TBCRC 032 IB/II Multicenter Study: Molecular Insights to AR Antagonist and PI3K Inhibitor Efficacy in Patients with AR+ Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Paving the path ForwARd: Advances and challenges in androgen receptor targeting in breast cancer

The role of androgen receptors (AR) in breast cancer is crucial for preclinical and clinical research. While AR-targeted therapy is a standard treatment for prostate cancer, the application of this therapeutic strategy to breast cancer has not been established. Indeed, AR is expressed in around 60-90% of breast cancers, making it imperative that we learn more about its prognostic and predictive impacts and targeting potential in breast cancer. Over the past decade, AR-targeted therapies ─ including AR antagonists and selective AR modulators ─ have shown promise in breast cancer treatment. However, an incomplete understanding of AR's role across breast cancer subtypes hinders clinical application. The lack of standardized AR expression thresholds further complicates patient selection, underscoring the urgent need for biomarker-driven strategies to optimize AR-targeted approaches in breast cancer. In this review, we provide an overview of a clinical perspective of AR in breast cancer by discussing AR biology, AR as a biomarker, and AR-targeted therapy development. We present our review with a particular emphasis on the distinct roles of AR in ER-positive (ER+) and ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer subtypes. Finally, the paper addresses the hurdles that have impeded the development of a robust clinical landscape for AR-targeted therapies and possible solutions for overcoming these challenges.

Advances in tumor subclone formation and mechanisms of growth and invasion

Tumor subclones refer to distinct cell populations within the same tumor that possess different genetic characteristics. They play a crucial role in understanding tumor heterogeneity, evolution, and therapeutic resistance. The formation of tumor subclones is driven by several key mechanisms, including the inherent genetic instability of tumor cells, which facilitates the accumulation of novel mutations; selective pressures from the tumor microenvironment and therapeutic interventions, which promote the expansion of certain subclones; and epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, which alter gene expression patterns. Major methodologies for studying tumor subclones include single-cell sequencing, liquid biopsy, and spatial transcriptomics, which provide insights into clonal architecture and dynamic evolution. Beyond their direct involvement in tumor growth and invasion, subclones significantly contribute to tumor heterogeneity, immune evasion, and treatment resistance. Thus, an in-depth investigation of tumor subclones not only aids in guiding personalized precision therapy, overcoming drug resistance, and identifying novel therapeutic targets, but also enhances our ability to predict recurrence and metastasis risks while elucidating the mechanisms underlying tumor heterogeneity. The integration of artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and multi-omics technologies is expected to further advance research in tumor subclones, paving the way for novel strategies in cancer diagnosis and treatment. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of tumor subclone formation mechanisms, evolutionary models, analytical methods, and clinical implications, offering insights into precision oncology and future translational research.

APOBEC-Driven Hypermutation in the Lymphocyte-Predominant Group of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer subclassification. Triple-negative breast cancer was classified into the luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype and the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) groups of the non-LAR subtype-lymphocyte predominant (LP), lymphocyte intermediate, and lymphocyte depleted-based on androgen receptor immunohistochemistry and TILs. Clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics were evaluated for these triple-negative breast cancer subclasses. The LP group was associated with a histologic type of carcinoma with medullary features, a higher tumor mutation burden, and increased APOBEC activity, indicative of APOBEC-driven hypermutation. The LAR subtype was characterized by a higher prevalence of PIK3CA mutations, lower homologous recombination deficiency scores, and associations with histologic types of invasive lobular carcinoma, and carcinoma with apocrine differentiation. This study demonstrated the distinct clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer subclassifications. APOBEC activity-related hypermutation is a defining characteristic of the LP group.

Triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes and potential detection targets for biological therapy indications

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with poor prognosis. While chemotherapy remains the conventional treatment approach, its efficacy is limited and often accompanied by significant toxicity. Advances in precision-targeted therapies have expanded treatment options for TNBC, including immunotherapy, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, androgen receptor inhibitors, cell cycle-dependent kinase inhibitors, and signaling pathway inhibitors. However, the heterogeneous nature of TNBC contributes to variations in treatment outcomes, underscoring the importance of identifying intrinsic molecular subtypes for personalized therapy. Additionally, due to patient-specific variability, the therapeutic response to targeted treatments is inconsistent. This highlights the need to strategize patients based on potential therapeutic targets for targeted drugs to optimize treatment strategies. This review summarizes the classification strategies and immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers for TNBC subtypes, along with potential targets for identifying indications for targeted drug therapy. These insights aim to support the development of personalized treatment approaches for TNBC patients.

Association of Androgen Receptor Expression With Tumor Immune Landscape and Treatment Outcomes of Patients With Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Although estrogen receptor is well studied in breast cancer (BC), the role of androgen receptor (AR) in prognosis and therapy response is less understood. Here, we characterized the clinicopathologic and molecular features of AR gene expression in BC subtypes.

METHODS

Ten thousand seven hundred twenty-eight BC samples were tested by next-generation DNA sequencing, whole-transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Tumors with AR-high and AR-low RNA expression were stratified by top and bottom quartiles, respectively. Treatment-associated survival was obtained from insurance claims and calculated from treatment start to last contact using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Statistical significance was determined by chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test with P values adjusted for multiple comparisons (q < .05).

RESULTS

AR-low was associated with basal-like tumors. AR-high tumors were associated with increased mutation rates in several genes-namely PIK3CA and CDH1-across all subtypes, while other associations such as RB1 and MAP3K1 were subtype-dependent. The immune landscape was differentially affected by AR expression in each subtype, but these differences did not correspond to differential responses to immune checkpoint blockade. Patients with AR-high tumors had a longer therapy response for most subtypes, but those with AR-high tumors that were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-enriched and luminal B trended toward worse chemotherapy or hormone therapy response, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest a unique molecular profile of AR-high BC that is subtype-specific and generally associated with improved outcomes. Exploration of specific mutations and immune-oncology markers associated with AR-high may aid in molecularly selected clinical trial design for patients with advanced BC.

The DNA methylation landscape of primary triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a clinically challenging and molecularly heterogenous breast cancer subgroup. Here, we investigate the DNA methylation landscape of TNBC. By analyzing tumor methylome profiles and accounting for the genomic context of CpG methylation, we divide TNBC into two epigenetic subtypes corresponding to a Basal and a non-Basal group, in which characteristic transcriptional patterns are correlated with DNA methylation of distal regulatory elements and epigenetic regulation of key steroid response genes and developmental transcription factors. Further subdivision of the Basal and non-Basal subtypes identifies subgroups transcending genetic and proposed TNBC mRNA subtypes, demonstrating widely differing immunological microenvironments, putative epigenetically-mediated immune evasion strategies, and a specific metabolic gene network in older patients that may be epigenetically regulated. Our study attempts to target the epigenetic backbone of TNBC, an approach that may inform future studies regarding tumor origins and the role of the microenvironment in shaping the cancer epigenome.

Next-generation sequencing for guiding matched targeted therapies in people with relapsed or metastatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Matched targeted therapies (MTT) given alone or in combination with systemic anti-cancer therapies have delivered proven survival benefit for many people with newly diagnosed cancer. However, there is little evidence of their effectiveness in the recurrent or late-stage setting. With this uncertainty, alongside the perception that late-stage cancers are too genetically heterogenous or too mutationally diverse to benefit from matched targeted therapies, next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumours in people with refractory cancer remains a low priority. As a result, next-generation sequencing testing of recurrent or late-stage disease is discouraged. We lack evidence to support the utility of next generation sequencing in guiding matched targeted therapies in this setting.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of matched targeted therapies in people with advanced cancers in randomised controlled trials.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP) search portal up to 30th October 2024. We also screened reference lists of included studies and also the publications that cited these studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that had enroled participants with advanced/refractory solid or haematological cancers who had progressed through at least one line of standard anti-cancer systemic therapy. To be eligible, all participants should have received matched targeted therapy based on next-generation sequencing carried out on their tumour (tumour tissue, blood or bone marrow).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We systematically searched medical databases (e.g. MEDLINE, Embase) and trial registers for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rates (ORR), serious (grade 3 or 4) adverse events (AEs) and quality of life (QOL). We used a random-effects model to pool outcomes across studies and compared predefined subgroups using interaction tests. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment of certainty was used to evaluate the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified a total of 37 studies, out of which 35 studies (including 9819 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies compared a matched targeted therapy intervention to standard-of-care treatment, non-matched targeted therapies or no treatment (best supportive care): Matched targeted therapy versus standard-of-care treatment Matched targeted therapy (MTT) compared with standard systematic therapy probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 34% (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 0.74; 14 studies, 3848 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). However, MTT might have little to no difference in risk of death (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97; 14 studies, 3848 participants; low-certainty evidence) and may increase overall response rates (low-certainty evidence). There was no clear evidence of a difference in severe (grade 3/4) adverse events between matched targeted therapy and standard-of-care treatment (low-certainty evidence). There was limited evidence of a difference in quality of life between groups (very low-certainty of evidence). Matched targeted therapy in combination with standard-of-care treatment versus standard-of-care treatment alone Matched targeted therapy in combination with standard-of-care treatment compared with standard-of-care treatment alone probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 39% (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.70, 14 studies, 2,637 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and risk of death by 21% (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89; 11 studies, 2575 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). The combination of MTT and standard-of-care treatment may also increase overall response rates (low-certainty evidence). There was limited evidence of a difference in the incidence of severe adverse events (very low-certainty evidence) and quality of life between the groups (very low-certainty of evidence). Matched targeted therapy versus non-matched targeted therapy Matched targeted therapy compared with non-matched targeted therapy probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 24% (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.89; 3 studies, 1568 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may reduce the risk of death by 25% (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86, 1307 participants; low-certainty evidence). There was little to no effect on overall response rates between MTT and non-MTT. There was no clear evidence of a difference in overall response rates (low-certainty evidence) and severe adverse events between MTT and non-MTT (low-certainty evidence). None of the studies comparing MTT and non-MTT reported quality of life. Matched targeted therapy versus best supportive care Matched targeted therapy compared with the best supportive care (BSC) i.e. no active treatment probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 63% (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.50; 4 studies, 858 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no clear evidence of a difference in overall survival between groups (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.06, 3 studies, 783 participants; low-certainty evidence). There was no clear evidence of a difference in overall response rates (very low-certainty of evidence) and incidence of severe adverse events (very low-certainty of evidence) between the groups. Quality of life was reported in a single study but did not provide composite scores. Risk of bias The overall risk of bias was judged low for eight studies, unclear for two studies, and the remaining 27 studies were high risk.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Matched targeted therapies guided by next-generation sequencing in people with advanced cancer prolongs the time before cancer progresses compared to standard therapies. However, there is limited evidence to suggest that it prolongs overall survival, improves the quality of life or increases adverse events. Importantly, this review supports equitable access to next-generation sequencing technology for all people with advanced cancer and offers them the opportunity to access genotype-matched targeted therapies.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in androgen receptor-positive triple-negative breast cancer: potential predictive biomarkers and genetic alterations

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the androgen receptor (AR) status affects the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, and to elucidate the predictive biomarkers and mutations associated with pathological complete response (pCR) in AR-positive TNBC patients.

METHODS

The current retrospective cohort included 226 TNBC patients who underwent NACT. AR and FOXC1 were assessed by immunohistochemistry on pretreatment biopsy specimens of 226 TNBC patients from 2018 to 2022. The clinicopathological features of AR-negative, AR < 10%, and AR ≥ 10% TNBC patients were analyzed to confirm the appropriate threshold. The response was evaluated in terms of pCR and Miller-Payne (MP) grade in the subsequent mastectomy or breast conservation samples. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was utilized to further investigate the molecular characteristics of 44 AR-positive TNBC patients.

RESULTS

Among the 226 TNBC patients, compared with AR-negative and AR < 10% tumors (68.58%, 155/226), AR ≥ 10% TNBC patients (31.41%, 71/226) exhibited distinct clinicopathological features, while no significant difference was detected between those with AR-negative tumors and those with AR < 10% tumors. Thus, tumors with AR ≥ 10% expression were defined as having AR positive expression. The pCR rate of AR-positive TNBCs was lower than that of AR-negative TNBC patients (12.68% vs. 34.19%, p < 0.001). In TNBC, multivariate analysis demonstrated that FOXC1 was an independent predictor of pCR (p = 0.042), whereas AR was not. The pCR rate was higher in FOXC1 positive patients than in FOXC1 negative patients (34.44% vs. 3.13%, p < 0.001). In the AR-positive TNBC subgroup, patients with FOXC1 expression had lower AR expression, higher Ki-67 expression, and higher histological grade. Compared with AR-positive TNBC patients who achieved pCR, the non-pCR patients had a greater percentage of mutations in genes involved in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study indicated that the AR-positive TNBC is correlated with lower rates of pCR after NACT. The expression of FOXC1 in TNBC patients and AR-positive TNBC patients could be utilized as a predictive marker for the efficacy of NACT. The present study provides a rationale for treating these non-pCR AR-positive TNBC tumors with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors.

[Apocrine lesions of the breast]

Apocrine breast lesions encompass a spectrum of histopathological abnormalities, ranging from benign apocrine metaplasia to invasive apocrine carcinomas. Their defining feature lies in cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and round nuclei with prominent nucleoli. These cells strongly express the androgen receptor while lacking estrogen receptor-alpha and progesterone receptor expression. Benign lesions, frequently associated with mammary cysts or papillomas, lack nuclear and architectural atypia. In contrast, atypical apocrine lesions exhibit significant nuclear and structural abnormalities, posing diagnostic challenges when distinguishing them from apocrine ductal or lobular carcinoma in situ. Diagnosis relies on the extent of atypia and the presence of tumor necrosis. Invasive apocrine carcinomas are rare, accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers, and predominantly occur in postmenopausal women. Histologically, they are often grade 1 or 2 tumors. Approximately 50% exhibit HER2 amplification and overexpression. Immunohistochemically, they are characterized by positivity for FOXA1 and GATA3, and negativity for FOXC1 and SOX10, and variable expression of TRPS1. These carcinomas belong to the molecular apocrine carcinoma family, which includes HER2-enriched tumors driven by HER2 addiction and androgen receptor-positive luminal tumors, a subtype of triple-negative breast cancers. The latter are defined by androgen receptor pathway activation and are frequently associated with PI3K pathway alterations and cell cycle dysregulation, suggesting potential therapeutic targets.

Population-specific patterns in assessing molecular subtypes of young black females with triple-negative breast cancer

We determined triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes, genetic ancestry, and immune features in a cohort of self-reported Black females with TNBC diagnosed at or below age 50. Among 104 tumors, 34.6% were basal-like 1 (BL1), 17.3% basal-like 2 (BL2), 9.6% luminal androgen receptor (LAR), 26.9% mesenchymal (M), and 11.5% unsubtyped (UNS). Subtypes resembled those seen in Europeans or East Asians, with less LAR (9.6% vs. 14.6-24.4%) and more UNS (11.5% vs. 0-7.5%). "High" proportion of West African ancestry was associated with more LAR (14.9% vs. 4.9%) and less M (25.5% vs. 34.2%). M demonstrated reduced immune activity and was marginally associated with worse overall survival in a multivariate model including stage, West African ancestry, BMI, and TILs, meriting future research. Our study is the largest to date of TNBC subtypes in young Black females. These results reinforce TNBC subtypes' application across populations and potential use as a prognostic biomarker.

Darolutamide or capecitabine in triple-negative, androgen receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (UCBG 3-06 START): a multicentre, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

We proposed in 2005 that androgens replace oestrogens as the driver steroids in a subgroup of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with androgen receptor (AR) expression called molecular apocrine (MA) or luminal androgen receptor (LAR). Here, we report the analysis of a clinical trial evaluating the antitumour activity of the anti-androgen darolutamide in MA breast cancer. Our aim was to assess the clinical benefit in patients with AR-positive TNBCs defined by immunohistochemistry and by RNA profiling.

METHODS

In this multicentre, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial, women aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and with advanced TNBC that was previously treated with a maximum of one line of chemotherapy were recruited from 45 hospitals in France. After central confirmation of TNBC status and AR positivity (≥10%; SP107 antibody), participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive darolutamide 600 mg orally twice daily or capecitabine minimum 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks on and 1 week off, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, lost to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent. Randomisation was done centrally using the minimisation procedure and was stratified according to the number of previous lines of chemotherapy. Transcriptomic analysis was used to classify tumours into groups with high and low AR activity (MAhigh and MAlow). The primary clinical endpoint was clinical benefit rate at 16 weeks (confirmed complete response, partial response, or stable disease). The primary translational endpoint was clinical benefit rate in the darolutamide group in MAhigh tumours versus all other tumours. Analyses were done per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03383679), and is closed to recruitment.

FINDINGS

Between April 9, 2018, and July 20, 2021, 254 women were screened and 94 were randomly assigned to darolutamide (n=61) or capecitabine (n=33), of whom 90 were evaluable for efficacy analyses. Median follow-up at the data cutoff on July 20, 2022, was 22·5 months (IQR 16·5-30·5). The clinical benefit rate was 29% (17 of 58; 90% CI 19-39) with darolutamide and 59% (19 of 32; 90% CI 45-74) with capecitabine. In patients treated with darolutamide, the clinical benefit rate was 57% (12 of 21; 95% CI 36-78) in MAhigh tumours, and 16% (five of 31; 95% CI 3-29; p=0·0020) in other tumours. The most common grade 3 adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (none of 60 in the darolutamide group vs two [6%] of 33 in the capecitabine group), and headache (three [5%] vs none). No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were observed. Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in three (5%) patients in the darolutamide group and three (9%) in the capecitabine group, which were toxicoderma (n=1) and headache (n=2) in the darolutamide group, and diarrhoea, general physical deterioration, and hepatic cytolysis in the capecitabine group (n=1 each).

INTERPRETATION

This study did not reach its prespecified endpoint for darolutamide activity in patients with triple-negative breast cancer selected on the basis of immunohistochemistry for AR. Further studies selecting patients based on RNA profiling might allow better identification of tumours sensitive to anti-androgens.

FUNDING

Bayer and Fondation Bergonié.

Divide and Conquer-Targeted Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive and malignant type of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. One of the most significant impediments in TNBC treatment is the high heterogeneity of this disease, as highlighted by the detection of several molecular subtypes of TNBC. Each subtype is driven by distinct mutations and pathway aberrations, giving rise to specific molecular characteristics closely connected to clinical behavior, outcomes, and drug sensitivity. This review summarizes the knowledge regarding TNBC molecular subtypes and how it can be harnessed to devise tailored treatment strategies instead of blindly using targeted drugs. We provide an overview of novel targeted agents and key insights about new treatment modalities with an emphasis on the androgen receptor signaling pathway, cancer stem cell-associated pathways, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway, growth factor signaling, and immunotherapy.

Advancements in clinical research and emerging therapies for triple-negative breast cancer treatment

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), defined by the lack of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) expression, is acknowledged as the most aggressive form of breast cancer (BC), comprising 15%-20% of all primary cases. Despite the prevalence of TNBC, effective and well-tolerated targeted therapies remain limited, with chemotherapy continuing to be the mainstay of treatment. However, the horizon is brightened by recent advancements in immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which have garnered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for various stages of TNBC. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), particularly for TNBC with BRCA mutations, present a promising avenue, albeit with the challenge of resistance that must be addressed. The success of phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibitors in hormone receptor (HR)-positive BC suggests potential applicability in TNBC, spurring optimism within the research community. This review endeavors to offer a comprehensive synthesis of both established and cutting-edge targeted therapies for TNBC. We delve into the specifics of PARPi, androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors, Cancer stem cells (CSCs), PI3K/Protein Kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), Ntoch, Wnt/β-catenin, hedgehog (Hh) pathway inhibitors, Epigenetic target-mediated drug delivery, ADCs, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)and novel immunotherapeutic solutions, contextualizing TNBC within current treatment paradigms. By elucidating the mechanisms of these drugs and their prospective clinical applications, we aim to shed light on the challenges and underscore the beacon of hope that translational research and innovative therapies represent for the oncology field.

Classifications of triple-negative breast cancer: insights and current therapeutic approaches

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and challenging type of cancer, characterized by the absence of specific receptors targeted by current therapies, which limits effective targeted treatment options. TNBC has a high risk of recurrence and distant metastasis, resulting in lower survival rates. Additionally, TNBC exhibits significant heterogeneity at histopathological, proteomic, transcriptomic, and genomic levels, further complicating the development of effective treatments. While some TNBC subtypes may initially respond to chemotherapy, resistance frequently develops, increasing the risk of aggressive recurrence. Therefore, precisely classifying and characterizing the distinct features of TNBC subtypes is crucial for identifying the most suitable molecular-based therapies for individual patients. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of these subtypes, highlighting their unique profiles as defined by various classification systems. We also address the limitations of conventional therapeutic approaches and explore innovative biological strategies, all aimed at advancing the development of targeted and effective therapeutic strategies for TNBC.

Insights into the Emerging Therapeutic Targets of Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), the most aggressive breast cancer subtype, is characterized by the non-appearance of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Clinically, TNBC is marked by its low survival rate, poor therapeutic outcomes, high aggressiveness, and lack of targeted therapies. Over the past few decades, many clinical trials have been ongoing for targeted therapies in TNBC. Although some classes, such as Poly (ADP Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and immunotherapies, have shown positive therapeutic outcomes, however, clinical effects are not much satisfiable. Moreover, the development of drug resistance is the major pattern observed in many targeted monotherapies. The heterogeneity of TNBC might be the cause for limited clinical benefits. Hence,, there is a need for the potential identification of new therapeutic targets to address the above limitations. In this context, some novel targets that can address the above-mentioned concerns are emerging in the era of TNBC therapy, which include Hypoxia Inducible Factor (HIF-1α), Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), Tumour Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α), β-Adrenergic Receptor (β-AR), Voltage Gated Sodium Channels (VGSCs), and Cell Cycle Regulators. Currently, we summarize the ongoing clinical trials and discuss the novel therapeutic targets in the management of TNBC.

Latest Therapeutical Approaches for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: From Preclinical to Clinical Research

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents roughly one-sixth of all breast cancer patients, but accounts for 30-40% of breast cancer deaths. Due to the lack of typical biomarkers exploited clinically for breast cancer, it remains very difficult to treat. Moreover, its intrinsic high heterogeneity and proneness to become resistant to the drugs administered makes the treatment management very challenging for oncologists. Herein, we outline the different therapies used currently for TNBC and list the ongoing clinical trials to provide an overview of the most recent TNBC therapeutic landscape. In addition, we highlight the emerging therapies in the preclinical stage that hold the most promise, such as epigenetic modulators, CRISPR, miniproteins, radioconjugates, cancer vaccines, and PROTACs. Moreover, we navigate through the existing limitations and challenges which hamper the development of new and more effective treatments for TNBC. Lastly, we point to emerging new directions that may revolutionize future therapy for TNBC.

Betulinic acid and oleanolic acid modulate CD81 expression and induce apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells through ROS generation

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer characterized by a lack of hormones receptors and the HER2 receptor, making it unresponsive to targeted therapy. Triterpenoids such as betulinic acid (BA) and oleanolic acid (OA) have anticancer effects by inducing apoptosis in TNBC cells. CD81 is a tetraspanin that affects the growth and metastasis of cancer cells. To examine the effect of BA and OA on the viability of TNBC cell line (MDA-MB 231) by analyzing the CD81 expression, intracellular ROS, and apoptosis. The MDA-MB 231 cells was cultured and treated by BA and OA. The viability cell was evaluated by the CCK8 assay. This study analyzed the binding of BA and OA with CD81 using molecular docking and evaluated CD81 expression, intracellular ROS, and apoptosis by flow cytometry. The result showed that BA and OA inhibited viability of MDA-MB-231 cells. BA and OA bind to CD81 in silico, with binding affinities of 9.0 kcal/mol for BA and 7.2 kcal/mol for OA. Flow cytometry results revealed that BA can downregulate CD81 expression. BA and OA also increased intracellular ROS levels and induced apoptosis. These findings suggest that BA and OA, especially BA, can modulate CD81 expression and promote apoptosis in TNBC cells through the generation of ROS, thereby offering a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of TNBC.

Spatial transcriptomics reveals substantial heterogeneity in triple-negative breast cancer with potential clinical implications

While triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is known to be heterogeneous at the genomic and transcriptomic levels, spatial information on tumor organization and cell composition is still lacking. Here, we investigate TNBC tumor architecture including its microenvironment using spatial transcriptomics on a series of 92 patients. We perform an in-depth characterization of tumor and stroma organization and composition using an integrative approach combining histomorphological and spatial transcriptomics. Furthermore, a detailed molecular characterization of tertiary lymphoid structures leads to identify a gene signature strongly associated to disease outcome and response to immunotherapy in several tumor types beyond TNBC. A stepwise clustering analysis identifies nine TNBC spatial archetypes, further validated in external datasets. Several spatial archetypes are associated with disease outcome and characterized by potentially actionable features. In this work, we provide a comprehensive insight into the complexity of TNBC ecosystem with potential clinical relevance, opening avenues for treatment tailoring including immunotherapy.

Identifying therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer via phosphoproteomics

INTRODUCTION

Given the poor prognosis of patients with TNBC, it is urgent to identify new biomarkers and therapeutic targets to enable personalized treatment strategies and improve patient survival. Comprehensive insights beyond genomic and transcriptomic analysis are crucial to improved outcomes for patients. As proteins are the workhorses of cellular function with their activity primarily regulated by phosphorylation, advanced phosphoproteomics techniques, such as mass spectrometry and antibody arrays, are essential for elucidating kinase signaling pathways that drive TNBC progression and contribute to therapy resistance.

AREA COVERED

This review discusses the critical need to integrate phosphoproteomics into TNBC research, evaluates commonly used technologies and their applications, and explores their advantages and limitations. We highlight significant findings from phosphoproteomic analyses in TNBC and address the challenges of implementing these technologies into clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Rapid advances in phosphoproteomics analysis facilitate subtype stratification, adaptive response monitoring, and identification of biomarkers and therapeutic targets in TNBC. However, challenges in analyzing protein phosphorylation, especially in deep spatially resolved analysis of malignant cells and the tumor ecosystem, hinder the translation of phosphoproteomics to the CLIA setting. Nonetheless, phosphoproteomics offers a powerful tool that, when integrated into routine clinical practice, has the potential to revolutionize patient care.

Combined inhibition of CDK4/6 and AKT is highly effective against the luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype of triple negative breast cancer

Luminal Androgen Receptor (LAR) triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) express androgen receptors (AR), exhibit high frequency of PIK3CA mutations and intact RB. Herein, we investigated combined blockade of the CDK4/6 and PI3K signaling with palbociclib, alpelisib, and capivasertib, which inhibit CDK4/6, PI3Kα, and AKT1-3, respectively. The combination of palbociclib/capivasertib, but not palbociclib/alpelisib, synergistically inhibited proliferation of MDA-MB-453 and MFM-223 LAR cells [synergy score 7.34 (p = 5.81x10-11) and 4.78 (p = 0.012), respectively]. The AR antagonist enzalutamide was inactive against MDA-MB-453, MFM-223, and CAL148 cells and did not enhance the efficacy of either combination. Palbociclib/capivasertib inhibited growth of LAR patient-derived xenografts more potently than palbociclib/alpelisib. Treatment of LAR cells with palbociclib suppressed phosphorylated-RB and resulted in adaptive phosphorylation/activation of S473 pAKT and AKT substrates GSK3β, PRAS40, and FoxO3a. Capivasertib blocked palbociclib-induced phosphorylation of AKT substrates more potently than alpelisib. Treatment with PI3Kβ inhibitors did not block phosphorylation of AKT substrates, suggesting that PI3Kβ did not mediate the adaptive response to CDK4/6 inhibition. Phosphokinase arrays of MDA-MB-453 cells treated with palbociclib showed time-dependent upregulation of PDGFRβ, GSK3β, STAT3, and STAT6. RNA silencing of PDGFRβ in palbociclib-treated MDA-MB-453 and MFM-223 cells blocked the upregulation of S473 pAKT, suggesting that the adaptive response to CDK4/6 blockade involves PDGFRβ signaling. Finally, treatment with palbociclib and the PDGFR inhibitor CP637451 arrested growth of MDA-MB-453 and MFM-223 cells to the same degree as palbociclib/capivasertib. These findings support testing the combination of CDK4/6 and AKT inhibitors in patients with LAR TNBC, and further investigation of PDGFR antagonists in this breast cancer subtype.

Multiomics and single-cell sequencings reveal the specific biological characteristics of low Ki-67 triple-negative breast cancer

Background

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) displays high heterogeneity. The majority of TNBC cases are characterized by high Ki-67 expression. TNBC with low Ki-67 expression accounts for only a small fraction of cases and has been relatively less studied.

Methods

This study analyzed a large single-center multiomics TNBC data set, combined with a single-cell data set. The clinical, genomic, and metabolic characteristics of patients with low Ki-67 TNBC were analyzed.

Results

The clinical and pathological characteristics were analyzed in 2217 TNBC patients. Low Ki-67 TNBC was associated with a higher patient age at diagnosis, a lower proportion of invasive ductal carcinoma, increased alterations in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, upregulated lipid metabolism pathways, and enhanced infiltration of M2 macrophages. High Ki-67 TNBC exhibited a higher prevalence of TP53 gene mutations, elevated nucleotide metabolism, and increased infiltration of M1 macrophages.

Conclusions

We identified specific genomic and metabolic characteristics unique to low Ki-67 TNBC, which have implications for the development of precision therapies and patient stratification strategies.

Developing combination therapies with biologics in triple-negative breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Novel compounds have entered the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treatment algorithm, namely immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs), PARP inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). The optimization of treatment efficacy can be enhanced with the use of combination treatments, and the incorporation of novel compounds. In this review, we discuss the combination treatments under development for the treatment of TNBC.

AREAS COVERED

The development of new drugs occurring in recent years has boosted the research for novel combinations to target TNBC heterogeneity and improve outcomes. ICIs, ADCs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and PARP inhibitors have emerged as leading players in this new landscape, while other compounds like novel intracellular pathways inhibitors or cancer vaccines are drawing more and more interest. The future of TNBC is outlined in combination approaches, and based on new cancer targets, including many chemotherapy-free treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

A large number of TNBC therapies have either proved clinically ineffective or weighted by unacceptable safety profiles. Others, however, have provided promising results and are currently in late-stage clinical trials, while a few have actually changed clinical practice in recent years. As novel, more and more selective drugs come up, combination strategies focusing the concept of synergy are fully warranted for the future.

Targeting PI3K family with small-molecule inhibitors in cancer therapy: current clinical status and future directions

The Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) family is well-known to comprise three classes of intracellular enzymes. Class I PI3Ks primarily function in signaling by responding to cell surface receptor stimulation, while class II and III are more involved in membrane transport. Under normal physiological conditions, the PI3K signaling network orchestrates cell growth, division, migration and survival. Aberrant activation of the PI3K signaling pathway disrupts cellular activity and metabolism, often marking the onset of cancer. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the clinical use of five class I PI3K inhibitors. These small-molecule inhibitors, which exhibit varying selectivity for different class I PI3K family members, are primarily used in the treatment of breast cancer and hematologic malignancies. Therefore, the development of novel class I PI3K inhibitors has been a prominent research focus in the field of oncology, aiming to enhance potential therapeutic selectivity and effectiveness. In this review, we summarize the specific structures of PI3Ks and their functional roles in cancer progression. Additionally, we critically evaluate small molecule inhibitors that target class I PI3K, with a particular focus on their clinical applications in cancer treatment. Moreover, we aim to analyze therapeutic approaches for different types of cancers marked by aberrant PI3K activation and to identify potential molecular targets amenable to intervention with small-molecule inhibitors. Ultimately, we propose future directions for the development of therapeutic strategies that optimize cancer treatment outcomes by modulating the PI3K family.

PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway: an important driver and therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous tumor lacking estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. It has higher aggressiveness and metastasis than other subtypes, with limited effective therapeutic strategies, leading to a poor prognosis. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is prevalently over-activated in human cancers and contributes to breast cancer (BC) growth, survival, proliferation, and angiogenesis, which could be an interesting therapeutic target. This review summarizes the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway activation mechanism in TNBC and discusses the relationship between its activation and various TNBC subtypes. We also report the latest clinical studies on kinase inhibitors related to this pathway for treating TNBC. Our review discusses the issues that need to be addressed in the clinical application of these inhibitors.

Genomic characterization reveals distinct mutational landscapes and therapeutic implications between different molecular subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has high heterogeneity, poor prognosis, and limited treatment success. Recently, an immunohistochemistry-based surrogate classification for the "Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) subtyping" has been developed and is considered more suitable for clinical application. Seventy-one paraffin-embedded sections of surgically resected TNBC were classified into four molecular subtypes using the IHC-based surrogate classification. Genomic analysis was performed by targeted next-generation sequencing and the specificity of the subtypes was explored by bioinformatics, including survival analysis, multivariate Cox regression, pathway enrichment, Pyclone analysis, mutational signature analysis and PHIAL analysis. AKT1 and BRCA1 mutations were identified as independent prognostic factors in TNBC. TNBC molecular subtypes encompass distinct genomic landscapes that show specific heterogeneities. The luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype was associated with mutations in PIK3CA and PI3K pathways, which are potentially sensitive to PI3K pathway inhibitors. The basal-like immune-suppressed (BLIS) subtype was characterized by high genomic instability and the specific possession of signature 19 while patients in the immunomodulatory (IM) subtype belonged to the PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroup with enrichment in Notch signaling, suggesting a possible benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors and Notch inhibitors. Moreover, mesenchymal-like (MES) tumors displayed enrichment in the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-RAS pathway and potential sensitivity to RTK pathway inhibitors. The findings suggest potential treatment targets and prognostic factors, indicating the possibility of TNBC stratified therapy in the future.

Molecular pathways and therapeutic targets linked to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Cancer is a group of diseases characterized by uncontrolled cellular growth, abnormal morphology, and altered proliferation. Cancerous cells lose their ability to act as anchors, allowing them to spread throughout the body and infiltrate nearby cells, tissues, and organs. If these cells are not identified and treated promptly, they will likely spread. Around 70% of female breast cancers are caused by a mutation in the BRCA gene, specifically BRCA1. The absence of progesterone, oestrogen and HER2 receptors (human epidermal growth factor) distinguishes the TNBC subtype of breast cancer. There were approximately 6,85,000 deaths worldwide and 2.3 million new breast cancer cases in women in 2020. Breast cancer is the most common cancer globally, affecting 7.8 million people at the end of 2020. Compared to other cancer types, breast cancer causes more women to lose disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Worldwide, women can develop breast cancer at any age after puberty, but rates increase with age. The maintenance of mammary stem cell stemness is disrupted in TNBC, governed by signalling cascades controlling healthy mammary gland growth and development. Interpreting these essential cascades may facilitate an in-depth understanding of TNBC cancer and the search for an appropriate therapeutic target. Its treatment remains challenging because it lacks specific receptors, which renders hormone therapy and medications ineffective. In addition to radiotherapy, numerous recognized chemotherapeutic medicines are available as inhibitors of signalling pathways, while others are currently undergoing clinical trials. This article summarizes the vital druggable targets, therapeutic approaches, and strategies associated with TNBC.

Determination of the androgen receptor status of disseminated tumor cells in primary breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Androgen receptor (AR) can serve as a new therapeutic target since it was shown to play a proliferative role in several breast cancer (BC) subtypes. Moreover, AR positivity has been suggested to reflect the metastatic potential of tumor cells in some BC subtypes. The aim of this study was to determine the AR expression on disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) as a surrogate marker of minimal residual disease (MRD) and potential precursor of metastasis in early BC.

METHODS

Bone marrow (BM) aspirates from 62 DTC-positive early BC patients were included into this study and analyzed by immunofluorescence staining for the presence of AR-positive DTCs. CK-positive, CD45-negative cells containing an intact nucleus (DAPI positive) were identified as DTCs. AR expression of the primary tumor (PT) was assessed by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor sections from core biopsies and surgical specimens.

RESULTS

AR status of DTCs could be determined in 21 patients. We detected AR-positive DTCs in nine samples (43%). AR expression of DTCs and corresponding PT showed a concordance rate of 33%. The DTC-AR status did not correlate with clinicopathological factors, nor did we observe a significant correlation between the AR status of the PT and other established prognostic factors for BC.

CONCLUSION

AR-positive DTCs can be detected in BM of early BC patients with a marked discordance of the AR status between DTCs and corresponding PTs. The clinical significance of these findings needs further investigation.

Analysis of the responsiveness to antiandrogens in multiple breast cancer cell lines

Antiandrogens were originally developed as therapeutic agents for prostate cancer but are also expected to be effective for breast cancer. However, the role of androgen signaling in breast cancer has long been controversial due to the limited number of experimental models. Our study aimed to comprehensively investigate the efficacy of antiandrogens on breast cancer. In the present study, a total of 18 breast cancer cell lines were treated with the agonist or antagonists of the androgen receptor (AR). Among the 18 cell lines tested, only T-47D cells proliferated in an androgen-dependent manner, while the other cell lines were almost irresponsive to AR stimulation. On the other hand, treatment with AR antagonists at relatively high doses suppressed the proliferation of not only T-47D cells but also some other cell lines including AR-low/negative cells. In addition, expression of the full-length AR and constitutively active AR splice variants, AR-V7 and ARV567es, was not correlated with sensitivity to AR antagonists. These data suggest that the antiproliferative effect of AR antagonists is AR-independent in some cases. Consistently, proliferation of AR-knockout BT-549 cells was inhibited by AR antagonists. Identification of biomarkers would be necessary to determine which breast cancer patients will benefit from these drugs.

Comprehensive Analysis Identifies Variability in PI3K Pathway Alterations in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes

PURPOSE

The PI3K pathway is frequently altered in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Limited cell line and human data suggest that TNBC tumors characterized as mesenchymal (M) and luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtypes have increased incidence of alterations in the PI3K pathway. The impact of PI3K pathway alterations across TNBC subtypes is poorly understood.

METHODS

Pretreatment tumor was evaluated from operable TNBC patients enrolled on a clinical trial of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT; A Robust TNBC Evaluation fraMework to Improve Survival [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02276443]). Tumors were characterized into seven TNBC subtypes per Pietenpol criteria (basal-like 1, basal-like 2, immunomodulatory, M, mesenchymal stem-like, LAR, and unstable). Using whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and immunohistochemistry for PTEN, alterations were identified in 32 genes known to activate the PI3K pathway. Alterations in each subtype were associated with pathologic response to NAT.

RESULTS

In evaluated patients (N = 177), there was a significant difference in the incidence of PI3K pathway alterations across TNBC subtypes (P < .01). The highest incidence of alterations was seen in LAR (81%), BL2 (79%), and M (62%) subtypes. The odds ratio for pathologic complete response (pCR) in the presence of PIK3CA mutation, PTEN mutation, and/or PTEN loss was highest in the LAR subtype and lowest in the M subtype, but these findings did not reach statistical significance. Presence of PIK3CA mutation was associated with pCR in the LAR subtype (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

PI3K pathway alteration can affect response to NAT in TNBC, and targeted agents may improve outcomes, particularly in patients with M and LAR TNBC.

Treatments Targeting the Androgen Receptor and Its Splice Variants in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is a major cause of death worldwide. The complexity of endocrine regulation in breast cancer may allow the cancer cells to escape from a particular treatment and result in resistant and aggressive disease. These breast cancers usually have fewer treatment options. Targeted therapies for cancer patients may offer fewer adverse side effects because of specificity compared to conventional chemotherapy. Signaling pathways of nuclear receptors, such as the estrogen receptor (ER), have been intensively studied and used as therapeutic targets. Recently, the role of the androgen receptor (AR) in breast cancer is gaining greater attention as a therapeutic target and as a prognostic biomarker. The expression of constitutively active truncated AR splice variants in breast cancer is a possible mechanism contributing to treatment resistance. Therefore, targeting both the full-length AR and AR variants, either through the activation or suppression of AR function, depending on the status of the ER, progesterone receptor, or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, may provide additional treatment options. Studies targeting AR in combination with other treatment strategies are ongoing in clinical trials. The determination of the status of nuclear receptors to classify and identify patient subgroups will facilitate optimized and targeted combination therapies.

Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The TBCRC 043 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Agents targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have demonstrated efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) when combined with chemotherapy and are now the standard of care in patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic disease. In contrast to microtubule-targeting agents, the effect of combining platinum compounds with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 immunotherapy has not been extensively determined.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of atezolizumab with carboplatin in patients with metastatic TNBC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted in 6 centers from August 2017 to June 2021.

Interventions

Patients with metastatic TNBC were randomized to receive carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 alone or with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects with a 3-year duration of follow-up.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and overall survival (OS). Other objectives included correlation of response with tumor PD-L1 levels, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor DNA- and RNA-sequenced biomarkers, TNBC subtyping, and multiplex analyses of immune markers.

Results

All 106 patients with metastatic TNBC who were enrolled were female with a mean (range) age of 55 (27-79) years, of which 12 (19%) identified as African American/Black, 1 (1%) as Asian, 73 (69%) as White, and 11 (10%) as unknown. Patients were randomized and received either carboplatin (n = 50) or carboplatin and atezolizumab (n = 56). The combination improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-1.01; P = .05) from a median of 2.2 to 4.1 months, increased ORR from 8.0% (95% CI, 3.2%-18.8%) to 30.4% (95% CI, 19.9%-43.3%), increased CBR at 6 months from 18.0% (95% CI, 9.8%-30.1%) to 37.5% (95% CI, 26.0%-50.6%), and improved OS (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.96; P = .03) from a median of 8.6 to 12.6 months. Subgroup analysis showed PD-L1-positive tumors did not benefit more from adding atezolizumab (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.23-1.65; P = .35). Patients with high TILs (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.30-0.50), high mutation burden (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.23-1.06), and prior chemotherapy (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.95) received greater benefit on the combination. Patients with obesity and patients with more than 125 mg/dL on-treatment blood glucose levels were associated with better PFS (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.10-1.80) on the combination. TNBC subtypes benefited from adding atezolizumab, except the luminal androgen receptor subtype.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of atezolizumab to carboplatin significantly improved survival of patients with metastatic TNBC regardless of PD-L1 status. Further, lower risk of disease progression was associated with increased TILs, higher mutation burden, obesity, and uncontrolled blood glucose levels.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03206203.

Efficacy of antiandrogens in androgen receptor-positive triple-negative metastatic breast cancer: Real-life data

Antiandrogens (AA) have been tested in clinical trials in androgen receptor (AR) + triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We aim to assess the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of AA in real life. The primary end-point was CBR at 6 months. Twenty-four patients were assessable and received: abiraterone acetate (62 %), enzalutamide (8 %) and bicalutamide (30 %). CBR at 6 months was 29 % (7/24) with 2 CR, 3 PR and 2 SD. Four patients had a clinical benefit >12 months. Real-life efficacy of AA use in metastatic AR + TNBC are in line with data from published trials.

A novel Fc-engineered cathepsin D-targeting antibody enhances ADCC, triggers tumor-infiltrating NK cell recruitment, and improves treatment with paclitaxel and enzalutamide in triple-negative breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) prognosis is poor. Immunotherapies to enhance the antibody-induced natural killer (NK) cell antitumor activity are emerging for TNBC that is frequently immunogenic. The aspartic protease cathepsin D (cath-D), a tumor cell-associated extracellular protein with protumor activity and a poor prognosis marker in TNBC, is a prime target for antibody-based therapy to induce NK cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). This study investigated whether Fc-engineered anti-cath-D antibodies trigger ADCC, their impact on antitumor efficacy and tumor-infiltrating NK cells, and their relevance for combinatory therapy in TNBC.

METHODS

Cath-D expression and localization in TNBC samples were evaluated by western blotting, immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemistry. The binding of human anti-cath-D F1M1 and Fc-engineered antibody variants, which enhance (F1M1-Fc+) or prevent (F1M1-Fc-) affinity for CD16a, to secreted human and murine cath-D was analyzed by ELISA, and to CD16a by surface plasmon resonance and flow cytometry. NK cell activation was investigated by flow cytometry, and ADCC by lactate dehydrogenase release. The antitumor efficacy of F1M1 Fc-variants was investigated using TNBC cell xenografts in nude mice. NK cell recruitment, activation, and cytotoxic activity were analyzed in MDA-MB-231 cell xenografts by immunophenotyping and RT-qPCR. NK cells were depleted using an anti-asialo GM1 antibody. F1M1-Fc+ antitumor effect was assessed in TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and TNBC SUM159 cell xenografts, and in combination with paclitaxel or enzalutamide.

RESULTS

Cath-D expression on the TNBC cell surface could be exploited to induce ADCC. F1M1 Fc-variants recognized human and mouse cath-D. F1M1-Fc+ activated NK cells in vitro and induced ADCC against TNBC cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts more efficiently than F1M1. F1M1-Fc- was ineffective. In the MDA-MB-231 cell xenograft model, F1M1-Fc+ displayed higher antitumor activity than F1M1, whereas F1M1-Fc- was less effective, reflecting the importance of Fc-dependent mechanisms in vivo. F1M1-Fc+ triggered tumor-infiltrating NK cell recruitment, activation and cytotoxic activity in MDA-MB-231 cell xenografts. NK cell depletion impaired F1M1-Fc+ antitumor activity, demonstrating their key role. F1M1-Fc+ inhibited growth of SUM159 cell xenografts and two TNBC PDXs. In combination therapy, F1M1-Fc+ improved paclitaxel and enzalutamide therapeutic efficacy without toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

F1M1-Fc+ is a promising immunotherapy for TNBC that could be combined with conventional regimens, including chemotherapy or antiandrogens.

Efficacy and Safety of Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase Inhibitors for Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors belong to the class of drugs that inhibit the activity of the PI3K protein, which is commonly overexpressed in breast cancer cells. However, there is a need to summarize the evidence to provide conclusive advice on the benefit of PI3K inhibitors in breast cancer patients. Therefore, this review assessed the effectiveness and safety of the PI3K inhibitors amongst breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Searches were made in PubMed Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, WHO trial registry and Clinicaltrials.gov up to December 2022. Meta-analysis was executed using the random-effects model. Pooled hazard ratio (HR)/risk ratio (RR) was reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In total, 13 studies were included in the analysis. Most were multi-country studies and had a higher risk of bias. Regarding the efficacy parameters, pooled HR for progression-free survival was 0.79 (95%CI: 0.67-0.92), pooled RR for complete response was 1.54 [95%CI: 1.14 to 2.09], partial response was 1.18 [95%CI: 0.87-1.61], overall response was 1.20 [95%CI: 0.93-1.56], stable disease was 1.09 [95%CI: 0.78-1.53], progressive disease was 0.80 [95%CI: 0.74 to 0.87], and clinical benefit was 1.08 [95%CI: 0.80-1.49]. For safety parameters, pooled RR for hyperglycemia was 4.57 [95%CI: 3.15-6.62], and gastrointestinal toxicity was 1.82 [95%CI: 1.56 to 2.14].

CONCLUSION

PI3K inhibitors had better efficacy than the present standard of concern for patients with breast cancer, especially among patients with PIK3CA mutations. Hence, clinicians and oncologists can provide this drug for the target population with extra caution for diabetes patients.

Identification of a targetable JAK-STAT enriched androgen receptor and androgen receptor splice variant positive triple-negative breast cancer subtype

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype with no targeted therapeutics. The luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype constitutes 15% of TNBC and is enriched for androgen receptor (AR) and AR target genes. Here, we show that a cohort of TNBC not only expresses AR at a much higher rate (∼80%) but also expresses AR splice variants (AR-SVs) (∼20%), further subclassifying LAR-TNBC. Higher AR and AR-SV expression and corresponding aggressive phenotypes are observed predominantly in specimens obtained from African American women. LAR TNBC specimens are enriched for interferon, Janus kinase (JAK)-signal activator and transducer (STAT), and androgen signaling pathways, which are exclusive to AR-expressing epithelial cancer cells. AR- and AR-SV-expressing TNBC cell proliferation and xenograft and patient-tumor explant growth are inhibited by AR N-terminal domain-binding selective AR degrader or by a JAK inhibitor. Biochemical analysis suggests that STAT1 is an AR coactivator. Collectively, our work identifies pharmacologically targetable TNBC subtypes and identifies growth-promoting interaction between AR and JAK-STAT signaling.

Emerging treatment approaches for triple-negative breast cancer

Approximately, 15% of global breast cancer cases are diagnosed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), identified as the most aggressive subtype due to the simultaneous absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2. This characteristic renders TNBC highly aggressive and challenging to treat, as it excludes the use of effective drugs such as hormone therapy and anti-HER2 agents. In this review, we explore standard therapies and recent emerging approaches for TNBC, including PARP inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors, and cytotoxin-conjugated antibodies. The mechanism of action of these drugs and their utilization in clinical practice is explained in a pragmatic and prospective manner, contextualized within the current landscape of standard therapies for this pathology. These advancements present a promising frontier for tailored interventions with the potential to significantly improve outcomes for TNBC patients. Interestingly, while TNBC poses a complex challenge, it also serves as a paradigm and an opportunity for translational research and innovative therapies in the field of oncology.

Molecular targets and therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is known for its heterogeneous complexity and is often difficult to treat. TNBC lacks the expression of major hormonal receptors like estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and is further subdivided into androgen receptor (AR) positive and AR negative. In contrast, AR negative is also known as quadruple-negative breast cancer (QNBC). Compared to AR-positive TNBC, QNBC has a great scarcity of prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. QNBC shows excessive cellular growth and proliferation of tumor cells due to increased expression of growth factors like EGF and various surface proteins. This study briefly reviews the limited data available as protein biomarkers that can be used as molecular targets in treating TNBC as well as QNBC. Targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently changed cancer treatment. Many studies in medicinal chemistry continue to focus on the synthesis of novel compounds to discover new antiproliferative medicines capable of treating TNBC despite the abundance of treatments currently on the market. Drug repurposing is one of the therapeutic methods for TNBC that has been examined. Moreover, some additional micronutrients, nutraceuticals, and functional foods may be able to lower cancer risk or slow the spread of malignant diseases that have already been diagnosed with cancer. Finally, nanomedicines, or applications of nanotechnology in medicine, introduce nanoparticles with variable chemistry and architecture for the treatment of cancer. This review emphasizes the most recent research on nutraceuticals, medication repositioning, and novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of TNBC.

Breast Cancer Treatment: To tARget or Not? That Is the Question

To assess AR's role in TNBC treatment, various existing and completed clinical trials targeting AR or co-targeting AR with other pertinent signaling molecules were analyzed. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6), cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17 lyase), and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) signaling pathway were some of the most prevalent biomarkers used in combination therapy with AR inhibitors in these trials. Studying how AR functions in tandem with these molecules can have increasing breakthroughs in the treatment options for TNBC. Previous studies have been largely unsuccessful in utilizing AR as the sole drug target for systemic targeted treatment in TNBC. However, there is a lack of other commonly used drug target biomarkers in the treatment of this disease, as well. Thus, analyzing the clinical benefit rate (CBR) within clinical trials that use combination therapy can prove to be imperative to the progression of improving treatment options and prognoses.

Identification of Predictive Factors for Post-operative Recurrence and Clinical Outcomes of Primary Vulvar Extramammary Paget Disease

BACKGROUND/AIM

Data regarding the clinicopathological factors predicting recurrence and prognosis in patients with vulvar extramammary Paget disease (VPD) are limited. Therefore, we aimed to identify predictive factors for recurrence and outcomes in patients with VPD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with VPD were included in this study. We reviewed electronic medical records and pathology slides to collect clinicopathological information.

RESULTS

Eighteen cases (40.0%) had resection margin (RM) involvement. Twelve patients (26.7%) received adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Ten patients (22.2%) experienced recurrence. The recurrence rate was higher in patients who underwent wide local excision or simple vulvectomy than in those who underwent radical vulvectomy. Positive RM involvement was a significant and independent predictive factor for worse recurrence-free survival (RFS). The overall survival rate of patients who received adjuvant RT was significantly higher than that of those who underwent surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

A positive RM involvement independently predicted worse RFS. The recurrence rate was significantly associated with the type of surgical procedure performed. Additionally, adjuvant RT can improve the prognosis of patients with VPD.

Recent advances in targeted strategies for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer, negatively expresses estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Although chemotherapy is the main form of treatment for patients with TNBC, the effectiveness of chemotherapy for TNBC is still limited. The search for more effective therapies is urgent. Multiple targeted therapeutic strategies have emerged according to the specific molecules and signaling pathways expressed in TNBC. These include PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, Notch inhibitors, poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors, for example, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab, are widely explored in the clinic. We summarize recent advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy in TNBC, with the aim of serving as a reference for the development of individualized treatment of patients with TNBC in the future.

Advances in the Management of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with both inter- and intratumor heterogeneity, thought to result in a more aggressive course and worse outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become the preferred treatment modality of early-stage TNBC as it allows for the downstaging of tumors in the breast and axilla, monitoring early treatment response, and most importantly, provides important prognostic information that is essential to determining post-surgical therapies to improve outcomes. It focuses on combinations of systemic drugs to optimize pathologic complete response (pCR). Excellent response to NAT has allowed surgical de-escalation in ideal candidates. Further, treatment algorithms guide the systemic management of patients based on their pCR status following surgery. The expanding knowledge of molecular pathways, genomic sequencing, and the immunological profile of TNBC has led to the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, including PARP inhibitors, further revolutionizing the therapeutic landscape of this clinical entity. However, subgroups most likely to benefit from these novel approaches in TNBC remain elusive and are being extensively studied. In this review, we describe current practices and promising therapeutic options on the horizon for TNBC, surgical advances, and future trends in molecular determinants of response to therapy in early-stage TNBC.

Update on Classic and Novel Approaches in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment: A Comprehensive Review

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for almost 15% of all diagnosed breast cancers and often presents high rates of relapses and metastases, with generally poor prognosis despite multiple lines of treatment. Immunotherapy has radically changed the approach of clinicians towards TNBC in the last two to three years, even if targeted and specific therapeutic options are still missing; this unmet need is further justified by the extreme molecular and clinical heterogeneity of this subtype of breast cancer and by the weak response to both single-agent and combined therapies. In March 2023, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the main association of cancer centers in the United States, released the last clinical practice guidelines, with an update on classic and novel approaches in the field of breast cancer. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to summarize the latest findings in the setting of metastatic TNBC treatment, focusing on each category of drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and included in the NCCN guidelines. We also introduce part of the latest published studies, which have reported new and promising molecules able to specifically target some of the biomarkers involved in TNBC pathogenesis. We searched the PubMed and Scopus databases for free full texts reported in the literature of the last 5 years, using the words "triple-negative breast cancer" or "TNBC" or "basal-like". The articles were analyzed by the authors independently and double-blindly, and a total of 114 articles were included in the review.

Phase II trial of fulvestrant plus enzalutamide in ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer

This clinical trial combined fulvestrant with the anti-androgen enzalutamide in women with metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer (BC). Eligible patients were women with ECOG 0-2, ER+/HER2- measurable or evaluable metastatic BC. Prior fulvestrant was allowed. Fulvestrant was administered at 500 mg IM on days 1, 15, 29, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Enzalutamide was given at 160 mg po daily. Fresh tumor biopsies were required at study entry and after 4 weeks of treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial was the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24). The median age was 61 years (46-87); PS 1 (0-1); median of 4 prior non-hormonal and 3 prior hormonal therapies for metastatic disease. Twelve had prior fulvestrant, and 91% had visceral disease. CBR24 was 25% (7/28 evaluable). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 weeks (95% CI: 2-52). Adverse events were as expected for hormonal therapy. Significant (p < 0.1) univariate relationships existed between PFS and ER%, AR%, and PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations. Baseline levels of phospho-proteins in the mTOR pathway were more highly expressed in biopsies of patients with shorter PFS. Fulvestrant plus enzalutamide had manageable side effects. The primary endpoint of CBR24 was 25% in heavily pretreated metastatic ER+/HER2- BC. Short PFS was associated with activation of the mTOR pathway, and PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations were associated with an increased hazard of progression. Thus, a combination of fulvestrant or other SERD plus AKT/PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with or without AR inhibition warrants investigation in second-line endocrine therapy of metastatic ER+ BC.

Newly Developed Targeted Therapies Against the Androgen Receptor in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review

Among different types of breast cancers (BC), triple-negative BC (TNBC) amounts to 15% to 20% of breast malignancies. Three principal characteristics of TNBC cells are (i) extreme aggressiveness, (ii) absence of hormones, and (iii) growth factor receptors. Due to the lack or poor expression of the estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and progesterone receptor, TNBC is resistant to hormones and endocrine therapies. Consequently, chemotherapy is currently used as the primary approach against TNBC. Expression of androgen receptor (AR) in carcinoma cells has been observed in a subset of patients with TNBC; therefore, inhibiting androgen signaling pathways holds promise for TNBC targeting. The new AR inhibitors have opened up new therapy possibilities for BC patients carrying AR-positive TNBC cells. Our group provides a comprehensive review of the structure and function of the AR and clinical evidence for targeting the cell's nuclear receptor in TNBC. We updated AR agonists, inhibitors, and antagonists. We also presented a new era of genetic manipulating CRISPR/Cas9 and nanotechnology as state-of-the-art approaches against AR to promote the efficiency of targeted therapy in TNBC. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The lack of effective treatment for triple-negative breast cancer is a health challenge. The main disadvantages of existing treatments are their side effects, due to their nonspecific targeting. Molecular targeting of cellular receptors, such as androgen receptors, increased expression in malignant tissues, significantly improving the survival rate of breast cancer patients.

Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase (PI3K) Inhibitors and Breast Cancer: An Overview of Current Achievements

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is one of the most altered pathways in human cancers, and it plays a central role in cellular growth, survival, metabolism, and cellular mobility, making it a particularly interesting therapeutic target. Recently, pan-inhibitors and then selective p110α subunit inhibitors of PI3K were developed. Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women and, despite therapeutic progress in recent years, advanced breast cancers remain incurable and early breast cancers are at risk of relapse. Breast cancer is divided in three molecular subtypes, each with its own molecular biology. However, PI3K mutations are found in all breast cancer subtypes in three main "hotspots". In this review, we report the results of the most recent and main ongoing studies evaluating pan-PI3K inhibitors and selective PI3K inhibitors in each breast cancer subtype. In addition, we discuss the future of their development, the various potential mechanisms of resistance to these inhibitors and the ways to circumvent them.

Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinomas: Toward a Unified Group With Shared Molecular Features and Clinical Behavior

Triple-negative apocrine carcinomas (TNACs) are rare breast tumors with limited studies evaluating their molecular characteristics and clinical behavior. We performed a histologic, immunohistochemical, genetic, and clinicopathologic assessment of 42 invasive TNACs (1 with a focal spindle cell component) from 41 patients, 2 pure apocrine ductal carcinomas in situ (A-DCIS), and 1 A-DCIS associated with spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma (SCMBC). All TNACs had characteristic apocrine morphology and expressed androgen receptor (42/42), gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (24/24), and CK5/6 (16/16). GATA3 was positive in most cases (16/18, 89%), and SOX10 was negative (0/22). TRPS1 was weakly expressed in a minority of tumors (3/14, 21%). Most TNACs had low Ki67 proliferation (≤10% in 67%, 26/39), with a median index of 10%. Levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were low (≤10% in 93%, 39/42, and 15% in 7%, 3/42). Eighteen percent of TNACs presented with axillary nodal metastasis (7/38). No patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieved pathologic complete response (0%, 0/10). Nearly all patients with TNAC (97%, n = 32) were without evidence of disease at the time of study (mean follow-up of 62 months). Seventeen invasive TNACs and 10 A-DCIS (7 with paired invasive TNAC) were profiled by targeted capture-based next-generation DNA sequencing. Pathogenic mutations in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway genes PIK3CA (53%) and/or PIK3R1 (53%) were identified in all TNACs (100%), including 4 (24%) with comutated PTEN. Ras-MAPK pathway genes, including NF1 (24%), and TP53 were mutated in 6 tumors each (35%). All A-DCIS shared mutations, such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase aberrations and copy number alterations with paired invasive TNACs or SCMBC, and a subset of invasive carcinomas showed additional mutations in tumor suppressors (NF1, TP53, ARID2, and CDKN2A). Divergent genetic profiles between A-DCIS and invasive carcinoma were identified in 1 case. In summary, our findings support TNAC as a morphologically, immunohistochemically, and genetically homogeneous subgroup of triple-negative breast carcinomas and suggest overall favorable clinical behavior.

Inhibition of WNT signaling by conjugated microRNA nano-carriers: A new therapeutic approach for treating triple-negative breast cancer a perspective review

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer is the most aggressive form and accounts the 15%-25% of all breast cancer. Receptors are absent in triple-negative breast cancer, which makes them unresponsive to the current hormonal therapies. The patients with TNBC are left with the option of cytotoxic chemotherapy. The Wnt pathways are connected to cancer, and when activated, they result in mammary hyperplasia and tumors. The tumor suppressor microRNAs can block tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, lead to cancer cell death, and are also known to down-regulate the WNT signaling. Nanoparticles with microRNA have been seen to be more effective when compared with their single release. In this review, we have tried to understand how Wnt signaling plays a crucial role in TNBC, EMT, metastasis, anti-drug resistance, and regulation of Wnt by microRNA. The role of nano-carriers in delivering micro-RNA. The clinical biomarkers, including the present state-of-the-art, involve novel pathways of Wnt.

Ferroptosis heterogeneity in triple-negative breast cancer reveals an innovative immunotherapy combination strategy

Treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains challenging. Deciphering the orchestration of metabolic pathways in regulating ferroptosis will provide new insights into TNBC therapeutic strategies. Here, we integrated the multiomics data of our large TNBC cohort (n = 465) to develop the ferroptosis atlas. We discovered that TNBCs had heterogeneous phenotypes in ferroptosis-related metabolites and metabolic pathways. The luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype of TNBC was characterized by the upregulation of oxidized phosphatidylethanolamines and glutathione metabolism (especially GPX4), which allowed the utilization of GPX4 inhibitors to induce ferroptosis. Furthermore, we verified that GPX4 inhibition not only induced tumor ferroptosis but also enhanced antitumor immunity. The combination of GPX4 inhibitors and anti-PD1 possessed greater therapeutic efficacy than monotherapy. Clinically, higher GPX4 expression correlated with lower cytolytic scores and worse prognosis in immunotherapy cohorts. Collectively, this study demonstrated the ferroptosis landscape of TNBC and revealed an innovative immunotherapy combination strategy for refractory LAR tumors.