1
|
Wu B, Neupane J, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Chen Y, Surani MA, Zhang Y, Bao S, Li X. Stem cell-based embryo models: a tool to study early human development. SCIENCE CHINA. LIFE SCIENCES 2025; 68:1626-1645. [PMID: 39969747 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-024-2741-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2025]
Abstract
How a mammalian fertilized egg acquires totipotency and develops into a full-term offspring is a fundamental scientific question. Human embryonic development is difficult to study due to limited resources, technical challenges and ethics. Moreover, the precise regulatory mechanism underlying early human embryonic development remains unknown. In recent years, the emergence of stem cell-based embryo models (SCBEM) provides the opportunity to reconstitute pre- to post-implantation development in vitro. These models to some extent mimic the embryo morphologically and transcriptionally, and thus may be used to study key events in mammalian pre- and post-implantation development. Many groups have successfully generated SCBEM of the mouse and human. Here, we provide a comparative review of the mouse and human SCBEM, discuss the capability of these models to mimic natural embryos and give a perspective on their potential future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baojiang Wu
- The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China
- Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China
| | - Jitesh Neupane
- The Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, UK
| | - Yang Zhou
- The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China
- Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China
| | - Jingcheng Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
| | - Yanglin Chen
- The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China
- Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China
| | - M Azim Surani
- The Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, UK
| | - Yong Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
| | - Siqin Bao
- The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China.
- Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China.
| | - Xihe Li
- The State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China.
- Research Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China.
- Inner Mongolia Saikexing Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animals, Hohhot, 011517, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wieloch J, Blanco J, Zordick C, Ohnesorge N, Schneider MR, Barenys M, Knöspel F. In vitro embryolethality testing during the peri-implantation stage using 3D mouse embryoids: Comparison with 2D mouse cell cultures and the zebrafish embryo model. Reprod Toxicol 2025; 135:108941. [PMID: 40339762 DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2025.108941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2025] [Accepted: 05/05/2025] [Indexed: 05/10/2025]
Abstract
The recent development of in vitro embryoid models may be a way to reduce or even replace animals in developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies. Here, we evaluated an in vitro mouse 3D embryoid model using three stem cell lineages including mouse embryonic stem cells (ESC), trophoblast stem cells (TSC) and extra-embryonic endoderm stem cells (XENC) to detect embryolethality of seven known positive or negative compounds at the peri-implantation stage in vivo. We performed a comparative study by testing these substances in parallel on monocultures of the individual cell lines in 2D and in zebrafish embryos. Embryoids were exposed to each compound for 48 h and analysed on day in vitro (DIV) 4, which resemble the peri-implantation embryo at E5.5 in vivo. Metabolic activity, morphological development and gene expression were evaluated. We showed that all early direct embryolethal compounds significantly reduced the metabolic activity of the embryoids at an in vivo relevant concentration range. Furthermore, this model could also detect embryolethal compounds that have specific adverse effects on extraembryonic structures. The additional endpoints (gene expression or morphological assessments) were required to detect adverse effects when only a minoritarian cell type of the embryoid was affected. In contrast, zebrafish embryos had a very low sensitivity, and the monocultures of the individual cell lines were less specific than the 3D embryoids. Combining 2D and 3D testing with carefully selected additional endpoints could serve as a powerful tool to assess the potential effects of new chemicals on embryo development at the peri-implantation stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Wieloch
- ZEBET and German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin 10589, Germany
| | - Jordi Blanco
- ZEBET and German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin 10589, Germany; Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Reus, Spain; Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Center of Environmental, Food and Toxicological Technology (TECNATOX), Reus, Spain; Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Research Group in Neurobehavior and Health (NEUROLAB), Tarragona, Spain
| | - Catrin Zordick
- ZEBET and German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin 10589, Germany
| | - Nils Ohnesorge
- ZEBET and German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin 10589, Germany
| | - Marlon R Schneider
- ZEBET and German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin 10589, Germany
| | - Marta Barenys
- ZEBET and German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin 10589, Germany; GRET and Toxicology Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fanny Knöspel
- ZEBET and German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin 10589, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lodewijk GA, Kozuki S, Han CJ, Topacio BR, Lee S, Nixon L, Zargari A, Knight G, Ashton R, Qi LS, Shariati SA. Self-organization of mouse embryonic stem cells into reproducible pre-gastrulation embryo models via CRISPRa programming. Cell Stem Cell 2025:S1934-5909(25)00083-9. [PMID: 40118066 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2025.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 12/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 03/23/2025]
Abstract
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can self-organize into structures with spatial and molecular similarities to natural embryos. During development, embryonic and extraembryonic cells differentiate through activation of endogenous regulatory elements while co-developing via cell-cell interactions. However, engineering regulatory elements to self-organize ESCs into embryo models remains underexplored. Here, we demonstrate that CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) of two regulatory elements near Gata6 and Cdx2 generates embryonic patterns resembling pre-gastrulation mouse embryos. Live single-cell imaging revealed that self-patterning occurs through orchestrated collective movement driven by cell-intrinsic fate induction. In 3D, CRISPRa-programmed embryo models (CPEMs) exhibit morphological and transcriptomic similarity to pre-gastrulation mouse embryos. CPEMs allow versatile perturbations, including dual Cdx2-Elf5 activation to enhance trophoblast differentiation and lineage-specific activation of laminin and matrix metalloproteinases, uncovering their roles in basement membrane remodeling and embryo model morphology. Our findings demonstrate that minimal intrinsic epigenome editing can self-organize ESCs into programmable pre-gastrulation embryo models with robust lineage-specific perturbation capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerrald A Lodewijk
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Sayaka Kozuki
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Clara J Han
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin R Topacio
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Seungho Lee
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Lily Nixon
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Abolfazl Zargari
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Gavin Knight
- Neurosetta LLC, Madison, WI, USA; Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Randolph Ashton
- Neurosetta LLC, Madison, WI, USA; Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Lei S Qi
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Sarafan ChEM-H, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S Ali Shariati
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Turner DA, Martinez Arias A. Three-dimensional stem cell models of mammalian gastrulation. Bioessays 2024; 46:e2400123. [PMID: 39194406 PMCID: PMC11589689 DOI: 10.1002/bies.202400123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
Gastrulation is a key milestone in the development of an organism. It is a period of cell proliferation and coordinated cellular rearrangement, that creates an outline of the body plan. Our current understanding of mammalian gastrulation has been improved by embryo culture, but there are still many open questions that are difficult to address because of the intrauterine development of the embryos and the low number of specimens. In the case of humans, there are additional difficulties associated with technical and ethical challenges. Over the last few years, pluripotent stem cell models are being developed that have the potential to become useful tools to understand the mammalian gastrulation. Here we review these models with a special emphasis on gastruloids and provide a survey of the methods to produce them robustly, their uses, relationship to embryos, and their prospects as well as their limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Turner
- Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, William Henry Duncan Building, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim H, Kim E. Current Status of Synthetic Mammalian Embryo Models. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:12862. [PMID: 39684574 PMCID: PMC11641582 DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2024] [Revised: 11/26/2024] [Accepted: 11/27/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in three-dimensional culture technologies have facilitated the development of synthetic embryo models, such as blastoids, through the co-culturing of diverse stem cell types. These in vitro models enable precise investigation of developmental processes, including gastrulation, neurulation, and lineage specification, thereby advancing our understanding of early embryogenesis. By providing controllable, ethically viable platforms, they help circumvent the limitations of in vivo mammalian embryo studies and contribute to developing regenerative medicine strategies. Nonetheless, ethical challenges, particularly regarding human applications, persist. Comparative studies across various species-such as mice, humans, non-human primates, and ungulates, like pigs and cattle-offer crucial insights into both species-specific and conserved developmental mechanisms. In this review, we outline the species-specific differences in embryonic development and discuss recent advancements in stem cell and synthetic embryo models. Specifically, we focus on the latest stem cell research involving ungulates, such as pigs and cattle, and provide a comprehensive overview of the improvements in synthetic embryo technology. These insights contribute to our understanding of species-specific developmental biology, help improve model efficiency, and guide the development of new models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eunhye Kim
- Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Cell Biology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li M, Jin H, Zhao Y, Zhu G, Liu Y, Long H, Shen X. PHD2 safeguards modest mesendoderm development. Commun Biol 2024; 7:1100. [PMID: 39244636 PMCID: PMC11380689 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06824-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PHD2 is essential in modulating HIF-1α levels upon oxygen fluctuations. Hypoxia, a hallmark of uterus, and HIF-1α have recently emerged as opposing regulators of mesendoderm specification, suggesting a role for PHD2 therein. We found that PHD2 expression initially covered the epiblast and gradually receded from the primitive streak, which was identical to hypoxia and exclusive to HIF-1α. The investigations performed in mESCs, embryoids, and mouse embryos together demonstrated that PHD2 negatively regulated mesendoderm specification. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that PHD2 governed the transition from epiblast to mesendoderm. The downstream effect of PHD2 relied on the HIF-1α regulated Wnt/β-catenin pathway, while it was regulated upstream by miR-429. In summary, our research highlights PHD2's essential role in mesendoderm specification and its interactions with hypoxia and HIF-1α.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Li
- College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Huaizhang Jin
- College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Yun Zhao
- College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Guoping Zhu
- College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hongan Long
- Institute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, KLMME, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaopeng Shen
- College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dupont C. A comprehensive review: synergizing stem cell and embryonic development knowledge in mouse and human integrated stem cell-based embryo models. Front Cell Dev Biol 2024; 12:1386739. [PMID: 38715920 PMCID: PMC11074781 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1386739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/06/2025] Open
Abstract
Mammalian stem cell-based embryo models have emerged as innovative tools for investigating early embryogenesis in both mice and primates. They not only reduce the need for sacrificing mice but also overcome ethical limitations associated with human embryo research. Furthermore, they provide a platform to address scientific questions that are otherwise challenging to explore in vivo. The usefulness of a stem cell-based embryo model depends on its fidelity in replicating development, efficiency and reproducibility; all essential for addressing biological queries in a quantitative manner, enabling statistical analysis. Achieving such fidelity and efficiency requires robust systems that demand extensive optimization efforts. A profound understanding of pre- and post-implantation development, cellular plasticity, lineage specification, and existing models is imperative for making informed decisions in constructing these models. This review aims to highlight essential differences in embryo development and stem cell biology between mice and humans, assess how these variances influence the formation of partially and fully integrated stem cell models, and identify critical challenges in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathérine Dupont
- Department of Developmental Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rodriguez-Polo I, Moris N. Using Embryo Models to Understand the Development and Progression of Embryonic Lineages: A Focus on Primordial Germ Cell Development. Cells Tissues Organs 2024; 213:503-522. [PMID: 38479364 PMCID: PMC7616515 DOI: 10.1159/000538275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recapitulating mammalian cell type differentiation in vitro promises to improve our understanding of how these processes happen in vivo, while bringing additional prospects for biomedical applications. The establishment of stem cell-derived embryo models and embryonic organoids, which have experienced explosive growth over the last few years, opens new avenues for research due to their scale, reproducibility, and accessibility. Embryo models mimic various developmental stages, exhibit different degrees of complexity, and can be established across species. Since embryo models exhibit multiple lineages organized spatially and temporally, they are likely to provide cellular niches that, to some degree, recapitulate the embryonic setting and enable "co-development" between cell types and neighbouring populations. One example where this is already apparent is in the case of primordial germ cell-like cells (PGCLCs). SUMMARY While directed differentiation protocols enable the efficient generation of high PGCLC numbers, embryo models provide an attractive alternative as they enable the study of interactions of PGCLCs with neighbouring cells, alongside the regulatory molecular and biophysical mechanisms of PGC competency. Additionally, some embryo models can recapitulate post-specification stages of PGC development (including migration or gametogenesis), mimicking the inductive signals pushing PGCLCs to mature and differentiate and enabling the study of PGCLC development across stages. Therefore, in vitro models may allow us to address questions of cell type differentiation, and PGC development specifically, that have hitherto been out of reach with existing systems. KEY MESSAGE This review evaluates the current advances in stem cell-based embryo models, with a focus on their potential to model cell type-specific differentiation in general and in particular to address open questions in PGC development and gametogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Naomi Moris
- The Francis Crick Institute, 1 Midland Road, Somers Town, London, NW1 1AT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lodewijk GA, Kozuki S, Han C, Topacio BR, Zargari A, Lee S, Knight G, Ashton R, Qi LS, Shariati SA. Self-organization of embryonic stem cells into a reproducible embryo model through epigenome editing. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.03.05.583597. [PMID: 38496557 PMCID: PMC10942404 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.05.583597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can self-organize in vitro into developmental patterns with spatial organization and molecular similarity to that of early embryonic stages. This self-organization of ESCs requires transmission of signaling cues, via addition of small molecule chemicals or recombinant proteins, to induce distinct embryonic cellular fates and subsequent assembly into structures that can mimic aspects of early embryonic development. During natural embryonic development, different embryonic cell types co-develop together, where each cell type expresses specific fate-inducing transcription factors through activation of non-coding regulatory elements and interactions with neighboring cells. However, previous studies have not fully explored the possibility of engineering endogenous regulatory elements to shape self-organization of ESCs into spatially-ordered embryo models. Here, we hypothesized that cell-intrinsic activation of a minimum number of such endogenous regulatory elements is sufficient to self-organize ESCs into early embryonic models. Our results show that CRISPR-based activation (CRISPRa) of only two endogenous regulatory elements in the genome of pluripotent stem cells is sufficient to generate embryonic patterns that show spatial and molecular resemblance to that of pre-gastrulation mouse embryonic development. Quantitative single-cell live fluorescent imaging showed that the emergence of spatially-ordered embryonic patterns happens through the intrinsic induction of cell fate that leads to an orchestrated collective cellular motion. Based on these results, we propose a straightforward approach to efficiently form 3D embryo models through intrinsic CRISPRa-based epigenome editing and independent of external signaling cues. CRISPRa-Programmed Embryo Models (CPEMs) show highly consistent composition of major embryonic cell types that are spatially-organized, with nearly 80% of the structures forming an embryonic cavity. Single cell transcriptomics confirmed the presence of main embryonic cell types in CPEMs with transcriptional similarity to pre-gastrulation mouse embryos and revealed novel signaling communication links between different embryonic cell types. Our findings offer a programmable embryo model and demonstrate that minimum intrinsic epigenome editing is sufficient to self-organize ESCs into highly consistent pre-gastrulation embryo models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerrald A Lodewijk
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Equal contribution to this work
| | - Sayaka Kozuki
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Equal contribution to this work
| | - Clara Han
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
| | - Benjamin R Topacio
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
| | - Abolfazl Zargari
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
| | - Seungho Lee
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
| | - Gavin Knight
- Neurosetta LLC, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, Madison, WI
| | - Randolph Ashton
- Neurosetta LLC, Madison, WI
- Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, Madison, WI
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Lei S Qi
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Sarafan ChEM-H, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - S Ali Shariati
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
- Institute for The Biology of Stem Cells, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Handford CE, Junyent S, Jorgensen V, Zernicka-Goetz M. Topical section: embryonic models (2023) for Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2024; 84:102134. [PMID: 38052116 PMCID: PMC11556421 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2023.102134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
Stem cell-based mammalian embryo models facilitate the discovery of developmental mechanisms because they are more amenable to genetic and epigenetic perturbations than natural embryos. Here, we highlight exciting recent advances that have yielded a plethora of models of embryonic development. Imperfections in these models highlight gaps in our current understanding and outline future research directions, ushering in an exciting new era for embryology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte E Handford
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. https://twitter.com/@CEHandford
| | - Sergi Junyent
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. https://twitter.com/@JunyentSergi
| | - Victoria Jorgensen
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA; Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li H, Chang L, Wu J, Huang J, Guan W, Bates LE, Stuart HT, Guo M, Zhang P, Huang B, Chen C, Zhang M, Chen J, Min M, Wu G, Hutchins AP, Silva JCR. In vitro generation of mouse morula-like cells. Dev Cell 2023; 58:2510-2527.e7. [PMID: 37875119 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
Generating cells with the molecular and functional properties of embryo cells and with full developmental potential is an aim with fundamental biological significance. Here we report the in vitro generation of mouse transient morula-like cells (MLCs) via the manipulation of signaling pathways. MLCs are molecularly distinct from embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and cluster instead with embryo 8- to 16-cell stage cells. A single MLC can generate a blastoid, and the efficiency increases to 80% when 8-10 MLCs are used. MLCs make embryoids directly, efficiently, and within 4 days. Transcriptomic analysis shows that day 4-5 MLC-derived embryoids contain the cell types found in natural embryos at early gastrulation. Furthermore, MLCs introduced into morulae segregate into epiblast (EPI), primitive endoderm (PrE), and trophectoderm (TE) fates in blastocyst chimeras and have a molecular signature indistinguishable from that of host embryo cells. These findings represent the generation of cells that are molecularly and functionally similar to the precursors of the first three cell lineages of the embryo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanhuan Li
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China.
| | - Litao Chang
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; Guangzhou Medical University, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 511495, China
| | - Jinyi Wu
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; Guangzhou Medical University, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 511495, China
| | - Jiahui Huang
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China
| | - Wei Guan
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China
| | - Lawrence E Bates
- Wellcome - MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Puddicombe Way, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK
| | - Hannah T Stuart
- Wellcome - MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Puddicombe Way, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK
| | - Mingyue Guo
- Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; Guangzhou Medical University, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 511495, China
| | - Pengfei Zhang
- Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China
| | - Boyan Huang
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China
| | - Chuanxin Chen
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China
| | - Man Zhang
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China
| | - Jiekai Chen
- Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mingwei Min
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China
| | - Guangming Wu
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China
| | - Andrew P Hutchins
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province 518055, China
| | - José C R Silva
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China; Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou International Bio Island, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510005, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oh SY, Na SB, Kang YK, Do JT. In Vitro Embryogenesis and Gastrulation Using Stem Cells in Mice and Humans. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13655. [PMID: 37686459 PMCID: PMC10563085 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
During early mammalian embryonic development, fertilized one-cell embryos develop into pre-implantation blastocysts and subsequently establish three germ layers through gastrulation during post-implantation development. In recent years, stem cells have emerged as a powerful tool to study embryogenesis and gastrulation without the need for eggs, allowing for the generation of embryo-like structures known as synthetic embryos or embryoids. These in vitro models closely resemble early embryos in terms of morphology and gene expression and provide a faithful recapitulation of early pre- and post-implantation embryonic development. Synthetic embryos can be generated through a combinatorial culture of three blastocyst-derived stem cell types, such as embryonic stem cells, trophoblast stem cells, and extraembryonic endoderm cells, or totipotent-like stem cells alone. This review provides an overview of the progress and various approaches in studying in vitro embryogenesis and gastrulation in mice and humans using stem cells. Furthermore, recent findings and breakthroughs in synthetic embryos and gastruloids are outlined. Despite ethical considerations, synthetic embryo models hold promise for understanding mammalian (including humans) embryonic development and have potential implications for regenerative medicine and developmental research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jeong Tae Do
- Department of Stem Cell Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk Institute of Technology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea; (S.Y.O.); (S.B.N.); (Y.K.K.)
| |
Collapse
|