A dose-dependent effect of the novel inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide on airway responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate in asthmatic patients

Endogenous Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate, But Not Acetylcholine or Histamine, is Associated with Asthma Control, Quality of Life, and Exacerbations

OBJECTIVE

Endogenous adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), acetylcholine (ACh), and histamine (HA) are known to be important in bronchial contraction, but their clinical relevance to asthma is poorly understood. We aimed to quantify endogenous AMP, ACh, and HA in induced sputum samples and explore their relationships with asthma control and exacerbations.

METHODS

20 healthy subjects and 112 asthmatics underwent clinical assessment, sputum induction, and blood sampling. The level of asthma control was determined by the asthma control test (ACT) questionnaire. Asthma exacerbation was evaluated according to the criteria of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. Levels of AMP, ACh, and HA in sputum were measured by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. IL-β, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-13, IL-17A, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC) were also measured.

RESULTS

Compared to healthy controls, asthmatics had higher levels of HA, lower levels of ACh, and similar levels of AMP in induced sputum samples. Compared to controlled asthma (n = 54), uncontrolled asthma (n = 58) showed higher AMP levels (P = 0.002), but similar HA and ACh levels. AMP was negatively correlated with ACT scores (r = - 0.348) and asthma quality of life questionnaire scores (r = - 0.188) and positively correlated with blood monocytes percentage (r = 0.195), sputum MDC (r = 0.214), and IL-6 levels (r = 0.196). Furthermore, AMP was associated with an increased risk of exacerbations in the preceding year.

CONCLUSION

Endogenous AMP, but not ACh or HA, was associated with asthma control, quality of life, and exacerbations in the previous year, which indicates that AMP could be a clinically useful biomarker of asthma.

Direct and indirect bronchoprovocation tests in dose-response studies of inhaled corticosteroids: Past, present, and future directions

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are a mainstay of treatment in eosinophilic asthma. Many studies have explored the dose-response effect of different formulations of ICS through direct or indirect bronchoprovocation testing. Such studies are important for investigating efficacy and identifying the relative potency between formulations. However, lack of consistency in methods and designs has hindered the comparability of study findings. This review discusses current knowledge of the dose-response, or lack thereof, of different formulations of ICS through direct and indirect bronchoprovocation testing. The strengths and weaknesses of past studies inform recommendations for future methodological considerations in this field, such as utilizing a randomized double-blind crossover design, enrolling participants likely to respond to ICS therapy, and carefully selecting treatment durations and washout periods to assess incremental improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness while reducing the likelihood of a carryover effect.

A Dose-Response Study to Examine the Methodology for Demonstrating the Local Therapeutic Equivalence of the Fluticasone Propionate Component of an Orally Inhaled Combination Therapy of Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Dry Powder

Background: Asthma is widely treated using inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist combinations, such as fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FPS) dry powder inhaler. Some regulators require generic medications to demonstrate local therapeutic equivalence (LTE) for each component of the FPS reference product. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F_eNO) was developed as a possible LTE endpoint for the fluticasone propionate (FP) component of FPS in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in steroid-naive asthma patients with elevated F_eNO (≥45 parts per billion). Methods: Thirty-four patients received three of five treatments: FPS 100/50 μg once daily (QD), FPS 100/50 μg twice daily (BID), FPS 250/50 μg BID, FPS 500/50 μg BID, or placebo, each for 2 weeks separated by 14-day washout. F_eNO was measured on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 14 of each period, according to American Thoracic Society standards. Results: FPS treatments decreased F_eNO compared with placebo, with the largest differentiation between doses noted on day 14; the mean decreases from days 1 to 14 ranged from -46.6% to -64.5% with FPS versus -9.1% with placebo. The dose-response plateaued at 200 μg/day (FPS 100/50 μg BID). Linear regression analysis revealed significant slopes between FPS doses, with the steepest between 100/50 μg QD and 100/50 μg BID (-0.0039, p = 0.020). An estimated sample size (SS) of 160 or 48 patients would be required to demonstrate LTE of generic and FPS reference products (0.80-1.25 and 0.67-1.50 bioequivalence limits, respectively). However, as the slope between BID FPS doses was shallow, a larger SS may be needed if only an approved dose regimen was used. Conclusion: F_eNO could be a valid endpoint to determine LTE between the FP component of generic and reference FPS products, but only if QD dosing and wide equivalence limits are included. As QD dosing is not an approved regimen, this approach is unlikely to be acceptable.

Repurposing drugs as inhaled therapies in asthma

For the first 40 years of the 20th century treatment for asthma occurred in response to an asthma attack. The treatments were given by injection or orally and included the adrenergic agonists adrenalin/epinephrine and ephedrine and a phosphodiesterase inhibitor theophylline. Epinephrine became available as an aerosol in 1930. After 1945, isoprenaline, a non-selective beta agonist, became available for oral use but it was most widely used by inhalation. Isoprenaline was short-acting with unwanted cardiac effects. More selective beta agonists, with a longer duration of action and fewer side-effects became available, including orciprenaline in 1967, salbutamol in 1969 and terbutaline in 1970. The inhaled steroid beclomethasone was available by 1972 and budesonide by 1982. Spirometry alone and in response to exercise was used to assess efficacy and duration of action of these drugs for the acute benefits of beta₂ agonists and the chronic benefits of corticosteroids. Early studies comparing oral and aerosol beta₂ agonists found equivalence in bronchodilator effect but the aerosol treatment was superior in preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Inhaled drugs are now widely used including the long-acting beta₂ agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, and the corticosteroids, fluticasone, ciclesonide, mometasone and triamcinolone, that act locally and have low systemic bio-availability. Repurposing drugs as inhaled therapies permitted direct delivery of low doses of drug to the site of action reducing the incidence of unwanted side-effects and permitting the prophylactic treatment of asthma.

Evaluation of New Drugs for Asthma and COPD: Endpoints, Biomarkers and Clinical Trial Design

There remains a considerable need to develop novel therapies for patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The greatest challenge at the moment is measuring the effects of novel anti-inflammatory drugs, as these drugs often cause only small effects on lung function. Measurements that demonstrate the pharmacological and clinical effects of these drugs are needed. Furthermore, we now recognise that only subgroups of patients are likely to respond to these novel drugs, so using biomarkers to determine the clinical phenotype most suitable for such therapies is important. An endotype is a subtype of a (clinical) condition defined by a distinct pathophysiological mechanism. An endotype-driven approach may be more helpful in drug development, enabling drugs to be targeted specifically towards specific biological mechanisms rather than clinical characteristics. This requires the development of biomarkers to define endotypes and/or to measure drug effects. This newer approach should continue alongside efforts to optimise the measurement of clinical endpoints, including patient-reported outcome measurements, required by drug regulatory authorities.

Association of symptom control with changes in lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and exhaled nitric oxide after inhaled corticosteroid treatment in children with asthma

BACKGROUND

A key therapeutic approach to asthma, which is characterized by chronic airway inflammation, is inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). This study evaluated the association of symptom control with changes in lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) after ICS treatment in asthmatic children.

METHODS

A total of 33 children aged between 5 and 12 years with mild to moderate persistent asthma were treated with 160 μg ciclesonide per day for 3 months. At days 0 and 90, the following parameters were assessed: asthma symptom scores; lung function, including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of forced vital capacity (FEF_25-75%); BHR to methacholine and adenosine 5-monophosphate (AMP); and eNO.

RESULTS

Asthma symptom scores, lung function parameters, BHR to methacholine and AMP, and eNO levels at day 90 were significantly improved versus day 0 (all p < 0.001). Symptom scores at day 90 were not correlated with changes in lung function and BHR to methacholine during the follow-up period, whereas those at day 90 were more closely correlated with changes in BHR to AMP (r = 0.511, p = 0.003) than with eNO (r = -0.373, p = 0.035). Additionally, changes in PC₂₀ AMP were correlated with changes in PC₂₀ methacholine (r = 0.451, p = 0.011) and eNO (r = -0.474, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in the BHR to AMP, and to a lesser extent eNO, correlate with asthma symptom control after ICS treatment. BHR to AMP may better reflect the relationship between improved airway inflammation due to ICS treatment and asthma symptoms.

Ciclesonide: A Pro-Soft Drug Approach for Mitigation of Side Effects of Inhaled Corticosteroids

Inhaled corticosteroids are used as one of the first-line drug therapy in patients with asthma. However, their long-term use is associated with various oropharyngeal and systemic side and adverse effects. Design of pro-soft drug is one of the strategies, which was adopted in the design of ciclesonide for mitigation of side effects usually observed with the use of inhaled corticosteroids. Ciclesonide, a pro-soft drug, is converted to an active metabolite desisobutyryl-ciclesonide in the lungs. The anti-inflammatory effect of desisobutyryl-ciclesonide is much higher than ciclesonide, and therefore, the local effect of the metabolite is higher with lower systemic side effects. Ciclesonide has favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties as inhaled corticosteroid including low oral bioavailability, high plasma protein binding and rapid systemic clearance, high pulmonary deposition and distribution and long pulmonary residence duration. These advantageous properties make ciclesonide a very effective treatment option with low side effects. Various clinical studies support safety and efficacy of ciclesonide use in mild, moderate, and severe asthma patients.

Effects of low- versus high-dose fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate combination therapy on AMP challenge in asthmatic patients: A double-blind, randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The dose-response relationship between two dose levels of fluticasone/formoterol (flutiform(®), 100/10 μg and 500/20 μg) was evaluated in asthmatic patients. Non-invasive inflammatory markers were used including adenosine monophosphate (AMP) challenge (primary endpoint), and sputum eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (secondary endpoints).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ≥60% predicted and who required a dose of <60 mg AMP to elicit a 20% drop in FEV1 (AMP PD20) were randomised in this incomplete block, crossover study to receive 2 of 3 treatments b.i.d.: fluticasone/formoterol 500/20 μg (high dose), 100/10 μg (low dose) or placebo, during 2 periods of 28 ± 3 days each, separated by 2-3 weeks. AMP challenges were performed pre-dose and 12 h after last dose at the end of each treatment period. A series of post hoc analyses were performed only in patients allocated to both fluticasone/formoterol doses, who completed the study and had evaluable AMP PD20 data for both treatments ("fluticasone/formoterol subgroup"). Changes in AMP PD20 FEV1, percentage sputum eosinophils and FeNO levels (Day 1 vs Day 28) between treatments were compared by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were randomised and 46 completed the study. Fifteen patients received both high- and low-dose fluticasone/formoterol (post hoc subgroup). The difference in AMP PD20 for the overall population was not statistically significant between high- and low-dose fluticasone/formoterol (LS mean fold difference: 1.3; p = 0.489), although both dose levels were superior to placebo: high-dose vs placebo LS mean fold difference: 4.4, p < 0.001; low-dose vs placebo LS mean fold difference: 3.5, p < 0.001. In the post hoc subgroup, the difference in AMP PD20 between the doses was statistically significant in favour of the high-dose (LS mean fold difference: 2.4, p = 0.012). Other inflammatory parameters (sputum eosinophil counts and FeNO) showed small differences and statistically non-significant changes between high- and low-dose fluticasone/formoterol.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant dose-response was found between low- and high-dose fluticasone/formoterol in the post hoc subgroup (patients who received both doses), but not in the overall population, with the higher dose demonstrating a greater reduction in airway responsiveness to AMP.

Omalizumab therapy for asthma patients with poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, is administered by injection once or twice monthly in offices and clinics. It offers a potential alternative intervention for patients with allergic asthma that is not well controlled because of recalcitrant poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of omalizumab therapy by measuring airway responsiveness to adenosine, a marker of allergic airway inflammation, and resource use.

METHODS

Patients (N = 17) aged 6 to 26 years (mean age, 16.4 years) with poorly controlled persistent allergic asthma, less than 50% adherence to inhaled corticosteroid therapy, a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 60% predicted or higher, and adenosine provocation concentration that caused a decrease in FEV1 of 20% (PC20) of 60 mg/mL or less were randomized to receive 4 months of omalizumab or placebo in a double-blind, crossover trial with a 3- to 4-month washout between treatments. Patients were instructed to continue taking inhaled corticosteroids throughout the study. The PC20 was measured before and after each period.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients completed the study. The mean baseline PC20 was 14.1 mg/mL (95% CI, 10.8-18.4 mg/mL). The fold change PC20 was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.7) during placebo and 3.1 (95% CI, 1.6-6.2) during omalizumab treatment; the estimated ratio was 3.4 (95% CI, 1.2-9.3; P = .02). Six patients required one or more short courses of oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations during placebo, but none required this intervention during omalizumab. During the study, the median prescription refills for inhaled corticosteroids was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.00-0.33) canisters per month.

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab therapy is an alternative for patients with more severe poorly controlled asthma in whom adherence does not improve with conventional interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00133042.

Therapeutic applications

The current treatments offered to patients with chronic respiratory diseases are being re-evaluated based on the loss of potency during long-term treatments or because they only provide significant clinical benefits to a subset of the patient population. For instance, glucocorticoids are considered the most effective anti-inflammatory therapies for chronic inflammatory and immune diseases, such as asthma. But they are relatively ineffective in asthmatic smokers, and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or cystic fibrosis (CF). As such, the pharmaceutical industry is exploring new therapeutic approaches to address all major respiratory diseases. The previous chapters demonstrated the widespread influence of purinergic signaling on all pulmonary functions and defense mechanisms. In Chap. 8, we described animal studies which highlighted the critical role of aberrant purinergic activities in the development and maintenance of chronic airway diseases. This last chapter covers all clinical and pharmaceutical applications currently developed based on purinergic receptor agonists and antagonists. We use the information acquired in the previous chapters on purinergic signaling and lung functions to scrutinize the preclinical and clinical data, and to realign the efforts of the pharmaceutical industry.

Comparison of the Oropharyngeal Deposition of Inhaled Ciclesonide and Fluticasone Propionate in Patients With Asthma

Ciclesonide is a novel inhaled corticosteroid that is converted in the lungs to its active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC). The aim of this study was to compare the deposition of ciclesonide, as well as its conversion to des-CIC, in the oropharyngeal cavity with fluticasone propionate (FP) following inhalation via hydrofluoroalkane-propelled metered-dose inhalers (HFA-MDIs). Eighteen asthmatics inhaled ciclesonide 800 microg followed by FP 1000 microg or vice versa in an open, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-sequence study design. The oropharynx was washed out immediately and at 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after inhalation. Samples were analyzed for ciclesonide, des-CIC, and FP using liquid chromatography with tandem mass-spectrometric detection. Concentration-time curves and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were calculated for each drug. Ciclesonide and FP were recovered in almost all samples. Within 60 minutes after inhalation, the amounts of both ciclesonide and FP decreased sharply, and low residual levels were detected after 30 minutes. des-CIC was detected in relatively low concentrations, with maximum concentration 30 minutes following inhalation. The AUC(0-60 min) for ciclesonide (250.4 nmol x h/L) and des-CIC (37.8 nmol x h/L) were found to be significantly lower compared with FP (636.2 nmol.h/L, P < .001). Approximately 50% less ciclesonide and 90% less metabolite were present in the oropharynx compared with FP. Less than 20% of the residual ciclesonide in the oropharynx was metabolized to des-CIC. These findings indicate that oropharyngeal deposition of ciclesonide is only half that of FP following inhalation from an HFA-MDI. Furthermore, there is little activation of ciclesonide to its active metabolite in the oropharynx, suggesting a decreased likelihood of inhaled ciclesonide-associated oropharyngeal side effects.

Is low dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy as effective for inflammation and remodeling in asthma? A randomized, parallel group study

Background

While most of the clinical benefits of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy may occur at low doses, results of dose-ranging studies are inconsistent. Although symptom/lung function response to low and high dose ICS medication is comparable, it is uncertain whether low dose ICSs are as effective as high dose in the treatment of inflammation and remodeling.

Methods

22 mild or moderate asthmatic adult subjects (corticosteroid free for > 2 months) participated in a randomized, parallel group study to compare effects of fluticasone propionate (FP) 200 mcg/day and 1000 mcg/day. Alveolar macrophage (AM)-derived cytokines and basement membrane thickness (BMT) were measured at baseline and after 7 weeks treatment while symptoms, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to mannitol at baseline and 6 weeks.

Results

FP improved spirometry, eNO, symptoms and AHR with no difference between low and high dose FP. Both high and low dose FP reduced GM-CSF, TNF-alpha and IL-1ra, with no change in BMT and with no differences between low and high dose FP.

Conclusions

200 μg/day of FP was as effective as 1000 μg/day in improving asthma control, airway inflammation, lung function and AHR in adults in the short term. Future studies should examine potential differential effects between low and high dose combination therapy (ICS/long acting beta agonist) on inflammation and airway remodeling over longer treatment periods.

Rapid effects of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fixed combination inhaler on airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction in asthma: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effects of a recent fixed combination of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol (BDP/F) were investigated using non-invasive markers of inflammation, exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and adenosine monophosphate (AMP) provocative challenge. The aim was to assess the onset of the anti-inflammatory action of low and high doses and evaluate the suitability of non-invasive assessments to demonstrate dose response.

METHODS

Steroid naïve adult out-patients with mild asthma, sensitive to AMP with baseline exhaled NO > 25 parts per billion entered a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way, cross-over study. Patients were randomised to low dose (1 actuation) or high dose (4 actuations) extrafine BDP/F 100/6 μg, or placebo administered twice daily on Days 1 and 2 and once in the morning on Day 3 of each period. Exhaled NO was measured pre-dose on Day 1, then 2 and 4 hours post-administration on Day 3. The AMP challenge was performed 4 hours post-administration on Day 3 and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1, L) was measured from 0 to 4 hours post-dose on Day 1. Endpoints were NO at 2 and 4 hours, AMP challenge at 4 hours after the fifth dose on Day 3 and FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 4 h post-dose on Day 1. Analysis of covariance was performed for NO and FEV1 and analysis of variance for AMP challenge.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were randomised and completed the study. Exhaled NO was significantly lower for both doses of extrafine BDP/F versus placebo at 2 and 4 hours (high dose LS mean difference: -22.5 ppb, p < 0.0001 and -20.5 ppb, p < 0.0001; low dose: -14.1 ppb, p = 0.0006 and -12.1 ppb, p = 0.0043) with a significant dose response (p = 0.0342 and p = 0.0423). Likewise, AMP challenge revealed statistically significant differences between both doses of extrafine BDP/F and placebo (high dose LS mean difference: 4.8 mg/mL, p < 0.0001; low dose: 3.7 mg/mL, p < 0.0001), and a significant dose response (p = 0.0185). FEV1 was significantly improved versus placebo for both doses (high dose LS mean difference: 0.2 L, p = 0.0001; low dose: 0.2 L p = 0.0001), but without a significant dose response.

CONCLUSIONS

The fixed combination inhaler of extrafine BDP/F has early dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effects with a rapid onset of bronchodilatation in mild asthmatic patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01343745.

Profile of ciclesonide for the maintenance treatment of asthma

Ciclesonide is a nonhalogenated synthetic inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of all severities of persistent asthma. It is available as a hydrofluroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhaler in two strengths, 80 mcg/activation and 160 mcg/activation, with the recommenced dosage being two inhalations twice-daily. It is a prodrug that is converted in the lung to its active form, which possesses 100-fold greater glucocorticoid-receptor-binding affinity than the parent compound. Its relative receptor affinity is similar to budesonide. In clinical studies, ciclesonide was effective in improving pulmonary function, reducing asthma symptoms, and reducing or eliminating the need for oral corticosteroids (OCSs). Patients with severe asthma dependent on OCSs and high doses of ICSs were able to achieve greater asthma control and reduce or even eliminate the use of OCSs when switched to ciclesonide. In comparison with fluticasone propionate and budesonide, ciclesonide was demonstrated to be at least as effective in maintaining pulmonary function and asthma control. In clinical trials, ciclesonide was well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events considered mild or moderate in intensity. It had low systemic bioavailability and no clinically significant hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis suppression at therapeutic doses. Its safety profile establishes ciclesonide as an important addition to the currently available ICSs.

The role of measuring airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammatory biomarkers in asthma

Asthma is characterized by inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness, which results in episodic airflow obstruction. It is diagnosed once a compatible clinical history plus objective evidence of diurnal variability in peak expiratory flow or significant reversibility to inhaled bronchodilator is documented. In accordance with current guidelines, measures of airway calibre and symptoms allow patients and clinicians to assess the degree of asthma control and titrate pharmacotherapy. However, these parameters fail to reflect the extent of underlying endobronchial inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness, which in turn suggests that additional measures of asthma control may be of benefit. This evidence-based review highlights ways by which inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness can be assessed and how they may provide additional useful information in the diagnosis and management of asthmatic patients.

Monitoring asthma therapy using indirect bronchial provocation tests

OBJECTIVES

Bronchial provocation tests that assess airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) are known to be useful in assisting the diagnosis of asthma and in monitoring inhaled corticosteroid therapy. We reviewed the use of bronchial provocation tests that use stimuli that act indirectly for monitoring the benefits of inhaled corticosteroids.

DATA SOURCE

Published clinical trials investigating the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in persons with asthma were used for this review.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies using indirect stimuli to provoke airway narrowing such as exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation, cold air hyperventilation, hypertonic saline, mannitol, or adenosine monophosphate (AMP) to assess the effect of inhaled corticosteroids were selected.

RESULTS

Stimuli acting indirectly result in the release of a variety of bronchoconstricting mediators such as leukotrienes, prostaglandins, and histamine, from cells such as mast cells and eosinophils. A positive response to indirect stimuli is suggestive of active inflammation and AHR that is consistent with a diagnosis of asthma. Persons with a positive response to indirect stimuli benefit from daily treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Symptoms and lung function are not useful to predict the long-term success of inhaled corticosteroid dose as they usually resolve rapidly, and well before inflammation and AHR has resolved. Following treatment, AHR to indirect stimuli is attenuated. Further, during long-term treatment, asthmatics can become as non-responsive as non-asthmatic healthy persons, suggesting that asthma is not active.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-responsiveness to indirect bronchial provocation tests following inhaled corticosteroids occurs weeks to months following the resolution of symptoms and lung function. Non-responsiveness to indirect stimuli may provide a goal for adequate therapy with inhaled corticosteroids.

The effect of low-dose inhaled budesonide on PC20 AMP levels in patients with mild asthma: a 3-month follow-up study

Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) challenge is a diagnostic tool for asthma. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of low dose inhaled budesonide (IB) on PC(20)AMP levels. Seventeen stable mild asthmatic patients were prospectively recruited. After initial testing, patients were administered 400 microg of inhaled budesonide. AMP challenge was then repeated at the 12th hour and 5th,15th, 30th, and 90th days of the treatment. AMP challenge resulted in negative in 47% of the patients at 12(-)hour testing. This study suggests that low-dose IB may return airway responsiveness as early as 12 hours and AMP challenge may be effectively used for treatment monitorization.

Emerging drugs for asthma

BACKGROUND

Current therapies for asthma are aimed at controlling disease symptoms and for the majority of asthmatics inhaled corticosteroid anti-inflammatory therapy is effective. However, this approach requires life-time therapy while a subset of patients remains symptomatic despite optimal treatment creating a clear unmet medical need.

OBJECTIVES

It is recognised that airway inflammation is key to asthma pathogenesis. Biopharmaceutical approaches may identify new therapies that target key cells and mediators that drive the inflammatory responses in the asthmatic lung. Such an approach may provide disease-modifying treatments.

RESULTS

Significant areas of drug development include humanised monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for asthma therapy including those against IgE, IL-4 and IL-5. Asthma-relevant cytokines or chemokines have been targeted in a number of other ways. These include the use of humanised receptor blocking mAb or the removal of cytokines or chemokines via their binding to soluble receptor constructs. Small-molecule receptor antagonists also target receptors or the cellular signal transduction pathways that are activated following cytokine or chemokine receptor ligation. Another approach is to target asthma relevant mediators or the pathways controlling pro-inflammatory leukocyte accumulation within the asthmatic lung.

CONCLUSIONS

This review will discuss the current status, therapeutic potential and potential problems of these novel drug developments in asthma therapy. Current therapies for asthma are aimed at controlling disease symptoms, and for the majority of asthmatics inhaled corticosteroid anti-inflammatory therapy is effective. However, this approach requires lifetime therapy; and a subset of patients remains symptomatic despite optimal treatment, creating a clear unmet medical need. It is recognised that airway inflammation is key to asthma pathogenesis. Biopharmaceutical approaches may identify new therapies that target key cells and mediators that drive the inflammatory responses in the asthmatic lung. Such an approach may provide disease-modifying treatments. Significant areas of drug development include humanised mAb for asthma therapy, including those against IgE, IL-4 and IL-5. Asthma-relevant cytokines or chemokines have been targeted in a number of other ways. These include the use of humanised receptor blocking mAb or the removal of cytokines or chemokines via their binding to soluble receptor constructs. Small-molecule receptor antagonists also target receptors or the cellular signal transduction pathways that are activated following cytokine or chemokine receptor ligation. Another approach is to target asthma-relevant mediators, or the pathways controlling pro-inflammatory leukocyte accumulation within the asthmatic lung. This review will discuss the current status, therapeutic potential and potential problems of these novel drug developments in asthma therapy.

Ciclesonide: a review of its use in the management of asthma

Ciclesonide (Alvesco) is an inhaled corticosteroid used in the preventative treatment of persistent bronchial asthma in adults, adolescents and, in some countries, children. The drug is delivered by a non-chlorofluorocarbon hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI). In the lungs, ciclesonide is converted to an active metabolite, which is responsible for the beneficial effects of the drug in patients with asthma. Ciclesonide and its active metabolite have low systemic bioavailability and therefore have a low potential to produce systemic adverse events. Inhaled ciclesonide delivered by HFA-MDI is effective in the prophylactic treatment of persistent asthma in adults, adolescents and children, and is generally well tolerated. In general, ciclesonide improves lung function and reduces asthma symptoms and rescue medication use in adults and adolescents with asthma of varying severity. The drug is generally no less effective than other inhaled corticosteroids with regard to maintaining or improving lung function and may have a more favourable tolerability profile than some other agents in this class. Ciclesonide has also shown efficacy in paediatric patients with asthma. Data on its long-term effects on other clinical outcomes, such as asthma exacerbations, would be of interest. Further comparative and long-term studies would also be beneficial in order to definitively position ciclesonide with respect to other inhaled corticosteroids. In the meantime, ciclesonide offers an effective and well tolerated first-line preventative treatment option for persistent asthma.

The reproducibility of adenosine monophosphate bronchial challenges in mild, steroid-naive asthmatics

AIMS

Repeated adenosine monophosphate (AMP) challenges are used to assess drug efficacy in clinical trials of mild, steroid-naive asthmatics. Refractoriness has been reported after repeated challenges over short intervals. This study evaluated possible tachyphylaxis after repeated AMP challenges at 12 and 24 h in mild, steroid-naive asthmatics.

METHODS

This was an open, three-way crossover study. Twenty-six steroid-naive asthmatic subjects were randomized to the following AMP challenge regimens separated by 7-14 days: (A) challenge at 08.00 h, repeated 24 h later; (B) challenge at 08.00 h, repeated 12 and 24 h later; (C) challenge at 20.00 h, repeated 12 h later. Comparisons within day were assessed using 90% confidence intervals (CIs). Non-inferiority approach taken with 1 doubling concentration (DC) as a clinically relevant difference.

RESULTS

Regimen A: Significant increase in AMP reactivity at 24 h. Mean DC difference was 0.6 (90% CI 0.24, 0.96). Regimen B: No evidence of difference between AMP reactivity at 08.00 h and a repeated challenge 12 h later. Repeated challenge at 24 h caused a significant increase in provocation concentration (PC)(20) compared with 12 h (mean DC difference 0.48, 90% CI 0.02, 0.95) and 0 h (mean DC difference 0.82, 90% CI 0.49, 1.14 - the upper CI exceeds the criteria of 1 DC). Challenge regimen C: No difference between challenges; mean DC difference of 0.28 (90% CI -0.2, 0.76).

CONCLUSION

The small decline in AMP reactivity during repeated challenges was not consistently observed, and was small compared with the known effects of inhaled drugs.

Ciclesonide versus other inhaled steroids for chronic asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are an integral part of asthma management, and act as an anti-inflammatory agent in the airways of the lung. These agents confer both significant benefit in terms of symptom management and improvement in lung function, but may also cause harm in terms of local and systemic side-effects. Ciclesonide is a novel steroid that is metabolised to its active component in the lung, making it a potentially useful for reducing local side effects.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and adverse effects of ciclesonide relative to those of other inhaled corticosteroids in the management of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group register of trials with pre-defined terms. Additional searches of PubMed and Clinicalstudyresults.org were undertaken. The literature searches for this review are current up to June 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel or crossover studies were eligible for the review. We included studies comparing ciclesonide with other steroids both at nominally equivalent dose or lower doses of ciclesonide.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty one trials involving 7243 participants were included. Equal daily doses of ciclesonide and beclomethasone (BDP) or budesonide (BUD) gave similar results for peak expiratory flow rates (PEF), although forced vital capacity (FVC) was higher with ciclesonide. Data on forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) were inconsistent. Withdrawal data and symptoms were similar between treatments. Compared with the same dose of fluticasone (FP), data on lung function parameters (FEV1, FVC and PEF) did not differ significantly. Paediatric quality of life score favoured ciclesonide. Candidiasis was less frequent with ciclesonide, although other side-effect outcomes did not give significant differences in favour of either treatment. When lower doses of ciclesonide were compared to BDP or BUD, the difference in FEV1 did not reach significance but we cannot exclude a significant effect in favour of BDP/BUD. Other lung function outcomes did not give significant differences between treatments. Paediatric quality of life scores did not differ between treatments. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency between ciclesonide and BDP/BUD. Comparison with FP at half the nominal dose was undertaken in three studies, which indicated that FEV1 was not significantly different, but was not equivalent between the treatments (per protocol: -0.05 L 95% confidence intervals -0.11 to 0.01).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review give some support to ciclesonide as an equivalent therapy to other ICS at similar nominal doses. The studies assessed low doses of steroids, in patients whose asthma required treatment with low doses of steroids. At half the dose of FP and BDP/BUD, the effects of ciclesonide were more inconsistent The effect on candidiasis may be of importance to people who find this to be problematic. The role of ciclesonide in the management of asthma requires further study, especially in paediatric patients. Further assessment against FP at a dose ratio of 1:2 is a priority.

Ciclesonide versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are an integral part of asthma management, and act as an anti-inflammatory agent in the airways of the lung. These agents confer significant benefit in terms of symptom management and improvement in lung function, but may also cause harm in terms of local and systemic side-effects. Ciclesonide is a novel steroid that has efficient distribution and release properties that mean it can be taken once daily, making it potentially useful in ongoing asthma management.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of inhaled ciclesonide in adults and children with chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group register of trials with pre-defined terms. Additional searches of CENTRAL and PubMed were undertaken. The literature searches for this review are current up to June 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel or crossover studies were eligible for the review. We included studies comparing ciclesonide with placebo, and we also included studies comparing ciclesonide at different doses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors assessed studies for inclusion in the review, extracted data independently and checked each others' work. We contacted study investigators in order to obtain additional data. Extracted data were entered into RevMan 4.2 and analysed as fixed effect mean differences for continuous data, and fixed effect risk ratios for dichotomous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighteen trials (reporting 20 study comparisons) met the review entry criteria. We report findings from 18 group comparisons where data were available (6343 participants, of whom 1692 were children). Ciclesonide versus placebo: The short duration of the included studies means that there is a lack of data with respect to the impact of ciclesonide on asthma exacerbations. At doses of 100 mcg/d or less up to 400 mcg/d in mild to moderate asthma, ciclesonide improved lung function, asthma symptoms and rescue inhaler use, compared with placebo.Dose response outcomes: Comparisons of 100 versus 200 mcg/d, 100 versus 400 mcg/d and 400 versus 800 mcg/d did not yield significant differences in lung function outcomes. Adverse event data were not available in sufficient detail to permit assessment of the safety profile of this drug.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Ciclesonide was more effective than placebo, in the short term, in improving lung function in patients with mild to moderate asthma previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids. There remain questions as to dose response, and the lack of data on the longer term impact on exacerbations and safety profile should be addressed in future studies.

Rapid effect of inhaled ciclesonide in asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Ciclesonide is a novel inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma, and it is important to measure the onset of effect of this therapy on airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and levels of eosinophils in induced sputum.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, 21 patients with mild asthma inhaled ciclesonide 320 microg (ex-actuator) qd, ciclesonide 640 microg (ex-actuator) bid, and placebo for 7 days. Exhaled NO and AHR to adenosine monophosphate (AMP), measured as the provocative concentration of AMP producing a 20% reduction in FEV1 (PC20FEV1), were assessed after inhalation on days 1, 3 and 7. Eosinophil levels in induced sputum were also measured.

RESULTS

Ciclesonide 320 microg qd and 640 microg bid produced significantly greater improvements in PC20FEV1 compared with placebo on day 1 (within 2.5 h), and on days 3 and 7 (all p < 0.0001). On day 3, both ciclesonide doses significantly reduced exhaled NO levels by - 17.7 parts per billion (p < 0.0001) and - 15.4 parts per billion (p < 0.003) vs placebo, respectively. Significant reductions were maintained during the study with both ciclesonide doses (p < 0.01). A nonsignificant trend towards a decrease in eosinophil cell numbers was observed after 7 days of ciclesonide treatment, especially in patients receiving the higher dose.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of ciclesonide decreased AHR to AMP and exhaled NO within 3 h, while FEV, improved at 3 days and 7 days.

Sputum eosinophils and the response of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction to corticosteroid in asthma

BACKGROUND

The relationship between eosinophilic airway inflammation and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), and the response to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy was examined.

METHODS

Twenty-six steroid-naïve asthmatic patients with EIB were randomized to two parallel, double-blind, crossover study arms (13 subjects in each arm). Each arm compared two dose levels of inhaled ciclesonide that were administered for 3 weeks with a washout period of 3 to 8 weeks, as follows: (1) 40 vs 160 microg daily; and (2) 80 vs 320 microg daily. Baseline and weekly assessments with exercise challenge and sputum analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Data were pooled and demonstrated that 10 subjects had baseline sputum eosinophilia >or= 5%. Only high-dose ICS therapy (ie, 160 and 320 microg) significantly attenuated the sputum eosinophil percentage. Sputum eosinophil percentage significantly correlated with EIB severity, and predicted the magnitude and temporal response of EIB to high-dose therapy, but not to low-dose therapy (ie, 40 and 80 microg). Low-dose ICS therapy provided a significant reduction in EIB at 1 week, with little additional improvement thereafter, irrespective of baseline sputum eosinophil counts. In contrast, high-dose ICS therapy provided a significantly greater improvement in EIB in subjects with sputum eosinophilia compared to those with an eosinophil count of < 5%. The difference between the eosinophilic groups in the magnitude of improvement in EIB was evident after the first week of high-dose ICS therapy and increased with time.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that eosinophilic airway inflammation may be important in modifying the severity of EIB and the response to ICS therapy. Measurements of sputum eosinophil percentage may, therefore, be useful in predicting the magnitude and temporal response of EIB to different dose levels of ICSs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrial.gov; Identifier: NCT00525772.

Formoterol turbuhaler is as effective as salbutamol diskus in relieving adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in children

Salbutamol diskus (SD) and formoterol turbuhaler (FT) are both fast-acting beta(2) agonists delivery systems used to relieve bronchoconstriction, such as that which accompanies acute exacerbations of asthma. Although SD (which is used only on an as-needed basis) is flow independent, the FT (currently recommended for regular therapy) requires a forceful deep inspiration. Thus, the efficacy of FT in children with bronchoconstriction may be inferior to that of SD. We have studied the bronchodilatation response induced by FT after a standard adenosine-5-monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge, and compared it to that induced by SD, and placebo. Seventeen children (mean age +/- SD 10.3 +/- 1.7 y) with asthma underwent three AMP challenges, each time followed by inhalation of either placebo, SD (200 mug) or FT (9 mug), in random order. Patterns of bronchodilatation (forced expiratory volume in 1 second recovery) to 90% of baseline levels were compared. Both SD and FT were significantly better than placebo. FT was slightly better than SD, but this difference was not statistically significant. FT and SD are both effective bronchodilators and may be of comparable efficiency during acute bronchoconstriction in young children with asthma.

The role of esterases in the metabolism of ciclesonide to desisobutyryl-ciclesonide in human tissue

Ciclesonide (CIC) is an inhaled glucocorticosteroid. This study aimed to identify esterases involved in the metabolism of CIC to the active metabolite desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC), and to measure hydrolysis rates in human liver, lung and plasma and normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells in vitro. Ciclesonide (5 microM and 500 microM) was incubated with microsomal or cytosolic fractions from liver, lung and plasma (n=4 for each) and des-CIC formation was determined by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with U.V. detection. The roles of carboxylesterase, cholinesterase and A-esterase in CIC hydrolysis were determined using a range of inhibitors. Inhibitor concentrations for liver and NHBE cells were 100 microM and 5 microM, respectively. Liver tissue had a higher activity for 500 microM CIC hydrolysis (microsomes: 25.4; cytosol: 62.9 nmol/g tissue/min) than peripheral lung (microsomes: 0.089; cytosol: 0.915 nmol/g tissue/min) or plasma (0.001 nmol/mL plasma/min), corresponding with high levels of carboxylesterase and cholinesterase in the liver compared with the lung. CIC (5 microM) was rapidly hydrolyzed by NHBE cells (approximately 30% conversion at 4h), with almost complete conversion by 24h. In liver and NHBE cells, major involvement of cytosolic carboxylesterases, with some contribution by cholinesterases, was indicated. The highest level of conversion was found in the liver, the site of inactivation of des-CIC through rapid oxidation by cytochrome P450. Carboxylesterases in bronchial epithelial cells probably contribute significantly to the conversion to des-CIC in the target organ, whereas low systemic levels of des-CIC are a result of the high metabolic clearance by the liver following CIC inhalation.

Ciclesonide disposition and metabolism: pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion in the mouse, rat, rabbit, and dog

The pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of ciclesonide, a novel and effective inhaled glucocorticoid for the treatment of asthma, were investigated after intravenous and oral administration of 14C-ciclesonide in the mouse, rat, rabbit, and dog. The pharmacokinetics of ciclesonide in all animal species were characterized by a low oral bioavailability (approximately 6% or less), a high clearance, and a large volume of distribution. The apparent terminal half-life of ciclesonide was short; the apparent terminal half-life of the active desisobutyryl-ciclesonide metabolite (des-CIC or M1) was longer and ranged from 2.4 to 6.9 hours in the 4 species. Metabolites derived from ciclesonide in serum (or plasma) and excreta samples from the 4 animal species were profiled and identified by LC/RAM/MS (liquid chromatography/radioactivity monitor/mass spectrometry). Ciclesonide was extensively metabolized to yield des-CIC, which was further metabolized to primarily yield hippuric acid and hydroxylated metabolites, namely, isomers of cyclohexane-monohydroxylated des-CIC and B-ring-monohydroxylated des-CIC. Greater than 90% of intravenous and oral 14C-ciclesonide doses were recovered in all species; the main elimination route was fecal/biliary. A comparison of in vitro and in vivo metabolite profiles between mice, rats, rabbits, and dogs with those from humans indicated that metabolic pathways for ciclesonide were qualitatively similar in humans and in the 4 animal species.

A multinational, 12-week, randomized study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide and budesonide in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Ciclesonide is a new lung-activated inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) that has shown efficacy in previous placebo-controlled and comparative studies in patients with persistent asthma. It is important to compare new treatments with existing ICSs to obtain relative data concerning their efficacy and tolerability.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide QD with budesonide BID in patients with asthma.

METHODS

This 12-week, randomized study was conducted at 62 study sites across Europe. Male and female patients aged 12 to 75 years with primarily mild to moderate asthma were enrolled. This study was double blind with respect to the ciclesonide dose and open label for budesonide, as placebofor budesonide was not available. Patients were randomly assigned to receive inhaled ciclesonide 80 or 320 microg QD (morning) or budesonide 200 microg BID for 12 weeks. Efficacy and tolerability assessments were performed at weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 8, and 12. The primary end point was the change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 12 weeks. Secondary end points were changes from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptom scores, and rescue medication use. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study by monitoring of standard laboratory variables (hematology and biochemistry); physical examination, including vital signs; reporting of adverse events (AEs); and 24-hour urinary cortisol as a measure of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis function.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-four patients were randomized (301 men, 253 women; mean age, 41.3 years; ciclesonide 80 microg QD, 182 patients; ciclesonide 320 microg QD, 195; budesonide 200 microg BID, 177). Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics, including age, sex, weight, and (FEV1) were similar between the 3 groups. Compared with baseline values, week-12 FEV1 (least squares mean [LSM] [SEM] A, +0.267 [0.035], +0.256 [0.033], and +0.355 [0.034] L, respectively; all, P<0.001) and morning PEF (LSM [SEM] Delta, +12 [5], +17 [4], and +21 [4] L/min, respectively; all, P<or=0.008) were significantly improved with ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD and budesonide 200 microg BID. At 12 weeks, ciclesonide was found to be noninferior to budesonide with regard to mean changes from baseline in (FEV1) (intent to treat [ITT]: 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 80 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -0.192 to 0.015; 97.5 CI for ciclesonide 320 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -0.200 to 0.001) and morning PEF (ITT. 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 80 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -22 to 5; 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 320 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -17 to 10). Similar findings were seen in the per-protocol population. Week-12 daily, daytime, and nighttime asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use were significantly decreased from baseline in all 3 treatment groups (all, P<0.001). The prevalences of AEs were similar across all 3 treatment groups. Week-12 mean urinary cortisol excretion was statistically similar to baseline with both ciclesonide doses (Delta, -0.54 and +0.16 nmol/mmol creatinine with ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD, respectively) but was significantly reduced from baseline with budesonide (Delta, -1.42 nmol/mmol creatinine; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study in patients with primarily mild to moderate asthma suggest that ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD were similar to budesonide 200 microg BID in improving pulmonary function, controlling asthma symptoms, and reducing the need for rescue medication use. Unlike budesonide, ciclesonide was not associated with significant urinary cortisol suppression in these patients.

In Vitro metabolism of ciclesonide in human lung and liver precision-cut tissue slices

Ciclesonide is a new-generation inhaled corticosteroid developed to treat the inflammation associated with persistent asthma. In order to identify the properties of ciclesonide responsible for anti-inflammatory activity, ciclesonide metabolism was investigated in human lung and liver precision-cut tissue slices. Three human lung and three human liver tissue slices were incubated with 25 microM [14C]-ciclesonide for 2, 6 and 24 h. Cellular viability was assessed using adenosine 5'-triphosphate content and protein synthesis in lung slices and adenosine 5'-triphosphate content and potassium retention in liver slices. Ciclesonide and ciclesonide metabolites were analysed in tissue samples using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and radiochemical detection. Metabolite identity was confirmed using mass spectrometry. In lung slices, the inactive parent compound, ciclesonide, was initially converted to the active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide, and subsequently converted to fatty acid conjugates. The reversible formation of fatty acid conjugates was a major pathway of ciclesonide metabolism in human lung slices. The primary conjugate was identified as desisobutyryl-ciclesonide oleate. Ciclesonide was metabolized to at least five polar metabolites in the liver. Dihydroxylated desisobutyryl-ciclesonide was the major polar metabolite in liver slices. Activation and fatty acid esterification in the lung followed by rapid inactivation in the liver may explain the improved safety profile and prolonged anti-inflammatory activity of ciclesonide.

The newly developed inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide for the treatment of asthma

Ciclesonide is the most recently developed inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma to enter global markets. It has been formulated as an aerosol solution in a metered dose inhaler with hydrofluoralkane. The mass median aerodynamic diameter of aerosolised ciclesonide is 1 - 2 microm, providing excellent lung deposition characteristics. Ciclesonide can undergo reversible esterification in the lungs, possibly allowing once-daily dosing, and is highly protein bound, possibly leading to reduced systemic side effects. Clinical trials suggest that ciclesonide effectively controls asthma and has a favourable safety profile.

A comparative study of inhaled ciclesonide 160 microg/day and fluticasone propionate 176 microg/day in children with asthma

Ciclesonide (CIC) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with high anti-inflammatory activity and low incidence of local and systemic adverse effects. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of CIC with fluticasone propionate (FP) in children and adolescents with persistent asthma. This was a 12-week, randomized, double blind, parallel-group study. After a 2-to 4-week baseline period, a total of 556 children (ages 6-15 years) with asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV(1)], 50% to 90% predicted) were treated twice daily with CIC 80 microg (ex-actuator, equivalent to 100 microg ex-valve) or FP 88 microg (ex-actuator, equivalent to 100 microg ex-valve) administered via a hydrofluoroalkane-propelled metered-dose inhaler. A statistically significant increase from baseline was observed in FEV(1) for both CIC (285 +/- 16 ml) and FP (285 +/- 15 ml) (P < 0.0001 for both) and in morning and evening peak expiratory flow (P < 0.0001 for both). Significant improvements were seen in asthma symptoms, use of rescue medication, and asthma symptom-free days in both treatment groups, without any differences between the treatment groups in changes from baseline. Two FP-treated patients experienced oral candidiasis and one patient experienced voice alteration. Creatinine-adjusted 24-hr urine cortisol levels increased from baseline levels by 10% in the CIC group (P < 0.05) and by 6% in the FP group (not significant). The efficacy and safety of CIC 160 microg/day were comparable to those of FP 176 microg/day in children with asthma.

Developing the ideal inhaled corticosteroid

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are considered the most effective asthma therapy, but concerns remain about side effects. The ideal ICS would have a larger therapeutic ratio than currently available agents, allowing doses to be increased but without greatly increasing the frequency or severity of adverse events. The ideal ICS would possess the following pharmacokinetic properties to maximize efficacy and minimize side effects: high pulmonary deposition, conversion to an active metabolite, high receptor potency, high pulmonary retention, low oral bioavailability, extensive metabolism, and rapid elimination. The new ICS ciclesonide has been shown to possess many of these characteristics. Ciclesonide has also been shown to improve lung function, to treat the underlying inflammation, to be effective as monotherapy in patients with persistent asthma, to have reduced side effects compared with other ICS, and to be easy to use with once-daily dosing. However, as with all new products, the advantages witnessed in clinical trials still have to be demonstrated to be beneficial long-term in general clinical use. ICS with an improved therapeutic index may have the potential to increase patient adherence, enhance the use of ICS monotherapy in the primary care setting, and increase the range of patients for whom ICS monotherapy would be appropriate.

Two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging show ciclesonide has high lung deposition and peripheral distribution: a nonrandomized study in healthy volunteers

Drug deposition is an important factor that contributes to safety and efficacy outcomes of inhaled steroid therapy. Ciclesonide is a nonhalogenated, inhaled corticosteroid under investigation for the treatment of asthma. Therefore, this study was performed to assess lung deposition of ciclesonide. Technetium-99m (99mTc)-labeled ciclesonide (where the 99mTc-label is physically dissolved in the ciclesonide-hydrofluoroalkane [HFA] solution aerosol) inhaled by healthy volunteers was analyzed by two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) imaging to determine lung deposition. Six healthy volunteers inhaled one puff of 40 microg (exactuator, equivalent to 50 microg ex-valve) ciclesonide for 2-D imaging, and two healthy volunteers inhaled 10 puffs of 40 microg ciclesonide for 2-D and 3-D imaging. The ciclesonide aerosol was administered via metered-dose inhaler (MDI) containing HFA-134a as propellant. The ex-actuator mean (+/- standard deviation) deposition of ciclesonide in the lungs was higher (52% +/- 11%) than in the mouth/pharynx (38% +/- 14%). Two-dimensional and 3-D imaging showed that ciclesonide reached all regions of the lung. Mean percent deposition in peripheral regions (47% and 34%) was higher than in lower central regions (17% and 30%), as revealed by 3-D and 2-D imaging, respectively. Inhalation of up to 400 microg of ciclesonide produced no drug-related side effects. In conclusion, ciclesonide administered via metered-dose inhaler using HFA-134a as a propellant provided high lung deposition (>50%), greater distribution throughout peripheral regions of the lungs, and relatively low oropharyngeal deposition.

Determinants of airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in school-age children with asthma

Airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) is more specific than that to direct stimuli for asthma diagnosis and response to treatment, but is not detected in all patients with asthma. This study was planned to determine predictive factors for responsiveness to AMP in asthmatic children between 7-16 years old. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 71 asthmatic children who were challenged by AMP in our department. All children were characterized by skin-prick and lung function tests and bronchial challenge with AMP. Data on simultaneous methacholine challenge tests were available for 46 children, 34 of whom were also challenged with a third stimulus, exercise. Potential demographic factors for responsiveness to AMP were assessed by logistic regression analysis within the study group. The proportion of school-age children with asthma responsive to AMP was 39.4%. The geometric mean provocative concentration of AMP causing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (PC20AMP) was 20.50 mg/ml (range, 0.31-377 mg/ml). There were no significant differences either in response to methacholine below 16 mg/ml (P = 0.66) or in PC20 methacholine level (P = 0.075) when we compared AMP-responsive and -nonresponsive children. These two groups also did not differ with respect to their response to exercise challenge in subgroup analysis (P = 0.34). Among school-age children with asthma, allergic rhinitis (P = 0.004) and sensitizaton to grass mix (P = 0.001), cereal mix (P = 0.003), house dust mite (P = 0.024), and cat (P = 0.043) were found to be more frequent in AMP-responsive children than the others. There was no difference in lung function test parameters between children responsive to AMP and the others. Grass pollen sensitization was found to be the only independent predictive factor for determining AMP responsiveness in school-age children with asthma (odds ratio, 5.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.84-17.45; P = 0.003). In conclusion, atopic sensitization is the most important predictive factor for responsiveness to AMP in school-age children with asthma, as in adults.

Ciclesonide reduces the need for oral steroid use in adult patients with severe, persistent asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) may be associated with systemic adverse events (AEs), which can be reduced by replacing OCS with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The potential of ciclesonide, a novel ICS, to reduce OCS use in patients with severe, persistent asthma was evaluated in this study.

DESIGN

A phase III, 12-week, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

PATIENTS

Adult and adolescent patients (> or = 12 years old; n = 141) with severe, persistent, oral steroid (prednisone)-dependent asthma.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive ciclesonide (640 mug/d or 1,280 microg/d [ex-actuator]) bid or placebo for 12 weeks. Weekly evaluations determined eligibility for prednisone dose reduction based on predetermined criteria.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The prednisone dose was significantly reduced by 47% and 63% in the groups receiving ciclesonide, 640 microg/d, and ciclesonide, 1,280 microg/d, respectively, vs an increase of 4% in the placebo group (both p < or = 0.0003) at week 12. By week 12, prednisone was discontinued by approximately 30% of patients in the ciclesonide-treated groups, vs 11% of patients in the placebo group (both p < or = 0.04). FEV1 improved significantly at week 12 in the ciclesonide treatment groups vs placebo (p < 0.03). The occurrence of local and systemic AEs was comparable between all treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Study results suggest that ciclesonide significantly reduces the need for OCS in patients with severe, persistent asthma, while maintaining asthma control.

Anti-inflammatory effects of once daily low dose inhaled ciclesonide in mild to moderate asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Ciclesonide exhibits clinical efficacy at 160 microg (ex-actuator) once daily but the anti-inflammatory effects at this dose are not known. We wished to know whether 4 weeks therapy with ciclesonide pMDI 160 microg once daily in the morning exhibited significant anti-inflammatory effects.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with mild persistent asthma (FEV(1) 3.35 l) were recruited into a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized crossover study. Measurements were made after ciclesonide and placebo treatment as well as after run-in and washout periods, for adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge (primary variable), exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and induced sputum (in a subgroup).

RESULTS

The mean (SEM) AMP bronchial challenge PC(20) following ciclesonide (140 (63) mg/ml) was significantly (P < 0.001) increased compared with placebo (17 (8) mg/ml), run-in (13 (5) mg/ml) and washout (9 (3) mg/ml) periods. This amounted to an eightfold (CI: 5.3-12.0) for ciclesonide vs placebo. Likewise, there were significant improvements in exhaled NO levels and a significant reduction in induced sputum eosinophil cell counts.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that inhaled ciclesonide given at 160 microg once daily in the morning exhibits significant anti-inflammatory effects that are in keeping with the previously described clinical effects.

Ciclesonide: a novel inhaled corticosteroid

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are a mainstay in the treatment of persistent asthma, a disease with increasing prevalence and cost implications worldwide. However, long-term use of currently available ICS is associated with local adverse effects that include hoarseness and oral candidiasis. In addition, systemic adverse effects including adrenal cortical suppression, osteoporosis, growth retardation, cataracts and glaucoma are also present. Ciclesonide is a novel ICS, which promises to provide airway anti-inflammatory efficacy that is comparable with that of the available ICS in addition to reducing the risk for local and systemic adverse events. Ciclesonide is an agent that is inactive until it reaches its target site, the lung, where it is converted to its active metabolite desisobutyryl-ciclesonide. In addition, other favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics such as high protein binding, low oral bioavailability and rapid clearance contribute to the efficacy and improved systemic safety profile of ciclesonide.

Comparative efficacy of once-daily ciclesonide and budesonide in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily ciclesonide, a new-generation, on-site-activated, inhaled corticosteroid, with once-daily budesonide in persistent asthma.

METHODS

Eligible patients requiring budesonide or equivalent 320-640 microg (ex-mouthpiece, equivalent to 400-800 microg; Turbohalertrade mark) daily entered a 2-week baseline, and then a 2- to 4-week pretreatment period (budesonide 1280 microg/day; ex-mouthpiece, equivalent to 1600 microg/day). Patients with an increase in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) of 7% or 0.15 L were randomised to ciclesonide 320 microg (ex-actuator, equivalent to 400 microg ex-valve) via a hydrofluoroalkane-metered dose inhaler (HFA-MDI) without a spacer or budesonide 320 microg once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. Change in FEV1 was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

In all, 359 patients were randomised. The FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) decreased by 0.18 and 0.12L, respectively, in the ciclesonide group, and by 0.23 and 0.21L in the budesonide group. For FEV1, ciclesonide was noninferior and numerically superior to budesonide. For FVC, ciclesonide was statistically superior to budesonide (P=0.010). Asthma symptom scores were comparable; the median percentage of symptom-free days was significantly higher for ciclesonide (43.6%) versus budesonide (25.8%) (P=0.017). Rescue medication use decreased significantly only for ciclesonide patients (P=0.009). Frequency of adverse events was low in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Ciclesonide 320 microg once daily by HFA-MDI without a spacer was at least as effective as budesonide 320 microg once daily in persistent asthma.

New anti-inflammatory therapies and targets for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are diseases of the airways with an underlying inflammatory component. The prevalence and healthcare burden of asthma and COPD is still rising and is predicted to continue to rise in the foreseeable future. Beta-agonists and corticosteroids form the basis of the therapies available to treat asthma. However, the treatments available for COPD, corticosteroids and anticholinergics, reduce the number and severity of exacerbations, but have a limited effect on slowing the progression of the disease. The inflammatory processes underlying the pathology of asthma have received a great deal of attention and more recently, those underlying COPD have begun to be elucidated. This has resulted in the identification of new targets that will allow the development of novel approaches by the pharmaceutical industry, which will be able to focus its efforts in an attempt to provide new and improved therapies to treat these debilitating diseases. The resultant therapies should impinge on the underlying development of these diseases rather than providing symptomatic relief or palliative treatment alone. This review will outline new targets and novel approaches currently under investigation, which may provide opportunities for novel anti-inflammatory therapeutic interventions that slow or halt disease progression in asthma and COPD.

Effect of omalizumab on adenosine 5'-monophosphate responsiveness in subjects with allergic asthma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of omalizumab on bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP).

METHODS

Thirty-four subjects with mild to moderate allergic asthma were randomized to receive placebo (n = 16) or omalizumab (n = 18) subcutaneously during 12 weeks. Airway responsiveness to AMP was measured at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment, whereas the response to methacholine was measured at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment, the increase in AMP PC(20) (provocative concentration required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1)) was significantly greater in the omalizumab group than in the placebo group, the mean difference in the change between the groups being 1.52 doubling concentrations (95% CI, 0.25-2.79, p = 0.02). Compared with baseline, the mean AMP PC(20) values at 12 weeks were increased by 1.91 doubling concentrations with omalizumab (p < 0.001) and 1.01 doubling concentrations with placebo (p = 0.16), but changes were not significantly different between the treatment groups. Changes in methacholine PC(20) values were not significantly different between the omalizumab and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects with allergic asthma, omalizumab reduces the response to AMP without decreasing the response to methacholine. These findings are consistent with the conclusion that the contribution of IgE to the development of AMP bronchoconstriction is more important than their role in the induction of methacholine hyperresponsiveness.

The treatment of asthma in children: inhaled corticosteroids

The evidence that asthma is characterized by extensive inflammation of the airways has warranted the use of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in asthma maintenance therapy. Corticosteroid treatment, especially if high or frequent doses are required, is associated with a range of adverse effects including adrenal suppression and impairment in growth and bone metabolism. New corticosteroids are in development, including mometasone furoate, and some of these are predicted to have reduced adverse effects such as the soft steroid ciclesonide. Soft steroids are designed for delivery near to their site of action, to exert their effect and then to undergo controlled and predictable metabolism to inactive metabolites. This review points out the anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroid in asthmatic airways and the clinical efficacy and safety of ICS in asthmatic children. The development of a soft steroid should help to achieve the aim of improving the therapeutic profile of ICS in asthma and thus alleviate the ongoing problem of poor patient compliance especially in childhood.

Ciclesonide, a novel inhaled steroid, does not affect hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) reduce local airway inflammation, which is an underlying cause of asthma symptoms. However, potential systemic side effects associated with ICS use are a major concern for asthmatic patients.

METHODS

Adult patients (n = 60; > or = 18 years of age) with moderate-to-severe asthma were randomized to receive 4 weeks of treatment with ciclesonide (CIC), 320 microg bid (CIC 640), CIC, 640 microg bid (CIC 1280), fluticasone propionate (FP), 440 microg bid (FP 880), FP 880 microg bid (FP 1760), or placebo (PBO) [all doses expressed as ex-actuator; comparable to ex-valve doses of 800 and 1,600 microg/d for CIC and 1,000 and 2,000 microg/d for FP, respectively].

RESULTS

After 29 days of treatment, CIC 640, CIC 1280, and FP 880 had no significant effect on the mean serum cortisol area under the curve for 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24h). FP 1760 produced a statistically significant suppression in mean serum cortisol AUC0-24h compared to PBO (p = 0.0009; 95% confidence interval [CI] -117.5 [corrected] to -32.1). Results obtained with cosyntropin stimulation revealed no statistically significant differences among the groups. The CIC 640 group demonstrated a significant increase compared to the PBO group in 24-h urinary cortisol levels from baseline at week 4 (p = 0.0224; 95% CI, 0.0023 to 0.0283), while the other treatment groups revealed no change in this parameter. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in all groups, and all adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with moderate and high doses of CIC does not result in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis suppression as compared with PBO.

Formation of fatty acid conjugates of ciclesonide active metabolite in the rat lung after 4-week inhalation of ciclesonide

Ciclesonide, an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with prolonged anti-inflammatory activity, is being developed for the treatment of asthma. Fatty acid conjugation of ICS is thought to be related to prolonged ICS activity. In vitro studies demonstrated that ciclesonide is converted to an active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC), which undergoes reversible fatty acid conjugation. We tested the in vivo metabolism of ciclesonide in the lung by exposing rats to inhaled ciclesonide (0.16 mg/kg/day) for 1h daily over 4 weeks. Lungs (n=6 per time point) were extracted with ethanol 2, 5, and approximately 27 h after the final treatment. Ciclesonide and des-CIC concentrations were determined using solid-phase extraction and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Concentrations of fatty acid ester conjugates were indirectly assessed using enzymatic de-esterification before LC/MS/MS. At 2 and 5 h, fatty acid conjugates of des-CIC were the major metabolites (61 and 55%, respectively). Ciclesonide, des-CIC, and fatty acid conjugates of des-CIC were clearly present in lung samples the day after the last inhalation. This in vivo study confirmed ciclesonide activation to des-CIC and formation of fatty acid conjugates. The presence of des-CIC fatty acid conjugates at >24 h after dosing suggests that ciclesonide is appropriate for once-daily dosing.

Effect of histamine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate provocation on sputum neutrophils and related mediators in atopic patients

BACKGROUND

Airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation can be noninvasively studied by bronchial provocation using direct (histamine) or indirect (adenosine 5'-monophosphate [AMP]) stimuli and induced sputum.

OBJECTIVE

To report on the immediate effects of histamine and AMP challenge on induced sputum neutrophil counts and related mediator levels.

METHODS

We performed a single-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-way, crossover, methodological study in 14 atopic patients (median age, 25 years; 8 males; mean +/- SD forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 99% +/- 5%) without anti-inflammatory medication use. At baseline, sputum induction was performed. Bronchial challenges with AMP, histamine, or placebo were performed 48 hours later. Thirty minutes after challenge, sputum induction was performed again. Challenge periods in each patient were separated by more than 2 weeks. Sputum cells and the mediators leukotriene B4, interleukin 8, myeloperoxidase, and albumin were quantified.

RESULTS

Comparing median challenge-induced relative changes in cells and mediators, neither histamine nor AMP challenge altered the induced sputum neutrophil counts (histamine, 2.7%; AMP, 2.95%; placebo, -2%; P > .07 for all), interleukin 8 levels (histamine, 2.4 ng/mL; AMP, -3.8 ng/mL; placebo, -0.2 ng/mL; P > .06), leukotriene B4 levels (histamine, -4.8 pg/mL; AMP, 3 pg/mL; placebo, 6 pg/mL; P > .08), or myeloperoxidase levels (histamine, 0.16 microg/mL; AMP, 0 microg/mL; placebo, -0.03 microg/mL; P > .07). Sputum albumin levels were increased after histamine challenge compared with AMP and placebo challenge (P < .01 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Histamine and AMP provocation have no major effects on induced neutrophil counts and related mediator levels in atopic patients, whereas histamine challenge induces plasma leakage. Potential interactions of noninvasive methods to evaluate airway reactivity and inflammation should be carefully considered.

Effects of inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on cortisol secretion and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'monophosphate in asthmatic patients

The efficacy and systemic effects of ciclesonide, a novel glucocorticosteroid, inhaled via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) were compared with fluticasone propionate pMDI in 26 patients with asthma, using a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, double dummy, 6-period crossover study design. Treatments were placebo, ciclesonide 320 microg (ex-actuator dose) once daily (o.d.), ciclesonide 640 microg o.d., ciclesonide 640 microg twice daily (b.i.d.), fluticasone propionate 440 microg (ex-actuator dose) b.i.d., and fluticasone propionate 880 microg b.i.d. The primary variable was area under the plasma cortisol concentration-time curve over 24 h (plasma cortisol AUC(0-24), relative to placebo) derived from samples taken every 2 h, on the 9th day of treatment. Secondary variables were 24-h urinary cortisol excretion and PC20 for adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) (relative to placebo and expressed in doubling concentrations). Ciclesonide did not affect 24-h cortisol secretion. Fluticasone propionate suppressed cortisol secretion as demonstrated by a decrease in plasma cortisol AUC(0-24), relative to placebo, by 29% (95% CI 15-41) and 59% (95% CI 51-66) with 440 and 880 microg b.i.d., respectively. PC20 more than doubled with each active treatment, but no statistically significant dose-response effect could be established. It was concluded that moderate to high doses of fluticasone propionate suppressed cortisol secretion, that ciclesonide did not suppress cortisol secretion, and that all active treatments decreased hyperresponsiveness to AMP.