Individual and System Contributions to Race and Sex Disparities in Thrombolysis Use for Stroke Patients in the United States

Association of Age, Sex and Education With Access to the Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Barriers to treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in South Korea remain incompletely characterized. We analyze a nationwide prospective cohort to determine patient-level features associated with delayed presentation and non-treatment of potential IVT-eligible patients.

METHODS

We identified consecutive patients with AIS from 01/2011 to 08/2023 from a multicenter and prospective acute stroke registry in Korea. Patients were defined as IVT candidates if they presented within 4.5 hours from the last known well, had no lab evidence of coagulopathy, and had National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 4. Multivariable generalized linear mixed regression models were used to investigate the associations between their characteristics and the IVT candidates or the use of IVT among the candidates.

RESULTS

Among 84,103 AIS patients, 41.0% were female, with a mean age of 69 ± 13 years and presentation NIHSS of 4 [interquartile range, 1-8]. Out of these patients, 13,757 (16.4%) were eligible for IVT, of whom 8,179 (59.5%) received IVT. Female sex (adjusted risk ratio [RR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.94) and lower years of education (adjusted RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97 for 0-3 years, compared to ≥ 13 years) were associated with a decreased likelihood of presenting as eligible for IVT after AIS; meanwhile, young age (adjusted RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24 for ≤ 44 years, compared to 75-84 years) was associated with an increased likelihood of being an IVT candidate. Among those who were eligible for IVT, only age was significantly associated with the use of IVT (adjusted RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.16 for age 65-74 and adjusted RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90 for ≥ 85 years, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Most patients with AIS present outside IVT eligibility in South Korea, and only 60% of eligible patients were ultimately treated. We identified increased age, female sex and lower education as key features on which to focus interventions for improving IVT utilization.

Racial Differences in Adoption and Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization among High-Risk Adults with Carotid Artery Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Differential access to new technologies may contribute to racial disparities in surgical outcomes but has not been well-studied in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. We examined race-based differences in adoption and outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) among high-risk non-Hispanic (NH) Black and NH white adults undergoing carotid revascularization.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of TCAR, transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS), and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedures performed for carotid artery stenosis from January 2015 to July 2023 in the Vascular Quality Initiative. NH Black and NH white adults were included if they met Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services high-risk criteria. Hospitals and physicians were categorized as TCAR-capable if they had previously performed at least one TCAR prior to the time of a given procedure. We fit logistic and linear regressions, adjusted a priori for common demographic, clinical, and disease characteristics, to estimate associations of race with receipt of TCAR (versus CEA or TF-CAS), and to explore associations between race, hospital and physician characteristics, and perioperative composite stroke/death/myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Of 159,471 high-risk patients undergoing revascularization for carotid artery stenosis (mean age 72 years, 38.5% female, 5.3% NH Black), 28,722 (18.0%) received TCAR, including 16.9% of NH Black adults and 18.1% of NH white adults (P < 0.001). After controlling for patient and disease characteristics, NH Black patients were less likely than NH white patients to receive TCAR (aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.99). The use of TCAR did not vary by race among patients treated at TCAR-capable hospitals (aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91-1.05) or by TCAR-capable physicians (aOR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93-1.10); however, NH Black race was associated with lower odds of receiving treatment in these settings (TCAR-capable hospital: aOR 0.93 [0.88-0.98]; TCAR-capable physician: aOR 0.92 [0.87-0.98]). NH Black race was associated with higher odds of stroke/death/MI in the full cohort (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.36), but not in the subgroup of patients who received TCAR (aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.56-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

TCAR attenuated racial disparities in perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with carotid revascularization, but NH Black adults were less likely than NH white adults to receive TCAR. Relatively worse access for NH Black adults to technologically-advanced treatment settings may partially explain the broader persistence of race-based differences in carotid revascularization treatment patterns and outcomes.

Case for Establishing a National Stroke Activation Fee in the United States: Learning From Trauma Centers

There is a large burden of stroke in the United States, and extensive systems of care have been established to address it. The resources devoted to stroke centers are analogous to those of trauma centers, both sharing many strict requirements for certification, clinical preparedness, quality improvement, data management, and reporting. However, trauma programs partly defray these costs through a trauma activation billing code, a billable fee that is charged for activation of the trauma team under strict criteria. There are potential benefits to establishing an analogous national stroke code activation fee. Although a billable stroke code activation fee may increase financial burden on patients, this may be counterbalanced by the significant potential for individual and societal benefits. Providing additional financial support for stroke systems of care may improve acute stroke treatment, reduce stroke burden and poststroke disability, and reduce inequality by broadening the reach of stroke systems of care to disadvantaged communities. Further evaluation of the costs and benefits of implementing a stroke code activation fee based on that currently used by trauma centers is needed.

Racial Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

We examined racial disparities in (1) cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) utilization and (2) CDA in-hospital outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ACDF and CDA are established treatments for cervical disc disease. While CDA may offer certain advantages over ACDF, its utilization patterns have not been comprehensively explored.

METHODS

This study of 2012 to 2019 discharges from the National Inpatient Sample included White, Black, and Hispanic patients aged 18 years and older who underwent elective ACDF or CDA. Patient demographics, comorbidities, cervical spine diagnoses, and hospital characteristics were extracted. Survey-weighted logistic regression modeled the adjusted association between race and CDA (vs. ACDF) utilization; an interaction between race and year examined temporal changes in disparities. For CDA outcomes, multivariable logistic regression was used for binary outcomes (nonhome discharge, combined complications, and dysphagia) and linear regression for length of stay.

RESULTS

The cohort included 712,355 weighted procedures (97.6% ACDF; 84.2% White, 9.7% Black, 6.1% Hispanic). CDA utilization increased from 1.0% of the procedures in 2012 to 3.8% in 2019. Black and Hispanic patients had significantly lower odds than White patients of receiving CDA versus ACDF (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.89, P=0.001; OR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93, P=0.003) respectively. There was no statistically significant interaction between race and discharge year (P=0.50). For in-hospital CDA-specific outcomes, Black (vs. White) patients were more likely to experience dysphagia (OR=2.70, 95% CI: 1.53-4.78, P=0.001) and combined complications (OR=3.10, 95% CI: 1.91-5.05, P <0.001). There were no significant differences in any CDA outcome for Hispanic versus White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed decreased utilization of CDA versus ACDF in minority patients, a pattern that persisted over time despite overall increasing CDA utilization. In addition, a higher burden of dysphagia and combined complications following CDA in Black patients warrants further examination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Race/Ethnic Differences in In-Hospital Mortality after Acute Ischemic Stroke

INTRODUCTION

Stroke mortality has declined, with differential changes by race; stroke is now the 5th leading cause of death overall, but 2nd leading cause of death in Black individuals. Little is known about recent race/ethnic and sex trends in in-hospital mortality after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and whether system-level factors contribute to possible differences.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample, adults (≥18 years) with a primary diagnosis of AIS from 2006 to 2017 (n = 643,912) were identified. We assessed in-hospital mortality by race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander [API], other), sex, and age. Hospitals were categorized by proportion of White patients served: "≥75% White hospitals," "50-75% White hospitals," and "<50% White hospitals." Using survey adjusted logistic regression, the association between race/ethnicity and odds of mortality was assessed, adjusting for key sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics (e.g., age, comorbidities, stroke severity, do not resuscitate orders, and palliative care).

RESULTS

Overall, mortality decreased from 5.0% in 2006 to 2.9% in 2017 (p < 0.01). Comparing 2012-2017 to 2006-2011, there was a 68% reduction in mortality odds overall after adjusting for covariates, most prominent in White individuals (69%) and smallest in Black individuals (57%). Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients had lower odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.87 and aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-1.00), primarily driven by those >65 years (age × ethnicity interaction p < 0.01). Compared to White men, Black, Hispanic, and API men, and Black women had lower aOR of mortality. The differences in mortality between White and all the other race/ethnic groups combined were most pronounced in ≥75% White hospitals (aOR 0.80, 0.74-0.87) compared to 50-75% White hospitals (aOR 0.85, 0.79-0.91) and <50% White hospitals (aOR 0.88, 0.81-0.95; interaction effect: p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

AIS mortality has decreased dramatically in recent years in all race/ethnic subgroups. Overall, while individuals of other race/ethnic subgroups had lower mortality odds compared to White individuals, this effect was significantly lower in hospitals serving predominantly White patients compared to those serving minority populations. Further study is needed to understand these differences and to what extent sociocultural, biological, and system-level factors play a role. Category: Health services, quality improvement, and patient-centered outcomes were the elements used to categorize the study sample.

Disparities in access to and timing of interventional therapies for pulmonary embolism across the United States

BACKGROUND

Interventional therapies (ITs) are an emerging treatment modality for pulmonary embolism (PE); however, the degree of racial, sex-based, and sociodemographic disparities in access and timing is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate barriers to access and timing of ITs for PE across the United States.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2016-2020 included adult patients with PE. The use of ITs (mechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis) was identified via International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes. Early IT was defined as procedure performed within the first 2 days after admission.

RESULTS

A total of 27 805 273 records from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database were examined. There were 387 514 (1.4%) patients with PE, with 14 249 (3.6%) of them having undergone IT procedures (11 115 catheter-directed thrombolysis, 2314 thrombectomy, and 780 both procedures). After multivariate adjustment, factors associated with less use of IT included Black race (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.94; P < .01), Hispanic race (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.79; P < .01), female sex (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.91; P < .01), treatment in a rural hospital (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.54; P < .01), and lack of private insurance (Medicare OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.80; P < .01; Medicaid OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.61-0.69; P < .01; no coverage OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.93; P < .01). Among the patients who received IT, 11 315 (79%) procedures were conducted within 2 days of admission and 2934 (21%) were delayed. Factors associated with delayed procedures included Black race (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26; P = .04), Hispanic race (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.28-1.80; P < .01), weekend admission (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.25-1.51; P < .01), Medicare coverage (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.10-1.40; P < .01), and Medicaid coverage (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12-1.49; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Significant racial, sex-based, and geographic barriers exist in overall access to IT for PE in the United States.

Treatment with intravenous alteplase in ischaemic stroke patients with onset time between 4.5 and 24 hours (HOPE): protocol for a randomised, controlled, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

While intravenous thrombolysis is recommended for patients who had an acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, there are few randomised trials investigating the benefits of thrombolysis beyond this therapeutic window.

AIM

To determine whether patients who had an AIS selected with the presence of potentially salvageable tissue on CT perfusion at 4.5-24 hours after stroke onset (for stroke with unknown onset time, the midpoint of the time last known to be well and symptom recognition time; for wake-up stroke, the midpoint of the time last known to be well or sleep onset and wake up time) will benefit from intravenous thrombolysis.

DESIGN

HOPE is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label blinded endpoint trial with the stage of phase III. The treatment allocation employs 1:1 randomisation. The treatment arm under investigation is alteplase with standard therapy, the control arm is standard therapy. Eligibility imaging criteria include ischaemic core volume ≤70 mL, penumbra ≥10 mL and mismatch ≥20%.

STUDY OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is non-disabled functional outcome (assessed as modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days).

DISCUSSION

HOPE is the first trial to investigate whether intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase offers benefits in patients who had an AIS presenting within 4.5-24 hours, which has the potential to extend time window and expand eligible population for thrombolysis therapy.

Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the United States: Results From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND

Despite its approval for acute ischemic stroke >25 years ago, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains underused, with inequities by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and geography. Little is known about IVT rates by insurance status.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed temporal trends from 2002 to 2015 in IVT for acute ischemic stroke in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample using adjusted, survey-weighted logistic regression. We calculated odds ratios for IVT for each category in 2002 to 2008 (period 1) and 2009 to 2015 (period 2). IVT use for acute ischemic stroke increased from 1.0% in 2002 to 6.8% in 2015 (adjusted annual relative ratio, 1.15). Individuals aged ≥85 years had the most pronounced increase during 2002 to 2015 (adjusted annual relative ratio, 1.18) but were less likely to receive IVT compared with 18- to 44-year-olds in period 1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.23) and period 2 (aOR, 0.36). Women were less likely than men to receive IVT, but the disparity narrowed over time (period 1: aOR, 0.81; period 2: aOR, 0.94). Inequities in IVT resolved for Hispanic individuals in period 2 (aOR, 0.96) but not for Black individuals (period 2: aOR, 0.81). The disparity in IVT for Medicare patients, compared with privately insured patients, lessened over time (period 1: aOR, 0.59; period 2: aOR, 0.75). Patients treated in rural hospitals remained less likely to receive IVT than in urban hospitals; a more dramatic increase in urbanity widened the inequity (period 2, urban nonteaching versus rural: aOR, 2.58, period 2, urban teaching versus rural: aOR, 3.90).

CONCLUSIONS

IVT for acute ischemic stroke increased among adults. Despite some encouraging trends, the remaining disparities highlight the need for intensified efforts at addressing inequities.

Provider Care Segregation and Hospital-Region Racial Disparities in the United States for Acute Ischemic Stroke and Endovascular Therapy Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Reasons for racial disparities in the use and outcomes of endovascular treatment (ET) are not known. We examined patterns in care segregation for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the United States, and outcomes of segregation of care after ET.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used deidentified Medicare data sets to identify AIS admissions between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019, using validated International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. For AIS, we calculated (1) the proportion of White patients at the hospital, (2) the proportional difference in the proportion of White patients between hospital patients and the county, and (3) provider care segregation by the dissimilarity index for ET cases. Using unadjusted and adjusted multilevel logistic models, we examined associations between measures of segregation and outcomes of discharge home, inpatient mortality, and 30-day mortality. The mean proportional difference in the proportion of White patients comparing hospitalized patients with AIS to the county race distribution was 0.015 (SD, 0.219) at the hospital level. For ET, the mean proportional difference in the proportion of White patients comparing patients receiving ET to the county race distribution was much higher, at 0.146 (SD, 0.374). The dissimilarity index for ET providers was high, with a mean of 0.48 (SD, 0.29) across all hospitals. Black patients with AIS (compared with White patients) had reduced odds of discharge home, inpatient mortality, and 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national study with contemporary data in the endovascular era of AIS treatment, we found substantial evidence for segregation of care in the United States, not for only AIS in general but also especially for ET.

Gender-Based Disparity in Acute Stroke Imaging Utilization and the Impact on Treatment and Outcomes: 2012 to 2021

INTRODUCTION

Prior studies have revealed significant socio-economic disparities in neuro-imaging and treatment utilization for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In this study, we sought to evaluate whether a sex-based disparity exists in neuro-imaging and to determine its etiology and association with acute treatment and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients with AIS admitted to a comprehensive stroke center between 2012 and 2021. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, neuro-imaging, acute treatment, and early clinical outcomes were extracted from the electronic medical records. Trend analysis, bivariate analysis of patient characteristics by sex, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Of the 7,540 AIS episodes registered from 2012 to 2021, 47.9% were female patients. After adjusting for demographic, clinical, and temporal factors, significantly higher utilization of CTA was found for male patients (odds ratio = 1.20 [95% confidence interval 1.07-1.34]), particularly from socio-economically advantaged groups, and in years 2015 and 2019, representing the years endovascular thrombectomy recommendations changed. Despite this, male patients had significantly lower intravenous thrombolysis utilization (odds ratio = 0.83 [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.96]) and similar endovascular thrombectomy rates as female patients. There were no significant sex differences in early clinical outcomes, and no relevant clinical or demographic factors explained the CT angiography utilization disparity.

CONCLUSION

Despite higher CT angiography utilization in socio-economically advantaged male patients with AIS, likely overutilization due to implicit biases following guideline updates, the rates of acute treatment, and early clinical outcomes were unaffected.

Diagnostic error among vulnerable populations presenting to the emergency department with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular or neurological symptoms: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic error (DE) is a common problem in clinical practice, particularly in the emergency department (ED) setting. Among ED patients presenting with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular/neurological symptoms, a delay in diagnosis or failure to hospitalise may be most impactful in terms of adverse outcomes. Minorities and other vulnerable populations may be at higher risk of DE. We aimed to systematically review studies reporting the frequency and causes of DE in under-resourced patients presenting to the ED with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular/neurological symptoms.

METHODS

We searched EBM Reviews, Embase, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science from 2000 through 14 August 2022. Data were abstracted by two independent reviewers using a standardised form. The risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Of the 7342 studies screened, we included 20 studies evaluating 7436,737 patients. Most studies were conducted in the USA, and one study was multicountry. 11 studies evaluated DE in patients with cerebrovascular/neurological symptoms, 8 studies with cardiovascular symptoms and 1 study examined both types of symptoms. 13 studies investigated missed diagnoses and 7 studies explored delayed diagnoses. There was significant clinical and methodological variability, including heterogeneity of DE definitions and predictor variable definitions as well as methods of DE assessment, study design and reporting.Among the studies evaluating cardiovascular symptoms, black race was significantly associated with higher odds of DE in 4/6 studies evaluating missed acute myocardial infarction (AMI)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis compared with white race (OR from 1.18 (1.12-1.24) to 4.5 (1.8-11.8)). The association between other analysed factors (ethnicity, insurance and limited English proficiency) and DE in this domain varied from study to study and was inconclusive.Among the studies evaluating DE in patients with cerebrovascular/neurological symptoms, no consistent association was found indicating higher or lower odds of DE. Although some studies showed significant differences, these were not consistently in the same direction.The overall ROB was low for most included studies; however, the certainty of evidence was very low, mostly due to serious inconsistency in definitions and measurement approaches across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrated consistent increased odds of missed AMI/ACS diagnosis among black patients presenting to the ED compared with white patients in most studies. No consistent associations between demographic groups and DE related to cerebrovascular/neurological diagnoses were identified. More standardised approaches to study design, measurement of DE and outcomes assessment are needed to understand this problem among vulnerable populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020178885 and is available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020178885.

Racial Disparities and Surgical Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis 2015-2020

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to assess the effect of race on outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

We identified 57,913 adult patients who underwent elective ACDF spine surgery from 2015 to 2020. Data were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative course, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were stratified by race.

RESULTS

A total of 57,913 patients, white (n = 49,016), African American (AA; n = 7200), Native American (NA; n = 565), and Asian (n = 1132) underwent ACDF fusion surgery. AA patients had higher comorbidities, including diabetes (24.7%), dyspnea (5.9%), and hypertension (61.6%) compared with the other groups (P < 0.001). NA and AA were higher tobacco users, (33.1%) and (28.7%), respectively (P < 0.001). Most of the patients reported in this dataset had single-level surgeries. AAs had a longer average hospital stay (2.51±7.31 days) and operative time (144.13±82.26 min) (P < 0.001). Lower risk of superficial surgical site infection (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.77; P = 0.005) and greater risk of reintubation (ORadj, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.25-2.17; P < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (ORadj, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.27-2.79; P = 0.001), renal insufficiency (ORadj, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.38-7.20; P = 0.006), and return to the operating room (ORadj, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.65; P < 0.001 were reported in AAs compared with whites. NAs showed an increased risk of superficial surgical site infection compared with whites (ORadj, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.05-6.36; P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities were found to independently affect rates of complications after surgery for ACDF.

Sex differences in onset to hospital arrival time, prestroke disability, and clinical symptoms in patients with a large vessel occlusion: a MR CLEAN Registry substudy

BACKGROUND

Women have been reported to have worse outcomes after endovascular treatment (EVT), despite a similar treatment effect in non-clinical trial populations. We aimed to assess sex differences at hospital presentation with respect to workflow metrics, prestroke disability, and presenting clinical symptoms.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients from the Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischaemic Stroke in The Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry (2014-2018) who received EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO). We assessed sex differences in workflow metrics, prestroke disability (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥1), and stroke severity and symptoms according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on hospital admission with logistic and linear regression analyses and calculated the adjusted OR (aOR).

RESULTS

We included 4872 patients (47.6% women). Compared with men, women were older (median age 76 vs 70 years) and less often achieved good functional outcome at 90 days (mRS ≤2: 35.2% vs 46.4%, aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.82). Mean onset-to-door time was longer in women (2 hours 16 min vs 2 hours 7 min, adjusted delay 9 min, 95% CI 4 to 13). This delay contributed to longer onset-to-groin times (3 hours 26 min in women vs 3 hours 13 min in men, adjusted delay 13 min, 95% CI 9 to 17). Women more often had prestroke disability (mRS ≥1: 41.1% vs 29.1%, aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.82). NIHSS on admission was essentially similar in men and women (mean 15±6 vs 15±6, NIHSS <10 vs ≥10, aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06). There were no clear sex differences in the occurrence of specific stroke symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Women with LVO had longer onset-to-door times and more often prestroke disability than men. Raising awareness of these differences at hospital presentation and investigating underlying causes may help to improve outcome after EVT in women.

Effects of System-Level Factors on Race/Ethnic Differences in In-Hospital Mortality after Acute Ischemic Stroke

Introduction

Stroke mortality has declined, with differential changes by race; stroke is now the 5th leading cause of death overall, but 2nd leading cause of death in Black individuals. Little is known about recent race/ethnic and sex trends in in-hospital mortality after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and whether system-level factors contribute to possible differences.

Methods

Using the National Inpatient Sample, adults (≥18 years) with a primary diagnosis of AIS from 2006 to 2017 (n=643,912) were identified. We assessed in-hospital mortality by race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander [API], other), sex, and age. Hospitals were categorized by proportion of non-White patients served: <25% ("predominantly White patients"), 25-50% ("mixed race/ethnicity profile"), and ≥50% ("predominantly non-White patients"). Using survey adjusted logistic regression, the association between race/ethnicity and odds of mortality was assessed, adjusting for key sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics (e.g., age, comorbidities, stroke severity, do not resuscitate orders, and palliative care).

Results

Overall, mortality decreased from 5.0% in 2006 to 2.9% in 2017 (p<0.001). Comparing 2012-2017 to 2006-2011, there was a 68% reduction in mortality odds overall after adjusting for covariates, most prominent in White individuals (69%) and smallest in Black individuals (57%). Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients had lower odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.87 and aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-1.00), primarily driven by those >65 years (age x ethnicity interaction p < 0.0001). Compared to White men, Black, Hispanic, and API men, and Black women had lower aOR of mortality. The differences in mortality between White and non-White patients were most pronounced in hospitals predominantly serving White patients (aOR 0.80, 0.74-0.87) compared to mixed hospitals (aOR 0.85, 0.79-0.91) and predominantly non-White hospitals (aOR 0.88, 0.81-0.95; interaction effect: p=0.005).

Discussion

AIS mortality decreased dramatically in recent years in all race/ethnic subgroups. Overall, non-White AIS patients had lower mortality than their White counterparts, a difference that was most striking in hospitals predominantly serving White patients. Further study is needed to understand these differences and to what extent biological, sociocultural, and system-level factors play a role.

Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the United States: Results from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Background

Despite its approval for use in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) >25 years ago, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains underutilized, with inequities by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and geography. Little is known about IVT rates by insurance status. We aimed to assess temporal trends in the inequities in IVT use.

Methods

We assessed trends from 2002 to 2015 in IVT for AIS in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample by sex, age, race/ethnicity, hospital location/teaching status, and insurance, using survey-weighted logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. We calculated odds ratios for IVT for each category in 2002-2008 (Period 1) and 2009-2015 (Period 2).

Results

Among AIS patients (weighted N=6,694,081), IVT increased from 1.0% in 2002 to 6.8% in 2015 (adjusted annual relative ratio (AARR) 1.15, 95% CI 1.14-1.16). Individuals ≥85 years had the most pronounced increase from 2002 to 2015 (AARR 1.18, 1.17-1.19), but were less likely to receive IVT compared to those aged 18-44 years in both Period 1 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.23, 0.21-0.26) and Period 2 (aOR 0.36, 0.34-0.38). Women were less likely than men to receive IVT, but the disparity narrowed over time (Period 1 aOR 0.81, 0.78-0.84, Period 2 aOR 0.94, 0.92-0.97). Inequities in IVT by race/ethnicity resolved for Hispanic individuals in Period 2 but not for Black individuals (Period 2 aOR 0.81, 0.78-0.85). The disparity in IVT for Medicare patients, compared to privately insured patients, lessened over time (Period 1 aOR 0.59, 0.56-0.52, Period 2 aOR 0.75, 0.72-0.77). Patients treated in rural hospitals were less likely to receive IVT than those treated in urban hospitals; a more dramatic increase in urban areas widened the inequity (Period 2 urban non-teaching vs. rural aOR 2.58, 2.33-2.85, urban teaching vs. rural aOR 3.90, 3.55-4.28).

Conclusion

From 2002 through 2015, IVT for AIS increased among adults. Despite encouraging trends, only 1 in 15 AIS patients received IVT and persistent inequities remained for Black individuals, women, government-insured, and those treated in rural areas, highlighting the need for intensified efforts at addressing inequities.

Disparities in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion provision and outcomes for cervical stenosis

Background

Disparities in neurosurgical care have emerged as an area of interest when considering the impact of social determinants on access to health care. Decompression via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical stenosis (CS) may prevent progression towards debilitating complications that may severely compromise one's quality of life. This retrospective database analysis aims to elucidate demographic and socioeconomic trends in ACDF provision and outcomes of CS-related pathologies.

Methods

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database was queried between 2016 and 2019 using International Classification of Diseases 10th edition codes for patients undergoing ACDF as a treatment for spinal cord and nerve root compression. Baseline demographics and inpatient stay measures were analyzed.

Results

Patients of White race were significantly less likely to present with manifestations of CS such as myelopathy, plegia, and bowel-bladder dysfunction. Meanwhile, Black patients and Hispanic patients were significantly more likely to experience these impairments representative of the more severe stages of the degenerative spine disease process. White race conferred a lesser risk of complications such as tracheostomy, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury in comparison to non-white race. Insurance by Medicaid and Medicare conferred significant risks in terms of more advanced disease prior to intervention and negative inpatient. Patients in the highest quartile of median income consistently fared better than patients in the lowest quartile across almost every aspect ranging from degree of progression at initial presentation to incidence of complications to healthcare resource utilization. All outcomes for patients age > 65 were worse than patients who were younger at the time of the intervention.

Conclusions

Significant disparities exist in the trajectory of CS and the risks associated with ACDF amongst various demographic cohorts. The differences between patient populations may be reflective of a larger additive burden for certain populations, especially when considering patients' intersectionality.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Reperfusion Therapy in the USA

Racial and ethnic inequities in stroke care are ubiquitous. Acute reperfusion therapies, i.e., IV thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT), are central to acute stroke care and are highly efficacious at preventing death and disability after stroke. Disparities in the use of IVT and MT in the USA are pervasive and contribute to worse outcomes among racial and ethnic minority individuals with ischemic stroke. A meticulous understanding of disparities and underlying root causes is necessary in order to develop targeted mitigation strategies with lasting effects. This review details racial and ethnic disparities in the use of IVT and MT after stroke and highlights inequities in the underlying process measures as well as the contributing root causes. Furthermore, this review spotlights the systemic and structural inequities that contribute to race-based differences in the use of IVT and MT, including geographic and regional differences and differences based on neighborhood, zip code, and hospital type. In addition, recent promising trends suggesting improvements in racial and ethnic IVT and MT disparities and potential approaches for future solutions to achieve equity in stroke care are briefly discussed.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy for stroke by race/ethnicity in the United States

Objective

Racial and ethnic differences in the performance of indicated neurosurgical procedures have been reported. However, it is not clear whether there are racial or ethnic differences in the performance of decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) for acute ischemic stroke. This study evaluated the rate, trends, and independent association of race and ethnicity with DHC among hospitalized ischemic stroke patients in the United States.

Materials and methods

We used the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to identify adult patients (18-year-old and older) with a primary discharge diagnosis of ischemic stroke, excluding those with a posterior circulation ischemic stroke in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2006 and 2014. We computed the rate and trends of DHC. We then applied a multivariable logistic regression model to evaluate the independent association of race with DHC.

Results

A total 715,649 patients had anterior ischemic stroke, including 1514 who underwent DHC (2.1 per 1000). The rate of DHC increased overall from 1 per 1000 in 2006 to 3 per 1000 in 2014. Similar upward trends were noted among Non-Hispanic Whites, Non-Hispanic Blacks, and Hispanics. Hispanics with anterior ischemic stroke were 1.28 times more likely than non-Hispanic Whites to have DHC but no difference was observed between Non-Hispanic Blacks and Non-Hispanic Whites.

Conclusions

In this nationally representative sample of patients with anterior ischemic strokes, being of Hispanic ethnicity was independently associated with a higher frequency of receiving DHC compared to being Non-Hispanic White. Future studies should confirm this difference and explore the underlying reasons for it.

•

Between 2006 and 2014,

•

The rate of decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) increased from 1 per 1000 to 3 per 1000.

•

The rate of DHC increased across all races/ethnicities.

•

DHC was performed less frequently in Whites compared with other races each year.

•

Hispanics with anterior ischemic stroke were 1.28 times more likely than non-Hispanic Whites to have DHC.

•

No difference in the rate of DHC was observed between Blacks and Non-Hispanic Whites.

Sex and Economic Disparity Related to Reperfusion Therapies for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke in South Korea across a 10-Year Period: A Nationwide Population-Based Study Using the National Health Insurance Database

A complete enumeration study was conducted to evaluate trends related to reperfusion therapies (intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT)) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in South Korea, according to sex, economic status, and age, over a 10-year period retrospectively, using the National Health Information Database (NHIS-2020-1-481). This study included AIS patients aged ≥20 years who were hospitalized in a general hospital or tertiary hospital for ≥4 days and underwent brain imaging during the same period. Study participants were classified by sex, economic status (Medical Aid beneficiaries and National Health Insurance beneficiaries) and age (20-44, 45-64, 65-79, and ≥80 years). Women showed a significantly lower OR (Odds ratio) than men in IVT (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.73-0.77), EVT (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.99), and any therapy (OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.80-0.84). The Medical Aid beneficiaries showed significantly lower OR in IVT (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.95), EVT (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.98), and either therapy (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.95) than the National Health Insurance beneficiaries. This study showed sex and economic disparity related to reperfusion therapies in patients with AIS in Korea.

Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: 2021 Update

There are stark inequities in stroke incidence, prevalence, acute care, rehabilitation, risk factor control, and outcomes. To address these inequities, it is critical to engage communities in identifying priorities and designing, implementing, and disseminating interventions. This issue of Stroke features health equity themed lectures delivered during the International Stroke Conference and Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: Understanding and Problem-Solving meetings in 2021 as well as articles covering issues of disparities and diversity in stroke. Bruce Ovbiagele, MD, MSc, MAS, MBA, MLS, received the 2021 William Feinberg Award Lecture for his lifetime achievements in seeking global and local solutions to cerebrovascular health inequities. The second annual Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: Understanding and Problem-Solving symposium, which took place the day before the International Stroke Conference in February 2021, focused on community-engaged research for reducing inequities in stroke. Phil Gorelick, MD was awarded the Edgar J. Kenton III Award for his lifetime achievements in using community engagement strategies to recruit and retain Black participants in observational studies and clinical trials. Walter Koroshetz, MD, Director of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke delivered the keynote lecture on stroke inequities and Richard Benson, MD, PhD, Director of the Office of Global Health and Health Disparities at National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, gave a lecture focused on National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke efforts to address inequities. Nichols et al highlighted approaches of community-based participatory research to address stroke inequities. Verma et al showcased digital health innovations to reduce inequities in stroke. Das et al showed that the proportion of underrepresented in medicine vascular neurology fellows has lowered over the past decade and authors provided a road map for enhancing the diversity in vascular neurology. Clearly, to overcome inequities, multipronged strategies are required, from broadening representation among vascular neurology faculty to partnering with communities to conduct research with meaningful impact.

Use of reperfusion therapy and time delay in patients with ischemic stroke by immigration status: a register-based cohort study in Denmark

Background and purpose

Reperfusion therapy is the mainstay of treatment for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS); however, little is known about the use of reperfusion therapy and time delay amongst immigrants.

Methods

This is a Danish nationwide register‐based cohort study of patients with AIS aged ≥18 years (n = 49,817) recruited from 2009 to 2018. Use of reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy) and time delay between immigrants and Danish‐born residents were compared using multivariable logistics and quantile regression.

Results

Overall, 10,649 (39.8%) Danish‐born residents and 452 (39.0%) immigrants with AIS were treated with reperfusion therapy in patients arriving <4.5 h following stroke onset. Compared with Danish‐born residents, immigrants had lower odds of receiving reperfusion therapy after adjustment for prehospital delay, age, sex, stroke severity, sociodemographic factors and comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.49‒0.92, p = 0.01). The lowest odds were observed amongst immigrants originating from Poland and non‐Western countries. Similarly, immigrants had a longer prehospital delay than Danish‐born residents in the fully adjusted model in patients arriving <4.5 h after stroke onset (15 min; 95% confidence interval 4‒26 min, p = 0.03). No evidence was found that system delay and clinical outcome differed between immigrants and Danish‐born residents in patients eligible for reperfusion therapy after adjustment for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities.

Conclusion

Immigration status was significantly associated with lower chances of receiving reperfusion therapy and there may be differences in patient delay between immigrants and Danish‐born residents in patients arriving to a stroke unit <4.5 h after stroke onset.

The weekend effect on mechanical thrombectomy: A nationwide analysis before and after the pivotal 2015 trials

OBJECTIVES:

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

RESULTS:

CONCLUSIONS:

Racial Disparities in Stroke Readmissions Reduced in Hospitals With Better Nurse Staffing

BACKGROUND

Racial minorities are disproportionately affected by stroke, with Black patients experiencing worse poststroke outcomes than White patients. A modifiable aspect of acute stroke care delivery not yet examined is whether disparities in stroke outcomes are related to hospital nurse staffing levels.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether 7- and 30-day readmission disparities between Black and White patients were associated with nurse staffing levels.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of 542 hospitals in four states. Risk-adjusted, logistic regression models were used to determine the association of nurse staffing with 7- and 30-day all-cause readmissions for Black and White ischemic stroke patients.

RESULTS

Our sample included 98,150 ischemic stroke patients (87% White, 13% Black). Thirty-day readmission rates were 10.4% (12.7% for Black patients, 10.0% for White patients). In models accounting for hospital and patient characteristics, the odds of 30-day readmissions were higher for Black than White patients. A significant interaction was found between race and nurse staffing, with Black patients experiencing higher odds of 30- and 7-day readmissions for each additional patient cared for by a nurse. In the best-staffed hospitals (less than three patients per nurse), Black and White stroke patients' disparities were no longer significant.

DISCUSSION

Disparities in readmissions between Black and White stroke patients may be linked to the level of nurse staffing in the hospitals where they receive care. Tailoring nurse staffing levels to meet the needs of Black ischemic stroke patients represents a promising intervention to address systemic inequities linked to readmission disparities among minority stroke patients.

Geographic and Regional Variability in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Thrombolysis in the United States

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) after ischemic stroke is underutilized in racially/ethnically minoritized groups. We aimed to determine the regional and geographic variability in racial/ethnic IVT disparities in the United States.

METHODS

Acute ischemic stroke admissions between 2012 and 2018 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test the association between IVT and race/ethnicity, stratified by geographic region and controlling for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 545 509 included cases, 47 031 (8.6%) received IVT. Racially/ethnically minoritized groups had significantly lower adjusted odds of IVT compared with White people in the South Atlantic region (odds ratio [OR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.91]), the East North Central region (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.85-0.97]) and the Pacific region (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.85-0.96]). In the South Atlantic region, IVT use in racial/ethnic minority groups was below the national average of all racial/ethnic minority patients (P=0.002). Compared with White patients, Black patients had lower odds of IVT in the Middle Atlantic region (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78-0.91]), the South Atlantic region (OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.74-0.82]), and the East North Central region (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.93]). In the South Atlantic region, this difference was below the national average for Black people (P<0.001). Hispanic patients had significantly lower use of IVT only in the Pacific region (OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-0.99]), while Asian/Pacific Islander patients had lower odds of IVT in the Mountain (OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.59-0.98]) and Pacific region (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82-0.97]).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial/ethnic disparities in IVT use in the United States vary by region. Geographic hotspots of lower IVT use in racially/ethnically minoritized groups are the South Atlantic region, driven predominantly by lower use of IVT in Black patients, and the East North Central and Pacific regions.

Evaluation of Between-County Disparities in Premature Mortality Due to Stroke in the US

IMPORTANCE

Identifying the factors associated with premature stroke mortality and measuring between-county disparities may provide insight into how to reduce variations and achieve more equitable health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the between-county disparities in premature stroke mortality in the US, investigate county-level factors associated with mortality, and describe differences in mortality disparities by place of death and stroke subtype.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cross-sectional study linked the mortality and demographic data of US counties from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database to county-level characteristics from multiple databases. The outcome measure was county-level age-adjusted stroke mortality among adults aged 25 to 64 years in 2637 US counties from 1999 to 2018. This study was conducted from April 1, 2019, to October 31, 2020. Generalized linear Poisson regressions were fitted to investigate 4 sets of factors associated with county-level mortality: demographic composition, socioeconomic status, health care and environmental features, and population health. The Theil index score was calculated to assess the mortality disparities.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Stroke mortality was measured as the number of deaths attributed to stroke in the data set. Out-of-stroke-unit death was defined as any death occurring in outpatient or emergency departments or at the pretransport location. Five stroke subtypes were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Although mortality did not change substantially from 1999 to 2018 (from 12.62 to 11.81 per 100 000 population), the proportion of deaths occurring out of the stroke unit increased from 23.56% (4328 of 18 369) to 34.57% (6978 of 20 188). A large percentage of stroke of an uncertain cause was reported, with most deaths (55.20%) occurring out of the stroke unit. In the county with the highest premature stroke mortality, the incidence was 20.78 times as high as that in the county with the lowest mortality (65.04 vs 3.13 deaths per 100 000 population). The highest between-county disparities were found for stroke of uncertain cause. For out-of-stroke-unit death, county-level mortality was largely associated with demographic composition (31.6%) and health care and environmental features (25.8%). For in-hospital death, 29.8% of county-level mortality was associated with population health and 28.7% was associated with demographic composition.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that strategies addressing specific factors that underlie the mortality disparities among US counties, especially for out-of-stroke-unit death and stroke of uncertain cause, may be useful when tailored to the county-level context before implementing interventions for the neediest counties.

Effect of Insurance Status on Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Intra-Arterial Treatment: Results from the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program

BACKGROUND

Stroke continues to be a leading cause of death and disability in the United States. Rates of intra-arterial reperfusion treatments (IAT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are increasing, and these treatments are associated with more favorable outcomes. We sought to examine the effect of insurance status on outcomes for AIS patients receiving IAT within a multistate stroke registry.

METHODS

We used data from the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (PCNASP) from 2014 to 2019 to quantify rates of IAT (with or without intravenous thrombolysis) after AIS. We modeled outcomes based on insurance status: private, Medicare, Medicaid, or no insurance. Outcomes were defined as rates of discharge to home, in-hospital death, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), or life-threatening hemorrhage during hospitalization.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 486,180 patients with a clinical diagnosis of AIS (mean age 70.6 years, 50.3% male) from 674 participating hospitals in PCNASP. Only 4.3% of patients received any IAT. As compared to private insurance, uninsured patients receiving any IAT were more likely to experience in-hospital death (AOR 1.36 [95% CI 1.07-1.73]). Medicare (AOR 0.78 [95% CI 0.71-0.85]) and Medicaid (AOR 0.85 [95% CI 0.75-0.96]) beneficiaries were less likely but uninsured patients were more likely (AOR 1.90 [95% CI 1.61-2.24]) to be discharged home. Insurance status was not found to be independently associated with rates of sICH.

CONCLUSIONS

Insurance status was independently associated with in-hospital death and discharge to home among AIS patients undergoing IAT.

Adherence to Acute Care Measures Affects Mortality in Patients with Ischemic Stroke: The Florida Stroke Registry

OBJECTIVES

How race/ethnic disparities in acute stroke care contribute to disparities in outcomes is not well-understood. We examined the relationship between acute stroke care measures with mortality within the first year and 30-day hospital readmission by race/ethnicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries age ≥65 with ischemic stroke in 2010-2013 treated at 66 hospitals in the Florida Stroke Registry. Stroke care metrics included intravenous Alteplase treatment, in-hospital antithrombotic therapy, DVT prophylaxis, discharge antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulation therapy, statin use, and smoking cessation counseling. We used mixed logistic models to assess the associations between stroke care and mortality (in-hospital, 30-day, 6-month, 1-year post-stroke) and hospital readmission by race/ethnicity, adjusting for demographics, stroke severity, and vascular risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 14,100 ischemic stroke patients in the full study population (73% white, 11% Black, 15% Hispanic), mortality was 3% in-hospital, 12% at 30d, 21% at 6m, 26% at 1y, and 15% had a hospital readmission within 30 days. Patients who received antithrombotics early and at discharge had lower mortality at all time points, and the protective association for early antithrombotic use was strongest among whites. Eligible patients who received statin therapy at discharge had decreased 6m and 1y mortality, but specifically among minority groups. Statin therapy was associated with lower 30-day hospital readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute stroke care measures, particularly antithrombotic use and statin therapy, were associated with reduced odds of long-term mortality. The benefits of these acute care measures were less likely among Hispanic patients. Results underscore the importance of optimizing acute stroke care for all patients.

Inaugural Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: Understanding and Problem-Solving Symposium

Race/ethnic minorities face significant inequities in stroke incidence, prevalence, care, and outcomes. The Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: Understanding and Problem-solving symposium, a collaborative initiative of the American Heart Association and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, was the first-ever annual multidisciplinary scientific forum focused on race/ethnic inequities in cerebrovascular disease, with the overarching goal of reducing inequities in stroke and accelerating the translation of research findings to improve outcomes for race/ethnic minorities. The symposium featured esteemed invited plenary speakers, lecturing on determinants of race/ethnic inequities in stroke and interventions aimed at redressing the inequities. The Edgar J. Kenton III Award recognized Ralph Sacco, MD, MS, for his lifetime contributions to investigation, management, mentorship, and community service in the field of stroke inequities. Early career investigators were provided with travel awards to attend the symposium; presented their research at moderated poster and Think Tank sessions; received career development advice at the Building Momentum session; and networked with experienced stroke inequities researchers. Future conferences-The Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: Understanding and Problem-solving 2021 to 2024-will broaden the focus to include 5 major persistent inequities (race/ethnic, sex, geographic, socioeconomic, and global). Each year will focus on a different theme (community and stakeholder engagement; clinical trials; implementation science; and policy and dissemination). By fostering a community of stroke inequities researchers, we hope to highlight promising work, illuminate research gaps, facilitate networking, inform policy makers, recognize achievement, inspire greater interest among junior investigators to pursue careers in this field, and provide networking opportunities for underrepresented minority scientists.

HEADS-UP: Understanding and Problem-Solving: Seeking Hands-Down Solutions to Major Inequities in Stroke

There are substantial and longstanding inequities in stroke incidence, prevalence, care, and outcomes. The Health Equity and Actionable Disparities in Stroke: Understanding and Problem-Solving (HEADS-UP) symposium is an annual multidisciplinary scientific and educational forum targeting major inequities in cerebrovascular disease, with the ultimate objective of helping to bridge major inequities in stroke, and promptly translating scientific results into routine clinical practice, for the benefit of vulnerable and underserved populations. HEADS-UP is a collaborative undertaking by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the American Stroke Association and is held the day before the annual International Stroke Conference. In 2020, the HEADS-UP focused on the topic of racial/ethnic disparities in stroke and comprised invited lectures on determinants of racial/ethnic inequities in stroke as well as emerging interventions or promising strategies designed to overcome these inequities. Competitively selected travel award scholarships were given to 19 early stage investigators who presented posters at professor moderated sessions; engaged in several career development activities aimed imparting grant writing skills, knowledge about climbing the academic ladder, and striving for work-life balance; and participated in networking events. This Health Equity edition of Focused Updates will feature an overview of the HEADS-UP 2020 symposium proceedings and articles covering the key scientific content of the major lectures delivered during the symposium including the presentation by the award-winning plenary speaker. Starting in 2021, HEADS-UP will expand to include 5 major inequities in stroke (racial/ethnic, sex, geographic, socioeconomic, and global) and seeks to be a viable avenue to meet the health equity goals of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and World Stroke Organization.

Sex differences in IV thrombolysis treatment for acute ischemic stroke

Objective

A prior meta-analysis of reports published between 2000 and 2008 found that women were 30% less likely to receive IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) treatment for stroke than men; we updated this meta-analysis to determine if this sex difference persisted.

Methods

We identified studies that reported sex-specific IV rtPA treatment rates for acute ischemic stroke published between 2008 and 2018. Eligible studies included representative populations of patients with ischemic stroke from hospital-based, registry-based, or administrative data. Random effects odds ratios (ORs) were generated to quantify sex differences.

Results

Twenty-four eligible studies were identified during this 10-year period. The summary unadjusted OR based on 17 studies with data on all ischemic stroke patients was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82–0.93), indicating that women had 13% lower odds of receiving IV rtPA treatment than men. However, substantial between-study variability existed. Lower treatment odds in women were also observed in 7 studies that provided data on the subgroup of patients eligible for IV rtPA treatment, although the summary OR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88–1.02) was not statistically significant. Examination of time trends across 33 studies published between 2000 and 2018 found evidence that the sex difference had narrowed in more recent years.

Conclusions

Although there is considerable variability in the findings of individual studies, pooled data from recent studies show that women with acute stroke are less likely to be treated with IV thrombolysis compared with men. However, the size of this difference has narrowed compared to studies published before 2008.

The Impact of One's Sex and Social Living Situation on Rehabilitation Outcomes After a Stroke

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate sex differences and the impact of social living situation on individual functional independence measure outcomes after stroke rehabilitation.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study using Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (N = 125,548) who were discharged from inpatient rehabilitation facilities in 2013 and 2014 after a stroke. Discharge individual functional independence measure score, dichotomized as ≥5 and <5, was the primary outcome measure. A two-step generalized linear mixed model was used to measure the effect of sex on each functional independence measure item while controlling for many clinical and sociodemographic covariates.

RESULTS

After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, females had higher odds of reaching a supervision level for 14 of 18 functional independence measure items. Males had higher odds of reaching a supervision level on 2 of 18 functional independence measure items. Individuals who lived alone before their stroke had higher odds of reaching a supervision level than individuals who lived with a caregiver or with family for all functional independence measure items.

CONCLUSIONS

When sociodemographic and clinical factors are controlled, females are more likely to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation at a supervision level or better for most functional independence measure items. Individuals who live alone before their stroke have higher odds of discharging at a supervision level or better.

Temporal Trends and Patient Characteristics Associated With Drug Utilisation After First-Ever Stroke: Insights From Chronic Disease Registry Data in Singapore

Introduction: Data on drug utilisation among stroke patients of Asian ethnicities are lacking. The objectives of the study were to examine the temporal trends and patient characteristics associated with prescription of thrombolytic, antithrombotic and statin medications among patients with first-ever stroke. Materials and Methods: First-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke patients admitted to 2 Singapore tertiary hospitals between 2010‒2014 were included. Data were extracted from the National Healthcare Group Chronic Disease Management System. Association between drug utilisation and admission year, as well as characteristics associated with drug use, were explored using multivariable logistic regression. Results: There was an increasing trend in the combined use of all 3 guideline medications in ischaemic stroke patients (P<0.001) ―specifically thrombolytic agents (P <0.001), oral antithrombotics (P = 0.002) and statins (P = 0.003) at discharge. Among antithrombotics, the use of clopidogrel (P <0.001) and aspirinclopidogrel (P <0.001) had increased, whereas prescription of dipyridamole (P <0.001) and aspirin-dipyridamole (P <0.001) had declined. For statins, the increase in atorvastatin prescription (P <0.001) was accompanied by decreasing use of simvastatin (P <0.001). Age, ethnicity and certain comorbidities (hyperlipidaemia, atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease) were associated with the combined use of all 3 guideline medications (P <0.05). In haemorrhagic stroke, prescription of statins at discharge were comparatively lower. Conclusion: This study reveals changes in prescription behaviour over time in a multiethnic Asian population with first-ever stroke. Patient characteristics including younger age, Malay ethnicity and certain comorbidities (i.e. hyperlipidaemia, atrial fibrillation) were associated with the combined use of all 3 guideline medications among ischaemic stroke patients. Key words: Antithrombotics, Asian, Statins, Thrombolytic agents

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Utilization of Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke

Background and Purpose- Racial and ethnic disparities in the access to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion have been previously described. The effect of recent randomized trials validating MT as an effective therapy for AIS secondary to large vessel occlusion on such disparities has not been investigated. Methods- Information on admissions for AIS to endovascular centers occurring between January 2016 and September 2018 was obtained from a national database. The number of patients receiving IV-tPA (intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator) and MT at each institution was determined, and patient demographics were characterized according to age, sex, race/ethnicity, and insurance status. Comparisons of patients who did and did not undergo MT and between patients of different racial and ethnic backgrounds were performed. Demographic variables independently associated with the utilization of MT were identified using multivariate linear regression analysis. Results- There were 206 853 admissions to 173 endovascular centers during the time period of interest. The overall utilization of MT was 8.4%. The utilization of MT for black/Hispanic patients was lower than that among white/non-Hispanic patients (7.0% versus 9.8%; P<0.001). Black/Hispanic patients were also less likely to receive IV-tPA (16.2% versus 20.5%; P<0.001) and to be admitted to the endovascular center after transfer from a different hospital (20.0% versus 30.1%; P<0.001). On multivariate linear regression analysis, increasing institutional proportions of patients with female sex (β=-0.601; P<0.001), insurance with Medicaid or uninsured status (β=-0.153; P=0.029), and black/Hispanic race/ethnicity (β=-0.062; P=0.046) were independently associated with lower institutional utilization of MT. Conclusions- Despite the mainstream acceptance of MT for the treatment of AIS secondary to large vessel occlusion, racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization of MT persist.

Lower carotid revascularization rates after stroke in racial/ethnic minority-serving US hospitals

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether the use of carotid revascularization procedures after stroke due to carotid stenosis differs between minority-serving hospitals and hospitals serving predominantly white patients.

METHODS

We identified ischemic stroke cases due to carotid disease, identified by ICD-9-CM codes, from 2007 to 2011 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The use of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) was recorded. Hospitals with ≥40% racial/ethnic minority patients (minority-serving hospitals) were compared to hospitals with <40% minority patients (predominantly white hospitals [hereafter, abbreviated to white]). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the use of CEA/CAS among minority-serving and white hospitals.

RESULTS

Of the 26,189 ischemic stroke cases meeting inclusion criteria, 20,870 (79.7%) were treated at 1,113 white hospitals and 5,319 (20.3%) received care at 325 minority-serving hospitals. Compared to patients in white hospitals, patients in minority-serving hospitals were less likely to undergo CEA/CAS (17.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.6%-18.6%, in minority-serving vs 21.2%, 95% CI 20.7%-21.8%, in white hospitals; p < 0.001). In fully adjusted logistic regression models, the odds of CEA/CAS were lower in minority-serving compared to white hospitals (odds ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.93), independent of individual patient race/ethnicity and other measured hospital characteristics. White and Hispanic individuals had significantly lower odds of CEA/CAS in minority-serving compared to white hospitals. Patient-level racial/ethnic differences in the use of carotid revascularization procedures remained within each hospital stratum.

CONCLUSION

The odds of carotid revascularization after stroke is lower in minority- compared to white-serving hospitals, suggesting system-level factors as a major contributor to explain race disparities in the use of carotid revascularization.

Use of Chronic Care Management Codes for Medicare Beneficiaries: a Missed Opportunity?

BACKGROUND

Physicians spend significant time outside of regular office visits caring for complex patients, and this work is often uncompensated. In 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced a billing code for care coordination between office visits for beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions.

OBJECTIVE

Characterize use of the Chronic Care Management (CCM) code in New England in 2015.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

All Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in New England continuously enrolled in Parts A and B in 2015.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was the number of beneficiaries with a CCM claim per 1000 eligible beneficiaries. Secondary outcomes included the total number of CCM claims, total reimbursement, mean number of claims per beneficiary, and beneficiary characteristics independently associated with receiving CCM services.

KEY RESULTS

Of the more than two million Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in New England, almost 1.7 million were potentially eligible for CCM services. Among eligible beneficiaries, 10,951 (0.65%) had a CCM claim in 2015. Massachusetts had the highest penetration of CCM use (9.40 claims per 1000 eligible beneficiaries); Vermont had the lowest (0.54 claims per 1000 eligible beneficiaries). Mean reimbursement per physician was $1745.98. Age, race/ethnicity, dual-eligible status, income, number of chronic conditions, and state of residence were associated with receiving CCM services in an adjusted model.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCM code is likely underutilized in New England; the program may therefore not be achieving its intended goal of encouraging consistent, team-based chronic care management for Medicare's most complex beneficiaries. Or practices may be foregoing reimbursement for care coordination that they are already providing. Recently implemented revisions may improve uptake of CCM services; it will be important to compare our results with future utilization.

Comorbid Psychiatric Disease Is Associated With Lower Rates of Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) improves outcomes after acute ischemic stroke but is underused in certain patient populations. Mental illness is pervasive in the United States, and patients with comorbid psychiatric disease experience inequities in treatment for a range of conditions. We aimed to determine whether comorbid psychiatric disease is associated with differences in IVT use in acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Acute ischemic stroke admissions between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Psychiatric disease was defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for secondary diagnoses of schizophrenia or other psychoses, bipolar disorder, depression, or anxiety. Using logistic regression, we tested the association between IVT and psychiatric disease, controlling for demographic, clinical, and hospital factors.

RESULTS

Of the 325 009 ischemic stroke cases meeting inclusion criteria, 12.8% had any of the specified psychiatric comorbidities. IVT was used in 3.6% of those with, and 4.4% of those without, psychiatric disease (P<0.001). Presence of any psychiatric disease was associated with lower odds of receiving IVT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.85). When psychiatric diagnoses were analyzed separately individuals with schizophrenia or other psychoses, anxiety, or depression each had significantly lower odds of IVT compared to individuals without psychiatric disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute ischemic stroke patients with comorbid psychiatric disease have significantly lower odds of IVT. Understanding barriers to IVT use in such patients may help in developing interventions to increase access to evidence-based stroke care.

Racial Differences in Palliative Care Use After Stroke in Majority-White, Minority-Serving, and Racially Integrated U.S. Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Racial/ethnic differences in palliative care resource use after stroke have been recognized, but it is unclear whether patient or hospital characteristics drive this disparity. We sought to determine whether palliative care use after intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke differs between hospitals serving varying proportions of minority patients.

DESIGN

Population-based cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Inpatient hospital admissions from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2007 and 2011.

PATIENTS

A total of 46,735 intracerebral hemorrhage and 331,521 ischemic stroke cases.

INTERVENTIONS

Palliative care use.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke admissions were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2007 and 2011. Hospitals were categorized based on the percentage of ethnic minority stroke patients (< 25% minorities ["white hospitals"], 25-50% minorities ["mixed hospitals"], or > 50% minorities ["minority hospitals"]). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and palliative care use within and between the different hospital strata. Stroke patients receiving care in minority hospitals had lower odds of palliative care compared with those treated in white hospitals, regardless of individual patient race/ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.84 for intracerebral hemorrhage and odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.77 for ischemic stroke). Ethnic minorities had a lower likelihood of receiving palliative care compared with whites in any hospital stratum, but the odds of palliative care for both white and minority intracerebral hemorrhage patients was lower in minority compared with white hospitals (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87 for white and odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.88 for minority patients). Similar results were observed in ischemic stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

The odds of receiving palliative care for both white and minority stroke patients is lower in minority compared with white hospitals, suggesting system-level factors as a major contributor to explain race disparities in palliative care use after stroke.