A cfDNA methylation-based tissue-of-origin classifier for cancers of unknown primary

Cancers of Unknown Primary (CUP) remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to biological heterogeneity and poor responses to standard chemotherapy. Predicting tissue-of-origin (TOO) molecularly could help refine this diagnosis, with tissue acquisition barriers mitigated via liquid biopsies. However, TOO liquid biopsies are unexplored in CUP cohorts. Here we describe CUPiD, a machine learning classifier for accurate TOO predictions across 29 tumour classes using circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation patterns. We tested CUPiD on 143 cfDNA samples from patients with 13 cancer types alongside 27 non-cancer controls, with overall sensitivity of 84.6% and TOO accuracy of 96.8%. In an additional cohort of 41 patients with CUP CUPiD predictions were made in 32/41 (78.0%) cases, with 88.5% of the predictions clinically consistent with a subsequent or suspected primary tumour diagnosis, when available (23/26 patients). Combining CUPiD with cfDNA mutation data demonstrated potential diagnosis re-classification and/or treatment change in this hard-to-treat cancer group.

Repotrectinib in ROS1 Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The early-generation ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that are approved for the treatment of ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have antitumor activity, but resistance develops in tumors, and intracranial activity is suboptimal. Repotrectinib is a next-generation ROS1 TKI with preclinical activity against ROS1 fusion-positive cancers, including those with resistance mutations such as ROS1 G2032R.

METHODS

In this registrational phase 1-2 trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of repotrectinib in patients with advanced solid tumors, including ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC. The primary efficacy end point in the phase 2 trial was confirmed objective response; efficacy analyses included patients from phase 1 and phase 2. Duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety were secondary end points in phase 2.

RESULTS

On the basis of results from the phase 1 trial, the recommended phase 2 dose of repotrectinib was 160 mg daily for 14 days, followed by 160 mg twice daily. Response occurred in 56 of the 71 patients (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 68 to 88) with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who had not previously received a ROS1 TKI; the median duration of response was 34.1 months (95% CI, 25.6 to could not be estimated), and median progression-free survival was 35.7 months (95% CI, 27.4 to could not be estimated). Response occurred in 21 of the 56 patients (38%; 95% CI, 25 to 52) with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received one ROS1 TKI and had never received chemotherapy; the median duration of response was 14.8 months (95% CI, 7.6 to could not be estimated), and median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI, 6.8 to 19.6). Ten of the 17 patients (59%; 95% CI, 33 to 82) with the ROS1 G2032R mutation had a response. A total of 426 patients received the phase 2 dose; the most common treatment-related adverse events were dizziness (in 58% of the patients), dysgeusia (in 50%), and paresthesia (in 30%), and 3% discontinued repotrectinib owing to treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Repotrectinib had durable clinical activity in patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, regardless of whether they had previously received a ROS1 TKI. Adverse events were mainly of low grade and compatible with long-term administration. (Funded by Turning Point Therapeutics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb; TRIDENT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03093116.).

A Phase I Trial of the Dual MET Kinase/OCT-2 Inhibitor OMO-1 in Metastatic Solid Malignancies Including MET Exon 14 Mutated Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14) and MET amplifications has improved patients' outcomes. The development of more potent MET kinase inhibitors could further benefit these patients. The aim of this trial is to determine the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of OMO-1 (an oral dual MET kinase/OCT-2 inhibitor) and to assess preliminary clinical efficacy in METex14-positive NSCLC and other MET-positive solid tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a first-in-patient, open-label, multicenter study of OMO-1 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid malignancies. A standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design was utilized starting at a dose level of 100 mg BID continuously. Preliminary efficacy was investigated in patients with METex14-positive NSCLC, and MET amplified NSCLC and other solid tumors (MET basket).

RESULTS

In the dose-escalation part, 24 patients were included in 5 dose levels ranging from 100 mg twice daily (BID) to 400 mg BID. Most common adverse events (≥ 20%) were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, increased blood creatinine, and headache. The RP2D was determined at 250 mg BID. In the expansion cohorts, 15 patients were included (10 in METex14-positive NSCLC cohort and 5 in MET basket cohort) and received either 200 or 250 mg BID. Eight out of the 10 patients with METex14 positive NSCLC had stable disease as the best response.

CONCLUSION

OMO-1 was tolerated at the dose of 250 mg BID and shows initial signs of MET inhibition and anti-tumor activity in METex14 mutated NSCLC patients.

Single-Agent Divarasib (GDC-6036) in Solid Tumors with a KRAS G12C Mutation

BACKGROUND

Divarasib (GDC-6036) is a covalent KRAS G12C inhibitor that was designed to have high potency and selectivity.

METHODS

In a phase 1 study, we evaluated divarasib administered orally once daily (at doses ranging from 50 to 400 mg) in patients who had advanced or metastatic solid tumors that harbor a KRAS G12C mutation. The primary objective was an assessment of safety; pharmacokinetics, investigator-evaluated antitumor activity, and biomarkers of response and resistance were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients (60 with non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC], 55 with colorectal cancer, and 22 with other solid tumors) received divarasib. No dose-limiting toxic effects or treatment-related deaths were reported. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 127 patients (93%); grade 3 events occurred in 15 patients (11%) and a grade 4 event in 1 patient (1%). Treatment-related adverse events resulted in a dose reduction in 19 patients (14%) and discontinuation of treatment in 4 patients (3%). Among patients with NSCLC, a confirmed response was observed in 53.4% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.9 to 66.7), and the median progression-free survival was 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.8 to could not be estimated). Among patients with colorectal cancer, a confirmed response was observed in 29.1% of patients (95% CI, 17.6 to 42.9), and the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 8.2). Responses were also observed in patients with other solid tumors. Serial assessment of circulating tumor DNA showed declines in KRAS G12C variant allele frequency associated with response and identified genomic alterations that may confer resistance to divarasib.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with divarasib resulted in durable clinical responses across KRAS G12C-positive tumors, with mostly low-grade adverse events. (Funded by Genentech; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04449874.).

RETaliation-Tackling Rare Resistance Alterations to Osimertinib

RET fusions occur as a rare mechanism of acquired resistance to osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Inhibiting RET alongside osimertinib shows promising clinical activity, but innovative approaches are needed to seek regulatory approvals in these rare treatment resistance settings. See related article by Rotow et al., p. 2979.

Dose escalation and expansion cohorts in patients with advanced breast cancer in a Phase I study of the CDK7-inhibitor samuraciclib

Samuraciclib is a selective oral CDK7-inhibitor. A multi-modular, open-label Phase I study to evaluate safety and tolerability of samuraciclib in patients with advanced malignancies was designed (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03363893). Here we report results from dose escalation and 2 expansion cohorts: Module 1A dose escalation with paired biopsy cohort in advanced solid tumor patients, Module 1B-1 triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) monotherapy expansion, and Module 2A fulvestrant combination in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients post-CDK4/6-inhibitor. Core study primary endpoints are safety and tolerability, and secondary endpoints are pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) activity, and anti-tumor activity. Common adverse events are low grade nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Maximum tolerated dose is 360 mg once daily. PK demonstrates dose proportionality (120 mg-480 mg), a half-life of approximately 75 hours, and no fulvestrant interaction. In dose escalation, one partial response (PR) is identified with disease control rate of 53% (19/36) and reduction of phosphorylated RNA polymerase II, a substrate of CDK7, in circulating lymphocytes and tumor tissue. In TNBC expansion, one PR (duration 337 days) and clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR) of 20.0% (4/20) is achieved. In combination with fulvestrant, 3 patients achieve PR with CBR 36.0% (9/25); in patients without detectable TP53-mutation CBR is 47.4% (9/19). In this study, samuraciclib exhibits tolerable safety and PK is supportive of once-daily oral administration. Clinical activity in TNBC and HR+/HER2-breast cancer post-CDK4/6-inhibitor settings warrants further evaluation.

Olaparib and durvalumab in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (MEDIOLA): An open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2, basket study

INTRODUCTION

Preclinical studies have demonstrated increased efficacy with combined DNA damage response inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade compared with either alone. We assessed olaparib in combination with durvalumab in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

Patients with previously treated limited or extensive-stage SCLC received oral olaparib 300 mg twice daily, as run-in for 4 weeks, then with durvalumab (1500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) until disease progression. Primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, and 12-week disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included 28-week DCR, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, change in tumor size, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled and analyzed for safety; 38 were analyzed for efficacy. Eleven patients (28.9% [90% confidence interval (CI), 17.2-43.3]) had disease control at 12 weeks. ORR was 10.5% (95% CI, 2.9-24.8). Median progression-free and overall survival were 2.4 (95% CI, 0.9-3.0)months and 7.6(95% CI, 5.6-8.8)months, respectively. The most common adverse events (≥40.0%) were anemia, nausea, and fatigue. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 32 patients (80.0%). PD-L1 levels, tumor mutational burden, and other genetic mutations were evaluated, but no significant correlations with clinical outcomes wereobserved.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolerability of olaparib with durvalumab was consistent with the safety profile of each agent alone. Although the 12-week DCR did not meet the prespecified target (60%), four patients responded, and median overall survival was promising for a pretreated SCLC population. Further analyses are required to identify patients most likely to benefit from this treatment approach.

The evolution of lung cancer and impact of subclonal selection in TRACERx

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide1. Here we analysed 1,644 tumour regions sampled at surgery or during follow-up from the first 421 patients with non-small cell lung cancer prospectively enrolled into the TRACERx study. This project aims to decipher lung cancer evolution and address the primary study endpoint: determining the relationship between intratumour heterogeneity and clinical outcome. In lung adenocarcinoma, mutations in 22 out of 40 common cancer genes were under significant subclonal selection, including classical tumour initiators such as TP53 and KRAS. We defined evolutionary dependencies between drivers, mutational processes and whole genome doubling (WGD) events. Despite patients having a history of smoking, 8% of lung adenocarcinomas lacked evidence of tobacco-induced mutagenesis. These tumours also had similar detection rates for EGFR mutations and for RET, ROS1, ALK and MET oncogenic isoforms compared with tumours in never-smokers, which suggests that they have a similar aetiology and pathogenesis. Large subclonal expansions were associated with positive subclonal selection. Patients with tumours harbouring recent subclonal expansions, on the terminus of a phylogenetic branch, had significantly shorter disease-free survival. Subclonal WGD was detected in 19% of tumours, and 10% of tumours harboured multiple subclonal WGDs in parallel. Subclonal, but not truncal, WGD was associated with shorter disease-free survival. Copy number heterogeneity was associated with extrathoracic relapse within 1 year after surgery. These data demonstrate the importance of clonal expansion, WGD and copy number instability in determining the timing and patterns of relapse in non-small cell lung cancer and provide a comprehensive clinical cancer evolutionary data resource.

Real-world Comparative Effectiveness of First-Line Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients with Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC with or without Baseline Central Nervous System Metastases

Introduction

Alectinib was found to have superior efficacy to crizotinib in the phase 3 ALEX study and is a preferred initial treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. To understand the efficacy of alectinib in U.S. clinical practice, we conducted a retrospective real-world comparative effectiveness analysis of first-line alectinib versus crizotinib.

Methods

Adults with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who received first-line alectinib (from December 11, 2015) or crizotinib (from January 1, 2014) were included from a real-world database. Propensity scores were applied to balance baseline characteristics. Real-world data (RWD), including real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), real-world overall survival, real-world time to new central nervous system (CNS) metastases, and outcomes in patients with or without baseline CNS metastases were analyzed. The ALEX-like RWD cohort (filtered by ALEX laboratory eligibility criteria) was used to compare real-world comparative effectiveness with ALEX.

Results

The RWD cohort comprised 364 patients (141 alectinib; 223 crizotinib); rwPFS (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.65) and real-world overall survival (wHR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31-0.69) were significantly improved with alectinib versus crizotinib. In patients with baseline brain scans, a substantial rwPFS benefit was found regardless of baseline CNS metastases. Real-world time to new CNS metastases was delayed with alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with (wHR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16-0.52) and without (wHR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24-0.76) baseline CNS metastases. The ALEX-like RWD cohort comprised 325 patients (120 alectinib; 205 crizotinib); alectinib was found to have similar rwPFS benefits with ALEX.

Conclusions

Outcomes were significantly improved with first-line alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC in the U.S. real-world setting.

Digital ECMT Cancer Trial Matching Tool: an Open Source Research Application to Support Oncologists in the Identification of Precision Medicine Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

Matching patients with cancer to precision medicine clinical trials on the basis of their tumor genotype has the potential to improve outcomes for patients who have exhausted standard-of-care treatment options. However, the matching process presents a substantial challenge because of the number of clinical trials available. We describe a free, open source research tool designed to extract relevant trial information to support oncologists in the matching process, and we illustrate its utility with recent case studies of patients who were matched to trials using this tool.

METHODS

Trial records are sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and indexed using natural language processing techniques, including named entity recognition, term normalization, and relationship extraction. Relationships between trials and genetic alterations are assigned scores on the basis of a rule-based system. All data are updated daily. A user interface is provided via R Shiny app.

RESULTS

An instance of the trial match tool, configured for UK clinical trials, is hosted by the digital Experimental Cancer Medicine Team (see link in Data Sharing Statement). Users select the relevant cancer type and genetic alteration(s). Matching studies are ranked according to the score assigned for the selected genetic alterations. Results may be downloaded and attached to the patient's health record if desired. The tool is currently being used to support the ongoing TARGET National study, which aims to match up to 6,000 patients to early phase clinical trials. We present three case studies that exemplify relationships between genetic alterations and studies.

CONCLUSION

With increasing numbers of precision medicine treatments and as comprehensive molecular profiling of tumor samples becomes more common, decision support tools are likely to become increasingly important. This work represents an important step toward the development and wider implementation of such systems.

Practical Considerations for the Use of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Treatment of Patients With Cancer: A Narrative Review

Importance

Personalized medicine based on tumor profiling and identification of actionable genomic alterations is pivotal in cancer management. Although tissue biopsy is still preferred for diagnosis, liquid biopsy of blood-based tumor analytes, such as circulating tumor DNA, is a rapidly emerging technology for tumor profiling.

Observations

This review presents a practical overview for clinicians and allied health care professionals for selection of the most appropriate liquid biopsy assay, specifically focusing on circulating tumor DNA and how it may affect patient treatment and case management across multiple tumor types. Multiple factors influence the analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility of testing. This review provides recommendations and practical guidance for best practice. Current methodologies include polymerase chain reaction-based approaches and those that use next-generation sequencing (eg, capture-based profiling, whole exome, or genome sequencing). Factors that may influence utility include sensitivity and specificity, quantity of circulating tumor DNA, detection of a small vs a large panel of genes, and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Currently, liquid biopsy appears useful in patients unable to undergo biopsy or where mutations detected may be more representative of the predominant tumor burden than for tissue-based assays. Other potential applications may include screening, primary diagnosis, residual disease, local recurrence, therapy selection, or early therapy response and resistance monitoring.

Conclusions and Relevance

This review found that liquid biopsy is increasingly being used clinically in advanced lung cancer, and ongoing research is identifying applications of circulating tumor DNA-based testing that complement tissue analysis across a broad range of clinical settings. Circulating tumor DNA technologies are advancing quickly and are demonstrating potential benefits for patients, health care practitioners, health care systems, and researchers, at many stages of the patient oncologic journey.

EPIC: an evaluation of the psychological impact of early-phase clinical trials in cancer patients

Background

Anxiety and depression in patients with cancer is associated with decreased quality of life and increased morbidity and mortality. However, these are often overlooked and untreated. Early-phase clinical trials (EPCTs) recruit patients with advanced cancers who frequently lack future treatment options, which may lead to increased anxiety and depression. Despite this, EPCTs do not routinely consider psychological screening for patients.

Patients and methods

This prospective observational study explored levels of anxiety and depression alongside impact of trial participation in the context of EPCTs. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire were completed at the point of EPCT consent, the end of screening and at pre-specified time points thereafter.

Results

Sixty-four patients (median age 56 years; median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1) were recruited. At consent, 57 patients returned questionnaires; 39% reported clinically relevant levels of anxiety whilst 18% reported clinically relevant levels of depression. Sixty-three percent of patients experiencing psychological distress had never previously reported this. Males were more likely to be depressed (P = 0.037) and females were more likely to be anxious (P = 0.011). Changes in anxiety or depression were observed after trial enrolment on an individual level, but not significant on a population level.

Conclusions

Patients on EPCTs are at an increased risk of anxiety and depression but may not seek relevant support. Sites offering EPCTs should consider including psychological screening to encourage a more holistic approach to cancer care and consider the sex of individuals when tailoring psychological support to meet specific needs.

•

Early-phase cancer trial patients have an increased risk of anxiety and depression.

•

Patients at risk were not seeking support for anxiety and depression.

•

Male patients were more likely to be depressed; female patients were more likely to be anxious.

•

This work highlights the need to screen for psychological symptoms in patients entering early-phase trials.

Abstract 2808: cfDNA multi-omics profiling and tissue of origin predictions in cancers of unknown primary

Cancers of Unknown Primary (CUP) comprise a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers where the primary site is undetectable. It accounts for 2% of all new UK cancer diagnoses and is the 6th leading cause of cancer death. Favourable subsets of CUP exist, based on clinico-pathological features, and although these patients have improved clinical outcomes, they make up only 20% of patients with CUP. The evolution of molecular profiling and tissue-of-origin (TOO) classifiers has the potential to transform diagnosis and management of patients with CUP. Reliable molecular profiling requires good quality and quantity tumour tissue material, often scarce in patients with CUP. Liquid biopsies offer an alternative, minimally invasive approach. We developed a novel cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based multi-omics assay combining methylation profiling with mutation and copy number alterations (CNA) detection, to enable TOO prediction and biomarker discovery to aid treatment stratification.

Methods: Two novel library preparation methods were applied to 41 CUP cfDNA samples, 80 non-cancer controls and 80 cfDNA samples from known tumour types (breast, lung, colorectal cancer): 1) Targeted (641 gene panel) next generation sequencing (NGS); 2) A multiplex genome-wide methylation capture assay (T7-MBDSeq). Both sequencing outputs can estimate CNA. Cancer Genome Interpreter (CGI) was used to evaluate the potential actionability of molecular alterations detected. A novel TOO classifier, generated utilising in silico dilution mixture sets derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) methylation data, demonstrated an AUROC of 0.96 across 15 different cancer groups. This was applied to cfDNA methylation data from known tumour types to test performance accuracy and subsequently applied to CUP cfDNA samples.

Results: Multi-omics profiling from cfDNA was completed for 34/41 patients with CUP. cfDNA mutation profiling and estimated CNA analysis so far revealed >350 alterations across 225 genes. 17/34 (50%) of patients harboured potentially actionable alterations by CGI and, where performed, 68% of tumour mutations were concordant in the cfDNA. cfDNA methylation profiling revealed tumour-specific methylation changes in breast, lung and colorectal cancers. Our preliminary TOO classifier performance in these tumour types had an overall sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 98%, respectively. In patients with CUP, a predicted TOO was made in 26/41 (63%) patients and for 6 patients, where a subsequent primary tumour diagnosis was made, the TOO prediction was correct.

Conclusions: cfDNA multi-omics profiling revealed potential therapeutic benefit in 77% of this retrospective CUP cohort and illustrates the potential to re-classify patients to primary tumour types where alternative therapies may improve clinical outcomes. Further multi-omics cfDNA profiling of the CUP cohort and validation in known primary cancer types are ongoing.

Citation Format: Alicia-Marie Conway, Alexandra Clipson, Francesca Chemi, Simon Pearce, Katarzyna Kamieniecka, Saba Ferdous, Sophie Richardson, Elaine Kilgour, Matthew G. Krebs, Alastair Kerr, Dominic Rothwell, Natalie Cook, Caroline Dive. cfDNA multi-omics profiling and tissue of origin predictions in cancers of unknown primary [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2808.

Abstract 3476: Mechanistic evaluation of VS-6766 (dual RAF/MEK inhibitor) and defactinib (FAK inhibitor) in low-grade serous ovarian cancer models with correlations to clinical response

Background: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) constitutes up to 10% of all ovarian cancer and has clinical and molecular characteristics (resistance to chemotherapy, presence of RAS/RAF mutations, lack of TP53 mutations) distinct from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Here, we characterized the effects of the dual RAF/MEK inhibitor VS-6766 and the FAK inhibitor defactinib on signal transduction and viability in LGSOC cell lines and patient-derived organoids. To correlate molecular characteristics with clinical response, we characterized genomic alterations in archival tumor samples from patients with LGSOC treated with the combination of VS-6766 and defactinib on a clinical trial (FRAME).

Material and Methods: We exposed 5 LGSOC cell lines to clinical Cmax concentrations adjusted for protein binding of VS-6766 and defactinib. We quantified phospho- and total proteins (n=66) with an antibody-bead based assay normalized to GAPDH. We also studied growth inhibitory effects of the combination on KRAS mutant (mt) LGSOC patient-derived organoids. We performed next generation sequencing on archival samples from LGSOC patients treated with VS-6766 in combination with defactinib.

Results: Signal transduction changes at 1 hr included reduction of p-FAK in 5/5 cell lines in response to defactinib. Cells exposed to VS-6766 showed a reduction in p-ERK and p-p90-RSK in 4/5 cell lines. Additionally, VS-6766 decreased p-cJUN and increased p-IκB in 4/5 cell lines, changes correlated with apoptosis. At 24 hrs, p-ERK and p-p90-RSK inhibition were maintained in 3/5 cell lines. Both drugs increased cleaved PARP in 4/5 cell lines and VS-6766 increased p-SMAD3 and BIM levels, indicating an increase in cell death/apoptosis. The combination of VS-6766 + defactinib showed synergistic growth inhibition in a KRAS mt LGSOC organoid model (combination index 0.51). The clinical combination of VS-6766 and defactinib (September 2021 cut-off) has shown an objective response rate (ORR) of 11/24 (46%) across all patients with LGSOC, and an ORR of 64% (7/11) for patients with KRAS mt LGSOC (n=11). In addition to mutations in KRAS, emerging data may suggest a correlation of U2AF1 and MED12 mutations with response.

Conclusions: VS-6766, the dual RAF/MEK inhibitor, induces significant inhibition of ERK pathway signaling in addition to perturbations in TNF/NFκB signaling. Both defactinib and VS-6766 induce apoptosis in LGSOC models. The results provide mechanistic insights into the encouraging response rates observed in patients with LGSOC treated with VS-6766 and defactinib (NCT03875820). These data support the ongoing randomized phase II ENGOTov60/GOG3052/RAMP201 study (NCT04625270).

Citation Format: Adam R. Stewart, Lisa Pickard, Ekta Paranjape, Victoria Sanchez Perez, Sanjib Chowdhury, Stephanie Lustgarten, Silvia Coma, Jonathan A. Pachter, Mark S. Carey, Gabriel DiMattia, Hannah C. Badham, Toby Prout, Mona Parmar, Muneeb Mahmud, Christina Yap, Matthew G. Krebs, Susana Banerjee, Udai Banerji. Mechanistic evaluation of VS-6766 (dual RAF/MEK inhibitor) and defactinib (FAK inhibitor) in low-grade serous ovarian cancer models with correlations to clinical response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3476.

Abstract CT201: Ceralasertib and olaparib in the treatment of homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer after progression on PARP inhibitors

Background: The majority of BRCA-mutant or HRR-deficient ovarian cancers are initially sensitive to PARP inhibitors (PARPis) but eventually develop resistance. The most commonly reported PARPi resistance mechanisms are (1) reversal of HRR deficiency through (a) reversion mutations in BRCA or other HRR genes (eg, RAD51C/D) or (b) DNA end resection rewiring with loss of 53BP1, REV7, or Shieldin complex components; or (2) stabilization of stalled replication forks through loss of PTIP or EZH2, preventing nuclease recruitment. The only confirmed PARPi resistance mechanism in the clinic to date is reversion mutations.

Combined ATR and PARP inhibition is an attractive strategy that may overcome PARPi resistance, as has been shown in PARPi-resistant cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models (Yazinski et al Genes Dev 2017; Murai et al Oncotarget 2016; Kim et al Nat Commun 2020; data on file, AstraZeneca). The PARPi olaparib 300 mg twice daily (BID) continuously in combination with the ATR inhibitor ceralasertib 160 mg daily on days 1-7 of a 28-day cycle has demonstrated promising activity in the CAPRI study in patients with ovarian cancer who had progressed on PARPis (Wethington et al J Clin Oncol 2021). However, preclinical models of PARPi resistance suggest that a higher dose or duration of ceralasertib with a lower dose of olaparib may be more beneficial (data on file, AstraZeneca).

Methods: D5330C00004 (NCT02264678) is a multicenter, modular, phase 1 study assessing ceralasertib in combination with other anti-cancer agents in adults with advanced solid malignancies. In Module 2, a lower dose of olaparib (150 mg BID continuous) and a longer duration of ceralasertib (80 mg BID, days 1-14 of a 28-day cycle) is now being explored in 2 expansion cohorts in patients with platinum-sensitive, high-grade, serous or endometrioid ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline or somatic BRCA or RAD51C/D mutations, or HRR deficiency by Myriad MyChoice® or FoundationOne® CDx (F1CDx) assays. Patients will have progressed on prior PARPis after ≥6 months in the maintenance or treatment setting (≥12 months after first-line maintenance). Cohort 1 is enrolling ~30 patients immediately after progression on a PARPi; Cohort 2 is recruiting ~30 PARPi-treated patients after intervening platinum-based chemotherapy. Study endpoints include safety, tumor response by RECIST 1.1, and duration of response. Exploratory analyses include genomic and functional analysis of HRR restoration in tumor and circulating tumor DNA, and analysis of replication fork stability in organoid cultures established from mandatory fresh tumor biopsy samples. Recruitment began in July 2021 with the first patient dosed in August 2021.

Citation Format: Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Bristi Basu, Anthony El-Khoueiry, Sophie Postel-Vinay, Seock-Ah Im, Sun Young Rha, Claire F. Friedman, Antoine Italiano, Yong Man Kim, Myong Cheol Lim, Rene Roux, Joyce F. Liu, Elhan Sanai, Simon A. Smith, Claire Smith, Sarah El Farhi, Alan Lau, Natalia Lukashchuk, Emma Dean, Matthew G. Krebs. Ceralasertib and olaparib in the treatment of homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer after progression on PARP inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT201.

Abstract CT198: Subcutaneous delivery of amivantamab in patients with advanced solid malignancies: Initial safety and pharmacokinetic results from the PALOMA study

Background: Amivantamab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-MET bispecific antibody, is approved for patients with advanced EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. First-dose intravenous (IV) delivery leads to infusion-related reactions (IRR) among 66% of patients, resulting in dose interruptions and slower infusion restart rates (infusion duration ranges 2-4 hours) and necessitates splitting of the dose over 2 days (Park Ann Oncol 32[suppl_5]:S981). Subcutaneous (SC) administration of amivantamab, which could simplify and accelerate administration, is being investigated in an ongoing phase 1 study (PALOMA; NCT04606381). Preliminary safety (including IRR) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SC formulations of amivantamab ± recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) for enhanced absorption were evaluated.

Methods: PALOMA is an ongoing phase 1 dose escalation study of amivantamab SC in patients with advanced solid tumors who may derive benefit from EGFR or MET-directed therapy. Eligible patients must have progressed after standard-of-care therapy for metastatic disease, be ineligible for, or have declined current standard therapies. The study objectives were to evaluate the feasibility of administration, safety, and PK of a low concentration formulation, 50 mg/mL of amivantamab ± rHuPH20 (Part 1) and a high concentration formulation, 160 mg/mL of amivantamab ± rHuPH20 (Part 2). Patients in Part 1 and Part 2 received the currently approved dosage of amivantamab, 1050 mg (1400 mg for bodyweight ≥80 kg) SC (weekly for the first 4 weeks and every other week thereafter). This study also evaluated administering the full dose of amivantamab on the first day.

Results: The full safety, PK, bioavailability, and receptor occupancy data of patients enrolled in Part 1 (n=16) and Part 2 (n=17) will be presented. Compared to IV administration, initial SC experience demonstrates the co-formulation of high concentration amivantamab with rHuPH20 shortened the needed infusion time to less than 5 minutes, with initial bioavailability of approximately 65% of IV administration. Saturation of soluble free EGFR and MET was achieved after the first SC dose. The incidence of IRRs was 18.2%, with all events of grade 1-2 severity. The full amivantamab SC dose was safely given at first administration to 14 patients, potentially obviating the need for split dosing.

Conclusions: Initial SC amivantamab ± rHuPH20 was well tolerated with improvements in time and ease of administration and associated with a meaningful reduction in IRRs, eliminating the need for split dosing compared with IV administration. Higher SC dose levels and alternative dosing schedules are being explored.

Citation Format: Matthew G. Krebs, Melissa L. Johnson, Byoung Chul Cho, Se-Hoon Lee, Rachel Kudgus-Lokken, Donna Zemlickis, Anna Mitselos, Eileen Berkay, Joshua M. Bauml, Roland E. Knoblauch, Peter Hellemans, Anna Minchom. Subcutaneous delivery of amivantamab in patients with advanced solid malignancies: Initial safety and pharmacokinetic results from the PALOMA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT198.

Abstract GS3-10: Study of samuraciclib (CT7001), a first-in-class, oral, selective inhibitor of CDK7, in combination with fulvestrant in patients with advanced hormone receptor positive HER2 negative breast cancer (HR+BC)

Background: CDK7 inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy in cancer; acting as a regulator of the cell cycle, transcription and endocrine receptor signalling [1]. Patients with HR+BC post CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment have a poor prognosis; median progression free survival (mPFS) of ~ 8 weeks for fulvestrant post CDK4/6i in HR+BC [2,3]. Pre-clinical HR+BC models indicate the potential for synergy when the CDK7 inhibitor samuraciclib is combined with the Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader fulvestrant [4]Materials and Methods: This single arm cohort assessed the tolerability and efficacy of samuraciclib in combination with standard dose fulvestrant in patients with advanced HR+BC; all patients had previously received an aromatase inhibitor and a CDK4/6i for advanced disease.Results: 31 patients with HR+BC received the combination of standard dose with fulvestrant and samuraciclib. 6 patients received samuraciclib dose of 240mg once daily (QD) and 25 patients a dose of 360mg QD. The combination treatment was generally well tolerated, with adverse drug reactions (AE) of note being G1-2 nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea; the majority of patients staying on treatment until disease progression.RECIST evaluation indicates evidence of reduction in tumor disease burden, including a partial response in one patient who has been on treatment for ~ 1 year.Graphic illustrations of data, including ‘waterfall’ and ‘swimmer’ plots, will be presented along with stratification data based on demographic factors such as hepatic involvement and cfDNA analysis (ESR1m, PI3Km).Conclusions: Samuraciclib has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with evidence of anti-tumour activity in combination with fulvestrant for patients with advanced HR+BC who have progressed on their prior CDK4/6i.References:1.Patel et al., Mol Cancer Therap. 20182.Juric et al., SABCS 20183.Lindeman et al., JCO 20214.Jeselsohn et al., SABCS 2019

Citation Format: Charles Coombes, Sasha J Howell, Matthew G Krebs, Simon Lord, Laura M Kenny, Ash Bahl, Glen Clack, Edward Ainscow, Paul A Dickinson, Raluca Fostea, Janine Mansi, Carlo Palmieri, Gianflippo Bertelli, Rinath Jeselsohn, Zahi Mitri, William J Gradishar, Sagar Sardesai, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Patrick Ward, Pavani Chalasani, Manfred Lehnert, Simak Ali, Stuart McIntosh. Study of samuraciclib (CT7001), a first-in-class, oral, selective inhibitor of CDK7, in combination with fulvestrant in patients with advanced hormone receptor positive HER2 negative breast cancer (HR+BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-10.

Abstract P1-18-10: A clinical study of samuraciclib (CT7001), a first-in-class, oral, selective inhibitor of CDK7, in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Background: CDK7 inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy in cancer. CDK7 is a key kinase, regulating cell division, transcription and nuclear receptor function [1]. Although recent advances have been made in the treatment of TNBC this disease is still one of significant unmet need. Materials and Methods: Tolerability and efficacy of Samuraciclib were assessed in a TNBC expansion cohort of the first in human study of Samuraciclib. These patients had metastatic or locally advanced TNBC and had received prior taxane and anthracycline therapy including at least one line of chemotherapy for metastatic or locally advanced disease. Results: From 29th January 2019 to 12th April 2021, 23 women with advanced TNBC were recruited and dosed with Samuraciclib 360mg OD. Treatment has generally been well tolerated with all patients remaining on treatment until disease progression. The most common adverse drug reactions (AE) were: G1-2 Nausea (96%), Vomiting (52%) and Diarrhea (91%). There were 4 dose reductions to manage upper GI adverse events of nausea and/or vomiting. G3 events were as follows: 2 Grade 3 Diarrhea, 1 Grade 3 Vomiting, 1 Grade 3 Fatigue, 1 Grade 3 Stomatitis, 1 Grade 3 Anaemia and 1 Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia21 patients have had follow-up evaluations for assessment of efficacy. Stable disease was achieved in 14 patients, 1 with partial response (being on treatment for 72 weeks) and 7 patients with progressive disease; two additional patients remain on compassionate use treatment, following disease progression by RECIST. 5 patients have been on treatment for at least 24 weeks of whom 3 have exceeded 1 year. Conclusions: Samuraciclib demonstrated an acceptable safety and tolerability profile with evidence of antitumour activity in advanced TNBC. References1.Patel et al. ICEC0942, an Orally Bioavailable Selective Inhibitor of CDK7 for Cancer Treatment. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0847. PMID:29545334.

Citation Format: Sacha J Howell, Laura M Kenny, Simon Lord, Matthew G Krebs, Tobias Arkenau, Richard Baird, Iain R MacPherson, Ash Bahl, Glen Clack, Edward Ainscow, Anthony GM Barrett, Paul A Dickinson, Matthew J Fuchter, Manfred Lehnert, Simak Ali, Stuart McIntosh, Charles Coombes. A clinical study of samuraciclib (CT7001), a first-in-class, oral, selective inhibitor of CDK7, in patients with advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-10.

Ceralasertib (AZD6738), an Oral ATR Kinase Inhibitor, in Combination with Carboplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Study

PURPOSE

This study reports the safety, tolerability, MTD, recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, and preliminary antitumor activity of ceralasertib combined with carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. It also examined exploratory predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients (n = 36) received a fixed dose of carboplatin (AUC5) with escalating doses of ceralasertib (20 mg twice daily to 60 mg once daily) in 21-day cycles. Sequential and concurrent combination dosing schedules were assessed.

RESULTS

Two ceralasertib MTD dose schedules, 20 mg twice daily on days 4-13 and 40 mg once daily on days 1-2, were tolerated with carboplatin AUC5; the latter was declared the RP2D. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3) were anemia (39%), thrombocytopenia (36%), and neutropenia (25%). Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 2; including one grade 4 platelet count decreased) and a combination of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 3 patients. Ceralasertib was quickly absorbed (tmax ∼1 hour), with a terminal plasma half-life of 8-11 hours. Upregulation of pRAD50, indicative of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) activation, was observed in tumor biopsies during ceralasertib treatment. Two patients with absent or low ATM or SLFN11 protein expression achieved confirmed RECIST v1.1 partial responses. Eighteen of 34 (53%) response-evaluable patients had RECIST v1.1 stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The RP2D for ceralasertib plus carboplatin was established as ceralasertib 40 mg once daily on days 1-2 administered with carboplatin AUC5 every 3 weeks, with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies confirming pharmacodynamic modulation and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity observed.

Enrolment of older adults with cancer in early phase clinical trials-an observational study on the experience in the north west of England

INTRODUCTION

older patients represent the majority of cancer patients but are under-represented in trials, particularly early phase clinical trials (EPCTs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

observational retrospective study of patients referred for EPCTs (January-December 2018) at a specialist cancer centre in the UK. The primary aim was to analyse the successful enrolment into EPCTs according to age (<65/65+). The secondary aims were to identify enrolment obstacles and the outcomes of enrolled patients. Patient data were analysed at: referral; in-clinic assessment and after successful enrolment. Among patients assessed in clinic, a sample was defined by randomly matching the older cohort with the younger cohort (1:1) by tumour type.

RESULTS

555 patients were referred for EPCTs with a median age of 60 years, of whom 471 were assessed in new patient clinics (38% were 65+). From those assessed, a randomly tumour-matched sample of 318 patients (159 per age cohort) was selected. Older patients had a significantly higher comorbidity score measured by ACE-27 (P < 0.0001), lived closer to the hospital (P = 0.045) and were referred at a later point in their cancer management (P = 0.002). There was no difference in suitability for EPCTs according to age with overall 84% deemed suitable. For patients successfully enrolled into EPCTs, there was no difference between age cohorts (20.1 vs. 22.6% for younger and older, respectively; P = 0.675) and no significant differences in their safety and efficacy outcomes.

DISCUSSION

older age did not affect the enrolment into EPCTs. However, the selected minority referred for EPCTs suggests a pre-selection upstream by primary oncologists.

Comparative effectiveness analysis between entrectinib clinical trial and crizotinib real-world data in ROS1+ NSCLC

Aim: Generating direct comparative evidence in prospective randomized trials is difficult for rare diseases. Real-world cohorts may supplement control populations. Methods: Entrectinib-treated adults with advanced ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC (n = 94) from Phase I/II trials (ALKA-372-001 [EudraCT2012-00148-88], STARTRK-1 [NCT02097810], and STARTRK-2 [NCT02568267]) were compared with a real-world crizotinib-treated cohort (n = 65). Primary end point, time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD); secondary end points, PFS and OS. Results: Median (95% CI) weighted TTD: 12.9 (9.9-17.4) months for entrectinib; 8.8 (6.2-9.9) months for crizotinib (weighted hazard ratio: 0.72 [0.51-1.02]). Median OS with entrectinib was not reached, weighted median OS with crizotinib was 18.5 (15.1-19.9) months. Conclusion: Entrectinib administered in clinical trials may be associated with longer TTD than a real-world crizotinib population.

Amivantamab in EGFR Exon 20 Insertion-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Progressing on Platinum Chemotherapy: Initial Results From the CHRYSALIS Phase I Study

PURPOSE

Non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (Exon20ins) mutations exhibits inherent resistance to approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell–directing activity, binds to each receptor's extracellular domain, bypassing resistance at the tyrosine kinase inhibitor binding site.

METHODS

CHRYSALIS is a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study, which included a population with EGFR Exon20ins NSCLC. The primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity and overall response rate. We report findings from the postplatinum EGFR Exon20ins NSCLC population treated at the recommended phase II dose of 1,050 mg amivantamab (1,400 mg, ≥ 80 kg) given once weekly for the first 4 weeks and then once every 2 weeks starting at week 5.

RESULTS

In the efficacy population (n = 81), the median age was 62 years (range, 42-84 years); 40 patients (49%) were Asian, and the median number of previous lines of therapy was two (range, 1-7). The overall response rate was 40% (95% CI, 29 to 51), including three complete responses, with a median duration of response of 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.9 to not reached). The median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.5 to 10.9). In the safety population (n = 114), the most common adverse events were rash in 98 patients (86%), infusion-related reactions in 75 (66%), and paronychia in 51 (45%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypokalemia in six patients (5%) and rash, pulmonary embolism, diarrhea, and neutropenia in four (4%) each. Treatment-related dose reductions and discontinuations were reported in 13% and 4% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Amivantamab, via its novel mechanism of action, yielded robust and durable responses with tolerable safety in patients with EGFR Exon20ins mutations after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy.

Abstract CT019: A phase I trial of the combination of the dual RAF-MEK inhibitor VS-6766 and the FAK inhibitor defactinib: Evaluation of efficacy in KRAS mutated NSCLC

Background

KRAS is a known oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with KRAS G12C and G12V mutations occurring in ~13% and ~7% of the of NSCLC ( adenocarcinoma subtype). The dual RAF-MEK inhibitor VS-6766 has shown single agent activity against G12V KRAS mutated NSCLC (Guo C et al Lancet Oncology 2020, 21:1478-88). Based on pre-clinical data, we hypothesised that augmented focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signalling is a mechanism of resistance to MEK inhibition and devised the current clinical trial. We have previously reported the safety of an intermittent schedule of the combination of VS-6766 and the FAK inhibitor defactinib and its efficacy in low grade serous ovarian cancer (Shinde et al., AACR 2020). We now report the activity of the combination in KRAS mutated NSCLC.

Methods

Patients were treated with an intermittent dose of drugs VS-6766 at 3.2 - 4 mg twice a week and defactinib 200 mg twice daily in the dose escalation and expansion cohorts of the study. Both drugs were administered three weeks on/one week off in 28-day cycles. We aim to recruit 20 patients with KRAS mutated NSCLC in an expansion cohort.

Results

To date, 19 patients with KRAS mutated NSCLC have been treated in the dose escalation and expansion cohorts. All patients had been previously treatment with a PD-1 or PDL-1 targeting immune checkpoint inhibitor. The median age was 64 years (22 - 73), M/F ratio was 7/12, and the median prior lines of treatment was 3. Currently, 17 of 19 patients have had at least one re-staging assessment, 2/17 (12%) patients had a partial response and 10/17 (59%) had stable disease as their best response. Of note, 11/17 (65%) patients had a degree of reduction in size of their tumours and 5/17 (29%) have been treated for 6 months or more with 3 patients still on treatment. Interestingly, 2/2 (100%) of the KRAS G12V NSCLC patients showed a partial response.

Conclusions

Developing new treatments for non-G12C KRAS mutated NSCLC is an area of unmet need. The combination of VS-6766 and defactinib treatment in cohorts of patients with NSCLC pre-treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy has shown anti-tumour activity in subsets of patients with KRAS mutated NSCLC, in particular those with tumours harbouring KRAS G12V mutations. A registration-directed study evaluating VS-6766 ± defactinib for treatment of recurrent NSCLC with KRAS G12V mutation (NCT04620330) has been initiated

Citation Format: Matthew G. Krebs, Rajiv Shinde, Rozana Abdul Rahman, Rafael Grochot, Martin Little, Jenny King, Joseph Kitchin, Mona Parmar, Alison Turner, Muneeb Mahmud, Christina Yap, Nina Tunariu, Juanita Lopez, Johann S. De Bono, Udai Banerji, Anna Minchom. A phase I trial of the combination of the dual RAF-MEK inhibitor VS-6766 and the FAK inhibitor defactinib: Evaluation of efficacy in KRAS mutated NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT019.

Discovery and Evaluation of Protein Biomarkers as a Signature of Wellness in Late-Stage Cancer Patients in Early Phase Clinical Trials

TARGET (tumour characterisation to guide experimental targeted therapy) is a cancer precision medicine programme focused on molecular characterisation of patients entering early phase clinical trials. Performance status (PS) measures a patient's ability to perform a variety of activities. However, the quality of present algorithms to assess PS is limited and based on qualitative clinician assessment. Plasma samples from patients enrolled into TARGET were analysed using the mass spectrometry (MS) technique: sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH)-MS. SWATH-MS was used on a discovery cohort of 55 patients to differentiate patients into either a good or poor prognosis by creation of a Wellness Score (WS) that showed stronger prediction of overall survival (p = 0.000551) compared to PS (p = 0.001). WS was then tested against a validation cohort of 77 patients showing significant (p = 0.000451) prediction of overall survival. WS in both sets had receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.76 (p = 0.002) and 0.67 (p = 0.011): AUC of PS was 0.70 (p = 0.117) and 0.55 (p = 0.548). These signatures can now be evaluated further in larger patient populations to assess their utility in a clinical setting.

EPAC-lung: European pooled analysis of the prognostic value of circulating tumour cells in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumour cell (CTC) number is an independent prognostic factor in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) but there is no consensus on the CTC threshold for prognostic significance. We undertook a pooled analysis of individual patient data to clinically validate CTC enumeration and threshold for prognostication.

METHODS

Four European cancer centres, experienced in CellSearch CTC enumeration for SCLC provided pseudo anonymised data for patients who had undergone pre-treatment CTC count. Data was collated, and Cox regression models, stratified by centre, explored the relationship between CTC count and survival. The added value of incorporating CTCs into clinico-pathological models was investigated using likelihood ratio tests.

RESULTS

A total of 367 patient records were evaluated. A one-unit increase in log-transformed CTC counts corresponded to an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.19-1.29, P<0.0001) for progression free survival (PFS) and 1.23 (95% CI: 1.18-1.28, P<0.0001) for overall survival (OS). CTC count of ≥15 or ≥50 was significantly associated with an increased risk of progression (CTC ≥15: HR 3.20, 95% CI: 2.50-4.09, P<0.001; CTC ≥50: HR 2.56, 95% CI: 2.01-3.25, P<0.001) and an increased risk of death (CTC ≥15: HR 2.90, 95% CI: 2.28-3.70, P<0.001; CTC ≥50: HR 2.47, 95% CI: 1.95-3.13, P<0.001). There was no significant inter-centre heterogeneity observed. Addition of CTC count to clinico-pathological models as a continuous log-transformed variable, offers further prognostic value (both likelihood ratio P<0.001 for OS and PFS).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher pre-treatment CTC counts are a negative independent prognostic factor in SCLC when considered as a continuous variable or dichotomised counts of ≥15 or ≥50. Incorporating CTC counts, as a continuous variable, improves clinic-pathological prognostic models.

Intrapatient comparisons of efficacy in a single-arm trial of entrectinib in tumour-agnostic indications

Background

Entrectinib is a tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive solid tumours based on single-arm trials. Traditional randomised clinical trials in rare cancers are not feasible; we conducted an intrapatient analysis to evaluate the clinical benefit of entrectinib versus prior standard-of-care systemic therapies.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced/metastatic NTRK fusion-positive tumours enrolled in the global phase II, single-arm STARTRK-2 trial were grouped according to prior systemic therapy and response. The key analysis used growth modulation index [GMI; ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) on entrectinib to time to discontinuation (TTD) on the most recent prior therapy]; ratio ≥1.3 indicated clinically meaningful efficacy. Additional analyses investigated TTD and objective response rate (ORR) for entrectinib and prior therapies.

Results

Seventy-one patients were included; 51 received prior systemic therapy. In 38 patients who progressed on prior therapy, ORR was 60.5% (23/38) with entrectinib and 15.8% (6/38) with the most recent prior therapy. Median PFS [11.2 months; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.7–not estimable] for entrectinib exceeded median TTD (2.9 months; 95% CI 2.0-4.9) for most recent prior therapy. From the intrapatient analysis of GMI, 65.8% had a ratio ≥1.3 and median GMI was 2.53. Consistent results were observed at more stringent GMI thresholds; 60.5% of patients had GMI ≥1.5 or ≥1.8 and 57.9% had GMI ≥2.0.

Conclusions

ORR was high and PFS was longer on entrectinib versus TTD on prior therapy. Furthermore, 65.8% of patients experienced clinically meaningful benefit based on GMI. This intrapatient analysis demonstrates comparative effectiveness of entrectinib in a rare, heterogeneous adult population.

•

Randomised trials are unfeasible for molecular targeted agents in rare indications because of low patient numbers.

•

Intrapatient comparison with prior therapies can be used to evaluate relative treatment efficacy in rare tumours.

•

Entrectinib is a potent tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor with proven efficacy in neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive tumours from the global STARTRK-2 trial.

•

Median progression-free survival on entrectinib was longer than time to discontinuation on prior therapy (11.2 months versus 2.9 months).

•

About 61% of patients with prior therapy progression responded to entrectinib; 66% had growth modulation index ≥1.3 (clinically meaningful threshold).

Updated Integrated Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic ROS1 Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Genetic rearrangements of the tyrosine receptor kinase ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) are oncogenic drivers in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results of an updated integrated analysis of three phase I or II clinical trials (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2) of the ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, entrectinib, in ROS1 fusion–positive NSCLC.

Abstract PS11-18: Ceralasertib (cer) in combination with olaparib (ola) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (BC): Results of phase I expansion cohorts

Background: Alterations in BRCA1/2 are associated with ~9% of all BCs. Ola (a poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor [PARPi]) is approved for treating pts with HER2-negative metastatic BC with germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm), demonstrating an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). Ceralasertib (an ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein ATR inhibitor) targets DNA damage repair and cell cycle regulation. Preclinical studies show synergistic antitumor effects of ola+cer vs ola monotherapy supporting the clinical evaluation of this combination.

Methods: Study 4 is a modular multicenter Phase I study of cer combinations (NCT02264678). Module 2 established the Recommended Phase 2 Dose of ola+cer as ola 300 mg bid daily + cer 160 mg qd D1-7 q 28d. We report the results of two expansion cohorts testing ola+cer in pts with triple negative breast cancer with no alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR)-related genes (HRR wt group), and pts with advanced HER2- BRCAm BC (BRCAm group), with a data cut-off of 19th June 2019. Eligible pts had to have received 1-2 prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and were PARPi naive. Patients may have enrolled directly based on a local BRCAm test result, but all pts submitted a tumor specimen for central confirmation of a deleterious (or suspected deleterious) germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutation. The primary objective was to investigate the safety and tolerability of the combination; secondary objectives included assessment of objective response rate by RECIST 1.1.

Results: Twenty-five pts were enrolled in the HRR wt group: median age 53 (31-75), ECOG PS 0/1 13 (52%)/12 (48%), median number of prior chemotherapy lines 2 of which 8 pts (32%) had received prior platinum. Thirty-seven pts enrolled in the BRCAm group: median age 51 (24-69), ECOG PS 0/1 20 (54%)/17 (46%), median number of prior chemotherapy lines 1 of which 19 pts (51%) had received prior platinum. The most frequent all causality Adverse Events (AEs) were nausea 43 (69%), anemia 36 (58%), diarrhea 20 (32%) and vomiting 20 (32%); CTCAE ≥ Grade 3 AEs included anemia 15 (24%), neutropenia 6 (10%) with few patients discontinuing treatment. In the HRR wt group, no responses were observed, 12 (48%) pts achieved a best response of stable disease and 13 (52%) had disease progression. The median PFS was 3.1 months (80%CI 2.0,3.9). In the BRCAm group, 13 (35%) pts achieved a confirmed response (including 1 complete response), 17 (46%) stable disease and 7 (19%) pts disease progression. The median PFS in pts with a centrally confirmed BRCAm was 11.5 months (80%CI 5.8-14.8, n=30), 7.7 months (80%CI 5.8-11.4, n=37) in all pts enrolled in the BRCAm group. Eleven of the 13 responders in the BRCAm group were on study treatment for a longer duration than their treatment immediately prior to enrollment. As of 18th June 20, preliminary data shows 10 pts are still ongoing with a treatment duration ranging 20 to 35 months.

Conclusion: In pts with HER2- BRCAm breast cancer, clinical efficacy was observed with durable radiological response despite adverse prognostic features in this Phase I population. The observations in this study are currently being tested in a global multicenter open-label randomised Phase 2 study: VIOLETTE (NCT03330847).

Citation Format: Emma Dean, Matthew G Krebs, Seock-Ah Im, Mario Campone, Sophie Postel-Vinay, Tobias Arkenau, Juanita Lopez, Wassim Abida, Duncan Jodrell, Keun-Wook Lee, SunYoung Rha, Irene Kang, Rebecca Roylance, Graeme Parr, Claire Smith, Andrew Goldwin, Elhan Sanay, Natasha Lukashchuk, Alan Lau, Andrew Pierce, Bienvenu Loembe. Ceralasertib (cer) in combination with olaparib (ola) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (BC): Results of phase I expansion cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-18.

The paradox-breaking panRAF plus SRC family kinase inhibitor, CCT3833, is effective in mutant KRAS-driven cancers

BACKGROUND

KRAS is mutated in ∼90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, ∼35% of colorectal cancers and ∼20% of non-small-cell lung cancers. There has been recent progress in targeting G12CKRAS specifically, but therapeutic options for other mutant forms of KRAS are limited, largely because the complexity of downstream signaling and feedback mechanisms mean that targeting individual pathway components is ineffective.

DESIGN

The protein kinases RAF and SRC are validated therapeutic targets in KRAS-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, colorectal cancers and non-small-cell lung cancers and we show that both must be inhibited to block growth of these cancers. We describe CCT3833, a new drug that inhibits both RAF and SRC, which may be effective in KRAS-mutant cancers.

RESULTS

We show that CCT3833 inhibits RAF and SRC in KRAS-mutant tumors in vitro and in vivo, and that it inhibits tumor growth at well-tolerated doses in mice. CCT3833 has been evaluated in a phase I clinical trial (NCT02437227) and we report here that it significantly prolongs progression-free survival of a patient with a G12VKRAS spindle cell sarcoma who did not respond to a multikinase inhibitor and therefore had limited treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

New drug CCT3833 elicits significant preclinical therapeutic efficacy in KRAS-mutant colorectal, lung and pancreatic tumor xenografts, demonstrating a treatment option for several areas of unmet clinical need. Based on these preclinical data and the phase I clinical unconfirmed response in a patient with KRAS-mutant spindle cell sarcoma, CCT3833 requires further evaluation in patients with other KRAS-mutant cancers.

Vulnerability of drug-resistant EML4-ALK rearranged lung cancer to transcriptional inhibition

A subset of lung adenocarcinomas is driven by the EML4-ALK translocation. Even though ALK inhibitors in the clinic lead to excellent initial responses, acquired resistance to these inhibitors due to on-target mutations or parallel pathway alterations is a major clinical challenge. Exploring these mechanisms of resistance, we found that EML4-ALK cells parental or resistant to crizotinib, ceritinib or alectinib are remarkably sensitive to inhibition of CDK7/12 with THZ1 and CDK9 with alvocidib or dinaciclib. These compounds robustly induce apoptosis through transcriptional inhibition and downregulation of anti-apoptotic genes. Importantly, alvocidib reduced tumour progression in xenograft mouse models. In summary, our study takes advantage of the transcriptional addiction hypothesis to propose a new treatment strategy for a subset of patients with acquired resistance to first-, second- and third-generation ALK inhibitors.

A biobank of small cell lung cancer CDX models elucidates inter- and intratumoral phenotypic heterogeneity

Although small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is treated as a homogeneous disease, biopsies and preclinical models reveal heterogeneity in transcriptomes and morphology. SCLC subtypes were recently defined by neuroendocrine transcription factor (NETF) expression. Circulating-tumor-cell-derived explant models (CDX) recapitulate donor patients' tumor morphology, diagnostic NE marker expression and chemotherapy responses. We describe a biobank of 38 CDX models, including six CDX pairs generated pretreatment and at disease progression revealing complex intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity. Transcriptomic analysis confirmed three of four previously described subtypes based on ASCL1, NEUROD1 and POU2F3 expression and identified a previously unreported subtype based on another NETF, ATOH1. We document evolution during disease progression exemplified by altered MYC and NOTCH gene expression, increased 'variant' cell morphology, and metastasis without strong evidence of epithelial to mesenchymal transition. This CDX biobank provides a research resource to facilitate SCLC personalized medicine.

Entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials

BACKGROUND

Recurrent gene fusions, such as ROS1 fusions, are oncogenic drivers of various cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Up to 36% of patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC have brain metastases at the diagnosis of advanced disease. Entrectinib is a ROS1 inhibitor that has been designed to effectively penetrate and remain in the CNS. We explored the use of entrectinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

We did an integrated analysis of three ongoing phase 1 or 2 trials of entrectinib (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2). The efficacy-evaluable population included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who received entrectinib at a dose of at least 600 mg orally once per day, with at least 12 months' follow-up. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and previous cancer treatment (except for ROS1 inhibitors) was allowed. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with an objective response (complete or partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) and duration of response, and were evaluated by blinded independent central review. The safety-evaluable population for the safety analysis included all patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC in the three trials who received at least one dose of entrectinib (irrespective of dose or duration of follow-up). These ongoing studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02097810 (STARTRK-1) and NCT02568267 (STARTRK-2), and EudraCT, 2012-000148-88 (ALKA-372-001).

FINDINGS

Patients were enrolled in ALKA-372-001 from Oct 26, 2012, to March 27, 2018; in STARTRK-1 from Aug 7, 2014, to May 10, 2018; and in STARTRK-2 from Nov 19, 2015 (enrolment is ongoing). At the data cutoff date for this analysis (May 31, 2018), 41 (77%; 95% CI 64-88) of 53 patients in the efficacy-evaluable population had an objective response. Median follow-up was 15·5 monhts (IQR 13·4-20·2). Median duration of response was 24·6 months (95% CI 11·4-34·8). In the safety-evaluable population, 79 (59%) of 134 patients had grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events. 46 (34%) of 134 patients had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events, with the most common being weight increase (ten [8%]) and neutropenia (five [4%]). 15 (11%) patients had serious treatment-related adverse events, the most common of which were nervous system disorders (four [3%]) and cardiac disorders (three [2%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Entrectinib is active with durable disease control in patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, and is well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, making it amenable to long-term dosing in these patients. These data highlight the need to routinely test for ROS1 fusions to broaden therapeutic options for patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC.

FUNDING

Ignyta/F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, gastro-oesophageal cancer, or urothelial carcinomas (JVDF): a multicohort, non-randomised, open-label, phase 1a/b trial

BACKGROUND

Pre-clinical and clinical evidence suggests that simultaneous blockade of VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and PD-1 or PD-L1 enhances antigen-specific T-cell migration, antitumour activity, and has favourable toxicity. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety and preliminary antitumour activity of ramucirumab (an IgG1 VEGFR-2 antagonist) combined with pembrolizumab (an IgG4 PD-1 antagonist) in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, or urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

We did a multicohort, non-randomised, open-label, phase 1a/b trial at 16 academic medical centres, hospitals, and clinics in the USA, France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. We enrolled adult patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (cohorts A and B), non-small-cell lung cancer (cohort C), or urothelial carcinoma (cohort D), whose disease had progressed on one or two lines of previous therapy (for those with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma) or one to three lines of previous therapy (for those with non-small-cell lung cancer and urothelial carcinoma) that included platinum (for all tumour types) or fluoropyrimidine or both (for gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma). Eligibility criteria included presence of measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients with previously untreated gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and non-small-cell lung cancer were also enrolled (in two additional separate cohorts); the results for these cohorts will be reported separately. The first 21-day treatment cycle was a dose-limiting toxicity observation period (phase 1a; safety run-in), followed by a phase 1b cohort expansion stage. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously on day 1, and intravenous ramucirumab was administered at 8 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 for cohort A or at 10 mg/kg on day 1 for cohorts B, C, and D, every 3 weeks, until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of ramucirumab in combination with pembrolizumab assessed by the incidence of adverse events in both phase 1a and 1b and as dose-limiting toxicities during phase 1a. The safety and activity analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02443324, and is no longer enrolling patients.

FINDINGS

Between July 30, 2015 and June 24, 2016, we enrolled and treated 92 patients (41 with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, 27 with non-small-cell lung cancer, and 24 with urothelial carcinoma). Median follow-up was 32·8 months (IQR 28·1-33·6). During the first cycle of treatment (phase 1a safety run-in; n=11), one patient with gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received the 8 mg/kg dose of ramucirumab had grade 3 abdominal pain, colitis, hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, and jaundice, and grade 4 cholestasis, and died on treatment on day 40; the death was deemed related to progressive disease. No additional dose-limiting toxicities occurred and the decision was made to maintain the full planned doses of ramucirumab and pembrolizumab in phase 1b (n=81). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 75 (82%) of 92 patients, the most common of which was fatigue (in 33 patients [36%]), predominantly of grade 1 or 2 severity. 22 patients (24%) had one or more treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse, most commonly hypertension (six patients; 7%) and colitis (five patients; 5%). Serious adverse events occurred in 53 (58%) of 92 patients, and were deemed related to treatment in 22 (24%) patients. The most common treatment-related serious adverse events were abdominal pain in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (in three [7%] of 41 patients); asthenia and myocardial infarction in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (two [7%] of 27 patients), and colitis in patients with urothelial carcinoma (two [8%] of 24 patients). Six (7%) of 92 patients discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events, and one death (from pulmonary sepsis in a patient with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma) was deemed related to treatment. The number of patients achieving an objective response was three (7%; 95% CI 1·5-19·9) of 41 in the gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma cohort, eight (30%; 13·8-50·2) of 27 in the non-small-cell lung cancer cohort, and three (13%, 2·7-32·4) in the urothelial carcinoma cohort.

INTERPRETATION

Ramucirumab in combination with pembrolizumab showed a manageable safety profile with favourable antitumour activity in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Our results contribute to the growing evidence that supports dual inhibition of the VEGF-VEGFR2 and PD-1-PD-L1 pathways. This combination could be further explored with or without chemotherapy, especially for patients with tumours for which single-agent checkpoint inhibitors have shown no additional benefit over chemotherapy.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company, and Merck and Co.

EPAC-lung: pooled analysis of circulating tumour cells in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the clinical validity of circulating tumour cell (CTC) quantification for prognostication of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by undertaking a pooled analysis of individual patient data.

METHODS

Nine European NSCLC CTC centres were asked to provide reported/unreported pseudo-anonymised data for patients with advanced NSCLC who participated in CellSearch CTC studies from January 2003 to March 2017. We used Cox regression models, stratified by centres, to establish the association between CTC count and survival. We assessed the added value of CTCs to prognostic clinicopathological models using likelihood ratio (LR) statistics and c-indices.

RESULTS

Seven out of nine eligible centres provided data for 550 patients with prognostic information for overall survival. CTC counts of ≥2 and ≥ 5 per 7·5 mL were associated with reduced progression-free survival (≥2 CTCs: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.72, p < 0·001; ≥5 CTCs: HR = 2.21, p < 0·001) and overall survival (≥2 CTCs: HR = 2·18, p < 0·001; ≥5 CTCs: HR = 2·75, p < 0·001), respectively. Survival prediction was significantly improved by addition of baseline CTC count to LR clinicopathological models (log-transformed CTCs p < 0·001; ≥2 CTCs p < 0·001; ≥5 CTCs p ≤ 0·001 for both survival end-points), whereas moderate improvements were observed with the use of c-index models. There was some evidence of between-centre heterogeneity, especially when examining continuous counts of CTCs.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm CTCs as an independent prognostic indicator of progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced NSCLC and also reveal some evidence of between-centre heterogeneity. CTC count improves prognostication when added to full clinicopathological predictive models.

Utility of ctDNA to support patient selection for early phase clinical trials: the TARGET study

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) supports blood-based genomic profiling but is not yet routinely implemented in the setting of a phase I trials clinic. TARGET is a molecular profiling program with the primary aim to match patients with a broad range of advanced cancers to early phase clinical trials on the basis of analysis of both somatic mutations and copy number alterations (CNA) across a 641 cancer-associated-gene panel in a single ctDNA assay. For the first 100 TARGET patients, ctDNA data showed good concordance with matched tumor and results were turned round within a clinically acceptable timeframe for Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) review. When a 2.5% variant allele frequency (VAF) threshold was applied, actionable mutations were identified in 41 of 100 patients, and 11 of these patients received a matched therapy. These data support the application of ctDNA in this early phase trial setting where broad genomic profiling of contemporaneous tumor material enhances patient stratification to novel therapies and provides a practical template for bringing routinely applied blood-based analyses to the clinic.

Ramucirumab Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: Nonrandomized, Open-Label, Phase I Trial (JVDF)

LESSONS LEARNED

Ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab revealed no unexpected safety findings in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer, which is consistent with reports of other tumor cohorts within this phase Ia/b trial.Ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab did not demonstrate an improvement in overall survival when compared with historical controls in biomarker unselected, heavily pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.Patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors had improved overall survival compared with patients with PD-L1-negative disease.

BACKGROUND

Few treatment options exist for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following progression on gemcitabine-cisplatin. Preclinical evidence suggests that simultaneous blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) and programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) enhances antitumor effects. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab, an IgG1 VEGFR-2 antagonist, with pembrolizumab, an IgG4 PD-1 antagonist, in biomarker-unselected patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic BTC.

METHODS

Patients had previously treated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder, intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts, or ampulla of Vater. Ramucirumab 8 mg/kg was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 with intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of the combination. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were treated at 12 centers in five countries. Hypertension was the most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), occurring in five patients. One patient experienced a grade 4 TRAE (neutropenia), and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Objective response rate was 4%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.6 months and 6.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ramucirumab-pembrolizumab showed limited clinical activity with infrequent grade 3-4 TRAEs in patients with biomarker-unselected progressive BTC.

Vistusertib (dual m-TORC1/2 inhibitor) in combination with paclitaxel in patients with high-grade serous ovarian and squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

We have previously shown that raised p-S6K levels correlate with resistance to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. We hypothesised that inhibiting p-S6K signalling with the dual m-TORC1/2 inhibitor in patients receiving weekly paclitaxel could improve outcomes in such patients.

Patients and methods

In dose escalation, weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) was given 6/7 weeks in combination with two intermittent schedules of vistusertib (dosing starting on the day of paclitaxel): schedule A, vistusertib dosed bd for 3 consecutive days per week (3/7 days) and schedule B, vistusertib dosed bd for 2 consecutive days per week (2/7 days). After establishing a recommended phase II dose (RP2D), expansion cohorts in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) were explored in 25 and 40 patients, respectively.

Results

The dose-escalation arms comprised 22 patients with advanced solid tumours. The dose-limiting toxicities were fatigue and mucositis in schedule A and rash in schedule B. On the basis of toxicity and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) evaluations, the RP2D was established as 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel with 50 mg vistusertib bd 3/7 days for 6/7 weeks. In the HGSOC expansion, RECIST and GCIG CA125 response rates were 13/25 (52%) and 16/25 (64%), respectively, with median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.8 months (95% CI: 3.28-18.54). The RP2D was not well tolerated in the SqNSCLC expansion, but toxicities were manageable after the daily vistusertib dose was reduced to 25 mg bd for the following 23 patients. The RECIST response rate in this group was 8/23 (35%), and the mPFS was 5.8 months (95% CI: 2.76-21.25).

Discussion

In this phase I trial, we report a highly active and well-tolerated combination of vistusertib, administered as an intermittent schedule with weekly paclitaxel, in patients with HGSOC and SqNSCLC.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicialTrials.gov identifier: CNCT02193633.

Signaling pathway screening platforms are an efficient approach to identify therapeutic targets in cancers that lack known driver mutations: a case report for a cancer of unknown primary origin

Precision medicine aims to tailor cancer therapies to target specific tumor-promoting aberrations. For tumors that lack actionable drivers, which occurs frequently in the clinic, extensive molecular characterization and pre-clinical drug efficacy studies will be required. A cell line maintained at low passage and a patient- derived xenograft model (PDX) were generated using a fresh biopsy from a patient with a poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary origin. Next-generation sequencing, high throughput signaling network analysis, and drug efficacy trials were then conducted to identify actionable targets for therapeutic intervention. No actionable mutations were identified after whole exome sequencing of the patient's DNA. However, whole genome sequencing revealed amplification of the 3q and 5p chromosomal arms, that include the PIK3CA and RICTOR genes, respectively. We then conducted pathway analysis, which revealed activation of the AKT pathway. Based on this analysis, efficacy of PIK3CA and AKT inhibitors were evaluated in the tumor biopsy-derived cell culture and PDX, and response to the AKT inhibitor AZD5363 was observed both in vitro and in vivo indicating the patient would benefit from targeted therapies directed against the serine/threonine kinase AKT. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that high throughput signaling pathway analysis will significantly aid in identifying actionable alterations in rare tumors and guide patient stratification into early-phase clinical trials.

The effect of itraconazole and rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of osimertinib

AIMS

We investigated the effects of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) or inducer (rifampicin) on the pharmacokinetics of the epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in two Phase I, open-label, two-part clinical studies. Part one of both studies is reported.

METHODS

In the itraconazole study (NCT02157883), patients received single-dose osimertinib 80 mg on Days 1 and 10 and itraconazole (200 mg twice daily) on Days 6-18 orally. In the rifampicin study (NCT02197247), patients received osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 1-77 and rifampicin 600 mg once daily on Days 29-49.

RESULTS

In the itraconazole study (n = 36), the geometric least squares mean (GMLSM) ratios (osimertinib plus itraconazole/osimertinib alone) for Cmax and AUC were 80% (90% CI 73, 87) and 124% (90% CI 115, 135), respectively, below the predefined no-effect upper limit of 200%. In the rifampicin study (n = 40), the GMLSM ratios (osimertinib plus rifampicin/osimertinib alone) for Css,max and AUCτ were 27% (90% CI 24, 30) and 22% (90% CI 20, 24), respectively, below the predefined no-effect lower limit of 50%. The induction effect of rifampicin was apparent within 7 days of initiation; osimertinib Css,max and AUCτ values returned to pre-rifampicin levels within 3 weeks of rifampicin discontinuation. No new osimertinib safety findings were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib can be co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors, but strong CYP3A inducers should be avoided if possible.

A Phase 1, open-label, multicentre study to compare the capsule and tablet formulations of AZD5363 and explore the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic exposure, safety and tolerability of AZD5363 in patients with advanced solid malignancies: OAK

PURPOSE

AZD5363 is a potent pan-AKT inhibitor originally formulated as a capsule; a tablet was developed for patient convenience and manufacturing ease. This study assessed the PK comparability of both formulations (Part A) and the effect of food (Part B) on the PK/safety of the tablet.

METHODS

Adults with advanced solid tumours received AZD5363 480 mg bid in a partially fasted state by tablet (Week 1) and capsule (Week 2) in a '4-days-on/3-days-off' schedule (Part A). PK parameters were evaluated using pre-defined 90% CIs for AUCτ and Cmax ratios of 0.75-1.33 to assess comparability. In Part B, AZD5363 tablet was given to a new cohort of patients under the same conditions as Part A, except on the morning of PK assessment days, when it was administered after an overnight fast (Week 1) and standard meal (Week 2).

RESULTS

In evaluable patients (N = 11), the geometric least-squares mean ratios (tablet:capsule) for AUCτ and Cmax were 0.90 (0.77-1.06) and 1.02 (0.86-1.20), respectively, demonstrating comparable PK in the partially fasted state. Tablet and capsule safety data were also comparable. Tablet PK profiles indicated later tmax and lower Cmax after food versus overnight fast. Fed and fasted AUCτ and Cmax ratios were 0.89 (0.76-1.05) and 0.67 (0.55-0.82), respectively (N = 9). The safety/tolerability profile of the tablet was comparable between fed and fasted states.

CONCLUSIONS

PK and safety/tolerability of AZD5363 tablet and capsule were comparable. Food did not affect the bioavailability of AZD5363, but reduced the absorption rate without discernibly affecting safety/tolerability.

Clinical evaluation of a novel microfluidic device for epitope-independent enrichment of circulating tumour cells in patients with small cell lung cancer

Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) have potential utility as minimally-invasive biomarkers to aid cancer treatment decision making. However, many current CTC technologies enrich CTCs using specific surface epitopes that do not necessarily reflect CTC heterogeneity. Here we evaluated the epitope-independent Parsortix system which enriches CTCs based on size and rigidity using both healthy normal volunteer blood samples spiked with tumour cells and blood samples from patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Blood samples were maintained unfractionated at room temperature for up to 4 days followed by plasma removal for circulating free DNA (cfDNA) isolation and direct application of the remaining cell component to the Parsortix system. For tumour cells expressing the EpCAM cell surface marker the numbers of spiked cells retained using the Parsortix system and by EpCAM-positive selection using CellSearch® were not significantly different, whereas only the Parsortix system showed strong enrichment of cells with undetectable EpCAM expression. In a pilot clinical study we banked both enriched CTCs as well as plasma from SCLC patient blood samples. Upon retrieval of the banked Parsortix cellular samples we could detect cytokeratin positive CTCs in all 12 SCLC patients tested. Interestingly, processing parallel samples from the same patients by EpCAM enrichment using CellSearch® revealed only 83% (10/12) with cytokeratin positive CTCs indicating the Parsortix system is enriching for EpCAM negative SCLC CTCs. Our combined results indicate the Parsortix system is a valuable tool for combined cfDNA isolation and CTC enrichment that enables CTC analysis to be extended beyond dependence on surface epitopes.

Circulating Tumor Cell Enumeration in a Phase II Trial of a Four-Drug Regimen in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Multidrug regimens are active against advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). However, the increased toxicity requires the use of biomarkers to select the patients who will derive the most benefit. We assessed circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as a prognostic biomarker in patients treated with a 4-drug regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-arm phase II trial (Erbitux Study of CPT11, Oxaliplatin, UFToral Targeted-therapy [eSCOUT]) was undertaken in patients with previously untreated KRAS wild-type ACRC using a regimen of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and tegafur-uracil with leucovorin and cetuximab. Baseline CTCs were enumerated using CellSearch. The endpoints were an objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). We modeled our results and compared them with those modeled for the capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab +/- cetuximab (CAIRO2) trial, stratifying patients a priori into low (< 3) and high (≥ 3) CTC groups.

RESULTS

For 48 eligible patients, the best ORR from the 4-drug regimen was 71%, with a disease control rate of 98%. The median OS for patients with a high and low CTC count was 18.7 and 22.3 months (log-rank test, P = .038), respectively. In our modeled data, for patients with a low CTC count, no differences were found between the median OS in the eSCOUT trial and that in the CAIRO2 trial (22.2 vs. 22.0 months). However, for the high CTC group, a clinically relevant improvement was seen in median OS (eSCOUT vs. CAIRO2, 18.7 vs. 13.7 months; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

These data are hypothesis generating-for patients with ACRC, stratification by CTC count can identify those who might benefit the most from an intensive 4-drug regimen, avoiding high-toxicity regimens in low CTC groups. This hypothesis warrants validation in a phase III biomarker-driven trial.