Captopril in heart failure. A double blind controlled trial

Application of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model in predicting captopril disposition in children with chronic kidney disease

Over the last several decades, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have been a staple in the treatment of hypertension and renovascular disorders in children. One of the ACEIs, captopril, is projected to have all the benefits of traditional vasodilators. However, conducting clinical trials for determining the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a drug is challenging, particularly in pediatrics. As a result, modeling and simulation methods have been developed to identify the safe and effective dosages of drugs. The physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is a well-established method that permits extrapolation from adult to juvenile populations. By using SIMCYP simulator, as a modeling platform, a previously developed PBPK drug-disease model of captopril was scaled to renally impaired pediatrics population for predicting captopril PK. The visual predictive checks, predicted/observed ratios (ratio_pred/obs), and the average fold error of PK parameters were used for model evaluation. The model predictions were comparable with the reported PK data of captopril in mild and severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, as the mean ratio_pred/obs C_max and AUC_0-t were 1.44 (95% CI 1.07 - 1.80) and 1.26 (95% CI 0.93 - 1.59), respectively. The successfully developed captopril-CKD pediatric model can be used in suggesting drug dosing in children diagnosed with different stages of CKD.

Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system improve survival and reduce morbidity in people with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); a review of the evidence is required to determine whether these treatments are beneficial for people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in people with HFpEF.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and one clinical trial register on 14 May 2020 to identify eligible studies, with no language or date restrictions. We checked references from trial reports and review articles for additional studies.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials with a parallel group design, enrolling adults with HFpEF, defined by LVEF greater than 40%.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 41 randomised controlled trials (231 reports), totalling 23,492 participants across all comparisons. The risk of bias was frequently unclear and only five studies had a low risk of bias in all domains. Beta-blockers (BBs) We included 10 studies (3087 participants) investigating BBs. Five studies used a placebo comparator and in five the comparator was usual care. The mean age of participants ranged from 30 years to 81 years. A possible reduction in cardiovascular mortality was observed (risk ratio (RR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.99; number needed to treat for an additional benefit (NNTB) 25; 1046 participants; three studies), however, the certainty of evidence was low. There may be little to no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.00; 1105 participants; four studies; low-certainty evidence). The effects on heart failure hospitalisation, hyperkalaemia, and quality of life remain uncertain. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) We included 13 studies (4459 participants) investigating MRA. Eight studies used a placebo comparator and in five the comparator was usual care. The mean age of participants ranged from 54.5 to 80 years. Pooled analysis indicated that MRA treatment probably reduces heart failure hospitalisation (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98; NNTB = 41; 3714 participants; three studies; moderate-certainty evidence). However, MRA treatment probably has little or no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06; 4207 participants; five studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.11; 4070 participants; three studies; moderate-certainty evidence). MRA treatment may have little or no effect on quality of life measures (mean difference (MD) 0.84, 95% CI -2.30 to 3.98; 511 participants; three studies; low-certainty evidence). MRA treatment was associated with a higher risk of hyperkalaemia (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.51; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) = 11; 4291 participants; six studies; high-certainty evidence). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) We included eight studies (2061 participants) investigating ACEIs. Three studies used a placebo comparator and in five the comparator was usual care. The mean age of participants ranged from 70 to 82 years. Pooled analyses with moderate-certainty evidence suggest that ACEI treatment likely has little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.42; 945 participants; two studies), all-cause mortality (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.45; 1187 participants; five studies) and heart failure hospitalisation (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.15; 1019 participants; three studies), and may result in little or no effect on the quality of life (MD -0.09, 95% CI -3.66 to 3.48; 154 participants; two studies; low-certainty evidence). The effects on hyperkalaemia remain uncertain. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) Eight studies (8755 participants) investigating ARBs were included. Five studies used a placebo comparator and in three the comparator was usual care. The mean age of participants ranged from 61 to 75 years. Pooled analyses with high certainty of evidence suggest that ARB treatment has little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.02, 95% 0.90 to 1.14; 7254 participants; three studies), all-cause mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.11; 7964 participants; four studies), heart failure hospitalisation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.02; 7254 participants; three studies), and quality of life (MD 0.41, 95% CI -0.86 to 1.67; 3117 participants; three studies). ARB was associated with a higher risk of hyperkalaemia (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.33; 7148 participants; two studies; high-certainty evidence). Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) Three studies (7702 participants) investigating ARNIs were included. Two studies used ARBs as the comparator and one used standardised medical therapy, based on participants' established treatments at enrolment. The mean age of participants ranged from 71 to 73 years. Results suggest that ARNIs may have little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.15; 4796 participants; one study; moderate-certainty evidence), all-cause mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.11; 7663 participants; three studies; high-certainty evidence), or quality of life (high-certainty evidence). However, ARNI treatment may result in a slight reduction in heart failure hospitalisation, compared to usual care (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.00; 7362 participants; two studies; moderate-certainty evidence). ARNI treatment was associated with a reduced risk of hyperkalaemia compared with valsartan (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.01; 5054 participants; two studies; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that MRA and ARNI treatment in HFpEF probably reduces heart failure hospitalisation but probably has little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality and quality of life. BB treatment may reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality, however, further trials are needed. The current evidence for BBs, ACEIs, and ARBs is limited and does not support their use in HFpEF in the absence of an alternative indication. Although MRAs and ARNIs are probably effective at reducing the risk of heart failure hospitalisation, the treatment effect sizes are modest. There is a need for improved approaches to patient stratification to identify the subgroup of patients who are most likely to benefit from MRAs and ARNIs, as well as for an improved understanding of disease biology, and for new therapeutic approaches.

Clinical determinants and prognostic implications of renin and aldosterone in patients with symptomatic heart failure

Aims

Activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system plays an important role in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) and has been associated with poor prognosis. There are limited data on the associations of renin and aldosterone levels with clinical profiles, treatment response, and study outcomes in patients with HF.

Methods and results

We analysed 2,039 patients with available baseline renin and aldosterone levels in BIOSTAT‐CHF (a systems BIOlogy study to Tailored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure). The primary outcome was the composite of all‐cause mortality or HF hospitalization. We also investigated changes in renin and aldosterone levels after administration of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in a subset of the EPHESUS trial and in an acute HF cohort (PORTO). In BIOSTAT‐CHF study, median renin and aldosterone levels were 85.3 (percentile_25–75 = 28–247) μIU/mL and 9.4 (percentile_25–75 = 4.4–19.8) ng/dL, respectively. Prior HF admission, lower blood pressure, sodium, poorer renal function, and MRA treatment were associated with higher renin and aldosterone. Higher renin was associated with an increased rate of the primary outcome [highest vs. lowest renin tertile: adjusted‐HR (95% CI) = 1.47 (1.16–1.86), P = 0.002], whereas higher aldosterone was not [highest vs. lowest aldosterone tertile: adjusted‐HR (95% CI) = 1.16 (0.93–1.44), P = 0.19]. Renin and/or aldosterone did not improve the BIOSTAT‐CHF prognostic models. The rise in aldosterone with the use of MRAs was observed in EPHESUS and PORTO studies.

Conclusions

Circulating levels of renin and aldosterone were associated with both the disease severity and use of MRAs. By reflecting both the disease and its treatments, the prognostic discrimination of these biomarkers was poor. Our data suggest that the “point” measurement of renin and aldosterone in HF is of limited clinical utility.

Adrenal cortex hypoxia modulates aldosterone production in heart failure

Plasma aldosterone concentration increases in proportion to the severity of heart failure, even during treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. This study investigated alternative regulatory mechanisms of aldosterone production that are significant in heart failure. Dahl salt-sensitive rats on a high-salt diet, a rat model of heart failure with cardio-renal syndrome, had high plasma aldosterone levels and elevated β3-adrenergic receptor expression in hypoxic zona glomerulosa cells. In H295R cells (a human adrenocortical cell line), hypoxia-induced β3-adrenergic receptor expression. Hypoxia-mediated β3-adrenergic receptor expression augmented aldosterone production by facilitating hydrolysis of lipid droplets though ERK-mediated phosphorylation of hormone-sensitive lipase, also known as cholesteryl ester hydrolase. Hypoxia also accelerated the synthesis of cholesterol esters by acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase, thereby increasing the cholesterol ester content in lipid droplets. Thus, hypoxia enhanced aldosterone production by zona glomerulosa cells via promotion of the accumulation and hydrolysis of cholesterol ester in lipid droplets. In conclusion, hypoxic zona glomerulosa cells with heart failure show enhanced aldosterone production via increased catecholamine responsiveness and activation of cholesterol trafficking, irrespective of the renin-angiotensin system.

Heart failure as a substrate and trigger for ventricular tachycardia

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality with more than 5.1 million individuals affected in the USA. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VAs) including ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation are common in patients with heart failure. The pathophysiology of these mechanisms as well as the contribution of heart failure to the genesis of these arrhythmias is complex and multifaceted. Myocardial hypertrophy and stretch with increased preload and afterload lead to shortening of the action potential at early repolarization and lengthening of the action potential at final repolarization which can result in re-entrant ventricular tachycardia. Myocardial fibrosis and scar can create the substrate for re-entrant ventricular tachycardia. Altered calcium handling in the failing heart can lead to the development of proarrhythmic early and delayed after depolarizations. Various medications used in the treatment of HF such as loop diuretics and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors have not demonstrated a reduction in sudden cardiac death (SCD); however, beta-blockers (BB) are effective in reducing mortality and SCD. Amongst patients who have HF with reduced ejection fraction, the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril/valsartan) has been shown to reduce cardiovascular mortality, specifically by reducing SCD, as well as death due to worsening HF. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in HF patients reduces the risk of SCD; however, subsequent mortality is increased in those who receive ICD shocks. Prophylactic ICD implantation reduces death from arrhythmia but does not reduce overall mortality during the acute post-myocardial infarction (MI) period (less than 40 days), for those with reduced ejection fraction and impaired autonomic dysfunction. Furthermore, although death from arrhythmias is reduced, this is offset by an increase in the mortality from non-arrhythmic causes. This article provides a review of the aforementioned mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis in heart failure; the role and impact of HF therapy such as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), including the role, if any, of CRT-P and CRT-D in preventing VAs; the utility of both non-invasive parameters as well as multiple implant-based parameters for telemonitoring in HF; and the effect of left ventricular assist device implantation on VAs.

Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system improve survival and reduce morbidity in people with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. There is uncertainty whether these treatments are beneficial for people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and a comprehensive review of the evidence is required.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and two clinical trial registries on 25 July 2017 to identify eligible studies. Reference lists from primary studies and review articles were checked for additional studies. There were no language or date restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials with a parallel group design enrolling adult participants with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction of greater than 40 percent.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. The outcomes assessed included cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalisation, hyperkalaemia, all-cause mortality and quality of life. Risk ratios (RR) and, where possible, hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. For continuous data, mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) were calculated. We contacted trialists where neccessary to obtain missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

37 randomised controlled trials (207 reports) were included across all comparisons with a total of 18,311 participants.Ten studies (3087 participants) investigating beta-blockers (BB) were included. A pooled analysis indicated a reduction in cardiovascular mortality (15% of participants in the intervention arm versus 19% in the control arm; RR 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.99; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 25; 1046 participants; 3 studies). However, the quality of evidence was low and no effect on cardiovascular mortality was observed when the analysis was limited to studies with a low risk of bias (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.29; 643 participants; 1 study). There was no effect on all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation or quality of life measures, however there is uncertainty about these effects given the limited evidence available.12 studies (4408 participants) investigating mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) were included with the quality of evidence assessed as moderate. MRA treatment reduced heart failure hospitalisation (11% of participants in the intervention arm versus 14% in the control arm; RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98; NNTB 41; 3714 participants; 3 studies; moderate-quality evidence) however, little or no effect on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and quality of life measures was observed. MRA treatment was associated with a greater risk of hyperkalaemia (16% of participants in the intervention group versus 8% in the control group; RR 2.11; 95% CI 1.77 to 2.51; 4291 participants; 6 studies; high-quality evidence).Eight studies (2061 participants) investigating angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) were included with the overall quality of evidence assessed as moderate. The evidence suggested that ACEI treatment likely has little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation, or quality of life. Data for the effect of ACEI on hyperkalaemia were only available from one of the included studies.Eight studies (8755 participants) investigating angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) were included with the overall quality of evidence assessed as high. The evidence suggested that treatment with ARB has little or no effect on cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation, or quality of life. ARB was associated with an increased risk of hyperkalaemia (0.9% of participants in the intervention group versus 0.5% in the control group; RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.07 to 3.33; 7148 participants; 2 studies; high-quality evidence).We identified a single ongoing placebo-controlled study investigating the effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) in people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that MRA treatment reduces heart failure hospitalisation in heart failure with preserverd ejection fraction, however the effects on mortality related outcomes and quality of life remain unclear. The available evidence for beta-blockers, ACEI, ARB and ARNI is limited and it remains uncertain whether these treatments have a role in the treatment of HFpEF in the absence of an alternative indication for their use. This comprehensive review highlights a persistent gap in the evidence that is currently being addressed through several large ongoing clinical trials.

Kallikrein-Kinin System Suppresses Type I Interferon Responses: A Novel Pathway of Interferon Regulation

The Kallikrein–Kinin System (KKS), comprised of kallikreins (klks), bradykinins (BKs) angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and many other molecules, regulates a number of physiological processes, including inflammation, coagulation, angiogenesis, and control of blood pressure. In this report, we show that KKS regulates Type I IFN responses, thought to be important in lupus pathogenesis. We used CpG (TLR9 ligand), R848 (TLR7 ligand), or recombinant IFN-α to induce interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and proteins, and observed that this response was markedly diminished by BKs, klk1 (tissue kallikrein), or captopril (an ACE inhibitor). BKs significantly decreased the ISGs induced by TLRs in vitro and in vivo (in normal and lupus-prone mice), and in human PBMCs, especially the induction of Irf7 gene (p < 0.05), the master regulator of Type I IFNs. ISGs induced by IFN-α were also suppressed by the KKS. MHC Class I upregulation, a classic response to Type I IFNs, was reduced by BKs in murine dendritic cells (DCs). BKs decreased phosphorylation of STAT2 molecules that mediate IFN signaling. Among the secreted pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines analyzed (IL-6, IL12p70, and CXCL10), the strongest suppressive effect was on CXCL10, a highly Type I IFN-dependent cytokine, upon CpG stimulation, both in normal and lupus-prone DCs. klks that break down into BKs, also suppressed CpG-induced ISGs in murine DCs. Captopril, a drug that inhibits ACE and increases BK, suppressed ISGs, both in mouse DCs and human PBMCs. The effects of BK were reversed with indomethacin (compound that inhibits production of PGE2), suggesting that BK suppression of IFN responses may be mediated via prostaglandins. These results highlight a novel regulatory mechanism in which members of the KKS control the Type I IFN response and suggest a role for modulators of IFNs in the pathogenesis of lupus and interferonopathies.

Skin whitening agents: medicinal chemistry perspective of tyrosinase inhibitors

Melanogenesis is a process to synthesize melanin, which is a primary responsible for the pigmentation of human skin, eye and hair. Although numerous enzymatic catalyzed and chemical reactions are involved in melanogenesis process, the enzymes such as tyrosinase and tyrosinase-related protein-1 (TRP-1) and TRP-2 played a major role in melanin synthesis. Specifically, tyrosinase is a key enzyme, which catalyzes a rate-limiting step of the melanin synthesis, and the downregulation of tyrosinase is the most prominent approach for the development of melanogenesis inhibitors. Therefore, numerous inhibitors that target tyrosinase have been developed in recent years. The review focuses on the recent discovery of tyrosinase inhibitors that are directly involved in the inhibition of tyrosinase catalytic activity and functionality from all sources, including laboratory synthetic methods, natural products, virtual screening and structure-based molecular docking studies.

Review: Aldosterone — the future challenge in cardiovascular disease?

Mineralocorticoid receptor activation plays a key role in cardiovascular disease and hypertension, which are particularly prevalent in diabetes mellitus; secondary hyperaldosteronism contributes to cardiac failure. Major intervention trials in heart failure have demonstrated unequivocal benefit from aldosterone receptor antagonism. Focused experimental studies in humans and in animal models of hypertension have shown that aldosterone blockade improves a number of pathogenic abnormalities including vascular endothelial dysfunction and altered baroreflex function, and prevents the development of cardiac hypertrophy and renal histological damage. Based on recent outcomes studies, the challenge is now to transfer the experimental evidence into clinical M practice.

Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Heart Failure

Objective:

To review the literature discussing the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the treatment of heart failure.

Data Sources:

English-language journal articles.

Study Selection:

Representative articles discussing the effects of ACE inhibitors on hemodynamics, symptoms, and survival.

Data Extraction:

Studies selected for review in the text were based on study design and clinical endpoints.

Data Synthesis:

Heart failure results in a series of compensatory responses that, although effective acutely, are ultimately maladaptive. A major mediator in this process is angiotensin II. The production of angiotensin II is dependent on the ACE. Inhibition of this enzyme by ACE inhibitors results in fewer symptoms, improved hemodynamic function, and prolonged survival in patients with heart failure.

Conclusions:

ACE inhibitors are beneficial in improving the survival of patients with symptomatic heart failure and of patients who have recently had an acute myocardial infarction (MI) and subsequently have a reduced ejection fraction. There appears to be no advantage for immediately initiating ACE-inhibitor therapy within the first few hours of an MI episode. With respect to patients with a reduced ejection fraction without symptoms of heart failure, current data suggest that ACE inhibitors delay the onset of symptoms of heart failure, reduce the need for hospitalization, and may possibly improve survival.

Eplerenone — A Novel Selective Aldosterone Blocker

OBJECTIVE:

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of eplerenone, a new selective aldosterone blocker.

DATA SOURCES:

Primary literature and review articles were obtained via MEDLINE search (1966–April 2002). Additional studies and abstracts were identified from the bibliographies of reviewed literature.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:

Studies and review articles related to eplerenone, aldosterone, aldosterone antagonist, and spironolactone were reviewed. Data pertinent to this article were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Eplerenone is a selective aldosterone blocker. Recent data have demonstrated the deleterious effects of aldosterone in several chronic disease states including hypertension and heart failure. Animal studies using eplerenone have shown a positive role for aldosterone antagonism in the treatment of hypertension, heart failure, myocardial infarction, renal disease, and atherosclerosis. In humans, eplerenone appears to be effective for the treatment of hypertension. An ongoing study will examine the effect of eplerenone for heart failure. To date, the incidence of adverse effects with eplerenone has been slightly lower than with spironolactone.

CONCLUSIONS:

Eplerenone appears to be a promising drug in a new class of agents called selective aldosterone blockers. The drug may be approved for treatment of hypertension in 2002. Additional studies are ongoing that may provide information on other clinical uses for this medication.

Aldosterone breakthrough with benazepril in furosemide-activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in normal dogs

Pilot studies in our laboratory revealed that furosemide-induced renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activation was not attenuated by the subsequent co-administration of benazepril. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of benazepril on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity and furosemide-induced circulating RAAS activation. Our hypothesis was that benazepril suppression of ACE activity would not suppress furosemide-induced circulating RAAS activation, indicated by urinary aldosterone concentration. Ten healthy hound dogs were used in this study. The effect of furosemide (2 mg/kg p.o., q12h; Group F; n = 5) and furosemide plus benazepril (1 mg/kg p.o., q24h; Group FB; n = 5) on circulating RAAS was determined by plasma ACE activity, 4-6 h posttreatment, and urinary aldosterone to creatinine ratio (UAldo:C) on days -1, -2, 1, 3, and 7. There was a significant increase in the average UAldo:C (μg/g) after the administration of furosemide (Group F baseline [average of days -1 and -2] UAldo:C = 0.41, SD 0.15; day 1 UAldo:C = 1.1, SD 0.56; day 3 UAldo:C = 0.85, SD 0.50; day 7 UAldo:C = 1.1, SD 0.80, P < 0.05). Benazepril suppressed ACE activity (U/L) in Group FB (Group FB baseline ACE = 16.4, SD 4.2; day 1 ACE = 3.5, SD 1.4; day 3 ACE = 1.6, SD 1.3; day 7 ACE = 1.4, SD 1.4, P < 0.05) but did not significantly reduce aldosterone excretion (Group FB baseline UAldo:C = 0.35, SD 0.16; day 1 UAldo:C = 0.79, SD 0.39; day 3 UAldo:C 0.92, SD 0.48, day 7 UAldo:C = 0.99, SD 0.48, P < 0.05). Benazepril decreased plasma ACE activity but did not prevent furosemide-induced RAAS activation, indicating aldosterone breakthrough (escape). This is particularly noteworthy in that breakthrough is observed at the time of initiation of RAAS suppression, as opposed to developing after months of therapy.

Serum aldosterone is associated with mortality and re-hospitalization in patients with reduced ejection fraction hospitalized for acute heart failure: analysis from the EVEREST trial

AIMS

Post-discharge morbidity and mortality for acute heart failure (AHF) patients remains high. Although the adverse effects of neurohormonal activation are well known in chronic HF, the prognostic significance of serum aldosterone in patients hospitalized for AHF has not been well studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A secondary analysis was carried out of the placebo arm (n = 1850) from the EVEREST trial which had aldosterone measured at baseline. All patients were hospitalized for worsening HF and had an LVEF <40%. The median follow-up was 9.9 months. The association between serum aldosterone levels at baseline and the independently adjudicated outcomes [all-cause mortality (ACM) and the combined outcome of cardiovascular mortality (CVM) and HF re-hospitalization] were explored with multivariable Cox models. Median aldosterone levels increased during the hospital stay from 11 ng/dL at baseline to 15 ng/dL at discharge (P < 0.001) and remained increased after discharge (16 ng/dL at 24 weeks, P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, higher baseline aldosterone levels were associated with an increased risk for ACM and CVM or HF re-hospitalization [hazard ratio (HR) 1.49, 95% confidence intrerval (CI) 1.11-1.99; and HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.11-1.78, respectively, in the highest quartile when compared with the lowest].

CONCLUSION

In patients with LVEF <40% hospitalized for AHF and receiving standard therapy, serum aldosterone levels correlated with worse post-discharge outcomes. Aldosterone levels increase during AHF hospitalization and remain increased long after discharge. These results suggest that further modulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients admitted with worsening HF might favourably improve post-discharge outcomes.

Aldosterone and angiotensin: Role in diabetes and cardiovascular diseases

The present review shall familiarize the readers with the role of renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS), which regulates blood pressure, electrolyte and fluid homeostasis. The local RAAS operates in an autocrine, paracrine and/or intracrine manner and exhibits multiple physiological effects at the cellular level. In addition to local RAAS, there exists a complete pancreatic RAAS which has multi-facet role in diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Aldosterone is known to mediate hyperinsulinemia, hypertension, cardiac failure and myocardial fibrosis while angiotensin II mediates diabetes, endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, hypertrophy and remodeling. As the understanding of this biology of RAAS increases, it serves to exploit this for the pharmacotherapy of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.

Suppression of aldosterone mediates regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension

Background: High circulating aldosterone levels stimulate myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). However, it is not clear whether suppression of aldosterone directly contributes to LVH regression in hypertensive patients.

Methods: The Aliskiren in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (ALLAY) trial randomised 465 hypertensive overweight subjects with LVH to the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren 300 mg, losartan 100 mg or the combination and followed patients for 9 months. All patients were treated to standard blood pressure targets. Left ventricular (LV) mass index (LVMI) and LV wall thickness (LVWT) were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. A subset of 136 patients who had plasma aldosterone concentration (ALDO) measured at baseline and study end was analysed.

Results: At baseline, plasma ALDO was modestly related to systolic blood pressure, LVMI, and wall thickness (all, p < 0.05). Aliskiren, either alone or in combination, was associated with a significantly greater reduction from baseline to 9 months in plasma aldosterone than losartan alone ( p < 0.02). Reduction in ALDO was related to reduction in LVMI even after adjustment for baseline ALDO, BP reduction and treatment group ( p for trend = 0.042).

Conclusion: In hypertensive patients with increased LVWT, aliskiren alone or in combination with the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan provides greater reduction in aldosterone compared to losartan alone. Moreover, suppression of aldosterone was associated with reduction of LVH, independently of the change in SBP, suggesting that suppression of aldosterone, a known mediator of LVH, may be particularly important for LVH regression and as a target for therapy.

Antihypertensive and organ-protective effects of benazepril

Benazepril is a nonsulfhydryl ACE inhibitor with favorable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, well-established antihypertensive effects and a good tolerability profile. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that patients treated with benazepril alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine may achieve beneficial renal outcomes that extend beyond blood pressure control. Furthermore, the recent Avoiding Cardiovascular Events Through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial showed decreased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality with benazepril when administered as a cotreatment. An additional novel therapeutic area for benazepril is atrial fibrillation. Differences between combination therapies have implications for which patients may be best suited to particular interventions, and further studies are required to fully ascertain this potential.

Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone on atrial conduction and remodeling in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Spironolactone was shown to reduce mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the effect of spironolactone on the incidence of atrial fibrillation remains unknown. Therefore, we examined the effects of spironolactone on atrial conduction and remodeling in patients with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 21 patients with HF were divided into either spironolactone group (n=11) or control group (n=10). The patients were followed up for 12 months. Blood examination, echocardiogram, and signal-averaged electrocardiogram were performed at study enrollment and after 3 and 12 months of treatment. In the spironolactone group, atrial natriuretic peptide tended to reduce, left atrium dimension was significantly smaller, the ratio of E wave to A wave tended to improve, and P-duration was significantly shortened.

CONCLUSIONS

Spironolactone improves atrial conduction and remodeling in patients with HF.

Dialysis patients treated with Epoetin α show improved exercise tolerance and physical function: A new analysis of the Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group trial

The risks/benefits of anemia treatment in dialysis patients have been redefined in the US Epoetin α label. This analysis was carried out to determine if increasing hemoglobin (Hb) levels improve exercise tolerance and physical function in anemic dialysis patients. This is a new analysis of the Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group trial, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in dialysis patients. Subjects were 18 to 75 years old, on hemodialysis for >3 months, and had a baseline Hb <9.0 g/dL. Patients with a history of diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, or severe/uncontrolled hypertension were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive Epoetin α to a target Hb of 9.5 to 11.0 g/dL (n=40) or a target of 11.5 to 13.0 g/dL (n=38), or receive placebo (n=40). Results from patients in the Epoetin-α-treated arms were combined for this analysis. Hb level, exercise tolerance (Treadmill Stress Test and 6-Minute Walk Test) and patient-reported physical function measures (Physical Summary domain from the Kidney Disease Questionnaire, and 4 domains from the Sickness Impact Profile) were reported at baseline and months 2, 4, and 6. Differences in measures were statistically significant for exercise tolerance (Treadmill Stress, P=0.0001) and patient-reported physical function (Kidney Disease Questionnaire Physical, P=0.0001; Sickness Impact Profile Physical, P=0.0015) across all time points for Epoetin-α-treated patients compared with placebo. Improvements were seen at 2 months and were maintained through months 4 and 6. Dialysis patients receiving Epoetin α showed improved exercise tolerance and physical function. These findings should be considered as physicians weigh the risks and benefits of treatment.

Sodium Retention in Heart Failure and Cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis and heart failure (HF) share the pathophysiology of decreased effective arterial blood volume because of splanchnic vasodilatation in cirrhosis and decreased cardiac output in HF, with resultant stimulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Hyperaldosteronism plays a major role in the pathogenesis of ascites and contributes to resistance to loop diuretics. Therefore, the use of high doses of aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone up to 400 mg/day) is the main therapy to produce a negative sodium balance in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Hyperaldosteronism also has increasingly been recognized as a risk factor for myocardial and vascular fibrosis. Therefore, low-dose aldosterone antagonists are being used in patients with HF for cardioprotective action. However, the doses (25 to 50 mg/day) at which they are being used in cardiac patients as reported in the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study are not natriuretic. It is likely, therefore, that the mortality benefit relates primarily from their effect on cardiac and vascular fibrosis. Resistance to commonly used loop diuretics is frequently present in patients with advanced HF. In patients with decompensated HF with volume overload who are loop diuretic resistant, ultrafiltration may be the only available option. This is, however, an invasive procedure. For these patients, natriuretic doses of aldosterone antagonists (spironolactone >50 mg/day) may be a potential option. The competitive natriuretic response of aldosterone antagonists is related to activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: the higher the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity, the higher the dose of aldosterone antagonist required to produce natriuresis. This article will discuss the potential use of natriuretic doses of aldosterone antagonists in patients with HF, including the potential side effect of hyperkalemia.

Effect of aldosterone antagonism on exercise tolerance, Doppler diastolic function, and quality of life in older women with diastolic heart failure

Optimal therapy for diastolic heart failure (DHF), the most common form of heart failure in older persons, is unclear. To determine the effect of aldosterone antagonism in DHF, the authors conducted an open-label preliminary trial of spironolactone 25 mg/d in 11 women with DHF. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, Doppler echocardiography, and a quality-of-life survey were administered at baseline and after 4 months. Peak exercise VO(2) increased by 8.3% (P=.001), the ratio of Doppler diastolic early filling velocity to mitral annulus velocity decreased by 25% (P=.02), quality-of-life score improved by 21% (P=.16 for trend), and median New York Heart Association class improved from class III to class II (P=.004). Findings from this preliminary study confirm the role of aldosterone in the pathophysiology of DHF and suggest that aldosterone antagonism may benefit such patients. These hypotheses are currently being tested in two separated National Institutes of Health-funded, randomized trials, the Spironolactone for Failure in the Elderly (SPIFFIE) and the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trials.

Role of drug therapy for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy, broadly defined, is the mainstay of treatment and prevention of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), which can lead to sudden death. This article evaluates the evidence for and appropriate use of class I antiarrhythmic drugs, class III antiarrhythmic drugs, beta-blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers, statins, angiotensin enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, aldosterone blockers, and digoxin for antiarrhythmic benefits in patients who have a propensity for VT/VF and therefore are at risk of sudden death.

High plasma aldosterone levels on admission are associated with death in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Aldosterone, the final mediator of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway, is at its highest plasma levels at presentation for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Whether aldosterone level at presentation for STEMI is associated with adverse outcome remains unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Plasma aldosterone levels were measured at presentation in consecutive patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI. We assessed the association between aldosterone levels and in-hospital events and mortality during a 6-month follow-up. Of 356 STEMI patients, 23 and 36 died during the hospital stay and 6-month follow-up period, respectively. Nine other patients survived in-hospital cardiac arrest. High aldosterone levels were associated with an almost stepwise increase in rates of in-hospital death (P=0.01), cardiovascular death (P=0.03), heart failure (P=0.005), ventricular fibrillation (P=0.02), and resuscitated cardiac arrest (P=0.01). After adjustment for age, Killip class, and reperfusion status, compared with patients in the first aldosterone quartile group, those in the highest quartile were at higher risk of death (hazard ratio 3.28, 95% CI 1.09 to 9.89, P=0.035) and death or resuscitated cardiac arrest (hazard ratio 3.74, 95% CI 1.40 to 9.98, P=0.008) during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma aldosterone levels on admission among patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI are associated with early and late adverse clinical outcomes, including mortality. The association between high aldosterone levels and late mortality is independent of age, heart failure, and reperfusion status. Such results underline the pivotal role of aldosterone and justify a randomized trial to assess the early administration of aldosterone antagonists in the setting of STEMI.

ACE inhibitors in pediatric patients with heart failure

This article reviews reports of ACE inhibitor use in pediatric heart failure and summarizes the present implications for clinical practice. Captopril, enalapril, and cilazapril are orally active ACE inhibitors, and widely used in pediatric cardiology, although more than ten other ACE inhibitors have been applied clinically in adults. Effects of ACE inhibitors on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in pediatric patients are similar to those in adults. ACE inhibitors lower aortic pressure and systemic vascular resistance, do not affect pulmonary vascular resistance significantly, and lower left atrial and right atrial pressures in pediatric patients with heart failure. In infants with a large ventricular septal defect and pulmonary hypertension, ACE inhibitors decrease left-to-right shunt in those infants with elevated systemic vascular resistance. ACE inhibitors induce a small increase in left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular fractional shortening, and systemic blood flow in children with left ventricular dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, and aortic regurgitation. These beneficial effects usually persist long term without the development of tolerance. Therapeutic trials of ACE inhibitors have been reported in children with heart failure and divergent hemodynamics, including myocardial dysfunction, left-to-right shunt, such as large ventricular septal defect and pulmonary hypertension, aortic or mitral regurgitation, and Fontan circulation. Hypotension and renal failure usually occur within 5 days after starting ACE inhibition or increasing the dose and, in most cases, recovery is seen after reduction or cessation of the drug. With all ACE inhibitors, smaller doses are administered initially to prevent excessive hypotension, and doses are increased gradually to the target dose. Captopril is administered orally, usually every 8 hours. Daily doses range from 0.3 to 1.5 mg/kg in children. Enalapril is administered orally, once or twice a day, and daily doses range from 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg. Enalaprilat is administered intravenously, one to three times a day, in doses ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 mg/kg/dose. For the treatment of chronic heart failure in children, ACE inhibitors are essential along with other medications including diuretics, digoxin, and beta-blockers (beta-adrenoceptor antagonists).

Levels of Hematopoiesis InhibitorN-Acetyl-Seryl-Aspartyl-Lysyl-Proline Partially Explain the Occurrence of Anemia in Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Anemia is common in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and is associated with a poor prognosis. However, only a minority of patients with CHF have impaired renal function or underlying hematinic deficiencies. It has been shown that inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system is associated with the development of anemia. The aim of the present study was to determine possible mechanisms linking anemia to renin-angiotensin system activity in CHF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We initially evaluated 98 patients with advanced stable CHF who were treated with ACE inhibitors (left ventricular ejection fraction, 28+/-1%; age, 69+/-1 years; 80% male), 10 of whom had an unexplained anemia (normal hematinics and no renal failure). These 10 anemic patients were matched with 10 nonanemic patients in terms of age and left ventricular ejection fraction. Serum ACE activity was 73% lower in anemic CHF patients compared with nonanemic CHF patients (P=0.018). Moreover, serum of these patients inhibited in vitro the proliferation of bone marrow-derived erythropoietic progenitor cells of healthy donors by 17% (P=0.003). Levels of the hematopoiesis inhibitor N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline (Ac-SDKP), which is almost exclusively degraded by ACE, were significantly higher in anemic CHF patients and were clearly correlated to erythroid progenitor cell proliferation (r=-0.64, P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum ACE activity is markedly lower in anemic CHF patients, and serum of these patients inhibits hematopoiesis. The clear correlation between Ac-SDKP and proliferation of erythroid progenitor cells suggests an inhibitory role of Ac-SDKP on hematopoiesis in CHF patients, which may explain the observed anemia in patients treated with ACE inhibitors.

Emerging therapies for heart failure

Although multiple advancements have been made in the treatment of heart failure (HF), mortality rates remain alarmingly high. The accepted arsenal of therapeutics includes a diuretic, digitalis, a beta-blocking agent and an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Despite the employment of a vast array of agents, nearly 300,000 patients in the US die annually with HF as a primary or contributory cause of death. Additional molecular targets are being evaluated in preclinical and clinical settings including vasopeptidase inhibitors, endothelin-1 receptor antagonists, arginine vasopressin antagonists, selective aldosterone blockers, TNF-alpha blockers and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Although these approaches hold promise as viable therapeutics, a thorough evaluation of clinical benefit from these agents requires additional trials. Future disease-modifying approaches will also undoubtedly include cell transplantation and gene therapy. It is likely that notable advances in HF treatment will come from agents that attenuate myocardial remodelling. Indeed, maintenance or improvement of cardiac structure can attenuate HF development and improve mortality.

A meta-analysis of the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on functional capacity in patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction

AIM

To determine by meta-analysis whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors improve exercise tolerance in patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After literature search 13 multi-centre double blind parallel group trials that evaluated the effect of ACE inhibitors vs. placebo on exercise duration were selected. Ninety-four percent of patients were in New York Heart Association class II-IV. The studies were combined using the Cochrane meta-analysis program (Review manager version 4.1). Analyses according to treatment period, exercise protocols and publication periods were performed. Treatment with ACE inhibitor over 4-12 weeks resulted in a beneficial effect on exercise duration (P=0.003 and P=0.0008 for 4- and 12-weeks treatment, respectively), but the magnitude of improvements did not exceed 30 s corresponding to only 5% compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the pronounced effect on mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic LVSD, ACE inhibitors have improving effect on functional capacity measured as exercise tolerance time.

Age, functional capacity, and health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Although heart failure disproportionately affects older persons and is associated with significant physical disability, existing data on physical limitations and health-related quality of life (HRQL) derive largely from studies of younger subjects. We compared the relationship between functional limitation and HRQL between older and younger patients with heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 546 outpatients with heart failure enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study. At baseline and 6 +/- 2 weeks later, functional status was assessed by New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and 6-minute walk testing. HRQL was measured with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Comparing older (age >65 years, n = 218) and younger patients (n = 328), we assessed baseline HRQL across strata of functional status. In the 484 patients who completed follow-up (194 older and 290 younger patients), we also assessed the changes in HRQL associated with changes in functional status over time. At baseline, older patients had better HRQL than younger patients (mean KCCQ score 60 +/- 25 versus 54 +/- 28, P = .005) in spite of worse NYHA class (mean 2.54 versus 2.35, P < .001) and lower 6-minute walk distances (824 +/- 378 versus 1064 +/- 371 feet, P < .001). After multivariable adjustment including baseline NYHA class, older age was independently correlated with better HRQL (beta = +7.9 points, P < .001). At follow-up, older patients with a deterioration in NYHA class experienced marked declines in HRQL compared with younger patients (mean HRQL change of -14.4 points versus +0.3 points, respectively, P < .001). Analyses using 6-minute walk distance as the functional measure yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although older patients with heart failure have relatively good HRQL in spite of significant functional limitations, they are at risk for worsening HRQL with further decline in functional status. These results underscore the importance of treatments aimed at maintaining functional status in older persons with heart failure, including those with significant baseline functional limitations.

The clinical implications of aldosterone escape in congestive heart failure

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy does not reliably suppress aldosterone production, and 'aldosterone escape' occurs in up to 40% of patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Aldosterone levels correlate with the risk of cardiovascular events. Aldosterone adversely affects the risk of cardiovascular events via mineralocorticoid receptors in the heart, blood vessels and other sites. Notably, aldosterone contributes to endothelial dysfunction and attenuates endothelium-dependent vasodilatation, at least partly by reducing nitric oxide bioavailability. Aldosterone also promotes myocardial fibrosis and cardiac remodelling by enhancing collagen synthesis, resulting in increased myocardial stiffness and increased left ventricular mass. These mechanisms mediated by aldosterone contribute to increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Two major prospective trials, including one in which patients routinely received ACE inhibitor and beta blocker therapy, have shown that the use of an aldosterone blocker significantly reduces all-cause mortality, sudden cardiovascular death and hospitalisation in patients with acute or chronic left ventricular dysfunction or CHF. Inhibition of aldosterone's effect on mineralocorticoid receptors should now be considered standard therapy in these patient populations.

Fiftieth anniversary of aldosterone: from discovery to cardiovascular therapy

Half a century after the elucidation of its molecular structure, aldosterone is generating the greatest interest, not in the fields of endocrinology or renal medicine but in cardiology-where aldosterone over-activation is now perceived as detrimental in heart failure (HF) and ischaemic heart disease. Clinically, excess aldosterone is associated with higher morbidity and mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) and HF. The Randomised Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) study in severe chronic heart failure and the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival (EPHESUS) study in post-MI heart failure have shown that use of non-selective and selective aldosterone receptor antagonists, respectively, improves prognosis. The pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning these damaging aldosterone-mediated cardiovascular effects are still being elucidated, but prime candidates include cardiomyocyte necrosis and apoptosis, and myocardial fibrosis resulting in adverse cardiac remodelling, coronary vasculopathy, tachyarrhythmia and positive feedback activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Practical points for consideration when instigating therapy include preferential use of aldosterone receptor antagonists to maintain electrolyte balance whenever loop or thiazide diuretics are used (vulnerable HF patients require higher ranges of potassium and magnesium to minimise propensity for tachyarrthythmia), for renoprotection and for counteracting aldosterone breakthrough despite adequate ACE inhibition; use of the minimum doses of loop diuretics required to lessen activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in HF; use of selective aldosterone receptor antagonists to avoid gynaecomastia/mastalgia and impotence; and prophylactic use of aldosterone receptor antagonists to improve prognosis.

Adverse effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure and/or ventricular dysfunction : meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The evidence-based benefit/risk evaluation of therapeutic interventions in randomised clinical trials should include both the assessment of the benefits and of the adverse outcomes. There is ample evidence that ACE inhibitors improve the symptoms and prognosis of chronic heart failure (CHF) and ventricular dysfunction. However, there is little systematic information on the tolerability and adverse effects associated with their use in these conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the adverse events related to ACE inhibitor use in the treatment of CHF and ventricular dysfunction.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Description of adverse events in reports of randomised clinical trials of ACE inhibitors in CHF or ventricular dysfunction was examined, and a meta-analysis was performed. Trials were included if they were placebo- or standard treatment-controlled, and if the treatment duration was at least 8 weeks. Relative risks and their 95% CIs were estimated with a random effects model.

RESULTS

Only 22 (43%) of 51 original reports contained information on the number of withdrawals and their causes. Missing information from the remaining 29 trials was obtained from the authors. The weighted mean duration of treatment was 100.2 weeks. After excluding administrative reasons, heart failure, myocardial infarction and hypertension, the withdrawal rates attributed to adverse events were 13.8% and 9.4% for the ACE inhibitor and control groups, respectively (RR = 1.54 [95% CI 1.30-1.83]; weighted difference = 3.1 per 100 treated patients [95% CI 1.8-4.4]). Cough, hypotension, renal dysfunction, dizziness, hyperkalaemia, and impotence were all significantly more prevalent among patients treated with ACE inhibitors than among those in the control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CHF or ventricular dysfunction enrolled in randomised clinical trials, treatment with an ACE inhibitor for an average of 2 years leads to an additional 3% of treatment withdrawals. In a significant proportion of the reports on these randomised clinical trials, information on adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal was inadequate. Proper evidence-based evaluation of the benefit/risk of therapeutic interventions needs a more systematic approach to reporting of adverse events experiences recorded in clinical trials.

Diuretic use, progressive heart failure, and death in patients in the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD)

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether non-potassium-sparing diuretics (PSDs) in the absence of a PSD may result in progressive heart failure (HF).

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors incompletely suppress ACE activity in HF patients. Furthermore, non-PSDs are activators of aldosterone secretion. We reasoned that non-PSDs, in the absence of a PSD, might result in progressive HF.

METHODS

In the 6,797 patients in the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD), we compared the risk of hospitalization for, or death from, HF between those taking a PSD and those who were not, adjusting for known covariates.

RESULTS

The risk of hospitalization from worsening HF in those taking a PSD relative to those taking only a non-PSD was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55 to 0.99; p = 0.047). The relative risk for cardiovascular death was 0.74 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.93; p = 0.011), for death from all causes 0.73 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.90; p = 0.004), and for hospitalization for, or death from, HF 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.97; p = 0.030). Compared with patients not taking any diuretic, the risk of hospitalization or death due to worsening HF in patients taking non-PSDs alone was significantly increased (risk ratio [RR] = 1.31, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.57; p = 0.0004); this was not observed in patients taking PSDs with or without a non-PSD (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.30; p = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PSDs in HF patients is associated with a reduced risk of death from, or hospitalization for, progressive HF or all-cause or cardiovascular death, compared with patients taking only a non-PSD.

Effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor alacepril on exercise capacity and neurohormonal factors in patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure

1. Alacepril is a long-acting, sulphydryl-containing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Data are limited regarding the effects of alacepril on exercise tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of chronic alacepril treatment on exercise capacity and neurohormones in patients with CHF. 2. The effects of 12 weeks treatment with alacepril on clinical, echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary exercise variables were studied in 18 CHF patients (mean age: 63 +/- 2 years; New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I n = 6, class II n = 10, class III n = 2) in a cross-over fashion. Resting levels of plasma noradrenaline, renin-angiotensin system activity and natriuretic peptides were evaluated. 3. Treatment with alacepril significantly improved NYHA functional class and decreased cardiothoracic ratio (60.1 +/- 2.0 vs 58.1 +/- 1.9% for baseline vs alacepril, respectively; P < 0.01). Cardiac dimensions by echocardiogram were decreased after alacepril therapy. Peak Vo2 (17.7 +/- 1.2 vs 19.5 +/- 1.3 mL/min per kg; P < 0.01) and anaerobic threshold (11.7 +/- 0.6 vs 13.2 +/- 0.9 mL/min per kg; P < 0.01) increased with alacepril treatment. Plasma noradrenaline and plasma angiotensin II levels were not altered, but plasma aldosterone (77.7 +/- 13.5 vs 51.7 +/- 9.7 pg/mL; P < 0.01), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP; 86.5 +/- 20.3 vs 43.6 +/- 7.6 pg/mL; P < 0.05) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP; 222.7 +/- 59.3 vs 117.7 +/- 34.3 pg/mL; P < 0.05) levels decreased after alacepril treatment. 4. These results suggest that treatment with alacepril improves functional status and exercise capacity in patients with mild-to-moderate CHF. Neurohormones were favourably influenced by alacepril therapy, with significant decreases in plasma aldosterone, ANP and BNP levels.

Long-term, dose-dependent effects of spironolactone on left ventricular function and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to assess the effects of spironolactone (SP) on left ventricular (LV) function and exercise tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

BACKGROUND

In severe heart failure (HF), SP improves survival, but the underlying mechanisms are not clear.

METHODS

We randomized 106 outpatients with HF to SP (12.5 to 50 mg/day) (group 1) or control (group 2). Complete echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing were performed at baseline and 12 months after randomization.

RESULTS

Left ventricular end-systolic volume at baseline and at follow-up was 188 +/- 94 ml and 171 +/- 97 ml in group 1 and 173 +/- 71 ml and 168 +/- 79 ml in group 2 (treatment group-by-time interaction, p = 0.03). Left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline and at follow-up was 33 +/- 7% and 36 +/- 9% in group 1 and 34 +/- 7% and 34 +/- 9% in group 2 (treatment group-by-time interaction, p = 0.02). At baseline, 9 patients in group 1 and 3 patients in group 2 had a restrictive mitral filling pattern, a marker of severe diastolic dysfunction; at follow-up, 3 patients in group 1 and no patient in group 2 improved their pattern. No patient in group 1 and 4 patients in group 2 worsened their pattern (chi-square, p = 0.02). Peak oxygen consumption increased significantly in patients treated with 50 mg of SP and decreased in group 2 (17.7 +/- 5.2 vs. 18.5 +/- 5.9 and 19.1 +/- 5.6 vs. 17.9 +/- 5.3, respectively; analysis of variance, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Spironolactone improves LV volumes and function; furthermore, it improves exercise tolerance at the highest administered dose. Our data might explain the mortality reduction during aldosterone antagonism in patients with HF.

Aldosterone receptor blockade in the management of heart failure

Mounting evidence suggests that increased circulating aldosterone levels, despite angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors therapy, may exert deleterious cardiovascular effects in heart failure, leading to clinical deterioration and poor prognosis. In the past decades, a number of experimental investigations have provided major insight into the mechanism(s) of action and the biological effects of aldosterone on the cardiovascular system, indicating that aldosterone participates in the structural and functional remodeling of cardiac and vascular tissue. In particular, it has emerged that aldosterone plays a key role in the regulation of myocardial extracellular matrix composition and endothelial function with important pathophysiological implications. Such evidence, coupled with the recent beneficial effects of spironolactone, a competitive aldosterone receptor antagonist, in reducing cardiac mortality and morbidity in patients with severe chronic heart failure treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and loop diuretics, highlights the importance of aldosterone in the pathophysiology of human heart failure. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the regulation of aldosterone production and metabolism in heart failure, the basic mechanism of aldosterone action, and the pathophysiological implications of aldosterone in heart failure, and to discuss recent evidence supporting the efficacy of aldosterone receptor blockade in the treatment of chronic heart failure in humans.