Fluoroquinolone Therapy for the Prevention of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Contacts. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance: A Systematic Literature Review of Methods

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Economic evaluation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) interventions is complicated by the multisectoral, inter-temporal and international aspects of the problem, further hindered by a lack of available data and theoretical understanding of the emergence and transmission of AMR. Despite the substantial global focus on the problem, there is a lack of comprehensive economic evaluation literature on AMR policies. The goal of this work is to review the available literature on the economic evaluation of AMR interventions focusing on methods used to quantify the effects on AMR and the associated health consequences and costs.

METHODS

The studies included in the review were identified by a previous study by Painter et al. that included all full economic evaluations of AMR policies in the peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2000 and 2020. The current review extracted additional information to (1) summarise the types and the key features of the AMR intervention economic evaluation literature available; (2) systemise the types of intervention effects on AMR quantified and describe these across the dimensions of AMR burden: time, space, wider pathogen pool and different sectors (One Health framework); and (3) categorise the methods used to derive these outcomes and how were these linked to health consequences and costs.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were included within this review, of which 18 evaluated interventions that aimed to reduce infection rates and 11 evaluated interventions that aimed to optimise antimicrobial use. Almost all were conducted with a high-income and/or upper-middle income country perspective and focused on human health. Thirteen of 31 studies were cost-utility analyses. Fifteen of 31 and 7/31 studies estimated the AMR effects through decision tree and/or Markov models and transmission models, respectively. Transmission models and linkage of AMR outcomes to quality-adjusted life-years and costs were more common in evaluations of interventions aimed at reducing infection rates. Most of the included studies restricted the scope of evaluation to a short time horizon and a narrow geographical scope and did not consider the wider impact on other pathogens and other settings, potentially resulting in an incomplete capture of the effects of interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

This review found limited available literature that mainly focused on high-income countries and infection prevention/reduction strategies. Most evaluations used a narrow study scope, which might have prevented the full capture of the costs and outcomes associated with interventions. Finally, despite the known complexities associated with quantifying AMR effects, and the corresponding methodological challenges, the implications of these choices were rarely discussed explicitly.

Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment in High TB-Burden Settings: A State-of-the-Art Review

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent. The burden is highest in some low- and middle-income countries. One-quarter of the world's population is estimated to have been infected with TB, which is the seedbed for progressing from TB infection to the deadly and contagious disease itself. Although some individuals may clear their infections through innate and acquired immunity, many do not. People living with HIV, TB-exposed household contacts, other individuals recently infected, and immunosuppressed individuals are at especially high risk of progressing to TB disease. There have been major advances in recent years to support the programmatic management of TB infection. New tests of infection, including those that predict progression to TB disease, have become available. Numerous World Health Organization-recommended TB preventive treatment (TPT) regimens are available for all ages and for both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB infection. All regimens are generally safe, efficacious, and cost effective and have a low risk of generating resistance. TPT is recommended for pregnant women who are at risk for developing TB, but some regimens are associated with an increased likelihood of poor obstetric and fetal outcomes, and newer regimens have not yet been tested in pregnancy. New formulations of rifapentine-based TPT have been developed, and the cost has been radically reduced. Innovative models of delivery to support the scale up of TPT have been developed. Modeling suggests that scaling up TPT, especially regimens with optimal target product profile characteristics, can contribute substantially to ending the TB epidemic. The global uptake of TPT has increased substantially, especially for people living with HIV. Implementation gaps remain, particularly for children, pregnant women, and other household contacts. Further innovation is required to support the continued scale up of TPT and to contribute to ending the TB epidemic.

Levofloxacin for the Prevention of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Vietnam

BACKGROUND

Prevention of drug-resistant tuberculosis is a global health priority. However, trials evaluating the effectiveness of treating Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection among contacts of persons with drug-resistant tuberculosis are lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing 6 months of daily levofloxacin (weight-based doses) with placebo to treat M. tuberculosis infection. The trial population comprised household contacts of persons with bacteriologically confirmed rifampicin-resistant or multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis in Vietnam. Contacts of any age with a positive tuberculin skin test or immunologic impairment were eligible. The primary end point was bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis within 30 months. Secondary end points included grade 3 or 4 adverse events, death from any cause, and acquired drug resistance.

RESULTS

Of 3948 persons screened for eligibility, 61 (1.5%) had coprevalent tuberculosis (defined as active tuberculosis disease diagnosed before randomization) and 2041 underwent randomization. Of these 2041 participants, 1995 (97.7%) completed 30 months of follow-up, had a primary end-point event, or died. Confirmed tuberculosis occurred in 6 participants (0.6%) in the levofloxacin group and 11 (1.1%) in the placebo group (incidence rate ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 1.62); this difference was not significant. There was little difference in grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the two groups (risk difference, 1.0 percentage point; 95% CI, -0.3 to 2.4). Adverse events of any grade were reported in 306 participants (31.9%) taking levofloxacin and 125 (13.0%) taking placebo (risk difference, 18.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 14.2 to 23.6). No acquired fluoroquinolone resistance was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the incidence of tuberculosis was lower in the levofloxacin group than in the placebo group at 30 months, the difference was not significant. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia; VQUIN MDR Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12616000215426.).

Impacts of MDR/XDR-TB on the global tuberculosis epidemic: Challenges and opportunities

Tuberculosis (TB) is the world's second-deadliest infectious disease. Despite the availability of drugs to cure TB, control of TB is hampered by the emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB). The presence of MDR/XDR-TB is alarming due to the low detection rate, high treatment failure, and high mortality. The increasing cases of MDR/XDR-TB are mainly due to the limitations in the diagnostic tests to detect the drug susceptibility of the pathogen, which contribute to the spread of the disease through close contacts. Moreover, inconsistent drug therapy or unsuitable drug regimens could also lead to the subsequent development of drug resistance. The close contacts of an index MDR/XDR-TB patient are at increased risk of developing MDR/XDR-TB. Also, the BCG vaccine may exhibit varying protective effects due to BCG strain diversification, host immune status, exposure to environmental non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), and differences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) subspecies infection, as in the case of sub-optimal protection in the case of Beijing family genotypes of Mtb. This review provides an overview of the current state of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) within the context of the global TB pandemic, with a focus on diagnosis, treatment, and the potential impact of BCG vaccination. It highlights the limitations of current approaches and aims to identify opportunities for improving TB control strategies.

A systematic literature review of economic evaluation studies of interventions impacting antimicrobial resistance

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is accelerated by widespread and inappropriate use of antimicrobials. Many countries, including those in low- and middle- income contexts, have started implementing interventions to tackle AMR. However, for many interventions there is little or no economic evidence with respect to their cost-effectiveness. To help better understand the scale of this evidence gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to provide a comprehensive summary on the value for money of different interventions affecting AMR.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted of economic evaluations on interventions addressing AMR. a narrative synthesis of findings was produced. Systematic searches for relevant studies were performed across relevant databases and grey literature sources such as unpublished studies, reports, and other relevant documents. All identified economic evaluation studies were included provided that they reported an economic outcome and stated that the analysed intervention aimed to affect AMR or antimicrobial use in the abstract. Studies that reported clinical endpoints alone were excluded. Selection for final inclusion and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. A quality assessment of the evidence used in the included studies was also conducted.

RESULTS

28,597 articles were screened and 35 articles were identified that satisfied the inclusion criteria. The review attempted to answer the following questions: (1) What interventions to address AMR have been the subject of an economic evaluation? (2) In what types of setting (e.g. high-income, low-income, regions etc.) have these economic evaluations been focused? (3) Which interventions have been estimated to be cost-effective, and has this result been replicated in other settings/contexts? (4) What economic evaluation methods or techniques have been used to evaluate these interventions? (5) What kind and quality of data has been used in conducting economic evaluations for these interventions?

DISCUSSION

The review is one of the first of its kind, and the most recent, to systematically review the literature on the cost-effectiveness of AMR interventions. This review addresses an important evidence gap in the economics of AMR and can assist AMR researchers' understanding of the state of the economic evaluation literature, and therefore inform future research. Systematic review registration PROSPERO (CRD42020190310).

Preventive Therapy for Contacts of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Preventing the progression of a drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) infection to disease is an important pillar of the DR-TB elimination strategy. International guidelines have recently proposed fluoroquinolones for tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) in DR-TB contacts, although the available evidence is low quality. The pooled data from small observational studies suggest that a fluoroquinolone-based TPT is safe, effective and cost-effective as a preventive treatment in DR-TB contacts. Three clinical trials are currently ongoing to generate higher quality evidence on the efficacy of levofloxacin and delamanid as a DR-TB preventive therapy. Additional evidence is also needed, regarding TPT treatment in fluoroquinolone-resistant-TB contacts, patient and health care worker perceptions on DR-TB preventive therapy for contacts, and the service delivery models to increase DR-TPT access. This state-of-the-art review presents the current literature on TPT for contacts of DR-TB cases, focusing on the available evidence and international guidelines.

The global impact of household contact management for children on multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis cases, deaths, and health-system costs in 2019: a modelling study

Background

Methods

Findings

Interpretation

Funding

Population-wide active case finding and prevention for tuberculosis and leprosy elimination in Kiribati: the PEARL study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Population-wide interventions offer a pathway to tuberculosis (TB) and leprosy elimination, but 'real-world' implementation in a high-burden setting using a combined approach has not been demonstrated. This implementation study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and evaluate the effect of population-wide screening, treatment and prevention on TB and leprosy incidence rates, as well as TB transmission.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A non-randomised 'screen-and-treat' intervention conducted in the Pacific atoll of South Tarawa, Kiribati. Households are enumerated and all residents ≥3 years, as well as children <3 years with recent household exposure to TB or leprosy, invited for screening. Participants are screened using tuberculin skin testing, signs and symptoms of TB or leprosy, digital chest X-ray with computer-aided detection and sputum testing (Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra). Those diagnosed with disease are referred to the National TB and Leprosy Programme for management. Participants with TB infection are offered TB preventive treatment and those without TB disease or infection, or leprosy, are offered leprosy prophylaxis. The primary study outcome is the difference in the annual TB case notification rate before and after the intervention; a similar outcome is included for leprosy. The effect on TB transmission will be measured by comparing the estimated annual risk of TB infection in primary school children before and after the intervention, as a co-primary outcome used for power calculations. Comparison of TB and leprosy case notification rates in South Tarawa (the intervention group) and the rest of Kiribati (the control group) before, during and after the intervention is a secondary outcome.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval was obtained from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (project no. 2021/127) and the Kiribati Ministry of Health and Medical Services (MHMS). Findings will be shared with the MHMS and local communities, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis Disease and Infection in Children: Key Updates, Challenges and Opportunities

Children affected by rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB; TB resistant to at least rifampicin) are a neglected group. Each year an estimated 25,000–30,000 children develop RR-TB disease globally. Improving case detection and treatment initiation is a priority since RR-TB disease is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Untreated paediatric TB has particularly high morbidity and mortality. However, children receiving TB treatment, including for RR-TB, respond well. RR-TB treatment remains a challenge for children, their caregivers and TB programmes, requiring treatment regimens of up to 18 months in duration, often associated with severe and long-term adverse effects. Shorter, safer, effective child-friendly regimens for RR-TB are needed. Preventing progression to disease following Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is another key component of TB control. The last few years have seen exciting advances. In this article, we highlight key elements of paediatric RR-TB case detection and recent updates, ongoing challenges and forthcoming advances in the treatment of RR-TB disease and infection in children and adolescents. The global TB community must continue to advocate for more and faster research in children on novel and repurposed TB drugs and regimens and increase investments in scaling-up effective approaches, to ensure an equitable response that prioritises the needs of this vulnerable population.

Isoniazid or rifampicin preventive therapy with and without screening for subclinical TB: a modeling analysis

BACKGROUND

Short-course, rifamycin-based regimens could facilitate scale-up of tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT), but it is unclear how stringently tuberculosis (TB) disease should be ruled out before TPT use.

METHODS

We developed a state-transition model of a TPT intervention among two TPT-eligible cohorts: adults newly diagnosed with HIV in South Africa (PWH) and TB household contacts in Pakistan (HHCs). We modeled two TPT regimens-4 months of rifampicin [4R] or 6 months of isoniazid [6H]-comparing each to a reference of no intervention. Before initiating TPT, TB disease was excluded either through symptom-only screening or with additional radiographic screening that could detect subclinical TB but might limit access to the TPT intervention. TPT's potential curative effects on both latent and subclinical TB were modeled, as were both acquisitions of resistance and prevention of drug-resistant disease. Although all eligible individuals received the screening and/or TPT interventions, the modeled TB outcomes comprised only those with latent or subclinical TB that would have progressed to symptomatic disease if untreated.

RESULTS

When prescribed after only symptom-based TB screening (such that individuals with subclinical TB were included among TPT recipients), 4R averted 45 active (i.e., symptomatic) TB cases (95% uncertainty range 24-79 cases or 40-89% of progressions to active TB) per 1000 PWH [17 (9-29, 43-94%) per 1000 HHCs]; 6H averted 37 (19-66, 52-73%) active TB cases among PWH [13 (7-23, 53-75%) among HHCs]. With this symptom-only screening, for each net rifampicin resistance case added by 4R, 12 (3-102) active TB cases were averted among PWH (37 [9-580] among HHCs); isoniazid-resistant TB was also reduced. Similarly, 6H after symptom-only screening increased isoniazid resistance while reducing overall and rifampicin-resistant active TB. Screening for subclinical TB before TPT eliminated this net increase in resistance to the TPT drug; however, if the screening requirement reduced TPT access by more than 10% (the estimated threshold for 4R among HHCs) to 30% (for 6H among PWH), it was likely to reduce the intervention's overall TB prevention impact.

CONCLUSIONS

All modeled TPT strategies prevent TB relative to no intervention, and differences between TPT regimens or between screening approaches are small relative to uncertainty in the outcomes of any given strategy. If most TPT-eligible individuals can be screened for subclinical TB, then pairing such screening with rifamycin-based TPT maximizes active TB prevention and does not increase rifampicin resistance. Where subclinical TB cannot be routinely excluded without substantially reducing TPT access, the choice of TPT regimen requires weighing 4R's efficacy advantages (as well as its greater safety and shorter duration that we did not directly model) against the consequences of rifampicin resistance in a small fraction of recipients.

The paradigm shift in the approach to management of latent tuberculosis infection in high tuberculosis burden countries

Introduction: Addressing the reservoir of Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) is critical to TB elimination because if left untreated LTBI can progress to active TB disease. This additional burden can prevent achieving the global targets of TB elimination. Management of LTBI has been a low priority target for National TB Elimination Programs (NTEP) due to various challenges in the field settings.Areas covered: This article reviews the most recent advances in the field of LTBI management including newer diagnostics, treatments, vaccines, programmatic challenges, and gaps and suggests a way forward that can be adopted by NTEPs for LTBI. We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2010 to 2020 using MeSH terms: Latent TB Diagnosis, TB preventive therapy, Vaccines, LTBI, and HIV/ COVID.Expert opinion: NTEPs of developing countries should offer a better, point-of-care diagnostic, and effective treatment for LTBI to reduce the number of new TB cases arising from people infected with M.tb. Awareness about LTBI should be increased among the health system staff and the public. More funding is needed to advance research as well as implement the newer findings in the NTEP to achieve the End TB targets by 2035.

Modelling the global burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis avertable by a post-exposure vaccine

There have been notable advances in the development of vaccines against active tuberculosis (TB) disease for adults and adolescents. Using mathematical models, we seek to estimate the potential impact of a post-exposure TB vaccine, having 50% efficacy in reducing active disease, on global rifampicin-resistant (RR-) TB burden. In 30 countries that together accounted for 90% of global RR-TB incidence in 2018, a future TB vaccine could avert 10% (95% credible interval: 9.7-11%) of RR-TB cases and 7.3% (6.6-8.1%) of deaths over 2020-2035, with India, China, Indonesia, Pakistan, and the Russian Federation having the greatest contribution. This impact would increase to 14% (12-16%) and 31% (29-33%) respectively, when combined with improvements in RR-TB diagnosis and treatment relative to a scenario of no vaccine and no such improvements. A future TB vaccine could have important implications for the global control of RR-TB, especially if implemented alongside enhancements in management of drug resistance.

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in children and adolescents: current strategies for prevention and treatment

INTRODUCTION

An estimated 30,000 children develop multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) each year, with only a small proportion diagnosed and treated. This field has historically been neglected due to the perception that children with MDR-TB are challenging to diagnose and treat. Diagnostic and therapeutic developments in adults have improved pediatric management, yet further pediatric-specific research and wider implementation of evidence-based practices are required.

AREAS COVERED

This review combines the most recent data with expert opinion to highlight best practice in the evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and support of children and adolescents with MDR-TB disease. A literature search of PubMed was carried out on topics related to MDR-TB in children. This review provides practical advice on MDR-TB prevention and gives updates on new regimens and novel treatments. The review also addresses host-directed therapy, comorbid conditions, special populations, psychosocial support, and post-TB morbidity, as well as identifying outstanding research questions.

EXPERT OPINION

Increased availability of molecular diagnostics has the potential to aid with the diagnosis of MDR-TB in children. Shorter MDR-TB disease treatment regimens have made therapy safer and shorter and further developments with novel agents and repurposed drugs should lead to additional improvements. The evidence base for MDR-TB preventive therapy is increasing.

Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance against fluoroquinolones in the northeast of Iran

BACKGROUND

Fluoroquinolones are broad-spectrum antibiotics that are recommended, and increasingly important, for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Resistance to fluoroquinolones is caused by mutations in the Quinolone Resistance Determining Region (QRDR) of gyrA and gyrB genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In this study, we characterized the phenotypic and genotypic resistance to fluoroquinolones for the first time in northeast Iran.

METHODS

A total of 123 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates, including 111 clinical and 12 collected multidrug-resistant isolates were studied. Also, 19 WHO quality control strains were included in the study. The phenotypic susceptibility was determined by the proportion method on Löwenstein-Jensen medium. The molecular cause of resistance to the fluoroquinolone drugs ofloxacin and levofloxacin was investigated by sequencing of the QRDR region of the gyrA and gyrB genes.

RESULTS

Among 123 isolates, six (4.8%) were fluoroquinolone-resistant according to phenotypic methods, and genotypically three of them had a mutation at codon 94 of the gyrA gene (Asp→ Gly) which was earlier reported to cause resistance. All three remaining phenotypically resistant isolates had a nucleotide change in codon 95. No mutations were found in the gyrB gene. Five of the 19 WHO quality control strains, were phenotypically fluoroquinolone-resistant, four of them were genotypically resistant with mutations at codon 90, 91 of the gyrA gene and one resistant strain had no detected mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

Mutation at codon 94 of the gyrA gene, was the main cause of fluoroquinolone resistance among M. tuberculosis isolates in our region. In 3/6 fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates, no mutations were found in either gyrA or gyrB. Therefore, it can be concluded that various other factors may lead to fluoroquinolone resistance, such as active efflux pumps, decreased cell wall permeability, and drug inactivation.

Cost-effectiveness of 3 months of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid compared with other standard treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection: a decision analysis study

Background

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is a critical driver of the global burden of active TB, and therefore LTBI treatment is key for TB elimination. Treatment regimens for LTBI include self-administered daily isoniazid for 6 (6H) or 9 (9H) months, self-administered daily rifampicin plus isoniazid for 3 months (3RH), self-administered daily rifampicin for 4 months (4R) and weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for 3 months self-administered (3HP-SAT) or administered by a healthcare worker as directly observed therapy (3HP-DOT). Data on the relative cost-effectiveness of these regimens are needed to assist policymakers and clinicians in selecting an LTBI regimen.

Objectives

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of all regimens for treating LTBI.

Methods

We developed a Markov model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of 3HP-DOT, 3HP-SAT, 4R, 3RH, 9H and 6H for LTBI treatment in a cohort of 10000 adults with LTBI. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from a health system perspective over a 20 year time horizon.

Results

Compared with no preventive treatment, 3HP-DOT, 3HP-SAT, 4R, 3RH, 9H and 6H prevented 496, 470, 442, 418, 370 and 276 additional cases of active TB per 10000 patients, respectively. All regimens reduced costs and increased QALYs compared with no preventive treatment. 3HP was more cost-effective under DOT than under SAT at a cost of US$27948 per QALY gained.

Conclusions

Three months of weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid is more cost-effective than other regimens. Greater recognition of the benefits of short-course regimens can contribute to the scale-up of prevention and achieving the 'End TB' targets.

Levofloxacin versus placebo for the treatment of latent tuberculosis among contacts of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (the VQUIN MDR trial): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) plays a substantial role in the prevention of drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB). However, clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of preventive therapy for presumed multidrug-resistant (MDR) LTBI are lacking. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of the antibiotic levofloxacin in preventing the development of active TB among latently infected contacts of index patients with MDR-TB.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 10 provinces of Vietnam. Household contacts living with patients with bacteriologically confirmed rifampicin-resistant or MDR-TB will be eligible for recruitment if they have a positive tuberculin skin test or are known to be immunosuppressed, and do not have active TB. Participants will be randomised to receive either levofloxacin or placebo tablets once per day for 6 months. Screening for incident TB will be performed at 6 months intervals. The primary study outcome is the incidence of bacteriologically confirmed TB within 30 months after randomisation. Analysis will be by intention to treat, using Poisson regression.

ETHICS

Ethical approval from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee was obtained on 29 April 2015 (2014/929), and from the Vietnam Ministry of Health Institutional Review Board on 30 September 2015 (4040/QD-BYT).

DISSEMINATION

Findings of the study will be published in peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12616000215426.

Finding New Ways to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major issue in global health and affects millions of people each year. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) annually causes many deaths worldwide. Development of a way to diagnose and treat patients with MDR-TB can potentially reduce the incidence of the disease. The current study reviews the risk factors, pattern of progression, mechanism of resistance, and interaction between bacteria and the host immune system, which disrupts the immune response. It also targets the components of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and diagnosis and treatment options that could be available for clinical use in the near future. Mutations play an important role in development of MDR-TB and the selection of appropriate mutations can help to understand the type of resistance in patients to anti-TB drugs. In this way, they can be initially treated with proper and effective therapeutic choices, which can accelerate the course of treatment and improve patient health. Targeting the components and enzymes of Mtb is necessary for understanding bacterial survival and finding a way to destroy the pathogen and allow patients to recover faster and prevent the spread of disease, especially resistant strains.

Implications of a school outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Northern China

In this study, we identified a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) outbreak in a high school in northern China. The aim of this work was to describe TB transmission, drug resistance and treatment outcomes for this patient cluster. In January 2017, pulmonary TB was identified in a 17-year-old boy in northern China. Subsequently, a total of 11 TB cases were identified during 6-month follow-up of attendees of the same school. Of five students with latent TB infection (LTBI) receiving isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT), two pulmonary TB cases (40.0%) emerged in March and April, for an active case rate not significantly different from that of the non-IPT group (4/16, 25.0%, P = 0.598). All TB patients were first treated with a standardised first-line treatment regimen administered by the local TB hospital, with 11 of 12 active TB patients exhibiting poor treatment outcomes. Further data demonstrated that all nine patient isolates collected during this outbreak were MDR-TB and shared a common genotypic profile. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that diagnostic delay for the index MDR-TB case of this outbreak played a primary role in transmission of MDR-TB infection within a school setting. Importantly, IPT failed to prevent progression of MDR-TB from LTBI to active TB.

Better than a pound of cure: preventing the development of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

Diagnostic and treatment delays contribute to increased death and disability among the 490,000 adults and children who develop multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis every year. Since the treatment of MDR tuberculosis is complex, costly and often toxic, tuberculosis control programs should prioritize strategies to prevent drug-resistant tuberculosis. Opportunities to limit transmission and prevent disease progression in close contacts of MDR tuberculosis cases are often neglected. Effective MDR tuberculosis preventive strategies could minimize the costs for patients and healthcare systems. This review characterizes the biological basis for the development of MDR tuberculosis, outlines the evidence for strategies to reduce transmission and highlights programmatic approaches to the management of patients infected with drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Cost-effectiveness of Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis to Reduce Progression to Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Background.

Evidence-based recommendations for treating persons having presumed latent tuberculosis (LTBI) after contact to infectious multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) are lacking because published data consist of small observational studies. Tuberculosis incidence in persons treated for latent MDR -TB infection is unknown.

Methods.

We conducted a systematic review of studies published 1 January 1994-31 December 2014 to analyze TB incidence, treatment completion and discontinuation, and cost-effectiveness. We considered contacts with LTBI effectively treated if they were on ≥1 medication to which their MDR-TB strain was likely susceptible. We selected studies that compared treatment vs nontreatment outcomes and performed a meta-analysis to estimate the relative risk of TB incidence and its 95% confidence interval.

Results.

We abstracted data from 21 articles that met inclusion criteria. Six articles presented outcomes for contacts who were treated compared with those not treated for MDR-LTBI; 10 presented outcomes only for treated contacts, and 5 presented outcomes only for untreated contacts. The estimated MDR-TB incidence reduction was 90% (9%-99%) using data from 5 comparison studies. We also found high treatment discontinuation rates due to adverse effects in persons taking pyrazinamide-containing regimens. Cost-effectiveness was greatest using a fluoroquinolone/ethambutol combination regimen.

Conclusions.

Few studies met inclusion criteria, therefore results should be cautiously interpreted. We found a reduced risk of TB incidence with treatment for MDR-LTBI, suggesting effectiveness in prevention of progression to MDR-TB, and confirmed cost-effectiveness. However, we found that pyrazinamide-containing MDR-LTBI regimens often resulted in treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects.

Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection

The treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is an essential component of tuberculosis (TB) elimination in regions that have a low incidence of TB. However, the decision to treat individuals with LTBI must consider the limitations of current diagnostic tests for LTBI, the risk of developing active TB disease, the potential adverse effects from chemoprophylactic therapy, and the importance of treatment adherence. When an individual has been diagnosed with LTBI and active TB has been ruled out, this is followed by an evaluation of the risks and benefits of LTBI treatment within the context of the regional epidemiology of TB and public health priorities. Once the decision to treat LTBI has been reached, and the infection is not suspected to be due to drug-resistant TB, the recommended regimens include isoniazid and/or rifamycin-derivatives, and the choice of regimen will depend upon the clinical considerations for that individual, such as patient preference, concomitant medications, hepatic disease, pregnancy, or immunodeficiency. As the duration of treatment of LTBI therapy is many months, therapy must be offered within a plan that monitors for adverse drug reactions and emphasizes adherence. For latent multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) or extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) infection, the management is more complicated as there are few options for chemoprophylactic therapy and little evidence regarding the efficacy or risks of these regimens.

Preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection-the promise and the challenges

Around one third of the world's population may harbour latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), an asymptomatic immunological state that confers a heightened risk of subsequently developing tuberculosis (TB). Effectively treating LTBI will be essential if the End TB Strategy is to be realized. This review evaluates the evidence in relation to the effectiveness of preventive antibiotic therapy to treat LTBI due to both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant bacteria. Current national and international preventive therapy guidelines are summarized, as well as ongoing randomized trials evaluating regimens to prevent drug-resistant TB. Populations that may benefit most from screening and treatment for LTBI include close contacts of patients with TB (particularly children under 5 years of age) and individuals with substantial immunological impairment. The risks and benefits of treatment must be carefully balanced for each individual. Electronic decision support tools offer one way in which clinicians can help patients to make informed decisions. Modelling studies indicate that the expanded use of preventive therapy will be essential to achieving substantial reductions in the global TB burden. However, the widespread scale-up of screening and treatment will require careful consideration of cost-effectiveness, while ensuring the drivers of ongoing disease transmission are also addressed.

Diagnosis and management of latent tuberculosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) may affect over two billion individuals and serves as a potential reservoir for future active tuberculosis. The identification and treatment of LTBI in those at highest risk for progression is an essential part of tuberculosis control.

RECENT FINDINGS

Interferon-γ release assays are increasingly used for targeted testing and diagnosis of latent disease. The performance of these immunodiagnostic tests has been studied in various groups and may be better than the tuberculin skin test in certain populations. Ongoing research is focused on new biomarkers that may diagnose LTBI or predict progression to active tuberculosis. Isoniazid preventive treatment is effective at reducing risk of active disease, but length of treatment and potential side-effects limit patient acceptance and compliance. Rifamycin-based regimens are increasingly studied as a shorter and perhaps less toxic alternative for preventive therapy.

SUMMARY

Identification of those with LTBI is important as it allows treatment of those at highest risk of progression to active disease and thus decreases the overall burden of tuberculosis. The development of new immunodiagnostics may further improve identification of those at risk and alternative medication regimens may increase compliance with and efficacy of preventive therapy.