Camrelizumab in combination with apatinib in second-line or above therapy for advanced primary liver cancer: cohort A report in a multicenter phase Ib/II trial

Camrelizumab combined with apatinib plus irinotecan as a second-line treatment in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Camrelizumab (CAM) combined with apatinib plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment shows good efficacy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. This study aimed to explore the potential of CAM combined with apatinib plus irinotecan (IRT) as a second-line treatment in advanced or metastatic ESCC patients.

METHODS

A total of 59 advanced or metastatic ESCC patients receiving CAM combined with apatinib plus IRT as second-line treatment were enrolled in this study between January 2020 and March 2024. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and the assessment of toxicity. Concurrently, a model was constructed utilizing patients' clinical characteristics and radiomic features to predict the patients' prognoses.

RESULTS

At the time of analysis, 58 patients were withdrawn due to disease progression (n = 9), death (n = 43), or lost to follow-up (n = 6), and 1 patient was ongoing. The ORR and DCR were 37.7% and 84.9%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 6.3 (95% CI: 4.8-7.8) and 16.7 (95% CI: 13.5-19.9) months, respectively. The most common adverse events of any grade were leukopenia (52.5%), fatigue (25.4%), anemia (23.7%), thrombocytopenia (23.7%), neutropenia (22.0%), and hypoalbuminemia (22.0%). Most of the adverse events were grade I-II. The incidence of grade III-IV adverse events was 20.3%. Predictive models were established based on the outcomes of multivariate Cox analyses. The combined model had an excellent ability to predict the 1-year OS [AUC (95% CI): 0.979 (0.930-1.000)].

CONCLUSION

CAM combined with apatinib plus IRT as a second-line treatment exhibits acceptable efficacy and safety in advanced or metastatic ESCC patients. The model that combines clinical and radiomic features has the greatest ability to predict the survival of advanced or metastatic ESCC patients.

Adverse events associated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has emerged as a promising treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the safety profiles of HAIC and its various combination therapies remain to be systematically evaluated.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to November 2024. Studies reporting adverse events (AEs) of HAIC monotherapy or combination therapies in HCC were included. The severity and frequency of AEs were analyzed according to different treatment protocols.

Results

A total of 58 studies (11 prospective, 47 retrospective) were included. HAIC monotherapy demonstrated relatively mild toxicity, primarily affecting hepatobiliary (transaminase elevation 53.2%, hypoalbuminemia 57.2%) and hematological systems (anemia 43.0%, thrombocytopenia 35.2%). HAIC with targeted therapy showed increased adverse events, including characteristic reactions like hand-foot syndrome (48.0%) and hypertension (49.9%). HAIC combined with targeted, and immunotherapy exhibited the highest adverse reaction rates (neutropenia 82.9%, transaminase elevation 97.1%), while HAIC with anti-angiogenic and immunotherapy showed a relatively favorable safety profile. Prospective studies consistently reported higher incidence rates than retrospective studies, suggesting potential underreporting in clinical practice.

Conclusions

Different HAIC-based regimens exhibit distinct safety profiles requiring individualized management approaches. We propose a comprehensive framework for patient selection, monitoring strategies, and AE management. These recommendations aim to optimize treatment outcomes while minimizing adverse impacts on patient quality of life.

Clinical efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with targeted therapy and PD1 inhibitors in patients with advanced liver cancer

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) combined with targeted therapy and PD1 inhibitors in patients with advanced liver cancer.

Methods

This was a retrospective study. A total of 120 patients with advanced primary liver cancer admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University were randomly divided into two groups, with 60 patients in each group from May 2020 to May 2023. Patients in the control group received conventional TACE, and those in the experimental group received 200 mg camrelizumab once every 21 days and oral lenvatinib mesylate capsules once daily in addition to TACE. Compared the clinical efficacy, levels of tumor markers, T lymphocyte subsets, and adverse drug reactions after treatment and the improvement of quality of life(QOL) before and after treatment between the two groups of patients.

Results

The overall response rate(ORR) was 80% in the experimental group and 62% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(p=0.03); the incidence of adverse reactions was 28% in the experimental group and 25% in the control group, with no significant difference between the two groups(p=0.68); the improvement rate of QOL score was significantly increased(p=0.03) and the deterioration rate was significantly decreased(p=0.01) in the experimental group compared with those in the control group, respectively.

Conclusion

TACE combined with targeted therapy and PD1 inhibitors is significantly effective to improve the cellular immune function with no significant increase in the incidence of adverse reactions, making it an effective and safe treatment option for patients with liver cancer.

Advancements in second-line treatment research for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. Due to its insidious onset, most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, often missing the opportunity for surgical resection. Consequently, systemic treatments play a pivotal role. In recent years, an increasing number of drugs have been approved for first-line systemic treatment of HCC. However, their efficacy is limited, and some patients develop drug resistance after a period of treatment. For such patients, there is currently a lack of standard second-line systemic treatment options. This review summarizes the latest advancements in second-line systemic treatment research for HCC patients who have developed resistance to various first-line systemic treatments, aiming to provide more rational and personalized second-line treatment strategies.

Optimal early endpoint for second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated advanced solid cancers: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials.

METHODS

Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8.

RESULTS

A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2-57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS.

Comprehensive analysis of publications concerning combinations of immunotherapy and targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a bibliometric study

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a prevalent malignancy, is often diagnosed at advanced stages. Recent advances have integrated immunotherapy with targeted therapy, significantly improving treatment outcomes. This study provides a bibliometric overview of these therapeutic combinations, evaluating their development and impact.

Methods

A rigorous selection process was applied to relevant literature from Web of Science, followed by in-depth bibliometric analyses- including timeline visualization, burst detection, and co-occurrence analysis-using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. This approach offered insights into the contributions of countries, institutions, authors, journals, references, and key terms within the field.

Results

A total of 506 studies published between 2014 and 2023 were included, with all articles in English. Mainland China dominated the publication output, contributing 40% (N = 202), followed by significant contributions from the United States and Japan. Kindai University led institutional contributions, accounting for 7.9% of the total (N = 40). The authors Kudo Masatoshi and Hatanaka Takeshi were the most prolific, each with nine publications. The journal Cancers emerged as the top publisher, with 48 relevant articles and an Impact Factor of 5.2 in 2022. A co-citation network analysis traced the evolution of immunotherapy and targeted therapy combinations in HCC treatment. Early research primarily focused on angiogenesis, dendritic cells, and expression markers, while recent trends have shifted towards phase III trials, adverse reactions, and checkpoint inhibitors, underscoring the field's dynamic progression.

Conclusion

Future research will expand on the pathological mechanisms underlying these therapies and novel interventions and combination strategies. Addressing adverse events and treatment discontinuation will remain central to advancing clinical applications.

Comprehensive review of signaling pathways and therapeutic targets in gastrointestinal cancers

Targeted therapy, the milestone in the development of human medicine, originated in 2004 when the FDA approved the first targeted agent bevacizumab for colorectal cancer treatment. This new development has resulted from drug developers moving beyond traditional chemotherapy, and several trials have popped up in the last two decades with an unprecedented speed. Specifically, EGF/EGFR, VEGF/VEGFR, HGF/c-MET, and Claudin 18.2 therapeutic targets have been developed in recent years. Some targets previously thought to be undruggable are now being newly explored, such as the RAS site. However, the efficacy of targeted therapy is extremely variable, especially with the emergence of new drugs and the innovative use of traditional targets for other tumors in recent years. Accordingly, this review provides an overview of the major signaling pathway mechanisms and recent advances in targeted therapy for gastrointestinal cancers, as well as future perspectives.

Serum pentraxin-3 as a potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis in primary liver cancer: An observational study

This study aimed to examine serum pentraxin 3 levels in patients with primary liver cancer and to assess its potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. Serum samples were obtained from 180 patients with primary liver cancer and 180 healthy control subjects. The concentration of PTX3 in these samples was measured using an ELISA kit. The study also investigated the correlation between PTX3 levels and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with primary liver cancer. The effectiveness of serum PTX3 in diagnosing primary liver cancer was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and their corresponding areas under the curve (AUC). The prognostic significance of serum PTX3 in patients with primary liver cancer was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Serum PTX3 levels were elevated in patients with primary liver cancer compared to those in healthy control subjects. These levels were significantly correlated with drinking history, TNM stage, BCLC stage, tumor size, tumor number, and vascular invasion. However, no significant correlations were observed between PTX3 levels and other factors, such as age, sex, BMI, liver cirrhosis, histological grade, and histological type. With a cut-off value of 5.1 ng/mL, PTX3 effectively differentiated patients with primary liver cancer from healthy control subjects, achieving an AUC of 0.734, a sensitivity of 73.24%, and a specificity of 84.78%. Patients with higher serum PTX3 levels had lower overall survival rates and recurrence-free survival rates than those with lower PTX3 levels. Serum PTX3 levels are elevated in patients with primary liver cancer and high serum PTX3 levels are associated with poor prognosis. This suggests that serum PTX3 has the potential to be a novel biomarker for both the diagnosis and prognosis of primary liver cancer. These findings may improve patient outcomes by enabling early detection and continuous monitoring.

Subverting Attachment to Prevent Attacking: Alteration of Effector Immune Cell Migration and Adhesion as a Key Mechanism of Tumor Immune Evasion

Cell adhesion regulates specific migratory patterns, location, communication with other cells, physical interactions with the extracellular matrix, and the establishment of effector programs. Proper immune control of cancer strongly depends on all these events occurring in a highly accurate spatiotemporal sequence. In response to cancer-associated inflammatory signals, effector immune cells navigating the bloodstream shift from their patrolling exploratory migration mode to establish adhesive interactions with vascular endothelial cells. This interaction enables them to extravasate through the blood vessel walls and access the cancer site. Further adhesive interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME) are crucial for coordinating their distribution in situ and for mounting an effective anti-tumor immune response. In this review, we examine how alterations of adhesion cues in the tumor context favor tumor escape by affecting effector immune cell infiltration and trafficking within the TME. We discuss the mechanisms by which tumors directly modulate immune cell adhesion and migration patterns to affect anti-tumor immunity and favor tumor evasion. We also explore indirect immune escape mechanisms that involve modifications of TME characteristics, such as vascularization, immunogenicity, and structural topography. Finally, we highlight the significance of these aspects in designing more effective drug treatments and cellular immunotherapies.

The complex role of immune cells in antigen presentation and regulation of T-cell responses in hepatocellular carcinoma: progress, challenges, and future directions

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent form of liver cancer that poses significant challenges regarding morbidity and mortality rates. In the context of HCC, immune cells play a vital role, especially concerning the presentation of antigens. This review explores the intricate interactions among immune cells within HCC, focusing on their functions in antigen presentation and the modulation of T-cell responses. We begin by summarizing the strategies that HCC uses to escape immune recognition, emphasizing the delicate equilibrium between immune surveillance and evasion. Next, we investigate the specific functions of various types of immune cells, including dendritic cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and CD8+ T cells, in the process of antigen presentation. We also examine the impact of immune checkpoints, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and the pathways involving programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), on antigen presentation, while taking into account the clinical significance of checkpoint inhibitors. The review further emphasizes the importance of immune-based therapies, including cancer vaccines and CAR-T cell therapy, in improving antigen presentation. In conclusion, we encapsulate the latest advancements in research, propose future avenues for exploration, and stress the importance of innovative technologies and customized treatment strategies. By thoroughly analyzing the interactions of immune cells throughout the antigen presentation process in HCC, this review provides an up-to-date perspective on the field, setting the stage for new therapeutic approaches.

Development of an LC-TOF/MS Method to Quantify Camrelizumab in Human Serum

With the advantages of a high specificity, a long half-life, and a high safety, the use of antibody biologic drugs, including camrelizumab, has been rapidly increasing in clinical practice. Camrelizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor and humanized monoclonal antibody, is used to treat several advanced solid cancers. Measuring its concentration supports personalized dosage adjustments, influences treatment decisions for patients, strengthens the control of disease activity through therapeutic drug monitoring, and helps evaluate and prevent drug interactions in combination therapy. Because antibodies are present in complex biological matrices, quantifying monoclonal antibody drugs is challenging, and must rely on precise, selective, and reliable analytical methods. In this study, a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry TripleTOF 6600+ (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA) system equipped with a Turbo V ion source was used for the qualitative analysis of monoclonal antibodies using the data-dependent acquisition (IDA) MS/MS mode, followed by quantitative analysis using a targeted MRMHR workflow. This method showed a good linear relationship within the range of 4-160 μg/mL, with a correlation coefficient of R2 ≥ 0.996. It demonstrated an acceptable accuracy (88.95-101.18%) and precision (≤15%). Furthermore, the lower limit of quantification was found to be 4 μg/mL, with the lowest detection limit of 0.3217 μg/mL, indicating that this method is rapid, accurate, and reliable for the quantitative analysis of camrelizumab in human serum.

Camrelizumab Combined with Apatinib for Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Two Case Reports

Aims/Background: Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a common complication of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC typically infiltrates intrahepatic vessels, particularly the portal vein, leading to the formation of PVTT, marking advanced-stage HCC and correlating with poor prognosis. PVTT often complicates local treatment strategies such as surgical resection and affects the efficacy of interventions. Combination therapy, including immunotherapy and targeted therapy, shows promise in HCC treatment, but management options for HCC patients with PVTT are incompletely characterized. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab + apatinib in treating HCC patients with PVTT. Case Presentation: Two cases of HCC with PVTT were presented. Patient 1, a 51-year-old male with a history of hepatitis B virus, was diagnosed with stage IIIA HCC and treated with camrelizumab + apatinib, achieving complete response (CR) after six cycles. Patient 2, a 50-year-old male with stage IIIA HCC, also underwent the same treatment and achieved CR after four cycles but died due to acute cardiac disease. Results: Our research found that camrelizumab + apatinib effectively shrank the size of filling defects and significantly prolonged patients' progression-free survival. In addition, no adverse effects were observed during the treatment process. However, despite the manageable safety profile demonstrated by combination therapy, further clinical research is needed to validate its long-term efficacy and safety. Conclusion: Camrelizumab + apatinib produced satisfactory efficacy and safety among the HCC patients with PVTT, providing clinical evidence for future treatment.

Phase I-IV Drug Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review of Ten Years of Studies

Despite advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over the last few decades, treatment opportunities for patients with HCC remain limited. HCC is the most common form of liver cancer, accounting for approximately 90% of all cases worldwide. Moreover, apart from the current pharmacological interventions, hepatic resection and liver transplantation are the mainstay curative approaches for patients with HCC. This systematic review included phase I, II, III, and IV clinical trials (CTs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on current treatments for patients with HCC in Asian populations (2013-2023). A total of 427 articles were screened, and 184 non-duplicate publications were identified. After screening the titles and abstracts, 96 publications were excluded, and another 28 were excluded after full-text screening. The remaining 60 eligible RCTs/CTs were finally included. A total of 60 clinical trials fulfilled our inclusion criteria with 36 drugs used as monotherapy or combination therapy for HCC. Most studies used sorafenib alone or in combination with any of the treatment regimens. Lenvatinib or atezolizumab with bevacizumab was used for HCC after initial sorafenib treatment. Eighteen studies compared the efficacy of sorafenib with that of other drugs, including lenvatinib, cabozantinib, tepotinib, tigatuzumab, linifanib, erlotinib, resminostat, brivanib, tislelizumab, selumetinib, and refametinib. This study provides comprehensive insights into effective treatment interventions for HCC in Asian populations. The overall assessment indicates that sorafenib, used alone or in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab, has been the first treatment choice in the past decade to achieve better outcomes in patients with HCC in Asian populations.

Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Among primary liver cancers, hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common pathological type. Its onset is insidious, and most patients have no obvious discomfort in the early stage, so it is found late, and the opportunity for surgical radical treatment is lost, resulting in a poor prognosis. With the introduction of molecular-targeted drugs represented by sorafenib, patients with middle- and late-stage liver cancer have regained the light of day. However, their therapeutic efficacy is relatively low due to the limited target of drug action, toxic side effects, and other reasons. At this time, the emergence of immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) well breaks this embarrassing situation, which mainly achieves the anti-tumor purpose by improving the tumor immune microenvironment. Currently, ICI monotherapy, as well as combination therapy, has been widely used in the clinic, further prolonging the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This article reviews the development of monotherapy and combination therapy for ICIs in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and the latest research progress.

The current status and future of targeted-immune combination for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and the third leading cause of death worldwide. surgery, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), systemic therapy, local ablation therapy, radiotherapy, and targeted drug therapy with agents such as sorafenib. However, the tumor microenvironment of liver cancer has a strong immunosuppressive effect. Therefore, new treatments for liver cancer are still necessary. Immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), along with high levels of immunosuppressive cytokines, induce T cell inhibition and are key mechanisms of immune escape in HCC. Recently, immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy or in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-angiogenesis drugs, chemotherapy agents, and topical therapies has offered great promise in the treatment of liver cancer. In this review, we discuss the latest advances in ICIs combined with targeted drugs (targeted-immune combination) and other targeted-immune combination regimens for the treatment of patients with advanced HCC (aHCC) or unresectable HCC (uHCC), and provide an outlook on future prospects. The literature reviewed spans the last five years and includes studies identified using keywords such as "hepatocellular carcinoma," "immune checkpoint inhibitors," "targeted therapy," "combination therapy," and "immunotherapy".

Toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations in solid tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be associated with significant toxicity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the toxicity of combination treatment of ICIs with TKIs (ICI + TKI) in clinical trials with solid organ malignancies. Our primary endpoint explored the incidence of grade 3 - 5 (G3-5) treatment-related toxicity and our secondary endpoints included the incidence of toxicity by treatment type, disease type and studies with run-in strategies. A total of 9750 abstracts were identified, of which 72 eligible studies were included. The most common disease types were non-small cell lung cancer (n=8, 11.1%), renal cell carcinoma (n=10, 13.8%) and hepatobiliary cancers (n=10, 13.8%). The overall incidence of G3-5 toxicity was 56% (95% CI = 50% - 61%). The most common TKIs combined with ICIs in this analysis were multi-targeted TKIs (n = 52, 72%), VEGF specific (n = 9, 12.5%), or oncogene-targeting TKIs (EGFR, ALK, BRAF, MEK) (n =11, 15.3%). Oncogene-targeted TKIs were associated a higher incidence of rashes and immune related adverse events (irAEs) and lower incidence of hypertension. In studies which used a TKI 'run-in' to mitigate toxicity, the pooled estimate of G3-5 toxicity was 71% (95% CI 57-81%). Almost half of studies (48%) omitted the incidence of G3-5 irAEs. Our work suggests that the majority of patients who receive ICI-TKI combinations will experience high grade toxicity (G3-G5) and that toxicity may be specific to TKI partner (Oncogene targeted TKIs: Rash, irAEs; VEGF/Multitargeted: Hypertension). These data did not suggest that a TKI 'run-in' was associated with a lower incidence of G3-5 toxicity. Reporting of irAEs was inconsistent supporting the need for harmonisation of adverse event reporting to include onset, duration and treatment.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022367416.

Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation following camrelizumab monotherapy or combination therapy for multi-cancers: a large-scale pooled analysis of 10 studies in China

Background

Skin toxicities are the most common adverse events related to immunotherapy, such as reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) following treatment with the anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody camrelizumab.

Objective

This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the clinical features and prognostic value of RCCEP in patients with malignancies who received camrelizumab alone (Camre) or in combination with the angiogenesis-targeted agent apatinib (Camre-Apa) or chemotherapy (Camre-Chemo).

Design

A large-scale pooled analysis.

Methods

Individual patient-level data were derived from 10 clinical trials of camrelizumab monotherapy, camrelizumab plus apatinib, or camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 1305).

Results

RCCEP occurred in 77.0% (516/670) of patients with Camre, 23.6% (70/296) with Camre-Apa, and 67.8% (230/339) with Camre-Chemo. Most RCCEP lesions were grade 1 or 2 in severity. The median time to onset was 0.8 months [interquartile range (IQR), 0.6-1.2] with Camre, 5.0 months (IQR, 2.7-8.0) with Camre-Apa, and 1.6 months (IQR, 1.0-4.2) with Camre-Chemo; and the median duration was 4.8 months (IQR, 2.6-8.8), 4.4 months (IQR, 1.7-8.9), and 7.2 months (IQR, 4.1-14.3), respectively. In all the three groups, patients with RCCEP showed significantly better clinical outcomes compared with those without [objective response rate: 23.8% versus 1.9% with Camre, 48.6% versus 21.2% with Camre-Apa, and 78.7% versus 54.1% with Camre-Chemo; median progression-free survival: 3.2 versus 1.7 months (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.36), 10.2 versus 4.5 months (HR = 0.39), and 12.7 versus 7.3 months (HR = 0.38); median overall survival: 13.3 versus 3.8 months (HR = 0.34), 29.2 versus 13.5 months (HR = 0.46), and not reached versus 12.8 months (HR = 0.19); all p < 0.0001].

Conclusion

Although RCCEP occurred frequently with camrelizumab, most lesions were mild and self-limiting. The occurrence of RCCEP was strongly associated with the antitumor activity and survival of camrelizumab, both as monotherapy and in combination therapy.

New clinical trial design in precision medicine: discovery, development and direction

In the era of precision medicine, it has been increasingly recognized that individuals with a certain disease are complex and different from each other. Due to the underestimation of the significant heterogeneity across participants in traditional "one-size-fits-all" trials, patient-centered trials that could provide optimal therapy customization to individuals with specific biomarkers were developed including the basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs under the master protocol framework. In recent years, the successive FDA approval of indications based on biomarker-guided master protocol designs has demonstrated that these new clinical trials are ushering in tremendous opportunities. Despite the rapid increase in the number of basket, umbrella, and platform trials, the current clinical and research understanding of these new trial designs, as compared with traditional trial designs, remains limited. The majority of the research focuses on methodologies, and there is a lack of in-depth insight concerning the underlying biological logic of these new clinical trial designs. Therefore, we provide this comprehensive review of the discovery and development of basket, umbrella, and platform trials and their underlying logic from the perspective of precision medicine. Meanwhile, we discuss future directions on the potential development of these new clinical design in view of the "Precision Pro", "Dynamic Precision", and "Intelligent Precision". This review would assist trial-related researchers to enhance the innovation and feasibility of clinical trial designs by expounding the underlying logic, which be essential to accelerate the progression of precision medicine.

Efficacy and safety of the combination of camrelizumab and apatinib in the treatment of liver cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of camrelizumab and apatinib in the treatment of liver cancer and to furnish clinical recommendations for pharmacological interventions.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were scrutinized for research publications from their inception to 22 December 2023. Bibliographic perusal and data procurement were executed. The quality of the included studies was evaluated employing the MINORS tool. Meta-analysis was conducted utilizing Stata 15.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies involving 849 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The study revealed that the objective response rate (ORR) of the combined therapy was 28% (95% CI: 23%-34%), the disease control rate (DCR) was 69% (95% CI: 64%-73%), the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.87 months (95% CI: 4.96-6.78), the median overall survival (mOS) was 19.35 months (95% CI: 17.53-21.17), the incidence of any grade adverse events was 90% (95% CI: 85%-95%), and the occurrence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 49% (95% CI: 27%-71%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of camrelizumab and apatinib exhibits commendable effectiveness in the management of liver cancer; nevertheless, vigilance should be exercised concerning potential adverse reactions in clinical applications to enhance the safety of pharmacological interventions.

Clinical research progress of targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a common and highly malignant form of cancer that has shown high rates of morbidity and mortality in recent years. The prognosis for cholangiocarcinoma is generally poor due to its aggressive nature and high recurrence rate. Most patients are diagnosed in the middle or late stages of the disease, making surgical treatment challenging. As a result, there is a pressing need to improve the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma. The advancement of tumor genetics has allowed for more precise and targeted treatment approaches. Targeted molecular therapy has shown promise in cholangiocarcinoma treatment, and the study of immunotherapy has provided hope for patients who are not eligible for surgery or have a poor response to chemotherapy. However, the effectiveness of single targeted therapy or immunotherapy is limited. Therefore, the combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy represents a significant breakthrough and challenge. Recent research on the combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma has yielded promising results, surpassing the outcomes of single therapy or chemotherapy. This has sparked intense interest in further investigating this combined approach. In this article, we aim to review the development and research findings of targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy, providing new insights for the selection of combined therapy and future clinical research in cholangiocarcinoma.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improve the survival of cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). The effect of anti-hypertensive drugs on the prognosis of CCA is not clear.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 102 patients (56.9% males, median age 66 years) diagnosed with CCA and hypertension concurrently and received radical surgery (R0), with a median follow-up of 36.7 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regressions, and propensity score (PS) matching were applied for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Results of multivariable cox analysis showed that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASis) usage was a protective factor for progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.32-0.96) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20-0.79), respectively. Calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and β-blockers didn't show significant associations. The association of RASis usage and PFS and OS was derived by PS matching, with a cohort of 28 RASis users and 56 RASis non-users. The median PFS and OS of RASis users (PFS, 17.6 months (9.2-34.4); OS, 24.8 months (16.5-42.3)) were longer than RASis non-users (PFS, 10.5 months (4.1-24.1); OS, 14.6 months (10.6-28.4)). The 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years' survival rates of RASis users (89.1%, 77.0%, and 65.5%) were higher than RASis non-users (70.9%, 54.0%, and 40.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

RASis usage improves the survival of patients with CCA and hypertension concurrently.

Potential candidates for liver resection in liver-confined advanced HCC: a Chinese multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized as symptomatic tumors [performance status (PS) score of 1-2], vascular invasion and extrahepatic spread, but patients with PS1 alone may be eliminated from this stage. Although liver resection is used for liver-confined HCC, its role in patients with PS1 alone remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to explore its application in such patients and identify potential candidates.

METHODS

Eligible liver-confined HCC patients undergoing liver resection were retrospectively screened in 15 Chinese tertiary hospitals, with limited tumor burden, liver function and PS scores. Cox-regression survival analysis was used to investigate the prognostic factors and develop a risk-scoring system, according to which patients were substratified using fitting curves and the predictive values of PS were explored in each stratification.

RESULTS

From January 2010 to October 2021, 1535 consecutive patients were selected. In the whole cohort, PS, AFP, tumor size and albumin were correlated with survival (adjusted P<0.05), based on which risk scores of every patient were calculated and ranged from 0 to 18. Fitting curve analysis demonstrated that the prognostic abilities of PS varied with risk scores and that the patients should be divided into three risk stratifications. Importantly, in the low-risk stratification, PS lost its prognostic value, and patients with PS1 alone achieved a satisfactory 5-year survival rate of 78.0%, which was comparable with that PS0 patients (84.6%).

CONCLUSION

Selected patients with PS1 alone and an ideal baseline condition may benefit from liver resection and may migrate forward to BCLC stage A.

Phase 2 Study of the PD-1 Inhibitor Serplulimab plus the Bevacizumab Biosimilar HLX04 in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Current treatments for patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) provide modest survival benefits. We evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of serplulimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, plus the bevacizumab biosimilar HLX04 in this patient population.

METHODS

In this open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study in China, patients with advanced HCC who failed prior systemic therapy received serplulimab 3 mg/kg plus HLX04 5 mg/kg (group A) or 10 mg/kg (group B) intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety.

RESULTS

As of April 8, 2021, 20 and 21 patients were enrolled into groups A and B, and they had received a median of 7 and 11 treatment cycles, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 14 (70.0%) patients in group A and 12 (57.1%) in group B. Most immune-related adverse events were grade ≤3. The objective response rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9-54.3) in group A and 14.3% (95% CI, 3.0-36.3) in group B. Median duration of response was not reached (95% CI, 3.3-not evaluable [NE]) in group A and was 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.9-NE) in group B. Median progression-free survival was 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.4-5.5) and 4.1 months (95% CI, 1.5-NE), and median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% CI, 6.4-NE) and 14.3 months (95% CI, 8.2-NE) in groups A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Serplulimab plus HLX04 showed a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in patients with previously treated advanced HCC.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

At present, pancreatic cancer (PC) has a high morbidity and mortality rate and a poor prognosis. The aim of this article was to study the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced PC.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI, VIP, and CBM databases were searched by computer to identify studies on the application of apatinib in patients with advanced PC. The patients in the included study were divided into an observation group (apatinib combined with radiotherapy) and a control group (radiotherapy only), and meta-analysis was performed for each outcome with Revman 5.4 software. This study was successfully registered on the PROSPERO website, and the registration number is CRD: 42,022,384,056 (available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=384056 ).

RESULTS

A total of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 428 patients were included, including 215 in the observation group and 213 in the control group. Compared with the control group, the observation group showed a greater objective response rate [OR = 3.26, 95% CI (2.18, 4.87), P < 0.0001], disease control rate [OR = 5.04, 95% CI (3.12, 8.12), P < 0.0001], complete response rate [OR = 3.87, 95% CI (1.51, 9.88), P = 0.005], and partial response rate [OR = 2.43, 95% CI (1.63, 3.61), P < 0.001], The 1-year survival rate [OR = 2.39, 95% CI (1.15, 4.96), P < 0.05], 2-year survival rate [OR = 2.41, 95% CI (1.03, 5.61), P < 0.05], progression-free survival time [MD = 1.17, 95% CI (0.37, 1.96), P < 0.05], overall survival time [MD = 1.47, 95% CI (0.13, 2.80), P < 0.05], while the stability rate [OR = 1.14, 95% CI (0.72, 1.81), P = 0.58] and various complications were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib combined with radiotherapy was more effective than radiotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (PC), and apatinib had acceptable safety. However, since our study was limited by the quantity and quality of the included studies, we look forward to more large-sample, multicentre, and high-quality RCTs in the future to verify the conclusions.

Research progress of targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a common gastrointestinal malignancy with a high mortality rate and limited treatment options. Molecularly targeted drugs combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown unique advantages over single-agent applications, significantly prolonging patient survival. This paper reviews the research progress of molecular-targeted drugs combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and discusses the effectiveness and safety of the combination of the two drugs to provide a reference for the further application of molecular-targeted drugs combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice.

Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with antiangiogenic therapy reportedly have potential synergistic antitumor activity. We investigated the activity and safety of this regimen for recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

This single-arm, Simon two-stage study enrolled patients with recurrent/metastatic NPC who were refractory to at least first-line systemic therapy and treatment-naive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The patients received camrelizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks and apatinib 250 mg once per day. The primary end point was the objective response rate. Key secondary end points included disease control rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

Between October 14, 2020, and December 23, 2021, 58 patients were enrolled, and all were included in the efficacy and safety analysis set. The objective response rate was 65.5% (95% CI, 51.9 to 77.5), and the disease control rate was 86.2% (95% CI, 74.6 to 93.9). The median duration of response was not reached, and the median progression-free survival was 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.2 to 13.6), with a median follow-up duration of 12.4 months (range, 2.1-19.9 months). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade 3 or higher were reported in 34 (58.6%) patients, with the most common being hypertension (19.0%), nasopharyngeal necrosis (15.5%), headache (12.1%), AST elevation (10.3%), and creatine phosphokinase elevation (10.3%). Sixteen (27.6%) patients discontinued apatinib treatment before progression because of unbearable TRAEs, and the most common complication was nasopharyngeal necrosis (9/16; 56.3%). Recurrent nasopharyngeal lesions (odds ratio, 5.94 [95% CI, 1.45 to 24.24]) and reirradiation (odds ratio, 5.33 [95% CI, 1.15 to 24.79]) were significantly positively correlated with nasopharyngeal necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab plus apatinib had promising antitumor activity in patients with refractory recurrent/metastatic NPC who failed first-line therapy. Moderate to severe TRAEs were experienced by 58.6%, including nasopharyngeal necrosis associated with local recurrence and a history of reirradiation.

New advances in the research of clinical treatment and novel anticancer agents in tumor angiogenesis

In 1971, Folkman proposed that tumors could be limited to very small sizes by blocking angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is the generation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels, considered to be one of the important processes in tumor growth and metastasis. Angiogenesis is a complex process regulated by various factors and involves many secreted factors and signaling pathways. Angiogenesis is important in the transport of oxygen and nutrients to the tumor during tumor development. Therefore, inhibition of angiogenesis has become an important strategy in the clinical management of many solid tumors. Combination therapies of angiogenesis inhibitors with radiotherapy and chemotherapy are often used in clinical practice. In this article, we will review common targets against angiogenesis, the most common and up-to-date anti-angiogenic drugs and clinical treatments in recent years, including active ingredients from chemical and herbal medicines.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Combination with Regorafenib Therapy as Second-Line Regimen for Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combination of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor and regorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 38 patients with unresectable HCC who were treated with PD-1 inhibitor in combination with regorafenib as a second⁃line therapy as well as the data of 32 patients treated with regorafenib only therapy as a control. The clinical data, previous treatment strategies, follow-up imaging results, and adverse events during follow-ups were recorded. The mRECIST Criteria were used to evaluate the treatment outcome of intrahepatic lesions, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate survival time.

Results

Up to the last follow-up, the rego-PD-1 group had higher objective response rate (39.5% vs 15.6%, P = 0.028), longer progression-free survival (median 5.9 vs 4.6 months; P = 0.044), and better overall survival (OS) (median 14.5 vs 9.5 months; P = 0.041) than the regorafenib only group. Among the 38 patients in rego-PD-1 group, 1 patient (2.7%) achieved complete response, 14 patients (36.8%) achieved partial response, 14 patients (36.8%) achieved stable disease, and 9 patients (23.7%) achieved progressive disease. Among the 32 patients in regorafenib alone, 5 (15.6%) achieved partial response, 12 (37.5%) achieved stable disease, and 15 (46.9%) achieved progressive disease. Regorafenib alone, Child-Pugh B, and tumors >3 were independent prognostic factors for poor OS. The difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between the two groups was not statistically significant (36.8% vs 28.1%; P = 0.439). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events included hypertension and diarrhea.

Conclusion

PD-1 inhibitor combined with regorafenib is a promising regimen in treating patients with unresectable HCC owing to its safety and effectiveness as well as low incidence of serious adverse events with its use.

Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Situs Inversus Totalis Achieved a Complete Response Following Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib and Combined with Two-Stage Hepatectomy: A Case Report

Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a rare congenital condition in which abdominal and thoracic organs are transposed from normal positions. Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) combined with translational therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with SIT has been rarely reported. We report a 41-year-old man with giant hepatocellular carcinoma (71 mm × 55 mm × 51 mm) whose future residual liver (FLR) and standard liver volume (SLV) ratio at first diagnosis was 37.4%. Preoperative volume assessment of portal vein ligation (PVL) revealed inadequate hypertrophy of FLR. After a multidisciplinary group discussion (MDT), the patient decided to follow conversion therapy. Three months later, ratio of the FLR/SLV increased from 37.4% to 71% after operation, which met the surgical requirements. Second hepatectomy, right lobectomy was successful. There was no recurrence after six months of follow-up. In our case, conversion therapy appears to be effective in maintaining residual liver hyperplasia, reducing tumor load, and preventing tumor progression in patients with large HCC during TSH.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves prognosis and quality of life of patients with metastatic and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study retrospectively analyzed the effect of concurrent chemoradiotherapy on prognosis and quality of life of patients with metastatic and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis. Data from 60 patients with metastatic and recurrent HCC admitted from Oct. 2020 to Feb. 2021 were chosen and grouped according to the treatment plans. Each group contained 30 cases. The control group was treated with chemotherapy, and the observation group received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The two groups were treated continuously for two rounds, with 21 days in each round. The therapeutic efficacy, toxic side effects, pre- and post-treatment quality of life, changes in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and survival during follow-up were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The total therapeutic efficacy of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The post-treatment Karnofsky score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The post-treatment protein expressions of VEGF and COX-2 and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were lower than those before treatment in the two groups (P<0.05), and were lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The observation group had superior survival times than the control group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has good short-term and long-term efficacy for patients with metastatic and recurrent HCC. It greatly improves patients' quality of life and down-regulates VEGF and COX-2 expression.

The addition of camrelizumab is effective and safe among unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients who progress after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib therapy

OBJECTIVE

Camrelizumab synergizes with apatinib or transarterial chemoembolization via tumor immunity and chemosensitivity. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib with or without drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after progression to DEB-TACE plus apatinib.

METHODS

Eighty-nine unresectable HCC patients accepted previous DEB-TACE plus apatinib therapy, then further received second-line camrelizumab plus apatinib with or without DEB-TACE treatment. Treatment responses were calculated at 3 months (M3) and 6 months (M6). Survival and treatment-related adverse events were documented.

RESULTS

Objective response rate and disease control rate were 39.3% and 80.9% at M3; meanwhile, they were 22.4% and 54.1% at M6. Furthermore, the median progression-free survival (PFS) (95% confidence interval (CI)) was 7.0 (6.2-7.8) months with a 1-year PFS rate of 18.4%; the median overall survival (OS) (95% CI) was 17.0 (15.3-18.7) months with a 1-year OS rate of 73.9%. Multivariable Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis presented that 3-4 times (vs. 0 time) of DEB-TACE, apatinib dose duration> 4 months, and camrelizumab dose duration> 5 months independently predicted longer PFS (all P<0.05); meanwhile, declined ECOG PS score, new lesions as progression pattern, 1-2 and 3-4 times (vs. 0 time) of DEB-TACE, apatinib dose duration> 4 months independently predicted prolonged OS (all P<0.05). Moreover, treatment-related adverse events mainly included grade 1-2 fever, gastrointestinal reaction, fatigue, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypertension.

CONCLUSION

After progression to DEB-TACE plus apatinib treatment, the addition of camrelizumab is effective and safe among unresectable HCC patients.

Dual immune checkpoint inhibitors or combined with anti-VEGF agents in advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy did not show superiority of survival over standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The combination immunotherapy including dual immune checkpoint inhibitors or combined with anti-VEGF agents have become a trend, but not fully evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate and compare distinct combination immunotherapy on efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from inception to January 31, 2022. The primary endpoints were overall objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), six-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR6m) and one-year overall survival rate (OSR1y).

RESULTS

11 studies with 16 independent cohorts and 3342 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with first-line sorafenib, combination immunotherapy resulted in a significant improvement in ORR (RR, 2.74; 95%CI, 1.55-4.85; p = 0.0006), PFS (HR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.49-0.65; p<0.0001) and OS (HR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.52-0.82; p = 0.0002). Based on RECIST 1.1, the pooled ORR, PFSR6m and OSR1y for combination immunotherapy were 24.6% (95%CI: 20.3%-29.6%), 42.0% (95%CI: 34.2%-50.3%) and 61.8% (95%CI: 57.7%-65.7%), respectively. In distinct combination regimens, PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus anti-VEGF agents showed a significant superiority of clinical benefit than PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus CTLA-4 inhibitors (ORR: 25.2% vs 23.4%, p = 0.033; PFSR6m: 47.4% vs 23.2%, p<0.001; OSR1y: 65.1% vs 55.0%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study was the first meta-analysis to demonstrate the better survival benefit and tolerable toxicity of combination immunotherapy than standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Compared with PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus CTLA-4 inhibitors, the regimens of PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus anti-VEGF agents may be associated with a significantly better clinical benefit. The difference in long-term survival and response population between two distinct combination regimens required further exploration.

Lenvatinib as second-line treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib as second-line therapy in Chinese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of Chinese patients with unresectable HCC who received second-line treatment of lenvatinib at three institutions from November 2018 to February 2022. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, data on the treatment regimens were obtained from medical records. Tumor response was evaluated every 4-6 weeks by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST).

RESULTS

In total, 50 patients with unresectable HCC who received second-line treatment of lenvatinib were enrolled in this study. The objective response rate (ORR) was 18.0% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 74.0%, respectively. The duration of response (DoR) was 6.0 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.0 and 8.5 months, respectively. Patients who received ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic inhibitors as first-line therapy, achieving CR/PR at first-line therapy, with PFS≥6months at first-line therapy had a higher DCR. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that AFP (ng/ml)<400, absence of extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh A, tumor number<3, ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic inhibitors as first-line therapy, CR/PR to first-line therapy, and PFS≥6months at first-line therapy were independent factors of favorable PFS. Univariate analysis showed that absence of extrahepatic metastasis, tumor number<3, ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic inhibitors as first-line therapy, and PFS≥6months at first-line therapy were significantly associated with longer OS. Multivariate analysis showed that absence of extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh A, tumor number<3, CR/PR to first-line therapy and PFS≥6months at first-line therapy were independent prognostic factors of OS. The majority of AEs were grade 1-2, and were reversible. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 12 patients (24.0%) and were mostly connected with hand-foot skin reactions (10.0%), and 10 patients had lenvatinib dose reductions. Two toxicity-related treatment interruptions were attributed to grade 3 hand-foot skin reaction, and grade 4 proteinuria, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib as second-line therapy after progression on sorafenib or ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic inhibitors.

Transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib with or without camrelizumab for unresected hepatocellular carcinoma: A two-center propensity score matching study

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib and camrelizumab with those of TACE as well as apatinib among patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

The data of patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC) who received TACE-apatinib-camrelizumab combination (TACE + AC group) and TACE-apatinib combination (TACE + A group) were collected from two centers between January 2018 and January 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to diminish the bias between the two groups. The primary outcome measures of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome measures were response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 102 patients were enrolled in this study after PSM, with 34 patients in the TACE + AC group and 68 patients in the TACE + A group. Compared to the TACE + A group, TACE + AC had a significantly longer median OS (25.5 months, interquartile range [IQR], 23.5–33.0) than 18.5 months (IQR, 13.0–25.0; P = 0.001). Similarly, the PFS of the TACE + AC group was significantly improved (14.0 months, IQR, 9.0–NA) compared to that of the TACE + A group (5.0 months, IQR, 2.5–9.0; P = 0.001). The ORR rates (55.9% vs. 51.5%), and DCR rates (79.4% vs. 72.1%) were comparable between groups (P &gt; 0.05). All treatment-related adverse events were tolerable and manageable, and no serious adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

TACE combined with apatinib plus camrelizumab demonstrated superior efficacy to TACE plus apatinib for patients with unresectable HCC. The two combination therapies showed similar safety profiles.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenic agents in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search of articles published between the establishment of the database and February 2022. Data were extracted and analyzed using STATA 14.0.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (980 patients for combination therapy and 565 patients for monotherapy) and 5 single-arm studies (246 patients for ICIs combination therapy) were enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 26% and 70%, respectively, after ICIs combination therapy. Compared with monotherapy in RCTs, ICIs combination therapy resulted in higher progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), but also increased the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Increased incidences of fatigue, hypertension, hyperbilirubinemia, proteinuria, and nausea were more common after ICIs combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

The analysis results reveal that ICI-combined anti-angiogenesis therapy has higher efficacy than either ICIs or anti-angiogenesis options for unresectable HCC, but it is necessary to manage the AEs.

The efficacy of oxaliplatin, surufatinib, and camrelizumab on neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-NECs) are rare, accounting for ~1/100,000 of NECs, aggressive neoplasms and poor prognosis. Sometimes, a non-neuroendocrine component is also accompanying these EP-NECs. Curative surgery is suggested for early stage patients while system chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy are considered for advanced inoperable disease. Nonetheless, there was lack of standard second-line treatment strategy. Herein, we report a case of NEC involving a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder treated with a surufatinib-containing regimen in the second-line treatment setting and establish the efficacy of this regimen in the treatment of EP-NECs.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 58-year-old male presented with symptoms such as distension in the upper right abdomen and a palpable mass. The abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed a giant soft tissue mass in the left lobe of the liver, and liver biopsy suggested LCNEC with a non-neuroendocrine (NNE) component. Based on the available literature, a first-line therapy of oxaliplatin + gemcitabine + camrelizumab + apatinib was started initially; however, there was rapid tumor progression. Thus, a second line of treatment was started, where apatinib was replaced with surufatinib, which was given along with oxaliplatin and camrelizumab and continued for seven complete cycles. The patient was re-examined with MRI, which showed a significant decrease in tumor size. And a partial response was achieved. Main adverse events included hand and foot numbness, hypertension, proteinuria, hematuria, and hyperthyroidism. The patient underwent surgery after the second line of treatment and the post-operative pathology report revealed the presence of LCNEC and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. Two months later, re-examination result showed no tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

As yet, the criteria strategy for unresectable EP-NECs to improve survival outcomes is scarce. EP-NECs are badly in need of effective second-line therapy to carry out survival benefits after resistance to first-line regimen. The case report demonstrated that a surufatinib-containing regimen including oxaliplatin and camrelizumab could be an effective treatment strategy for the second-line treatment of EP-NECs. Furthermore, this strategy is well tolerated and treatment-related toxicity are manageable. More clinical trials are warranted to further confirm the efficacy.

Second-line treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma: current state and challenges for the future

INTRODUCTION

Since the approval of sorafenib for systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), many tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy and tolerability as first-line treatments. On the other hand, these first-line therapies are associated with low objective response and drug resistance. Many drugs have been successfully tested for second-line treatment of advanced HCC. While the rapid proliferation of second-line treatments for advanced HCC brings hope to patients, it also complicates clinical decision-making.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to facilitate decisions by summarizing the latest guidelines for second-line treatment of HCC in various countries or regions. We then review existing second-line treatment options and discuss challenges that should be addressed in the future. A literature search was conducted in April 2022 of PubMed/Medline, Cochrane library, and abstracts of international cancer meetings.

EXPERT OPINION

There is no standard second-line treatment, especially for the case of sequential treatment after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo+bev) and further studies focused on sequential treatment are warranted in this setting. The design of clinical trials, different etiologies, and complications or quality of life (QoL) are interesting issues in the second-line setting.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor combined with antiangiogenic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy-antiangiogenesis combination therapy has achieved excellent survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in clinical trials. However, the combination therapy for HCC outside clinical trials is not well studied, and predictive factors are lacking. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy-antiangiogenesis combination therapy in unresectable HCC patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We conducted a four-center, retrospective study of unresectable HCC patients who received the combination of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and antiangiogenic agent between April 2018 and July 2021 in China.

RESULTS

In total, 136 patients were enrolled in the cohort. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 38.0% and 81.8%, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 7.2, 7.3, and 19.6 months, respectively. The multivariate analysis indicated that ECOG performance status score (PS) 2 was a significantly independent negative factor of ORR. Moreover, ECOG PS 2, peritoneum metastasis and previous immunotherapy were found to be independent negative predictors of PFS. A shorter OS was associated with ECOG PS 2, peritoneum metastasis, the presence of previous immunotherapy, Child-Pugh stage B, and high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration. One hundred and twenty-five patients (91.9%) reported adverse events (AEs) with any grade.

CONCLUSION

We elucidated the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy-antiangiogenesis combination therapy and identified potential predictors for response and survival in a real-world cohort of patients with unresectable HCC.

Advances and challenges of immunocheckpoint inhibitors in the treatment of primary liver cancer

Primary liver cancer (PLC) is one of the most common malignant tumors, which clinically characterized by occult onset, rapid development, easy recurrence and poor prognosis. With the rapid development of tumor immunotherapy research, tumor immunotherapy has also achieved remarkable clinical efficacy, and jointly promoted the overall improvement of tumor immunology from mechanism research to clinical transformation, from single discipline to multi-disciplinary integration. Immunotherapy has obvious advantages in treatment-related toxicity and efficacy compared with traditional therapy. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), immunotherapy alone or in combination with other therapies may help to control tumor progression, and there are many immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) widely used in clinical or ongoing clinical trials. However, tumor immunology research is still facing many challenges. How to effectively evaluate the efficacy, whether there are related biomarkers, the generation of immune tolerance and the lack of clinical trials to objectively evaluate the efficacy are still urgent problems to be solved, but it also brings new research opportunities for basic and clinical immunology researchers. The study of treatment of ICIs of PLC has become a hot spot in clinical research field. This paper summarizes and prospects the research progress and challenges of ICIs for PLC.

PD-1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib versus PD-1 inhibitors plus regorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of sorafenib

Background

Lenvatinib, regorafenib and anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) immunotherapy have shown promising clinical outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after sorafenib failure, respectively. However, the combination of the two treatments has not been reported. We compared the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors with lenvatinib (PL) and PD-1 inhibitors plus regorafenib (PR) in patients with advanced HCC in this study.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of advanced HCC patients who undergone PD-1 inhibitors combined with lenvatinib or regorafenib after failure of sorafenib at Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from July 2018 and December 2020. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), effective rates and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were investigated.

Results

In total, 61 patients met the criteria and were included in the present study, and they were divided into the PL group (n = 32) and PR group (n = 29). The overall response rate (ORR) (12.5%vs. 10.3%, respectively; p = 0.557) and disease control rate (DCR) (71.9%vs. 58.6%, respectively; p < 0.207) were higher in the PL group than in the PR group, but there was no statistical difference.

Furthermore, median PFS and OS were not significantly different between the two groups in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (PFS: 5.3 months vs 4.0 months, p = 0.512; OS: 14.1 months vs 13.7 months, p = 0.764 for the PL group vs PR group). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hand -foot skin reaction (24/61,39.3%), hypertension (20/61,32.8%) and hypothyroidism (13/61,21.3%). The frequent TRAEs (≥Grade 3) during PD-1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib or regorafenib treatment were hand-foot skin reaction (5/29,12.4%), thrombocytopenia (2/29 6.90%) and proteinuria (n =2/32,6.25%).

Conclusions

Combination of lenvatinib/regorafenib and PD-1 inhibitors is a promising therapy for HCC patients after sorafenib failure.

Pyrotinib combined with apatinib for targeting metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with HER2 alterations: a prospective, open-label, single-arm phase 2 study (PATHER2)

BACKGROUND

Although targeted agents have been gradually applied in the treatment of HER2-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, patients' therapeutic demands are far from being met. PATHER2 was the first phase 2 trial to explore the efficacy and safety of the HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) pyrotinib plus the antiangiogenic agent apatinib in previously treated HER2-altered metastatic NSCLC patients.

METHODS

HER2-mutated or HER2-amplified metastatic NSCLC patients who had failed at least first-line chemotherapy or HER2-targeted TKIs received oral pyrotinib 400 mg plus apatinib 250 mg once daily until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Between March 2019 and December 2020, 33 patients were enrolled; 13 (39.4%) presented brain metastases, and 16 (48.5%) had received at least two lines of prior chemotherapy or HER2-targeted TKIs. As of September 20, 2021, the median follow-up duration was 11.3 (range, 3.5-26.0) months. The investigator-assessed ORR was 51.5% (17/33; 95% CI, 33.5 to 69.2%), and the disease control rate was 93.9% (31/33; 95% CI, 79.8 to 99.3%). The median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 6.0 (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.6) months, 6.9 (95% CI, 5.8 to 8.5) months, and 14.8 (95% CI, 10.4 to 23.8) months, respectively. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea (3.0%) and hypertension (9.1%). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrotinib plus apatinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in HER2-mutated or HER2-amplified metastatic NSCLC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1900021684 .

Effect of prior thyroid cancer on survival of primary liver cancer: a study based on the SEER database

To explore the effect of prior thyroid cancer on the survival of primary liver cancer (PLC). Eligible PLC patients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 2004-2016. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to create a highly comparable control group that PLC patients without prior thyroid cancer. All PLC patients were divided into three groups based on the survival information: (1) PLC-specific death; (2) death due to other causes; (3) alive. The effect sizes were presented by the corresponding hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Totally, 142 PLC patients with prior thyroid cancer and 1420 PLC patients without prior thyroid cancer were included. During the follow-up period, 714 (45.71%) PLC patients died of liver cancer while 638 (40.85%) PLC patients were alive. Median survival time for PLC patients was 11.00 months, respectively. PLC patients with prior thyroid cancer have a lower risk of death (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.48-0.86). Subgroup analyses stratified by gender displayed the similar relation in female patients with PLC. Prior thyroid cancer may be a protective factor for liver cancer death in PLC patients, especially in female patients.

Response to apatinib and camrelizumab combined treatment in a radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer patient resistant to prior anti-angiogenic therapy: A case report and literature review

Background

Patients with radioactive iodine refractory progressive (RAIR) differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) often developed resistance after first-line therapy. Apatinib plus camrelizumab is a therapy with promising efficacy in patients with other malignant cancers. Herein, we presented a case of progressive RAIR DTC treated with apatinib plus camrelizumab.

Case presentation

We reported a 43-year-old man diagnosed as DTC with metastases in the lungs, the 7th cervical vertebra, and malignant lymph nodes mainly in the mediastinum. While initially showing disease stabilization after giving the first-line multitargeted kinase inhibitor (MKI) therapy, the patient developed progressive disease and was enrolled into a combined therapy with both apatinib and camrelizumab on November 10, 2020. Upon the first 6 months, the combination therapy showed disease control in terms of both stable structural lesions and biochemical thyroglobulin (Tg) level. Six months later, a decrease over the targeted lesions was observed and a partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was finally achieved upon 12 months’ assessment, followed by the decline in serum Tg level. The main adverse event was occasional diarrhea without treatment interruption.

Conclusion

We reported a case with RAIR DTC that benefited from combination immunotherapy, apatinib plus camrelizumab, after resistance from donafenib. We observed a gradually getting better efficacy and a mild and long duration of this combination therapy and hoped to provide a therapeutic choice for these patients.

Ang2-Targeted Combination Therapy for Cancer Treatment

Angiopoietin-2 (Ang2), a member of the angiopoietin family, is widely involved in the process of vascular physiology, bone physiology, adipose tissue physiology and the occurrence and development of inflammation, cardiac hypertrophy, rheumatoid, tumor and other diseases under pathological conditions. Proliferation and metastasis of cancer largely depend on angiogenesis. Therefore, anti-angiogenesis has become the target of tumor therapy. Due to the Ang2 plays a key role in promoting angiogenesis and stability in vascular physiology, the imbalance of its expression is an important condition for the occurrence and development of cancer. It has been proved that blocking Ang2 can inhibit the growth, invasion and metastasis of cancer cells. In recent years, research has been constantly supplemented. We focus on the mechanisms that regulate the expression of Ang2 mRNA and protein levels in different cancers, contributing to a better understanding of how Ang2 exerts different effects in different cancers and stages, as well as facilitating more specific targeting of relevant molecules in cancer therapy. At the same time, the importance of Ang2 in cancer growth, metastasis, prognosis and combination therapy is pointed out. And finally, we will discuss the current investigations and future challenges of combining Ang2 inhibition with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy to increase its efficacy in cancer patients. This review provides a theoretical reference for the development of new targets and effective combination therapy strategies for cancer treatment in the future.

Apatinib: A Novel Antiangiogenic Drug in Monotherapy or Combination Immunotherapy for Digestive System Malignancies

Digestive system malignancies are one of the primary causes of cancer-related death. Meanwhile, angiogenesis has been proved to play an important role in the process of cancer neovascularization. Apatinib, a novel targeted antiangiogenic molecule, could generate highly selective competition in the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, involved in tumor progression and metastasis. It has been implied as a promising cancer treatment agent that can prevent tumor cell proliferation meanwhile inhibit tumor angiogenesis. Furthermore, completed clinical trials demonstrated that apatinib could prolong the progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced gastric cancer and primary liver cancer. Recent studies revealed that apatinib had a synergistic effect with immunotherapy as a second-line and third-line treatment regimen for some other cancers. In this review, we summarize the pharmacological properties of apatinib and the latest clinical application in chemotherapy-refractory patients with advanced digestive system cancer. Based on the comparable survival results, the molecular mechanisms of apatinib are prospective to include the antiangiogenic, apoptosis-inducing, and autophagy-inducing properties in the corresponding signaling pathway. Treatment of apatinib monotherapy or combination immunotherapy remains the optimal option for patients with digestive system malignancies in the future.

Normalization of tumor vasculature: A potential strategy to increase the efficiency of immune checkpoint blockades in cancers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) eliminate tumor cells by reactivating CD8 + T cells using the cytotoxic effects of the immune system. However, in this process, tumor angiogenic factors and abnormal formation of tumor blood vessels are not conducive to the treatment of ICIs. In the tumor microenvironment (TME), proangiogenic factors prevent dendritic cell maturation, reduce T cell infiltration, and recruit inhibitory immune cells such as regulatory T (Treg) cells. Abnormal tumor blood vessels also prevent immune cells and chemotherapy drugs from reaching the target effectively and lead to poor perfusion and severe hypoxia of the tumor. Treatment with antiangiogenic inhibitors can block the transmission of abnormal angiogenesis signals and promote the normalization of tumor vasculature. Therefore, the combination of antiangiogenic inhibitors and ICIs is used in clinical therapy. Combination therapy has been proven theoretically feasible in preclinical trials, and many clinical trials have been completed to confirm its safety and efficacy.

Lenvatinib Combined With a PD-1 Inhibitor as Effective Therapy for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Background: Lenvatinib combined with a PD-1 inhibitor has obtained a satisfactory antitumor effect in several solid tumors. However, the efficacy and tumor response of lenvatinib with a PD-1 inhibitor in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma still need further exploration. Methods: This is a single-arm study for the assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of lenvatinib with a PD-1 inhibitor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients who had chemotherapy failure. Efficacy was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Results: A total of 40 patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled after the chemorefractory effect. The median progression-free survival was 5.83 ± 0.76 months. The 3-month and 6-month progression-free survival rates were 80.0% and 32.5%, respectively. The median overall survival was 14.30 ± 1.30 months. The 12-month and 18-month overall survival rates were 61.4% and 34.7%. The 3-month RECIST 1.1 evaluation was that seven patients (17.5%) showed partial response, 23 patients (57.5%) had stable disease, and 10 patients (25.0%) had progressive disease. The objective response rate was 17.5%, and the disease control rate was 75.0%. All the recorded any-grade adverse events inducing treatment termination were controllable, and there were no AE-related deaths. Conclusion: Our study showed that a combination of lenvatinib with the PD-1 inhibitor could be an effective treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after the chemorefractory effect.

Clinically approved combination immunotherapy: Current status, limitations, and future perspective

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor-based combination immunotherapy has become a first-line treatment for several major types of cancer including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), renal cell carcinoma, lung cancer, cervical cancer, and gastric cancer. Combination immunotherapy counters several immunosuppressive elements in the tumor microenvironment and activates multiple steps of the cancer-immunity cycle. The anti-PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab, plus the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, bevacizumab, represents a promising class of combination immunotherapy. This combination has produced unprecedented clinical efficacy in unresectable HCC and become a landmark in HCC therapy. Advanced HCC patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab demonstrated impressive improvements in multiple clinical endpoints including overall survival, progress-free survival, objective response rate, and patient-reported quality of life when compared to current first-line treatment with sorafenib. However, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab first-line therapy has limitations. First, cancer patients falling into the criteria for the combination therapy may need to be further selected to reap benefits while avoiding some potential pitfalls. Second, the treatment regimen of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at a fixed dose may require adjustment for optimal normalization of the tumor microenvironment to obtain maximum efficacy and reduce adverse events. Third, utilization of predictive biomarkers is urgently needed to guide the entire treatment process. Here we review the current status of clinically approved combination immunotherapies and the underlying immune mechanisms. We further provide a perspective analysis of the limitations for combination immunotherapies and potential approaches to overcome the limitations.

Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Transarterial Chemoembolization with Camrelizumab plus Apatinib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of 38 Patients from a Single Center

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immune checkpoint inhibition (camrelizumab) plus an antiangiogenic agent (apatinib) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Between March 2019 and April 2021, the clinical data of 38 patients diagnosed with advanced HCC who initially received TACE combined with camrelizumab plus apatinib were reviewed retrospectively. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 2-3 months after initial therapy, the ORR and DCR was 50.0% (19/38) and 76.3% (29/38), respectively. The median PFS and OS were 7.3 months (range: 1.0-22.6 months) and 13.5 months (range: 2.3-24.3 months), respectively. Treatment-related AEs (grades 3-4) were observed in 25 patients (67.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

The combination of TACE with camrelizumab plus apatinib for the treatment of patients with advanced HCC showed promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile.

Lenvatinib Plus Camrelizumab vs. Lenvatinib Monotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Combining an antiangiogenic agent with an anti-PD-1 agent is a promising strategy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Aims

To explore the effectiveness and tolerability of lenvatinib plus camrelizumab vs. lenvatinib monotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable HCC.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with unresectable HCC treated with oral lenvatinib 8 mg daily and intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (L+C group) or lenvatinib 12 mg or 8 mg daily (L group) in four Chinese centers between September 2018 and February 2020. Tumor response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. The outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), 1-year OS rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

Results

By March 31, 2021, 92 patients were finally included, with 48 and 44 in the L+C and L groups, respectively. ORR was significantly higher in the L+C group than in the L group (RECIST 1.1: 37.5% vs. 13.6%, P=0.009; mRECIST: 41.7% vs. 20.5%, P=0.029). Median OS and 95% confidence interval (CI) was 13.9 (13.3-18.3) months in the L group and not reached in the L+C group (P=0.015). The 1-year survival rate was 79.2% and 56.8% in the L+C and L groups, respectively. Median PFS was 10.3 (6.6-14.0) months and 7.5 (5.7-9.3) months in the L+C and L groups, respectively (P=0.0098). Combined therapy vs. monotherapy was independently associated with a prolonged OS (hazard ratio=0.380, 95% CI=: 0.196-0.739, P=0.004) and a prolonged PFS (hazard ratio=0.454, 95%CI=0.282-0.731, P=0.001). The safety profile was comparable between the two groups. The most common adverse event in the L+C and L groups was loss of appetite (41.7% vs. 40.9%, P=0.941). Three patients in the L+C group and two in the L group terminated treatment owing to adverse events.

Conclusion

First-line lenvatinib plus camrelizumab showed better effectiveness than lenvatinib alone in patients with unresectable HCC.