Psychotropic medication use in Australia, 2007 to 2015: Changes in annual incidence, prevalence and treatment exposure

Use of potentially inappropriate psychotropic medicines among older adults in 23 residential aged care facilities in Australia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Psychotropic medications are frequently utilised in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Longitudinal medication administration data can offer crucial insights into the potential inappropriate use of psychotropic medicines (PIPMs), guiding future quality improvement initiatives. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of PIPMs use and assess variation in PIPMs use by facility for residents of RACFs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective longitudinal cohort study using routinely collected electronic health data (2020-2021) relating to 3064 residents from 23 RACFs in New South Wales, Australia. The study included permanent residents aged ≥ 65 years and median length of stay was 483 days. The prevalence of PIPMs use was estimated using updated Beers criteria 2023. The extent of exposure to PIPMs was measured using two metrics i.e., number of days residents were exposed to PIPMs and the proportion of days covered by PIPMs. We used logistic regression model to determine factors associated with PIPM use. Funnel plots to visualised variation in PIPMs use across facilities.

RESULTS

In total 40% (n = 1224) residents used at least one PIPM and 10% (n = 302) used ≥ 2. The most frequently used PIPMs categories were benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (27.4%), followed by first and second generation antipsychotics (17.2%). Certain diagnoses (dementia, pain, depression, anxiety, and endocrine disorders) were associated with the increased use of PIPMs. For example, residents with dementia were 1.94 times more likely to use ≥ 2 PIPMs (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.50-2.51). The prevalence of at least one PIPM by residents in each facility ranged from 23.3 to 57.0% across facilities. The overall median number of days residents were exposed to PIPMs were 91 days (IQR 6-320) while the median proportion of days covered by at least one PIPM was 39.3% (IQR 2.6-86.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Residents in aged care facilities showed a high rate of PIPMs use with substantial variation across facilities. Quality improvement initiatives which target inappropriate psychotropic medication use are necessary, particularly considering the link between psychotropic drug use and adverse events such as falls.

Consumption of psychotropic drugs in Croatia before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a 10-year longitudinal study (2012-2021)

PURPOSE

This longitudinal study aimed to examine the trends in antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, and hypnotics/sedatives consumption in Croatia over a 10-year period (2012-2021). The study also assessed whether the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the yearly consumption of psychotropic drugs.

METHODS

Data were collected from Croatian Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (HALMED) and presented as defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/TID). The consumption before (2012-2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) was compared with interrupted time series analysis.

RESULTS

There was an increase in total consumption of analyzed psychotropic drugs in Croatia between the years 2012 and 2021, from 115.47 DDD/TID in 2012 to 155.50 DDD/TID in 2021. An increasing trend was observed in the consumption of all 4 analyzed groups of medicines (antipsychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, and antidepressants). Anxiolytics accounted for 59% (68.29/115.47 DDD/TID), and hypnotics and sedatives for 8.5% (9.76/115.47 DDD/TID) of total consumption in 2012. At the end of a 10-year period, hypnotics and sedatives represented 12% (19.05/155.50 DDD/TID) and anxiolytics 54% (83.53/155.50 DDD/TID) of psychotropic drugs consumption. The total consumption of psychotropic drugs was not significantly different before and during COVID-19 pandemic (estimate ± standard error = 5.029 ± 6.899, t = 0.729, P = 0.490).

CONCLUSION

Croatia had a high, continuously increasing consumption of psychotropic drugs. National anxiolytics consumption was one of the highest globally, while consumption of antidepressants was rather low compared to other high-income countries. The COVID-19 pandemic did not seem to influence the yearly utilization of psychotropic drugs in Croatia.

On- and off-label utilisation of antipsychotics in Australia (2000-2021): Retrospective analysis of two medication datasets

OBJECTIVE

To determine antipsychotic utilisation patterns in Australian adults from 2005 to 2021, with a focus on on-label and off-label prescriptions.

METHODS

We examined antipsychotic dispensing trends in adults from 2005 to 2021 using a 10% sample of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset, which contains patient-level information on medicines dispensed throughout Australia. The lack of diagnostic information in PBS was substituted by analysing BEACH (Bettering the Evaluation And Care of Health) dataset, a cross-sectional national survey from 2000 to 2016, consisting of data from general practitioner-patient encounters.

RESULTS

There were 5.6 million dispensings for 164,993 patients in PBS throughout this period; 69% patients had >1 dispensing, with a median of 6 per patient. Calculating the estimated period of exposure gave a total of 693,562 treatment episodes, with a median duration of 80 days. There were steady increases in both the incidence and prevalence of antipsychotic dispensings, mainly due to oral second-generation antipsychotics. The most commonly prescribed antipsychotics were quetiapine, olanzapine and risperidone, with a significant portion of patients receiving low-dose quetiapine without dose titration. Analysis of diagnostic indications from BEACH indicated that 27% of antipsychotic prescriptions were off-label for indications such as depression, dementia, anxiety and insomnia, at much lower prescribed daily dosages.

CONCLUSION

The increasing prescribing and off-label use highlights concerns about chronic adverse effects caused by antipsychotics. The combined analysis of medication dispensings and the diagnostic indications for which they are prescribed is a novel approach and throws a spotlight on the need for additional monitoring of antipsychotics.

Ten-Year Trends in Lithium Prescribing in Alberta, Canada

AIMS

Despite lithium's clinical efficacy, it is commonly thought that its use is declining. The objective of this study is to describe the new and prevalent lithium users as well as rates of discontinuation of lithium use over a 10-year period.

METHODS

This study used provincial administrative health data from Alberta, Canada between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2018. Lithium prescriptions were identified within the Pharmaceutical Information Network database. Total and subgroup specific frequencies of new and prevalent lithium use were determined over the 10-year study period. Lithium discontinuation was also estimated through survival analysis.

RESULTS

Between the calendar years of 2009 and 2018, 580,873 lithium prescriptions were dispensed in Alberta to 14,008 patients. The total number of new and prevalent lithium users appears to be decreasing over the 10-year timeframe, although the decline may have stopped or reversed in the latter years of the study period. Prevalent use of lithium was lowest among individuals between the ages of 18-24 years while the highest number of prevalent users were in the 50-64 age group, particularly among females. New lithium use was lowest amongst those 65 years and older. More than 60% (8,636) of patients prescribed lithium, discontinued use during the study timeframe. Lithium users between ages of 18-24 years were at the highest risk of discontinuations.

CONCLUSIONS

Rather than a general decline in prescribing, trends in lithium use are dependent on age and sex. Further, the period soon after lithium initiation appears to be a key time period in which many lithium trials are abandoned. Detailed studies using primary data collection are needed to confirm and further explore these findings. These population-based results not only confirm a decline in lithium use, but also suggest that this may have stopped or even reversed. Population-based data on discontinuation pinpoint the period soon after initiation as the time when trials are most often discontinued.

Patterns of suboptimal antipsychotic use and misuse in Australia: What can routinely collected data tell us?

AIMS

There are increasing concerns about harms related to suboptimal antipsychotic use. Here we describe recent population-based trends in antipsychotic use and harms in Australia and identify population groups exhibiting patterns of use likely to contribute to these harms.

METHODS

Using population-based data from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (2015-2020), poisoning calls to the New South Wales (NSW) Poisons Information Centre (2015-2020) and poisoning deaths in all coronial records (2005-2018) in Australia, we measured trends in the prevalence of antipsychotic use and related deaths and poisonings. We applied latent class analyses to identify patterns of antipsychotic use that may contribute to harms.

RESULTS

Quetiapine and olanzapine had the highest prevalence of use between 2015 and 2020. Noteworthy trends included increases of 9.1% and 30.8% in quetiapine use and poisonings, while olanzapine use decreased by 4.5% but poisonings increased by 32.7%. Quetiapine and olanzapine poisonings and related deaths had the highest rates of co-ingestion of opioids, benzodiazepines and pregabalin compared to other antipsychotics. We identified six distinct population groups using antipsychotics: (i) ongoing high-dose use with sedatives (8%), (ii) ongoing use (42%), (iii) ongoing use with analgesics and sedatives (11%), (iv) long-term low-dose use (9%), (v) sporadic use (20%) and (vi) sporadic use with analgesics (10%).

CONCLUSION

Ongoing potentially suboptimal antipsychotic use and associated harms highlight the need to monitor such patterns of use, for example through prescription monitoring systems.

RELEASE (REdressing Long-tErm Antidepressant uSE): protocol for a 3-arm pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial effectiveness-implementation hybrid type-1 in general practice

BACKGROUND

Many people experience withdrawal symptoms when they attempt to stop antidepressants. Withdrawal symptoms are readily misconstrued for relapse or ongoing need for medication, contributing to long-term use (> 12 months). Long-term antidepressant use is increasing internationally yet is not recommended for most people. Long-term use is associated with adverse effects including weight gain, sexual dysfunction, lethargy, emotional numbing and increased risk of falls and fractures. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of two multi-strategy interventions (RELEASE and RELEASE+) in supporting the safe cessation of long-term antidepressants, estimate cost-effectiveness, and evaluate implementation strategies.

METHODS

DESIGN: 3-arm pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial effectiveness-implementation hybrid type-1.

SETTING

primary care general practices in southeast Queensland, Australia.

POPULATION

adults 18 years or older taking antidepressants for longer than 1 year. Practices will be randomised on a 1.5:1:1 ratio of Usual care:RELEASE:RELEASE+.

INTERVENTION

RELEASE for patients includes evidence-based information and resources and an invitation to medication review; RELEASE for GPs includes education, training and printable resources via practice management software. RELEASE+ includes additional internet support for patients and prescribing support including audit and feedback for GPs.

OUTCOME MEASURES

the primary outcome is antidepressant use at 12 months self-reported by patients. Cessation is defined as 0 mg antidepressant maintained for at least 2 weeks.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

at 6 and 12 months are health-related quality of life, antidepressant side effects, well-being, withdrawal symptoms, emotional numbing, beliefs about antidepressants, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms; and at 12 months 75% reduction in antidepressant dose; aggregated practice level antidepressant prescribing, and health service utilisation for costs.

SAMPLE SIZE

653 patients from 28 practices. A concurrent evaluation of implementation will be through mixed methods including interviews with up to 40 patients and primary care general practitioners, brief e-surveys, and study administrative data to assess implementation outcomes (adoption and fidelity).

DISCUSSION

The RELEASE study will develop new knowledge applicable internationally on the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation of two multi-strategy interventions in supporting the safe cessation of long-term antidepressants to improve primary health care and outcomes for patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ANZCTR, ACTRN12622001379707p. Registered on 27 October 2022.

Medicinal cannabis for psychiatry-related conditions: an overview of current Australian prescribing

Objective: Evidence is accumulating that components of the Cannabis sativa plant may have therapeutic potential in treating psychiatric disorders. Medicinal cannabis (MC) products are legally available for prescription in Australia, primarily through the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) Special Access Scheme B (SAS-B). Here we investigated recent prescribing practices for psychiatric indications under SAS-B by Australian doctors. Methods: The dataset, obtained from the TGA, included information on MC applications made by doctors through the SAS-B process between 1st November 2016 and 30th September 2022 inclusive. Details included the primary conditions treated, patient demographics, prescriber location, product type (e.g., oil, flower or capsule) and the general cannabinoid content of products. The conditions treated were categorized according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, text revision (DSM-5-TR). Trends in prescribing for conditions over time were analyzed via polynomial regression, and relationships between categorical variables determined via correspondence analyses. Results: Approximately 300,000 SAS-B approvals to prescribe MC had been issued in the time period under investigation. This included approvals for 38 different DSM-5-TR defined psychiatric conditions (33.9% of total approvals). The majority of approvals were for anxiety disorders (66.7% of psychiatry-related prescribing), sleep-wake disorders (18.2%), trauma- and stressor-related disorders (5.8%), and neurodevelopmental disorders (4.4%). Oil products were most prescribed (53.0%), followed by flower (31.2%) and other inhaled products (12.4%). CBD-dominant products comprised around 20% of total prescribing and were particularly prevalent in the treatment of autism spectrum disorder. The largest proportion of approvals was for patients aged 25-39 years (46.2% of approvals). Recent dramatic increases in prescribing for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were identified. Conclusion: A significant proportion of MC prescribing in Australia is for psychiatry-related indications. This prescribing often appears somewhat "experimental", given it involves conditions (e.g., ADHD, depression) for which definitive clinical evidence of MC efficacy is lacking. The high prevalence of THC-containing products being prescribed is of possible concern given the psychiatric problems associated with this drug. Evidence-based clinical guidance around the use of MC products in psychiatry is lacking and would clearly be of benefit to prescribers.

Use of psychotropic medications in adults with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study presents the proportion of adults with intellectual disability using psychotropic medications including antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, and psychostimulants.

METHODS

A search was performed in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus up to 31 December 2021. Articles were included if they reported the proportion of adults with intellectual disability using psychotropic medications. Frequency of use was estimated using a random effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression analysis was used to assess the association between study-level characteristics and variability in estimates, when heterogeneity was considerable.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles were included in pooled analysis. The pooled prevalence of psychotropic medications was 41% (95% confidence interval: 35-46%). Pooled prevalences of subclasses were as follows: antipsychotics 31% (27-35%), antidepressants 14% (9-19%), anxiolytics 9% (4-15%), hypnotics/sedatives 5% (2-8%), and psychostimulants 1% (1-2%). Heterogeneity was considerable between studies, except for psychostimulants. There was no significant association between assessed characteristics and variability in prevalence estimates.

CONCLUSION

Two-fifths of adults with intellectual disability were prescribed psychotropic medications. Antipsychotics and antidepressants were used by one-third and one-seventh of adults, respectively. There was considerable variability between studies, and further investigation is required to determine the source of variability. More studies are needed to better characterise prescribed psychotropic medications, including effectiveness and adverse effects, to ensure appropriate use of these drugs.

Changes in antidepressant use in Australia: A nationwide analysis (2015-2021)

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety affect 4-14% of Australians every year; symptoms may have been exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined recent patterns of antidepressant use in Australia in the period 2015-2021, which includes the first year of the pandemic.

METHODS

We used national dispensing claims for people aged ⩾10 years to investigate annual trends in prevalent and new antidepressant use (no antidepressants dispensed in the year prior). We conducted stratified analyses by sex, age group and antidepressant class. We report outcomes from 2015 to 2019 and used time series analysis to quantify changes during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-February 2021).

RESULTS

In 2019, the annual prevalence of antidepressant use was 170.4 per 1000 women and 101.8 per 1000 men, an increase of 7.0% and 9.2% from 2015, respectively. New antidepressant use also increased for both sexes (3.0% for women and 4.9% for men) and across most age groups, particularly among adolescents (aged 10-17 years; 46-57%). During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed higher than expected prevalent use (+2.2%, 95% CI = [0.3%, 4.2%]) among females, corresponding to a predicted excess of 45,217 (95% CI = [5,819, 84,614]) females dispensed antidepressants. The largest increases during the first year of the pandemic occurred among female adolescents for both prevalent (+11.7%, 95% CI = [4.1%, 20.5%]) and new antidepressant use (+15.6%, 95% CI = [8.5%, 23.7%]).

CONCLUSION

Antidepressant use continues to increase in Australia overall and especially among young people. We found a differential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in treated depression and anxiety, greater among females than males, and greater among young females than other age groups, suggesting an increased mental health burden in populations already on a trajectory of increased use of antidepressants prior to the pandemic. Reasons for these differences require further investigation.

Characteristics of adverse reactions among antipsychotic drugs using the Korean Adverse Event Reporting System database from 2010 to 2019

BACKGROUND

Retrospective studies using spontaneous reporting system databases have provided a great understanding of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the real world, complementing the data obtained from randomized controlled trials. However, there have been few reports on large-scale epidemiological studies on the adverse effects of antipsychotics in Asia.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of antipsychotic ADRs using a nationwide pharmacovigilance database.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System database between 2010 and 2019. The study subjects were selected using the International Classification of Disease codes for diseases related to psychosis and Electronic Data Interchange codes for amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, haloperidol, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. The causality assessment of "possible," "probable," or "certain" by the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Center System causality category was selected. All data were descriptively analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 5067 adverse events associated with antipsychotic drugs were reported. The antipsychotics that commonly resulted in ADRs were quetiapine (47.7%), olanzapine (11.3%), and clozapine (10.7%). Serious ADRs were most commonly observed with clozapine. Gastrointestinal and central nervous system problems occurred within a month when ADRs were classified according to the time of onset. In contrast, metabolic and bone marrow-related symptoms occurred after long-term use. Sedation and nausea were the most common ADRs in children and adolescents, whereas constipation and dizziness were common in adults and the elderly.

CONCLUSIONS

This study extends our knowledge of antipsychotic ADRs in the Asian population.

Antidepressant medication use by patients accessing a national digital mental health service

BACKGROUND

Digital mental health services (DMHSs) provide psychological treatments via the internet or phone and are increasingly being offered as part of routine care. This study describes antidepressant (AD) medication use and treatment outcomes in a large sample of routine care patients accessing a DMHS.

METHODS

Patients completing an assessment with an Australia-wide DMHS (MindSpot Clinic) from 1st January to 31st December 2020 (n = 17,409) were asked about psychotropic medication use. Demographic characteristics and treatment outcomes on the PHQ-9 (depression), GAD-7 (anxiety), and K-10+ (general distress) were compared for patients taking an AD versus no AD. Treatment outcomes were also analyzed for a subgroup of patients reporting recent commencement of AD medication.

RESULTS

Almost one quarter of patients (4141/17409; 23.8%) reported taking an AD, mainly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Patients taking ADs had more severe symptoms however effect sizes were large (Cohen's d's > 1.0). Patients recently commencing ADs had the highest baseline symptoms but showed greater symptom improvement at post-treatment and 3-month follow-up.

LIMITATIONS

Treatment trajectory was measured weekly using standardized scales that are sensitive to change, however they did not allow formal clinical diagnoses of depression and were subject to the effects of missing data. The observational design did not control for spontaneous recovery or for comorbid conditions that might influence recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite these limitations, online treatment provided by a DMHS as part of routine care is acceptable and effective for patients reporting concurrent AD medication use.

Incidence in pharmacoepidemiology-Basic definitions and types of misclassification

The definition of a new case is a vital step in incidence studies in both epidemiology and pharmacoepidemiology, although with significant differences in methodology between the fields. We define and apply a framework for two different types of new cases of drug use, first-ever and recurrent, and show how the associated misclassifications related to length of run-in period can be expressed by the positive predictive value (PPV). In the study, we consider individual-level dispensations of statins 2006-2019 for 1,017,058 individuals with at least one dispensation in 2019 in Sweden. The incidence proportion for statins for both sexes of all ages in Sweden 2019 varied from 17.4/1000 with a run-in of 8 months, 9.45/1000 with 5 years and 8.4/1000 with 10 years. The PPV was 49% with 8 months and 89% for 5 years using 10 years as gold standard. We conclude that the interpretation of incidence and thus the selection of an appropriate run-in period, in pharmacoepidemiology, depends on whether first-ever use, recurrent treatment or both together (new cases) is the focus of the research question studied. At least five different misclassifications can be introduced depending on how incidence is defined.

Polypharmacy in Australian Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder upon Admission to a Mental Health Facility: A Retrospective Chart Review

Objective

Polypharmacy increases the risk of adverse drug events and drug–drug interactions, and contributes to falls, hospital admissions, morbidity and mortality. Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder often have psychological and physical comorbidities, increasing the likelihood of general and psychotropic polypharmacy. This study investigates the prevalence of general and psychotropic polypharmacy in inpatient veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder, and illustrates potential risks associated with polypharmacy in this population.

Methods

Medical records of 219 veterans admitted to a mental health facility for post-traumatic stress disorder management were retrospectively reviewed. Medication lists on admission were extracted and coded according to Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification classes. The prevalence of general (five or more total medications), psychotropic (two or more N-code medications), and sedative (two or more medications with sedating effects) polypharmacy and Drug Burden Index were calculated. Class combinations were reported, and associations between demographic characteristics and polypharmacy were determined.

Results

Mean age was 62.5 (± 14.6) years. In addition to post-traumatic stress disorder, 90.9% had a diagnosis of at least one other psychiatric condition, and 96.8% had a diagnosis of at least one non-psychiatric medical condition. The prevalence of general polypharmacy was 76.7%, psychotropic polypharmacy was 79.9% and sedative polypharmacy was 75.3%. Drug Burden Index scores ranged from 0 to 8.2, with 66.2% of participants scoring ≥ 1.

Conclusions

This cohort of inpatient veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder had a high prevalence of general, psychotropic and sedative polypharmacy, and were at high risk for drug-related adverse events. This highlights the importance of increasing awareness of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate drug combinations, and the need for improved medication review by prescribers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-022-00298-3.

The effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on memory functioning in older adults: A systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are commonly prescribed to older adults. In contrast to young subjects, it is unclear whether older adults may be vulnerable to cognitive side effects. Serotonin is involved in cognitive functions (e.g. memory). It is of great importance to examine the effects of SSRIs on memory functioning in older adults.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic literature review is to summarize studies in which the effects of SSRI treatment on all aspects of memory functioning in older adults are investigated.

METHODS

PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Embase were searched for all studies published until 18th of October 2021. Articles were included if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria as follows: (1) study design is (randomized) controlled trial, cross-sectional, or prospective cohort study; (2) study population consists of older adults (mean age ⩾65 years), or results for this age-group are reported separately; (3) intervention is use of an SSRI; and (4) effects on performance of any memory domain are measured and clearly described.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1888 articles, of which 136 were included for the full-text review. Eventually, 40 articles were included. Most studies reported no association between SSRI use and memory functioning. The studies that found a positive association mainly investigated older adults with mental or neurological disorders (e.g. depression or stroke). A few studies found a negative association in the following subgroups: non-responders (depression), patients with frontal brain disease, and women.

CONCLUSION

Overall, no consistent negative effects of SSRIs on memory functioning in older adults were found after SSRI treatment. Most studies reported no change in memory functioning after SSRI use. Some studies even showed an improvement in memory performance. Positive effects of SSRIs on memory functioning were especially found in older adults with mental or neurological disorders, such as subjects with depression or stroke.

Poisonings with ADHD medication in children under the age of 5 years in Australia: a retrospective study, 2004-2019

OBJECTIVE

To describe the temporal relationships in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication poisoning exposures in children; describe patient demographics, medications involved, poisoning exposure reasons and disposition.

DESIGN

A population-based, retrospective cohort study of calls to Australia's largest Poisons Information Centre. Poisoning exposure counts and dispensing-adjusted rates were modelled with Poisson, quasi-Poisson and negative binomial regression where appropriate.

SETTING

Calls to the New South Wales Poisons Information Centre and dispensings on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

PATIENTS

Children under the age of 5 years.

RESULTS

There were 1175 poisoning exposures to ADHD psychostimulants, 2004-2019; averaging 73 per year. Accidental poisonings accounted for 94% of cases. Methylphenidate was most frequently implicated (63%). Thirty-four per cent of cases were referred to hospital and a further 21% of calls were made by hospital staff. Poisoning exposure counts for all ADHD psychostimulants increased by 2.7% (95% CI=0.42% to 4.9%) per year; however, this differed by agent. Methylphenidate poisoning exposures increased by 5.2% per year (95% CI=4.3% to 6.1%), lisdexamfetamine increased by 62% per year (95% CI=48% to 76%), while dexamphetamine poisoning exposures decreased by 5.5% per year (95% CI=-9.5% to -1.4%). These trends are reflected in the number of dispensings; however, dispensings increased at a faster rate than exposures. When poisoning exposures were expressed as dispensing-adjusted rates, there was a 16% decrease (95% CI=-20% to -13%) per year.

CONCLUSIONS

ADHD medication use has increased, associated with an increased number of paediatric poisoning exposures. However, poisoning exposures per dispensed prescription has decreased. The majority of cases required hospitalisation, indicating the need for further poisoning prevention strategies.

A Review of Ocular Complications Associated with Medications Used for Anxiety, Depression, and Stress

This review of commonly prescribed psychotropic drugs aims to update the clinician on possible ophthalmic side effects that may include dry eye, diplopia, mydriasis, and cataracts. This review summarizes our current knowledge of known ocular side effects of psychotropic drugs based on reviews, case reports, case-control studies, a case series, and cross-sectional observational studies reported in the recent literature. The review covers disorders related to depression, anxiety, and stress which are commonly encountered within society and can have debilitating impacts on an individual's quality of life that may require chronic therapeutic management. The main medications used in the treatment and management of these conditions typically target receptors, metabolic enzymes, or transport pumps that alter the pre- and/or post-synaptic levels of neurotransmitters such as serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and opioids to improve mood and/or relieve pain and anxiety. Novel non-therapeutic options are undergoing clinical trials, and some patients may seek alternative therapies or have associated substance abuse issues to alleviate their symptoms. This review summarizes some of the clinical signs of depression and the main therapeutic options and their reported ocular side effects which may be pertinent today given the rise in use of psychotropic medications used to manage depression, anxiety, and stress.

Long-term antidepressant use in general practice: a qualitative study of GPs' views on discontinuation

Background

There is considerable concern about increasing antidepressant use, with Australians among the highest users in the world. Evidence suggests this is driven by patients on long-term use, rather than new prescriptions. Most antidepressant prescriptions are generated in general practice, and it is likely that attempts to discontinue are either not occurring or are proving unsuccessful.

Aim

To explore GPs’ insights about long-term antidepressant prescribing and discontinuation.

Design and setting

A qualitative interview study with Australian GPs.

Method

Semi-structured interviews explored GPs’ discontinuation experiences, decision-making, perceived risks and benefits, and support for patients. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Three overarching themes were identified from interviews with 22 GPs. The first, ‘not a simple deprescribing decision’, spoke to the complex decision-making GPs undertake in determining whether a patient is ready to discontinue. The second, ‘a journey taken together’, captured a set of steps GPs take together with their patients to initiate and set-up adequate support before, during, and after discontinuation. The third, ‘supporting change in GPs’ prescribing practices’, described what GPs would like to see change to better support them and their patients to discontinue antidepressants.

Conclusion

GPs see discontinuation of long-term antidepressant use as more than a simple deprescribing decision. It begins with considering a patient’s social and relational context, and is a journey involving careful preparation, tailored care, and regular review. These insights suggest interventions to redress long-term use will need to take these considerations into account and be placed in a wider discussion about the use of antidepressants.

Characteristics of voluntary reporting of adverse drug events related to antipsychotics in Australia: 14-year analysis

BACKGROUND

Retrospective analyses of large databases of treated patients can provide useful links to the presence of drug misuse or rare and infrequent adverse effects, such as agranulocytosis, diabetic ketoacidosis or neuroleptic malignant syndrome. The aim of this study is to describe the adverse effects to antipsychotics reported in the Australian Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN).

METHODS

Data were collected from the DAEN - a spontaneous reporting database. The database, which covered the period from January 2004 to December 2017, was obtained from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) website (www.TGA.gov). The drugs selected for this investigation are the following: aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, paliperidone, risperidone, ziprasidone, quetiapine, haloperidol and pimozide. All data were analysed descriptively. Comparison of reporting and management of adverse events between adults (older than 20 years) and children (5-19 years) was undertaken using chi squared test, where p < 0.05 is significant.

RESULTS

A total of 7122 adverse events associated with the antipsychotics aripiprazole, clozapine, haloperidol, olanzapine, paliperidone, pimozide, quetiapine and risperidone were reported to the TGA between January 2004 and December 2017. On average, there were 2.6 adverse events reported for each case. The most common adverse event reported for antipsychotics was neuroleptic malignant syndrome. There were no significant differences in the number of co-medications, formulations, indications, therapeutic dose, hospital admission and overdose among the antipsychotics between paediatric and adult populations. However, there were significant differences between causality, death and the management of adverse events between adult and paediatric populations (5-19 years) (p < 0.05, chi squared test).

CONCLUSION

The antipsychotic drug associated with the highest adverse events in adults was clozapine, followed by olanzapine. The most common adverse event in adults, and reported with a number of antipsychotic drugs, was neuroleptic malignant syndrome. In children, the highest numbers of adverse events reported in the database were associated with risperidone, clozapine and olanzapine.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Adverse events reported of antipsychoticsBackground: Retrospective analyses of large databases of treated patients can provide useful clues to the presence of drug misuse or rare and infrequent adverse effects associated with antipsychotics. The drugs selected for this investigation are the following: aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, paliperidone, risperidone, ziprasidone, quetiapine, haloperidol and pimozide.Methods: All data were analysed descriptively and investigated for any associations between the variables collected. Comparison of reporting and management of adverse events between adults (older than 20 years) and children (5-19 years) was undertaken using chi squared test, where p < 0.05 is significant.Results: The antipsychotic drug associated with the highest adverse events was clozapine, followed by olanzapine. In children, the highest numbers of adverse events reported in the database were associated with risperidone, clozapine and olanzapine. The most common adverse event in adults, and reported with a number of antipsychotic drugs, was neuroleptic malignant syndrome.Conclusion: There were significant differences between causality, death and the management of adverse events between adult and paediatric populations (5-19 years).Keywords: Antipsychotics, adverse effects, adverse events, safety.

Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety are the most frequent indication for which antidepressants are prescribed. Long-term antidepressant use is driving much of the internationally observed rise in antidepressant consumption. Surveys of antidepressant users suggest that 30% to 50% of long-term antidepressant prescriptions had no evidence-based indication. Unnecessary use of antidepressants puts people at risk of adverse events. However, high-certainty evidence is lacking regarding the effectiveness and safety of approaches to discontinuing long-term antidepressants.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched all databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) until January 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing approaches to discontinuation with continuation of antidepressants (or usual care) for people with depression or anxiety who are prescribed antidepressants for at least six months. Interventions included discontinuation alone (abrupt or taper), discontinuation with psychological therapy support, and discontinuation with minimal intervention. Primary outcomes were successful discontinuation rate, relapse (as defined by authors of the original study), withdrawal symptoms, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, quality of life, social and occupational functioning, and severity of illness.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 33 studies involving 4995 participants. Nearly all studies were conducted in a specialist mental healthcare service and included participants with recurrent depression (i.e. two or more episodes of depression prior to discontinuation). All included trials were at high risk of bias. The main limitation of the review is bias due to confounding withdrawal symptoms with symptoms of relapse of depression. Withdrawal symptoms (such as low mood, dizziness) may have an effect on almost every outcome including adverse events, quality of life, social functioning, and severity of illness. Abrupt discontinuation Thirteen studies reported abrupt discontinuation of antidepressant. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that abrupt discontinuation without psychological support may increase risk of relapse (hazard ratio (HR) 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59 to 2.74; 1373 participants, 10 studies) and there is insufficient evidence of its effect on adverse events (odds ratio (OR) 1.11, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.99; 1012 participants, 7 studies; I² = 37%) compared to continuation of antidepressants, without specific assessment of withdrawal symptoms. Evidence about the effects of abrupt discontinuation on withdrawal symptoms (1 study) is very uncertain. None of these studies included successful discontinuation rate as a primary endpoint. Discontinuation by "taper" Eighteen studies examined discontinuation by "tapering" (one week or longer). Most tapering regimens lasted four weeks or less. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that "tapered" discontinuation may lead to higher risk of relapse (HR 2.97, 95% CI 2.24 to 3.93; 1546 participants, 13 studies) with no or little difference in adverse events (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.38; 1479 participants, 7 studies; I² = 0%) compared to continuation of antidepressants, without specific assessment of withdrawal symptoms. Evidence about the effects of discontinuation on withdrawal symptoms (1 study) is very uncertain. Discontinuation with psychological support Four studies reported discontinuation with psychological support. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that initiation of preventive cognitive therapy (PCT), or MBCT, combined with "tapering" may result in successful discontinuation rates of 40% to 75% in the discontinuation group (690 participants, 3 studies). Data from control groups in these studies were requested but are not yet available. Low-certainty evidence suggests that discontinuation combined with psychological intervention may result in no or little effect on relapse (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.19; 690 participants, 3 studies) compared to continuation of antidepressants. Withdrawal symptoms were not measured. Pooling data on adverse events was not possible due to insufficient information (3 studies). Discontinuation with minimal intervention Low-certainty evidence from one study suggests that a letter to the general practitioner (GP) to review antidepressant treatment may result in no or little effect on successful discontinuation rate compared to usual care (6% versus 8%; 146 participants, 1 study) or on relapse (relapse rate 26% vs 13%; 146 participants, 1 study). No data on withdrawal symptoms nor adverse events were provided. None of the studies used low-intensity psychological interventions such as online support or a changed pharmaceutical formulation that allows tapering with low doses over several months. Insufficient data were available for the majority of people taking antidepressants in the community (i.e. those with only one or no prior episode of depression), for people aged 65 years and older, and for people taking antidepressants for anxiety.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, relatively few studies have focused on approaches to discontinuation of long-term antidepressants. We cannot make any firm conclusions about effects and safety of the approaches studied to date. The true effect and safety are likely to be substantially different from the data presented due to assessment of relapse of depression that is confounded by withdrawal symptoms. All other outcomes are confounded with withdrawal symptoms. Most tapering regimens were limited to four weeks or less. In the studies with rapid tapering schemes the risk of withdrawal symptoms may be similar to studies using abrupt discontinuation which may influence the effectiveness of the interventions. Nearly all data come from people with recurrent depression.   There is an urgent need for trials that adequately address withdrawal confounding bias, and carefully distinguish relapse from withdrawal symptoms. Future studies should report key outcomes such as successful discontinuation rate and should include populations with one or no prior depression episodes in primary care, older people, and people taking antidepressants for anxiety and use tapering schemes longer than 4 weeks.

The Prevalence and Characteristics of Psychotropic-Related Hospitalizations in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence and characteristics of psychotropic medication-related hospitalizations in older people.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Older adults (≥65 years of age) with psychotropic-related hospitalizations.

METHODS

A search of published literature was performed in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus from 2010 to March 2020. Three authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of relevant studies for relevance. Two authors independently extracted full text data, including characteristics, measures of causality, prevalence data, and performed quality assessment. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of psychotropic-related hospitalizations using random effects models. Heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Of 815 potentially relevant studies, 11 were included in the final analysis. Five studies were cross-sectional studies, 5 were cohort studies, and 1 was a case control study. The majority of studies were rated as good quality. Psychotropic medications contributed to 2.1% (95% CI 1.2%-3.3%) of total hospitalizations and 11.3% (95% CI 8.2%-14.8%) of adverse drug event-related hospitalizations. The main psychotropic medications attributable to hospitalizations were antidepressants, hypnotics, sedatives, and antipsychotics.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Psychotropic medications are a significant contributor to hospitalizations in older adults. The risk of hospitalization was greatest for those taking antidepressants, antipsychotics, hypnotics, and sedatives. Future studies should aim to address specific medication subgroups and implement uniform adverse drug event-related classification systems to improve comparability across studies.

Concomitant inpatient prescribing of strong opioids with sedatives: Associations with comorbid conditions

Co-prescribing of opioids and sedatives is a known risk factor for opioid-induced ventilatory impairment (OIVI). Prevalence data for sedative and opioid co-prescription in inpatients in Australia are unknown. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of inpatient sedative and opioid co-prescribing and to identify factors associated with co-prescription. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study from July 2017 to October 2017 across four South Australian hospitals utilizing a centralized electronic health record. Multivariate analysis was used to identify characteristics predictive of co-prescribing of a strong opioid (fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, and oxycodone) and sedative medications (benzodiazepines, antiepileptics, antipsychotics, and tricyclic antidepressants). Of the 6170 inpatients, 2795 (45.3%) were prescribed a strong opioid and of those, 1889 (30.6% of all inpatients) were co-prescribed a sedative. Of those prescribed a strong opioid, five (0.18%) developed OIVI. Patients prescribed a strong opioid had a 27-77% increased likelihood of being prescribed a sedative. Factors predictive of sedative co-prescribing included the presence of disease of the central nervous system adjusted OR (aOR) 8.66 [95% CI 5.83-12.9] and respiratory disease aOR 1.42 [95% CI 1.17-1.72]. Nearly, one third of all hospital inpatients were co-prescribed a strong opioid and a sedative medication. Patients with comorbidities resulting in increased risk of respiratory depression/OIVI were more likely to have sedative co-prescription. Clinicians should be aware of the effects of high-risk medications and ensure that systems and monitoring are in place that help mitigate adverse outcomes.

Trends in Psychotropic Medication Prescriptions in Urban China From 2013 to 2017: National Population-Based Study

Purpose: Psychotropic medications are commonly used for treating mental disorders; however, there is currently no study on how commonly they are used in China. This study reported the trends in psychotropic medications prescriptions in urban China. Methods: A national population-based study was conducted using the China Health Insurance Research Association database to estimate the period prescription prevalence of 11 major classes of psychotropic medications annually during 2013-2017. The World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes were used to identify psychotropic medications. Results: The prescription prevalence of any psychotropic medication increased from 8.110% (8.106-8.114%) in 2013 to 11.362% (11.357-11.366%) in 2017. The prescription prevalence of six classes increased significantly during 2013-2017, including sedatives-hypnotics (from 3.177 to 5.388%), anxiolytics (from 1.436 to 2.200%), antiepileptic drugs (from 1.416 to 2.140%), antipsychotics (from 0.809 to 1.156%), antidepressants (from 0.891 to 1.045%), and psycholeptic polypills (from 0.682 to 0.866%). The prescription prevalence of antidementia drugs increased from 0.069 to 0.122%, and mood stabilizers increased from 0.029 to 0.037%, although not statistically significant. The prescription prevalence of nootropic drugs, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications and drugs used in the treatment of addictive disorders was largely stable. Psychotropic medication prescription increased with age for all classes except for ADHD medications and mood stabilizers. Conclusion: Increasing trends in prescription prevalence were observed for most classes of psychotropic medications in urban China, although the prevalence was still lower than that in most developed countries. Further research is warranted to explore the potential treatment gap between China and most developed countries.

Antidepressant use in Australia and Sweden-A cross-country comparison

PURPOSE

To compare the dispensed use of antidepressants in Australia and Sweden.

METHODS

We analysed publicly available data from Australia and Sweden on dispensed use of antidepressants from 2006 to 2018.

RESULTS

The dispensed use of antidepressants has increased in both Australia and Sweden. Australia had a more rapid increase resulting in a higher total use. The utilisation profile was similar in both countries; SSRIs were the most commonly used group, "other antidepressants" were the group that increased the most, and seven of the eight most used substances were the same. There were differences in which antidepressants were most used, with the three most prescribed antidepressants being escitalopram, sertraline, and venlafaxine in Australia; and mirtazapine, sertraline, and citalopram in Sweden.

CONCLUSION

Dispensed use of antidepressants has increased remarkably in both Australia and Sweden between 2006 and 2018. Although similar with regard to economic status and health care system, use of antidepressants differs between both countries. This may be a result of a combination of factors related to medical, contextual and policy evidence. The differences displayed in this study may reflect varying accessibility of treatments, national programmes enhancing mental health literacy in the population, clinical prescribing guidelines and timing of approval of new antidepressants.

A cross sectional study of psychotropic medicine use in Australia in 2018: A focus on polypharmacy

AIMS

To examine prescribed psychotropic medicine use on a given day in Australia (25 September 2018; World Pharmacists Day), with a focus on psychotropic polypharmacy.

METHODS

We used a 10% sample of individual-level nationwide dispensing claims to examine psychotropic medicine use on a given day. We estimated the prevalence of psychotropic medicine use in all ages stratified by age and sex. We also calculated the observed vs expected (had medicines been randomly combined) prevalence of psychotropic combinations used. We focused on combinations of clinical significance as well combinations of psychotropics with medicines prescribed to manage cardiovascular risk and disease.

RESULTS

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants and gabapentinoids dominated psychotropic use. The use of any psychotropic as a proportion of people in the Australian population increased with age, peaking at the 85-89 year age group and declining thereafter. Combinations of medicines from the same subclass generally occurred at lower than expected frequencies. However, combinations including atypical antipsychotics occurred more frequently than expected; e.g. 7.4× with anticonvulsants and 2.2× with other atypical antipsychotics. This was also the case for combinations of sedatives, e.g. anxiolytic with hypnotic benzodiazepines (3.8×). Lipid-lowering drugs and antidiabetic medicines were combined with psychotropics at frequencies close to those expected had they been randomly combined.

CONCLUSION

Psychotropic use in older adults and certain psychotropic combinations that are not well supported with evidence remain prevalent and greater consideration of the drivers of this potentially inappropriate prescribing is required.

Examining the dispensing patterns of antipsychotics in Australia from 2006 to 2018 - A pharmacoepidemiology study

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic medications can be prescribed in Australia by medical and nurse practitioners under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). The current pharmacoepidemiology study aims to determine the dispensing rates of antipsychotic medicines in Australia, and to produce and examine a time-trend of the dispensing patterns of these medicines.

METHODS

Dispensing counts of antipsychotic medication from 2006 to 2018 were accessed from the PBS dataset. All of the antipsychotic medicines dispensed were included for time trend analysis. Cumulative dispensing counts and defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 concessional population days (DPD) were analysed for the purpose of time trend analysis.

RESULTS

Sixteen antipsychotic medications were assessed and had a total cumulative dispensing count of 33, 732, 404. Olanzapine had the highest cumulative prescription count and Quetiapine experienced the highest average dispensing count and rate as determined by DPD. Twelve out of the sixteen medications were second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). Overall, eleven out of the sixteen medications (aripiprazole, asenapine, brexpiprazole, clozapine, flupentixol, lurasidone, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, zuclopenthixol) had an increase in both dispensing count and rate, as expressed per DPD.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study highlights the increasing prescription rates of SGAs and the stagnation of FGA prescription among Australian health practitioners. This is observed through particularly large increase in the dispensing rates of Olanzapine and Quetiapine. Further interdisciplinary investigation is required to ensure that these medications are being prescribed under the appropriate medical rationale, particularly to groups that are vulnerable to the adverse effects of the medications.

Controversias frente al tratamiento farmacológico del TDAH entre padres y educadores de niños y adolescentes de Bogotá

Se presentan resultados parciales de la investigación titulada “Narrativas de niños y niñas sobre el trastorno de hiperactividad” en relación con las experiencias subjetivas, así como saberes, creencias y prácticas alrededor del tratamiento farmacológico del TDAH en un grupo de padres y educadores de niños y niñas con dicho diagnóstico en la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia. La información fue recolectada a través de entrevistas en profundidad y fue organizada y analizada a partir de seis categorías emergentes: actitud, conocimientos, efectividad, efectos secundarios, función y responsabilidad. Los resultados muestran que las ideas, creencias y prácticas alrededor del tratamiento farmacológico se organizan de acuerdo con el rol y el contexto del participante, respondiendo a procesos sociales de medicalización de la vida educativa.

Potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine use in Australian adults: A population-based study (2014-2017)

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Inappropriate benzodiazepine use continues to cause substantial morbidity and mortality globally. We aimed to characterise the initiation of new benzodiazepine treatment episodes in Australia and identify correlates of potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine use.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using dispensing claims from a 10% sample of Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme eligible Australians (2014-2017). Our cohort comprised adults initiating a new benzodiazepine treatment; we defined potentially inappropriate use as ≥3 benzodiazepine dispensing over any continuous 90-day period in the year following initiation. We examined characteristics associated with potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine use using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

People initiating a new benzodiazepine treatment episode (n = 276 765) were more frequently female (59.1%) and <65 years of age (73.6%). In the 90 days prior to initiating benzodiazepine, people were commonly dispensed antidepressants (26.5%), opioid analgesics (17.6%) and antipsychotics (4.7%). In the first year after initiation, 20 938 (9.5%) people experienced 'potentially inappropriate use'. Having a greater initial quantity of benzodiazepine dispensed [odds ratio (OR), 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.12 per 10 defined daily doses increase], dispensing of antipsychotics (OR 3.00, 95% CI 2.86-3.15) and >5 unique medicines (OR 2.54, 95% CI 2.44-2.64; vs. ≤5 unique medicines) in the 90 days prior to initiation were associated with potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine use.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Approximately, 1 in 10 people who initiated benzodiazepines were using it beyond the guideline recommended period. We identified factors at the time of initiation associated with potentially inappropriate use; clinicians should consider these before prescribing benzodiazepines and initiate conversations about alternative therapy when necessary.

Self-reported sleep disturbance in ambulance attendances for suicidal ideation and attempted suicide between 2012 and 2017

BACKGROUND

Sleep disturbances are among the top-ten warning signs for suicide, however there has been limited investigation of the relationship between these variables in acute presentations, particularly community settings. We examined ambulance attendances for suicide ideation and attempt to explore the role of sleep and co-morbid factors (mental health symptoms, attendance time, and alcohol and benzodiazepine use).

METHODS

Coded clinical records from Ambulance Victoria for the period 1 January 2012 to 30 June 2017 were analysed.

RESULTS

Paramedics attended 97,198 cases of suicidal ideation or suicide attempt during the study period. Just over half (56.4%) of these were for suicidal ideation, and 43.6% were for attempted suicide. Depression symptomology-related attendances were more common than those for anxiety and despite a lower proportion of both sleep and current anxiety-related symptoms, benzodiazepine use was significantly more common in attendances for suicide attempts (25.9%) than for ideation (2.2%). Co-morbid benzodiazepine use was associated with attempted suicide (OR: 10.37 (10.04-10.72), in a hierarchical regression model.

LIMITATIONS

Data represent self-report/paramedic observation only, and do include validated measures of sleep or drug use. Sleep disturbance is likely under recorded in ambulance attendances given the primary role of paramedics is to stabilise patients, and minimise risk of harm during transport.

CONCLUSION

This study reports internationally unique data, and provides the first examination of ambulance coded clinical records for suicide ideation and attempt. Sleep disturbances had a unique role in these attendances, over and above common co-occurring factors including drug use and mental health diagnoses.

Exploring Factors Influencing Medication Adherence From Initiation to Discontinuation in Parents and Adolescents With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

This study explored factors influencing parents' and adolescents' decisions to initiate, continue, and discontinue medication for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Three focus groups were conducted with parents (n = 23) of children with ADHD, and 2 with adolescents diagnosed with ADHD (n = 11). Parents and adolescents independently discussed the complexities surrounding their decisions to adhere to ADHD medication. Parents' negative beliefs about medication (fear of side effects) discouraged them from initiating therapy. Once initiated, parents struggled in balancing the need to medicate (improvements in learning and behavior) and concerns (weight loss, perceived delayed development) about the medication. Parents who had more concerns about the medication were more in favor of discontinuation. For adolescents, the desire for self-expression without being medicated was the primary factor determining nonadherence and/or discontinuation of the medication. Adolescents' medication-related concerns were relatively different from the parents. Phase- and group-specific interventions are required to improve medication adherence in people with ADHD.

The necessity-concern framework in the assessment of treatment adherence of psychiatric patients and the role of polypharmacy in a Spanish sample

OBJECTIVE

This study compares three measures (necessity and concern scores, the necessity-concern differential, and a skeptical attitude vs. three other attitudes) for studying the relationship between the necessity-concern framework and treatment adherence after considering the number of prescribed drugs.

METHODS

The sample included 588 consecutive adult psychiatric outpatients in the Canary Islands, Spain. The necessity-concern framework was assessed using a specific subscale of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire. Adherence (yes/no) to 1,101 prescribed psychiatric drugs was assessed using the Sidorkiewicz adherence tool.

RESULTS

In the three logistic regression models including 1,101 drugs, with adherence as the dependent variable, the highly significant odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were (a) OR = 1.57 (CI = 1.37-1.79) for necessity and OR = 0.747 (CI = 0.660-0.847) for concern; (b) OR = 1.44 (CI = 1.32-1.58) for the necessity-concern differential; and (c) OR = 0.452 (CI = 0.343-0.597) for a skeptical attitude (yes/no), defined as low necessity and high concern. In patients taking five or six drugs, adherence was associated with extremely high/low ORs for necessity, concern, and the differential.

CONCLUSION

If replicated, our results suggest clinicians need to pay careful attention to each drug in each patient taking five or six drugs, emphasize necessity, and listen carefully to patient concerns.

Trends in the Prevalence of Psychological Distress Over Time: Comparing Results From Longitudinal and Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys

Background: While there is discussion of increasing rates of mental disorders, epidemiological research finds little evidence of change over time. This research generally compares cross-sectional surveys conducted at different times. Declining response rates to representative surveys may mask increases in mental disorders and psychological distress. Methods: Analysis of data from two large nationally representative surveys: repeated cross-sectional data from the Australian National Health Survey (NHS) series (2001-2017), and longitudinal data (2007-2017) from the Household, Income and Labor Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. Data from each source was used to generate weighted national estimates of the prevalence of very high psychological distress using the Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10). Results: Estimates of the prevalence of very high psychological distress from the NHS were stable between 2001 and 2014, with a modest increase in 2017. In contrast, the HILDA Survey data demonstrated an increasing trend over time, with the prevalence of very high distress rising from 4.8% in 2007 to 7.4% in 2017. This increase was present for both men and women, and was evident for younger and middle aged adults but not those aged 65 years or older. Sensitivity analyses showed that this increase was notable in the upper end of the K10 distribution. Conclusions: Using household panel data breaks the nexus between declining survey participation rates and time, and suggests the prevalence of very high psychological distress is increasing. The study identifies potential challenges in estimating trends in population mental health using repeated cross-sectional survey data.

Barriers to discontinuing antidepressants in patients with depressive and anxiety disorders: a review of the literature and clinical recommendations

Use of antidepressants has recently increased, mainly caused by the increase of long-term users. Although evidence-based indications for long-term use are lacking, it is assumed that long-term use is unnecessary or undesirable in some patients. Perceived barriers to discontinuing antidepressants contribute to unnecessary or undesirable long-term use. Identifying barriers prior to, during and following discontinuation may enable strategies to overcome them. This narrative review summarises relevant qualitative and quantitative articles on perceived barriers to discontinuing antidepressants and provides recommendations for clinical practice. We can conclude that implications for clinical practice are diverse and the most important barriers experienced by patients and physicians include the fear of relapse or recurrence, insufficient evaluation and monitoring, withdrawal symptoms, and actual relapse or recurrence.

A review of the antimicrobial side of antidepressants and its putative implications on the gut microbiome

OBJECTIVE

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the predominant treatment for major depressive disorder. In recent years, the diversity of the gut microbiota has emerged to play a significant role in the occurrence of major depressive disorder and other mood and anxiety disorders. Importantly, the role of the gut microbiota in the treatment of such disorders remains to be elucidated. Here, we provide a review of the literature regarding the effects of physiologically relevant concentrations of serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the gut microbiota and the implications this might have on their efficacy in the treatment of mood disorders.

METHODS

First, an estimation of gut serotonin reuptake inhibitor concentrations was computed based on pharmacokinetic and gastrointestinal transit properties of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Literature regarding the in vivo and in vitro antimicrobial properties of serotonin reuptake inhibitors was gathered, and the estimated gut concentrations were examined in the context of these data. Computer-based investigation revealed putative mechanisms for the antimicrobial effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

RESULTS

In vivo evidence using animal models shows an antimicrobial effect of serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the gut microbiota. Examination of the estimated physiological concentrations of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the gastrointestinal tract collected from in vitro studies suggests that the microbial community of both the small intestine and the colon are exposed to serotonin reuptake inhibitors for at least 4 hours per day at concentrations that are likely to exert an antimicrobial effect. The potential mechanisms of the effect of serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the gut microbiota were postulated to include inhibition of efflux pumps and/or amino acid transporters.

CONCLUSION

This review raises important issues regarding the role that gut microbiota play in the treatment of mood-related behaviours, which holds substantial potential clinical outcomes for patients suffering from major depressive disorder and other mood-related disorders.

Depression, antidepressants and the risk of cardiovascular events and death in older men

INTRODUCTION

It is uncertain whether depression and exposure to antidepressants increase the risk of cardiovascular events in later life. This study attempts to clarify whether the risk of cardiovascular events associated with exposure to antidepressant medications varies according to history of depression.

METHODS

Cohort study of 5522 Australian men aged 70-89 years living in the metropolitan region of Perth, Western Australia, who were followed for novel cardiovascular events over 12 years. Clinical diagnoses followed the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular events and depressive disorders. Participants self-reported their use of medications. Other study measures included age, schooling, smoking history and the following concurrent morbidities: diabetes, hypertension, cancer, dementia, and respiratory diseases, gastrointestinal and renal diseases.

RESULTS

374 men (6.8%) had a recorded or current diagnosis of depression and 365 (6.6%) were using an antidepressant. Prevalent depression and antidepressant use were associated with increased mortality hazard, but not the interaction between them (hazard ratio, HR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.33, 0.65). Depression (HR = 1.50, 95%CI = 1.21, 1.86) and antidepressants (HR = 1.52, 95%CI = 1.20, 1.93) were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but the interaction term was associated with decreased risk (HR = 0.51, 95%CI = 0.30, 0.87). All analyses were adjusted for other study measures.

DISCUSSION

Depression and antidepressant use were associated with an increase in the 12-year risk of cardiovascular events, while antidepressants were associated with a decrease in the risk of cardiovascular events among older men with depression, but not among those without. This suggests that the effect of this interaction on the risk of cardiovascular events may be driven by the ability of antidepressants to lead to clinical improvements in mood.

A Review of Factors Influencing the Three Phases of Medication Adherence in People with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Objectives: Factors affecting adherence to medications in people with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are not well understood in the context of their influence on the different phases of adherence, that is, initiation, implementation, and discontinuation. This review aimed to identify the factors affecting the three phases of medication adherence in people with ADHD. Methods: Six electronic databases, including Medline, PubMed, IPA, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO, were systematically searched from inception through October 2018 with the limitations of English language and human studies. The search strategy was based on three concepts (adherence, ADHD, and factors) and their relevant terminologies. Results: Considerable variability was observed with regards to the criteria used to define adherence in identified studies (n = 48). Most studies focused on the implementation phase of adherence (n = 27), while only a handful focused on the initiation (n = 6) and discontinuation (n = 5) phase of adherence. The remaining studies (n = 10) examined multiple phases of adherence. Conflicting information received about medication, medication frequency, and fears of medication's effect on growth were the unique factors impacting initiation, implementation, and discontinuation, respectively. Moreover, factors within each phase of adherence also differed with different populations such as parents, children, adolescents, and adults. Fear of addiction, medication effectiveness, psychiatric comorbidity, and medication side effects were the most common factors identified in all three phases of adherence. Conclusions: This review found some unique factors in each phase of adherence while some overlap was also noted. Future interventions to improve adherence should be phase- and group specific rather than consider adherence as a single variable.

The relative lethal toxicity of pharmaceutical and illicit substances: A 16-year study of the Greater Newcastle Hunter Area, Australia

AIMS

We aim to calculate 2 metrics of relative lethal toxicity; the fatal toxicity index (FTI; number of deaths per year of a daily dose) and the case fatality (CF; number of deaths per overdose) with a focus on opioids, antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and illicit drugs.

METHODS

This descriptive cohort study used the Australian National Coronial Information System (NCIS) to identify a population of individuals with drug-associated deaths in the Greater Newcastle Hunter Area between January 2002 and December 2016. This was combined with Australian medicine dispensing data and corresponding data from the Hunter Area Toxicology Service to calculate FTI and CF.

RESULTS

There were 444 drug-related deaths and 21,296 overdoses during the study period. FTI and CF were well correlated (Spearman's rho 0.64, P < .001). Of the classes of interest, opioids had the highest FTI (40.3 95% confidence interval [CI] 35.2-45.4 deaths per 100 years of use at the defined daily dose or deaths/DDD/100 years) and CF (12.4% 95%CI 11.0-13.9). Fentanyl, methadone and morphine had the highest relative fatal toxicity within this class. Tricyclic antidepressants had the highest relative fatal toxicity of all antidepressants (FTI 14.5 95%CI 9.7-19.3 deaths/DDD/100 years and CF 7.1% [95%CI 4.8-9.3]) and benzodiazepines appeared to be more associated with multiple agent deaths than single. Of the illicit drugs, heroin had the highest CF (26.4%, 95%CI 19.1-33.7).

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of relative lethal toxicity is useful to prescribers and medicines and public health policy makers in restricting access to more toxic drugs and may also assist coroners in determining cause of death.

Sleep- and Wake-Promoting Drugs: Where Are They Being Sourced, and What Is Their Impact?

Background: Recent decades have seen both an increased number of shift workers in order to deliver services 24/7, and increased potential for social interactions at all hours of the day. People have sought to engage in strategies, which either promote vigilance or facilitate sleep, with the use of sleep- and wake-promoting drugs representing one strategy. Methods: We investigated use of sleep- and wake-promoting drugs in participants (n = 377) who completed a survey investigating the type and source of sleep- and wake-promoting drugs, and their impact on sleep and performance outcomes. Results: The most commonly reported wake-promoting drugs were amphetamine and dextroamphetamin salts, modafinil, and illicit substances including methamphetamine and cocaine, while the most commonly reported sleep-promoting drugs were benzodiazepines and antihistamines. Use of a sleep-promoting drug in the past month was associated with higher odds of having poorer sleep quality (OR = 3.15) and moderate-high insomnia (OR = 3.30), while use of a wake-promoting drug was associated with poor sleep quality (OR = 3.76), or making a fatigue-related error (OR = 2.65). Conclusions: These findings represent novel data on the use and source of sleep- and wake-promoting- drugs, and suggest that despite their use, poor sleep and performance outcomes persist, likely representing individuals struggling to keep up with the 24/7 world.

[Use and misuse of benzodiazepines out of France]

Among 8 countries included in the report of ANSM, France is second behind Spain, when defined daily doses (DDD) are considered. Few studies, recent and based on representative samples of population, investigated the use of benzodiazepines in other countries and data are limited to compare France and other countries. In most countries, the use of benzodiazepines increases with age and is more frequent in women than in men. Variations of benzodiazepines use that were observed in other countries are similar to those observed in France, with a slight decrease but persistent high levels of use. In most countries, the long-term use of benzodiazepines is stable over time even though simple use decreases.

Changes in Australian Early-Career General Practitioners' Benzodiazepine Prescribing: a Longitudinal Analysis

BACKGROUND

Australian and international guidelines recommend benzodiazepines and related drugs (hereafter "benzodiazepines") as second-line, short-term medications only. Most benzodiazepines are prescribed by general practitioners (GPs; family physicians). Australian GP registrars ("trainees" or "residents" participating in a post-hospital training, apprenticeship-like, practice-based vocational training program), like senior GPs, prescribe benzodiazepines at high rates. Education within a training program, and experience in general practice, would be expected to reduce benzodiazepine prescribing.

OBJECTIVE

To establish if registrars' prescribing of benzodiazepines decreases with time within a GP training program DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training multi-site cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Registrars of five of Australia's 17 Regional Training Providers. Analyses were restricted to patients ≥ 16 years.

MAIN MEASURES

The main outcome factor was prescription of a benzodiazepine. Conditional logistic regression was used, with registrar included as a fixed effect, to assess within-registrar changes in benzodiazepine-prescribing rates. The "time" predictor variable was "training term" (6-month duration Terms 1-4). To contextualize these "within-registrar" changes, a mixed effects logistic regression model was used, including a random effect for registrar, to assess within-program changes in benzodiazepine-prescribing rates over time. The "time" predictor variable was "year" (2010-2015).

KEY RESULTS

Over 12 terms of data collection, 2010-2015, 1161 registrars (response rate 96%) provided data on 136,809 face-to-face office-based consultations. Two thousand six hundred thirty-two benzodiazepines were prescribed (for 1.2% of all problems managed). In the multivariable model, there was a significant reduction in within-program benzodiazepine prescribing over time (year) (p = < 0.001, OR = 0.94, CI = 0.90, 0.97). However, there was no significant change in 'within-registrar' prescribing over time (registrar Term) (p = 0.92, OR = 1.00 [95% CI = 0.94-1.06]).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a welcome temporal trend for reductions in overall benzodiazepine prescribing from 2010 to 2015, there is still room for improvement and our findings suggest a lack of effect of specific GP vocational training program education and, thus, an opportunity for targeted education.

The impact of permissive and restrictive pharmaceutical policies on quetiapine dispensing: Evaluating a policy pendulum using interrupted time series analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of 2 policy changes on quetiapine dispensing in Australia: removal of prior authorisation for prescribing (policy 1: July 2007) and removal of repeat prescriptions for 25-mg quetiapine (policy 2: January 2014).

METHODS

We performed an interrupted time series analysis using Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claims data (July 2005 to December 2015). We assessed the impact of both policies on monthly quetiapine dispensing (25 mg and >25 mg) and the impact of policy change 2 on monthly rates of 25-mg discontinuation and switching from 25 mg to other quetiapine strengths. We also estimated the impact of both policies on the proportion of people with potentially inappropriate therapy (no evidence of dose escalation) following 25-mg initiation.

RESULTS

Following removal of prior authorisation, 25-mg and >25-mg quetiapine dispensing in the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 10% sample increased by 11/month (95% CI: 2-21) and 14/month (95% CI: 8-20), respectively. After removing 25-mg repeats, there was a permanent decrease of 1072 (95% CI 773-1371) dispensings and an increase in discontinuation of this strength; 48% of people dispensed the 25-mg strength that discontinued, discontinued quetiapine completely; the remainder continued to use higher quetiapine strengths. We observed minimal switching to other quetiapine strengths. There was no change in inappropriate 25-mg therapy following policy change 1 and a small decrease (79% to 76%, P = 0.05) following policy change 2.

CONCLUSION

More nuanced policies are needed to ensure the appropriate access to 25-mg quetiapine for dose escalation while discouraging use for indications where the evidence of risk and benefit is unclear.

Benzodiazepine Use in Older Adults in the United States, Ontario, and Australia from 2010 to 2016

OBJECTIVES

To detail annual trends in benzodiazepine incidence and prevalence in older adults between 2010 and 2016 in three countries.

DESIGN

Observational multicountry cohort study with harmonized study protocol.

SETTING

The United States (veteran population); Ontario, Canada; and Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

All people aged 65 and older (8,270,000 people).

MEASUREMENTS

Annual incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine use stratified according to age group (65-74, 75-84, ≥85) and sex. We performed multiple regression analyses to assess whether rates of incident and prevalent use changed significantly over time.

RESULTS

Over the study period, we observed a significant decrease in incident benzodiazepine use in the United States (2.6% to 1.7%) and Ontario (6.0% to 4.4%) but not Australia (7.0% to 6.7%). We found significant declines in prevalent use in all countries (United States: 9.2% to 7.3%; Ontario: 18.2% to 13.4%; Australia: 20.2% to 16.8%). Although incidence and prevalence increased with age in Ontario and Australia, they decreased with age in the United States. Incidence and prevalence were higher in women in all countries.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with other international studies, there have been small but significant reductions in the incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine use in older adults in all three countries, with the exception of incidence in Australia, although use remains inappropriately high-particularly in those aged 85 and older-which warrants further attention from clinicians and policy-makers.

Increased All-Cause Mortality by Antipsychotic Drugs: Updated Review and Meta-Analysis in Dementia and General Mental Health Care

It is almost ten years since the Banerjee 2009 report established that inappropriate prescribing of antipsychotics in the elderly was occurring in the UK and such patients had an 85% increased risk of adverse events and greater mortality. This report was a critical analysis addressing the outcomes of treatment practices for dementia in UK patients and globally, aimed at reducing prescribing of antipsychotic drugs for dementia. Since 2009, many significant studies worldwide (including several more recent large retrospective studies) provide more extensive longitudinal data for the adverse impacts of antipsychotic drugs in dementia. We have used the data in these studies including from over 380,000 dementia patients, with 85,069 prescribed antipsychotic agents as well as from 359,235 non-dementia antipsychotic drug users to provide an up-dated meta-analysis. This is the first meta-analysis to include evidence from general mental health studies showing that antipsychotic drugs precipitate excessive mortality across the spectrum. Prescribing of antipsychotic drugs for dementia or for other mental health care should be avoided and alternative means sought for handling behavioral disorders of such patients.

Use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines for dementia: Time for action? What will be required before global de-prescribing?

Comparing how nations including the UK, USA, Canada, Australia and others have made attempts aimed at improving the care and treatment of dementia patients can provide useful insights into methods that prove successful. The UK-based 2009 Banerjee Report provided international leadership in addressing treatment and practices for dementia patients with an aim to reduce prescribing of antipsychotic drugs. A historical account of the different government policies and developments with the similar aims of de-prescribing are examined. Using Australia as one example, different national strategies are discussed in the context of those that have been tried and failed. In addition, policies that have successfully reduced the controversial current practices of overprescribing antipsychotics or related psychotropic drugs for dementia patients are presented. The evidence overwhelmingly indicates such treatments only exacerbate the disease or precipitate death – giving justification to the recent call for use of chemical restraints such as antipsychotics to be included under ‘Elder Abuse’ when considering law reform necessary to regulate compliance .