Longitudinal analysis of anti-drug antibody development in multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta-1a (Rebif™) using B cell receptor repertoire analysis

A significant proportion of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon beta-1a (Rebif™) develop anti-drug antibodies (ADA) with a negative impact on treatment efficacy. We hypothesized that high-throughput B-cell receptor (BCR) repertoire analysis could be used to predict and monitor ADA development. To study this we analyzed 228 peripheral blood samples from 68 longitudinally followed patients starting on interferon beta-1a. Our results show that whole blood BCR analysis does not reflect, and does not predict ADA development in MS patients treated with interferon beta-1a. We propose that BCR analysis of phenotypically selected cell subsets or tissues might be more informative.

Antidrug Antibodies Against Biological Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis

The development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) is a major problem in several recombinant protein therapies used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The etiology of ADAs is multifaceted. The predisposition for a breakdown of immune tolerance is probably genetically determined, and many factors may contribute to the immunogenicity, including structural properties, formation of aggregates, and presence of contaminants and impurities from the industrial manufacturing process. ADAs may have a neutralizing capacity and can reduce or abrogate the bioactivity and therapeutic efficacy of the drug and cause safety issues. Interferon (IFN)-β was the first drug approved for the treatment of MS, and-although it is generally recognized that neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) appear and potentially have a negative effect on therapeutic efficacy-the use of routine measurements of NAbs and the interpretation of the presence of NAbs has been debated at length. NAbs appear after 9-18 months of therapy in up to 40% of patients treated with IFNβ, and the frequency and titers of NAbs depend on the IFNβ preparation. Although all pivotal clinical trials of approved IFNβ products in MS exhibited a detrimental effect of NAbs after prolonged therapy, some subsequent studies did not observe clinical effects from NAbs, which led to the claim that NAbs did not matter. However, it is now largely agreed that persistently high titers of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, an absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. Low and medium titers are ambiguous, and treatment decisions should be guided by determination of in vivo messenger RNA myxovirus resistance protein A induction after IFNβ administration and clinical disease activity. During treatment with glatiramer acetate, ADAs occur frequently but do not appear to adversely affect treatment efficacy or result in adverse events. ADAs occur in approximately 5% of patients treated with natalizumab within 6 months of therapy, and persistent NAbs are associated with a lack of efficacy and acute infusion-related reactions and should instigate a change of therapy. When using the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies ocrelizumab and ofatumumab in the treatment of MS, it is not necessary to test for NAbs as these occur very infrequently. Alemtuzumab is immunogenic, but routine measurements of ADAs are not recommended as the antibodies in the pivotal 2-year trials at the population level did not influence lymphocyte depletion or repopulation, efficacy, or safety. However, in some individuals, NAbs led to poor lymphocyte depletion.

Protein aggregation and immunogenicity of biotherapeutics

Recombinant proteins are the mainstay of biopharmaceuticals. A key challenge in the manufacturing and formulation of protein biologic products is the tendency for the active pharmaceutical ingredients to aggregate, resulting in irreversible drug loss, and an increase in immunogenicity risk. While the molecular mechanisms of protein aggregation have been discussed extensively in the literature, knowledge gaps remain in connecting the phenomenon in the context of immunogenicity of biotherapeutics. In this review, we discussed factors that drive aggregation of pharmaceutical recombinant proteins, and highlighted methods of prediction and mitigation that can be deployed through the development stages, from formulation to bioproduction. The purpose is to stimulate new dialogs that would bridge the interface between physical characterizations of protein aggregates in biotherapeutics and the functional attributes of the immune system.

Long-term efficacy and safety of intramuscular interferon beta-1a: Randomized postmarketing trial of two dosing regimens in Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 years of treatment with intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IM IFN beta-1a) in Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, with an exploratory analysis of the impact of initial dose titration on tolerability.

METHODS

Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were randomized to receive IM IFN beta-1a at dosages of either 30mcg once weekly (full-dose group, n=50) or 15mcg once weekly for 2 weeks then 30mcg once weekly thereafter (titration group, n=50). Key outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR) at 2 years (primary endpoint), change in disability measured using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), safety, and tolerability.

RESULTS

The ARR (95% CI) decreased from 1.540 (1.381-1.718) at baseline to 0.371 (0.240-0.571) at Year 1 and 0.351 (0.244-0.503) at Year 2. EDSS improvements were apparent from Week 24; the mean change from baseline EDSS score (2.1) at Year 2 was -0.34 (P=0.004). The most frequently reported adverse events were influenza-like illness (92%), nasopharyngitis (57%), relapse of multiple sclerosis (51%), and injection-site reaction (30%). The overall incidence and severity of influenza-like symptoms were similar in the full-dose group and titration group; only 1 participant, in the full-dose group (2%), experienced severe influenza-like symptoms. However, the incidence of influenza-like symptoms was slightly reduced at earlier timepoints in the titration group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this 2-year study demonstrate that IM IFN beta-1a can be used effectively and safely in Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis for an extended period of time.

Registers of multiple sclerosis in Denmark

There are two nationwide population-based registers for multiple sclerosis (MS) in Denmark. The oldest register is The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry (DMSR), which is an epidemiological register for estimation of prevalence and incidence of MS and survival, and for identifying exposures earlier in life that may affect the risk of MS. This register has no systematic follow-up data except for survival. The DMSR has over the years published nationwide incidence- and prevalence data from Denmark and has been involved in a number of 'historical prospective' studies to elucidate the association between a number of different environmental exposures in the past and the subsequent risk of MS. Some of these studies have been able to exonerate suspected risk factors. The other register, the nationwide Danish Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Register, is a follow-up register for all patients who have received disease-modifying treatments since 1996. It has, in particular, contributed to the knowledge of the role of antibodies against the biological drugs used for the treatment of MS.

Correlation between anti-interferon-β binding and neutralizing antibodies in interferon-β-treated multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Measurements of binding antibodies (BAbs), neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and MX1 mRNA expression are used to analyse the immunological reactions in patients with MS treated with IFN-β. The correlations between these are yet not fully understood.

METHODS

We measured BAbs and NAbs to IFN-β in 110 serum samples from 83 patients with MS treated with IFN-β, and in a subgroup, antibody titre was compared with corresponding expressions of MX1 mRNA. The methods used were capture ELISA assay, luciferase reporter gene assay and mRNA RT-PCR for MX1 gene expression.

RESULTS

There were significant correlations between binding, neutralizing and MX1 results. Cut-off values are suggested for the definition of samples of BAbs and NAbs as negative, positive and grey zones. Naturally occurring groups of low and high antibody titres were identified by the correlation between BAbs and NAbs, probably as a result of an immunological maturation process of antibodies. The low-titre group had lower correlations between BAbs and NAbs than the high-titre group.

CONCLUSIONS

High correlation is demonstrated between the results obtained by the three methods, and we suggest the possibility of using ELISA measurements of BAbs to identify patients with high titres of anti-IFN-β antibodies that block the biological response to IFN-β. Ιn patients with low titres, we suggest to supplement ELISA with measurement of MX1 mRNA to establish whether the bioavailability of IFN-β is preserved.

Neutralizing antibodies against interferon-Beta

The development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) is a major problem in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with interferon-beta (IFN-ß). Whereas binding antibodies (BAbs) can be demonstrated in the vast majority of patients, only a smaller proportion of patients develop NAbs. The principle in NAb in vitro assays is the utilization of cultured cell lines that are responsive to IFN-ß. The cytopathic effect (CPE) assay measures the capacity of NAbs to neutralize IFN- ß's protective effect on cells challenged with virus and the MxA induction assay measures the ability of NAbs to reduce the IFN-ß-induced expression of MxA, either at the mRNA or the protein level. A titer of >20 neutralizing units/ml traditionally defines NAb posi-tivity. NAbs in high titers completely abrogate the in vivo response to IFN-ß, whereas the effect of low and intermediate titers is unpredictable. As clinically important NAbs appear only after 9-18 months IFN- ß0 therapy, short-term studies of two years or less are unsuitable for evaluation of clinical NAb effects. All long-term trials of three years or more concordantly show evidence of a detrimental effect of NAbs on relapses, disease activity on MRI, or on disease progression. Persistent high titers of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. As low and medium titers are ambiguous treatment decisions in patients with low NAb titres should be guided by determination of in vivo mRNA MxA induction and clinical disease activity.

On the role of aggregates in the immunogenicity of recombinant human interferon beta in patients with multiple sclerosis

Like many other therapeutic proteins, recombinant human interferon beta (rhIFN-β) elicits undesirable immune responses. rhIFN-β-treated multiple sclerosis patients may form binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), with the latter being responsible for inhibition of the therapeutic effect of the protein. The incidence of binding antibodies and NAbs against rhIFN-β as well as the titer and persistence of NAbs differ among the marketed products. The proportion of patients forming antibodies against rhIFN-β-1b is higher than that against rhIFN-β-1a, which is likely explained by the differences in protein structure and aggregation behavior between the 2 types of rhIFN-β. Here, we summarize the different factors influencing the immunogenicity of rhIFN-β in patients with multiple sclerosis and discuss the role played by rhIFN-β aggregates.

Aggregated recombinant human interferon Beta induces antibodies but no memory in immune-tolerant transgenic mice

Purpose

To study the influence of protein aggregation on the immunogenicity of recombinant human interferon beta (rhIFNβ) in wild-type mice and transgenic, immune-tolerant mice, and to evaluate the induction of immunological memory.

Methods

RhIFNβ-1b and three rhIFNβ-1a preparations with different aggregate levels were injected intraperitoneally in mice 15× during 3 weeks, and the mice were rechallenged with rhIFNβ-1a. The formation of binding (BABs) and neutralizing antibodies (NABs) was monitored.

Results

Bulk rhIFNβ-1a contained large, mainly non-covalent aggregates and stressed rhIFNβ-1a mainly covalent, homogeneous (ca. 100 nm) aggregates. Reformulated rhIFNβ-1a was essentially aggregate-free. All products induced BABs and NABs in wild-type mice. Immunogenicity in the transgenic mice was product dependent. RhIFNβ-1b showed the highest and reformulated rhIFNβ-1a the lowest immunogenicity. In contrast with wild-type mice, transgenic mice did not show NABs, nor did they respond to the rechallenge.

Conclusions

The immunogenicity of the products in transgenic mice, unlike in wild-type mice, varied. In the transgenic mice, neither NABs nor immunological memory developed. The immunogenicity of rhIFNβ in a model reflecting the human immune system depends on the presence and the characteristics of aggregates.

Neutralizing antibodies explain the poor clinical response to interferon beta in a small proportion of patients with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study

Background

Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against Interferon beta (IFNβ) are reported to be associated with poor clinical response to therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. We aimed to quantify the contribution of NAbs to the sub-optimal response of IFNβ treatment.

Methods

We studied the prevalence of NAbs in MS patients grouped according to their clinical response to IFNβ during the treatment period. Patients were classified as: group A, developing ≥ 1 relapse after the first 6 months of therapy; group B, exhibiting confirmed disability progression after the first 6 months of therapy, with or without superimposed relapses; group C, presenting a stable disease course during therapy. A cytopathic effect assay tested the presence of NAbs in a cohort of ambulatory MS patients treated with one of the available IFNβ formulations for at least one year. NAbs positivity was defined as NAbs titre ≥ 20 TRU.

Results

Seventeen patients (12.1%) were NAbs positive. NAbs positivity correlated with poorer clinical response (p < 0.04). As expected, the prevalence of NAbs was significantly lower in Group C (2.1%) than in Group A (17.0%) and Group B (17.0%). However, in the groups of patients with a poor clinical response (A, B), NAbs positivity was found only in a small proportion of patients.

Conclusion

The majority of patients with poor clinical response are NAbs negative suggesting that NAbs explains only partially the sub-optimal response to IFNβ.

The clinical effect of neutralizing antibodies against interferon-beta is independent of the type of interferon-beta used for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Objective

To establish whether the clinical effect of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against interferon-beta (IFNβ) depends on the type of IFNβ (1a or 1b) used for treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS).

Introduction

NAbs against IFNβ-1b appear faster and may be more evenly distributed on IgG subclasses, whereas NAbs against IFNβ-1a develop more slowly and may be devoid of IgG3. This might cause different clinical responses to NAbs.

Design/patients

All Danish MS-patients who had started first-time treatment with IFNβ-1a 22 μg s.c tiw (Rebif22) or IFNβ-1b 250 μg s.c. qod (Betaferon) before January 1st 2003 were included. Relapses were recorded at bi-annual visit.

Methods

We measured NAbs every 12 months using a clinically validated cytopathic effect assay. A blood sample with a neutralizing capacity of 20% or more was considered as NAb-positive. We used a mixed logistic regression analysis in which NAb-status (three levels), IFNβ-preparation, and time since treatment started were included as explanatory variables, and relapse rate as response variable.

Results

In 1,309 patients, who were observed for 21,958 months, 32.3% were classified as NAb-positive. The odds-ratio (OR) for relapses in NAb-positive months compared with NAb-negative months was 1.25; P = 0.02. The risk of relapses was higher with Betaferon than with Rebif22 (OR 1.26; P < 0.01). The effect of NAb-level on relapses was independent of whether the patients were treated with Betaferon or Rebif22 ( P = 0.89) and of time ( P = 0.80).

Conclusion

NAbs caused by IFNβ-1a s.c. do not differ from NAbs caused by IFNβ-1b in their detrimental clinical effect.

Treatment with azathioprine and cyclic methylprednisolone has little or no effect on bioactivity in anti-interferon beta antibody-positive patients with multiple sclerosis

Background

It is unknown whether immunosuppression of patients who have developed interferon-β (IFN-β) neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) hastens disappearance of NAbs in the blood.

Objective

We wanted to test whether immunosuppression with cyclic methylprednisolone (MP) in combination with azathioprine (AZA) for 6 months accelerates recovery of IFN-β bioactivity in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with abolished in-vivo myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) mRNA response to IFN-β.

Methods

We included 13 patients with MS with NAbs and a low IFN-β bioavailability detected by the MxA-mRNA response in a descriptive, non-randomized trial. Another 14 NAb-positive patients with a low MxA-mRNA response served as controls. The primary outcome was the fraction of patients who regained an MxA-mRNA response to IFN-β. NAbs were measured by means of a clinically validated cytopathic effect assay and a new reporter gene assay. The in-vivo MxA-mRNA response was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Results

A total of 11 patients in the treatment group completed the trial. In all, two of these 11 patients regained an in-vivo MxA-mRNA response as compared to one of 14 patients in the control group.

Conclusion

Treatment with AZA and cyclic MP for 6 months has little or no effect on IFN-β bioactivity in NAb-positive patients with MS.