Persistent wheezing in infants with an atopic tendency responds to inhaled fluticasone

[Bench-test evaluation of spacer devices for fluticasone delivery to infants]

INTRODUCTION

Use of a spacer device to optimize the delivery of fluticasone to infants with asthma is an important issue and clinicians require guidance around the choice of device. This in vitro study characterizes the particle size and the fluticasone delivery via 9 spacers.

METHODS

We used an in vitro infant nasal cast with two different inspiratory flow rates (50 and 100mL/s). Fluticasone particle size in the aerosol was evaluated by laser diffractometry and tracheal deposition by spectrophotometric assay.

RESULTS

Significant differences in particle size were observed between the 9 spacers (similar D50 but D90 from 5.65±0.65 to 8.80±1.35μm). A 75 % or higher respirable fraction was obtained for only 5 spacers. The 50mL/s flow rate lead to the best drug delivery. At this flow, OptiChamber^® (62±3 %) and Vortex^® (91±8.5 %) had a tracheal deposition over 50 % of the initial dose of fluticasone, although the 7 other spacers exhibited a fluticasone deposition less than 25 %.

DISCUSSION

This study shows a wide variation of drug delivery between the 9 spacers studied. We demonstrate that a low inspiratory flow and a spacer showing antistatic properties facilitate drug delivery.

Pharmacological approach to wheezing in preschool children

INTRODUCTION

Wheezing disorders are very common during childhood (particularly among preschool children), and represent a significant burden for patients, their families, the healthcare system, and society as a whole. Identifying wheezing phenotypes, and recognizing the risk factors associated with each, may help to predict long-term outcomes, distinguish high-risk children who may benefit from secondary prevention measures, and ensure that the most effective therapy is prescribed for each case.

AREAS COVERED

The main aim of this review is to analyze the characteristics of the drugs currently used to treat wheezing in preschool children, and discuss the results obtained in children with different wheezing phenotypes.

EXPERT OPINION

The continuous or intermittent administration of various oral or inhaled drugs could theoretically be effective in preventing or controlling wheezing in preschool children. However, the optimal management of acute preschool wheezing episodes has not yet been determined mainly because of their phenotypical heterogeneity.

The role of inhaled corticosteroids in management of asthma in infants and preschoolers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review analyses published data on the treatment of wheezing in infants and preschoolers with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), including the effect in subgroups of patients such as 'multiple trigger wheeze' and 'episodic viral wheeze'.

RECENT FINDINGS

Therapy with ICS at daily doses of 100-200  μg results in significant clinical improvements in several outcomes in preschoolers and infants suspected of having asthma (multiple trigger wheeze). Such treatment is normally considered well tolerated. Although not well studied, higher daily doses may be associated with measurable effects on growth, which are not cumulative with continued treatment. In children who only wheeze in association with viral infections (episodic viral wheeze), preemptive treatment with high doses of ICS has demonstrated significant clinical effects on several outcomes, whereas lower doses seem to have little effect. Intermittent use of high doses of ICS has been associated with significant reductions in height and weight gain over 1 year.

SUMMARY

The review illustrates the complexity of treating wheezing in infants and preschoolers and interpreting the study results. It emphasizes the need for more studies in clinical subgroups, more long-term studies and dose-response studies to assess the optimal doses and safety of intermittent as well as regular ICS treatment.

Pacifier cleaning practices and risk of allergy development

OBJECTIVE

Immune stimulation through exposure to commensal microbes may protect against allergy development. Oral microbes may be transferred from parents to infants via pacifiers. We investigated whether pacifier cleaning practices affected the risk of allergy development.

METHODS

A birth-cohort of 184 infants was examined for clinical allergy and sensitization to airborne and food allergens at 18 and 36 months of age and, in addition, promptly on occurrence of symptoms. Pacifier use and pacifier cleaning practices were recorded during interviews with the parents when the children were 6 months old. The oral microbiota of the infants was characterized by analysis of saliva samples collected at 4 months of age.

RESULTS

Children whose parents "cleaned" their pacifier by sucking it (n = 65) were less likely to have asthma (odds ratio [OR] 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.99), eczema (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.15-0.91), and sensitization (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.10-1.27) at 18 months of age than children whose parents did not use this cleaning technique (n = 58). Protection against eczema remained at age 36 months (hazard ratio 0.51; P = .04). Vaginal delivery and parental pacifier sucking yielded independent and additive protective effects against eczema development. The salivary microbiota differed between children whose parents cleaned their pacifier by sucking it and children whose parents did not use this practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Parental sucking of their infant's pacifier may reduce the risk of allergy development, possibly via immune stimulation by microbes transferred to the infant via the parent's saliva.

An approach to preschool wheezing: to label as asthma?

Asthma is considered a chronic disease, but not all preschool wheezing is asthma since most will eventually grow out of their symptoms. Although still a matter of debate, preschool wheezing can be classified in 2 major groups: virus-induced wheezing and multitrigger wheezing, having a different prognosis and a different treatment approach. Virus-induced wheezing is the most common phenotype of preschool wheezing and is usually associated with a good prognosis. Treatment should be conservative, but if preventive treatment is required, leukotriene-receptor antagonists might be the first choice treatment. Multitrigger wheezing is associated with an allergic disposition and has a higher risk of persistent symptoms. Inhaled corticosteroids may give short-term reduction in exacerbations, but the beneficial effect of long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids and other anti-inflammatory agents have not yet been established. This review aims to give an opinion on preschool wheezing, and its association with asthma.

Assessment of controversial pediatric asthma management options using GRADE

OBJECTIVES

To develop explicit and transparent recommendations on controversial asthma management issues in children and to illustrate the usefulness of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach in rating the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

METHODS

Health care questions were formulated for 3 controversies in clinical practice: what is the most effective treatment in asthma not under control with standard-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS; step 3), the use of leukotriene receptor antagonist for viral wheeze, and the role of extra fine particle aerosols. GRADE was used to rate the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations after performing systematic literature searches. We provide evidence profiles and considerations about benefit and harm, preferences and values, and resource use, all of which played a role in formulating final recommendations.

RESULTS

By applying GRADE and focusing on outcomes that are important to patients and explicit other considerations, our recommendations differ from those in other international guidelines. We prefer to double the dose of ICS instead of adding a long-acting β-agonist in step 3; ICS instead of leukotriene receptor antagonist are the first choice in preschool wheeze, and extra fine particle ICS formulations are not first-line treatment in children with asthma. Recommendations are weak and based on low-quality evidence for critical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide systematically and transparently developed recommendations about controversial asthma management options. Using GRADE for guideline development may change recommendations, enhance guideline implementation, and define remaining research gaps.

The management of pre-school wheeze

Wheeze, a common symptom in pre-school children, is a continuous high-pitched sound, with a musical quality, emitting from the chest during expiration. A pragmatic clinical classification is episodic (viral) wheeze and multiple-trigger wheeze. Diagnostic difficulties include other conditions that give rise to noisy breathing which could be misinterpreted as wheeze. Most preschool children with wheeze do not need rigorous investigations. Primary prevention is not possible but avoidance of environmental tobacco smoke exposure should be strongly encouraged. Bronchodilators provide symptomatic relief in acute wheezy episodes but the evidence for using oral steroids is conflicting for children presenting to the Emergency Department [ED]. Parent initiated oral steroid courses cannot be recommended. High dose inhaled corticosteroids [ICS] used intermittently are effective in children with frequent episodes of moderately severe episodic (viral) wheeze or multiple-trigger wheeze, but this associated with short term effects on growth and cannot be recommended as a routine. Maintenance treatment with low to moderate continuous ICS in pure episodic (viral) wheeze is ineffective. Whilst low to moderate dose regular ICS work in multi-trigger wheeze, the medication does not modify the natural history of the condition. Even if there is a successful trial of treatment with ICS, a break in treatment should be given to see if the symptoms have resolved or continuous therapy is still required. Maintenance as well as intermittent Montelukast has a role in both episodic and multi trigger wheeze. Good multidisciplinary support and education is essential in managing this common condition.

Global strategy for the diagnosis and management of asthma in children 5 years and younger

Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood and the leading cause of childhood morbidity from chronic disease as measured by school absences, emergency department visits, and hospitalisation. During the past two decades, many scientific advances have improved our understanding of asthma and our ability to manage and control it effectively. However, in children 5 years and younger, the clinical symptoms of asthma are variable and non-specific. Furthermore, neither airflow limitation nor airway inflammation, the main pathologic hallmarks of the condition, can be assessed routinely in this age group. For this reason, to aid in the diagnosis of asthma in young children, a symptoms-only descriptive approach that includes the definition of various wheezing phenotypes has been recommended. In 1993, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) was implemented to develop a network of individuals, organizations, and public health officials to disseminate information about the care of patients with asthma while at the same time assuring a mechanism to incorporate the results of scientific investigations into asthma care. Since then, GINA has developed and regularly revised a Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Publications based on the Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention have been translated into many different languages to promote international collaboration and dissemination of information. In this report, Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention in Children 5 Years and Younger, an effort has been made to present the special challenges that must be taken into account in managing asthma in children during the first 5 years of life, including difficulties with diagnosis, the efficacy and safety of drugs and drug delivery systems, and the lack of data on new therapies. Approaches to these issues will vary among populations in the world based on socioeconomic conditions, genetic diversity, cultural beliefs, and differences in healthcare access and delivery. Patients in this age group are often managed by pediatricians and general practitioners routinely faced with a wide variety of issues related to childhood diseases.

Regular vs prn nebulized treatment in wheeze preschool children

BACKGROUND

International guidelines recommend regular treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids for children with frequent wheezing; however, prn inhaled bronchodilator alone or in combination with glucocorticoid is also often used in practice. We aimed to evaluate whether regular nebulized glucocorticoid plus a prn bronchodilator or a prn nebulized bronchodilator/glucocorticoid combination is more effective than prn bronchodilator alone in preschool children with frequent wheeze.

METHODS

Double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group trial. After a 2-week run-in period, 276 symptomatic children with frequent wheeze, aged 1-4 years, were randomly assigned to three groups for a 3-month nebulized treatment: (1) 400 microg beclomethasone bid plus 2500 microg salbutamol prn; (2) placebo bid plus 800 microg beclomethasone/1600 microg salbutamol combination prn; (3) placebo bid plus 2500 microg salbutamol prn. The percentage of symptom-free days was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included symptom scores, use of relief medication and exacerbation frequency.

RESULTS

As compared with prn salbutamol (61.0 +/- 24.83 [SD]), the percentage of symptom-free days was higher with regular beclomethasone (69.6%, SD 20.89; P = 0.034) but not with prn combination (64.9%, SD 24.74). Results were no different in children with or without risk factors for developing persistent asthma. The effect of prn combination was no different from that of regular beclomethasone on the primary and on several important secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular inhaled glucocorticoid is the most effective treatment for frequent wheezing in preschool children. However, prn bronchodilator/glucocorticoid combination might be an alternative option, but it requires further study.

Effect of inhaled fluticasone on lung function in infants with recurrent wheezing: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are used to treat infants with troublesome asthma-like symptoms but their effect on the lung function of these young patients is controversial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-four infants with recurrent wheezing (more than 3 episodes) and family history of asthma completed this randomised, parallel, double-blind, controlled trial to compare the effect on lung function (main endpoint) of once-daily inhaled fluticasone (375 microg) versus placebo for 3 months. Pulmonary function was measured while infants were asymptomatic, using the raised volume rapid thoracic compression technique (spirometry-like), and values were converted to z-scores.

RESULTS

The fluticasone group showed a significant increase in forced flows, (p < 0.001), a lower number of physician diagnosed wheezing episodes (p < 0.002), and a significant decrease in the parent-reported number of wheezing episodes per month (p < 0.03), as compared to placebo. One third of parents in the placebo group reported a clinical improvement in their infants. There was no significant difference in morning plasma cortisol between groups at entry or discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that once-daily treatment with 375 microg fluticasone increased forced flows and controlled symptoms in infants with recurrent wheezing without altering plasma cortisol levels. The spirometry-like technique is a useful tool to objectively assess the efficacy of anti-asthma medications in infants with repeated troublesome asthma-like symptoms.

Efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in infants and preschoolers with recurrent wheezing and asthma: a systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in infants and preschoolers with recurrent wheezing or asthma.

METHODS

Randomized, prospective, controlled trials published January 1996 to March 2008 with a minimum of 4 weeks of inhaled corticosteroids versus placebo were retrieved through Medline, Embase, and Central databases. The primary outcome was wheezing/asthma exacerbations; secondary outcomes were withdrawal caused by wheezing/asthma exacerbations, changes in symptoms score, pulmonary function (peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 second), or albuterol use.

RESULTS

Of eighty-nine studies identified, 29 (N = 3592 subjects) met the criteria for inclusion. Patients who received inhaled corticosteroids had significantly less wheezing/asthma exacerbations than those on placebo (18.0% vs 32.1%); posthoc subgroup analysis suggests that this effect was higher in those with a diagnosis of asthma than wheeze but was independent of age (infants versus preschoolers), atopic condition, type of inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide metered-dose inhaler versus fluticasone metered-dose inhaler), mode of delivery (metered-dose inhaler versus nebulizer), and study quality (Jadad score: <4 vs >/=4) and duration (<12 vs >/=12 weeks). In addition, children treated with inhaled corticosteroids had significantly fewer withdrawals caused by wheezing/asthma exacerbations, less albuterol use, and more clinical and functional improvement than those on placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants and preschoolers with recurrent wheezing or asthma had less wheezing/asthma exacerbations and improve their symptoms and lung function during treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.

Recurrent respiratory infections

The child who has recurrent infections poses one of the most difficult diagnostic challenges in pediatrics. The clinician faces a two-fold challenge in determining first whether the child is normal or has a serious disease, and then, in the latter case, how to confirm or exclude the diagnosis with the minimum number of the least invasive tests. It is hoped that, in the absence of good-quality evidence for most clinical scenarios, the experience-based approach described in this article may prove a useful guide to the clinician.

Pediatric asthma and related allergic and nonallergic diseases: patient-oriented evidence-based essentials that matter

Asthma is the most common medical diagnosis among hospitalized children. In the USA, asthma has accounted for approximately 15% of nonsurgical admissions to hospital in the pediatric age group. Asthma is also one of the leading causes for emergency care requirements, one of the leading causes for missed school, and a cause for considerable morbidity, disability and occasional mortality at all ages. Despite these discouraging statistics, convincing data indicate that this failure of asthma management is not the result of inadequate therapeutic potential, but instead represents ineffective delivery of medical care. Management of asthma and its major co-morbidities, allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis requires a knowledge of the alternative therapies, natural history, and educational techniques for providing patients and families with the ability to manage these troublesome chronic disorders.

Wheeze in preschool children

Exercise induced wheeze and atopic disorders predict persistent asthma

How has research changed my practice in the last 5 years?

You can't teach old dogs new tricks. Teaching middle-aged dogs new tricks is hard enough. They tend to stick to particular styles of attacking the postman that over the years have proved pretty reliable, often choosing to ignore new findings, or simply failing to keep up with progress in current discussions on, say, the old trouser versus postbag debate. Some unsettling papers are even asking whether dogs really need to attack postmen at all.

Anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy for wheezing in preschool children

Accumulating evidence indicates that there are at least two phenotypes of wheezing in preschool years with distinct natural history. Frequent wheezing in the first 3 years of life with risk factors for asthma (e.g., eczema, maternal asthma) predicts symptoms in older age, while infrequent viral-associated wheezing without risk factors for asthma has a benign prognosis. This systematic review summarizes evidence on the use of anti-inflammatory medications in preschool children with wheezing. Literature search was performed using Medline and the Cochrane Library. Retrieved articles were critically appraised. Episodic use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (>1,600 mcg/day of beclomethasone) may ameliorate severity of intermittent viral-associated wheezing. Maintenance inhaled corticosteroids can control symptoms in children with frequent wheezing associated with risk factors for asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids do not alter the natural history of wheezing even when started early in life and could have a negative impact on linear growth rate. Short courses of oral corticosteroids have been proposed as an effective measure to control exacerbations of symptoms although there is little evidence supporting their use. Some studies support the administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (leukotriene pathway modifiers, cromones, methylxanthines) for mild frequent wheezing. Maintenance inhaled corticosteroids is the most effective measure for controlling frequent wheezing in preschool children, especially when accompanied by risk factors for asthma. This treatment does not affect the natural history of wheezing, although deceleration of linear growth rate is the most commonly recognized systemic adverse effect.

[Fluticasone propionate in children and infants with asthma]

The known efficacy of fluticasone propionate in adults, comparable at half-dosage of corticosteroids has been validated by the market authorization (MA) and by the national and international guidelines for beclomethasone. This could be partly explained by its pharmacological properties, affinity for glucocorticosteroid receptors, lung deposition and lipophilicity. The limited systemic adverse events is due to its low bioavailability, optimal hepatic clearance, high plasma protein binding. The efficacy in asthmatic children has been confirmed in clinical studies showing a "plateau" efficacy between 100 and 200 microg/d for the majority of children. Most children are controlled by such dosages: the added value of increasing posology on asthma control exists but is small. A high off-label posology does not allow more quickly asthma control and therefore is not justified. A twice daily dosing is more efficient, particularly for initiation of maintenance therapy, than a once daily dosing. A literature survey confirms that, at MA recommended daily doses in children (100-200 microg), fluticasone propionate has no clinically significant effect either on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (basal function or stimulation tests), bone or growth velocity. However, high daily doses (higher to 500 microg/day) for long periods expose to systemic adverse effects with measurable consequences on growth rate, bone density (decreasing biochemical makers of bone formation) and HPA function. Several cases of adrenal insufficiency that may have led to acute adrenal crisis have been reported in 4- to 10-year-old children receiving fluticasone propionate in doses between 500 to 2000 microg daily. In case of surgery or infection, a preventive treatment of adrenal insufficiency with hydrocortisone should be proposed for children treated for more than 6 months with such high daily doses. Such children need definitely an advice from paediatricians specialized in chest diseases as well as in endocrinology. It is important to recall that the clinical benefit of daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids higher than recommended is low and that the good use of inhaled corticosteroids particularly in children lays on the careful search of the minimal efficient daily doses.

Lung bioavailability of hydrofluoroalkane fluticasone in young children when delivered by an antistatic chamber/mask

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an antistatic valved holding chamber/mask improves lung bioavailability of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) fluticasone in young children.

STUDY DESIGN

Twelve patients, age 1 to 6 years, with well-controlled asthma were treated with an HFA fluticasone metered-dose inhaler (Flovent HFA) twice daily (440 microg/day). The drug was delivered by tidal breathing through conventional (AeroChamber Plus) and antistatic (AeroChamber MAX) valved holding chambers (VHCs) with masks in a randomized, crossover manner, each for 3 to 7 days. When adherence was 100% at home, blood was collected for measurement of steady-state fluticasone plasma concentration (FPC) 1 hour after the last dose was administered in the clinic. FPC indicates systemic exposure directly and airway delivery indirectly. It was measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Data were analyzed by regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SD FPC was 107 +/- 30 pg/mL after conventional VHC and 186 +/- 134 pg/mL after the antistatic VHC (P = .03). In 5 patients (40%), the antistatic VHC increased FPC by >/= 100%, to potentially excessive levels in 4 of them; it had little effect in 7 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HFA fluticasone was delivered to the airways by both devices even though the patients could not inhale deeply and breath hold. The antistatic VHC variably increased lung bioavailability. To reduce systemic exposure, the dose should be weaned to the minimum required to maintain asthma control.

Inhaled budesonide in the management of acute worsenings and exacerbations of asthma: a review of the evidence

The use of systemic corticosteroids, together with bronchodilators and oxygen therapy, has become established for the management of acute asthma. These agents are undoubtedly effective, but are also associated with problems such as metabolic adverse effects. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) offer potential benefit in the acute setting because they are delivered directly to the airways. They are also likely to reduce systemic exposure, which would lead in turn to reductions in rates of unwanted systemic effects. In order to evaluate the role of budesonide in the management of acute asthma exacerbations we conducted a review of the literature and critically evaluated the rationale for the use of ICS in general in this setting. Trials in adults and children requiring treatment for acute exacerbation of asthma have shown clinical and/or spirometric benefit for budesonide when delivered via nebulizer, dry powder inhaler, or aerosol in the emergency department, hospital and follow-up settings. The efficacy seems to benefit from high doses given repeatedly during the initial phase of an acute exacerbation. These acute effects are likely to be linked to the drug's distinctive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. The current evidence base revealed encouraging results regarding the efficacy of the ICS budesonide in patients with wheeze and acute worsening of asthma. Future studies should focus on the efficacy of these agents in more severe asthma worsenings.

Paediatric pulmonary drug delivery: considerations in asthma treatment

Aerosol therapy, the preferred route of administration for glucocorticosteroids and short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonists in the treatment of paediatric asthma, may be given via nebulisers, metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers. For glucocorticosteroids, therapy with aerosolised medication results in higher concentrations of drug at the target organ with minimal systemic side effects compared with oral treatments. The dose of drug that reaches the airways in children with asthma is dependent on both the delivery device and patient-related factors. Factors that affect aerosol drug delivery are reviewed briefly. Advantages and disadvantages of each device and device-specific factors that influence patient preferences are examined. Although age-based device recommendations have been made, the optimal choice for drug delivery is the one that the patient or caregiver prefers to use, can use correctly and is most likely to use consistently.

Airway hyper-responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in preschool-age children with asthma

Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) is closely associated with airway inflammation; however, not all asthmatic patients are responsive to it. This study was planned to investigate the predictive factors of AHR to AMP in asthmatic children aged between 3 and 6 yr. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 63 asthmatic preschool-age children who were challenged by AMP in our department. All children were characterized by skin-prick tests, serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, peripheral blood eosinophil percentage and bronchial challenge with methacholine (MCH) and AMP. Potential determinants for AHR to AMP were assessed within the group. AHR to AMP was found in 46% of preschool-age children with asthma, while that of MCH was 93.7%. All children responsive to AMP were also responsive to MCH. The geometric mean provocative concentration of MCH and AMP causing a 15% fall in transcutaneous oxygen tension (PC(15)PtcO(2)MCH and AMP) were 0.55 mg/ml (0.004-9.19) and 10.53 mg/ml (0.59-342.89), respectively. AMP-responsive children did not differ from non-responsive ones with respect to demographic factors, geometric mean PC(15)PtcO(2)MCH and atopic status. The median serum IgE level was significantly higher in AMP-responsive group than the non-responsive ones (p = 0.011). The peripheral blood eosinophilia was more frequent among responsive children (p = 0.019), and it was found as the only predictive factor for AMP responsiveness in preschool-age children with asthma in logistic regression model (odds ratio: 5.14; 95% CI: 1.23-21.47; p = 0.025). AMP responsiveness may be predicted by peripheral blood eosinophilia but not with atopy markers in young children with asthma.

Secondary prevention of asthma by the use of Inhaled Fluticasone propionate in Wheezy INfants (IFWIN): double-blind, randomised, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Wheezing and asthma often begins in early childhood, but it is difficult to predict whether or not a wheezy infant will develop asthma. Some researchers suggest that treatment with inhaled corticosteroids at the first signs of wheezing in childhood could prevent the development of asthma later in life. However, other investigators have reported that although such treatment could help control symptoms, the benefits can disappear within months of stopping treatment. We tested our hypothesis that to prevent loss of lung function and worsening asthma later in childhood, anti-inflammatory treatment needs to be started early in life.

METHODS

We did a randomised, double-blind, controlled study of inhaled fluticasone propionate 100 mug twice daily in young children who were followed prospectively and randomised after either one prolonged (>1 month) or two medically confirmed wheezy episodes. The dose of study drug was reduced every 3 months to the minimum needed. If the symptoms were not under control by 3 months, open-label fluticasone propionate 100 mug twice daily was added to the treatment. Children were followed-up to 5 years of age, at which point we gave their parents or guardians questionnaires, and measured the children's lung function (specific airways resistance [sR(aw)], forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1]) and airway reactivity (eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation [EVH] challenge). This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN86717853.

FINDINGS

We followed 1073 children prospectively, of whom 333 were eligible, and 200 of these began treatment (130 male, median age 1.2 years [range 0.5-4.9]; 101 placebo, 99 treatment); 173 (85 treatment, 88 placebo) completed the follow-up at age five years. The groups did not differ significantly in the proportion of children with current wheeze, physician-diagnosed asthma or use of asthma medication, lung function, or airway reactivity (percentage change in FEV1, adjusted mean for placebo 5.5% [95% CI -2.5 to 13.4]) vs for treatment 5.0% [-2.2 to 12.2], p=0.87). There were no differences in the results after adjustment for open-label fluticasone propionate, nor between the two groups in the time before the open-label drug was added (estimated hazard ratio 1.12 [95% CI 0.73-1.73], p=0.60), or the proportion needing the open-label drug (43 [42.57%] placebo, 41 [41.41%] treatment).

INTERPRETATION

The early use of inhaled fluticasone propionate for wheezing in preschool children had no effect on the natural history of asthma or wheeze later in childhood, and did not prevent lung function decline or reduce airway reactivity.

Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids improves pulmonary function in children under 2 years old with risk factors for asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To report on recent studies on the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on pulmonary function in young children with asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Inhaled corticosteroids are considered the most effective treatment for persistent asthma in children. Appropriate control of childhood asthma may prevent more serious disease or irreversible obstruction in later years. While some authors have described an improvement with the use of inhaled corticosteroids in young children, others found no clinical or functional benefit. Various studies have shown that inhaled corticosteroids ameliorate clinical outcomes, and recently a study demonstrated improvement in pulmonary function in young children with asthma. The use of different study designs may explain the lack of consistent results and disagreement regarding the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in these patients.

SUMMARY

Based on the preponderance of evidence, treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in infants and young children with recurrent wheeze and risk factors of developing asthma appears to allow better control of the illness and improve the pulmonary function.

The efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate in very young children with persistent asthma symptoms

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) in children aged 12-47 months with recurrent/persistent asthma symptoms. One hundred and sixty children (12-47 months) were randomised into this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, and treated with either FP (100 microg bd) or placebo (2 puffs bd), both administered by metered-dose-inhaler and Babyhaler for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage of symptom-free 24h periods. Over weeks 1-12, FP-treated patients had significantly more percentage symptom-free 24-h periods compared with placebo (odds ratio 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.95; P = 0.035). Relative to baseline, where all patients were symptomatic for at least 21/28 days of the run-in, the improvement equated to one additional symptom-free 24 h period per week. FP patients also had a significantly higher percentage of 24 h periods with no wheeze or cough, the odds ratio for treatment difference corresponding to two additional wheeze-free and one additional cough-free periods per week. FP was well-tolerated, with similar reported adverse events in both groups. Urinary cortisol-creatinine ratio was slightly decreased among FP patients after 12 weeks, but with no clinical correlates. FP is effective for the treatment of chronic persistent asthma symptoms in very young children.

Sodium cromoglycate therapy in wheezing infants: preliminary evidence of beneficial outcome at early school age

BACKGROUND

In order to affect the natural course of childhood wheezing and asthma, anti-inflammatory therapy is often prescribed for young wheezing children, but there is lack of long-term follow-up data.

METHODS

Eighty-two of the original 100 children, hospitalized for wheezing under the age of 2 years in 1992-1993, were re-examined at school age in 1999. The children had participated in an open, randomized, parallel-group trial including a 4-month intervention with inhaled sodium cromoglycate (SCG) or budesonide (BUD). The baseline data, including data on atopy, eosinophilia and viral etiology, were prospectively collected on admission.

RESULTS

At early school age (median 7.2 years), asthma was present in 33 (40%) children. There was less asthma in the original SCG (21%) than in the control group (54%) (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.07-0.77). The figure was 46% in the BUD group. When the analyses were performed separately for atopic and non-atopic infants, the difference was significant only among atopics. The lowered risk for asthma in the SCG group remained significant in the multivariate logistic regression analysis when adjusted for age, sex and atopy, and further when adjusted for earlier episodes of wheezing and respiratory syncytial virus identification. However, after adjustment for blood eosinophilia, the significance was lost, albeit the risk for asthma remained low (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.04-1.12). A sensitivity analysis, which was done by including the six drop-outs of the SCG group as unfavorable and the 12 drop-outs of other groups as favorable outcomes in the model, did not change the direction of the result (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.26-1.89).

CONCLUSIONS

An early SCG intervention in infants hospitalized for wheezing was associated with a lowered risk for early school-age asthma, especially in infants with evidence of atopy.

Efficacy of fluticasone propionate on lung function and symptoms in wheezy infants

The role of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of recurrent or persistent wheeze in infancy remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of 3 months of treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate, 200 microg daily (FP200), on lung function and symptom scores in wheezy infants. Moreover, we evaluated whether infants with atopy and/or eczema respond better to FP200 as compared with non-atopic infants. Forced expiratory flow (Vmax(FRC)) was measured at baseline and after treatment. Sixty-five infants were randomized to receive FP200 or placebo, and 62 infants (mean age, 11.3 months) completed the study. Mean Vmax(FRC), expressed as a Z score, was significantly below normal at baseline and after treatment in both groups. The change from baseline of Vmax(FRC) was not different between the two treatment arms. After 6 weeks of treatment, and not after 13 weeks, the FP200 group had a significantly higher percentage of symptom-free days and a significant reduction in mean daily cough score compared with placebo. Separate analysis of treatment effect in infants with atopy or eczema showed no effect modification. We conclude that in wheezy infants, after 3 months of treatment with fluticasone, there was no improvement in lung function and no reduction in respiratory symptoms compared with placebo.

Inhaled fluticasone dipropionate decreases levels of nitric oxide in recurrenty wheezy infants

We examined the effect of inhaled fluticasone diproprionate (FDP) on symptoms, lung function (FEV(0.5)), and exhaled nitric oxide (Fe(NO)) in infants with recurrent wheeze and raised Fe(NO). Thirty-one infants aged 6-19 months (mean, 12.7 months; 12 girls) completed the study. All infants had a history of recurrent wheeze and a parental history of atopy. All children had raised Fe(NO), as determined by an offline tidal breathing technique prior to randomization. Lung function and Fe(NO) were assessed before and after 4 weeks of treatment with FDP or placebo. The parents recorded daily symptoms during the treatment period. Sixteen infants received FDP and 15 the placebo for 4 weeks. At completion of the study, infants treated with FDP had a significant reduction in Fe(NO) (35.0 ppb to 16.5 ppb) compared to those that received placebo (35.2 ppb to 30.2 ppb) (P = 0.05). Small increases in FEV(0.5) were observed in both groups, but these changes were not different between groups (P = 0.8). Symptom scores were not significantly different in either group following the intervention. We showed that a moderate dose of inhaled FDP reduces levels of Fe(NO), a potential marker of airway inflammation, even in the absence of significant changes in lung function and symptoms.

Difficult asthma in the pre-school child

The most important aspect of dealing with a pre-school child suspected of having difficult asthma, is to ensure that the diagnosis is correct, in order to avoid the inappropriate use of therapies such as inhaled corticosteroids. After exclusion of other diagnoses, if a pre-school child is thought to have asthma, difficult or otherwise, the corollary is, what sort of asthma? Is it a syndrome with airway inflammation susceptible to treatment, or one in which there is no inflammation and time alone will result in resolution of symptoms? Probably the most common mistake in this age group is to fail to recognise the latter and institute ever more aggressive and useless therapies. An approach to excluding other diagnoses, appropriate investigations to elicit the presence of airway inflammation and suggestions for subsequent management have been detailed in this review.

Management of unresponsive asthma

Difficult asthma is defined as asthma that is not controlled despite treatment with> 800 micro g budesonide or equivalent per day. Poor control is defined as the need for bronchodilators more than three times a week, school absence of more than five days a term, or one episode or more of wheezing each month. Common causes of poor response to treatment include; wrong diagnosis, inappropriate medications or improper inhalation technique, poor adherence to medications and co-morbidity. Steroid resistant asthma is uncommon and estimated to be 1 in 1000-10000 asthmatic patients. If there is no functional improvement to prednisolone 2 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks with adherence checked by measuring serum prednisolone and cortisol levels, a fibreoptic bronchoscopic examination with bronchoalveolar lavage and large airway biopsy should be considered. Eosinophilic inflammation identified on the biopsy in a child who is unresponsive to prednisolone may benefit from alternative anti-inflammatory treatments such as cyclosporin. Neutrophilic infiltration in biopsy may benefit with macrolide antibiotics, 5-lipogenase inhibitors or theophyllines.

Effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate in children less than 2 years old with recurrent wheezing

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of fluticasone propionate (FP) in young children with recurrent wheezing and risk factors for asthma. Our study design was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of inhaled FP 50 mcg twice daily (FP 100) and 125 mcg twice daily (FP 250), for 6 months. Outcome measures included number of wheezing episodes, days on albuterol, height standard deviation score (height SDS), osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase fraction (AKP), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), and serum levels of cortisol (SC). Our subjects were 30 patients, aged 7-24 months. Mean wheezing episodes were 6.0 +/- 1.9, 1.9 +/- 1.9, and 2.8 +/- 1.2; mean days of albuterol use were 24.3 +/- 1.3, 6.5 +/- 0.8, and 9.1 +/- 0.8, per patient for placebo, FP100, and FP250 groups, respectively. There was a significant reduction in clinical outcome in the two FP groups compared to placebo (P < 0.01). No significant correlations were found between FP dosage and height SDS, OC, AKP, IGFBP-3, and SC. In conclusion, in young children with asthmatic symptoms, FP at 50 and 125 mcg b.i.d. for 6 months significantly improved respiratory symptoms without causing significant side effects on growth and bone metabolism.

Anti-inflammatory treatment for recurrent wheezing in the first five years of life

Medications identified for the treatment of recurrent wheezing in preschool children by the Expert Panel Report of the NHLBI Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma include inhaled corticosteroids, chromones, theophylline, and leukotriene pathway modifiers. However, these various agents differ in their mechanism, extent of action on the airway inflammatory process, and degree of clinical efficacy. Inhaled corticosteroids can control symptoms in many young children with even severe persistent wheezing, but data on their long-term safety when administered in preschool-age children are scarce. There is some information on the uninterrupted use of inhaled corticosteroids in school-age children and the absence of an adverse effect on ultimate adult height. Despite laboratory evidence of adrenal suppression in some studies, few pediatric cases of clinical adrenal insufficiency have been reported. Low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (<400 mcg/day for beclomethasone), which is adequate for controlling mild persistent symptoms, is generally safe. Chromones have a remarkable safety profile, but they are most effective for symptoms of mild severity. Promising data have been published on the efficacy and safety of leukotriene pathway modifiers when used in young children with persistent symptoms. It is uncertain whether early introduction and long-term administration of inhaled corticosteroids prevent development of irreversible airway obstruction. Nevertheless, they may be especially useful for patients with moderate to severe disease in whom other agents (chromones or leukotriene pathway modifiers) will most likely fail to control symptoms. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003; 35:241-252.

How do we treat wheezing infants? Evidence or anecdote

Consultant paediatricians were questioned about their management of wheezing disorders in infants. Salbutamol was the preferred bronchodilator for recurrent wheeze, whereas ipratropium was preferred in viral bronchiolitis. Doses of both medications varied widely. Both inhaled and oral corticosteroids were considered by most respondents. Practice does not clearly follow guidelines or evidence and presumably continues to be based on anecdote.

Diagnosing asthma in young children

Asthma is a respiratory syndrome that frequently is underdiagnosed, particularly in young children. This primarily results from the lack of clinically useful criteria for making the diagnosis in the absence of objective tests, which are problematic in young children. Because new information suggests that delayed diagnosis may lead to permanently decreased lung function that could be prevented by early treatment, it is important that an accurate diagnosis be made as early as possible. Although simple criteria exist for determining if a patient has asthma, there is a tendency to delay making the diagnosis for a variety of reasons, including the observation that many children who begin wheezing at an early age stop wheezing by the time they are 6 years of age, and concerns over adverse effects from falsely labeling a patient with a potentially stigmatizing condition. Young children who receive an incorrect diagnosis of asthma are at an increased risk of receiving unnecessary medications and may be denied life insurance, health insurance, and admission into the military later in life. On close examination, each of these concerns is unfounded. Early diagnosis of asthma has many potentially positive effects; the negative effects have generally been exaggerated and do not stand up to close scrutiny. Routine use of clinically useful criteria for making the diagnosis, as outlined in this review, may help to simplify the process of making an early diagnosis of asthma.

Randomized controlled trial of fluticasone in preschool children with intermittent wheeze

Preschool children with intermittent wheeze are often prescribed inhaled corticosteroids, although there is no proven benefit. Measurement of airway resistance by the interrupter technique can be used to objectively assess response to treatment. If lung function improves, treatment may be justified. Children with intermittent wheeze aged 2 to <or= 5 years of age completed a 6-week randomized controlled crossover trial of fluticasone propionate (100 micro g, twice daily), followed by a 10-week parallel extension. The relationships between changes in resistance, serum immunoglobulin E and sensitization measured by skin prick testing were investigated. Sixty-one children completed the crossover trial and 44 (72%) completed the extension. After 6 weeks, geometric mean change in resistance was -16.0% (95% confidence interval, -7.0 to -25.0%, p = 0.003) in sensitized children and -3.5% (95% confidence interval, +0.7 to -7.6%, p = 0.1) in nonsensitized children. Changes in resistance were unrelated to immunoglobulin E. Sixteen weeks after stopping fluticasone, resistance returned to baseline. This is the first study of preschool children with intermittent wheeze that has related changes in lung function on treatment to aeroallergen sensitization. Lung function improved in sensitized children and deteriorated after stopping treatment. Treatment with inhaled steroids may be justified in sensitized children.

Difficult asthma in children

Asthmatic children on high dose corticosteroids need to be fully assessed to ensure that such dosages are really necessary. Further work needs to be undertaken to find the best approach to poor treatment adherence and false claims for financial support. The benefits of particular components of specialist assessment need to be evaluated prospectively and multicentre collaboration is needed to evaluate phenotype specific treatment and new treatments for truly difficult asthma.

Current drug therapies: relievers and preventers

What we know: The different wheezing phenotypes in early childhood may influence the response to therapy. beta-Agonists are effective in acute asthma from the first year of life and anticholinergics have been shown to provide additional benefit from at least 18 months of age. Non-steroidal preventer medications provide some benefit in early childhood asthma, but response is variable and dependent on severity. Inhaled corticosteroids are the most effective preventer medication in children with persistent asthma, but have not been shown to be effective in children with episodic viral wheeze. There is no convincing evidence to suggest that inhaled corticosteroids influence long-term outcome in childhood asthma. What we need to know: Can we distinguish different wheezing phenotypes at presentation (using clinical features or other markers of airway inflammation or airway hyperresponsiveness) in order to target therapy? What are the relative benefits of reliever and preventer medications in treating different wheezing phenotypes, and do all wheezing phenotypes require treatment? What is the dose-response curve for inhaled corticosteroids in infants and young children with asthma? Are infants and young children more susceptible than older children to growth suppression or other side effects from inhaled corticosteroids? Can early treatment with inhaled corticosteroids or non-steroidal medications influence long-term outcome in terms of asthma development and/or loss of lung function?