The stability of the agonist beta2-adrenergic receptor-Gs complex: evidence for agonist-specific states

Arrestin-dependent internalization of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors

The internalization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is an important mechanism regulating the signal strength and limiting the opportunity of receptor activation. Based on the importance of GPCRs, the detailed knowledge about the regulation of signal transduction is crucial. Here, current knowledge about the agonist-induced, arrestin-dependent internalization process of rhodopsin-like GPCRs is reviewed. Arrestins are conserved molecules that act as key players within the internalization process of many GPCRs. Based on highly conserved structural characteristics within the rhodopsin-like GPCRs, the identification of arrestin interaction sites in model systems can be compared and used for the investigation of internalization processes of other receptors. The increasing understanding of this essential regulation mechanism of receptors can be used for drug development targeting rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Here, we focus on the neuropeptide Y receptor family, as these receptors transmit various physiological processes such as food intake, energy homeostasis, and regulation of emotional behavior, and are further involved in pathophysiological processes like cancer, obesity and mood disorders. Hence, this receptor family represents an interesting target for the development of novel therapeutics requiring the understanding of the regulatory mechanisms influencing receptor mediated signaling.

Thermodynamics of the interaction between oxytocin and its myometrial receptor in sheep: a stepwise binding mechanism

Entropy (ΔS), enthalpy (ΔH) and heat capacity (ΔCp) changes attending the oxytocin interaction with its two binding sites on myometrial cell membranes in sheep were derived from the temperature dependence of Kd values. The high affinity oxytocin site (Kd on the order of 10(-9)mol l(-1), 25 °C), ascribed to the oxytocin receptor (OXTR), is entropy-driven in the temperature range 0-37 °C. Enthalpy component prevails as a driving force in the binding to the low affinity site (Kd ≈ 10(-7)) within the higher temperature range. ΔCp values in both cases do not differ significantly from zero but become highly relevant in the presence of a GTP analog (10(-4)M GTP-γS). Under these conditions, ΔCp in the low site interaction becomes negative and ΔS is shifted toward negative values (enthalpy drift); ΔCp of the high affinity site rises to a high positive value and the interaction is even more strongly entropy driven. Atosiban, a competitive antagonist of oxytocin at OXTR displays a single significant binding site on myometrial cells (Kd about 10(-7)mol l(-1)). Thermodynamic profiles of atosiban and the low affinity oxytocin site show conspicuous similarities, indicating that the inhibitor is bound to the low affinity site, and not, with a lower affinity, to the putative receptor protein. It is suggested that the interaction of oxytocin with its responding system on myometrial membranes follows in two distinct steps that are likely to be associated with several independent binding domains in the GPCR receptor.

VENNTURE--a novel Venn diagram investigational tool for multiple pharmacological dataset analysis

As pharmacological data sets become increasingly large and complex, new visual analysis and filtering programs are needed to aid their appreciation. One of the most commonly used methods for visualizing biological data is the Venn diagram. Currently used Venn analysis software often presents multiple problems to biological scientists, in that only a limited number of simultaneous data sets can be analyzed. An improved appreciation of the connectivity between multiple, highly-complex datasets is crucial for the next generation of data analysis of genomic and proteomic data streams. We describe the development of VENNTURE, a program that facilitates visualization of up to six datasets in a user-friendly manner. This program includes versatile output features, where grouped data points can be easily exported into a spreadsheet. To demonstrate its unique experimental utility we applied VENNTURE to a highly complex parallel paradigm, i.e. comparison of multiple G protein-coupled receptor drug dose phosphoproteomic data, in multiple cellular physiological contexts. VENNTURE was able to reliably and simply dissect six complex data sets into easily identifiable groups for straightforward analysis and data output. Applied to complex pharmacological datasets, VENNTURE's improved features and ease of analysis are much improved over currently available Venn diagram programs. VENNTURE enabled the delineation of highly complex patterns of dose-dependent G protein-coupled receptor activity and its dependence on physiological cellular contexts. This study highlights the potential for such a program in fields such as pharmacology, genomics, and bioinformatics.

Allosteric theory: taking therapeutic advantage of the malleable nature of GPCRs

The description of the allosteric modification of receptors to affect changes in their function requires a model that considers the effects of the modulator on both agonist affinity and efficacy. A model is presented which describes changes in affinity in terms of the constant α (ratio of affinity in the presence vs the absence of modulator) and also the constant ξ (ratio of intrinsic efficacy of the agonist in the presence vs absence of modulator). This allows independent effects of both affinity and efficacy and allows the modeling of any change in the dose-response curve to an agonist after treatment with modulator. Examples are given where this type of model can predict effects of modulators that reduce efficacy but actually increase affinity of agonist (i.e. ifenprodil) and also of modulators that block the action of some agonists (the CXCR4 agonist SDF-1α by the antagonist AMD3100) but not others for the same receptor (SDF-1α peptide fragments RSVM and ASLW).

‘All models are wrong…but some are useful…’

anonymous environmental scientist

Heptahelical terpsichory. Who calls the tune?

The discovery that arrestins can function as ligand-regulated signaling scaffolds has revealed a previously unappreciated level of complexity in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signal transduction. Because arrestin-bound GPCRs are uncoupled from G proteins, arrestin binding can be viewed as switching receptors between two temporally and spatially distinct signaling modes. Recent work has established two factors that underscore this duality of GPCR signaling and suggest it may ultimately have therapeutic significance. The first is that signaling by receptor-arrestin "signalsomes" does not require heterotrimeric G protein activation. The second is that arrestin-dependent signals can be initiated by pathway-specific "biased agonists," creating the potential for drugs that selectively modulate different aspects of GPCR function. Currently, however, little is known about the physiological relevance of G protein-independent signals at the cellular or whole animal levels, and additional work is needed to determine whether arrestin pathway-selective drugs will find clinical application.

Peptide design and structural characterization of a GPCR loop mimetic

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) control fundamental aspects of human physiology and behaviors. Knowledge of their structures, especially for the loop regions, is limited and has principally been obtained from homology models, mutagenesis data, low resolution structural studies, and high resolution studies of peptide models of receptor segments. We developed an alternate methodology for structurally characterizing GPCR loops, using the human S1P(4) first extracellular loop (E1) as a model system. This methodology uses computational peptide designs based on transmembrane domain (TM) model structures in combination with CD and NMR spectroscopy. The characterized peptides contain segments that mimic the self-assembling extracellular ends of TM 2 and TM 3 separated by E1, including residues R3.28(121) and E3.29(122) that are required for sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) binding and receptor activation in the S1P(4) receptor. The S1P(4) loop mimetic peptide interacted specifically with an S1P headgroup analog, O-phosphoethanolamine (PEA), as evidenced by PEA-induced perturbation of disulfide cross-linked coiled-coil first extracellular loop mimetic (CCE1a) (1)H and (15)N backbone amide chemical shifts. CCE1a was capable of weakly binding PEA near biologically relevant residues R29 and E30, which correspond to R3.28 and E3.29 in the full-length S1P(4) receptor, confirming that it has adopted a biologically relevant conformation. We propose that the combination of coiled-coil TM replacement and conformational stabilization with an interhelical disulfide bond is a general design strategy that promotes native-like structure for loops derived from GPCRs.

Some mechanistic insights into GPCR activation from detergent-solubilized ternary complexes on beads

The binding of full and partial agonist ligands (L) to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) initiates the formation of ternary complexes with G proteins [ligand-receptor-G protein (LRG) complexes]. Cyclic ternary complex models are required to account for the thermodynamically plausible complexes. It has recently become possible to assemble solubilized formyl peptide receptor (FPR) and beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) ternary complexes for flow cytometric bead-based assays. In these systems, soluble ternary complex formation of the receptors with G proteins allows direct quantitative measurements which can be analyzed in terms of three-dimensional concentrations (molarity). In contrast to the difficulty of analyzing comparable measurements in two-dimensional membrane systems, the output of these flow cytometric experiments can be analyzed via ternary complex simulations in which all of the parameters can be estimated. An outcome from such analysis yielded lower affinity for soluble ternary complex assembly by partial agonists compared with full agonists for the beta(2)AR. In the four-sided ternary complex model, this behavior is consistent with distinct ligand-induced conformational states for full and partial agonists. Rapid mix flow cytometry is used to analyze the subsecond dynamics of guanine nucleotide-mediated ternary complex disassembly. The modular breakup of ternary complex components is highlighted by the finding that the fastest step involves the departure of the ligand-activated GPCR from the intact G protein heterotrimer. The data also show that, under these experimental conditions, G protein subunit dissociation does not occur within the time frame relevant to signaling. The data and concepts are discussed in the context of a review of current literature on signaling mechanism based on structural and spectroscopic (FRET) studies of ternary complex components.

Salmeterol stimulation dissociates beta2-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation and internalization

Salmeterol is a long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) agonist commonly used in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It differs from other beta-agonists in that it has a very low intrinisic efficacy, especially when compared with the other available long-acting beta-agonist, formoterol. Receptor desensitization and down-regulation has been described with the chronic use of beta-agonists. This effect may not be the same with all beta-agonists and may be related to their stabilization of altered receptor states. The extreme hydrophobicity and high-affinity quasi-irreversible binding of salmeterol have rendered studies examining the mechanisms by which it mediates receptor desensitization, down-regulation, and internalization difficult. We determined the capacity of salmeterol to induce beta(2)AR endocytosis, G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-site phosphorylation, degradation, and beta-arrestin2 translocation in HEK293 cells as compared with other agonists of varying intrinsic efficacies. Despite stimulating GRK-mediated phosphorylation of Ser355,356 after 30 min and 18 h to an extent similar to that observed with agonists of high intrinsic efficacy, such as epinephrine and formoterol, salmeterol did not induce significant beta(2)AR internalization or degradation and was incapable of stimulating the translocation of enhanced green fluorescent protein-beta-arrestin2 chimera (EGFP-beta-arrestin2) to the cell surface. Salmeterol-induced receptor endocytosis was rescued, at least in part, by the overexpression of EGFP-beta-arrestin2. Our data indicate that salmeterol binding induces an active receptor state that is unable to recruit beta-arrestin or undergo significant endocytosis or degradation despite stimulating considerable GRK-site phosphorylation. Defects in these components of salmeterol-induced receptor desensitization may be important determinants of its sustained bronchodilation with chronic use.

G protein-coupled receptors: a count of 1001 conformations

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were initially regarded to adopt an inactive and an active conformation and to activate a single type of G protein. Studies with recombinant cell systems have led to a more complex picture. First, GPCRs can activate distinct G protein species. Second, GPCR multistate models have been invoked to explain their complex behaviour in the presence of agonists, antagonists and other binding partners. The occurrence of intermediate receptor conformational states during GPCR activation and antagonist binding is suggested by fluorescence measurements and studies with constitutively active receptor mutants and insurmountable antagonists. Different agonists may trigger distinct effector pathways through a single receptor by dictating its preference for certain G proteins (i.e. 'agonist trafficking'). Structural modification and exogenous and endogenous (e.g. other cellular proteins, lipids) allosteric modulators also affect ligand-GPCR interaction and receptor activation. These new developments in GPCR research could lead to the development of more selective therapeutic drugs.

Multiple signaling states of G-protein-coupled receptors

Studies have been amassed in the past several years indicating that an agonist can conform a receptor into an activation state that is dependent upon an intrinsic property of the agonist usually based upon its chemical composition. Theoretically, each different agonist could impart its own unique activation state. Evidence for multiple signaling states for the G-protein-coupled receptors will be reviewed and is derived from many different pharmacological behaviors: efficacy, kinetics, protean agonism, differential desensitization and internalization, inverse agonism, and fusion chimeras. A recent extension of the ternary complex model is suggested by evidence that the different processes that govern deactivation, such as desensitization and internalization, is also regulated by conformers specific to the agonist. Rhodopsin may serve as a primer for the study of multiple activation states. Therapeutic implications that utilize multiple signaling states hold vast promise in the rationale design of drugs.

What's for lunch at the conformational cafeteria?

In this issue of Molecular Pharmacology, Mukhopadhyay and Howlett present evidence for ligand-selective conformations of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor with differential coupling to G proteins. Ligand-directed signaling to different cellular effector pathways extends drug selectivity beyond that afforded by differential affinity for different receptor subtypes. The challenge for pharmacologists of the future will be not only to identify ligand-selective receptor conformations but also to develop an understanding of the relationships between those conformations, cell function, and ultimately therapeutics. As we learn more about ligand-selective receptor conformations, it should be possible to develop response-selective drugs that maximize therapeutic efficacy and minimize unwanted effects.

Pharmacology of stomoxytachykinin receptor depends on second messenger system

STKR is a neurokinin receptor derived from the stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans. Insect tachykinin-related peptides, also referred to as "insectatachykinins", produce dose-dependent calcium and cyclic AMP responses in cultured Drosophila melanogaster Schneider 2 (S2) cells that were stably transfected with the cloned STKR cDNA. Pronounced differences in pharmacology were observed between agonist-induced calcium and cyclic AMP responses. The results indicate that the pharmacological properties of STKR depend on its coupling to a unique second messenger system. Therefore, a model postulating the existence of multiple active receptor conformations is proposed. This article presents the first evidence that an insect peptide receptor with dual coupling properties to second messenger systems can display agonist-dependent functional differences.

Real-time analysis of ternary complex on particles: direct evidence for partial agonism at the agonist-receptor-G protein complex assembly step of signal transduction

We developed a novel and generalized approach to investigate G protein-coupled receptor molecular assemblies. We solubilized a fusion protein consisting of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor and green fluorescent protein (GFP) for bead-based flow cytometric analysis. beta(2)-Adrenergic receptor GFP bound to dihydroalprenolol-conjugated beads, providing a K(d) for the fusion protein and, in competition with beta(2)-adrenergic receptor ligands, K(d) values for agonists and antagonists. Beads displaying chelated nickel bound purified hexahistidine-tagged G protein heterotrimers and, subsequently, the binary complex of agonist with beta(2)-adrenergic receptor GFP. The dose-response curves of ternary complex formation revealed maximal assembly for ligands previously classified as full agonists and reduced assembly for ligands previously classified as partial agonists. Guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate-induced dissociation rates of the ternary complex were the same for full and partial agonists. Soluble G protein, competing with ternary complexes on beads provided an affinity estimate of agonist-receptor complexes to G protein. When performed simultaneously, the two assemblies discriminated between agonist, antagonist or inactive molecule in a manner appropriate for high throughput, small volume drug discovery. The assemblies can be further generalized to other G protein coupled receptor protein-protein interactions.

Characterization of agonist stimulation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and G protein-coupled receptor kinase phosphorylation of the beta2-adrenergic receptor using phosphoserine-specific antibodies

Agonist-stimulated desensitization of the beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) is caused by both a potent cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA)-mediated phosphorylation and a less potent, occupancy-dependent, G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-mediated phosphorylation that leads to beta-arrestin binding and internalization. In this study the kinetics of phosphorylation of the third intracellular loop PKA site Ser262 and the putative C-tail GRK sites Ser355, Ser356 of the human beta2AR overexpressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells were characterized using phosphoserine-specific antibodies. Specificity of the antibodies was shown by their lack of reactivity with mutant beta2ARs lacking the respective sites. In addition, overexpression of GRK2 and GRK5 increased basal levels of phosphorylation of the GRK sites Ser355, Ser356 in both COS-7 and HEK 293 cells. Epinephrine, prostaglandin E1, and forskolin at maximum concentrations stimulated phosphorylation of the beta2AR PKA site (Ser262) by 4-fold, whereas PMA stimulated it by 2-fold. Epinephrine stimulated PKA site phosphorylation with an EC50 of 20 to 40 pM. In contrast, epinephrine stimulated GRK site phosphorylation (Ser355,Ser356) with an EC50 of 200 nM (1-min treatments), which is more than 4000-fold higher relative to PKA site phosphorylation, consistent with an occupancy-driven process. After 10 to 30 min, the EC50 for epinephrine stimulation of GRK site phosphorylation was reduced to 10 to 20 nM but was still approximately 200-fold greater than for the PKA site. The EC50 for internalization correlated with GRK site phosphorylation and showed a similar shift with time of epinephrine stimulation. The kinetics of epinephrine-stimulated GRK site phosphorylation were not altered in a mutant of the beta2AR lacking the PKA consensus sites. The initial levels (2 min) of a range of agonist-stimulated GRK site phosphorylations were correlated with their efficacy for activation of adenylyl cyclase, namely epinephrine > or = formoterol = fenoterol > terbutaline = zinterol = albuterol > salmeterol > dobutamine > or = ephedrine. However, after 20 to 30 min of treatment, agonists with intermediate strengths, such as albuterol and salmeterol, stimulate GRK site phosphorylations that are approximately equal to that produced by epinephrine, and the correlation breaks down. The GRK and PKA site antibodies were also effective in detecting phosphorylation of the endogenous beta2AR expressed in A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells. To summarize, our results show a remarkable amplification of PKA site phosphorylation relative to the putative GRK site phosphorylation, heterologous stimulation of the PKA site phosphorylation, no dependence of GRK site phosphorylation on PKA sites, and a reasonable correlation of initial levels of GRK site phosphorylation with the strength of a range of agonists.

Ca2+ responses in Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells demonstrate an atypical pattern of ligand-induced 5-HT1A receptor activation

Little experimental evidence has been reported for diverse signaling via 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A receptors despite the fact that agonists seem to be more efficacious at dorsal raphe somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptors than at postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. The present study investigated Ca2+ responses in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells expressing a human 5-HT1A receptor by 5-HT, prototypical 5-HT1A agonists, N-(3-chloro-4-fluorobenzoyl)-4-fluoro-4-[(5-methyl-6-; methylaminopyridin-2-yl)-methylaminomethyl]-piperidine (F 14679), and especially N-(3-chloro-4-fluorobenzoyl)-4-fluoro-4-[(5-methylpyridin-2-yl)-; methylaminomethyl]piperidine (F 13640) as representative ligands of a new chemical class (methylamino-pyridine) that combines both high efficacy and selectivity for 5-HT1A receptors. 5-HT (pEC50 = 6.70 +/- 0.02) induced a pertussis toxin-sensitive, transient high-magnitude Ca2+ response. High-magnitude Ca2+ responses (Emax, percentage versus 5-HT) were also found with F 13640 (107 +/- 4), 5-carboxamidotryptamine (100 +/- 3), and F 14679 (87 +/- 3). In contrast, the prototypical 5-HT1A receptor agonists buspirone, ipsapirone, and 8-(hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin, and also flesinoxan and eptapirone, were virtually inactive (< or =5). This atypical pattern of 5-HT1A receptor activation contrasts with the broad spectrum of the ligands' partial agonist properties as observed by measuring guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35 S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding responses with membranes of either CHO-K1 or C6-glial cells stably expressing a human 5-HT1A receptor. Remarkably, differences between ligands that seem small in the [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay translate into huge differences in the magnitude of Ca2+ responses. Therefore, some of these 5-HT1A ligands (i.e., F 13640) may in a selective way induce responses that may be not at all be achieved with other ligands (i.e., buspirone). In conclusion, the pharmacology of 5-HT1A receptor ligands seems to be codetermined by the effector pathway.

Biochemical and pharmacological control of the multiplicity of coupling at G-protein-coupled receptors

For decades, it has been generally proposed that a given receptor always interacts with a particular GTP-binding protein (G-protein) or with multiple G-proteins within one family. However, for several G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), it now becomes generally accepted that simultaneous functional coupling with distinct unrelated G-proteins can be observed, leading to the activation of multiple intracellular effectors with distinct efficacies and/or potencies. Multiplicity in G-protein coupling is frequently observed in artificial expression systems where high densities of receptors are obtained, raising the question of whether such complex signalling reveals artefactual promiscuous coupling or is a genuine property of GPCRs. Multiple biochemical and pharmacological evidence in favour of an intrinsic property of GPCRs were obtained in recent studies. Thus, there are now many examples showing that the coupling to multiple signalling pathways is dependent on the agonist used (agonist trafficking of receptor signals). In addition, the different couplings were demonstrated to involve distinct molecular determinants of the receptor and to show distinct desensitisation kinetics. Such multiplicity of signalling at the level of G-protein coupling leads to a further complexity in the functional response to agonist stimulation of one of the most elaborate cellular transmission systems. Indeed, the physiological relevance of such versatility in signalling associated with a single receptor requires the existence of critical mechanisms of dynamic regulation of the expression, the compartmentalisation, and the activity of the signalling partners. This review aims at summarising the different studies that support the concept of multiplicity of G-protein coupling. The physiological and pharmacological relevance of this coupling promiscuity will be discussed.

Predicting therapeutic value in the lead optimization phase of drug discovery

Recombinant and natural cellular assays for human G-protein-coupled receptors are used to optimize initial lead molecules obtained from screening. Although the activity of these molecules can be assessed on human genotype receptors, there is increasing evidence that cells impose a phenotypic selectivity to molecules in various cellular backgrounds. This opens the possibility of dissimulations between activity seen in lead optimization assays and the intended therapeutic value in humans. This review discusses the mechanisms by which cells can impose phenotypic selectivity on molecules and approaches to reduce this practical problem for drug discovery.

New insights in insurmountable antagonism

Antagonists that produce parallel rightward shifts of agonist dose-response curves with no alteration of the maximal response are traditionally classified as surmountable, while insurmountable antagonists also depress the maximal response. Although the longevity of the antagonist-receptor complex is quoted in many studies to explain insurmountable antagonism, slowly interconverting receptor conformations, allosteric binding sites, and receptor internalization have been evoked as alternative explanations. To complicate matters even further, insurmountable antagonism is not only drug-related; it may also depend on the tissue, species and experimental design. For the sake of drug development, it is important to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of insurmountable antagonism. New experimental approaches, such as intact cell studies and the use of computer-assisted simulations based on dynamic receptor models, herald the advent of better insight in the future.

Drug efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors

Efficacy has been defined in receptor pharmacology as a proportionality factor denoting the amount of physiological response a given ligand imparts to a biological system for a given amount of receptor occupancy. While first defined in terms of response, the concept can be expanded to a wide variety of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) behaviors, which includes pleiotropic interaction with multiple G proteins, internalization, oligomerization, desensitization, and interaction with membrane auxilliary proteins. Thus, there can be numerous types of efficacy, and different ligands can have a range of efficacies for different receptor behaviors. This review discusses the use of the efficacy concept in GPCR models based on the thermodynamic linkage theory and also in terms of the protein ensemble theory, in which macroaffinity of ligands for an ensemble of receptor microstates produces a new ligand-bound ensemble. The pharmacological characteristics of the ligand emerge from the intersection of the ligand-bound ensemble with the various ensembles defining pharmacological receptor behaviors. Receptor behaviors discussed are activation of G proteins; ability to be phosphorylated, desensitized, and internalized; formation of dimers and oligomers; and the interaction with auxiliary membrane and cytosolic proteins. The concepts of ligand-specific receptor conformation and conditional efficacy are also discussed in the context of ligand control of physiological response.

Relationship between rate and extent of G protein activation: comparison between full and partial opioid agonists

Opioid agonists acting at their receptors alter intracellular events by initiating activation of various types of Gi/Go proteins. This can be measured by the binding of the stable GTP analog [(35)S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS). In this study agonist efficacy is defined by the degree to which an opioid stimulates the binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS. This allows for a definition of full and partial agonists; a full agonist causing a greater stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding than a partial agonist. The hypothesis that the rate of agonist-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding is dependent upon agonist efficacy was tested using membranes from C6 glioma cells expressing mu- or delta-opioid receptors. At maximal concentrations the rate of agonist-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding followed the efficacy of mu-agonists in stimulating [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, i.e., [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin > morphine > meperidine > butorphanol > nalbuphine. At submaximal concentrations of mu- or delta-full agonists the [(35)S]GTPgammaS association rate was also reduced, such that the rate of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding correlated with the extent of [(35)S]GTPgammaS bound, whether this binding was stimulated by a full agonist or a partial agonist. Agonists also stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS dissociation, showing that binding of this stable nucleotide was reversible. Comparison of the delta-agonists [D-Ser(2),Leu(5)]-enkephalin-Thr and (+/-)-4-((alpha-R*)-alpha-((2S*,5R*)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-hydroxylbenzyl)-N,N-diethylbenzamide, a compound with slow dissociation kinetics, showed the measured rate of G protein activation was not influenced by the agonist switching between receptors. The results are consistent with the idea that the active state(s) of the receptor induced by full or partial agonists is the same, but the number of activated receptors determines the rate of G protein activation.

Modelling of promiscuous receptor-Gi/Gs-protein coupling and effector response

A single G-protein-coupled receptor might activate multiple G-protein species. This multiplex coupling ability can be used by tissues to regulate signalling; for the pharmacologist, such multiplex coupling might cause difficulties in the interpretation of experimental data. In this article, we present mathematical models for the activation of two separate G-protein species by a single receptor. Issues addressed concern mutual antagonism between the G proteins and the availability of an already activated receptor for interaction with a new G protein (receptor-G-protein-effector complexing versus free diffusion of G proteins) in addition to receptor-G-protein precoupling at different G-protein and receptor expression levels. The output from the receptor models uses, as readout, a new model for adenylyl cyclase regulation by two allosteric regulators (i.e. G(s) and G(i)).

Insect G protein-coupled receptors and signal transduction

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven-transmembrane proteins (7-TM) that transduce extracellular signals into cellular physiological responses through the activation of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide binding proteins (alpha beta gamma subunits). Their general properties are remarkably well conserved during evolution. Despite this general resemblance, a large variety of different signals are mediated via this category of receptors. Several GPCR-(sub)families have an ancient origin that is situated before the divergence of Protostomian and Deuterostomian animals. Nevertheless, an enormous diversification has occurred since then. The availability of novel sequence information is growing very rapidly as a result of molecular cloning experiments and of metazoan genome (Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Homo sapiens) and EST (expressed sequence tags) sequencing projects. The Drosophila Genome Sequencing Project will certainly have an important impact on insect signal transduction and receptor research. In parallel, convenient expression systems and functional assay procedures will be needed to investigate insect receptor properties and to monitor the effects of natural and artificial ligands. The study of the evolutionary aspects of G protein-coupled receptors and of their signaling pathways will probably reveal insect-specific features. More insight into these features may result in novel methods and practical applications. Arch.

Functionally different agonists induce distinct conformations in the G protein coupling domain of the beta 2 adrenergic receptor

G protein-coupled receptors represent the largest class of drug discovery targets. Drugs that activate G protein-coupled receptors are classified as either agonists or partial agonists. To study the mechanism whereby these different classes of activating ligands modulate receptor function, we directly monitored ligand-induced conformational changes in the G protein-coupling domain of the beta(2) adrenergic receptor. Fluorescence lifetime analysis of a reporter fluorophore covalently attached to this domain revealed that, in the absence of ligands, this domain oscillates around a single detectable conformation. Binding to an antagonist does not change this conformation but does reduce the flexibility of the domain. However, when the beta(2) adrenergic receptor is bound to a full agonist, the G protein coupling domain exists in two distinct conformations. Moreover, the conformations induced by a full agonist can be distinguished from those induced by partial agonists. These results provide new insight into the structural consequence of antagonist binding and the basis of agonism and partial agonism.

Activation of guanosine 5'-[gamma-(35)S]thio-triphosphate binding through M(1) muscarinic receptors in transfected Chinese Hamster ovary cell membranes: 2. Testing the "two-states" model of receptor activation

I suggested in the accompanying article [Mol Pharmacol 2001;59:875-885] that muscarinic receptors catalyzed G protein activation. Acetylcholine or carbamylcholine recognition facilitated not only the GDP release from receptor-coupled inactive G proteins but also the release of G from the (unstable) HRG complex. The two effects facilitated [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the presence of GDP, but could be studied separately by comparing [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the absence and presence of GTP. Guanyl nucleotides affected the efficiency of receptor-G protein coupling. The relative efficacies of partial agonists in the absence and presence of GTP should remain nonlinearly correlated if all agonists stabilize (to different extents) the same active receptor conformation. The correlation between M(1) muscarinic agonists' efficacy in accelerating [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the absence of other nucleotides and their in vivo efficacy (inositol phosphate accumulation) was in fact very poor. This probably reflected the presence of GTP in intact cells: pertussis toxin pretreatment (which inactivates the G(i/o) proteins) did not affect the agonists' efficacy profile (evaluated in the absence of spare receptors), but the addition of GTP to the [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding medium did. These results did not support the allosteric "two states" model of receptor activation, but suggested that different agonists induced different receptor conformations ("induced fit").

Agonist trafficking of G(i/o)-mediated alpha(2A)-adrenoceptor responses in HEL 92.1.7 cells

1. The ability of 19 agonists to elevate Ca(2+) and inhibit forskolin-induced cyclic AMP elevation through alpha(2A)-adrenoceptors in HEL 92.1.7 cells was investigated. Ligands of catecholamine-like- (five), imidazoline- (nine) and non-catecholamine-non-imidazoline-type (five) were included. 2. The relative maximum responses were similar in both assays. Five ligands were full or nearly full agonists, six produced 20 - 70% of the response to a full agonist and the remaining eight gave lower responses (< 20%) so that their potencies were difficult to evaluate. 3. Marked differences in the potencies of the agonists with respect to the two measured responses were seen. The catecholamines were several times less potent in decreasing cyclic AMP than in increasing Ca(2+), whereas the other, both imidazoline and ox-/thiazoloazepine ligands, were several times more potent with respect to the former than the latter response. For instance, UK14,304 was more potent than adrenaline with respect to the cyclic AMP response but less potent than adrenaline with respect to the Ca(2+) response. 4. All the responses were sensitive to pertussis toxin-pretreatment. Also the possible role of PLA(2), beta-adrenoceptors or ligand transport or metabolism as a source of error could be excluded. The results suggest that the active receptor states produced by catecholamines and the other agonists are markedly different and therefore have different abilities to activate different signalling pathways.

Dual effects of muscarinic M(2) acetylcholine receptors on the synthesis of cyclic AMP in CHO cells: dependence on time, receptor density and receptor agonists

1. Muscarinic M(2) receptors normally inhibit the production of cyclic AMP via G(i) proteins, but a stimulatory component occurs in their effect at high agonist concentrations, believed to be based on the activation of G(s) proteins. We investigated the conditions which determine the occurrence and extent of the stimulatory component in CHO cells stably expressing muscarinic M(2) receptors. 2. Biphasic concentration-response curves (decline followed by return towards control values) were obtained after 10 min incubation with carbachol, oxotremorine-M, acetylcholine, arecoline and arecaidine propargyl ester, but the upward phase was missing with oxotremorine, methylfurmethide, furmethide and pentylthio-TZTP. Shortening the incubation favoured the occurrence of the stimulatory component. Carbachol (1 mM) and oxotremorine-M (1 mM) brought about net stimulation (above 100% of control) of cyclic AMP synthesis during 2 min incubations. The stimulatory components disappeared after the density of receptors had been lowered with oxyphenonium mustard. 3. All agonists stimulated the synthesis of cyclic AMP in cells pretreated with pertussis toxin. 4. Most differences between agonists regarding the stimulatory component of their effect on cyclic AMP synthesis could be explained by differences in their efficacy and the induced receptor internalization. 5. We propose that the G(s)-mediated stimulatory component of the effect of muscarinic M(2) receptors on cyclic AMP synthesis only occurs if the density of activated receptors is high enough to saturate the G(i) proteins and proportionate to the receptors' low affinity for the G(s) proteins. It tends to be abolished by receptor internalization.

Inverse, protean, and ligand-selective agonism: matters of receptor conformation

Concepts regarding the mechanisms by which drugs activate receptors to produce physiological response have progressed beyond considering the receptor as a simple on-off switch. Current evidence suggests that the idea that agonists produce only varying degrees of receptor activation is obsolete and must be reconciled with data to show that agonist efficacy has texture as well as magnitude. Thus, agonists can block system constitutive response (inverse agonists), behave as positive and inverse agonists on the same receptor (protean agonists), and differ in the stimulus pattern they produce in physiological systems (ligand-selective agonists). The molecular mechanism for this seemingly diverse array of activities is the same, namely, the selective microaffinity of ligands for different conformational states of the receptor. This paper reviews evidence for the existence of the various types of agonism and the potential therapeutic utility of different agonist types.-Kenakin, T. Inverse, protean, and ligand-selective agonism: matters of receptor conformation.

Diverse signalling by 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptors

Fourteen different receptor subtypes might be regarded as a diversity that is sufficient to accommodate the wide-ranging physiological roles of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). However, it is becoming clear that, for 5-HT as for other neurotransmitters, the concept of a receptor as a gatekeeper for a specific cellular process or event is too restrictive. Multiple receptor-mediated biochemical cascades can be activated in cells in response to an agonist by a number of mechanisms. Whereas it is well established that different agonists do not necessarily elicit the same magnitude of response, they probably also select between various possible signal transduction pathways. Receptor signalling may be diverse via a single receptor subtype as a consequence of specific agonist-receptor-G protein interactions. 5-HT receptors are even more heterogeneous when one considers that the amino acid sequence of these receptor subtypes may vary from individual to individual, and that there is an increasing number of receptor isoforms due to alternative splicing and RNA editing of 5-HT receptor transcripts. Activation, in particular constitutive, agonist-independent activation, of some of these receptor isoforms has been reported to be altered. This implies that ligands with similar binding affinities may display different pharmacological properties (partial agonist, antagonist, or inverse agonist) versus these receptor isoforms, depending on their activation state. Therefore, intervention with receptor ligands to modify hampered neurotransmission pathways is a difficult task, and one needs to consider the growing evidence of diversity in G protein-coupled receptor signalling.

The use of stimulus-biased assay systems to detect agonist-specific receptor active states: implications for the trafficking of receptor stimulus by agonists

The quantitative comparison of the relative potency of agonists is a standard method of receptor and agonist classification. If agonist potency ratios do not correspond in two given tissues, this is used as presumptive data to conclude that the receptors in those two tissues are different. This article presents data to show that a single receptor can demonstrate varying agonist potency ratios in different host cells. These data are described in terms of the production of more than one agonist-selective receptor active state and the interaction of these different active states with multiple G proteins in the membrane to produce cellular response. Stable host human embryonic kidney 293 cells with enhanced quantities of the respective Galpha-protein were created. Wild-type and Galpha-subunit enriched cells were then transiently transfected with human calcitonin receptor type 2 (hCTR2). Binding did not detect differences in the G protein-enriched cells versus wild-type cells. In contrast, functional studies did show differences between the host cell lines and Galpha-subunit enriched cell lines. The relative potency of eight calcitonin agonists was measured in studies of calcium fluorescence in transfected cells containing human calcitonin receptor type 2 by comparing pEC(50) (-log molar concentration producing half-maximal response) values. In Galphas-enriched cells, the relative order of potency of the agonists changed. The host-cell dependent differences in potency ratios ranged from 2-fold to more than 46-fold. This finding is not consistent with the idea that all of the agonists produce response in the same manner (i.e., through a common active state of the receptor). These data are consistent with the idea that these different agonists produce arrays of active states that differentially use G proteins. This idea is discussed in terms of the design of stimulus-bias assay systems to detect agonist-selective receptor active states with resulting potential for increased selectivity of agonists.

Hoe 140 and pseudo-irreversible antagonism in the rat vas deferens in vitro

The effects of bradykinin and the bradykinin B(2) receptor antagonists D-Arg-[Hyp(3),Thi(5,8),D-Phe(7)]-bradykinin (NPC 349) and D-Arg-[Hyp(3),Thi(5),D-Tic(7),Oic(8)]-bradykinin (Hoe 140) were examined in the electrically-stimulated rat vas deferens. Cumulative additions of bradykinin (1-3000 nM) produced two distinct responses: an enhancement in the magnitude of the basal electrically-induced twitch response (neurogenic response) and an increase in the baseline tension (musculotropic response). NPC 349 (10-100 microM) produced concentration-dependent surmountable rightward shifts of both the bradykinin neurogenic and musculotropic response curves. In contrast, while Hoe 140 (10-100 nM) caused an apparently surmountable antagonism of the bradykinin neurogenic response, it caused an apparent insurmountable antagonism of the bradykinin musculotropic response. Interestingly, co-incubation of Hoe 140 (30 nM) with NPC 349 (30 and 100 microM) resulted in a concentration-related upwards displacement of the Hoe 140-suppressed bradykinin musculotropic response curve. Thus, Hoe 140 can be described as a pseudo-irreversible antagonist against the bradykinin musculotropic response. No time-dependent changes were observed in the maximum bradykinin musculotropic response attainable when NPC 349 (100 microM) additions were made for the final 2 or 18 min of the Hoe 140 incubation (20 min). These findings indicate that slow reversibility of Hoe 140 from the bradykinin B(2) receptor is unlikely to be the mechanism responsible for the pseudo-irreversible antagonism of the bradykinin-induced musculotropic response. Instead, we propose an alternative explanation involving a third, unstable and inactive form of the bradykinin B(2) receptor.

Pharmacological characterization of receptor-activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) and the human calcitonin receptor

Receptor-activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) are a family of single transmembrane domain proteins shown to be important for the transport and ligand specificity of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. In this report, we describe the analysis of pharmacological properties of the human calcitonin receptor (hCTR) coexpressed with different RAMPs with the use of the Xenopus laevis melanophore expression system. We show that coexpression of RAMP3 with human calcitonin receptor changed the relative potency of hCTR to human calcitonin (hCAL) and rat amylin. RAMP1 and RAMP2, in contrast, had little effect on the change of hCTR potency to hCAL or rat amylin. When coexpressed with RAMP3, hCTR reversed the relative potency by a 3.5-fold loss in sensitivity to hCAL and a 19-fold increase in sensitivity to rat amylin. AC66, an inverse agonist, produced apparent simple competitive antagonism of hCAL and rat amylin, as indicated by linear Schild regressions. The potency of AC66 was changed in the blockade of rat amylin but not hCAL responses with RAMP3 coexpression. The mean pK(B) for AC66 to hCAL was 9.4 +/- 0.3 without RAMP3 and 9.45 +/- 0.07 with RAMP3. For the antagonism of AC66 to rat amylin, the pK(B) was 9.25 +/- 0.15 without RAMP3 and 8.2 +/- 0.35 with RAMP3. The finding suggests that RAMP3 might modify the active states of calcitonin receptor in such a way as to create a new receptor phenotype that is "amylin-like." Irrespective of the physiological association of the new receptor species, the finding that a coexpressed membrane protein can completely change agonist and antagonist affinities for a receptor raises implications for screening in recombinant receptor systems.

Efficacy in drug receptor theory: outdated concept or under-valued tool?

In classical occupancy receptor theory, efficacy is a dimensionless proportionality constant denoting the power of agonists to produce a pharmacological response. In theoretical terms, it is difficult to separate affinity and efficacy estimates of agonists for receptors, hence questioning the value of clearly flawed estimates of efficacy by conventional methods. In this paper, the use of efficacy estimates, the limitations of the current methods to estimate efficacy, and the types of systems in which serious errors in efficacy estimation would be expected, is discussed. Specifically, in constitutively active receptor systems or in those where the receptor interacts with more than one G protein, there are theoretical objections to the use of relative maximal responses as indicators of intrinsic efficacy of agonists.

Partial agonists and G protein-coupled receptor desensitization

Weak or partial agonists induce less desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) than do strong agonists. However, there have been few attempts to relate partial agonism quantitatively with the various parameters of agonist-induced desensitization, and to elucidate the mechanisms involved. Our understanding of how the treatment of cells and tissues with partial agonists affects their capacity to activate receptors is based on continued progress in defining partial agonism and the mechanisms of desensitization in which protein kinases, phosphatases, endocytosis and recycling play various roles. In this review, current research concerning partial-agonist-induced desensitization of GPCRs and the nature of partial agonism is summarized, and an attempt is made to put the existing knowledge into a working hypothesis concerning the mechanisms that account for the reduced desensitization in response to partial agonists.

A GppNHp-insensitivity factor modulates the activation of beta-adrenoceptor-coupled Gs protein in rat cortex and cerebellum

The effect known as the GTP-shift refers to the complete conversion of receptors from the high- to the low agonist-affinity state in the presence of an excess of GTP or one of its analogs. 5'-Guanylylimidodiphosphate (GppNHp) was able to fully suppress the high (-)-isoproterenol-affinity of beta-adrenoceptors (beta AR) in cultured rat brain astrocytes. In contrast, a proportion of beta AR in rat cortex and cerebellum synaptosomes was found to be insensitive to this GTP analog. This GppNHp-insensitivity was due to a membrane-associated factor, presumably interacting with Gs proteins and not present in a functional form in cultured astrocytes. Here we assessed the effect of this factor on the beta AR-mediated activation of Gs proteins. The removal of the GppNHp-insensitivity factor from the synaptosomes was achieved using 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), a mild detergent. The activation of Gs proteins was monitored by the binding of another non-hydrolysable GTP-analog, guanylyl 5'-[gamma-[35S]thio]-triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S). The beta AR-Gs protein coupling was at least twofold less efficient in synaptosomes relative to cultured astrocytes. The CHAPS treatment induced a twofold increase in the coupling efficiency in cortex and cerebellum synaptosomes, but had no effect in cultured astrocytes. It undoubtedly indicated the inhibitory effect of the GppNHp-insensitivity factor on the activation of Gs proteins in the synaptosomes. Using CHAPS-soluble material extracted from synaptosomes, it was possible to reconstitute the GppNHp-insensitivity of CHAPS-treated membranes or even to induce it in cultured astrocytes. This effect correlated with the amount of CHAPS-soluble material according to a sigmoid curve, but it was abolished by the heat of CHAPS-soluble material. Successful crossed reconstitutions of the GppNHp-insensitivity suggest that the GppNHp-insensitivity factor is the same regardless of its originating area, and that it might play a general role in the central nervous system. Further investigations should help to identify the GppNHp-insensitivity factor.

Contribution of serine residues to constitutive and agonist-induced signaling via the D2S dopamine receptor: evidence for multiple, agonist-specific active conformations

Dopamine D2 receptors contain a cluster of serine residues in the fifth transmembrane domain that contribute to activation of the receptor as well as to the binding of agonists. We used rat D2S dopamine receptor mutants, each containing a serine-to-alanine substitution (S193A, S194A, S197A), to investigate the mechanism through which these residues affect activation of the receptor. Activation of the mutant receptor S194A was abolished in an agonist-dependent manner, such that dopamine no longer inhibited cAMP accumulation in C6 glioma cells or activated G protein-regulated K+ channels in Xenopus laevis oocytes, whereas the efficacy of several other agonists was unaffected. Dihydrexidine did not inhibit cAMP accumulation at either S193A or S194A. The decreased efficacy of dihydrexidine at S193A and S194A and dopamine at S194A was associated with a decreased ability to detect a GTP-sensitive high affinity binding state for these agonists. The ability of dopamine to stimulate [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding via S194A also was decreased by approximately 50%. Finally, constitutive stimulation of [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding and inhibition of adenylate cyclase by the D2S receptor was reduced by mutation of either S193 or S194. These data support the existence of multiple active receptor conformations that are differentially sensitive to mutation of serine residues in the fifth-transmembrane domain.

Mutations at the domain interface of GSalpha impair receptor-mediated activation by altering receptor and guanine nucleotide binding

G protein alpha subunits consist of two domains, a GTPase domain and a helical domain. Receptors activate G proteins by catalyzing replacement of GDP, which is buried between these two domains, with GTP. Substitution of the homologous alphai2 residues for four alphas residues in switch III, a region that changes conformation upon GTP binding, or of one nearby helical domain residue decreases the ability of alphas to be activated by the beta-adrenergic receptor and by aluminum fluoride. Both sets of mutations increase the affinity of alphas for the beta-adrenergic receptor, based on an increased amount of high affinity binding of the beta-adrenergic agonist, isoproterenol. The mutations also decrease the rate of receptor-mediated activation and disrupt the ability of the beta-adrenergic receptor to increase the apparent affinity of alphas for the GTP analog, guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate). Simultaneous replacement of the helical domain residue and one of the four switch III residues with the homologous alphai2 residues restores normal receptor-mediated activation, suggesting that the defects caused by mutations at the domain interface are due to altered interdomain interactions. These results suggest that interactions between residues across the domain interface are involved in two key steps of receptor-mediated activation, promotion of GTP binding and subsequent receptor-G protein dissociation.

Differences between natural and recombinant G protein-coupled receptor systems with varying receptor/G protein stoichiometry

The increasing accessibility of genetically engineered receptor systems for the study of drug-receptor interaction has led to a corresponding increase in the testing of new drug entities in recombinant receptor systems. In this article Terry Kenakin illustrates some possible conditions within these recombinant systems where the relative stoichiometry of the receptors to other cellular components may differ from that found in natural systems and where this difference may lead to anomalies in drug testing.

beta2-adrenergic receptor desensitization, internalization, and phosphorylation in response to full and partial agonists

Previous studies indicated that partial agonists cause less desensitization of the beta2-adrenergic receptor (betaAR) than full agonists; however, the molecular basis for this in intact cells has not been investigated. In the present work, we have determined the rates of desensitization, internalization, and phosphorylation caused by a series of betaAR agonists displaying a 95-fold range of coupling efficiencies. These studies were performed with HEK-293 cells overexpressing the betaAR with hemagglutinin and 6-histidine epitopes introduced into the N and C termini, respectively. This modified betaAR behaved identically to the wild type receptor with regard to agonist Kd, coupling efficiency, and desensitization. The coupling efficiencies for betaAR agonist activation of adenylyl cyclase relative to epinephrine (100%) were 42% for fenoterol, 4.9% for albuterol, 2.5% for dobutamine, and 1.1% for ephedrine. At concentrations of these agonists yielding >90% receptor occupancy, the rate and extent (0-30 min) of agonist-induced desensitization of betaAR activation of adenylyl cyclase followed the same order as coupling efficiency, i.e. epinephrine >/= fenoterol > albuterol > dobutamine > ephedrine. The rate of internalization of the betaAR with respect to these agonists also followed the same order as the desensitization and exhibited a slight lag. Like internalization and desensitization, betaAR phosphorylation exhibited a dependence on agonist strength. The two strongest agonists, epinephrine and fenoterol, provoked 11-13-fold increases in the level of betaAR phosphorylation after just 1 min, whereas the weak agonists dobutamine and ephedrine caused only 3-4-fold increases, similar to levels induced by cAMP-dependent protein kinase activation with forskolin. With longer treatment times, the level of betaAR phosphorylation declined with strong agonists, but it progressively increased with the weaker partial agonists, such that after 30 min the -fold elevation with epinephrine (6.2 +/- 0.82) was not appreciably different from ephedrine (5.0 +/- 0.96) and significantly less than that caused by albuterol (10.4 +/- 1.7). In summary, our results demonstrate an excellent proportionality between the agonist strength and agonist-induced desensitization, internalization, and the rapid initial phase of phosphorylation. The data support the hypothesis that increasing agonist-coupling efficiency primarily affects desensitization by increasing the rate of betaARK phosphorylation of the betaAR.