Incidence of ocular complications in patients with multibacillary leprosy after completion of a 2 year course of multidrug therapy

Navigating diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in ocular manifestations of Hansen's disease and trachoma: A narrative review

Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) encompass a group of approximately 20 diseases prevalent in tropical and subtropical regions, closely associated with poverty, affecting over a billion people in low-income countries. This manuscript aims to explore the ocular manifestations and burden of two significant NTDs, namely Hansen's disease and trachoma while addressing gaps in understanding and management. Hansen's disease, caused by Mycobacterium leprae , has a long history and presents with diverse neurological and ocular manifestations. Despite the availability of treatment, ocular complications persist, leading to significant visual impairment in some cases. The manuscript emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis, regular ophthalmic examinations, and follow-ups to prevent and control ocular complications, reducing the burden of visual impairment and blindness. Trachoma, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis , remains the leading infectious cause of blindness in underdeveloped and remote areas. The manuscript highlights the clinical diagnosis and implementation of the World Health Organization's (WHO's) SAFE (surgery, antibiotics, facial hygiene, and environmental sanitation) strategy to prevent transmission and associated blindness. However, challenges in health surveillance tools and underreporting of trachoma cases are addressed, emphasizing the need for improved strategies to combat the disease effectively. Through a comprehensive review of the ocular manifestations and management of Hansen's disease and trachoma, this manuscript contributes to the existing knowledge base and enhances a deeper understanding of these NTDs. Addressing gaps in understanding and management emphasizes the importance of implementing WHO's strategies and collaborative efforts to achieve the global goal of reducing the burden of NTDs and improving community health and well-being. The manuscript underscores the significance of early intervention, preventive measures, and technological advancements, providing valuable insights for policymakers, healthcare professionals, and researchers working in the field of NTDs.

Leprosy, the Great Imitator of Rheumatic Diseases: A Case Study

A 68-year-old Hispanic man was referred to our center for cutaneous vasculitis of the lower extremities, diagnosed via skin biopsy. He had a 10-year history of erythematous plaques complicated by persistent, non-healing ulcers previously treated with prednisone and hydroxychloroquine. Laboratory testing was significant for positive U1-ribonucleoprotein antibody, antinuclear antibody human epithelial-2, and an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. A repeat skin biopsy revealed nonspecific ulcerations. The patient was diagnosed with a mixed connective tissue disease with features of scleroderma. Mycophenolate was initiated, and prednisone was tapered. After two years of relapsing ulcerations on his lower extremities, a third skin punch biopsy showed dermal granulomas with numerous acid-fast organisms, and a polymerase chain reaction identified Mycobacterium lepromatosis, indicating polar lepromatous leprosy with an erythema nodosum leprosum reaction. After three months of minocycline and rifampin therapy, his lower extremity ulcerations and erythema resolved. Our case highlights the variable and elusive nature of this disease, which can mimic many systemic rheumatologic conditions.

A Case of Lepromatous Leprosy With Erythema Nodosum Leprosum

Erythema nodosum leprosum is an immunologic reaction that occurs in patients with lepromatous leprosy. We present the case of a 23-year-old female with a one-week history of fever and painful erythematous nodules along her upper and lower extremities. The patient had immigrated to the United States from Micronesia, where she was partially treated for leprosy two years prior. Histological examination from a punch biopsy demonstrated noncaseating granulomatous inflammation with numerous bacilli highlighted by the Fite stain. The acid-fast bacilli smear was positive. Given the patient's clinical, laboratory, and histological findings, a diagnosis of lepromatous leprosy with a type 2 erythema nodosum leprosum reaction was established. Multidrug antibiotic therapy with rifampin, dapsone, minocycline, and prednisone was initiated, following the addition of clofazimine. Early recognition and treatment of leprosy are crucial to preventing chronic and disabling complications, especially in instances of systemic inflammatory responses such as erythema nodosum leprosum.

Bilateral corneal perforation caused by neurotrophic keratopathy associated with leprosy: a case report

Background

Neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) is a rare degenerative corneal disease caused by damage to the trigeminal nerve. We hereby describe a severe case with bilateral corneal perforation due to leprosy (Hansen’s disease)-associated NK.

Case presentation

An 89-year-old man with a history of leprosy treated 40 years previously in our sanatorium developed bilateral corneal perforation due to NK. He had a history of bilateral persistent epithelial defects and bacterial keratitis. Although epithelialization was obtained with the use of autologous serum eye drops, progressive corneal thinning concomitant with stromalysis led to bilateral perforation. Over one month treatment with topical antibiotics, anti-inflammatory and lubricants resulted in healing of the epithelial defects and corneal perforations. A Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer demonstrated a total absence of corneal sensation in both eyes.

Conclusions

The present case indicated the irreversible nerve damage due to leprosy that had been cured 23 years ago, which can progress over the years and cause bilateral corneal perforations.

Treatment and Evaluation Advances in Leprosy Neuropathy

Neuropathy and related disabilities are the major medical consequences of leprosy, which remains a global medical concern. Despite major advances in understanding the mechanisms of M. leprae entry into peripheral nerves, most aspects of the pathogenesis of leprosy neuropathy remain poorly understood. Sensory loss is characteristic of leprosy, but neuropathic pain is sometimes observed. Effective anti-microbial therapy is available, but neuropathy remains a problem especially if diagnosis and treatment are delayed. Currently there is intense interest in post-exposure prophylaxis with single-dose rifampin in endemic areas, as well as with enhanced prophylactic regimens in some situations. Some degree of nerve involvement is seen in all cases and neuritis may occur in the absence of leprosy reactions, but acute neuritis commonly accompanies both Type 1 and Type 2 leprosy reactions and may be difficult to manage. A variety of established as well as new methods for the early diagnosis and assessment of leprosy neuropathy are reviewed. Corticosteroids offer the primary treatment for neuritis and for subclinical neuropathy in leprosy, but success is limited if nerve function impairment is present at the time of diagnosis. A candidate vaccine has shown apparent benefit in preventing nerve injury in the armadillo model. The development of new therapeutics for leprosy neuropathy is greatly needed.

Ocular leprosy: from bench to bedside

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ocular manifestations of leprosy do occur despite advances in the areas of leprosy research. Understanding the nuances in the domain shall guide the clinician for effective patient-centered care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the existence of microbiologic cure for leprosy, ocular manifestations of this disease do occur. Advances in genetic and genomic studies have better characterized the interaction that the bacteria has with the host. The ocular features vary with the spectrum of the disease. Its careful correlation can help to predict the bacillary load of the patient. Investigations are particularly relevant in multibacillary cases. The WHO suggests a treatment duration longer than the 2 years in ocular involvement.

SUMMARY

The isolation of lepra bacilli from the iris biopsy in negative skin smear patients and multidrug therapy completion highlights the potential role of bactericidal agents in the planned intraocular treatment. Lepra reactions need careful titration of oral steroids and appropriate antibacterial agents. Advances in phacoemulsification with in the bag implantation of intraocular lenses is a game changer in the management of the most common cause of blindness of leprosy. Advances in vaccine research in leprosy are promising.

Evaluation of ocular involvement in patients with Hansen's disease

Hansen’s disease (HD) belongs to the group of neglected diseases and can cause physical deformities and disabilities, in addition to leading to social discrimination. Ocular involvement in HD is estimated at 70–75% worldwide. About 10–50% suffer from severe ocular symptoms and loss of vision occurs in approximately 5% of cases. Ocular changes may persist or worsen even after patients are considered cured and it is necessary to better understand these conditions in order to determine the need for additional public policies. The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of ocular involvement in patients with HD at two specialist referral centers for treatment of the disease. A cross-sectional study was conducted with ophthalmological evaluations of patients with HD from June 2017 to June 2018. Diagnostic ocular findings, corrected visual acuity, and refractive error were described. Findings were correlated with patients’ clinical and epidemiological variables. A total of 86 patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 50.1 years, predominantly males (59.3%), and with multibacillary HD (92%). The prevalence of ophthalmologic changes was 100% and the most common were dysfunction of the Meibomian glands (89.5%) and dry eye syndrome (81.4%). Cataracts were observed in 22 patients (25.6%), but best corrected visual acuity was normal or near normal in 84 patients (97.7%) and there were no cases of bilateral blindness. Patients with some degree of physical disability had more ophthalmological alterations, involving both the ocular adnexa (p = 0.03) and the ocular globe (p = 0.04). Ocular involvement is common in patients with Hansen’s disease, reinforcing the importance of ophthalmologic examination in the evaluation and follow-up of these patients.

Leprosy–although use of this term is not recommended because of the negative stigma attached to it–also known as Hansen’s disease is one of the oldest diseases in the world. In modern times, we have identified the agent that causes it, we know how to diagnose it, and we know how to treat it. Nevertheless, thousands of people are still diagnosed late and even though they receive the treatment recommended, they suffer from sequelae that can be highly incapacitating. When discussing its clinical presentation, what springs to mind, even among the public, are the notorious, whitened, discolored patches of skin with sensory dysfunction, but ocular involvement caused by the Mycobacterium leprae bacteria is often ignored by patients and even health professionals. Few studies have been published worldwide reporting the true incidence of eye damage caused by Hansen’s disease and identifying which patients need special care for the eyes. It is extremely important to raise awareness and increase knowledge about these conditions, so that public policies on treatment and prevention can be established. This study found that 100% of the sample of patients with Hansen’s disease had some type of abnormality of the eyes or adnexa and that patients over the age of 50 and those with some degree of physical incapacity secondary to Hansen’s disease were at greatest risk. Another important finding was the high rate of Meibomian gland dysfunction (89.5%) and dry eye syndrome.

Ocular leprosy

Ocular involvement in leprosy is estimated to be 70-75%, about 10-50% of leprosy patients suffer from severe ocular symptoms, and blindness occurs in about 5% of patients. The disease leads to many ophthalmologic symptoms and signs in the range of the eyeball itself, as well as of the bulb adnexa, ie, eyebrows, eyelids with eyelashes, and lacrimal drainage system. Especially dangerous are complications of lagophthalmos and corneal hypoanesthesia, neurotrophic or infectious keratitis, and iridocyclitis and cataract formation, which may lead to significant decrease of visual acuity or even blindness. Multidrug treatment rapidly interrupts transmission of Mycobacterium leprae by infectious patients, but even after being completed, it does not guarantee the withholding of ocular complications.

Neurologic manifestations of the neglected tropical diseases

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization has identified 17 neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) that disproportionately affect the world's poorest populations. The neurologic aspects of many of these NTDs have received relatively little attention.

METHODS

A review was performed in PubMed (MedLine) for each NTD by disease name, name of its causative organism, and neurology, neurosurgery, neurologist, brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerve, muscle, nervous system, encephalitis, meningitis, encephalopathy, stroke, neuropathy, and myopathy (1968-Sept. 2013). The Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine guidelines were used to determine the level of evidence of neurological involvement and treatment based on the reports identified.

RESULTS

Neurologic manifestations were reported for all NTDs except yaws. Neurologic involvement was described in systematic reviews for four NTDs (Chagas disease, echinococcosis, rabies, cysticercosis) (levels 2a-3a), retrospective cohort studies for six (dengue, human African trypanosomiasis, leishmaniasis, leprosy, onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis) (levels 2b-3b), case series for one (foodborne trematodiasis) (level 4), and case reports for five (Buruli ulcer, dracunculiasis, filariasis, soil-transmitted helminthes, and trachoma). Level 1 evidence for treatment of neurologic manifestations of NTDs was found for human African trypanosomiasis, leprosy, and cysticercosis and level 2 evidence exists for treatment of neurologic involvement in Chagas disease. For the remaining NTDs, treatment of neurologic complications is described in case series and case reports only.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic manifestations of NTDs cause significant morbidity and mortality, although limited evidence exists on how best to treat these neurologic complications. Increased awareness of neurologic manifestations of the NTDs can increase their early identification and treatment, contributing to ongoing elimination and eradication campaigns.

The prevalence of ocular complications in leprosy patients seen in the United Kingdom over a period of 21 years

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of ocular complications and blindness among leprosy patients presenting in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

Observational prospective study.

RESULTS

A total of 126 consecutive leprosy patients attending their ophthalmic visit were examined, out of which 18 patients were blind in one eye (14.3%) and five patients were blind in both the eyes (4.0%). Visual acuity of ≥ 6/18 was present in 96 patients (76.2%). A total of 65 patients (51.6%) had an ocular complication and 28 patients (22.2%) had a sight-threatening leprosy complication (lagophthalmos, severe corneal, or iris disease). The most common ocular complications were impaired lid closure (24 patients, 19%), impaired corneal sensation (20 patients, 15.9%), cataract (20 patients, 15.9%), mild corneal opacity (17 patients, 13.5%), and iris atrophy (17 patients, 13.5%). Impaired corneal sensation was associated with vision <6/18 (P<0.001, OR 13.5, 95% CI 5.14-35.44) and vision <3/60 (P=0.01 OR 6.42, 95% CI 2.15-19.15). Impaired lid closure was significantly associated with increasing age (P=0.029, OR 1.039, 95% CI 1.0-1.08) and vision <3/60 (P=0.03, OR 6.06, 95% CI 1.81-20.24).

CONCLUSION

There is a significant rate of ocular complications and blindness seen in leprosy patients in the United Kingdom, and over one in five had a potentially sight-threatening ocular complication. Health professionals and all leprosy patients, including those cured of the disease, need to be aware that new eye symptoms and signs require prompt ophthalmology review to prevent avoidable blindness, due to the life-long risk of sight-threatening ocular complications.

How to prevent immunological reactions in leprosy patients and interrupt transmission of Mycobacterium leprae to healthy subjects: two hypotheses

The basis of World Health Organization strategy for leprosy elimination is that the only source and reservoir for infection are patients with the disease. It was assumed that multi drug therapy (MDT) would reduce transmission of Mycobacterium leprae, but there is no convincing evidence for this. Furthermore, even if MDT has been proved to be extremely effective against the infectious disease, a noticeable proportion of leprosy patients can suffer from immunologic hypersensitivity reactions which are now the most significant issue in the managements of the disease. In endemic areas it was found that: M. leprae survives outside human body; healthy individuals harbor M. leprae bacilli in nasal cavity and shed micro-organisms in environment; there is widespread subclinical transmission of M. leprae with transient infection of the nose resulting in the development of a mucosal immune response. This disparate clinical, epidemiologic, and microbiologic evidence leads to the first hypothesis: that antigenic load in local tissues, sufficient to trigger the immune response, comes from external supply of M. leprae organisms. The hypothiocyanite anion (OSCN-) is generated in vivo by the reaction of thiocyanate with hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by lactoperoxidase. OSCN- is an antimicrobial oxidizing agent that prevents growth of bacteria, fungi, and viruses. OSNC- exists in lower airway secretions and lung has never been reported to be affected by leprosy. There is a sufficient concentration of OSCN- in the saliva, and accordingly mouth is rarely affected by leprosy. By contrast, the concentration of this compound is low or nil in nasal and lacrimal secretions and leprosy very often affects nose and eyes. The second hypothesis is that OSCN- may also protect from leprosy. Recently a method of OSCN- production, not involving enzymatic steps or use of toxic heavy-metal salts, has been patented. Studies on the susceptibility of M. leprae to hypothiocyanite could be carried out and, in case of positive results, the substance might be used in order to sterilize the nasal cavity of healthy carriers and prevent transmission of M. leprae to healthy subjects and to leprosy patients in whom it may trigger an immune response.

Evolution of vision reducing cataract in skin smear positive lepromatous patients: does it have an inflammatory basis?

AIM

To describe the incidence and risk factors of vision reducing cataract in skin smear positive lepromatous patients.

METHODS

Prospective longitudinal cohort study: 212 newly diagnosed lepromatous patients were followed during the two years of treatment with multidrug therapy and for a further five years, with biannual ocular examinations. Incidence of vision reducing (< or =6/18) cataract was calculated as the number of patients with cataract per person year of cataract-free follow up among those who did not have cataract at baseline.

RESULTS

Cataract was present in 27 (11%) of lepromatous patients at diagnosis. Forty nine patients (2.87%/person year (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.17% to 3.80%)) developed cataract during a total follow up period of 1704 person years; 45 of these were > or =41 years old and were followed for a total of 638 person years with an incident rate of 0.070 (95% CI, 0.0523 to 0.094). Stepwise multiple regression confirmed the association of age (per decade) (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.50 (95% CI, 1.82 to 2.78), p<0.001), clofazimine crystals on the cornea (HR = 49.92 (5.48 to 454.82), p = 0.001), grade 2 deformity in all limbs (HR = 3.17 (1.12 to 8.97), p = 0.029), and uveal inflammation (HR = 3.52 (1.42 to 8.67), p = 0.006). No significant association was found with oral steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract develops at the rate of 7%/person year in lepromatous patients over 40 years of age. It is associated with increasing age, subclinical intraocular inflammation, and grade 2 deformity.

Initial diagnosis of leprosy in patients treated by an ophthalmologist and confirmation by conventional analysis and polymerase chain reaction

PURPOSE

To report the initial diagnosis of leprosy in patients seeking treatment from an ophthalmologist in a tertiary eye care center, its confirmation by histopathologic and polymerase chain reaction analysis, and review of literature.

DESIGN

Noncomparative retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with no known history of leprosy who were selected based on either a clinical suspicion or a histopathologic diagnosis and were found to have ocular or periocular lesions suggestive of leprosy.

METHODS

Review of clinical records of patients with no known history of leprosy seen by an ophthalmologist at a tertiary eye care referral center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient demographics, presenting symptoms and signs, diagnostic studies, complications, and treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 6 patients (5 women and 1 man; average age, 55 years), only 2 were found to have leprosy from clinical examination alone. Histopathologic characteristics or demonstration of acid-fast bacilli, suggestive of leprosy, were found in 5 patients. Definite confirmation of leprosy was made by polymerase chain reaction performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of 4 patients having suspected leprosy based on clinicohistopathologic examination results.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of leprosy relies on the clinical symptom complex, epidemiologic factors, and demonstration of acid-fast bacilli in the tissue sample. Considering that the global leprosy population is 12 million, a patient with leprosy may be found anywhere. The ophthalmologist may be the first one to encounter such patient, in which case suspicion and detection of ocular findings may lead to early treatment of the infection. Polymerase chain reaction may be a new tool in the definite diagnosis of leprosy when suspicion of the diseases is raised by clinicohistopathologic studies.

Iris atrophy in patients with newly diagnosed multibacillary leprosy: at diagnosis, during and after completion of multidrug treatment

AIM

To describe the prevalence and incidence of iris atrophy in patients with multibacillary (MB) leprosy.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Prospective longitudinal cohort study. 301 newly diagnosed patients with MB leprosy were followed up during the 2 years of treatment with multidrug therapy (MDT) and for a further 5 years with biannual ocular examinations. Incidence of iris atrophy was calculated as the number of patients with iris atrophy per person-year (PY) of follow-up among those who did not have iris atrophy at baseline. Stepwise multiple regression confirmed the presence of specific associations of demographic and clinical characteristics (p<0.05) with iris atrophy, detected by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Iris atrophy was present in 6 (2%) patients at enrolment. During MDT, with 445 PYs of follow-up, 9 patients developed iris atrophy (IR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.04) that was associated with cataract (HR 15.13, 95% CI 3.71 to 61.79, p<0.001) and corneal opacities (HR 6.83, 95% CI 1.62 to 28.8, p = 0.009). After MDT, with 2005 PYs of follow-up, 60 patients developed iris atrophy (IR 0.03, 95% CI 0.023 to 0.039) that was associated with age (per decade; HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.78, p = 0.006), skin smear positivity (HR 3.50, 95% CI 1.33 to 9.24, p = 0.011), cataract (HR 3.66, 95% CI 1.85 to 7.25, p<0.001), keratic precipitates (HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.02 to 7.47, p = 0.046) and corneal opacity (HR 3.95, 95% CI 1.86 to 8.38, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Iris atrophy continues to develop in 3% of patients with MB leprosy every year after they complete a 2-year course of MDT, and is associated with age, increasing loads of mycobacteria, subclinical inflammation, cataract and corneal opacity.