Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants isolated from AIDS patients after prolonged adefovir dipivoxil therapy

Nucleotide HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors: tenofovir and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes the class of nucleotide HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors and summarises recent findings related to tenofovir and its oral prodrug tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, currently the only nucleotide approved for the treatment of HIV infection. In addition, novel strategies in the design of anti-HIV nucleotides and their prodrugs are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of studies have demonstrated a potent and durable clinical efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in combination with other antiretrovirals, particularly lamivudine or emtricitabine and efavirenz. The prophylactic antiretroviral effect of tenofovir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate has been characterized in various animal models and is currently being evaluated in controlled clinical studies. In addition, efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate against hepatitis B virus has been established and is currently being explored in phase III trials. The identification of GS-7340, an alternative prodrug of tenofovir has raised the possibility of using phosphonoamidates as novel prodrugs allowing for an effective intracellular delivery of nucleotides.

SUMMARY

The concept of nucleotides as a novel class of antiretroviral therapeutics has been successfully validated through tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, a nucleotide prodrug that exhibits potent and durable clinical efficacy and favourable safety profile both in treatment-naïve and experienced HIV-infected patients. Several novel nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors such as GS-9148, PMDTA, and PMEO have recently emerged from continuing preclinical drug discovery efforts.

Novel drug resistance pattern associated with the mutations K70G and M184V in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase

We describe an unusual pathway of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase resistance during therapy with tenofovir-emtricitabine, characterized initially by the mutations K70E and M184V and later by K70G and M184V, with the two mutations coexisting on the same viral genome. Phenotypic resistance to lamivudine, emtricitabine, abacavir, didanosine, and tenofovir was observed, whereas susceptibility to zidovudine and stavudine was preserved.

Sequential emergence and clinical implications of viral mutants with K70E and K65R mutation in reverse transcriptase during prolonged tenofovir monotherapy in rhesus macaques with chronic RT-SHIV infection

BACKGROUND

We reported previously on the emergence and clinical implications of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVmac251) mutants with a K65R mutation in reverse transcriptase (RT), and the role of CD8+ cell-mediated immune responses in suppressing viremia during tenofovir therapy. Because of significant sequence differences between SIV and HIV-1 RT that affect drug susceptibilities and mutational patterns, it is unclear to what extent findings with SIV can be extrapolated to HIV-1 RT. Accordingly, to model HIV-1 RT responses, 12 macaques were inoculated with RT-SHIV, a chimeric SIV containing HIV-1 RT, and started on prolonged tenofovir therapy 5 months later.

RESULTS

The early virologic response to tenofovir correlated with baseline viral RNA levels and expression of the MHC class I allele Mamu-A*01. For all animals, sensitive real-time PCR assays detected the transient emergence of K70E RT mutants within 4 weeks of therapy, which were then replaced by K65R mutants within 12 weeks of therapy. For most animals, the occurrence of these mutations preceded a partial rebound of plasma viremia to levels that remained on average 10-fold below baseline values. One animal eventually suppressed K65R viremia to undetectable levels for more than 4 years; sequential experiments using CD8+ cell depletion and tenofovir interruption demonstrated that both CD8+ cells and continued tenofovir therapy were required for sustained suppression of viremia.

CONCLUSION

This is the first evidence that tenofovir therapy can select directly for K70E viral mutants in vivo. The observations on the clinical implications of the K65R RT-SHIV mutants were consistent with those of SIVmac251, and suggest that for persons infected with K65R HIV-1 both immune-mediated and drug-dependent antiviral activities play a role in controlling viremia. These findings suggest also that even in the presence of K65R virus, continuation of tenofovir treatment as part of HAART may be beneficial, particularly when assisted by antiviral immune responses.

Molecular mechanism by which the K70E mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase confers resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

The K70E mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) has become more prevalent in clinical samples, particularly in isolates derived from patients for whom triple-nucleoside regimens that include tenofovir (TNV), abacavir, and lamivudine (3TC) failed. To elucidate the molecular mechanism by which this mutation confers resistance to these nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTI), we conducted detailed biochemical analyses comparing wild-type (WT), K70E, and K65R HIV-1 RT. Pre-steady-state kinetic experiments demonstrate that the K70E mutation in HIV-1 RT allows the enzyme to discriminate between the natural deoxynucleoside triphosphate substrate and the NRTI triphosphate (NRTI-TP). Compared to the WT enzyme, K70E RT showed 2.1-, 2.3-, and 3.5-fold-higher levels of resistance toward TNV-diphosphate, carbovir-TP, and 3TC-TP, respectively. By comparison, K65R RT demonstrated 12.4-, 12.0-, and 13.1-fold-higher levels of resistance, respectively, toward the same analogs. NRTI-TP discrimination by the K70E (and K65R) mutation was primarily due to decreased rates of NRTI-TP incorporation and not to changes in analog binding affinity. The K65R and K70E mutations also profoundly impaired the ability of RT to excise 3'-azido-2',3'-dideoxythymidine monophosphate (AZT-MP) and other NRTI-MP from the 3' end of a chain-terminated primer. When introduced into an enzyme with the thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) M41L, L210W, and T215Y, the K70E mutation inhibited ATP-mediated excision of AZT-MP. Taken together, these findings indicate that the K70E mutation, like the K65R mutation, reduces susceptibility to NRTI by selectively decreasing NRTI-TP incorporation and is antagonistic to TAM-mediated nucleotide excision.

Risk of selecting K65R in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected individuals with chronic hepatitis B treated with adefovir

Seven antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected individuals with chronic hepatitis B treated with adefovir for longer than 6 months were assessed. Using bulk population sequencing and a sensitive limiting dilution analysis, the selection of K65R or other resistance mutations did not occur in HIV, suggesting that adefovir can be confidently used as hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapy in HIV/HBV-co-infected patients who do not require antiretroviral therapy.

Selection of a rare resistance profile in an HIV-1-infected patient exhibiting a failure to an antiretroviral regimen including tenofovir DF

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) resistance profile, K65R, K70E and M184V, on reverse transcriptase gene was associated with the virologic rebound consecutively to the switch of lopinavir/r to tenofovir DF in a stable regimen with nucleoside backbone of abacavir, lamivudine and didanosine. The high selective pressure on the same resistance pathway was probably associated with the loss of antiviral potency, even in well-controlled patient.

Successful therapy of hepatitis B with tenofovir in HIV-infected patients failing previous adefovir and lamivudine treatment

Three HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis B (genotype A) were switched to adefovir therapy after unsuccessful lamivudine treatment. Surprisingly, adefovir therapy failed, although none of the virus isolates displayed mutations known to be associated with adefovir resistance (A181V, N236T). In two isolates we identified hepatitis B virus DNA polymerase mutation L217R, in one case we found multiple frameshifts in the same region. In all cases adefovir was replaced by tenofovir, resulting in a significant drop in the viral load.

Adefovir dipivoxil: review of a novel acyclic nucleoside analogue

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADF) is a novel acyclic nucleoside analogue that has recently been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV). Adefovir was initially assessed at higher doses for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, in these studies, nephrotoxicity proved a dose-limiting side effect. Large randomised controlled studies have recently shown that ADF results in histological, virological and biochemical improvement in both hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic HBV. While the rate of HBeAg seroconversion at 1 year (12%) was lower than both lamivudine and interferon, this increases with prolonged treatment. The clinical improvements occurred without serious side effects or the development of resistance at the dose of 10 mg daily, in treatment trials of up to 2 years, although resistance has now been observed. In addition, the drug is efficacious in HBV/HIV co-infection and hepatitis B-infected liver transplant recipients, particularly in those who have developed lamivudine resistance. ADF can be added as a treatment option to existing treatment options (interferon-alpha and lamivudine) and assumes a role in the ongoing management of chronic HBV. The optimal use of ADF as either a monotherapy or as part of combination therapy requires further assessment.

Resistance to adefovir dipivoxil therapy associated with the selection of a novel mutation in the HBV polymerase

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Adefovir dipivoxil effectively inhibits both hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication and disease activity in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Resistance to treatment was not observed in 2 recent large placebo-controlled 48-week studies with this drug. The aim of this study was to characterize adefovir resistance in a patient who developed clinical and virologic evidence of breakthrough during a 96-week course of treatment.

METHODS

HBV DNA was PCR amplified and sequenced. Phenotypic studies used patient-derived HBV as well as specific mutations created by site-directed mutagenesis of a HBV/baculovirus recombinant.

RESULTS

Following the commencement of treatment with adefovir dipivoxil, the patient initially responded with a 2.4 log(10) decrease in serum HBV DNA and normalization of alanine aminotransaminase levels by week 16. During the second year of treatment, however, serum HBV DNA rose progressively, eventually returning to near-pretreatment levels. This increase in viral replication was associated with a marked increase in alanine aminotransferase and mild changes in bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin time. Comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction sequencing identified a novel asparagine to threonine mutation at residue rt236 in domain D of the HBV polymerase. In vitro testing of a laboratory strain encoding the rtN236T mutation and testing of patient-derived virus confirmed that the rtN236T substitution caused a marked reduction in susceptibility to adefovir.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of this novel mutation in the HBV polymerase confers resistance to adefovir dipivoxil. The patient responded to subsequent lamivudine therapy, achieving normalization of alanine aminotransferase and a significant decrease in serum HBV DNA.

Comparisons of the Hbv and HIV Polymerase, and Antiviral Resistance Mutations

The antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B is limited by the selection of antiviral resistance mutations. Primary resistance to lamivudine occurs at rtM204I/V in the C Domain of the polymerase. Recently, resistance to adefovir has also been described in the D Domain at rtN236T. The treatment of patients with resistant virus without complete suppression can lead to the further selection of compensatory mutations. Thus, to gain an understanding of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase and also mutations associated with resistance, a three-dimensional model of the HBV reverse transcriptase core region based on homology with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was created. A comparative analysis of the HIV polymerase and the model of HBV polymerase was performed. In addition, the antiviral resistance mutations including potential compensatory mutations were mapped to determine their effect on the HBV polymerase model, especially in the nucleotide binding site.

Resistance surveillance in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with adefovir dipivoxil for up to 60 weeks

Current therapies for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection do not provide adequate long-term control of viral replication in the majority of patients. Monotherapy with nucleoside analogs, such as lamivudine and famciclovir, is effective for short periods but results in the emergence of drug-resistant HBV in a substantial number of patients within 1 year of therapy. Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) has demonstrated clinical activity against wild-type and lamivudine-resistant HBV, but it is unclear whether resistance mutations will emerge after long-term therapy with this drug. To determine whether extended treatment with ADV led to the emergence of drug-resistant populations of HBV, we analyzed virus isolated from patients currently enrolled in a long-term open-label study. The reverse transcriptase domain of HBV polymerase was amplified and sequenced from patients that had received a cumulative exposure of up to 60 weeks of ADV. During our analyses, several previously unreported amino acid substitutions were observed in the reverse transcriptase domain of HBV. Importantly, none of the observed mutations occurred in more than 1 patient, nor were they associated with an adefovir-resistant phenotype in vitro. Furthermore, none of the patients from whom these mutant viruses were isolated had evidence of virologic rebound. In conclusion, these results, although based on a limited number of patients, suggest that treatment with ADV does not lead to the emergence of resistant virus after up to 60 weeks of therapy.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Type 1 reverse transcriptase resistance mutations in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-HIV-coinfected patients treated for HBV chronic infection once daily with 10 milligrams of adefovir dipivoxil combined with lamivudine

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) at a suboptimal concentration for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (10 mg once daily) can be used to treat hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in HIV-1-HBV-coinfected patients and does not, even in the case of uncontrolled HIV-1 replication, select for either ADV mutations at codons 65 and 70 or any other particular HIV-1 reverse transcriptase resistance profile.

Adefovir and tenofovir susceptibilities of HIV-1 after 24 to 48 weeks of adefovir dipivoxil therapy: genotypic and phenotypic analyses of study GS-96-408

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether genotypic changes in HIV-1 (HIV) reverse transcriptase (RT) occur during adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) therapy that may alter the susceptibility of HIV to adefovir or the related nucleotide inhibitor, tenofovir.

DESIGN AND METHODS

GS-96-408 was a 1:1 randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of 120-mg daily ADV compared with placebo for the treatment of HIV when added to stable background antiretroviral therapy (ART). Of 442 patients enrolled, 142 were prospectively selected for a virology substudy. Baseline and posttreatment (weeks 24-48) plasma samples were genotypically analyzed in HIV RT. HIV from ADV-treated patients who developed RT mutations at week 24 were also phenotypically analyzed.

RESULTS

Nucleoside-associated RT mutations arose with similar frequency among the ADV-and placebo-treated patients, 32% (n = 23) and 28% (n = 20), respectively, during the 24-week blinded treatment phase. RT mutations previously selected by adefovir in vitro (K70E or K65R) did not develop in any patient. Most mutations were typical zidovudine (ZDV)-resistance mutations (e.g., M41L, D67N, K70R, T215Y) in patients taking ZDV or stavudine (d4T) concomitantly, demonstrating directly in the placebo arm that d4T is able to select for these mutations. There appeared to be more patients developing D67N and K70R mutations in the ADV arm versus more T215Y mutations in the placebo arm. Between weeks 24 and 48, 19 of 50 patients (38%) in the ADV arm developed similar RT mutations. The mean HIV RNA responses at weeks 24 and 48 among the ADV-treated patients developing RT mutations were -0.68 log(10) copies/ml (n = 23) and -0.52 log(10) copies/ml (n = 19), respectively, similar to the overall week-24 and week-48 responses (-0.53 and 0.48 log(10) copies/ml, respectively). Patient-derived HIV expressing the observed RT mutations showed insignificant decreases in adefovir susceptibility compared with wild-type in 12 of 16 cases (< threefold). HIV from 1 patient showed significantly reduced susceptibility to tenofovir, which was in association with a double insertion mutation after codon 69 that was also present at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV RT changes that arose during ADV therapy appear attributable to the patient's background ART. ADV therapy may have influenced the pattern of ZDV-associated resistance mutations that developed, but this did not result in an observed loss of viral load suppression. There was a trend toward decreased phenotypic susceptibility to adefovir in ADV-treated patients, with 4 of 16 analyzed patients showing mild, but significantly decreased susceptibility associated with the additional ZDV-associated mutations. Decreased susceptibility to the related nucleotide analog, tenofovir, was not observed to develop in ADV-treated patients.

Zidovudine and stavudine sequencing in HIV treatment planning: findings from the CHORUS HIV cohort

BACKGROUND

Optimal sequencing of zidovudine and stavudine in antiretroviral therapy has not been elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of the sequence of therapeutic regimens containing zidovudine and stavudine on HIV-1 RNA and CD4 lymphocyte counts over 12 months.

DESIGN

Observational, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Four large outpatient, HIV practices participating in the community-based Collaborations in HIV Outcomes Research-U.S. (CHORUS) cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

940 HIV-infected patients.

METHODS

Comparison of HIV-1 RNA and CD4 lymphocyte responses in patients sequenced from zidovudine to stavudine or from stavudine to zidovudine using repeated measures regression models fit to outcomes by application of generalized estimating equation (GEE) methodology.

RESULTS

Patients treated with zidovudine prior to stavudine (n = 834) achieved a greater mean drop from baseline HIV-1 RNA (p = .01) and higher proportion of undetectable HIV-1 RNA results (p = .05) over 12 months than those sequenced from stavudine to zidovudine (n = 106). CD4+ lymphocyte increases did not differ between the groups (p = .6).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior zidovudine therapy was not associated with long-term attenuation of HIV-1 RNA or CD4 response to subsequent stavudine-containing regimens. Zidovudine before stavudine may have benefit in a strategic long-term therapeutic plan.

Resistance of hepatitis B virus to antiviral drugs: current aspects and directions for future investigation

Despite the existence of vaccines, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major health problem worldwide. Interferon therapy successfully controls infection in only a small percentage of chronically infected individuals. The recent approval of the nucleoside analogue lamivudine for the treatment of chronic HBV infection has ushered in a new era of antiviral therapy. While lamivudine is highly effective at controlling viral infection short-term, prolonged therapy has been associated with an increasing incidence of viral resistance. Thus, it appears that lamivudine alone will not be sufficient to control chronic viral infection in the majority of individuals. In addition to lamivudine, several new nucleoside and nucleotide analogues that show promising antihepadnaviral activity are in various stages of development. Lamivudine resistance has been found to confer cross-resistance to some of these compounds and it is likely that resistance to newer antivirals may also develop during prolonged use. Drug resistance therefore poses a major threat to nucleoside analogue-based therapies for chronic HBV infection. Fortunately, combination chemotherapy (antiviral therapy with two or more agents) can minimize the chance that resistance will develop and can be expected to achieve sustained reductions in viral load, provided that suitable combinations of agents are chosen. Here we review the basis of drug resistance in HBV, with emphasis on aspects that are likely to affect drug choice in future.

Resistance against reverse transcriptase inhibitors

The response to antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients is limited by the emergence of drug resistance. This resistance is a consequence of the high rate of HIV mutation, the high rate of viral replication (especially when potent multidrug therapies are not used or taken reliably), and the selective effect of these drugs, which favors emergence of mutations that can establish clinical drug resistance. The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), which typically includes at least 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) and a protease inhibitor or a nonnucleoside RTI, for most treatment-naive patients results in a reduction of viral load below the limit of detection determined by currently available HIV RNA assays. It is this marked reduction that results in durable viral suppression, usually only possible by the simultaneous use of 3 or 4 drugs. The RTI components of HAART are crucial for these benefits of combination therapy. Specific amino acid changes are associated with resistance to several RTIs, but new mutation complexes have been observed that can confer broad cross-resistance within this class. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance assays to measure drug resistance are being developed, but refinements in both methodology and our ability to interpret results of these assays are necessary before they are introduced into widespread clinical use.

Effect of PMPA and PMEA on the kinetics of viral load in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques

In this study we compared the effect of postexposure treatment of the acyclic nucleoside analogs 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)-adenine (PMEA) and 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)-adenine (PMPA) on the kinetics of viral load in the blood and lymph nodes of rhesus macaques chronically infected with SIVmac251 for 18 weeks. Two of the four macaques treated with PMPA (20 mg/kg per day) for 28 consecutive days had demonstrable reductions in viral loads of 1.5 and 3 logs. Three of four macaques given the same dosing regimen of PMEA had viral load reductions ranging from 1.25 to 2.8 logs. Furthermore, treatment with either drug caused a reduction in virus burden in the lymph nodes by 2 weeks posttreatment. However, in both PMEA- and PMPA-treated animals, viral loads rebounded to day of treatment levels by 2 weeks after termination of treatment. The extent to which viral load was suppressed was similar for both drugs. In contrast, viral loads in three of four mock-treated animals remained persistently high throughout the study. This study has demonstrated that postexposure treatment with these acyclic nucleoside analogs could modulate the kinetics of viral load reduction in some animals.

In vitro selection and characterization of HIV-1 with reduced susceptibility to PMPA

9-(2-phosphonomethoxypropyl)adenine (PMPA) has demonstrated remarkable anti-simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) activity in macaque models of SIV infection and transmission prevention. Recently, PMPA and its oral prodrug, bis-POC PMPA, have also shown potent anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) activity in Phase I clinical studies. In vitro experiments were performed to address the resistance properties of PMPA. After eight passages in increasing concentrations of PMPA, HIV-1IIIB was able to grow in the presence of 2 microM PMPA, fivefold above the IC50 of PMPA for wild-type parental virus. Sequence analysis of the reverse transcriptase (RT) genes from four of 15 RT clones demonstrated the presence of a K65R substitution in RT and recombinant HIV expressing the K65R RT mutation showed a threefold to fourfold increase in IC50 value for PMPA as compared to wild-type. Additional experiments demonstrated that viruses expressing other nucleoside-associated RT resistance mutations all showed wild-type or < threefold reduced susceptibility to PMPA in vitro. Interestingly, lamivudine-resistant viruses expressing the M184V RT mutation showed wild-type to slightly increased susceptibility to PMPA in vitro and addition of the M184V mutation to HIV with the K65R mutation resulted in reversion to wild-type susceptibility for PMPA. In agreement with the cell culture findings, Escherichia coli-expressed K65R RT showed fivefold reduced susceptibility to PMPA diphosphate, the active moiety of PMPA. Furthermore, in combination experiments, PMPA with hydroxyurea showed synergistic inhibition of HIV replication in vitro. The potent antiretroviral activity and favourable resistance profile of PMPA and bis-POC PMPA are being further investigated in ongoing clinical trials.

Adefovir dipivoxil

Adefovir dipivoxil is an ester prodrug of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor adefovir (PMEA), the prototype compound of the acyclic nucleoside phosphonates. It has better oral bioavailability than the parent compound. Adefovir dipivoxil 120mg once daily significantly reduced viral load compared with placebo when added to standard antiretroviral therapy in a 6-month, double-blind study in patients with HIV infection. Viral suppression was maintained during an additional 6-month nonblind extension phase. The drug was most effective in patients with baseline isolates containing the M184V lamivudine resistance mutation according to data from a virological substudy of a large placebo-controlled trial. Adefovir dipivoxil 60mg was as effective as 120mg (both once daily) after 20 weeks' treatment in a randomised double-blind study in antiretroviral-experienced (protease inhibitor-naive) patients. Viral suppression was generally maintained in patients who developed new reverse transcriptase mutations during adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy or combination therapy for up to 12 months. No clear pattern of particular clinical resistance mutations has emerged. GI disturbances, hepatic effects and delayed renal abnormalities are the principal adverse events seen with adefovir dipivoxil. Reductions in serum free carnitine levels may occur and coadministration of L-carnitine is recommended.

Antiretroviral Drug Resistance in HIV-1

Progress in understanding antiretroviral resistance has evolved rapidly in recent years. Specific resistance mutations have been associated with virologic failure of different nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). These mutations vary in the extent of cross resistance they confer to other drugs in the same class. In addition, two novel mutational patterns conferring resistance to multiple NRTIs have been recognized. Considerable class-specific cross resistance also exists among viruses with reduced susceptibility to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). Among protease inhibitors, low level resistance that arises early during virologic failure may be drug specific in some situations, but high level resistance seen later during suboptimal therapy is likely to confer cross resistance to the entire class. Prevalence of drug resistance in infected patients appears to be considerable, and transmission of multidrug-resistant virus has been documented. Current methods of testing for resistance are promising, but they have significant limitations and require further clinical validation. The best approach to prevent resistance is to start treatment early during infection with a regimen that engenders good compliance and is potent enough to decrease viral load to below detection limits of the most sensitive assay available. Once resistance arises, salvage regimens in general have compromised efficacy and should be planned with attention to the patient's prior drug treatment history and the viruses' suspected or demonstrated resistance patterns.

Perspectives for the treatment of hepatitis B virus infections

Primarily resulting as a spin-off of the search for effective anti-HSV or anti-HIV agents, several compounds have been identified as effective and promising candidate anti-HBV drugs, i.e. famciclovir (penciclovir), BMS-200475, lamivudine (3TC), (-)FTC, L(-)Fd4C, L-FMAU, DAPD (DXG), bis(POM)-PMEA and bis(POC)-PMPA. They all inhibit HBV replication in Hep G2 2.2.15 at concentrations that are well below the cytotoxicity threshold. All these nucleoside analogues require three phosphorylation steps to be active, in their triphosphate form, as inhibitors of the HBV DNA polymerase, except for PMEA (adefovir) and PMPA (tenofovir), which need only two phosphorylation steps, to PMEApp and PMPApp, respectively, to interact as chain terminators with the HBV DNA polymerase reaction. Several of these compounds (for example, famciclovir, lamivudine and adefovir) have proven to be efficacious in the duck and/or woodchuck hepatitis models, and, accordingly, famciclovir, lamivudine and adefovir have also proven to be effective (i.e. in reducing HBV DNA levels) in patients with chronic HBV infection. Yet, famciclovir and lamivudine may lead to the emergence of resistance mutations (i.e. L528M and M552V/I) in the HBV DNA polymerase upon long-term treatment. These penciclovir- and lamivudine-resistant HBV mutants still retain susceptibility to adefovir, which, in turn, has so far not been found to engender resistance mutations in HBV. As has become obvious from the experience with the treatment of HIV infections, future HBV chemotherapy may reside in combination drug therapy so as to achieve the highest possible virus reduction, thereby minimizing the likelihood of drug resistance development.

Mutations in the hepatitis B virus polymerase gene associated with antiviral treatment for hepatitis B

Significant advances have been made, during the last 5 years, in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Several new antiviral agents: lamivudine, famciclovir, lobucavir and adefovir, have been shown to be safe and effective in inhibiting hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. These compounds can be administered orally and are well tolerated. However, virus clearance is uncommon after short courses (<6 months) of therapy. Lamivudine and famciclovir have been evaluated in Phase III clinical trials in patients with chronic hepatitis B as well as in liver transplant recipients. Unfortunately, drug-resistant mutants involving the HBV polymerase gene, leading to breakthrough infection, have been reported in some patients who have received long courses (>/= 12 months) of treatment. The incidence, clinical outcome and biological significance of these mutants will be reviewed.

Early short-term 9-[2-(R)-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]adenine treatment favorably alters the subsequent disease course in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected newborn Rhesus macaques

Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection of newborn macaques is a useful animal model of human pediatric AIDS to study disease pathogenesis and to develop intervention strategies aimed at delaying disease. In the present study, we demonstrate that very early events of infection greatly determine the ultimate disease course, as short-term antiviral drug administration during the initial viremia stage significantly delayed the onset of AIDS. Fourteen newborn macaques were inoculated orally with uncloned, highly virulent SIVmac251. The four untreated control animals showed persistently high virus levels and poor antiviral immune responses; they developed fatal immunodeficiency within 15 weeks. In contrast, SIV-infected newborn macaques which were started on 9-[2-(R)-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]adenine (PMPA) treatment at 5 days of age and continued for either 14 or 60 days showed reduced virus levels and enhanced antiviral immune responses. This short-term PMPA treatment did not induce detectable emergence of SIV mutants with reduced in vitro susceptibility to PMPA. Although viremia increased in most animals after PMPA treatment was withdrawn, all animals remained disease-free for at least 6 months. Our data suggest that short-term treatment with a potent antiviral drug regimen during the initial viremia will significantly prolong AIDS-free survival for HIV-infected infants and adults.

9-[2-(Phosphonomethoxy)propyl]adenine (PMPA) therapy prolongs survival of infant macaques inoculated with simian immunodeficiency virus with reduced susceptibility to PMPA

Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection of newborn rhesus macaques is a useful animal model of human immunodeficiency virus infection for the study of the emergence and clinical implications of drug-resistant viral mutants. We previously demonstrated that SIV-infected infant macaques receiving prolonged treatment with 9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]adenine (PMPA) developed viral mutants with fivefold reduced susceptibility to PMPA in vitro and that the development of these mutants was associated with the development of a K65R mutation and additional compensatory mutations in reverse transcriptase (RT). To study directly the virulence and clinical implications of these SIV mutants, two uncloned SIVmac isolates with similar fivefold reduced in vitro susceptibilities to PMPA but distinct RT genotypes, SIVmac055 (K65R, N69T, R82K A158S,S211N) and SIVmac385 (K65R, N69S, I118V), were each inoculated intravenously into six newborn rhesus macaques; 3 weeks later, three animals of each group were started on PMPA treatment. All six untreated animals developed persistently high levels of viremia and fatal immunodeficiency within 4 months. In contrast, the six PMPA-treated animals, despite having persistently high virus levels, survived significantly longer: 5 to 9 months for the three SIVmac055-infected infants and > or = 21 months for the three SIVmac385-infected infants. Virus from only one untreated animal demonstrated reversion to wild-type susceptibility and loss of the K65R mutation. In several other animals, additional RT mutations, including K64R and Y115F, were detected, but the biological role of these mutations is unclear since they did not affect the in vitro susceptibility of the virus to PMPA. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that although SIVmac mutants with the PMPA-selected K65R mutation in RT were highly virulent, PMPA treatment still offered strong therapeutic benefits. These results suggest that the potential emergence of HIV mutants with reduced susceptibility to PMPA in patients during prolonged PMPA therapy may not eliminate its therapeutic benefits.

New antivirals - mechanism of action and resistance development

In recent years, several novel treatment modalities emerged for a number of virus infections, including lamivudine for hepatitis B virus, abacavir, adefovir dipivoxyl and apropovir disprometil for human immunodeficiency virus, cidofovir for cytomegalovirus, and famciclovir (the oral prodrug of penciclovir) and cidofovir for other herpesviruses (i.e. herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus). For all drugs, resistance eventually develops upon prolonged administration to the infected individuals, albeit at a varying extent. In addition, new mutations related to multidrug resistance have recently been identified.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase expressing the K70E mutation exhibits a decrease in specific activity and processivity

Adefovir dipivoxil [9-(2-(bispivaloyloxymethyl)phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine (bis-POM PMEA)], an oral prodrug of adefovir (PMEA), is currently in phase III clinical testing for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection. Previous in vitro experiments have shown that HIV-1 recombinant viruses expressing either a K65R or a K70E mutation in reverse transcriptase (RT) have reduced sensitivity to PMEA and that the K70E mutant also has impaired replication capacity in vitro. Genotypic analyses of samples from patients enrolled in a phase I/II clinical trial of adefovir dipivoxil demonstrated that the K70E RT mutation developed in two of 29 patients during extended therapy. To further investigate the molecular mechanisms involved in the resistance to PMEA, we cloned, expressed, and purified HIV-1 RT enzymes carrying either the K65R or K70E and, for comparison, the M184V mutation. The Km values of dNTPs for these mutant enzymes were not significantly altered from wild-type RT. The Ki values for the K65R mutant were increased from wild-type by 2-5-fold against a variety of inhibitors, whereas the Ki values for the M184V mutant were increased 12-fold specifically for 2', 3'-dideoxy-3'-thiacytidine (3TC) triphosphate. The Ki values for the K70E mutant were increased for PMEA diphosphate and 3TC triphosphate by 2-3-fold. These results are in agreement with antiviral drug susceptibility assay results. The three recombinant enzymes were also evaluated for their specific activities and processivities. All mutants were reduced in specific activity with respect to wild-type RT. In single-cycle processivity studies, the M184V mutant was, as expected, notably impaired. The K70E mutant was also slightly impaired, whereas the K65R mutant was slightly more processive than wild-type. These results with recombinant K70E RT are consistent with the reduced in vitro replication capacity of the K70E RT mutant of HIV-1 and further demonstrate that the K70E mutation confers minor PMEA and 3TC resistance to HIV-1.