Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on glycemic control in cirrhotic patients with diabetes mellitus

Hepatogenous diabetes: Knowledge, evidence, and skepticism

The diabetogenic potential of liver cirrhosis (LC) has been known for a long time, and the name "hepatogenous diabetes" (HD) was coined in 1906 to define the condition. Diabetes mellitus (DM) that develops as a consequence of LC is referred to as HD. In patients with LC, the prevalence rates of HD have been reported to vary from 21% to 57%. The pathophysiological basis of HD seems to involve insulin resistance (IR) and pancreatic β-cell dysfunction. The neurohormonal changes, endotoxemia, and chronic inflammation of LC initially create IR; however, the toxic effects eventually lead to β-cell dysfunction, which marks the transition from impaired glucose tolerance to HD. In addition, a number of factors, including sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, gut dysbiosis, and hyperammonemia, have recently been linked to impaired glucose metabolism in LC. DM is associated with complications and poor outcomes in patients with LC, although the individual impact of each type 2 DM and HD is unknown due to a lack of categorization of diabetes in most published research. In fact, there is much skepticism within scientific organizations over the recognition of HD as a separate disease and a consequence of LC. Currently, T2DM and HD are being treated in a similar manner although no standardized guidelines are available. The different pathophysiological basis of HD may have an impact on treatment options. This review article discusses the existence of HD as a distinct entity with high prevalence rates, a strong pathophysiological basis, clinical and therapeutic implications, as well as widespread skepticism and knowledge gaps.

Clinical implications, diagnosis, and management of diabetes in patients with chronic liver diseases

Diabetes mellitus (DM) negatively affects the development and progression of chronic liver diseases (CLD) of various etiologies. Concurrent DM and CLD are also associated with worse clinical outcomes with respect to mortality, the occurrence of hepatic decompensation, and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unfortunately, early diagnosis and optimal treatment of DM can be challenging, due to the lack of established clinical guidelines as well as the medical complexity of this patient population. We conducted an exploratory review of relevant literature to provide an up-to-date review for internists and hepatologists caring for this patient population. We reviewed the epidemiological and pathophysiological associations between DM and CLD, the impact of insulin resistance on the progression and manifestations of CLD, the pathogenesis of hepatogenic diabetes, as well as the practical challenges in diagnosis and monitoring of DM in this patient population. We also reviewed the latest clinical evidence on various pharmacological antihyperglycemic therapies with an emphasis on liver disease-related clinical outcomes. Finally, we proposed an algorithm for managing DM in patients with CLD and discussed the clinical and research questions that remain to be addressed.

Diabetes Mellitus Heightens the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Except in Patients With Hepatitis C Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

As most hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have cirrhosis, the association between diabetes and HCC may be confounded by the fact that diabetes is common in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study is to investigate whether diabetes increases the risk of HCC in patients with cirrhosis and whether the etiology of liver disease modifies the association between diabetes and HCC.

METHODS

All liver cirrhosis patients who had repeated radiographic evaluation of the liver (that is, ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance image) at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 2006 and December 2011 were included. The Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of diabetes on the risk of HCC.

RESULTS

A total of 739 patients met the eligibility criteria, of whom 253 (34%) had diabetes. After a median follow-up of 38 months, 69 (9%) patients developed HCC. In patients without hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, diabetes was significantly associated with the risk of developing HCC (hazard ratio (HR)=2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.1-4.1), whereas in patients with HCV, there was no association (HR=0.8, 95% CI=0.4-1.8). When adjusted for covariates, the interaction between HCV and diabetes remained significant (HR for non-HCV=1.9, 95% CI=0.9-3.7; HR for HCV=0.6, 95% CI=0.2-1.3). Lack of association between diabetes and HCC was externally validated in 410 patients with HCV cirrhosis enrolled in the HALT-C trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes increases the risk of HCC in patients with non-HCV cirrhosis. In HCV cirrhosis patients who already have very high risk, diabetes may not increase the risk any further.

Diabetes mellitus in patients with cirrhosis: clinical implications and management

Disorders of glucose metabolism, namely glucose intolerance and diabetes, are frequent in patients with chronic liver diseases. In patients with cirrhosis, diabetes can be either a classical type 2 diabetes mellitus or the so-called hepatogenous diabetes, i.e. a consequence of liver insufficiency and portal hypertension. This review article provides an overview of the possible pathophysiological mechanisms explaining diabetes in patients with cirrhosis. Cirrhosis is associated with portosystemic shunts as well as reduced hepatic mass, which can both impair insulin clearance by the liver, contributing to peripheral insulin resistance through insulin receptors down-regulation. Moreover, cirrhosis is associated with increased levels of advanced-glycation-end products and hypoxia-inducible-factors, which may play a role in the development of diabetes. This review also focuses on the clinical implications of diabetes in patients with cirrhosis. First, diabetes is an independent factor for poor prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. Specifically, diabetes is associated with the occurrence of major complications of cirrhosis, including ascites and renal dysfunction, hepatic encephalopathy and bacterial infections. Diabetes is also associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver diseases. Last, the management of patients with concurrent diabetes and liver disease is also addressed. Recent findings suggest a beneficial impact of metformin in patients with chronic liver diseases. Insulin is often required in patients with advanced cirrhosis. However, the favourable impact of controlling diabetes in patients with cirrhosis has not been demonstrated yet.

Alcohol-attributable healthcare attendances up to 10 years prior to diagnosis of alcoholic cirrhosis: a population based case-control study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Cirrhosis because of alcohol could be avoided if drinking behaviour could be altered earlier in the disease course. Our aim was to quantify the burden of morbidities in patients prior to alcoholic cirrhosis diagnosis, as this may inform the earlier identification of people at high risk for targeted interventions.

METHODS

We carried out a case-control study using 2479 incident cases of alcoholic cirrhosis and 24 790 controls identified from 357 primary and secondary care centres in England. We assessed the prevalence of morbidities that are partly attributable to alcohol (namely malignant neoplasms, diabetes, epilepsy, injuries, cardiovascular and digestive diseases) prior to alcoholic cirrhosis diagnosis. We compared prevalence in cases to the control population and used logistic regression to derive odds ratios (95% CI).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight per cent of cases compared to 29% of controls had had at least one alcohol-attributable condition before cirrhosis diagnosis. The most frequent conditions (proportion in cases vs. controls) were intentional injuries (35.9% vs. 11.9%) and cardiovascular diseases (23.2% vs. 15.6%), followed by diabetes (12.8% vs. 5.3%), digestive diseases (6.1% vs. 1.2%) and epilepsy (5.0% vs. 1.1%). The strongest association with alcoholic cirrhosis was found for digestive diseases [OR 5.4 (4.4-6.7)], epilepsy [OR: 4.4 (3.5-5.5)] and injuries [OR: 4.0 (3.7-4.4)] particularly among those aged 18-44 years.

CONCLUSION

These data highlight the high burden of other alcohol-attributable conditions in patients prior to alcoholic cirrhosis diagnosis. Reviewing those consistently presenting with any of these conditions more closely could help practitioners reduce/avoid the long-term consequences of development of alcoholic liver disease.

Occlusion of portosystemic shunts improves hyperinsulinemia due to insulin resistance in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Liver cirrhosis (LC) is often complicated by hyperinsulinemia due to insulin resistance (IR), which is considered to be closely related to shunt formation and impaired liver function. This study evaluates whether balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO) can affect glucose and insulin metabolism in patients with LC.

METHODS

Twenty-five cirrhotic patients (mean age = 69.6 years; female/male = 12/13; hepatitis C virus/alcohol/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis = 14/6/5; Child-Pugh's class A/B = 10/15) with gastric varices and/or hepatic encephalopathy caused by portosystemic shunts (PSS) due to portal hypertension (PH) underwent B-RTO at our hospital. Testing was performed before and at 1 month after the procedure.

RESULTS

Shunt occlusion resulted in a decrease in extrahepatic collateral blood flow and an increase in portal venous flow, as well as a dramatic improvement in hepatic function markers. In addition, B-RTO significantly decreased homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) of IR without a statistical decline of HOMA of β-cell function. The 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (75-OGTT) revealed that occlusion of PSS reduced both fasting immunoreactive insulin (IRI) levels and the area under the curve for IRI. However, no significant change in preprandial or postprandial plasma glucose levels was observed. Furthermore, according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association, B-RTO led to an improved 75-OGTT profile in 58.3 % of patients who had impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes mellitus before the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Shunt occlusion improves IR-related hyperinsulinemia through increased portal venous flow, ameliorated liver function, and consequent augmented hepatic insulin clearance in cirrhotic patients with PH.

Diabetes mellitus is associated with gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been reported to increase the risk of complications of liver cirrhosis of any etiology and subsequent survival. However, the impact of DM on the development of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (GEVB) remains unclear. We aimed to elucidate whether DM is an independent risk factor for GEVB among cirrhotic patients. A total of 146 consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh Class A, n = 75; Class B, n = 40; and Class C, n = 31) were prospectively enrolled. Data on clinical and biochemical characteristics and history of ascites, GEVB, hepatic encephalopathy, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were retrospectively reviewed. Of these 146 patients, 37 (25%) had DM. Patients with DM had significantly higher ratio of Child-Pugh Class B/C (p = 0.043), renal insufficiency (p = 0.002), and history of GEVB (p = 0.006) compared with non-DM patients. GEVB was associated with Child-Pugh Class B/C (p = 0.001), ascites (p = 0.002), hepatic encephalopathy (p = 0.023), and low platelet counts (p < 0.001). Based on stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis, Child-Pugh class B/C [odds ratio (OR) = 4.90, p = 0.003] and DM (OR = 2.99, p = 0.022) were identified as independent predictors of GEVB. In the subgroup analysis, DM significantly correlated with GEVB in patients with Child-Pugh Class A (p = 0.042), but not in patients with Child-Pugh Class B/C (p = 0.128). DM is independently associated with GEVB in cirrhotic patients, especially in those with Child-Pugh Class A.

α-Lipoic acid prevents mild portal endotoxaemia-induced hepatic inflammation and β cell dysfunction

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to evaluate the preventive effect of α-lipoic acid (LA) on chronic mild portal endotoxaemia-mediated subacute hepatic inflammation and pancreatic β cell dysfunction in rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned into four groups: those with intraportal vehicle (saline) or low-dose lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (0·42 ng/kg/min) infusion, combined with oral administration of vehicle or LA, a potent antioxidant (60 mg/kg/day) for 4 weeks. The hyperglycaemic clamp and euglycaemic clamp techniques were used to access the glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and systemic insulin sensitivity in vivo.

RESULTS

Body weight, fasting plasma glucose and insulin were not different among groups. In rats with chronic intraportal LPS infusion, plasma C-reactive protein, amylase, superoxide levels, the contents of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance, tumour necrosis factor α and interleukin 6 in liver and pancreas and also the gene expression of Toll-like receptor 4 in liver were significantly increased as compared with those with LA cotreatment. The histopathological examination showed that inflammatory changes were clearly visible in liver and pancreatic islets of LPS-infused rats and rarely observed in those cotreated with LA. In addition, low-dose intraportal LPS infusion also significantly impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion but not affect the systemic insulin sensitivity and metabolic clearance rate of insulin. LA administration markedly reversed LPS-induced β cell dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

α-Lipoic acid cotreatment could significantly prevent mild portal endotoxaemia-induced chronic hepatic inflammation and impaired pancreatic insulin secretion in absence of changing systemic insulin resistance.

Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on glycometabolism in cirrhosis patients

OBJECTIVE

Patients with liver cirrhosis suffer from hyperinsulinemia, hyperglucagonemia and a certain degree of insulin resistance, and portosystemic shunts may be involved in the etiology. A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a treatment for the complications of portal hypertension leads to hemodynamic changes. The objective of the present study is to evaluate whether TIPS can also affect glycometabolism in cirrhosis patients.

METHODS

Forty-six liver cirrhosis patients (experimental group [EG]) without diabetes who underwent TIPS were evaluated. Portal venous pressure (PVP), cardiac output (CO) and blood flow in the shunt (BFS) were measured or calculated before TIPS, after 15 minutes and, finally, after 90 days. Twenty-five liver cirrhosis patients without diabetes and without TIPS were included as the control group (CG). Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) were carried out at 0, 1, 7, 30 and 90 days after TIPS or after inclusion in the study. Indices related to glycometabolism and liver function, which included biochemical values, were also investigated.

RESULTS

PVP changed immediately from 39.43 ± 1.29 cmH(2)O to 21.43 ± 1.42 cmH(2)O and remained stable thereafter. A pronounced increase in CO was observed after TIPS, while BFS did not change significantly. Also, glycosylated hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma C-peptide (FPC), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and 2-h post-challenge plasma glucose (2 hPG) were non significantly increased after the shunt. Statistically significant hyperinsulinemia and hyperglucagonemia persisted for 90 days after TIPS. In addition, TIPS was followed by an increase in insulin resistance (IR) and β-cell function. Thirty-four patients in the EG and 15 in the CG were diagnosed with diabetes or prediabetes after 90 days. No significant differences in biochemical values were observed 90 days after the shunt.

CONCLUSION

In addition to causing hemodynamic changes, TIPS augments hyperglucagonemia because of increased secretion and decreased clearance of glucagon in the liver, whereas IR deteriorates after the procedure. However, glycemic control does not worsen after TIPS, and the procedure is not associated with a higher risk of diabetes largely because of the simultaneous increase in insulin.

Impact of liver diseases on the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is higher in patients who have liver diseases such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic viral hepatitis, hemochromatosis, alcoholic liver disease and cirrhosis. It is suggested that there is a pathogenic link between the presence of T2DM and the severity of liver injury. However, evidence related to the impact of hepatic inflammation on the development of T2DM has not yet emerged. This article provides an overview of the evidence for an increased prevalence of diabetes in a range of liver diseases, the impact of liver diseases on insulin resistance and β cell dysfunction, and the potential mechanisms whereby coexistent liver diseases exacerbate the development of T2DM.

The dissociation between the diabetes and both Child-Pugh score and in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients due to hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or alcoholic

BACKGROUND

Up to 30% of the cirrhotic patients may clinically be classified as having diabetes. The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate the prevalence of diabetes, its association with the severity of cirrhosis, and subsequent implication on mortality in a broad population of cirrhotic patients in Taiwan.

METHODS

From January 2004 to October 2008, 4,127 cirrhotic patients were reviewed. The latest demographic data were gathered after the latest laboratory measurement in the outpatient or inpatient department. In all, 2,945 patients were included on the basis of the etiology of cirrhosis: hepatitis B, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C co-infection, or alcoholics.

RESULTS

The observed cases of diabetes were significantly higher in cirrhotic patients than general population. Neither the Child-Pugh score (odds ratio = 0.99, p = 0.527) nor the model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD) (odds ratio = 1.00, p = 0.352) was associated with diabetes. The presence of diabetes was dissociated with renal function by means of serum creatinine (β = -0.01, p = 0.604) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (β = -0.02, p = 0.233), or in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 1.08, p = 0.362).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of diabetes was higher in cirrhotic patients in Taiwan. The prevalence of diabetes was dissociated with Child-Pugh or MELD score. The diagnosis of diabetes did not affect the renal function or in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients. Since the clinical outcomes of diabetes were different from cirrhotic patients to general population, it is unclear whether the treatment of diabetes and improved glycemic control will benefit cirrhotic patients.

Insulin sensitivity and body composition in cirrhosis: changes after TIPS

Insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) increases body cell mass (BCM) in patients with liver cirrhosis. The responsible mechanism is unidentified, but may involve changes in insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism. Eleven patients with liver cirrhosis were examined before and 6 mo after a TIPS procedure with bioimpedance analyses, 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests, and two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp with tracer-determined endogenous glucose production. After TIPS, BCM increased by 4.8 kg [confidence interval (CI): 2.7-7.3]. Fasting (f)-insulin increased from 123 +/- 81 to 193 +/- 124 pmol/l (P = 0.03), whereas f-glucose was unchanged (6.0 +/- 0.8 vs. 6.2 +/- 1.0 mmol/l). Glucose and insulin oral glucose tolerance test area under the curve increased by 14% (CI: 7-22%) and 53% (CI: 14-90%), respectively, P < 0.05. The C-peptide-to-insulin ratio decreased by 21% (CI: 8-35%, P = 0.01). Insulin sensitivity based on glucose infusion rate (4.69 +/- 1.82 vs. 4.85 +/- 2.37 mg.kg(-1).min(-1)) and glucose tracer-based rate of disappearance were unchanged (5.01 +/- 1.61 vs. 4.97 +/- 2.13 mg.kg(-1).min(-1)). Despite a further increase in peripheral hyperinsulinemia, f-endogenous glucose production did not change between study days (2.01 +/- 0.42 vs. 2.42 +/- 0.58 mg.kg(-1).min(-1)) and was suppressed equally by insulin (1.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.1 mg.kg(-1).min(-1)). Insulin clearance, growth hormone, cortisol, and glucagon levels were unchanged. BCM improvement did not correlate with the measured variables. After TIPS, BCM rose, despite enhanced hyperinsulinemia and aggravated glucose intolerance, but unchanged peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitivity. This apparent discrepancy may be ascribed to shunt-related decreased insulin exposure to the liver cells. However, the anabolic effect of TIPS seems not to be related to improvements in insulin sensitivity and remains mechanistically unexplained.

Impact of diabetes on the severity of liver disease

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is higher in patients who have liver diseases, such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic viral hepatitis, hemochromatosis, alcoholic liver disease, and cirrhosis. The development of diabetes in patients with cirrhosis is well recognized, but evidence is emerging that the development of chronic liver disease and progression to cirrhosis may occur after the diagnosis of diabetes and that diabetes plays a role in the initiation and progression of liver injury. This article provides an overview of the evidence for an increased prevalence of diabetes in a range of liver diseases; the effect of diabetes on the severity of disease; the potential mechanisms whereby coexistent diabetes exacerbates progression of hepatic fibrosis; and the impact of obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes on clinical outcomes.

Diabetes in chronic liver disease: from old concepts to new evidence

The liver is one of the principal organs involved in glucose metabolism together with skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. A link between diabetes and chronic liver disease (CLD) was first observed in the early half of the last century, but to date several questions remain unsolved. Altered glucose tolerance has been well described in alcoholic CLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic hepatitis C and portal hypertension. Moreover, insulin resistance is assuming an ever-growing importance in CLD; chronic hepatitis C has recently been proposed as a metabolic disease and insulin sensitivity as a predictive factor for liver fibrosis.CLD is also complicated by acquired growth hormone (GH) resistance, characterized by low concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) with respect to normal or elevated GH levels. GH resistance in CLD is determined by several factors, including malnutrition, impaired liver function and reduced expression of hepatic GH receptors. We recently described the possible role of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in blunting the hepatic response to GH in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The role of GH in impaired glucose metabolism is well known, and recent evidence suggests a receptor and/or post-receptor modulation of insulin signalling. Moreover, as in other chronic inflammatory conditions, pro-inflammatory cytokines may directly modulate the signal cascade that follows insulin binding to its receptor in the course of CLD. In this review, the proposed links between impaired glucose tolerance and CLD are analysed, special emphasis being focussed on the most recent findings concerning the interplay of chronic inflammation, GH resistance and insulin resistance.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) augments hyperinsulinemia in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Cirrhosis of the liver is characterized by glucose intolerance and hyperinsulinemia. Both increased insulin secretion and decreased insulin clearance appear to contribute to hyperinsulinemia in cirrhotic patients. A decrease in hepatic insulin extraction rate may be due either to hepatocellular dysfunction or to portosystemic shunting with decreased first-pass insulin clearance.

METHODS

To specifically address the contribution of portosystemic shunting to the pathogenesis of hyperinsulinemia in cirrhotic patients, we analyzed glycemic control and insulin levels in fasting serum in 23 cirrhotic patients before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

RESULTS

Compared to respective values in healthy controls, C-peptide, insulin and proinsulin concentrations at baseline were increased by 340%, 120% and by 100% in cirrhotic patients (all p<0.05). In cirrhotic patients insulin levels before TIPS averaged 104+/-73 pmol/l and increased by more than 50% to 163+/-118 pmol/l after TIPS (p<0.01), whereas levels of C-peptide and proinsulin showed no significant change. Glucose and fructosamin levels also remained unchanged after TIPS.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that TIPS does not impair glycemic control in cirrhotic patients and that an increase in portosystemic shunting augments hyperinsulinemia, most likely by decreasing hepatic insulin clearance.