Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on the progression of diabetic nephropathy

Efficacy and Safety of Low-dose Spironolactone for Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes

CONTEXT

Although adding spironolactone to renin-angiotensin system blockers reduces albuminuria in adults with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, it increases the risk of hyperkalemia.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a lower dose of spironolactone (12.5 mg/d) reduces the risk of hyperkalemia while maintaining its effect on reducing albuminemia.

DESIGN

Multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

This study was conducted from July 2016 to November 2020 in ambulatory care at 3 diabetes medical institutions in Japan.

PATIENTS

We enrolled 130 Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria (≥30 mg/gCre), estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and serum potassium level <5.0 mEq/L.

INTERVENTIONS

The participants were randomly assigned to the spironolactone-administered and control groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline over the 24-week interventional period.

RESULTS

The spironolactone group showed a significant reduction in UACR from baseline (mean decrease, 103.47 ± 340.80 mg/gCre) compared with the control group, which showed an increased UACR (mean increase, 63.93 ± 310.14 mg/gCre; P = .0007, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and t test). Although the spironolactone group had a statistically significant increase in serum potassium levels, none of the participants had a potassium level ≥5.5 mEq/L at 24 weeks. Further, participants with a higher initial serum potassium level tended to have a smaller increase (estimate, -0.37, analysis of covariance).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose spironolactone administration reduced albuminuria without causing hyperkalemia. Spironolactone administration, the oldest known and most cost-effective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, at lower doses should be reconsidered.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism in diabetes reduces albuminuria by preserving the glomerular endothelial glycocalyx

The glomerular endothelial glycocalyx (GEnGlx) forms the first part of the glomerular filtration barrier. Previously, we showed that mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation caused GEnGlx damage and albuminuria. In this study, we investigated whether MR antagonism could limit albuminuria in diabetes and studied the site of action. Streptozotocin-induced diabetic Wistar rats developed albuminuria, increased glomerular albumin permeability (Ps'alb), and increased glomerular matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity with corresponding GEnGlx loss. MR antagonism prevented albuminuria progression, restored Ps'alb, preserved GEnGlx, and reduced MMP activity. Enzymatic degradation of the GEnGlx negated the benefits of MR antagonism, confirming their dependence on GEnGlx integrity. Exposing human glomerular endothelial cells (GEnC) to diabetic conditions in vitro increased MMPs and caused glycocalyx damage. Amelioration of these effects confirmed a direct effect of MR antagonism on GEnC. To confirm relevance to human disease, we used a potentially novel confocal imaging method to show loss of GEnGlx in renal biopsy specimens from patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). In addition, patients with DN randomized to receive an MR antagonist had reduced urinary MMP2 activity and albuminuria compared with placebo and baseline levels. Taken together, our work suggests that MR antagonists reduce MMP activity and thereby preserve GEnGlx, resulting in reduced glomerular permeability and albuminuria in diabetes.

Shen-Qi-Jiang-Tang granule ameliorates diabetic nephropathy via modulating tumor necrosis factor signaling pathway

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Shen-Qi-Jiang-Tang granule (SQJTG), a classic traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prescription, has been widely used in clinical for diabetes, especially type Ⅱ diabetes. Previous anti-diabetic studies stumbled across that SQJTG has a potential kidney protective effect on diabetic nephropathy (DN). However, the protective mechanism of SQJTG on DN still needs to be explored.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The purpose of the present study was to explore the therapeutic effect of SQJTG on DN through both bioinformatics analysis and in vivo experiments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The TCMIP database was used for screening potential compounds and targets of SQJTG, and the GeneCards, OMIM, DrugBank, and TTD databases were used for collecting DN-related genes. Then protein-protein interaction analysis for the common targets of SQJTG and DN was performed by the STRING database. Meanwhile, KEGG and GO were carried out using the Metascape and DAVID databases. In vivo experiments, to testify the potential kidney protective effects of SQJTG, STZ-induced DN mice with different dosages of SQJTG treatment were collected and the renal tissues were detected by H&E, PAS, Masson and TUNEL staining. Immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting were used to assess the proteins' expressions. Flow cytometry and ELISA assay were used to detect the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

RESULTS

Among the 338 compounds ascertained by SQJTG, there were 789 related targets as well. Moreover, 1,221 DN-related targets were predicted and 20 core targets were screened by the PPI analyses. According to GO and KEGG pathway analysis, SQJTG may affect DN via the TNF pathway. For the in vivo experiments, renal histomorphological examinations demonstrated that SQJTG treatment significantly ameliorated STZ-induced kidney damage and had a dosage dependence. Meanwhile, mice with DN were found to have dramatic increases in IL-1, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12, but markedly decreased after administration of SQJTG. In addition, the protein levels of TNF signaling molecules, like p-P65, p-JNK, and p-p38, showed significantly elevated in kidney tissues of DN mice and attenuated after SQJTG treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

SQJTG exerts a kidney protective effect in DN mice via modulating TNF signaling pathways, and it has promising applications for the treatment of DN.

Efficacy and Safety of Eplerenone for Treating Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Background

In recent years, a large amount of clinical evidence and animal experiments have demonstrated the unique advantages of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) for treating chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Aims

Accordingly, the present study aimed to systematically assess the second-generation selective MRAs eplerenone's safety and effectiveness for treating CKD.

Methods

Four databases (PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) correlated with eplerenone for treating CKD up to September 21, 2022. By complying with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature screening, and data extraction were conducted.

Results

A total of 19 randomized controlled articles involving 4501 cases were covered. As suggested from the meta-analysis, significant differences were reported with the 24-h urine protein (MD = -42.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -76.72 to -7.73, P = 0.02), urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) (MD = -23.57, 95% CI = -29.28 to -17.86, P < 0.00001), the systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD = -2.73, 95% CI = -4.86 to -0.59, P = 0.01), and eGFR (MD = -1.56, 95% CI = -2.78 to -0.34, P = 0.01) in the subgroup of eplerenone vs placebo. The subgroups of eplerenone vs placebo (MD = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.18, P < 0.00001) and eplerenone vs thiazide diuretic (MD = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.23, P < 0.00001) showed the significantly increased potassium levels. However, no statistical significance was reported between the eplerenone treatment groups and the control in the effect exerted by serum creatinine (MD=0.03, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.07, P = 0.12) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (MD = 0.11, 95% CI = -0.41 to 0.63, P = 0.68). Furthermore, significant risks of hyperkalemia were reported in the eplerenone group (K⁺ ≥ 5.5 mmol/l, RR = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.35 to 2.13, P=<0.00001; K+≥6.0 mmol/l, RR = 1.61, 95% CIs = 1.06 to 2.44, P = 0.02), respectively.

Conclusions

Eplerenone has beneficial effects on CKD by reducing urinary protein and the systolic blood pressure, but it also elevates the risk of hyperkalemia.

Evolution of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most frequent complications associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is also an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is a nuclear receptor expressed in many tissue types, including kidney and heart. Aberrant and long-term activation of MR by aldosterone in patients with T2DM triggers detrimental effects (eg, inflammation and fibrosis) in these tissues. The suppression of aldosterone at the early stage of T2DM has been a therapeutic strategy for patients with T2DM-associated CKD. Although patients have been treated with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers for decades, RAS blockers alone are not sufficient to prevent CKD progression. Steroidal MR antagonists (MRAs) have been used in combination with RAS blockers; however, undesired adverse effects have restricted their usage, prompting the development of nonsteroidal MRAs with better target specificity and safety profiles. Recently conducted studies, Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIDELIO-DKD) and Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIGARO-DKD), have reported that finerenone, a nonsteroidal MRA, improves both renal and cardiovascular outcomes compared with placebo. In this article, we review the history of MRA development and discuss the possibility of its combination with other treatment options, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and potassium binders for patients with T2DM-associated CKD.

NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis in diabetic nephropathy

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the main cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which is characterized by a series of abnormal changes such as glomerulosclerosis, podocyte loss, renal tubular atrophy and excessive deposition of extracellular matrix. Simultaneously, the occurrence of inflammatory reaction can promote the aggravation of DN-induced kidney injury. The most important processes in the canonical inflammasome pathway are inflammasome activation and membrane pore formation mediated by gasdermin family. Converging studies shows that pyroptosis can occur in renal intrinsic cells and participate in the development of DN, and its activation mechanism involves a variety of signaling pathways. Meanwhile, the activation of the NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain associated protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome can not only lead to the occurrence of inflammatory response, but also induce pyroptosis. In addition, a number of drugs targeting pyroptosis-associated proteins have been shown to have potential for treating DN. Consequently, the pathogenesis of pyroptosis and several possible activation pathways of NLRP3 inflammasome were reviewed, and the potential drugs used to treat pyroptosis in DN were summarized in this review. Although relevant studies are still not thorough and comprehensive, these findings still have certain reference value for the understanding, treatment and prognosis of DN.

Efficacy and safety of finerenone for treatment of diabetic kidney disease: current knowledge and future perspective

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in subjects with diabetes and develops in more than one third of diabetic patients. Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs - eplerenone and spironolactone) reduce mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, in clinical practice the use of steroidal MRAs is limited by the significant risk of hyperkalaemia, especially in patients with impaired renal function. Finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal MRA, shows a higher selectivity and binding affinity for mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) compared to steroidal MRAs and has been shown to reduce chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and cardiovascular mortality in patients with CKD and T2DM.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the current evidence on efficacy and safety of finerenone in the treatment of patients with CKD and T2DM, and discusses its mechanisms of action investigated in preclinical studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacological properties of finerenone and its unique tissue distribution are responsible for a lower risk of hyperkalaemia. Therefore, finerenone represents a valuable therapeutic tool in patients with CKD/diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Recent studies have shown that finerenone delays the progression of CKD and reduce cardiovascular events in patients with DKD, highlighting its safety and efficacy in this high-risk population.

Efficacy and Safety of Non-Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review Incorporating an Indirect Comparisons Meta-Analysis

Background: The non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are promising treatments in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal MRAs (finerenone, apararenone, esaxerenone) and detect the differences among them.

Methods: We searched several databases for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating non-steroidal MRAs versus placebo in patients with CKD and T2D. We performed a conventional meta-analysis separately, and then indirect comparisons for efficacy and safety outcomes were conducted among these included drugs.

Results: Eight RCTs with 14,450 subjects were enrolled. In patients with CKD and T2D, a greater reduction in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) (WMD −0.40, 95% CI −0.48 to −0.32, p < 0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (WMD −2.69, 95% CI −4.47 to −0.91, p = 0.003), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD −4.84, 95% CI −5.96 to −3.72, p < 0.001) and a higher risk of hyperkalemia (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.30, p < 0.001) were observed in the non-steroidal MRAs versus placebo; there is no significant difference in the incidence of serious adverse events between two groups (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.79, p = 0.067). Compared with finerenone, esaxerenone showed no significant difference in UACR reduction (WMD 0.24, 95% CI −0.016 to 0.496, p = 0.869); apararenone and esaxerenone showed greater decreases in SBP (WMD 1.37, 95% CI 0.456 to 2.284, p = 0.010; WMD 3.11, 95% CI 0.544 to 5,676, p = 0.021).

Conclusions: Despite the moderate increased risk of hyperkalemia, use of non-steroidal MRAs could reduce proteinuria and SBP in patients with CKD and T2D. In terms of renoprotection, esaxerenone and finerenone may have similar effects. Esaxerenone and apararenone may have better antihypertensive effects than finerenone. The head-to-head RCTs are still needed to compare the differences of the efficacy and safety in these non-steroidal MRAs.

Efficacy and safety of eplerenone treatment for patients with diabetic nephropathy: A meta-analysis

Diabetic nephropathy (DN), which is correlated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, significantly elevates the morbidity and mortality of patients with diabetes. Recently, the benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in chronic kidney disease (CKD), such as their anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties, have been discovered. Thus, the present meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of eplerenone treatment in patients with DN. Six electronic databases—PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and CBM(Chinese BioMedical Literature Database)—were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials that assessed eplerenone treatment in patients with DN and were published up to July 31, 2021. Eight randomized controlled trials involving 838 patients were included. Between the eplerenone treatment groups and controls, significant differences were identified in 24-h urine protein levels (mean difference [MD], −19.63 [95% CI, −23.73 to −15.53], P < 0.00001), microalbuminuria (MD, -7.75 [95% CI, -9.75 to -5.75], P < 0.00001), urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (MD, -48.29 [95% CI, -64.45 to -32.14], P < 0.00001), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD, -2.49 [95% CI, -4.48 to -0.50], P = 0.01), serum potassium levels (MD, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.24], P < 0.00001), and levels of the renal fibrosis indicator laminin (MD, -8.84 [95% CI, -11.93 to -5.75], P < 0.00001). However, for the effect of estimated glomerular filtration rate (MD, 1.74 [95% CI, -0.87 to 4.35], P = 0.19) and diastolic blood pressure (MD, -0.51 [95% CI, -1.58 to 0.57], P = 0.36), the differences between the two groups were not significant. In addition, no noticeable difference was identified in the adverse events of hyperkalemia and cough between them. These findings suggest that eplerenone exerts beneficial effects on DN by significantly reducing urinary albumin or protein excretion, SBP, and laminin levels, without increasing the incidence of hyperkalemia and other adverse events.

The Time to Reconsider Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocking Strategy: Arrival of Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blockers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The study aims to verify the advantages of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blockers (MRBs) in the management of hypertension and cardiovascular and renal diseases, comparing with conventional MRBs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Based on the unique structures, the nonsteroidal MRBs have higher selectivity for mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) and show no agonist activity for major steroid hormone receptors in contrast to steroidal MRBs. Today, there are two nonsteroidal MRBs, esaxerenone and finerenone, which completed phase 3 clinical trials. Series of clinical trials have shown that both agents achieve similar MR blockade with smaller doses as compared with steroidal MRBs, but have no off-target side effect such as gynecomastia. Esaxerenone has persistent blood pressure-lowering effects in various hypertensive populations, including essential hypertension and those with diabetes and/or chronic kidney disease, while finerenone has demonstrated reduction of the cardiovascular risk rather than blood pressure in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Nonsteroidal MRBs are a more refined agent which contributes to appropriate MR blocking with minimized unpleasant adverse effects.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Prevents the Synergistic Effect of Metabolic Challenge and Chronic Kidney Disease on Renal Fibrosis and Inflammation in Mice

Obesity and/or metabolic diseases are frequently associated with chronic kidney disease and several factors associated with obesity may contribute to proteinuria and extracellular matrix production. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have proven their clinical efficacy in diabetic kidney disease with preclinical data suggesting that they may also be efficient in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease associated to metabolic diseases. In the present study we developed a novel mouse model combining severe nephron reduction and High Fat Diet challenge that led to chronic kidney disease with metabolic alterations. We showed that the Mineralocorticoid Receptor antagonist canrenoate improved metabolic function, reduced albuminuria and prevented the synergistic effect of high fat diet on renal fibrosis and inflammation in chronic kidney disease mice.

Mineralocorticoid pathway in retinal health and diseases

In the retina, the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is expressed in retinal and choroidal vessels and in cells from neural and glial origins. Like in the brain, the major ligand of the MR is cortisol and the MR/glucocorticoid receptor (GR) balance regulates the activation of the MR pathway. Experimental MR pathway activation using either pharmacological agents or transgenic manipulation favors retinal and choroidal pathology. In various models of retinal diseases, such as glaucomatous neuropathy, retinopathy of prematurity, ischemic retinopathies, diabetic retinopathy and choroidal neovascularization, MR antagonism exerts beneficial effects, demonstrating its potential in the treatment of major blinding retinal diseases. But specific formulations are required to optimize the bioavailability of MR antagonists in various compartments of the eye and molecular biomarkers of MR pathway activation remain to be identify in humans to select patients amenable to clinical trials.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Pathway and Its Antagonism in a Model of Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy remains a major cause of vision loss worldwide. Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) pathway activation contributes to diabetic nephropathy, but its role in retinopathy is unknown. In this study, we show that MR is overexpressed in the retina of type 2 diabetic Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats and humans and that cortisol is the MR ligand in human eyes. Lipocalin 2 and galectin 3, two biomarkers of diabetes complications regulated by MR, are increased in GK and human retina. The sustained intraocular delivery of spironolactone, a steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist, decreased the early and late pathogenic features of retinopathy in GK rats, such as retinal inflammation, vascular leakage, and retinal edema, through the upregulation of genes encoding proteins known to intervene in vascular permeability such as Hey1, Vldlr, Pten, Slc7a1, Tjp1, Dlg1, and Sesn2 but did not decrease VEGF. Spironolactone also normalized the distribution of ion and water channels in macroglial cells. These results indicate that MR is activated in GK and human diabetic retina and that local MR antagonism could be a novel therapeutic option for diabetic retinopathy.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists-Use in Chronic Kidney Disease

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) are drugs with a potentially broad spectrum of action. They have been reported to have healing effects in many diseases, such as chronic heart failure, hypertension, or nephrotic syndrome. Numerous studies suggest that mineralocorticoid receptor activation is pathogenic and a progression factor of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, results of studies on the use of MRA in the treatment of CKD are inconclusive. Current guidelines recommend against the use of MRA in patients with advanced CKD. Although, there is growing interest on their use in this population due to treatment benefits. In this review, we summarize studies which were purposed to evaluate the impact of MRA therapy on CKD patients. Despite many benefits of this treatment e.g., reducing cardiovascular mortality or alleviating proteinuria, steroidal MRA (such as spironolactone or eplerenone) have a low safety profile. They often lead to hyperkalemia complications which are dangerous in patients with CKD, and diabetic nephropathy, especially in hemodialysis patients. Studies on recently developed nonsteroidal MRA showed that they have fewer side effects. In our review, we discuss steroidal and nonsteroidal MRA treatment effects on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria, the cardiovascular system, and hyperkalemia in CKD patients. We present new content and recent publications in this field.

New progress in drugs treatment of diabetic kidney disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is not only one of the main complications of diabetes, but also the leading cause of the end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The occurrence and development of DKD have always been a serious clinical problem that leads to the increase of morbidity and mortality and the severe damage to the quality of life of human beings. Controlling blood glucose, blood pressure, blood lipids, and improving lifestyle can help slow the progress of DKD. In recent years, with the extensive research on the pathological mechanism and molecular mechanism of DKD, there are more and more new drugs based on this, such as new hypoglycemic drugs sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors with good efficacy in clinical treatment. Besides, there are some newly developed drugs, including protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors, advanced glycation end product (AGE) inhibitors, aldosterone receptor inhibitors, endothelin receptor (ETR) inhibitors, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) inhibitors, Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitors and so on, which show positive effects in animal or clinical trials and bring hope for the treatment of DKD. In this review, we sort out the progress in the treatment of DKD in recent years, the research status of some emerging drugs, and the potential drugs for the treatment of DKD in the future, hoping to provide some directions for clinical treatment of DKD.

Juglanin protects against high fat diet-induced renal injury by suppressing inflammation and dyslipidemia via regulating NF-κB/HDAC3 signaling

Obesity is an important factor implicated in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Juglanin (Jug) is a natural compound extracted from the crude Polygonumaviculare, showing anti-inflammatory and anti-diabetic effects. However, whether Jug has protective effects against obesity-induced renal injury, little has been investigated. Herein, we attempted to explore the potential of Jug in mediating obesity-induced kidney disease in high fat diet (HFD)-challenged mice. Our results suggested that chronic HFD feeding markedly increased the body weights of mice compared to the ones fed with normal chow diet (NCD), along with significant glucose intolerance and insulin resistance. However, these metabolic disorders induced by HFD were effectively alleviated by Jug treatments in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, HFD-challenged mice showed apparent histopathological changes in renal tissues with significant collagen accumulation, which were attenuated by Jug supplementation. In addition, Jug treatment decreased the expression levels of kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), while increased nephrin and podocin expression levels in kidney of HFD-challenged mice, improving the renal dysfunction. Furthermore, HFD led to lipid deposition in kidney samples of mice by enhancing abnormal lipid metabolism. In addition, HFD promoted the releases of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines, and enhanced the renal inflammation by activating nuclear factor-kappa B/histone deacetylase 3 (NF-κB/HDAC3) signaling. HFD-induced dyslipidemia and inflammation were considerably abrogated by Jug administration in mice. The protective effects of Jug against renal injury were confirmed in palmitate (PA)-stimulated HK2 cells in vitro mainly through suppressing the nuclear translocation of NF-κB and HDAC3, repressing inflammation and lipid accumulation eventually. Hence, Jug could ameliorate HFD-induced kidney injury mainly through blocking the NF-κB/HDAC3 nuclear translocation.

Mineralcorticoid receptor blockers in chronic kidney disease

There are many experimental data supporting the involvement of aldosterone and mineralcorticoid receptor (MR) activation in the genesis and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular damage. Many studies have shown that in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD, blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) system with conversion enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) decreases proteinuria, progression of CKD and mortality, but there is still a significant residual risk of developing these events. In subjects treated with ACEi or ARBs there may be an aldosterone breakthrough whose prevalence in subjects with CKD can reach 50%. Several studies have shown that in CKD, the aldosterone antagonists (spironolactone, eplerenone) added to ACEi or ARBs, reduce proteinuria, but increase the risk of hyperkalemia. Other studies in subjects treated with dialysis suggest a possible beneficial effect of antialdosteronic drugs on CV events and mortality. Newer potassium binders drugs can prevent/decrease hyperkalemia induced by RAAS blockade, and may reduce the high discontinuation rates or dose reduction of RAAS-blockers. The nonsteroidal MR blockers, with more potency and selectivity than the classic ones, reduce proteinuria and have a lower risk of hyperkalemia. Several clinical trials, currently underway, will determine the effect of classic MR blockers on CV events and mortality in subjects with stage 3b CKD and in dialysis patients, and whether in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and CKD, optimally treated and with high risk of CV and kidney events, the addition of finerenone to their treatment produces cardiorenal benefits. Large randomized trials have shown that sodium glucose type 2 cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce mortality and the development and progression of diabetic and nondiabetic CKD. There are pathophysiological arguments, which raise the possibility that the triple combination ACEi or ARBs, SGLT2i and aldosterone antagonist provide additional renal and cardiovascular protection.

[Mineralcorticoid receptor blockers in chronic kidney disease]

There are many experimental data supporting the involvement of aldosterone and mineralcorticoid receptor (MR) activation in the genesis and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular damage. Many studies have shown that in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD, blocking the renin- angiotensin-aldosterone (RAAS) system with conversion enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) decreases proteinuria, progression of CKD and mortality, but there is still a significant residual risk of developing these events. In subjects treated with ACEi or ARBs there may be an aldosterone breakthrough whose prevalence in subjects with CKD can reach 50%. Several studies have shown that in CKD, the aldosterone antagonists (spironolactone, eplerenone) added to ACEi or ARBs, reduce proteinuria, but increase the risk of hyperkalemia. Other studies in subjects treated with dialysis suggest a possible beneficial effect of antialdosteronic drugs on CV events and mortality. Newer potassium binders drugs can prevent / decrease hyperkalemia induced by RAAS blockade, and may reduce the high discontinuation rates or dose reduction of RAAS-blockers. The nonsteroidal MR blockers, with more potency and selectivity than the classic ones, reduce proteinuria and have a lower risk of hyperkalemia. Several clinical trials, currently underway, will determine the effect of classic MR blockers on CV events and mortality in subjects with stage 3b CKD and in dialysis patients, and whether in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and CKD, optimally treated and with high risk of CV and kidney events, the addition of finerenone to their treatment produces cardiorenal benefits. Large randomized trials have shown that sodium glucose type 2 cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce mortality and the development and progression of diabetic and nondiabetic CKD. There are pathophysiological arguments, which raise the possibility that the triple combination ACEi or ARBs, SGLT2i and aldosterone antagonist provide additional renal and cardiovascular protection.

Aldosterone antagonists in addition to renin angiotensin system antagonists for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) is used to reduce proteinuria and retard the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, resolution of proteinuria may be incomplete with these therapies and the addition of an aldosterone antagonist may be added to further prevent progression of CKD. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009 and updated in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of aldosterone antagonists (selective (eplerenone), non-selective (spironolactone or canrenone), or non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists (finerenone)) in adults who have CKD with proteinuria (nephrotic and non-nephrotic range) on: patient-centred endpoints including kidney failure (previously know as end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)), major cardiovascular events, and death (any cause); kidney function (proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and doubling of serum creatinine); blood pressure; and adverse events (including hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury, and gynaecomastia).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 13 January 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared aldosterone antagonists in combination with ACEi or ARB (or both) to other anti-hypertensive strategies or placebo in participants with proteinuric CKD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Data were summarised using random effects meta-analysis. We expressed summary treatment estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean difference (SMD) when different scales were used together with their 95% confidence interval (CI). Risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane tool. Evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-four studies (5745 participants) were included. Risk of bias in the evaluated methodological domains were unclear or high risk in most studies. Adequate random sequence generation was present in 12 studies, allocation concealment in five studies, blinding of participant and investigators in 18 studies, blinding of outcome assessment in 15 studies, and complete outcome reporting in 24 studies. All studies comparing aldosterone antagonists to placebo or standard care were used in addition to an ACEi or ARB (or both). None of the studies were powered to detect differences in patient-level outcomes including kidney failure, major cardiovascular events or death. Aldosterone antagonists had uncertain effects on kidney failure (2 studies, 84 participants: RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.33 to 27.65, I² = 0%; very low certainty evidence), death (3 studies, 421 participants: RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.10 to 3.50, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), and cardiovascular events (3 studies, 1067 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.56; I² = 42%; low certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Aldosterone antagonists may reduce protein excretion (14 studies, 1193 participants: SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.20, I² = 82%; very low certainty evidence), eGFR (13 studies, 1165 participants, MD -3.00 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI -5.51 to -0.49, I² = 0%, low certainty evidence) and systolic blood pressure (14 studies, 911 participants: MD -4.98 mmHg, 95% CI -8.22 to -1.75, I² = 87%; very low certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Aldosterone antagonists probably increase the risk of hyperkalaemia (17 studies, 3001 participants: RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.22, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), acute kidney injury (5 studies, 1446 participants: RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.97, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), and gynaecomastia (4 studies, 281 participants: RR 5.14, 95% CI 1.14 to 23.23, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Non-selective aldosterone antagonists plus ACEi or ARB had uncertain effects on protein excretion (2 studies, 139 participants: SMD -1.59, 95% CI -3.80 to 0.62, I² = 93%; very low certainty evidence) but may increase serum potassium (2 studies, 121 participants: MD 0.31 mEq/L, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.45, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) compared to diuretics plus ACEi or ARB. Selective aldosterone antagonists may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia (2 studies, 500 participants: RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.95, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) compared ACEi or ARB (or both). There were insufficient studies to perform meta-analyses for the comparison between non-selective aldosterone antagonists and calcium channel blockers, selective aldosterone antagonists plus ACEi or ARB (or both) and nitrate plus ACEi or ARB (or both), and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists and selective aldosterone antagonists.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of aldosterone antagonists when added to ACEi or ARB (or both) on the risks of death, major cardiovascular events, and kidney failure in people with proteinuric CKD are uncertain. Aldosterone antagonists may reduce proteinuria, eGFR, and systolic blood pressure in adults who have mild to moderate CKD but may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury and gynaecomastia when added to ACEi and/or ARB.

Blood pressure reduction and RAAS inhibition in diabetic kidney disease: therapeutic potentials and limitations

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) affects approximately one-third of patients with diabetes and taking into consideration the high cardiovascular risk burden associated to this condition a multifactorial therapeutic approach is traditionally recommended, in which glucose and blood pressure control play a central role. The inhibition of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone RAAS system represent traditionally the cornerstone of DKD. Clinical outcome trials have demonstrated clinical significant benefit in slowing nephropathy progression mainly in the presence of albuminuria. Thus, international guidelines mandate their use in such patients. Given the central role of RAAS activity in the pathogenesis and progression of renal and cardiovascular damage, a more profound inhibition of the system by the use of multiple agents has been proposed in the past, especially in the presence of proteinuria, however clinical trials have failed to confirm the usefulness of this therapeutic approach. Furthermore, whether strict blood pressure control and pharmacologic RAAS inhibition entails a favorable renal outcome in non-albuminuric patients is at present unclear. This aspect is becoming an important issue in the management of DKD since nonalbuminuric DKD is currently the prevailing presenting phenotype. For these reasons it would be advisable that blood pressure management should be tailored in each subject on the basis of the renal phenotype as well as related comorbidities. This article reviews the current literature and discusses potentials and limitation of targeting the RAAS in order to provide the greatest renal protection in DKD.

The Ascent of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Diabetic Nephropathy

Diabetic nephropathy is defined as a decline in the renal function and an increase in the amount of albuminuria (>300 mg/day). The interruption of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) by well-established therapies such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or diuretics has been beneficial in reducing the progression of renal diseases; however, there is an increase in the levels of aldosterone due to the aldosterone escape phenomenon. Newer and novel approaches to counteract this aldosterone breakthrough while accentuating the anti-hypertensive and anti-proteinuric effects of these agents would be ideal and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists fit in this slot perfectly. This review attempted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for diabetic nephropathy. Presently mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as spironolactone, eplerenone and finerenone are being investigated as both monotherapies and as additional therapies. Clinical studies have shown that these drugs have been effective in the reduction of blood pressure, urinary-albumin-excretion and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The commonly observed adverse effects are hyperkalemia, gynaecomastia and vaginal bleeding, that are bothersome with spironolactone seems to be avoidable if these patients are switched to non-steroidal and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as finerenone and eplerenone. Most of the studies have only evaluated the short-term effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on diabetic nephropathy. Hard outcomes such as cardiovascular events, creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, mortality and the need for temporary or permanent dialysis need to be studied with these molecules.

Synergistic reduction in albuminuria in type 2 diabetic mice by esaxerenone (CS-3150), a novel nonsteroidal selective mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, combined with an angiotensin II receptor blocker

Esaxerenone is a novel selective mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) blocker that was recently approved in Japan to treat hypertension. In phase II and III studies, esaxerenone plus a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor markedly reduced the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy. To evaluate a direct renoprotective effect by MR blockade independent of an antihypertensive effect in the context of diabetic nephropathy, esaxerenone (3 mg/kg), olmesartan (an angiotensin II receptor blocker; 1 mg/kg), or both were orally administered to KK-Ay mice, a type 2 diabetes model, once daily for 56 days. Urinary albumin (Ualb), UACR, and markers, such as podocalyxin, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), were measured, along with systolic blood pressure (SBP), fasting blood glucose, and serum K⁺ levels. Prior to the initiation of drug administration, KK-Ay mice showed higher blood glucose, insulin, Ualb excretion, and UACR levels than C57BL/6 J mice, a nondiabetic control, indicating the development of diabetic renal injury. Combined treatment with esaxerenone and olmesartan significantly reduced the change in UACR from baseline compared with the change associated with vehicle at week 8 (−1.750 vs. 0.339 g/gCre; P < 0.002) and significantly inhibited the change in Ualb from baseline compared with the change associated with vehicle at week 8 (P < 0.002). The combination treatment also reduced urinary excretion of podocalyxin and MCP-1, but did not influence 8-OHdG excretion, SBP, blood glucose, or serum K⁺ levels. Overall, esaxerenone plus olmesartan treatment ameliorated diabetic nephropathy in KK-Ay mice without affecting SBP, suggesting that the renoprotective effects of esaxerenone could be exerted independently of its antihypertensive effect.

Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in proteinuric kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Reductions in albuminuria of more than 30% are considered a strong marker of delay of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. Single renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade represents the cornerstone of CKD treatment. However, as CKD progression still occurs, other nephroprotective options were explored; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) were tested with generally positive results.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of MRAs on albuminuria/proteinuria, and adverse events, such as change in renal function and hyperkalemia incidence. A detailed search in electronic databases, clinical trial registries and grey literature was performed to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which administration of an MRA alone or on-top of ACEi/ARB was compared with placebo or active treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 45 initially identified reports, 31, with 2767 participants, were included in analysis of the primary outcome. The use of MRAs (alone or on top of RAS blockade) compared with placebo decreased urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) by -24.55% (95% CI -29.57 to -19.53%), urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) by -53.93% (95% CI -79% to -28.86%) and 24 h albumin excretion by -32.47% (95% CI -41.1 to -23.85%). MRAs also reduced UACR by -22.48% (95% CI -24.51 to -20.44%) compared with calcium-channel-blockers (CCBs), whereas no differences were found compared with a second ACEi/ARB or nonpotassium-sparing diuretics. Addition of an MRA was associated with change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of -2.38 ml/min per 1.73 m (95% CI -3.51 to -1.25), rise in potassium by 0.22 mEq/l (95% CI 0.16-0.28 mEq/l) and a 2.6-fold increase in hyperkalemia risk (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.69-4.08) compared with placebo/active control.

CONCLUSION

Use of MRAs alone or on top of RAS blockade confers important antiproteinuric effects in patients with CKD, with a slight increase in mean potassium levels.

Disease characteristics and outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes: a matched cohort study of spironolactone users and non-users

Background

Limited evidence has indicated that addition of a steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) to the standard of care reduces proteinuria in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD); however, there are limited data regarding real-world MRA use in these patients. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of spironolactone users and non-users with DKD, and to explore their clinical outcomes.

Methods

This was a non-interventional, retrospective cohort study using demographic and clinical data from a US claims database (PharMetrics Plus) and the Experian consumer data asset during 2006–2015. Baseline characteristics (e.g. comorbidities) and post-inclusion clinical outcomes were described in matched cohorts of spironolactone users and non-users (n = 5465 per group).

Results

Although matching aligned key demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohorts, a significantly greater proportion of spironolactone users than non-users had oedema, proteinuria, and cardiovascular disease at baseline (P < 0.0001). During the post-inclusion period, disease progression and clinical events of interest such as acute kidney injury were more commonly observed in spironolactone users than non-users. Users also had higher healthcare resource utilization and costs than non-users; however, these differences diminished at later stages of disease.

Conclusions

In this study, spironolactone users had a greater comorbidity burden at baseline than matched non-users, suggesting that the presence of certain comorbidities may be contributing factors in the decision to prescribe spironolactone. High healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients at later stages of disease, irrespective of spironolactone use, highlight the need for new therapies for DKD.

Mechanisms of Herbal Nephroprotection in diabetes mellitus

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a leading cause of kidney morbidity. Despite the multilayered complexity of the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of DN, the conventional treatment is limited to just a few drug classes fraught with the risk of adverse events, including the progression of renal dysfunction. Phytoceuticals offer a promising alternative as they act on the many-sidedness of DN pathophysiology, multitargeting its intricacies. This paper offers a review of the mechanisms underlying the protective action of these phytoagents, including boosting the antioxidant capabilities, suppression of inflammation, averting the proliferative and sclerosing/fibrosing events. The pathogenesis of DN is viewed as a continuum going from the original offense, high glucose, through the noxious products it generates (advanced glycation end-products, products of oxidative and nitrosative stress) and the signaling chains consequently brought into action, to the harmful mediators of inflammation, sclerosis, and proliferation that eventually lead to DN, despite the countervailing attempts of the protective mechanisms. Special attention was given to the various pathways involved, pointing out the ability of the phytoagents to hinder the deleterious ones (especially those leading to, driven by, or associated with TGF-β activation, SREBP, Smad, MAPK, PKC, NF-κB, NLRP3 inflammasome, and caspase), to promote the protective ones (PPAR-α, PPAR-γ, EP4/Gs/AC/cAMP, Nrf2, AMPK, and SIRT1), and to favorably modulate those with potentially dual effect (PI3K/Akt). Many phytomedicines have emerged as potentially useful out of in vitro and in vivo studies, but the scarcity of human trials seriously undermines their usage in the current clinical practice-an issue that stringently needs to be addressed.

A Prospective Single-Blind Randomized Trial of Ramipril, Eplerenone and Their Combination in Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) combined with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were found to have a beneficial effect on patients with chronic kidney disease. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of our clinical trial was to compare the antialbuminuric effect of ramipril monotherapy, eplerenone monotherapy and eplerenone/ramipril combination therapy in patients with stage 1 hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a single-blind, randomized clinical trial, 75 hypertensive patients (stage 1 hypertension) with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to 1 of 3 groups: ramipril 10 mg monotherapy (25 patients), eplerenone 50 mg monotherapy (25 patients) and combination therapy of eplerenone/ramipril 50/10 mg (25 patients) through a randomized clinical trial. Blood pressure, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum K level were measured before randomization and after 24 weeks. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ramipril and eplerenone monotherapy showed a significant lowering of UACR compared with baseline levels (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001). The eplerenone/ramipril combination group showed a more significant reduction of UACR compared with the ramipril and eplerenone monotherapy groups (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). There was a more significant lowering of systolic blood pressure in the combination group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). A nonsignificant change of serum potassium level, serum creatinine and eGFR was found among the 3 groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Addition of eplerenone to ACEI shows an added antialbuminuric effect without significant change of the serum K level compared with eplerenone or ACEI.

Efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists with ACEI/ARB treatment for diabetic nephropathy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To explore the efficacy and safety of adding mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) to the treatment in diabetic nephropathy (DN) with ACEI/ARB.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for randomised controlled trials up to November 1st 2018 that evaluated the effects of MRAs with ACEI/ARB treatment.

RESULTS

The combination treatment of MRAs and ACEI/ARB further reduced urinary protein/albumin excretion compared with ACEI/ARB monotherapy (mean difference [MD], -44.17 [95% CIs, -61.73 to -26.61], P < .00001). Although no statistically significant changes in glomerular filtration rate were observed, the combination group significantly increased serum/plasma creatinine (MD, 7.40 [95% CIs, 4.69-10.11], P < .00001). Subgroup analysis based on generations of MRAs suggested a lower relative risk of hyperkalaemia with finerenone (relative risk, 2.22 [95% CIs, 0.13-38.13], P = .58) than eplerenone (relative risk, 2.81 [95% CIs, 1.03-7.69], P = .04) or spironolactone (relative risk, 4.58 [95% CIs, 2.60-8.08], P < .00001).

CONCLUSION

MRAs can significantly reduce proteinuria and increase blood creatinine in DN patients under blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. The combination treatment of finerenone and ACEI/ARB runs a lower risk of hyperkalaemia than eplerenone or spironolactone.

Efficacy and safety of dosage-escalation of low-dosage esaxerenone added to a RAS inhibitor in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria: a single-arm, open-label study

The stimulation of mineralocorticoid receptors is linked to the development of hypertension and cardiovascular or renal damage in patients with diabetes, and the blockade of these receptors may be an effective treatment option. This open-label study with a 12-week treatment period assessed the antihypertensive (primary) and antialbuminuric (secondary) efficacy and safety of esaxerenone as an add-on therapy to a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria (urinary albumin-creatinine ratio 30 to <1000 mg/g•Cr). Esaxerenone was administered over 12 weeks at a starting dosage of 1.25 mg/day, which was gradually titrated to 2.5 mg/day and 5 mg/day at weeks 4, 6, or 8 according to the dosage-escalation criteria based on serum K⁺ levels, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and the likelihood/occurrence of hypotension. Of the 51 patients enrolled, 44 (86.3%) reached an esaxerenone dosage of 2.5 or 5 mg/day. The changes from the baseline in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were −13.7 mmHg (p < 0.05) and −6.2 mmHg (p < 0.05), respectively. Significant decreases in blood pressure occurred regardless of age, baseline systolic blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The urinary albumin-creatinine ratio decreased by 32.4% from the baseline (p < 0.05). Two consecutive serum K⁺ measurements ≥ 5.5 mEq/L occurred in one patient but resolved after dosage reduction. Esaxerenone showed antihypertensive and antialbuminuric effects and a low risk of hyperkalemia with dosage titration from 1.25 mg in Japanese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria receiving a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor.

Patient characteristics and initiation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease in routine clinical practice in the US: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are recommended for the treatment of heart failure (HF) and resistant hypertension, both common comorbidities in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study explored the clinical characteristics of, and steroidal MRA use in, patients with CKD with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and/or HF.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used PharMetrics Plus US claims database data (October 2009–September 2014) to identify two patient populations aged ≥18 years with a first diagnosis of CKD or a first prescription for steroidal MRAs. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, clinical events, medication use and healthcare costs were reported by population and stratified by diagnosis: CKD, CKD + T2D (DKD), CKD + HF and DKD + HF. The CKD population cohorts were further stratified by steroidal MRA treatment duration (no MRAs, < 6 and ≥ 6 months’ treatment).

Results

The CKD and MRA populations comprised 229,004 patients and 5899 patients, respectively. Median age and the proportion of men were similar in the CKD and MRA populations across disease cohorts. Disease burden increased across the cohorts as comorbidity and clinical event incidences increased. Hypertension was reported in 70–92% of patients, irrespective of disease cohort or population. In the CKD population, MRA use was low but increased with disease burden: CKD, 1.2%; DKD, 1.8%; CKD + HF, 6.5%; and DKD + HF, 6.6%. Moreover, MRA users presented with higher rates of comorbidities and medication use, and higher healthcare costs than MRA non-users. Longer MRA treatment duration was associated with reduced polypharmacy, lower event rates and lower healthcare costs. In the MRA population, patients almost exclusively received spironolactone (≥ 96%; median dose across all groups 25 mg; one-year persistence, ≤ 43%); up to 16% of patients had end-stage renal disease at baseline despite steroidal MRAs being contraindicated.

Conclusions

Steroidal MRA use was low across all cohorts, but increased with disease severity, driven particularly by HF. Steroidal MRAs were used in patients with advanced CKD, despite being contraindicated. The persistent morbidity and clinical event rates in CKD and DKD patients highlight the disease burden and the need for treatments that effectively target both cardio-vascular and kidney-related events.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1348-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Boosting the Limited Use of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists Through New Agents for Hyperkalemia

Background:

Hyperkalemia is an important clinical problem that is associated with significant lifethreatening complications. Several conditions are associated with increased risk for hyperkalemia such as chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors.

Objective:

The purpose of this review is to present and critically discuss treatment options for the management of hyperkalemia.

Method:

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify studies assessing the drug-induced management of hyperkalemia.

Results:

The management of chronic hyperkalemia seems to be challenging and includes a variety of traditional interventions, such as restriction in the intake of the dietary potassium, loop diuretics or sodium polystyrene sulfonate. In the last few years, several new agents have emerged as promising options to reduce potassium levels in hyperkalemic patients. Patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate 9 (ZS-9) have been examined in hyperkalemic patients and were found to be efficient and safe. Importantly, the efficacy of these novel drugs might allow the continuation of the use of RAAS inhibitors, morbidity- and mortality-wise beneficial class of drugs in the setting of chronic kidney disease and heart failure.

Conclusion:

Data support that the recently emerged patiromer and ZS-9 offer significant hyperkalemia-related benefits. Larger trials are needed to unveil the impact of these drugs in other patients’ subpopulations, as well.

Aldosterone Antagonists Reduce the Risk of Cardiovascular Mortality in Dialysis Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Purpose. Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death in dialysis patients. Although aldosterone antagonists were considered a treatment for severe heart failure patients to reduce cardiac mortality, whether treating patients undergoing maintenance dialysis with aldosterone antagonists could reduce the risk of cardiocerebrovascular (CCV) remains unclear. We aim to systematically assess the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of aldosterone antagonists to conventional therapy in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis. Materials and Methods. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for relevant articles. The primary endpoint of interest was CCV mortality. The secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software version 5.3. Results. This analysis included 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1172 total chronic dialysis patients. The use of aldosterone antagonists in the dialysis population resulted in a marked reduction in CCV mortality (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.65, P=0.0002) and all-cause mortality (RR0.46, 95%CI 0.32-0.66, P<0.0001). The LVEF was improved by treatment with aldosterone antagonists (WMD 6.35%, P<0.00001). Moreover, aldosterone antagonists decreased the LVMI (WMD -8.69 g/m², P=0.0006), whereas aldosterone antagonists increased the occurrence of hyperkalemia (RR1.70, 95%CI 1-2.88, P=0.05) and gynecomastia (RR 8.01, 95% CI 2.44- 26.27, P=0.0006). Conclusions. Addition of aldosterone antagonists to conventional treatment in chronic dialysis patients may reduce CCV mortality, improve cardiac function, and simultaneously decrease LVMI.

Mineralocorticoid Antagonism and Diabetic Kidney Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased risk of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), cardiovascular disease, and heart failure, in part through activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Although recent cardiovascular outcome trials have identified newer therapeutic agents such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-receptor agonists that reduce the risk of these complications, patients still exhibit residual cardiorenal morbidity and mortality. Accordingly, the identification of pharmacological agents that attenuate micro- and macrovascular complications related to T2D is a major priority. Our aim was to review evidence for the role of novel mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) that are being developed as adjunctive therapies to reduce the risk of DKD and cardiovascular disease in the setting of T2D.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dual RAAS blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor plus angiotensin receptor blockade (ARB) or ARB plus renin inhibition increases serious adverse events such as acute kidney injury and stroke. Due to the potential for these serious side effects, more recent interest has focused on newer, more selective non-steroidal MRAs such as finerenone as cardiorenal protective therapies. Finerenone reduces albuminuria in the setting of DKD in patients with T2D and has a lower risk of hyperkalemia compared to currently available MRAs. Novel MRAs such as finerenone have the potential to reduce the risk of DKD progression in patients with T2D. The impact of finerenone on hard, long-term cardiorenal endpoints is being examined in the FIGARO and FIDELIO trials in patients with DKD.

Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on the progression of diabetic nephropathy

Aims/Introduction

We aimed to evaluate the potential benefits and adverse effects of adding a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) to angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), as standard treatment in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Materials and Methods

We scanned the Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for human clinical trials published in English until June 2016, evaluating renal outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Results

A total of 18 randomized controlled trials involving 1,786 patients were included. Compared with ACEI/ARB alone, co‐administration of MRA and ACEI/ARB significantly reduced urinary albumin excretion and the urinary albumin–creatinine ratio (mean difference −69.38, 95% confidence intervals −103.53 to −35.22, P < 0.0001; mean difference −215.74, 95% confidence intervals −409.22 to −22.26, P = 0.03, respectively). A decrease of blood pressure was also found in the co‐administration of MRA and ACEI/ARB groups. However, we did not observe any improvement in the glomerular filtration rate. There was a significant increase in the risk of hyperkalemia on the addition of MRA to ACEI/ARB treatment (relative risk 3.74, 95% confidence intervals 2.30–6.09, P < 0.00001).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that co‐administration of MRA and ACEI/ARB has beneficial effects on renal outcomes with increasing the incidence of hyperkalemia.