Elevated levels of plasma C-reactive protein are associated with decreased graft survival in cardiac transplant recipients

A gentler approach to monitor for heart transplant rejection

Despite developments in circulating biomarker and imaging technology in the assessment of cardiovascular disease, the surveillance and diagnosis of heart transplant rejection has continued to rely on histopathologic interpretation of the endomyocardial biopsy. Increasing evidence shows the utility of molecular evaluations, such as donor-specific antibodies and donor-derived cell-free DNA, as well as advanced imaging techniques, such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, in the assessment of rejection, resulting in the elimination of many surveillance endomyocardial biopsies. As non-invasive technologies in heart transplant rejection continue to evolve and are incorporated into practice, they may supplant endomyocardial biopsy even when rejection is suspected, allowing for more precise and expeditious rejection therapy. This review describes the current and near-future states for the evaluation of heart transplant rejection, both in the settings of rejection surveillance and rejection diagnosis. As biomarkers of rejection continue to evolve, rejection risk prediction may allow for a more personalized approach to immunosuppression.

Selection and Interpretation of Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Transplantation

The number of heart transplants performed annually in the United States and worldwide continues to increase, but there has been little change in graft longevity and patient survival over the past 2 decades. The reference standard for diagnosis of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection includes histologic and immunofluorescence evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy samples, despite invasiveness and high interrater variability for grading histologic rejection. Circulating biomarkers and molecular diagnostics have shown substantial predictive value in rejection monitoring, and emerging data support their use in diagnosing other posttransplant complications. The use of genomic (cell-free DNA), transcriptomic (mRNA and microRNA profiling), and proteomic (protein expression quantitation) methodologies in diagnosis of these posttransplant outcomes has been evaluated with varying levels of evidence. In parallel, growing knowledge about the genetically mediated immune response leading to rejection (immunogenetics) has enhanced understanding of antibody-mediated rejection, associated graft dysfunction, and death. Antibodies to donor human leukocyte antigens and the technology available to evaluate these antibodies continues to evolve. This review aims to provide an overview of biomarker and immunologic tests used to diagnose posttransplant complications. This includes a discussion of pediatric heart transplantation and the disparate rates of rejection and death experienced by Black patients receiving a heart transplant. This review describes diagnostic modalities that are available and used after transplant and the landscape of future investigations needed to enhance patient outcomes after heart transplantation.

Diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide to detect complications of cardiac transplantation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the utility of BNP and NT-proBNP in identifying adverse recipient outcomes following cardiac transplantation.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023. We included studies reporting associations between BNP or NT-proBNP and adverse outcomes following cardiac transplantation in adults. We calculated standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); or confusion matrices with sensitivities and specificities. Where meta-analysis was inappropriate, studies were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies involving 2,297 cardiac transplantation recipients were included. We report no significant association between BNP or NT-proBNP and significant acute cellular rejection of grade 3A or higher (SMD 0.40, 95% CI -0.06-0.86) as defined by the latest 2004 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines. We also report no strong associations between BNP or NT-proBNP and cardiac allograft vasculopathy or antibody mediated rejection.

CONCLUSION

In isolation, serum BNP and NT-proBNP lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity to reliably predict adverse outcomes following cardiac transplantation.

The Role of Preoperative Chronic Statin Therapy in Heart Transplant Receipts-A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Statin therapy has been proven to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. The objective of our retrospective study was to investigate the relationship between preoperative chronic administration of statins to postoperative 2-month heart transplantation complications.

METHODS

A total number of 38 heart transplantation recipients from the Cardiovascular and Transplant Emergency Institute of Târgu Mureș between May 2014 and January 2021 were included in our study.

RESULTS

In logistic regression, we found a statistical significance between statin treatment and the presence of postoperative complications of any cause (OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.008-0.56; p = 0.0128), simultaneously presenting an elevated risk for early-postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). From the statin group, atorvastatin therapy had a higher risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) development (OR: 29.73, 95% CI: 1.19-741.76; p = 0.0387) and AKI (OR: 29.73, 95% CI: 1.19-741.76; p = 0.0387). C-reactive protein (CRP), total cholesterol (TC), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) represented risk factors, atorvastatin administration being independently associated with lower CRP values.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic previous administration of statins represented a protective factor to the development of 2-month postoperative complications of any cause in heart transplant receipts.

Elevated Levels of Neutrophil-to Monocyte Ratio Are Associated with the Initiation of Paroxysmal Documented Atrial Fibrillation in the First Two Months after Heart Transplantation: A Uni-Institutional Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation represents the treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) being symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. We investigated the role of NMR (neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio), NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), NPR (neutrophil-to-platelet ratio), NWR (neutrophil-to-white cells ratio), MLR (monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio), PLR (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio), MWR (neutrophil-to-white cells ratio), and LWR (lymphocyte-to-white cells ratio) at the same cut-off values previously studied, to predict complications after heart transplant within 2 months after surgery.

METHODS

From May 2014 to January 2021, was included 38 patients in our study from the Cardiovascular and Transplant Emergency Institute of Târgu Mureș.

RESULTS

Preoperative NMR > 8.9 (OR: 70.71, 95% CI: 3.39-1473.64; p = 0.006) was a risk factor for the apparition of post-operative paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (Afib). In contrast, preoperative MWR > 0.09 (OR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.003-0.58; p = 0.0182) represented a protective factor against AFib, but being the risk of complications of any cause (OR: 14.74, 95% CI: 1.05-206.59, p = 0.0458).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative elevated levels of NMR were associated with the apparition of documented AFib, with high levels of MWR as a protective factor. High MWR was a risk factor in developing complications of any cause in the first 2 months after heart transplantation.

Long term development of diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in heart transplant recipients

Heart transplant recipients (HTX) have several risk factors for heart failure which can trigger pro-inflammatory and fibrosis factors and set into motion pathophysiologic changes leading to diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF. The objective of the study was to determine if HTX recipients with dyspnea have diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF. Twenty-five HTX were included. LV systolic and diastolic functions were evaluated using conductance catheters to obtain pressure volume loops. LV function was assessed at rest and during moderate intensity exercise of the upper extremities. A significant increase occurred in LV minimal pressure (3.7 ± 3.3 to 6.5 ± 3.5 mmHg) and end diastolic pressure or EDP (11.5 ± 4 to 18 ± 3.8 mmHg, both P < 0.01) with exercise. With exercise, the time constant of LV relaxation shortened in 2, was unchanged in 3, and increased in the remaining patients (group results: rest 40 ± 11.6 vs 46 ± 9 ms, P < 0.01). LV chamber stiffness constant was abnormally increased in all but 2 patients. Indices of LV systolic properties were normal at rest but failed to augment with exercise. In 15 who agreed to blood draw, inflammation and fibrosis markers were obtained. A significant association was observed between LV EDP and Pro-Col III N-terminal (r = 0.58, P = 0.024) and IL-1-soluble receptor (r = 0.59, P = 0.02) levels. HTX have diastolic dysfunction and can develop HFpEF several years after cardiac transplantation. The abnormally increased LV chamber stiffness and the prolongation or lack of shortening of the time constant of LV relaxation with exercise are the underlying reasons behind the observed changes in LV diastolic pressures with exercise.

The evolution of patient-specific precision biomarkers to guide personalized heart-transplant care

Introduction

In parallel to the clinical maturation of heart transplantation over the last 50 years, rejection testing has been revolutionized within the systems biology paradigm triggered by the Human Genome Project.

Areas Covered

We have co-developed the first FDA-cleared diagnostic and prognostic leukocyte gene expression profiling biomarker test in transplantation medicine that gained international evidence-based medicine guideline acceptance to rule out moderate/severe acute cellular cardiac allograft rejection without invasive endomyocardial biopsies. This work prompted molecular re-classification of intragraft biology, culminating in the identification of a pattern of intragraft myocyte injury, in addition to acute cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection. This insight stimulated research into non-invasive detection of myocardial allograft injury. The addition of a donor-organ specific myocardial injury marker based on donor-derived cell-free DNA further strengthens the non-invasive monitoring concept, combining the clinical use of two complementary non-invasive blood-based measures, host immune activity-related risk of acute rejection as well as cardiac allograft injury.

Expert Opinion

This novel complementary non-invasive heart transplant monitoring strategy based on leukocyte gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA that incorporates longitudinal variability measures provides an exciting novel algorithm of heart transplant allograft monitoring. This algorithm's clinical utility will need to be tested in an appropriately designed randomized clinical trial which is in preparation.

Noninvasive biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of heart transplantation rejection

For most patients with end-stage heart failure, heart transplantation is the treatment of choice. Allograft rejection is one of the major post-transplantation complications affecting graft outcome and survival. Recent advancements in science and technology offer an opportunity to integrate genomic and other omics-based biomarkers into clinical practice, facilitating noninvasive evaluation of allograft for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Omics, including gene expression profiling (GEP) of blood immune cell components and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) are of special interest to researchers. Several studies have investigated levels of dd-cfDNA and miroRNAs in blood as potential markers for early detection of allograft rejection. One of the achievements in the field of transcriptomics is AlloMap, GEP of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), which can identify 11 differentially expressed genes and help with detection of moderate and severe acute cellular rejection in stable heart transplant recipients. In recent years, the utilization of GEP of PBMC for identifying differentially expressed genes to diagnose acute antibody-mediated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy has yielded promising results. Advancements in the field of metabolomics and proteomics as well as their potential implications have been further discussed in this paper.

Elevated AT1R Antibody and Morbidity in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplant Using Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

BACKGROUND

We studied longitudinal levels of angiotensin-II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) and their effects on adverse events (death, treated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy) in patients who were bridged to heart transplant using a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sera of 77 patients bridged to heart transplant (from 2009 to 2017) were tested for AT1R-Ab and CRP before and after LVAD. Elevated AT1R-Ab was defined as >10.0 U/mL. The median follow-up after transplant was 3.6 years (interquartile range, 2.2-5.6 years). After LVAD, AT1R-Ab levels increased from baseline and remained elevated until transplant. Freedom from adverse events at 5 years was lower in those with elevated AT1R-Ab levels at time of transplant. In an adjusted, multivariable Cox analysis, an AT1R-Ab level of >10 U/mL was associated with developing the primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-9.2, P = .017). Although C-reactive protein levels were high before and after LVAD placement, C-reactive protein did not correlate with AT1R-Ab.

CONCLUSIONS

In LVAD patients bridged to heart transplant, an increased AT1R-Ab level at time of transplant was associated with poor outcomes after heart transplant. Post-LVAD AT1R-Ab elevations were not correlated with serum markers of systemic inflammation. Larger studies are needed to examine the pathologic role of AT1R-Ab in heart transplant.

Levels of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Heart Transplant Patients With and Without Periodontitis

OBJECTIVES

The outcomes of heart transplantation are very favorable, but inflammation still plays a critical role in deterioration of chronic transplants. Periodontal diseases are not limited to supporting the structures of the teeth, but they also cause systemic inflammation. Based on the importance of inflammation in heart transplant recipients and the association between periodontal disease and systemic inflammation, this study explored whether periodontitis may be a modifier of serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in heart transplant patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study included 33 patients who had heart transplant procedures at the Baskent University Hospital. Clinical periodontal parameters were recorded to assess the periodontal status. On the same day as clinical measurements, blood samples were collected to measure the serum levels of highsensitivity C-reactive protein.

RESULTS

Of the 33 heart transplant patients, 9 patients (27.3%) were diagnosed with periodontitis, 4 (12.1%) were periodontally healthy, and 20 (60.6%) had gingivitis. In the group with periodontitis, serum highsensitivity C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher than the periodontally healthy and gingivitis groups (P = .006). In addition, Spearman correlation analyses showed that serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was positively correlated with probing depth (r = 0.358; P = .041), clinical attachment level (r = 0.352; P = .045), and gingival recession (r = 0.422; P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that elevated levels of serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in heart transplant patients were associated with periodontitis. Thus, these findings reinforce the need for the inclusion of regular periodontal visits after transplant.

Initial Intravascular Ultrasound Without a Routine Early Baseline Study in the Evaluation of Cardiac Transplant Vasculopathy has Prognostic Valve

BACKGROUND

Abnormal minimal intimal thickening (MIT) on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) defined as difference of ≥0.5 mm between baseline and one-year post-transplantation has been shown to have prognostic value. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate whether abnormal MIT found on routine IVUS studies in cardiac transplant patients after 6 months without an early baseline study (modified MIT or MMIT), has any prognostic value. Furthermore, we evaluated the prognostic effect of serial IVUS performed beyond one year.

METHODS

A cohort of 149 cardiac transplant patients who underwent IVUS examination > 6 months post-transplant were evaluated retrospectively. Of these 149 patients, 109 patients underwent a subsequent IVUS study approximately 1 year following the initial study. MMIT values of ≥0.5 mm without an early baseline study were correlated with major adverse cardiac event (MACE).

RESULTS

The all-cause mortality was 4.7% (5/107) in patients with MMIT of <0.5 mm vs. 14.6% (6/41) in patients with MMIT of ≥0.5 mm [hazards ratio (HR): 3.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002-12.17; p = 0.039]. The overall MACE rate was 8.4% (9/107) in patients with MMIT of <0.5 mm vs. 24.4% (10/41) in patients with MMIT of ≥0.5 mm [HR: 6.7; 95% CI: 1.30-9.42; p = 0.009]. After adjusting for age, abnormal MMIT remained a significant independent predictor of MACE (HR: 3.93; CI 1.21-12.81; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of abnormal MMIT noted on IVUS performed after 6 months post-transplantation without a routine baseline IVUS carries important prognostic value.

The hematopoietic stem cell number in the peripheral blood of pediatric recipients correlates with the outcome after living donor liver transplantation

It has been proposed that circulating HSCs play a role in graft survival after liver transplantation. The aim was to analyze the relationship between the number of HSCs before and after LDLT and liver function, immune biomarkers, and clinical outcomes in pediatric patients. We studied 15 pairs of adult healthy liver donors and pediatric recipients with ESLD. The CD34/CD45+ cell number was measured in the blood via flow cytometry, and plasma levels of immune biomarkers - via ELISA. CD34/CD45+ cell number in the recipients decreased within the first week after LDLT. The cell number before LDLT was negatively correlated with the plasma levels of CRP and the development of graft dysfunction in the early post-transplant period. After LDLT, the CD34/CD45+ cell number was positively correlated with the pretransplant plasma level of sCD40L, a T-cell activation marker. In adult liver donors, the cell number did not change within the first week after liver resection and was lower than in pediatric recipients. The results suggest that in pediatric recipients, the HSC number may be associated with graft function and could be regarded as a potential predictor of the clinical outcome after LDLT.

Markers of inflammation in recipients of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

Although the newer continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) provide clinical advantages over the pulsatile pumps, the effects of low pulsatility on inflammation are incompletely understood. The objective of our study was to examine the levels of inflammatory mediators in CF-LVAD recipients compared with both healthy control subjects and heart failure patients who were candidates for CF-LVAD support. Plasma levels of chemokines, cytokines, and inflammatory markers were measured in 18 CF-LVAD recipients and compared with those of 14 healthy control subjects and 14 heart failure patients who were candidates for CF-LVADs. The levels of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, macrophage inflammatory proteins-1β, and macrophage-derived chemokine were significantly higher in the CF-LVAD group compared with both the heart failure and the healthy control groups, whereas no significant differences were observed between the healthy control subjects and the heart failure groups. Compared with the healthy controls, C-reactive protein, interferon gamma-induced protein-10, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and interleukin-8 levels were significantly higher in both the CF-LVAD and heart failure groups, but no significant differences were observed between the CF-LVAD recipients and the heart failure patients. Inflammatory markers were elevated in CF-LVAD recipients compared with healthy control subjects and the heart failure patients. Further studies should investigate the clinical implications of elevated levels of inflammation in CF-LVAD recipients.

C-reactive protein as a novel biomarker

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a relatively nonspecific marker of inflammation. However, it can be used to monitor the severity and progression of some well-defined cardiovascular diseases. For example, it can predict serious events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who are hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction (MI), or advanced peripheral vascular disease. In this article, the authors review the role of CRP in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of various forms of ischemic and inflammatory cardiovascular disease.

Repeated measurements of NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin T or C-reactive protein do not predict future allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Studies on the prognostic value of serial biomarker assays for future occurrence of allograft rejection (AR) are scarce. We examined whether repeated measurements of NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin T (TropT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) predict AR.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2010, 77 consecutive heart transplantation (HTx) recipients were included. The NT-proBNP, TropT, and CRP were measured at 16 ± 4 (mean ± standard deviation) consecutive routine endomyocardial biopsy surveillance visits during the first year of follow-up. Allograft rejection was defined as International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grade 2R or higher at endomyocardial biopsy. Joint modeling was used to assess the association between repeated biomarker measurements and occurrence of future AR. Joint modeling accounts for dependence among repeated observations in individual patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients at HTx was 49 ± 9.2 years, and 68% were men. During the first year of follow-up, 1,136 biopsies and concurrent blood samples were obtained, and 56 patients (73%) experienced at least one episode of AR. All biomarkers were elevated directly after HTx and achieved steady-state after ∼ 12 weeks, both in patients with or without AR. No associations were present between the repeated measurements of NT-proBNP, TropT, or CRP and AR both early (weeks 0-12) and late (weeks 13-52) in the course after HTx (hazard ratios for weeks 13-52: 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.68), 0.67 (0.27-1.69), and 1.44 (0.90-2.30), respectively, per ln[unit]). Combining the three biomarkers in one model also rendered null results.

CONCLUSION

The temporal evolution of NT-proBNP, TropT, and CRP before AR did not predict occurrence of acute AR both in the early and late course of the first year after HTx.

Early inflammatory markers are independent predictors of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart-transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Identification of risk is essential to prevent cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and graft failure due to CAV (GFDCAV) in heart transplant patients, which account for 30% of all deaths. Early CAV detection involves invasive, risky, and expensive monitoring approaches. We determined whether prediction of CAV and GFDCAV improves by adding inflammatory markers to a previously validated atherothrombotic (AT) model.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

AT and inflammatory markers interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured in heart biopsies and sera of 172 patients followed prospectively for 8.9±5.0 years. Models were estimated for 5- and 10-year risk using (1) the first post-transplant biopsy only, or (2) all biopsies obtained within 3 months. Multivariate models were adjusted for other covariates and cross-validated by bootstrapping. After adding IL-6 and CRP to the AT models, we evaluated the significance of odds ratios (ORs) associated with the additional inflammatory variables and the degree of improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). When inflammatory markers were tested alone in prediction models, CRP (not IL-6) was a significant predictor of CAV and GFDCAV at 5 (CAV: p<0.0001; GFDCAV: p = 0.005) and 10 years (CAV: p<0.0001; GFDCAV: p = 0.003). Adding CRP (not IL-6) to the best AT models improved discriminatory power to identify patients destined to develop CAV (using 1st biopsy: p<0.001 and p = 0.001; using all 3-month biopsies: p<0.04 and p = 0.008 at 5- and 10-years, respectively) and GFDCAV (using 1st biopsy: 0.92 vs. 0.95 and 0.86 vs. 0.89; using all 3-month biopsies: 0.94 vs. 0.96 and 0.88 vs. 0.89 at 5- and 10-years, respectively), as indicated by an increase in AUROC.

CONCLUSIONS

Early inflammatory status, measured by a patient's CRP level (a non-invasive, safe and inexpensive test), independently predicts CAV and GFDCAV. Adding CRP to a previously established AT model improves its predictive power.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current knowledge and future direction

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a unique form of coronary artery disease affecting heart transplant recipients. Although prognosis of heart transplant recipients has improved over time, CAV remains a significant cause of mortality beyond the first year of cardiac transplantation. Many traditional and non-traditional risk factors for the development of CAV have been described. Traditional risk factors include dyslipidemia, diabetes and hypertension. Non-traditional risk factors include cytomegalovirus infection, HLA mismatch, antibody-mediated rejection, and mode of donor brain death. There is a complex interplay between immunological and non-immunological factors ultimately leading to endothelial injury and exaggerated repair response. Pathologically, CAV manifests as fibroelastic proliferation of intima and luminal stenosis. Early diagnosis is paramount as heart transplant recipients are frequently asymptomatic owing to cardiac denervation related to the transplant surgery. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) offers many advantages over conventional angiography and is an excellent predictor of prognosis in heart transplant recipients. Many non-invasive diagnostic tests including dobutamine stress echocardiography, CT angiography, and MRI are available; though, none has replaced angiography. This review discusses the risk factors, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of CAV and highlights some current concepts and recent developments in this field.

Macrophage activation is associated with poorer long-term outcomes in renal transplant patients

Long-term graft and patient survival after renal transplantation are largely determined by progression of chronic allograft dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. Inflammation plays a crucial role in both disease processes. We prospectively analyzed the association of early peri-transplant inflammatory burden on long-term outcomes in 144 consecutive deceased donor renal allograft recipients. Single time point and cumulative levels of markers of acute phase response (serum amyloid A [SAA] and C-reactive protein [SCRP]) and macrophage activation (serum and urine neopterin) were measured daily during the immediate post-operative period. Mean patient follow-up was 16 yr. Graft and patient survival rates at one-, five-, and 10-yr were 90%, 70%, and 51%, and 97%, 77%, and 59%, respectively. Graft loss occurred in 90 patients, of whom 71 died with a functioning graft and 19 returned to dialysis. CRP, SAA and neopterin (NEOP) levels were all elevated post-operatively. High levels of NEOP, in contrast to SAA or SCRP, were associated with poorer graft and patient survival (p < 0.05), specifically with death from cardiovascular events and cytomegalovirus IgG positivity. These findings strongly suggest that early post-transplant macrophage activation, as reflected by NEOP levels, is associated with poorer long-term graft and patient survival.

Acute cellular rejection and the subsequent development of allograft vasculopathy after cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is primarily immune-mediated. We investigated the role of cellular rejection in CAV development.

METHODS

The study comprised 252 cardiac transplant recipients (mean age, 49.02 +/- 17.05 years; mean follow-up, 7.61 +/- 4.49 years). Total rejection score (TRS) based on the 2004 International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation R grading system (0R = 0, 1R = 1, 2R = 2, 3R = 3) and any rejection score (ARS; calculated as 0R = 0, 1R = 1, 2R = 1; 3R = 1, or the number of rejections of any grade) were normalized for the total number of biopsy specimens. CAV was defined as coronary stenosis of 40% or more and/or distal pruning of secondary side branches. Thirty-two patients had undergone 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at baseline and with virtual histology (VH) IVUS at 24 months.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, 6-month TRS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-3.90, p = 0.05) and ARS (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.01-4.95; p = 0.047) were associated with increased risk of CAV. In multivariate analysis, 6-month TRS (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.44-6.91, p = 0.02) was significantly associated with increased risk of CAV onset. The 12- and 24-month rejection scores were not risk factors for the onset of CAV. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 6-month TRS exceeding 0.3 was associated with a significantly shorter time to CAV onset (p = 0.018). There was direct correlation (r = 0.44, p = 0.012) between TRS at 6 months and the percentage of necrotic core demonstrated by VH-IVUS at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent cellular rejection has a cumulative effect on the onset of CAV. The mechanism may be due to increased inflammation resulting in increased plaque burden suggesting a relationship between the immune basis of cellular rejection and CAV.

What is the best biomarker for diagnosis of rejection in heart transplantation?

INTRODUCTION

Acute cellular rejection is a major cause of graft loss in heart transplantation (HT). Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for its diagnosis, but it is an invasive procedure not without risk. A proinflammatory state exists in rejection that could be assessed by determining plasma levels of inflammatory biomarkers.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the utility of various inflammatory markers, which is most important and what values best classify patients to diagnose rejection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study in 123 consecutive cardiac transplant recipients was conducted from January 2002 to December 2006. Fibrinogen protein (Fgp) and function (Fgf), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and sialic acid (SA) determinations were performed at one, two, four, six, nine, and 12 months post-HT at the same time as biopsies. Coronary arteriography and intravascular ultrasound were performed on the first and last follow-up visits. Heart-lung transplants, retransplants, pediatric transplants, patients who died in the first month, and patients who refused consent were excluded. Also excluded were determinations that coincided with renal dysfunction, active infection, hemodynamic instability, or a non-evaluable biopsy. The final analysis included 79 patients and 294 determinations. The correlation between the levels of these biomarkers and the presence of rejection in the biopsy (> or = ISHLT grade 3) was studied.

RESULTS

We did not find significant differences in the values of any of the markers analyzed on the six follow-up visits. Only CRP showed significant and sustained differences between the two groups (with and without rejection) from the second follow-up visit (month 2). The area under the curve showed significant differences in Fgp (0.614, p = 0.013), Fgf (0.585, p = 0.05), TNF-alpha (0.605, p = 0.02), SA (0.637, p = 0.002) and mainly CRP (0.765, p = 0.0001). CRP levels below 0.87 mg/dL ruled out rejection with a specificity of 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the inflammatory markers analyzed, CRP was the most useful parameter for non-invasive screening of acute cellular rejection in the first year post-HT.

Inflammatory burden of cardiac allograft coronary atherosclerotic plaque is associated with early recurrent cellular rejection and predicts a higher risk of vasculopathy progression

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to investigate tissue characterization of the coronary allograft atherosclerotic plaque with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) imaging to assess the presence and predictors of vessel wall inflammation and its significance in cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression.

BACKGROUND

A unique form of accelerated atherosclerosis, CAV remains the leading cause of late morbidity and mortality in heart transplant patients. The pathogenesis of CAV is not fully elucidated.

METHODS

A total of 86 patients with coronary allograft vasculopathy underwent VH-IVUS examination of the left anterior descending coronary artery 3.61 +/- 3.04 years following cardiac transplantation. Based on the VH-IVUS plaque characteristics, coronary allograft plaque was divided on virtual histology intravascular ultrasound-derived "inflammatory" (VHD-IP) (necrotic core and dense calcium > or =30%) and "noninflammatory" plaque (VHD-NIP) (necrotic core and dense calcium <30%). Total rejection scores were calculated based on the 2004 International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation rejection grading system.

RESULTS

In the whole study population, the mean percentage of fibrous, fibrofatty, dense calcified, and necrotic core plaques in a mean length of 62.3 +/- 17.4 mm of the left anterior descending coronary artery were 50 +/- 17%, 16 +/- 11%, 15 +/- 11%, and 18 +/- 9%, respectively. Patients with a 6-month total rejection score >0.3 had significantly higher incidence of VHD-IP than those with a 6-month total rejection score < or =0.3 (69% vs. 33%, p = 0.011). The presence of VHD-IP at baseline was associated with a significant increase in plaque volume (2.42 +/- 1.78 mm(3)/mm vs. -0.11 +/- 1.65 mm(3)/mm, p = 0.010), plaque index (7 +/- 9% vs. 0 +/- 8%, p = 0.04), and remodeling index (1.24 +/- 0.44 vs. 1.09 +/- 0.36, p = 0.030) during 12 months of follow-up when compared with the presence of VHD-NIP at baseline and during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of VHD-IP as assessed by VH-IVUS is associated with early recurrent rejection and with higher subsequent progression of CAV. A VH-IVUS assessment may add important information in the evaluation of transplant recipients.

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 predicts progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and increased risk of cardiovascular events in heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) is a risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) in nontransplant patients. We evaluated the association between Lp-PLA2, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) assessed by 3D intravascular ultrasound, and incidence of cardiac adverse events in heart transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fasting blood samples were obtained and stored from a cross-section of 112 cardiac transplant recipients attending the Mayo cardiac transplant clinic in 2000 to 2001, mean of 4.7 years after transplant. Lp-PLA2 was measured in plasma aliquots using an enzyme-linked immunoassay. Fifty-six of these patients subsequently underwent two 3D intravascular ultrasound studies in 2004 to 2006 12 months apart. Cardiovascular (CV) events included percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =45% secondary to CAV and CV death.

RESULTS

High Lp-PLA2 level was associated with increase in plaque volume (r=0.43, P=0.0026) and percent plaque volume (r=0.45, P=0.0004). The association remained significant after adjusting for clinical and lipid variables. During follow-up of 5.1+/-1.6 years, 24 CV adverse events occurred in 15 of 112 (13%) heart transplant patients. Lp-PLA2 level>236 ng/mL (higher tertile) identified a subgroup of patients having a 2.4-fold increase of relative risk for combined endpoint of CV events (percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG, LVEF<45%, and CV death; 95% CI 1.16-5.19, P=0.012) compared with patients with Lp-PLA2< or =236 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp-PLA2 is independently associated with progression of CAV and predicts a higher incidence of CV events and CV death in transplant patients. This finding supports the concept that systemic inflammation is an important mediator of CAV. Lp-PLA2 may be a useful marker for risk of CAV and a therapeutic target in posttransplant patients.

Effects of exercise training on forearm and calf vasodilation and proinflammatory markers in recent heart transplant recipients: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Aerobic exercise training improves vasodilatory capacity of peripheral resistance vasculature and modifies plasma proinflammatory markers in chronic heart failure patients. It is, however, currently unknown whether aerobic exercise has a similar effect in heart transplant recipients (HTR).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Eight weeks after transplantation, 14 HTR were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of supervised aerobic exercise training (TRAINED; n=8) or attention-time control (CONTROL; n=6) in addition to posttransplantation medical care. Peak forearm blood flow and calf blood flow (CBF) during reactive hyperemia after 5 min of limb ischemia was used as a measure of endothelium-dependent vasodilation of limb resistance arteries. Plasma C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), and exercise capacity were measured at baseline and again after 12 weeks in both groups.

RESULTS

Peak CBF increased 22% in the TRAINED (25.9+/-5.8-31.6+/-7.9 ml/min/100 ml, P<0.05), but there was no change in peak CBF after 12 weeks in CONTROL. Plasma C-reactive protein, IL-6, TNF-alpha, sICAM-1 did not change in TRAINED, but there was a significant increase in TNF-alpha (1.66+/-1.02 vs. 3.07+/-1.10 pg/ml, P<0.05), and sICAM-1 (205.9+/-59.1 vs. 245.0+/-47.9 ng/ml, P<0.01) in CONTROL after 12 weeks. Furthermore, exercise test duration improved 51.7% (P<0.01) and there was a trend toward an increase in peak VO2 (P=0.05) in TRAINED after 12 weeks but neither changed in CONTROL.

CONCLUSION

A program of supervised aerobic exercise improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the calf, but not forearm resistance arteries, and may attenuate a progressive increase in selected proinflammatory markers in HTR.

C-reactive protein: the harbinger of cardiovascular diseases

Coronary heart disease remains the major cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States and other western countries despite major advances in its treatment. During the last decades, many markers of coronary artery disease have been found which help predict future risk of cardiovascular events. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein has been studied extensively and was seen to be associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or peripheral artery disease. Discussed in this review is the latest literature about this marker and its association with cardiovascular disease, as well as the latest therapeutic options available.

Systemic inflammation and metabolic syndrome in cardiac allograft vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome and elevation of inflammatory markers is common in transplant recipients. We investigated the role of insulin resistance and C-reactive protein (CRP) in predicting development of angiographic cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV).

METHODS

CRP and lipid profile were measured in 114 cardiac transplant recipients at 4.7 +/- 3.1 years post-transplant. A triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL) ratio of >or=3 was considered a marker of insulin resistance. Ninety-seven patients (mean age +/- SD: 48.2 +/- 16.7 years) subsequently underwent routine coronary angiography at 8.6 +/- 3.2 years post-transplantation. Diagnosis of CAV required the presence of stenosis of >or=40% in any major branch, and/or distal pruning of secondary side branches. Coronary artery stenosis >or=70% was defined as severe.

RESULTS

Eighty-one percent of patients were treated with statins. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol level was 98 +/- 26 mg/dl at study entry. CRP and TG/HDL were found to be predictors of development of CAV. CAV severity correlated with TG/HDL (p < 0.005), but not with CRP level. Freedom from CAV 5 years after study entry was 9% in patients with TG/HDL >3, CRP >3 mg/liter, as compared with 65% in patients with TG/HDL <3, CRP <3 mg/liter (p = 0.003). The combination of CRP >3 mg/liter and TG/HDL >3 identified a sub-group of patients having a 2.8-fold increased odds ratio for a combined end-point of cardiovascular (CV) events (percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, left ventricular ejection fraction <45%) and death (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 8.45, p = 0.07) compared to patients with CRP <3 mg/liter and TG/HDL <3.

CONCLUSIONS

CRP >3 mg/liter and TG/HDL >3 are cumulative risk factors for angiographic CAV and the combined end-point of CV events and death in transplant patients and these patients should be targeted for intervention.

Probrain Natriuretic Peptide and C-Reactive Protein as Markers of Acute Rejection, Allograft Vasculopathy, and Mortality in Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are useful in risk stratification of patients with congestive heart failure. They could also be markers of distinctly altered hormonal and immunological milieus, but the combined prognostic value of these biomarkers in heart transplant (HTx) recipients has not been assessed previously.

METHODS

We sought to assess the individual and combined value of NT-proBNP and CRP as markers of acute rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and all-cause mortality in HTx recipients. We evaluated 101 patients for acute rejection and 210 patients for CAV and all-cause mortality. Patients evaluated for rejection had serial endomyocardial biopsies and plasma sampling performed during the first year postHTx. All other patients had plasma samples taken upon inclusion at an annual visit. Median follow-up for CAV and all-cause mortality was 2.2 years and 5.4 years, respectively.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1131 biopsy procedures were performed, and increased NT-proBNP and CRP levels were not useful markers of acute cellular rejection. In total, 78 (37%) patients developed CAV, and 39 (19%) patients died. Neither biomarker was a predictor of CAV, but both were independent predictors of mortality. When combining both biomarkers, elevated levels of both NT-proBNP and CRP identified patients at highest risk for CAV (HR 2.10, P=0.01) and all-cause mortality (HR 3.14, P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In HTx recipients, NT-proBNP and CRP are not useful as markers of acute cellular rejection during the first year postHTx, but combined analysis adds significantly to their predictive value for development of CAV and all-cause mortality.

Unsuspected rejection episodes on routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy post-heart transplant in paediatric patients

The use of routine endomyocardial biopsies post-heart transplant in children remains controversial. It is generally accepted as the gold standard for detecting rejection, but details of the surveillance protocol, such as number and timing of biopsies, remain uncertain, with suggestions that recent advances in immunosuppressant therapy have obviated the need to perform surveillance biopsies. We retrospectively analysed results of endomyocardial biopsies performed in our unit since the introduction of a policy of three routine biopsies in the first six months post-transplantation. We specifically examined only routine surveillance biopsies in order to determine whether clinically unsuspected cases of rejection were identified. Between January 2002 and April 2006, 63 children completed three biopsies in the first six months post-transplant. Of 189 surveillance endomyocardial biopsies, 19 (10%) patients showed significant, grade III or above, rejection. One patient had two episodes of rejection. In only one case the child was haemodynamically unstable, four cases were mildly unwell, and 14 of 19 (74%) cases demonstrated no cardiac symptoms. Four of eight cases treated with sirolimus for some part of their post-transplant course had an episode of rejection and of 54 tacrolimus-treated patients, 13 had an episode of asymptomatic rejection detected. One of the seven infants had significant episode of rejection. Asymptomatic, clinically significant rejection is detected in about 10% of biopsies overall using a three-biopsy protocol in the first six months after paediatric heart transplantation, and occurs in 24% of tacrolimus-treated patients. More frequent surveillance appears needed in children treated with sirolimus, but less frequent surveillance may be possible in infants.

Interplay Between Systemic Inflammation and Markers of Insulin Resistance in Cardiovascular Prognosis After Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Metabolic and immuno-inflammatory risk factors contribute to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) pathogenesis. Although systemic inflammation, as detected by C-reactive protein (CRP), predicts CAV development, the relationship between CRP and markers of metabolic abnormalities remains unexplored.

METHODS

CRP and the entire metabolic panel were evaluated in 98 consecutive heart transplant recipients at the time of annual coronary angiography, 5.8 years after transplant (range, 1-12 years). A ratio of triglycerides (TG) to high-density lipoproteins (HDL) of 3.0 or more was considered a marker of insulin resistance. CAV prevalence was defined by angiography, and subsequent prognosis was evaluated as incidence of major cardiac adverse events.

RESULTS

CRP was higher in the 34 patients with angiographic CAV than in those without CAV (1.10 +/- 0.20 vs 0.50 +/- 0.05 mg/dl, p < 0.001). Patients with insulin resistance had higher CRP concentrations (p = 0.023) and higher CAV prevalence (p = 0.005). High CRP and a TG/HDL of 3.0 or more were independently associated with an increased likelihood of CAV (odds ratio, > or = 3.9; p = 0.02) and predicted an increased risk of major cardiac adverse events. The combination of high CRP and a TG/HDL of 3.0 or more identified a subgroup of patients having a 4-fold increased risk for CAV and a 3-fold increased risk for major cardiac adverse events compared with patients with low CRP and normal values for metabolic indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CRP and insulin resistance, as estimated by TG/HDL, appear to be strong, synergic risk factors for CAV and for major cardiac adverse events. These findings support the hypothesis that in heart transplant recipients, systemic inflammation may be an important mediator of graft vascular injury associated with metabolic syndrome.

Critical appraisal of C-reactive protein throughout the spectrum of cardiovascular disease

Clinicians involved in the care of patients with cardiovascular conditions have recently been confronted with an important body of literature linking inflammation and cardiovascular disease. Indeed, the level of systemic inflammation as measured by circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) has been linked to prognosis in patients with atherosclerotic disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, myocarditis, aortic valve disease and heart transplantation. In addition, a number of basic science reports suggest an active role for CRP in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases. This article explores the potential role of CRP in disease initiation, progression, and clinical manifestations and reviews its role in the prediction of future events in clinical practice. Therapeutic interventions to decrease circulating levels of CRP are also reviewed.

Diagnosis of graft coronary artery disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Graft coronary artery disease is the leading cardiac cause of death in patients who have undergone cardiac transplantation. Due to denervation, classic symptoms of angina are not reliable. Many transplant centers have a protocol of routine annual surveillance cardiac angiography because treatment options are limited, especially with advanced disease. Angiography is an assessment of the arterial lumen, however, and can miss nonfocal disease. This paper reviews invasive and noninvasive diagnostic tools for graft coronary artery disease. Intravascular ultrasound is the most sensitive, but the cost and lack of widespread expertise make it unpopular. Noninvasive techniques have been studied. An ideal test would be sufficiently sensitive to detect disease and allow for prognostic information. Dobutamine echocardiography is the most sensitive noninvasive test but can have a high false-positive rate. It is also not universally available. Exercise nuclear imaging is specific and can be used as a confirmatory test in patients with positive dobutamine echocardiograms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Computed tomographic imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are exciting new modalities but require further study.

SUMMARY

There is no test sensitive and specific enough yet that can be confidently used to replace coronary angiography.

Quantitative survival model for short-term survival after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) has been accepted as an important option for end-stage liver disease, but information regarding the risk factors remains fragmentary. We aimed to establish a predictive model for 90-day survival. In the first step, a total of 286 cases who had received primary ALDLT using a right lobe graft between 1998 and 2004 were randomly divided into 2 cohorts at a ratio of 2:1 (191 vs. 95 recipients). The larger cohort of patients was used to develop a model. The outcome was defined as 90-day survival, and a total of 39 preoperative and operative variables, including the period of surgery (1998-2001 vs. 2002-2004), were included using Cox's proportional hazard regression model. Two mismatches of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type DR (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.45; confidence interval [CI] = 1.96-10.1), log(e)[blood loss volume] (HR = 2.43; CI = 1.64-3.60), period of surgery (1998-2001 vs. 2002-2004) (HR = 2.41; CI = 1.04-5.57), and log(e)[serum C-reactive protein or CRP] (HR = 1.64; CI = 1.13-2.38) were found to be independent risk factors. In the second step, we tried to establish a realistic survival model. In this step, we created 2 models, 1 that used all 4 variables (model 1) and 1 (model 2) in which blood loss volume was replaced with the past history of upper abdominal surgery and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (> or =25), both of which showed associations with blood loss volume. These models were applied to the smaller cohort of 95 patients. Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated that both models showed similar significant c-statistics (0.63 and 0.62, respectively). In conclusion, model 2 can provide a rough estimation of the 90-day survival after ALDLT.

Contemporary concepts in prevention and treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), is characterized by heterogeneous proliferative thickening of the vascular intima of the cardiac allograft vasculature. Since its presentation is commonly clinically silent, early diagnosis and preventative therapy are critical. Preventative therapy including optimization of immunosuppressive therapy and treatment of comorbidities associated with CAV progression must be initiated early since most of the intimal thickening occurs during the first year posttransplant. Long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors is associated with a high incidence of chronic renal disease and also contributes to hyperlipidemia and hypertension, all of which may exacerbate CAV. In addition, statins, antihypertensive agents and anti-CMV agents all have demonstrated benefits in reducing CAV. Once established, the limited treatment options include nonpharmacologic interventions such as retransplantation, percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary artery bypass grafting, transmyocardial laser revascularization and heparin-induced/mediated extracorporeal LDL plasmapheresis (HELP). As the use of new assessment tools increases our understanding of this disease, better preventative and treatment strategies are evolving.

Pharmacotherapy of hyperlipidemia in pediatric heart transplant recipients: current practice and future directions

Lipoprotein abnormalities are fairly common after pediatric heart transplantation. Graft coronary artery disease (GCAD) limits long-term survival and has been linked to elevated serum triglyceride levels and decreased high-density lipoprotein levels. Histologically, GCAD represents intimal hyperplasia of the coronary vessel and is best imaged by intravascular ultrasound.A number of pharmacologic agents are available for the management of lipid disorders but experience with these drugs has mainly been in adults. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are currently used by many adult transplantation centers to alter lipid profiles in the hope of reducing GCAD. The use of statins among pediatric heart transplant centers is more limited. Although rhabdomyolysis is a concern with these agents, the incidence among individuals receiving immunosuppressant therapy is low. Aside from their lipid-lowering properties, statins may also protect against graft failure and rejection.

The promise of protein-based and gene-based clinical markers in heart transplantation: from bench to bedside

Advances in immunosuppression, guided by invasive endomyocardial biopsy for the assessment of graft rejection, have ushered heart transplantation into the clinical arena by the demonstration of acceptable 1-year outcomes. Further decreases in the risk of malignancy and cardiac allograft vasculopathy that improve long-term outcomes, are, however, still desired. Attention has become directed towards the use of markers that can be detected noninvasively to provide insight into underlying molecular and cellular events associated with the immune response and graft function. Various candidate, protein-based markers have been identified: those of alloimmune activation; those of microvascular injury, such as cardiac-specific troponins; those of inflammation, including C-reactive protein; and surrogate markers of cardiac function, including natriuretic peptides such as brain natriuretic peptide. In the realm of genomics, it is becoming increasingly clear that a single molecular marker is unlikely to prove to be useful, but rather that multiple genes from a number of pathways are needed to capture biological complexity and overcome variability in the general population. Thus, the field of protein-based and gene-based biomarkers is advancing rapidly to define its place in clinical therapeutics and to guide immunosuppression according to molecular mechanisms of disease. We discuss here the main findings for the more-successful protein markers identified so far, and the genomic molecular approaches being used to improve heart transplant outcomes.

Pathophysiology and diagnostic value of urinary trypsin inhibitors

Inflammation is an important indicator of tissue injury. In the acute form, there is usually accumulation of fluids and plasma components in the affected tissues. Platelet activation and the appearance in blood of abnormally increased numbers of polymorphonucleocytes, lymphocytes, plasma cells and macrophages usually occur. Infectious disorders such as sepsis, meningitis, respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, viral infection, and bacterial infection usually induce an inflammatory response. Chronic inflammation is often associated with diabetes mellitus, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, kidney diseases, and certain auto-immune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis, organ failures and other disorders with an inflammatory component or etiology. The disorder may occur before inflammation is apparent. Markers of inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and urinary trypsin inhibitors have changed our appraisal of acute events such as myocardial infarction; the infarct may be a response to acute infection and (or) inflammation. We describe here the pathophysiology of an anti-inflammatory agent termed urinary trypsin inhibitor (uTi). It is an important anti-inflammatory substance that is present in urine, blood and all organs. We also describe the anti-inflammatory agent bikunin, a selective inhibitor of serine proteases. The latter are important in modulating inflammatory events and even shutting them down.