1
|
Edsjö A, Russnes HG, Lehtiö J, Tamborero D, Hovig E, Stenzinger A, Rosenquist R. High-throughput molecular assays for inclusion in personalised oncology trials - State-of-the-art and beyond. J Intern Med 2024; 295:785-803. [PMID: 38698538 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
In the last decades, the development of high-throughput molecular assays has revolutionised cancer diagnostics, paving the way for the concept of personalised cancer medicine. This progress has been driven by the introduction of such technologies through biomarker-driven oncology trials. In this review, strengths and limitations of various state-of-the-art sequencing technologies, including gene panel sequencing (DNA and RNA), whole-exome/whole-genome sequencing and whole-transcriptome sequencing, are explored, focusing on their ability to identify clinically relevant biomarkers with diagnostic, prognostic and/or predictive impact. This includes the need to assess complex biomarkers, for example microsatellite instability, tumour mutation burden and homologous recombination deficiency, to identify patients suitable for specific therapies, including immunotherapy. Furthermore, the crucial role of biomarker analysis and multidisciplinary molecular tumour boards in selecting patients for trial inclusion is discussed in relation to various trial concepts, including drug repurposing. Recognising that today's exploratory techniques will evolve into tomorrow's routine diagnostics and clinical study inclusion assays, the importance of emerging technologies for multimodal diagnostics, such as proteomics and in vivo drug sensitivity testing, is also discussed. In addition, key regulatory aspects and the importance of patient engagement in all phases of a clinical trial are described. Finally, we propose a set of recommendations for consideration when planning a new precision cancer medicine trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Edsjö
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Janne Lehtiö
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden
- Cancer genomics and proteomics, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - David Tamborero
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eivind Hovig
- Center for Bioinformatics, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, Division of Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Richard Rosenquist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Verlingue L, Desevre M, Polito M, Garin G, Rodriguez C, Qing W, Tredan O, Perol D, Ray-Coquard I, Chabaud S, Blay JY. The French multicentric molecular analysis platforms and personalized medicine trials MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST. Acta Oncol 2024; 63:411-417. [PMID: 38807312 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.32745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In this manuscript we describe the academic French multicentric molecular analysis platforms including PROFILER, promoted by Centre Léon Berard, and the multicentric personalized medicine trials MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS MOST, MOST Plus and MEGAMOST comprise 14 cohorts with different targeted agents and immunotherapies. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION PROFILER has recruited 5,991 patients in 10 years, MOST and MOST Plus 875 patients since 2014 and MEGAMOST 172 patients since 2020, and are still ongoing. We provide a description of the local, national and international implications of these initiatives, and we review the results of the sorafenib and olaparib cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loic Verlingue
- Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France.
| | - Marine Desevre
- Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Marie Polito
- Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Gwenaelle Garin
- Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Christine Rodriguez
- Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Wang Qing
- Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Tredan
- Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - David Perol
- Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Sylvie Chabaud
- Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Yves Blay
- Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taskén K, F Haj Mohammad S, Fagereng GL, Sørum Falk R, Helland Å, Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani S, Steen Carlsson K, Ryll B, Jalkanen K, Edsjö A, Russnes HG, Lassen U, Hallersjö Hult E, Lugowska I, Blay JY, Verlingue L, Abel E, Lowery MA, Krebs MG, Staal Rohrberg K, Ojamaa K, Oliveira J, Verheul HMW, Voest EE, Gelderblom H. PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE: Collaboration for implementation of precision cancer medicine in Europe. Acta Oncol 2024; 63:385-391. [PMID: 38779910 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.34791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the two European Union (EU)-funded projects, PCM4EU (Personalized Cancer Medicine for all EU citizens) and PRIME-ROSE (Precision Cancer Medicine Repurposing System Using Pragmatic Clinical Trials), we aim to facilitate implementation of precision cancer medicine (PCM) in Europe by leveraging the experience from ongoing national initiatives that have already been particularly successful. PATIENTS AND METHODS PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE gather 17 and 24 partners, respectively, from 19 European countries. The projects are based on a network of Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP)-like clinical trials that are currently ongoing or soon to start in 11 different countries, and with more trials expected to be established soon. The main aims of both the projects are to improve implementation pathways from molecular diagnostics to treatment, and reimbursement of diagnostics and tumour-tailored therapies to provide examples of best practices for PCM in Europe. RESULTS PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE were launched in January and July 2023, respectively. Educational materials, including a podcast series, are already available from the PCM4EU website (http://www.pcm4eu.eu). The first reports, including an overview of requirements for the reimbursement systems in participating countries and a guide on patient involvement, are expected to be published in 2024. CONCLUSION PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE were launched in January and July 2023, respectively. Educational materials, including a podcast series, are already available from the PCM4EU website (http://www.pcm4eu.eu). The first reports, including an overview of requirements for the reimbursement systems in participating countries and a guide on patient involvement, are expected to be published in 2024. CONCLUSION European collaboration can facilitate the implementation of PCM and thereby provide affordable and equitable access to precision diagnostics and matched therapies for more patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjetil Taskén
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Soemeya F Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Gro Live Fagereng
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Ragnhild Sørum Falk
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Åslaug Helland
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | - Bettina Ryll
- Stockholm School of Economics Institute for Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Katriina Jalkanen
- Clinical Trial Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Anders Edsjö
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden.
| | - Hege G Russnes
- Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Ulrik Lassen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | - Iwona Lugowska
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
| | | | | | - Edvard Abel
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Maeve A Lowery
- Trinity St James Cancer Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Matthew G Krebs
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | | | - Kristiina Ojamaa
- Hematology-Oncology Clinic at Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
| | - Julio Oliveira
- Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto FG, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Emile E Voest
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haj Mohammad SF, Timmer HJL, Zeverijn LJ, Geurts BS, Spiekman IAC, Verkerk K, Verbeek FAJ, Verheul HMW, Voest EE, Gelderblom H. The evolution of precision oncology: The ongoing impact of the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP). Acta Oncol 2024; 63:368-372. [PMID: 38779868 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.34885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP) is a Dutch, pan-cancer, nonrandomized clinical trial that aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of targeted and immunotherapies outside their registered indication in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. PATIENTS Patients with advanced or metastatic cancer are eligible when there are no standard of care treatment options left and the tumor possesses a molecular genomic variant for which commercially available anticancer treatment is accessible off-label in DRUP. Clinical benefit is the study's primary endpoint, characterized by a confirmed objective response or stable disease after at least 16 weeks of treatment. RESULTS More than 2,500 patients have undergone evaluation, of which over 1,500 have started treatment in DRUP. The overall clinical benefit rate (CBR) remains 33%. The nivolumab cohort for patients with microsatellite instable metastatic tumors proved highly successful with a CBR of 63%, while palbociclib or ribociclib in patients with tumors harboring CDK4/6 pathway alterations showed limited efficacy, with a CBR of 15%. The formation of two European initiatives (PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE) strives to accelerate implementation and enhance data collection to broaden equitable access to anticancer treatments and gather more evidence. CONCLUSION DRUP persists in improving patients access to off-label targeted or immunotherapy in the Netherlands and beyond. The expansion of DRUP-like clinical trials across Europe provides countless opportunities for broadening the horizon of precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soemeya F Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Hans J L Timmer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien J Zeverijn
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Birgit S Geurts
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ilse A C Spiekman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karlijn Verkerk
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Florentine A J Verbeek
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vanni I, Pastorino L, Andreotti V, Comandini D, Fornarini G, Grassi M, Puccini A, Tanda ET, Pastorino A, Martelli V, Mastracci L, Grillo F, Cabiddu F, Guadagno A, Coco S, Allavena E, Barbero F, Bruno W, Dalmasso B, Bellomo SE, Marchiò C, Spagnolo F, Sciallero S, Berrino E, Ghiorzo P. Combining germline, tissue and liquid biopsy analysis by comprehensive genomic profiling to improve the yield of actionable variants in a real-world cancer cohort. J Transl Med 2024; 22:462. [PMID: 38750555 PMCID: PMC11097509 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05227-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comprehensive next-generation sequencing is widely used for precision oncology and precision prevention approaches. We aimed to determine the yield of actionable gene variants, the capacity to uncover hereditary predisposition and liquid biopsy appropriateness instead of, or in addition to, tumor tissue analysis, in a real-world cohort of cancer patients, who may benefit the most from comprehensive genomic profiling. METHODS Seventy-eight matched germline/tumor tissue/liquid biopsy DNA and RNA samples were profiled using the Hereditary Cancer Panel (germline) and the TruSight Oncology 500 panel (tumor tissue/cfDNA) from 23 patients consecutively enrolled at our center according to at least one of the following criteria: no available therapeutic options; long responding patients potentially fit for other therapies; rare tumor; suspected hereditary cancer; primary cancer with high metastatic potential; tumor of unknown primary origin. Variants were annotated for OncoKB and AMP/ASCO/CAP classification. RESULTS The overall yield of actionable somatic and germline variants was 57% (13/23 patients), and 43.5%, excluding variants previously identified by somatic or germline routine testing. The accuracy of tumor/cfDNA germline-focused analysis was demonstrated by overlapping results of germline testing. Five germline variants in BRCA1, VHL, CHEK1, ATM genes would have been missed without extended genomic profiling. A previously undetected BRAF p.V600E mutation was emblematic of the clinical utility of this approach in a patient with a liver undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma responsive to BRAF/MEK inhibition. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms the clinical relevance of performing extended parallel tumor DNA and cfDNA testing to broaden therapeutic options, to longitudinally monitor cfDNA during patient treatment, and to uncover possible hereditary predisposition following tumor sequencing in patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Vanni
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - L Pastorino
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - V Andreotti
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - D Comandini
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - G Fornarini
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - M Grassi
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - A Puccini
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - E T Tanda
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - A Pastorino
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - V Martelli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - L Mastracci
- Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - F Grillo
- Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - F Cabiddu
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - A Guadagno
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Coco
- Lung Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - E Allavena
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - F Barbero
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - W Bruno
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - B Dalmasso
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - S E Bellomo
- Pathology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - C Marchiò
- Pathology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, 10060, Turin, Italy
| | - F Spagnolo
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Sciallero
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - E Berrino
- Pathology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, 10060, Turin, Italy
| | - P Ghiorzo
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Edsjö A, Gisselsson D, Staaf J, Holmquist L, Fioretos T, Cavelier L, Rosenquist R. Current and emerging sequencing-based tools for precision cancer medicine. Mol Aspects Med 2024; 96:101250. [PMID: 38330674 DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2024.101250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Current precision cancer medicine is dependent on the analyses of a plethora of clinically relevant genomic aberrations. During the last decade, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has gradually replaced most other methods for precision cancer diagnostics, spanning from targeted tumor-informed assays and gene panel sequencing to global whole-genome and whole-transcriptome sequencing analyses. The shift has been impelled by a clinical need to assess an increasing number of genomic alterations with diagnostic, prognostic and predictive impact, including more complex biomarkers (e.g. microsatellite instability, MSI, and homologous recombination deficiency, HRD), driven by the parallel development of novel targeted therapies and enabled by the rapid reduction in sequencing costs. This review focuses on these sequencing-based methods, puts their emergence in a historic perspective, highlights their clinical utility in diagnostics and decision-making in pediatric and adult cancer, as well as raises challenges for their clinical implementation. Finally, the importance of applying sensitive tools for longitudinal monitoring of treatment response and detection of measurable residual disease, as well as future avenues in the rapidly evolving field of sequencing-based methods are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Edsjö
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden; Division of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - David Gisselsson
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden; Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johan Staaf
- Division of Translational Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden
| | - Louise Holmquist
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
| | - Thoas Fioretos
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden; Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Clinical Genomics Lund, Science for Life Laboratory, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lucia Cavelier
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Richard Rosenquist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Genomic Medicine Center Karolinska, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fieuws C, Van der Meulen J, Proesmans K, De Jaeghere EA, Loontiens S, Van Dorpe J, Tummers P, Denys H, Van de Vijver K, Claes KBM. Identification of potentially actionable genetic variants in epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:71. [PMID: 38519644 PMCID: PMC10959961 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00565-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, mainly due to late-stage diagnosis, frequent recurrences, and eventually therapy resistance. To identify potentially actionable genetic variants, sequencing data of 351 Belgian ovarian cancer patients were retrospectively captured from electronic health records. The cohort included 286 (81%) patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, 17 (5%) with low-grade serous ovarian cancer, and 48 (14%) with other histotypes. Firstly, an overview of the prevalence and spectrum of the BRCA1/2 variants highlighted germline variants in 4% (11/250) and somatic variants in 11% (37/348) of patients. Secondly, application of a multi-gene panel in 168 tumors revealed a total of 214 variants in 28 genes beyond BRCA1/2 with a median of 1 (IQR, 1-2) genetic variant per patient. The ten most often altered genes were (in descending order): TP53, BRCA1, PIK3CA, BRCA2, KRAS, ERBB2 (HER2), TERT promotor, RB1, PIK3R1 and PTEN. Of note, the genetic landscape vastly differed between the studied histotypes. Finally, using ESCAT the clinical evidence of utility for every genetic variant was scored. Only BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were classified as tier-I. Nearly all patients (151/168; 90%) had an ESCAT tier-II variant, most frequently in TP53 (74%), PIK3CA (9%) and KRAS (7%). In conclusion, our findings imply that although only a small proportion of genetic variants currently have direct impact on ovarian cancer treatment decisions, other variants could help to identify novel (personalized) treatment options to address the poor prognosis of ovarian cancer, particularly in rare histotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Fieuws
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joni Van der Meulen
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Emiel A De Jaeghere
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Siebe Loontiens
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Tummers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Van de Vijver
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kathleen B M Claes
- Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
- Center for Medical Genetics Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thng DKH, Hooi L, Siew BE, Lee KY, Tan IJW, Lieske B, Lin NS, Kow AWC, Wang S, Rashid MBMA, Ang C, Koh JJM, Toh TB, Tan KK, Chow EKH. A functional personalised oncology approach against metastatic colorectal cancer in matched patient derived organoids. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:52. [PMID: 38413740 PMCID: PMC10899621 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00543-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently occurring cancer. Progression on to an advanced metastatic malignancy (metCRC) is often indicative of poor prognosis, as the 5-year survival rates of patients decline rapidly. Despite the availability of many systemic therapies for the management of metCRC, the long-term efficacies of these regimens are often hindered by the emergence of treatment resistance due to intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity. Furthermore, not all systemic therapies have associated biomarkers that can accurately predict patient responses. Hence, a functional personalised oncology (FPO) approach can enable the identification of patient-specific combinatorial vulnerabilities and synergistic combinations as effective treatment strategies. To this end, we established a panel of CRC patient-derived organoids (PDOs) as clinically relevant biological systems, of which three pairs of matched metCRC PDOs were derived from the primary sites (ptCRC) and metastatic lesions (mCRC). Histological and genomic characterisation of these PDOs demonstrated the preservation of histopathological and genetic features found in the parental tumours. Subsequent application of the phenotypic-analytical drug combination interrogation platform, Quadratic Phenotypic Optimisation Platform, in these pairs of PDOs identified patient-specific drug sensitivity profiles to epigenetic-based combination therapies. Most notably, matched PDOs from one patient exhibited differential sensitivity patterns to the rationally designed drug combinations despite being genetically similar. These findings collectively highlight the limitations of current genomic-driven precision medicine in guiding treatment strategies for metCRC patients. Instead, it suggests that epigenomic profiling and application of FPO could complement the identification of novel combinatorial vulnerabilities to target synchronous ptCRC and mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dexter Kai Hao Thng
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lissa Hooi
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bei En Siew
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kai-Yin Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ian Jse-Wei Tan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bettina Lieske
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Norman Sihan Lin
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alfred Wei Chieh Kow
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shi Wang
- Department of Pathology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Chermaine Ang
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jasmin Jia Min Koh
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tan Boon Toh
- The N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- The Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ker-Kan Tan
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Edward Kai-Hua Chow
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- The N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang X, Yang C, Zhang S, Geng H, Zhu AX, Bernards R, Qin W, Fan J, Wang C, Gao Q. Precision treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2024; 42:180-197. [PMID: 38350421 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
The past decade has witnessed significant advances in the systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, the newly developed treatment strategies have not achieved universal success and HCC patients frequently exhibit therapeutic resistance to these therapies. Precision treatment represents a paradigm shift in cancer treatment in recent years. This approach utilizes the unique molecular characteristics of individual patient to personalize treatment modalities, aiming to maximize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects. Although precision treatment has shown significant success in multiple cancer types, its application in HCC remains in its infancy. In this review, we discuss key aspects of precision treatment in HCC, including therapeutic biomarkers, molecular classifications, and the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment. We also propose future directions, ranging from revolutionizing current treatment methodologies to personalizing therapy through functional assays, which will accelerate the next phase of advancements in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xupeng Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chen Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Immune Regulation in Cancer Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Shu Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haigang Geng
- State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Andrew X Zhu
- I-Mab Biopharma, Shanghai, China; Jiahui International Cancer Center, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China
| | - René Bernards
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wenxin Qin
- State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Cun Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Systems Medicine for Cancer, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Qiang Gao
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Menzel M, Ossowski S, Kral S, Metzger P, Horak P, Marienfeld R, Boerries M, Wolter S, Ball M, Neumann O, Armeanu-Ebinger S, Schroeder C, Matysiak U, Goldschmid H, Schipperges V, Fürstberger A, Allgäuer M, Eberhardt T, Niewöhner J, Blaumeiser A, Ploeger C, Haack TB, Tay TKY, Kelemen O, Pauli T, Kirchner M, Kluck K, Ott A, Renner M, Admard J, Gschwind A, Lassmann S, Kestler H, Fend F, Illert AL, Werner M, Möller P, Seufferlein TTW, Malek N, Schirmacher P, Fröhling S, Kazdal D, Budczies J, Stenzinger A. Multicentric pilot study to standardize clinical whole exome sequencing (WES) for cancer patients. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:106. [PMID: 37864096 PMCID: PMC10589320 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00457-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
A growing number of druggable targets and national initiatives for precision oncology necessitate broad genomic profiling for many cancer patients. Whole exome sequencing (WES) offers unbiased analysis of the entire coding sequence, segmentation-based detection of copy number alterations (CNAs), and accurate determination of complex biomarkers including tumor mutational burden (TMB), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), and microsatellite instability (MSI). To assess the inter-institution variability of clinical WES, we performed a comparative pilot study between German Centers of Personalized Medicine (ZPMs) from five participating institutions. Tumor and matched normal DNA from 30 patients were analyzed using custom sequencing protocols and bioinformatic pipelines. Calling of somatic variants was highly concordant with a positive percentage agreement (PPA) between 91 and 95% and a positive predictive value (PPV) between 82 and 95% compared with a three-institution consensus and full agreement for 16 of 17 druggable targets. Explanations for deviations included low VAF or coverage, differing annotations, and different filter protocols. CNAs showed overall agreement in 76% for the genomic sequence with high wet-lab variability. Complex biomarkers correlated strongly between institutions (HRD: 0.79-1, TMB: 0.97-0.99) and all institutions agreed on microsatellite instability. This study will contribute to the development of quality control frameworks for comprehensive genomic profiling and sheds light onto parameters that require stringent standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Menzel
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Ossowski
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Tübingen, Germany
- Institute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics (IBMI), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kral
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Freiburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Metzger
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine (IBSM), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Horak
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ralf Marienfeld
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Ulm, Germany
| | - Melanie Boerries
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine (IBSM), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg (CCCF), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Wolter
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Freiburg, Germany
| | - Markus Ball
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olaf Neumann
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sorin Armeanu-Ebinger
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christopher Schroeder
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Tübingen, Germany
| | - Uta Matysiak
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hannah Goldschmid
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vincent Schipperges
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine (IBSM), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Axel Fürstberger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Ulm, Germany
- Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Michael Allgäuer
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Timo Eberhardt
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Ulm, Germany
| | - Jakob Niewöhner
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Blaumeiser
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine (IBSM), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Ploeger
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Bernd Haack
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Tübingen, Germany
| | - Timothy Kwang Yong Tay
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Olga Kelemen
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Pauli
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Bioinformatics and Systems Medicine (IBSM), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kirchner
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kluck
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Ott
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcus Renner
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Admard
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Tübingen, Germany
| | - Axel Gschwind
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Tübingen, Germany
| | - Silke Lassmann
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hans Kestler
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Ulm, Germany
| | - Falko Fend
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anna Lena Illert
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79085, Freiburg, Germany
- Medical Department for Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 80333, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Werner
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Möller
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Nisar Malek
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Kazdal
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Budczies
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Edsjö A, Holmquist L, Geoerger B, Nowak F, Gomon G, Alix-Panabières C, Ploeger C, Lassen U, Le Tourneau C, Lehtiö J, Ott PA, von Deimling A, Fröhling S, Voest E, Klauschen F, Dienstmann R, Alshibany A, Siu LL, Stenzinger A. Precision cancer medicine: Concepts, current practice, and future developments. J Intern Med 2023; 294:455-481. [PMID: 37641393 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Precision cancer medicine is a multidisciplinary team effort that requires involvement and commitment of many stakeholders including the society at large. Building on the success of significant advances in precision therapy for oncological patients over the last two decades, future developments will be significantly shaped by improvements in scalable molecular diagnostics in which increasingly complex multilayered datasets require transformation into clinically useful information guiding patient management at fast turnaround times. Adaptive profiling strategies involving tissue- and liquid-based testing that account for the immense plasticity of cancer during the patient's journey and also include early detection approaches are already finding their way into clinical routine and will become paramount. A second major driver is the development of smart clinical trials and trial concepts which, complemented by real-world evidence, rapidly broaden the spectrum of therapeutic options. Tight coordination with regulatory agencies and health technology assessment bodies is crucial in this context. Multicentric networks operating nationally and internationally are key in implementing precision oncology in clinical practice and support developing and improving the ecosystem and framework needed to turn invocation into benefits for patients. The review provides an overview of the diagnostic tools, innovative clinical studies, and collaborative efforts needed to realize precision cancer medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Edsjö
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Genomic Medicine Sweden (GMS), Kristianstad, Sweden
| | - Louise Holmquist
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
- Genomic Medicine Sweden (GMS), Kristianstad, Sweden
| | - Birgit Geoerger
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- INSERM U1015, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Georgy Gomon
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Catherine Alix-Panabières
- Laboratory of Rare Human Circulating Cells, University Medical Center of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- CREEC, MIVEGEC, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Carolin Ploeger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrik Lassen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christophe Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France
- INSERM U900 Research Unit, Saint-Cloud, France
- Faculty of Medicine, Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Janne Lehtiö
- Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Patrick A Ott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Division of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Emile Voest
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederick Klauschen
- Institute of Pathology, Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- BIFOLD - Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Munich Partner Site, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lillian L Siu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stenzinger A, Moltzen EK, Winkler E, Molnar-Gabor F, Malek N, Costescu A, Jensen BN, Nowak F, Pinto C, Ottersen OP, Schirmacher P, Nordborg J, Seufferlein T, Fröhling S, Edsjö A, Garcia-Foncillas J, Normanno N, Lundgren B, Friedman M, Bolanos N, Tatton-Brown K, Hill S, Rosenquist R. Implementation of precision medicine in healthcare-A European perspective. J Intern Med 2023; 294:437-454. [PMID: 37455247 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
The technical development of high-throughput sequencing technologies and the parallel development of targeted therapies in the last decade have enabled a transition from traditional medicine to personalized treatment and care. In this way, by using comprehensive genomic testing, more effective treatments with fewer side effects are provided to each patient-that is, precision or personalized medicine (PM). In several European countries-such as in England, France, Denmark, and Spain-the governments have adopted national strategies and taken "top-down" decisions to invest in national infrastructure for PM. In other countries-such as Sweden, Germany, and Italy with regionally organized healthcare systems-the profession has instead taken "bottom-up" initiatives to build competence networks and infrastructure to enable equal access to PM. In this review, we summarize key learnings at the European level on the implementation process to establish sustainable governance and organization for PM at the regional, national, and EU/international levels. We also discuss critical ethical and legal aspects of implementing PM, and the importance of access to real-world data and performing clinical trials for evidence generation, as well as the need for improved reimbursement models, increased cross-disciplinary education and patient involvement. In summary, PM represents a paradigm shift, and modernization of healthcare and all relevant stakeholders-that is, healthcare, academia, policymakers, industry, and patients-must be involved in this system transformation to create a sustainable, non-siloed ecosystem for precision healthcare that benefits our patients and society at large.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Germany
| | - Ejner K Moltzen
- Innovation Fund Denmark, International Consortium for Personalised Medicine (IC PerMed), Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eva Winkler
- Section of Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Nisar Malek
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Germany
- Department for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Carmine Pinto
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Peter Schirmacher
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Germany
| | - Jenni Nordborg
- Lif - The Research-Based Pharmaceutical Industry, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anders Edsjö
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Genomic Medicine Sweden (GMS), Sweden
| | - Jesus Garcia-Foncillas
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Institute, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, Autonomous University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nicola Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Mikaela Friedman
- Genomic Medicine Sweden (GMS), Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Katrina Tatton-Brown
- National Genomics Education, NHS England, London, UK
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Sue Hill
- Office of Chief Scientific Officer and the Genomics Unit, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Richard Rosenquist
- Genomic Medicine Sweden (GMS), Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
de Nigris F, Meo C, Palinski W. Combination of Genomic Landsscape and 3D Culture Functional Assays Bridges Sarcoma Phenotype to Target and Immunotherapy. Cells 2023; 12:2204. [PMID: 37681936 PMCID: PMC10486752 DOI: 10.3390/cells12172204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic-based precision medicine has not only improved tumour therapy but has also shown its weaknesses. Genomic profiling and mutation analysis have identified alterations that play a major role in sarcoma pathogenesis and evolution. However, they have not been sufficient in predicting tumour vulnerability and advancing treatment. The relative rarity of sarcomas and the genetic heterogeneity between subtypes also stand in the way of gaining statistically significant results from clinical trials. Personalized three-dimensional tumour models that reflect the specific histologic subtype are emerging as functional assays to test anticancer drugs, complementing genomic screening. Here, we provide an overview of current target therapy for sarcomas and discuss functional assays based on 3D models that, by recapitulating the molecular pathways and tumour microenvironment, may predict patient response to treatments. This approach opens new avenues to improve precision medicine when genomic and pathway alterations are not sufficient to guide the choice of the most promising treatment. Furthermore, we discuss the aspects of the 3D culture assays that need to be improved, such as the standardisation of growth conditions and the definition of in vitro responses that can be used as a cut-off for clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filomena de Nigris
- Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Concetta Meo
- Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Wulf Palinski
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dietz MV, van Kooten JP, Paats MS, Aerts JGVJ, Verhoef C, Madsen EVE, Dubbink HJ, von der Thüsen JH. Molecular alterations and potential actionable mutations in peritoneal mesothelioma: a scoping review of high-throughput sequencing studies. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101600. [PMID: 37453150 PMCID: PMC10368826 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. Currently there is a lack of effective systemic therapies. Due to the rarity of PeM, it is challenging to study new treatment options. Off-label use of targeted drugs could be an effective approach. This scoping review aims to explore the genomic landscape of PeM to identify potential therapeutic targets. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search of Embase, Medline, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was carried out up to 1 November 2022. Studies that reported on molecular alterations in PeM detected by high-throughput sequencing techniques were included. Genes that were altered in ≥1% of PeMs were selected for the identification of potential targeted therapies. RESULTS Thirteen articles were included, comprising 824 PeM patients. In total, 142 genes were altered in ≥1% of patients, of which 7 genes were altered in ≥10%. BAP1 was the most commonly altered gene (50%). Other commonly altered genes were NF2 (25%), CDKN2A (23%), CDKN2B (17%), PBRM1 (15%), TP53 (14%), and SETD2 (13%). In total, 17% of PeM patients were carriers of a germline mutation, mainly in BAP1 (7%). CONCLUSIONS This scoping review provides an overview of the mutational landscape of PeM. Germline mutations might be a larger contributor to the incidence of PeM than previously thought. Currently available targeted therapy options are limited, but several targeted agents [such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors] were identified that might provide new targeted therapy options in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - M S Paats
- Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
| | - J G V J Aerts
- Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
| | | | | | - H J Dubbink
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baldo P, De Re V, Garutti M. How will the identification and therapeutic intervention of genetic targets in oncology evolve for future therapy? Expert Opin Ther Targets 2023; 27:1189-1194. [PMID: 38095918 DOI: 10.1080/14728222.2023.2295493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mapping of the human genome, together with the broad understanding of new biomolecular pathways involved in cancer development, represents a huge dividing line for advances in cancer treatment. This special article aims to express the next evolution of cancer therapy, while also considering the challenges and uncertainties facing future directions. AREA COVERED The recent achievements of medical science in the oncology field concern both new diagnostic techniques, such as liquid biopsy, and therapeutic strategies with innovative anticancer drugs. Although several molecular characteristics of tumors are linked to the tissue of origin, some mutations are shared by multiple tumor histologies, thus paving the way for what is called 'precision oncology.' The article highlights the importance of identifying new mutations and biomolecular pathways that can be pursued with new anticancer drugs. EXPERT OPINION Oncology and medical science have made great progress in understanding new molecular targets; being able to early identify tumor markers that are not confined to a single organ through minimally invasive diagnostic techniques allows us to design new effective therapeutic strategies. Multidisciplinary teams now aim to evaluate the most appropriate and personalized diagnostic/therapeutic approach for the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Baldo
- Hospital Pharmacy Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Valli De Re
- Immunopathology and Cancer Biomarkers Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Mattia Garutti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
O'Dwyer PJ, Gray RJ, Flaherty KT, Chen AP, Li S, Wang V, McShane LM, Patton DR, Tricoli JV, Williams PM, Iafrate AJ, Sklar J, Mitchell EP, Takebe N, Sims DJ, Coffey B, Fu T, Routbort M, Rubinstein LV, Little RF, Arteaga CL, Marinucci D, Hamilton SR, Conley BA, Harris LN, Doroshow JH. The NCI-MATCH trial: lessons for precision oncology. Nat Med 2023; 29:1349-1357. [PMID: 37322121 PMCID: PMC10612141 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02379-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The NCI-MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) trial ( NCT02465060 ) was launched in 2015 as a genomically driven, signal-seeking precision medicine platform trial-largely for patients with treatment-refractory, malignant solid tumors. Having completed in 2023, it remains one of the largest tumor-agnostic, precision oncology trials undertaken to date. Nearly 6,000 patients underwent screening and molecular testing, with a total of 1,593 patients (inclusive of continued accrual from standard next-generation sequencing) being assigned to one of 38 substudies. Each substudy was a phase 2 trial of a therapy matched to a genomic alteration, with a primary endpoint of objective tumor response by RECIST criteria. In this Perspective, we summarize the outcomes of the initial 27 substudies in NCI-MATCH, which met its signal-seeking objective with 7/27 positive substudies (25.9%). We discuss key aspects of the design and operational conduct of the trial, highlighting important lessons for future precision medicine studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert J Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Shuli Li
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David R Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - P Mickey Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - A John Iafrate
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Naoko Takebe
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David J Sims
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Brent Coffey
- Center for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tony Fu
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Mark Routbort
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Richard F Little
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Barbara A Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - James H Doroshow
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Teuwen LA, Roets E, D’Hoore P, Pauwels P, Prenen H. Comprehensive Genomic Profiling and Therapeutic Implications for Patients with Advanced Cancers: The Experience of an Academic Hospital. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:1619. [PMID: 37175010 PMCID: PMC10177779 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13091619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be used to detect tumor-specific genomic alterations. This retrospective single-center study aims to assess the application of an extensive NGS panel to identify actionable alterations and initiate matched targeted treatment for patients with advanced cancer. We analyzed genomic alterations in solid tumor biopsies from 464 patients with advanced cancer with the Foundation Medicine assay (FoundationOne®CDx). Therapeutic implications were determined using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Precision Oncology Knowledge Base (OncoKB) classification. The FoundationOne®CDx was successfully applied in 464/521 patients (89%). The most common altered genes were TP53 (61%), KRAS (20%), CDKN2A (20%), TERT (16%), and APC (16%). Among the 419 patients with successfully analyzed tumor mutational burden (TMB), 43 patients presented with a high TMB (≥10 mutations/megabase). Out of the 126 patients with an actionable target, 40 patients received matched treatment (32%) of which 17 were within a clinical trial. This study shows that the application of NGS is feasible in an academic center and increases the detection of actionable alterations and identification of patients eligible for targeted treatment or immunotherapy regardless of tumor histology. Strategies such as early referral for NGS, inclusion in clinical (basket) trials, and the development of new targeted drugs are necessary to improve the matched treatment rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure-Anne Teuwen
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; (L.-A.T.); (E.R.); (P.D.)
| | - Evelyne Roets
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; (L.-A.T.); (E.R.); (P.D.)
| | - Pieter D’Hoore
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; (L.-A.T.); (E.R.); (P.D.)
| | - Patrick Pauwels
- Department of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium;
- Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Hans Prenen
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; (L.-A.T.); (E.R.); (P.D.)
- Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Subbiah V, Kreitman RJ, Wainberg ZA, Gazzah A, Lassen U, Stein A, Wen PY, Dietrich S, de Jonge MJA, Blay JY, Italiano A, Yonemori K, Cho DC, de Vos FYFL, Moreau P, Fernandez EE, Schellens JHM, Zielinski CC, Redhu S, Boran A, Passos VQ, Ilankumaran P, Bang YJ. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAFV600E-mutated rare cancers: the phase 2 ROAR trial. Nat Med 2023; 29:1103-1112. [PMID: 37059834 PMCID: PMC10202803 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02321-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BRAFV600E alterations are prevalent across multiple tumors. Here we present final efficacy and safety results of a phase 2 basket trial of dabrafenib (BRAF kinase inhibitor) plus trametinib (MEK inhibitor) in eight cohorts of patients with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced rare cancers: anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (n = 36), biliary tract cancer (n = 43), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), adenocarcinoma of the small intestine (n = 3), low-grade glioma (n = 13), high-grade glioma (n = 45), hairy cell leukemia (n = 55) and multiple myeloma (n = 19). The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed overall response rate in these cohorts was 56%, 53%, 0%, 67%, 54%, 33%, 89% and 50%, respectively. Secondary endpoints were median duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Median DoR was 14.4 months, 8.9 months, not reached, 7.7 months, not reached, 31.2 months, not reached and 11.1 months, respectively. Median PFS was 6.7 months, 9.0 months, not reached, not evaluable, 9.5 months, 5.5 months, not evaluable and 6.3 months, respectively. Median OS was 14.5 months, 13.5 months, not reached, 21.8 months, not evaluable, 17.6 months, not evaluable and 33.9 months, respectively. The most frequent (≥20% of patients) treatment-related adverse events were pyrexia (40.8%), fatigue (25.7%), chills (25.7%), nausea (23.8%) and rash (20.4%). The encouraging tumor-agnostic activity of dabrafenib plus trametinib suggests that this could be a promising treatment approach for some patients with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced rare cancers. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02034110 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Robert J Kreitman
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Zev A Wainberg
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anas Gazzah
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Ulrik Lassen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alexander Stein
- Department of Internal Medicine II (Oncology Center), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Center Leon Berard & University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Early Phase Trials and Sarcoma Units, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Filip Y F L de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Elena Elez Fernandez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Suman Redhu
- Global Program Biostatistics, Novartis Oncology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Aislyn Boran
- Global Drug Development, Oncology Development Unit, Novartis Services, Inc., East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Vanessa Q Passos
- Global Drug Development, Oncology Development Unit, Novartis Services, Inc., East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Palanichamy Ilankumaran
- Global Drug Development, Oncology Development Unit, Novartis Services, Inc., East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Yung-Jue Bang
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Repetto M, Crimini E, Boscolo Bielo L, Guerini-Rocco E, Ascione L, Bonfanti A, Zanzottera C, Mazzarella L, Ranghiero A, Belli C, Criscitiello C, Esposito A, Barberis MCP, Curigliano G. Molecular tumour board at European Institute of Oncology: Report of the first three year activity of an Italian precision oncology experience. Eur J Cancer 2023; 183:79-89. [PMID: 36801623 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision oncology aims to improve clinical outcomes by personalising treatment options for patients with cancer. Exploiting vulnerabilities identified in a patient's cancer genome requires reliable interpretation of a huge mole of alterations and heterogeneous biomarkers. ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) allows evidence-based evaluation of genomic findings. Molecular tumour boards (MTBs) convey the required multi-disciplinary expertise to enable ESCAT evaluation and strategical treatment choice. MATERIALS AND METHOD We retrospectively reviewed the records of 251 consecutive patients discussed by European Institute of Oncology MTB between June 2019 and June 2022. RESULTS One-hundred eighty-eight (74.6%) patients had at least one actionable alteration. After MTB discussion, 76 patients received molecularly matched therapies (MMTs) while 76 patients received standard of care. Patients receiving MMT displayed higher overall response rate (37.3% versus 12.9%), median progression-free survival (mPFS 5.8 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-7.5 versus 3.6 months, 95% CI 2.5-4.8, p = 0.041; hazard ratio 0.679, 95% CI 0.467-0.987) and median overall survival (mOS 35.1 months, 95% CI not evaluable versus 8.5 months, 95% CI 3.8-13.2; hazard ratio 0.431, 95% CI 0.250-0.744, p = 0.002). Superiority in OS and PFS persisted in multivariable models. Among 61 pretreated patients receiving MMT, 37.5% of patients had PFS2/PFS1 ratio ≥1.3. Patients with higher actionable targets (ESCAT tier I) had better OS (p = 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.049), while no difference was observed in lower evidence levels. CONCLUSIONS Our experience shows that MTBs can yield valuable clinical benefit. Higher actionability ESCAT level appears to be associated with better outcomes for patients receiving MMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Repetto
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Edoardo Crimini
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Elena Guerini-Rocco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy; Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Liliana Ascione
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Andrea Bonfanti
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Cristina Zanzottera
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Mazzarella
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Ranghiero
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Belli
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Angela Esposito
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo C P Barberis
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, 20122, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Song IW, Vo HH, Chen YS, Baysal MA, Kahle M, Johnson A, Tsimberidou AM. Precision Oncology: Evolving Clinical Trials across Tumor Types. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1967. [PMID: 37046628 PMCID: PMC10093499 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in molecular technologies and targeted therapeutics have accelerated the implementation of precision oncology, resulting in improved clinical outcomes in selected patients. The use of next-generation sequencing and assessments of immune and other biomarkers helps optimize patient treatment selection. In this review, selected precision oncology trials including the IMPACT, SHIVA, IMPACT2, NCI-MPACT, TAPUR, DRUP, and NCI-MATCH studies are summarized, and their challenges and opportunities are discussed. Brief summaries of the new ComboMATCH, MyeloMATCH, and iMATCH studies, which follow the example of NCI-MATCH, are also included. Despite the progress made, precision oncology is inaccessible to many patients with cancer. Some patients' tumors may not respond to these treatments, owing to the complexity of carcinogenesis, the use of ineffective therapies, or unknown mechanisms of tumor resistance to treatment. The implementation of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and bioinformatic analyses of complex multi-omic data may improve the accuracy of tumor characterization, and if used strategically with caution, may accelerate the implementation of precision medicine. Clinical trials in precision oncology continue to evolve, improving outcomes and expediting the identification of curative strategies for patients with cancer. Despite the existing challenges, significant progress has been made in the past twenty years, demonstrating the benefit of precision oncology in many patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Wen Song
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ying-Shiuan Chen
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mehmet A. Baysal
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael Kahle
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Amber Johnson
- Khalifa Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Apostolia M. Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Functional precision oncology using patient-derived assays: bridging genotype and phenotype. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:305-317. [PMID: 36914745 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00745-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
Genomics-based precision medicine has revolutionized oncology but also has inherent limitations. Functional precision oncology is emerging as a complementary approach that aims to bridge the gap between genotype and phenotype by modelling individual tumours in vitro. These patient-derived ex vivo models largely preserve several tumour characteristics that are not captured by genomics approaches and enable the functional dissection of tumour vulnerabilities in a personalized manner. In this Review, we discuss several examples of personalized functional assays involving tumour organoids, spheroids and explants and their potential to predict treatment responses and drug-induced toxicities in individual patients. These developments have opened exciting new avenues for precision oncology, with the potential for successful clinical applications in contexts in which genomic data alone are not informative. To implement these assays into clinical practice, we outline four key barriers that need to be overcome: assay success rates, turnaround times, the need for standardized conditions and the definition of in vitro responders. Furthermore, we discuss novel technological advances such as microfluidics that might reduce sample requirements, assay times and labour intensity and thereby enable functional precision oncology to be implemented in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
|
22
|
Rothermundt C, Andreou D, Blay JY, Brodowicz T, Desar IME, Dileo P, Gelderblom H, Haas R, Jakob J, Jones RL, Judson I, Kunz WG, Liegl-Atzwanger B, Lindner LH, Messiou C, Miah AB, Reichardt P, Szkandera J, van der Graaf WTA, van Houdt WJ, Wardelmann E, Hofer S. Controversies in the management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma: Recommendations of the Conference on State of Science in Sarcoma 2022. Eur J Cancer 2023; 180:158-179. [PMID: 36599184 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Owing to the rarity and heterogeneity in biology and presentation, there are multiple areas in the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of soft tissue sarcoma (STS), with no, low-level or conflicting evidence. METHODS During the first Consensus Conference on the State of Science in Sarcoma (CSSS), we used a modified Delphi process to identify areas of controversy in the field of sarcoma, to name topics with limited evidence-based data in which a scientific and knowledge gap may remain and a consensus statement will help to guide patient management. We determined scientific questions which need to be addressed in the future in order to generate evidence and to inform physicians and caregivers in daily clinical practice in order to improve the outcomes of patients with sarcoma. We conducted a vote on STS key questions and controversies prior to the CSSS meeting, which took place in May 2022. RESULTS Sixty-two European sarcoma experts participated in the survey. Sixteen strong consensus (≥95%) items were identified by the experts, as well as 30 items with a ≥75% consensus on diagnostic and therapeutic questions. Ultimately, many controversy topics remained without consensus. CONCLUSIONS In this manuscript, we summarise the voting results and the discussion during the CSSS meeting. Future scientific questions, priorities for clinical trials, registries, quality assurance, and action by stakeholders are proposed. Platforms and partnerships can support innovative approaches to improve management and clinical research in STS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Rothermundt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| | - Dimosthenis Andreou
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medicine, Léon Bérard Center, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Brodowicz
- Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital - Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ingrid M E Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Palma Dileo
- London Sarcoma Service, Department of Oncology, University College Hospital London, United Kingdom
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rick Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam and the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jens Jakob
- Sarcoma Unit, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Robin L Jones
- Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Judson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Lars H Lindner
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christina Messiou
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aisha B Miah
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Reichardt
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Care, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joanna Szkandera
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Winan J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Wardelmann
- Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Silvia Hofer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Debien V, Vignot S, Massard C, Malouf G, Hollebecque A, Scoazec JY, Michiels S, Verlingue L. Molecular analysis for refractory rare cancers: Sequencing battle continues - learnings for the MOSCATO-01 study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 181:103888. [PMID: 36460264 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with metastatic rare cancers, treatments are limited. How systematic tumor sequencing can improve therapeutic possibilities in this population? PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with rare cancer were identified in the MOSCATO-01 trial. Patients' outcome was measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The most frequently identified histologic subypes were ovarian adenocarcinoma (N = 13), carcinoma of unknown primary (N = 11), and leiomyosarcoma (N = 10). Ninety-nine (39%) of them had at least one targetable cancer molecular alteration Forty-nine patients (50%) received the therapy proposed by the molecular tumor board, and 13 patients (26%, 95%CI 15-41%) achieved a PFS2/PFS1 > 1.3. The median PFS2 on matched treatment subgroup was 2.3 months (95% CI 1.8-3.6) and the median OS was 11.4 months (95% CI 9-15.5). CONCLUSIONS The molecular screening of patients with refractory, metastatic rare cancers might increase the therapeutic options. Facilitating access strategy to molecular-driven clinical trials or agnostic-approved treatment is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Debien
- Department of oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, ICANS, Strasbourg, France; Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Christophe Massard
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Department of Oncology, Institut Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Gabriel Malouf
- Department of oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Antoine Hollebecque
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Yves Scoazec
- Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; AMMICa, CNRS UAR3655 INSERM US23, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Oncostat, CESP, Inserm U1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Loïc Verlingue
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Unité de Phase 1, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cuppen E, Elemento O, Rosenquist R, Nikic S, IJzerman M, Zaleski ID, Frederix G, Levin LÅ, Mullighan CG, Buettner R, Pugh TJ, Grimmond S, Caldas C, Andre F, Custers I, Campo E, van Snellenberg H, Schuh A, Nakagawa H, von Kalle C, Haferlach T, Fröhling S, Jobanputra V. Implementation of Whole-Genome and Transcriptome Sequencing Into Clinical Cancer Care. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200245. [PMID: 36480778 PMCID: PMC10166391 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The combination of whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing (WGTS) is expected to transform diagnosis and treatment for patients with cancer. WGTS is a comprehensive precision diagnostic test that is starting to replace the standard of care for oncology molecular testing in health care systems around the world; however, the implementation and widescale adoption of this best-in-class testing is lacking. METHODS Here, we address the barriers in integrating WGTS for cancer diagnostics and treatment selection and answer questions regarding utility in different cancer types, cost-effectiveness and affordability, and other practical considerations for WGTS implementation. RESULTS We review the current studies implementing WGTS in health care systems and provide a synopsis of the clinical evidence and insights into practical considerations for WGTS implementation. We reflect on regulatory, costs, reimbursement, and incidental findings aspects of this test. CONCLUSION WGTS is an appropriate comprehensive clinical test for many tumor types and can replace multiple, cascade testing approaches currently performed. Decreasing sequencing cost, increasing number of clinically relevant aberrations and discovery of more complex biomarkers of treatment response, should pave the way for health care systems and laboratories in implementing WGTS into clinical practice, to transform diagnosis and treatment for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin Cuppen
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Oncode Institute, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier Elemento
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Richard Rosenquist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Svetlana Nikic
- Illumina Productos de España, S.L.U., Plaza Pablo Ruiz Picasso, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maarten IJzerman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Isabelle Durand Zaleski
- Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, URCEco, AP-HP, Hôpital de l'Hôtel Dieu, Paris, France
| | - Geert Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lars-Åke Levin
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | | | - Trevor J. Pugh
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sean Grimmond
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute and Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Elias Campo
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
- Hematopathology Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Anna Schuh
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hidewaki Nakagawa
- Laboratory for Cancer Genomics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Christof von Kalle
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Clinical Study Center, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Fröhling
- Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vaidehi Jobanputra
- New York Genome Center; Department of Pathology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Identification of Fusion Genes and Targets for Genetically Matched Therapies in a Large Cohort of Salivary Gland Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174156. [PMID: 36077692 PMCID: PMC9454424 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Salivary gland cancer (SGC) is a rare and heterogeneous cancer for which limited treatment options are available in the palliative treatment setting. Characterization of the SGC genetic landscape to identify actionable aberrations is therefore important. This research aimed to comprehensively assess the prevalence of various types of actionable aberrations, including gene fusions, in a large cohort of patients with different SGC subtypes. The combined approach using RNA- and DNA-based targeted next-generation sequencing panels revealed the presence of gene fusions in half of the cases, including several fusions not previously described in SGC. Targets for genetically matched therapies were identified in 28.3–81.8% of cases, depending on the SGC subtype (overall 53.7% of the cases). This highlights the potential of molecular diagnostics to select systemic treatment in SGC. Abstract Introduction: Salivary gland cancer (SGC) is a rare cancer for which systemic treatment options are limited. Therefore, it is important to characterize its genetic landscape in search for actionable aberrations, such as NTRK gene fusions. This research aimed to identify these actionable aberrations by combining NGS-based analysis of RNA (gene fusions) and DNA (single and multiple nucleotide variants, copy number variants, microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden) in a large cohort of SGC patients. Methods: RNA and DNA were extracted from archival tissue of 121 patients with various SGC subtypes. Gene fusion analysis was performed using a customized RNA-based targeted NGS panel. DNA was sequenced using a targeted NGS panel encompassing 523 cancer-related genes. Cross-validation of NGS-based NTRK fusion detection and pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed. Results: Fusion transcripts were detected in 50% of the cases and included both known (MYB-NFIB, MYBL1-NFIB, CRTC1-MAML2) and previously unknown fusions (including transcripts involving RET, BRAF or RAD51B). Only one NTRK fusion transcript was detected, in a secretory carcinoma case. Pan-TRK IHC (clone EPR17341) was false positive in 74% of cases. The proportion of patients with targets for genetically matched therapies differed among subtypes (salivary duct carcinoma: 82%, adenoid cystic carcinoma 28%, mucoepidermoid carcinoma 50%, acinic cell carcinoma 33%). Actionable aberrations were most often located in PIK3CA (n = 18, 15%), ERBB2 (n = 15, 12%), HRAS and NOTCH1 (both n = 9, 7%). Conclusions: Actionable genetic aberrations were seen in 53.7% of all SGC cases on the RNA and DNA level, with varying percentages between subtypes.
Collapse
|
26
|
Crimini E, Repetto M, Tarantino P, Ascione L, Antonarelli G, Rocco EG, Barberis M, Mazzarella L, Curigliano G. Challenges and Obstacles in Applying Therapeutical Indications Formulated in Molecular Tumor Boards. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:3193. [PMID: 35804968 PMCID: PMC9264928 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Considering the rapid improvement of cancer drugs' efficacy and the discovery of new molecular targets, the formulation of therapeutical indications based on the multidisciplinary approach of MTB is becoming increasingly important for attributing the correct salience to the targets identified in a single patient. Nevertheless, one of the biggest stumbling blocks faced by MTBs is not the bare indication, but its implementation in the clinical practice. Indeed, administering the drug suggested by MTB deals with some relevant difficulties: the economical affordability and geographical accessibility represent some of the major limits in the patient's view, while bureaucracy and regulatory procedures are often a disincentive for the physicians. In this review, we explore the current literature reporting MTB experiences and precision medicine clinical trials, focusing on the challenges that authors face in applying their therapeutical indications. Furthermore, we analyze and discuss some of the solutions devised to overcome these difficulties to support the MTBs in finding the most suitable solution for their specific situation. In conclusion, we strongly encourage regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies to develop effective strategies with medical centers implementing MTBs to facilitate access to innovative drugs and thereby allow broader therapeutical opportunities to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Crimini
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Repetto
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Tarantino
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Liliana Ascione
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Antonarelli
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Guerini Rocco
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Barberis
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Mazzarella
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Macerola E, Poma AM, Vignali P, Proietti A, Ugolini C, Torregrossa L, Basolo A, Elisei R, Santini F, Basolo F. Predictive Biomarkers in Thyroid Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:901004. [PMID: 35600349 PMCID: PMC9120826 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.901004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In molecular pathology, predictive biomarkers identify which patients are likely to respond to targeted drugs. These therapeutic agents block specific molecules directly involved in cancer growth, dedifferentiation and progression. Until few years ago, the only targeted drugs available for advanced thyroid cancer included multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mainly targeting the MAPK pathway and the angiogenic signaling. The administration of these drugs does not necessarily require a molecular characterization of tumors to assess the presence of predictive alterations. However, the availability of new selective targeted drugs for thyroid cancer patients is changing the diagnostic strategies for the molecular characterization of these tumors. The search for targetable alterations can be performed directly on tumor tissue by using a variety of methodologies, depending also on the number and type of alterations to test (i.e. single nucleotide variation or gene rearrangement). Herein, a comprehensive review of the currently available targeted treatments for thyroid cancer, related predictive markers and testing methodologies is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabetta Macerola
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Anello Marcello Poma
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paola Vignali
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Agnese Proietti
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Clara Ugolini
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Liborio Torregrossa
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessio Basolo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rossella Elisei
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ferruccio Santini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fulvio Basolo
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- *Correspondence: Fulvio Basolo,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
van der Graaf W, Tesselaar M, McVeigh T, Oyen W, Fröhling S. Biology-Guided Precision Medicine in Rare Cancers: Lessons from Sarcomas and Neuroendocrine Tumours. Semin Cancer Biol 2022; 84:228-241. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|