Cancer Patient Survival in the Elderly in Italy

Cancer Prevalence in the Elderly

Aims and Background

To describe the cancer prevalence in elderly Italian people and analyze the differences, if any, with the prevalence among younger subjects.

Methods & Study Design

The cancer prevalence among elderly patients (65 years and over), the three age classes encompassing elderly age (65-74 years, 75-84 years, 85 years and over) and younger patients (0-64 years) was computed using the PREVAL method on the basis of the incident cases over the period 1976-1992 followed up to 31 December 1992 (prevalence reference date). Data were collected by 11 Italian cancer registries.

Results

The observed prevalence figures for all cancers (except skin epitheliomas), both sexes combined and considering the whole elderly group, were 1,090 and 3,601 cases per 100,000 one and five years since diagnosis, respectively; the prevalence increased up to the 75-84 age group and showed a slight decrease after age 85. With regard to specific cancer sites, in men bladder and prostate had the highest prevalence 5 years from diagnosis (more than 800 cases per 100,000), followed by colon and lung (about 500 cases per 100,000) stomach and rectum (about 300 cases per 100,000); in women breast cancer ranked first (more than 1,000 cases per 100,000), followed by colon (about 350 cases per 100,000), corpus uteri, stomach and rectum cancers (between 150 and 200 cases per 100,000). For all malignancies and the two sexes combined the prevalence figures were about six times higher in the older than in the younger age group.

Conclusions

These figures confirm the important role of aging in determining the increase in cancer prevalence. The resulting prevalence figures clearly indicate the cancer burden placed on health care services; moreover, the figures will probably increase in the next decades due to a possible improvement in survival and to the dramatic aging of the population, assuming a stable trend for incidence rates. This picture will represent a major challenge for politicians and those dealing with health care planning and social policies in general, especially in the light of the reduction of the available financial resources and the specific features of medical and social needs in the elderly.

The Itacare Study

ITACARE is a collaborative study on the survival of Italian cancer patients diagnosed in the period 1978–1989. The study involves 11 Italian population-based cancer registries (CRs) (Firenze, Forlì-Ravenna, Genova, Latina, Modena, Parma, Ragusa, Torino, Varese, the childhood CR of Piedmont and the colorectal CR of Modena), and its principal aim is to identify and analyze possible differences between the areas covered by the CRs. This article describes the ITACARE database. Ten percent of the Italian population is covered by the participating CRs, most of which are located in the northern part of the country. All malignant cancer sites (classified by ICD-9) except skin cancers were included. For bladder cancers, papillomas and transitional cell tumours grade 1 and 2 were also included. Survival data on over 100,000 cases were collected. The principal information variables were sex, date of birth, diagnosis and end of follow-up, life status, ICD-9 code for tumour site, diagnosis modality (clinical, cytologic confirmation, histologic confirmation), ICD-0 morphology code, and tumour stage (grouped into broad categories). Follow-up is active in all registries. All cases were checked systematically for errors and inconsistencies, following which about 0.2% of cases were excluded from the analyses. The percentage of cases microscopically verified, which is an indicator of diagnostic accuracy and data reliability, was higher among patients under 65 years of age (90%), breast cancer patients (92%) and cases covered by the Varese, Torino and Forlì-Ravenna CRs (more than 82%). The percentage of cases known by death certificate only (an indicator of the completeness and quality of registration) was about 3% of total cases and was higher among older patients (4%). Province-specific mortality, used to compute relative survival from cancer (i.e., survival adjusted for competing causes of death), varied according to period of diagnosis, sex and area: the highest mortality was among women of the Ragusa CR (Sicily) and men in northern CRs. Overall mortality decreased during the period, more markedly in the north and among women.

Survival in Adult Italian Cancer Patients, 1978–1989

Aims

To present a systematic analysis of population-based cancer patient survival in Italy.

Methods

Population-based survival data have been made available from 10 Italian cancer registries within the ITACARE project. Data, collected and validated using a common protocol, included over 100,000 patients with cancer diagnosed between 1978 and 1989. Multivariate weighted analysis was used to provide relative survival estimates attributable to Italy at national level.

Results

Results are presented, according to a systematic frame, as the main object of the ITACARE study, involving crude and relative survival figures for adult Italian cancer patients, by age, sex, period of diagnosis and registry area. An estimate with reference to Italy as a whole is also presented by cancer site and for all malignant neoplasms combined. Age-standardized relative survival figures are presented to allow comparisons between Italian registries and also to give a basis for international comparisons with countries involved in the EUROCARE study.

Conclusions

For the fist time, population-based survival of cancer patients is made available in Italy on a large scale analysis of data from all the Italian cancer registries in a combined action. Estimates of cancer patient survival at a national level in Italy allow proper international comparisons with European countries and give elements of evaluation and discussion on the performance of the Italian health care system.

Evaluation of the Reliability of Electronic Medical Record Data in Identifying Comorbid Conditions among Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background. Traditional methods for identifying comorbidity data in EMRs have relied primarily on costly and time-consuming manual chart review. The purpose of this study was to validate a strategy of electronically searching EMR data to identify comorbidities among cancer patients. Methods. Advanced stage NSCLC patients (N = 2,513) who received chemotherapy from 7/1/2006 to 6/30/2008 were identified using iKnowMed, US Oncology's proprietary oncology-specific EMR system. EMR data were searched for documentation of comorbidities common to advanced stage cancer patients. The search was conducted by a series of programmatic queries on standardized information including concomitant illnesses, patient history, review of systems, and diagnoses other than cancer. The validity of the comorbidity information that we derived from the EMR search was compared to the chart review gold standard in a random sample of 450 patients for whom the EMR search yielded no indication of comorbidities. Negative predictive values were calculated. Results. The overall prevalence of comorbidities of 22%. Overall negative predictive value was 0.92 in the 450 patients randomly sampled patients (36 of 450 were found to have evidence of comorbidities on chart review). Conclusion. Results of this study suggest that efficient queries/text searches of EMR data may provide reliable data on comorbid conditions among cancer patients.

A retrospective analysis of outcomes by age in a three-arm phase III trial of gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin or paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel plus carboplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Sufficient data are currently unavailable to assist in defining suitable regimens for patients ≥ 70 years with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Chemonaïve patients with a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 and stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomized to gemcitabine 1000mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5.5 on day 1; the same schedule of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel 200mg/m(2) on day 1; or paclitaxel 225mg/m(2) on day 1 plus carboplatin AUC 6.0 on day 1. Cycles were every 21 days up to 6. Efficacy and toxicity results were compared by age groups.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS) between patients <70 years (8.6 months, 95% CI: 7.9, 9.5) and ≥ 70 years (7.9 months, 95% CI: 7.1, 9.5) was similar. OS was 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.5, 10.3) among patients 70-74 years, 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.6, 9.3) among patients 75-79 years, and 7.9 months (95% CI: 6.3, 10.3) among patients ≥ 80 years. OS was lower among patients 75-79 years compared with patients 70-74 years (P=0.04). Compared with patients <70 years, patients ≥ 70 years experienced similar rates of myelosuppresion, but younger patients experienced more vomiting and nausea. There was no clear pattern with respect to differences in efficacy by treatments across age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the similarity of patient outcomes across age groups, doublet chemotherapy is feasible among carefully selected elderly patients with good PS.

Efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in elderly cancer patients: results of an integrated analysis

PURPOSE

To analyze pemetrexed in elderly patients (>or=65 years) based on data collected in three randomized, phase III registration trials.

METHODS

Patients who received pemetrexed as monotherapy or in combination with another drug were included in this analysis (N=764). In all studies, pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) was administered every 21 days. Data from patients receiving pemetrexed were stratified by age +/-65 years.

RESULTS

Out of the 764 patients randomized, 271 were >or=65 years of age (35.4%). Of these, 28% had non-small cell lung cancer, 41% pancreatic cancer, and 31% had malignant pleural mesothelioma that was either locally advanced or metastatic. The overall response rate of the integrated database of elderly patients was 21.4%, with complete response in three patients (1.11% in >or=65 years vs. 1.01% in <65 years), partial response in 55 (20.30% vs. 19.68%), and stable disease in 116 (42.80% vs. 43.00%). Median survival time was 8.34 months in both groups, and median time to progressive disease was 4.80 months versus 4.60. Toxicity observed in the elderly group included 70 patients (25.8% vs. 17.0%; p=0.005) with grade 4 toxicity; myelosuppression was the major toxicity, with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 33% versus 22% (p<0.05), and thrombocytopenia in 13% versus 6% (p<0.05). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 4.8% versus 4.7% of patients. Non-hematological grade 3/4 events were fatigue (10.3% vs. 9.5%) and nausea (6.3% vs. 6.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed produced similar treatment effects in older and younger patients, and appeared to be well tolerated in the elderly population. This analysis was limited by the pooling of different disease types and the lack of uniform treatment regimens.

Insight into the treatment of cancer in older patients: Developments in the last decade

In the last decades there has been an increased interest in the treatment of elderly cancer patients and a change in attitude of both clinicians and their patients has occurred. Drugs are now available that might be considered "elderly-friendly" and the enormous advances in surgical procedures and supportive treatments over the recent years have enabled adverse effects to be minimized. A Geriatric Assessment is increasingly used as a tool to define those patients who are more suitable for aggressive chemotherapy or, on the contrary, palliative treatment. For almost all cancers, older patients are better treated today than they were in the past, even though we are still far from optimal management. Despite the perceived barriers to including elderly patients in clinical trials, there are few data to support excluding them. We must not permit increased age in cancer patients to continue to be an important and independent risk factor for receiving inadequate care.

Stage at diagnosis is a key explanation of differences in breast cancer survival across Europe

We used multiple regression models to assess the influence of disease stage at diagnosis on the 5-year relative survival of 4,478 patients diagnosed with breast cancer in 1990-1992. The cases were representative samples from 17 population-based cancer registries in 6 European countries (Estonia, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain and UK) that were combined into 9 regional groups based on similar survival. Five-year relative survival was 79% overall, varying from 98% for early, node-negative (T1N0M0) tumours; 87% for large, node-negative (T2-3N0M0) tumours; 76% for node-positive (T1-3N+M0) tumours and 55% for locally advanced (T4NxM0) tumours to 18% for metastatic (M1) tumours and 69% for tumours of unspecified stage. There was considerable variation across Europe in relative survival within each disease stage, but this was least marked for early node-negative tumours. Overall 5-year relative survival was highest in the French group of Bas-Rhin, Côte d'Or, Hérault and Isère (86%), and lowest in Estonia (66%). These geographic groups were characterised by the highest and lowest percentages of women with early stage disease (T1N0M0: 39% and 9%, respectively). The French, Dutch and Italian groups had the highest percentage of operated cases. The number of axillary nodes examined, a factor influencing nodal status, was highest in Italy and Spain. After adjusting for TNM stage and the number of nodes examined, survival differences were greatly reduced, indicating that for these women, diagnosed with breast cancer in Europe during 1990-1992, the survival differences were mainly due to differences in stage at diagnosis. However, in 3 regional groups, the relative risks of death remained high even after these adjustments, suggesting less than optimal treatment. Screening for breast cancer did not seem to affect the survival patterns once stage had been taken into account.

The use of surgery to treat lung cancer in elderly patients

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death and its cure depends on an adequate surgical approach. More than half of all lung cancers are diagnosed in patients aged 65 years or over. However, surgical risk increases in patients over 65 years old. Therefore, surgical procedures for lung cancer are far less frequent in elderly patients. Many clinicians avoid surgery, or minimise surgical procedures on the basis of age but recent advances in preoperative risk assessment and surgical and anaesthetic techniques have resulted in a significant decrease in operative mortality and morbidity for older patients. The treatment of lung cancer in elderly patients should no longer be based on the premise that surgery is too risky for elderly patients. Every effort should be made to assess risk and optimise treatment for this large and expanding proportion of the population.

Prostate cancer in Italy before and during the 'PSA era': survival trend and prognostic determinants

The aim of the study was to investigate the variations in prostate cancer prognosis during a period of major diagnostic change, such as the introduction of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Data were provided by 14 Italian cancer registries (CRs). Incidence and follow-up information was collected for patients diagnosed from 1978 to 1994. Relative survival was computed taking into account incidence period, age, tumour stage and grade at diagnosis. A multivariate analysis was carried out to evaluate the independent simultaneous effect on survival of some prognostic determinants. A large geographical variability was observed: in 1993-1994 Italian survival rates ranged from 76% to 52%, with a north-south gradient. A striking prognostic improvement (up to +27 percentage points) between the late 1980s and the early 1990s occurred in almost all CRs, particularly with regard to younger patients. Multivariate analysis showed a strong influence of incidence period on survival, also after correction by tumour stage. The slowdown of metastatic cancers suggests that the survival improvement could be due both to the introduction of an effective opportunistic screening and to a quantitative change in the application of clinical treatment, even if the effect of the lead-time bias phenomenon has to be taken into account.

Does chemotherapy have a role as palliative therapy for unfit or elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer?

Elderly patients and younger "unfit" patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (> or = 2) suffering from advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are two different populations--both of which require palliative treatments. Elderly patients frequently experience progressive decline of organ function and multiple comorbidities, which need to be considered when choosing therapy. ECOG 1594 showed that advanced NSCLC patients with an ECOG PS of 2 did not tolerate platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin/paclitaxel, carboplatin/paclitaxel, cisplatin/docetaxel, carboplatin/paclitaxel). These data confirm that treatments designed specifically for this patient subset are needed. Single-agent chemotherapy seems to be a reasonable approach, and non-platinum-based combination chemotherapy should also be investigated. The oncology community has become increasingly aware of the magnitude of the problem of cancer in the elderly. More than 30% of lung cancers arise in patients > or = 70 years old. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly, according to the few published papers, and are not considered eligible for aggressive cisplatin-based chemotherapy in clinical practice. A phase III randomized trial (ELVIS [Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study]) demonstrated survival and quality-of-life benefits with single-agent vinorelbine versus best supportive care. Among the newer drugs, gemcitabine has demonstrated activity and low toxicity in phase II studies. With this background, we performed a randomized, multicenter phase III trial (MILES [Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study]) in 707 advanced NSCLC elderly patients. The MILES study compared single-agent chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine versus polychemotherapy with gemcitabine plus vinorelbine. Results showed no benefit in response rate, time to progression, survival, and quality of life for the combination. Single-agent chemotherapy remains the standard treatment approach for elderly NSCLC patients with advanced disease.

Estudo comparativo dos fatores prognósticos entre os pacientes com maior e menor sobrevida em portadores de carcinoma broncogênico

Apesar dos avanços no tratamento, há pouca melhora na sobrevida dos pacientes com câncer do pulmão. Atualmente, é importante o conhecimento dos fatores que intervêm na sobrevida. Objetivos: Verificar possíveis diferenças de fatores prognósticos em duas populações de pacientes com câncer de pulmão, uma com pequena sobrevida (menos de seis meses) e outra com maior sobrevida (acima de 24 meses). Métodos: De 1997 a 1999 foram estudados 52 pacientes com diagnóstico histopatológico de carcinoma homogênico, sendo colhidos dados demográficos, clínicos, paramétricos, hábitos tabágicos, índice de Karnofsky, estadiamento da doença e dosagem laboratorial de desidrogenase lática, fosfatase alcalina, antígeno carcinoembrionário e cálcio. Resultados: 29 pacientes tiveram sobrevida menor do que seis meses e 23, superior a 24 meses. Os três fatores mais importantes que influenciaram o tempo curto de sobrevida foram baixo índice de Karnofsky inicial, redução do apetite e alto nível sérico de DHL. Conclusão: Os três componentes do prognóstico são o estado físico atual, o estado físico prévio e o estado atual da doença.

Individualized chemotherapy for elderly patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer

Approximately one third of all patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are over the age of seventy. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly because of impaired organ function and comorbidities. For this reason, these patients are often not considered eligible for aggressive cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A multidimensional geriatric evaluation is important to plan appropriate treatments. At present, there are no indications for adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Combined chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced disease increases toxicity and seems determine no survival advantage as compared with radiation therapy alone. In advanced disease, single-agent vinorelbine proves to be active and well-tolerated, and compared with best supportive care, improves survival and perhaps quality of life. Gemcitabine is active and also well tolerated. Taxanes are in advanced phase of evaluation. A phase III randomized trial showed that polychemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine does not improve any outcome as compared with single-agent chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine. In clinical practice, single-agent chemotherapy should remain the standard treatment. The choice of the drug should be based on the toxicity profile of each drug and type of comorbid conditions. In the near future, new therapeutic strategies and biologic agents could improve present results.

Differences in stage and therapy for breast cancer across Europe

We examined variations in stage, diagnostic workup and therapy for breast cancer across Europe. Seventeen cancer registries in six European countries contributed 4,480 cases diagnosed in 1990-91. The clinical records of these cases were examined, and the distribution of stage, diagnostic examinations and therapy were analyzed. Stage was earliest in the French registries, followed by those of Italy and Eindhoven (Netherlands). The proportion of stage I cancers was highest in the French areas with screening in place. Estonia, the English registries and Granada (Spain) had the most advanced stage at diagnosis. Use of liver ultrasonography varied from 84% (Italian registries) to 18% (Granada). Bone scan use varied from 81% (Italian registries) to 15% (Mersey, UK). The highest proportions treated by breast-conserving surgery were in the French (57%) and English registries (63%); the lowest were in Estonia (6%) and Granada (11%). The highest proportions of Halsted mastectomies were in Italy (19%) and Granada (8%). In all countries except England, 90% of operations included axillary lymphadenectomy. Medical treatment only was given to 8% of (mostly advanced) cases overall. Estonia (21%) and the English registries (14%) had the highest proportions of patients given medication only. Chemotherapy was given to low proportions of node-positive cases in the Italian (76%) and English (74%) areas; breast-conserving surgery for stage I tumors varied from 24% in Granada to 84% in England. These wide differences in breast cancer care across Europe in the early 1990s indicate a need for continual monitoring of past treatments to help ensure application of the most effective protocols.

Activity and toxicity of gemcitabine and gemcitabine + vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer elderly patients: Phase II data from the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Following the demonstration that vinorelbine improves survival and quality of life compared with best supportive care in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we started the three-arm prospective Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) trial of vinorelbine, gemcitabine and gemcitabine + vinorelbine.

DESIGN

Within the randomized phase 3 trial, pilot single-stage phase 2 studies were planned for gemcitabine and for gemcitabine + vinorelbine. Eligible patients are aged 70 or more, with stage IV or IIIb (with metastatic supraclavear nodes or malignant pleural effusion) NSCLC. Single-agent gemcitabine is given at 1200 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8; in the combination, gemcitabine is given at 1000 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine at 25 mg/m(2), both on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

As planned 49 patients were enrolled in each group. Median age was 74 in both groups. Two-thirds of patients had stage IV disease. The response rate was 18.4% (95% exact CI 8.8-32.0) with both treatments. With single-agent gemcitabine main toxicities were grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 2 hepatic toxicity, in one patient each, and grade 2 pulmonary toxicity in two patients. With gemcitabine + vinorelbine combination there were grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (one patient each), grade 3 anemia requiring red blood cell transfusion (two patients), and grade 4 fever in two patients. Four patients, with severe cardiac comorbidities, suffered grade 3 heart toxicity with atrial flutter or fibrillation, followed by congestive heart failure responsive to treatment.

CONCLUSION

Both single-agent gemcitabine and the gemcitabine + vinorelbine combination are sufficiently active and tolerable to allow continuation of the MILES study.

Chemotherapy of advanced non small cell lung cancer in the elderly: an update

In the last years there has been a growing awareness in the oncological community about the size of the problem of cancer in the elderly. More than 30% of lung cancers arise in patients aged 70 years or more. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly and are not considered eligible for aggressive cisplatin based chemotherapy in clinical practice. A few papers have been published on chemotherapy of elderly NSCLC patients. Cisplatin based chemotherapy seems to be tolerated poorly. Vinorelbine as a single agent showed active and good tolerance. A phase III randomized trial, named ELVIS (Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study), showed a survival and quality of life benefit of vinorelbine versus supportive care. Among the new drugs gemcitabine can be considered more promising. Future trials should attempt to improve the results of vinorelbine chemotherapy and include geriatric and quality of life evaluations.

Epidemiology of major age-related diseases in women compared to men

Many observations indicate that women have a longer life expectancy than men. Population-based studies report that mortality and morbidity are higher in men than in women. The gender difference is constant in cardiovascular disease, cancer and dementia, the more frequent diseases in industrialized countries; these chronic conditions strongly influence longevity and quality of life in old persons. Biological, behavioral and environmental factors emerge as major contributors to the difference in mortality, morbidity and case fatality. However, the causes of gender differences remain poorly understood.

[Multiple primary neoplasms in colorectal cancer patients]

INTRODUCTION

Multiple primary neoplasms are defined as a second malignance having histology and site different from the first. The increase of the life expectation in cancer patients leads to an increase in multiple primary neoplasms incidence. This study analyzes the characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer and another primary neoplasms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the period from 1993 to 1998, 145 patients with colorectal cancer were accompanied in the Oncology Division of Gastroenterology of Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Five patients (3.4%) had multiple primary neoplasms. The possibility of metastasis were excluded and the second cancer was confirmed by hystological examination.

RESULTS

The medium age was of 60.6 years old, four were female and one male. Three had rectum cancer and two colon cancer, one in the right colon and one in the left colon. The other site of cancer was breast, uterus, uterus and vagina, skin and lip. One patient died and the others were in attendance, two for more than three years. Two patients received pelvic radiotherapy before the rectal cancer. In one patient the tumor colorectal cancer appeared before the other cancer, and in four it appeared later on to the diagnosis of the other primary neoplasia.

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of multiple primary neoplasms was of 3.4%, being major in female. Uterus' cancer was the more frequent association. Radiotherapy was performed in 40% of patients. We believe that attendance of cancer patients is very important to precocious diagnosis and treatment of multiple primary neoplasms.

Relative survival in elderly cancer patients in Europe. EUROCARE Working Group

In this paper different patterns of survival by age and gender are presented for 17 European countries which participated in the EUROCARE II programme. Survival data were available for 701,521 patients aged between 65 and 99 years from 44 population-based cancer registries. Age-standardised relative survival rates at 1 and 5 years from diagnosis were computed. Relative risks (RRs) of death for those aged between 65 and 99 years compared with those aged between 55 and 64 years were estimated by gender and country. In general, the elderly had a large survival disadvantage, particularly 1 year after diagnosis and in women. Poorer survival rates in the elderly were observed for patients from Eastern European countries for almost all sites. However, relative survival of the elderly with respect to younger patients was similar in the different geographic areas. The results are in agreement with other population-based studies, confirming a worse prognosis for the elderly in both sexes. This may be explained by changes in biology and the natural history of the tumour and the occurrence of severe comorbidities, potentially affecting preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. The lack of equality in providing adequate treatment to elderly cancer patients should be addressed as a matter of urgency by health-care providers.