CheR- and CheB-dependent chemosensory adaptation system of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Widespread bacterial responses and their mechanism of bacterial metallogenic detoxification under high concentrations of heavy metals

Microbial mineralization is increasingly used in bioremediation of heavy metal pollution, but better mechanistic understanding of the processes involved and how they are regulated are required to improve the practical application of microorganisms in bioremediation. We used a combination of morphological (TEM) and analytical (XRD, XPS, FTIR) methods, together with novel proteomic analyses, to investigate the detoxification mechanisms, used by a range of bacteria, including the strains Bacillus velezensis LB002, Escherichia coli DH5α, B. subtilis 168, Pseudomonas putida KT2440, and B. licheniformis MT-1, exposed to elevated concentrations of Cd²⁺ and combinations of Cd²⁺, Pb²⁺, Cu²⁺, and Zn²⁺, in the presence and absence of added CaCl₂. Common features of detoxification included biomineralization, including the production of biological vaterite, up-regulation of proteins involved in flagellar movement and chemotaxis, biofilm synthesis, transmembrane transport of small molecules and organic matter decomposition. The putative roles of differentially expressed proteins in detoxification are discussed in relation to chemical and morphological data and together provide important tools to improve screening, selection, and practical application of bacterial isolates in bioremediation of polluted environments.

A non-flagellated, predatory soil bacterium reprograms a chemosensory system to control antifungal antibiotic production via cyclic di-GMP signalling

Lysobacter enzymogenes is a non-flagellated, soil proteobacterium that secretes a diffusible antibiotic known as heat-stable antifungal factor (HSAF) to kill nearby fungi for food. The genome of the model strain OH11 encodes a homologous Wsp system, which is generally deployed by flagellated bacteria to achieve flagella-dependent outputs via a c-di-GMP-FleQ complex, in which c-di-GMP is a ubiquitous dinucleotide second messenger and FleQ is a transcription factor (TF). Here, we show that the Wsp system in the non-flagellated OH11 participates in a unique c-di-GMP-dependent signalling pathway and forms a WspR-CdgL binary complex to alter HSAF production, in which WspR and CdgL act as a c-di-GMP diguanylate cyclase (DGC) and a non-TF binding protein respectively. We found that the phosphorylation of WspR activates its DGC activity and enhances c-di-GMP production while inhibiting HSAF biosynthesis. The phosphorylation of WspR also plays a key role in weakening WspR-CdgL binding and HSAF generation. Interestingly, c-di-GMP binding to CdgL did not seem to induce the disassociation of the WspR-CdgL complex. These observations, along with our earlier findings, lead us to propose a model in which L. enzymogenes re-programs the Wsp system via c-di-GMP signalling to regulate HSAF biosynthesis for the benefit of ecological adaptation.

Mechanism of Signalling and Adaptation through the Rhodobacter sphaeroides Cytoplasmic Chemoreceptor Cluster

Rhodobacter sphaeroides has two chemotaxis clusters, an Escherichia coli-like cluster with membrane-spanning chemoreceptors and a less-understood cytoplasmic cluster. The cytoplasmic CheA is split into CheA₄, a kinase, and CheA₃, a His-domain phosphorylated by CheA₄ and a phosphatase domain, which together phosphorylate and dephosphorylate motor-stopping CheY₆. In bacterial two-hybrid analysis, one major cytoplasmic chemoreceptor, TlpT, interacted with CheA₄, while the other, TlpC, interacted with CheA₃. Both clusters have associated adaptation proteins. Deleting their methyltransferases and methylesterases singly and together removed chemotaxis, but with opposite effects. The cytoplasmic cluster signal overrode the membrane cluster signal. Methylation and demethylation of specific chemoreceptor glutamates controls adaptation. Tandem mass spectroscopy and bioinformatics identified four putative sites on TlpT, three glutamates and a glutamine. Mutating each glutamate to alanine resulted in smooth swimming and loss of chemotaxis, unlike similar mutations in E. coli chemoreceptors. Cells with two mutated glutamates were more stoppy than wild-type and responded and adapted to attractant addition, not removal. Mutating all four sites amplified the effect. Cells were non-motile, began smooth swimming on attractant addition, and rapidly adapted back to non-motile before attractant removal. We propose that TlpT responds and adapts to the cell's metabolic state, generating the steady-state concentration of motor-stopping CheY₆~P. Membrane-cluster signalling produces a pulse of CheY₃/CheY₄~P that displaces CheY₆~P and allows flagellar rotation and smooth swimming before both clusters adapt.

Light-controlled motility in prokaryotes and the problem of directional light perception

The natural light environment is important to many prokaryotes. Most obviously, phototrophic prokaryotes need to acclimate their photosynthetic apparatus to the prevailing light conditions, and such acclimation is frequently complemented by motility to enable cells to relocate in search of more favorable illumination conditions. Non-phototrophic prokaryotes may also seek to avoid light at damaging intensities and wavelengths, and many prokaryotes with diverse lifestyles could potentially exploit light signals as a rich source of information about their surroundings and a cue for acclimation and behavior. Here we discuss our current understanding of the ways in which bacteria can perceive the intensity, wavelength and direction of illumination, and the signal transduction networks that link light perception to the control of motile behavior. We discuss the problems of light perception at the prokaryotic scale, and the challenge of directional light perception in small bacterial cells. We explain the peculiarities and the common features of light-controlled motility systems in prokaryotes as diverse as cyanobacteria, purple photosynthetic bacteria, chemoheterotrophic bacteria and haloarchaea.

(1)H, (13)C and (15)N resonance assignments for the response regulator CheY3 from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Rhodobacter sphaeroides has emerged as a model system for studies of the complex chemotaxis pathways that are a hallmark of many non-enteric bacteria. The genome of R. sphaeroides encodes two sets of flagellar genes, fla1 and fla2, that are controlled by three different operons. Each operon encodes homologues of most of the proteins required for the well-studied E. coli chemotaxis pathway. R. sphaeroides has six homologues of the response regulator CheY that are localized to and are regulated by different clusters of chemosensory proteins in the cell and have different effects on chemotaxis. CheY6 is the major CheY stopping the fla1 flagellar motor and associated with a cytoplasmically localised chemosensory pathway. CheY3 and CheY4 are associated with a membrane localised polar chemosensory cluster, and can bind to but not stop the motor. CheY6 and either CheY3 or CheY4 are required for chemotaxis. We are using NMR spectroscopy to characterise and compare the structure and dynamics of CheY3 and CheY6 in solution. We are interested in defining the conformational changes that occur upon activation of these two proteins and to identify differences in their properties that can explain the different functions they play in chemotaxis in R. sphaeroides. Here we present the (1)H, (13)C and (15)N assignments for CheY3 in its active, inactive and Mg(2+)-free apo form. These assignments provide the starting point for detailed investigations of the structure and function of CheY3.

Swimming, swarming, twitching, and chemotactic responses of Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34 and Pseudomonas putida mt2 in the presence of cadmium

To use of microorganisms for bioremediation purposes, the study of their motility behavior toward metals is essential. In the present study, Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34 and Pseudomonas putida mt2 were used as cadmium (Cd)-resistant and -sensitive bacteria, respectively, to evaluate the effects of Cd on their motility behaviors. Potassium morpholinopropane sulfonate (MOPS) buffer was used to observe the motility behavior of both isolates. Movement of mt2 was less in MOPS buffer compared with CH34, likely reflecting the mono-flagellated nature of mt2 and the peritrichous nature of CH34. The swimming, swarming, twitching, and chemotaxis behaviors of mt2 were greater in the presence of glucose than that of Cd. mt2 exhibited negative motility behaviors when exposed to Cd, but the opposite effect was seen in CH34. Cd was found to be a chemorepellent for mt2 but a chemoattractant for CH34, suggesting that CH34 is a potential candidate for metal (Cd) bioremediation.

Interplay of RsbM and RsbK controls the σ(B) activity of Bacillus cereus

The alternative transcription factor σ(B) of Bacillus cereus controls the expression of a number of genes that respond to environmental stress. Four proteins encoded in the sigB gene cluster, including RsbV, RsbW, RsbY (RsbU) and RsbK, are known to be essential in the σ(B)-mediated stress response. In the context of stress, the hybrid sensor kinase RsbK is thought to phosphorylate the response regulator RsbY, a PP2C serine phosphatase, leading to the dephosphorylation of the phosphorylated RsbV. The unphosphorylated RsbV then sequesters the σ(B) antagonist, RsbW, ultimately liberating σ(B). The gene arrangement reveals an open reading frame, bc1007, flanked immediately downstream by rsbK within the sigB gene cluster. However, little is known about the function of bc1007. In this study, the deletion of bc1007 resulted in high constitutive σ(B) expression independent of environmental stimuli, indicating that bc1007 plays a role in σ(B) regulation. A bacterial two-hybrid analysis demonstrated that BC1007 interacts directly with RsbK, and autoradiographic studies revealed a specific C(14)-methyl transfer from the radiolabelled S-adenosylmethionine to RsbK when RsbK was incubated with purified BC1007. Our data suggest that BC1007 (RsbM) negatively regulates σ(B) activity by methylating RsbK. Additionally, mutagenic substitution was employed to modify 12 predicted methylation residues in RsbK. Certain RsbK mutants were able to rescue σ(B) activation in a rsbK-deleted bacterial strain, but RsbK(E439A) failed to activate σ(B), and RsbK(E446A) only moderately induced σ(B). These results suggest that Glu439 is the preferred methylation site and that Glu446 is potentially a minor methylation site. Gene arrays of the rsbK orthologues and the neighbouring rsbM orthologues are found in a wide range of bacteria. The regulation of sigma factors through metylation of RsbK-like sensor kinases appears to be widespread in the microbial world.

In Rhodobacter sphaeroides, chemotactic operon 1 regulates rotation of the flagellar system 2

Rhodobacter sphaeroides is able to assemble two different flagella, the subpolar flagellum (Fla1) and the polar flagella (Fla2). In this work, we report the swimming behavior of R. sphaeroides Fla2(+) cells lacking each of the proteins encoded by chemotactic operon 1. A model proposing how these proteins control Fla2 rotation is presented.

Feedback control architecture and the bacterial chemotaxis network

Bacteria move towards favourable and away from toxic environments by changing their swimming pattern. This response is regulated by the chemotaxis signalling pathway, which has an important feature: it uses feedback to ‘reset’ (adapt) the bacterial sensing ability, which allows the bacteria to sense a range of background environmental changes. The role of this feedback has been studied extensively in the simple chemotaxis pathway of Escherichia coli. However it has been recently found that the majority of bacteria have multiple chemotaxis homologues of the E. coli proteins, resulting in more complex pathways. In this paper we investigate the configuration and role of feedback in Rhodobacter sphaeroides, a bacterium containing multiple homologues of the chemotaxis proteins found in E. coli. Multiple proteins could produce different possible feedback configurations, each having different chemotactic performance qualities and levels of robustness to variations and uncertainties in biological parameters and to intracellular noise. We develop four models corresponding to different feedback configurations. Using a series of carefully designed experiments we discriminate between these models and invalidate three of them. When these models are examined in terms of robustness to noise and parametric uncertainties, we find that the non-invalidated model is superior to the others. Moreover, it has a ‘cascade control’ feedback architecture which is used extensively in engineering to improve system performance, including robustness. Given that the majority of bacteria are known to have multiple chemotaxis pathways, in this paper we show that some feedback architectures allow them to have better performance than others. In particular, cascade control may be an important feature in achieving robust functionality in more complex signalling pathways and in improving their performance.

Bacteria move towards favourable environments by changing their swimming pattern. An important feature of this response, which is called bacterial chemotaxis, is that their sensing ability remains independent of the background environment in which they find themselves. This feature has been studied extensively in the bacterium E. coli, which has a simple chemotaxis decision mechanism. However, it has been recently found that most bacteria could potentially have a much more complicated decision mechanism for this response. In this paper, we look at the chemotaxis behaviour of one such bacterium, R. sphaeroides. We develop mathematical models of possible decision mechanisms and undertake an experimental procedure to investigate their validity. We find that only one of four such models can explain the chemotaxis response in R. sphaeroides. Compared to the other models, this model corresponds to a decision mechanism that provides the bacterium with improved swimming performance over the others. Moreover, this decision mechanism has been used extensively to improve performance in several engineering systems. We suggest that this mechanism may play an important role in improving chemotactic performance in other bacteria and in other signalling pathways.

Specificity of localization and phosphotransfer in the CheA proteins of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Specificity of protein-protein interactions plays a vital role in signal transduction. The chemosensory pathway of Rhodobacter sphaeroides comprises multiple homologues of chemotaxis proteins characterized in organisms such as Escherichia coli. Three CheA homologues are essential for chemotaxis in R. sphaeroides under laboratory conditions. These CheAs are differentially localized to two chemosensory clusters, one at the cell pole and one in the cytoplasm. The polar CheA, CheA(2), has the same domain structure as E. coli CheA and can phosphorylate all R. sphaeroides chemotaxis response regulators. CheA(3) and CheA(4) independently localize to the cytoplasmic cluster; each protein has a subset of the CheA domains, with CheA(3) phosphorylating CheA(4) together making a functional CheA protein. Interestingly, CheA(3)-P can only phosphorylate two response regulators, CheY(6) and CheB(2). R. sphaeroides CheAs exhibit two interesting differences in specificity: (i) the response regulators that they phosphorylate and (ii) the chemosensory cluster to which they localize. Using a domain-swapping approach we investigated the role of the P1 and P5 CheA domains in determining these specificities. We show that the P1 domain is sufficient to determine which response regulators will be phosphorylated in vitro while the P5 domain is sufficient to localize the CheAs to a specific chemosensory cluster.

Adaptation and control circuits in bacterial chemotaxis

Bacteria are capable of sensing and responding to changes in their environment. One of the ways they do this is via chemotaxis, regulating swimming behaviour. The chemotaxis pathway senses chemoattractant gradients and uses a feedback loop to change the bacterial swimming pattern; this feedback loop differs in detail between species. In the present article, we summarize the current understanding of the regulatory mechanisms in three species and how these pathways can be viewed and analysed through the ideas of feedback control systems engineering.

Spatial organization in bacterial chemotaxis

Spatial organization of signalling is not an exclusive property of eukaryotic cells. Despite the fact that bacterial signalling pathways are generally simpler than those in eukaryotes, there are several well-documented examples of higher-order intracellular signalling structures in bacteria. One of the most prominent and best-characterized structures is formed by proteins that control bacterial chemotaxis. Signals in chemotaxis are processed by ordered arrays, or clusters, of receptors and associated proteins, which amplify and integrate chemotactic stimuli in a highly cooperative manner. Receptor clusters further serve to scaffold protein interactions, enhancing the efficiency and specificity of the pathway reactions and preventing the formation of signalling gradients through the cell body. Moreover, clustering can also ensure spatial separation of multiple chemotaxis systems in one bacterium. Assembly of receptor clusters appears to be a stochastic process, but bacteria evolved mechanisms to ensure optimal cluster distribution along the cell body for partitioning to daughter cells at division.

Modeling chemotaxis reveals the role of reversed phosphotransfer and a bi-functional kinase-phosphatase

Understanding how multiple signals are integrated in living cells to produce a balanced response is a major challenge in biology. Two-component signal transduction pathways, such as bacterial chemotaxis, comprise histidine protein kinases (HPKs) and response regulators (RRs). These are used to sense and respond to changes in the environment. Rhodobacter sphaeroides has a complex chemosensory network with two signaling clusters, each containing a HPK, CheA. Here we demonstrate, using a mathematical model, how the outputs of the two signaling clusters may be integrated. We use our mathematical model supported by experimental data to predict that: (1) the main RR controlling flagellar rotation, CheY₆, aided by its specific phosphatase, the bifunctional kinase CheA₃, acts as a phosphate sink for the other RRs; and (2) a phosphorelay pathway involving CheB₂ connects the cytoplasmic cluster kinase CheA₃ with the polar localised kinase CheA₂, and allows CheA₃-P to phosphorylate non-cognate chemotaxis RRs. These two mechanisms enable the bifunctional kinase/phosphatase activity of CheA₃ to integrate and tune the sensory output of each signaling cluster to produce a balanced response. The signal integration mechanisms identified here may be widely used by other bacteria, since like R. sphaeroides, over 50% of chemotactic bacteria have multiple cheA homologues and need to integrate signals from different sources.

Chemotactic bacteria sense nutrient gradients and swim towards better environments for growth. A cluster of receptors in the cell membrane detects nutrient levels and signals via a cytoplasmic signaling pathway to the flagellum. The complexity of this signaling pathway varies across different bacterial species. The relatively simple pathway used by Escherichia coli is well understood; however, many bacteria, for example Rhodobacter sphaeroides, have more sophisticated pathways that, as well as being able to detect nutrients, are also able to assess the metabolic state of the cell. The receptors that detect metabolic state are located within an additional cluster that is physically distinct from the one that senses nutrients. In this work, we use a combination of experimentation and mathematical modeling to gain insight into the complex decision-making mechanisms that enable bacteria to weigh-up different stimuli and decide upon an appropriate response. We find novel communication mechanisms between the two signaling clusters that allow the outputs of the signaling pathways to be balanced and tuned according to the prevailing environmental conditions. The signaling principles identified here are likely to be used in other complex sensory networks.

Cloning and characterization of three cheB genes in Leptospira interrogans

Motility and chemotaxis systems are critical for the virulence of leptospires. There were multiple copies of putative chemotaxis homologs located at leptospires large chromosome. CheB1 and CheB3 from Leptospira interrogans strain Lai are predicted to have a global CheB-like domain, but CheB2 is predicted to have a C-terminal effector domain only. In order to verify the function of three putative cheB genes, they were cloned into pQE31 vector and then expressed, respectively, in wild-type Escherichia coli strain RP437 and cheB defective strain RP4972. The results of swarming assays and the predicted ternary structures of CheB1 and CheB3 of L. interrogans strain Lai suggested that the absence of an N-terminal regulatory domain may be one of the reasons for the failure of CheB2 to complement an E. coli cheB mutant. Furthermore, CheB2 links solely to CheR1 and CheR3 in the interaction network of leptospires. Taken together, these results indicated that CheB2 may not function alone, and under certain physiological conditions, it may require CheB3 and CheR1 to function. The existence of multiple copies of chemotaxis gene homologs suggested that L. interrogans strain Lai might have a more complex chemosensory pathway.

Using structural information to change the phosphotransfer specificity of a two-component chemotaxis signalling complex

Analysis of the crystal structure of a phosphotransfer complex from the Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis pathway allowed reengineering of molecular recognition in a two-component signalling system.

Two-component signal transduction pathways comprising histidine protein kinases (HPKs) and their response regulators (RRs) are widely used to control bacterial responses to environmental challenges. Some bacteria have over 150 different two-component pathways, and the specificity of the phosphotransfer reactions within these systems is tightly controlled to prevent unwanted crosstalk. One of the best understood two-component signalling pathways is the chemotaxis pathway. Here, we present the 1.40 Å crystal structure of the histidine-containing phosphotransfer domain of the chemotaxis HPK, CheA₃, in complex with its cognate RR, CheY₆. A methionine finger on CheY₆ that nestles in a hydrophobic pocket in CheA₃ was shown to be important for the interaction and was found to only occur in the cognate RRs of CheA₃, CheY₆, and CheB₂. Site-directed mutagenesis of this methionine in combination with two adjacent residues abolished binding, as shown by surface plasmon resonance studies, and phosphotransfer from CheA₃-P to CheY₆. Introduction of this methionine and an adjacent alanine residue into a range of noncognate CheYs, dramatically changed their specificity, allowing protein interaction and rapid phosphotransfer from CheA₃-P. The structure presented here has allowed us to identify specificity determinants for the CheA–CheY interaction and subsequently to successfully reengineer phosphotransfer signalling. In summary, our results provide valuable insight into how cells mediate specificity in one of the most abundant signalling pathways in biology, two-component signal transduction.

The ability to respond to environmental stimuli is a universal feature of living cells. Evolution has created a vast array of signalling mechanisms that enable cells to react in many ways to extracellular changes. In bacteria, two-component signalling mechanisms, comprising a sensor protein kinase paired with its a cognate response regulator, are used widely to sense and respond to environmental changes. Some species of bacteria have over 150 different two-component pairs in a single cell, so the specificity between these pairs has to be tightly controlled to prevent “crossed wires” between signalling pathways. In this study, we have identified the determinants of this specificity in a two-component complex that controls the movement of Rhodobacter sphaeroides along a chemical gradient. By solving and analysing the crystal structure of this complex, we were able to pinpoint the amino acid residues that are crucially involved in formation of the complex. Knowledge of these crucial residues allowed us to convert noncognate response regulators into cognate response regulators simply by changing two amino acids. This reengineering of two-component signalling pathways paves the way for producing custom-designed circuits for applications in synthetic biology.

Deciphering chemotaxis pathways using cross species comparisons

Background

Chemotaxis is the process by which motile bacteria sense their chemical environment and move towards more favourable conditions. Escherichia coli utilises a single sensory pathway, but little is known about signalling pathways in species with more complex systems.

Results

To investigate whether chemotaxis pathways in other bacteria follow the E. coli paradigm, we analysed 206 species encoding at least 1 homologue of each of the 5 core chemotaxis proteins (CheA, CheB, CheR, CheW and CheY). 61 species encode more than one of all of these 5 proteins, suggesting they have multiple chemotaxis pathways. Operon information is not available for most bacteria, so we developed a novel statistical approach to cluster che genes into putative operons. Using operon-based models, we reconstructed putative chemotaxis pathways for all 206 species. We show that cheA-cheW and cheR-cheB have strong preferences to occur in the same operon as two-gene blocks, which may reflect a functional requirement for co-transcription. However, other che genes, most notably cheY, are more dispersed on the genome. Comparison of our operons with shuffled equivalents demonstrates that specific patterns of genomic location may be a determining factor for the observed in vivo chemotaxis pathways.

We then examined the chemotaxis pathways of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Here, the PpfA protein is known to be critical for correct partitioning of proteins in the cytoplasmically-localised pathway. We found ppfA in che operons of many species, suggesting that partitioning of cytoplasmic Che protein clusters is common. We also examined the apparently non-typical chemotaxis components, CheA3, CheA4 and CheY6. We found that though variants of CheA proteins are rare, the CheY6 variant may be a common type of CheY, with a significantly disordered C-terminal region which may be functionally significant.

Conclusions

We find that many bacterial species potentially have multiple chemotaxis pathways, with grouping of che genes into operons likely to be a major factor in keeping signalling pathways distinct. Gene order is highly conserved with cheA-cheW and cheR-cheB blocks, perhaps reflecting functional linkage. CheY behaves differently to other Che proteins, both in its genomic location and its putative protein interactions, which should be considered when modelling chemotaxis pathways.

Rhodobacter sphaeroides: complexity in chemotactic signalling

Most bacteria have much more complex chemosensory systems than those of the extensively studied Escherichia coli. Rhodobacter sphaeroides, for example, has multiple homologues of the E. coli chemosensory proteins. The roles of these homologues have been extensively investigated using a combination of deletion, subcellular localization and phosphorylation assays. These studies have shown that the homologues have specific roles in the sensory pathway, and they differ in their cellular localization and interactions with other components of the pathway. The presence of multiple chemosensory pathways might enable bacteria to tune their tactic responses to different environmental conditions.

The major chemotaxis gene cluster of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae is essential for competitive nodulation

Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae strain 3841 is a motile alpha-proteobacterium that can establish a nitrogen-fixing symbiosis within the roots of pea plants. In order to determine the contribution of chemotaxis to the lifestyle of R. leguminosarum, we have characterized the function of two chemotaxis gene clusters (che1 and che2) in controlling motility behaviour. We have found that both chemotaxis gene clusters modulate the motility swimming bias of R. leguminosarum cells and that the che1 cluster is the major pathway controlling swimming bias and chemotaxis. The che2 cluster also contributes to swimming bias, but has a minor effect on chemotaxis. Using competitive nodulation assays, we have demonstrated that a functional che1 cluster, but not the che2 cluster, promotes competitive nodulation of the peas. This finding implies that the environmental cue(s) triggering chemotaxis of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae cells towards the roots of pea and facilitating colonization are likely to be processed through the che1 cluster despite the contribution of both che clusters to swimming behaviour. A phylogenetic analysis of the distribution of che1 and che2 orthologues in the alpha-proteobacteria together with our results allow us to propose that che1 homologues are major controllers of chemotaxis and host association in the Rhizobiaceae.

Characterization of the Thermotoga maritima chemotaxis methylation system that lacks pentapeptide-dependent methyltransferase CheR:MCP tethering

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by covalent modifications of specific glutamate and glutamine residues within the cytoplasmic domains of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). In Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica, efficient methylation of MCPs depends on the localization of methyltransferase CheR to MCP clusters through an interaction between the CheR beta-subdomain and a pentapeptide sequence (NWETF or NWESF) at the C-terminus of the MCP. In vitro methylation analyses utilizing S. enterica and Thermotoga maritima CheR proteins and MCPs indicate that MCP methylation in T. maritima occurs independently of a pentapeptide-binding motif. Kinetic and binding measurements demonstrate that despite efficient methylation, the interaction between T. maritima CheR and T. maritima MCPs is of relatively low affinity. Comparative protein sequence analyses of CheR beta-subdomains from organisms having MCPs that contain and/or lack pentapeptide-binding motifs identified key similarities and differences in residue conservation, suggesting the existence of two distinct classes of CheR proteins: pentapeptide-dependent and pentapeptide-independent methyltransferases. Analysis of MCP C-terminal ends showed that only approximately 10% of MCPs contain a putative C-terminal binding motif, the majority of which are restricted to the different proteobacteria classes (alpha, beta, gamma, delta). These findings suggest that tethering of CheR to MCPs is a relatively recent event in evolution and that the pentapeptide-independent methylation system is more common than the well-characterized pentapeptide-dependent methylation system.

Two chemosensory operons of Rhodobacter sphaeroides are regulated independently by sigma 28 and sigma 54

Rhodobacter sphaeroides has a complex chemosensory system, with several loci encoding multiple homologues of the components required for chemosensing in Escherichia coli. The operons cheOp2 and cheOp3 each encode complete pathways, and both are essential for chemosensing. The components of cheOp2 are predominantly localized to the cell pole, whereas those encoded by cheOp3 are predominantly targeted to a discrete cluster in the cytoplasm. Here we show that the expression of the two pathways is regulated independently. Overlapping promoters recognized by sigma(28) and sigma(70) RNAP holoenzyme transcribe cheOp2, whereas cheOp3 is regulated by one of the four sigma(54) homologues, RpoN3. The different regulation of these operons may reflect the need for balancing responses to extra- and intracellular signals under different growth conditions.

The CheYs of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The Escherichia coli two-component chemosensory pathway has been extensively studied, and its response regulator, CheY, has become a paradigm for response regulators. However, unlike E. coli, most chemotactic nonenteric bacteria have multiple CheY homologues. The roles and cellular localization of the CheYs in Rhodobacter sphaeroides were determined. Only two CheYs were required for chemotaxis, CheY(6) and either CheY(3) or CheY(4). These CheYs were partially localized to either of the two chemotaxis signaling clusters, with the remaining protein delocalized. Interestingly, mutation of the CheY(6) phosphorylatable aspartate to asparagine produced a stopped motor, caused by phosphorylation on alternative site Ser-83 by CheA. Extensive mutagenesis of E. coli CheY has identified a number of activating mutations, which have been extrapolated to other response regulators (D13K, Y106W, and I95V). Analogous mutations in R. sphaeroides CheYs did not cause activation. These results suggest that although the R. sphaeroides and E. coli CheYs are similar in that they require phosphorylation for activation, they may differ in both the nature of the phosphorylation-induced conformational change and their subsequent interactions with the flagellar motor. Caution should therefore be used when projecting from E. coli CheY onto novel response regulators.

Role of CheB and CheR in the complex chemotactic and aerotactic pathway of Azospirillum brasilense

It has previously been reported that the alpha-proteobacterium Azospirillum brasilense undergoes methylation-independent chemotaxis; however, a recent study revealed cheB and cheR genes in this organism. We have constructed cheB, cheR, and cheBR mutants of A. brasilense and determined that the CheB and CheR proteins under study significantly influence chemotaxis and aerotaxis but are not essential for these behaviors to occur. First, we found that although cells lacking CheB, CheR, or both were no longer capable of responding to the addition of most chemoattractants in a temporal gradient assay, they did show a chemotactic response (albeit reduced) in a spatial gradient assay. Second, in comparison to the wild type, cheB and cheR mutants under steady-state conditions exhibited an altered swimming bias, whereas the cheBR mutant and the che operon mutant did not. Third, cheB and cheR mutants were null for aerotaxis, whereas the cheBR mutant showed reduced aerotaxis. In contrast to the swimming bias for the model organism Escherichia coli, the swimming bias in A. brasilense cells was dependent on the carbon source present and cells released methanol upon addition of some attractants and upon removal of other attractants. In comparison to the wild type, the cheB, cheR, and cheBR mutants showed various altered patterns of methanol release upon exposure to attractants. This study reveals a significant difference between the chemotaxis adaptation system of A. brasilense and that of the model organism E. coli and suggests that multiple chemotaxis systems are present and contribute to chemotaxis and aerotaxis in A. brasilense.

Differential localization of Mre proteins with PBP2 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In Rhodobacter sphaeroides, MreB, MreC, MreD, PBP2, and RodA are encoded at the same locus. The localizations of PBP2, MreB, and MreC, which have all been implicated in the synthesis of the peptidoglycan layer, were investigated under different growth conditions to gain insight into the relationships between these proteins. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that PBP2 localized to specific sites at the midcell of elongating cells under both aerobic and photoheterotrophic conditions. Visualizing PBP2 at different stages of the cell cycle showed that in elongating cells, PBP2 was found predominately at the midcell, with asymmetric foci and bands across the cell. PBP2 remained at midcell until the start of septation, after which it moved to midcell of the daughter cells. Deconvolution and three-dimensional reconstructions suggested that PBP2 forms a partial ring at the midcell of newly divided cells and elongated cells, while in septating cells, partial PBP2 rings were present at one-quarter and three-quarter positions. Due to the diffraction limits of light microscopy, these partial rings could represent unresolved helices. Colocalization studies showed that MreC always colocalized with PBP2, while MreB colocalized with PBP2 only during elongation; during septation, MreB remained at the septation site, whereas PBP2 relocalized to the one-quarter and three-quarter positions. These results suggest that PBP2 and MreC are involved in peptidoglycan synthesis during elongation and that this occurs at specific sites close to midcell in R. sphaeroides.

Coupling of multicellular morphogenesis and cellular differentiation by an unusual hybrid histidine protein kinase in Myxococcus xanthus

We describe an unusual hybrid histidine protein kinase, which is important for spatially coupling cell aggregation and sporulation during fruiting body formation in Myxococcus xanthus. A rodK mutant makes abnormal fruiting bodies and spores develop outside the fruiting bodies. RodK is a soluble, cytoplasmic protein, which contains an N-terminal sensor domain, a histidine protein kinase domain and three receiver domains. In vitro phosphorylation assays showed that RodK possesses kinase activity. Kinase activity is essential for RodK function in vivo. RodK is present in vegetative cells and remains present until the late aggregation stage, after which the level decreases in a manner that depends on the intercellular A-signal. Genetic evidence suggests that RodK may regulate multiple temporally separated events during fruiting body formation including stimulation of early developmental gene expression, inhibition of A-signal production and inhibition of the intercellular C-signal transduction pathway. We speculate that RodK undergoes a change in activity during development, which is reflected in changes in phosphotransfer to the receiver domains.

The in vivo and in vitro characterization of DnaK from Agrobacterium tumefaciens RUOR

Molecular chaperones of the heat shock protein 70 family (Hsp70; also called DnaK in prokaryotes) play an important role in the folding and functioning of cellular protein machinery. The dnaK gene from the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens RUOR was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction and the DnaK protein (Agt DnaK) was over-produced as a His-tagged protein in Escherichia coli. The Agt DnaK amino acid sequence was 96% identical to the A. tumefaciens C58 DnaK sequence and 65% identical to the E. coli DnaK sequence. Agt DnaK was shown to be able to functionally replace E. coli DnaK in vivo using complementation assays with an E. coli dnaK756 mutant strain and a dnaK52 deletion strain. Over-production and purification of Agt DnaK was successful, and allowed for further characterization of the protein. Kinetic analysis of the basal ATPase activity of purified Agt DnaK revealed a Vmax of 1.3 nmol phosphate released per minute per milligram DnaK, and a Km of 62 microM ATP. Thus, this is the first study to provide both in vivo and in vitro evidence that Agt DnaK has the properties of a molecular chaperone of the Hsp70 family.

Localization of MreB in Rhodobacter sphaeroides under conditions causing changes in cell shape and membrane structure

MreB is thought to be a bacterial actin homolog that defines the morphology of rod-shaped bacteria. Rhodobacter sphaeroides changes shape, from a rod to coccobacillus, and undergoes extensive cytoplasmic membrane invagination when it switches from aerobic to photoheterotrophic growth. The role of MreB in defining R. sphaeroides shape was therefore investigated. Attempts at deleting or insertionally inactivating mreB were unsuccessful under all growth conditions. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed MreB localized to mid-cell in elongating cells under both aerobic and photoheterotrophic conditions. Three-dimensional reconstruction showed that MreB formed a ring at mid-cell. MreB remained at mid-cell as septation began but localized to new sites in the daughter cells before the completion of septation. MreB localized to putative septation sites in cephalexin-treated filamentous cells. Genomic single-copy mreB was replaced with gfp-mreB, and green fluorescent protein (GFP)-MreB localized in the same pattern, as seen with immunofluorescence microscopy. Some of the cells expressing GFP-MreB were abnormal, principally displaying an increase in cell width, suggesting that the fusion was not fully functional in all cells. GFP-MreB localized to swellings at mid-cell in cells treated with the penicillin-binding protein 2 inhibitor amdinocillin. These data suggest that MreB is essential in R. sphaeroides, performing a role at mid-cell in elongating cells, and in early septation, putatively in the cytoplasmic control of the peptidoglycan synthetic complexes.

Chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides requires an atypical histidine protein kinase

Rhodobacter sphaeroides has a complex chemosensory system comprising two classic CheAs, two atypical CheAs, and eight response regulators (six CheYs and two CheBs). The classic CheAs, CheA(1) and CheA(2), have similar domain structures to Escherichia coli CheA, whereas the atypical CheAs, CheA(3) and CheA(4), lack some of the domains found in E. coli CheA. CheA(2), CheA(3), and CheA(4) are all essential for chemotaxis. Here we demonstrate that CheA(3) and CheA(4) are both unable to undergo ATP-dependent autophosphorylation, however, CheA(4) is able to phosphorylate CheA(3). The in vitro kinetics of this phosphorylation reaction were consistent with a reaction mechanism in which CheA(3) associates with a CheA(4) dimer forming a complex, CheA(3)A(4). To the best of our knowledge, CheA(3)A(4) is the first characterized histidine protein kinase where the subunits are encoded by distinct genes. Selective phosphotransfer was observed from CheA(3)-P to the response regulators CheY(1), CheY(6), and CheB(2). Using phosphorylation site and kinase domain mutants of CheA we show that phosphosignaling involving CheA(2), CheA(3), and CheA(4) is essential for chemotaxis in R. sphaeroides. Interestingly, CheA(3) was not phosphorylated in vitro by CheA(1) or CheA(2), although CheA(1) and CheA(2) mutants with defective kinase domains were phosphorylated by CheA(4). Because in vivo CheA(3) and CheA(4) localize to the cytoplasmic chemotaxis cluster, while CheA(2) localizes to the polar chemotaxis cluster, it is likely that the physical separation of CheA(2) and CheA(4) prevents unwanted cross-talk between these CheAs.

Diversity in chemotaxis mechanisms among the bacteria and archaea

The study of chemotaxis describes the cellular processes that control the movement of organisms toward favorable environments. In bacteria and archaea, motility is controlled by a two-component system involving a histidine kinase that senses the environment and a response regulator, a very common type of signal transduction in prokaryotes. Most insights into the processes involved have come from studies of Escherichia coli over the last three decades. However, in the last 10 years, with the sequencing of many prokaryotic genomes, it has become clear that E. coli represents a streamlined example of bacterial chemotaxis. While general features of excitation remain conserved among bacteria and archaea, specific features, such as adaptational processes and hydrolysis of the intracellular signal CheY-P, are quite diverse. The Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis system is considerably more complex and appears to be similar to the one that existed when the bacteria and archaea separated during evolution, so that understanding this mechanism should provide insight into the variety of mechanisms used today by the broad sweep of chemotactic bacteria and archaea. However, processes even beyond those used in E. coli and B. subtilis have been discovered in other organisms. This review emphasizes those used by B. subtilis and these other organisms but also gives an account of the mechanism in E. coli.

Polar localization of CheA2 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides requires specific Che homologs

Rhodobacter sphaeroides is a motile bacterium that has multiple chemotaxis genes organized predominantly in three major operons (cheOp(1), cheOp(2), and cheOp(3)). The chemoreceptor proteins are clustered at two distinct locations, the cell poles and in one or more cytoplasmic clusters. One intriguing possibility is that the physically distinct chemoreceptor clusters are each composed of a defined subset of specific chemotaxis proteins, including the chemoreceptors themselves plus specific CheW and CheA proteins. Here we report the subcellular localization of one such protein, CheA(2), under aerobic and photoheterotrophic growth conditions. CheA(2) is predominantly clustered and localized at the cell poles under both growth conditions. Furthermore, its localization is dependent upon one or more genes in cheOp(2) but not those of cheOp(1) or cheOp(3). In E. coli, the polar localization of CheA depends upon CheW. The R. sphaeroides cheOp(2) contains two cheW genes. Interestingly, CheW(2) is required under both aerobic and photoheterotrophic conditions, whereas CheW(3) is not required under aerobic conditions but appears to play a modest role under photoheterotrophic conditions. This suggests that R. sphaeroides contains at least two distinct chemotaxis complexes, possibly composed of proteins dedicated for each subcellular location. Furthermore, the composition of these spatially distinct complexes may change under different growth conditions.

TlpC, a novel chemotaxis protein in Rhodobacter sphaeroides, localizes to a discrete region in the cytoplasm

TlpC is encoded in the second chemotaxis operon of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. This protein shows some homology to membrane-spanning chemoreceptors of many bacterial species but, unlike these, is essential for R. sphaeroides chemotaxis to all compounds tested. Genomic replacement of tlpC with a C-terminal gfp fusion demonstrated that TlpC localized to a discrete cluster within the cytoplasm. Immunogold electron microscopy also showed that TlpC localized to a cytoplasmic electron-dense region. Correct TlpC-GFP localization depended on the downstream signalling proteins, CheW3, CheW4 and CheA2, and was tightly linked to cell division. Newly divided cells contained a single cluster but, as the cell cycle progressed, a second cluster appeared close to the initial cluster. As elongation continued, these clusters moved apart so that, on septation, each daughter cell contained a single TlpC cluster. The data presented suggest that TlpC is either a cytoplasmic chemoreceptor responding to or integrating global signals of metabolic state or a novel and essential component of the chemotaxis signalling pathway. These data also suggest that clustering is essential for signalling and that a mechanism may exist for targeting and localizing proteins within the bacterial cytoplasm.

Phosphotransfer in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis

The two-component sensing system controlling bacterial chemotaxis is one of the best studied in biology. Rhodobacter sphaeroides has a complex chemosensory pathway comprising two histidine protein kinases (CheAs) and eight downstream response regulators (six CheYs and two CheBs) rather than the single copies of each as in Escherichia coli. We used in vitro analysis of phosphotransfer to start to determine why R.sphaeroides has these multiple homologues. CheA(1) and CheA(2) contain all the key motifs identified in the histidine protein kinase family, except for conservative substitutions (F-L and F-I) within the F box of CheA(2), and both are capable of ATP-dependent autophosphorylation. While the K(m) values for ATP of CheA(1) and CheA(2) were similar to that of E.coli, the k(cat) value was three times lower, but similar to that measured for the related Sinorhizobium meliloti CheA. However, the two CheAs differed both in their ability to phosphorylate the various response regulators and the rates of phosphotransfer. CheA(2) phosphorylated all of the CheYs and both CheBs, whilst CheA(1) did not phosphorylate either CheB and phosphorylated only the response regulators encoded within its own genetic locus (CheY(1), CheY(2), and CheY(5)) and CheY(3). The dephosphorylation rates of the R.sphaeroides CheBs were much slower than the E.coli CheB. The dephosphorylation rate of CheY(6), encoded by the third chemosensory locus, was ten times faster than that of the E.coli CheY. However, the dephosphorylation rates of the remaining R.sphaeroides CheYs were comparable to that of E.coli CheY.

The third chemotaxis locus of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is essential for chemotaxis

The purple photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides has three loci encoding multiple homologues of the bacterial chemosensory proteins: 13 putative chemoreceptors, four CheW, four CheA, six CheY, two CheB and three CheR. Previously, studies have shown that, although deletion of cheOp1 led to only minor changes in behaviour, deletion of cheOp2 led to a loss of taxis. The third locus encodes two CheA, one CheR, one CheB, one CheW, one CheY, a putative cytoplasmic chemoreceptor (TlpT) and a protein showing homology to the chromosomal partitioning factor Soj (designated Slp). Here, we show that every protein encoded by this locus is essential for normal chemotaxis. Phototaxis is also dependent upon all the components of this locus, except CheB2 and Slp. The two putative CheA proteins encoded in this locus are unusual. CheA3 has only the P1 domain and the P5 regulatory domain linked by a large internal domain, whereas CheA4 lacks the P1 and P2 domains required for phosphorylation and response regulator binding. These data indicate that the minimal set of proteins required for normal chemotaxis in R. sphaeroides is all the proteins encoded by cheOp2 and the third chemotaxis locus, and that the multiple chemosensory protein homologues found in R. sphaeroides are not redundant.