Regulation of histone deposition on the herpes simplex virus type 1 genome during lytic infection

The opportunities and challenges of epigenetic approaches to manage herpes simplex infections

INTRODUCTION

Despite the existence of antivirals that potently and efficiently inhibit the replication of herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 (HSV-1, -2), their ability to establish and maintain, and reactivate from, latency has precluded the development of curative therapies. Several groups are exploring the opportunities of targeting epigenetic regulation to permanently silence latent HSV genomes or induce their simultaneous reactivation in the presence of antivirals to flush the latent reservoirs, as has been explored for HIV.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the basic principles of epigenetic regulation with an emphasis on those mechanisms relevant to the regulation of herpes simplex viruses, as well as the current knowledge on the regulation of lytic infections and the establishment and maintenance of, and reactivation from, latency, with an emphasis on epigenetic regulation. The differences with the epigenetic regulation of viral and cellular gene expression are highlighted as are the effects of known epigenetic regulators on herpes simplex viruses. The major limitations of current models to the development of novel antiviral strategies targeting latency are highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

We provide an update on the epigenetic regulation during lytic and latent HSV-1 infection, highlighting the commonalities and differences with cellular gene expression and the potential of epigenetic drugs as antivirals, including the opportunities, challenges, and potential future directions.

Daxx mediated histone H3.3 deposition on HSV-1 DNA restricts genome decompaction and the progression of immediate-early transcription

Herpesviruses are ubiquitous pathogens that cause a wide range of disease. Upon nuclear entry, their genomes associate with histones and chromatin modifying enzymes that regulate the progression of viral transcription and outcome of infection. While the composition and modification of viral chromatin has been extensively studied on bulk populations of infected cells by chromatin immunoprecipitation, this key regulatory process remains poorly defined at single-genome resolution. Here we use high-resolution quantitative imaging to investigate the spatial proximity of canonical and variant histones at individual Herpes Simplex Virus 1 (HSV-1) genomes within the first 90 minutes of infection. We identify significant population heterogeneity in the stable enrichment and spatial proximity of canonical histones (H2A, H2B, H3.1) at viral DNA (vDNA) relative to established promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear body (PML-NB) host factors that are actively recruited to viral genomes upon nuclear entry. We show the replication-independent histone H3.3/H4 chaperone Daxx to cooperate with PML to mediate the enrichment and spatial localization of variant histone H3.3 at vDNA that limits the rate of HSV-1 genome decompaction to restrict the progress of immediate-early (IE) transcription. This host response is counteracted by the viral ubiquitin ligase ICP0, which degrades PML to disperse Daxx and variant histone H3.3 from vDNA to stimulate the progression of viral genome expansion, IE transcription, and onset of HSV-1 replication. Our data support a model of intermediate and sequential histone assembly initiated by Daxx that limits the rate of HSV-1 genome decompaction independently of the stable enrichment of histones H2A and H2B at vDNA required to facilitate canonical nucleosome assembly. We identify HSV-1 genome decompaction upon nuclear infection to play a key role in the initiation and functional outcome of HSV-1 lytic infection, findings pertinent to the transcriptional regulation of many nuclear replicating herpesvirus pathogens.

Models of Herpes Simplex Virus Latency

Our current understanding of HSV latency is based on a variety of clinical observations, and in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro model systems, each with unique advantages and drawbacks. The criteria for authentically modeling HSV latency include the ability to easily manipulate host genetics and biological pathways, as well as mimicking the immune response and viral pathogenesis in human infections. Although realistically modeling HSV latency is necessary when choosing a model, the cost, time requirement, ethical constraints, and reagent availability are also equally important. Presently, there remains a pressing need for in vivo models that more closely recapitulate human HSV infection. While the current in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro models used to study HSV latency have limitations, they provide further insights that add to our understanding of latency. In vivo models have shed light on natural infection routes and the interplay between the host immune response and the virus during latency, while in vitro models have been invaluable in elucidating molecular pathways involved in latency. Below, we review the relative advantages and disadvantages of current HSV models and highlight insights gained through each.

Histone H2A variant H2A.B is enriched in transcriptionally active and replicating HSV-1 lytic chromatin

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) transcription is restricted in latently infected neurons and the genomes are in mostly silenced chromatin, whereas all viral genes are transcribed in lytically infected cells, in which the genomes are dynamically chromatinized. Epigenetic regulation modulates HSV-1 transcription during lytic, latent, and reactivating infections but the precise mechanisms are not fully defined. Nucleosomes are dynamic: they slide, breathe, assemble, and disassemble. We and others have proposed that the most dynamic HSV-1 chromatin is transcriptionally competent, whereas the least dynamic is silenced. However, the mechanisms yielding the unusually dynamic viral chromatin remain unknown. Histone variants affect nucleosome dynamics. The dynamics of H2A, H2A.X, and macroH2A were enhanced in infected cells, whereas those of H2A.B were uniquely decreased. We constructed stably transduced cells expressing tagged histone H2A, H2A.B, macroH2A, or H2B, which assembles the H2A/H2B nucleosome dimers with all H2A variants. All H2A variants, as well as ectopic and endogenous H2B were assembled into HSV-1 chromatin evenly throughout the genome but canonical H2A was relatively depleted whereas H2A.B was enriched, particularly in the most dynamic viral chromatin. When viral transcription and DNA replication were restricted, H2A.B became as depleted from the viral chromatin through the entire genome as H2A. We propose that lytic HSV-1 nucleosomes are enriched in the dynamic variant H2A.B/H2B dimers to promote HSV-1 chromatin dynamics and transcriptional competency and conclude that the dynamics of HSV-1 chromatin are determined in part by the H2A variants.

IMPORTANCE

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) transcription is epigenetically regulated during latent and lytic infections, and epigenetic inhibitors have been proposed as potential antiviral drugs to modulate latency and reactivation. However, the detailed epigenetic mechanisms of regulation of HSV-1 transcription have not been fully characterized and may differ from those regulating cellular transcription. Whereas lytic HSV-1 chromatin is unusually dynamic, latent silenced HSV-1 chromatin is not. The mechanisms resulting in the unique dynamics of the lytic chromatin remain unknown. Here we identify the enrichment of the highly dynamic histone 2A variant H2A in the most dynamic viral chromatin, which provides a mechanistic understanding of its unique dynamics. Future work to identify the mechanisms of enrichment in H2A.B on the viral chromatin may identify novel druggable epigenetic regulators that modulate HSV-1 latency and reactivation.

Single-genome analysis reveals a heterogeneous association of the herpes simplex virus genome with H3K27me2 and the reader PHF20L1 following infection of human fibroblasts

The fate of herpesvirus genomes following entry into different cell types is thought to regulate the outcome of infection. For the Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), latent infection of neurons is characterized by association with repressive heterochromatin marked with Polycomb silencing-associated lysine 27 methylation on histone H3 (H3K27me). However, whether H3K27 methylation plays a role in repressing lytic gene expression in non-neuronal cells is unclear. To address this gap in knowledge, and with consideration that the fate of the viral genome and outcome of HSV-1 infection could be heterogeneous, we developed an assay to quantify the abundance of histone modifications within single viral genome foci of infected fibroblasts. Using this approach, combined with bulk epigenetic techniques, we were unable to detect any role for H3K27me3 during HSV-1 lytic infection of fibroblasts. By contrast, we could detect the lesser studied H3K27me2 on a subpopulation of viral genomes, which was consistent with a role for H3K27 demethylases in promoting lytic gene expression. In addition, viral genomes co-localized with the H3K27me2 reader protein PHF20L1, and this association was enhanced by inhibition of the H3K27 demethylases UTX and JMJD3. Notably, targeting of H3K27me2 to viral genomes was enhanced following infection with a transcriptionally defective virus in the absence of Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. Collectively, these studies implicate a role for H3K27me2 in fibroblast-associated HSV genome silencing in a manner dependent on genome sub-nuclear localization and transcriptional activity.

IMPORTANCE

Investigating the potential mechanisms of gene silencing for DNA viruses in different cell types is important to understand the differential outcomes of infection, particularly for viruses like herpesviruses that can undergo distinct types of infection in different cell types. In addition, investigating chromatin association with viral genomes informs on the mechanisms of epigenetic regulation of DNA processes. However, there is a growing appreciation for heterogeneity in the outcome of infection at the single cell, and even single viral genome, level. Here we describe a novel assay for quantifying viral genome foci with chromatin proteins and show that a portion of genomes are targeted for silencing by H3K27me2 and associate with the reader protein PHF20L1. This study raises important questions regarding the mechanism of H3K27me2-specific targeting to viral genomes, the contribution of epigenetic heterogeneity to herpesvirus infection, and the role of PHF20L1 in regulating the outcome of DNA virus infection.

c-Jun signaling during initial HSV-1 infection modulates latency to enhance later reactivation in addition to directly promoting the progression to full reactivation

Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) establishes a latent infection in peripheral neurons and periodically reactivates to permit transmission, which can result in clinical manifestations. Viral transactivators required for lytic infection are largely absent during latent infection, and therefore, HSV-1 relies on the co-option of neuronal host signaling pathways to initiate its gene expression. The activation of the neuronal c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) cell stress pathway is central to initiating biphasic reactivation in response to multiple stimuli. However, how host factors work with JNK to stimulate the initial wave of gene expression (known as Phase I) or the progression to full Phase II reactivation remains unclear. Here, we found that c-Jun, the primary target downstream of neuronal JNK cell stress signaling, functions during reactivation but not during the JNK-mediated initiation of Phase I gene expression. Instead, c-Jun was required to transition from Phase I to full HSV-1 reactivation and was detected in viral replication compartments of reactivating neurons. Interestingly, we also identified a role for both c-Jun and enhanced neuronal stress during initial neuronal infection in promoting a more reactivation-competent form of HSV-1 latency. Therefore, c-Jun functions at multiple stages during the HSV latent infection of neurons to promote reactivation but not during the initial JNK-dependent Phase I. Importantly, by demonstrating that initial infection conditions can contribute to later reactivation abilities, this study highlights the potential for latently infected neurons to maintain a molecular scar of previous exposure to neuronal stressors.IMPORTANCEThe molecular mechanisms that regulate the reactivation of herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) from latent infection are unknown. The host transcription and pioneer factor c-Jun is the main target of the JNK cell stress pathway that is known to be important in exit of HSV from latency. Surprisingly, we found that c-Jun does not act with JNK during exit from latency but instead promotes the transition to full reactivation. Moreover, c-Jun and enhanced neuronal stress during initial neuronal infection promoted a more reactivation-competent form of HSV-1 latency. c-Jun, therefore, functions at multiple stages during HSV-1 latent infection of neurons to promote reactivation. Importantly, this study contributes to a growing body of evidence that de novo HSV-1 infection conditions can modulate latent infection and impact future reactivation events, raising important questions on the clinical impact of stress during initial HSV-1 acquisition on future reactivation events and consequences.

Histone H2A variant H2A.B is enriched in transcriptionally active HSV-1 lytic chromatin

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) transcription is restricted in latently infected neurons and the genomes are in mostly silenced chromatin, whereas all viral genes are transcribed in lytically infected cells, in which the genomes are dynamically chromatinized. Epigenetic regulation modulates HSV-1 transcription during lytic, latent, and reactivating infections, but the precise mechanisms are not fully defined. Nucleosomes are dynamic; they slide, breathe, assemble and disassemble. We and others have proposed that the most dynamic HSV-1 chromatin is transcriptionally competent whereas the least dynamic is silenced. However, the mechanisms yielding the unusually dynamic viral chromatin remain unknown. Histone variants affect nucleosome dynamics. The dynamics of H2A, H2A.X and macroH2A were enhanced in infected cells, whereas those of H2A.B uniquely decreased. We constructed stably transduced cells expressing tagged histone H2A, H2A.B, macroH2A, or H2B, which assembles the H2A/H2B nucleosome dimers with all H2A variants. All H2A variants, ectopic, and endogenous H2B, were assembled into HSV-1 chromatin evenly throughout the genome, but canonical H2A was relatively depleted from the viral chromatin whereas H2A.B was enriched in the most dynamic viral chromatin. When viral transcription was restricted, H2A.B became as depleted from the viral chromatin through the entire genome as H2A. We propose that lytic HSV-1 nucleosomes are enriched in the dynamic variant H2A.B/H2B dimers to promote HSV-1 chromatin dynamics and transcriptional competency, and conclude that the dynamics of HSV-1 chromatin are determined in part by the H2A variants.

Importance

HSV-1 transcription is epigenetically regulated during latent and lytic infections, and epigenetic inhibitors have been proposed as potential antiviral drugs to modulate latency and reactivation. However, the detailed mechanisms of regulation of HSV-1 transcription by epigenetics have not been fully characterized and may differ from those regulating cellular transcription. In particular, the lytic HSV-1 chromatin is unusually dynamic, whereas the latent silenced one is not, but the mechanisms resulting in the unique dynamics of the lytic chromatin remain unknown. Here we identify the enrichment on the highly dynamic histone 2A variant H2A in the most dynamic viral chromatin, which provides a mechanistic understanding for its unique dynamics. Future work to identify the mechanisms of enrichment in H2A.B on the viral chromatin may identify novel druggable epigenetic regulators that modulate HSV-1 latency and reactivation.

Single-genome analysis reveals heterogeneous association of the Herpes Simplex Virus genome with H3K27me2 and the reader PHF20L1 following infection of human fibroblasts

The fate of herpesvirus genomes following entry into different cell types is thought to regulate the outcome of infection. For the Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), latent infection of neurons is characterized by association with repressive heterochromatin marked with Polycomb silencing-associated lysine 27 methylation on histone H3 (H3K27me). However, whether H3K27 methylation plays a role in repressing lytic gene expression in non-neuronal cells is unclear. To address this gap in knowledge, and with consideration that the fate of the viral genome and outcome of HSV-1 infection could be heterogeneous, we developed an assay to quantify the abundance of histone modifications within single viral genome foci of infected fibroblasts. Using this approach, combined with bulk epigenetic techniques, we were unable to detect any role for H3K27me3 during HSV-1 lytic infection of fibroblasts. In contrast, we could detect the lesser studied H3K27me2 on a subpopulation of viral genomes, which was consistent with a role for H3K27 demethylases in promoting lytic gene expression. This was consistent with a role for H3K27 demethylases in promoting lytic gene expression. In addition, viral genomes co-localized with the H3K27me2 reader protein PHF20L1, and this association was enhanced by inhibition of the H3K27 demethylases UTX and JMJD3. Notably, targeting of H3K27me2 to viral genomes was enhanced following infection with a transcriptionally defective virus in the absence of Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. Collectively, these studies implicate a role for H3K27me2 in fibroblast-associated HSV genome silencing in a manner dependent on genome sub-nuclear localization and transcriptional activity.

c-Jun Signaling During Initial HSV-1 Infection Modulates Latency to Enhance Later Reactivation in addition to Directly Promoting the Progression to Full Reactivation

Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) establishes a latent infection in peripheral neurons and can periodically reactivate to permit transmission and clinical manifestations. Viral transactivators required for lytic infection are largely absent during latent infection and therefore HSV-1 relies on the co-option of neuronal host signaling pathways to initiate its gene expression. Activation of the neuronal c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) cell stress pathway is central to initiating biphasic reactivation in response to multiple stimuli. However, how host factors work with JNK to stimulate the initial wave of gene expression (known as Phase I) or the progression to full, Phase II reactivation remains unclear. Here, we found that c-Jun, the primary target downstream of neuronal JNK cell stress signaling, functions during reactivation but not during the JNK-mediated initiation of Phase I gene expression. Instead, c-Jun was required for the transition from Phase I to full HSV-1 reactivation and was detected in viral replication compartments of reactivating neurons. Interestingly, we also identified a role for both c-Jun and enhanced neuronal stress during initial neuronal infection in promoting a more reactivation-competent form of HSV-1 latency. Therefore, c-Jun functions at multiple stages during HSV latent infection of neurons to promote reactivation. Importantly, by demonstrating that initial infection conditions can contribute to later reactivation abilities, this study highlights the potential for latently infected neurons to maintain a molecular scar of previous exposure to neuronal stressors.

DLK-Dependent Biphasic Reactivation of Herpes Simplex Virus Latency Established in the Absence of Antivirals

Understanding the molecular mechanisms of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) latent infection and reactivation in neurons requires the use of in vitro model systems. Establishing a quiescent infection in cultured neurons is problematic, as any infectious virus released can superinfect the cultures. Previous studies have used the viral DNA replication inhibitor acyclovir to prevent superinfection and promote latency establishment. Data from these previous models have shown that reactivation is biphasic, with an initial phase I expression of all classes of lytic genes, which occurs independently of histone demethylase activity and viral DNA replication but is dependent on the cell stress protein DLK. Here, we describe a new model system using HSV-1 Stayput-GFP, a reporter virus that is defective for cell-to-cell spread and establishes latent infections without the need for acyclovir. The establishment of a latent state requires a longer time frame than previous models using DNA replication inhibitors. This results in a decreased ability of the virus to reactivate using established inducers, and as such, a combination of reactivation triggers is required. Using this system, we demonstrate that biphasic reactivation occurs even when latency is established in the absence of acyclovir. Importantly, phase I lytic gene expression still occurs in a histone demethylase and viral DNA replication-independent manner and requires DLK activity. These data demonstrate that the two waves of viral gene expression following HSV-1 reactivation are independent of secondary infection and not unique to systems that require acyclovir to promote latency establishment. IMPORTANCE Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) enters a latent infection in neurons and periodically reactivates. Reactivation manifests as a variety of clinical symptoms. Studying latency and reactivation in vitro is invaluable, allowing the molecular mechanisms behind both processes to be targeted by therapeutics that reduce the clinical consequences. Here, we describe a novel in vitro model system using a cell-to-cell spread-defective HSV-1, known as Stayput-GFP, which allows for the study of latency and reactivation at the single neuron level. We anticipate this new model system will be an incredibly valuable tool for studying the establishment and reactivation of HSV-1 latent infection in vitro. Using this model, we find that initial reactivation events are dependent on cellular stress kinase DLK but independent of histone demethylase activity and viral DNA replication. Our data therefore further validate the essential role of DLK in mediating a wave of lytic gene expression unique to reactivation.

Human cytomegalovirus lytic infection inhibits replication-dependent histone synthesis and requires stem loop binding protein function

Until now, it was not known if, how, or why pathogenic human viruses might modulate the de novo production of the replication-dependent (RD) histone proteins that decorate their DNA genomes within infected cells. Our finding that human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) inhibits RD histone production affirms that a virus targets this fundamental cellular process. Furthermore, our revelation that HCMV induces, relocalizes, and then commandeers the stem loop–binding protein (SLBP) for a purpose other than RD histone synthesis to support productive replication illuminates the potential for other functions of this highly conserved protein. The critical nature of SLBP for HCMV infection and of RD histone synthesis for cellular DNA replication highlights this process as a target for future antiviral and chemotherapeutic interventions.

Replication-dependent (RD) histones are deposited onto human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) genomes at the start of infection. We examined how HCMV affects the de novo production of RD histones and found that viral infection blocked the accumulation of RD histone mRNAs that normally occurs during the S phase. Furthermore, RD histone mRNAs present in HCMV-infected cells did not undergo the unique 3′ processing required for their normal nuclear export and translation. The protein that orchestrates processing in the nucleus, stem loop–binding protein (SLBP), was found predominantly in the cytoplasm, and RD histone proteins were not de novo synthesized in HCMV-infected cells. Intriguingly, however, we found that SLBP was required for the efficient synthesis and assembly of infectious progeny virions. We conclude that HCMV infection attenuates RD histone mRNA accumulation and processing and the de novo protein synthesis of the RD histones, while utilizing SLBP for an alternative purpose to support infectious virion production.

Insights into the roles of histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly and disassembly in virus infection

Nucleosomes are assembled or disassembled with the aid of histone chaperones in a cell. Viruses can exist either as minichromosomes/episomes or can integrate into the host genome and in both the cases the viral proteins interact and manipulate the cellular nucleosome assembly machinery to ensure their survival and propagation. Recent studies have provided insight into the mechanism and role of histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly and disassembly on the virus genome. Further, the interactions between viral proteins and histone chaperones have been implicated in the integration of the virus genome into the host genome. This review highlights the recent progress and future challenges in understanding the role of histone chaperones in viruses with DNA or RNA genome and their role in governing viral pathogenesis.

"Non-Essential" Proteins of HSV-1 with Essential Roles In Vivo: A Comprehensive Review

Viruses encode for structural proteins that participate in virion formation and include capsid and envelope proteins. In addition, viruses encode for an array of non-structural accessory proteins important for replication, spread, and immune evasion in the host and are often linked to virus pathogenesis. Most virus accessory proteins are non-essential for growth in cell culture because of the simplicity of the infection barriers or because they have roles only during a state of the infection that does not exist in cell cultures (i.e., tissue-specific functions), or finally because host factors in cell culture can complement their absence. For these reasons, the study of most nonessential viral factors is more complex and requires development of suitable cell culture systems and in vivo models. Approximately half of the proteins encoded by the herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) genome have been classified as non-essential. These proteins have essential roles in vivo in counteracting antiviral responses, facilitating the spread of the virus from the sites of initial infection to the peripheral nervous system, where it establishes lifelong reservoirs, virus pathogenesis, and other regulatory roles during infection. Understanding the functions of the non-essential proteins of herpesviruses is important to understand mechanisms of viral pathogenesis but also to harness properties of these viruses for therapeutic purposes. Here, we have provided a comprehensive summary of the functions of HSV-1 non-essential proteins.

The HSV-1 ubiquitin ligase ICP0: Modifying the cellular proteome to promote infection

•

ICP0 is a viral E3 ubiquitin ligase that promotes HSV-1 infection.

•

ICP0 interacts with multiple component proteins of the ubiquitin pathway.

•

ICP0 disrupts multiple cellular processes activated in response to infection

•

ICP0 remodels the SUMO proteome to counteract host immune defences to infection.

•

ICP0 is an attractive drug target for the development of antiviral HSV-1 therapeutics.

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) hijacks ubiquitination machinery to modify the cellular proteome to create an environment permissive for virus replication. HSV-1 encodes its own RING-finger E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase, Infected Cell Protein 0 (ICP0), that directly interfaces with component proteins of the Ub pathway to inactivate host immune defences and cellular processes that restrict the progression of HSV-1 infection. Consequently, ICP0 plays a critical role in the infectious cycle of HSV-1 that is required to promote the efficient onset of lytic infection and productive reactivation of viral genomes from latency. This review will describe the current knowledge regarding the biochemical properties and known substrates of ICP0 during HSV-1 infection. We will highlight the gaps in the characterization of ICP0 function and propose future areas of research required to understand fully the biological properties of this important HSV-1 regulatory protein.

Chromatin dynamics and the transcriptional competence of HSV-1 genomes during lytic infections

During latent infections with herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), viral transcription is restricted and the genomes are mostly maintained in silenced chromatin, whereas in lytically infected cells all viral genes are transcribed and the genomes are dynamically chromatinized. Histones in the viral chromatin bear markers of silenced chromatin at early times in lytic infection or of active transcription at later times. The virion protein VP16 activates transcription of the immediate-early (IE) genes by recruiting transcription activators and chromatin remodelers to their promoters. Two IE proteins, ICP0 and ICP4 which modulate chromatin epigenetics, then activate transcription of early and late genes. Although chromatin is involved in the mechanism of activation of HSV- transcription, its precise role is not entirely understood. In the cellular genome, chromatin dynamics often modulate transcription competence whereas promoter-specific transcription factors determine transcription activity. Here, biophysical fractionation of serially digested HSV-1 chromatin followed by short-read deep sequencing indicates that nuclear HSV-1 DNA has different biophysical properties than protein-free or encapsidated HSV-1 DNA. The entire HSV-1 genomes in infected cells were equally accessible. The accessibility of transcribed or non-transcribed genes under any given condition did not differ, and each gene was entirely sampled in both the most and least accessible chromatin. However, HSV-1 genomes fractionated differently under conditions of generalized or restricted transcription. Approximately 1/3 of the HSV-1 DNA including fully sampled genes resolved to the most accessible chromatin when HSV-1 transcription was active, but such enrichment was reduced to only 3% under conditions of restricted HSV-1 transcription. Short sequences of restricted accessibility separated genes with different transcription levels. Chromatin dynamics thus provide a first level of regulation on HSV-1 transcription, dictating the transcriptional competency of the genomes during lytic infections, whereas the transcription of individual genes is then most likely activated by specific transcription factors. Moreover, genes transcribed to different levels are separated by short sequences with limited accessibility.

Although chromatin epigenetics modulate transcription of the nuclear replicating DNA viruses, and play major roles in the process of establishment of, and reactivation from, latency, the specific mechanisms of this modulation are not totally clear. Chromatin often regulates the transcriptional competency of cellular genes, rather than the actual level of transcription of individual genes. Here, we show that chromatin dynamics regulate the transcription competency of entire herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) genomes, rather than the actual transcription level of individual genes. Moreover, CTCF/ insulator containing sequences flanking the immediate-early gene loci are more inaccessible when these genes are highly transcribed in a context of little transcription from the rest of the genome than when no gene was highly transcribed or all genes were. We postulate that chromatin dynamics modulate the transcriptional competency of the HSV-1 genome. Genes in genomes rendered transcriptionally inactive by chromatin dynamics cannot be transcribed, whereas transcription of individual genes, or of group of genes, is regulated separately in the transcriptionally competent genomes.

The canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway stimulates herpes simplex virus 1 productive infection

The ability of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) to replicate efficiently in differentiated cells is regulated by cellular factors that stimulate viral gene expression, cell survival, and viral morphogenesis. Activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway generally increases β-catenin protein levels, cell survival, and growth in dividing cells suggesting this important signaling pathway regulates productive infection. In this study, we demonstrated that a β-catenin specific small molecule inhibitor (iCRT14) reduced HSV-1 titers approximately 10-fold in primary human lung fibroblasts and Vero cells. Furthermore, β-catenin dependent transcription was increased at late times after infection and as expected iCRT14 reduced β-catenin dependent transcription. Although HSV-1 infection increased β-catenin steady state protein levels approximately 4-fold in Vero cells, there was only a nominal increase in human lung fibroblasts. We hypothesized that VP16 regulates β-catenin dependent transcription because VP16 is a viral regulatory protein expressed at late times after infection. In the absence of other viral proteins, VP16 increased β-catenin dependent transcription and β-catenin steady state protein levels. Collectively, these studies suggested the cellular transcription factor β-catenin stimulates productive infection, in part because VP16 enhances β-catenin dependent transcription.

Timing Is Everything

N. Drayman et al. in their recent article (mBio 8:e01612-17, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01612-17) have used dynamic proteomics and machine learning to show that the cell cycle state of any individual cell affects the outcome of a productive herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) infection. Cells infected from early G₁ through S were most permissive for expression of genes from the HSV-1 genome, whereas cells infected in late G₂ to mitosis were much less so. Most of the infected cells that underwent mitosis became permanently nonpermissive for HSV-1 gene expression afterward. The cell cycle stage accounted for 60% of the success of infection, and cell density and motility accounted for most of the rest. To successfully reactivate, HSV-1 must express its genes in neurons and cells of the spinosum and granulosum epidermis strata. These cells are permanently in the cell cycle stages most permissive for HSV-1 gene expression, and none reenters mitosis, thus maximizing the efficiency of a successful HSV-1 reactivation before the adaptive immunity can control it.

Promoting Simultaneous Onset of Viral Gene Expression Among Cells Infected with Herpes Simplex Virus-1

Synchronous viral infection facilitates the study of viral gene expression, viral host interactions, and viral replication processes. However, the protocols for achieving synchronous infections were hardly ever tested in proper temporal resolution at the single-cell level. We set up a fluorescence-based, time lapse microscopy assay to study sources of variability in the timing of gene expression during herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infection. We found that with the common protocol, the onset of gene expression within different cells can vary by more than 3 h. We showed that simultaneous viral genome entry to the nucleus can be achieved with a derivative of the previously characterized temperature sensitive mutant tsB7, however, this did not improve gene expression synchrony. We found that elevating the temperature in which the infection is done and increasing the multiplicity of infection (MOI) significantly promoted simultaneous onset of viral gene expression among infected cells. Further, elevated temperature result in a decrease in the coefficient of variation (a standardized measure of dispersion) of viral replication compartments (RCs) sizes among cells as well as a slight increment of viral late gene expression synchrony. We conclude that simultaneous viral gene expression can be improved by simple modifications to the infection process and may reduce the effect of single-cell variability on population-based assays.

Cellular Transcriptional Coactivator RanBP10 and Herpes Simplex Virus 1 ICP0 Interact and Synergistically Promote Viral Gene Expression and Replication

To investigate the molecular mechanism(s) by which herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) regulatory protein ICP0 promotes viral gene expression and replication, we screened cells overexpressing ICP0 for ICP0-binding host cell proteins. Tandem affinity purification of transiently expressed ICP0 coupled with mass spectrometry-based proteomics technology and subsequent analyses showed that ICP0 interacted with cell protein RanBP10, a known transcriptional coactivator, in HSV-1-infected cells. Knockdown of RanBP10 in infected HEp-2 cells resulted in a phenotype similar to that observed with the ICP0-null mutation, including reduction in viral replication and in the accumulation of viral immediate early (ICP27), early (ICP8), and late (VP16) mRNAs and proteins. In addition, RanBP10 knockdown or the ICP0-null mutation increased the level of histone H3 association with the promoters of these viral genes, which is known to repress transcription. These effects observed in wild-type HSV-1-infected HEp-2 RanBP10 knockdown cells or those observed in ICP0-null mutant virus-infected control HEp-2 cells were remarkably increased in ICP0-null mutant virus-infected HEp-2 RanBP10 knockdown cells. Our results suggested that ICP0 and RanBP10 redundantly and synergistically promoted viral gene expression by regulating chromatin remodeling of the HSV-1 genome for efficient viral replication.

IMPORTANCE

Upon entry of herpesviruses into a cell, viral gene expression is restricted by heterochromatinization of the viral genome. Therefore, HSV-1 has evolved multiple mechanisms to counteract this epigenetic silencing for efficient viral gene expression and replication. HSV-1 ICP0 is one of the viral proteins involved in counteracting epigenetic silencing. Here, we identified RanBP10 as a novel cellular ICP0-binding protein and showed that RanBP10 and ICP0 appeared to act synergistically to promote viral gene expression and replication by modulating viral chromatin remodeling. Our results provide insight into the mechanisms by which HSV-1 regulates viral chromatin remodeling for efficient viral gene expression and replication.

Early nucleosome deposition on, and replication of, HSV DNA requires cell factor PCNA

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is a double-stranded DNA virus that can cause lytic infections in epithelial cells of the skin and latent infections in neuronal cells of the peripheral nervous system. After virion attachment to the cell membrane, the capsid enters the cytoplasm and is transported to the nucleus. Following docking at the nuclear pore, the HSV DNA, and contents of the virion, are injected into the nucleus. The viral DNA that enters the nucleus is devoid of histones, but begins to be covered with them soon after entry. The covering of histones, in the form of nucleosomes, reaches a maximum during the early stages of infection and drops off during late infection (after DNA replication). However, during latency, the genome is saturated with nucleosomes. In this study, we examine the role of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a cellular DNA polymerase accessory protein (processivity factor), and cell DNA polymerases in histone deposition during the early stages of HSV infection. Using SiRNA knockdown, and a cytosine arabinoside (araC) chemical inhibitor, we conclude that PCNA is important for viral replication and histone deposition. However, cell DNA polymerases that bind PCNA do not appear to be required for these processes and PCNA does not appear to bind to the viral DNA polymerase (which has its own viral processivity factor).

Epstein-Barr viral productive amplification reprograms nuclear architecture, DNA replication, and histone deposition

The spontaneous transition of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) from latency to productive infection is infrequent, making its analysis in the resulting mixed cell populations difficult. We engineered cells to support this transition efficiently and developed EBV DNA variants that could be visualized and measured as fluorescent signals over multiple cell cycles. This approach revealed that EBV's productive replication began synchronously for viral DNAs within a cell but asynchronously between cells. EBV DNA amplification was delayed until early S phase and occurred in factories characterized by the absence of cellular DNA and histones, by a sequential redistribution of PCNA, and by localization away from the nuclear periphery. The earliest amplified DNAs lacked histones accompanying a decline in four histone chaperones. Thus, EBV transits from being dependent on the cellular replication machinery during latency to commandeering both that machinery and nuclear structure for its own reproductive needs.

Biphasic euchromatin-to-heterochromatin transition on the KSHV genome following de novo infection

The establishment of latency is an essential step for the life-long persistent infection and pathogenesis of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV). While the KSHV genome is chromatin-free in the virions, the viral DNA in latently infected cells has a chromatin structure with activating and repressive histone modifications that promote latent gene expression but suppress lytic gene expression. Here, we report a comprehensive epigenetic study of the recruitment of chromatin regulatory factors onto the KSHV genome during the pre-latency phase of KSHV infection. This demonstrates that the KSHV genome undergoes a biphasic chromatinization following de novo infection. Initially, a transcriptionally active chromatin (euchromatin), characterized by high levels of the H3K4me3 and acetylated H3K27 (H3K27ac) activating histone marks, was deposited on the viral episome and accompanied by the transient induction of a limited number of lytic genes. Interestingly, temporary expression of the RTA protein facilitated the increase of H3K4me3 and H3K27ac occupancy on the KSHV episome during de novo infection. Between 24–72 hours post-infection, as the levels of these activating histone marks declined on the KSHV genome, the levels of the repressive H3K27me3 and H2AK119ub histone marks increased concomitantly with the decline of lytic gene expression. Importantly, this transition to heterochromatin was dependent on both Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 and 2. In contrast, upon infection of human gingiva-derived epithelial cells, the KSHV genome underwent a transcription-active euchromatinization, resulting in efficient lytic gene expression. Our data demonstrate that the KSHV genome undergoes a temporally-ordered biphasic euchromatin-to-heterochromatin transition in endothelial cells, leading to latent infection, whereas KSHV preferentially adopts a transcriptionally active euchromatin in oral epithelial cells, resulting in lytic gene expression. Our results suggest that the differential epigenetic modification of the KSHV genome in distinct cell types is a potential determining factor for latent infection versus lytic replication of KSHV.

Although the KSHV genome is linear and chromatin-free in the virions, it circularizes and adopts a repressive chromatin structure in latently infected cells, inhibiting the majority of viral gene expression. In this study, we investigate the epigenetic regulatory mechanism of the pre-latency phase of KSHV infection. We found that upon de novo infection, the KSHV genome undergoes distinct chromatin states in a temporally ordered manner prior to the establishment of latency. Initially, the KSHV genome carried a transcriptionally permissive chromatin structure to allow expression of a subset of viral lytic genes. Subsequently, cellular Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) and PRC2 were recruited to the KSHV genome, resulting in the deposition of repressive histone marks onto the viral chromatin and the accumulation of heterochromatin structures, both of which were critical for the establishment of viral latency. In contrast to the biphasic chromatinization and genome-wide inhibition of lytic genes observed in de novo-infected SLK and TIME cells, KSHV adopts a transcriptionally permissive chromatin form in human gingiva-derived epithelial cells, resulting in prolonged and robust lytic gene expression. Thus, our results suggest that the differential epigenetic modification of the KSHV genome in distinct cell types is a potential determining factor for latent infection versus lytic replication of KSHV.

The differential mobilization of histones H3.1 and H3.3 by herpes simplex virus 1 relates histone dynamics to the assembly of viral chromatin

During lytic infections, HSV-1 genomes are assembled into unstable nucleosomes. The histones required for HSV-1 chromatin assembly, however, are in the cellular chromatin. We have shown that linker (H1) and core (H2B and H4) histones are mobilized during HSV-1 infection, and proposed that the mobilized histones are available for assembly into viral chromatin. However, the actual relevance of histone mobilization remained unknown. We now show that canonical H3.1 and variant H3.3 are also mobilized during HSV-1 infection. Mobilization required no HSV-1 protein expression, although immediate early or early proteins enhanced it. We used the previously known differential association of H3.3 and H3.1 with HSV-1 DNA to test the relevance of histone mobilization. H3.3 binds to HSV-1 genomes first, whereas H3.1 only binds after HSV-1 DNA replication initiates. Consistently, H3.3 and H3.1 were differentially mobilized. H3.1 mobilization decreased with HSV-1 DNA replication, whereas H3.3 mobilization was largely unaffected by it. These results support a model in which previously mobilized H3.1 is immobilized by assembly into viral chromatin during HSV-1 DNA replication, whereas H3.3 is mobilized and assembled into HSV-1 chromatin throughout infection. The differential mobilizations of H3.3 and H3.1 are consistent with their differential assembly into viral chromatin. These data therefore relate nuclear histone dynamics to the composition of viral chromatin and provide the first evidence that histone mobilization relates to viral chromatin assembly.

H3.1 is typically assembled into chromatin during DNA replication-dependent chromatin assembly. However, histones undergo exchange with those not bound in chromatin. During such exchanges, DNA replication-independent chromatin assembly incorporates histone variants, such as H3.3. The HSV-1 genomes are chromatinized, albeit in unstable nucleosomes. The viral genomes initially associate with H3.3, then associate with H3.1 only after HSV-1 DNA replication initiates. These differential interactions are consistent with the DNA replication-independent or -dependent assembly of H3.3 or H3.1, respectively, in cellular chromatin. We have shown that linker (H1) and core (H2B and H4) histones are mobilized during HSV-1 infection, but the significance of this mobilization remained unknown. We now find that H3.3 and H3.1 are also mobilized during infection. H3.3 is mobilized to a similar extent before or after HSV-1 DNA replication, which is consistent with its DNA replication-independent assembly into HSV-1 chromatin. In contrast, H3.1 mobilization decreases during HSV-1 DNA replication, which is consistent with the assembly of previously mobilized H3.1 into HSV-1 chromatin concomitant with HSV-1 DNA replication. The mobilizations of H3.1 and H3.3 are consistent with their kinetics of association with HSV-1 genomes, providing the first indication that histone mobilization relates to the assembly of viral chromatin.

Nucleosome maps of the human cytomegalovirus genome reveal a temporal switch in chromatin organization linked to a major IE protein

Human CMV (hCMV) establishes lifelong infections in most of us, causing developmental defects in human embryos and life-threatening disease in immunocompromised individuals. During productive infection, the viral >230,000-bp dsDNA genome is expressed widely and in a temporal cascade. The hCMV genome does not carry histones when encapsidated but has been proposed to form nucleosomes after release into the host cell nucleus. Here, we present hCMV genome-wide nucleosome occupancy and nascent transcript maps during infection of permissive human primary cells. We show that nucleosomes occupy nuclear viral DNA in a nonrandom and highly predictable fashion. At early times of infection, nucleosomes associate with the hCMV genome largely according to their intrinsic DNA sequence preferences, indicating that initial nucleosome formation is genetically encoded in the virus. However, as infection proceeds to the late phase, nucleosomes redistribute extensively to establish patterns mostly determined by nongenetic factors. We propose that these factors include key regulators of viral gene expression encoded at the hCMV major immediate-early (IE) locus. Indeed, mutant virus genomes deficient for IE1 expression exhibit globally increased nucleosome loads and reduced nucleosome dynamics compared with WT genomes. The temporal nucleosome occupancy differences between IE1-deficient and WT viruses correlate inversely with changes in the pattern of viral nascent and total transcript accumulation. These results provide a framework of spatial and temporal nucleosome organization across the genome of a major human pathogen and suggest that an hCMV major IE protein governs overall viral chromatin structure and function.

Chromatin dynamics during lytic infection with herpes simplex virus 1

Latent HSV-1 genomes are chromatinized with silencing marks. Since 2004, however, there has been an apparent inconsistency in the studies of the chromatinization of the HSV-1 genomes in lytically infected cells. Nuclease protection and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays suggested that the genomes were not regularly chromatinized, having only low histone occupancy. However, the chromatin modifications associated with transcribed and non-transcribed HSV-1 genes were those associated with active or repressed transcription, respectively. Moreover, the three critical HSV-1 transcriptional activators all had the capability to induce chromatin remodelling, and interacted with critical chromatin modifying enzymes. Depletion or overexpression of some, but not all, chromatin modifying proteins affected HSV-1 transcription, but often in unexpected manners. Since 2010, it has become clear that both cellular and HSV-1 chromatins are highly dynamic in infected cells. These dynamics reconcile the weak interactions between HSV-1 genomes and chromatin proteins, detected by nuclease protection and chromatin immunoprecipitation, with the proposed regulation of HSV-1 gene expression by chromatin, supported by the marks in the chromatin in the viral genomes and the abilities of the HSV-1 transcription activators to modulate chromatin. It also explains the sometimes unexpected results of interventions to modulate chromatin remodelling activities in infected cells.

Role of polycomb proteins in regulating HSV-1 latency

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) establishes a latent infection within sensory neurons of humans. Latency is characterized by the transcriptional repression of lytic genes by the condensation of lytic gene regions into heterochromatin. Recent data suggest that facultative heterochromatin predominates, and that cellular Polycomb proteins are involved in the establishment and maintenance of transcriptional repression during latency. This review summarizes these data and discusses the implication of viral and cellular factors in regulating heterochromatin composition.

The dynamics of HCF-1 modulation of herpes simplex virus chromatin during initiation of infection

Successful infection of herpes simplex virus is dependent upon chromatin modulation by the cellular coactivator host cell factor-1 (HCF-1). This review focuses on the multiple chromatin modulation components associated with HCF-1 and the chromatin-related dynamics mediated by this coactivator that lead to the initiation of herpes simplex virus (HSV) immediate early gene expression.

Regulation of alphaherpesvirus infections by the ICP0 family of proteins

Immediate-early protein ICP0 of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is important for the regulation of lytic and latent viral infection. Like the related proteins expressed by other alphaherpesviruses, ICP0 has a zinc-stabilized RING finger domain that confers E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. This domain is essential for the core functions of ICP0 and its activity leads to the degradation of a number of cellular proteins, some of which are involved in cellular defences that restrict viral infection. The article reviews recent advances in ICP0-related research, with an emphasis on the mechanisms by which ICP0 and related proteins counteract antiviral restriction and the roles in this process of cellular nuclear substructures known as ND10 or PML nuclear bodies. We also summarize recent advances in the understanding of the biochemical aspects of ICP0 activity. These studies highlight the importance of the SUMO conjugation pathway in both intrinsic resistance to HSV-1 infection and in substrate targeting by ICP0. The topics discussed in this review are relevant not only to HSV-1 infection, but also to cellular intrinsic resistance against herpesviruses more generally and the mechanisms by which viruses can evade this restriction.

Evasion of oncogene-induced senescence by gammaherpesviruses

A common feature of herpesvirus infection is activation of DNA damage responses (DDRs) that are essential for efficient lytic replication. Latent infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) also elicit DDRs via the action of latent viral oncoproteins that deregulate cell proliferation and initiate a host anti-proliferative defense known as oncogene-induced senescence (OIS). These viruses encode auxiliary latent proteins that undermine OIS to allow the ongoing proliferation of infected cells despite robust DDR signaling. Persistent DDRs have also been linked to the aberrant secretion of pathogenetically important inflammatory mediators from infected cells. The accumulating evidence indicates that herpesviruses have evolved ways to co-opt DDR signaling to manage both latent and lytic phases of infection, and that DDR subversion may contribute to herpesvirus-associated disease states.

A cultured affair: HSV latency and reactivation in neurons

After replicating in surface epithelia, herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1) enters the axonal terminals of peripheral neurons. The viral genome translocates to the nucleus, where it establishes a specialized infection known as latency, re-emerging periodically to seed new infections. Studies using cultured neuron models that faithfully recapitulate the molecular hallmarks of latency and reactivation defined in live animal models have provided fresh insight into the control of latency and connections to neuronal physiology. With this comes a growing appreciation for how the life cycles of HSV-1 and other herpesviruses are governed by key host pathways controlling metabolic homeostasis and cell identity.

Chromatin assembly on herpes simplex virus 1 DNA early during a lytic infection is Asf1a dependent

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is a large DNA virus which is characterized by its ability to form latent infections in neurons of the peripheral nervous system. Although histones are found in the capsids of small DNA viruses (papovaviruses), none are found in the capsids of large HSV. However, after entry into the infected cell nucleus, the HSV genome begins to associate with nucleosomes during the earliest stages of infection. In contrast, late during infection, newly replicated viral DNA does not appear to associate with nucleosomes, suggesting that histones are deposited specifically on input viral DNA. The mechanisms of deposition and removing histones from the viral genome are unclear. Recently, histone chaperones, involved in the assembly and disassembly of nucleosomes, have been identified. Human antisilencing factor 1 (Asf1) is one such factor which is involved in both the assembly and disassembly of nucleosomes in cellular systems. In this study, we have examined the effect of small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of Asf1a on HSV infections in HeLa cells. Both viral replication and growth were found to be decreased. Also, viral DNA was significantly less protected from micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion up to 6 h postinfection (hpi). However, transcription of the immediate early (IE) genes ICP0 and ICP4 was significantly upregulated at 3 h postinfection. Also, these genes were found to be less protected from MNase digestion and, therefore, less associated with nucleosomes. These results suggest that Asf1a plays a role in regulating IE genes by assembling chromatin onto histone-free viral DNA by 3 h postinfection.

Herpes simplex virus 1 DNA is in unstable nucleosomes throughout the lytic infection cycle, and the instability of the nucleosomes is independent of DNA replication

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) DNA is chromatinized during latency and consequently regularly digested by micrococcal nuclease (MCN) to nucleosome-size fragments. In contrast, MCN digests HSV-1 DNA in lytically infected cells to mostly heterogeneous sizes. Yet HSV-1 DNA coimmunoprecipitates with histones during lytic infections. We have shown that at 5 h postinfection, most nuclear HSV-1 DNA is in particularly unstable nucleoprotein complexes and consequently is more accessible to MCN than DNA in cellular chromatin. HSV-1 DNA was quantitatively recovered at this time in complexes with the biophysical properties of mono- to polynucleosomes following a modified MCN digestion developed to detect potential unstable intermediates. We proposed that most HSV-1 DNA is in unstable nucleosome-like complexes during lytic infections. Physiologically, nucleosome assembly typically associates with DNA replication, although DNA replication transiently disrupts nucleosomes. It therefore remained unclear whether the instability of the HSV-1 nucleoprotein complexes was related to the ongoing viral DNA replication. Here we tested whether HSV-1 DNA is in unstable nucleosome-like complexes before, during, or after the peak of viral DNA replication or when HSV-1 DNA replication is inhibited. HSV-1 DNA was quantitatively recovered in complexes fractionating as mono- to polynucleosomes from nuclei harvested at 2, 5, 7, or 9 h after infection, even if viral DNA replication was inhibited. Therefore, most HSV-1 DNA is in unstable nucleosome-like complexes throughout the lytic replication cycle, and the instability of these complexes is surprisingly independent of HSV-1 DNA replication. The specific accessibility of nuclear HSV-1 DNA, however, varied at different times after infection.

Entry of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) into the distal axons of trigeminal neurons favors the onset of nonproductive, silent infection

Following productive, lytic infection in epithelia, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) establishes a lifelong latent infection in sensory neurons that is interrupted by episodes of reactivation. In order to better understand what triggers this lytic/latent decision in neurons, we set up an organotypic model based on chicken embryonic trigeminal ganglia explants (TGEs) in a double chamber system. Adding HSV-1 to the ganglion compartment (GC) resulted in a productive infection in the explants. By contrast, selective application of the virus to distal axons led to a largely nonproductive infection that was characterized by the poor expression of lytic genes and the presence of high levels of the 2.0-kb major latency-associated transcript (LAT) RNA. Treatment of the explants with the immediate-early (IE) gene transcriptional inducer hexamethylene bisacetamide, and simultaneous co-infection of the GC with HSV-1, herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) or pseudorabies virus (PrV) helper virus significantly enhanced the ability of HSV-1 to productively infect sensory neurons upon axonal entry. Helper-virus-induced transactivation of HSV-1 IE gene expression in axonally-infected TGEs in the absence of de novo protein synthesis was dependent on the presence of functional tegument protein VP16 in HSV-1 helper virus particles. After the establishment of a LAT-positive silent infection in TGEs, HSV-1 was refractory to transactivation by superinfection of the GC with HSV-1 but not with HSV-2 and PrV helper virus. In conclusion, the site of entry appears to be a critical determinant in the lytic/latent decision in sensory neurons. HSV-1 entry into distal axons results in an insufficient transactivation of IE gene expression and favors the establishment of a nonproductive, silent infection in trigeminal neurons.

Upon primary infection of the oronasal mucosa, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) rapidly reaches the ganglia of the peripheral nervous system via axonal transport and establishes lifelong latency in surviving neurons. Central to the establishment of latency is the ability of HSV-1 to reliably switch from productive, lytic spread in epithelia to nonproductive, latent infection in sensory neurons. It is not fully understood what specifically disposes incoming particles of a highly cytopathogenic, fast-replicating alphaherpesvirus to nonproductive, latent infection in sensory neurons. The present study shows that selective entry of HSV-1 into the distal axons of trigeminal neurons strongly favors the establishment of a nonproductive, latent infection, whereas nonselective infection of neurons still enables HSV-1 to induce lytic gene expression. Our data support a model of latency establishment in which the site of entry is an important determinant of the lytic/latent decision in the infected neuron. Productive infection of the neuron ensues if particles enter the soma of the neuron directly. In contrast, previous retrograde axonal transport of incoming viral particles creates a distinct scenario that abrogates VP16-dependent transactivation of immediate-early gene expression and precludes the expression of lytic genes to an extent sufficient to prevent the initiation of massive productive infection of trigeminal neurons.

Roles of the nuclear lamina in stable nuclear association and assembly of a herpesviral transactivator complex on viral immediate-early genes

Little is known about the mechanisms of gene targeting within the nucleus and its effect on gene expression, but most studies have concluded that genes located near the nuclear periphery are silenced by heterochromatin. In contrast, we found that early herpes simplex virus (HSV) genome complexes localize near the nuclear lamina and that this localization is associated with reduced heterochromatin on the viral genome and increased viral immediate-early (IE) gene transcription. In this study, we examined the mechanism of this effect and found that input virion transactivator protein, virion protein 16 (VP16), targets sites adjacent to the nuclear lamina and is required for targeting of the HSV genome to the nuclear lamina, exclusion of heterochromatin from viral replication compartments, and reduction of heterochromatin on the viral genome. Because cells infected with the VP16 mutant virus in1814 showed a phenotype similar to that of lamin A/C(-/-) cells infected with wild-type virus, we hypothesized that the nuclear lamina is required for VP16 activator complex formation. In lamin A/C(-/-) mouse embryo fibroblasts, VP16 and Oct-1 showed reduced association with the viral IE gene promoters, the levels of VP16 and HCF-1 stably associated with the nucleus were lower than in wild-type cells, and the association of VP16 with HCF-1 was also greatly reduced. These results show that the nuclear lamina is required for stable nuclear localization and formation of the VP16 activator complex and provide evidence for the nuclear lamina being the site of assembly of the VP16 activator complex.

IMPORTANCE

The targeting of chromosomes in the cell nucleus is thought to be important in the regulation of expression of genes on the chromosomes. The major documented effect of intranuclear targeting has been silencing of chromosomes at sites near the nuclear periphery. In this study, we show that targeting of the herpes simplex virus DNA genome to the nuclear periphery promotes formation of transcriptional activator complexes on the viral genome, demonstrating that the nuclear periphery also has sites for activation of transcription. These results highlight the importance of the nuclear lamina, the structure that lines the inner nuclear membrane, in both transcriptional activation and repression. Future studies defining the molecular structures of these two types of nuclear sites should define new levels of gene regulation.

Checkpoints in productive and latent infections with herpes simplex virus 1: conceptualization of the issues

The fundamental question posed here is why in dorsal root ganglia herpes simplex viruses (HSV) can establish a silent infection in which only latency associate transcripts (LAT) and miRNAs are expressed and the neuronal cell survives whereas in non-neuronal cells HSV replicates and destroys the infected cells. Current evidence indicates that in productive infection there are two checkpoints. The first is at activation of α genes and requires a viral protein (VP16) that recruits HCF-1, Oct1, LSD1, and the CLOCK histone acetyl transferase to demethylate histones and initiate transcription. The second checkpoint involves activation of β and γ genes. An α protein, ICP0, activates transcription by displacing HDAC1 or 2 from the HDAC/CoREST/LSD1/REST repressor complex at its DNA binding sites. Current data suggest that in dorsal root ganglia VP16 and HCF-1 are not translocated to neuronal nucleus and that the HDAC/CoREST/LSD1/REST complex is not suppressed-a first step in silencing of the viral genome and establishment of heterochromatin. The viral genome remains in a state of equilibrium with respect to viral gene expression. The function of both LAT and the micro RNAs is to silence low level expression of viral genes that could reactivate the latent genomes.

Dynamic association of gammaherpesvirus DNA with core histone during de novo lytic infection of primary cells

Association of herpesvirus DNA with histones has important implications for lytic and latent infections; thus herpesviruses arbitrate interactions with histones to productively infect host cells. While regulation of alpha and betaherpesvirus chromatin during lytic infection has been actively investigated, very little is known about interaction of gammaherpesvirus DNA with histones upon de novo lytic infection. Murine gammaherpesvirus-68 (MHV68) is a rodent pathogen that offers a tractable system to study gammaherpesvirus lytic infection in primary cells. In this study we report that MHV68 promoter and orilyt sequences underwent dynamic association with histone H3 during de novo lytic infection of primary macrophages and fibroblasts. Similar to HSV-1, the degree of MHV68 DNA association with histone H3 was dependent on the multiplicity of infection and was further regulated by viral DNA synthesis. Our work sets a precedent for future studies of gammaherpesvirus chromatin during de novo lytic infection.

Core histones H2B and H4 are mobilized during infection with herpes simplex virus 1

The infecting genomes of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) are assembled into unstable nucleosomes soon after nuclear entry. The source of the histones that bind to these genomes has yet to be addressed. However, infection inhibits histone synthesis. The histones that bind to HSV-1 genomes are therefore most likely those previously bound in cellular chromatin. In order for preexisting cellular histones to associate with HSV-1 genomes, however, they must first disassociate from cellular chromatin. Consistently, we have shown that linker histones are mobilized during HSV-1 infection. Chromatinization of HSV-1 genomes would also require the association of core histones. We therefore evaluated the mobility of the core histones H2B and H4 as measures of the mobilization of H2A-H2B dimers and the more stable H3-H4 core tetramer. H2B and H4 were mobilized during infection. Their mobilization increased the levels of H2B and H4 in the free pools and decreased the rate of H2B fast chromatin exchange. The histones in the free pools would then be available to bind to HSV-1 genomes. The mobilization of H2B occurred independently from HSV-1 protein expression or DNA replication although expression of HSV-1 immediate-early (IE) or early (E) proteins enhanced it. The mobilization of core histones H2B and H4 supports a model in which the histones that associate with HSV-1 genomes are those that were previously bound in cellular chromatin. Moreover, this mobilization is consistent with the assembly of H2A-H2B and H3-H4 dimers into unstable nucleosomes with HSV-1 genomes.

How to control an infectious bead string: nucleosome-based regulation and targeting of herpesvirus chromatin

Herpesvirus infections of humans can cause a broad variety of symptoms ranging from mild afflictions to life-threatening disease. During infection, the large double-stranded DNA genomes of all herpesviruses are transcribed, replicated and encapsidated in the host cell nucleus, where DNA is typically structured and manoeuvred through nucleosomes. Nucleosomes individually assemble DNA around core histone octamers to form 'beads-on-a-string' chromatin fibres. Herpesviruses have responded to the advantages and challenges of chromatin formation in biologically unique ways. Although herpesvirus DNA is devoid of histones within nucleocapsids, nuclear viral genomes most likely form irregularly arranged or unstable nucleosomes during productive infection, and regular nucleosomal arrays resembling host cell chromatin in latently infected cells. Besides variations in nucleosome density, herpesvirus chromatin 'bead strings' undergo dynamic changes in histone composition and modification during the different stages of productive replication, latent infection and reactivation from latency, raising the likely possibility that epigenetic processes may dictate, at least in part, the outcome of infection and ensuing pathogenesis. Here, we summarise and discuss several new and important aspects regarding the nucleosome-based mechanisms that regulate herpesvirus chromatin structure and function in infected cells. Special emphasis is given to processes of histone deposition, histone variant exchange and covalent histone modification in relation to the transcription from the viral genome during productive and latent infections by human cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus type 1. We also present an overview on emerging histone-directed antiviral strategies that may be developed into 'epigenetic therapies' to improve current prevention and treatment options targeting herpesvirus infection and disease.

The intrinsic antiviral defense to incoming HSV-1 genomes includes specific DNA repair proteins and is counteracted by the viral protein ICP0

Cellular restriction factors responding to herpesvirus infection include the ND10 components PML, Sp100 and hDaxx. During the initial stages of HSV-1 infection, novel sub-nuclear structures containing these ND10 proteins form in association with incoming viral genomes. We report that several cellular DNA damage response proteins also relocate to sites associated with incoming viral genomes where they contribute to the cellular front line defense. We show that recruitment of DNA repair proteins to these sites is independent of ND10 components, and instead is coordinated by the cellular ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168. The viral protein ICP0 targets RNF8 and RNF168 for degradation, thereby preventing the deposition of repressive ubiquitin marks and counteracting this repair protein recruitment. This study highlights important parallels between recognition of cellular DNA damage and recognition of viral genomes, and adds RNF8 and RNF168 to the list of factors contributing to the intrinsic antiviral defense against herpesvirus infection.

The checkpoints of viral gene expression in productive and latent infection: the role of the HDAC/CoREST/LSD1/REST repressor complex

At the portal of entry into the body, herpes simplex viruses (HSV) vigorously multiply and spread until curtailed by the adaptive immune response. At the same time, HSV invades nerve ending-abutting infected cells and is transported in a retrograde manner to the neuronal nucleus, where it establishes a latent (silent) infection. At intervals, as a consequence of physical or metabolic stress, the virus is activated and transported in an anterograde manner to the body surface. The progression of infection is regulated at four checkpoints. In cell culture or at the portal of entry into the body, HSV uses components of the HDAC1- or HDAC2/CoREST/LSD1/REST repressor complex to activate α genes (checkpoint 1) and then uses an α protein, ICP0, to suppress the same repressor complex from silencing post-α gene expression (checkpoint 2). In neurons destined to harbor latent virus (checkpoint 3), HSV hijacks the same repressor complex to silence itself as a first step in the establishment of the latent state. Suppression of histone deacetylases (HDACs) plays a key role in the reactivation from latency (checkpoint 4). HSV has evolved a strategy of using the same host repressor complex to meet its diverse lifestyle needs.

Cellular and viral chromatin proteins are positive factors in the regulation of adenovirus gene expression

The adenovirus genome forms chromatin-like structure with viral core proteins. This complex supports only a low level of transcription in a cell-free system, and thus core proteins have been thought to be negative factors for transcription. The mechanism how the transcription from the viral DNA complexed with core proteins is activated in infected cells remains unclear. Here, we found that both core proteins and histones are bound with the viral DNA in early phases of infection. We also found that acetylation of histone H3 occurs at the promoter regions of viral active genes in a transcription-independent manner. In addition, when a plasmid DNA complexed with core proteins was introduced into cells, core proteins enhanced transcription. Knockdown of TAF-I, a remodeling factor for viral core protein-DNA complexes, reduces the enhancement effect by core proteins, indicating that core proteins positively regulate viral transcription through the interaction with TAF-I. We would propose a possible mechanism that core proteins ensure transcription by regulating viral chromatin structure through the interaction with TAF-I.

Chromatinisation of herpesvirus genomes

The double-stranded DNA genomes of herpesviruses exist in at least three alternative global chromatin states characterised by distinct nucleosome content. When encapsidated in virus particles, the viral DNA is devoid of any nucleosomes. In contrast, within latently infected nuclei herpesvirus genomes are believed to form regular nucleosomal structures resembling cellular chromatin. Finally, during productive infection nuclear viral DNA appears to adopt a state of intermediate chromatin formation with irregularly spaced nucleosomes. Nucleosome occupancy coupled with posttranslational histone modifications and other epigenetic marks may contribute significantly to the extent and timing of transcription from the viral genome and, consequently, to the outcome of infection. Recent research has provided first insights into the viral and cellular mechanisms that either maintain individual herpesvirus chromatin states or mediate transition between them. Here, we summarise and discuss both early work and new developments pointing towards common principles pertinent to the dynamic structure and epigenetic regulation of herpesvirus chromatin. Special emphasis is given to the emerging similarities in nucleosome assembly and disassembly processes on herpes simplex virus type 1 and human cytomegalovirus genomes over the course of the viral productive replication cycle and during the switch between latent and lytic infectious stages.

Chromatin assembly on herpes simplex virus genomes during lytic infection

The human herpes simplex viruses HSV-1 and HSV-2 infect a significant portion of the human population. Both viruses can undergo lytic infection in epithelial cells and establish lifelong latency in neuronal cells. The large HSV-1 DNA genomes have long been considered to be devoid of histones both inside the virion particle and inside the cell during lytic infection, but to be packaged in repressive chromatin during latency. However, recent reports indicate that many histone and non-histone chromosomal proteins can associate with viral DNA during lytic infection and may influence important events during the HSV-1 lytic cycle. In this article, we summarize recent developments in this field and their implications.

During lytic infections, herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA is in complexes with the properties of unstable nucleosomes

The genomes of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) are regularly chromatinized during latency such that their digestion with micrococcal nuclease (MCN) releases nucleosome-sized DNA fragments. In lytically infected cells, in contrast, MCN releases HSV-1 DNA in primarily heterogeneously sized fragments. Consistently, only a small percentage of this HSV-1 DNA coimmunoprecipitates with histones. Most current models propose that histones associate with HSV-1 DNA during lytic infections at low occupancy. However, histone modification or occupation is also proposed to regulate HSV-1 transcription. It remains unclear how the histones associated with a small percentage of HSV-1 DNA may regulate transcription globally. Moreover, the physical properties of the complexes containing histones and HSV-1 DNA are unknown. We evaluated the HSV-1 DNA-containing complexes at 5 h after (lytic) infection by biochemical fractionations. Nuclear HSV-1 DNA did not fractionate as protein-free HSV-1 DNA but as DNA in cellular nucleosomes. Moreover, MCN released HSV-1 DNA in complexes that fractionate as cellular mono- and dinucleosomes by centrifugation followed by sucrose gradients and size-exclusion chromatography. The HSV-1 DNA in such complexes was protected to heterogeneous sizes and was more accessible to MCN than DNA in most cellular chromatin. Using a modified MCN digestion to trap unstable digestion intermediates, HSV-1 DNA was quantitatively recovered in discrete mono- to polynucleosome sizes in complexes fractionating as cellular mono- to polynucleosomes. The HSV-1 DNAs in complexes fractionating as mono- to dinucleosomes were stabilized by cross-linking. Therefore, most HSV-1 DNA forms particularly unstable nucleosome-like complexes at 5 h of lytic infection.

Herpes simplex virus VP16, but not ICP0, is required to reduce histone occupancy and enhance histone acetylation on viral genomes in U2OS osteosarcoma cells

The herpes simplex virus (HSV) genome rapidly becomes associated with histones after injection into the host cell nucleus. The viral proteins ICP0 and VP16 are required for efficient viral gene expression and have been implicated in reducing the levels of underacetylated histones on the viral genome, raising the possibility that high levels of underacetylated histones inhibit viral gene expression. The U2OS osteosarcoma cell line is permissive for replication of ICP0 and VP16 mutants and appears to lack an innate antiviral repression mechanism present in other cell types. We therefore used chromatin immunoprecipitation to determine whether U2OS cells are competent to load histones onto HSV DNA and, if so, whether ICP0 and/or VP16 are required to reduce histone occupancy and enhance acetylation in this cell type. High levels of underacetylated histone H3 accumulated at several locations on the viral genome in the absence of VP16 activation function; in contrast, an ICP0 mutant displayed markedly reduced histone levels and enhanced acetylation, similar to wild-type HSV. These results demonstrate that U2OS cells are competent to load underacetylated histones onto HSV DNA and uncover an unexpected role for VP16 in modulating chromatin structure at viral early and late loci. One interpretation of these findings is that ICP0 and VP16 affect viral chromatin structure through separate pathways, and the pathway targeted by ICP0 is defective in U2OS cells. We also show that HSV infection results in decreased histone levels on some actively transcribed genes within the cellular genome, demonstrating that viral infection alters cellular chromatin structure.

Role of viral chromatin structure in the regulation of herpes simplex virus 1 gene expression and replication

Herpes simplex virus 1 initially infects epithelial cells during the lytic phase of its infectious cycle, followed by establishment of the latent phase within neuronal cells. The two different phases of infection are characterized by distinct gene-expression profiles, involving a temporal gene-expression pattern during the lytic phase succeeded by a complete shutdown of all gene expression, except for one abundant transcript, during the latent phase. The mechanisms controlling these varying degrees of gene expression appear to involve regulation of the viral chromatin structure, presumably using many of the same tactics employed by the host cell.