible by cystoscopy. Although overall sensitivity was 48% for cytology and 74% for FISH, its greatest advantage was in the detection of high-grade UC, including carcinoma in situ (CIS). Cumulative data from comparative studies showed the sensitivity of cytology compared with FISH was 19% versus 58% for grade 1, 50% versus 77% for grade 2, and 71% versus 96% for grade 3. Similar findings occurred by stage, where cytology compared with FISH sensitivity was 35% versus 64% for Ta, 66% versus 83% for T1, and 76% versus 94% for muscle-invasive carcinoma. Notably, cytology detected only 67% of CIS versus 100% detection by FISH. Specificity data were comparable. Unlike conventional urinary cytology and cystoscopy, which depend on subjective visible microscopic or macroscopic changes, FISH allows identification of chromosomal abnormalities associated with malignant development before phenotypic expression of those alterations. Use of morphologic cellular changes allows more rapid detection of such alterations, combining the benefits of conventional cytology with molecular diagnostics. It is apparent that we are in the early phases of realizing the potential of molecular diagnostics.

Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers

This is the first of 2 articles that summarize the findings of the International Consensus Panel on cytology and bladder tumor markers. The objectives of our panel were to reach a consensus on the areas where markers are needed, to define the attributes of an ideal tumor marker, and to identify which marker(s) would be suitable for diagnosis and/or surveillance of bladder cancer. Our panel consisted of urologists and researchers from Europe, Asia, and the United States who reviewed original articles, reviews, and book chapters on individual bladder tumor markers published in the English language mainly using the PubMed search engine. Panel members also met during 3 international meetings to write recommendations regarding bladder tumor markers. The panel found that the most practical use of noninvasive tests is to monitor bladder cancer recurrence, thereby reducing the number of surveillance cystoscopies performed each year. Markers also may be useful in the screening of high-risk individuals for early detection of bladder cancer. However, more prospective studies are needed to strengthen this argument. Case-control and cohort studies show that several markers have a higher sensitivity to detect bladder cancer. However, cytology is the superior marker in terms of specificity, although some markers in limited numbers of studies have shown specificity equivalent to that of cytology. Our panel believes that several bladder tumor markers are more accurate in detecting bladder cancer than prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is in detecting prostate cancer. However, bladder tumor markers are held to a higher standard than PSA. Therefore, use of bladder tumor markers in the management of patients with bladder cancer will require the willingness of both urologists and clinicians to accept them.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization for detecting transitional cell carcinoma: implications for clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic sensitivity of genetic studies using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detecting both new and recurrent cases of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) in a routine clinical practice setting, as bladder cancer has a significant risk of recurrence and progression to invasive disease and thus sensitive surveillance testing is very important.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

FISH was performed using the UroVysion kit (Vysis Inc., Downers Grove, IL, USA) Consecutive patients were assessed using FISH, both to evaluate those with a history of TCC or with suspicious symptoms, and the FISH results were compared with concurrent biopsy and cytological assessments.

RESULTS

In all, 521 consecutive FISH tests from 300 patients were evaluated; 47% had a history of bladder cancer and 53% had suspicious symptoms. Of the 521 FISH tests, 24% were positive; concurrent cytology was available for 84% of the FISH tests, with a concordance rate of 78% (6% were positive for both and 72% were negative by both tests). For the discordant cases, FISH was positive and cytology negative in 21% of cases, and cytology was positive with a negative FISH for 1%. In all, 99 FISH tests had concurrent biopsy data. Of the 44 cases histologically positive for TCC, 32 were FISH-positive, resulting in an overall sensitivity (95% confidence interval) of 73 (60-88)%. FISH detected 95% of cases with high-grade carcinoma, while only seven of these 17 were positive by concurrent cytological assessment. FISH detected 56% and cytology detected 32% of low-grade lesions. FISH detected all nine new cases with positive histology. Overall, the specificity of FISH was 65 (53-78)%. Of 112 patients with previous TCC, 28 had a recurrence; 22 of these had positive FISH results.

CONCLUSION

FISH analysis has a high sensitivity for detecting new cases of TCC, as well as recurrences. From the present data FISH is considerably more sensitive and only slightly less specific than cytology in diagnosing TCC. Therefore, we recommend FISH as a useful initial diagnostic tool in patients suspected of both new and recurrent TCC.

New molecular markers for bladder cancer detection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bladder cancer continues to be one of the most common genitourinary malignancies. The mainstay of diagnosis remains cystoscopic visualization with transurethral biopsy or resection. As over two-thirds of bladder tumors recur, vigilant surveillance is required. Due to the invasiveness and expense of frequent cystoscopies and the lack of sensitivity of urinary cytology, especially for low-grade superficial lesions, novel molecular markers have been investigated as a means to detect bladder cancer noninvasively.

RECENT FINDINGS

As our understanding of the pathogenesis of urothelial neoplasia improves, coupled with recent advances in molecular biological techniques, an array of new approaches to the diagnosis of bladder cancer has emerged. Several urine-based markers have been tested against the standard of urinary cytology with promising results. However, lack of standardization of technique and heterogeneity of bladder cancer itself may hinder the widespread dissemination of these diagnostic aids.

SUMMARY

A host of new molecular markers based on the pathogenesis of bladder cancer have been investigated, such as telomerase, survivin, and multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization, which may eventually improve detection and management of urothelial malignancies. By improving the sensitivity of urinary cytology for low-grade superficial lesions and detecting recurrent disease noninvasively early in its course, these new molecular markers might someday allow changes in the way bladder cancer is diagnosed and followed. At the present time, however, no single molecular marker provides 100% accuracy. Perhaps panels utilizing the most promising of these markers may alter bladder cancer detection and management policy.