Amikacin levels in bronchial secretions of 10 pneumonia patients with respiratory support treated once daily versus twice daily

Tissue Penetration of Antimicrobials in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review-Part II

In patients that are admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), the clinical outcome of severe infections depends on several factors, as well as the early administration of chemotherapies and comorbidities. Antimicrobials may be used in off-label regimens to maximize the probability of therapeutic concentrations within infected tissues and to prevent the selection of resistant clones. Interestingly, the literature clearly shows that the rate of tissue penetration is variable among antibacterial drugs, and the correlation between plasma and tissue concentrations may be inconstant. The present review harvests data about tissue penetration of antibacterial drugs in ICU patients, limiting the search to those drugs that mainly act as protein synthesis inhibitors and disrupting DNA structure and function. As expected, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, linezolid, and tigecycline have an excellent diffusion into epithelial lining fluid. That high penetration is fundamental for the therapy of ventilator and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Some drugs also display a high penetration rate within cerebrospinal fluid, while other agents diffuse into the skin and soft tissues. Further studies are needed to improve our knowledge about drug tissue penetration, especially in the presence of factors that may affect drug pharmacokinetics.

Pulmonary biofilm-based chronic infections and inhaled treatment strategies

Certain pulmonary diseases, such as cystic fibrosis (CF), non-CF bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and ventilator-associated pneumonia, are usually accompanied by respiratory tract infections due to the physiological alteration of the lung immunological defenses. Recurrent infections may lead to chronic infection through the formation of biofilms. Chronic biofilm-based infections are challenging to treat using antimicrobial agents. Therefore, effective ways to eradicate biofilms and thus relieve respiratory tract infection require the development of efficacious agents for biofilm destruction, the design of delivery carriers with biofilm-targeting and/or penetrating abilities for these agents, and the direct delivery of them into the lung. This review provides an in-depth description of biofilm-based infections caused by pulmonary diseases and focuses on current existing agents that are administered by inhalation into the lung to treat biofilm, which include i) inhalable antimicrobial agents and their combinations, ii) non-antimicrobial adjuvants such as matrix-targeting enzymes, mannitol, glutathione, cyclosporin A, and iii) liposomal formulations of anti-biofilm agents. Finally, novel agents that have shown promise against pulmonary biofilms as well as traditional and new devices for pulmonary delivery of anti-biofilm agents into the lung are also discussed.

Predictive Performance of Physiology-Based Pharmacokinetic Dose Estimates for Pediatric Trials: Evaluation With 10 Bayer Small-Molecule Compounds in Children

Development and guidance of dosing schemes in children have been supported by physiology-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling for many years. PBPK models are built on a generic basis, where compound- and system-specific parameters are separated and can be exchanged, allowing the translation of these models from adults to children by accounting for physiological differences. Owing to these features, PBPK modeling is a valuable approach to support clinical decision making for dosing in children. In this analysis, we evaluate pediatric PBPK models for 10 small-molecule compounds that were applied to support clinical decision processes at Bayer for their predictive power in different age groups. Ratios of PBPK-predicted to observed PK parameters for the evaluated drugs in different pediatric age groups were estimated. Predictive performance was analyzed on the basis of a 2-fold error range and the bioequivalence range (ie, 0.8 ≤ predicted/observed ≤ 1.25). For all 10 compounds, all predicted-to-observed PK ratios were within a 2-fold error range (n = 27), with two-thirds of the ratios within the bioequivalence range (n = 18). The findings demonstrate that the pharmacokinetics of these compounds was successfully and adequately predicted in different pediatric age groups. This illustrates the applicability of PBPK for guiding dosing schemes in the pediatric population.

Low-dose amikacin in the treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB)

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization recommends intravenous amikacin for the treatment of MDR-TB at a dose of 15 mg/kg. However, higher doses are associated with significant toxicity.

METHODS

Patients with MDR-TB treated at our institution receive amikacin at 8-10 mg/kg, with dose adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with MDR-TB who received amikacin between 2010 and 2016.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were included in the study. The median starting dose of amikacin was 8.9 mg/kg (IQR 8, 10), and target therapeutic drug levels were achieved at a median of 12 days (IQR 5, 26). The median duration of amikacin treatment was 7.2 months (IQR 5.7, 8), and median time to sputum culture conversion was 1 month (IQR 1,2). Six patients (12.2%) experienced hearing loss based on formal audiometry testing (95% CI 4.6-24.8%); 22.2% had subjective hearing loss (95% CI 11.2-37.1%) and 31.9% subjective tinnitus (95% CI 19.1-47.1%). Ten patients (23%) had a significant rise in serum creatinine (95% CI 11.8-38.6%), but only 5 patients had a GFR < 60 at treatment completion. 84% of patients had a successful treatment outcome (95% CI 84-99%).

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose amikacin is associated with relatively low rates of aminoglycoside-related adverse events. We hypothesize that low-dose amikacin can be used as a safe and effective treatment for MDR-TB in situations where an adequate regimen cannot be constructed with Group A and B drugs, and where careful monitoring for adverse events is feasible.

Aerosol delivery during invasive mechanical ventilation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aimed to assess inhaled drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients or in animal models. Whole lung and regional deposition and the impact of the ventilator circuit, the artificial airways and the administration technique for aerosol delivery were analyzed.

METHODS

In vivo studies assessing lung deposition during invasive mechanical ventilation were selected based on a systematic search among four databases. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility and the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Twenty-six clinical and ten experimental studies were included. Between 30% and 43% of nominal drug dose was lost to the circuit in ventilated patients. Whole lung deposition of up to 16% and 38% of nominal dose (proportion of drug charged in the device) were reported with nebulizers and metered-dose inhalers, respectively. A penetration index inferior to 1 observed in scintigraphic studies indicated major proximal deposition. However, substantial concentrations of antibiotics were measured in the epithelial lining fluid (887 (406-12,819) μg/mL of amikacin) of infected patients and in sub-pleural specimens (e.g., 197 μg/g of amikacin) dissected from infected piglets, suggesting a significant distal deposition. The administration technique varied among studies and may explain a degree of the variability of deposition that was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung deposition was lower than 20% of nominal dose delivered with nebulizers and mostly occurred in proximal airways. Further studies are needed to link substantial concentrations of antibiotics in infected pulmonary fluids to pulmonary deposition. The administration technique with nebulizers should be improved in ventilated patients in order to ensure an efficient but safe, feasible and reproducible technique.

The epidemiology, pathogenesis, transmission, diagnosis, and management of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and incurable tuberculosis

Global tuberculosis incidence has declined marginally over the past decade, and tuberculosis remains out of control in several parts of the world including Africa and Asia. Although tuberculosis control has been effective in some regions of the world, these gains are threatened by the increasing burden of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis. XDR tuberculosis has evolved in several tuberculosis-endemic countries to drug-incurable or programmatically incurable tuberculosis (totally drug-resistant tuberculosis). This poses several challenges similar to those encountered in the pre-chemotherapy era, including the inability to cure tuberculosis, high mortality, and the need for alternative methods to prevent disease transmission. This phenomenon mirrors the worldwide increase in antimicrobial resistance and the emergence of other MDR pathogens, such as malaria, HIV, and Gram-negative bacteria. MDR and XDR tuberculosis are associated with high morbidity and substantial mortality, are a threat to health-care workers, prohibitively expensive to treat, and are therefore a serious public health problem. In this Commission, we examine several aspects of drug-resistant tuberculosis. The traditional view that acquired resistance to antituberculous drugs is driven by poor compliance and programmatic failure is now being questioned, and several lines of evidence suggest that alternative mechanisms-including pharmacokinetic variability, induction of efflux pumps that transport the drug out of cells, and suboptimal drug penetration into tuberculosis lesions-are likely crucial to the pathogenesis of drug-resistant tuberculosis. These factors have implications for the design of new interventions, drug delivery and dosing mechanisms, and public health policy. We discuss epidemiology and transmission dynamics, including new insights into the fundamental biology of transmission, and we review the utility of newer diagnostic tools, including molecular tests and next-generation whole-genome sequencing, and their potential for clinical effectiveness. Relevant research priorities are highlighted, including optimal medical and surgical management, the role of newer and repurposed drugs (including bedaquiline, delamanid, and linezolid), pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations, preventive strategies (such as prophylaxis in MDR and XDR contacts), palliative and patient-orientated care aspects, and medicolegal and ethical issues.

Amikacin Optimal Exposure Targets in the Hollow-Fiber System Model of Tuberculosis

Aminoglycosides such as amikacin are currently used for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, formal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies to identify amikacin exposures and dosing schedules that optimize Mycobacterium tuberculosis killing have not been performed. It is believed that aminoglycosides do not work well under acidic conditions, which, if true, would mean poor sterilizing activity against semidormant bacilli at low pH. We performed time-kill studies to compare the bactericidal effect of amikacin in log-phase-growth bacilli with the sterilizing effect in semidormant bacilli at pH 5.8 in broth. In log-phase M. tuberculosis at normal pH versus semidormant M. tuberculosis at pH 5.8, the maximal kill (Emax) estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 5.39 (95% CI, 4.91 to 5.63) versus 4.88 (CI, 4.46 to 5.22) log10 CFU/ml, while the concentration mediating 50% of Emax (EC50) was 1.0 (CI, 0. 0.86 to 1.12) versus 0.60 (CI, 0.50 to 0.66) times the MIC, respectively. Thus, the optimal exposures and kill rates identified for log-phase M. tuberculosis will be optimal even for semidormant bacilli. Next, we performed exposure-response and dose-scheduling studies in the hollow-fiber system model of tuberculosis using log-phase M. tuberculosis We recapitulated the amikacin concentration-time profiles observed in lungs of patients treated over 28 days. The PK/PD index linked to M. tuberculosis kill was the peak concentration (Cmax)-to-MIC ratio (r(2) > 0.99), closely followed by the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24)-to-MIC ratio (r(2) = 0.98). The EC90 was a Cmax/MIC ratio of 10.13 (95% CI, 7.73 to 12.48). The EC90 is the dosing target for intermittent therapy that optimizes cure in TB programs for MDR-TB patients.

Failure of the Amikacin, Cefoxitin, and Clarithromycin Combination Regimen for Treating Pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus Infection

In a hollow-fiber model, we mimicked the drug exposures achieved in the lungs of humans treated with standard amikacin, clarithromycin, and cefoxitin combination therapy for Mycobacterium abscessus infection. At optimal dosing, a kill rate of -0.09 (95% confidence interval, -0.04 to 0.03) log10 CFU per ml/day was achieved over the first 14 days, after which there was regrowth due to acquired drug resistance. Thus, the standard regimen quickly failed. A new regimen is needed.

Amikacin Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics in a Novel Hollow-Fiber Mycobacterium abscessus Disease Model

The treatment of pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus disease is associated with very high failure rates and easily acquired drug resistance. Amikacin is the key drug in treatment regimens, but the optimal doses are unknown. No good preclinical model exists to perform formal pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics experiments to determine these optimal doses. We developed a hollow-fiber system model of M. abscessus disease and studied amikacin exposure effects and dose scheduling. We mimicked amikacin human pulmonary pharmacokinetics. Both amikacin microbial kill and acquired drug resistance were linked to the peak concentration-to-MIC ratios; the peak/MIC ratio associated with 80% of maximal kill (EC80) was 3.20. However, on the day of the most extensive microbial kill, the bacillary burden did not fall below the starting inoculum. We performed Monte Carlo simulations of 10,000 patients with pulmonary M. abscessus infection and examined the probability that patients treated with one of 6 doses from 750 mg to 4,000 mg would achieve or exceed the EC80. We also examined these doses for the ability to achieve a cumulative area under the concentration-time curve of 82,232 mg · h/liter × days, which is associated with ototoxicity. The standard amikacin doses of 750 to 1,500 mg a day achieved the EC80 in ≤ 21% of the patients, while a dose of 4 g/day achieved this in 70% of the patients but at the cost of high rates of ototoxicity within a month or two. The susceptibility breakpoint was an MIC of 8 to 16 mg/liter. Thus, amikacin, as currently dosed, has limited efficacy against M. abscessus. It is urgent that different antibiotics be tested using our preclinical model and new regimens developed.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of aerosolized antibacterial agents in chronically infected cystic fibrosis patients

Bacteria adapt to growth in lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) by selection of heterogeneously resistant variants that are not detected by conventional susceptibility testing but are selected for rapidly during antibacterial treatment. Therefore, total bacterial counts and antibiotic susceptibilities are misleading indicators of infection and are not helpful as guides for therapy decisions or efficacy endpoints. High drug concentrations delivered by aerosol may maximize efficacy, as decreased drug susceptibilities of the pathogens are compensated for by high target site concentrations. However, reductions of the bacterial load in sputum and improvements in lung function were within the same ranges following aerosolized and conventional therapies. Furthermore, the use of conventional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) surrogates correlating pharmacokinetics in serum with clinical cure and presumed or proven eradication of the pathogen as a basis for PK/PD investigations in CF patients is irrelevant, as minimization of systemic exposure is one of the main objectives of aerosolized therapy; in addition, bacterial pathogens cannot be eradicated, and chronic infection cannot be cured. Consequently, conventional PK/PD surrogates are not applicable to CF patients. It is nonetheless obvious that systemic exposure of patients, with all its sequelae, is minimized and that the burden of oral treatment for CF patients suffering from chronic infections is reduced.

Delivering Antibacterials to the Lungs

An important determinant of clinical outcome of a lower respiratory tract infection may be sterilization of the infected lung, which is also dependent on sustained antibacterial concentrations achieved in the lung. For this reason, recently there has been increased interest in measuring the concentration of antimicrobial agents at different potential sites of infection in the lung. Levels of antibacterials are now measured in bronchial mucosa, epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophages, as well as in sputum. Penicillins and cephalosporins reach only marginal concentrations in bronchial secretions, whereas fluoroquinolones and macrolides have been shown to achieve high concentrations. The extent of penetration of different antibacterials into the bronchial mucosa is relatively high. This is also true for beta-lactams, although their tissue concentrations never reach blood concentrations. Antibacterials penetrate less into the ELF than into the bronchial mucosa, but fluoroquinolones appear to concentrate more into alveolar lavage than into bronchial mucosa. Pulmonary pharmacokinetics is a very useful tool for describing how drugs behave in the human lung, but it does not promote an understanding of the pharmacological effects of a drug. More important, instead, is the correlation between pulmonary disposition of the drug and its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for the infectious agent. The addition of bacteriological characteristics to in vivo pharmacokinetic studies has triggered a 'pharmacodynamic approach'. Pharmacodynamic parameters integrate the microbiological activity and pharmacokinetics of an anti-infective drug by focusing on its biological effects, particularly growth inhibition and killing of pathogens. Drugs that penetrate well and remain for long periods at the pulmonary site of infection often induce therapeutic responses greater than expected on the basis of in vitro data. However, although the determination of antibacterial concentrations at the site of infection in the lung has been suggested to be important in predicting the therapeutic efficacy of antimicrobial treatment during bacterial infections of the lower respiratory tract, some studies have demonstrated that pulmonary bacterial clearance is correlated more closely to concentrations in the serum than to those in the lung homogenates, probably because they better reflect antibacterial concentration in the interstitial fluid.

BAY41-6551 achieves bactericidal tracheal aspirate amikacin concentrations in mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia

PURPOSE

To conduct a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II study of BAY41-6551 (NCT01004445), an investigational drug-device combination of amikacin, formulated for inhalation, and a proprietary Pulmonary Drug Delivery System, for the treatment of Gram-negative pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

Sixty-nine mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia, a clinical pulmonary infection score ≥6, at risk for multidrug-resistant organisms, were randomized to BAY41-6551 400 mg every 12 h (q12h), 400 mg every 24 h (q24h) with aerosol placebo, or placebo q12h for 7-14 days, plus standard intravenous antibiotics. The combined primary endpoint was a tracheal aspirate amikacin maximum concentration ≥6,400 μg/mL (25 × 256 μg/mL reference minimum inhibitory concentration) and a ratio of area under the aspirate concentration-time curve (0-24 h) to minimum inhibitory concentration ≥100 on day 1.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was achieved in 50% (6/12) and 16.7% (3/18) of patients in the q12h and q24h groups, respectively. Clinical cure rates, in the 48 patients getting ≥7 days of therapy, were 93.8% (15/16), 75.0% (12/16), and 87.5% (14/16) in the q12h, q24h, and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.467). By the end of aerosol therapy, the mean number of antibiotics per patient per day was 0.9 in the q12h, 1.3 in the q24h, and 1.9 in the placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.02 for difference between groups). BAY41-6551 was well tolerated and attributed to two adverse events in one patient (mild bronchospasm).

CONCLUSIONS

BAY41-6551 400 mg q12h warrants further clinical evaluation.

Quantification of amikacin in bronchial epithelial lining fluid in neonates

Amikacin efficacy is based on peak concentrations and the possibility of reaching therapeutic levels at the infection site. This study aimed to describe amikacin concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) through bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in newborns. BAL fluid was collected in ventilated neonates treated with intravenous (i.v.) amikacin. Clinical characteristics, amikacin therapeutic drug monitoring serum concentrations, and the concentrations of urea in plasma were extracted from the individual patient files. Amikacin and urea BAL fluid concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography with pulsed electrochemical detection (LC-PED) and capillary electrophoresis with capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection (CE-C(4)D), respectively. ELF amikacin concentrations were converted from BAL fluid concentrations through quantification of dilution (urea in plasma/urea in BAL fluid) during the BAL procedure. Twenty-two observations in 17 neonates (postmenstrual age, 31.9 [range, 25.1 to 41] weeks; postnatal age, 3.5 [range, 2 to 37] days) were collected. Median trough and peak amikacin serum concentrations were 2.1 (range, 1 to 7.1) mg/liter and 39.1 (range, 24.1 to 73.2) mg/liter; the median urea plasma concentration was 30 (8 to 90) mg/dl. The median amikacin concentration in ELF was 6.5 mg/liter, the minimum measured concentration was 1.5 mg/liter, and the maximum (peak) was 23 mg/liter. The highest measured ELF concentration was reached between 6 and 14.5 h after i.v. amikacin administration, and an estimated terminal elimination half-life was 8 to 10 h. The median and highest (peak) ELF amikacin concentrations observed in our study population were, respectively, 6.5 and 23 mg/liter. Despite the frequent use of amikacin in neonatal (pulmonary) infections, this is the first report of amikacin quantification in ELF in newborns.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of BAY41-6551 in subjects with chronic kidney disease

Abstract Background: BAY41-6551, a drug-device combination in development for adjunctive treatment of Gram-negative pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, consists of amikacin formulated for inhalation coupled with the Pulmonary Drug Delivery System (PDDS) Clinical aerosol delivery platform. This study evaluated safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BAY41-6551 in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

Single doses of BAY41-6551 (400 mg amikacin) were administered using the PDDS Clinical handheld device to six subjects with mild-to-moderate (Group 1) and six subjects with severe renal impairment (Group 2). Seven subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD; Group 3) received single doses of BAY41-6551 on days 1 and 9, with hemodialysis (HD) scheduled 24 h postdose on day 1 and 3 h postdose on day 9. PK analysis was performed on serum, urine, and dialysate samples (Group 3).

RESULTS

Individual serum amikacin concentrations in Groups 1 and 2 were below 6 mg/L at all times [mean maximum serum drug concentration (C(max)) 0.94 mg/L and 2.46 mg/L, respectively). In Group 3, serum amikacin concentrations decreased after each HD session, and amikacin area under the serum concentration-time curve from zero to 72 h (AUC(72)) and C(max) values were lower on day 9 than on day 1 (mean AUC(72) 71.5 mg · h/L vs. 151.5 mg · h/L; mean C(max) 2.09 mg/L vs. 6.16 mg/L). The amounts of amikacin removed by HD and the dialysate clearance rates were similar on days 1 and 9. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Single doses of BAY41-6551 were well tolerated in subjects with CKD. HD effectively removed amikacin from serum in subjects with ESRD, and the timing relative to BAY41-6551 administration was an important determinant of systemic amikacin exposure. Nevertheless, standard precautionary measures for intravenous amikacin should apply for patients receiving BAY41-6551, and dose adjustments and/or dialysis should be considered for subjects with severe renal impairment.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of amikacin administered as BAY41-6551 aerosol in mechanically ventilated patients with gram-negative pneumonia and acute renal failure

BACKGROUND

BAY41-6551, a drug-device combination in development for adjunctive treatment of Gram-negative pneumonia in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients, consists of amikacin formulated for inhalation coupled with the Pulmonary Drug Delivery System (PDDS) Clinical aerosol delivery platform. Given the predominantly renal clearance of aminoglycosides, understanding systemic amikacin exposure and safety during administration of BAY41-6551 to patients with acute renal failure (ARF) is clinically important.

METHODS

Seven mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia and ARF receiving continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) were treated with multiple administrations of BAY41-6551 400 mg amikacin twice daily using the PDDS Clinical on-ventilator device [in addition to standard intravenous (i.v.) antimicrobial therapy]. CVVHDF parameters were recorded and a PK analysis was performed using serum, urine, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples.

RESULTS

Maximum serum amikacin concentration [median 1.93 (range: 0.63-3.99) mg/L] and area under the concentration-time curve from zero to 12 h on day 3 [median 19.32 (range 6.32-36.87) mg · h/L] were elevated compared with mechanically ventilated patients with normal renal function; however, serum amikacin trough concentrations were within accepted safety limits. The median amikacin concentration in epithelial lining fluid [887 (range: 406-12,819) mg/L] was similar to that reported previously in mechanically ventilated patients with normal renal function. BAY41-6551 demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability with most adverse events (AEs) as expected for the patient population. One serious AE of bronchospasm was attributed to the study medication; no reported AEs were related to the PDDS Clinical device.

CONCLUSIONS

CVVHDF appears to provide adequate clearance of systemically absorbed amikacin in mechanically ventilated patients with ARF, suggesting that dose adjustments for BAY41-6551 are probably not necessary for this patient population. Nonetheless, the standard precautionary measures for critically ill patients receiving i.v. amikacin should be followed for patients with ARF who are treated with BAY41-6551.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of antibacterials in the Intensive Care Unit: setting appropriate dosing regimens

Patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are at very high risk of developing severe nosocomial infections. Consequently, antimicrobials are among the most important and commonly prescribed drugs in the management of these patients. Critically ill patients in ICUs include representatives of all age groups with a range of organ dysfunction related to severe acute illness that may complicate long-term illness. The range of organ dysfunction, together with drug interactions and other therapeutic interventions (e.g. haemodynamically active drugs and continuous renal replacement therapies), may strongly impact on antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. In the last decade, it has become apparent that the intrinsic pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties are the major determinants of in vivo efficacy of antimicrobial agents. PK/PD parameters are essential in facilitating the translation of microbiological activity into clinical situations, ensuring a successful outcome. In this review, we analyse the typical patterns of antimicrobial activity and the corresponding PK/PD parameters, with a special focus on a PK/PD dosing approach of the antimicrobial agent classes commonly utilised in the ICU setting.

Prolonged use of carbapenems and colistin predisposes to ventilator-associated pneumonia by pandrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

OBJECTIVE

We present our experience with five cases of pandrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and analysis of risk factors.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Case-control study in a 15-bed intensive care unit (ICU).

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

The study included 5 cases and 20 controls. Each case patient was matched to four contemporary controls according to gender, prior hospital admissions, hospitalization duration, ICU admission cause, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) scores on ICU admission, and length of ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation duration until first VAP episode by a multidrug-resistant bacterium.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Recorded variables included age, gender, daily APACHE II and SOFA scores, patient medication, treatment interventions, positive cultures and corresponding antibiograms, occurrence of infection, sepsis, and septic shock, other ICU-associated morbidity, length of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, and patient outcome. Healthcare worker and environmental cultures, and a hand-disinfection survey were performed. Pandrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates belonged to the same genotype and were bla (VIM-1)-like gene positive. The outbreak resolved following reinforcement of infection-control measures (September 27). The sole independent predictor for pandrug-resistant P. aeruginosa VAP was combined use of carbapenem for more than 20 days and colistin use for and more than 13 days (odds ratio 76.0; 95% confidence interval 3.7-1487.6). An additional risk factor was more than 78 open suctioning procedures during 6-26 September (odds ratio 16.0; 95% confidence interval 1.4-185.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged carbapenem-colistin use predisposes to VAP by pandrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Cross-transmission may be facilitated by open suctioning.

Lung deposition and efficiency of nebulized amikacin during Escherichia coli pneumonia in ventilated piglets

Lung tissue deposition and antibacterial efficiency of nebulized and intravenous amikacin (AMK) were compared in anesthetized and ventilated piglets suffering from a bronchopneumonia produced by the intrabronchial inoculation of Escherichia coli. AMK was administered 24 hours after the inoculation either through an ultrasonic nebulizer (45 mg x kg-1, n = 10) or by intravenous infusion (15 mg x kg-1, n = 8). Piglets were killed 1 hour after a second AMK administration performed 24 hours after the first one, and lung tissue concentrations of AMK and lung bacterial burden were assessed on multiple lung specimens. The amount of nebulized AMK reaching the tracheobronchial tree represented 38 +/- 6% of the initial nebulizer AMK charge. After nebulization, AMK lung tissue concentrations were 3- to 30-fold higher than after intravenous administration and were influenced by the severity of lung lesions: 188 +/- 175 microg x g-1 in lung segments with mild bronchopneumonia versus 40 +/- 65 microg x g-1 in lung segments with severe bronchopneumonia (p < 0.01). Lung bacterial burden was significantly lower in the aerosol group than in the intravenous group (median = 0 colony forming units. g-1 versus median = 5 x 10(2) colony forming units x g-1, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the deposition of AMK in infected lung parenchyma and the efficiency of bacterial killing were greater after nebulization than after intravenous administration.

Lung tissue concentrations of nebulized amikacin during mechanical ventilation in piglets with healthy lungs

The tissue concentration of aminoglycosides in lung parenchyma is the main determinant of bactericidal efficiency. The aim of the study was to compare the lung deposition of amikacin administered either by an ultrasonic nebulizer or by intravenous infusion during mechanical ventilation. Eighteen healthy ventilated piglets received a single daily dose of amikacin by intravenous infusion (15 mg. kg(-1)) and 18 by aerosol (1 g in 12 ml). The amount of aerosolized amikacin reaching the tracheobronchial tree represented 40 +/- 5% of the initial dose with an aerodynamic size distribution showing 50% of particles ranging between 0.5 and 5 microm mass median diameter. Animals were killed at different time intervals after the second dose. Tissue concentrations of amikacin were determined on cryomixed multiple lung specimen by an immunoenzymatic method. The lung concentrations of nebulized amikacin, peaking at 208 +/- 76 microg. g(-1), were more than 10-fold higher than the lung concentrations of intravenous amikacin and were homogeneously distributed throughout the lung parenchyma. Amikacin plasma concentrations lower than 5 mmol. l(-1) were measured after the sixth hour after the nebulization. In conclusion, the ultrasonic nebulization of amikacin resulted in high tissue concentrations, far above the minimal inhibitory concentrations of most gram-negative strains.

Response of complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis to the addition of trovafloxacin

The newer fluoroquinolones have many properties such as safety, bioavailability, and tissue penetration that make them attractive in the therapy of complicated infections. Unfortunately, the rapid development of resistance by Staphylococcus aureus to ciprofloxacin has dampened interest in these agents for serious staphylococcal infections. A patient with right-sided methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endocarditis with a complicated clinical course received trovafloxacin in addition to vancomycin and rifampin. He was initially treated with vancomycin, gentamicin, and rifampin for serious MRSA infection, but because of complications, including septic central nervous system emboli, persistent fever, and leukocytosis, gentamicin was stopped and trovafloxacin begun. After this addition the patient improved and completely recovered. In vitro and animal model data show that many newer fluoroquinolones have excellent activity against S. aureus, including MRSA, and are also less likely to induce resistance. Animal models of endocarditis support their efficacy in serious staphylococcal infections.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of isepamicin

Isepamicin is an aminoglycoside antibacterial with properties similar to those of amikacin, but with better activity against strains producing type I 6'-acetyltransferase. The antibacterial spectrum includes Enterobacteriaceae and staphylococci. Anaerobes, Neisseriaceae and streptococci are resistant. The lower and upper break-points are 8 and 16 mg/L. Like other aminoglycosides, isepamicin exhibits a strong concentration-dependent bactericidal effect, a long post-antibiotic effect (several hours) and induces adaptive resistance. Isepamicin is administered intravenously or intramuscularly at a dosage of 15 mg/kg once daily or 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. Isepamicin is not bound to plasma proteins, and it distributes in extracellular fluids and into some cells (outer hair cells, kidney cortex) by active transport. Isepamicin is not metabolised and is eliminated solely via the renal route with an elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta) of 2 to 3 hours in adults with normal renal function. The clearance of isepamicin is reduced in neonates, and 7.5 mg/kg once daily is recommended in children <16 days old. Clearance is also reduced in the elderly, but no dosage adjustment is required. In patients with chronic renal impairment, isepamicin clearance is proportional to creatinine clearance (CLCR); the recommended regimen is 8 mg/kg with an administration interval of 24 hours in moderate impairment, 48 hours in severe impairment, 72 hours for CL(CR) 0.6 to 1.14 L/h (10 to 19 ml/min) and 96 hours for CL(CR) 0.36 to 0.54 L/h (6 to 9 ml/min). In end-stage renal failure, isepamicin is eliminated by haemodialysis, but the administration interval should be determined by monitoring the plasma concentration. Compared with healthy volunteers, patients in the intensive care unit or with neutropenic cancer have an increased volume of distribution and a lower clearance, but the 15 mg/kg once daily regimen remains adequate. Isepamicin kinetics are linear in the range 7.5 to 25 mg/kg, so that dosage adjustments, if necessary, are straightforward. Isepamicin can induce nephro-, vestibulo- and oto-toxicity. However, animal and clinical studies show that isepamicin is one of the less toxic aminoglycosides. The usefulness of maintaining serum aminoglycoside concentrations within a therapeutic range remains controversial. With isepamicin, it is proposed to achieve a 1-hour concentration (30 minutes after a 30-minute infusion) >40 mg/L to maximise bactericidal efficacy, and a 'trough' concentration (at the end of the administration interval) <5 mg/L to minimise toxicity. These thresholds should be modified on an individual basis, considering covariates such as concomitant treatment, underlying disease, nature of bacterial strain and site of infection.

Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults

Critically ill patients exhibit a range of organ dysfunctions and often require treatment with a variety of drugs including sedatives, analgesics, neuromuscular blockers, antimicrobials, inotropes and gastric acid suppressants. Understanding how organ dysfunction can alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs is a vital aspect of therapy in this patient group. Many drugs will need to be given intravenously because of gastrointestinal failure. For those occasions on which the oral route is possible, bioavailability may be altered by hypomotility, changes in gastrointestinal pH and enteral feeding. Hepatic and renal dysfunction are the primary determinants of drug clearance, and hence of steady-state drug concentrations, and of efficacy and toxicity in the individual patient. Oxidative metabolism is the main clearance mechanism for many drugs and there is increasing recognition of the importance of decreased activity of the hepatic cytochrome P450 system in critically ill patients. Renal failure is equally important with both filtration and secretion clearance mechanisms being required for the removal of parent drugs and their active metabolites. Changes in the steady-state volume of distribution are often secondary to renal failure and may lower the effective drug concentrations in the body. Failure of the central nervous system, muscle, the endothelial system and endocrine system may also affect the pharmacokinetics of specific drugs. Time-dependency of alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters is well documented for some drugs. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology in the critically ill and applying pharmacokinetic principles in selection of drug and dose regimen is, therefore, crucial to optimising the pharmacodynamic response and outcome.

Pharmacokinetics of antimicrobial agents in the respiratory tract

The ability of antibiotics to penetrate into the respiratory tract has been investigated at several sites, namely, sputum and bronchial secretions, tissue homogenates, pleural fluid and, more recently, epithelial lining fluid and alveolar macrophages. The major reason for such investigations is that these data may be helpful to a more thorough understanding of drug distribution in the lung tissue and fluids and to a more accurate prediction of clinical outcome. However, the study of drug concentration at each of these sites presents problems in terms of methodology and data interpretation. The advantages and disadvantages of each of these methods are considered, and the data on penetration of betalactams, aminoglycosides, macrolides, fluoroquinolones and other antimicrobial agents (including antifungal and antiprotozoan drugs) are reviewed.

Aminoglycoside dosing: one, two or three times a day?

The safety and efficacy of conventional aminoglycoside dosing regimens have been proven in clinical trials. Higher doses at longer intervals may be more effective if they result in higher peak serum levels of the drug, but few trials of "once-a-day" dosing have shown improved clinical outcome. The clinical safety of allowing trough serum levels to fall below the minimum inhibitory concentration is not established. Literal "once-a-day" dosing will result in drug accumulation and toxicity in patients with reduced renal clearance, and in potential lack of efficacy and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant organisms in those with increased renal clearance. However, modified "once-a-day" dosing, with the interval determined by the individual's renal clearance rate (hence avoiding subtherapeutic trough levels), will avoid these problems.