1
|
Sultanov R, Mulyukina A, Zubkova O, Fedoseeva A, Bogomazova A, Klimina K, Larin A, Zatsepin T, Prikazchikova T, Lukina M, Bogomiakova M, Sharova E, Generozov E, Lagarkova M, Arapidi G. TP63-TRIM29 axis regulates enhancer methylation and chromosomal instability in prostate cancer. Epigenetics Chromatin 2024; 17:6. [PMID: 38481282 PMCID: PMC10938740 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-024-00529-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men. High variability in DNA methylation and a high rate of large genomic rearrangements are often observed in PRAD. RESULTS To investigate the reasons for such high variance, we integrated DNA methylation, RNA-seq, and copy number alterations datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), focusing on PRAD, and employed weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Our results show that only single cluster of co-expressed genes is associated with genomic and epigenomic instability. Within this cluster, TP63 and TRIM29 are key transcription regulators and are downregulated in PRAD. We discovered that TP63 regulates the level of enhancer methylation in prostate basal epithelial cells. TRIM29 forms a complex with TP63 and together regulates the expression of genes specific to the prostate basal epithelium. In addition, TRIM29 binds DNA repair proteins and prevents the formation of the TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion typically observed in PRAD. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates that TRIM29 and TP63 are important regulators in maintaining the identity of the basal epithelium under physiological conditions. Furthermore, we uncover the role of TRIM29 in PRAD development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Sultanov
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
| | - A Mulyukina
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - O Zubkova
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - A Fedoseeva
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - A Bogomazova
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - K Klimina
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - A Larin
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Zatsepin
- Department of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Prikazchikova
- Department of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Lukina
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Bogomiakova
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - E Sharova
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - E Generozov
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Lagarkova
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - G Arapidi
- Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Creighton CJ, Zhang F, Zhang Y, Castro P, Hu R, Islam M, Ghosh S, Ittmann M, Kwabi-Addo B. Comparative and integrative analysis of transcriptomic and epigenomic-wide DNA methylation changes in African American prostate cancer. Epigenetics 2023. [DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2023.2180585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chad J. Creighton
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Flora Zhang
- Center for Women’s Studies, Colgate University, Hamilton, New York, USA
| | - Yiqun Zhang
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patricia Castro
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rong Hu
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Md Islam
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Somiranjan Ghosh
- Department of Biology, Howard University, Washington, Columbia, USA
| | - Michael Ittmann
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bernard Kwabi-Addo
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Howard University, Washington, Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma C, Wang X, Dai JY, Turman C, Kraft P, Stopsack KH, Loda M, Pettersson A, Mucci LA, Stanford JL, Penney KL. Germline Genetic Variants Associated with Somatic TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion Status in Prostate Cancer: A Genome-Wide Association Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1436-1443. [PMID: 37555839 PMCID: PMC10592169 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prostate cancer subtype defined by the presence of TMPRSS2:ERG has been shown to be molecularly and epidemiologically distinct. However, few studies have investigated germline genetic variants associating with TMPRSS2:ERG fusion status. METHODS We performed a genome-wide association study with 396 TMPRSS2:ERG(+) cases, 390 TMPRSS2:ERG(-) cases, and 2,386 cancer-free controls from the Physicians' Health Study (PHS), the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS), and a Seattle-based Fred Hutchinson (FH) Cancer Center Prostate Cancer Study. We applied logistic regression models to test the associations between ∼5 million SNPs with TMPRSS2:ERG fusion status accounting for population stratification. RESULTS We did not identify genome-wide significant variants comparing the TMPRSS2:ERG(+) to the TMPRSS2:ERG(-) prostate cancer cases in the meta-analysis. When comparing TMPRSS2:ERG(+) prostate cancer cases with controls without prostate cancer, 10 genome-wide significant SNPs on chromosome 17q24.3 were observed in the meta-analysis. When comparing TMPRSS2:ERG(-) prostate cancer cases with controls without prostate cancer, two SNPs on chromosome 8q24.21 in the meta-analysis reached genome-wide significance. CONCLUSIONS We observed SNPs at several known prostate cancer risk loci (17q24.3, 1q32.1, and 8q24.21) that were differentially and exclusively associated with the risk of developing prostate tumors either with or without the gene fusion. IMPACT Our findings suggest that tumors with the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion exhibit a different germline genetic etiology compared with fusion negative cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoran Ma
- Department of Nutrition, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA
| | - Xiaoyu Wang
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchison Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - James Y. Dai
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchison Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA
| | - Constance Turman
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Konrad H. Stopsack
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Andreas Pettersson
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lorelei A. Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Janet L. Stanford
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchison Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA
| | - Kathryn L. Penney
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Silvestri R, Nicolì V, Gangadharannambiar P, Crea F, Bootman MD. Calcium signalling pathways in prostate cancer initiation and progression. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:524-543. [PMID: 36964408 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00738-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
Cancer cells proliferate, differentiate and migrate by repurposing physiological signalling mechanisms. In particular, altered calcium signalling is emerging as one of the most widespread adaptations in cancer cells. Remodelling of calcium signalling promotes the development of several malignancies, including prostate cancer. Gene expression data from in vitro, in vivo and bioinformatics studies using patient samples and xenografts have shown considerable changes in the expression of various components of the calcium signalling toolkit during the development of prostate cancer. Moreover, preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that altered calcium signalling is a crucial component of the molecular re-programming that drives prostate cancer progression. Evidence points to calcium signalling re-modelling, commonly involving crosstalk between calcium and other cellular signalling pathways, underpinning the onset and temporal progression of this disease. Discrete alterations in calcium signalling have been implicated in hormone-sensitive, castration-resistant and aggressive variant forms of prostate cancer. Hence, modulation of calcium signals and downstream effector molecules is a plausible therapeutic strategy for both early and late stages of prostate cancer. Based on this premise, clinical trials have been undertaken to establish the feasibility of targeting calcium signalling specifically for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vanessa Nicolì
- Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Crea
- Cancer Research Group, School of Life Health and Chemical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Martin D Bootman
- Cancer Research Group, School of Life Health and Chemical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schimmelpfennig C, Rade M, Füssel S, Löffler D, Blumert C, Bertram C, Borkowetz A, Otto DJ, Puppel SH, Hönscheid P, Sommer U, Baretton GB, Köhl U, Wirth M, Thomas C, Horn F, Kreuz M, Reiche K. Characterization and evaluation of gene fusions as a measure of genetic instability and disease prognosis in prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:575. [PMID: 37349736 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11019-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide. The clinical manifestations and molecular characteristics of PCa are highly variable. Aggressive types require radical treatment, whereas indolent ones may be suitable for active surveillance or organ-preserving focal therapies. Patient stratification by clinical or pathological risk categories still lacks sufficient precision. Incorporating molecular biomarkers, such as transcriptome-wide expression signatures, improves patient stratification but so far excludes chromosomal rearrangements. In this study, we investigated gene fusions in PCa, characterized potential novel candidates, and explored their role as prognostic markers for PCa progression. METHODS We analyzed 630 patients in four cohorts with varying traits regarding sequencing protocols, sample conservation, and PCa risk group. The datasets included transcriptome-wide expression and matched clinical follow-up data to detect and characterize gene fusions in PCa. With the fusion calling software Arriba, we computationally predicted gene fusions. Following detection, we annotated the gene fusions using published databases for gene fusions in cancer. To relate the occurrence of gene fusions to Gleason Grading Groups and disease prognosis, we performed survival analyses using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox regression. RESULTS Our analyses identified two potential novel gene fusions, MBTTPS2,L0XNC01::SMS and AMACR::AMACR. These fusions were detected in all four studied cohorts, providing compelling evidence for the validity of these fusions and their relevance in PCa. We also found that the number of gene fusions detected in a patient sample was significantly associated with the time to biochemical recurrence in two of the four cohorts (log-rank test, p-value < 0.05 for both cohorts). This was also confirmed after adjusting the prognostic model for Gleason Grading Groups (Cox regression, p-values < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our gene fusion characterization workflow revealed two potential novel fusions specific for PCa. We found evidence that the number of gene fusions was associated with the prognosis of PCa. However, as the quantitative correlations were only moderately strong, further validation and assessment of clinical value is required before potential application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Schimmelpfennig
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Michael Rade
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Susanne Füssel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dennis Löffler
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Conny Blumert
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Catharina Bertram
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Angelika Borkowetz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dominik J Otto
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sven-Holger Puppel
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Pia Hönscheid
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulrich Sommer
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo B Baretton
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulrike Köhl
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Manfred Wirth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Thomas
- Department of Urology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Friedemann Horn
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Kreuz
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kristin Reiche
- Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
- Institute of Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shin HJ, Hua JT, Li H. Recent advances in understanding DNA methylation of prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1182727. [PMID: 37234978 PMCID: PMC10206257 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1182727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, is widely studied in cancer. DNA methylation patterns have been shown to distinguish between benign and malignant tumors in various cancers, including prostate cancer. It may also contribute to oncogenesis, as it is frequently associated with downregulation of tumor suppressor genes. Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation, in particular the CpG island hypermethylator phenotype (CIMP), have shown associative evidence with distinct clinical features and outcomes, such as aggressive subtypes, higher Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and overall tumor stage, overall worse prognosis, as well as reduced survival. In prostate cancer, hypermethylation of specific genes is significantly different between tumor and normal tissues. Methylation patterns could distinguish between aggressive subtypes of prostate cancer, including neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) and castration resistant prostate adenocarcinoma. Further, DNA methylation is detectable in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and is reflective of clinical outcome, making it a potential biomarker for prostate cancer. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding DNA methylation alterations in cancers with the focus on prostate cancer. We discuss the advanced methodology used for evaluating DNA methylation changes and the molecular regulators behind these changes. We also explore the clinical potential of DNA methylation as prostate cancer biomarkers and its potential for developing targeted treatment of CIMP subtype of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jin Shin
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Junjie T Hua
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Haolong Li
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang R, Qin Z, Luo H, Pan M, Liu M, Yang P, Shi T. Prognostic value of PNN in prostate cancer and its correlation with therapeutic significance. Front Genet 2022; 13:1056224. [PMID: 36468018 PMCID: PMC9708726 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1056224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy. New biomarkers are in demand to facilitate the management. The role of the pinin protein (encoded by PNN gene) in PCa has not been thoroughly explored yet. Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA-PCa) dataset validated with Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and protein expression data retrieved from the Human Protein Atlas, the prognostic and diagnostic values of PNN were studied. Highly co-expressed genes with PNN (HCEG) were constructed for pathway enrichment analysis and drug prediction. A prognostic signature based on methylation status using HCEG was constructed. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and the TISIDB database were utilised to analyse the associations between PNN and tumour-infiltrating immune cells. The upregulated PNN expression in PCa at both transcription and protein levels suggests its potential as an independent prognostic factor of PCa. Analyses of the PNN's co-expression network indicated that PNN plays a role in RNA splicing and spliceosomes. The prognostic methylation signature demonstrated good performance for progression-free survival. Finally, our results showed that the PNN gene was involved in splicing-related pathways in PCa and identified as a potential biomarker for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruisong Wang
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, Hunan, China
- Changde Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Biomedicine, Changde, China
- Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Arts and Science (the Maternal and Child Health Hospital), Changde, Hunan, China
| | - Ziyi Qin
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, Hunan, China
| | - Huiling Luo
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, Hunan, China
| | - Meisen Pan
- Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Arts and Science (the Maternal and Child Health Hospital), Changde, Hunan, China
- Medical College, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, Hunan, China
| | - Mingyao Liu
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, Hunan, China
- Changde Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Biomedicine, Changde, China
| | - Pinhong Yang
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, Hunan, China
- Changde Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Biomedicine, Changde, China
- Hunan Provincial Ley Laboratory for Molecular Immunity Techonology of Aquatic Animal Diseases, Changde, China
| | - Tieliu Shi
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, Hunan, China
- Changde Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Biomedicine, Changde, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patra SK, Szyf M. Epigenetic perspectives of COVID-19: Virus infection to disease progression and therapeutic control. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2022; 1868:166527. [PMID: 36002132 PMCID: PMC9393109 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2022.166527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
COVID-19 has caused numerous deaths as well as imposed social isolation and upheaval world-wide. Although, the genome and the composition of the virus, the entry process and replication mechanisms are well investigated from by several laboratories across the world, there are many unknown remaining questions. For example, what are the functions of membrane lipids during entry, packaging and exit of virus particles? Also, the metabolic aspects of the infected tissue cells are poorly understood. In the course of virus replication and formation of virus particles within the host cell, the enhanced metabolic activities of the host is directly proportional to viral loads. The epigenetic landscape of the host cells is also altered, particularly the expression/repression of genes associated with cellular metabolism as well as cellular processes that are antagonistic to the virus. Metabolic pathways are enzyme driven processes and the expression profile and mechanism of regulations of the respective genes encoding those enzymes during the course of pathogen invasion might be highly informative on the course of the disease. Recently, the metabolic profile of the patients' sera have been analysed from few patients. In view of this, and to gain further insights into the roles that epigenetic mechanisms might play in this scenario in regulation of metabolic pathways during the progression of COVID-19 are discussed and summarised in this contribution for ensuring best therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Kumar Patra
- Epigenetics and Cancer Research Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Group, Department of Life Science, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela 769008, Odisha, India.
| | - Moshe Szyf
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McIntyre Medical Sciences Building, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thiruvalluvan M, Billet S, Bhowmick NA. Antagonizing Glutamine Bioavailability Promotes Radiation Sensitivity in Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102491. [PMID: 35626095 PMCID: PMC9139225 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiation is the standard of care for prostate cancer, but almost half the patients develop resistant disease. It is imperative to understand the reasons behind disease progression to develop more effective strategies of treatment. We determined that glutamine is a crucial nutrient in driving prostate cancer tumors as people with more glutamine have poorer outcomes. We hypothesized that directly depriving cancer cells of this precious resource will further sensitize them to radiation. We sought to repurpose the drug L-asparaginase, which has been used extensively to treat leukemia patients, to complement radiation therapy for prostate cancer patients. This drug depletes glutamine in the blood and hinders an aspect of cell growth that makes cancer cells that are otherwise resistant vulnerable to irradiation. Ultimately, mouse models of prostate cancer given L-asparaginase in combination with irradiation were more effective at reducing tumor size than radiation alone. Abstract Nearly half of localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients given radiation therapy develop recurrence. Here, we identified glutamine as a key player in mediating the radio-sensitivity of PCa. Glutamine transporters and glutaminase are upregulated by radiation therapy of PCa cells, but respective inhibitors were ineffective in radio-sensitization. However, targeting glutamine bioavailability by L-asparaginase (L-ASP) led to a significant reduction in clonogenicity when combined with irradiation. L-ASP reduced extracellular asparagine and glutamine, but the sensitization effects were driven through its depletion of glutamine. L-ASP led to G2/M cell cycle checkpoint blockade. As evidence, there was a respective delay in DNA repair associated with RAD51 downregulation and upregulation of CHOP, contributing to radiation-induced cell death. A radio-resistant PCa cell line was developed, was found to bypass radiation-induced mitotic catastrophe, and was sensitive to L-ASP/radiation combination treatment. Previously, PCa-associated fibroblasts were reported as a glutamine source supporting tumor progression. As such, glutamine-free media were not effective in promoting radiation-induced PCa cell death when co-cultured with associated primary fibroblasts. However, the administration L-ASP catalyzed glutamine depletion with irradiated co-cultures and catalyzed tumor volume reduction in a mouse model. The clinical history of L-ASP for leukemia patients supports the viability for its repurposing as a radio-sensitizer for PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Thiruvalluvan
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (M.T.); (S.B.)
| | - Sandrine Billet
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (M.T.); (S.B.)
- Department of Research, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA
| | - Neil A. Bhowmick
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (M.T.); (S.B.)
- Department of Research, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-310-871-4697
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tost J. Current and Emerging Technologies for the Analysis of the Genome-Wide and Locus-Specific DNA Methylation Patterns. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2022; 1389:395-469. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-11454-0_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
11
|
Kukkonen K, Taavitsainen S, Huhtala L, Uusi-Makela J, Granberg KJ, Nykter M, Urbanucci A. Chromatin and Epigenetic Dysregulation of Prostate Cancer Development, Progression, and Therapeutic Response. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3325. [PMID: 34283056 PMCID: PMC8268970 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The dysregulation of chromatin and epigenetics has been defined as the overarching cancer hallmark. By disrupting transcriptional regulation in normal cells and mediating tumor progression by promoting cancer cell plasticity, this process has the ability to mediate all defined hallmarks of cancer. In this review, we collect and assess evidence on the contribution of chromatin and epigenetic dysregulation in prostate cancer. We highlight important mechanisms leading to prostate carcinogenesis, the emergence of castration-resistance upon treatment with androgen deprivation therapy, and resistance to antiandrogens. We examine in particular the contribution of chromatin structure and epigenetics to cell lineage commitment, which is dysregulated during tumorigenesis, and cell plasticity, which is altered during tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konsta Kukkonen
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (K.K.); (S.T.); (L.H.); (J.U.-M.); (K.J.G.); (M.N.)
| | - Sinja Taavitsainen
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (K.K.); (S.T.); (L.H.); (J.U.-M.); (K.J.G.); (M.N.)
| | - Laura Huhtala
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (K.K.); (S.T.); (L.H.); (J.U.-M.); (K.J.G.); (M.N.)
| | - Joonas Uusi-Makela
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (K.K.); (S.T.); (L.H.); (J.U.-M.); (K.J.G.); (M.N.)
| | - Kirsi J. Granberg
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (K.K.); (S.T.); (L.H.); (J.U.-M.); (K.J.G.); (M.N.)
| | - Matti Nykter
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, 33520 Tampere, Finland; (K.K.); (S.T.); (L.H.); (J.U.-M.); (K.J.G.); (M.N.)
| | - Alfonso Urbanucci
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Zong Z, Wei Y, Ren J, Zhang L, Zhou F. The intersection of COVID-19 and cancer: signaling pathways and treatment implications. Mol Cancer 2021; 20:76. [PMID: 34001144 PMCID: PMC8126512 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-021-01363-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a serious public health concern. Patients with cancer have been disproportionately affected by this pandemic. Increasing evidence has documented that patients with malignancies are highly susceptible to severe infections and mortality from COVID-19. Recent studies have also elucidated the molecular relationship between the two diseases, which may not only help optimize cancer care during the pandemic but also expand the treatment for COVID-19. In this review, we highlight the clinical and molecular similarities between cancer and COVID-19 and summarize the four major signaling pathways at the intersection of COVID-19 and cancer, namely, cytokine, type I interferon (IFN-I), androgen receptor (AR), and immune checkpoint signaling. In addition, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of repurposing anticancer treatment for the treatment of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi Zong
- Institutes of Biology and Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China
- MOE Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China
- The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518033, China
| | - Yujun Wei
- Anhui Anlong Gene Technology Co., Ltd, Hefei, 230041, China
| | - Jiang Ren
- The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518033, China
| | - Long Zhang
- MOE Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China
| | - Fangfang Zhou
- Institutes of Biology and Medical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Segura-Moreno YY, Sanabria-Salas MC, Varela R, Mesa JA, Serrano ML. Decoding the heterogeneous landscape in the development prostate cancer. Oncol Lett 2021; 21:376. [PMID: 33777200 PMCID: PMC7988715 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.12637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is characterized as being histologically and molecularly heterogeneous; however, this is not only incorrect among individuals, but also at the multiple foci level, which originates in the prostate gland itself. The reasons for such heterogeneity have not been fully elucidated; however, understanding these may be crucial in determining the course of the disease. PCa is characterized by a complex network of chromosomal rearrangements, which simultaneously deregulate multiple genes; this could explain the appearance of exclusive events associated with molecular subtypes, which have been extensively investigated to establish clinical management and the development of therapies targeted to this type of cancer. From a clinical aspect, the prognosis of the patient has focused on the characteristics of the index lesion (the largest focus in PCa); however, a significant percentage of patients (11%) also exhibit an aggressive secondary foci, which may determine the prognosis of the disease, and could be the determining factor of why, in different studies, the classification of the subtypes does not have an association with prognosis. Due to the aforementioned reasons, the analysis of molecular subtypes in several foci, from the same individual could assist in determining the association between clinical evolution and management of patients with PCa. Castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) has the worst prognosis and develops following androgen ablation therapy. Currently, there are two models to explain the development of CRPC: i) The selection model and ii) the adaptation model; both of which, have been found to include alterations described in the molecular subtypes, such as Enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit overexpression, isocitrate dehydrogenase (NAPD+)1 and forkhead box A1 mutations, suggesting that the presence of specific molecular alterations could predict the development of CRPC. This type of analysis could lead to a biological understanding of PCa, to develop personalized medicine strategies, which could improve the response to treatment thus, avoiding the development of resistance. Therefore, the present review discusses the primary molecular factors, to which variable heterogeneity in PCa progress has been attributed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yenifer Yamile Segura-Moreno
- Cancer Biology Research Group, National Institute of Cancerology, Bogota 110411, Colombia.,Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, National University of Colombia, University City, Bogota 111321, Colombia
| | | | - Rodolfo Varela
- Department of Urology, National Institute of Cancerology, Bogota 110411, Colombia.,Department of Urology, National University of Colombia, University City, Bogota 111321, Colombia
| | - Jorge Andrés Mesa
- Department of Pathology, National Institute of Cancerology, Bogota 110411, Colombia
| | - Martha Lucia Serrano
- Cancer Biology Research Group, National Institute of Cancerology, Bogota 110411, Colombia.,Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, National University of Colombia, University City, Bogota 111321, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bauer S, Ratz L, Heckmann-Nötzel D, Kaczorowski A, Hohenfellner M, Kristiansen G, Duensing S, Altevogt P, Klauck SM, Sültmann H. miR-449a Repression Leads to Enhanced NOTCH Signaling in TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion Positive Prostate Cancer Cells. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:964. [PMID: 33669024 PMCID: PMC7975324 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13050964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
About 50% of prostate cancer (PCa) tumors are TMPRSS2:ERG (T2E) fusion-positive (T2E+), but the role of T2E in PCa progression is not fully understood. We were interested in investigating epigenomic alterations associated with T2E+ PCa. Using different sequencing cohorts, we found several transcripts of the miR-449 cluster to be repressed in T2E+ PCa. This repression correlated strongly with enhanced expression of NOTCH and several of its target genes in TCGA and ICGC PCa RNA-seq data. We corroborated these findings using a cellular model with inducible T2E expression. Overexpression of miR-449a in vitro led to silencing of genes associated with NOTCH signaling (NOTCH1, HES1) and HDAC1. Interestingly, HDAC1 overexpression led to the repression of HES6, a negative regulator of the transcription factor HES1, the primary effector of NOTCH signaling, and promoted cell proliferation by repressing the cell cycle inhibitor p21. Inhibition of NOTCH as well as knockdown of HES1 reduced the oncogenic properties of PCa cell lines. Using tissue microarray analysis encompassing 533 human PCa cores, ERG-positive areas exhibited significantly increased HES1 expression. Taken together, our data suggest that an epigenomic regulatory network enhances NOTCH signaling and thereby contributes to the oncogenic properties of T2E+ PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Bauer
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (S.B.); (D.H.-N.); (S.M.K.)
- Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leonie Ratz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (S.B.); (D.H.-N.); (S.M.K.)
- Computer Assisted Medical Interventions, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adam Kaczorowski
- Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.K.); (S.D.)
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Glen Kristiansen
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Institute of Pathology, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Stefan Duensing
- Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.K.); (S.D.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Peter Altevogt
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sabine M. Klauck
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (S.B.); (D.H.-N.); (S.M.K.)
| | - Holger Sültmann
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (S.B.); (D.H.-N.); (S.M.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Differential Expression of a Panel of Ten CNTN1-Associated Genes during Prostate Cancer Progression and the Predictive Properties of the Panel Towards Prostate Cancer Relapse. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12020257. [PMID: 33578925 PMCID: PMC7916715 DOI: 10.3390/genes12020257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Contactin 1 (CNTN1) is a new oncogenic protein of prostate cancer (PC); its impact on PC remains incompletely understood. We observed CNTN1 upregulation in LNCaP cell-derived castration-resistant PCs (CRPC) and CNTN1-mediated enhancement of LNCaP cell proliferation. CNTN1 overexpression in LNCaP cells resulted in enrichment of the CREIGHTON_ENDOCRINE_THERAPY_RESISTANCE_3 gene set that facilitates endocrine resistance in breast cancer. The leading-edge (LE) genes (n = 10) of this enrichment consist of four genes with limited knowledge on PC and six genes novel to PC. These LE genes display differential expression during PC initiation, metastatic progression, and CRPC development, and they predict PC relapse following curative therapies at hazard ratio (HR) 2.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.96–3.77, and p = 1.77 × 10−9 in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) PanCancer cohort (n = 492) and HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.84–4.01, and p = 4.99 × 10−7 in Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) cohort (n = 140). The LE gene panel classifies high-, moderate-, and low-risk of PC relapse in both cohorts. Additionally, the gene panel robustly predicts poor overall survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC, p = 1.13 × 10−11), consistent with ccRCC and PC both being urogenital cancers. Collectively, we report multiple CNTN1-related genes relevant to PC and their biomarker values in predicting PC relapse.
Collapse
|
17
|
Epigenetic reprogramming during prostate cancer progression: A perspective from development. Semin Cancer Biol 2021; 83:136-151. [PMID: 33545340 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Conrad Waddington's theory of epigenetic landscape epitomize the process of cell fate and cellular decision-making during development. Wherein the epigenetic code maintains patterns of gene expression in pluripotent and differentiated cellular states during embryonic development and differentiation. Over the years disruption or reprogramming of the epigenetic landscape has been extensively studied in the course of cancer progression. Cellular dedifferentiation being a key hallmark of cancer allow us to take cues from the biological processes involved during development. Here, we discuss the role of epigenetic landscape and its modifiers in cell-fate determination, differentiation and prostate cancer progression. Lately, the emergence of RNA-modifications has also furthered our understanding of epigenetics in cancer. The overview of the epigenetic code regulating androgen signalling, and progression to aggressive neuroendocrine stage of PCa reinforces its gene regulatory functions during the development of prostate gland as well as cancer progression. Additionally, we also highlight the clinical implications of cancer cell epigenome, and discuss the recent advancements in the therapeutic strategies targeting the advanced stage disease.
Collapse
|
18
|
Afshari A, Janfeshan S, Yaghobi R, Roozbeh J, Azarpira N. Covid-19 pathogenesis in prostatic cancer and TMPRSS2-ERG regulatory genetic pathway. INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION 2020; 88:104669. [PMID: 33301988 PMCID: PMC7720011 DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Members of Coronaviridae family have been the source of respiratory illnesses. The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 that produced a severe lung disease in afflicted patients in China and other countries was the reason for the incredible attention paid toward this viral infection. It is known that SARS-CoV-2 is dependent on TMPRSS2 activity for entrance and subsequent infection of the host cells and TMPRSS2 is a host cell molecule that is important for the spread of viruses such as coronaviruses. Different factors can increase the risk of prostate cancer, including older age, a family history of the disease. Androgen receptor (AR) initiates a transcriptional cascade which plays a serious role in both normal and malignant prostate tissues. TMPRSS2 protein is highly expressed in prostate secretory epithelial cells, and its expression is dependent on androgen signals. One of the molecular signs of prostate cancer is TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion. In TMPRSS2-ERG-positive prostate cancers different patterns of changed gene expression can be detected. The possible molecular relation between fusion positive prostate cancer patients and the increased risk of lethal respiratory viral infections especially SARS-CoV-2 can candidate TMPRSS2 as an attractive drug target. The studies show that some molecules such as nicotinamide, PARP1, ETS and IL-1R can be studied deeper in order to control SARS-CoV-2 infection especially in prostate cancer patients. This review attempts to investigate the possible relation between the gene expression pattern that is produced through TMPRSS2-ERG fusion positive prostate cancer and the possible influence of these fluctuations on the pathogenesis and development of viral infections such as SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afsoon Afshari
- Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Shiraz Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Sahar Janfeshan
- Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ramin Yaghobi
- Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Shiraz Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Jamshid Roozbeh
- Shiraz Nephro-Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Negar Azarpira
- Shiraz Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wu Z, Chen H, Luo W, Zhang H, Li G, Zeng F, Deng F. The Landscape of Immune Cells Infiltrating in Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:517637. [PMID: 33194581 PMCID: PMC7658630 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.517637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study was to explore the infiltration pattern of immune cells in the prostate cancer (PCa) microenvironment and evaluate the possibility of specific infiltrating immune cells as potential prognostic biomarkers in PCa. Methods Infiltrating percentage of 22 immune cells were extracted from 27 normalized datasets by CIBERSORT algorithm. Samples with CIBERSORT p-value < 0.05 were subsequently merged and divided into normal or tumor groups. The differences of 22 immune cells between normal and tumor tissues were analyzed along with potential infiltrating correlations among 22 immune cells and Gleason grades. SNV data from TCGA was used to calculate the TMB score. A univariate and multivariate regression were used to evaluate the prognostic effects of immune cells in PCa. Results Ten immune cells with significant differences were identified, including seven increased and three decreased infiltrating immune cells from 190 normal prostate tissues and 537 PCa tissues. Among them, the percentage of infiltration of resting NK cells increased the most, whereas the percentage of infiltration of resting mast cells decreased the most. In normal tissues, CD8+ T cells had the strongest infiltrating correlation with monocytes, while activated NK cells and naive B cells were the highest in PCa tissues. Moreover, the infiltration of five immune cells was significantly associated with TMB score and mutations of immune gene change the infiltration of immune cells. The Area Under Curve (AUC) of the multivariate regression model for the five- and 10-year survival prediction of PCa reached 0.796 and 0.862. The validation cohort proved that the model was reproducible. Conclusions This study demonstrated that different infiltrating immune cells in prostate cancer, especially higher infiltrating M1 macrophages and neutrophils in PCa tissue, are associated with patients’ prognosis, suggesting that these two immune cells might be potential targets for PCa diagnosis and prognosis of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhicong Wu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hua Chen
- Department of Cell Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenyang Luo
- Department of Cell Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hanyun Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guihuan Li
- Department of Cell Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangyin Zeng
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fan Deng
- Department of Cell Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jin L, Cai Q, Wang S, Wang S, Wang J, Quan Z. Long noncoding RNA PVT1 promoted gallbladder cancer proliferation by epigenetically suppressing miR-18b-5p via DNA methylation. Cell Death Dis 2020; 11:871. [PMID: 33067424 PMCID: PMC7568542 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-03080-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) accounts for 85–90% malignancies of the biliary tree worldwide. Considerable evidence has demonstrated that dysregulation of lncRNAs is involved in the progression of cancer. LncRNA PVT1 has been reported to play important roles in various cancers, but its role in gallbladder cancer remains unknown. In the present study, we found that PVT1 was upregulated in GBC tissues and cells, and its upregulation was related with poor prognosis in GBC patients. PVT1 promoted GBC cells proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, PVT1 recruited DNMT1 via EZH2 to the miR-18b-5p DNA promoter and suppressed the transcription of miR-18b-5p through DNA methylation. Moreover, HIF1A was proved to be the downstream target gene of miR-18b-5p and PVT1 regulated GBC cells proliferation via HIF1A. In conclusion, our studies clarified the PVT1/miR-18b-5p/HIF1A regulation axis and indicated that PVT1 could be a potential therapeutic target for GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Longyang Jin
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655, China
| | - Qiang Cai
- Department of Surgery, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Shouhua Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Shuqing Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Jiandong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
| | - Zhiwei Quan
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wang YA, Sfakianos J, Tewari AK, Cordon-Cardo C, Kyprianou N. Molecular tracing of prostate cancer lethality. Oncogene 2020; 39:7225-7238. [PMID: 33046797 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-020-01496-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is diagnosed mostly in men over the age of 50 years, and has favorable 5-year survival rates due to early cancer detection and availability of curative surgical management. However, progression to metastasis and emergence of therapeutic resistance are responsible for the majority of prostate cancer mortalities. Recent advancement in sequencing technologies and computational capabilities have improved the ability to organize and analyze large data, thus enabling the identification of novel biomarkers for survival, metastatic progression and patient prognosis. Large-scale sequencing studies have also uncovered genetic and epigenetic signatures associated with prostate cancer molecular subtypes, supporting the development of personalized targeted-therapies. However, the current state of mainstream prostate cancer management does not take full advantage of the personalized diagnostic and treatment modalities available. This review focuses on interrogating biomarkers of prostate cancer progression, including gene signatures that correspond to the acquisition of tumor lethality and those of predictive and prognostic value in progression to advanced disease, and suggest how we can use our knowledge of biomarkers and molecular subtypes to improve patient treatment and survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanshuo Alice Wang
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - John Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.,Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ashutosh K Tewari
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.,Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Carlos Cordon-Cardo
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Natasha Kyprianou
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA. .,Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA. .,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA. .,Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shopit A, Li X, Tang Z, Awsh M, Shobet L, Niu M, Wang H, Mousa H, Alshwmi M, Tesfaldet T, Gamallat Y, Li H, Chu P, Ahmad N, Jamalat Y, Ai J, Qaed E, Almoiliqy M, Wang S, Tang Z. miR-421 up-regulation by the oleanolic acid derivative K73-03 regulates epigenetically SPINK1 transcription in pancreatic cancer cells leading to metabolic changes and enhanced apoptosis. Pharmacol Res 2020; 161:105130. [PMID: 32818653 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
SPINK1 overexpression promotes cancer cell aggressiveness and confers chemo-resistance to multiple drugs in pancreatic cancer. Oleanolic acid (OA) derivatives possess active effects against different cancers. Here we report the effect of K73-03, a new novel OA derivative, against pancreatic cancer through mitochondrial dysfunction via miR-421/SPINK1 regulation. We examined the binding ability of miR-421 with SPINK1-3'UTR Luciferase reporter assays. Moreover, miR-421/SPINK1 expressions in pancreatic cancer, with or without K73-03 treatment, were evaluated. Cells viability, migration, autophagy, mitochondrial function and apoptosis were examined with or without K73-03 treatment. We established that the K73-03 effect on the miR-421 that plays a crucial role in the regulation of SPINK1 in pancreatic cancer. Our findings indicated that K73-03 inhibited the mitochondrial function that led to inducing autophagy and apoptosis through epigenetic SPINK1 down-regulation via miR-421 up-regulation in pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, the inhibition of miR-421 expression in pancreatic cancer cells abolished the efficacy of K73-03 against SPINK1 oncogenic properties. We found an interesting finding that the interaction between miR-421 and SPINK1 is related to mitochondrial function through the effect of K73-03. Further, SPINK1 appear to be the molecular targets of K73-03 especially more than gemcitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Shopit
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xiaodong Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Zhongyuan Tang
- Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Mohammed Awsh
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Loubna Shobet
- Department of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mengyue Niu
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Hongyan Wang
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Haithm Mousa
- Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Department, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Mohammed Alshwmi
- Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Department, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Tsehaye Tesfaldet
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yaser Gamallat
- Department of Biochemistry, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Hailong Li
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Peng Chu
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Nisar Ahmad
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yazeed Jamalat
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Jie Ai
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Eskandar Qaed
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Marwan Almoiliqy
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Shisheng Wang
- College of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Zeyao Tang
- Acad Integrated Med & Collage of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhao SG, Chen WS, Li H, Foye A, Zhang M, Sjöström M, Aggarwal R, Playdle D, Liao A, Alumkal JJ, Das R, Chou J, Hua JT, Barnard TJ, Bailey AM, Chow ED, Perry MD, Dang HX, Yang R, Moussavi-Baygi R, Zhang L, Alshalalfa M, Laura Chang S, Houlahan KE, Shiah YJ, Beer TM, Thomas G, Chi KN, Gleave M, Zoubeidi A, Reiter RE, Rettig MB, Witte O, Yvonne Kim M, Fong L, Spratt DE, Morgan TM, Bose R, Huang FW, Li H, Chesner L, Shenoy T, Goodarzi H, Asangani IA, Sandhu S, Lang JM, Mahajan NP, Lara PN, Evans CP, Febbo P, Batzoglou S, Knudsen KE, He HH, Huang J, Zwart W, Costello JF, Luo J, Tomlins SA, Wyatt AW, Dehm SM, Ashworth A, Gilbert LA, Boutros PC, Farh K, Chinnaiyan AM, Maher CA, Small EJ, Quigley DA, Feng FY. The DNA methylation landscape of advanced prostate cancer. Nat Genet 2020; 52:778-789. [PMID: 32661416 PMCID: PMC7454228 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0648-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 180] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Although DNA methylation is a key regulator of gene expression, the comprehensive methylation landscape of metastatic cancer has never been defined. Through whole-genome bisulfite sequencing paired with deep whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing of 100 castration-resistant prostate metastases, we discovered alterations affecting driver genes only detectable with integrated whole-genome approaches. Notably, we observed that 22% of tumors exhibited a novel epigenomic subtype associated with hyper-methylation and somatic mutations in TET2, DNMT3B, IDH1, and BRAF. We also identified intergenic regions where methylation is associated with RNA expression of the oncogenic driver genes AR, MYC and ERG. Finally, we showed that differential methylation during progression preferentially occurs at somatic mutational hotspots and putative regulatory regions. This study is a large integrated study of whole-genome, whole-methylome and whole-transcriptome sequencing in metastatic cancer and provides a comprehensive overview of the important regulatory role of methylation in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang G Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - William S Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Haolong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adam Foye
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Meng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Martin Sjöström
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Denise Playdle
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Joshi J Alumkal
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Rajdeep Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Junjie T Hua
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Travis J Barnard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adina M Bailey
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric D Chow
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Center for Advanced Technology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marc D Perry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ha X Dang
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rendong Yang
- The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, USA
| | - Ruhollah Moussavi-Baygi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Li Zhang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mohammed Alshalalfa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S Laura Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kathleen E Houlahan
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Human Genetics, Institute for Precision Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yu-Jia Shiah
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - George Thomas
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Martin Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amina Zoubeidi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Owen Witte
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics at the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - M Yvonne Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lawrence Fong
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rohit Bose
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Franklin W Huang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lisa Chesner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tanushree Shenoy
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hani Goodarzi
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Irfan A Asangani
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joshua M Lang
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Nupam P Mahajan
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Primo N Lara
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Christopher P Evans
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Housheng H He
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jiaoti Huang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph F Costello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jianhua Luo
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Scott A Tomlins
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Scott M Dehm
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alan Ashworth
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Luke A Gilbert
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Human Genetics, Institute for Precision Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Arul M Chinnaiyan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christopher A Maher
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric J Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David A Quigley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kaczorowski A, Tolstov Y, Falkenstein M, Vasioukhin V, Prigge ES, Geisler C, Kippenberger M, Nientiedt C, Ratz L, Kuryshev V, Herpel E, Kristiansen G, Sültmann H, Stenzinger A, Doeberitz MVK, Hohenfellner M, Duensing A, Duensing S. Rearranged ERG confers robustness to prostate cancer cells by subverting the function of p53. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:736.e1-736.e10. [PMID: 32674955 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE ERG rearrangements are frequent and early events in prostate cancer. The functional role of rearranged ERG, however, is still incompletely understood. ERG rearrangements are maintained during prostate cancer progression suggesting that they may confer a selective advantage. The molecular basis of this notion is the subject of this study. METHODS A variety of immunological methods were used to characterize the effects of rearranged ERG on p53. Consequences of an overexpression of N-terminally deleted ERG on p53 function were interrogated by measuring apoptosis and cellular senescence in the presence or absence of exogenous DNA damage. Effects of N-terminally deleted ERG on the transactivation function of p53 were analyzed by qRT-PCR. RESULTS We show that overexpression of ERG leads to an increased basal level of DNA damage and a stabilization of p53 that involves a sequestration of its E3 ubiquitin ligase, MDM2, into nucleoli. A higher p53 expression was also observed in vivo in an ERG-overexpressing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia mouse model. The correlation between ERG and p53 expression was corroborated in 163 patients with prostate cancer. ERG overexpression was found to inhibit both apoptosis and cellular senescence induced by exogenous DNA damage. Mechanistically, this protective effect of ERG involved an abrogation of the DNA damage-induced expression of p53 target genes. CONCLUSIONS By protecting tumor cells from the antiproliferative consequences of genotoxic stress, ERG may allow the survival and proliferation of genomically unstable tumor cells. Targeting ERG may therefore represent a promising strategy to suppress such adverse features during prostate cancer progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Kaczorowski
- Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 517, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yanis Tolstov
- Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 517, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Falkenstein
- Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 517, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Valeri Vasioukhin
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview, Avenue N C3-168, Seattle, 98109, Washington
| | - Elena-Sophie Prigge
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital, Heidelberg, and Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Geisler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Kippenberger
- Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 517, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cathleen Nientiedt
- Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 517, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leonie Ratz
- Cancer Genome Research, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vladimir Kuryshev
- Cancer Genome Research, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Esther Herpel
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany; Tissue Bank of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Glen Kristiansen
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Holger Sültmann
- Cancer Genome Research, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital, Heidelberg, and Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anette Duensing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Precision Oncology of Urological Malignancies, Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 517, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Therapeutics Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, 5117 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, 15213, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, 15213, Pennsylvania
| | - Stefan Duensing
- Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 517, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Association of germline genetic variants with TMPRSS2-ERG fusion status in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2020; 11:1321-1333. [PMID: 32341752 PMCID: PMC7170497 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Oncogenic activation of ERG resulting from TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion is a key molecular genetic alteration in prostate cancer (CaP). The frequency of ERG fusion is variable by race; however, there are limited data available on germline polymorphisms associating with ERG fusion status. The goal of this study is to identify the inherited risk variants associating with ERG status of CaP. Materials and Methods: SNP genotyping was performed on the Illumina platform using Infinium Oncoarray SNP chip on blood derived genomic DNA samples from 400 patients treated by radical prostatectomy at a single military institution. ERG status was determined in whole mounted prostate specimens by immuno-histochemistry (IHC) for ERG protein expression. Data analysis approaches included association analyses based on EMMAX and imputation by IMPUTE2. Imputed SNPs were validated by ddPCR. Results: SNP genotyping analysis using imputation identified rs34349373 (p 4.68 × 10-8) and rs2055272 (p 5.62 × 10-8) in TBC1D22B to be significantly associated with ERG fusion status in index tumor and non-index tumor foci. Imputed SNP rs2055272 was further experimentally validated by ddPCR with 98.04% (100/102) concordance. Initial discovery analysis based on SNPs on Oncoarray SNP chip, showed significant (p 10-5) association for SNPs (rs6698333, rs1889877, rs3798999, rs10215144, rs3818136, rs9380660 and rs1792695) with ERG fusion status. The study also replicated two previously known ERG fusion associated SNPs (rs11704416 in chromsome 22; rs16901979 in chromosome 8). Conclusions: This study identified SNPs associated with ERG status of CaP. Impact: The findings may contribute towards defining the underlying genetics of ERG positive and ERG negative CaP patients.
Collapse
|
26
|
JAB1/COPS5 is a putative oncogene that controls critical oncoproteins deregulated in prostate cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2019; 518:374-380. [PMID: 31434609 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.08.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Recent evidence support that the c-Jun activation domain-binding protein 1 (JAB1)/COPS5 has an oncogenic function in various tissues. We show that JAB1 amplification in human prostate cancer (PCa) correlates with reduced overall survival and disease-free progression. Immunohistochemical staining shows enhanced expression of JAB1 in the cytoplasmic compartment of PCa cells compared to the normal prostate epithelium, indicating the activity/function of JAB1 is altered in PCa. To test the function of JAB1 in PCa, we efficiently silenced JAB1 expression using four unique shRNAs in three PCa cell lines (LNCaP, C4-2, and PC-3) and an immortalized prostate epithelial cell line, RWPE-1. Our data clearly show that silencing JAB1 robustly suppresses the growth of PCa cells, but not RWPE-1 cells, suggesting that PCa cells become addicted to JAB1. To study the potential mechanism by which JAB1 controls PCa growth, we profiled gene expression changes by whole transcriptome microarray analysis of C4-2 cells silenced for JAB1 using a pool of 3 shRNAs compared to scrambled shRNA control. We identified 1268 gene changes ≥1.5 fold by silencing JAB1 in C4-2. Western blot confirmation and bioinformatics pathway analyses support that PCa cells become addicted to JAB1 through controlling the following signaling pathways: cell cycle, p53 signaling, DNA replication, TGF-β/BMP, MAPK, TNF, and steroid hormone biosynthesis. We propose that UGT2B28, UGT2B10, UGT2B11, Skp2, EZH2, MDM2, BIRC5 (Survivin), UBE2C, and Smads 1/5/8, which are all associated with the abovementioned key oncogenic pathways, may play critical roles in the putative oncogenic function of JAB1 in PCa.
Collapse
|
27
|
Bhatia V, Ateeq B. Molecular Underpinnings Governing Genetic Complexity of ETS-Fusion-Negative Prostate Cancer. Trends Mol Med 2019; 25:1024-1038. [PMID: 31353123 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2019.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Inter- and intra-patient molecular heterogeneity of primary and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) confers variable clinical outcome and poses a formidable challenge in disease management. High-throughput integrative genomics and functional approaches have untangled the complexity involved in this disease and revealed a spectrum of diverse aberrations prevalent in various molecular subtypes, including ETS fusion negative. Emerging evidence indicates that SPINK1 upregulation, mutations in epigenetic regulators or chromatin modifiers, and SPOP are associated with the ETS-fusion negative subtype. Additionally, patients with defects in a DNA-repair pathway respond to poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) inhibition therapies. Furthermore, a new class of immunogenic subtype defined by CDK12 biallelic loss has also been identified in ETS-fusion-negative cases. This review focuses on the emerging molecular underpinnings driving key oncogenic aberrations and advancements in therapeutic strategies of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vipul Bhatia
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, 208016, U.P., India
| | - Bushra Ateeq
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, 208016, U.P., India.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lee JY, Lin SY, Lin CY, Chuang YH, Huang SH, Tseng YY, Wang HJ, Yang JM. Identification of the PCA29 gene signature as a predictor in prostate cancer. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2019; 17:1940006. [PMID: 31288639 DOI: 10.1142/s0219720019400067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer death among men worldwide. About 70% of PCa patients were diagnosed at later stage, and metastasis has been observed. Additionally, the cure rate of PCa closely relies on the early diagnosis with biomarkers. The identification of biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis is an urgent clinical issue for PCa. Here, we developed a novel scoring strategy, including cluster score (CS) and predicting score (PS), to identify 29 PCa genes (called PCa29) for early diagnostic biomarkers from two datasets in Gene Expression Omnibus. The result indicates that PCa29 can discriminate between normal and tumor tissues and are specific for prostate cancer. To validate PCa29, we found that 97% of PCa29 were consistently significant with these gene expressions in The Cancer Genome Atlas; furthermore, ∼ 70% of PCa29 are consensus to the protein expression in The Human Protein Atlas. Finally, we examined 10 genes in PCa29 on three PCa cell lines by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The experimental results show that the trend of the differential PCa29 expression is consistent with the analyzed results from our novel scoring method. We believe that our method is useful and PCa29 are potential biomarkers that provide the clues to develop targeting therapy for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung-Yu Lee
- * Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
| | - Si-Yu Lin
- * Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Yu Lin
- † Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
| | - Yi-Huan Chuang
- * Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
| | - Sing-Han Huang
- * Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Yao Tseng
- * Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Jung Wang
- ‡ Institute of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 350, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bhatia V, Yadav A, Tiwari R, Nigam S, Goel S, Carskadon S, Gupta N, Goel A, Palanisamy N, Ateeq B. Epigenetic Silencing of miRNA-338-5p and miRNA-421 Drives SPINK1-Positive Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 25:2755-2768. [PMID: 30587549 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Serine peptidase inhibitor, Kazal type-1 (SPINK1) overexpression defines the second most recurrent and aggressive prostate cancer subtype. However, the underlying molecular mechanism and pathobiology of SPINK1 in prostate cancer remains largely unknown. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN miRNA prediction tools were employed to examine the SPINK1-3'UTR for miRNA binding. Luciferase reporter assays were performed to confirm the SPINK1-3'UTR binding of shortlisted miR-338-5p/miR-421. Furthermore, miR-338-5p/-421-overexpressing cancer cells (SPINK1-positive) were evaluated for oncogenic properties using cell-based functional assays and a mouse xenograft model. Global gene expression profiling was performed to unravel the biological pathways altered by miR-338-5p/-421. IHC and RNA in situ hybridization were carried out on prostate cancer patients' tissue microarray for SPINK1 and EZH2 expression, respectively. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay was performed to examine EZH2 occupancy on the miR-338-5p/-421-regulatory regions. Bisulfite sequencing and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation were performed on prostate cancer cell lines and patients' specimens. RESULTS We established a critical role of miRNA-338-5p/-421 in posttranscriptional regulation of SPINK1. Ectopic expression of miRNA-338-5p/-421 in SPINK1-positive cells abrogates oncogenic properties including cell-cycle progression, stemness, and drug resistance, and shows reduced tumor burden and distant metastases in a mouse model. Importantly, we show that patients with SPINK1-positive prostate cancer exhibit increased EZH2 expression, suggesting its role in epigenetic silencing of miRNA-338-5p/-421. Furthermore, presence of CpG dinucleotide DNA methylation marks on the regulatory regions of miR-338-5p/-421 in SPINK1-positive prostate cancer cells and patients' specimens confirms epigenetic silencing. CONCLUSIONS Our findings revealed that miRNA-338-5p/-421 are epigenetically silenced in SPINK1-positive prostate cancer, although restoring the expression of these miRNAs using epigenetic drugs or synthetic mimics could abrogate SPINK1-mediated oncogenesis.See related commentary by Bjartell, p. 2679.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vipul Bhatia
- Molecular Oncology Lab, Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Anjali Yadav
- Molecular Oncology Lab, Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ritika Tiwari
- Molecular Oncology Lab, Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Shivansh Nigam
- Molecular Oncology Lab, Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Sakshi Goel
- Molecular Oncology Lab, Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Shannon Carskadon
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Department of Urology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Nilesh Gupta
- Department of Pathology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Apul Goel
- Department of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Nallasivam Palanisamy
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Department of Urology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Bushra Ateeq
- Molecular Oncology Lab, Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gerhauser C, Favero F, Risch T, Simon R, Feuerbach L, Assenov Y, Heckmann D, Sidiropoulos N, Waszak SM, Hübschmann D, Urbanucci A, Girma EG, Kuryshev V, Klimczak LJ, Saini N, Stütz AM, Weichenhan D, Böttcher LM, Toth R, Hendriksen JD, Koop C, Lutsik P, Matzk S, Warnatz HJ, Amstislavskiy V, Feuerstein C, Raeder B, Bogatyrova O, Schmitz EM, Hube-Magg C, Kluth M, Huland H, Graefen M, Lawerenz C, Henry GH, Yamaguchi TN, Malewska A, Meiners J, Schilling D, Reisinger E, Eils R, Schlesner M, Strand DW, Bristow RG, Boutros PC, von Kalle C, Gordenin D, Sültmann H, Brors B, Sauter G, Plass C, Yaspo ML, Korbel JO, Schlomm T, Weischenfeldt J. Molecular Evolution of Early-Onset Prostate Cancer Identifies Molecular Risk Markers and Clinical Trajectories. Cancer Cell 2018; 34:996-1011.e8. [PMID: 30537516 PMCID: PMC7444093 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2018] [Revised: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Identifying the earliest somatic changes in prostate cancer can give important insights into tumor evolution and aids in stratifying high- from low-risk disease. We integrated whole genome, transcriptome and methylome analysis of early-onset prostate cancers (diagnosis ≤55 years). Characterization across 292 prostate cancer genomes revealed age-related genomic alterations and a clock-like enzymatic-driven mutational process contributing to the earliest mutations in prostate cancer patients. Our integrative analysis identified four molecular subgroups, including a particularly aggressive subgroup with recurrent duplications associated with increased expression of ESRP1, which we validate in 12,000 tissue microarray tumors. Finally, we combined the patterns of molecular co-occurrence and risk-based subgroup information to deconvolve the molecular and clinical trajectories of prostate cancer from single patient samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Gerhauser
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Francesco Favero
- Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Risch
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Ihnestrasse 63-73, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Feuerbach
- Division Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yassen Assenov
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Doreen Heckmann
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nikos Sidiropoulos
- Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sebastian M Waszak
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Hübschmann
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology and Bioquant, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany; Department of Pediatric Immunology, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Alfonso Urbanucci
- Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway, Nordic European Molecular Biology Laboratory Partnership, Forskningsparken, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, 0316 Oslo, Norway; Department of Core Facilities, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Etsehiwot G Girma
- Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vladimir Kuryshev
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leszek J Klimczak
- Integrative Bioinformatics Support Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, 27709 NC, USA
| | - Natalie Saini
- Genome Integrity and Structural Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, 27709 NC, USA
| | - Adrian M Stütz
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Weichenhan
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lisa-Marie Böttcher
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Reka Toth
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Josephine D Hendriksen
- Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina Koop
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pavlo Lutsik
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sören Matzk
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Ihnestrasse 63-73, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans-Jörg Warnatz
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Ihnestrasse 63-73, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Vyacheslav Amstislavskiy
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Ihnestrasse 63-73, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Clarissa Feuerstein
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Raeder
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olga Bogatyrova
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Hube-Magg
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kluth
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chris Lawerenz
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gervaise H Henry
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA
| | - Takafumi N Yamaguchi
- Informatics & Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alicia Malewska
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA
| | - Jan Meiners
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; NCT Trial Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Reisinger
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roland Eils
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology and Bioquant, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Matthias Schlesner
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Bioinformatics and Omics Data Analytics (B240), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Douglas W Strand
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christof von Kalle
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dmitry Gordenin
- Genome Integrity and Structural Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, 27709 NC, USA
| | - Holger Sültmann
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Brors
- Division Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Plass
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marie-Laure Yaspo
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Ihnestrasse 63-73, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan O Korbel
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Joachim Weischenfeldt
- Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Angeles AK, Bauer S, Ratz L, Klauck SM, Sültmann H. Genome-Based Classification and Therapy of Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2018; 8:E62. [PMID: 30200539 PMCID: PMC6164491 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics8030062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past decade, multi-national and multi-center efforts were launched to sequence prostate cancer genomes, transcriptomes, and epigenomes with the aim of discovering the molecular underpinnings of tumorigenesis, cancer progression, and therapy resistance. Multiple biological markers and pathways have been discovered to be tumor drivers, and a molecular classification of prostate cancer is emerging. Here, we highlight crucial findings of these genome-sequencing projects in localized and advanced disease. We recapitulate the utility and limitations of current clinical practices to diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy, and we provide examples of insights generated by the molecular profiling of tumors. Novel treatment concepts based on these molecular alterations are currently being addressed in clinical trials and will lead to an enhanced implementation of precision medicine strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlou Kristina Angeles
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.
| | - Simone Bauer
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.
| | - Leonie Ratz
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.
| | - Sabine M Klauck
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.
| | - Holger Sültmann
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ding Q, Wang Y, Zuo Z, Gong Y, Krishnamurthy S, Li CW, Lai YJ, Wei W, Wang J, Manyam GC, Diao L, Zhang X, Lin F, Symmans WF, Sun L, Liu CG, Liu X, Debeb BG, Ueno NT, Harano K, Alvarez RH, Wu Y, Cristofanilli M, Huo L. Decreased expression of microRNA-26b in locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. Hum Pathol 2018; 77:121-129. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review will examine the taxonomy of PCa subclasses across disease states, explore the relationship among specific alterations, and highlight current clinical relevance. RECENT FINDINGS Prostate cancer (PCa) is driven by multiple genomic alterations, with distinct patterns and clinical implications. Alterations occurring early in the timeline of the disease define core subtypes of localized, treatment-naive PCa. With time, an increase in number and severity of genomic alterations adds molecular complexity and is associated with progression to metastasis. These later events are not random and are influenced by the underlying subclasses. All the subclasses of localized disease initially respond to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), but with progression to castrate-resistant PCa (CRPC), mechanisms of resistance against ADT shift the molecular landscape. In CRPC, resistance mechanisms largely define the biology and sub-classification of these cancers, while clinical relevance and opportunities for precision therapy are still being defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveri Arora
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, Belfer Research Building, BRB 1452, 413 East 69th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher E Barbieri
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, Belfer Research Building, BRB 1452, 413 East 69th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. .,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. .,Englander Institute for Precision Medicine of Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nevedomskaya E, Baumgart SJ, Haendler B. Recent Advances in Prostate Cancer Treatment and Drug Discovery. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19051359. [PMID: 29734647 PMCID: PMC5983695 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19051359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Novel drugs, drug sequences and combinations have improved the outcome of prostate cancer in recent years. The latest approvals include abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide and apalutamide which target androgen receptor (AR) signaling, radium-223 dichloride for reduction of bone metastases, sipuleucel-T immunotherapy and taxane-based chemotherapy. Adding abiraterone acetate to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in order to achieve complete androgen blockade has proven highly beneficial for treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer and metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Also, ADT together with docetaxel treatment showed significant benefit in mHSPC. Ongoing clinical trials for different subgroups of prostate cancer patients include the evaluation of the second-generation AR antagonists enzalutamide, apalutamide and darolutamide, of inhibitors of the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, of inhibitors of DNA damage response, of targeted alpha therapy and of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting approaches. Advanced clinical studies with immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited benefits in prostate cancer and more trials are needed to demonstrate efficacy. The identification of improved, personalized treatments will be much supported by the major progress recently made in the molecular characterization of early- and late-stage prostate cancer using “omics” technologies. This has already led to novel classifications of prostate tumors based on gene expression profiles and mutation status, and should greatly help in the choice of novel targeted therapies best tailored to the needs of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Nevedomskaya
- Therapeutic Research Groups, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals, Bayer AG, Müllerstr. 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Simon J Baumgart
- Therapeutic Research Groups, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals, Bayer AG, Müllerstr. 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Bernard Haendler
- Therapeutic Research Groups, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals, Bayer AG, Müllerstr. 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Antagonizing CD105 enhances radiation sensitivity in prostate cancer. Oncogene 2018; 37:4385-4397. [PMID: 29717261 PMCID: PMC6085281 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-018-0278-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Revised: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is the primary intervention for nearly half of the patients with localized advanced prostate cancer and standard of care for recurrent disease following surgery. The development of radiation-resistant disease is an obstacle for nearly 30–50% of patients undergoing radiotherapy. A better understanding of mechanisms that lead to radiation resistance could aid in the development of sensitizing agents to improve outcome. Here we identified a radiation-resistance pathway mediated by CD105, downstream of BMP and TGF-β signaling. Antagonizing CD105-dependent BMP signaling with a partially humanized monoclonal antibody, TRC105, resulted in a significant reduction in clonogenicity when combined with irradiation. In trying to better understand the mechanism for the radio-sensitization, we found that radiation-induced CD105/BMP signaling was sufficient and necessary for the upregulation of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) in contributing to p53 stabilization and PGC-1α activation. Combining TRC105 with irradiation delayed DNA damage repair compared to irradiation alone. However, in the absence of p53 function, combining TRC105 and radiation resulted in no reduction in clonogenicity compared to radiation alone, despite similar reduction of DNA damage repair observed in p53-intact cells. This suggested DNA damage repair was not the sole determinant of CD105 radio-resistance. As cancer cells undergo an energy deficit following irradiation, due to the demands of DNA and organelle repair, we examined SIRT1’s role on p53 and PGC-1α with respect to glycolysis and mitochondrial biogenesis, respectively. Consequently, blocking the CD105-SIRT1 axis was found to deplete the ATP stores of irradiated cells and cause G2 cell cycle arrest. Xenograft models supported these findings that combining TRC105 with irradiation significantly reduces tumor size over irradiation alone (p value = 10−9). We identified a novel synthetic lethality strategy of combining radiation and CD105 targeting to address the DNA repair and metabolic addiction induced by irradiation in p53-functional prostate cancers.
Collapse
|
36
|
Wieringen WN, Peeters CFW, Menezes RX, Wiel MA. Testing for pathway (in)activation by using Gaussian graphical models. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
37
|
Böttcher R, Dulla K, van Strijp D, Dits N, Verhoef EI, Baillie GS, van Leenders GJLH, Houslay MD, Jenster G, Hoffmann R. Human PDE4D isoform composition is deregulated in primary prostate cancer and indicative for disease progression and development of distant metastases. Oncotarget 2018; 7:70669-70684. [PMID: 27683107 PMCID: PMC5342582 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Phosphodiesterase 4D7 was recently shown to be specifically over-expressed in localized prostate cancer, raising the question as to which regulatory mechanisms are involved and whether other isoforms of this gene family (PDE4D) are affected under the same conditions.We investigated PDE4D isoform composition in prostatic tissues using a total of seven independent expression datasets and also included data on DNA methylation, copy number and AR and ERG binding in PDE4D promoters to gain insight into their effect on PDE4D transcription.We show that expression of PDE4D isoforms is consistently altered in primary human prostate cancer compared to benign tissue, with PDE4D7 being up-regulated while PDE4D5 and PDE4D9 are down-regulated. Disease progression is marked by an overall down-regulation of long PDE4D isoforms, while short isoforms (PDE4D1/2) appear to be relatively unaffected. While these alterations seem to be independent of copy number alterations in the PDE4D locus and driven by AR and ERG binding, we also observed increased DNA methylation in the promoter region of PDE4D5, indicating a long lasting alteration of the isoform composition in prostate cancer tissues.We propose two independent metrics that may serve as diagnostic and prognostic markers for prostate disease: (PDE4D7 - PDE4D5) provides an effective means for distinguishing PCa from normal adjacent prostate, whereas PDE4D1/2 - (PDE4D5 + PDE4D7 + PDE4D9) offers strong prognostic potential to detect aggressive forms of PCa and is associated with metastasis free survival. Overall, our findings highlight the relevance of PDE4D as prostate cancer biomarker and potential drug target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Böttcher
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Bioinformatics, Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau, Wildau, Germany
| | - Kalyan Dulla
- Department of Oncology Solutions and Precision Diagnostics, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Dianne van Strijp
- Department of Oncology Solutions and Precision Diagnostics, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Natasja Dits
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther I Verhoef
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - George S Baillie
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | | | - Miles D Houslay
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Guido Jenster
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ralf Hoffmann
- Department of Oncology Solutions and Precision Diagnostics, Philips Research Europe, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zoni E, Karkampouna S, Thalmann GN, Kruithof-de Julio M, Spahn M. Emerging aspects of microRNA interaction with TMPRSS2-ERG and endocrine therapy. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2018; 462:9-16. [PMID: 28189568 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2016] [Revised: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy detected in males and the second most common cause of cancer death in western countries. The development of the prostate gland, is finely regulated by androgens which modulate also its growth and function. Importantly, androgens exert a major role in PCa formation and progression and one of the hypothesized mechanism proposed has been linked to the chromosomal rearrangement of the androgen regulated gene TMPRSS2 with ERG. Androgens have been therefore used as main target for therapies in the past. However, despite the development of endocrine therapies (e.g. androgen ablation), when PCa progress, tumors become resistant to this therapeutic castration and patients develop incurable metastases. A strategy to better understand how patients respond to therapy, in order to achieve a better patient stratification, consists in monitoring the levels of small noncoding RNAs (microRNAs). microRNAs are a class of small molecules that regulate protein abundance and their application as biomarkers to monitor disease progression has been intensely studied in the last years. In this review, we highlight the interactions between microRNAs and endocrine-related aspects of PCa in tissues. We focus on the modulation of TMPRSS2-ERG and Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR) by microRNAs and detail the influence of steroidal hormonal therapies on microRNAs expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenio Zoni
- Urology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sofia Karkampouna
- Urology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - George N Thalmann
- Urology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marianna Kruithof-de Julio
- Urology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Urology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Spahn
- Urology Research Laboratory, Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Assenov Y, Brocks D, Gerhäuser C. Intratumor heterogeneity in epigenetic patterns. Semin Cancer Biol 2018; 51:12-21. [PMID: 29366906 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 11/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Analogous to life on earth, tumor cells evolve through space and time and adapt to different micro-environmental conditions. As a result, tumors are composed of millions of genetically diversified cells at the time of diagnosis. Profiling these variants contributes to understanding tumors' clonal origins and might help to better understand response to therapy. However, even genetically homogenous cell populations show remarkable diversity in their response to different environmental stimuli, suggesting that genetic heterogeneity does not explain the full spectrum of tumor plasticity. Understanding epigenetic diversity across cancer cells provides important additional information about the functional state of subclones and therefore allows better understanding of tumor evolution and resistance to current therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yassen Assenov
- Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Brocks
- Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clarissa Gerhäuser
- Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bijnsdorp IV, Hodzic J, Lagerweij T, Westerman B, Krijgsman O, Broeke J, Verweij F, Nilsson RJA, Rozendaal L, van Beusechem VW, van Moorselaar JA, Wurdinger T, Geldof AA. miR-129-3p controls centrosome number in metastatic prostate cancer cells by repressing CP110. Oncotarget 2017; 7:16676-87. [PMID: 26918338 PMCID: PMC4941343 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The centrosome plays a key role in cancer invasion and metastasis. However, it is unclear how abnormal centrosome numbers are regulated when prostate cancer (PCa) cells become metastatic. CP110 was previously described for its contribution of centrosome amplification (CA) and early development of aggressive cell behaviour. However its regulation in metastatic cells remains unclear. Here we identified miR-129-3p as a novel metastatic microRNA. CP110 was identified as its target protein. In PCa cells that have metastatic capacity, CP110 expression was repressed by miR-129-3p. High miR-129-3p expression levels increased cell invasion, while increasing CP110 levels decreased cell invasion. Overexpression of CP110 in metastatic PCa cells resulted in a decrease in the number of metastasis. In tissues of PCa patients, low CP110 and high miR-129-3p expression levels correlated with metastasis, but not with the expression of genes related to EMT. Furthermore, overexpression of CP110 in metastatic PCa cells resulted in excessive-CA (E-CA), and a change in F-actin distribution which is in agreement with their reduced metastatic capacity. Our data demonstrate that miR-129-3p functions as a CA gatekeeper in metastatic PCa cells by maintaining pro-metastatic centrosome amplification (CA) and preventing anti-metastatic E-CA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene V Bijnsdorp
- Department of Urology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasmina Hodzic
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tonny Lagerweij
- Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Westerman
- Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Krijgsman
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Molecular Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurjen Broeke
- Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Verweij
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Jonas A Nilsson
- Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Lawrence Rozendaal
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Victor W van Beusechem
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Thomas Wurdinger
- Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Albert A Geldof
- Department of Urology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Astrologo L, Zoni E, Karkampouna S, Gray PC, Klima I, Grosjean J, Goumans MJ, Hawinkels LJAC, van der Pluijm G, Spahn M, Thalmann GN, Ten Dijke P, Kruithof-de Julio M. ALK1Fc Suppresses the Human Prostate Cancer Growth in in Vitro and in Vivo Preclinical Models. Front Cell Dev Biol 2017; 5:104. [PMID: 29259971 PMCID: PMC5723291 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2017.00104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men and lethality is normally associated with the consequences of metastasis rather than the primary tumor. Therefore, targeting the molecular pathways that underlie dissemination of primary tumor cells and the formation of metastases has a great clinical value. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) play a critical role in tumor progression and this study focuses on the role of BMP9- Activin receptor-Like Kinase 1 and 2 (ALK1 and ALK2) axis in prostate cancer. In order to study the effect of BMP9 in vitro and in vivo on cancer cells and tumor growth, we used a soluble chimeric protein consisting of the ALK1 extracellular domain (ECD) fused to human Fc (ALK1Fc) that prevents binding of BMP9 to its cell surface receptors and thereby blocks its ability to activate downstream signaling. ALK1Fc sequesters BMP9 and the closely related BMP10 while preserving the activation of ALK1 and ALK2 through other ligands. We show that ALK1Fc acts in vitro to decrease BMP9-mediated signaling and proliferation of prostate cancer cells with tumor initiating and metastatic potential. In line with these observations, we demonstrate that ALK1Fc also reduces tumor cell proliferation and tumor growth in vivo in an orthotopic transplantation model, as well as in the human patient derived xenograft BM18. Furthermore, we also provide evidence for crosstalk between BMP9 and NOTCH and find that ALK1Fc inhibits NOTCH signaling in human prostate cancer cells and blocks the induction of the NOTCH target Aldehyde dehydrogenase member ALDH1A1, which is a clinically relevant marker associated with poor survival and advanced-stage prostate cancer. Our study provides the first demonstration that ALK1Fc inhibits prostate cancer progression, identifying BMP9 as a putative therapeutic target and ALK1Fc as a potential therapy. Altogether, these findings support the validity of ongoing clinical development of drugs blocking ALK1 and ALK2 receptor activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letizia Astrologo
- Department of Urology and Department for BioMedical Research, Urology Research Laboratory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eugenio Zoni
- Department of Urology and Department for BioMedical Research, Urology Research Laboratory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sofia Karkampouna
- Department of Urology and Department for BioMedical Research, Urology Research Laboratory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Cancer Genomics Center, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Peter C Gray
- Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Irena Klima
- Department of Urology and Department for BioMedical Research, Urology Research Laboratory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Joël Grosjean
- Department of Urology and Department for BioMedical Research, Urology Research Laboratory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marie J Goumans
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Cancer Genomics Center, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Lukas J A C Hawinkels
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Cancer Genomics Center, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Martin Spahn
- Department of Urology and Department for BioMedical Research, Urology Research Laboratory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology and Department for BioMedical Research, Urology Research Laboratory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Ten Dijke
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Cancer Genomics Center, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marianna Kruithof-de Julio
- Department of Urology and Department for BioMedical Research, Urology Research Laboratory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Cancer Genomics Center, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kumar B, Lupold SE. MicroRNA expression and function in prostate cancer: a review of current knowledge and opportunities for discovery. Asian J Androl 2017; 18:559-67. [PMID: 27056344 PMCID: PMC4955179 DOI: 10.4103/1008-682x.177839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are well-conserved noncoding RNAs that broadly regulate gene expression through posttranscriptional silencing of coding genes. Dysregulated miRNA expression in prostate and other cancers implicates their role in cancer biology. Moreover, functional studies provide support for the contribution of miRNAs to several key pathways in cancer initiation and progression. Comparative analyses of miRNA gene expression between malignant and nonmalignant prostate tissues, healthy controls and prostate cancer (PCa) patients, as well as less aggressive versus more aggressive disease indicate that miRNAs may be future diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers in tumor tissue, blood, or urine. Further, miRNAs may be future therapeutics or therapeutic targets. In this review, we examine the miRNAs most commonly observed to be de-regulated in PCa gene expression analyses and review the potential contribution of these miRNAs to important pathways in PCa initiation and progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binod Kumar
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shawn E Lupold
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
The Genomic Impact of DNA CpG Methylation on Gene Expression; Relationships in Prostate Cancer. Biomolecules 2017; 7:biom7010015. [PMID: 28216563 PMCID: PMC5372727 DOI: 10.3390/biom7010015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The process of DNA CpG methylation has been extensively investigated for over 50 years and revealed associations between changing methylation status of CpG islands and gene expression. As a result, DNA CpG methylation is implicated in the control of gene expression in developmental and homeostasis processes, as well as being a cancer-driver mechanism. The development of genome-wide technologies and sophisticated statistical analytical approaches has ushered in an era of widespread analyses, for example in the cancer arena, of the relationships between altered DNA CpG methylation, gene expression, and tumor status. The remarkable increase in the volume of such genomic data, for example, through investigators from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), has allowed dissection of the relationships between DNA CpG methylation density and distribution, gene expression, and tumor outcome. In this manner, it is now possible to test that the genome-wide correlations are measurable between changes in DNA CpG methylation and gene expression. Perhaps surprisingly is that these associations can only be detected for hundreds, but not thousands, of genes, and the direction of the correlations are both positive and negative. This, perhaps, suggests that CpG methylation events in cancer systems can act as disease drivers but the effects are possibly more restricted than suspected. Additionally, the positive and negative correlations suggest direct and indirect events and an incomplete understanding. Within the prostate cancer TCGA cohort, we examined the relationships between expression of genes that control DNA methylation, known targets of DNA methylation and tumor status. This revealed that genes that control the synthesis of S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) associate with altered expression of DNA methylation targets in a subset of aggressive tumors.
Collapse
|
44
|
Yang C, Zheng S, Liu T, Liu Q, Dai F, Zhou J, Chen Y, Sheyhidin I, Lu X. Down-regulated miR-26a promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion via negative regulation of MTDH in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. FASEB J 2017; 31:2114-2122. [PMID: 28174206 DOI: 10.1096/fj.201601237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2016] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Numerous studies have reported that the role played by miR-26a in cancer is controversial, but whether miR-26a regulates metadherin (MTDH) expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is unclear. We performed this study to investigate the clinical relevance of miR-26a expression in ESCC. miR-26a was detected by using the in situ hybridization method. To functionally analyze the role of miR-26a in ESCC cell lines in vitro, KYSE-450 and Eca109 cells were employed, whose endogenous miR-26a was artificially down- or up-regulated, respectively, by using lentiviral-based transfection. There was significant association between miR-26a expression and clinical stage (P = 0.049), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.023), tumor volume (P = 0.003), and poor overall prognosis (P = 0.026). miR-26a was able to suppress proliferation and migration of ESCC cells in vitro Moreover, we have confirmed that miR-26a can negatively regulate MTDH in ESCC cells by using luciferase reporter assay. In addition, to investigate the role miR-26a plays in cell proliferation, we nude mice were xenografted with ESCC cells whose miR-26a was stably down- and up-regulated. Together, our results show that miR-26a is capable of suppressing the proliferation and migration of ESCC cells via negative regulation of MTDH. Moreover, miR-26a expression was clinically relevant in cancer progression and poor prognosis, which supports the idea that miR-26a acts as a tumor suppressor in ESCC.-Yang, C., Zheng, S., Liu, T., Liu, Q., Dai, F., Zhou, J., Chen, Y., Sheyhidin, I., Lu, X. Down-regulated miR-26a promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion via negative regulation of MTDH in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenchen Yang
- Clinical Medical Research Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.,State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Xinjiang Major Diseases Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Shutao Zheng
- Clinical Medical Research Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.,State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Xinjiang Major Diseases Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Tao Liu
- Clinical Medical Research Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.,State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Xinjiang Major Diseases Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Qing Liu
- Clinical Medical Research Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.,State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Xinjiang Major Diseases Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Fang Dai
- Clinical Medical Research Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.,State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Xinjiang Major Diseases Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Clinical Medical Research Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.,State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Xinjiang Major Diseases Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Yumei Chen
- Clinical Medical Research Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.,State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Xinjiang Major Diseases Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Ilyar Sheyhidin
- State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Xinjiang Major Diseases Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Xiaomei Lu
- Clinical Medical Research Institute, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China; .,State Key Laboratory Incubation Base of Xinjiang Major Diseases Research, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wang J, Sun G. FOXO1-MALAT1-miR-26a-5p Feedback Loop Mediates Proliferation and Migration in Osteosarcoma Cells. Oncol Res 2017; 25:1517-1527. [PMID: 28160461 PMCID: PMC7841132 DOI: 10.3727/096504017x14859934460780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
miR-26a has been found to be downregulated in osteosarcoma (OS) when compared with normal control tissues and has been shown to suppress the malignant behaviors of OS cells. The underlying mechanism, nevertheless, remains unknown. In our study, the long noncoding RNA MALAT1, confirmed to be significantly upregulated in OS, is first shown to be capable of promoting proliferation and migration by directly suppressing miR-26a-5p in OS cells. In addition, we have identified forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) as a transcriptional factor of MALAT1 that can negatively regulate MALAT1. We have shown that MALAT1 promoted growth and migration through inhibiting miR-26a-5p in OS cells. Suppression of FOXO1, identified as a regulatory transcriptional factor of MALAT1, was shown to be able to slow down both proliferation and metastases in OS cells, suggesting that targeting FOXO1 can be useful in the therapy of patients with OS.
Collapse
|
46
|
Massie CE, Mills IG, Lynch AG. The importance of DNA methylation in prostate cancer development. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2017; 166:1-15. [PMID: 27117390 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2016] [Revised: 04/09/2016] [Accepted: 04/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
After briefly reviewing the nature of DNA methylation, its general role in cancer and the tools available to interrogate it, we consider the literature surrounding DNA methylation as relating to prostate cancer. Specific consideration is given to recurrent alterations. A list of frequently reported genes is synthesized from 17 studies that have reported on methylation changes in malignant prostate tissue, and we chart the timing of those changes in the diseases history through amalgamation of several previously published data sets. We also review associations with genetic alterations and hormone signalling, before the practicalities of investigating prostate cancer methylation using cell lines are assessed. We conclude by outlining the interplay between DNA methylation and prostate cancer metabolism and their regulation by androgen receptor, with a specific discussion of the mitochondria and their associations with DNA methylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles E Massie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian G Mills
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Centre for Molecular Medicine (Norway), University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospitals, Gaustadalleen, Oslo, Norway; Department of Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway; PCUK/Movember Centre of Excellence for Prostate Cancer Research, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Andy G Lynch
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Todorova K, Metodiev MV, Metodieva G, Mincheff M, Fernández N, Hayrabedyan S. Micro-RNA-204 Participates in TMPRSS2/ERG Regulation and Androgen Receptor Reprogramming in Prostate Cancer. Discov Oncol 2017; 8:28-48. [PMID: 28050800 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-016-0279-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer progression is driven by genome instability incurred rearrangements such as transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2)/v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene (ERG) that could possibly turn some of the tumor suppressor micro-RNAs into pro-oncogenic ones. Previously, we found dualistic miR-204 effects, acting either as a tumor suppressor or as an oncomiR in ERG fusion-dependent manner. Here, we provided further evidence for an important role of miR-204 for TMPRSS2/ERG and androgen receptor (AR) signaling modulation and fine tuning that prevents TMPRSS2/ERG overexpression in prostate cancer. Based on proximity-based ligation assay, we designed a novel method for detection of TMPRSS2/ERG protein products. We found that miR-204 is TMPRSS2/ERG oncofusion negative regulator, and this was mediated by DNA methylation of TMPRSS2 promoter. Transcriptional factors runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and ETS proto-oncogene 1 (ETS1) were positive regulators of TMPRSS2/ERG expression and promoter hypo-methylation. Clustering of patients' sera for fusion protein, transcript expression, and wild-type ERG transcript isoforms, demonstrated not all patients harboring fusion transcripts had fusion protein products, and only few fusion positive ones exhibited increased wild-type ERG transcripts. miR-204 upregulated AR through direct promoter hypo-methylation, potentiated by the presence of ERG fusion and RUNX2 and ETS1. Proteomics studies provided evidence that miR-204 has dualistic role in AR cancer-related reprogramming, promoting prostate cancer-related androgen-responsive genes and AR target genes, as well as AR co-regulatory molecules. miR-204 methylation regulation was supported by changes in molecules responsible for chromatin remodeling, DNA methylation, and its regulation. In summary, miR-204 is a mild regulator of the AR function during the phase of preserved AR sensitivity as the latter one is required for ERG-fusion translocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krassimira Todorova
- Institute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction "Acad. Kiril Bratanov", Laboratory of Reproductive OMICs Technologies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 73 Tsarigradsko shosse blvd, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | | | - Milcho Mincheff
- Cellular and Gene Therapy Ward, National Specialized Hematology Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Nelson Fernández
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Soren Hayrabedyan
- Institute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction "Acad. Kiril Bratanov", Laboratory of Reproductive OMICs Technologies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 73 Tsarigradsko shosse blvd, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yates C, Long MD, Campbell MJ, Sucheston-Campbell L. miRNAs as drivers of TMPRSS2-ERG negative prostate tumors in African American men. FRONT BIOSCI-LANDMRK 2017; 22:212-229. [PMID: 27814612 PMCID: PMC5858730 DOI: 10.2741/4482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
African Americans (AAs) who have PCa typically have more aggressive disease and make up a disproportionate number of the disease deaths, relative to European Americans (EAs). TMPRSS2 translocations, a common event in EA patients, are exploited in diagnostic and prognostic settings, whereas they are diminished in frequency in AA men. Thus, these patients with TMPRSS2 fusion-negative disease represent an under-investigated patient group. We propose that epigenetic events are a significant and alternative driver of aggressive disease in fusion-negative PCa. To reveal epigenetically governed microRNAs (miRNAs) that are enriched in fusion-negative disease and associated with aggressive in AA PCa, we leveraged both our experimental evidence and publically available data. These analyses identified 18 miRNAs that are differentially altered in fusion-negative disease, associated with DNA CpG methylation, and implicated in aggressive and AA PCas. Understanding the relationships between miRNA expression, upstream epigenetic regulation by DNA methylation, and downstream regulation of mRNA targets in fusion negative disease is imperative to understanding the biological basis of the racial health disparity in PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clayton Yates
- Department of Biology and Center for Cancer Research, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088
| | - Mark D Long
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263
| | - Moray J Campbell
- Department of Biology and Center for Cancer Research, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088,
| | - Lara Sucheston-Campbell
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Epigenetic Changes in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. ADVANCES IN PROTEIN CHEMISTRY AND STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY 2017; 106:139-189. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2016.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
50
|
Luedeke M, Rinckleb AE, FitzGerald LM, Geybels MS, Schleutker J, Eeles RA, Teixeira MR, Cannon-Albright L, Ostrander EA, Weikert S, Herkommer K, Wahlfors T, Visakorpi T, Leinonen KA, Tammela TL, Cooper CS, Kote-Jarai Z, Edwards S, Goh CL, McCarthy F, Parker C, Flohr P, Paulo P, Jerónimo C, Henrique R, Krause H, Wach S, Lieb V, Rau TT, Vogel W, Kuefer R, Hofer MD, Perner S, Rubin MA, Agarwal AM, Easton DF, Al Olama AA, Benlloch S, Hoegel J, Stanford JL, Maier C. Prostate cancer risk regions at 8q24 and 17q24 are differentially associated with somatic TMPRSS2:ERG fusion status. Hum Mol Genet 2016; 25:5490-5499. [PMID: 27798103 PMCID: PMC5418832 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddw349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 09/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular and epidemiological differences have been described between TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-positive and fusion-negative prostate cancer (PrCa). Assuming two molecularly distinct subtypes, we have examined 27 common PrCa risk variants, previously identified in genome-wide association studies, for subtype specific associations in a total of 1221 TMPRSS2:ERG phenotyped PrCa cases. In meta-analyses of a discovery set of 552 cases with TMPRSS2:ERG data and 7650 unaffected men from five centers we have found support for the hypothesis that several common risk variants are associated with one particular subtype rather than with PrCa in general. Risk variants were analyzed in case-case comparisons (296 TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-positive versus 256 fusion-negative cases) and an independent set of 669 cases with TMPRSS2:ERG data was established to replicate the top five candidates. Significant differences (P < 0.00185) between the two subtypes were observed for rs16901979 (8q24) and rs1859962 (17q24), which were enriched in TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-negative (OR = 0.53, P = 0.0007) and TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-positive PrCa (OR = 1.30, P = 0.0016), respectively. Expression quantitative trait locus analysis was performed to investigate mechanistic links between risk variants, fusion status and target gene mRNA levels. For rs1859962 at 17q24, genotype dependent expression was observed for the candidate target gene SOX9 in TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-positive PrCa, which was not evident in TMPRSS2:ERG negative tumors. The present study established evidence for the first two common PrCa risk variants differentially associated with TMPRSS2:ERG fusion status. TMPRSS2:ERG phenotyping of larger studies is required to determine comprehensive sets of variants with subtype-specific roles in PrCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Luedeke
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Antje E. Rinckleb
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Liesel M. FitzGerald
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Cancer, Genetics and Immunology, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Milan S. Geybels
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Johanna Schleutker
- Institute of Biomedical Technology/BioMediTech, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, University of Turku, and Tyks Microbiology and Genetics, Department of Medical Genetics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Rosalind A. Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Manuel R. Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
- Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute, Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Lisa Cannon-Albright
- Division of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Steffen Weikert
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathleen Herkommer
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tiina Wahlfors
- Institute of Biomedical Technology/BioMediTech, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Tapio Visakorpi
- Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Teuvo L.J. Tammela
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Colin S. Cooper
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Department of Biological Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Chee L. Goh
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Chris Parker
- Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Penny Flohr
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Paula Paulo
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
- Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute, Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Carmen Jerónimo
- Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute, Porto University, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Henrique
- Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute, Porto University, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Hans Krause
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sven Wach
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Verena Lieb
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tilman T. Rau
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Bern, Bern Switzerland
| | - Walther Vogel
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Rainer Kuefer
- Department of Urology, Klinik am Eichert, Göppingen, Germany
| | - Matthias D. Hofer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sven Perner
- Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck and the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Luebeck and Borstel, Germany
| | - Mark A. Rubin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Doug F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetics Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ali Amin Al Olama
- Centre for Cancer Genetics Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sara Benlloch
- Centre for Cancer Genetics Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Josef Hoegel
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Janet L. Stanford
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Christiane Maier
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|