Current Strategies for the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and neuromodulation techniques: a systematic review of progress and prospects

Neuromodulation for diabetic peripheral neuropathy represents a significant area of interest in the management of chronic pain associated with this condition. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, a common complication of diabetes, is characterized by nerve damage due to high blood sugar levels that lead to symptoms, such as pain, tingling, and numbness, primarily in the hands and feet. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of neuromodulatory techniques as potential therapeutic interventions for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, while also examining recent developments in this domain. The investigation encompassed an array of neuromodulation methods, including frequency rhythmic electrical modulated systems, dorsal root ganglion stimulation, and spinal cord stimulation. This systematic review suggests that neuromodulatory techniques may be useful in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Understanding the advantages of these treatments will enable physicians and other healthcare providers to offer additional options for patients with symptoms refractory to standard pharmacologic treatments. Through these efforts, we may improve quality of life and increase functional capacity in patients suffering from complications related to diabetic neuropathy.

Long-term efficacy of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation in managing painful diabetic neuropathy: A post-study survey

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the longer-term efficacy of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in managing painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) in a routine clinical setting after the transition from the 24-month SENZA-PDN study.

METHODS

We contacted 142 participants who completed 24 months of postimplantation follow-up in the former randomized controlled trial (SENZA-PDN). Of these, 57 consented and responded to this longer-term post-study survey. Outcomes assessed included pain relief, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured using the EuroQol 5-Dimensional 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), HbA1c, and weight.

RESULTS

Our survey captured patient-reported outcomes at a median of 4.1 years after implantation of a permanent 10 kHz SCS system. Among the surveyed participants, 76.8% (43 of 56) reported clinically meaningful pain relief (≥2 points), and 84.6% (44 of 52) achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in their EQ-5D-5L index score, with a final mean EQ-5D-5L index score of 0.825. Additionally, 74.5% (38 of 51) reported being "Better" or "A great deal better" on the PGIC scale. The surveyed participants reported a mean HbA1c level decrease of 0.4% (p = 0.027), with a more substantial improvement of 1.6% (p < 0.001) among those with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and a higher preimplantation HbA1c (>8%). Significant weight loss was also observed, with a mean reduction of 7.0 kg (p < 0.001) in the overall cohort and 8.7 kg (p < 0.001) in the subgroup with T2D and a higher BMI at preimplantation (≥35 kg/m2).

CONCLUSIONS

High-frequency SCS at 10 kHz provided sustained and clinically meaningful improvements in pain and HRQoL for PDN patients at 4.1 years postimplantation, with no explants in the cohort due to inefficacy. Alongside these benefits, participants experienced metabolic changes that included reductions in body weight and HbA1c beyond that achieved at 24 months, although changes in lifestyle and medication were not accounted for in this analysis. Notably, the cohort's final mean EQ-5D-5L index score was comparable to the US norm. These findings support 10 kHz SCS as a durable and effective treatment option for PDN in routine clinical practice.

Comparative analysis of the therapeutic effects of pregabalin, gabapentin, and duloxetine in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the effects of pregabalin, gabapentin, and duloxetine on diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) to guide tailored treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 180 patients with type 2 diabetes and DPN were matched 1:1:1 across three groups based on HbA1c and age, resulting in 60 patients per group. Clinical data were collected, and the painDETECT score was used to evaluate treatment response over six weeks.

RESULTS

After six weeks, the gabapentin group had significantly higher pain scores than the pregabalin (P = 0.002) and duloxetine groups (P < 0.001). The pregabalin group's scores were higher than the duloxetine group's, but not significantly (P = 0.62). Side effects were more frequent with duloxetine (23.3 %) compared to gabapentin (1.7 %) and pregabalin (6.7 %) (P = 0.001). Among those with over 50 % improvement, mean HbA1c levels were 9.42 for gabapentin, 10.43 for pregabalin, and 7.72 for duloxetine. Duloxetine significantly lowered HbA1c compared to gabapentin (P = 0.001) and pregabalin (P = 0.001), with no significant difference between gabapentin and pregabalin (P = 0.45).

CONCLUSION

Duloxetine and pregabalin effectively treat DPN. Gabapentin and pregabalin are suitable for patients with HbA1c over 8.7, while duloxetine is better for those with well-controlled HbA1c. Treatment should consider side effects, adherence, costs, and response time.

LEVEL OF THE EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective cohort study.

Can Spinal Cord Stimulation be Considered as a Frontier for Chronic Pain in Diabetic Foot?

Chronic pain in the diabetic foot (DF) is a common complication of diabetes, bringing a significant burden to patients, their families, and even society. There is no very effective treatment for it, traditional treatments such as medication, lumbar sympathetic nerve block, and alternative therapies are often not very effective and have more adverse effects. The emergence of neuromodulation technology has brought new hope for the treatment of DF, among which spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a hotspot in current research and has achieved remarkable efficacy in the study of DF treatment by blocking pain signaling and improving circulation and other mechanisms. This article reviews the SCS technique and clinical trails of SCS for chronic DF pain, and describes the prospects and current challenges of SCS.

Association between lipoprotein(a) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a known cardiovascular risk factor, has been hypothesized to influence the development of DPN. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the relationship between Lp(a) levels and DPN in patients with T2D.

METHODS

Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI databases was performed up to October 12, 2024. Observational studies assessing blood Lp(a) levels in T2D patients with and without DPN or evaluating the association between Lp(a) and DPN risk were included. Data synthesis utilized a random-effects model to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eleven studies with 18,022 patients were included. Patients with DPN had significantly higher Lp(a) levels than those without DPN (SMD: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02-0.19, p = 0.01; I² = 43%). High Lp(a) levels were associated with DPN (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.07-1.60, p = 0.009; I² = 62%). Subgroup analyses according to study design, mean age of the patients, methods for measuring Lp(a) concentration, cutoff values of a high Lp(a), and study quality scores showed consistent results (p for subgroup difference all > 0.05). A high Lp(a) was associated with DPN in studies from Asian countries, but not in those from European countries (p for subgroup difference = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Elevated Lp(a) levels are associated DPN in T2D patients, particularly in studies from Asian countries.

Causal relationship between dyslipidemia and diabetic neuropathy: a mendelian randomization study

Some studies have shown an association between dyslipidemia and diabetic neuropathy (DN), but the genetic association has not been clarified. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the genetic causal association between dyslipidemia and DN through a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Genetic causal associations between total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) and DN were investigated by MR to provide a basis for the prevention and treatment of DN. Significant and independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified in genome-wide association studies were selected as instrumental variables (IVs) for MR analysis. Inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR‒Egger regression, weighted median (WME), simple mode (SM), and weighted mode (WM) methods were used to analyze causal associations. Heterogeneity and multiplicity tests were also performed and analyzed using the leave-one-out method to assess the stability of the results. Genetically predicted TC and DN (OR = 0.793, 95% CI = 0.655⁓0.961, P = 0.019) and LDL and DN (OR = 0.842, 95% CI = 0.711⁓0.998, P = 0.049) may be causally associated, but no causal associations were found between TG and DN (OR = 0.837, 95% CI = 0.631⁓1.111, P = 0.221) or between HDL and DN (OR = 1.192, 95% CI = 0.940⁓1.510, P = 0.149). TC and LDL may have genetic causal associations with DN, though no genetic causal associations were found for TG or HDL with DN. However, this study may have several limitations, and further clinical studies are needed to expand the sample size for future validation.

Analysis of risk factors for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy and construction of a prediction model based on Lasso regression

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) in patients with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in Hunan Province, and establish and verify the prediction model.

Methods

This was a retrospective study involving 4908 patients, all patients were randomly divided into the training dataset(3436 cases)and the validation dataset (1472 cases) in a ratio of 7:3. Electroneurogram, clinical signs,and symptoms were used to evaluate neuropathy. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to select the optimal factors, and multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to build a clinical prediction model. Calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), and subject work characteristic curves (ROC) were used to assess the predictive effects.

Result

The prevalence of PDPN was 33.2%, and the multivariate logistic regression model showed that peripheral artery disease, duration of diabetes, smoking, and HBA1c were independent risk factors for PDPN in patients with type 2 diabetes. ROC analysis results showed that the AUC of the established prediction model was 0.872 in the training dataset and 0.843 in the validation dataset. The calibration curve and decision curve show that the model has good consistency and significant net benefit.

Conclusion

33.2% of DPN patients had PDPN in Hunan Province, China. Peripheral artery disease, duration of diabetes, smoking, and HBA1c are risk factors for PDPN in patients with type 2 diabetes. The prediction model is based on the above factors, which can well predict the probability of PDPN.

High-Frequency 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Provides Long-term (24-Month) Improvements in Diabetes-Related Pain and Quality of Life for Patients with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

BACKGROUND

The SENZA-PDN study evaluated high-frequency 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Over 24 months, 10-kHz SCS provided sustained pain relief and improved health-related quality of life. This report presents additional outcomes from the SENZA-PDN study, focusing on diabetes-related pain and quality of life outcomes.

METHODS

The SENZA-PDN study randomized 216 participants with refractory PDN to receive either conventional medical management (CMM) or 10-kHz SCS plus CMM (10-kHz SCS + CMM), allowing crossover after six months if pain relief was insufficient. Postimplantation assessments at 24 months were completed by 142 participants with a permanent 10-kHz SCS implant, comprising 84 initial and 58 crossover recipients. Measures included the Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (BPI-DPN), Diabetes-Related Quality of Life (DQOL), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and treatment satisfaction.

RESULTS

Over 24 months, 10-kHz SCS treatment significantly reduced pain severity by 66.9% (P < .001; BPI-DPN) and pain interference with mood and daily activities by 65.8% (P < .001; BPI-DPN). Significant improvements were also observed in overall DQOL score (P < .001) and GAF score (P < .001), and 91.5% of participants reported satisfaction with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

High-frequency 10-kHz SCS significantly decreased pain severity and provided additional clinically meaningful improvements in DQOL and overall functioning for patients with PDN. The robust and sustained benefits over 24 months, coupled with high participant satisfaction, highlight that 10-kHz SCS is an efficacious and comprehensive therapy for patients with PDN.

Diabetic Neuropathy: A Guide to Pain Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetic neuropathy is a common complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) and can affect up to 50% of DM patients during their lifetime. Patients typically present with numbness, tingling, pain, and loss of sensation in the extremities. Since there is no treatment targeting the underlying mechanism of neuropathy, strategies focus on preventative care and pain management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Up to 69% of patients with diabetic neuropathy receive pharmacological treatment for neuropathic pain. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) confirmed four drugs for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN): pregabalin, duloxetine, tapentadol, and the 8% capsaicin patch. Nonpharmacological treatments such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) both show promise in reducing pain in DM patients. Despite the high burden associated with PDN, effective management remains challenging. This update covers the background and management of diabetic neuropathy, including its epidemiology, pathogenesis, preventative care, and current therapeutic strategies.

The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)®: Updates on Clinical Pharmacology and Comorbidity Management in Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Cancer Pain

INTRODUCTION

The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise with international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on using intrathecal drug delivery in chronic pain treatment. This Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)® project's scope is to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical pharmacology and best practices for intrathecal drug delivery for cancer pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Authors were chosen on the basis of their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Meeting Abstracts, and Scopus from 2017 (when the PACC last published guidelines) to the present. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations were based on the strength of evidence, and when evidence was scant, recommendations were based on expert consensus.

RESULTS

The PACC evaluated the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based expert opinion recommendations to guide best practices in treating cancer pain. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process.

CONCLUSIONS

The PACC recommends best practices regarding the use of intrathecal drug delivery in cancer pain, with an emphasis on managing the unique disease and patient characteristics encountered in oncology. These evidence- and consensus-based expert opinion recommendations should be used as a guide to assist decision-making when clinically appropriate.

Effects of phospholipid type and particle size on lipid nanoparticle distribution in vivo and in pancreatic islets

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have recently been used as nanocarriers in drug delivery systems for nucleic acid drugs. Their practical applications are currently primarily limited to the liver and specific organs. However, altering the type and composition ratio of phospholipids improves their distribution in organs other than the liver, such as the spleen and lungs. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of LNP components and particle size on in vivo distribution through systemic circulation to pancreatic islets to achieve better targeting of islets, which are a fundamental therapeutic target for diabetes. Fluorescence-labeled LNPs were prepared using three phospholipids: 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), and 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE), with particle sizes of 30-160 nm (diameter) using a microfluidic device. Baffled-structured iLiNP devices with adjusted flow-rate ratios and total flow rates were used. After the intravenous administration of LNPs to C57BL/6 J mice, the distribution of each LNP type to the major organs, including the pancreas and pancreatic islets, was compared using ex vivo fluorescence imaging and observation of pancreatic tissue sections. DSPC-LNPs- and DOPE-LNPs showed the highest distribution in the spleen and liver, respectively. In contrast, the DOPC-LNPs showed the highest distribution in the pancreas and the lowest distribution in the liver and spleen. In addition, smaller particles showed better distribution throughout the pancreas. The most significant LNP distribution in the islets was observed for DOPC-LNPs with a particle size of 160 nm. Furthermore, larger LNPs tended to be distributed in the islets, whereas smaller LNPs tended to be distributed in the exocrine glands. DOPC-LNPs were distributed in the islets at all cholesterol concentrations, with a high distribution observed at >40% cholesterol and > 3% PEG and the distribution was higher at 24 h than at 4 h. Thus, LNP composition and particle size significantly affected islet distribution characteristics, indicating that DOPC-LNPs may be a drug delivery system for effectively targeting the pancreas and islets.

Preclinical Evaluation of Sigma 1 Receptor Antagonists as a Novel Treatment for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

The global prevalence of diabetes is steadily rising, with an estimated 537 million adults affected by diabetes in 2021, projected to reach 783 million by 2045. A severe consequence of diabetes is the development of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), afflicting approximately one in every three diabetic patients and significantly compromising their quality of life. Current pharmacotherapies for PDN provide inadequate pain relief for many patients, underscoring the need for novel treatments that are both safe and effective. The Sigma 1 Receptor (S1R) is a ligand-operated chaperone protein that resides at the mitochondria-associated membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. The S1R has been shown to play crucial roles in regulating cellular processes implicated in pain modulation. This study explores the potential of PW507, a novel S1R antagonist, as a therapeutic candidate for PDN. PW507 exhibited promising in vitro and in vivo properties in terms of ADME, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and safety. In preclinical rat models of Streptozotocin-induced diabetic neuropathy, PW507 demonstrated significant efficacy in alleviating mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia following both acute and chronic (2-week) administration, without inducing tolerance and visual evidence of toxicity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to evaluate an S1R antagonist in STZ-induced diabetic rats following both acute and 2-week chronic administration, offering compelling preclinical evidence for the potential use of PW507 as a promising therapeutic option for PDN.

Correlations between distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy and cardiovascular complications in diabetic patients in the North-Eastern region of Hungary

Distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) is the earliest detectable and the most frequent microvascular complication in diabetes mellitus. Several studies have previously demonstrated correlations between cardiovascular risk factors in diabetic patients and independent risk factors for diabetic neuropathy. Our objective was to retrospectively analyze data from diabetic patients in the North-East region of Hungary who underwent neuropathy screening at the Diabetic Neuropathy Center, University of Debrecen, between 2017 and 2021. We aimed to investigate the correlations between cardiovascular risk factors and microvascular complications among patients with DSPN. The median age of the patients was 67 years, 59,6% were female, and 91,1% had type 2 diabetes. The prevalence of DSPN among the study subjects was 71.7%. A significantly longer duration of diabetes (p<0.01) was noted in patients with DSPN. Those with DSPN demonstrated a significantly higher HbA1c level (p<0.001) and a greater frequency of insulin use (p = 0.001). We observed a significantly elevated albumin/creatinine ratio (p<0.001) and a significantly lower eGFR (p<0.001) in patients with DSPN. Diabetic retinopathy exhibited a significantly higher prevalence in patients with DSPN (p<0.001). A higher prevalence of myocardial infarction (p<0.05), ischemic heart disease (p<0.001), peripheral arterial disease (p<0.05) and a history of atherosclerosis (p<0.05) was observed in patients with DSPN. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following factors were independently associated with the presence of DSPN: higher HbA1c (OR:2.58, 95% CI:1.89-3.52, p<0.001), age (OR:1.03, 95% CI:1.01-1.05, p = 0.006), albumin/creatinine ratio above 3 mg/mmol (OR:1.23, 95% CI:1.06-1.45, p = 0.008), retinopathy (OR:6.06, 95% CI:1.33-27.53, p = 0.02), and composite cardiovascular endpoint (OR:1.95, 95% CI:1.19-3.19, p = 0.008). Our study revealed that age, elevated HbA1c levels, significant albuminuria, retinopathy, and cardiovascular complications may increase the risk of DSPN. Further investigation of these associations is necessary to understand the impact of patient characteristics during the treatment of diabetic neuropathy.

Update on Treating Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Current US Guidelines with a Focus on the Most Recently Approved Management Options

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a highly prevalent and disabling complication of diabetes that is often misdiagnosed and undertreated. The management of painful DPN involves treating its underlying cause via lifestyle modifications and intensive glucose control, targeting its pathogenesis, and providing symptomatic pain relief, thereby improving patient function and health-related quality of life. Four pharmacologic options are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat painful DPN. These include three oral medications (duloxetine, pregabalin, and tapentadol extended release) and one topical agent (capsaicin 8% topical system). More recently, the FDA approved several spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices to treat refractory painful DPN. Although not FDA-approved specifically to treat painful DPN, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, gabapentinoids, and sodium channel blockers are common first-line oral options in clinical practice. Other strategies may be used as part of individualized comprehensive pain management plans. This article provides an overview of the most recent US guidelines for managing painful DPN, with a focus on the two most recently approved treatment options (SCS and capsaicin 8% topical system), as well as evidence for using FDA-approved and guideline-supported drugs and devices. Also discussed are unmet needs for this patient population, and evidence for potential future treatments for painful DPN, including drugs with novel mechanisms of action, electrical stimulation devices, and nutraceuticals.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy among adult type 2 diabetes patients in Adama, Ethiopia: health facility-based study

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is the most prominent microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus and the leading cause of ulceration, amputation, and extended hospitalization. Evidence regarding the magnitude and factors associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy is not well documented in Ethiopia, particularly in the study area. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 293 adult type 2 diabetic patients who were on treatment and follow-up from May to June 31, 2023. To select participants in the study, a systematic random sampling method was utilized. Data were collected using semi-structured questionnaires and medical record reviews. The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) was employed to assess diabetic peripheral neuropathy. To model the association between diabetic peripheral neuropathy and independent variables, binary logistic regression model was used. An adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used to estimate the association and statistical significance was proclaimed at a p-value < 0.05. The magnitude of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was 14.3% (95% CI 10.4-18.0). It was 13.4% (95% CI 8.4-19.1) among males and 15.4% (95% CI 10.1-22.2) among females. Age above 60 years (AOR = 5.06, 95% CI 1.60-15.96), being rural resident (AOR = 2.41; 95% CI 1.15-5.06), duration of diabetes above 5 years (AOR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.16-5.27) and having comorbid hypertension (AOR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.24-5.28) were independently associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. One in seven adult type 2 diabetes patients in the study area had diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Factors such as age, place of residence, duration of diabetes, and comorbid hypertension showed positive associations with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Thus, it is imperative to give special consideration to diabetic patients who are elderly, living in rural areas, experiencing a prolonged duration of diabetes, or dealing with comorbid hypertension.

Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: The Need for New Approaches

Painful diabetic neuropathy is a common vexing problem for people with diabetes and a costly problem for society. The pathophysiology is not well understood, and no safe and effective mechanistically-based treatment has been identified. Poor glycemic control is a risk factor for painful diabetic neuropathy. Excessive intraneuronal glucose in people with diabetes can be shunted away from physiological glycolysis into multiple pathological pathways associated with neuropathy and pain. The first three treatments that are traditionally offered consist of risk factor reduction, lifestyle modifications, and pharmacological therapy, which includes only three drugs that are approved for this indication by the United States Food and Drug Administration. All of these traditional treatments are often inadequate for relieving neuropathic pain, and thus, new approaches are needed. Modern devices based on neuromodulation technology, which act directly on the nervous system, have been recently cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration for painful diabetic neuropathy and offer promise as next-in-line therapy when traditional therapies fail.

Effects of acupuncture therapy in diabetic neuropathic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in relieving diabetic neuropathic pain and to establish a more reliable and efficient foundation for acupuncture practice in diabetes care.

METHODS

The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, Chongqing Weipu, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were all searched for a randomized controlled trial research of acupuncture for DNP. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction. After selecting studies and extracting data, we conducted the data analysis using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 14.0. The quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.

RESULTS

An extensive review of 19 studies involving 1276 patients up to April 29, 2023, found that acupuncture was successful in improving pain intensity [MD= -1.09; 95% CI (-1.28, -0.89), P < 0.00001], clinical efficacy indicating pain changes [RR= 1.22; 95% CI (1.15, 1.29), P < 0.00001], and clinical neuropathy [MD= -1.55; 95% CI ( -3.00, -0.09), P = 0.04] in DNP patients. Quality of life was also improved, with few side effects reported.

CONCLUSION

According to this meta-analysis, acupuncture therapy significantly improved the clinical efficacy of pain intensity, pain changes, and clinical neuropathy in patients with DNP, improved the quality of life of patients to a certain extent, and had lower side effects. This discovery provides evidence-based and practical recommendations for the treatment of DNP patients.

Painful Peripheral Neuropathies of the Lower Limbs and/or Lower Extremities Treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis

Introduction

Painful peripheral neuropathy (PPN) is a debilitating condition with varied etiologies. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly used when conservative treatments fail to provide adequate pain relief. Few published reviews have examined SCS outcomes in all forms of PPN.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of SCS in PPN. The PubMed database was searched up to February 7th, 2022, for peer-reviewed studies of SCS that enrolled PPN patients with pain symptoms in their lower limbs and/or lower extremities. We assessed the quality of randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were tabulated and presented narratively.

Results

Twenty eligible studies documented SCS treatment in PPN patients, including 10 kHz SCS, traditional low-frequency SCS (t-SCS), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), and burst SCS. In total, 451 patients received a permanent implant (10 kHz SCS, n=267; t-SCS, n=147; DRGS, n=25; burst SCS, n=12). Approximately 88% of implanted patients had painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Overall, we found clinically meaningful pain relief (≥30%) with all SCS modalities. Among the studies, RCTs supported the use of 10 kHz SCS and t-SCS to treat PDN, with 10 kHz SCS providing a higher reduction in pain (76%) than t-SCS (38-55%). Pain relief with 10 kHz SCS and DRGS in other PPN etiologies ranged from 42-81%. In addition, 66-71% of PDN patients and 38% of nondiabetic PPN patients experienced neurological improvement with 10 kHz SCS.

Conclusion

Our review found clinically meaningful pain relief in PPN patients after SCS treatment. RCT evidence supported the use of 10 kHz SCS and t-SCS in the diabetic neuropathy subpopulation, with more robust pain relief evident with 10 kHz SCS. Outcomes in other PPN etiologies were also promising for 10 kHz SCS. In addition, a majority of PDN patients experienced neurological improvement with 10 kHz SCS, as did a notable subset of nondiabetic PPN patients.

Time to diabetic neuropathy and its predictors among adult type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Amhara regional state Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022: A retrospective follow up study

BACKGROUND

Diabetic neuropathy is the primary cause of foot ulcers and amputations in both industrialized and poor countries. In spite of this, most epidemiological research on diabetic neuropathy in Ethiopia have only made an effort to estimate prevalence, and the information underlying the condition's beginning is not well-established. Therefore, determining the time to diabetic neuropathy and its variables among adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at the Compressive Specialized Hospitals of the Amhara region was the aim of this study.

METHODS

An institutional-based retrospective follow-up study was undertaken among 669 newly recruited adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were diagnosed between the first of March 2007 and the last day of February 2012. Patients with diabetic neuropathy at the time of the diagnosis for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), patients without a medical chart, patients with an unknown date of DM diagnosis, and patients with an unknown date of diabetic neuropathy diagnosis were excluded from the study. All newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients aged 18 years and older who were enrolled from 1st March 2007 to 28th February 2012 in selected hospitals were included in this study. Cox proportional hazard model was fitted to determine predictors of time to diabetic neuropathy, and the Kaplan Meier survival curve was used to assess the cumulative survival time. Variables with a p-value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significance at 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

The restricted mean survival time of this study was 179.45 (95% CI: 173.77-185.14) months. The overall incidence rate of diabetic neuropathy was 2.14 cases per 100 persons-years. Being aged > 60 years [AHR = 2.93(95% CI: 1.29-6.66)], having diabetic retinopathy [AHR = 2.76(95% CI: 1.84-4.16)], having anemia [AHR = 3.62 (95% CI: 2.46-5.33)], having hypertension [AHR = 3.22(95% CI: 2.10-4.93)], and baseline fasting blood sugar > 200 mg/dl [AHR = 2.56(95% CI: 1.68-3.92)] were the predictors of diabetic neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

The risk of occurrence of diabetic neuropathy among type two diabetes mellitus patients was high in the early period. Age > 60 years, diabetic retinopathy, anemia, baseline fasting blood sugar level > 200 mg/dl, and hypertension were the main predictors of incidence of diabetic neuropathy. Therefore, early detection and appropriate interventions are important for patients with old age, diabetic retinopathy, anemia, hypertension, and FBS > 200mg/dl.

Prevention and Management Strategies for Diabetic Neuropathy

Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a common complication of diabetes that is becoming an increasing concern as the prevalence of diabetes rapidly rises. There are several types of DN, but the most prevalent and studied type is distal symmetrical polyneuropathy, which is the focus of this review and is simply referred to as DN. It can lead to a wide range of sensorimotor and psychosocial symptoms and is a major risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration and Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy, which are associated with high rates of lower limb amputation and mortality. The prevention and management of DN are thus critical, and clinical guidelines recommend several strategies for these based on the best available evidence. This article aims to provide a narrative review of DN prevention and management strategies by discussing these guidelines and the evidence that supports them. First, the epidemiology and diverse clinical manifestations of DN are summarized. Then, prevention strategies such as glycemic control, lifestyle modifications and footcare are discussed, as well as the importance of early diagnosis. Finally, neuropathic pain management strategies and promising novel therapies under investigation such as neuromodulation devices and nutraceuticals are reviewed.

Pathogenesis of Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy in Diabetes

Distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN) is a serious complication of diabetes associated with significant disability and mortality. Although more than 50% of people with diabetes develop DSPN, its pathogenesis is still relatively unknown. This lack of understanding has limited the development of novel disease-modifying therapies and left the reasons for failed therapies uncertain, which is critical given that current management strategies often fail to achieve long-term efficacy. In this article, the pathogenesis of DSPN is reviewed, covering pathogenic changes in the peripheral nervous system, microvasculature and central nervous system (CNS). Furthermore, the successes and limitations of current therapies are discussed, and potential therapeutic targets are proposed. Recent findings on its pathogenesis have called the definition of DSPN into question and transformed the disease model, paving the way for new research prospects.

Evidence-Based Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) manifests with pain typically in the distal lower extremities and can be challenging to treat. The authors appraised the literature for evidence on conservative, pharmacological, and neuromodulation treatment options for PDN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intensive glycemic control with insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes may be associated with lower odds of distal symmetric polyneuropathy compared to patients who receive conventional insulin therapy. First-line pharmacologic therapy for PDN includes gabapentinoids (pregabalin and gabapentin) and duloxetine. Additional pharmacologic modalities that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but are considered second-line agents include tapentadol and 8% capsaicin patch, although studies have revealed modest treatment effects from these modalities. There is level I evidence on the use of dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treatment of PDN, delivering either a 10-kHz waveform or tonic waveform. In summary, this review provides an overview of treatment options for PDN. Furthermore, it provides updates on the level of evidence for SCS therapy in cases of PDN refractory to conventional medical therapy.

An overview of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Diagnosis and treatment advancements

Diabetes mellitus remains a public health problem, affecting 422 million people worldwide. Currently, there is no consensus around treating painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in a step-wise manner. Among the non-pharmacological interventions, neuromodulation has become a promising alternative. Over the past decade, significant clinical trials have paved the way for prompt inclusion of high-frequency spinal cord stimulation within the painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy treatment algorithm. This article aims to provide an updated evidence-based approach for the management of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Neuromodulation Interventions for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a prevalent and debilitating condition, characterized by severe burning, tingling, and lancinating pain usually located in the distal lower extremities. In addition to manifesting with severe pain, PDN may also be associated with poor quality of life and sleep, mood disorders, burns, falls, and social withdrawal. The authors appraised the current body of literature for evidence on neuromodulation interventions for PDN.

RECENT FINDINGS

In patients with refractory PDN unresponsive to conventional medical management (glucose optimization and oral analgesic medications), there is level I evidence supporting the use of 10-kHz and tonic dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Included studies reported significant associations between 10-kHz and tonic dorsal column SCS and superior analgesic outcomes, physical functioning, and patient satisfaction. Current level of evidence remains limited for other modalities of neuromodulation for PDN including burst SCS (level II-3), dorsal root ganglion SCS (level III), and peripheral nerve stimulation (level II-3). Some studies reported improvements in neurological physical examination, sensory testing, and/or reflex testing in patients undergoing 10-kHz SCS for treatment of PDN. In summary, the purpose of this review is to equip provider with important updates on the use of neuromodulation interventions for the treatment of PDN that is refractory to conventional medical therapy, with current level I evidence supporting use of 10-kHz and tonic SCS for PDN.

Diagnostic Tools, Biomarkers, and Treatments in Diabetic polyneuropathy and Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy

The various manifestations of diabetic neuropathy, including distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN), are among the most prevalent chronic complications of diabetes. Major clinical complications of diabetic neuropathies, such as neuropathic pain, chronic foot ulcers, and orthostatic hypotension, are associated with considerable morbidity, increased mortality, and diminished quality of life. Despite the substantial individual and socioeconomic burden, the strategies to diagnose and treat diabetic neuropathies remain insufficient. This review provides an overview of the current clinical aspects and recent advances in exploring local and systemic biomarkers of both DSPN and CAN assessed in human studies (such as biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress) for better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and for improving early detection. Current therapeutic options for DSPN are (I) causal treatment, including lifestyle modification, optimal glycemic control, and multifactorial risk intervention, (II) pharmacotherapy derived from pathogenetic concepts, and (III) analgesic treatment against neuropathic pain. Recent advances in each category are discussed, including non-pharmacological approaches, such as electrical stimulation. Finally, the current therapeutic options for cardiovascular autonomic complications are provided. These insights should contribute to a broader understanding of the various manifestations of diabetic neuropathies from both the research and clinical perspectives.

Treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy

Painful diabetic neuropathy is observed in almost half of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and is associated with a decrease in the quality of life, emotional disorders, sleep disorders. The achievement and maintenance of the normal level of glucose in the blood is the basis for the prevention and treatment of DM, but this often does not allow the patient from pain and other clinical manifestations of neuropathy. Drug diabetic neuropathy therapy methods are discussed, the results of randomized placebo controlled studies on the efficiency and side effects of various drugs are analyzed. It is noted that pregabalin and gabapenitin, as antidepressants duloxetin, venlafaxin and amitriptyline, are most effective as anti-epileptic agents. In our country, with painful diabetic neuropathy, the preparations of a-lipoic acid are widely used. Analyzed data on efficacy and complications of the use of transcutaneus electrical nerves stimulation and spinal cord stimulation with pain diabetic neuropathy refractory to drug therapy. It is noted that many patients with pain diabetic neuropathy have combined diseases, detection and effective treatment of which can lead to an improvement in the state of patients and reduce the manifestations of neuropathy.

Therapeutic role of yoga in neuropsychological disorders

Yoga is considered a widely-used approach for health conservation and can be adopted as a treatment modality for a plethora of medical conditions, including neurological and psychological disorders. Hence, we reviewed relevant articles entailing various neurological and psychological disorders and gathered data on how yoga exerts positive impacts on patients with a diverse range of disorders, including its modulatory effects on brain bioelectrical activities, neurotransmitters, and synaptic plasticity. The role of yoga practice as an element of the treatment of several neuropsychological diseases was evaluated based on these findings.

Recommendations for Neuromodulation in Diabetic Neuropathic Pain

Over 50% of the 34 million people who suffer from diabetes mellitus (DM) are affected by diabetic neuropathy. Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) impacts 40–50% of that group (8.5 million patients) and is associated with a significant source of disability and economic burden. Though new neuromodulation options have been successful in recent clinical trials (NCT03228420), still there are many barriers that restrict patients from access to these therapies. We seek to examine our tertiary care center (Albany Medical Center, NY, USA) experience with PDN management by leveraging our clinical database to assess patient referral patterns and utilization of neuromodulation. We identified all patients with a diagnosis of diabetes type 1 (CODE: E10.xx) or diabetes type 2 (CODE: E11.xx) AND neuralgia/neuropathic pain (CODE: M79.2) or neuropathy (CODE: G90.09) or chronic pain (CODE: G89.4) or limb pain (CODE: M79.6) OR diabetic neuropathy (CODE: E11.4) who saw endocrinology, neurology, and/or neurosurgery from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. We then determined which patients had received pain medications and/or neuromodulation to divide the cohort into three groups: no treatment, conservative treatment, and neuromodulation treatment. The cohorts were compared with chi-square or one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons to analyze the differences. A total of 2,635 PDN patients were identified, of which 700 received no treatment for PDN, 1,906 received medication(s), and 29 received neuromodulation (intrathecal therapy, spinal cord stimulation, or dorsal root ganglion stimulation). The patients who received pain medications for PDN visited neurology more often than the pain specialists. Of the patients that received neuromodulation, 24 had seen neurology, 6 neurology pain, and 3 anesthesia pain. They averaged 2.78 pain medications prior to implant. Approximately 41% of the patients in the conservative management group were prescribed three or more medications. Of the 1,935 treated patients, only 1.5% of the patients received neuromodulation. The patients on three or more pain medications without symptomatic relief may be potential candidates for neuromodulation. An opportunity, therefore, exists to educate providers on the benefits of neuromodulation procedures.

Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy-A Narrative Review of Pharmacological and Interventional Approaches

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus that is associated with a significant decline in quality of life. Like other painful neuropathic conditions, PDN is difficult to manage clinically, and a variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological options are available for this condition. Recommended pharmacotherapies include anticonvulsive agents, antidepressant drugs, and topical capsaicin; and tapentadol, which combines opioid agonism and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition, has also recently been approved for use. Additionally, several neuromodulation therapies have been successfully used for pain relief in PDN, including intrathecal therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Recently, 10 kHz SCS has been shown to provide clinically meaningful pain relief for patients refractory to conventional medical management, with a subset of patients demonstrating improvement in neurological function. This literature review is intended to discuss the dosage and prospective data associated with pain management therapies for PDN.