Smad4 inactivation predicts for worse prognosis and response to fluorouracil-based treatment in colorectal cancer

Driver Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer and Opportunities for Targeted Therapy

Pancreatic cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. As the most common form of pancreatic cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents up to 95% of all pancreatic cancer cases, accounting for more than 300,000 deaths annually. Due to the lack of early diagnoses and the high refractory response to the currently available treatments, PDAC has a very poor prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy are highly effective and have been used for the treatment of many types of cancer; however, they offer limited benefits in pancreatic cancer patients due to tumor-intrinsic and extrinsic factors that culminate in drug resistance. The identification of key factors responsible for PDAC growth and resistance to different treatments is highly valuable in developing new effective therapeutic strategies. In this review, we discuss some molecules which promote PDAC initiation and progression, and their potential as targets for PDAC treatment. We also evaluate the challenges associated with patient outcomes in clinical trials and implications for future research.

Distinct clinical characteristics in stage III rectal cancer among different age groups and treatment outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

There is a rapidly increasing incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) which threatens the survival of young people, while aging also represents a challenging clinical problem.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the differences in the clinical characteristics and prognosis in stage III rectal cancer (RC), to help optimize treatment strategies.

Design and methods

This study included 757 patients with stage III RC, all of whom received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. The whole cohort was categorized as very early onset (VEO, ⩽30 years old), early onset (EO, >30 years old, ⩽50 years old), intermediate onset (IO, >50 years, ⩽70 years), or late onset (LO, >70 years old).

Results

There were more female VEO patients than males, more mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet-ring cell carcinoma, pre-treatment cT4 stage, and higher pre-treatment serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 compared with the other three groups. VEO patients had the worst survival with the highest RC-related mortality (34.5%), recurrence (13.8%), and metastasis (51.7%). LO patients had the highest non-RC-related mortality rate (16.6%). The Cox regression model showed VEO was a negative independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival [DFS, hazard ratio (HR): 2.830, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.633-4.904, p < 0.001], distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, HR: 2.969, 95% CI: 1.720-5.127, p < 0.001), overall survival (OS, HR: 2.164, 95% CI: 1.102-4.249, p = 0.025), and cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR: 2.321, 95% CI: 1.145-4.705, p = 0.020). LO was a negative independent factor on DFS (HR: 1.800, 95% CI: 1.113-2.911, p = 0.017), DMFS (HR: 1.903, 95% CI: 1.150-3.149, p = 0.012), OS (HR: 2.856, 95% CI: 1.745-4.583, p < 0.001), and CSS (HR: 2.248, 95% CI: 1.282-3.942, p = 0.005). VEO patients had better survival in the total neoadjuvant therapy-like (TNT-like) pattern on DFS (p = 0.039). IO patients receiving TNT-like patterns had better survival on DFS, OS, and CSS (p = 0.006, p = 0.018, p = 0.006, respectively).

Conclusion

In stage III RC, VEO patients exhibited unique clinicopathological characteristics, with VEO a negative independent prognostic factor for DFS, DMFS, OS, and CSS. VEO and IO patients may benefit from a TNT-like treatment pattern.

Assessment of the Influence of 5-Fluorouracil on SMAD4 and TGFB1 Gene Expression, Apoptosis Induction and DNA Damage in Human Cell Lines

PURPOSE

Suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD family member 4, SMAD4) is involved in the adenoma-carcinoma pathway, leading to the development of colon cancer. The encoded protein is a key downstream signaling mediator in the TGFβ pathway. This pathway has tumor-suppressor functions, including cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Its activation in late-stage cancer can promote tumorigenesis, including metastasis and chemoresistance. Most colorectal cancer patients receive chemotherapy based on 5-FU as an adjuvant treatment. However, the success of therapy is hampered by multidrug resistance by neoplastic cells. In colorectal cancer, resistance to 5-FU-based therapy is influenced by SMAD4 gene expression, as patients with decreased SMAD4 gene expression probably have a higher risk of developing 5-FU-induced resistance. The mechanism leading to the development of this phenomenon is not fully understood. Therefore, the present study assesses the possible influence of 5-FU on changes in the expression of the SMAD4 and TGFB1 genes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The effect of 5-FU on the expression of SMAD4 and TGFB1 in colorectal cancer cells derived from the CACO-2, SW480 and SW620 cell lines was evaluated using real-time PCR. The cytotoxicity of 5-FU on colon cancer cells was assessed by the MTT method, and its effect on the induction of cell apoptosis and the initiation of DNA damage using a flow cytometer.

RESULTS

Significant changes in the level of SMAD4 and TGFB1 gene expression were noted in the CACO-2, SW480 and SW620 cells treated with 5-FU at various concentrations during 24 h and 48 h exposure. The use of 5-FU at a concentration of 5 µmol/L resulted in a decrease in the expression of the SMAD4 gene in all cell lines at both exposure times, while the concentration of 100 µmol/L increased the expression of the SMAD4 gene in CACO-2 cells. The level of expression of the TGFB1 gene was higher for all cells treated with 5-FU at the highest concentrations, while the exposure time was extended to 48 h.

CONCLUSION

The observed in vitro changes in CACO-2 cells caused by 5-FU may be of clinical relevance when choosing the drug concentration for treating patients with colorectal cancer. It is possible that 5-FU has a stronger effect on colorectal cancer cells at the higher concentrations. Low concentrations of 5-FU may not have a therapeutic effect and may also influence drug resistance in cancer cells. Higher concentrations and prolonged exposure time may affect SMAD4 gene expression, which may increase the effectiveness of therapy.

Genome-wide CRISPR Screen Reveals RAB10 as a Synthetic Lethal Gene in Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers Carrying SMAD4 Loss

The TGFβ signaling mediator SMAD4 is frequently mutated or deleted in colorectal and pancreatic cancers. SMAD4 acts as a tumor suppressor and its loss is associated with poorer patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to find synthetic lethal interactions with SMAD4 deficiency to find novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of patients with SMAD4-deficient colorectal or pancreatic cancers. Using pooled lentiviral single-guide RNA libraries, we conducted genome-wide loss-of-function screens in Cas9-expressing colorectal and pancreatic cancer cells harboring altered or wild-type SMAD4. The small GTPase protein RAB10 was identified and validated as a susceptibility gene in SMAD4-altered colorectal and pancreatic cancer cells. Rescue assays showed that RAB10 reintroduction reversed the antiproliferative effects of RAB10 knockout in SMAD4-negative cell lines. Further investigation is necessary to shed light on the mechanism by which RAB10 inhibition decreases cell proliferation of SMAD4-negative cells.

Significance

This study identified and validated RAB10 as new synthetic lethal gene with SMAD4. This was achieved by conducting a whole-genome CRISPR screens in different colorectal and pancreatic cell lines. A future RAB10 inhibitors could correspond to a new therapeutic solution for patients with cancer with SMAD4 deletion.

Fluid shear stress-induced down-regulation of miR-146a-5p inhibits osteoblast apoptosis via targeting SMAD4

Fluid shear stress (FSS) plays an important role in osteoblast apoptosis. However, the role of miRNA in osteoblast apoptosis under FSS and possible molecular mechanisms remain unknown. Our aim of the study was to explore whether miR-146a-5p regulates osteoblast apoptosis under FSS and its molecular mechanisms. FSS could down-regulate the expression of miR-146a-5p in MC3T3-E1 cells. We confirm that up-regulation of miR-146a-5p promotes osteoblasts apoptosis and down-regulation of miR-146a-5p inhibits osteoblasts apoptosis. We further demonstrated that FSS inhibits osteoblast apoptosis by down-regulated miR-146a-5p. Dual-luciferase reporter assay validated that SMAD4 is a direct target gene of miR-146a-5p. In addition, mimic-146a-5p suppressed FSS-induced up-regulation of SMAD4 protein levels, which suggests that FSS elevated SMAD4 protein expression levels via regulation miR-146a-5p. Further investigations showed that SMAD4 could inhibit osteoblast apoptosis. We demonstrated that miR-146a-5p regulates osteoblast apoptosis via targeting SMAD4. Taken together, our present study showed that FSS-induced down-regulation miR-146a-5p inhibits osteoblast apoptosis via target SMAD4. These findings may provide novel mechanisms for FSS to inhibit osteoblast apoptosis, and also may provide a potential therapeutic target for osteoporosis.

Presence of Concurrent TP53 Mutations Is Necessary to Predict Poor Outcomes within the SMAD4 Mutated Subgroup of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Simple Summary

Prior studies have resulted in conflicting conclusions on the value of SMAD4 mutations as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer. In a cohort study of 433 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, we showed that the presence of a coexisting mutation in TP53 is necessary to culminate in a negative overall survival impact in patients with SMAD4 mutations (multivariate HR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.44–4.36, p = 0.001). Our findings indicate that patients with concurrent SMAD4 and TP53 mutations represent a distinct poor-prognosis subgroup that may benefit from further translational studies.

Abstract

Prior studies have resulted in conflicting conclusions on the value of SMAD4 mutations as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer. In this study, the impact of coexisting mutations with SMAD4 on overall survival was evaluated retrospectively in 433 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SMAD4 mutation was found in 16.2% (70/433) of tumors. A systemic univariate and multivariate survival analysis model including age, gender, sidedness of primary tumor, RAS, BRAF^V600E, APC, TP53 and SMAD4 status showed that SMAD4 mutations were not associated with worse prognosis (multivariate HR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.90–1.73, p = 0.18). However, coexisting mutations in SMAD4 and TP53 were significantly associated with worse overall survival (multivariate HR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.44–4.36, p = 0.001). The median overall survival of patients with coexisting SMAD4 and TP53 mutation was 24.2 months, compared to 42.2 months for the rest of the population (p = 0.002). Concurrent SMAD4 and TP53 defines a new subgroup of patients of metastatic colorectal cancer with poor clinical outcomes.

Prognostic Roles of ZNF703 and SMAD4 Expression in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Association with Nodal Metastasis

It is important to detect novel predictive biomarkers of cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) to help the surgeons in making early decision of performing central lymph node dissection and aggressive management strategies in selected high-risk patients, thus improving their prognosis. Zinc finger protein 703 (ZNF703) is a member of the neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) transcription factors family which has roles in proliferation and invasion of cancer cells. SMAD4 is a protein that has a role in cellular processes including cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis through many genes' transcription. In this study, we aimed to assess the expression of ZNF703 and SMAD4 in PTC and evaluated the correlation between its expression, clinicopathological features of PTC cases, and prognostic parameters of patients to evaluate their roles in PTC progression. This is a retrospective study which included 40 cases with PTC. For immunohistochemistry, tissues stained their paraffin blocks with ZNF703 and SMAD4. We followed patients to detect disease progression and recurrence. Positive ZNF703 expression and negative SMAD4 expression were associated with higher incidence of CLNM, advanced stage and large tumor size, higher incidence of disease progression, recurrence, unfavorable PFS, and unfavorable OS rates. The higher ZNF703 expression and the lower SMAD4 expression were significantly increased in PTC patients with cervical LNM compared with those without. ZNF703 over expression and downregulation SMAD4 expression was significantly increased in PTC patients. Elevated expression of ZNF703 in tumor tissue with CLNM can be considered a predictive factor for the development of metastasis.

SMAD7 and SMAD4 expression in colorectal cancer progression and therapy response

Inhibitory SMAD7 and common mediator SMAD4 play crucial roles in SMAD-dependent TGF-β signaling that is often disrupted in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to profile the expression of SMAD7 and SMAD4 in primary and metastatic CRC and to evaluate their significance in disease progression and therapy response. The expression of SMAD7 and SMAD4 genes was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR in tissues from 35 primary and metastatic CRC patients and in vitro in 7 human cell lines originating from colon tissue. Expression levels of SMAD7 and SMAD4, as well as their ratio, were determined and their association with tumor characteristics and response to therapy were evaluated. SMAD4 level was significantly lower in tumors compared to non-tumor tissues in both primary (p = 0.001) and metastatic (p = 0.001) CRC patients, while tumor expression of SMAD7 was significantly lower from non-tumor tissue only in metastatic patients (p = 0.017). SMAD7/SMAD4 ratio was elevated in CRC primary tumor tissues and cell lines compared to corresponding non-tumor tissues and cell line, respectively (p = 0.003). SMAD7 expression was significantly elevated in primary tumor tissues obtained from responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) compared to non-responders (p = 0.014). Alterations of expression and ratio of SMAD7 and SMAD4 in CRC cell lines, primary rectal cancer, and liver metastasis emphasize the importance of these genes in different stages of disease progression. Differential expression of SMAD7 in responders versus non-responders to nCRT should be further investigated for its potential predictive value.

A SMAD4-modulated gene profile predicts disease-free survival in stage II and III colorectal cancer

Background

Colorectal cancer is the second‐leading cause of cancer‐related mortality in the United States and a leading cause of cancer‐related mortality worldwide. Loss of SMAD4, a critical tumor suppressor and the central node of the transforming growth factor‐beta superfamily, is associated with worse outcomes for colorectal cancer patients; however, it is unknown whether an RNA‐based profile associated with SMAD4 expression could be used to better identify high‐risk colorectal cancer patients.

Aim

Identify a gene expression‐based SMAD4‐modulated profile and test its association with patient outcome.

Methods and results

Using a discovery dataset of 250 colorectal cancer patients, we analyzed expression of BMP/Wnt target genes for association with SMAD4 expression. Promoters of the BMP/Wnt genes were interrogated for SMAD‐binding elements. Fifteen genes were implicated and three tested for modulation by SMAD4 in patient‐derived colorectal cancer tumoroids. Expression of the 15 genes was used for unsupervised hierarchical clustering of a training dataset and two resulting clusters modeled in a centroid model. This model was applied to an independent validation dataset of stage II and III patients. Disease‐free survival was analyzed by the Kaplan‐Meier method. In vitro analysis of three genes identified in the SMAD4‐modulated profile (JAG1, TCF7, and MYC) revealed modulation by SMAD4 consistent with the trend observed in the profile. In the training dataset (n = 553), the profile was not associated with outcome. However, among stage II and III patients (n = 461), distinct clusters were identified by unsupervised hierarchical clustering that were associated with disease‐free survival (p = .02, log‐rank test). The main model was applied to a validation dataset of stage II/III CRC patients (n = 257) which confirmed the association of clustering with disease‐free survival (p = .013, log‐rank test).

Conclusions

A SMAD4‐modulated gene expression profile identified high‐risk stage II and III colorectal cancer patients, can predict disease‐free survival, and has prognostic potential for stage II and III colorectal cancer patients.

Association of SMAD4 loss with drug resistance in clinical cancer patients: A systematic meta-analysis

Background

Drug resistance frequently led to the failure of chemotherapy for malignant cancers, hence causing cancer relapse. Thus, understanding mechanism of drug resistance in cancer is vital to improve the treatment efficacy. Here, we aim to evaluate the association between SMAD4 expression and the drug resistance in cancers by performing a meta-analysis.

Method

Relevant studies detecting SMAD4 expression in cancer patients treated with chemo-drugs up till December 2020 were systematically searched in four common scientific databases using selected keywords. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) was the ratio of hazard rate between SMAD4^neg population vs SMAD4^pos population. The HRs and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to explore the association between SMAD4 expression losses with drug resistance in cancers.

Result

After an initial screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. There were a total of 2092 patients from all the included studies in this analysis. Results obtained indicated that loss of SMAD4 expression was significantly correlated with drug resistance with pooled HRs (95% CI) of 1.23 (1.01–1.45), metastasis with pooled RRs (95% CI) of 1.10 (0.97–1.25) and recurrence with pooled RRs (95% CI) of 1.32 (1.06–1.64). In the subgroup analysis, cancer type, drug type, sample size and antibody brand did not affect the significance of association between loss of SMAD4 expression and drug resistance. In addition, there was no evidence of publication bias as suggested by Begg’s test.

Conclusion

Findings from our meta-analysis demonstrated that loss of SMAD4 expression was correlated with drug resistance, metastasis and recurrence. Therefore, SMAD4 expression could be potentially used as a molecular marker for cancer resistance.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer

Simple Summary

In patients with stage III colon cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine combined with oxaliplatin reduces the risk of recurrence and mortality, with a treatment duration that may be shortened from 6 to 3 months in certain situations allowing to limit toxicities, especially cumulative sensitive neuropathy. However, it is difficult to effectively predict the risk of recurrence individually for each patient. It is indeed necessary not to over-treat patients with potential toxicities of chemotherapy and, conversely, not to under-treat patients at high risk of recurrence, and also to find new treatment approaches for specific subgroups. Though no single biomarker have sufficient predictive value to adapt the therapeutic strategy, we have considerably improved our knowledge of these biomarkers predictive of recurrence in localized colon cancer and many trials testing their ability to guide treatment are ongoing.

Abstract

In patients with stage III colon cancer (CC), adjuvant chemotherapy with the combination of oxapliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine (FOLFOX or CAPOX) is a standard of care. The duration of treatment can be reduced from 6 months to 3 months, depending on the regimen, for patients at low risk of recurrence, without loss of effectiveness and allowing a significant reduction in the risk of cumulative sensitive neuropathy. However, our capacity to identify patients that do really need this doublet adjuvant treatment remains limited. In fact, only 30% at the most will actually benefit from this adjuvant treatment, 50% of them being already cured by the surgery and 20% of them experiencing disease recurrence despite the adjuvant treatment. Thus, it is necessary to be able to better predict individually for each patient the risk of recurrence and the need for adjuvant chemotherapy together with the need of new treatment approaches for specific subgroups. Many biomarkers have been described with their own prognostic weight, without leading to any change in clinical practices for now. In this review, we will first discuss the recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy, and then the different biomarkers described and the future perspectives for the management of stage III CC.

Single-nucleotide variants, tumour mutational burden and microsatellite instability in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Next-generation sequencing results of the FIRE-3 trial

BACKGROUND

Molecular biomarkers and primary tumour sidedness guide treatment decisions in metastatic colorectal cancer. Comprehensive molecular profiling aims to identify targetable alterations and measure tumour mutational burden (TMB) to enable precision oncology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

FoundationOne® next-generation sequencing identified single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), copy number alterations, high TMB (TMB-H) and high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in patients treated in the FIRE-3 trial. Data were correlated with objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-three (49.6%) of 752 patients provided material for this analysis. Frequent SNVs included TP53, APC, KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF, SMAD4 and FBXW7. KRAS, BRAF V600E and SMAD4 mutations were confirmed as prognostic biomarkers by logistic penalised regression for ORR. OS was significantly longer in patients with SMAD4 wild-type (WT) tumours than in those with SMAD4-mutated tumours (hazard ratio = 0.59 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 0.34-1.01], p = 0.05), with a higher probability of ORR [odds ratio, SMAD4 SNV versus WT = 0.32 [95% CI = 0.10-0.98], p = 0.05] when treated with cetuximab. MSI-H (30.0%, p = 0.03) and TMB-H (17.3%, p = 0.003) tumours were enriched by FBXW7 mutations. Numerically lower ORR, OS and PFS were observed in MSI-H tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

RAS, BRAF V600E and SMAD4 mutations were identified as poor prognostic biomarkers in patients of the FIRE-3 trial, whereas improved outcome was observed for BRAF non-V600E mutation. SMAD4 mutation might provide predictive relevance for cetuximab efficacy. MSI-H tumours showed numerically lower ORR, OS and PFS.

Genomic stratification beyond Ras/B-Raf in colorectal liver metastasis patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion

Background

Resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) can cure disease, but many patients with extensive disease cannot be fully resected and others recur following surgery. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy can convert extensive liver disease to a resectable state or decrease recurrence risk, but response varies and no biomarkers currently exist to identify patients most likely to benefit.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of CLM patients receiving HAI chemotherapy whose tumors underwent MSK‐IMPACT sequencing. The frequency of oncogenic alterations and their association with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate were analyzed at the individual gene and signaling pathway levels.

Results

Three hundred and seventy patients met inclusion criteria: 189 (51.1%) who underwent colorectal liver metastasectomy followed by HAI + systemic therapy (Adjuvant cohort), and 181 (48.9%) with unresectable CLM (Metastatic cohort) who received HAI + systemic therapy, consisting of 63 (34.8%) with extrahepatic disease and 118 (65.2%) with liver‐restricted disease. Genomic alterations were similar in each cohort, and no individual gene or pathway was significantly associated with objective response. Patients in the adjuvant cohort with concurrent Ras/B‐Raf alteration and SMAD4 inactivation had worse prognosis while in the metastatic cohort patients with co‐alteration of Ras/B‐Raf and TP53 had worse OS. Similar findings were observed in a validation cohort.

Conclusions

Concurrently altered Ras/B‐Raf and SMAD4 mutations were associated with worse survival in resectable patients, while concurrent Ras/B‐Raf and TP53 alterations were associated with worse survival in unresectable patients. The mutual exclusivity of Ras/B‐Raf, SMAD4, and TP53 may have prognostic value for CLM patients receiving HAI.

Eribulin rapidly inhibits TGF-β-induced Snail expression and can induce Slug expression in a Smad4-dependent manner

Background

Evidence shows that the anticancer effects of microtubule targeting agents are not due solely to their antimitotic activities but also their ability to impair microtubule-dependent oncogenic signalling.

Methods

The effects of microtubule targeting agents on regulators of TGF-β-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) were evaluated in breast cancer cell lines using high content imaging, gene and protein expression, siRNA-mediated knockdown and chromatin immunoprecipitation.

Results

Microtubule targeting agents rapidly and differentially alter the expression of Snail and Slug, key EMT-promoting transcription factors in breast cancer. Eribulin, vinorelbine and in some cases, ixabepalone, but not paclitaxel, inhibited TGF-β-mediated Snail expression by impairing the microtubule-dependent nuclear localisation of Smad2/3. In contrast, eribulin and vinorelbine promoted a TGF-β-independent increase in Slug in cells with low Smad4. Mechanistically, microtubule depolymerisation induces c-Jun, which consequently increases Slug expression in cells with low Smad4.

Conclusion

These results identify a mechanism by which eribulin-mediated microtubule disruption could reverse EMT in preclinical models and in patients. Furthermore, high Smad4 levels could serve as a biomarker of this response. This study highlights that microtubule targeting drugs can exert distinct effects on the expression of EMT-regulating transcription factors and that identifying differences among these drugs could lead to their more rational use.

Loss of SMAD4 protein expression in gastrointestinal and extra-gastrointestinal carcinomas

AIMS

SMAD4 (DPC4) is a tumour suppressor gene that is dysregulated in various tumour types, particularly pancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal carcinomas. Corresponding loss of protein expression has been reported in approximately 50% of pancreatic and 25% of colonic adenocarcinomas. In the evaluation of carcinoma of unknown primary site, immunohistochemical loss of SMAD4 expression is often used to suggest pancreaticobiliary origin, but there are limited data on the spectrum of SMAD4 expression in carcinomas of other sites. This study evaluates the frequency of SMAD4 loss in a large cohort of carcinomas from diverse anatomical sites.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry for SMAD4 was performed on tissue microarrays or whole tissue sections of 1210 carcinomas from various organs: gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas/biliary tract, lung, breast, thyroid, kidney, ovary and uterus. Expression was considered lost when there was complete absence of staining in tumour cell nuclei, in the presence of intact staining in non-neoplastic cells. SMAD4 loss was seen in 58% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 27% of appendiceal adenocarcinomas, 19% of colorectal adenocarcinomas, 16% of cholangiocarcinomas, 10% of lung adenocarcinomas and <5% of oesophageal, breast, gastric and mucinous ovarian adenocarcinomas. All papillary thyroid, hepatocellular, non-mucinous ovarian, endometrial and renal cell carcinomas showed intact SMAD4 nuclear expression.

CONCLUSION

In addition to pancreaticobiliary, appendiceal and colonic tumours, SMAD4 loss is also seen in a small subset of other carcinomas, specifically breast, lung, oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas, all of which are typically CK7-positive, similar to pancreaticobiliary carcinoma. Awareness of SMAD4 loss in these other carcinoma types is helpful in the evaluation of carcinomas of unknown or uncertain primary site.

Clinicopathological Characterization and Prognostic Implication of SMAD4 Expression in Colorectal Carcinoma

Background

SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4) has gained attention as a promising prognostic factor of colorectal cancer (CRC) as well as a key molecule to understand the tumorigenesis and progression of CRC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 1,281 CRC cases immunohistochemically for their expression status of SMAD4, and correlated this status with clinicopathologic and molecular features of CRCs.

Results

A loss of nuclear SMAD4 was significantly associated with frequent lymphovascular and perineural invasion, tumor budding, fewer tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, higher pT and pN category, and frequent distant metastasis. In contrast, tumors overexpressing SMAD4 showed a significant association with sporadic microsatellite instability. After adjustment for TNM stage, tumor differentiation, adjuvant chemotherapy, and lymphovascular invasion, the loss of SMAD4 was found to be an independent prognostic factor for worse 5-year progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.60; p=.042) and 7-year cancer-specific survival (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.99; p=.022).

Conclusions

We confirmed the value of determining the loss of SMAD4 immunohistochemically as an independent prognostic factor for CRC in general. In addition, we identified some histologic and molecular features that might be clues to elucidate the role of SMAD4 in colorectal tumorigenesis and progression.

TGFβ-induced SMAD4-dependent Apoptosis Proceeded by EMT in CRC

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In Saudi Arabia, colorectal cancer is more aggressive and presents at younger age, warranting new treatment strategies. Role of TGFβ/Smad4 signaling pathway in initiation and progression of colorectal cancer is well documented. This study examined the role of TGFβ/Smad4 signaling pathway in a large cohort of Saudi patients with colorectal cancer, followed by in vitro analysis to dissect the dual role of TGFβ on inducing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and apoptosis. Our study demonstrated high frequency of Smad4 alterations with low expression of Smad4 protein identifying a subgroup of aggressive colorectal cancer to be an independent marker for poor prognosis. Functional studies using colorectal cancer cells show that TGFβ induces Smad4-dependent EMT followed by apoptosis. Induction of mesenchymal transcriptional factors, Snail1 and Zeb1, was essential for TGFβ-induced apoptosis. Our results indicate that KLF5 acts as an oncogene in colorectal cancer cells regardless of Smad4 expression and inhibition of KLF5 is requisite for TGFβ-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, TGFβ/Smad4 signal inhibits the transcription of KLF5 that in turn switches Sox4 from tumor promoter to suppressor. A high incidence of Smad4 alterations were found in the Saudi patients with colorectal cancer. Functional study results indicate that TGFβ induces Smad4-dependent EMT followed by apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells.

SMAD4 alteration associates with invasive-front pathological markers and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer

Aims

SMAD4 acts as a tumour suppressor, and the loss of SMAD4 is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Although next‐generation sequencing (NGS) enabled us to detect numerous genetic alterations in a single assay, the clinical significance of SMAD4 alteration detected with NGS has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical significance of SMAD4 alteration detected with NGS in CRC.

Methods and results

We retrospectively investigated 201 patients with stage I–IV CRC, by using a 415‐gene panel. To analyse the relationship between SMAD4 alteration and other clinicopathological characteristics, we evaluated clinicopathological variables, including invasive‐front pathological markers: tumour budding, poorly differentiated cluster, and Crohn‐like lymphoid reaction. Fifty‐six patients (28%) had SMAD4 alteration: 24 and 32 patients had SMAD4 mutation and deletion, respectively. SMAD4 alteration was significantly associated with T category (P = 0.027), N category (P = 0.037), M category (P = 0.028), and invasive‐front pathological markers, such as poorly differentiated cluster grade 3 (P = 0.020) and absence of Crohn‐like lymphoid reaction (P = 0.004). Immunohistochemistry revealed that SMAD4 alteration was significantly associated with loss of SMAD4 (P = 0.023). In 90 patients with stage I–III disease, SMAD4 alteration was significantly associated with poor prognosis for relapse‐free and overall survival (P = 0.047; P = 0.022, respectively). Conversely, in 111 patients with stage IV disease, SMAD4 alteration was not significantly associated with overall survival.

Conclusion

SMAD4 alteration is associated with invasive‐front pathological markers and poor prognosis in stage I–III CRC patients.

MiR-144 inhibits growth and metastasis in colon cancer by down-regulating SMAD4

MicroRNAs (MiRs) are thought to display regulator action in tumor suppression and oncogenesis. miR-144 plays an important role in the development of various cancers, such as colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer, by targetting different molecules potentially involved in many signaling pathways. SMAD4 is a common signaling during tumor progression, and it can inhibit cell proliferation and promote cell motility in most epithelial cells. The present study focused on the effect of miR-144 and SMAD4 on colon cancer in order to find the novel gene therapy target for the treatment of colon cancer. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to assess the expression level of miR-144 in colon cancer tissues and SW620 cells. MTT assay, scratch test, and transwell assay were used to evaluate cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, respectively. Moreover, luciferase assays were utilized to identify the predictive effect of miR-144 on SMAD4. Western blotting was performed to determine the relative expression of protein related to SMAD4. We found miR-144 level was significantly lower in colon cancer tissues and SW620 cells. Moreover, SMAD4 level, both in mRNA and protein, was obviously elevated in colon cancer tissues. Further, miR-144 mimics treatment inhibited cells proliferation, invasion, and migration. Fluorescence intensity of miR-144 mimics group in wild type cells was decreased. MiR-144 mimics repressed the SMAD4 expression both in mRNA and protein. These findings about miR-144/SMAD4 pair provide a novel therapeutic method for colon cancer patients.

Clinicopathological characterization of SMAD4-mutated intestinal adenocarcinomas: A case-control study

The SMAD4 tumor suppressor gene product inhibits transforming growth factor-β-mediated signaling and is mutated in ~10% of colorectal carcinomas. The prognostic significance of SMAD4 mutations has been controversial. We studied the pathological and clinical characteristics of SMAD4-mutated intestinal adenocarcinomas using a retrospective case-control study design. Cases and controls were identified among 443 primary adenocarcinomas that had undergone next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) with the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2, which evaluates 50 cancer-related genes. Twenty-eight SMAD4-mutated (SMAD4m) patients were matched 1:2 with 56 consecutive SMAD4 wild-type (SMAD4wt) control patients from the same analysis stream. Compared with the SMAD4wt controls, the SMAD4m tumors were of higher stage (P = 0.026) and were more likely to feature mucinous differentiation (P = 0.0000), to occur in the setting of Crohn’s disease (P = 0.0041), and to harbor concurrent RAS mutations (P = 0.0178). Tumor mucin content was significantly correlated with mutations involving the MH2 domain of the SMAD4 protein (P = 0.0338). Correspondence between mutation sites and morphology was demonstrated directly in a mixed adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor where SMAD4 mutations involving different protein domains were found in histologically disparate tumor regions despite both containing identical KRAS and TP53 mutations.

Biomarker concordance between primary colorectal cancer and its metastases

Background

The use of biomarkers to target anti-EGFR treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is well-established, requiring molecular analysis of primary or metastatic biopsies. We aim to review concordance between primary CRC and its metastatic sites.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies (1991–2018) reporting on biomarker concordance between primary CRC and its metastatic site(s) was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines using several medical databases. Studies without matched samples or using peripheral blood for biomarker analysis were excluded.

Findings

61 studies including 3565 patient samples were included. Median biomarker concordance for KRAS (n = 50) was 93.7% [[67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]], NRAS (n = 11) was 100% [[90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]], BRAF (n = 22) was 99.4% [[80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]], and PIK3CA (n = 17) was 93% [[42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]]. Meta-analytic pooled discordance was 8% for KRAS (95% CI = 5–10%), 8% for BRAF (95% CI = 5–10%), 7% for PIK3CA (95% CI = 2–13%), and 28% overall (95% CI = 14–44%). The liver was the most commonly biopsied metastatic site (n = 2276), followed by lung (n = 438), lymph nodes (n = 1123), and peritoneum (n = 132). Median absolute concordance in multiple biomarkers was 81% (5–95%).

Interpretation

Metastatic CRC demonstrates high concordance across multiple biomarkers, suggesting that molecular testing of either the primary or liver and lung metastasis is adequate. More research on colorectal peritoneal metastases is required.

SMAD4 Loss in Colorectal Cancer Patients Correlates with Recurrence, Loss of Immune Infiltrate, and Chemoresistance

PURPOSE

SMAD4 has shown promise in identifying patients with colorectal cancer at high risk of recurrence or death.Experimental Design: A discovery cohort and independent validation cohort were classified by SMAD4 status. SMAD4 status and immune infiltrate measurements were tested for association with recurrence-free survival (RFS). Patient-derived xenografts from SMAD4-deficient and SMAD4-retained tumors were used to examine chemoresistance.

RESULTS

The discovery cohort consisted of 364 patients with stage I-IV colorectal cancer. Median age at diagnosis was 53 years. The cohort consisted of 61% left-sided tumors and 62% stage II/III patients. Median follow-up was 5.4 years (interquartile range, 2.3-8.2). SMAD4 loss, noted in 13% of tumors, was associated with higher tumor and nodal stage, adjuvant therapy use, fewer tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and lower peritumoral lymphocyte aggregate (PLA) scores (all P < 0.04). SMAD4 loss was associated with worse RFS (P = 0.02). When stratified by SMAD4 and immune infiltrate status, patients with SMAD4 loss and low TIL or PLA had worse RFS (P = 0.002 and P = 0.006, respectively). Among patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based systemic chemotherapy, those with SMAD4 loss had a median RFS of 3.8 years compared with 13 years for patients with SMAD4 retained. In xenografted mice, the SMAD4-lost tumors displayed resistance to 5-FU. An independent cohort replicated our findings, in particular, the association of SMAD4 loss with decreased immune infiltrate, as well as worse disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show SMAD4 loss correlates with worse clinical outcome, resistance to chemotherapy, and decreased immune infiltrate, supporting its use as a prognostic marker in patients with colorectal cancer.

Smad4/DPC4

Smad4 or DPC4 belongs to a family of signal transduction proteins that are phosphorylated and activated by transmembrane serine-threonine receptor kinases in response to transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling via several pathways. The gene acts as a tumour suppressor gene and inactivation of smad4/DPC4 is best recognised in pancreatic cancer. However, smad4/DPC4 is also mutated in other conditions and cancers such as juvenile polyposis syndrome with and without hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia, colorectal and prostate cancers.Immunohistochemistry for smad4/DPC4 protein is most useful in separating benign/reactive conditions from pancreatic cancer in needle/core biopsies. In normal and reactive states, the protein is localised to the cytoplasm and nucleus, while the protein is lost in high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia/carcinoma in situ and pancreatic cancer.

SMAD4 and NF1 mutations as potential biomarkers for poor prognosis to cetuximab-based therapy in Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Background

Cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, is used in combination with chemotherapy in clinic to enhance the outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with only ~ 20% response rate. To date only activating mutations in KRAS and NRAS have been identified as poor prognosis biomarkers in cetuximab-based treatment, which makes an urgent need for identification of novel prognosis biomarkers to precisely predict patients’ response in order to maximize the benefit.

Methods

In this study, we analysed the mutation profiles of 33 Chinese mCRC patients using comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeting 416 cancer-relevant genes before cetuximab treatment. Upon receiving cetuximab-based therapy, patients were evaluated for drug response, and the progression-free survival (PFS) was monitored. The association of specific genetic alterations and cetuximab efficacy was analyzed.

Results

Patients carrying SMAD4 mutations (SMAD4^mut, n = 8) or NF1 mutations (NF1^mut, n = 4) had significantly shorter PFS comparing to those carrying wildtype SMAD4 (SMAD4^wt, n = 25) (P = 0.0081) or wildtype NF1 (NF1^wt, n = 29) (P = 0.0028), respectively. None of the SMAD4^mut or NF1^mut patients showed response to cetuximab when assessed at 12-week post-treatment. Interestingly, two patients carrying both SMAD4^mut and NF1^mut showed the shortest PFS among all the patients.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that SMAD4 and NF1 mutations can serve as potential biomarkers for poor prognosis to cetuximab-based therapy in Chinese mCRC patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4298-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

SMAD4 gene mutation predicts poor prognosis in patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

Dorsophilia protein, mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD4) is a key mediator in the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling pathway and SMAD4 gene mutations are thought to play a critical role in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression. However, little is known about its influence on survival in patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2015, all patients with known SMAD4 mutation status who underwent resection of CLM were identified. Patients with SMAD4 mutation were compared to those with SMAD4 wild type. Next, the prognostic value of SMAD4 mutation was validated in a separate cohort of patients with synchronous stage IV CRC who underwent systemic therapy alone.

RESULTS

Of 278 patients, 37 (13%) were SMAD4 mutant while 241 (87%) were wild type. Overall survival (OS) after hepatic resection was worse in SMAD4-mutant patients compared to SMAD4 wild type (OS rate at 3 years, 62% vs. 82%; P < 0.0001). Independent predictors for worse OS were poor differentiation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.586; P = 0.007), multiple tumors (HR 1.970; P = 0.01), diameter greater than 3 cm (HR 1.752; P = 0.017), R1 margin status (HR 2.452; P = 0.014), RAS mutation (HR 2.044; P = 0.002), and SMAD4 mutation (HR 2.773; P < 0.0001). Among 237 patients in the validation cohort, SMAD4-mutations were significantly associated with worse 3-year OS rate (22% vs. 38%; P = 0.012) and was an independent predictor for worse OS (HR, 1.647; P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

SMAD4 mutation is independently associated with worse outcomes among patients undergoing resection of CLM.

Cell-free DNA mutations as biomarkers in breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen

The aim was to identify mutations in serum cell-free DNA (cfDNA) associated with disease progression on tamoxifen treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Sera available at start of therapy, during therapy and at disease progression were selected from 10 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients. DNA from primary tumor and normal tissue and cfDNA from minute amounts of sera were analyzed by targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) of 45 genes (1,242 exons). At disease progression, stop-gain single nucleotide variants (SNVs) for CREBBP (1 patient) and SMAD4 (1 patient) and non-synonymous SNVs for AKAP9 (1 patient), PIK3CA (2 patients) and TP53 (2 patients) were found. Mutations in CREBBP and SMAD4 have only been occasionally reported in breast cancer. All mutations, except for AKAP9, were also present in the primary tumor but not detected in all blood specimens preceding progression. More sensitive detection by deeper re-sequencing and digital PCR confirmed the occurrence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and these biomarkers in blood specimens.

Prognostic value of loss of heterozygosity and sub-cellular localization of SMAD4 varies with tumor stage in colorectal cancer

Background

Although loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosome location 18q21 and decreased expression of SMAD4 in invasive colorectal cancers (CRCs) correlate with poor patient survival, the prognostic value of LOH at 18q21 and sub-cellular localization of SMAD4 have not been evaluated in relation to tumor stage.

Methods

Genomic DNA samples from 209 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sporadic CRC tissues and their matching controls were analyzed for 18q21 LOH, and corresponding tissue sections were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for expression of SMAD4 and assessed for its sub-cellular localization (nuclear vs. cytoplasmic). In addition, 53 frozen CRCs and their matching control tissues were analyzed for their mutational status and mRNA expression of SMAD4. The phenotypic expression pattern and LOH status were evaluated for correlation with patient survival by the use of Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.

Results

LOH of 18q21 was detected in 61% of the informative cases. In 8% of the cases, missense point mutations were detected in Smad4. In CRCs, relative to controls, there was increased SMAD4 staining in the cytoplasm (74%) and decreased staining in the nuclei (37%). LOH of 18q21 and high cytoplasmic localization of SMAD4 were associated with shortened overall survival of Stage II patients, whereas low nuclear expression of SMAD4 was associated with worse survival, but only for patients with Stage III CRCs.

Conclusions

LOH of 18q21 and high cytoplasmic localization of SMAD4 in Stage II CRCs and low nuclear SMAD4 in Stage III CRCs are predictors of shortened patient survival.

Smad4 re-expression increases the sensitivity to parthenolide in colorectal cancer

Parthenolide (PT), a sesquiterpene lactone extracted from the plant feverfew, has been demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties. Although PT has been revealed to markedly inhibit colorectal cancer cell proliferation, the inhibitory effects decrease with administration time. These findings revealed that colorectal cancer cells develop resistance to PT. However, the underlying mechanism is unclear. In the present study we observed significantly low expression of Smad4 in 3 PT-resistant cell lines (HCT‑116/PT, HT-29/PT and Caco-2/PT), which were obtained using in vitro concentration gradient-increased induction, but not in their parental cells. In the present study we used the lentiviral‑mediated transfection method to upregulate Smad4 in resistant colorectal cancer cell lines. Flow cytometry assay was used to assess cell apoptosis. Cell migration was detected using a QCM™ 24-well Fluorimetric Cell Migration Assay kit. Our study showed that Smad4 overexpression notably decreased the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for PT in the 3 PT-resistant cell lines, and improved the inhibitory effects of PT on cell migration and enhanced apoptosis in vitro as well as suppressed xenografted tumors in a PT-resistant colorectal cancer mouse model. Further study by western blotting into the underlying mechanism demonstrated that Smad4 overexpression suppressed the expression of MDR1 in the resistant cells, and resulted in the accumulation of PT, which in turn promoted the expession of caspase-3 and Bax and inhibited the expression of Bcl-2 and the phosphorylation of NF-κB p65. In short, Smad4 re-expression may be crucial for enhancing the sensitivity and reversing the resistance to PT in PT-resistant colorectal cancer cells.

Current and future biomarkers in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. CRC develops as a consequence of genomic instability, characterized by various genetic and epigenetic alterations. Its molecular heterogeneity explains the large variability in patient prognosis and treatment response, emphasizing the need for development of accurate prognostic and predictive biomarkers. This article delineates the different pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis and its molecular subtype classification. With this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current and future biomarkers guiding clinical decision-making and CRC treatment.

Morphological characterization of colorectal cancers in The Cancer Genome Atlas reveals distinct morphology-molecular associations: clinical and biological implications

The Cancer Genome Atlas data on colorectal carcinoma have provided a comprehensive view of the tumor's genomic alterations and their tumorigenic roles. Tumor morphology, however, has not been fully integrated into the analysis. The aim of this study was to explore relevant associations between tumor morphology and the newly characterized genomic alterations in colorectal carcinoma. Two hundred and seven colorectal carcinomas that had undergone whole-exome sequencing as part of The Cancer Genome Atlas project and had adequate virtual images in the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics constituted our study population. Upon analysis, a tight association between 'microsatellite instability-high histology' and microsatellite instability-high (P<0.001) was readily detected and helped validate our image-based histology evaluation. Further, we showed, (1) among all histologies, the not otherwise specified type had the lowest overall mutation count (P<0.001 for entire cohort, P<0.03 for the microsatellite-instable group), and among the microsatellite-instable tumors, this type also correlated with fewer frameshift mutations in coding mononucleotide repeats of a defined set of relevant genes (P<0.01); (2) cytosine phosphate guanine island methylator phenotype-high colorectal cancers with or without microsatellite instability tended to have different histological patterns: the former more often mucinous and the latter more often not otherwise specified; (3) mucinous histology was associated with more frequent alterations in BRAF, PIK3CA, and the transforming growth factor-β pathway when compared with non-mucinous histologies (P<0.001, P=0.01, and P<0.001, respectively); and (4) few colorectal cancers (<9%) exhibited upregulation of immune-inhibitory genes including major immune checkpoints; these tumors were primarily microsatellite-instable (up to 43%, vs <3% in microsatellite-stable group) and had distinctly non-mucinous histologies with a solid growth. These morphology-molecular associations are interesting and propose important clinical implications. The morphological patterns associated with alterations of immune checkpoint genes bear the potential to guide patient selection for clinical trials that target immune checkpoints in colorectal cancer, and provide directions for future studies.

Important molecular genetic markers of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in the incidences of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. CRC is rather heterogeneous with regard to molecular genetic characteristics and pathogenic pathways. A wide spectrum of biomarkers is used for molecular subtype determination, prognosis, and estimation of sensitivity to different drugs in practice. These biomarkers can include germline and somatic mutations, chromosomal aberrations, genomic abnormalities, gene expression alterations at mRNA or protein level and changes in DNA methylation status. In the present review we discuss the most important and well-studied CRC biomarkers, and their potential clinical significance and current approaches to molecular classification of colorectal tumors.

Colorectal cancer carcinogenesis: a review of mechanisms

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer in women and the third most common in men globally. CRC arises from one or a combination of chromosomal instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, and microsatellite instability. Genetic instability is usually caused by aneuploidy and loss of heterozygosity. Mutations in the tumor suppressor or cell cycle genes may also lead to cellular transformation. Similarly, epigenetic and/or genetic alterations resulting in impaired cellular pathways, such as DNA repair mechanism, may lead to microsatellite instability and mutator phenotype. Non-coding RNAs, more importantly microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs have also been implicated at various CRC stages. Understanding the specific mechanisms of tumorigenesis and the underlying genetic and epigenetic traits is critical in comprehending the disease phenotype. This paper reviews these mechanisms along with the roles of various non-coding RNAs in CRCs.

Colorectal cancer carcinogenesis: a review of mechanisms

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer in women and the third most common in men globally. CRC arises from one or a combination of chromosomal instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, and microsatellite instability. Genetic instability is usually caused by aneuploidy and loss of heterozygosity. Mutations in the tumor suppressor or cell cycle genes may also lead to cellular transformation. Similarly, epigenetic and/or genetic alterations resulting in impaired cellular pathways, such as DNA repair mechanism, may lead to microsatellite instability and mutator phenotype. Non-coding RNAs, more importantly microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs have also been implicated at various CRC stages. Understanding the specific mechanisms of tumorigenesis and the underlying genetic and epigenetic traits is critical in comprehending the disease phenotype. This paper reviews these mechanisms along with the roles of various non-coding RNAs in CRCs.

Genomic aberrations in young and elderly breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Age at breast cancer diagnosis is a known prognostic factor. Previously, several groups including ours have shown that young age at diagnosis is associated with higher prevalence of basal-like tumors and aggressive tumor phenotypes. Yet the impact of age at diagnosis on the genomic landscape of breast cancer remains unclear. In this study, we examined the pattern of somatic mutations, chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) and transcriptomic profiles in young and elderly breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Analyses were performed on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, classified as normal-like by PAM50 or had missing clinical information were excluded. Young patients were defined as ≤45 years of age, while elderly patients were those ≥70 years of age at breast cancer diagnosis. The remaining patients were classified as "intermediate". We evaluated the association between age at diagnosis and somatic mutations, CNV and gene expression in a logistic regression model adjusting for tumor size, nodal status, histology and breast cancer subtype. All analyses were corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg approach.

RESULTS

In this study, 125, 486 and 169 patients were ≤45, 46-69 and ≥70 years of age, respectively. Older patients had more somatic mutations (n = 44 versus 35 versus 31; P = 0.0009) and more CNVs, especially in ductal tumors (P = 0.02). Eleven mutations were independently associated with age at diagnosis, of which only GATA3 was associated with young age (15.2% versus 8.2% versus 9%; P = 0.003). Only two CNV events were independently associated with age, with more chr18p losses in older patients and more chr6q27 deletions in younger ones. Younger age at diagnosis was associated with higher expression of gene signatures related to proliferation, stem cell features and endocrine resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Age adds a layer of biological complexity beyond breast cancer molecular subtypes, classic pathological and clinical variables, worthy of further consideration in future drug development as we seek to refine therapeutic strategies in the era of personalized medicine.