Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection and Classification of Central Canal, Lateral Recess, and Neural Foraminal Stenosis at Lumbar Spine MRI

Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: realistic clinical applications in the next decade

This article will provide a perspective review of the most extensively investigated deep learning (DL) applications for musculoskeletal disease detection that have the best potential to translate into routine clinical practice over the next decade. Deep learning methods for detecting fractures, estimating pediatric bone age, calculating bone measurements such as lower extremity alignment and Cobb angle, and grading osteoarthritis on radiographs have been shown to have high diagnostic performance with many of these applications now commercially available for use in clinical practice. Many studies have also documented the feasibility of using DL methods for detecting joint pathology and characterizing bone tumors on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, musculoskeletal disease detection on MRI is difficult as it requires multi-task, multi-class detection of complex abnormalities on multiple image slices with different tissue contrasts. The generalizability of DL methods for musculoskeletal disease detection on MRI is also challenging due to fluctuations in image quality caused by the wide variety of scanners and pulse sequences used in routine MRI protocols. The diagnostic performance of current DL methods for musculoskeletal disease detection must be further evaluated in well-designed prospective studies using large image datasets acquired at different institutions with different imaging parameters and imaging hardware before they can be fully implemented in clinical practice. Future studies must also investigate the true clinical benefits of current DL methods and determine whether they could enhance quality, reduce error rates, improve workflow, and decrease radiologist fatigue and burnout with all of this weighed against the costs.

Development of a Deep-Learning Model for Diagnosing Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Based on CT Images

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop an initial deep-learning (DL) model based on computerized tomography (CT) scans for diagnosing lumbar spinal stenosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Magnetic resonance imaging is commonly used for diagnosing lumbar spinal stenosis due to its high soft tissue resolution, but CT is more portable, cost-effective, and has wider regional coverage. Using DL models to improve the accuracy of CT diagnosis can effectively reduce missed diagnoses and misdiagnoses in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Axial lumbar spine CT scans obtained between March 2022 and September 2023 were included. The data set was divided into a training set (62.3%), a validation set (22.9%), and a control set (14.8%). All data were labeled by two spine surgeons using the widely accepted grading system for lumbar spinal stenosis. The training and validation sets were used to annotate the regions of interest by the two spine surgeons. First, a region of interest detection model and a convolutional neural network classifier were trained using the training set. After training, the model was preliminarily evaluated using a validation set. Finally, the performance of the DL model was evaluated on the control set, and a comparison was made between the model and the classification performance of specialists with varying levels of experience.

RESULTS

The central stenosis grading accuracies of DL Model Version 1 and DL Model Version 2 were 88% and 83%, respectively. The lateral recess grading accuracies of DL Model Version 1 and DL Model Version 2 were 75% and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminarily developed DL system for assessing the degree of lumbar spinal stenosis in CT, including the central canal and lateral recess, has shown similar accuracy to experienced specialist physicians. This holds great value for further development and clinical application.

Diagnostic evaluation of deep learning accelerated lumbar spine MRI

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Deep learning (DL) accelerated MR techniques have emerged as a promising approach to accelerate routine MR exams. While prior studies explored DL acceleration for specific lumbar MRI sequences, a gap remains in comprehending the impact of a fully DL-based MRI protocol on scan time and diagnostic quality for routine lumbar spine MRI. To address this, we assessed the image quality and diagnostic performance of a DL-accelerated lumbar spine MRI protocol in comparison to a conventional protocol.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 36 consecutive outpatients undergoing non-contrast enhanced lumbar spine MRIs. Both protocols included sagittal T1, T2, STIR, and axial T2-weighted images. Two blinded neuroradiologists independently reviewed images for foraminal stenosis, spinal canal stenosis, nerve root compression, and facet arthropathy. Grading comparison employed the Wilcoxon signed rank test. For the head-to-head comparison, a 5-point Likert scale to assess image quality, considering artifacts, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), anatomical structure visualization, and overall diagnostic quality. We applied a 15% noninferiority margin to determine whether the DL-accelerated protocol was noninferior.

RESULTS

No significant differences existed between protocols when evaluating foraminal and spinal canal stenosis, nerve compression, or facet arthropathy (all p > .05). The DL-spine protocol was noninferior for overall diagnostic quality and visualization of the cord, CSF, intervertebral disc, and nerve roots. However, it exhibited reduced SNR and increased artifact perception. Interobserver reproducibility ranged from moderate to substantial (κ = 0.50-0.76).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that DL reconstruction in spine imaging effectively reduces acquisition times while maintaining comparable diagnostic quality to conventional MRI.

A fully automatic MRI-guided decision support system for lumbar disc herniation using machine learning

Background

Normalized decision support system for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) will improve reproducibility compared with subjective clinical diagnosis and treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an essential role in the evaluation of LDH. This study aimed to develop an MRI-based decision support system for LDH, which evaluates lumbar discs in a reproducible, consistent, and reliable manner.

Methods

The research team proposed a system based on machine learning that was trained and tested by a large, manually labeled data set comprising 217 patients' MRI scans (3255 lumbar discs). The system analyzes the radiological features of identified discs to diagnose herniation and classifies discs by Pfirrmann grade and MSU classification. Based on the assessment, the system provides clinical advice.

Results

Eventually, the accuracy of the diagnosis process reached 95.83%. An 83.5% agreement was observed between the system's prediction and the ground-truth in the Pfirrmann grade. In the case of MSU classification, 95.0% precision was achieved. With the assistance of this system, the accuracy, interpretation efficiency and interrater agreement among surgeons were improved substantially.

Conclusion

This system showed considerable accuracy and efficiency, and therefore could serve as an objective reference for the diagnosis and treatment procedure in clinical practice.

Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods on Osteoporosis Classification with Radiographs-A Systematic Review

Osteoporosis is a complex endocrine disease characterized by a decline in bone mass and microstructural integrity. It constitutes a major global health problem. Recent progress in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has opened new avenues for the effective diagnosis of osteoporosis via radiographs. This review investigates the application of AI classification of osteoporosis in radiographs. A comprehensive exploration of electronic repositories (ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE) was carried out in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement (PRISMA). A collection of 31 articles was extracted from these repositories and their significant outcomes were consolidated and outlined. This encompassed insights into anatomical regions, the specific machine learning methods employed, the effectiveness in predicting BMD, and categorizing osteoporosis. Through analyzing the respective studies, we evaluated the effectiveness and limitations of AI osteoporosis classification in radiographs. The pooled reported accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of osteoporosis classification ranges from 66.1% to 97.9%, 67.4% to 100.0%, and 60.0% to 97.5% respectively. This review underscores the potential of AI osteoporosis classification and offers valuable insights for future research endeavors, which should focus on addressing the challenges in technical and clinical integration to facilitate practical implementation of this technology.

Deep Learning Model for Grading and Localization of Lumbar Disc Herniation on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

Methods for grading and localization of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) on MRI are complex, time-consuming, and subjective. Utilizing deep learning (DL) models as assistance would mitigate such complexities.

PURPOSE

To develop an interpretable DL model capable of grading and localizing LDH.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

1496 patients (M/F: 783/713) were evaluated, and randomly divided into training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) sets.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5T MRI for axial T2-weighted sequences (spin echo).

ASSESSMENT

The training set was annotated by three spinal surgeons using the Michigan State University classification to train the DL model. The test set was annotated by a spinal surgery expert (as ground truth labels), and two spinal surgeons (comparison with the trained model). An external test set was employed to evaluate the generalizability of the DL model.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Calculated intersection over union (IoU) for detection consistency, utilized Gwet's AC1 to assess interobserver agreement, and evaluated model performance based on sensitivity and specificity, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The DL model achieved high detection consistency in both the internal test dataset (grading: mean IoU 0.84, recall 99.6%; localization: IoU 0.82, recall 99.5%) and external test dataset (grading: 0.72, 98.0%; localization: 0.71, 97.6%). For internal testing, the DL model (grading: 0.81; localization: 0.76), Rater 1 (0.88; 0.82), and Rater 2 (0.86; 0.83) demonstrated results highly consistent with the ground truth labels. The overall sensitivity of the DL model was 87.0% for grading and 84.0% for localization, while the specificity was 95.5% and 94.4%. For external testing, the DL model showed an appreciable decrease in consistency (grading: 0.69; localization: 0.66), sensitivity (77.2%; 76.7%), and specificity (92.3%; 91.8%).

DATA CONCLUSION

The classification capabilities of the DL model closely resemble those of spinal surgeons. For future improvement, enriching the diversity of cases could enhance the model's generalization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

TECHNICAL EFFICACY

Stage 2.

Development of a Deep Learning Model for the Analysis of Dorsal Root Ganglion Chromatolysis in Rat Spinal Stenosis

Objective

To create a deep learning (DL) model that can accurately detect and classify three distinct types of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons: normal, segmental chromatolysis, and central chromatolysis. The DL model has the potential to improve the efficiency and precision of neuron classification in research related to spinal injuries and diseases.

Methods

H&E slide images were divided into an internal training set (80%) and a test set (20%). The training dataset was labeled by two pathologists using pre-defined grades. Using this dataset, a two-component DL model was developed with the first component being a convolutional neural network (CNN) that was trained to detect the region of interest (ROI) and the second component being another CNN used for classification.

Results

A total of 240 lumbar dorsal root ganglion (DRG) pathology slide images from rats were analyzed. The internal testing results showed an accuracy of 93.13%, and the external dataset testing demonstrated an accuracy of 93.44%.

Conclusion

The DL model demonstrated a level of agreement comparable to that of pathologists in detecting and classifying normal and segmental chromatolysis neurons, although its agreement was slightly lower for central chromatolysis neurons. Significance: DL in improving the accuracy and efficiency of pathological analysis suggests that it may have a role in enhancing medical decision-making.

A Convolutional Neural Network for Automated Detection of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop and validate a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to distinguish between cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and multilevel degenerative spinal stenosis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and to compare the diagnostic ability with spine surgeons.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Some artificial intelligence models have been applied in spinal image analysis and many of promising results were obtained; however, there was still no study attempted to develop a deep learning model in detecting cervical OPLL using MRI images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 272 cervical OPLL and 412 degenerative patients underwent surgical treatment were enrolled and divided into the training (513 cases) and test dataset (171 cases). CNN models applying ResNet architecture with 34, 50, and 101 layers of residual blocks were constructed and trained with the sagittal MRI images from the training dataset. To evaluate the performance of CNN, the receiver operating characteristic curves of 3 ResNet models were plotted and the area under the curve were calculated on the test dataset. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the diagnosis by the CNN were calculated and compared with 3 senior spine surgeons.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracies of our ResNet34, ResNet50, and ResNet101 models were 92.98%, 95.32%, and 97.66%, respectively; the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curves of these models were 0.914, 0.942, and 0.971, respectively. The accuracies and specificities of ResNet50 and ResNet101 models were significantly higher than all spine surgeons; for the sensitivity, ResNet101 model achieved better values than that of the 2 surgeons.

CONCLUSION

The performance of our ResNet model in differentiating cervical OPLL from degenerative spinal stenosis using MRI is promising, better results were achieved with more layers of residual blocks applied.

Radiology Reports Do Not Accurately Portray the Severity of Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

(1) To compare cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiology reports to a validated grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis (FS) and (2) to evaluate whether the severity of cervical neural FS on MRI correlates to motor weakness or patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Radiology reports of cervical spine MRI are often reviewed to assess the degree of neural FS. However, research looking at the association between these reports and objective MRI findings, as well as clinical symptoms, is lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified all adult patients undergoing primary 1 or 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at a single academic center for an indication of cervical radiculopathy. Preoperative MRI was assessed for neural FS severity using the grading system described by Kim and colleagues for each level of fusion, as well as adjacent levels. Neural FS severity was recorded from diagnostic radiologist MRI reports. Motor weakness was defined as an examination grade <4/5 on the final preoperative encounter. Regression analysis was conducted to evaluate whether the degree of FS by either classification was related to patient-reported outcome measure severity.

RESULTS

A total of 283 patients were included in the study, and 998 total levels were assessed. There were significant differences between the MRI grading system and the assessment by radio-logists (P< 0.001). In levels with moderate stenosis, 28.9% were classified as having no stenosis by radiology. In levels with severe stenosis, 29.7% were classified as having mild-moderate stenosis or less. Motor weakness was found similarly often in levels of moderate or severe stenosis (6.9% and 9.2%, respectively). On regression analysis, no associations were found between baseline patient-reported outcome measures and stenosis severity assessed by radiologists or MRI grading systems.

CONCLUSION

Radiology reports on the severity of cervical neural FS are not consistent with a validated MRI grading system. These radiology reports underestimated the severity of neural foraminal compression and may be inappropriate when used for clinical decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Artificial intelligence to predict T4 stage of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using CT imaging

BACKGROUND

The accurate assessment of T4 stage of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has consistently presented a considerable difficulty for radiologists. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline for the prediction of T4 stage of PDAC using contrast-enhanced CT imaging.

METHODS

The data were obtained retrospectively from consecutive patients with surgically resected and pathologically proved PDAC at two institutions between July 2017 and June 2022. Initially, a deep learning (DL) model was developed to segment PDAC. Subsequently, radiomics features were extracted from the automatically segmented region of interest (ROI), which encompassed both the tumor region and a 3 mm surrounding area, to construct a predictive model for determining T4 stage of PDAC. The assessment of the models' performance involved the calculation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

The study encompassed a cohort of 509 PDAC patients, with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range: 55-67). The proportion of patients in T4 stage within the model was 16.9%. The model achieved an AUC of 0.849 (95% CI: 0.753-0.940), a sensitivity of 0.875, and a specificity of 0.728 in predicting T4 stage of PDAC. The performance of the model was determined to be comparable to that of two experienced abdominal radiologists (AUCs: 0.849 vs. 0.834 and 0.857).

CONCLUSION

The automated AI pipeline utilizing tumor and peritumor-related radiomics features demonstrated comparable performance to that of senior abdominal radiologists in predicting T4 stage of PDAC.

Practical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Imaging: A Review

Artificial intelligence (AI), a transformative technology with unprecedented potential in medical imaging, can be applied to various spinal pathologies. AI-based approaches may improve imaging efficiency, diagnostic accuracy, and interpretation, which is essential for positive patient outcomes. This review explores AI algorithms, techniques, and applications in spine imaging, highlighting diagnostic impact and challenges with future directions for integrating AI into spine imaging workflow.

A neural network model for detection and classification of lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI

OBJECTIVES

To develop a three-stage convolutional neural network (CNN) approach to segment anatomical structures, classify the presence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) for all 3 stenosis types: central, lateral recess and foraminal and assess its severity on spine MRI and to demonstrate its efficacy as an accurate and consistent diagnostic tool.

METHODS

The three-stage model was trained on 1635 annotated lumbar spine MRI studies consisting of T2-weighted sagittal and axial planes at each vertebral level. Accuracy of the model was evaluated on an external validation set of 150 MRI studies graded on a scale of absent, mild, moderate or severe by a panel of 7 radiologists. The reference standard for all types was determined by majority voting and in case of disagreement, adjudicated by an external radiologist. The radiologists' diagnoses were then compared to the diagnoses of the model.

RESULTS

The model showed comparable performance to the radiologist average both in terms of the determination of presence/absence of LSS as well as severity classification, for all 3 stenosis types. In the case of central canal stenosis, the sensitivity, specificity and AUROC of the CNN were (0.971, 0.864, 0.963) for binary (presence/absence) classification compared to the radiologist average of (0.786, 0.899, 0.842). For lateral recess stenosis, the sensitivity, specificity and AUROC of the CNN were (0.853, 0.787, 0.907) compared to the radiologist average of (0.713, 0.898, 805). For foraminal stenosis, the sensitivity, specificity and AUROC of the CNN were (0.942, 0.844, 0.950) compared to the radiologist average of (0.879, 0.877, 0.878). Multi-class severity classifications showed similarly comparable statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The CNN showed comparable performance to radiologist subspecialists for the detection and classification of LSS. The integration of neural network models in the detection of LSS could bring higher accuracy, efficiency, consistency, and post-hoc interpretability in diagnostic practices.

AI-Based Measurement of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on MRI: External Evaluation of a Fully Automated Model

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to clinically validate a fully automated AI model for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based quantifications of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included lumbar spine MRI of 100 consecutive clinical patients (56 ± 17 years; 43 females, 57 males) performed on clinical 1.5 (51 examinations) and 3 T MRI scanners (49 examinations) with heterogeneous clinical imaging protocols. The AI model performed segmentations of the thecal sac on axial T2-weighted sequences. Based on these segmentations, the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) distance, and the area of the thecal sac were measured in a fully automated manner. For comparison, 2 fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists performed the same segmentations and measurements independently. Statistics included 1-sample t tests, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots, and Dice coefficients. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The average measurements of the AI model, reader 1, and reader 2 were 194 ± 72 mm2, 181 ± 71 mm2, and 179 ± 70 mm2 for thecal sac area, 13 ± 3.3 mm, 12.6 ± 3.3 mm, and 12.6 ± 3.2 mm for AP distance, and 19.5 ± 3.9 mm, 20 ± 4.3 mm, and 19.4 ± 4 mm for ML distance, respectively. Significant differences existed for all pairwise comparisons, besides reader 1 versus AI model for the ML distance and reader 1 versus reader 2 for the AP distance (P = 0.1 and P = 0.21, respectively). The pairwise mean absolute errors among reader 1, reader 2, and the AI model ranged from 0.59 mm and 0.75 mm for the AP distance, from 1.16 mm to 1.37 mm for the ML distance, and from 7.9 mm2 to 15.54 mm2 for the thecal sac area. Pairwise ICCs among reader 1, reader 2, and the AI model ranged from 0.91 and 0.94 for the AP distance and from 0.86 to 0.9 for the ML distance without significant differences. For the thecal sac area, the pairwise ICC between both readers and the AI model of 0.97 each was slightly, but significantly lower than the ICC between reader 1 and reader 2 of 0.99. Similarly, the Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance between both readers and the AI model were significantly lower than the values between reader 1 and reader 2, overall ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 for the Dice coefficients and 1.1 to 1.44 for the Hausdorff distances.

CONCLUSIONS

The investigated AI model is reliable for assessing the AP and the ML thecal sac diameters with human level accuracies. The small differences for measurement and segmentation of the thecal sac area between the AI model and the radiologists are likely within a clinically acceptable range.

Automated detection and classification of the rotator cuff tear on plain shoulder radiograph using deep learning

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) using radiographs alone is clinically challenging; thus, the utility of deep learning algorithms based on convolutional neural networks has been remarkable in the field of medical imaging recognition. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (a deep learning algorithm; a convolutional neural network) to detect and classify RCTs using shoulder radiographs, and compare its diagnostic performance with that of orthopedic surgeons.

METHODS

A total of 1169 plain shoulder anteroposterior radiographs (1 image per shoulder) were included in the total dataset and divided into four groups: intact, small, medium, and large to massive tear groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating curve were measured for the detection of RCTs through binary classification. The average accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score were divided into four groups by cuff tear size for multiclass classification.

RESULTS

The convolutional neural network demonstrated a high performance, with 92% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 86% accuracy, and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.88 for the detection of RCTs. The average accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score of the convolutional neural network for classification were 60%, 0.42, 0.49, and 0.45, respectively. The accuracy of the convolutional neural network for the detection and classification of RCTs was significantly better than that of orthopedic surgeons.

CONCLUSION

The convolutional neural network demonstrated the diagnostic ability to detect and classify RCTs using plain shoulder radiographs, and the diagnostic performance exhibited equal to superior accuracy when compared with those of shoulder experts.

MRI radiomics-based decision support tool for a personalized classification of cervical disc degeneration: a two-center study

Objectives: To develop and validate an MRI radiomics-based decision support tool for the automated grading of cervical disc degeneration. Methods: The retrospective study included 2,610 cervical disc samples of 435 patients from two hospitals. The cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of patients confirmed cervical disc degeneration grades using the Pfirrmann grading system. A training set (1,830 samples of 305 patients) and an independent test set (780 samples of 130 patients) were divided for the construction and validation of the machine learning model, respectively. We provided a fine-tuned MedSAM model for automated cervical disc segmentation. Then, we extracted 924 radiomic features from each segmented disc in T1 and T2 MRI modalities. All features were processed and selected using minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and multiple machine learning algorithms. Meanwhile, the radiomics models of various machine learning algorithms and MRI images were constructed and compared. Finally, the combined radiomics model was constructed in the training set and validated in the test set. Radiomic feature mapping was provided for auxiliary diagnosis. Results: Of the 2,610 cervical disc samples, 794 (30.4%) were classified as low grade and 1,816 (69.6%) were classified as high grade. The fine-tuned MedSAM model achieved good segmentation performance, with the mean Dice coefficient of 0.93. Higher-order texture features contributed to the dominant force in the diagnostic task (80%). Among various machine learning models, random forest performed better than the other algorithms (p < 0.01), and the T2 MRI radiomics model showed better results than T1 MRI in the diagnostic performance (p < 0.05). The final combined radiomics model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95, an accuracy of 89.51%, a precision of 87.07%, a recall of 98.83%, and an F1 score of 0.93 in the test set, which were all better than those of other models (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The radiomics-based decision support tool using T1 and T2 MRI modalities can be used for cervical disc degeneration grading, facilitating individualized management.

An Artificial Intelligence-Based Support Tool for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Diagnosis from Self-Reported History Questionnaire

OBJECTIVES

Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) leads to functional impairment and pain. While radiologic characterization of the morphological stenosis grade can aid in the diagnosis, it may not always correlate with patient symptoms. Artificial intelligence (AI) may diagnose symptomatic LSS in patients solely based on self-reported history questionnaires.

METHODS

We evaluated multiple machine learning (ML) models to determine the likelihood of LSS using a self-reported questionnaire in patients experiencing low back pain and/or numbness in the legs. The questionnaire was built from peer-reviewed literature and a multidisciplinary panel of experts. Random forest, lasso logistic regression, support vector machine, gradient boosting trees, deep neural networks, and automated machine learning models were trained and performance metrics were compared.

RESULTS

Data from 4827 patients (4690 patients without LSS: mean age 62.44, range 27-84 years, 62.8% females, and 137 patients with LSS: mean age 50.59, range 30-71 years, 59.9% females) were retrospectively collected. Among the evaluated models, the random forest model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) between model prediction and LSS diagnosis of 0.96, a sensitivity of 0.94, a specificity of 0.88, a balanced accuracy of 0.91, and a Cohen's kappa of 0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that ML can automate the diagnosis of LSS based on self-reported questionnaires with high accuracy. Implementation of standardized and intelligence-automated workflow may serve as a supportive diagnostic tool to streamline patient management and potentially lower health care costs.

Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to prospectively compare quantitative and subjective image quality, scanning time, and diagnostic confidence between a new deep learning-based reconstruction(DLR) algorithm and standard MRI protocol of lumbar spine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty healthy volunteers underwent 1.5T MRI examination of lumbar spine from September 2021 to May 2023. Protocol acquisition comprised sagittal T1- and T2-weighted fast spin echo and short-tau inversion recovery images and axial multislices T2-weighted fast spin echo images. All sequences were acquired with both DLR algorithm and standard protocols. Two radiologists, blinded to the reconstruction technique, performed quantitative and qualitative image quality analysis in consensus reading; diagnostic confidence was also assessed. Quantitative image quality analysis was assessed by calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative image quality analysis and diagnostic confidence were assessed with a five-point Likert scale. Scanning times were also compared.

RESULTS

DLR SNR was higher in all sequences (all p<0.001). CNR of the DLR was superior to conventional dataset only for axial and sagittal T2-weighted fast spin echo images (p<0.001). Qualitative analysis showed DLR had higher overall quality in all sequences (all p<0.001), with an inter-rater agreement of 0.83 (0.78-0.86). DLR total protocol scanning time was lower compared to standard protocol (6:26 vs 12:59 min, p<0.001). Diagnostic confidence for DLR algorithm was not inferior to standard protocol.

CONCLUSION

DLR applied to 1.5T MRI is a feasible method for lumbar spine imaging providing morphologic sequences with higher image quality and similar diagnostic confidence compared with standard protocol, enabling a remarkable time saving (up to 50%).

Machine Learning Predicts Decompression Levels for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Using Canal Radiomic Features from Computed Tomography Myelography

BACKGROUND

The accurate preoperative identification of decompression levels is crucial for the success of surgery in patients with multi-level lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The objective of this study was to develop machine learning (ML) classifiers that can predict decompression levels using computed tomography myelography (CTM) data from LSS patients.

METHODS

A total of 1095 lumbar levels from 219 patients were included in this study. The bony spinal canal in CTM images was manually delineated, and radiomic features were extracted. The extracted data were randomly divided into training and testing datasets (8:2). Six feature selection methods combined with 12 ML algorithms were employed, resulting in a total of 72 ML classifiers. The main evaluation indicator for all classifiers was the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC-AUC), with the precision-recall AUC (PR-AUC) serving as the secondary indicator. The prediction outcome of ML classifiers was decompression level or not.

RESULTS

The embedding linear support vector (embeddingLSVC) was the optimal feature selection method. The feature importance analysis revealed the top 5 important features of the 15 radiomic predictors, which included 2 texture features, 2 first-order intensity features, and 1 shape feature. Except for shape features, these features might be eye-discernible but hardly quantified. The top two ML classifiers were embeddingLSVC combined with support vector machine (EmbeddingLSVC_SVM) and embeddingLSVC combined with gradient boosting (EmbeddingLSVC_GradientBoost). These classifiers achieved ROC-AUCs over 0.90 and PR-AUCs over 0.80 in independent testing among the 72 classifiers. Further comparisons indicated that EmbeddingLSVC_SVM appeared to be the optimal classifier, demonstrating superior discrimination ability, slight advantages in the Brier scores on the calibration curve, and Net benefits on the Decision Curve Analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

ML successfully extracted valuable and interpretable radiomic features from the spinal canal using CTM images, and accurately predicted decompression levels for LSS patients. The EmbeddingLSVC_SVM classifier has the potential to assist surgical decision making in clinical practice, as it showed high discrimination, advantageous calibration, and competitive utility in selecting decompression levels in LSS patients using canal radiomic features from CTM.

Deep learning-based reconstruction for acceleration of lumbar spine MRI: a prospective comparison with standard MRI

OBJECTIVE

To compare the image quality and diagnostic performance between standard turbo spin-echo MRI and accelerated MRI with deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction for degenerative lumbar spine diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent both the standard and accelerated lumbar MRIs at a 1.5-T scanner for degenerative lumbar spine diseases were prospectively enrolled. DL reconstruction algorithm generated coarse (DL_coarse) and fine (DL_fine) images from the accelerated protocol. Image quality was quantitatively assessed in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and qualitatively assessed using five-point visual scoring systems. The sensitivity and specificity of four radiologists for the diagnosis of degenerative diseases in both protocols were compared.

RESULTS

The accelerated protocol reduced the average MRI acquisition time by 32.3% as compared to the standard protocol. As compared with standard images, DL_coarse and DL_fine showed significantly higher SNRs on T1-weighted images (T1WI; both p < .001) and T2-weighted images (T2WI; p = .002 and p < 0.001), higher CNRs on T1WI (both p < 0.001), and similar CNRs on T2WI (p = .49 and p = .27). The average radiologist assessment of overall image quality for DL_coarse and DL_fine was higher on sagittal T1WI (p = .04 and p < .001) and axial T2WI (p = .006 and p = .01) and similar on sagittal T2WI (p = .90 and p = .91). Both DL_coarse and DL_fine had better image quality of cauda equina and paraspinal muscles on axial T2WI (both p = .04 for cauda equina; p = .008 and p = .002 for paraspinal muscles). Differences in sensitivity and specificity for the detection of central canal stenosis and neural foraminal stenosis between standard and DL-reconstructed images were all statistically nonsignificant (p ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DL-based protocol reduced MRI acquisition time without degrading image quality and diagnostic performance of readers for degenerative lumbar spine diseases.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction algorithm may be used to further accelerate spine MRI imaging to reduce patient discomfort and increase the cost efficiency of spine MRI imaging.

KEY POINTS

• By using deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction algorithm in combination with the accelerated MRI protocol, the average acquisition time was reduced by 32.3% as compared with the standard protocol. • DL-reconstructed images had similar or better quantitative/qualitative overall image quality and similar or better image quality for the delineation of most individual anatomical structures. • The average radiologist's sensitivity and specificity for the detection of major degenerative lumbar spine diseases, including central canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and disc herniation, on standard and DL-reconstructed images, were similar.

Deep learning model for measuring the sagittal Cobb angle on cervical spine computed tomography

PURPOSES

To develop a deep learning (DL) model to measure the sagittal Cobb angle of the cervical spine on computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two VB-Net-based DL models for cervical vertebra segmentation and key-point detection were developed. Four-points and line-fitting methods were used to calculate the sagittal Cobb angle automatically. The average value of the sagittal Cobb angle was manually measured by two doctors as the reference standard. The percentage of correct key points (PCK), matched samples t test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation coefficient, mean absolute error (MAE), and Bland‒Altman plots were used to evaluate the performance of the DL model and the robustness and generalization of the model on the external test set.

RESULTS

A total of 991 patients were included in the internal data set, and 112 patients were included in the external data set. The PCK of the DL model ranged from 78 to 100% in the test set. The four-points method, line-fitting method, and reference standard measured sagittal Cobb angles were - 1.10 ± 18.29°, 0.30 ± 13.36°, and 0.50 ± 12.83° in the internal test set and 4.55 ± 20.01°, 3.66 ± 18.55°, and 1.83 ± 12.02° in the external test set, respectively. The sagittal Cobb angle calculated by the four-points method and the line-fitting method maintained high consistency with the reference standard (internal test set: ICC = 0.75 and 0.97; r = 0.64 and 0.94; MAE = 5.42° and 3.23°, respectively; external test set: ICC = 0.74 and 0.80, r = 0.66 and 0.974, MAE = 5.25° and 4.68°, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The DL model can accurately measure the sagittal Cobb angle of the cervical spine on CT. The line-fitting method shows a higher consistency with the doctors and a minor average absolute error.

A deep learning-based technique for the diagnosis of epidural spinal cord compression on thoracolumbar CT

PURPOSE

To develop a deep learning (DL) model for epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) on CT, which will aid earlier ESCC diagnosis for less experienced clinicians.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected CT and MRI data from adult patients with suspected ESCC at a tertiary referral institute from 2007 till 2020. A total of 183 patients were used for training/validation of the DL model. A separate test set of 40 patients was used for DL model evaluation and comprised 60 staging CT and matched MRI scans performed with an interval of up to 2 months. DL model performance was compared to eight readers: one musculoskeletal radiologist, two body radiologists, one spine surgeon, and four trainee spine surgeons. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using inter-rater agreement, sensitivity, specificity and AUC.

RESULTS

Overall, 3115 axial CT slices were assessed. The DL model showed high kappa of 0.872 for normal, low and high-grade ESCC (trichotomous), which was superior compared to a body radiologist (R4, κ = 0.667) and all four trainee spine surgeons (κ range = 0.625-0.838)(all p < 0.001). In addition, for dichotomous normal versus any grade of ESCC detection, the DL model showed high kappa (κ = 0.879), sensitivity (91.82), specificity (92.01) and AUC (0.919), with the latter AUC superior to all readers (AUC range = 0.732-0.859, all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A deep learning model for the objective assessment of ESCC on CT had comparable or superior performance to radiologists and spine surgeons. Earlier diagnosis of ESCC on CT could reduce treatment delays, which are associated with poor outcomes, increased costs, and reduced survival.

Performance evaluation of a deep learning-based cascaded HRNet model for automatic measurement of X-ray imaging parameters of lumbar sagittal curvature

PURPOSE

To develop a deep learning-based cascaded HRNet model, in order to automatically measure X-ray imaging parameters of lumbar sagittal curvature and to evaluate its prediction performance.

METHODS

A total of 3730 lumbar lateral digital radiography (DR) images were collected from picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Among them, 3150 images were randomly selected as the training dataset and validation dataset, and 580 images as the test dataset. The landmarks of the lumbar curve index (LCI), lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis index (LLI), and the posterior edge tangent angle of the vertebral body (PTA) were identified and marked. The measured results of landmarks on the test dataset were compared with the mean values of manual measurement as the reference standard. Percentage of correct key-points (PCK), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate the performance of the cascade HRNet model.

RESULTS

The PCK of the cascaded HRNet model was 97.9-100% in the 3 mm distance threshold. The mean differences between the reference standard and the predicted values for LCI, LLA, SS, LLI, and PTA were 0.43 mm, 0.99°, 1.11°, 0.01 mm, and 0.23°, respectively. There were strong correlation and consistency of the five parameters between the cascaded HRNet model and manual measurements (ICC = 0.989-0.999, R = 0.991-0.999, MAE = 0.63-1.65, MSE = 0.61-4.06, RMSE = 0.78-2.01).

CONCLUSION

The cascaded HRNet model based on deep learning algorithm could accurately identify the sagittal curvature-related landmarks on lateral lumbar DR images and automatically measure the relevant parameters, which is of great significance in clinical application.

Efficacy of OLIF combined with pedicle screw internal fixation for lumbar spinal stenosis on spinal canal changes before and after surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of OLIF combined with pedicle screw internal fixation in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by assessing the changes in spinal canal before and after surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included sixteen patients who underwent a combination of single-segment OLIF and pedicle screw internal fixation for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine between February 2018 and August 2022. The patients' pre- and post-operative data were compared. Intraoperative bleeding, duration of surgery, visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc height (DH), cross-sectional area of vertebral canal (CSAVC), cross-sectional area of dural sac (CSADS), cross-sectional area of intervertebral foramen (CSAIF), spinal canal volume (SCV), spinal canal volume expansion rate, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis were observed and recorded. The efficacy of OLIF combined with pedicle screw internal fixation for lumbar spinal stenosis on spinal canal changes before and after surgery was summarized.

RESULTS

The results showed that OLIF combined with pedicle screw internal fixation effectively restored disc height and increased the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal. It also had an indirect decompression effect. The intraoperative bleeding and duration of surgery were within acceptable ranges. The VAS and ODI scores significantly improved after surgery, indicating a reduction in pain and improvement in functional disability. The CSAVC, CSADS, CSAIF, SCV, and spinal canal volume expansion rate were all increased postoperatively. Additionally, there was improvement in lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis. We conducted a follow-up of all patients at 1 year after the surgery. The results revealed that the parameter values at 1 year post-surgery showed varying degrees of decrease or increase compared to the immediate postoperative values. However, these values remained statistically significant when compared to the preoperative parameter values (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

OLIF combined with pedicle screw internal fixation effectively restores disc height and increases the cross-sectional area of the vertebral canal in patients with LSS, reflecting the indirect decompression effect. Measuring parameters such as DH, CSAVC, CSADS, CSAIF, SCV, and SCV expansion rate before and after surgery provides valuable information for evaluating the efficacy and functional recovery of the lumbar spine in LSS patients treated with OLIF surgery.

Nerve Root Compression Analysis to Find Lumbar Spine Stenosis on MRI Using CNN

Lumbar spine stenosis (LSS) is caused by low back pain that exerts pressure on the nerves in the spine. Detecting LSS is a significantly important yet difficult task. It is detected by analyzing the area of the anteroposterior diameter of the patient's lumbar spine. Currently, the versatility and accuracy of LSS segmentation algorithms are limited. The objective of this research is to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to automatically categorize LSS. This study presents a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method to detect LSS using MRI images. Radiological grading is performed on a publicly available dataset. Four regions of interest (ROIs) are determined to diagnose LSS with normal, mild, moderate, and severe gradings. The experiments are performed on 1545 axial-view MRI images. Furthermore, two datasets-multi-ROI and single-ROI-are created. For training and testing, an 80:20 ratio of randomly selected labeled datasets is used, with fivefold cross-validation. The results of the proposed model reveal a 97.01% accuracy for multi-ROI and 97.71% accuracy for single-ROI. The proposed computer-aided diagnosis approach can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy in everyday clinical workflows to assist medical experts in decision making. The proposed CNN-based MRI image segmentation approach shows its efficacy on a variety of datasets. Results are compared to existing state-of-the-art studies, indicating the superior performance of the proposed approach.

The use of deep learning in medical imaging to improve spine care: A scoping review of current literature and clinical applications

Background

Artificial intelligence is a revolutionary technology that promises to assist clinicians in improving patient care. In radiology, deep learning (DL) is widely used in clinical decision aids due to its ability to analyze complex patterns and images. It allows for rapid, enhanced data, and imaging analysis, from diagnosis to outcome prediction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current literature and clinical utilization of DL in spine imaging.

Methods

This study is a scoping review and utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to review the scientific literature from 2012 to 2021. A search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embased, and IEEE Xplore databases with syntax specific for DL and medical imaging in spine care applications was conducted to collect all original publications on the subject. Specific data was extracted from the available literature, including algorithm application, algorithms tested, database type and size, algorithm training method, and outcome of interest.

Results

A total of 365 studies (total sample of 232,394 patients) were included and grouped into 4 general applications: diagnostic tools, clinical decision support tools, automated clinical/instrumentation assessment, and clinical outcome prediction. Notable disparities exist in the selected algorithms and the training across multiple disparate databases. The most frequently used algorithms were U-Net and ResNet. A DL model was developed and validated in 92% of included studies, while a pre-existing DL model was investigated in 8%. Of all developed models, only 15% of them have been externally validated.

Conclusions

Based on this scoping review, DL in spine imaging is used in a broad range of clinical applications, particularly for diagnosing spinal conditions. There is a wide variety of DL algorithms, database characteristics, and training methods. Future studies should focus on external validation of existing models before bringing them into clinical use.

Development and validation of convolutional neural network-based model to predict the risk of sentinel or non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer: a machine learning study

Background

For patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis and low risk of residual non-SLN (NSLN) metastasis, axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection could lead to overtreatment. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated preoperative deep learning-based tool to predict the risk of SLN and NSLN metastasis in patients with breast cancer (BC) using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) images.

Methods

In this machine learning study, we retrospectively enrolled 988 women with BC from three hospitals in Zhejiang, China between June 1, 2013 to December 31, 2021, June 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021, and January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2023, respectively. Patients were divided into the training set (n = 519), internal validation set (n = 129), external test set 1 (n = 296), and external test set 2 (n = 44). A convolutional neural network (CNN) model was proposed to predict the SLN and NSLN metastasis and was compared with clinical and radiomics approaches. The performance of different models to detect ALN metastasis was measured by the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. This study is registered at ChiCTR, ChiCTR2300070740.

Findings

For SLN prediction, the top-performing model (i.e., the CNN algorithm) achieved encouraging predictive performance in the internal validation set (AUC 0.899, 95% CI, 0.887-0.911), external test set 1 (AUC 0.885, 95% CI, 0.867-0.903), and external test set 2 (AUC 0.768, 95% CI, 0.738-0.798). For NSLN prediction, the CNN-based model also exhibited satisfactory performance in the internal validation set (AUC 0.800, 95% CI, 0.783-0.817), external test set 1 (AUC 0.763, 95% CI, 0.732-0.794), and external test set 2 (AUC 0.728, 95% CI, 0.719-0.738). Based on the subgroup analysis, the CNN model performed well in tumour group smaller than 2.0 cm, with the AUC of 0.801 (internal validation set) and 0.823 (external test set 1). Of 469 patients with BC, the false positive rate of SLN prediction declined from 77.9% to 32.9% using CNN model.

Interpretation

The CNN model can predict the SLN status of any detectable lesion size and condition of NSLN in patients with BC. Overall, the CNN model, employing ready DCE-MRI images could serve as a potential technique to assist surgeons in the personalized axillary treatment of in patients with BC non-invasively.

Funding

National Key Research and Development projects intergovernmental cooperation in science and technology of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, and Zhejiang Medical and Health Science Project.

Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: A Review of Current Topics and Competition Challenges

There is an expanding body of literature that describes the application of deep learning and other machine learning and artificial intelligence methods with potential relevance to neuroradiology practice. In this article, we performed a literature review to identify recent developments on the topics of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology, with particular emphasis on large datasets and large-scale algorithm assessments, such as those used in imaging AI competition challenges. Numerous applications relevant to ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, brain tumors, demyelinating disease, and neurodegenerative/neurocognitive disorders were discussed. The potential applications of these methods to spinal fractures, scoliosis grading, head and neck oncology, and vascular imaging were also reviewed. The AI applications examined perform a variety of tasks, including localization, segmentation, longitudinal monitoring, diagnostic classification, and prognostication. While research on this topic is ongoing, several applications have been cleared for clinical use and have the potential to augment the accuracy or efficiency of neuroradiologists.

LSS-VGG16: Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Deep Learning

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

OBJECTION

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is a disease that causes chronic low back pain and can often be confused with herniated disk. In this study, a deep learning-based classification model is proposed to make LSS diagnosis quickly and automatically with an objective tool.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LSS is a disease that causes negative consequences such as low back pain, foot numbness, and pain. Diagnosis of this disease is difficult because it is confused with herniated disk and requires serious expertise. The shape and amount of this stenosis are very important in deciding the surgery and the surgical technique to be applied in these patients. When the spinal canal narrows, as a result of compression on these nerves and/or pressure on the vessels feeding the nerves, poor nutrition of the nerves causes loss of function and structure. Image processing techniques are applied in biomedical images such as MR and CT and high classification success is achieved. In this way, computer-aided diagnosis systems can be realized to help the specialist in the diagnosis of different diseases.

METHODS

To demonstrate the success of the proposed model, different deep learning methods and traditional machine learning techniques have been studied.

RESULTS

The highest classification success was obtained in the VGG16 method, with 87.70%.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed LSS-VGG16 model reveals that a computer-aided diagnosis system can be created for the diagnosis of spinal canal stenosis. In addition, it was observed that higher classification success was achieved compared with similar studies in the literature. This shows that the proposed LSS-VGG16 model will be an important resource for scientists who will work in this field.

Deep learning for automated, interpretable classification of lumbar spinal stenosis and facet arthropathy from axial MRI

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a deep learning model for automated and interpretable classification of central canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and facet arthropathy from lumbar spine MRI.

METHODS

T2-weighted axial MRI studies of the lumbar spine acquired between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively selected (n = 200) and graded for central canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and facet arthropathy. Studies were partitioned into patient-level train (n = 150), validation (n = 20), and test (n = 30) splits. V-Net models were first trained to segment the dural sac and the intervertebral disk, and localize facet and foramen using geometric rules. Subsequently, Big Transfer (BiT) models were trained for downstream classification tasks. An interpretable model for central canal stenosis was also trained using a decision tree classifier. Evaluation metrics included linearly weighted Cohen's kappa score for multi-grade classification and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) for binarized classification.

RESULTS

Segmentation of the dural sac and intervertebral disk achieved Dice scores of 0.93 and 0.94. Localization of foramen and facet achieved intersection over union of 0.72 and 0.83. Multi-class grading of central canal stenosis achieved a kappa score of 0.54. The interpretable decision tree classifier had a kappa score of 0.80. Pairwise agreement between readers (R1, R2), (R1, R3), and (R2, R3) was 0.86, 0.80, and 0.74. Binary classification of neural foraminal stenosis and facet arthropathy achieved AUROCs of 0.92 and 0.93.

CONCLUSION

Deep learning systems can be performant as well as interpretable for automated evaluation of lumbar spine MRI including classification of central canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and facet arthropathy.

KEY POINTS

• Interpretable deep-learning systems can be developed for the evaluation of clinical lumbar spine MRI. Multi-grade classification of central canal stenosis with a kappa of 0.80 was comparable to inter-reader agreement scores (0.74, 0.80, 0.86). Binary classification of neural foraminal stenosis and facet arthropathy achieved favorable and accurate AUROCs of 0.92 and 0.93, respectively. • While existing deep-learning systems are opaque, leading to clinical deployment challenges, the proposed system is accurate as well as interpretable, providing valuable information to a radiologist in clinical practice.

Emerging trends and research foci of deep learning in spine: bibliometric and visualization study

As the cognition of spine develops, deep learning (DL) emerges as a powerful tool with tremendous potential for advancing research in this field. To provide a comprehensive overview of DL-spine research, our study utilized bibliometric and visual methods to retrieve relevant articles from the Web of Science database. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were primarily used for literature measurement and knowledge graph analysis. A total of 273 studies focusing on deep learning in the spine, with a combined total of 2302 citations, were retrieved. Additionally, the overall number of articles published on this topic demonstrated a continuous upward trend. China was the country with the highest number of publications, whereas the USA had the most citations. The two most prominent journals were "European Spine Journal" and "Medical Image Analysis," and the most involved research area was Radiology Nuclear Medicine Medical Imaging. VOSviewer identified three visually distinct clusters: "segmentation," "area," and "neural network." Meanwhile, CiteSpace highlighted "magnetic resonance image" and "lumbar" as the keywords with the longest usage, and "agreement" and "automated detection" as the most commonly used keywords. Although the application of DL in spine is still in its infancy, its future is promising. Intercontinental cooperation, extensive application, and more interpretable algorithms will invigorate DL in the field of spine.

Deep learning assessment compared to radiologist reporting for metastatic spinal cord compression on CT

Introduction

Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is a disastrous complication of advanced malignancy. A deep learning (DL) algorithm for MSCC classification on CT could expedite timely diagnosis. In this study, we externally test a DL algorithm for MSCC classification on CT and compare with radiologist assessment.

Methods

Retrospective collection of CT and corresponding MRI from patients with suspected MSCC was conducted from September 2007 to September 2020. Exclusion criteria were scans with instrumentation, no intravenous contrast, motion artefacts and non-thoracic coverage. Internal CT dataset split was 84% for training/validation and 16% for testing. An external test set was also utilised. Internal training/validation sets were labelled by radiologists with spine imaging specialization (6 and 11-years post-board certification) and were used to further develop a DL algorithm for MSCC classification. The spine imaging specialist (11-years expertise) labelled the test sets (reference standard). For evaluation of DL algorithm performance, internal and external test data were independently reviewed by four radiologists: two spine specialists (Rad1 and Rad2, 7 and 5-years post-board certification, respectively) and two oncological imaging specialists (Rad3 and Rad4, 3 and 5-years post-board certification, respectively). DL model performance was also compared against the CT report issued by the radiologist in a real clinical setting. Inter-rater agreement (Gwet's kappa) and sensitivity/specificity/AUCs were calculated.

Results

Overall, 420 CT scans were evaluated (225 patients, mean age=60 ± 11.9[SD]); 354(84%) CTs for training/validation and 66(16%) CTs for internal testing. The DL algorithm showed high inter-rater agreement for three-class MSCC grading with kappas of 0.872 (p<0.001) and 0.844 (p<0.001) on internal and external testing, respectively. On internal testing DL algorithm inter-rater agreement (κ=0.872) was superior to Rad 2 (κ=0.795) and Rad 3 (κ=0.724) (both p<0.001). DL algorithm kappa of 0.844 on external testing was superior to Rad 3 (κ=0.721) (p<0.001). CT report classification of high-grade MSCC disease was poor with only slight inter-rater agreement (κ=0.027) and low sensitivity (44.0), relative to the DL algorithm with almost-perfect inter-rater agreement (κ=0.813) and high sensitivity (94.0) (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Deep learning algorithm for metastatic spinal cord compression on CT showed superior performance to the CT report issued by experienced radiologists and could aid earlier diagnosis.

Application of artificial intelligence to imaging interpretations in the musculoskeletal area: Where are we? Where are we going?

The interest of researchers, clinicians and radiologists, in artificial intelligence (AI) continues to grow. Deep learning is a subset of machine learning, in which the computer algorithm itself can determine the optimal imaging features to answer a clinical question. Convolutional neural networks are the most common architecture for performing deep learning on medical images. The various musculoskeletal applications of deep learning are the detection of abnormalities on X-rays or cross-sectional images (CT, MRI), for example the detection of fractures, meniscal tears, anterior cruciate ligament tears, degenerative lesions of the spine, bone metastases, classification of e.g., dural sac stenosis, degeneration of intervertebral discs, assessment of skeletal age, and segmentation, for example of cartilage. Software developments are already impacting the daily practice of orthopedic imaging by automatically detecting fractures on radiographs. Improving image acquisition protocols, improving the quality of low-dose CT images, reducing acquisition times in MRI, or improving MR image resolution is possible through deep learning. Deep learning offers an automated way to offload time-consuming manual processes and improve practitioner performance. This article reviews the current state of AI in musculoskeletal imaging.

Automated measurement of spine indices on axial MR images for lumbar spinal stenosis diagnosis using segmentation-guided regression network

PURPOSE

Automated measurement of spine indices on axial magnetic resonance (MR) images plays a significant role in lumbar spinal stenosis diagnosis. Existing direct spine indices measurement approaches fail to explicitly focus on the task-specific region or feature channel with the additional information for guiding. We aim to achieve accurate spine indices measurement by introducing the guidance of the segmentation task.

METHODS

In this paper, we propose a segmentation-guided regression network (SGRNet) to achieve automated spine indices measurement. SGRNet consists of a segmentation path for generating the spine segmentation prediction and a regression path for producing spine indices estimation. The segmentation path is a U-Net-like network which includes a segmentation encoder and a decoder which generates multilevel segmentation features and segmentation prediction. The proposed segmentation-guided attention module (SGAM) in the regression encoder extracts the attention-aware regression feature under the guidance of the segmentation feature. Based on the attention-aware regression feature, a fully connected layer is utilized to output the accurate spine indices estimation.

RESULTS

Experiments on the open-access Lumbar Spine MRI data set show that SGRNet achieves state-of-the-art performance with a mean absolute error of 0.49 mm and mean Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.956 for four indices estimation.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed SGAM in SGRNet is capable of improving the performance of spine indices measurement by focusing on the task-specific region and feature channel under the guidance of the segmentation task.

Deep-learning based quantification model for hip bone marrow edema and synovitis in patients with spondyloarthritis based on magnetic resonance images

Objectives: Hip inflammation is one of the most common complications in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Herein, we employed use of a deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation model to identify irregular and multiple inflammatory lesions of the hip. Methods: All of the SpA patients were enrolled at the Xijing Hospital. The erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), hip function Harris score, and disease activity were evaluated by clinicians. Manual MRI annotations including bone marrow edema (BME) and effusion/synovitis, and a hip MRI scoring system (HIMRISS) assessment was performed by experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. The segmentation accuracies of four deep learning models, including U-Net, UNet++, Attention-Unet, and HRNet, were compared using five-fold cross-validation. The clinical agreement of U-Net was evaluated with clinical symptoms and HIMRISS results. Results: A total of 1945 MRI slices of STIR/T2WI sequences were obtained from 195 SpA patients with hip involvement. After the five-fold cross-validation, U-Net achieved an average segmentation accuracy of 88.48% for the femoral head and 69.36% for inflammatory lesions, which are higher than those obtained by the other three models. The UNet-score, which was calculated based on the same MRI slices as HIMRISS, was significantly correlated with the HIMRISS scores and disease activity indexes (p values <0.05). Conclusion: This deep-learning based automatic MRI evaluation model could achieve similar quantification performance as an expert radiologist, and it has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of clinical diagnosis for SpA patients with hip involvement.

Radiomics and Deep Learning for Disease Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiology: An Overview of Novel MRI- and CT-Based Approaches

ABSTRACT

Radiomics and machine learning-based methods offer exciting opportunities for improving diagnostic performance and efficiency in musculoskeletal radiology for various tasks, including acute injuries, chronic conditions, spinal abnormalities, and neoplasms. While early radiomics-based methods were often limited to a smaller number of higher-order image feature extractions, applying machine learning-based analytic models, multifactorial correlations, and classifiers now permits big data processing and testing thousands of features to identify relevant markers. A growing number of novel deep learning-based methods describe magnetic resonance imaging- and computed tomography-based algorithms for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament tears, meniscus tears, articular cartilage defects, rotator cuff tears, fractures, metastatic skeletal disease, and soft tissue tumors. Initial radiomics and deep learning techniques have focused on binary detection tasks, such as determining the presence or absence of a single abnormality and differentiation of benign versus malignant. Newer-generation algorithms aim to include practically relevant multiclass characterization of detected abnormalities, such as typing and malignancy grading of neoplasms. So-called delta-radiomics assess tumor features before and after treatment, with temporal changes of radiomics features serving as surrogate markers for tumor responses to treatment. New approaches also predict treatment success rates, surgical resection completeness, and recurrence risk. Practice-relevant goals for the next generation of algorithms include diagnostic whole-organ and advanced classification capabilities. Important research objectives to fill current knowledge gaps include well-designed research studies to understand how diagnostic performances and suggested efficiency gains of isolated research settings translate into routine daily clinical practice. This article summarizes current radiomics- and machine learning-based magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography approaches for musculoskeletal disease detection and offers a perspective on future goals and objectives.

Assessment of Fusion After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm

BACKGROUND

A convolutional neural network (CNN) is a deep learning (DL) model specialized for image processing, analysis, and classification.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we evaluated whether a CNN model using lateral cervical spine radiographs as input data can help assess fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic imaging study using DL.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We included 187 patients who underwent ACDF and fusion assessment with postoperative one-year computed tomography and neutral and dynamic lateral cervical spine radiographs.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The performance of the CNN-based DL algorithm was evaluated in terms of accuracy and area under the curve.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fusion or nonunion was confirmed by cervical spine computed tomography. Among the 187 patients, 69.5% (130 patients) were randomly selected as the training set, and the remaining 30.5% (57 patients) were assigned to the validation set to evaluate model performance. Radiographs of the cervical spine were used as input images to develop a CNN-based DL algorithm. The CNN algorithm used three radiographs (neutral, flexion, and extension) per patient and showed the diagnostic results as fusion (0) or nonunion (1) for each radiograph. By combining the results of the three radiographs, the final decision for a patient was determined to be fusion (fusion ≥2) or nonunion (fusion ≤1). By combining the results of the three radiographs, the final decision for a patient was determined as fusion (fusion ≥2) or nonunion (nonunion ≤1).

RESULTS

The CNN-based DL model demonstrated an accuracy of 89.5% and an area under the curve of 0.889 (95% confidence interval, 0.793-0.984).

CONCLUSION

The CNN algorithm for fusion assessment after ACDF trained using lateral cervical radiographs showed a relatively high diagnostic accuracy of 89.5% and is expected to be a useful aid in detecting pseudarthrosis.

Clinical Application of Large Channel Endoscopic Systems with Full Endoscopic Visualization Technique in Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Recently, large channel endoscopic systems and full endoscopic visualization technique have been used to perform unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) treatment for lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS). However, various endoscopic systems possess different design parameters, which may affect the technical points and treatment outcomes. The object of this retrospective study was to compare the efficiency, safety, and effectiveness of ULBD under the iLESSYS Delta system versus the Endo-Surgi Plus system.

METHODS

In the period from October 2020 to April 2021, ULBD was performed using the iLESSYS Delta system or Endo-Surgi Plus system to treat LCSS. Patients were classified into two groups based on the endoscopy system employed. Patient demographics, perioperative indexes, complications, and imaging characteristics were reviewed. Clinical outcomes were quantified using back and leg visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at the time points of follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were assigned to the iLESSYS Delta system group and 37 to the Endo-Surgi Plus system group. In the comparison between the two groups, the Endo-Surgi Plus system possessed a shorter incision length and operation time (p < 0.005), and no statistical differences in other aspects were observed. The dural sacs of both groups were significantly expanded postoperatively compared to preoperatively (p < 0.001). Both groups experienced improvements in VAS and ODI scores at all time points (p < 0.001) and equally low frequency of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Current research suggests that both the Endo-Surgi Plus system and iLESSYS Delta system achieved favorable high safety and clinical outcomes in ULBD for treatment of LCSS. The use of a fully visualized trephine may have increased the efficiency of the Endo-Surgi Plus system. Moreover, the Endo-Surgi Plus system may be associated with a wider decompression range and indications.

A Pipeline for the Implementation and Visualization of Explainable Machine Learning for Medical Imaging Using Radiomics Features

Machine learning (ML) models have been shown to predict the presence of clinical factors from medical imaging with remarkable accuracy. However, these complex models can be difficult to interpret and are often criticized as “black boxes”. Prediction models that provide no insight into how their predictions are obtained are difficult to trust for making important clinical decisions, such as medical diagnoses or treatment. Explainable machine learning (XML) methods, such as Shapley values, have made it possible to explain the behavior of ML algorithms and to identify which predictors contribute most to a prediction. Incorporating XML methods into medical software tools has the potential to increase trust in ML-powered predictions and aid physicians in making medical decisions. Specifically, in the field of medical imaging analysis the most used methods for explaining deep learning-based model predictions are saliency maps that highlight important areas of an image. However, they do not provide a straightforward interpretation of which qualities of an image area are important. Here, we describe a novel pipeline for XML imaging that uses radiomics data and Shapley values as tools to explain outcome predictions from complex prediction models built with medical imaging with well-defined predictors. We present a visualization of XML imaging results in a clinician-focused dashboard that can be generalized to various settings. We demonstrate the use of this workflow for developing and explaining a prediction model using MRI data from glioma patients to predict a genetic mutation.

Deep Learning Model for Grading Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression on Staging CT

Background: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is a disastrous complication of advanced malignancy. Deep learning (DL) models for automatic MESCC classification on staging CT were developed to aid earlier diagnosis. Methods: This retrospective study included 444 CT staging studies from 185 patients with suspected MESCC who underwent MRI spine studies within 60 days of the CT studies. The DL model training/validation dataset consisted of 316/358 (88%) and the test set of 42/358 (12%) CT studies. Training/validation and test datasets were labeled in consensus by two subspecialized radiologists (6 and 11-years-experience) using the MRI studies as the reference standard. Test sets were labeled by the developed DL models and four radiologists (2−7 years of experience) for comparison. Results: DL models showed almost-perfect interobserver agreement for classification of CT spine images into normal, low, and high-grade MESCC, with kappas ranging from 0.873−0.911 (p < 0.001). The DL models (lowest κ = 0.873, 95% CI 0.858−0.887) also showed superior interobserver agreement compared to two of the four radiologists for three-class classification, including a specialist (κ = 0.820, 95% CI 0.803−0.837) and general radiologist (κ = 0.726, 95% CI 0.706−0.747), both p < 0.001. Conclusion: DL models for the MESCC classification on a CT showed comparable to superior interobserver agreement to radiologists and could be used to aid earlier diagnosis.

Improved Productivity Using Deep Learning-assisted Reporting for Lumbar Spine MRI

Background Lumbar spine MRI studies are widely used for back pain assessment. Interpretation involves grading lumbar spinal stenosis, which is repetitive and time consuming. Deep learning (DL) could provide faster and more consistent interpretation. Purpose To assess the speed and interobserver agreement of radiologists for reporting lumbar spinal stenosis with and without DL assistance. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, a DL model designed to assist radiologists in the interpretation of spinal canal, lateral recess, and neural foraminal stenoses on lumbar spine MRI scans was used. Randomly selected lumbar spine MRI studies obtained in patients with back pain who were 18 years and older over a 3-year period, from September 2015 to September 2018, were included in an internal test data set. Studies with instrumentation and scoliosis were excluded. Eight radiologists, each with 2-13 years of experience in spine MRI interpretation, reviewed studies with and without DL model assistance with a 1-month washout period. Time to diagnosis (in seconds) and interobserver agreement (using Gwet κ) were assessed for stenosis grading for each radiologist with and without the DL model and compared with test data set labels provided by an external musculoskeletal radiologist (with 32 years of experience) as the reference standard. Results Overall, 444 images in 25 patients (mean age, 51 years ± 20 [SD]; 14 women) were evaluated in a test data set. DL-assisted radiologists had a reduced interpretation time per spine MRI study, from a mean of 124-274 seconds (SD, 25-88 seconds) to 47-71 seconds (SD, 24-29 seconds) (P < .001). DL-assisted radiologists had either superior or equivalent interobserver agreement for all stenosis gradings compared with unassisted radiologists. DL-assisted general and in-training radiologists improved their interobserver agreement for four-class neural foraminal stenosis, with κ values of 0.71 and 0.70 (with DL) versus 0.39 and 0.39 (without DL), respectively (both P < .001). Conclusion Radiologists who were assisted by deep learning for interpretation of lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI scans showed a marked reduction in reporting time and superior or equivalent interobserver agreement for all stenosis gradings compared with radiologists who were unassisted by deep learning. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Hayashi in this issue.

Automatic detection and voxel‐wise mapping of lumbar spine Modic changes with deep learning

Background

Modic changes (MCs) are the most prevalent classification system for describing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity changes in the vertebrae. However, there is a growing need for novel quantitative and standardized methods of characterizing these anomalies, particularly for lesions of transitional or mixed nature, due to the lack of conclusive evidence of their associations with low back pain. This retrospective imaging study aims to develop an interpretable deep learning‐based detection tool for voxel‐wise mapping of MCs.

Methods

Seventy‐five lumbar spine MRI exams that presented with acute‐to‐chronic low back pain, radiculopathy, and other symptoms of the lumbar spine were enrolled. The pipeline consists of two deep convolutional neural networks to generate an interpretable voxel‐wise Modic map. First, an autoencoder was trained to segment vertebral bodies from T₁‐weighted sagittal lumbar spine images. Next, two radiologists segmented and labeled MCs from a combined T₁‐ and T₂‐weighted assessment to serve as ground truth for training a second autoencoder that performs segmentation of MCs. The voxels in the detected regions were then categorized to the appropriate Modic type using a rule‐based signal intensity algorithm. Post hoc, three radiologists independently graded a second dataset with the aid of the model predictions in an artificial (AI)‐assisted experiment.

Results

The model successfully identified the presence of changes in 85.7% of samples in the unseen test set with a sensitivity of 0.71 (±0.072), specificity of 0.95 (±0.022), and Cohen's kappa score of 0.63. In the AI‐assisted experiment, the agreement between the junior radiologist and the senior neuroradiologist significantly improved from Cohen's kappa score of 0.52 to 0.58 (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

This deep learning‐based approach demonstrates substantial agreement with radiologists and may serve as a tool to improve inter‐rater reliability in the assessment of MCs.

Automating Scoliosis Measurements in Radiographic Studies with Machine Learning: Comparing Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Reports

Scoliosis is a condition of abnormal lateral spinal curvature affecting an estimated 2 to 3% of the US population, or seven million people. The Cobb angle is the standard measurement of spinal curvature in scoliosis but is known to have high interobserver and intraobserver variability. Thus, the objective of this study was to build and validate a system for automatic quantitative evaluation of the Cobb angle and to compare AI generated and human reports in the clinical setting. After IRB was obtained, we retrospectively collected 2150 frontal view scoliosis radiographs at a tertiary referral center (January 1, 2019, to January 1, 2021, ≥ 16 years old, no hardware). The dataset was partitioned into 1505 train (70%), 215 validation (10%), and 430 test images (20%). All thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies were segmented with bounding boxes, generating approximately 36,550 object annotations that were used to train a Faster R-CNN Resnet-101 object detection model. A controller algorithm was written to localize vertebral centroid coordinates and derive the Cobb properties (angle and endplate) of dominant and secondary curves. AI-derived Cobb angle measurements were compared to the clinical report measurements, and the Spearman rank-order demonstrated significant correlation (0.89, p < 0.001). Mean difference between AI and clinical report angle measurements was 7.34° (95% CI: 5.90-8.78°), which is similar to published literature (up to 10°). We demonstrate the feasibility of an AI system to automate measurement of level-by-level spinal angulation with performance comparable to radiologists.

Deep Learning Model for Classifying Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression on MRI

Background

Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is a devastating complication of advanced cancer. A deep learning (DL) model for automated MESCC classification on MRI could aid earlier diagnosis and referral.

Purpose

To develop a DL model for automated classification of MESCC on MRI.

Materials and Methods

Patients with known MESCC diagnosed on MRI between September 2007 and September 2017 were eligible. MRI studies with instrumentation, suboptimal image quality, and non-thoracic regions were excluded. Axial T2-weighted images were utilized. The internal dataset split was 82% and 18% for training/validation and test sets, respectively. External testing was also performed. Internal training/validation data were labeled using the Bilsky MESCC classification by a musculoskeletal radiologist (10-year experience) and a neuroradiologist (5-year experience). These labels were used to train a DL model utilizing a prototypical convolutional neural network. Internal and external test sets were labeled by the musculoskeletal radiologist as the reference standard. For assessment of DL model performance and interobserver variability, test sets were labeled independently by the neuroradiologist (5-year experience), a spine surgeon (5-year experience), and a radiation oncologist (11-year experience). Inter-rater agreement (Gwet’s kappa) and sensitivity/specificity were calculated.

Results

Overall, 215 MRI spine studies were analyzed [164 patients, mean age = 62 ± 12(SD)] with 177 (82%) for training/validation and 38 (18%) for internal testing. For internal testing, the DL model and specialists all showed almost perfect agreement (kappas = 0.92–0.98, p < 0.001) for dichotomous Bilsky classification (low versus high grade) compared to the reference standard. Similar performance was seen for external testing on a set of 32 MRI spines with the DL model and specialists all showing almost perfect agreement (kappas = 0.94–0.95, p < 0.001) compared to the reference standard.

Conclusion

A DL model showed comparable agreement to a subspecialist radiologist and clinical specialists for the classification of malignant epidural spinal cord compression and could optimize earlier diagnosis and surgical referral.

Artificial Intelligence and Computer Aided Diagnosis in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

Low Back Pain (LBP) is currently the first cause of disability in the world, with a significant socioeconomic burden. Diagnosis and treatment of LBP often involve a multidisciplinary, individualized approach consisting of several outcome measures and imaging data along with emerging technologies. The increased amount of data generated in this process has led to the development of methods related to artificial intelligence (AI), and to computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in particular, which aim to assist and improve the diagnosis and treatment of LBP. In this manuscript, we have systematically reviewed the available literature on the use of CAD in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic LBP. A systematic research of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases was performed. The search strategy was set as the combinations of the following keywords: “Artificial Intelligence”, “Machine Learning”, “Deep Learning”, “Neural Network”, “Computer Aided Diagnosis”, “Low Back Pain”, “Lumbar”, “Intervertebral Disc Degeneration”, “Spine Surgery”, etc. The search returned a total of 1536 articles. After duplication removal and evaluation of the abstracts, 1386 were excluded, whereas 93 papers were excluded after full-text examination, taking the number of eligible articles to 57. The main applications of CAD in LBP included classification and regression. Classification is used to identify or categorize a disease, whereas regression is used to produce a numerical output as a quantitative evaluation of some measure. The best performing systems were developed to diagnose degenerative changes of the spine from imaging data, with average accuracy rates >80%. However, notable outcomes were also reported for CAD tools executing different tasks including analysis of clinical, biomechanical, electrophysiological, and functional imaging data. Further studies are needed to better define the role of CAD in LBP care.

Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN)

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Evaluation of deep learning reconstructed high-resolution 3D lumbar spine MRI

OBJECTIVES

To compare interobserver agreement and image quality of 3D T2-weighted fast spin echo (T2w-FSE) L-spine MRI images processed with a deep learning reconstruction (DLRecon) against standard-of-care (SOC) reconstruction, as well as against 2D T2w-FSE images. The hypothesis was that DLRecon 3D T2w-FSE would afford improved image quality and similar interobserver agreement compared to both SOC 3D and 2D T2w-FSE.

METHODS

Under IRB approval, patients who underwent routine 3-T lumbar spine (L-spine) MRI from August 17 to September 17, 2020, with both isotropic 3D and 2D T2w-FSE sequences, were retrospectively included. A DLRecon algorithm, with denoising and sharpening properties was applied to SOC 3D k-space to generate 3D DLRecon images. Four musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to reconstruction status evaluated randomized images for motion artifact, image quality, central/foraminal stenosis, disc degeneration, annular fissure, disc herniation, and presence of facet joint cysts. Inter-rater agreement for each graded variable was evaluated using Conger's kappa (κ).

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (mean age 58 ± 19, 26 female) were evaluated. 3D DLRecon demonstrated statistically significant higher median image quality score (2.0/2) when compared to SOC 3D (1.0/2, p < 0.001), 2D axial (1.0/2, p < 0.001), and 2D sagittal sequences (1.0/2, p value < 0.001). κ ranges (and 95% CI) for foraminal stenosis were 0.55-0.76 (0.32-0.86) for 3D DLRecon, 0.56-0.73 (0.35-0.84) for SOC 3D, and 0.58-0.71 (0.33-0.84) for 2D. Mean κ (and 95% CI) for central stenosis at L4-5 were 0.98 (0.96-0.99), 0.97 (0.95-0.99), and 0.98 (0.96-0.99) for 3D DLRecon, 3D SOC and 2D, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DLRecon 3D T2w-FSE L-spine MRI demonstrated higher image quality and similar interobserver agreement for graded variables of interest when compared to 3D SOC and 2D imaging.

KEY POINTS

• 3D DLRecon T2w-FSE isotropic lumbar spine MRI provides improved image quality when compared to 2D MRI, with similar interobserver agreement for clinical evaluation of pathology. • 3D DLRecon images demonstrated better image quality score (2.0/2) when compared to standard-of-care (SOC) 3D (1.0/2), p value < 0.001; 2D axial (1.0/2), p value < 0.001; and 2D sagittal sequences (1.0/2), p value < 0.001. • Interobserver agreement for major variables of interest was similar among all sequences and reconstruction types. For foraminal stenosis, κ ranged from 0.55 to 0.76 (95% CI 0.32-0.86) for 3D DLRecon, 0.56-0.73 (95% CI 0.35-0.84) for standard-of-care (SOC) 3D, and 0.58-0.71 (95% CI 0.33-0.84) for 2D.