Testing algorithm for identification of patients with TRK fusion cancer

Feasibility of two-step approach for screening NTRK fusion in two major subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer within a large cohort

Our objective is to investigate a cost-effective approach to screen for NTRK fusion in the major subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evaluate the concordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), as well as between fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and NGS, to detect any discrepancies in methodological consistency between lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Analyze the factors influencing IHC results. A cohort of 1654 patients with NSCLC underwent screening for NTRK fusion using whole slide IHC. The positive cases were analyzed by both FISH and NGS. Totally, 57 tested positive for pan-TRK, with positivity rates of 0.68% (10/1467) for LADC and 29.01% (47/162) for LSCC. FISH showed separate NTRK1 and NTRK3 rearrangements in two pan-TRK-positive LADCs, while all LSCCs tested negative. NGS confirmed functional NTRK fusion in two FISH-positive cases: one involving TPM3-NTRK1 and the other involving SQSTM1-NTRK3. A non-functional fusion of NTRK2-XRCC1 was detected in LSCC, while FISH was negative. According to our approach, the prevalence of NTRK fusion in NSCLC is 0.12%. The concordance rate between IHC and RNA-based NGS was 20% (2/10) in LADC and 0% (0/162) in LSCC. When the positive criteria increased over 50% of tumor cells showing strong staining, the concordance would be 100% (2/2). A concordance rate of 100% (2/2) was observed between FISH and RNA-based NGS in LADC. The expression of pan-TRK was significantly correlated with the tumor proportion score (TPS) of PD-L1 (p < 0.05) and transcript per million (TPM) values of NTRK2 (p < 0.05). We recommend using IHC with strict criteria to screen NTRK fusion in LADC rather than LSCC, confirmed by RNA-based NGS directly. When the NGS results are inconclusive, FISH validation is necessary.

Prevalence and detection methodology for preliminary exploration of NTRK fusion in gastric cancer from a single-center retrospective cohort

The fusion of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) is a novel target for cancer therapy and offers hope for patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, there are few studies on the prevalence and detection methods of NTRK fusions in GC. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening method to select cases for molecular testing and evaluated the effectiveness of IHC, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). We retrospectively collected 1970 patients with GC. Pan-TRK IHC was conducted in all cases, and three cases were positive: one with strong and diffuse cytoplasmic staining, while two with weak cytoplasmic staining. All three cases were validated using NTRK1/2/3 FISH. FISH results revealed a single 3' signal of NTRK1 in 95% of the tumor cells in the first case, while the remaining two cases were negative. NGS confirmed LMNA-NTRK1 fusion in the first case, with no gene fusion detected in the other two cases. Out of 46 negative controls, one had a non-functional fusion of IGR-NTRK1, and four had point mutations. The case with LMNA-NTRK1 fusion were negative for pMMR, EBV, HER2, and AFP. The pan-TRK IHC showed a 33.33% (1/3) concordance rate with RNA-based NGS. If the criterion for positivity was 3+ cytoplasmic staining, the agreement between IHC and RNA-based NGS was 100% (1/1). In conclusion, the incidence of NTRK fusion in GC is extremely low (0.05%). If the criteria are strict, pan-TRK IHC is highly effective for screening NTRK fusions. FISH could complement NGS detection, particularly when NTRK fusion is detected by DNA sequencing. NTRK fusion in GC may not be limited to specific subtypes.

Current trends in the management of Gastro-oEsophageal cancers: Updates to the ESSO core curriculum (ESSO-ETC-UGI-WG initiative)

Gastro-oEsophageal Cancers (GECs) are severe diseases whose management is rapidly evolving. The European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) is committed to the generation and spread of knowledge, and promotes the multidisciplinary management of cancer patients through its core curriculum. The present work discusses the approach to GECs, including the management of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancers (OMEC), the diagnosis and management of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer (GC), the management of Siewert Type II tumors, the importance of mesogastric excision, the role of robotic surgery, textbook outcomes, organ preserving options, the use of molecular markers and immune check-point inhibitors in the management of patients with GECs, as well as the improvement of current clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with GECs. The aim of the present review is to provide a concise overview of the state-of-the-art on the management of patients with GECs and, at the same time, to share the latest advancements in the field and to foster the debate between surgical oncologists treating GECs worldwide. We are sure that our work will, at the same time, give an update to the advanced surgical oncologists and help the training surgical oncologists to settle down the foundations for their future practice.

Kinase expression in angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma: panTRK is commonly expressed in the absence of NTRK rearrangement

Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (AFH) is a soft tissue tumour of intermediate (rarely metastasising) malignant potential, which harbours EWSR1/FUS gene fusions. These tumours can express anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) in the absence of gene rearrangement or copy number alteration and can also coexpresses Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC). All EWSR1/FUS-rearranged AFH were retrieved from the files of three institutions and Pan-TRK (EPR17341), ALK and BRAF V600E IHC were performed. Fourteen AFH cases were identified, which included three cases of intracranial mesenchymal tumours with FET-CREB fusions. PanTRK and ALK positive immunostaining was identified in 9 (64.2%) and 12 (85.7%) cases, respectively. No NTRK or ALK translocations or increased copy number/amplification were identified in all eight cases which had fluorescence in situ hybridisation and/or next generation sequencing for NTRK1-3 and ALK available for assessment. None of the cases expressed BRAF-V600E.Although our study is limited, our report is the first to document PanTRK expression in AFH in the absence of identifiable NTRK1-3 gene alterations.

Efficient Identification of Patients With NTRK Fusions Using a Supervised Tumor-Agnostic Approach

CONTEXT.—

The neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) family gene rearrangements have been recently incorporated as predictive biomarkers in a "tumor-agnostic" manner. However, the identification of these patients is extremely challenging because the overall frequency of NTRK fusions is below 1%. Academic groups and professional organizations have released recommendations on the algorithms to detect NTRK fusions. The European Society for Medical Oncology proposal encourages the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) if available, or alternatively immunohistochemistry (IHC) could be used for screening with NGS confirmation of all positive IHC results. Other academic groups have included histologic and genomic information in the testing algorithm.

OBJECTIVE.—

To apply some of these triaging strategies for a more efficient identification of NTRK fusions within a single institution, so pathologists can gain practical insight on how to start looking for NTRK fusions.

DESIGN.—

A multiparametric strategy combining histologic (secretory carcinomas of the breast and salivary gland; papillary thyroid carcinomas; infantile fibrosarcoma) and genomic (driver-negative non-small cell lung carcinomas, microsatellite instability-high colorectal adenocarcinomas, and wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors) triaging was put forward.

RESULTS.—

Samples from 323 tumors were stained with the VENTANA pan-TRK EPR17341 Assay as a screening method. All positive IHC cases were simultaneously studied by 2 NGS tests, Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 and FoundationOne CDx. With this approach, the detection rate of NTRK fusions was 20 times higher (5.57%) by only screening 323 patients than the largest cohort in the literature (0.30%) comprising several hundred thousand patients.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Based on our findings, we propose a multiparametric strategy (ie, "supervised tumor-agnostic approach") when pathologists start searching for NTRK fusions.

Discovery, Optimization, and Evaluation of Novel Pyridin-2(1H)-one Analogues as Potent TRK Inhibitors for Cancer Treatment

Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion, an oncogenic form of kinase with pan-tumor occurrence, is a clinically validated important antitumor target. In this study, we screened our in-house kinase inhibitor library against TRK and identified a promising hit compound 4 with a novel pyridin-2(1H)-one scaffold. Through a combination of structure-based drug design and structure-activity relationship (SAR) study, compound 14q was identified as a potent TRK inhibitor with good kinase selectivity. It also blocked cellular TRK signaling, thereby inhibiting TRK-dependent cell viability. Additionally, 14q displayed acceptable pharmacokinetic properties with 37.8% oral bioavailability in mice. Strong in vivo tumor growth inhibition of 14q was observed in subcutaneous M091 and KM12 tumor xenograft models with TRK fusion, causing significant tumor inhibition or even complete tumor regression.

Detection of NTRK gene fusions in solid tumors: recommendations from a Latin American group of oncologists and pathologists

NTRK gene fusions have been detected in more than 25 types of tumors and their prevalence is approximately 0.3% in solid tumors. This low prevalence makes identifying patients who could benefit from TRK inhibitors a considerable challenge. Furthermore, while numerous papers on the evaluation of NTRK fusion genes are available, not all countries have guidelines that are suitable for their setting, as is the case with Latin America. Therefore, a group of oncologists and pathologists from several countries in Latin America (Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay) met to discuss and reach consensus on how to identify patients with NTRK gene fusions in solid tumors. To do so, they developed a practical algorithm, considering their specific situation and limitations.

Detection of NTRK fusions by RNA-based nCounter is a feasible diagnostic methodology in a real-world scenario for non-small cell lung cancer assessment

NTRK1, 2, and 3 fusions are important therapeutic targets for NSCLC patients, but their prevalence in South American admixed populations needs to be better explored. NTRK fusion detection in small biopsies is a challenge, and distinct methodologies are used, such as RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry, and RNA-based nCounter. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and concordance of positive samples for NTRK fusions using a custom nCounter assay in a real-world scenario of a single institution in Brazil. Out of 147 NSCLC patients, 12 (8.2%) cases depicted pan-NTRK positivity by IHC. Due to the absence of biological material, RNA-based NGS and/or nCounter could be performed in six of the 12 IHC-positive cases (50%). We found one case exhibiting an NTRK1 fusion and another an NTRK3 gene fusion by both RNA-based NGS and nCounter techniques. Both NTRK fusions were detected in patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma, with no history of tobacco consumption. Moreover, no concomitant EGFR, KRAS, and ALK gene alterations were detected in NTRK-positive patients. The concordance rate between IHC and RNA-based NGS was 33.4%, and between immunohistochemistry and nCounter was 40%. Our findings indicate that NTRK fusions in Brazilian NSCLC patients are relatively rare (1.3%), and RNA-based nCounter methodology is a suitable approach for NRTK fusion identification in small biopsies.

Treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: A rapidly evolving landscape

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma represent frequent and severe diseases whose management has radically changed over the last 10 years. With the advent of second- and third-line standard therapies for metastatic GC patients in the 2010s, the molecular dismemberment of the disease and positive trials with immunotherapy and targeted agents will mark the 2020s. New treatment options have emerged in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting. In addition to improved multimodal treatment in operable patients, new subgroups have emerged depending on molecular alterations (HER2, Microsatellite instability) or expression of specific proteins in the tumour (PDL1, Claudin 18.2) making immunohistochemistry central in profiling the tumour for an optimal individualised management. The aim of this review is to describe the current standards of management of early and late stage GC and the molecular markers needed today to optimally manage our patients together with future perspectives on this disease.

Nerve Growth Factor and Autoimmune Diseases

NGF plays a crucial immunomodulatory role and increased levels are found in numerous tissues during autoimmune states. NGF directly modulates innate and adaptive immune responses of B and T cells and causes the release of neuropeptides and neurotransmitters controlling the immune system activation in inflamed tissues. Evidence suggests that NGF is involved in the pathogenesis of numerous immune diseases including autoimmune thyroiditis, chronic arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, mastocytosis, and chronic granulomatous disease. Furthermore, as NGF levels have been linked to disease severity, it could be considered an optimal early biomarker to identify therapeutic approach efficacy. In conclusion, by gaining insights into how these molecules function and which cells they interact with, future studies can devise targeted therapies to address various neurological, immunological, and other disorders more effectively. This knowledge may pave the way for innovative treatments based on NGF manipulation aimed at improving the quality of life for individuals affected by diseases involving neurotrophins.

Multicenter Harmonization Study of Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry for the Detection of NTRK3 Fusions

Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry has been described as a screening test for the detection of NTRK fusions in a broad spectrum of tumor types. However, pan-Trk testing in the clinical setting may be limited by many factors, including analytical parameters such as clones, platforms, and protocols used. This study aimed to harmonize pan-Trk testing using various clones and immunohistochemical (IHC) platforms and to evaluate the level of analytical variability across pathology laboratories. We developed several IHC pan-Trk assays using clones EPR17341 (Abcam) and A7H6R (Cell Signaling Technology) on Ventana/Roche, Agilent, and Leica platforms. To compare them, we sent unstained sections of a tissue microarray containing 9 cases with NTRK3 fusions to participating laboratories, to perform staining on Ventana/Roche (10 centers), Agilent (4 centers), and Leica (3 centers) platforms. A ready-to-use pan-Trk IVD assay (Ventana/Roche) was also performed in 3 centers. All slides were centrally and blindly reviewed for the percentage of stained tumor cells. Laboratory-developed tests with clone EPR17341 were able to detect pan-Trk protein expression in all cases, whereas lower rates of positivity were observed with clone A7H6R. Moderate to strong variability of the positive cases rate was observed with both antibodies in each IHC platforms type and each of the positivity cut points evaluated (≥1%, ≥10%, and ≥50% of stained tumor cells). The rate of false-negative cases was lower when pan-Trk staining was assessed with the lowest positivity threshold (≥1%). In conclusion, most evaluated pan-Trk IHC laboratory-developed tests were able to detect NTRK3-fusion proteins; however, a significant analytical variability was observed between antibodies, platforms, and centers.

The significance of tissue-agnostic biomarkers in solid tumors: the more the merrier?

INTRODUCTION

To date, several emerging biomarkers have gained considerable interest in the field of predictive molecular oncology. The advent of precision medicine has led to the development of innovative drugs targeting rare molecular pathways independently from histology, defined as tissue-agnostic drugs.

AREAS COVERED

Although there is a lot of promise for this new tissue-agnostic model in the oncological scenario, crucial issues from both the diagnostic and therapeutic standpoint are emerging. This review aims to critically examine the role of tissue-agnostic biomarkers in different solid tumors, focusing on the prevalence and methods of detection of agnostic biomarkers together with drug approvals to guide clinicians in this evolving landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

To strengthen the framework for tissue-agnostic approvals, the dialogue between regulatory, industrial, and academic parties should be intensified. Critical questions include the development of an efficient network system that can overcome the heterogeneity of patients' inclusion criteria along with the increasingly difficult interpretation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) profiling technologies. Cost-effectiveness and risk-benefit studies are needed in the national context considering the modalities of access to diagnostic tests and reimbursement of treatments.

Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion positive tumors: a historical cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

NTRK gene fusions have been identified in various tumors; some requiring aggressive therapy and sometimes new TRK inhibitors (TRKi). We aimed to describe a national, unselected, retrospective, multicenter cohort.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients were identified through the French sarcoma diagnostic laboratory at Institut Curie through samples analyzed by RT-qPCR or whole-transcriptome sequencing.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2019, 65 NTRK fusion tumors were identified within 2120 analyses (3.1%): 58 by RNA sequencing (including 20 after RT-qPCR analysis) and 7 exclusively by RT-qPCR. Of the 61 patients identified, 37 patients had infantile soft tissue or kidney fibrosarcomas (IFS), 15 other mesenchymal (Other-MT) and nine central nervous system (CNS) tumors. They encompassed 14 different tumor types with variable behaviors. Overall, 53 patients had surgery (3 mutilating), 38 chemotherapy (20 alkylating agents/anthracycline), 11 radiotherapy, two 'observation strategy' and 13 received TRKi. After a median follow-up of 61.0 months [range, 2.5-226.0], 10 patients died. Five-year overall survival is, respectively, 91.9% [95%CI, 83.5-100.0], 61.1% [95%CI, 34.2-100.0] and 64.8% [95%CI, 39.3-100.0] for IFS, Other-MT, and CNS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

NTRK-fusion positive tumors are rare but detection is improved through RNA sequencing. TRKi could be considered at diagnosis for CNS NTRK-fusion positive tumors, some IFS, and Other-MT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not adapted.

NTRK fusions in solid tumours: what every pathologist needs to know

Fusions involving the Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene family (NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3) are targetable oncogenic alterations that are found in a diverse range of tumours. There is an increasing demand to identify tumours which harbour these fusions to enable treatment with selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as larotrectinib and entrectinib. NTRK fusions occur in a wide range of tumours including rare tumours such as infantile fibrosarcoma and secretory carcinomas of the salivary gland and breast, as well as at low frequencies in more common tumours including melanoma, colorectal, thyroid and lung carcinomas. Identifying NTRK fusions is a challenging task given the different genetic mechanisms underlying NTRK fusions, their varying frequency across different tumour types, complicated by other factors such as tissue availability, optimal detection methods, accessibility and costs of testing methods. Pathologists play a key role in navigating through these complexities by determining optimal approaches to NTRK testing which has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. This review provides an overview of tumours harbouring NTRK fusions, the importance of identifying these fusions, available testing methods including advantages and limitations, and generalised and tumour-specific approaches to testing.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in adult and pediatric patients with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have reported the efficacy of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors against neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusion gene-positive advanced solid tumors. The accumulated evidence of tumor-agnostic agent has made since TRK inhibitors were approved and used in clinical practice. Therefore, we have revised the 'Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO)/Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO)-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in adult and pediatric patients with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive advanced solid tumors, cooperated by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO)'.

METHODS

Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO, and the public comments among all societies' members was done.

RESULTS

The current guideline describes 3 clinical questions and 14 recommendations for whom, when, and how NTRK fusion should be tested, and what is recommended for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors.

CONCLUSION

The committee proposed 14 recommendations for performing NTRK testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from TRK inhibitors.

Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the journey from molecular background to the role of bone marrow transplant-review article

Philadelphia chromosome-like (Ph-like) ALL is a recent subtype of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Although it does not express the BCR-ABL fusion gene, it has a behavior like true BCR/ABL1-positive cases. This subtype harbors different molecular alterations most commonly CRLF2 rearrangements. Most cases of Ph-like ALL are associated with high white blood cell count, high minimal residual disease level after induction therapy, and high relapse rate. Efforts should be encouraged for early recognition of Ph-like ALL to enhance therapeutic strategies. Recently, many trials are investigating the possibility of adding the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to chemotherapy to improve clinical outcomes. The role and best timing of allogeneic bone marrow transplant in those cases are still unclear. Precision medicine should be implemented in the treatment of such cases. Here in this review, we summarize the available data on Ph-like ALL.

Performances of the Idylla GeneFusion Assay: contribution to a rapid diagnosis of targetable gene fusions in tumour samples

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the performances of the Idylla GeneFusion Assay (IGFA) designed to detect, in a single, rapid and fully automated assay, ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 gene fusions and MET exon 14 skipping in cancer samples.

METHODS

Based on a set of tumours enriched in cases with gene fusions, we applied the IGFA to tumour areas of various sizes and tumour cell contents. IGFA results were compared with those obtained with other methods (immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridisation, DNA and RNA next-generation sequencing).

RESULTS

We selected 68 tumours: 49 cases with known gene fusions (8 ALK, 8 ROS1, 5 RET, 7 NTRK1, 3 NTRK2 and 6 NTRK3 ones) or MET exon 14 skipping mutations (12 cases) and 19 cases with no fusion and no MET mutation. We performed 128 IGFA tests on distinct tissue areas. The global sensitivity and specificity of the IGFA were, respectively, 62.82% and 99.2% with variations between molecular targets and tissue areas. Of note, 72.5% sensitivity and 98.79% specificity were obtained in 37 tissue areas fulfilling the manufacturer's recommendations (ie, at least 10% of tumour cells in at least 20 mm² of tissue area). The rate of non-conclusive results was higher in small samples with low percentages of tumour cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The IGFA could contribute to the rapid detection of targetable gene fusions and mutations, especially in context of rapidly growing cancers requiring urgent therapeutic choices.

NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms: a clinicopathological and molecular study of 13 cases with peculiar characteristics at one of the largest institutions in China

NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms (NTRK-RSCNs) represent an emerging group of rare tumours defined using molecular means. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no large series of reports about this tumour in the Chinese population in English full-text articles. Herein, we present 13 NTRK-RSCNs with peculiar characteristics. Ten of the 13 (77%) patients were children without sex differences. The tumour locations included six trunks, four extremities, two recta, and one small bowel. The histological morphology included four lipofibromatosis-like neural tumour (LPF-NT)-like, eight malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNST)/fibrosarcoma-like, and one extremely rare myxofibrosarcoma-like pattern. Immunohistochemically, all cases were CD34, pan-TRK and TRK-A positive, SOX-10 negative, and H3K27me3 intact. S-100 protein expression was identified in 11 of 13 (85%) cases. Genetically, NTRK1 rearrangements were considered positive (7/13, 54%) or suspicious for positivity (6/13, 46%) by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Next-generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing confirmed NTRK1 fusions with a variety of partner genes, including five LMNA, three TPM3, one SQSTM1, three novel CPSF6, IGR (downstream PMVK), and GAS2L1 genes. Interestingly, the last tumour concurrently harboured a second EWSR1-PBX1 fusion, which has never been reported. Four patients developed local recurrence and two of them suffered metastasis. In our study, NTRK-RSCNs had peculiar fusions that displayed unusual or complicated clinicopathological features. Histological clues and IHC helped streamline a small subset of potential candidates. Although FISH is a powerful technology for identifying NTRK rearrangements, RNA-/DNA-based NGS is recommended for highly suspected cases in which FISH signal patterns are not discernible as classic positive patterns, particularly if targeted therapy is considered.

Consensus Recommendations to Optimize the Detection and Reporting of NTRK Gene Fusions by RNA-Based Next-Generation Sequencing

The detection of gene fusions by RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an emerging method in clinical genetic laboratories for oncology biomarker testing to direct targeted therapy selections. A recent Canadian study (CANTRK study) comparing the detection of NTRK gene fusions on different NGS assays to determine subjects’ eligibility for tyrosine kinase TRK inhibitor therapy identified the need for recommendations for best practices for laboratory testing to optimize RNA-based NGS gene fusion detection. To develop consensus recommendations, representatives from 17 Canadian genetic laboratories participated in working group discussions and the completion of survey questions about RNA-based NGS. Consensus recommendations are presented for pre-analytic, analytic and reporting aspects of gene fusion detection by RNA-based NGS.

Molecular characterisation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with NTRK fusions and review of the literature

AIMS

The majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) harbour oncogenic mutations in KRAS with variants in TP53, CDKN2A and SMAD4 also prevalent. The presence of oncogenic fusions including NTRK fusions are rare but important to identify. Here we ascertain the prevalence of NTRK fusions and document their genomic characteristics in a large series of PDAC.

METHODS

Whole genome sequencing and RNAseq were performed on a series of patients with resected or locally advanced/metastatic PDAC collected between 2008 and 2020 at a single institution. A subset of specimens underwent immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. Clinical and molecular characterisation and IHC sensitivity and specificity were evaluated.

RESULTS

400 patients were included (resected n=167; locally advanced/metastatic n=233). Three patients were identified as harbouring an NTRK fusion, two EML4-NTRK3 (KRAS-WT) and a single novel KANK1-NTRK3 fusion. The latter occurring in the presence of a subclonal KRAS mutation. Typical PDAC drivers were present including mutations in TP53 and CDKN2A. Substitution base signatures and tumour mutational burden were similar to typical PDAC. The prevalence of NTRK fusions was 0.8% (3/400), while in KRAS wild-type tumours, it was 6.25% (2/32). DNA prediction alone documented six false-positive cases. RNA analysis correctly identified the in-frame fusion transcripts. IHC analysis was negative in the KANK1-NTRK3 fusion but positive in a EML4-NTRK3 case, highlighting lower sensitivity of IHC.

CONCLUSION

NTRK fusions are rare; however, with emerging therapeutic options targeting these fusions, detection is vital. Reflex testing for KRAS mutations and subsequent RNA-based screening could help identify these cases in PDAC.

CANTRK: A Canadian Ring Study to Optimize Detection of NTRK Gene Fusions by Next-Generation RNA Sequencing

The Canadian NTRK (CANTRK) study is an interlaboratory comparison ring study to optimize testing for neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusions in Canadian laboratories. Sixteen diagnostic laboratories used next-generation sequencing (NGS) for NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 fusions. Each laboratory received 12 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples with unique NTRK fusions and two control non-NTRK fusion samples (one ALK and one ROS1). Laboratories used validated protocols for NGS fusion detection. Panels included Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3, Oncomine Focus Assay, Oncomine Precision Assay, AmpliSeq for Illumina Focus, TruSight RNA Pan-Cancer Panel, FusionPlex Lung, and QIAseq Multimodal Lung. One sample was withdrawn from analysis because of sample quality issues. Of the remaining 13 samples, 6 of 11 NTRK fusions and both control fusions were detected by all laboratories. Two fusions, WNK2::NTRK2 and STRN3::NTRK2, were not detected by 10 laboratories using the Oncomine Comprehensive or Focus panels, due to absence of WNK2 and STRN3 in panel designs. Two fusions, TPM3::NTRK1 and LMNA::NTRK1, were challenging to detect on the AmpliSeq for Illumina Focus panel because of bioinformatics issues. One ETV6::NTRK3 fusion at low levels was not detected by two laboratories using the TruSight Pan-Cancer Panel. Panels detecting all fusions included FusionPlex Lung, Oncomine Precision, and QIAseq Multimodal Lung. The CANTRK study showed competency in detection of NTRK fusions by NGS across different panels in 16 Canadian laboratories and identified key test issues as targets for improvements.

NGF and BDNF in pediatrics syndromes

Neurotrophins (NTs) as nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) play multiple roles in different settings including neuronal development, function and survival in both the peripheral and the central nervous systems from early stages. This report aims to provide a summary and subsequent review of evidences on the role of NTs in rare and non-common pediatric human diseases associated with changes in neurodevelopment. A variety of diseases has been analyzed and many have been linked to NTs neurobiological effects, including chronic granulomatous disease, hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Angelman syndrome, fragile X syndrome, trisomy 16, Williams-Beuren syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, WAGR syndrome, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, Down syndrome and Klinefelter Syndrome. NTs alterations have been associated with numerous pathologic manifestations including cognitive defects, behavioral abnormalities, epilepsy, obesity, tumorigenesis as well as muscle-skeletal, immunity, bowel, pain sensibility and cilia diseases. In this report, we discuss that further studies are needed to clear a possible therapeutic role of NTs in these still often uncurable diseases.

Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry as screening tool for NTRK fusions: A diagnostic workflow for the identification of positive patients in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Pan-TRK inhibitors Entrectinib and Larotrectinib have been recently approved as tumor-agnostic therapies in NTRK1-2-3 rearranged patients and there is therefore an urgent need to identify reliable and accessible biomarkers for capturing NTRK fusions in the real-world practice.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess the analytical validity of the recently released pan-TRK assay (Ventana), running a head-to-head comparison between immunohistochemistry and Archer FusionPlex Lung Panel (ArcherDX) that is designed to detect key fusions in 13 genes, also including NTRK1-3.

METHODS

Pan-TRK IHC and NGS analysis were conducted on a retrospective/prospective cohort of 124 cancer patients (carcinomas, 93 cases; soft tissue sarcomas, 19; primary central nervous system tumours, 10; and neuroblastomas, 2). FISH data were available in most of the IHC/NGS discordant cases.

RESULTS

A comparison between IHC and NGS results was carried out in 117 cases: among 30 pan-TRK positive cases, NTRK rearrangement by NGS was found in 11 (37%), while one of the 87 (1.1%) pan-TRK negative cases (a case of NSCLC) showed a TPM3-NRTK1 rearrangement by NGS. Accordingly, sensitivity and specificity of IHC in predicting NTRK status were 91.7% and 81.9%, respectively, while negative (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were 98.8% and 36.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data lead to suggest that IHC with VENTANA pan-TRK antibody can be a reliable screening tool for the identification of patients potentially bearing NTRK rearranged tumours.

Brazilian Expert Consensus for NTRK Gene Fusion Testing in Solid Tumors

Oncogenic neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase gene fusions occur in less than 1% of common cancers. These mutations have emerged as new biomarkers in cancer genomic profiling with the approval of selective drugs against tropomyosin receptor kinase fusion proteins. Nevertheless, the optimal pathways and diagnostic platforms for this biomarker's screening and genomic profiling have not been defined and remain a subject of debate. A panel of national experts in molecular cancer diagnosis and treatment was convened by videoconference and suggested topics to be addressed in the literature review. The authors proposed a testing algorithm for oncogenic neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase gene fusion screening and diagnosis for the Brazilian health system. This review aims to discuss the latest literature evidence and international consensus on neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase gene fusion diagnosis to devise clinical guidelines for testing this biomarker. We propose an algorithm in which testing for this biomarker should be requested to diagnose advanced metastatic tumors without known driver mutations. In this strategy, Immunohistochemistry should be used as a screening test followed by confirmatory next-generation sequencing in immunohistochemistry-positive cases.

Biological Mechanism-based Neurology and Psychiatry: A BACE1/2 and Downstream Pathway Model

In oncology, comprehensive omics and functional enrichment studies have led to an extensive profiling of (epi)genetic and neurobiological alterations that can be mapped onto a single tumor's clinical phenotype and divergent clinical phenotypes expressing common pathophysiological pathways. Consequently, molecular pathway-based therapeutic interventions for different cancer typologies, namely tumor type- and site-agnostic treatments, have been developed, encouraging the real-world implementation of a paradigm shift in medicine. Given the breakthrough nature of the new-generation translational research and drug development in oncology, there is an increasing rationale to transfertilize this blueprint to other medical fields, including psychiatry and neurology. In order to illustrate the emerging paradigm shift in neuroscience, we provide a state-of-the-art review of translational studies on the β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme (BACE) and its most studied downstream effector, neuregulin, which are molecular orchestrators of distinct biological pathways involved in several neurological and psychiatric diseases. This body of data aligns with the evidence of a shared genetic/biological architecture among Alzheimer's disease, schizoaffective disorder, and autism spectrum disorders. To facilitate a forward-looking discussion about a potential first step towards the adoption of biological pathway-based, clinical symptom-agnostic, categorization models in clinical neurology and psychiatry for precision medicine solutions, we engage in a speculative intellectual exercise gravitating around BACE-related science, which is used as a paradigmatic case here. We draw a perspective whereby pathway-based therapeutic strategies could be catalyzed by highthroughput techniques embedded in systems-scaled biology, neuroscience, and pharmacology approaches that will help overcome the constraints of traditional descriptive clinical symptom and syndrome-focused constructs in neurology and psychiatry.

Interlaboratory Comparison Study (Ring Test) of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based NTRK Fusion Detection in South Korea

PURPOSE

Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors are approved for the treatment of neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive tumors. The detection of NTRK fusion using a validated method is required before therapeutic application. An interlaboratory comparison study of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based NTRK gene fusion detection with validated clinical samples was conducted at six major hospitals in South Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 18 samples, including a positive standard reference and eight positive and nine negative clinical samples, were validated using the VENTANA pan-TRK (EPR17341) and TruSight Oncology 500 assays. These samples were then tested using four different NGS panels currently being used at the six participating institutions.

RESULTS

NTRK fusions were not detected in any of the nine negative clinical samples, demonstrating 100% specificity in all six participating institutions. All assays showed 100% analytical sensitivity to identify the NTRK fusion status in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, although with variable clinical sensitivity. False-negative results were due to low tumor purity, poor RNA quality, and DNA-based sequencing panel. The RNA-based targeted NGS assay showed an overall high success rate of identifying NTRK fusion status in FFPE samples.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to test the proficiency of NGS-based NTRK detection in South Korea with the largest participating institutions. RNA-based NGS assays to detect NTRK fusions can accurately characterize fusion transcripts if sufficient RNA of adequate quality is available. The comparative performance data will support the implementation of targeted NGS-based sequencing assays for NTRK fusion detection in routine diagnostics.

Prevalence of NTRK Fusions in Canadian Solid Tumour Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions occur in ~ 0.3% of all solid tumours but are enriched in some rare tumour types. Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib are approved as tumour-agnostic therapies for solid tumours harbouring NTRK fusions.

METHODS

This study investigated the prevalence of NTRK fusions in Canadian patients and also aimed to help guide NTRK testing paradigms through analysis of data reported from a national clinical diagnostic testing program between September 2019 and July 2021.

RESULTS

Of 1,687 patients included in the final analysis, NTRK fusions were detected in 0.71% (n = 12) of patients representing salivary gland carcinoma (n = 3), soft tissue sarcoma (n = 3), CNS (n = 3), and one in each of melanoma, lung, and colorectal cancer. All three salivary gland carcinomas contained ETV6-NTRK3 fusions. Thirteen (0.77%) clinically actionable incidental findings were also detected. Two of the 13 samples containing incidental findings were NTRK fusion-positive (GFOD1-NTRK2, FGFR3-TACC3 in a glioblastoma and AFAP1-NTRK2, BRAF c.1799T>A in a glioma). The testing algorithm screened most patient samples via pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), whereas samples from the central nervous system (CNS), pathognomonic cancers, and confirmed/ putative NTRK fusion-positive samples identified under research protocols were reflexed straight to next-generation sequencing (NGS).

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the benefit and practicality of a diagnostic testing program to identify patients suitable for tumour-agnostic TRK inhibitor therapies, as well as other targeted therapies, due to clinically actionable incidental findings identified. Collectively, these findings may inform future guidance on selecting the appropriate testing approach per tumour type and on optimal NTRK testing algorithms.

Tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) signalling: targeted therapy in neurogenic tumours

Tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB), a transmembrane receptor protein, has been found to play a pivotal role in neural development. This protein is encoded by the neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (NTRK2) gene, and its abnormal activation caused by NTRK2 overexpression or fusion can contribute to tumour initiation, progression, and resistance to therapeutics in multiple types of neurogenic tumours. Targeted therapies for this mechanism have been designed and developed in preclinical and clinical studies, including selective TrkB inhibitors and pan-TRK inhibitors. This review describes the gene structure, biological function, abnormal TrkB activation mechanism, and current-related targeted therapies in neurogenic tumours.

Clinical Value Screening, Prognostic Significance, and Key Gene Identification of TrkB in Laryngeal Carcinoma

Purpose

Using human gene chip expression profiling technology to screen out downstream genes related to TrkB regulation in laryngeal cancer cells.

Methods

Using the Hep-2 TrkB shRNA cell line, divide it into an experimental group (shNTRK2) and a control group (PLKO1), and use the human gene expression microarray to screen out the differential genes. Then, select 10 upregulated genes and 10 downregulated genes from the differential genes, and use RT-PCR to verify whether the screening results of human gene expression microarray profiles are reliable. Use GO, KEGG, and miRNA enrichment analyses, PPI network diagram, etc., to analyze the differential genes and further screen out the key genes.

Results

A total of 318 differential genes (87 upregulated genes and 231 downregulated genes) were screened in laryngeal cancer cells. Use RT-PCR for the 10 upregulated differential genes (DMKN, FHL1, FOXN4, GGNBP1, HOXB9, ABCB1, TNFAI, RGS2, LINC01133, and FGG) and 10 downregulated differential genes (CHI3L1, FMOD, IGFBP1, IRF5, SPARC, NPAS4, TRPS1, TRAP, COL8A1, and DNER), and the results are consistent with the chip results, confirming the accuracy of the chip results; GO analysis results show that the downstream differential genes (DEGs) regulated by TrkB are mainly involved in biological processes such as retinol metabolic process, diterpenoid metabolic process, and regulation of cell-substrate adhesion. DEGs mainly affect cytoskeletal protein binding, serotonin-activated cation-selective channel activity, and sphingosine molecular functions. DEGs are mainly enriched in the cell periphery, secretory granule, cytoplasmic membrane-bounded vesicle lumen, blood microparticle, and other molecular components. The results of disease enrichment analysis show that the downstream differential genes regulated by TrkB are mainly involved in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, hematologic disease, meningococcal disease, lung cancer, susceptibility, asthma, and other diseases. The PPI network diagram results showed 7 hub genes, and then, we used GO analysis and KEGG enrichment analysis to see the biological process, cell component, molecular functions, and biological pathways.

Conclusion

Gene chip technology was used to screen out the differential genes of TrkB epigenetic modification in the Hep-2 cell line, and seven key genes (ALDH1A1, SDR16C5, PIK3R1, PLCG2, IL2RG, PIK3CD, and SPARC) were further screened using bioinformatics technology.

Çocukluk Çağı Kanserlerinde NTRK Somatik Füzyonları ve Tümör Agnostik Tedavi

Nörotrofik tirozin reseptör kinaz (NTRK) geni yeniden düzenlemeleri yakın zamanda kanser tedavisi için yeni hedefler olarak ortaya konulan biyobelirteçlerden (biyomarker) bir tanesi olarak tanımlanmış ve geliştirilmiştir. NTRK gen füzyonları öngörücü (prediktif-tanısal) bir biyobelirteç olarak kullanılmasının yanı sıra tedavi hedefi olarak da kullanılarak bireyselleştirilmiş hedef tedavide yerini almıştır. NTRK füzyon proteinlerinin selektif inhibitörleri, NTRK füzyon pozitif solid tümörlerin tedavisinde güçlü etkinliğe sahiptir (tümör-agnostik tedavi). Tümörlerinde NTRK füzyonları saptanan hastaların tedavisinde etkili olan FDA (Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Gıda ve İlaç Yönetimi) onaylı yeni tedavilerle birlikte, bu füzyonların test edilmesi önemli hale gelmiştir. Yapılan klinik çalışmalar birinci nesil tirozin reseptör kinaz (TRK) inhibitörleri olan larotrectinib ve entrectinibin NTRK füzyonu pozitif kanserlerin tedavisinde yüksek oranda başarılı olduğu görülmüştür. İlerleyen zamanlarda bu ilaçlar üzerine geniş kapsamlı araştırmaların sayısının artması bu ilaçlar hakkında daha fazla bilgiyi mevcut kılacak ve faydalı olacaktır.

Toward in vivo proof of binding of 18F-labeled inhibitor [18F]TRACK to peripheral tropomyosin receptor kinases

BACKGROUND

Tropomyosin receptor kinases (TrkA, TrkB, TrkC) are a family of tyrosine kinases primarily expressed in neuronal cells of the brain. Identification of oncogenic alterations in Trk expression as a driver in multiple tumor types has increased interest in their role in human cancers. Recently, first- and second-generation ¹¹C and ¹⁸F-labeled Trk inhibitors, e.g., [¹⁸F]TRACK, have been developed. The goal of the present study was to analyze the direct interaction of [¹⁸F]TRACK with peripheral Trk receptors in vivo to prove its specificity for use as a functional imaging probe.

METHODS

In vitro uptake and competition experiments were carried out using the colorectal cancer cell line KM12. Dynamic PET experiments were performed with [¹⁸F]TRACK, either alone or in the presence of amitriptyline, an activator of Trk, entrectinib, a Trk inhibitor, or unlabeled reference compound TRACK in KM12 tumor-bearing athymic nude mice as well as B6129SF2/J and corresponding B6;129S2-Ntrk2^tm1Bbd/J mice. Western blot and immunohistochemistry experiments were done with KM12 tumors, brown adipose tissue (BAT), and brain tissue samples.

RESULTS

Uptake of [¹⁸F]TRACK was increasing over time reaching 208 ± 72% radioactivity per mg protein (n = 6/2) after 60 min incubation time. Entrectinib and TRACK competitively blocked [¹⁸F]TRACK uptake in vitro (IC₅₀ 30.9 ± 3.6 and 29.4 ± 9.4 nM; both n = 6/2). [¹⁸F]TRACK showed uptake into KM12 tumors (SUV_mean,60 min 0.43 ± 0.03; n = 6). Tumor-to-muscle ratio reached 0.9 (60 min) and 1.2 (120 min). In TrkB expressing BAT, [¹⁸F]TRACK uptake reached SUV_mean,60 min 1.32 ± 0.08 (n = 7). Activation of Trk through amitriptyline resulted in a significant radioactivity increase of 21% in KM12 tumor (SUV_mean,60 min from 0.53 ± 0.01 to 0.43 ± 0.03; n = 6; p < 0.05) and of 21% in BAT (SUV_mean,60 min from 1.32 ± 0.08; n = 5 to 1.59 ± 0.07; n = 6; p < 0.05) respectively. Immunohistochemistry showed TrkB > TrkA expression on BAT fat cells, but TrkA > TrkB in whole brain. WB analysis showed sevenfold higher TrkB expression in BAT versus KM12 tumor tissue.

CONCLUSION

The present data show that radiotracer [¹⁸F]TRACK can target peripheral Trk receptors in human KM12 colon cancer as well as brown adipose tissue as confirmed through in vitro and in vivo blocking experiments. Higher TrkB versus TrkA protein expression was detected in brown adipose tissue of mice confirming a peripheral functional role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in adipose tissue.

Limited Accuracy of Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry Screening for NTRK Rearrangements in Follicular-Derived Thyroid Carcinoma

Patients with advanced thyroid cancer harboring NTRK rearrangements can be treated with highly effective selective inhibitors. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis, to detect Trk protein expression, represents an appealing screening strategy for NTRK rearrangements, but its efficacy has been poorly explored in thyroid cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic utility of Trk IHC in the identification of NTRK rearrangements. A series of 26 follicular-derived thyroid tumors, positive for NTRK rearrangements, and 28 NTRK fusion-negative controls were retrospectively analyzed by IHC using the pan-Trk monoclonal antibody (clone EPR17341) on the Ventana system. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated by ROC analysis. Trk expression was detected in 25 samples, including 22 out of the 26 NTRK-rearranged (84.6%) and three out of 28 NTRK-negative samples (10.7%). Four out of twenty-six NTRK-rearranged thyroid tumors were negative for Trk expression (15.4%), all carrying the ETV6/NTRK3 fusion. The AUC, sensitivity and specificity were 0.87, 0.85 and 0.89, respectively. A screening based on IHC analysis showed limited sensitivity and specificity in the identification of NTRK-rearranged tumors. Since falsely negative results could preclude the administration of effective targeted drugs, alternative detection strategies should be considered for thyroid cancer.

Pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry and NTRK Gene Fusions in Primary Carcinomas of the Liver

Gene fusions involving NTRK are not common in solid tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the TRK protein expression and molecular characteristics of gene fusions in primary liver carcinomas. A total of 110 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and 69 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were retrieved for tissue microarray (TMA) construction and clinicopathologic characterization. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for pan-TRK was initially performed on TMA slides and evaluated for staining intensity. Twelve (10.9%) of 110 HCC showed weak cytoplasmic TRK expression by IHC on TMA, while all others, including 69 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, were negative for TRK. The TRK expression did not correlate with patient's age, sex, tumor differentiation, or tumor stage. The 12 cases were then validated by IHC on whole sections but all turned out to be negative. Further, RNA sequencing analysis did not detect any NTRK fusions in all 12 HCC cases; however, it did identify many fusions frequently involving genes that encode mitochondrial and ribosomal proteins, microRNAs, and some transcription factors. A few fusions were recurrent, including MT-ATP6/MT-ATP8 fusion (n=9, 75%), Ig κ light chain gene IGKV/IGKJ fusion (n=5, 41.7%), and histocompatibility complex gene HLA-C/HLA-B fusion (n=4, 33.3%). In summary, NTRK fusion is very rare in primary liver carcinomas. IHC on TMA for TRK expression yields high false positive results, which should be validated on whole sections and confirmed by molecular genetic studies such as RNA sequencing. Many fusions involving genes other than NTRK are detected in HCC, the significance of which warrants further studies.

Tropomyosin receptor kinase protein expression in Thai cholangiocarcinoma: Clinicopathological correlation, expression pattern, and prognosis

OBJECTIVE

Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) gene fusion was found in association with many tumors and could be a target of treatment. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of TRK is widely used to screening this alternation.

AIM

To investigate the expression of TRK protein detected by IHC in Thai cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) whereas the high endemic area of liver fluke infection and correlate with clinicopathological and survival data.

METHODS

Retrospective study of CCA patients who diagnosed from January 2011 to December 2015. The TRK IHC was performed on paraffin-embedded tissues.

RESULTS

A total of 85 CCA patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 59 y (range; 35-79). Tumors were situated at intrahepatic (42 cases, 49.4 %), perihilar (41 cases, 48.2 %) and extrahepatic (2 cases, 2.4 %). The TRK IHC was expressed in 26 cases (31 %) and most of them (25 cases, 96.2 %) showed focal cytoplasmic expression with weak intensity. TRK IHC expression was not correlated with clinicopathological findings. Nevertheless, the median survival time of the TRK IHC positive and negative groups were 1.88-year and 1.30-year, respectively (p = 0.041) with the hazard ratio of 0.564 (p = 0.039, 95%CI 0.328-0.971).

CONCLUSION

In Thai CCA, TRK IHC was detected about 1/3 of the patients and most expressed focally in the cytoplasm with weak staining. TRK expression showed better overall survival and was an independent prognostic factor. As the screening assays, the TRK IHC is wildly available with rapid, and high sensitivity but the confirmatory testing is necessary in tumors with low incidence of NTRK gene fusion.

Rationale and design of ON-TRK: a novel prospective non-interventional study in patients with TRK fusion cancer treated with larotrectinib

BACKGROUND

Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion proteins resulting from neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are rare primary oncogenic drivers in a wide array of tumors. Larotrectinib is a first-in-class, highly selective, central nervous system-active TRK inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and over 40 countries for the treatment of TRK fusion solid tumors in adult and pediatric patients. Due to the rarity of TRK fusion cancer, larotrectinib was granted accelerated approval based on a relatively small number of patients enrolled in three early phase trials. ON-TRK aims to evaluate the safety profile of larotrectinib in a broader population and over extended time periods.

METHODS

ON-TRK is a prospective, non-interventional, open-label, multicenter, multi-cohort, post-approval study in adult and pediatric patients with locally advanced or metastatic TRK fusion cancer treated with larotrectinib that will describe the safety and effectiveness of larotrectinib in real-world practice conditions. Adult patients will be grouped by tumor type and followed for at least 2 years. Patients < 18 years old will be enrolled under a 'pediatric' cohort regardless of tumor type and will be followed for 5 years to evaluate the risk of potential long-term adverse effects of larotrectinib on their growth and development. The effectiveness of larotrectinib in the overall study population as well as in patient subgroups will also be evaluated. Procedures avoided in patients with infantile fibrosarcoma (e.g., amputation) and the number of patients who were able to undergo surgery with a curative intent (excluding amputation) because of the use of larotrectinib will be described. Larotrectinib treatment patterns in real-world practice, including dosing and duration of treatment, will be described.

DISCUSSION

The FDA Accelerated Approval Program allows for earlier approval of and patient access to drugs that treat serious conditions and fill an unmet medical need. This study is designed to fulfill post-approval requirements set by the FDA as well as post-marketing requirements set forth by local regulatory bodies and is part of the risk management plan for the EMA.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04142437 ).

PROTOCOL VERSION

v2.5, 25 March 2021.

NTRK gene fusions in solid tumors: agnostic relevance, prevalence and diagnostic strategies

A number of innovative drugs, developed for precision medicine, have shown impressive activity in neoplastic patients with rare molecular targets, independently from the site and type of tumor. This gave rise to the concept of agnostic treatments in oncology. The detection of such rare targets is a prerequisite for these treatments and is nowadays one of the main challenges in diagnostic molecular pathology. Various algorithms, new diagnostic strategies and pathological workflows have been suggested to help pathologists in the detection of these rare molecular alterations. An emblematic example of biological targets for agnostic treatments is represented by genetic rearrangements affecting members of the Neurotrophic Tyrosine Receptor Kinase (NTRK) gene family. These gene rearrangements have an unusual dual mode of distribution: the first, at high frequency in some very rare neoplasms, and the second with extremely lower frequencies in more common tumors. Even in the context of an agnostic approach, knowledge of site, histotype and prevalence of the tumors carrying these genetic lesions may be helpful to guide the pathologist in the daily effort in search of these molecular alterations. This review examines the prevalence of NTRK gene fusions in different forms of solid tumors, based on the largest studies to date, reports a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm and an innovative pathological workflow for rapid screening.

Tropomyosin-Related Kinase Fusions in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Simple Summary

The canonical mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are typically activating mutations in KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Imatinib, the treatment of choice for GISTs, shows a lower response in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs. Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion, which can be treated with an NTRK target agent, has been reported in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs, and, therefore, the Yonsei Cancer Center analyzed NTRK fusion incidence in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs. At the Yonsei Cancer Center, NTRK fusion was confirmed in 16% of cases. Confirmation of NTRK fusion in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs provides important information for improving therapeutic outcomes. NTRK fusion was confirmed in 16% of KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GIST cases at the Yonsei Cancer Center. Confirmation of NTRK fusion in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs will improve therapeutic outcomes.

Abstract

The canonical mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are typically activating mutations in KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). GISTs with non-canonical mutations are a heterogeneous group. Here, we examined tropomyosin-related kinase (TRK) fusion in GIST cases without KIT/PDGFRA mutations (KIT/PDGFRA wild-type (WT) GISTs). We retrospectively analyzed patients who were diagnosed with GISTs at the Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, between January 1998 and December 2016. Thirty-one patients with KIT/PDGFRA WT GISTs were included in the analysis. TRK expression in tumor samples was assessed by pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), and the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK: the gene encoding TRK) rearrangement was analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). IHC analyses revealed that five cases in this cohort exhibited a weak to moderate TRK expression. NTRK1 fusions were detected in three tumor samples, and two samples harbored NTRK3 fusions. The remaining 26 samples did not harbor NTRK fusions. Two types of NTRK fusions were detected, and the overall NTRK fusion frequency in KIT/PDGFRA WT GIST cases was 16% (5/31). Our data provide insights into the molecular alterations underpinning KIT/PDGFRA WT GISTs. More effort should be devoted to improve methods to identify this distinct disease subtype within the KIT/PDGFRA WT GIST group.

Larotrectinib Treatment for Patients With TRK Fusion-Positive Salivary Gland Cancers

BACKGROUND

Larotrectinib is a first-in-class, highly selective, and central nervous system-active tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with TRK fusion cancer. We report the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland cancer treated with larotrectinib were identified from two clinical trials (NCT02122913 and NCT02576431). Patients received larotrectinib 100 mg twice daily (BID) except for one patient who received 150 mg BID in the phase I trial. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

At the data cut-off (July 20, 2020), 24 patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland cancer had been treated. The most common histologies were secretory carcinoma (54%), adenocarcinoma (25%), and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (13%). All 24 patients had an ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. The ORR was 92% (95% confidence interval, 73-99). Best overall response was complete response in three (13%) patients, partial response in 19 (79%), and progressive disease in two (8%). The rate of progression-free survival at 24 months was 78% (median follow-up 30.9 months). Most treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2, and no patients discontinued treatment due to AEs.

CONCLUSION

Larotrectinib demonstrated robust and durable efficacy in patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland tumors of various histologies, and a favorable safety profile. These findings support NTRK gene fusion testing in patients with advanced salivary gland cancers.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBERS

NCT02122913 and NCT02576431.

FFPE-Based NGS Approaches into Clinical Practice: The Limits of Glory from a Pathologist Viewpoint

The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the molecular diagnostic armamentarium is deeply changing pathology practice and laboratory frameworks. NGS allows for the comprehensive molecular characterization of neoplasms, in order to provide the best treatment to oncologic patients. On the other hand, NGS raises technical issues and poses several challenges in terms of education, infrastructures and costs. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the main NGS sequencing platforms that can be used in current molecular diagnostics and gain insights into the clinical applications of NGS in precision oncology. Hence, we also focus on the preanalytical, analytical and interpretative issues raised by the incorporation of NGS in routine pathology diagnostics.

The Use of Pan-Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase Immunohistochemistry as a Screening Tool for the Detection of Neurotrophic Tropomyosin-Related Kinase Fusions: Real-World Data from a National Multicentric Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

The neurotrophic tropomyosin-related kinase (NTRK) genes encode the tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKs). Patients with solid tumors harboring an oncogenic NTRK fusion are eligible for treatment with TRK inhibitors. NTRK fusion is often associated with TRK overexpression. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) is used to screen for NTRK fusions, but immunoreactivity patterns are poorly defined.

METHODS

Data on pan-TRK immunoreactivity patterns in 2,669 solid tumors (comprising carcinomas, sarcomas, and melanocytic lesions) were retrospectively collected by nine laboratories and comprised tumor type, percentage of pan-TRK-positive tumor cells, staining intensity, cytoplasmic, membrane and/or nuclear staining pattern, and the presence or absence of NTRK fusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 2,457 tumors (92%) were pan-TRK negative and 212 neoplasms (8%) were pan-TRK positive. Twenty-two pan-TRK-positive tumors (0.8%) harbored an NTRK fusion, representing 10% of all pan-TRK-positive tumors. Cytoplasmic immunoreactivity was most often observed, followed by membrane immunoreactivity. Nuclear pan-TRK positivity was least frequent, but was most often (33%) associated with NTRK fusion.

CONCLUSION

Pan-TRK IHC can be used to screen for NTRK fusions, especially in commonly diagnosed solid tumors with low NTRK fusion prevalence. In case of pan-TRK immunoreactivity, regardless of its intensity and tumor cell percentage, subsequent molecular tests should be performed to formally confirm the presence or absence of NTRK fusions.

NTRK Fusions Detection in Paediatric Sarcomas to Expand the Morphological Spectrum and Clinical Relevance of Selected Entities

Undifferentiated round cell sarcomas (URCS) of soft tissue and bone and tumours of uncertain differentiation (TUD) are commonly ascribed to a subset of neoplasms with low frequency of NTRK gene fusions. However, more recently NTRK-rearranged round and spindle cell tumours have been noted in case reports and in limited or heterogeneous cohorts. The aim of our study was to investigate the presence of NTRK gene fusions in a large retrospective cohort of paediatric URCS and TUD after a systematic review of the diagnosis, according to the recently updated WHO classification scheme. One-hundred and five patients with diagnosis of URCS or TUD, involving the bone or soft tissue, were retrospectively evaluated. After the case selection and the histopathological review of the case cohort, pan-Trk immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Tumour RNA was extracted from FFPE tissue and subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) library preparation, using a 10-gene NGS fusion panel, sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq. The NGS-positive cases were further confirmed by real-time PCR. On immunohistochemical screening, 12/105 (11.4%) cases were positive using the pan-Trk antibody, showing three different staining patterns with the cytoplasmic distribution being most common. Molecular analysis using NGS and confirmed by the real-rime PCR detected two positive cases for the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. The histological pattern of the two positive cases, together with the demonstration of the NTRK rearrangement, leaded to re-classify these previously not otherwise specified sarcomas with uncertain differentiation into the emerging category of NTRK-rearranged neoplasms. In addition, we found the two NTRK fused neoplasms showing a clinical indolent course, in contrast with literature.

NTRK Fusion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Diagnosis, Therapy, and TRK Inhibitor Resistance

Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusion has been identified as an oncogenic driver of various solid tumors, and it is rare in non-smalll cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a frequency of approximately less than 1%. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is of priority for detecting NTRK fusions, especially RNA-based NGS. Currently, the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have shown promising efficacy and well tolerance in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors, regardless of tumor histology. The first-generation TRK inhibitors (larotrectinib and entrectinib) are recommended as the first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with positive NTRK fusion. However, TRK inhibitor resistance can eventually occur due to on-target or off-target mechanisms. Further studies are under investigation to overcome resistance and improve survival. Interestingly, NTRK fusion might be the mechanism of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Regarding immunotherapy, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC patients harboring NTRK fusion has yet to be well described. In this review, we elucidate the function of NTRK genes, summarize the diagnostic techniques for NTRK fusions, and present clinical data for TRK inhibitors; we also discuss potential mechanisms of resistance to TRK inhibitors.

Detection of NTRK Fusions and TRK Expression and Performance of pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry in Routine Diagnostics: Results from a Nationwide Community-Based Cohort

Gene fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 are rare drivers of cancer that can be targeted with histology-agnostic inhibitors. This study aimed to determine the nationwide landscape of NTRK/TRK testing in the Netherlands and the usage of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a preselection tool to detect NTRK fusions. All pathology reports in 2017–2020 containing the search term ‘TRK’ were retrieved from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Patient characteristics, tumor histology, NTRK/TRK testing methods, and reported results were extracted. NTRK/TRK testing was reported for 7457 tumors. Absolute testing rates increased from 815 (2017) to 3380 (2020). Tumors were tested with DNA/RNA-based molecular assay(s) (48%), IHC (47%), or in combination (5%). A total of 69 fusions involving NTRK1 (n = 22), NTRK2 (n = 6) and NTRK3 (n = 41) were identified in tumors from adult (n = 51) and pediatric (n = 18) patients. In patients tested with both IHC and a molecular assay (n = 327, of which 29 NTRK fusion-positive), pan-TRK IHC had a sensitivity of 77% (95% confidence interval (CI), 56–91) and a specificity of 84% (95% CI, 78–88%). These results showed that pan-TRK IHC has a low sensitivity in current routine practice and warrants the introduction of quality guidelines regarding the implementation and interpretation of pan-TRK IHC.

Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework

BACKGROUND

The first histology-independent marketing authorisation in Europe was granted in 2019. This was the first time that a cancer treatment was approved based on a common biomarker rather than the location in the body at which the tumour originated. This research aims to explore the implications for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisals.

METHODS

Targeted reviews were undertaken to determine the type of evidence that is likely to be available at the point of marketing authorisation and the analyses required to support National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisals. Several challenges were identified concerning the design and conduct of trials for histology-independent products, the greater levels of heterogeneity within the licensed population and the use of surrogate end points. We identified approaches to address these challenges by reviewing key statistical literature that focuses on the design and analysis of histology-independent trials and by undertaking a systematic review to evaluate the use of response end points as surrogate outcomes for survival end points. We developed a decision framework to help to inform approval and research policies for histology-independent products. The framework explored the uncertainties and risks associated with different approval policies, including the role of further data collection, pricing schemes and stratified decision-making.

RESULTS

We found that the potential for heterogeneity in treatment effects, across tumour types or other characteristics, is likely to be a central issue for National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisals. Bayesian hierarchical methods may serve as a useful vehicle to assess the level of heterogeneity across tumours and to estimate the pooled treatment effects for each tumour, which can inform whether or not the assumption of homogeneity is reasonable. Our review suggests that response end points may not be reliable surrogates for survival end points. However, a surrogate-based modelling approach, which captures all relevant uncertainty, may be preferable to the use of immature survival data. Several additional sources of heterogeneity were identified as presenting potential challenges to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisal, including the cost of testing, baseline risk, quality of life and routine management costs. We concluded that a range of alternative approaches will be required to address different sources of heterogeneity to support National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisals. An exemplar case study was developed to illustrate the nature of the assessments that may be required.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequately designed and analysed basket studies that assess the homogeneity of outcomes and allow borrowing of information across baskets, where appropriate, are recommended. Where there is evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effects and estimates of cost-effectiveness, consideration should be given to optimised recommendations. Routine presentation of the scale of the consequences of heterogeneity and decision uncertainty may provide an important additional approach to the assessments specified in the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence methods guide.

FURTHER RESEARCH

Further exploration of Bayesian hierarchical methods could help to inform decision-makers on whether or not there is sufficient evidence of homogeneity to support pooled analyses. Further research is also required to determine the appropriate basis for apportioning genomic testing costs where there are multiple targets and to address the challenges of uncontrolled Phase II studies, including the role and use of surrogate end points.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 76. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Pan-tumor screening for NTRK gene fusions using pan-TRK immunohistochemistry and RNA NGS fusion panel testing

Targetable NTRK gene fusions can be detected across tumor types using methodologies such as pan-TRK IHC, DNA or RNA NGS testing, or FISH. Challenges for implementation of clinical testing for NTRK fusions may arise due to the range in NTRK fusion prevalence across tumors, endogenous levels of TRK expression in tissues, and the large number of potential fusion partners. In this study, we examined our experience evaluating driver mutation negative lung, urothelial or cholangiocarcinoma cases, in addition to cases with positive, equivocal, or weak staining by pan-TRK IHC for NTRK fusions. 63/127 (49.6%) of these cases were positive for pan-TRK IHC, of which 71.4% showed weak or focal staining, potentially due to physiologic or non-specific TRK expression. Of these 127 cases, 4 harbored a NTRK fusion (1 fusion was seen in two separate samples from the same patient) as confirmed by RNA fusion panel testing. Pan-TRK IHC was positive in 1 case with TPM3-NTRK1 fusion, equivocal in 1 case with GOLGA4-NTRK3 fusion, and negative in 2 samples with ADAM19-NTRK3 fusion. Our findings show that we were able to successfully identify NTRK fusions that resulted in targeted therapy. However, our results suggest limited sensitivity of pan-TRK IHC for NTRK3 fusions, and that the reduced specificity for pan-TRK IHC in tumors with physiologic or non-specific TRK expression, results in false positive samples that require confirmatory testing by RNA based NGS.

Diagnostic testing approaches for the identification of patients with TRK fusion cancer prior to enrollment in clinical trials investigating larotrectinib

INTRODUCTION

NTRK gene fusions are targetable oncogenic drivers independent of tumor type. Prevalence varies from highly recurrent in certain rare tumors to <1% in common cancers. The selective TRK inhibitor larotrectinib was shown to be highly active in adult and pediatric patients with tumors harboring NTRK gene fusions.

METHODS

We examined the techniques used by local sites to detect tumor NTRK gene fusions in patients enrolled in clinical trials of larotrectinib. We also report the characteristics of the detected fusions in different tumor types.

RESULTS

The analysis included 225 patients with 19 different tumor types. Testing methods used were next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 196 of 225 tumors (87%); this was RNA-based in 96 (43%); DNA-based in 53 (24%); DNA/RNA-based in 46 (20%) and unknown in 1 (<1%); FISH in 14 (6%) and PCR-based in 12 (5%). NanoString, Sanger sequencing and chromosome microarray were each utilized once (<1%). Fifty-four different fusion partners were identified, 39 (72%) of which were unique occurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common local testing approach was RNA-based NGS. Many different NTRK gene fusions were identified with most occurring at low frequency. This supports the need for validated and appropriate testing methodologies that work agnostic of fusion partners.

Diagnosis and management of TRK fusion cancer

The tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) family of proteins is encoded by neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) genes and has a role in the development and normal functioning of the nervous system. NTRK gene fusions have been identified as oncogenic drivers in a wide range of tumors in both adult and pediatric patients. There has recently been a paradigm shift in cancer treatment toward biomarker-based targeted therapies, as an increasing number of actionable targets are being identified across different tumors and/or tumor histologies. These targeted agents offer greater comparative effectiveness and safety vs historical nontargeted standard therapies. The development of drugs that specifically target oncogenic drivers of cancer has led to the emergence of screening technologies to identify the patients most likely to benefit from targeted therapy. This review describes the role of NTRK gene fusions in cancer and outlines the epidemiology of NTRK gene fusions, the therapeutic benefits of targeting TRK fusions with small molecule inhibitors, and recommendations for NTRK gene fusion testing in adult and pediatric patients with cancer, in order to guide treatment decisions.

Recent advances in lung cancer genomics: Application in targeted therapy

Genomic characterization of lung cancer has not only improved our understanding of disease biology and carcinogenesis but also revealed several therapeutic opportunities. Targeting tumor dependencies on specific genomic alterations (oncogene addiction) has accelerated the therapeutic developments and significantly improved the outcomes even in advanced stage of disease. Identification of genomic alterations predicting response to specific targeted treatment is the key to success for this "personalized treatment" approach. Availability of multiple choices of therapeutic options for specific genomic alterations highlight the importance of optimum sequencing of drugs. Multiplex gene testing has become mandatory in view of constantly increasing number of therapeutic targets and effective treatment options. Influence of genomic characteristics on response to immunotherapy further makes comprehensive genomic profiling necessary before therapeutic decision making. A comprehensive elucidation of resistance mechanisms and directed treatments have made the continuum of care possible and transformed this deadly disease into a chronic condition. Liquid biopsy-based approach has made the dynamic monitoring of disease possible and enabled treatment optimizations accordingly. Current lung cancer management is the perfect example of "precision-medicine" in clinical oncology.

Pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry Is Highly Correlated With NTRK3 Gene Rearrangements in Salivary Gland Tumors

AIMS

Secretory carcinoma (SC) is characterized by ETV6 rearrangements, most often ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. Given its histologic overlap with other salivary gland tumors (SGTs), SCs can be difficult to diagnose without genetic confirmation. A recently developed pan-TRK (tropomyosin receptor kinase) antibody shows promise for identifying tumors with NTRK (neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 3) fusions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry in distinguishing SCs from mimics and selecting patients eligible for TRK inhibitor clinical trials. We examined whole-tissue sections from 111 SGTs with molecular characterization, including 26 SCs (23 with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and 3 with ETV6-RET fusion detected by ligation-dependent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing and 85 non-SC SGTs (no ETV6-NTRK3 fusion). Immunohistochemistry was performed with a pan-TRK rabbit monoclonal antibody. When any pan-TRK staining (nuclear or cytoplasmic with any staining intensity) was considered to indicate positivity, 22 of 23 SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (95.7%) and 33 of 85 non-SC (38.8%) salivary neoplasms were positive, mainly basal cell adenoma, pleomorphic adenomas, adenoid cystic carcinomas, and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas. All SCs with ETV6-RET fusion were entirely negative. When only nuclear pan-TRK staining with any staining intensity was considered positive, 18 of 23 SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (78.3%) were positive, 11 among them with diffuse staining (>30% of cells). All non-SCs and SCs with ETV6-RET fusion were entirely negative. In comparison to molecular analysis (ligation-dependent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing), nuclear pan-TRK IHC has a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 100% for diagnosing SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion, 69% and 100% for SCs (all fusions). Pan-TRK is a reasonable screening test for diagnosing SCs among SGTs when taking only nuclear staining into account. Although pan-TRK expression is not entirely sensitive for SCs, nuclear staining is highly specific for SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. The lack of pan-TRK immunoreactivity in a subset of SCs is suggestive of atypical exons 4 to 14 or exons 5 to 14 ETV6-NTRK3 fusion or non-NTRK alternative fusion partners such as ETV6-RET. Pan-TRK staining can serve as a strong diagnostic marker to distinguish SC from it mimics and to select patients eligible for TRK inhibitor clinical trials.