Safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily regimens of soft-gel capsule saquinavir plus minidose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-negative adults

Protease Inhibitors for the Treatment of HIV/AIDS: Recent Advances and Future Challenges

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is a chronic disease characterized by multiple life-threatening illnesses caused by a retro-virus, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). HIV infection slowly destroys the immune system and increases the risk of various other infections and diseases. Although, there is no immediate cure for HIV infection/AIDS, several drugs targeting various cruxes of HIV infection are used to slow down the progress of the disease and to boost the immune system. One of the key therapeutic strategies is Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) or ' AIDS cocktail' in a general sense, which is a customized combination of anti-retroviral drugs designed to combat the HIV infection. Since HAART's inception in 1995, this treatment was found to be effective in improving the life expectancy of HIV patients over two decades. Among various classes of HAART treatment regimen, Protease Inhibitors (PIs) are known to be widely used as a major component and found to be effective in treating HIV infection/AIDS. For the past several years, a variety of protease inhibitors have been reported. This review outlines the drug design strategies of PIs, chemical and pharmacological characteristics of some mechanism-based inhibitors, summarizes the recent developments in small molecule based drug discovery with HIV protease as a drug target. Further discussed are the pharmacology, PI drug resistance on HIV PR, adverse effects of HIV PIs and challenges/impediments in the successful application of HIV PIs as an important class of drugs in HAART regimen for the effective treatment of AIDS.

The changing face of an epidemic: healthy old age with HIV

The demographics of the HIV epidemic in the UK have changed significantly. Owing to a steady rate of new diagnoses and improved survival, the population of individuals living with HIV continues to increase. HIV is now widely considered to be a chronic condition and HIV-positive individuals are expected to live into old age. Increasing rates of age-related comorbidities challenge HIV care providers to deliver durable viral suppression, ensure long-term adherence to antiretroviral treatment and promote wellbeing into old age. High rates of mental health disorders and social stigma continue to have a negative impact on the quality of life of people living with HIV. Models of care must adapt to this evolving epidemic.

Pilot Study of Saquinavir and Lopinavir/Ritonavir Twice Daily in Protease Inhibitor-Naive HIV-Positive Patients

PURPOSE

Protease inhibitor (PI)-naive patients may have limited reverse transcriptase inhibitor (RTI) options due to resistance and/or toxicity. Effective, well-tolerated nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing regimens are therefore needed.

METHOD

This prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir (1000/400/100 mg bid) in PI-naive patients over 48 weeks. The regimen could be intensified with NRTIs if patients did not achieve virologic suppression by 12 weeks. The primary study endpoint was virologic suppression at 48 weeks. Additional study objectives included assessment of safety, CD4 cell counts, blood lipids, PI trough levels, and anthropometrics.

RESULTS

Of the 20 PI-naive study participants, 16 completed 48 weeks of study treatment, with no discontinuations attributed to virologic failure. Fourteen of 16 patients achieved virologic suppression with only the PIs; 2 patients required tenofovir intensification to achieve complete suppression. Median CD4 counts increased significantly over 48 weeks. Adverse events were generally mild and manageable. Extreme lipid elevations were uncommon, although moderate lipid elevations occurred in the majority of patients. Most patients reported some degree of central fat accumulation.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir 1000/400/100 mg bid with tenofovir intensification is a potent nucleoside-sparing regimen for PI-naive patients, associated with durable HIV suppression and improved CD4 cell counts. Fat accumulation and metabolic changes observed in this study warrant confirmation from ongoing trials.

The Effects of Once-Daily Saquinavir/Minidose Ritonavir on the Pharmacokinetics of Methadone

Twelve methadone-maintained HIV-negative subjects were given saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/rtv) 1600 mg/100 mg once daily for 14 days. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of total and unbound methadone enantiomers (R and S) were conducted before and after SQV/rtv. SQV/rtv was well tolerated, with no ACTG Grade 3-4 adverse events, no evidence of sedation, and no changes in methadone dose. For R-methadone (active isomer), C(max), AUC(0-24 h), and C(min) were unchanged, but percent unbound 4 hours after dosing was reduced by 12%. For S-methadone, no differences in pharmacokinetic parameters of total drug were seen, but unbound concentrations were reduced by 15% and 21% at 4 and 24 hours after dosing, respectively. SQV trough concentrations exceeded the anticipated EC(50) (50 ng/mL) in 10/12 subjects, persisting for at least 6 hours after the final dose in 4/6 subjects. Once-daily SQV/rtv in methadone-maintained subjects is safe and not associated with any clinically significant interaction with methadone during 14 days of concomitant administration.

Mechanisms of pharmacokinetic enhancement between ritonavir and saquinavir; micro/small dosing tests using midazolam (CYP3A4), fexofenadine (p-glycoprotein), and pravastatin (OATP1B1) as probe drugs

We investigated the mechanisms of ritonavir-mediated enhancement effect on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir using in vivo probes for CYP3A4 (midazolam), p-glycoprotein (fexofenadine), and OATP1B1 (pravastatin) following oral micro/small dosing. A cocktail of the drugs (2 mg of saquinavir, 100 µg of each probe) was administered to eight healthy volunteers (phase 1), and then coadministered with 20 mg (phase 2) and 100 mg (phase 3) of ritonavir. Plasma concentrations of the drugs were measured by validated LC-MS/MS methods. The mean plasma AUC0-24 (pg hour/mL) of saquinavir at phases 1, 2, and 3 was 101, 2 540, and 23 900 (P < .01), respectively. The relative area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC)0-24 ratios of midazolam and fexofenadine at phases 1, 2, and 3 were 1:5.9:14.7 (P < .01), and 1:1.4:2.2 (P < .01-.05), respectively. In contrast, there was no difference in the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin. Inhibition of intestinal and hepatic CYP3A-mediated metabolism, and intestinal p-glycoprotein-mediated efflux of saquinavir, but not OATP1B1, is involved in the enhancement mechanism. Micro/small dosing is useful for examining the mechanism of drug interactions without safety concern.

Analysis of the pharmacokinetic boosting effects of ritonavir on oral bioavailability of drugs in mice

  Ritonavir dramatically increases the bioavailability of a variety of concurrently administered drugs by inhibition of metabolic enzymes and drug transporters. The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which ritonavir's inhibition of drug transporters and/or CYP3A contributes to the increased oral bioavailability in mice. The area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) for orally administered saquinavir after coadministration with 50 mg/kg ritonavir dramatically increased (325-fold). As a result, the bioavailability, Fa·Fg and Fh increased 75-, 38- and twofold, respectively. In addition, the increase in the AUC predicted from the in vitro Ki value was ninefold, which was derived from the inhibition of metabolic enzymes by ritonavir in the liver. The remaining 36-fold increase in the AUC was considered to be derived from the inhibition in the small intestine. The AUCinf for probe substrate midazolam, fexofenadine, and pravastatin increased after the oral administration of ritonavir by only five-, 13-, and sevenfold, respectively. Moreover, the AUC0-12 for saquinavir was affected negligibly by itraconazole. These results indicate ritonavir mainly affects the first-pass effect of saquinavir in the small intestine, increasing the bioavailability of orally administered saquinavir. Furthermore, cyp isoforms other than CYP3A, which contribute to the metabolism of saquinavir in humans, are involved in the metabolism of saquinavir in mice.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic of once-daily boosted saquinavir (1500/100 mg) together with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in real life: a multicentre prospective study

Background

Ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQVr) is nowadays regarded as an alternative antiretroviral drug probably due to several drawbacks, such as its high pill burden, twice daily dosing and the requirement of 200 mg ritonavir when given at the current standard 1000/100 mg bid dosing. Several once-daily SQVr dosing schemes have been studied with the 200 mg SQV old formulations, trying to overcome some of these disadvantages. SQV 500 mg strength tablets became available at the end of 2005, thus facilitating a once-daily regimen with fewer pills, although there is very limited experience with this formulation yet.

Methods

Prospective, multicentre study in which efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of a regimen of once-daily SQVr 1500/100 mg plus 2 NRTIs were evaluated under routine clinical care conditions in either antiretroviral-naïve patients or in those with no previous history of antiretroviral treatments and/or genotypic resistance tests suggesting SQV resistance. Plasma SQV trough levels were measured by HPLV-UV.

Results

Five hundred and fourteen caucasian patients were included (47.2% coinfected with hepatitis C and/or B virus; 7.8% with cirrhosis). Efficacy at 52 weeks (plasma RNA-HIV <50 copies/ml) was 67.7% (CI₉₅: 63.6 - 71.7%) by intention-to-treat, and 92.2% (CI₉₅: 89.8 - 94.6%) by on-treatment analysis. The reasons for failure were: dropout or loss to follow-up (18.4%), virological failure (7.8%), adverse events (3.1%), and other reasons (4.6%). The high rate of dropout may be explained by an enrollement and follow-up under routine clinical care condition, and a population with a significant number of drug users. The median SQV Cmin (n = 49) was 295 ng/ml (range, 53-2172). The only variable associated with virological failure in the multivariate analysis was adherence (OR: 3.36; CI95, 1.51-7.46, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Our results suggests that SQVr (1500/100 mg) once-daily plus 2 NRTIs is an effective regimen, without severe clinical adverse events or hepatotoxicity, scarce lipid changes, and no interactions with methadone. All these factors and its once-daily administration suggest this regimen as an appropriate option in patients with no SQV resistance-associated mutations.

Current and Novel Inhibitors of HIV Protease

The design, development and clinical success of HIV protease inhibitors represent one of the most remarkable achievements of molecular medicine. This review describes all nine currently available FDA-approved protease inhibitors, discusses their pharmacokinetic properties, off-target activities, side-effects, and resistance profiles. The compounds in the various stages of clinical development are also introduced, as well as alternative approaches, aiming at other functional domains of HIV PR. The potential of these novel compounds to open new way to the rational drug design of human viruses is critically assessed.

How much ritonavir is needed to boost protease inhibitors? Systematic review of 17 dose-ranging pharmacokinetic trials

BACKGROUND

Ritonavir has been evaluated at boosting doses of 50–800 mg daily with seven protease inhibitors: amprenavir, atazanavir, darunavir, indinavir, lopinavir,saquinavir and tipranavir. Minimizing the boosting dose of ritonavir could improve tolerability and lower costs.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search identified 17 phamacokinetic trials using different ritonavir doses with protease inhibitors. The dose of ritonavir used was correlated with plasma levels of each boosted protease inhibitor. For the five pharmacokinetic trials of lopinavir/ritonavir, a meta-analysis was used to estimate the effects of lopinavir dose versus ritonavir dose on lopinavir pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Saquinavir, fosamprenavir and darunavir were boosted equally well by lower(50–100 mg) versus higher doses of ritonavir. Indinavir, tipranavir and lopinavir were boosted more by higher ritonavir doses. Data on atazanavir were inconclusive. The ritonavir dose-dependence of boosting effects did not correlate with their bioavailability or their effects on ritonavir plasma levels. Atazanavir and indinavir raised plasma ritonavir levels by 69–72%, whereas saquinavir had no effects on ritonavir. Darunavir,lopinavir, tipranavir and fosamprenavir all lowered ritonavir plasma levels. For the meta-analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir trials, the 200/150 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) dose of lopinavir/ritonavir (one Meltrex 200/50mg tablet and one ritonavir 100mg b.i.d.)showed lopinavir area under the curve and minimum concentration similar to the standard 400/100mg b.i.d. dose.

CONCLUSION

It may be possible to use three protease inhibitors (saquinavir, amprenavir and darunavir) with lower doses of ritonavir. A 200/150 mg b.i.d. dose of lopinavir/ritonavir could lower costs while maintaining very similar lopinavir plasma levels to the standard dose. New pharmaco enhancer drugs may need to be used at different doses to boost different antiretrovirals.

Reducing the boosting dose of ritonavir does not affect saquinavir plasma concentrations in HIV-1-infected individuals

Currently, the optimal boosting dose for saquinavir is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics profiles in a cross over setting comparing saquinavir/ritonavir 1500/50 mg (plus NRTI backbone) to saquinavir/ritonavir 1500/100 mg in the same HIV-infected, Thai individuals. The 50% reduction of ritonavir boosting did not result in a change in the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir, whereas the ritonavir exposure was significantly lower when a dose of 50 mg was administered.

The pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of boosted saquinavir tablets in HIV type-1-infected pregnant women

Background

Pregnancy affects the pharmacokinetics of most protease inhibitors. Saquinavir, when administered in a tablet formulation, has not been studied extensively in this setting.

Methods

A pharmacokinetic, prospective, multicentre trial of HIV type-1-infected pregnant women treated with saquinavir (500 mg tablets) boosted with ritonavir at a dose of 1,000/100 mg twice daily plus a nucleoside backbone was conducted. Pharmacokinetic curves were recorded for 12 h in the second trimester (week 20 ±2), the third trimester (week 33 ±2) and post-partum (weeks 4–6). Blood was sampled pre-dosing and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h post-dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using WinNonlin software version 4.1.

Results

A total of 37 women were included in the analysis. Mean (±sd) values for saquinavir area under the curve (AUC0–12h) were 23.47 h•mg/l (11.92) at week 20 ( n=16), 23.65 h•mg/l (9.07) at week 33 ( n=31) and 25.00 h•mg/l (11.81) post-partum ( n=9). There was no significant difference in the saquinavir AUC0–12h when comparing the data during pregnancy and post-partum. Subtherapeutic plasma concentrations of saquinavir (defined as <0.10 mg/l) were not observed throughout the study. No major safety concerns were noted.

Conclusions

Saquinavir exposure in the new tablet formulation generates adequate saquinavir concentrations throughout the course of pregnancy and is safe to use; therefore, no dose adjustment during pregnancy is needed.

A randomized trial of therapeutic drug monitoring of protease inhibitors in antiretroviral-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients

OBJECTIVE

Whether therapeutic drug monitoring of protease inhibitors improves outcomes in HIV-infected patients is controversial. We evaluated this strategy in a randomized, open-label clinical trial, using a normalized inhibitory quotient (NIQ), which incorporates drug exposure and viral drug resistance. NIQs < or = 1 may predict poor outcome and identify patients who could benefit from dose escalation.

DESIGN/METHODS

Eligible patients had a viral load > or =1000 copies/ml on a failing regimen, and began a new protease inhibitor containing regimen at entry. All FDA-approved protease inhibitors available during the study recruitment (June 2002-May 2006) were allowed. One hundred and eighty-three participants with NIQ < or = 1, on the basis of their week 2 protease inhibitor trough concentration and pre-entry drug resistance test, were randomized at week 4 to standard of care (SOC) or protease inhibitor dose escalation (TDM). The primary endpoint was change in log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration from randomization to 20 weeks later.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were randomized to SOC and 92 to TDM. NIQs increased more in the TDM arm compared to SOC (+69 versus +25%, P = 0.01). Despite this, TDM and SOC arms showed no difference in outcome (+0.09 versus +0.02 log10, P = 0.17). In retrospective subgroup analyses, patients with less HIV resistance to their protease inhibitors benefited from TDM (P = 0.002), as did black and Hispanic patients (P = 0.035 and 0.05, respectively). Differences between black and white patients persisted when accounting for protease inhibitor susceptibility.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no overall benefit of TDM. In post hoc subgroup analyses, TDM appeared beneficial in black and Hispanic patients, and in patients whose virus retained some susceptibility to the protease inhibitors in their regimen.

Pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of BILR 355, a second-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in healthy volunteers

BILR 355 is a second-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) under clinical development for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection, particularly in those who harbor virus resistant to the currently available NNRTIs. Two single-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel dose-escalation studies were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral BILR 355 administration alone and after coadministration with ritonavir (RTV) at 100 mg. Following a single dose of BILR 355 in oral solution, the mean half life (t(1/2)) was 2 to 4 h, with peak concentrations occurring at 0.5 to 1 h postadministration. The mean apparent clearance (CL/F) ranged from 79.2 to 246 liters/h for administered doses of 12.5 mg to 100 mg. This observed nonlinearity in CL/F resulted from the increased bioavailability attributed to a saturated absorption and/or elimination process at higher doses. In contrast, after the coadministration of single doses of 5 mg to 87.5 mg of BILR 355 with RTV, the mean CL/F ranged from 5.88 to 8.47 liters/h. Over the dose range (5 to 87.5 mg) studied, systemic BILR 355 exposures were approximately proportional to the doses administered when they were coadministered with RTV. With RTV coadministration, the mean t(1/2) increased to 10 to 16 h, and the mean time of the maximum concentration in plasma lengthened to 1.5 to 5 h. Compared to the values for BILR 355 given alone, the mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, the maximum concentration in plasma, and the t(1/2) of BILR 355 achieved after coadministration with RTV increased 15- to 30-fold, 2- to 5-fold, and 3- to 5-fold, respectively. In both studies, BILR 355 appeared to be safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers when the outcomes in the treated volunteers were compared with those in the placebo group.

Efficacy of Low-Dose Boosted Saquinavir Once Daily Plus Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Pregnant HIV-1-Infected Women With a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Strategy

The efficacy of low-dose, ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQV/rtv) once daily plus 2 nucleoside retrotranscriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in pregnant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected women was prospectively evaluated, ensuring a SQV minimum concentration (Cmin) >/=100 ng/mL with a therapeutic drug monitoring strategy. The primary clinical endpoint was the percentage of women with an HIV-RNA viral load (VL) of <50 copies/mL at the time of delivery. Forty-nine pregnancy episodes were included, with a median CD4 count and VL of 441/muL and 3710 copies/mL, respectively. Two patients were lost to follow-up and 1 patient discontinued treatment because of abdominal discomfort. SQV levels were in excess of the target Cmin in 43 of 46 episodes (93.4%) in which the end of pregnancy was reached on 1200/100 mg daily. The dosage was increased to 1600/100 mg in the remaining 3 episodes to achieve the target levels. By an intention-to-treat analysis, VL was undetectable at delivery in 43 episodes (87.7%; 95% confidence interval, 78.5-96.9) after a median of 18 weeks of treatment (range, 3-39). In the 3 episodes remaining, VLs of 110,400 copies/mL and no available data were observed after only 3 weeks of treatment. Mild adverse events attributable to SQV/rtv occurred in 6 of 49 pregnancies (12.2%). No cases of HIV vertical transmission were observed. The pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability of this regimen suggest that once-daily low-dose boosted SQV may be considered an appropriate option in PI-naive or limited-PI-experienced HIV-infected pregnant women. Nevertheless, therapeutic drug monitoring is advisable to maintain appropriate levels throughout pregnancy.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic data support once-daily low-dose boosted saquinavir (1,200 milligrams saquinavir with 100 milligrams ritonavir) in treatment-naive or limited protease inhibitor-experienced human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

We evaluated the plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of once-daily low-dose boosted saquinavir (SQVr; 1,200 of saquinavir [SQV] with 100 mg of ritonavir) plus two nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive or limited protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. A prospective study without entry restrictions on the plasma HIV-RNA (VL) or CD4 cell count was carried out. Plasma and intracellular SQV levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Efficacy was evaluated by an intention-to-treat analysis; treatment failure was defined as virological failure (a VL of >50 copies/ml after 24 weeks or a confirmed rebound to >50 copies/ml) or interruption for any reason. A total of 151 patients were included in the study (106 of them either had never received PI or had no previous virological failure on PIs) and could be characterized as follows: previous C3 stage, 28.9%; injection-drug users, 69.1%; subjects with chronic viral hepatitis, 53%; and subjects with cirrhosis, 10%. The median baseline CD4 level was 184/mul, and the median VL was 4.8 log(10) copies/ml. Median C(max), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h, and C(min) plasma and intracellular SQV levels were 3,672 and 10,105 ng/ml, 34,283 and 99,535 ng.h/ml, and 359 and 1,062 ng/ml, respectively. The efficacy as determined by intention to treat at 52 weeks was 69.7% (96% in the on-treatment analysis), with similar results regardless of the baseline VL and CD4 counts. Only five patients had virological failure despite adequate C(min) levels, but with a poor adherence (the only variable related to virological failure). Adverse events caused the withdrawal of the treatment in four patients (2.6%). In conclusion, given the pharmacokinetic profile, efficacy, and tolerability of this regimen, once-daily low-dose SQVr may be considered a treatment option in treatment-naive or limited PI-experienced HIV-infected patients, with the additional benefit of being currently the least-expensive PI-based regimen available.

Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir, atazanavir, and ritonavir in a twice-daily boosted double-protease inhibitor regimen

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir (ATV), saquinavir (SQV), and ritonavir (RTV) in a boosted double-protease inhibitor (PI) therapy regimen without reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs). The study design was as follows. Patients with limited RTI options received a PI combination of 300/100 mg ATV/RTV once daily and 1,000 mg SQV twice daily (group 1; n=49) without RTI comedication. The results were compared to the plasma concentrations of PIs of patients taking either 300 mg ATV/100 mg RTV once daily plus RTIs (group 2; n=72) or patients taking 1,000 mg SQV/100 mg RTV plus RTIs (group 3; n=90). The study methods were as follows. Patients were given a 12/24-h pharmacokinetic assessment at steady state. Drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The minimum and maximum concentrations (Cmin and Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve under steady-state conditions (AUCss), elimination half-life, time of maximum concentration and lag time were subject to statistical analysis. The results show that patients treated with ATV/SQV/RTV exhibited significantly high SQV concentrations and moderate enhancement of the AUCss of ATV in comparison to those of patients of the control groups: for SQV in groups 1 and 3, the geometric mean (GM) of the AUCss was 22,794 versus 15,759 ng.h/ml (GM ratio [GMR]=1.45; P<0.05), the GM of the Cmax was 3,257 versus 2,331 ng/ml (GMR=1.40; P<0.05), and the GM of the Cmin was 438 versus 437 ng/ml (GMR=1.00); for ATV in groups 1 and 2, the GM of the AUCss was 39,154 versus 33,626 ng.h/ml (GMR=1.16), the GM of the Cmax was 3,488 versus 2,924 ng/ml (GMR=1.20), and the GM of the Cmin was 515 versus 428 ng/ml (GMR=1.21). RTV levels were comparable for all groups. A subgroup analysis detected only marginal differences in ATV plasma exposure if combined with tenofovir-disoproxilfumarate and without it. We conclude that our pharmacokinetic results support the use of a boosted double-PI regimen of ATV/SQV/RTV as a treatment option for patients who need antiretroviral therapy without RTIs.

Plasma amprenavir pharmacokinetics and tolerability following administration of 1,400 milligrams of fosamprenavir once daily in combination with either 100 or 200 milligrams of ritonavir in healthy volunteers

Once-daily (QD) fosamprenavir (FPV) at 1,400 mg boosted with low-dose ritonavir (RTV) at 200 mg is effective when it is used in combination regimens for the initial treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Whether a lower RTV boosting dose (i.e., 100 mg QD) could ensure sufficient amprenavir (APV) concentrations with improved safety/tolerability is unknown. This randomized, two 14-day-period, crossover pharmacokinetic study compared the steady-state plasma APV concentrations, safety, and tolerability of FPV at 1,400 mg QD boosted with either 100 mg or 200 mg of RTV QD in 36 healthy volunteers. Geometric least-square (GLS) mean ratios and the associated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for plasma APV maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing period (AUC0-tau), and trough concentrations (Ctau) during each dosing period. Equivalence between regimens (90% CIs of GLS mean ratios, 0.80 to 1.25) was observed for the plasma APV AUC0-tau (GLS mean ratio, 0.90 [90% CI, 0.84 to 0.96]) and Cmax (0.97 [90% CI, 0.91 to 1.04]). The APV Ctau was 38% lower with RTV at 100 mg QD than with RTV at 200 mg QD (GLS mean ratio, 0.62 [90% CI, 0.55 to 0.69]) but remained sixfold higher than the protein-corrected 50% inhibitory concentration for wild-type virus, with the lowest APV Ctau observed during the 100-mg QD period being nearly threefold higher. The GLS mean APV Ctau was 2.5 times higher than the historical Ctau for unboosted FPV at 1,400 mg twice daily. Fewer clinical adverse drug events and smaller increases in triglyceride levels were observed with the RTV 100-mg QD regimen. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of FPV at 1,400 mg QD boosted by RTV at 100 mg QD are now under way with antiretroviral therapy-naïve patients.

Differential protein binding of indinavir and saquinavir in matched maternal and umbilical cord plasma

AIMS

To determine whether lower umbilical cord than maternal binding of indinavir and saquinavir contributed to the low cord : maternal (C : M) total concentration ratios reported previously.

METHODS

Indinavir and saquinavir unbound fraction (fu) was determined using equilibrium dialysis. Buffer solutions of human serum albumin (HSA) (20.0, 30.0, 40.0 g l(-1)) and alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein (AAG) (0.20, 0.60, 2.00 g l(-1)) were spiked with indinavir (1.00 and 8.00 mg l(-1)) or saquinavir (0.15 and 1.50 mg l(-1)). Matched maternal and umbilical cord plasma was spiked with 1.00 mg l(-1) indinavir (n = 12) or 0.15 mg l(-1) saquinavir (n = 20). Spiked protein/plasma solutions were dialyzed against isotonic phosphate buffer, at 37 degrees C. At equilibrium, indinavir and saquinavir concentrations were quantified, and the f(u) determined.

RESULTS

Indinavir and saquinavir demonstrated protein concentration-dependent binding in buffer solutions of HSA and AAG. Indinavir f(u) was significantly higher in umbilical cord (0.53 +/- 0.12) compared with maternal (0.36 +/- 0.11) plasma (95% CI of the difference -0.26, -0.097). Similarly, saquinavir fu was different between umbilical cord (0.0090 +/- 0.0046) and maternal plasma (0.0066 +/- 0.0039) (95% CI of the difference -0.0032, -0.0016). The transplacental AAG concentration gradient contributed significantly to the binding differential of both drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The differential plasma binding of both drugs, which was largely the result of the transplacental AAG concentration gradient, would contribute to the low C : M total plasma concentration ratios observed previously. Unbound concentrations of indinavir and saquinavir are likely to be substantially lower in umbilical cord than maternal plasma.

Lack of sex-related differences in saquinavir pharmacokinetics in an HIV-seronegative cohort

AIMS

To examine the influence of sex on steady-state saquinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-seronegative volunteers administered saquinavir without a concomitant protease inhibitor.

METHODS

Thirty-eight healthy volunteers (14 female) received saquinavir soft-gel capsules 1200 mg three times daily for 3 days to achieve steady-state conditions. Following administration of the 10th dose, blood was collected serially over 8 h for measurement of saquinavir plasma concentrations. Saquinavir pharmacokinetic parameter values were determined using noncompartmental methods and compared between males and females. CYP3A phenotype (using oral midazolam) and MDR-1 genotypes at positions 3435 and 2677 were determined for all subjects in order to characterize possible mechanisms for any observed sex-related differences.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in saquinavir AUC(0-8) or any other pharmacokinetic parameter value between the sexes. These findings persisted after mathematically correcting for total body weight. The mean weight-normalized AUC(0-8) was 29.9 (95% confidence interval 15.5, 44.3) and 29.8 (18.6, 40.9) ng h(-1) ml(-1) kg(-1) for males and females, respectively. No significant difference in CYP3A phenotype was observed between the groups; likewise, the distribution of MDR-1 genotypes was similar for males and females.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to previous study findings, results from this investigation showed no difference in saquinavir pharmacokinetics between males and females. The discrepancy between our findings and those previously reported may be explained by the fact that we evaluated HIV-seronegative volunteers and administered saquinavir in the absence of concomitant protease inhibitors such as ritonavir. Caution must be exercised when extrapolating pharmacokinetic data from healthy volunteer studies (including sex-based pharmacokinetic differences) to HIV-infected populations or to patients receiving additional concurrent medications.

Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir hard-gel/ritonavir and atazanavir when combined once daily in HIV Type 1-infected individuals administered different atazanavir doses

The pharmacokinetics and short-term safety of atazanavir 150 and 200 mg, when coadministered with saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once daily, were evaluated. On day 1, atazanavir 150 mg once daily, was added to saquinavir/ritonavir regimens and sampling was performed to evaluate saquinavir, ritonavir, and atazanavir pharmacokinetics (day 11). Atazanavir was increased to 200 mg and pharmacokinetic assessment repeated (day 30). Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare saquinavir, ritonavir, and atazanavir pharmacokinetic parameters in the present study and for 14 of the subjects treated with saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once daily without and with atazanavir 300 mg who participated in a previous trial. Geometric mean (GM) saquinavir AUC0-24, Ctrough, and Cmax were 30,589 and 32,312 ng . h/ml, 166 and 182 ng/ml, and 4267 and 4261 ng/ml when coadministered with atazanavir 150 and 200 mg (n = 18). On days 11 and 30, saquinavir and atazanavir Ctrough remained >100 ng/ml in 13/18, 14/18, 18/18, and 17/18 patients. Among the above mentioned 14 subjects, significant increases in saquinavir Ctrough (87%, 92%, 99%), Cmax (40%, 55%, 44%), and AUC0-24 (51%, 60%, 63%) were observed with atazanavir 300, 150, and 200 mg. Ritonavir AUC0-24 and Cmax were significantly increased with the addition of atazanavir 300 mg only. Atazanavir enhances saquinavir and ritonavir by a mechanism that requires elucidation. While saquinavir enhancement was apparently independent of atazanavir dose, atazanavir 300 mg produced an increase in ritonavir Cmax, which is not observed with lower atazanavir doses. Atazanavir-related hyperbilirubinemia was dose dependent. However, higher saquinavir and atazanavir exposure may be required to suppress HIV-resistant strain replication.

Antiretroviral therapy 2006: Pharmacology, applications, and special situations

As we approach the completion of the first 25 years of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, there have been dramatic improvements in the care of patients with HIV infection. These have prolonged life and decreased morbidity. There are twenty currently available antiretrovirals approved in the United States for the treatment of this infection. The medications, including their pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and dosing are reviewed. In addition, the current approach to the use of these medicines is discussed. We have included a section addressing common comorbid conditions including hepatitis B and C along with tuberculosis.

Pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of high-dose combinations of fosamprenavir and ritonavir

High-dose combinations of fosamprenavir (FPV) and ritonavir (RTV) were evaluated in healthy adult subjects in order to select doses for further study in multiple protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Two high-dose regimens, FPV 1,400 mg twice a day (BID) plus RTV 100 mg BID and FPV 1,400 mg BID plus RTV 200 mg BID, were planned to be compared to the approved regimen, FPV 700 mg BID plus RTV 100 mg BID, in a randomized three-period crossover study. Forty-two healthy adult subjects were enrolled, and 39 subjects completed period 1. Due to marked hepatic transaminase elevations, predominantly with FPV 1,400 mg BID plus RTV 200 mg BID, the study was terminated prematurely. For FPV 1,400 mg BID plus RTV 100 mg BID, the values for plasma amprenavir (APV) area under the concentration-time profile over the dosing interval (tau) at steady state [AUC(0-tau)], maximum concentration of drug in plasma (C(max)), and plasma concentration at the end of tau at steady state (C(tau)) were 54, 81, and 26% higher, respectively, and the values for plasma RTV AUC(0-tau), C(max), and C(tau) were 49% higher, 71% higher, and 11% lower, respectively, than those for FPV 700 mg BID plus RTV 100 mg BID. For FPV 1,400 mg BID plus RTV 200 mg BID, the values for plasma APV AUC(0-tau), C(max), and C(tau) were 26, 48, and 32% higher, respectively, and the values for plasma RTV AUC(0-tau), C(max), and C(tau) increased 4.15-fold, 4.17-fold, and 3.99-fold, respectively, compared to those for FPV 700 mg BID plus RTV 100 mg BID. FPV 1,400 mg BID plus RTV 200 mg BID is not recommended due to an increased rate of marked hepatic transaminase elevations and lack of pharmacokinetic advantage. FPV 1,400 mg BID plus RTV 100 mg BID is currently under clinical evaluation in multiple PI-experienced patients.

Analysis of genotypic and phenotypic clinical cut-off levels for ritonavir-boosted saquinavir

There is a need for new, clinically relevant interpretation algorithms for genotypic and phenotypic resistance for ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQV/r) at the current approved dosage [1000/100 mg twice a day (bid)]. Clinical cut-off levels, which correlate baseline measures of resistance with HIV RNA responses in large cohorts or clinical trials, are the ideal reference for developing such algorithms. Cut-off levels previously developed for unboosted saquinavir may no longer apply, as the plasma drug levels with SQV/r are significantly higher and may be able partially to overcome protease inhibitor-resistant HIV. Clinical cut-off levels for SQV/r, assessed in several cohort studies and clinical trials, also suggest that multiple genotypic mutations are required for complete loss of virological response. For phenotypic analysis of resistance, saquinavir cut-off levels 10-11-fold higher than the wild-type IC50 have best distinguished responders from non-responders in cohort studies. Using Virtual Phenotype, a 12.3-fold upper cut-off level was determined from analysis of large cohort databases. These genotypic and phenotypic algorithms need to be validated in larger prospective studies.

Pharmacoenhancement of Protease Inhibitors

Toxicity, adherence problems, and virological failure may limit treatment by protease inhibitor-containing regimens at standard doses. Addition of low-dose ritonavir results in a high plasma concentration of coadministered protease inhibitor resulting in decreased pill burden, a reduction in the number of doses, fewer food and/or fluid restrictions, and a higher rate of virological suppression. These effects are due to improved pharmacokinetics of coadministered protease inhibitors.

Once-daily antiretroviral therapy: Spanish Consensus Statement

BACKGROUND

Administration of antiretroviral therapy (ART) once daily is creating extraordinary interest among the members of the scientific community and also among those who receive the therapy. However, in clinical practice, some doubts remain about its use.

OBJECTIVES

This document examines the characteristics and possibilities of treatment administered once daily.

METHODS

Consensus of 248 Spanish experts in the field.

RESULTS

Once-daily dosing is considered an added value which could favour adherence and, therefore, efficacy, as well as the quality of life of certain patients, however, the objective of adequate adherence in the long term is often difficult to achieve regardless of the treatment used. In theory, any patient can receive once-daily therapy, although some patients could particularly benefit from it, e.g. those with unfavourable social or personal circumstances, including drug users, patients whose treatment must be supervised, patients receiving multiple medications, or those who need rescue therapy after multiple treatment failures. At present, it is possible to design once-daily ART using some of the combinations of drugs considered as first-choice in national and international recommendations for antiretroviral therapy, but the options are still limited. The marketing of new drugs with this characteristic could allow us to increase the number and types of patient who can benefit from once-daily regimens, including those patients who need rescue therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily ART is a good alternative to regimens administered several times each day when a potent combination of active drugs is available.

Phanuphak P, Ubolyam S, Sankote J, Pongprayoon P, Saenawat S, Wicharuk S, Nonenoy S, Wannachai N, Chautrakarn S, Chuenyam T, Jeanpan N, Nuchapong T, Jupimai T, le Braz M, Bunyaprawit P, Putthawong S, Penglimoon Y, Seekaow N, Karakate W, Khongsawad S, Kiatatchasai W, Ananworanich J, Hill A, Siangphoe U, Ruxrungtham K, Prasithsirikul W, Chetchotisakd P, Kiertiburanakul S, Munsakul W, Raksakulkarn P, Tansuphasawadikul S, Nuesch R, Cooper DA, Hirschel B. A Prospective Study of Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Saquinavir/Ritonavir plus Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Treatment-Naive Thai Patients

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), as induction therapy before enrollment in a randomized trial of structured treatment interruption strategies.

Design

Two-hundred antiretroviral-naive patients with CD4+ cell counts between 200–350 at screening were enrolled in this open-label 24week study.

Methods

Patients were followed up every 8 weeks for CD4+ cells, HIV RNA, and clinical and laboratory toxicities. Results: Two-hundred patients were enrolled with median baseline CD4+ cell count of 267 cells/μl and HIV RNA 50 118 (4.7 log10) copies/ml. After 24 weeks of treatment, 191 of 200 (96%) patients had below 400 copies/ml HIV RNA, with 177/200 (89%) below 50 copies/ml (intent to treat, missing equals failure method), with a median rise in CD4+ cell count of 122 cells/μl. There was no significant correlation between the minimum concentration of saquinavir and HIV RNA reductions at week 8 ( P=0.957) or absolute HIV RNA at week 24 ( P=0.77).

Conclusion

First-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir plus two NRTIs showed strong antiviral efficacy over 24 weeks, and should be evaluated in larger prospective randomized clinical trials.

Indinavir protein-free concentrations when used in indinavir/ritonavir combination therapy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the in vivo protein-binding characteristics of indinavir (IDV) in the presence of ritonavir (RTV) relative to total IDV plasma concentrations.

DESIGN

The ACTG protocol 5055 was a multicenter study comparing the safety and pharmacokinetics of IDV/RTV at doses of 800/200 and 400/400 mg twice daily in HIV-infected adults.

METHODS

Forty-four patients underwent a 12-h intensive pharmacokinetic assessment after 2 weeks of therapy. Three plasma samples from 35 patients at Cmax, 6 and 12 h post dose were used to determine the unbound IDV concentrations. Unbound IDV was separated in plasma samples using ultra-filtration and measured using high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection.

RESULTS

Mean IDV protein-bound fraction across all time points in the 800/200 and 400/400 arm were 53.4 and 51.8%, respectively. In the 800/200 arm, percentage binding at Cmax was 50% compared with 56% at 12 h (P = 0.008). In the 400/400 arm, percentage binding at Cmax was 49% compared with 54% at 12 h (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of plasma protein binding of IDV in this study was less than in previously published data with IDV alone. Although IDV concentrations differed across the arms, the percentage of IDV protein binding at all time points was not different between the 800/200 and 400/400 arms. However, the percentage of IDV protein binding at Cmax was significantly lower compared with 12 h in each arm, possibly suggesting that IDV protein binding is concentration-dependent. These data suggest that RTV affects IDV protein-binding characteristics and IDV also exhibits concentration dependent binding when administered with RTV.

[Therapeutic strategies for HIV infection: clinical approach with boost antiproteases in adults]

When boosted by ritonavir, protease inhibitors trough concentration and inhibitory quotient are increased, thus enhancing their therapeutic margin. Although the inhibitory quotient is less high when patients are pre-treated and have developed resistance mutations, it nonetheless offers a precious alternative for patients experiencing therapeutic failure. Despite great inter-individual variability in virologic responses, boosted protease inhibitors can be compared to boosted lopinavir. The latter seems superior to saquinavir boosted and indinavir boosted in terms of virologic efficacy and resistance mutations selection. A conclusion regarding boosted atazanavir and boosted fos-amprenavir versus lopinavir cannot be absolutely drawn on the basis of present results.

Drug interactions in the management of HIV infection

The availability of antiretroviral therapy has significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality of HIV infection. In addition, improved treatment of opportunistic infections and comorbidities common to patients with HIV is further prolonging the lives of patients. Improvement in the treatment of HIV has led to a significant increase in the number of medications which caregivers are able to utilise to manage HIV/AIDS. Antiretroviral medications, as well as many of the drugs used in the management of opportunistic infections and primary care (e.g., macrolide antibiotics, azole antifungals, cholesterol-lowering medications), are particularly prone to drug interactions. The interpretation of clinically significant interactions is complicated by the rate at which new information on drug metabolism and transport is becoming available. Management of drug interactions in HIV is further confounded by conflicting study results and differences between documented and theoretical inter-actions. The mechanisms and significance of interactions involving antiretrovirals, drugs used for opportunistic infections, and other medications commonly used in HIV patients will be reviewed.

Boosted saquinavir hard gel formulation exposure in HIV-infected subjects: ritonavir 100 mg once daily versus twice daily

OBJECTIVES

The amount of ritonavir needed to enhance saquinavir hard gel (hg) plasma concentrations is unclear. Reduced ritonavir dosing may help to reduce ritonavir-related side effects and costs. This study examined the pharmacokinetics of twice-daily saquinavir-hg (1000 mg) in the presence of ritonavir 100 mg, dosed twice-daily and once-daily on one single occasion.

METHODS

Eighteen HIV-infected adults taking saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice-daily underwent pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment of saquinavir/ritonavir on day 1 following a morning saquinavir/ritonavir dose. On day 2, PK assessment was repeated when subjects took saquinavir without ritonavir. Drug intake (with a standard meal containing 20 g of fat) was timed on days -1, 1 and 2. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess changes in saquinavir PK parameters.

RESULTS

Geometric mean saquinavir AUC(0-12), C(trough), C(max) and elimination half-life on days 1 and 2 were 14 389 and 9590 ng.h/mL, 331 and 234 ng/mL, 2503 and 1893 ng/mL and 2.80 and 2.82 h, respectively. The GMR (95% CI) for these parameters were 0.67 (0.53-0.84), 0.71 (0.48-1.04), 0.76 (0.58-0.98) and 1.01 (0.86-1.18), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Withholding a ritonavir dose significantly reduces overall saquinavir exposure and C(max), but had no impact on the elimination half-life. These data establish the need to administer saquinavir and ritonavir simultaneously.

Effect of Chronic Administration of Ritonavir on Function of Cytochrome P450 3A and P-Glycoprotein in Rats

Ritonavir (RTV) is well known as an inhibitor of many drugs that are metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A or fluxed via P-glycoprotein (Pgp), although it is also reported that RTV is a potent inducer for them. In this study, to elucidate these contradictory phenomena, functional changes of CYP3A or Pgp during chronic administration of RTV were examined in rats. After pretreatment with RTV for indicated days (day 3-day 14), rats were used in the experiments. The area under the plasma drug concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) after oral administration of RTV (20 mg/kg) to these rats showed an RTV-treatment period-dependent decrease, and the mean AUC(0-infinity) of RTV in Day 14 rats decreased significantly by 57% as compared to the control. The AUC(0-infinity) after intravenous (i.v.) administration of RTV to Day 3 and Day 5 rats increased significantly by 28% and 22%, respectively, while there were no significant changes in the AUC(0-infinity) in Day 7 and Day 14 rats as compared to the control. As for i.v. administration of erythromycin (EM) or midazolam (MDZ) to RTV-treated rats, the AUC(0-infinity)in Day 3 and Day 5 rats increased significantly as compared to the control, while in Day 7 rats and rifampicin-treated rats, the AUC(0-infinity) of EM decreased significantly by 82% and 42%, respectively, as compared to the control. For MDZ, there were no significant changes in the AUC(0-infinity) in Day 7 or Day 14 rats. After i.v. administration of rhodamine123 (Rho123), the excretion clearances from blood circulation to the intestinal lumen and the biliary excretion clearances in Day 14 rats increased markedly by 2.2-fold and 2.6-fold as compared to the control. It has been confirmed that RTV is not only a potent inhibitor but also a potent inducer of CYP3A, and that RTV is a potent inducer of intestinal Pgp. This property of RTV is responsible for regulating the oral bioavailability of drugs that are mediated by CYP3A and Pgp.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Summary of Efficacy and Tolerability of Atazanavir

The efficacy of HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy is now well established and has provided benefits to many patients with HIV infection. Atazanavir is a new azapeptide PI compound that was recently approved in the US and Europe. Atazanavir is recommended in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Atazanavir is rapidly absorbed and administration of a single dose of atazanavir with a light meal resulted in a 70% increase in area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC); therefore atazanavir should be taken with food. Atazanavir is 86% bound to human serum protein independently of concentration. Concentration in body fluids appeared to be lower than plasma concentration. Like other PIs, atazanavir is extensively metabolised by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isoenzymes. The mean terminal elimination half-life in healthy volunteers was approximately 7 hours at steady state following administration of atazanavir 400 mg daily with a light meal. When atazanavir 300 mg was coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg on a once-daily dosage regimen, atazanavir AUC from 0 to 24 hours and minimum plasma concentration were increased by 3- to 4-fold and approximately 10-fold, respectively, compared with atazanavir 300 mg alone. Therefore, ritonavir boosted atazanavir regimen (ritonavir 100 mg and atazanavir 300 mg once daily) is increasingly favoured in some patients. Efavirenz, a potent CYP3A inducer, decreased atazanavir concentrations by 75% and, unexpectedly, tenofovir, a nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor, decreased atazanavir concentrations by 25%. Average predose concentrations in HIV-infected patients who received atazanavir 400mg once daily were 273 ng/mL, which was believed to be several-fold higher than protein-binding corrected 50% inhibitory concentration of wild-type viruses. In HIV-infected patients who received once-daily ritonavir (100mg) boosted atazanavir (300 mg), mean (+/-SD) trough concentration was 862 (+/-838) ng/mL. Several clinical trials showed the efficacy of atazanavir 400 mg once daily with a nucleoside analogue backbone in antiretroviral-naive patients. The atazanavir 300/ritonavir 100 mg once-daily combination coadministered with other antiretrovirals showed the efficacy of this strategy in patients receiving efavirenz or in moderately antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients. Recommended once-daily doses of atazanavir taken with food are either 400 mg or 300 mg in combination with low dose ritonavir (100 mg) in moderately antiretroviral-experienced patients. Major advantages of atazanavir to date are its simplicity of administration (once-daily administration) and its less undesirable effect on the lipid profiles in patients.

Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir Hard-Gel/Ritonavir/Fosamprenavir in HIV-1???Infected Patients

BACKGROUND

In vitro synergy and complementary resistance profiles provide a strong rationale for combining fosamprenavir with saquinavir as part of a potent double-boosted protease inhibitor regimen. This study evaluated the steady-state pharmacokinetics of saquinavir 1000 mg twice daily (bid) and fosamprenavir 700 mg bid administered with 2 different doses of ritonavir (100 and 200 mg bid) in HIV-1-infected subjects.

METHODS

On day 1, 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles for saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg bid) were obtained for 18 subjects. All subjects were receiving ongoing treatment with a saquinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen. Fosamprenavir 700 mg bid was then added to the regimen, and pharmacokinetic sampling was repeated for all 3 agents at day 11. The ritonavir daily dose was then increased to 200 mg bid, and a 3rd pharmacokinetic profile was obtained at day 22.

RESULTS

The coadministration of fosamprenavir 700 mg bid with saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg bid resulted in a statistically nonsignificant decrease in saquinavir concentrations (by 14, 9, and 24%, for saquinavir area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]0-12, C(max), and C(trough), respectively). This was compensated for by an increased ritonavir dose of 200 mg bid, which resulted in a statistically nonsignificant increase in saquinavir exposure compared with baseline. Amprenavir levels did not appear to be significantly influenced by coadministration of saquinavir with fosamprenavir. Fosamprenavir significantly reduced ritonavir exposure, but the increased ritonavir dose compensated for this interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that saquinavir/ritonavir/fosamprenavir was well tolerated over the study period. Saquinavir plasma concentrations were slightly lowered by the addition of fosamprenavir to the regimen. However, the addition of a further 100 mg ritonavir bid restored the small and insignificant decrease.

Pharmacokinetic study of saquinavir hard gel caps/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients: 1600/100 mg once-daily compared with 2000/100 mg once-daily and 1000/100 mg twice-daily

OBJECTIVES

A pharmacokinetic comparison of three dosing regimens of saquinavir/ritonavir was carried out: 1600/100 mg once-daily with 1000/100 mg twice-daily, and 1600/100 mg once-daily with 2000/100 mg once-daily.

METHODS

Twenty patients on saquinavir hard gel caps/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once-daily in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for at least 4 weeks were enrolled and randomized to either saquinavir hard gel caps/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice-daily or 2000/100 mg once-daily. Two pharmacokinetic curves were plotted, at baseline (day 0) and 7 days after the switch. Plasma concentrations were measured at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 (and 24 for once-daily dosing) hours after drug intake by validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay (HPLC). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-24 or AUC0-12), maximum and minimum concentration (Cmax and Cmin) and elimination half-life were calculated using a non-compartmental model.

RESULTS

Compared with saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once-daily dosing, the saquinavir AUC and Cmin improved significantly when dosed as 1000/100 mg twice-daily (53% and 299%, respectively), and as 2000/100 mg once-daily (71% and 65%, respectively). Low Cmin in three subjects at baseline was corrected after switch to the other dosages. Saquinavir/ritonavir 2000/100 mg once-daily was also associated with a significant increase in saquinavir Cmax (52%) compared with saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once-daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Saquinavir/ritonavir when dosed as 2000/100 mg once-daily or 1000/100 mg twice-daily achieves higher saquinavir plasma levels compared with saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once-daily. Taking the convenience of once-daily dosing into consideration, dosage of 2000/100 mg once-daily may be preferred.

Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitor therapy

Combination antiretroviral therapy with two or more protease inhibitors has become the standard of care in the treatment of HIV infection. Dual protein inhibitor (PI) regimens, such as lopinavir/ritonavir, are commonly used as initial PI therapy. As viral resistance increases and the development of mechanistically novel protease inhibitors decreases, clinicians turn to ritonavir-enhanced dual PI therapy to treat salvage patients. Potency of these combination regimens is increased while pill burden, food restrictions and often, side effects are decreased. These clinical advantages result from the enhancement of their pharmacological properties, including alterations in the absorption and metabolism process. Alterations in the absorption and metabolism of protease inhibitors when co-administered with a cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme inhibitor, such as low dose ritonavir, are reflected by impressive changes in pharmacokinetic parameters. For example, the addition of ritonavir 100 or 200 mg to saquinavir 1200-1800 mg has been shown to increase saquinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by approximately 300-800% compared with saquinavir alone. The ability of ritonavir to increase plasma trough concentrations (C(min)) of concomitantly administered PIs is perhaps the greatest clinical benefit of dual or ritonavir-enhanced dual PI therapy since inadequate concentrations of antiretrovirals may support long term antiretroviral resistance. For example, lopinavir 400mg alone in healthy volunteers produced plasma concentrations that briefly exceeded the concentration required to inhibit 50% of viral replication (IC(50)). Yet, when low doses of ritonavir were added, C(min) values were 50- to 100-fold greater than the concentration required to produce 50% of the maximum effect for wild-type HIV (EC(50)). The following manuscript will discuss the rationale for combining protease inhibitors and will review pertinent pharmacokinetic and clinical data on these combination regimens.

The Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Initial Virologic Response of a Triple???Protease Inhibitor Salvage Regimen Containing Amprenavir, Saquinavir, and Ritonavir

The aim of this study was to quantify the change in saquinavir and amprenavir exposure when combined and used with low-dose ritonavir; to evaluate 24-week safety and immunologic and virologic response. It was a randomized, nonblinded, prospective study. There were 11 HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-experienced, male and female subjects > or = 18 years old, median HIV-1 RNA and CD4(+) T-cell count of 4.86 log copies/mL and 10(6) cells/mm(3), respectively. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive saquinavir 1000 mg/ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours or amprenavir 600 mg/ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours for 7 days. After 12-hour pharmacokinetic sampling, the third protease inhibitor (PI) was added, and pharmacokinetics sampling was repeated 14 days later. Subsequent PI dosage adjustments were based on real-time pharmacokinetic assessment. Saquinavir did not affect amprenavir or ritonavir pharmacokinetics. Amprenavir decreased area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12h)) and C(12h) for saquinavir 82 and 61%, and 74 and 75% for ritonavir. An adjusted PI regimen of amprenavir 600 mg/saquinavir 1400 mg/ritonavir 200 mg every 12 hours returned saquinavir exposure to baseline. At 24 weeks, HIV RNA declined a median of 1.55 log copies/mL and CD4(+) T-cell counts increased a median of 52 cells/mm(3). Gastrointestinal events predominated and were mild to moderate. These data suggest that amprenavir/saquinavir/ritonavir may be a viable salvage regimen in heavily PI-experienced individuals. New formulations of amprenavir and saquinavir may simplify this regimen.

Atazanavir enhances saquinavir hard-gel concentrations in a ritonavir-boosted once-daily regimen

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir hard-gel capsules/ritonavir/atazanavir co-administered once daily at 1600/100/300 mg in HIV-infected individuals.

METHODS

Eighteen patients receiving saquinavir/ritonavir switched to 1600/100 mg once daily a minimum of 3 days before the study. On study day 1, levels of saquinavir and ritonavir were determined over 24 h. Atazanavir (300 mg once daily) was then added to the regimen. On day 11, a pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Atazanavir was discontinued on day 32. Drug concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare saquinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters, with and without atazanavir. A safety analysis was performed at screening, days 1, 11, 32 and follow-up.

RESULTS

After the addition of atazanavir, statistically significant increases in saquinavir trough plasma concentration (Ctrough GMR, 95% CI 2.12, 1.72-3.50), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax 1.42, 1.24-1.94), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0-24 h (AUC0-24 1.60, 1.35-2.43) and ritonavir Cmax (1.58, 1.32-2.08), AUC0-24 (1.41, 1.22-1.74) were observed. The pharmacokinetics of atazanavir compared with those obtained in patients receiving atazanavir/ritonavir without saquinavir. Four patients developed scleral icterus and two jaundice. Total and unconjugated bilirubin increased approximately fivefold during atazanavir therapy.

CONCLUSION

The addition of atazanavir to saquinavir/ritonavir increased saquinavir Ctrough, Cmax and AUC0-24 by 112, 42 and 60%. Ritonavir Cmax and AUCo-24 increased by 34 and 41%. The regimen was well tolerated, with no significant change in laboratory parameters, except for the occurrence of hyperbilirubinemia.

Sex-Related Differences in the Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Saquinavir Soft-Gelatin Capsules Boosted with Low-Dose Ritonavir in Patients Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of saquinavir soft-gelatin capsules (SGC) plus low-dose ritonavir administered once/day in antiretroviral-naive adult patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and to evaluate any sex-related differences.

DESIGN

Single-center, open-label, pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

University-affiliated outpatient HIV clinic.

PATIENTS

Six men and seven women with HIV-1.

INTERVENTION

Each patient received saquinavir SGC 1600 mg and ritonavir 100 mg for a 14-day course of therapy. Nine serial blood samples during 24 hours were collected on day 14 of therapy

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Plasma saquinavir and ritonavir concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Standard noncompartmental methods were used to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters. The unpaired Student t test was used for the statistical comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters between male and female patients. Once-daily saquinavir SGC plus ritonavir was generally well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic data from five men and five women were evaluable. The median saquinavir area under the concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours (AUC0-24) in the female patients (82,300 ng x hr/ml) was significantly (p=0.036) higher than that in the male patients (47,400 ng x hr/ml). This relationship remained significant for weight-adjusted saquinavir AUC0-24 values. Ritonavir's apparent oral clearance in the women was significantly (p=0.023) lower than that in the men.

CONCLUSION

Significantly higher plasma concentrations of saquinavir were achieved in female compared with male HIV-infected patients receiving once-daily saquinavir SGC 1600 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg.

Contributions of CYP3A4, P-glycoprotein, and serum protein binding to the intestinal first-pass extraction of saquinavir

Using CYP3A4-expressing Caco-2 cell monolayers, we assessed the roles of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism, P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-mediated efflux, and serum protein binding in determining the extent of the intestinal first-pass extraction (E(i)) of saquinavir. Saquinavir (5-40 microM) was added to the apical compartment of culture inserts. After 3 h, apical and basolateral media and cell scrapings were analyzed for saquinavir and a major CYP3A4-mediated metabolite (M7). The intracellular concentration of saquinavir was estimated from the degree of inhibition of CYP3A4 catalytic activity (midazolam 1'-hydroxylation). Compared with vehicle, the P-gp inhibitor LY335979 (zosuquidar trihydrochloride) (0.5 microM, apical) increased saquinavir cell content and M7 formation rate, but decreased the E(i) by approximately 50% due to a >90% increase in the amount of saquinavir recovered in the basolateral compartment. Compared with LY335779, physiological concentrations of basolateral serum proteins [human serum albumin and alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG)] increased saquinavir permeability by a similar degree but decreased the E(i) by approximately 50% due to a marked reduction in M7 formation. Increasing AAG concentration (1.0-2.5 g/l) had no additional effect on permeability or E(i). An estimate of the range of the E(i) of saquinavir (7-60%) was less than has been predicted based on in vitro data (>99%) but was consistent with a clinical study involving grapefruit juice. The incidental finding of greater M7 formation after basolateral compared with apical dosing could not be explained by differences in saquinavir cell content. We conclude that variable intestinal first-pass extraction of saquinavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients could reflect variation in P-gp-mediated efflux and/or CYP3A4-catalyzed metabolism, but not in blood AAG levels.

Once-Daily Dosing of Saquinavir Soft-Gel Capsules and Ritonavir Combination in HIV-1-Infected Patients (Imea015 Study)

This was a prospective pilot study evaluating a saquinavir (SQV) soft-gel capsules (SGC)/ritonavir (RTV)-containing once-daily regimen over a follow-up of 3 months. The primary end-point was to determine the number of patients both remaining on treatment at month 3 and with trough SQV plasma concentration 24 h after the last intake (C24h) exceeding the inhibition of 95% of viral replication in vitro (IC95). The secondary end-points were to investigate the immuno-virological efficacy and safety of SQV-SGC/RTV once daily, and to explore SQV concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Twenty-three antiretroviral-naive and 17 protease inhibitors (PIs) experienced HIV-1-infected patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA level below 200 copies/ml were enrolled. They were assigned to SQV-SGC/RTV (1600/100 mg once daily) combined with nucleoside and/or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. In a subgroup of 13 patients, both plasma and intracellular SQV concentrations were determined. By intent to treat analysis the percentage of success at month 3 was 87.5% (confidence interval: 73.2–95.8%) with 78.3% in naive and 100% in PI-experienced patients. SQV C24h and intracellular concentrations [median (range, n)] were 241 ng/ml (40–1209, 35) and 323 ng/ml (168–475, 12), respectively. Intracellular concentrations showed an accumulation of SQV in PBMCs persisting during 24 h. Neither immunological nor virological failure was observed. Clinical and biological tolerance was acceptable in all patients but three with adverse effects leading to discontinuation. These data confirmed the short-term efficacy of SQV-SGC/RTV once-daily regimen based on SQV therapeutic drug monitoring.

This work was presented in part at the 2nd International Conference on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Infection, Noordwijk, the Netherlands, 2-4 April 2001 (Abstract 3.16); and at the 1st International Conference on HIV Pathogenesis & Treatment, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 8–11 July 2001 (Abstract 344).

Pharmacology considerations for antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children

The contemporary treatment of the child infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) unavoidably requires combination therapy with antiretroviral agents and may include additional drugs for the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections or other disease states. The current guidelines for the treatment of the HIV-infected child recommend that the same principles of treatment for adults should apply to children. However, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of many agents and regimens used in adults have not been defined adequately in children, and large-scale clinical trials to establish safety and show efficacy have not been completed. Therefore, the clinician will be required to use agents with incomplete knowledge about their pharmacologic properties. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the pediatric pharmacologic principles, a review of the pharmacologic characteristics of selected antiretroviral agents in children, and a prospectus on the design of drug dosing regimens in children.

A Once-Daily Haart Regimen Containing Indinavir + Ritonavir plus One Or Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (Pipo Study)

Introduction

There is an increased interest in developing once-daily regimens for the treatment of HIV-infected patients. A Phase II study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics, and short-term safety and efficacy of an indinavir/ritonavir combination as part of a once-daily regimen.

Methods

HIV-infected patients with either proven poor compliance to HAART regimens in the past or an anticipated poor compliance to such a regimen in the future were eligible for this study. They received a once-daily regimen consisting of indinavir 1200 mg, ritonavir 400 mg, and one or two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), also administered once daily with food. A 24 h pharmacokinetic profile was constructed in a subset of patients. Short-term safety and efficacy were evaluated at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Results

A total of 64 patients were included in this study, of whom 27 (42.2%) were treatment-naive. The geometric mean (+95% CI) of indinavir AUC0–24h, Cmax and Cmin as determined in an unselected group of 16 patients were 84.9 (69.7–103.5) mg/l.h, 12.0 (10.2–14.1) mg/l and 0.15 (0.09–0.26) mg/l, respectively. A large interpatient variability was observed, with five out of the 16 subjects having a Cmin value below the minimum effective concentration of 0.10 mg/l. During the 24 weeks of follow-up nine patients (14.1%) discontinued study medication, two due to medication-related toxicity. Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported most frequently (50.0%), followed by skin effects (45.3%), joint pain (9.4%) and urological complaints (7.8%). No patient developed nephrolithiasis. The median (+interquartile range) serum creatinine level in the 64 patients increased slightly from 74 (63–88) μmol/l to 79 (66–92) μmol/l during the 24 weeks of follow-up. One new patient reached a grade 1 elevation in serum creatinine, which normalized during the follow-up; five other patients with elevated serum creatinine at baseline remained stable. During the 24 weeks of follow-up, the proportion of patients with a viral load <500 copies/ml increased from 35.1% at baseline to 71.4% (ITT NC=F analysis) or 83.3% (OT analysis), and from 0% at baseline to 76.2% (ITT NC=F analysis) or 100.0% (OT analysis) in treatment-experienced and -naive patients, respectively. This was accompanied by a mean increase in CD4 cell count of 52 and 220 cells/mm3 in these two sub-groups, respectively.

Conclusion

The 24-week follow-up data of this study indicate favourable pharmacokinetics of an indinavir/ritonavir 1200/400 mg combination as part of a once-daily regimen consisting also of one or two NRTIs. Short-term safety and efficacy were also satisfactory. Long-term follow up is planned to evaluate the durability of these results.

A review of low-dose ritonavir in protease inhibitor combination therapy

The pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitors center around the microsomal enzyme cytochrome P-450 3A4. As a potent inhibitor of this enzyme, ritonavir can increase the bioavailability and half-life of coadministered protease inhibitors. Evidence suggests that increased exposure to protease inhibitors is clinically relevant. Antiretroviral treatment with low-dose ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, indinavir, and saquinavir has durable virological activity and shows impressive immune reconstitution. Although tolerable in most cases, gastrointestinal side effects, hepatotoxicity, and blood lipid abnormalities remain relevant issues. Additional study will elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of twice-daily, low-dose ritonavir-boosted regimens and determine whether once-daily regimens based on this principle will have a lasting role in clinical practice.

Therapy with atazanavir plus saquinavir in patients failing highly active antiretroviral therapy: a randomized comparative pilot trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety, efficacy of atazanavir (400 and 600 mg)/saquinavir (1200 mg) once daily versus ritonavir/saquinavir (400 mg/400 mg) twice daily with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in highly active antiretroviral therapy failure.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Randomized, multinational, 48-week, pilot trial with antiretroviral-experienced patients having at least 1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml, 100 x 106 CD4 cells/l (75 x 106 cells/l without AIDS diagnosis) and virological response to a prior regimen. Efficacy was evaluated by HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell changes from baseline to 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Comparable efficacy across groups at 48 weeks: mean HIV-1 RNA decreases, 1.44, 1.19 and 1.66 log(10) copies/ml (P = NS) and comparable virological response (> 1.0 log(10) decrease HIV-1 RNA or HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/ml) was achieved in 41, 29 and 35% (P = NS); and mean CD4 cell increases, 109, 55 and 149 x 106 cells/l in atazanavir 400-mg, atazanavir 600-mg and ritonavir groups, respectively. There were fewer adverse event discontinuations in the atazanavir groups (9%, 11%) versus the ritonavir group (30%) and atazanavir lacked adverse effects on lipids. In the atazanavir 400-mg, atazanavir 600-mg and ritonavir groups the mean changes from baseline at 48 weeks in fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations were -0.6, -6.7 and 23.2%, respectively and in fasting triglyceride concentrations they were -4.8, -27.1 and 93.0%, respectively (P < 0.05, LDL cholesterol; P < 0.001, fasting triglyceride; atazanavir/saquinavir versus ritonavir/saquinavir).

CONCLUSIONS

In antiretroviral-experienced patients, once-daily atazanavir/saquinavir was safe and well tolerated, showing comparable efficacy to twice-daily ritonavir/saquinavir, both with two NRTIs. Small lipid changes from baseline with atazanavir/saquinavir were not clinically significant in comparison with the prompt, marked and sustained changes of a magnitude suggesting clinical relevance achieved in the ritonavir/saquinavir group.

Pharmacokinetics, food intake requirements and tolerability of once-daily combinations of nelfinavir and low-dose ritonavir in healthy volunteers

AIMS

This study was performed to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics, food intake requirements and short-term tolerability of once-daily combinations of nelfinavir and low-dose ritonavir.

METHODS

Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were randomized over three groups to receive a once-daily regimen of nelfinavir/ritonavir 2,000/200 mg (group 1), 2,000/400 mg (group 2) or 2,500/200 mg (group 3) with food for 14 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters for nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 were assessed on study days 15 and 16, after administration of the regimens with a full (610 kcal) or light (271 kcal) breakfast, respectively.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic data were evaluable for eight volunteers in group 1, eight in group 2 and four in group 3. Administration of nelfinavir/ritonavir with a full breakfast resulted in geometric mean (GM) nelfinavir AUC(24h) values of 76.8, 51.3, and 61.9 h*mg/l in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. GM 24-h Cmin concentrations of nelfinavir were 0.76 mg l(-1), 0.43 mg l(-1) and 0.47 mg l(-1), respectively. Co-administration of ritonavir increased M8 concentrations more than nelfinavir concentrations, resulting in GM AUC(24h) and Cmin values for nelfinavir plus M8 that were higher than or comparable to reference values for the approved regimen of nelfinavir (1,250 mg BID without ritonavir). In the 2,000/200 mg group, seven out of eight subjects had a Cmin value of nelfinavir plus M8 above a threshold of 1.0 mg l-1. Administration of the combinations with a light breakfast resulted in significant decreases in the AUC(24h) and Cmin of nelfinavir and nelfinavir plus M8, compared with intake with a full breakfast. For the Cmin of nelfinavir plus M8, the GM ratio (light/full breakfast) was 0.76 (90% confidence interval 0.67-0.86, participants from all groups combined). Short-term tolerability was satisfactory, apart from a higher than expected incidence of mild rash (12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of nelfinavir in a once-daily regimen appears feasible. A nelfinavir/ritonavir 2,000/200 mg combination appears appropriate for further evaluation. Once-daily nelfinavir/ritonavir should be taken with a meal containing at least 600 kcal.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of amprenavir coadministered with ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients

The protease inhibitor (PI) ritonavir is used as a strong inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4, which boosts the activities of coadministered PIs, resulting in augmented plasma PI levels, simplification of the dosage regimen, and better efficacy against resistant viruses. The objectives of the present open-label, multiple-dose study were to determine the steady-state pharmacokinetics of amprenavir administered at 600 mg twice daily (BID) and ritonavir administered at 100 mg BID in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected adults treated with different antiretroviral combinations including or not including a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Nineteen patients completed the study. The steady-state mean minimum plasma amprenavir concentration (C(min,ss)) was 1.92 microg/ml for patients who received amprenavir and ritonavir without an NNRTI and 1.36 microg/ml for patients who received amprenavir and ritonavir plus efavirenz. For patients who received amprenavir-ritonavir without an NNRTI, the steady-state mean peak plasma amprenavir concentration (C(max,ss)) was 7.12 microg/ml, the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 10 h (AUC(0-10)) was 32.06 microg. h/ml, and the area under the concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (12 h) at steady-state (AUC(ss)) was 35.74 microg. h/ml. Decreases in the mean values of C(min,ss) (29%), C(max,ss) (42%), AUC(0-10) (42%), and AUC(ss) (40%) for amprenavir occurred when efavirenz was coadministered with amprenavir-ritonavir. No unexpected side effects were observed. As expected, coadministration of amprenavir with ritonavir resulted in an amprenavir C(min,ss) markedly higher than those previously reported for the marketed dose of amprenavir. When amprenavir-ritonavir was coadministered with efavirenz, amprenavir-ritonavir maintained a mean amprenavir C(min,ss) above the mean 50% inhibitory concentration of amprenavir previously determined for both wild-type HIV-1 isolates and HIV-1 strains isolated from PI-experienced patients. These data support the use of low-dose ritonavir to enhance the level of exposure to amprenavir and increase the efficacy of amprenavir.