Prevention of Complications in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Evolution of Critical Care Cardiology: An Update on Structure, Care Delivery, Training, and Research Paradigms: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Critical care cardiology refers to the practice focus of and subspecialty training for the comprehensive management of life-threatening cardiovascular diseases and comorbid conditions that require advanced critical care in an intensive care unit. The development of coronary care units is often credited for a dramatic decline in mortality rates after acute myocardial infarction throughout the 1960s. As the underlying patient population became progressively sicker, changes in organizational structure, staffing, care delivery, and training paradigms lagged. The coronary care unit gradually evolved from a focus on rapid resuscitation from ventricular arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction into a comprehensive cardiac intensive care unit designed to care for the sickest patients with cardiovascular disease. Over the past decade, the cardiac intensive care unit has continued to transform with an aging population, increased clinical acuity, burgeoning cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities, technologic advances in cardiovascular interventions, and increased use of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices. Herein, we provide an update and contemporary expert perspective on the organizational structure, staffing, and care delivery in the cardiac intensive care unit; examine the challenges and opportunities present in the education and training of the next generation of physicians for critical care cardiology; and explore quality improvement initiatives and scientific investigation, including multicenter registry initiatives and randomized clinical trials, that may change clinical practice, care delivery, and the research landscape in this rapidly evolving discipline.

In-Hospital Adverse Events in Heart Failure Patients: Incidence and Association with 90-Day Mortality

BACKGROUND

In-hospital adverse events (IHAEs) are key patient safety indicators but are not comprehensively assessed among patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). The authors aimed to determine the association of IHAEs with downstream outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed data from patients hospitalized for HF in 17 acute care hospitals (2010-2023). The research team abstracted 36 IHAEs and grouped them into eight composite categories. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and 90-day postdischarge all-cause readmission.

RESULTS

Of the 11,169 hospitalized HF patients (median age 77.7 years; 47.0% women; 7.1% non-white; 39.8% from rural counties; 78,869 hospital bed-days), IHAEs occurred at varying frequency across the composite IHAE categories: general 4.6%, cardiovascular 6.6%, pulmonary 11.7%, endocrine and metabolism 9.2%, renal and electrolyte 9.1%, gastrointestinal 4.0%, neurological 2.7%, and hospital-acquired infection (HAI) 3.2%. Except for the renal and electrolyte (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, p = 0.2956), IHAE in any other category was consistently associated with higher 90-day mortality (HRs 1.50-2.42, p < 0.0001 for all). Associations with secondary outcomes varied by IHAE categories: LOS increased in the general (incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.09), pulmonary (IRR 1.65), neurological (IRR 1.37), and HAI (IRR 1.09) categories (p < 0.0001). In-hospital mortality was higher in all categories except gastrointestinal. The 90-day readmission rate was elevated in the gastrointestinal (HR 1.85), neurological (HR 1.89), and HAI (HR 1.66) categories (p < 0.0001). Guideline-focused medical treatment (GFMT) was associated with reduced mortality in patients with and without IHAEs.

CONCLUSION

HF cohorts with specific composite IHAEs experience higher in-hospital and 90-day all-cause mortality and increased health care resource utilization. This elevated mortality risk may be mitigated by GFMT, with potential tailoring to each specific IHAE category.

Effect of active teaching strategies on interprofessional clinical judgment: a quasi-experiment

OBJECTIVES

to assess the effect of active teaching strategies on clinical judgment for cardiopulmonary arrest care of patients with COVID-19 in in-hospital settings by an interprofessional team.

METHODS

quasi-experimental study without a comparison group. A total of 85 professionals were selected by non-probabilistic sampling. The educational intervention consisted of a class combined with skills training. The significance level was 5%.

RESULTS

most professionals were categorized as "proficiency" on a clinical judgment scale (52.9%). The "exemplary" category accounted for 31.8% of the total. Only 2.4% of participants were categorized as "beginning" and 12.9% were "developing" post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

an active strategy based on a dialogued lecture combined with skills training had a positive impact on clinical judgment improvement. Thus, participatory educational actions, based on an active teaching method, developed, in most nurses, the "proficiency" and "exemplary" levels, while, in the medical and physiotherapy team, the "exemplary" level predominated.

Evolution of Critical Care Cardiology: An Update on Structure, Care Delivery, Training, and Research Paradigms: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Critical care cardiology refers to the practice focus of and subspecialty training for the comprehensive management of life-threatening cardiovascular diseases and comorbid conditions that require advanced critical care in an intensive care unit. The development of coronary care units is often credited for a dramatic decline in mortality rates after acute myocardial infarction throughout the 1960s. As the underlying patient population became progressively sicker, changes in organizational structure, staffing, care delivery, and training paradigms lagged. The coronary care unit gradually evolved from a focus on rapid resuscitation from ventricular arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction into a comprehensive cardiac intensive care unit designed to care for the sickest patients with cardiovascular disease. Over the past decade, the cardiac intensive care unit has continued to transform with an aging population, increased clinical acuity, burgeoning cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities, technologic advances in cardiovascular interventions, and increased use of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices. Herein, we provide an update and contemporary expert perspective on the organizational structure, staffing, and care delivery in the cardiac intensive care unit; examine the challenges and opportunities present in the education and training of the next generation of physicians for critical care cardiology; and explore quality improvement initiatives and scientific investigation, including multicenter registry initiatives and randomized clinical trials, that may change clinical practice, care delivery, and the research landscape in this rapidly evolving discipline.

Weakness acquired in the cardiac intensive care unit: still the elephant in the room?

Over the past two decades, the cardiac critical care population has shifted to increasingly comorbid and elderly patients often presenting with nonprimary cardiac conditions that exacerbate underlying advanced cardiac disease. Consequently, the modern cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patient has poor outcome regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction. Importantly, delayed liberation from organ support, independent from premorbid health status and admission severity of illness, has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality up to years post-general critical care. Although a constellation of several acquired morbidities is at play, the most prominent enactor of poor long-term outcome in this population appears to be intensive care unit acquired weakness. Although the specific burden of ICU-acquired morbidities in CICU patients is yet to be clearly defined, it seems unfathomable that patients will not accrue some sort of ICU-related morbidity. There is hence an urgent need to better establish the exact benefit and cost of resource-intensive strategies in both short- and long-term survival of the CICU patient. Consequent and standardized documentation of admission comorbidities, severity of illness indicators, relevant ICU-related complications including weakness, and long-term post-ICU morbidity outcomes can help our understanding of the disease continuum and how to better care for the CICU survivor and their families and caregivers. Given increasing budgetary pressure on healthcare systems worldwide, interventions targeting CICU patients should focus on improving patient-centred long-term outcomes in a cost-effective manner. It will require a holistic and transmural continuity of care model to meet the challenges associated with treating critically ill cardiac patients in the future.

Underrepresentation and Exclusion of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in Intensive Care Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The complexity of the contemporary cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has increased due a growing prevalence of multisystem, noncardiac illnesses. Despite this increase, patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are often underrepresented from intensive care randomized controlled trials (RCT). We sought to quantify the representation of patients with cardiovascular disease comorbidities in intensive care RCTs.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE for trials published from 2007 to 2019 with the five highest journal impact factors in the disciplines of critical care medicine, general internal medicine, and cardiovascular disease. Prospective RCTs in the adult (age ≥18 years), intensive care setting with ≥50 individuals were included. Study characteristics, proportion of patients with CVD and cardiovascular exclusion criteria were extracted independently by two reviewers. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of cardiovascular exclusion and representation.

RESULTS

A total of 412 eligible RCTs were identified for analysis, 132 (32.0%) of which included specific CVD-related exclusion criteria with history of heart failure (29.5%) and of ischemic heart disease (26.5%) being the most common exclusions. Exclusions were more likely in multicenter trials and varied substantially across study intervention categories. Representation of CVD, reflected by the reporting of any CVD history, was noted in 150 (36.4%) RCTs. Of those reporting, the prevalence of any CVD, ischemic heart disease and heart failure were 15.7%, 13.2% and 10.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Those with comorbid CVD are both frequently excluded and underrepresented in intensive care RCTs, limiting the application of RCTs to this physiologically complex patient population.

Survivorship After Cardiogenic Shock

Advances in critical care therapies for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), including temporary mechanical circulatory support and multidisciplinary shock teams, have led to improved survival to hospital discharge, ranging from 60% to 70%. After their index hospitalization, however, survivors of CS may continue to face cardiac as well as extracardiac sequelae of these therapies and complications for years to come. Most studies in CS have focused primarily on survival, with limited data on long-term recovery measures among survivors. In other forms of critical illness, research indicates that many intensive care unit survivors experience impairments in multiple domains, such as cognitive function, physical ability, and mental health. These impairments, collectively referred to as Post-Intensive Care Syndrome, in turn impact survivors' quality of life and future prognosis. This review identifies unique aspects of CS-related survivorship, highlights lessons learned from other forms of critical illness, and outlines future research directions to determine specific strategies to enhance recovery and survivorship after CS.

Mixed Cardiogenic-Vasodilatory Shock: Current Insights and Future Directions

This state-of-the-art review describes the potential etiologies, pathophysiology, and management of mixed shock in the context of a proposed novel classification system. Cardiogenic-vasodilatory shock occurs when cardiogenic shock is complicated by inappropriate vasodilation, impairing compensatory mechanisms, and contributing to worsening shock. Vasodilatory-cardiogenic shock occurs when vasodilatory shock is complicated by myocardial dysfunction, resulting in low cardiac output. Primary mixed shock occurs when a systemic insult triggers both myocardial dysfunction and vasoplegia. Regardless of the etiology of mixed shock, the hemodynamic profile can be similar, and outcomes tend to be poor. Identification and treatment of both the initial and complicating disease processes is essential along with invasive hemodynamic monitoring given the evolving nature of mixed shock states. Hemodynamic support typically involves a combination of inotropes and vasopressors, with few data available to guide the use of mechanical circulatory support. Consensus definitions and novel treatment strategies are needed for this dangerous condition.

Optimizing brain protection after cardiac arrest: advanced strategies and best practices

Cardiac arrest (CA) is associated with high incidence and mortality rates. Among patients who survive the acute phase, brain injury stands out as a primary cause of death or disability. Effective intensive care management, including targeted temperature management, seizure treatment and maintenance of normal physiological parameters, plays a crucial role in improving survival and neurological outcomes. Current guidelines advocate for neuroprotective strategies to mitigate secondary brain injury following CA, although certain treatments remain subjects of debate. Clinical examination and neuroimaging studies, both invasive and non-invasive neuromonitoring methods and serum biomarkers are valuable tools for predicting outcomes in comatose resuscitated patients. Neuromonitoring, in particular, provides vital insights for identifying complications, personalizing treatment approaches and forecasting prognosis in patients with brain injury post-CA. In this review, we offer an overview of advanced strategies and best practices aimed at optimizing brain protection after CA.

Acute Coronary Syndrome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Incidence, Risk Factors and Impact on the Outcome

Background and Objectives: Development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) strongly affects further neuro-intensive care management. We aimed to analyze the incidence, risk factors and clinical impact of ACS in aSAH patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis included 855 aSAH cases treated between 01/2003 and 06/2016. The occurrence of ACS during 3 weeks of aSAH was documented. Patients' demographic, clinical, radiographic and laboratory characteristics at admission were collected as potential ACS predictors. The association between ACS and the aSAH outcome was analyzed as the occurrence of cerebral infarcts in the computed tomography scans and unfavorable outcome (modified Rankin scale > 3) at 6 months after aSAH. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Results: ACS was documented in 28 cases (3.3%) in the final cohort (mean age: 54.9 years; 67.8% females). In the multivariable analysis, there was a significant association between ACS, an unfavorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.43, p = 0.027) and a borderline significance with cerebral infarcts (aOR = 2.5, p = 0.066). The final prediction model for ACS occurrence included five independent predictors (age > 55 years [1 point], serum sodium < 142 mmol/L [3 points], blood sugar ≥ 170 mg/dL [2 points], serum creatine kinase ≥ 255 U/L [3 points] and gamma-glutamyl transferase ≥ 36 U/L [1 point]) and showed high diagnostic accuracy for ACS prediction (AUC = 0.879). Depending on the cumulative score value, the risk of ACS in the cohort varied between 0% (0 points) and 66.7% (10 points). Conclusions: ACS is a rare, but clinically very relevant, complication of aSAH. The development of ACS can reliably be predicted by the presented prediction model, which enables the early identification of aSAH individuals at high risk for ACS. External validation of the prediction model is mandatory.

Contemporary Training in American Critical Care Cardiology: Minnesota Critical Care Cardiology Education Summit: JACC Scientific Expert Panel

This consensus statement emerges from collaborative efforts among leading figures in critical care cardiology throughout the United States, who met to share their collective expertise on issues faced by those active in or pursuing contemporary critical care cardiology education. The panel applied fundamentals of adult education and curriculum design, reviewed requisite training necessary to provide high-quality care to critically ill patients with cardiac pathology, and devoted attention to a purposeful approach emphasizing diversity, equity, and inclusion in developing this nascent field. The resulting paper offers a comprehensive guide for current trainees, with insights about the present landscape of critical care cardiology while highlighting issues that need to be addressed for continued advancement. By delineating future directions with careful consideration and intentionality, this Expert Panel aims to facilitate the continued growth and maturation of critical care cardiology education and practice.

Current practices in the management of temporary mechanical circulatory support: A survey of CICU directors in North America

INTRODUCTION

Despite the growing use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS), little data exists to inform management and weaning of these devices.

METHODS

We performed an online survey among cardiac intensive care unit directors in North America to examine current practices in the management of patients treated with intraaortic balloon pump and Impella.

RESULTS

We received responses from 84% of surveyed centers (n=37). Our survey focused on three key aspects of daily management: 1. Hemodynamic monitoring; 2. Hemocompatibility; and 3. Weaning and removal. We found substantial variability surrounding all three areas of care.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the need for consensus around practices associated with improved outcomes in patients treated with tMCS.

Multidisciplinary Care Teams in Acute Cardiovascular Care: A Review of Composition, Logistics, Outcomes, Training, and Future Directions

As cardiovascular care continues to advance and with an aging population with higher comorbidities, the epidemiology of the cardiac intensive care unit has undergone a paradigm shift. There has been increasing emphasis on the development of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for providing holistic care to complex critically ill patients, analogous to heart teams for chronic cardiovascular care. Outside of cardiovascular medicine, MDTs in critical care medicine focus on implementation of guideline-directed care, prevention of iatrogenic harm, communication with patients and families, point-of-care decision-making, and the development of care plans. MDTs in acute cardiovascular care include physicians from cardiovascular medicine, critical care medicine, interventional cardiology, cardiac surgery, and advanced heart failure, in addition to nonphysician team members. In this document, we seek to describe the changes in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit, health care delivery, composition, logistics, outcomes, training, and future directions for MDTs involved in acute cardiovascular care. As a part of the comprehensive review, we performed a scoping of concepts of MDTs, acute hospital care, and cardiovascular conditions and procedures.

Extra-cardiac management of cardiogenic shock in the intensive care unit

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome characterized by low cardiac output leading to end-organ hypoperfusion. Organ dysoxia ranging from transient organ injury to irreversible organ failure and death occurs across all CS etiologies but differing by incidence and type. Herein, we review the recognition and management of respiratory, renal and hepatic failure complicating CS. We also discuss unmet needs in the CS care pathway and future research priorities for generating evidence-based best practices for the management of extra-cardiac sequelae. The complexity of CS admitted to the contemporary cardiac intensive care unit demands a workforce skilled to care for these extra-cardiac critical illness complications with an appreciation for how cardio-systemic interactions influence critical illness outcomes in afflicted patients.

The Role of Prognostic Scores in Assessing the Prognosis of Patients Admitted in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: Emphasis on Heart Failure Patients

Background/Objectives: Patient care in Cardiac Intensive Care Units (CICU) has evolved but data on patient characteristics and outcomes are sparse. This retrospective observational study aimed to define clinical characteristics and risk factors of CICU patients, their in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and compare it with established risk scores. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 294, mean age 70 years, 74% males) hospitalized within 15 months were studied; APACHE II, EHMRG, GWTG-HF, and GRACE II were calculated on admission. Results: Most patients were admitted for ACS (48.3%) and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) (31.3%). Median duration of hospitalization was 2 days (IQR = 1, 4). In-hospital infection occurred in 20%, 18% needed mechanical ventilation, 10% renal replacement therapy and 4% percutaneous ventricular assist devices (33%, 29%, 20% and 4%, respectively, for ADHF). In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 18% and 11% for all patients (29% and 23%, respectively, for ADHF). Established scores (especially APACHE II) had a good diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve-AUC). In univariate and multivariate analyses in-hospital intubation and infection, history of coronary artery disease, hypotension, uremia and hypoxemia on admission were the most important risk factors. Based on these, a proposed new score showed a diagnostic accuracy of 0.954 (AUC) for in-hospital mortality, outperforming previous scores. Conclusions: Patients are admitted mainly with ACS or ADHF, the latter with worse prognosis. Several patients need advanced support; intubation and infections adversely affect prognosis. Established scores predict mortality satisfactorily, but larger studies are needed to develop CICU-directed scores to identify risk factors, improve prediction, guide treatment and staff training.

Variation in risk-adjusted cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) length of stay and the association with in-hospital mortality: An analysis from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that there is wide variability in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) length of stay (LOS); however, these studies are limited by the absence of detailed risk assessment at the time of admission. Thus, we evaluated inter-hospital differences in CICU LOS, and the association between LOS and in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

Using data from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry, we included 22,862 admissions between 2017 and 2022 from 35 primarily tertiary and quaternary CICUs that captured consecutive admissions in annual 2-month snapshots. The primary analysis compared inter-hospital differences in CICU LOS, as well as the association between CICU LOS and all-cause in-hospital mortality using a Fine and Gray competing risk model.

RESULTS

The overall median CICU LOS was 2.2 (1.1-4.8) days, and the median hospital LOS was 5.9 (2.8-12.3) days. Admissions in the longest tertile of LOS tended to be younger with higher rates of pre-existing comorbidities, and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, as well as higher rates of mechanical ventilation, intravenous vasopressor use, mechanical circulatory support, and renal replacement therapy. Unadjusted all-cause in-hospital mortality was 9.3%, 6.7%, and 13.4% in the lowest, intermediate, and highest CICU LOS tertiles. In a competing risk analysis, individual patient CICU LOS was correlated (r2 = 0.31) with a higher risk of 30-day in-hospital mortality. The relationship remained significant in admissions with heart failure, ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large registry of academic CICUs, we observed significant variation in CICU LOS and report that LOS is independently associated with all-cause in-hospital mortality. These findings could potentially be used to improve CICU resource utilization planning and refine risk prognostication in critically ill cardiovascular patients.

Recovery and Survival of Patients After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Literature Review Showcasing the Big Picture of Intensive Care Unit-Related Factors

As an important public health issue, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) requires several stages of high quality medical care, both on-field and after hospital admission. Post-cardiac arrest shock can lead to severe neurological injury, resulting in poor recovery outcome and increased risk of death. These characteristics make this condition one of the most important issues to deal with in post-OHCA patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs). Also, the majority of initial post-resuscitation survivors have underlying coronary diseases making revascularization procedure another crucial step in early management of these patients. Besides keeping myocardial blood flow at a satisfactory level, other tissues must not be neglected as well, and maintaining mean arterial pressure within optimal range is also preferable. All these procedures can be simplified to a certain level along with using targeted temperature management methods in order to decrease metabolic demands in ICU-hospitalized post-OHCA patients. Additionally, withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy as a controversial ethical topic is under constant re-evaluation due to its possible influence on overall mortality rates in patients initially surviving OHCA. Focusing on all of these important points in process of managing ICU patients is an imperative towards better survival and complete recovery rates.

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type 2-receptor blockers (H2Bs) are commonly used for stress ulcer prophylaxis among patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Recent studies suggest an increased mortality associated with PPIs compared to H2Bs, but these studies poorly represent patients with cardiovascular disease or acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes related to stress ulcer prophylaxis with PPIs compared to H2Bs in patients with AMI requiring IMV.

Methods

We queried the Vizient Clinical Data Base for adults aged ≥18 years admitted between October 2015 and December 2019 with a primary diagnosis of AMI and requiring IMV. Using multivariable logistic regression, we assessed for the association between stress ulcer prophylaxis and in-hospital mortality.

Results

Including 11,252 patients with AMI requiring IMV, 66.7% (n = 7,504) received PPIs and 33.3% (n = 3,748) received H2Bs. Age, sex, and the proportion of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or cardiogenic shock were similar between groups (all, P > 0.05). Compared to PPIs, patients receiving H2Bs had a lower mortality (41.5% vs 43.5%, P = 0.047), which was not statistically significant after multivariate adjustment (odds ratio 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.89-1.06, P = 0.49). In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, H2Bs use was associated with fewer ventilator days, less ventilator-associated pneumonia, and lower hospitalization cost but similar Clostridium difficile infections.

Conclusions

Among patients with AMI requiring IMV in this observation cohort study, there was no difference in mortality among patients receiving H2Bs vs PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis despite fewer ventilator days and lower ventilator-associated pneumonia in those receiving H2Bs.

Retrospective Analysis of Hospital Acquired Infection and Antibiotic Resistance in Coronary Care Unit (CCU), Adult, and Pediatric Cardiology Wards

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics resistance is an paramount threat affecting the whole world but nowhere situation is as gloomy as in India. No study till date regarding epidemiology of hospital acquired infections in coronary care units(CCU) and cardiology wards from India. From Indian perspective it is the first observational study to analyse microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance in CCU. The purpose of this observational study is to explore the epidemiology and importance of infections in CCU patients.

METHODOLOGY

After ethics committee approval, the records of all patients who were admitted in coronary care units, adult and pediatric cardiology wards surgery between January 2020 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The type of organism,source of infection ,age wise distribution and seasonal variability among patients who developed hospital acquired infection (HAI) were determined.

RESULTS

271 patients developed microbiologically documented HAI during from January 2020 to December 2021. Maximum number of organisms(78/271 28.78%) are isolated from urinary samples ,followed by blood stream(60/271 22.14%) and Endotracheal tube (54/271 19.92%). Acinetobacter baumanii (53/271, 19.5%) being the most common isolate among all the samples taken . Acinetobacter was the most frequent pathogens isolated in patients with LRTI and blood stream infection while E. coli was from urinary tract infection . In the adult population, infection with E. coli(24.6%) is the most common followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.8%) and Acinetobacter baumanii (10.1%). In the pediatric population Acinetobacter baumanii (38.6%%) is the most common followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.5%) and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA (6.8%). Commonly used antibiotics eg ciprofloxacin,ceftazidime and amikacin were found to be resistant against the top three isolates.

CONCLUSION

Urinary tract was the most common site of infection and Gram-negative bacilli, the most common pathogens in adult as well as pediatric population. Antibiotic resistance was maximum with commonly isolated microorganisms.

U-shaped association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and risk of all-cause mortality in cardiac ICU

BACKGROUND

Stress hyperglycemia has been associated with poor prognosis in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). Recently, the stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) has been proposed to reflect true acute hyperglycemic. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between SHR and prognosis of patients in the cardiac ICU.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 5,564 patients admitted to the cardiac ICU. The participants were divided into seven groups based on their SHR levels. SHR was calculated as admission blood glucose/[(28.7 × HbA1c %) - 46.7]. The primary outcomes of this study were 28-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 349 (6.3%) patients succumbed within 28 days. A U-shaped correlation between SHR and mortality persisted, even after adjusting for other confounding variables, with a discernible inflection point at 0.95. When SHR surpassed 0.95, each standard deviation (SD) increase corresponded to a 1.41-fold elevation in the risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.59). In contrast, when SHR fell below 0.95, each SD increment correlated with a significantly reduced risk of mortality (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.91).

CONCLUSION

There was a U-shaped association between SHR and short -term mortality in patients in the cardiac ICU. The inflection point of SHR for poor prognosis was identified at an SHR value of 0.95.

The Changing Epidemiology of the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

Coronary care units (CCUs) were originally designed to monitor and treat peri-infarction ventricular arrhythmias but have evolved into highly specialized cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) that provide care to a patient population that is increasingly heterogeneous and complex. Paralleling broader epidemiologic trends, patients admitted to contemporary CICUs are older and have a greater burden of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities. Moreover, contemporary CICU patients have high illness severity and often present with acute noncardiac organ dysfunction. In addition to these shifting demographic patterns, there have been important epidemiologic changes in CICU technologies, multidisciplinary systems of care, and physician staffing and training.

Trends and Outcomes of Early Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Unit for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Cohort Study With Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of acute-phase cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) in intensive care settings remains unclear in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to investigate the trends and outcomes of acute-phase CR in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients with CVD, including in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study reviewed a total of 1,948 consecutive patients who were admitted to a tertiary academic ICU for CVD treatment and underwent CR during hospitalisation. The endpoints of this study were the following: in-hospital outcomes: probabilities of walking independence and returning home; and long-term outcomes: clinical events 5 years following hospital discharge, including all-cause readmission or cardiovascular events. It evaluated the associations of CR implementation during ICU treatment (ICU-CR) with in-hospital and long-term outcomes using propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Among the participants, 1,092 received ICU-CR, the rate of which tended to increase with year trend (p for trend <0.001). After propensity score matching, 758 patients were included for analysis (pairs of n=379 ICU-CR and non-ICU-CR). ICU-CR was significantly associated with higher probabilities of walking independence (rate ratio, 2.04; 95% CI 1.77-2.36) and returning home (rate ratio, 1.22; 95% CI 1.05-1.41). These associations were consistently observed in subgroups aged >65 years, after surgery, emergency, and prolonged ICU stay. ICU-CR showed significantly lower incidences of all-cause (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.56-0.89) and cardiovascular events (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.95) than non-ICU-CR.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of acute-phase CR in ICU increased with year trend, and is considered beneficial to improving in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with CVD and various subgroups.

Sedation and shivering management after cardiac arrest

Management of sedation and shivering during targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest is limited by a dearth of high-quality evidence to guide clinicians. Data from general intensive care unit (ICU) populations can likely be extrapolated to post-cardiac arrest patients, but clinicians should be mindful of key differences that exist between these populations. Most importantly, the goals of sedation after cardiac arrest are distinct from other ICU patients and may also involve suppression of shivering during TTM. Drug metabolism and clearance are altered considerably during TTM when a low goal temperature is used, which can delay accurate neuroprognostication. When neuromuscular blockade is used to prevent shivering, sedation should be deep enough to prevent awareness and providers should be aware that this can mask clinical manifestations of seizures. However, excessively deep or prolonged sedation is associated with complications including delirium, infections, increased duration of ventilatory support, prolonged ICU length of stay, and delays in neuroprognostication. In this manuscript, we review sedation and shivering management best practices in the post-cardiac arrest patient population.

Patient-, Clinician-, and Institution-level Variation in Inotrope Use for Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Observational Analysis

BACKGROUND

Conflicting evidence exists regarding the risks and benefits of inotropic therapies during cardiac surgery, and the extent of variation in clinical practice remains understudied. Therefore, the authors sought to quantify patient-, anesthesiologist-, and hospital-related contributions to variation in inotrope use.

METHODS

In this observational study, nonemergent adult cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass were reviewed across a multicenter cohort of academic and community hospitals from 2014 to 2019. Patients who were moribund, receiving mechanical circulatory support, or receiving preoperative or home inotropes were excluded. The primary outcome was an inotrope infusion (epinephrine, dobutamine, milrinone, dopamine) administered for greater than 60 consecutive min intraoperatively or ongoing upon transport from the operating room. Institution-, clinician-, and patient-level variance components were studied.

RESULTS

Among 51,085 cases across 611 attending anesthesiologists and 29 hospitals, 27,033 (52.9%) cases received at least one intraoperative inotrope, including 21,796 (42.7%) epinephrine, 6,360 (12.4%) milrinone, 2,000 (3.9%) dobutamine, and 602 (1.2%) dopamine (non-mutually exclusive). Variation in inotrope use was 22.6% attributable to the institution, 6.8% attributable to the primary attending anesthesiologist, and 70.6% attributable to the patient. The adjusted median odds ratio for the same patient receiving inotropes was 1.73 between 2 randomly selected clinicians and 3.55 between 2 randomly selected institutions. Factors most strongly associated with increased likelihood of inotrope use were institutional medical school affiliation (adjusted odds ratio, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.39 to 27.8), heart failure (adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.46 to 2.76), pulmonary circulation disorder (adjusted odds ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.58 to 1.87), loop diuretic home medication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.69), Black race (adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.68), and digoxin home medication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in inotrope use during cardiac surgery is attributable to the institution and to the clinician, in addition to the patient. Variation across institutions and clinicians suggests a need for future quantitative and qualitative research to understand variation in inotrope use affecting outcomes and develop evidence-based, patient-centered inotrope therapies.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Evolution of concomitant use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support with Impella in cardiogenic shock: From percutaneous femoral Impella to axillary Impella 5.5

BACKGROUND

Little is known about safety and efficacy of the use of Impella 5.5 compared to previous iterations in the setting of Impella with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support as ECPELLA.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who were treated by ECPELLA with surgically implanted axillary Impella 5.5 (N = 13) were compared with patients supported by ECPELLA with percutaneous femoral Impella CP or 2.5 (Control, N = 13).

RESULTS

The total ECPELLA flow was higher in ECPELLA 5.5 group (6.9 vs. 5.4 L/min, p = 0.019). Actual hospital survival was higher than predicted and comparable in both groups (ECPELLA 5.5, 61.5% vs. Control, 53.8%, p = 0.691). Both total device complications (ECPELLA 5.5, 7.7% vs. Control, 46.1%, p = 0.021) and Impella-specific complications (ECPELLA 5.5, 0% vs. Control, 30.8%, p = 0.012) were significantly lower in the ECPELLA 5.5 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of Impella 5.5 in the setting of ECPELLA provides greater hemodynamic support with a lower risk of complications compared to Impella CP or 2.5.

Emergence of microbial infections in some hospitals of Cairo, Egypt: studying their corresponding antimicrobial resistance profiles

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance is one of the ten major public health threats facing humanity, especially in developing countries. Identification of the pathogens responsible for different microbial infections and antimicrobial resistance patterns are important to help clinicians to choose the correct empirical drugs and provide optimal patient care.

METHODS

During the period from November 2020 to January 2021, one hundred microbial isolates were collected randomly from different specimens from some hospitals in Cairo, Egypt. Sputum and chest specimens were from COVID-19 patients. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to CLSI guidelines.

RESULTS

Most microbial infections were more common in males and in elderly people over 45 years of age. They were caused by Gram-negative, Gram-positive bacteria, and yeast isolates that represented 69%, 15%, and 16%, respectively. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (35%) were the most prevalent microbial isolates and showed high resistance rates towards penicillin, ampicillin, and cefixime, followed by Klebsiella spp. (13%) and Candida spp. (16%). Of all microbial isolates, Acinetobacter spp., Serratia spp., Hafnia alvei, and Klebsiella ozaenae were extremely multidrug-resistant (MDR) and have resisted all antibiotic classes used, except for glycylcycline, in varying degrees. Acinetobacter spp., Serratia spp., and Candida spp. were secondary microbial infections in COVID-19 patients, while H. alvei was a bloodstream infection isolate and K. ozaenae was recorded in most infections. Moreover, about half of Staphylococcus aureus strains were MRSA isolates and reported low rates of resistance to glycylcycline and linezolid. In comparison, Candida spp. showed high resistance rates between 77 and 100% to azole drugs and terbinafine, while no resistance rate towards nystatin was reported. Indeed, glycylcycline, linezolid, and nystatin were considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of MDR infections.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in some Egyptian hospitals was high among Gram-negative, Gram-positive bacteria, and candida spp. The high resistance pattern -especially in secondary microbial infections in COVID-19 patients- to most antibiotics used is a matter of great concern, portends an inevitable catastrophe, and requires continuous monitoring to avoid the evolution of new generations.

Reperfusion Delays and Outcomes Among Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With and Without Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND

Mortality remains high in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), and early reperfusion has been shown to improve outcomes. We analyzed the association between first medical contact (FMC)-to-percutaneous coronary angiography time with mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with STEMI with and without CS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority STEMI registry, including all patients with STEMI who received primary percutaneous coronary angiography between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020, and stratified them by presence or absence of CS at hospital arrival. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, the secondary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of the first occurrence of mortality, cardiac arrest, heart failure, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebrovascular accident, or reinfarction. Mixed effects logistic regression with restricted cubic splines was used to estimate the relationships between FMC-to-device time and the outcomes in the CS and non-CS groups.

RESULTS

2929 patients were included, 9.4% (n=275) had CS. Median FMC-to-device time was 113.5 (interquartile range, 93.0-145.0) and 103.0 (interquartile range, 85.0-130.0) minutes for patients with CS and without CS, respectively. More patients with CS had FMC-to-device times above guideline recommendations (76.6% versus 54.1%, P<0.001). Between 60 and 90 minutes, for each 10-minute increase in FMC-to-device time, absolute mortality for patients with CS increased by 4% to 7%, whereas for patients without CS, it increased by <0.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary angiography, reperfusion delays among patients with CS are associated with significantly worse outcomes. Strategies to reduce FMC-to-device times for patients with STEMI presenting with CS are required.

Presentation and Outcomes of Patients With Preoperative Critical Illness Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the prevalence and post-surgical outcomes associated with cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) therapeutics among CICU patients referred for cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of CICU patients referred for cardiac surgery from the intensive care unit.

METHODS

We analyzed characteristics and outcomes of CICU admissions referred from the CICU for cardiac surgery during 2017 to 2020 across 29 centers. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among 10,321 CICU admissions, 887 (8.6%) underwent cardiac surgery, including 406 (46%) coronary artery bypass graftings, 201 (23%) transplants or ventricular assist devices, 171 (19%) valve surgeries, and 109 (12%) other procedures. Common indications for CICU admission included shock (33.5%) and respiratory insufficiency (24.9%). Preoperative CICU therapies included vasoactive therapy in 52.2%, mechanical circulatory support in 35.9%, renal replacement in 8.2%, mechanical ventilation in 35.7%, and 17.5% with high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. In-hospital mortality was 11.7% among all CICU admissions and 9.1% among patients treated with cardiac surgery. After multivariable adjustment, pre-op mechanical circulatory support and renal replacement therapy were associated with mortality, while respiratory support and vasoactive therapy were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 1 in 12 contemporary CICU patients receive cardiac surgery. Despite high preoperative disease severity, CICU admissions undergoing cardiac surgery had a comparable mortality rate to CICU patients overall; highlighting the ability of clinicians to select higher acuity patients with a reasonable perioperative risk.

Recent developments and controversies in therapeutic hypothermia after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Therapeutic hypothermia was recommended as the only neuroprotective treatment in comatose patients after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). With new evidence suggesting a similar neuroprotective effect of 36 °C and 33 °C, the term "therapeutic hypothermia" was substituted by "targeted temperature management" in 2011, which in turn was replaced by the term "temperature control" in 2022 because of new evidence of the similar effects of target normothermia and 33 °C. However, there is no clear consensus on the efficacy of therapeutic hypothermia. In this article, we provide an overview of the recent evidence from basic and clinical research related to therapeutic hypothermia and re-evaluate its application as a post-ROSC neuroprotective intervention in clinical settings.

Management of Cardiogenic Shock Unrelated to Acute Myocardial Infarction

Cardiogenic shock is an extreme manifestation of acute decompensated heart failure. Cardiogenic shock is often caused by-and has traditionally been studied in the setting of-acute myocardial infarction (AMI CS); however, there is increasing incidence and recognition of cardiogenic shock not associated with acute myocardial infarction (non-AMI CS) as a distinct entity. Despite decades of study and technologic advancements, cardiogenic shock mortality remains as high as 50%, regardless of etiology. New approaches to shock phenotyping and classification have emerged, with a focus on appropriately matching patient physiology to a growing list of available interventions. Further study is needed to determine whether these efforts will lead to more nuanced use of mechanical circulatory support and improved patient outcomes, especially in non-AMI CS. In the meantime, models of care incorporating multidisciplinary decision making, such as shock teams, may improve patient selection and outcomes.

Failure to Rescue: A Quality Metric for Cardiac Surgery and Cardiovascular Critical Care

Failure to rescue, defined as mortality after a surgical complication, is a widely accepted quality metric across many specialties and is becoming an important metric in cardiac surgery. The failure to rescue metric provides a target for improvements in patient outcomes after complications occur. To be used appropriately, the failure to rescue metric must be defined using a prespecified set of life-threatening and rescuable complications. Successful patient rescue requires a systematic approach of complication recognition, timely escalation of care, effective medical management, and mitigation of additional complications. This process requires contributions from cardiac surgeons, intensivists, and other specialists including cardiologists, neurologists, and anaesthesiologists. Factors that affect failure to rescue rates in cardiac surgery and cardiovascular critical care include nurse staffing ratios, intensivist coverage, advanced specialist support, hospital and surgical volume, the presence of trainees, and patient comorbidities. Strategies to improve patient rescue include working to understand the mechanisms of failure to rescue, anticipating postoperative complications, prioritizing microsystem factors, enhancing early escalation of care, and educating and empowering junior clinicians. When used appropriately, the failure to rescue quality metric can help institutions focus on improving processes of care that minimize morbidity and mortality from rescuable complications after cardiac surgery.

Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

The prevalence of respiratory failure is increasing in the contemporary cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) and is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. For patients that survive their initial respiratory decompensation, liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and the decision to extubate requires careful clinical assessment and planning. Therefore, it is essential for the CICU clinician to know how to assess and manage the various stages of IMV liberation, including ventilator weaning, evaluation of extubation readiness, and provide post-extubation care. In this review, we provide a comprehensive approach to liberation from IMV in the CICU, including cardiopulmonary interactions relative to withdrawal from positive pressure ventilation, evaluation of readiness for and assessment of spontaneous breathing trials, sedation management to optimize extubation, strategies for patients at a high risk for extubation failure, and tracheostomy in the cardiovascular patient.

Cardiovascular Critical Care Training: A Collaboration between Intensivists and Cardiologists

With growing patient complexity, the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CICU) of today has evolved substantially from the coronary care unit (CCU) of decades ago. The growing burden of noncardiac critical illness and highly specialized acute cardiovascular disease requires a degree of expertise beyond that afforded through a general cardiology training program. Therefore, the American Heart Association (AHA) has proposed a CICU staffing model to include dedicated cardiac intensivists; in the present day, "dual-trained" physicians are extremely sparse. Guidance on designing critical care fellowships for cardiologists is limited but will require collaboration between cardiologists and medical intensivists. Here, we review the evolution of the CICU, describe training pathways, and offer guidance on creating a cardiology critical care training program.

Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN): a cohort profile

AIMS

The aims of the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) are to develop a registry to investigate the epidemiology of cardiac critical illness and to establish a multicentre research network to conduct randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in patients with cardiac critical illness.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The CCCTN was founded in 2017 with 16 centres and has grown to a research network of over 40 academic and clinical centres in the United States and Canada. Each centre enters data for consecutive cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) admissions for at least 2 months of each calendar year. More than 20 000 unique CICU admissions are now included in the CCCTN Registry. To date, scientific observations from the CCCTN Registry include description of variations in care, the epidemiology and outcomes of all CICU patients, as well as subsets of patients with specific disease states, such as shock, heart failure, renal dysfunction, and respiratory failure. The CCCTN has also characterised utilization patterns, including use of mechanical circulatory support in response to changes in the heart transplantation allocation system, and the use and impact of multidisciplinary shock teams. Over years of multicentre collaboration, the CCCTN has established a robust research network to facilitate multicentre registry-based randomised trials in patients with cardiac critical illness.

CONCLUSION

The CCCTN is a large, prospective registry dedicated to describing processes-of-care and expanding clinical knowledge in cardiac critical illness. The CCCTN will serve as an investigational platform from which to conduct randomised controlled trials in this important patient population.

Position Statement on Vascular Access Safety for Percutaneous Devices in AMI Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

In the United States, the frequency of using percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is increasing. These devices require large-bore vascular access to provide left, right, or biventricular cardiac support, frequently under urgent/emergent circumstances. Significant technical and logistical variability exists in device insertion, care, and removal in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and in the cardiac intensive care unit. This variability in practice may contribute to adverse outcomes observed in centers that receive patients with cardiogenic shock, who are at higher risk for circulatory insufficiency, venous stasis, bleeding, and arterial hypoperfusion. In this position statement, we aim to: 1) describe the public health impact of bleeding and vascular complications in cardiogenic shock; 2) highlight knowledge gaps for vascular safety and provide a roadmap for a regulatory perspective necessary for advancing the field; 3) propose a minimum core set of process elements, or "vascular safety bundle"; and 4) develop a possible study design for a pragmatic trial platform to evaluate which structured approach to vascular access drives most benefit and prevents vascular and bleeding complications in practice.

Intensive Care Management of the Cardiogenic Shock Patient

Optimal management of patients with cardiogenic shock requires a detailed and systematic assessment of all organ systems, balancing the risks and benefits of any investigation and intervention, while avoiding the complications of critical illness. Overall prognosis depends upon a number of factors, including that of the underlying cardiac disease and its potential reversibility, the severity of shock, the involvement of other organ systems, the age of the patient and comorbidities. As with all intensive care patients, the mainstay of management is supportive, up to and including implementation and management of a number of devices, including acute mechanical circulatory support. The assessment and management of these most critically ill patients therefore demands in-depth knowledge and skill relating to cardiac intensive care, extending well beyond standard intensive care or cardiology practice.

Targeted temperature management after out of hospital cardiac arrest: quo vadis?

Targeted temperature management (TTM) has become a cornerstone in the treatment of comatose post-cardiac arrest patients over the last two decades. Belief in the efficacy of this intervention for improving neurologically intact survival was based on two trials from 2002, one truly randomized-controlled and one small quasi-randomized trial, without clear confirmation of that finding. Subsequent large randomized trials reported no difference in outcomes between TTM at 33 vs. 36°C and no benefit of TTM at 33°C as compared with fever control alone. Given that these results may help shape post-cardiac arrest patient care, we sought to review the history and rationale as well as trial evidence for TTM, critically review the TTM2 trial, and highlight gaps in knowledge and research needs for the future. Finally, we provide contemporary guidance for the use of TTM in daily clinical practice.

Implementation of a Nurse-Driven Spontaneous Awakening Trial Protocol in a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

In patients receiving mechanical ventilation, spontaneous awakening trials reduce morbidity and mortality when paired with spontaneous breathing trials. However, spontaneous awakening trials are not performed every day they are indicated and little is known about spontaneous awakening trial protocol use in cardiac intensive care units.

LOCAL PROBLEM

Spontaneous awakening trial completion rate at the study institution was low and no trial protocol was regularly used.

METHODS

A preintervention-postintervention retrospective cohort study was performed in adult patients with at least 24 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation in Michigan Medicine's cardiac intensive care unit. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. Data included demographics, sedation, mechanical ventilation duration, and in-hospital mortality. A nurse-driven spontaneous awakening trial protocol modified for the cardiac intensive care unit was implemented in October 2020.

RESULTS

Compared with the preintervention cohort (n = 29, May through July 2020), the postintervention cohort (n = 27, October 2020 through February 2021) had a higher ratio of number of trials performed to number of days eligible for trial (0.91 vs 0.52; P < .01). Median continuous sedative infusion duration was shorter after intervention (2.3 vs 3.6 days; P = .02). Median mechanical ventilation duration (3.8 vs 4.7 days; P = .18) and mortality (41% vs 41%; P = .95) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous awakening trial protocol implementation led to a higher trial completion rate and a shorter duration of continuous sedative infusion. Larger studies are needed to assess the impact of protocolized spontaneous awakening trials on cardiac intensive care unit patient outcomes.

Concomitant Sepsis Diagnoses in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock: 15-Year National Temporal Trends, Management, and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES:

DESIGN:

SETTING:

PARTICIPANTS:

INTERVENTIONS:

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

CONCLUSIONS:

Atypical Antipsychotic Safety in the CICU

Atypical antipsychotics are used in cardiac intensive care units (CICU) to treat delirium despite limited data on safety in patients with acute cardiovascular conditions. Patients treated with these agents may be at higher risk for adverse events such as QTc prolongation and arrhythmias. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 144 adult patients who were not receiving antipsychotics before admission and received olanzapine (n = 50) or quetiapine (n = 94) in the Michigan Medicine CICU. Data on baseline characteristics, antipsychotic dose and duration, length of stay, and adverse events were collected. Adverse events included ventricular tachycardia (sustained ventricular tachycardia attributed to the medication), hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg attributed to the medication), and QTc prolongation (QTc increase by ≥60 ms or to an interval ≥500 ms). Twenty-six patients (18%) experienced an adverse event. Of those adverse events, 20 patients (14%) experienced QTc prolongation, 3 patients (2%) had ventricular tachycardia, and 3 patients (2%) had hypotension. Patients who received quetiapine had a higher rate of adverse events (25% vs 6%, p = 0.01) including QTc prolongation (18% vs 6%, p = 0.046). Intensive care unit length of stay was shorter in patients who received olanzapine (6.5 vs 9.5 days, p = 0.047). Eighteen patients (13%) had their antipsychotic continued at discharge from the hospital. In conclusion, QTc prolongation was more common in patients treated with quetiapine versus olanzapine although the number of events was relatively low with both agents in a CICU cohort.

The association between cardiac intensive care unit mechanical ventilation volumes and in-hospital mortality

AIMS

The incidence of respiratory failure and use of invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in the cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) is increasing. While institutional MV volumes are associated with reduced mortality in medical and surgical ICUs, this volume-mortality relationship has not been characterized in the CICU.

METHODS AND RESULTS

National population-based data were used to identify patients admitted to CICUs (2005-2015) requiring MV in Canada. CICUs were categorized into low (≤100), intermediate (101-300), and high (>300) volume centres based on spline knots identified in the association between annual MV volume and mortality. Outcomes of interest included all-cause in-hospital mortality, the proportion of patients requiring prolonged MV (>96 h) and CICU length of stay (LOS). Among 47 173 CICU admissions requiring MV, 89.5% (42 200) required invasive MV. The median annual CICU MV volume was 43 (inter-hospital range 1-490). Compared to low-volume centres (35.9%), in-hospital mortality was lower in intermediate [29.2%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.97, P = 0.019] and high-volume (18.2%; aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66-1.02, P = 0.076) centres. Prolonged MV was higher in low-volume (29.2%) compared to high-volume (14.8%, aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89, P = 0.003) and intermediate-volume (23.0%, aOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.06, P = 0.14] centres. Mortality and prolonged MV were lower in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable and academic centres, but a shorter CICU LOS was observed only in subgroup of PCI-capable intermediate- and high-volume hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

In a national dataset, we observed that higher CICU MV volumes were associated with lower incidence of in-hospital mortality, prolonged MV, and CICU LOS. Our data highlight the need for minimum MV volume benchmarks for CICUs caring for patients with respiratory failure.

Quality of Heart Failure Care in the Intensive Care Unit

Patients with heart failure (HF) who are seen in an intensive care unit (ICU) manifest the highest-risk, most complex and most resource-intensive disease states. These patients account for a large relative proportion of days spent in an ICU. The paradigms by which critical care is provided to patients with HF are being reconsidered, including consideration of various multidisciplinary ICU staffing models and the development of acute-response teams. Traditional HF quality initiatives have centered on the peri- and postdischarge period in attempts to improve adherence to guideline-directed therapies and reduce readmissions. There is a compelling rationale for expanding high-quality efforts in treating patients with HF who are receiving critical care so we can improve outcomes, reduce preventable harm, improve teamwork and resource use, and achieve high health-system performance. Our goal is to answer the following question: For a patient with HF in the ICU, what is required for the provision of high-quality care? Herein, we first review the epidemiology of HF syndromes in the ICU and identify relevant critical care and quality stakeholders in HF. We next discuss the tenets of high-quality care for patients with HF in the ICU that will optimize critical care outcomes, such as ICU staffing models and evidence-based management of cardiac and noncardiac disease. We discuss strategies to mitigate preventable harm, improve ICU culture and conduct outcomes review, and we conclude with our summative vision of high-quality of ICU care for patients with HF; our vision includes clinical excellence, teamwork and ICU culture.

Predicting mortality in cardiac care unit patients: external validation of the Mayo cardiac intensive care unit admission risk score

AIMS

The Mayo Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Admission Risk Score (M-CARS) had excellent performance in predicting in-hospital mortality in the US population. We sought to validate the M-CARS for in-hospital and post-discharge mortality in Asian patients admitted to the cardiac care unit (CCU).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients admitted to the CCU of a tertiary care centre between July 2015 and December 2019 were included into the study. Patients with intra-hospital transfer to the CCU due to intensive care unit overflow, postoperative cardiac surgery, or for monitoring after elective procedures were excluded. Cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, Braden skin score, blood urea nitrogen, anion gap, and red cell distribution width, were used to calculate the M-CARS. Patients were stratified into three groups, according to the M-CARS (<2, 2-6, >6). Of 1988 patients in the study, 30.1% were female with a median age of 65 years. Prevalence of cardiogenic shock and respiratory failure at admission were 2.8% and 4.5%, respectively. One hundred and seventeen patients died during the admission (mortality rate of 5.9%). The in-hospital mortality rate in patients with M-CARS of <2, 2-6, and >6 was 1.1%, 9.8%, and 35.5%, respectively. C-statistic of M-CARS for in-hospital mortality was 0.840 (95% CI 0.805-0.873); whereas, it was 0.727 (95% CI 0.690-0.761) for 1-year post-discharge mortality. Calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted and observed in-hospital mortality in the majority of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The M-CARS was useful in our study, in terms of discrimination and calibration. M-CARS identified high-risk patients in CCU, who had unacceptably high mortality rate during hospital stay and thereafter.