Long-term outcomes in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis receiving adalimumab with or without methotrexate

Comparative efficacy and safety of etanercept and adalimumab in the treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Etanercept and Adalimumab in the treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA).

METHODS

From Jan 2021 to Oct 2023, 66 pJIA patients were prospectively randomized into Etanercept (n = 33) and Adalimumab (n = 33) groups at our hospital. Efficacy, via Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 (JADAS-10), and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cell count (WBC) were assessed pre-treatment and at 1-, 3-, 6-month intervals post-treatment. Adverse reactions were monitored.

RESULTS

Two groups showed comparable efficacy (P > 0.05) at baseline in anti-CCP, TNF-α, CRP, ESR, WBC, and JADAS-10 score. Treatment for a period of 1 to 3 months led to statistically significant reductions in these markers over time (P < 0.05). Adalimumab group was found significantly lower levels of mentioned markers than Etanercept group at 1-3 months (P < 0.05), but after 6 months, statistical differences vanished (P > 0.05). Normal total bilirubin, alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, serum creatinine levels were detected post-3 months in both groups; with similar adverse reaction rates (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both Etanercept and Adalimumab are effective and safe for managing pJIA, demonstrating significant reductions in inflammatory markers and disease activity with no significant difference in efficacy or safety profiles.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a rheumatic disorder that causes chronic joint inflammation beginning before the age of 16 years. Pharmacological treatment necessary to prevent joint destruction and functional impairment includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intra-articular corticosteroids, conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) like methotrexate (MTX), and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), abatacept, anakinra, and tocilizumab. More recently, targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) like tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib have been approved for the treatment of JIA.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of TNFi in children with JIA.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), and ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP from inception to 28 February 2024, with no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and data from the randomized part of withdrawal trials conducted in individuals with JIA where TNFi were compared to placebo, MTX, NSAIDs, other bDMARDs, tsDMARDs, or other TNFi. Our major outcomes were treatment response, pain, function, participant global assessment of well-being (disease activity), remission, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. At least two review authors performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias and GRADE assessment. The primary comparison was TNFi versus placebo. The primary time point was up to 16 weeks and up to the end of the trials for efficacy and safety outcomes, respectively.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine studies with 678 participants (80% females) with JIA. The mean age of participants ranged from 8 to 15 years, and the mean duration of symptoms ranged from 0.8 years to 6.7 years. Seven studies compared TNFi to placebo (570 participants), and two studies compared TNFi combined with MTX to MTX alone (108 participants). We identified no studies investigating the other predefined comparisons. Only two studies had a low risk of bias in all domains, while five studies had a high risk of bias in at least one domain, predominantly other bias. Two studies were at unclear risk of selection bias, and two studies were at unclear risk of detection bias. TNFi versus placebo Benefits at up to 16 weeks Low-certainty evidence (downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision) suggests that treatment with TNFi may increase the likelihood of achieving a treatment response, defined as pedACR70 (34% compared to 14% with placebo) (risk ratio [RR] 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48 to 4.14; 4 studies, 245 participants). The evidence is very uncertain (downgraded for indirectness and imprecision) for the effect of TNFi on pain, with mean pain scores (visual analogue scale [VAS] 0 to 100, 0 no pain, minimal clinically important difference [MCID] = 15 mm) lower with TNFi (11 mm) compared to placebo (33 mm) (mean difference [MD] 22 mm, 95% CI 50 mm lower to 5.7 mm higher; 2 studies, 72 participants). Similarly, the effect of TNFi on function (Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire [CHAQ], 0 to 3, 0 normal function) and quality of life (global assessment of well-being, VAS 0 to 100 mm, 0 no disease activity) is very uncertain. Mean function was 0.84 with TNFi and 1 with placebo (MD 0.16 lower, 95% CI 0.39 lower to 0.06 higher; 3 studies, 194 participants; very low-certainty evidence, downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision). The mean participant global assessment of well-being was 23 mm with TNFi and 34 mm with placebo (MD 11 mm lower, 95% CI 23 mm lower to 1 mm higher; 3 studies, 194 participants; very low-certainty evidence, downgraded for indirectness, imprecision, and risk of bias). No study reported data on remission. Harms at any time We are uncertain about the effect of TNFi on withdrawals due to adverse events (3%) compared to placebo (1%) (RR 3.41, 95% CI 0.73 to 15.9; 6 studies, 448 participants). We are also uncertain about the effect of TNFi on serious adverse events (7%) compared to placebo (6%) (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.22; 6 studies, 448 participants). The certainty of evidence was very low, downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision. TNFi plus MTX versus MTX alone Benefits at 17 to 26 weeks We are uncertain about the effect of TNFi plus MTX on treatment response. Seventy per cent of participants receiving MTX and 90% receiving TNFi plus MTX achieved treatment response (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.77; 1 study, 40 participants). We are also uncertain about the effect of TNFi plus MTX on remission. Five per cent of participants on MTX monotherapy and 40% on combination therapy were in remission (RR 8.00, 95% CI 1.10 to 58.19; 1 study, 40 participants). No study reported pain, function, or participant global assessment of well-being. Harms at any time We are uncertain about the effect of TNFi plus MTX on withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events. Very low-certainty evidence from two studies shows that 2/53 participants (4%) receiving MTX alone and 3/55 (5%) receiving TNFi plus MTX withdrew due to adverse events (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 9.82; 108 participants), and 5/53 (9%) receiving MTX alone and 0/55 receiving TNFi plus MTX reported serious adverse events (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.32). Due to risk of bias and imprecision, the certainty of evidence was very low across all major outcomes for this comparison.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In JIA, TNFi may result in a higher proportion of individuals achieving clinical improvement compared to placebo, but we are uncertain about the effect of TNFi on pain, function, and quality of life. We are also uncertain about the effect of TNFi combined with MTX versus MTX alone on clinical improvement and remission. Evidence for the safety of TNFi compared to placebo or MTX is very uncertain. There are no RCTs comparing TNFi to other treatments. More high-quality studies are warranted to assess the benefits and harms of TNFi in JIA.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of the JAK Inhibitors and Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Treating Children With Nonsystemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the efficacy and safety profiles of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) when used with or without methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of nonsystemic forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (nsJIA).

METHODS

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating efficacy and safety outcomes of JAKi or bDMARDs for the nsJIA population up to 2023 were searched in ClinicalTrial.gov, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Bayesian arm-based network meta-analysis compared efficacy as measured by Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-American College of Rheumatology 70 (JIA-ACR70) improvement and safety based on rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) among all therapies.

RESULTS

Eligible studies included 45 citations from 16 RCTs (7 parallel and 9 withdrawal trials) with a total of 1,821 participants that investigated nine bDMARDs, three with and six without MTX co-treatment, and two JAKis (tofacitinib and baricitnib). The reported SAE incidence rates ranged from 0 to 0.3 per person-year of follow-up; none of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. The JIA-ACR70 improvement by 16 weeks of treatment ranged from 11.3% to 89.5%. Compared with controls, significant JIA-ACR70 improvements were observed for etanercept, golimumab, and all three combination therapies (adalimumab+MTX, etanercept+MTX, and infliximab+MTX), with odds ratios ranging from 2.97 to 3.99. No significant pairwise comparisons between bDMARDs and JAKi versus bDMARDs were noted.

CONCLUSION

Overall, no significant evidence was found for efficacy and safety profiles in pairwise comparisons of JAKis and bDMARDs. Future studies will expand the meta-analysis by including non-RCT studies and individual participant data.

Early Anti-Drug Antibodies Predict Adalimumab Response in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Adalimumab, a TNF-alpha inhibitor, is approved to treat juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), helping control disease activity and reduce flare frequency. This study aims to investigate predictors of treatment response, including anti-drug antibodies. We reviewed 65 JIA patients (mean age 10.47 ± 3.90 years; 61.5% male) receiving adalimumab for an average of 2.64 ± 0.56 years, with demographics, laboratory parameters, therapeutic regimens, and treatment outcomes recorded. Disease status was evaluated using the Wallace criteria up to 36 months post-treatment initiation, and anti-adalimumab antibody levels were measured after 6 months of treatment. Enthesitis-related arthritis was the most common subtype (64.6%). Inactive disease status was achieved by 83.1% of patients, with 59.3% experiencing relapse. Detectable anti-adalimumab antibody at six months (p = 0.023) and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement (p = 0.038) identified those less likely to achieve inactive disease. An antibody level cutoff of 7.426 ng/mL best predicted response (AUC = 0.808; p = 0.008), while high anti-adalimumab antibody levels after treatment (p = 0.032) and an injection intervals over two weeks (p = 0.042) were predictors of future flares. Our results highlight that the presence of anti-adalimumab antibodies six months after treatment is a risk factor for poor response to adalimumab therapy.

Risk factors for growth retardation in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the role of various factors contributing to growth retardation, including nutritional intake, disease duration, and treatment history, and further identify key risk factors that may influence growth outcomes in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

Clinical data from 155 JIA children who were treated at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2022 were analyzed. The children were divided into the growth retardation group (n = 40) and the non-growth retardation group (n = 115) based on the height Z-score < -2 SD or not. The two groups were compared based on their baseline characteristics, disease-related factors, dietary habits, lifestyle, and family background. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were employed to identify and assess the factors associated with growth retardation.

RESULTS

Out of the 155 children, 40 (25.81%) were diagnosed with growth retardation. Children with growth retardation were more likely to have a disease duration ≥ 3 years (72.50% vs. 39.13%, P < 0.001), exercise time < 1 h/per day (68.50% vs. 33.04%, P < 0.001), glucocorticoid use (65.00% vs. 34.78%, P = 0.001), and active disease activity (72.50% vs. 37.39%, P < 0.001). These factors were identified as independent risk factors for growth retardation in multivariate analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) values for these factors ranged from 0.651 to 0.676, indicating moderate predictive accuracy. When considering all these factors together, the combined model demonstrated an AUC value of 0.702, suggesting a high predictive value.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of growth retardation in children with JIA is high, with factors such as disease duration, exercise time, GC treatment, clinic visits, picky eating, and disease activity contributing to its development. While each of these factors demonstrates moderate predictive value individually, their combined consideration significantly improves predictive accuracy.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Intravenous Golimumab in Children With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Long-Term Extension of an Open-Label Phase III Study

OBJECTIVE

To report pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, clinical effect, and safety of intravenous (IV) golimumab in children with active polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pcJIA) who participated in A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Golimumab in Pediatric Participants With Active Polyarticular Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy (GO-VIVA)'s open-label, long-term extension (LTE) through week 252.

METHODS

GO-VIVA participants who continued IV golimumab (80 mg/m2 every 8 weeks) after week 52 were included. PK and safety were assessed through week 244 (last dose) and week 252, respectively, and clinical response through week 116. Clinical outcomes included JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses and clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints (cJADAS10). Binary outcomes used nonresponder imputation, and other descriptive analyses used observed data.

RESULTS

Of 112/127 (88.2%) participants entering the LTE, 69 completed the week 252 visit. Median steady-state trough golimumab concentrations were generally maintained from week 52 through week 244 (range 0.3-0.6 μg/mL). Antigolimumab antibody rates were consistent through week 52 (39.2% [49/125]) and week 244 (44.8% [56/125]). Week 52 JIA-ACR 30/50/70/90 response rates (75.6% [96/127], 74% [94/127], 65.4% [83/127], and 48.8% [62/127], respectively) were generally maintained through week 116 (72.4% [92/127], 71.7% [91/127], 63.8% [81/127], and 50.4% [64/127], respectively), when the median cJADAS10 was 1.6 and 56.7% (72/127) of participants achieved cJADAS10 ≤ 5 (minimal disease activity). Rates (per 100 patient-years) of serious adverse events and serious infections through week 252 were 7.7 and 3.9, respectively.

CONCLUSION

GO-VIVA LTE participants experienced adequate PK exposure and stable safety and immunogenicity. The majority of participants experienced no more than minimal residual disease activity. Data suggest IV golimumab treatment provided durable clinical response through week 116, with an acceptable risk-benefit profile.

Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab in clinical trials of polyarticular or systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab (SC-TCZ) treatment in a long-term extension (LTE) of clinical trials in polyarticular or systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA or sJIA).

METHODS

Patients with pJIA or sJIA from two open-label, 52-week phase 1b core trials of SC-TCZ who had adequate response per investigator assessment entered the LTE and continued SC-TCZ treatment according to body weight-based dosing regimens until commercial availability or up to 5 years. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy were assessed for up to 3 years, and safety for up to 5 years in the LTE.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients with pJIA and 38 patients with sJIA entered the LTE. Tocilizumab trough concentrations were maintained within the range expected to provide clinical benefit (mean values: pJIA, ∼10 μg/ml; sJIA, ∼75 μg/ml over 3 years). Pharmacodynamic parameters (interleukin-6, soluble interleukin-6 receptor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein) were maintained throughout the LTE at levels achieved in the core trials. Inactive disease per American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria was reported for 90% (17/19) and 53% (8/15) of patients with pJIA and 91% (10/11) and 92% (12/13) of patients with sJIA in the <30 and ≥30 kg body weight groups, respectively. Serious adverse events in the LTE were reported in six patients with pJIA (13.6%; five serious infections) and five patients with sJIA (13.2%; one serious infection).

CONCLUSION

Patients with pJIA or sJIA experienced long-term disease control with SC-TCZ treatment. Long-term safety was consistent with the known tocilizumab safety profile.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02165345.

Prospective study to characterize adalimumab exposure in pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

In pediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD), adalimumab is dosed using fixed weight-based bands irrespective of methotrexate co-treatment, disease activity (DA) or other factors that might influence adalimumab pharmacokinetics (PK). In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) adalimumab exposure between 2-8 mg/L is associated with clinical response. PRD data on adalimumab is scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze adalimumab PK and its variability in PRD treated with/without methotrexate.

METHODS

A two-center prospective study in PRD patients aged 2-18 years treated with adalimumab and methotrexate (GA-M) or adalimumab alone (GA) for ≥ 12 weeks was performed. Adalimumab concentrations were collected 1-9 (maximum concentration; Cmax), and 10-14 days (minimum concentration; Cmin) during ≥ 12 weeks following adalimumab start. Concentrations were analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (lower limit of quantification: 0.5 mg/L). Log-normalized Cmin were compared between GA-M and GA using a standard t-test.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (14 per group), diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (71.4%), non-infectious uveitis (25%) or chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (3.6%) completed the study. GA-M included more females (71.4%; GA 35.7%, p = 0.13). At first study visit, children in GA-M had a slightly longer exposure to adalimumab (17.8 months [IQR 9.6, 21.6]) compared to GA (15.8 months [IQR 8.5, 30.8], p = 0.8). Adalimumab dosing was similar between both groups (median dose 40 mg every 14 days) and observed DA was low. Children in GA-M had a 27% higher median overall exposure compared to GA, although median Cmin adalimumab values were statistically not different (p = 0.3). Cmin values ≥ 8 mg/L (upper limit RA) were more frequently observed in GA-M versus GA (79% versus 64%). Overall, a wide range of Cmin values was observed in PRD (0.5 to 26 mg/L).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed a high heterogeneity in adalimumab exposure in PRD. Adalimumab exposure tended to be higher with methotrexate co-treatment compared to adalimumab monotherapy although differences were not statistically significant. Most children showed adalimumab exposure exceeding those reported for RA with clinical response, particularly with methotrexate co-treatment. This highlights the need of further investigations to establish model-based personalized treatment strategies in PRD to avoid under- and overexposure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04042792 , registered 02.08.2019.

Defining a therapeutic range for adalimumab serum concentrations in the management of pediatric noninfectious uveitis, a step towards personalized treatment

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab is currently considered the most efficacious anti-TNFα agent for childhood noninfectious uveitis (NIU). The objective of this study was to define a therapeutic range for adalimumab trough levels in the treatment of childhood NIU.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, pilot study of 36 children with NIU aged < 18 years, treated with adalimumab. Serum adalimumab through levels and adalimumab anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were analysed at least 24 weeks after start adalimumab.

RESULTS

Adalimumab trough levels were significantly higher in complete responders 11.8 μg/mL (range 6.9-33.0) compared to partial or non-responders 9,2 μg/mL (range 0-13.6) (p = 0,004). Receiver-operator characteristics analyses with an area under the curve of 0,749 (95% CI, 0,561-0,937) defined 9.6 µg/mL as the lower margin for the therapeutic range. This cut-off corresponds with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 56% (positive predictive value, 85%; negative predictive value, 62.5%). A concentration effect curve defined 13 µg/mL as the upper margin. Approximately one-third (30.5%) of patients had an adalimumab trough concentration exceeding 13 µg/mL. Free ADA were observed in 2 patients (5.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

A therapeutic range of adalimumab trough levels of 9.6 to 13 µg/mL, which corresponds with an optimal clinical effect, was identified. Therapeutic drug monitoring may guide the optimisation of treatment efficacy in children with NIU in the treat-to-target era.

Long-term immunoprotection after live attenuated measles-mumps-rubella booster vaccination in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Vaccines, especially live attenuated vaccines, in children with JIA pose a great challenge due to both potential lower immunogenicity and safety as a result of immunosuppressive treatment. For many years, in the Netherlands, JIA patients receive a measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) booster vaccine at the age of nine years as part of the national immunization program.

OBJECTIVES

To study long-term humoral immunoprotection in a large cohort of JIA patients who received the MMR booster vaccine while being treated with immunomodulatory therapies at the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital in Utrecht, the Netherlands.

METHODS

MMR-specific IgG antibody concentrations in stored serum samples of vaccinated JIA patients were determined with chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays (CMIA). Samples were analyzed five years after MMR booster vaccination and at last available follow-up visit using both crude and adjusted analyses. Additional clinical data were collected from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

In total, 236 samples from 182 patients were analyzed, including 67 samples that were available five years post-vaccination, and an additional 169 samples available from last visits with a median duration after vaccination of 6.9 years (IQR: 2.8-8.8). Twenty-eight patients were using biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDS) of whom 96% anti-TNF agents and 4% tocilizumab. Percentages of protective antibody levels against measles after five years were significantly lower for patients who used bDMARD therapy at vaccination compared to patients who did not: 60% versus 86% (P = 0.03). For mumps (80% versus 94%) and rubella (60% versus 83%) this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.11 and P = 0.07, respectively). Antibody levels post-vaccination decreased over time, albeit not significantly different between bDMARD users and non-bDMARD users.

CONCLUSION

The MMR booster vaccine demonstrated long-term immunogenicity in the majority of children with JIA from a large cohort, although lower percentages of protective measles antibody levels were observed in bDMARD users. Hence, it might be indicated to measure antibody levels at least five years after MMR booster vaccination in the latter group and advice an extra booster accordingly.

Efficacy and safety of TNF inhibitors in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

A systematic literature review was conducted to summarize efficacy and safety data from studies that evaluated tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

Relevant publications were identified via online searches (cutoff: March 16, 2021). After screening search results, outcome data were extracted if the treatment arm included ≥ 30 patients. Outcomes were described narratively, with efficacy assessed by JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria and safety assessed by the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) per 100 patient-years (100PY).

RESULTS

Among 87 relevant publications included in the qualitative synthesis, 19 publications described 13 clinical trials. Across the 13 trials, the percentages of patients who achieved JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 responses at Week 12 with adalimumab ranged 71-94%, 68-90%, 55-61%, and 39-42%, respectively; with etanercept (Week 12), 73-94%, 53-78%, 36-59%, and 28%; with golimumab (Week 16), 89%, 79%, 66%, and 36%; and with infliximab (Week 14), 64%, 50%, and 22% (JIA-ACR90 not reported). SAE incidence across all time points ranged 0-13.7 SAE/100PY for adalimumab, 0-20.0 SAE/100PY for etanercept, and 10.4-24.3 SAE/100PY for golimumab (1 study). SAE incidence could not be estimated from the 2 infliximab publications.

CONCLUSION

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of JIA, but additional evidence from head-to-head studies and over longer periods of time, especially in the context of the transition from pediatric to adult care, would be useful.

Dosing Variation at Initiation of Adalimumab and Etanercept and Clinical Outcomes in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the dose-response relationship of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibition in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

Participants of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry were eligible for inclusion in the analyses if they started TNF inhibition treatment for JIA. The primary treatment response was determined 3 to 7 months after the start of treatment, based on the JIA American College of Rheumatology Pediatric criteria for improvement, clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score, and persistence of treatment after 6 months. Subsequently, pooled logistic regression models were performed to include long-term follow-up data. The models were adjusted for risk factors associated with poor treatment response. Dosing was expressed by body weight, body surface area, ideal body weight, fat free mass, and lean body mass.

RESULTS

Participants treated with adalimumab (n = 328) and etanercept (n = 437) were included in the analyses (median dose 0.82 mg/kg body weight [interquartile range (IQR) 0.66-1.04] and 0.83 mg/kg body weight [IQR 0.75-0.95], respectively). The majority of analyses did not show a relationship between dose and outcome. Where associations were found, results were conflicting. Alternative dosing characteristics based on ideal body weight, fat free mass, and lean body mass did not result in stronger or more consistent associations.

CONCLUSION

This study was not able to confirm our hypothesis that increased dosing of TNF inhibitors results in improved treatment outcomes. Although adjustment was performed for risk factors of impaired treatment response, residual confounding by indication likely explains the negative associations found in this study.

Probability of Response in the First Sixteen Weeks After Starting Biologics: An Analysis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Biologics Trials

OBJECTIVES

Most juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) trials used an open-label run-in period followed by randomized medication withdrawal. We used data from the run-in period of 4 bDMARD trials to 1) delineate early response trajectory to bDMARDs and 2) identify predictors of early response.

METHODS

Data from the first 16 weeks of 4 bDMARD trials were used. The primary outcome was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 50 (Pedi 50) response criteria: clinically significant response defined as ACR Pedi 50 or greater. The secondary outcome was the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints (cJADAS10) minimal disease activity state. Response transition rates and predictors were modeled using an inhomogeneous Markov multistate model.

RESULTS

Five hundred thirty-two participants (70% receiving methotrexate, 41% prednisone) were included. By month 4, the probability of attaining ACR Pedi 50 or greater was 0.698. If ACR Pedi 50 or more was not achieved by month 1, the probability of achieving it by month 4 was 0.60. If ACR Pedi 50 or more was not achieved by month 3, the probability of achieving this by month 4 was 0.31. Age at diagnosis, disease duration, baseline rheumatoid factor, and active joint counts predicted ACR and cJADAS state transitions, adjusted for concomitant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

No response ACR Pedi 50 or more by month 1 after treatment was associated with a 0.60 probability of responding by month 4, but not responding by month 3 was associated with a 0.31 probability of response by month 4. Baseline disease duration, rheumatoid factor, and active joint counts predicted early treatment response (ACR and cJADAS10 states).

Uveitis Is a Risk Factor for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis' Significant Flare in Patients Treated With Biologics

OBJECTIVES

Uveitis is the most frequent extra-articular manifestation of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Our study is aimed to evaluate the possible difference in arthritis course depending on uveitis presence in patients with JIA, treated with biologics.

METHODS

From our database of patients with JIA treated with biologics, we extracted patients to whom the first agent was administrated with or without MTX. The exclusion criteria included treatment with current systemic corticosteroids, infliximab, rituximab, observation period <3 years, and no missing data. After selection, 175 patients were eligible for analysis. We evaluated clinically significant flare with joint involvement (which required change of biologic or non-biologic DMARD) and time to flare. We compared two groups: (i) patients with uveitis (n = 32) and (ii) patients without uveitis (n = 143). For statistical analysis, we used Cox's regression models, the log-Rank test, x ² test, and the Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

There was no difference in gender distribution and achievement of arthritis remission between groups. Patients in the non-uveitis group predominantly received etanercept (64.3%). In the uveitis group, the most prescribed biologic agent was adalimumab (71.9%). The presence of uveitis increased the risk of JIA flare, OR = 3.8 (95% CI: 1.7; 8.7), and the cumulative probability of joint flare, RR = 4.5 (95% CI: 1.7; 12.1), p =.003, after adjustment on methotrexate, RR = 3.1 (1.6; 6.), p =.0008. In the subgroup of patients treated with adalimumab, the absence of methotrexate increased the cumulative probability of flare [RR = 6.5 (95% CI: 1.4; 31.1), p = 0.02].

CONCLUSION

The presence of uveitis proved to be a risk factor in JIA flare. Methotrexate can decrease the cumulative flare probability. Further trials are required.

Signals and Mechanisms Regulating Monocyte and Macrophage Activation in the Pathogenesis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Monocytes (Mos) and macrophages (Mφs) are key players in the innate immune system and are critical in coordinating the initiation, expansion, and regression of many autoimmune diseases. In addition, they display immunoregulatory effects that impact inflammation and are essential in tissue repair and regeneration. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an umbrella term describing inflammatory joint diseases in children. Accumulated evidence suggests a link between Mo and Mφ activation and JIA pathogenesis. Accordingly, topics regarding the signals and mechanisms regulating Mo and Mφ activation leading to pathologies in patients with JIA are of great interest. In this review, we critically summarize recent advances in the understanding of how Mo and Mφ activation is involved in JIA pathogenesis and focus on the signaling pathways and mechanisms participating in the related cell activation processes.

OBSIDIAn - real world evidence of Originator to BioSImilar Drug switch in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Limited data about use of biosimilars are available in children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). This study therefore aimed to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of switching from etanercept (ETA) and adalimumab (ADA) originators to their biosimilars, in children with JIA, in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This is a retro-prospective non-interventional multicentre Italian comparative cohort study. Medical charts of JIA children treated with biosimilars of ETA or ADA were included. Efficacy and safety of TNF-inhibitors therapy was evaluated at last follow-up during originator and at 3, 6 and 12 months following the switch to biosimilar.

RESULTS

59 children (42 female, median age at onset 88 months) were treated with biosimilar of ETA (21) and ADA (38). Forty-five switched from the originator to the BIO (17 ETA, 28 ADA). At time of switch, 12/17 patients on ETA and 18/28 on ADA were in remission. No significant difference has been found at 3, 6 and 12 months after the switch. Ten patients discontinued biosimilars due to disease remission (4 ETA, 3 ADA), family willing (1 ETA), occurrence of burning at injection site (1 ETA), and persistent activity (1 ADA). No statistically significant difference was observed between originator and BIOs, nor between originator and BIOs, and between ADA and ETA in time to disease remission achievement, time to relapse and number of patients who experienced AE.

CONCLUSION

Our real-life results seem to confirm the efficacy and safety profile of switching from originator of ADA and ETA to their respective BIOs also in paediatric patients with JIA.

Biomarkers of Response to Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Background: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic inflammatory arthritis of childhood, characterized by various clinical phenotypes associated with variable prognosis. Significant progress has been achieved with the use of biologic treatments, which specifically block pro-inflammatory molecules involved in the disease pathogenesis. The most commonly used biologics in JIA are monoclonal antibodies and recombinant proteins targeting interleukins 1 (IL-1) and 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α). Several biomarkers have been investigated in JIA. Aims: To assess the level of evidence available regarding the role of biomarkers in JIA related to guiding clinical and therapeutic decisions, providing disease prognostic information, facilitating disease activity monitoring and assessing biologic treatment response in JIA, as well as propose new strategies for biologic therapy-related biomarker use in JIA. Methods: We searched PubMed for relevant literature using predefined key words corresponding to several categories of biomarkers to assess their role in predicting and assessing biologic treatment response and clinical remission in JIA. Results: We reviewed serological, cellular, genetic, transcriptomic and imaging biomarkers, to identify candidates that are both well-established and widely used, as well as newly investigated in JIA on biologic therapy. We evaluated their role in management of JIA as well as identified the unmet needs for new biomarker discovery and better clinical applications. Conclusion: Although there are no ideal biomarkers in JIA, we identified serological biomarkers with potential clinical utility. We propose strategies of combining biomarkers of response to biologics in JIA, as well as routine implementation of clinically acceptable imaging biomarkers for improved disease assessment performance.